keynote "health it through your customers’ eyes: what meaningful use and the hit strategic...
TRANSCRIPT
Health IT Through your Customers’ Eyes: what meaningful use and the federal Health IT
Strategic Plan say about the changing health care market
iHT2 HIT Summit
March 3, 2015
David Lansky, PhD
President and CEO
HIT Policy Committee
Meaningful Use Workgroup Presentation
Paul Tang
Palo Alto Medical Foundation
Farzad Mostashari,
New York City Health Department
June 16, 2009
Health IT and Transformed Health Care
6
• Ultimate vision is to enable significant and measurable improvements in population health through a transformed health care delivery system.
• Key goals*: – Improve quality, safety, & efficiency
– Engage patients & their families
– Improve care coordination
– Improve population and public health; reduce disparities
– Ensure privacy and security protections
*Adapted from National Priorities Partnership. National Priorities and Goals:
Aligning Our Efforts to Transform America’s Healthcare. Washington, DC: National Quality Forum; 2008.
Achievable Vision for 2015
• Prevention, and management, of chronic diseases
– A million heart attacks and strokes prevented
– Heart disease no longer the leading cause of death in the US
• Medical errors
– 50% fewer preventable medication errors
• Health disparities
– The racial/ ethnic gap in diabetes control halved
• Care Coordination
– Preventable hospitalizations and re-admissions cut by 50%
• Patients and families
– All patients have access to their own health information
– Patient preferences for end of life care are followed more often
• Public health
– All health departments have real-time situational awareness of
outbreaks
HIT-Enabled Health Reform Achieving Meaningful Use
2009 2011 2013 2015
HIT-Enabled Health Reform
Meanin
gfu
l U
se C
rite
ria
HITECH
Policies 2011 Meaningful
Use Criteria
(Capture/share
data) 2013 Meaningful
Use Criteria
(Advanced care
processes with
decision support)
2015 Meaningful
Use Criteria
(Improved
Outcomes)
8
©PBGH 2015 9
Federal HIT – what it’s not…
• Not about more EHRs
• Not about clinical decision support
• Not about improved documentation
• Not about more HIE
It’s about transforming care to deliver value to the
public – and addressing the national debt.
Payments are conditional upon making progress
towards that goal.
©PBGH 2015 11
Where are we now – with MU3?
• Far behind intended pace of functional advancement, quality measurement, and interoperability
• Significant provider opposition and slow uptake
• Perception of “burden”, cost, and low value
• CMS making modest accommodations
• Congress proposing legislative curtailment of pace and scope
©PBGH 2015 13
Entering a fundamentally new era
• Incentives for system redesign are escalating
• Market pressure will reward those who leverage
HIT and punish those who don’t
• MU incentives and penalties becoming less
important than market forces
• New federal planning to support desired payment
and delivery system environment • New policy workgroups – like accountable care
• Interoperability roadmap
• Federal Health IT Strategic Plan
Vision
Accountable health models:
• Optimal patient/consumer and community health
• Aligned accountability for patient and community health that bridges employers, health plans, hospitals, providers, communities, and patients
• Aligned financial incentives that encourage market competition to optimize patient and community health
• Seamless integration of required clinical, financial, administrative, and operational information across the entire continuum of care to eliminate information gaps as a root cause of inefficient and ineffective patient care.
• Promotion of innovations and improvements to continuously discover, test, and evaluate better ways to achieve health and healthcare outcomes
14
16
DRAFT Shared Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap - Version 0.5 The Vision
2021 - 2024
Broad-scale learning health
system
2018 - 2020
Expand interoperable data, users,
sophistication, scale
2015 - 2017
Nationwide ability to send, receive, find,
use a common clinical data set
©PBGH 2015 18
Reactions to Strategic Plan
• Strategic Plan should better integrate its focus on individuals/consumers as a Health Improvement Plan, rather than emphasizing data in a “Collect, Share, Use” framework
• The Plan’s focus should be how to build a culture of shared, person-centered health and care goals, and how federal policies, programs, and regulations will support individuals, providers, and community partners to meet these goals
• Federal actions should unambiguously show how they facilitate and reinforce the Triple Aim
• The end state is not a health IT infrastructure – it is the widespread, effective use of digitized information to support improved health and health care. The Plan should use language to emphasize the end, not the means.
©PBGH 2015 19
Joint Recommendations for Refinement
• Articulate a pathway to evolve toward a new paradigm: More dynamic, interactive learning system
Health equity for consumers and providers
Improved patient/family caregiver experience, as well as improved empowerment and engagement through consumer participation
Accommodate a pluralistic data and care delivery environment
• Integrate public health and social determinants of health into the health IT ecosystem and into health improvement efforts
• Provide clear guidance on privacy framework
• Plan must hold federal partners accountable, with regular, transparent reporting on progress toward goals