judicial whore c. e. honeywell's fake "resolution 569/875"
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
1/36
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
2/36
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTMIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT, DR. JORG BUSSE, Plaintiffs,
versus Case # 2:10-cv-00390-JES-AEP
CHARLENE EDWARDS HONEYWELL; SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL;JOHN EDWIN STEELE; JENNIFER WAUGH CORINIS; A. BRIAN ALBRITTON,
Defendants.
INDEPENDENT ACTION
FOR RELIEF FROM GOVERNMENT CRIMES, CORRUPTION,AND FACIALLY FRAUDULENT WRIT OF EXECUTION
____________________________________________________________________________/
EMERGENCY MOTION TO ENJOIN RECORD THREATS, EXTORTION, CRIMES
BY DEFENDANT JUDICIAL WHORE CHARLENE E. HONEYWELL
PUBLISHED RECORD CONCLUSIVE PUBLIC CORRUPTION & PERJURY PROOF
NOTICE OF FAKE lien and FAKE 07/29/2009 judgment, CH. 55, FLA. STAT.,
AND FACIALLY FORGED judgment, DOC. # 386-5
EMERGENCY OF CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL RECORD PERJURY
1. Defendant Crooked Judge Charlene E. Honeywell fraudulently concealed and agreed to
conceal that Defendant JACK N. PETERSON had perjured himself, Doc. # 432-2, Case No.
2:2007-cv-00228:
KENNETH M. WILKINSON, as Property Appraiser of Lee County, Florida, is theholder of a judgment issued by the United States of Appeals in and for the Eleventh
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
3/36
2
Circuit on July 29, 2009 in Docket 08-13170-BB against Appellant JORG BUSSE inthe amount of $5,048.60.
Here, said Defendant Crooked Government Officials Honeywell, Wilkinson, and
Peterson conspired with other Defendants, Judges, and Officials to fraudulently conceal
the non-existent July 29, 2009 judgment and the non-existent lien. See Ch. 55,
Florida Statutes.
CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL CLOSURE OF CASE # 08-13170-BB ON 06/11/2009
2. Here, said Defendants conspired with other Defendants to fraudulently conceal that CASE
NO. 2008-13170-BB had been CLOSED on June 11, 2009. See Appellate Docket on file.
11th
Circuit Record and Exhibits had been RETURNED to this Court on 06/11/2009.
RECORD JUN 11 2009 BILL OF COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $24.30
3. The facially fraudulent judgment issued as mandate June 11 2009 and received by the U.S.
District Court 2009 JUN 15 AM 11:20, Doc. # 365, was in the amount of$24.30, Doc. #
386, 386-3, 365; BILL OF COSTS issued on JUN 11 2009; 11th CIRCUIT FORM MISC-
12 (12/07).
4. Here, Defendant Wilkinson had neverclaimedmore than $24.30, and therefore under the
Rules, was never entitled to more than $24.30. See attached Fed. R. App. P. Here as a
matter of record, Defendant Wilkinson and/or his Attorney had sworn and/or affirmed
that the costs claimed were $24.30. See Doc. # 386-3; Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.
$24.30 WAS FINAL AMOUNT [FRAUDULENTLY ALLOWED]
5. The Eleventh Circuit has held that the action becomes final on the date the district court
receives the appellate court's mandate. See U.S. v. Lasteed, 832 F.2d 1240-43 (11th Cir.
1987).
HONEYWELL CONCEALED DEFENDANTS CONCOCTION OF FAKE $5,048.60
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
4/36
3
6. Here, Defendant Crooked Honeywell concealed and agreed to conceal that Defendants
Peterson and Wilkinson had concocted an amount of $5,048.60. Plaintiff Government
corruption and crime victims sued Defendants KENNETH M. WILKINSON, JACK N.
PETERSON, and CHARLENE E. HONEYWELL in theirprivate individual capacities.
