ite trip generation summary - burlington · ite trip generation worksheet (9th edition, updated...

ITE TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY

TRIP GENERATION COMPARRISON

Approved Summit Proposed Total Summit

Development Development Net Increase (250,000 sf) (413,325 sf) (163,325 sf)

DAILY 2,634 3860 1,226

AM Peak

in 350 524 174

out 48 71 23

total 398 595 197

PM Peak

in 61 92 31

out 298 449 151

total. 358 541 183

SATURDAY 615 1017 402

Midday Peak · ··· ......... '

in 58 96 38

out 50 82 32

total. 108 178 70

ITE TRIP GENERATION WORKSHEET (9th Edition, Updated 2012)

RATES:

TRIPS:

RATES:

LANDUSE: General Office Building LANDUSE CODE: 710

JOB NAME: JOB NUMBER:

DAILY AM PEAK PM PEAK

#Studies 79

218 236

#Studies DAILY 18

R"2 o:81

0.83 0.82

DAILY AM PEAK PM PEAl<

PEAK OF GENERATOR 11

TRIPS:

RATES:

DAILY PEAK OF GENERATOR

#Studies DAILY 18


TRIPS:


Average 11.0~ 1.56 1.49

Total 2,758 390 373

Average 2.46 0.43

Total 615 108

Average 1.05 0.16

Total 263 40

Approv1d 2.So~SF StJMM IT DE.Vf1 oPMiNT

Independent Variable--- 1 ,000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area

FLOOR AREA (KSF):

WEEKDAY

Total Trip Ends Low 3.58 0.60 0.49

BY AVERAGE Enter 1,379 343 63

High 28.80 5.98 6.39

Exit 1,379

47 309

SATURDAY

Total Trip Ends Low 0.59 0.16

BY AVERAGE Enter 308 58 -

· High 14.67 1.77

Exit 308 49

SUNDAY


BY AVERAGE Enter 131 23

High 7.33 1.37

Exit 131 17

250.0

Independent Variable Range Average Low High

197 0 1,300 222 0 2,500 215 0 2,500

BY REGRESSION Total Enter Exit 2634 1317 1317 398 350 48 358 61 298


75 0 190 90 0 190

BY REGRESSION Total Enter Exit 539 270 270


75 0 190 90 0 190

BY REGRESSION Total Enter Exit

Directional Distribution

Enter Exit 50% 50% 68'% 12% 17% 83%


Enter Exit 50% 50% 54% 46.%


Enter Exit 50% 50%. 58% 42%

hllp://vhbcentral. vhb.comffeams/lransportation/trafficffrip G~ah00c~<Biilildii1!}71111Qksf_ 9th.xls 7/2312013

ITE TRIP GENERATION WORKSHEET (9th Edition, Updated 2012)

RATES:

TRIPS:

LANDUSE: General Office Building LANDUSE CODE: 710

JOB NAME: JOB NUMBER:


#Studies 79

218 236

R'2 D.8'1

0.83 o:82


RATES: ' #Studies

DAILY 18 PEAK OF GENERATOR 11

TRIPS:

RATES:


#Studies DAILY 18


TRIPS:

DAILY ,PEAK OF GENERATOR

Avera!Ie 11.03 1.56 1.49

Total 4,559 645 616

Average 2.46 0.43

Total 1,017 178

Average 1.05 0.16

Total 434 66

ApproveJ 2.?o tr:$ SVI<4M er D&V&t.DpMeNr PLUS

1

\C,~,~2.S SF SUMM IT E'KPANSIO~

Independent Variable--- 1,000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area

FLOOR AREA (I<SF):

WEEKDAY

Total Tri[! Ends Low High 3.58 28.80 0.60 5.98 0.49 6.39

BY AVERAGE Enter Exit 2,279 2,279 567 77 105 511

SATURDAY



High 14.67 1.77

Exit 508 82

SUNDAY

Total Trie Ends Low 0.19 0.06


High 7.33 1.37

Exit 217 28

413.3

lndeeendent Variable Range Averal:!e Low High

197 0 1,300 222 0 2,500 215 0 2,500

BY REGRESSION Total Enter Exit 3860 1930 1930 595 524 71 541 92 449

lndeeendent Variable Range Average Low High

75 0 190 90 0 190

BY REGRESSION Total Enter Exit 871 435 435

lndeeendent Variable Range Average Low High

75 0 190 90 0 190

BY REGRESSION Total Enter Exit


Enter Exit 50% 50% 88% 12% 17% 83%


Enter Exit 50% 50% 54% 46%


Enter Exit 50% 50% 58% 42%

http://vhbcentral.vhb.comffeams/transporta!ion/trafficffrip GaaernR!ahmlicedltiildllt!l7'liDQksf_9th.xls 7/23/2013

WEEKDAY & SATURDAY ATR DATA

Location :Middlesex Turnpike Location : Between Route 95 Ramps City/State: Burlington, MA Counter : 13735

Start 12-Sep-11 Time NB SB NB ---12:oo AM ------.-----,

01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00

12:00 PM 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00

*

__ j_t_Q_O ___ ---:c---·

Lane 0 0 ____ Qmt__ 0

AM Peak

0

Tue Wed SB NB SB -,-···---*--------;;

*

*

*

*

0 0 0 0 0

Accurate Counts 978-664-2565

Thu Fri Sat Sun

Page 1

11503001 Site Code: 11503001

Week Average __ ___.,.N..-oB_ SB ____ _____1\J_§__ _____ SB NB $_8 NB SB NB SJ? __ _

54 86 57 99 105 181 * * 72 122 33 57 24 62 51 99 * * 36 73 20 19 17 23 32 40 * * 23 27 15 22 19 20 19 31 * * 18· 24 41 34 37 38 32 19 * * 37 30

173 135 175 150 52 72 * * 133 119 474 481 452 497 171 168 * * 366 382

1077 1047 960 974 270 309 * * 769 777 1457 1141 1436 977 472 448 * * 1122 855 1361 871 1309 831 861 589 * * 1177 764 1275 .856 1329 1004 1325 865 * * 1310 908 1372 1136 1533 1320 1451 1261 • * 1452 1239 1585 1.488 1705 1531 1676 1390 *. * 1655 1470 1404 1385 1612 1589 1701 1494 • * 1572 1489 1387 1341 1514 1608 1643 1617 * * 1515 1522 1380 1284 1547 1362 1612 1583 * * 1513 1410 1511 1345 1591 1381 1579 1547 * * 1560 1424 1655 1512 1723 1540 1656 1500 * * 1678 1517 1470 1356 1692 1346 1519 1452 * * 1560 1385 1106 ·1155 1395 1240 1246 1288 * * 1249 1228 111 985 851 1087 852 1089 * * 805 1054 436 775 497 933 443 899 * * 459 869 251 430 280 631 280 618 * * 270 560 130 164 _ ___1Z_3 __ ~65 __ 1_!)_8 282 * * 1__!)4 237

20378 19105 21928 20508 19206 18841 0 0 20505 19485 3948_3 42436 - 38047 0 _3_9990

--=-o8-=-:-=-oo"'"" 08:oo 11 :oo 11 :oo 11 :oo 11 :oo 11 :oo "--'<-----:--11-:o-:--c:o ---~__1._ _______ ---- _.11§_L _ ____l11_1____ 1533 1320 1451 1?61 _ 1452 1?~

17:00 17:00 17:00 14:00 13:00 14:00 17:00 14:00 PM Peak Vol. _______________________ _._16=5=5:___1_._,51? 1723 1608 1701 1617 1€)78 15?£..

Comb. Total

0

ADT ADT 40,242

0 0 39483 42436

AADT 40,242

If /J1 ~~tf/C- lir»£. ::=- d... ( _s-q E:;; v {-> t...

P/11. /EA{C tfz;u~ ~ 3{ I ~7 Vf?A

38047 0 39990

3 '~"%54-8

tl 'PM P~lS 2l7o &,~ --rl'tAN ~

~eA-CC-

WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR EXISTING SYNCHRO

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11503.00 :: Proposed Canyon Rezoning 2: Middlesex Turneike & 1-95 SB Rames

