kelli j. schutte william jewell college robbins & judge organizational behavior 14th edition...

21
Kelli J. Schutte William Jewell College Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 14th Edition Power and Politics 13-1 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Upload: lea-hatchel

Post on 02-Apr-2015

234 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Kelli J. Schutte William Jewell College Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 14th Edition Power and Politics 13-0 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education,

Kelli J. SchutteWilliam Jewell College

Robbins & Judge

Organizational Behavior14th Edition

Power and PoliticsPower and Politics

13-1 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 2: Kelli J. Schutte William Jewell College Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 14th Edition Power and Politics 13-0 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education,

A Definition of PowerA Definition of Power

Power– The capacity that A has to influence the

behavior of B so that B acts in accordance with A’s wishes

– Exists as a potential or fully actualized influence over a dependent relationship

Dependency– B’s relationship to A when A possesses

something that B requires

– The greater B's dependence, the more power A has

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-2

Page 3: Kelli J. Schutte William Jewell College Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 14th Edition Power and Politics 13-0 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education,

Contrasting Leadership and PowerContrasting Leadership and Power

Leadership– Focuses on goal

achievement

– Requires goal compatibility with followers

– Focuses influence downward

Research Focus– Leadership styles and

relationships with followers

Power– Used as a means for

achieving goals

– Requires follower dependency

– Used to gain lateral and upward influence

Research Focus– Power tactics for gaining

compliance

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-3

Page 4: Kelli J. Schutte William Jewell College Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 14th Edition Power and Politics 13-0 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education,

Bases of Power: Formal PowerBases of Power: Formal Power Formal Power

– Established by an individual’s position in an organization– Three bases:

• Coercive Power» A power base dependent on fear of

negative results• Reward Power

» Compliance achieved based on the ability to distribute rewards that others view as valuable

• Legitimate Power» The formal authority to control and

use resources based on a person’s position in the formal hierarchy

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-4

Page 5: Kelli J. Schutte William Jewell College Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 14th Edition Power and Politics 13-0 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education,

Bases of Power: Personal PowerBases of Power: Personal Power

Power that comes from an individual’s unique characteristics – these are the most effective– Expert Power

• Influence based on special skills or knowledge

– Referent Power• Influence based on possession by an individual of desirable

resources or personal traits

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-5

E X H I B I T 13-1E X H I B I T 13-1

Page 6: Kelli J. Schutte William Jewell College Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 14th Edition Power and Politics 13-0 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education,

Dependency: The Key to PowerDependency: The Key to Power

The General Dependency Postulate

– The greater B’s dependency on A, the greater the power A has over B

– Possession/control of scarce organizational resources that others need makes a manager powerful

– Access to optional resources (e.g., multiple suppliers) reduces the resource holder’s power

Dependency increases when resources are:

– Important

– Scarce

– Nonsubstitutable

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-6

Page 7: Kelli J. Schutte William Jewell College Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 14th Edition Power and Politics 13-0 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education,

Power TacticsPower Tactics

Power Tactics

– Ways in which individuals translate power bases into specific actions

– Nine influence tactics:• Legitimacy

• Rational persuasion*

• Inspirational appeals*

• Consultation*

• Exchange

• Personal appeals

• Ingratiation

• Pressure

• Coalitions Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-7

* Most effective (Pressure is the least effective)

Page 8: Kelli J. Schutte William Jewell College Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 14th Edition Power and Politics 13-0 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education,

Preferred Power Tactics by Influence DirectionPreferred Power Tactics by Influence Direction

Upward Influence Downward Influence Lateral Influence

Rational persuasion Rational persuasion Rational persuasion

Inspirational appeals Consultation

Pressure Ingratiation

Consultation Exchange

Ingratiation Legitimacy

Exchange Personal appeals

Legitimacy Coalitions

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-8

E X H I B I T 13-2E X H I B I T 13-2

Page 9: Kelli J. Schutte William Jewell College Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 14th Edition Power and Politics 13-0 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education,

Factors Influencing Power TacticsFactors Influencing Power Tactics

Choice and effectiveness of influence tactics are moderated by:– Sequencing of tactics

• Softer to harder tactics work best

– Political skill of the user

– The culture of the organization

• Culture affects user’s choice of tactic

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-9

Page 10: Kelli J. Schutte William Jewell College Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 14th Edition Power and Politics 13-0 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education,

Sexual Harassment: A Case of Unequal PowerSexual Harassment: A Case of Unequal Power

Sexual Harassment:– Any unwanted activity of a sexual nature that affects an

individual’s employment and creates a hostile work environment

• Overt actions, like unwanted touching, are relatively easy to spot

• Subtle actions, like jokes or looks, can cross over the line into harassment

Sexual harassment isn’t about sex – it is about abusing an unequal power relationship– Harassment can damage the well-being of the individual,

work group, and organization

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-10

Page 11: Kelli J. Schutte William Jewell College Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 14th Edition Power and Politics 13-0 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education,

Managerial Actions to Prevent Sexual Harassment Managerial Actions to Prevent Sexual Harassment

Make sure a policy against it is in place.