RECORD EXTORTION, PUBLIC CORRUPTION, CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD
7. Under color of non-existent authority, Lee County, Florida, Defendants and Officials
fabricated and conspired to fabricate fake land parcels 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and
07-44-21-01-00001.0000. See Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25 (1912).
CONSPIRACY TO COVER UP & CONCEAL RECORD GOVERNMENT CRIMES
8. In these State and Federal Cases since 2006, Defendant U.S. Judges idiotically conspired
with other Officials to conceal the prima facie record forgeries of said non-existent land
parcels. See, e.g., record Transcript of corrupted proceedings before Defendant judicial
whore Sheri Polster Chappell in November 2007 on file; Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.
DEF. CROOK HONEYWELL CONSPIRED TO CONCEAL 2006 STATE ACTION
9. Even though the State Court Judge himself was a Co-Defendant in this U.S. Court,
Defendant Corrupt Judges John E. Steele and Sheri Polster Chappell fraudulently concealed
Plaintiffs State Court action after said judicial Defendants themselves had removed
Plaintiffs legal action from State to Federal Court. See Case No. 2:2008-cv-00899 (BUSSE
v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Lee County Circuit Court; Def. Judge: Gerald, Lynn, Jr.).
FACIALLY FRAUDULENT 03/05/09 judgment and 06/11/09 mandate
10. In its facially fraudulent judgment issued as mandate June 11 2009, said 11th Circuit
fraudulently pretended and fabricated on the record, Doc. ## 365; 386:
III. Since Busses takings claim was not ripe because he had notpursued available stateremedies and he failed to adequately plead his other federal claims Id.
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
5/36
4
Here as a matter of fact and record, Busse and Prescott had pursued available state
remedies in Lee County Circuit Court [removed to this Court: 2:2008-cv-00899],
adequately pleadedall their prima facie ripe federal claims, and demanded relief from said
facially fraudulent and corrupt Government determinations.
EMERGENCY OF DEFENDANTS CONCEALMENT OF REMOVED STATE ACTION
11. Here, Judges concealed and conspired to conceal Busses pursuit in State Courtand
Defendant Crooked Judge Steeles and Chappells removal from State to Federal Court. See
2006-CA-003185; Def. Judge Gerald, Lynn, Jr.; 2:2008-cv-00899 [removed].
EMERGENCY OF RECORD BRIBERY AND CASE FIXING
12. Here insanely, and in exchange for Defendants bribes, Defendant Judicial Crooks Steele and
Chappell fraudulently and criminally pretended that Plaintiffs rights to own their real
property and exclude Government from their riparian Gulf-front street and up lands,
S.T.R.A.P # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, PB 3 PG 25 (1912), were purportedly not
fundamental rights. See brazen bribery and public corruption on the record!
DEFENDANTS CONSPIRED TO FABRICATE RIPENESS REQUIREMENTS
13. Furthermore here, Defendant judicial whore Honeywell knew and concealed that in
exchange for bribes, Defendants Steele and Chappell had conspired with other Defendants to
fabricate ripeness requirements under color of fake resolution 569/875. See Doc. # 338;
Fixed Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228. See Doc. ## 213; 236; Fixed Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791.
PLAINTIFF CORRUPTION VICTIMS SUED UNREPRESENTED DEF. HONEYWELL
14. Here, the Plaintiff unimpeachable record landowners and public corruption victims sued
Defendant judicial whore C. E. Honeywell in herprivate individual capacity, because her
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
6/36
5
purported orders were outside any immunity and scope ofofficialacts. See Docket 2:2010-
cv-00390.
15. Here, Defendant Crooked Judge Honeywell had admitted to having been served and
disqualified herself. See Doc. # 3; 06/22/2010; Case No. 2:2010-cv-00390.
16. Idiotically, the Court then reassigned the Case to Co-Defendant Crooked Judge John Edwin
Steele. See Doc. # 4, 06/22/2010.
17. Here, no notice of appearance was filed on behalf of said Defendant Corrupt Judge
Honeywell. See Docket, Case No. 2:2010-cv-00390; 07/14/2009, 19:43:47.
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AGREED TO CONCEAL FORGED LAND PARCELS
18. Judges, Defendants, and Officials knew and fraudulently concealed that said facially forged
parcels had neverexistednor been legally described, conveyed, andplatted. See 1912 Plat
of Survey of private undedicated Cayo Costa Subdivision, Lee County PB 3 PG 25.
FRAUDULENT PRETENSES OF 07/292009 judgment
19. Defendant crooked Officials Kenneth M. Wilkinson and Jack N. Peterson fraudulently
pretended:
11. A certified copy of the [07/29/09] judgment has been recorded in the PublicRecords of Lee County, Florida at Instrument No. 2009000309384 and serves as alien against the property. See Doc. # 386, p. 3, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.
Here, the non-existentjudgmentdid notserveasany lien. See Ch. 55, Fla. Stat.
20. Here, the Clerk of this U.S. District Court and custodian of said Courts records could not
authenticate the fraudulently pretended 07/29/2009 judgment, because said Clerk never
received any 07/29/2009 judgment. Here, the Docket, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, was
devoid of any 07/29/09 judgment. See authenticated Docket on file.
21. Here, Def. U.S. Judges, Government Officials, and the other Defendants knew and agreed to
conceal that this Court had no power whatsoever to enforce a non-existentjudgment.
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
7/36
6
DEF. WILKINSON FORGED judgment, DOC. # 386-5, Page 2 of 2
22. Defendant Crooked Official Kenneth M. Wilkinson had forged, e.g., land parcels, and
maps. Here, Defendant Wilkinson perpetrated fraud on the Court and facially forged a
judgment. See Doc. # 386-5, Page 2 of 2. The smaller font size of the page number 2 did
not match font size 14 of the text. The facially forged judgment was not, and could not
possibly have been, a true copy. See Exhibit below. The facially forged and pasted
judgment copy did not comply with 55.10, Fla. Stat. E.g., said fake did not contain any
address.
23. In Doc. # 432, p. 3 of 7, Defendant Wilkinson had asserted:
On February 2, 2010, the Clerk of this Court issued a Writ of Execution (D.E. 425).
24. Here, said Clerk knew that no such judgment had ever been receivedfrom the Circuit Clerk
and that no 07/29/2010 judgment appeared on the Docket, Case # 2:2007-cv-00228.
HONEYWELL CONCEALED THAT FAKE WRIT WAS VOID & NEVER WITNESSED
25. Here, Doc. # 425 Filed 02/02/10 materially misrepresented in the record absence of any
identifiable judge:
you cause to be made and levied as well a certain debt of:$Five thousand Forty-Eight AND Sixty Centsin the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, before the Judgeof the said Court by the consideration of the same Judge lately recovered against thesaid, Jorg Busse Witness the Honorable [United States Judge] ____ [blank]
Here on its face, the fraudulent writ of execution did not identify any judge and was
null and void. In particular, Witness the Honorable ___ was blank. See Doc. # 425.
DEF. WILKINSON EXTORTED MONEY AND PROPERTY
26. Defendant Wilkinson extorted fees and property by fraudulently pretending:
4. On August 22, 2008, Wilkinson filed a motion for sanctions pursuant to EleventhCircuit Rule 27-4, requesting an order awarding attorneys fees in the amount of $5,000,
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
8/36
7
double costs and such other relief as the Court deemed appropriate for defendantAppellants frivolous appeal. See Doc. # 432, p. 2.
Here, Def. Wilkinson again deceived the Court, because Jorg Busse had been the Plaintiff
[and not the defendant] and Wilkinson had admittedly neverfiledany Rule 38 motion.
27. Fed.R.App.P. 27-4 states:
Repy to Response. Any reply to a response must be filed within 7 days after serviceof the response. A reply must not present matters that do not relate to the response.
Here, Def. Wilkinsons pleading(s) and brief had been without legal meritand could not be
supported by a reasonable argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing
law, or the establishment of new law. In addition, Def. Wilkinsons pleadings contained
assertions of material facts that were patently clearly false and unsupported by the record,
O.R. 569/875 In particular, prima facie sham claim O.R. 569/875 was not any
regulation, legislative act, resolution, or law and as a matter of law, could not have
possibly divestedthe Plaintiffs of their property against Plaintiffs expressly stated will. Here,
the Plaintiffs had defended their unimpeachable record title against any condemnation and
refused to exchange their perfected title just because corrupt Government Officials, e.g.,
threatened, harassed, defrauded, and deliberately deprived the Plaintiffs of their
fundamental rights to own property, exclude Government(s), redress their grievances of no
due process and no equal protection, and have ajury trial.
28. Here, no accounting whatsoever, and none was ever provided as required, could have
possiblyexplained and/orjustifiedthe fraudulent amount of $5,048.60 under the Rules.
Here, presentingor opposing Plaintiff(s) conclusive record evidence of Def. Wilkinsons
fraud, extortion, corruption on the record did not, and could not, possibly have incurred
5,048.60 according to the Rule.
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
9/36
8
WILKINSON FRAUDULENTLY MISREPRESENTED REGULATORY TAKING
IN THE PRIMA FACIE RECORD ABSENCE OF ANYREGULATION:
HOW FRIVOLOUS WAS THAT?
29. Therefore here, Defendant Wilkinsons assertion of a regulatory taking was on its face
frivolous, deceptive, and fraudulent. Furthermore, Defendant Wilkinson presented his
pleadings and brief for the improper and illegal purposes of, e.g., extorting fees and property
from the Plaintiff public corruption victims, coercing the Plaintiffs to refrain from further
prosecution, fraudulently concealing forged land parcels 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0
and 07-44-21-01-00001.0000, extending and conspiring to extend extortion and fraud
scheme O.R. 569/875, obstructing justice and just speedy adjudication of Plaintiffs
claims for relief, harassing the Plaintiffs, and causing unnecessary delay and needless
increase in the cost of litigation since 2006 in State and Federal Courts over one single piece
of trash paper: facially null and void O.R. 569/875.
30. Therefore here admittedly, Defendant Wilkinson had neverfiledany Rule 38 motion, never
allegeda frivolous appeal, and neverdemanded any Rule 38 relief.
UPDATED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
31. Plaintiff public corruption victims filed another updated Criminal Complaint in this matter
with State and Federal law enforcement
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
10/36
9
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
11/36
10
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
12/36
11
Def. Crooked Honeywells Real Estate Fraud:
Fake lot and block numbers such as, e.g.:
o 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0;o 07-44-21-01-00001.0000;
Neither fake lot 00A0 nor block
00001ever existed.
Fake Government ownership claims;
Fake transaction(s) such as, e.g., O.R.
569/875; Fake resolution and law claims;
Fake land parcels;
Fake frivolity defenses;
Fake vexatiousness contentions;
Fake legal descriptions:
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
13/36
12
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
14/36
13
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
15/36
14
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
16/36
15
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
17/36
16
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
18/36
17
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
19/36
18
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
20/36
19
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
21/36
20
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
22/36
21
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
23/36
22
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
24/36
23
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
25/36
24
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
26/36
25
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
27/36
26
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
28/36
PS USE CODE
DRESS WETLANDS
SITE INSPECTION
MARKS ACQUISITION DATE
AGENDA DATE
GRANTOR
BLUE SHEET
ITEM
CCMBINSTRUMENT
TOTAL PURCHASE PRICESEARCHLEGAL DESC
PURCHASE PRICE 1 AGENDA DATE 2 AGENDA DATE 3
BLUE SHEET 2 BLUE SHEET 3PRICE/ACRE
PRIOR STRAPITEM 2 ITEM 3
PCL
PURCHASE PRICE 2 PURCHASE PRICE 3
ASSESSEDVALUE
VALUE DATECCMB 2 CCMB 3
E COUNTY DIVISION OF COUNTY LANDS
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
29/36
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
30/36
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
31/36
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
32/36
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
33/36
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
34/36
U.S. District Court
Middle District of Florida (Ft. Myers)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:10-cv-00390-JES-AEP
Prescott et al v. Honeywell et al
Assigned to: Judge John E. Steele
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli
Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Date Filed: 06/21/2010
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff
Jennifer Franklin Prescott represented by Jennifer Franklin Prescott
P.O. Box 845
Palm Beach, FL 33480
PRO SE
Plaintiff
Dr. Jorg Busse represented by Jorg Busse
P.O. Box 7561
Naples, Fl 34101-7561
239/595-7074
PRO SE
V.