.(" '- t /"' \.. + Movement W8L W8R N8T N8R S8L $8T Lane Configurations "i"i '(' ttt '(' "i"i tt Volume (vph) 190 265 1125 615 660 1290 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 13 16 12 16 11 12 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3618 1830 5136 1812 3385 3610 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (Qerm) 3618 1830 5136 1812 3385 3610 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 211 294 1184 647 733 1433 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 211 294 1184 647 733 1433 Heav~ Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% Turn Type NA Free NA Free Prot NA Protected Phases 4 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Free Free Actuated Green, G (s) 10.2 100.0 45.6 100.0 26.2 77.8 Effective Green, g (s) 11.2 100.0 46.6 100.0 28.2 78.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 1.00 0.47 1.00 0.28 0.79 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 405 1830 2393 1812 954 2844 v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 0.23 c0.22 c0.40 v/s Ratio Perm 0.16 0.36 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.16 0.49 0.36 0.77 0.50 Uniform Delay, d1 41.9 0.0 18.5 0.0 32.9 3.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.6t 1.00 0.85 1.50 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 2.8 0.5 Delay (s) 42.4 0.2 11.3 0.0 30.7 6.1 Level of Service D A 8 A c A Approach Delay (s) 17.8 7.3 14.4 Approach LOS 8 A 8

[In-tersection summar~----,._ - -- --- --~-~ __ ,< ___

HCM 2000 Control Delay 11.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.61 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.7% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group

\\MAWALD\Id\11503.00\tech\Traffic\Synchro\October 2011 Analysis\EX_PM-alt.syn VH8

2011 Existing Weekday Evening Peak Hour

8

14.0 8

-1

7<,-

Synchro 7 - Report Page 2

I

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11503.00 ::Proposed Canyon Rezoning 3: Middlesex Turneike & 1:-95 NB Rames

~ __.... ~ .f ......... -\..

"" ;Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL -:WBT WBR NBL Lane Configurations 'i 1+ 'i +t. Volume (vph) 205 95. 100 330 20 505 20 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 10 10 12 14 14 16 12 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.86 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1685 1637 1811 1643 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (~erm) 1685 1637 1811 1643 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 244 113 119 363 22 555 21 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 38 0 0 306 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 244 194 0 327 307 0 0 Heav~ Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% Turn Type Split NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 4 4 3 3 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.0 12.0 18.0 18.0 Effective Green, g (s) 13.0 13.0 19.0 19.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.19 0.19 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 219 212 344 312 v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 0.12 0.18 c0.19 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 1.11 0.91 0.95 0.98 Uniform Delay, d1 43.5 42.9 40.0 40.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 94.8 38.1 35.4 46.0 Delay (s) 138.3 81.0 75.4 86.4 Level of Service F F E F Approach Delay (s) 110.4 82.5 Approach LOS F F

jntetsection -Summar~ · HCM 2000 Control Delay 61.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.99 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 113.5% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group

\\MAWALD\Id\11503.00\tech\Traffic\Synchro\October 2011 Analysis\EX_PM-alt.syn VHB


t r NBT NBR

4't '(' 1035 200 1900 1900

12 16 5.0 4.0

0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00

3571 1812 0.91 1.00

3245 1812 0.95 0.95 1089 211

0 0 1110 211

1% 1% NA Free

2 Free

30.0 100.0 31.0 100.0 0.31 1.00 6.0 3.0

1005 1812

c0.34 0.12 1.10 0.12 34.5 0.0 0.86 1.00 59.8 0.1 89.6 0.1

F A 75.3

E

E

20.0 H

\.. ~ ..,; SBL SBT s8R ~'i tt+ 400 1095 25

1900 1900 1900 12 12 12

5.0 5.0 0.97 0:95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00

3467 3562 0.95 1.00

3467 3562 0.96 0.96 0.96 417 1141 26

0 1 0 417 1166 0 1% 1% 1%

Prot NA 1 6

16.0 52.0 17.0 53.0 0.17 0.53 6.0 6.0 2.0 3.0

589 1887 0.12 c0.33

0.71 0.62 39.2 16.4 1.30 0.68 2.8 1.4

53.6 12.5 D B

23.3 c

-I

Synchro 7- Report Page 3

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11503.00 :: Proposed Canyon Rezoning 8: Middlesex Turn~ike & Wheeler Road ~East~

.( ..... t /"" \.. + Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations 'i 7' t~ 'i tt Volume (vph) 135 390 860 55 205 1275 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 1805 1615 3542 1805 3610 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (~erm) 1805 1615 3542 1805 3610 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 147 424 935 60 216 1342 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 21 3 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 147 403 992 0 216 1342 Heav~ Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% Turn Type NA pt+ov NA Prot NA Protected Phases 4 41 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 12.0 36.6 51.4 18.6 76.0 Effective Green, g (s) 12.0 36.6 51.4 18.6 76.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.37 0.51 0.19 0.76 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 216 591 1820 335 2743 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.25 c0.28 0.12 0.37 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.68 0.68 0.54 0.64 0.49 Uniform Delay, d1 42.2 26.8 16.4 37.6 4.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.08 0.82 Incremental Delay, d2 6.8 2.6 1.2 2.2 0.4 Delay (s) 49.0 29.4 17.6 42.9 4.2 Level of Service D c B D A Approach Delay (s) 34.4 17.6 9.5 Approach LOS c B A

ilnters~ctlon Summar~ - --- -- --· ·--

,;.,


\\MAWALD\Id\11503.00\tech\Traffic\Synchro\October 2011 Analysis\EX_PM-alt.syn VHB


B

18.0 B

~- I


11503.00 :: Canyon Parcel- Adams Street 6: Adams Stl~laza dw~ & Middlesex T~ke

..f - " f' - ' ..... t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT Lane Configurations 'I 1' 4+ 'I tt-Volume (vph) 250 0 90 5 5 15 40 550 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Widlh .14 8 16 12 12 12 10 12 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Uti!. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.92 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 1925 1830 1726 1668 3574 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (~erm) 1925 1830 1726 1668 3574 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 272 0 98 7 7 22 43 591 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 80 0 21 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 272 0 18 0 15 0 43 591 Hea~ Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% Turn Type custom custom Split Prot Protected Phases 4 3 1 Permitted Phases 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.6 15.6 3.3 3.1 47.0 Effective Green, g (s) 15.6 15.6 3.3 3.1 48.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.04 0.04 0.57 Clearance Trme (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 357 339 68 61 2037 v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 c0.01 c0.03 0.17 vts Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.05 0.22 0.70 0.29 Uniform Delay, d1 32.5 28.2 39.2 40.1 9.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 8.4 0.0 0.6 30.9 0.4 Delay (s) 40.9 28.2 39.8 71.0 9.7 Level of Senrice D c D E A Approach Delay (s) 37.6 398 13.8 Approach LOS D D B

Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 20.7 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73 Actuated Cycle Lenglh (s) 84.2 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.7% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group

\IMAWALDUd\11503.00\tech\Traffic\Synchro\Dec 2011 Adams St Tests\Traffic Memo\REVISED\PM-EX.syn VHB

~ '-. NBR SBL

'I 0 15

1900 1900 13 12

4.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1787 0.95 1787

0.93 0.97 0 15 0 0 0 15

1% 1% Prot

5

1.3 1.3

0.02 4.0 3.0 28

0.01

0.54 41.2 1.00 18.3 59.4

E

c

16.0 B

~ SBT

tt-875

1900 13

4.0 '0.80 0.96 1.00

2976 1.00

2976 0.97 902 24

1244 1%

45.2 46.2 0.55 5.0 3.0

1633 c0.42

0.76 14.7 1.00 3.4

18.1 B

18.6 B

.,, SBR

355 1900

12

0.97 366

0 0

1%

11503.00 :: Canyon Parcel -Adams Street 2011 Existing Weekday PM Peak Hour

HCM Signalized lnterseclion Capacity Analysis 12/29/2011

11503.00 :: Canyon Parcel- Adams Street 7: Middlesex Commons Mall & Middlesex T~ke

~ ' t /'" '-.

* Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Conf1Qurations ~ rt tf. ~ tt Volume (vph) 45 240 350 50 300 670 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 15 15 16 15 12 12 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 1988 1776 3975 1787 3574 Fll Permitled 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 100 Satd. Flow (e!!rm) 1986 1776 3975 1787 3574 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 54 289 365 52 323 720 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 139 11 0 0 0 Lane Group· Flow (vph) 54 150 406 0 323 720 Hea:!t Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% Turn Type pt->Ov Prot Protected Phases 85 5 Permilted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 21.0 51.0 39.0 25.0 69.0 Effective Green, g (s) 22.0 52.0 40.0 26.0 70.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.52 0.40 0.26 0.70 Clearance TimEr s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 437 924 1590 465 2502 vis Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.08 0.10 c0.18 c0.20 vis Ratio Perm vic Ratio 0.12 0.16 0.26 0.69 0.29 Uniform Delay, d1 31.3 12.6 20.0 33.4 5.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.4 0.4 8.3 0.3 Delay (s) 31.8 13.0 20.4 41.7 5.9 Level of Se!Vice c B c D A Approach Delay (s) 15.9 20.4 17.0 Approach LOS B c B