Ensure that employees will not encounter retaliation if they file a complaint.

Investigate every complaint and include the human resource and legal departments.

Make sure offenders are disciplined or terminated.

Set up in-house seminars and training.

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-11

Page 12: Kelli J. Schutte William Jewell College Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 14th Edition Power and Politics 13-0 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education,

Politics: Power in ActionPolitics: Power in Action

Political Behavior– Activities that are not required as part of one’s formal role

in the organization, but that influence, or attempt to influence, the distribution of advantages or disadvantages within the organization

– Legitimate Political Behavior• Normal everyday politics - complaining, bypassing,

obstructing

– Illegitimate Political Behavior• Extreme political behavior that violates the implied rules of the

game: sabotage, whistle-blowing, and symbolic protest

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-12

Page 13: Kelli J. Schutte William Jewell College Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 14th Edition Power and Politics 13-0 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education,

The Reality of PoliticsThe Reality of Politics Politics is a natural result of resource scarcity

– Limited resources lead to competition and political behaviors

Judgments on quality of resource distribution differ markedly based on the observer’s perception– “Blaming others” or “fixing responsibility”– “Covering your rear” or “documenting decisions”– “Perfectionist” or “attentive to detail”

Most decisions are made under ambiguous conditions– Lack of an objective standard encourages political

maneuvering of subjective reality

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-13

E X H I B I T 13-3E X H I B I T 13-3

Page 14: Kelli J. Schutte William Jewell College Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 14th Edition Power and Politics 13-0 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education,

Causes and Consequences of Political BehaviorCauses and Consequences of Political Behavior

Factors that Influence Political Behavior

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-14

E X H I B I T 13-4E X H I B I T 13-4

Page 15: Kelli J. Schutte William Jewell College Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 14th Edition Power and Politics 13-0 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education,

Employee Responses to Organizational PoliticsEmployee Responses to Organizational Politics

Most employees have low to modest willingness to play politics and have the following reactions to politics:

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-15

E X H I B I T 13-5E X H I B I T 13-5

Page 16: Kelli J. Schutte William Jewell College Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 14th Edition Power and Politics 13-0 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education,

Defensive BehaviorsDefensive Behaviors

Employees who perceive politics as a threat have defensive reactions– May be helpful in the short run, dangerous in the long run

Types of defensive behaviors– Avoiding Action

• Overconforming, buck passing, playing dumb, stalling

– Avoiding Blame• Bluffing, playing safe, justifying, scapegoating

– Avoiding Change• Prevention, self-protection

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-16

E X H I B I T 13-6E X H I B I T 13-6

Page 17: Kelli J. Schutte William Jewell College Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 14th Edition Power and Politics 13-0 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education,

Impression Management (IM)Impression Management (IM)

The process by which individuals attempt to control the impression others form of them

IM Techniques– Conformity

– Excuses

– Apologies

– Self-Promotion

– Flattery

– Favors

– Association

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-17

E X H I B I T 13-7E X H I B I T 13-7

Source: Based on B. R. Schlenker, Impression Management (Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1980); W. L. Gardner and M. J. Martinko, “Impression Management in Organizations,” Journal of Management, June 1988, p. 332; and R. B. Cialdini, “Indirect Tactics of Image Management Beyond Basking,” in R. A. Giacalone and P. Rosenfeld (eds.), Impression Management in the Organization (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1989), pp. 45–71.

Page 18: Kelli J. Schutte William Jewell College Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 14th Edition Power and Politics 13-0 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education,

IM EffectivenessIM Effectiveness

Job Interview Success – IM does work and most people use it

– Self-promotion techniques are important

– Ingratiation is of secondary importance

Performance Evaluations– Ingratiation is positively related to ratings

– Self-promotion tends to backfire

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-18

Page 19: Kelli J. Schutte William Jewell College Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 14th Edition Power and Politics 13-0 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education,

The Ethics of Behaving PoliticallyThe Ethics of Behaving Politically

It is difficulty to tell ethical from unethical politicking Three questions help:

1. What is the utility of engaging in the behavior?

2. Does the utility balance out any harm done by the action?

3. Does the action conform to standards of equity and justice?

Answers can be skewed toward either viewpoint

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13-19

Page 20: Kelli J. Schutte William Jewell College Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 14th Edition Power and Politics 13-0 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education,

Global ImplicationsGlobal Implications

Politics Perceptions– Negative consequences to the perception of politics seem to

be fairly widespread

Preference for Power Tactics– The choice of effective tactics is heavily dependent on the

culture of the country in which they are to be used

Effectiveness of Power Tactics– Still open to debate; too little research has been done

13-20 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Page 21: Kelli J. Schutte William Jewell College Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 14th Edition Power and Politics 13-0 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education,

Summary and Managerial ImplicationsSummary and Managerial Implications

Increase your power by having others depend on you more.

Expert and referent power are far more effective than is coercion.– Greater employee motivation, performance, commitment,

and satisfaction

– Personal power basis, not organizational

Effective managers accept the political nature of organizations.

Political astuteness and IM can result in higher evaluations, salary increases, and promotions.

13-21 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall