john b. miller

21
Using atmospheric radiocarbon ( 14 CO 2 ) to constrain North American fossil and biogenic CO 2 fluxes John B. Miller Scott Lehman, Arlyn Andrews, Colm Sweeney, Pieter Tans, Chad Wolak, Jocelyn Turnbull, Marc Fischer, Brian LaFranchi, Tom Guilderson, John Southon

Upload: zita

Post on 08-Jan-2016

28 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Using atmospheric radiocarbon ( 14 CO 2 ) to constrain North American fossil and biogenic CO 2 fluxes. John B. Miller Scott Lehman, Arlyn Andrews, Colm Sweeney, Pieter Tans, Chad Wolak , Jocelyn Turnbull, Marc Fischer, Brian LaFranchi , Tom Guilderson , John Southon. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: John B. Miller

Using atmospheric radiocarbon (14CO2) to constrain North American fossil and biogenic

CO2 fluxes

John B. MillerScott Lehman, Arlyn Andrews, Colm Sweeney, Pieter

Tans, Chad Wolak, Jocelyn Turnbull, Marc Fischer, Brian LaFranchi, Tom Guilderson, John Southon

Page 2: John B. Miller

Fossil Fuel are the biggest annual global and N. American fluxes…

1. …but, at many time scales NEE is bigger, which makes FF hard to identify (see Yoichi Shiga poster)

2. Inventories are good; why check them?

a. They have spatio-temporal biases at the state/monthly and smaller scales.

b. Generally, for up to date inversions, we need to extrapolate inventories.

Global

USA

Page 3: John B. Miller

Biases in FF will manifest themselves as biases in NEE in inversions, when using only CO2

1. So, with a limited set of 14C observations, we’ll soon focus on relaxing the assumption of FF_error = 0.

2. Eventually, with more 14C observations, we’ll move towards direct emissions verification.

3. Here, I’ll describe our data and our modeling framework (and some examples of constraints of NEE and fossil fluxes).

Page 4: John B. Miller

14C is a theoretically robust tracer for fossil fuel fluxes. Total 14C looks just like fossil CO2.

Catm*datm/dt = (fos-atm)Ffos +

disFsurf_gross+ isoFnuc+ isoFcosmo

dCatm/dt = Ffos + Fnet_surf + Ffire

14Cff = -1000 per mil (i.e. zero 14C)Scaling: -2.7 per mil 14C = 1 ppm CO2-fossil

14C Cff

Page 5: John B. Miller

Results of simulated 14CO2 inversions show Fossil Fuel emissions can be retrieved with low uncertainty

5000 measurements per year over the US (currently ~ 750) Monthly, state-sized fluxes at ~ 10% uncertainty.

NRC Recommendation of large increase in 14CO2 measurements to verify reductions

Page 6: John B. Miller

Current network of sites samples a large fraction of N. American fossil fuel emissions.

Dense enough to relax assumption of perfectly known fossil fuel emissions.(without sacrificing precision in NEE)

Page 7: John B. Miller

US PBL data show expected depletions of 14C(… AND enhancements of other anthropogenic

gases: see Steve Montzka’s poster)

NWR Downwind PBL

~ 2-3 samples/week

10 ppm Cff

Page 8: John B. Miller

CO2 PBL enhancements (or depletions) can be partitioned into NEE and Fossil fractions.

Fossil Fuel masks Bio signal

Cbio large even in winter (~60% of total winter-time enhancement) despite urban/industrial observational footprint

CO2-only methods (tower, satellite, etc.) can not assume enhancements are due just to Cff

(see Miller et al, JGR-D 2012)

US East Coast 300 m asl

PBL enhancement

Page 9: John B. Miller

How well can we model our observations?(using TM5 with full 14CO2 and CO2 budget)

TM5

Land(CASA model)

Ocean(GLODAP/WOCE)

Fossil(CDIAC/CT)

Cosmogenic(50/50 Strat/trop)

Nuclear Power(Graven)

Page 10: John B. Miller

The global trend and background for N. America are modeled very well.

Bias = 0.8 per milStdev = 2.3 per mil

Page 11: John B. Miller

…And depletions relative to the trend fairly well.

R2= 0.50

1:1

Page 12: John B. Miller

At polluted tower sites, seasonally varying depletion is captured.

NWR • Seasonal cycles probably driven by wind direction co-varying with flux

• (not PBL height or flux seasonality)

Page 13: John B. Miller

Downwind of mid-Atlantic East Coast, there are significant differences in vertical gradients

Page 14: John B. Miller

CMA(Original fossil fuel emissions)

Page 15: John B. Miller

CMA(Vulcan fossil fuel emissions)

Page 16: John B. Miller

Vulcan’s emissions match data better because of lower urban emissions.

Standard CT-FF Vulcan FFVulcan minus CT

Page 17: John B. Miller

CMA(Vulcan fossil fuel emissions)

But, Vulcan may still have too much FF fuel emission near the coast in urban areas.

Page 18: John B. Miller

Summary

1. 14CO2 can partition NEE and FF fluxes – AND CO2 ≠ Cff

2. Increasingly dense set of 14CO2 observations that will allow us to soon relax the assumption of fixed FF in inversions.

3. A reliable modeling framework.4. Some ability already to distinguish fossil fuel

patterns.

Page 19: John B. Miller
Page 20: John B. Miller

Detection Sensitivity allows for < 1ppm recently added Fossil Fuel CO2

NWT3 by measurement order:

manual = 43.25 ± 1.60 Crex = 43.26 ± 1.65

Sigma-Cff = sqrt(2) * 1.8 per mil / 2.7 per mil/ppm = 0.9 ppm

Determination of background is always important!

Page 21: John B. Miller

use of 14C + CO2 in CT to improve NEE

Fff prior (given 0 uncertainty) NEE posterior retrieval

deviation Fff prior from actuals will lead directly to bias in retrieved Fbio (NEE) from inversion of Cobs

dCobs/dt = Fff + Fbio + Ffire

Fff is large w.r.t net annual Fbio, and.. extrapolation of Fff inventories will not capture Fff anomalies associated with sustained heat and cold waves

CT 2000-10