Defendant
Charlene Edwards Honeywell
Defendant
Sheri Polster Chappell
Defendant
John Edwin Steele
Defendant
Jennifer Waugh Corinis
Defendant
A. Brian Albritton
Date Filed # Docket Text
06/21/2010 1 COMPLAINT against A. Brian Albritton, Sheri Polster Chappell, Jennifer Waugh
Corinis, Charlene Edwards Honeywell, John Edwin Steele with Jury Demand (Filing fee $
7/14/2010 Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Co
ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.p 1
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
35/36
350 receipt number F013917) filed by Jennifer Franklin Prescott, Jorg Busse.
(Independent Action for relief from Government fraud, corruption, and writ of execution)
(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(SLU) (Entered: 06/22/2010)
06/21/2010 Summons Issued as to A. Brian Albritton, Sheri Polster Chappell, Jennifer Waugh
Corinis, Charlene Edwards Honeywell, John Edwin Steele. (SLU) (Entered: 06/22/2010)
06/22/2010 2 STANDING ORDER: Filing of documents that exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by All
Divisional Judges on 12/7/09. (SLU) (Entered: 06/22/2010)
06/22/2010 3 ORDER directing the Clerk to reassign this case to the next available District Judge. The
undersigned hereby disqualifies herself from these proceedings. All magistrate judge
matters will continue to be addressed by the assigned Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge
Charlene E. Honeywell on 6/22/2010. (BGS) (Entered: 06/22/2010)
06/22/2010 4 Case Reassigned to Judge John E. Steele. New case number: 2:10-cv-390-FtM-
29DNF. Judge Charlene E. Honeywell no longer assigned to the case. (SLU) (Entered:
06/22/2010)
06/25/2010 5 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. Certificate of interested persons and corporatedisclosure statement due by 7/9/2010. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 6/25/2010.
(BJH) (Entered: 06/25/2010)
06/25/2010 6 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track
2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 7/6/2010. Signed by All Divisional Judges
on 6/25/2010. (BJH) (Entered: 06/25/2010)
06/28/2010 7 ORDER of recusal. This case shall be transferred to the next assigned Magistrate Judge.
Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas N. Frazier on 6/28/2010. (brh) (Entered:
06/28/2010)
06/28/2010 8 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell. New case number: 2:10-
cv-390-FtM-29SPC. Magistrate Judge Douglas N. Frazier no longer assigned to the
case. (SLU) (Entered: 06/28/2010)
06/30/2010 9 ORDER. The undersigned hereby disqualifies herself from these proceedings, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. 455(b)(5)(i). SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge
Sheri Polster Chappell on 6/29/2010. (LMH) (Entered: 06/30/2010)
07/02/2010 10 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 2:10-cv-
390-FtM-29AEP. Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell no longer assigned to the
case. (SLU) (Entered: 07/02/2010)
PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
07/14/2010 19:43:47
PACER Login: we0083 Client Code:
7/14/2010 Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Co
ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.p 2
-
8/9/2019 Judicial Whore C. E. Honeywell's Fake "resolution 569/875"
36/36
Description:Report
Search Criteria: 2:10-cv-00390-JES-AEP
Billable
Pages:2 Cost: 0.16
7/14/2010 Electronic Case Filing | U.S. District Co