Intersection Summa HCM Average Con~ol Delay 17.6 HCM Level of Se!Vice HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.37 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.9% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group

\\MAWALDUd\11503.00\tech\Trafflc\Synchro\Dec 2011 Adams St Tesls\Trafflc Memo\REVISED\PM-EX.syn VHB

B

8.0 A

11503.00 ::Canyon Parcel- Adams Street 2011 Existing Weekday PM Peak Hour

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12/29i2011

· WEEKDAY EVENING PEAl< HOUR NO BUILD SVNCHRO

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11503.00 :: Proposed Canyon Rezoning 2: Middlesex Turneike & 1-95 SB Rames

.f -\... t r \. + Movement WBL WBR NBT NJlR ssL SBT Cane Configurations "'i"'i (I ttt ,

"'i"'i tt Volume (vph) 245 380 1640 795 875 1910 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 13 16 12 16 11 12 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3618 1830 5136 1812 3385 3610 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (~erm) 3618 1830 5136 1812 3385 3610 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 272 422 1726 837 972 2122 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 272 422 1726 837 972 2122 Heav~ Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 1% 1% '0% 0% Turn Type NA Free NA Free Prot NA Protected Phases 4 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Free Free Actuated Green, G (s) 11.6 100.0 39.2 100.0 31.2 76.4 Effective Green, g (s) 12.6 100.0 40.2 100.0 33.2 77.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.33 0.77 Clearance Time (s) 6.0' 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 455 1830 2064 1812 1123 2794 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.34 c0.29 0.59 v/s Ratio Perm 0.23 c0.46 v/c Ratio 0.60 0.23 0.84 0.46 0.87 0.76 Uniform Delay, d1 41.3 0.0 26.9 0.0 31.3 6.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.72 1.31 Incremental Delay, d2 1.4 0.3 2.1 0.4 4.6 1.3 Delay (s) 42.7 0.3 15.6 0.4 27.2 9.4 Level of Service D A B A c A Approach Delay {s) 16.9 10.6 15.0 Approach LOS B B B

!ritersecH6n su.mma~ -- - --~- ------ ---;:-;::::--


\\MAWALD\Id\11503.00\tech\Traffic\Synchro\October 2011 Analysis\NB_PM.syn VHB

2016No Build Weekday Evening Peak Hour

B

14.0 D

.. I

- - - ------.


I

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11503.00 :: Proposed Canyon Rezoning 3: Middlesex Turn~ike & 1-95 NB Ram~s

...} __... ..... ., .,.__ -\...

"" ~o'lemenf- EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT ·wsR NBL Lane Configurations "i 1+ "i +1' .,., "i Volume (vph) 325 170 135 355 40 705 30 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 10 10 12 14 14 16 12 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.88 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1685 1655 1811 1833 3189 1787 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (Qerm) 1685 1655 1811 1833 3189 1787 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 387 202 161 390 44 775 32 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 387 335 0 214 220 775 32 Heav~ Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% Turn Type Split NA Split NA Free Prot Protected Phases 4 4 3 3 5 Permitted Phases Free Actuated_ Green, G (s) 20.0 20.0 10.0 10.0 100.0 2.4 Effective Green, g (s) 21.0 21.0 11.0 11.0 100.0 3.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.11 0.11 1.00 0.03 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 353 347 199 201 3189 60 v/s Ratio Prot c0.23 0.20 0.12 c0.12 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.24 v/c Ratio 1.10 0.96 1.08 1.09 0.24 0.53 Uniform Delay, d1 39.5 39.1 44.5 44.5 0.0 47.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.12 Incremental Delay, d2 76.3 38.3 85.3 91.0 0.2 5.1 Delay (s) 115.8 77.5 129.8 135.5 0.2 58.4 Level of Service F E F F A E Approach Delay (s) 97.3 47.7 Approach LOS F D

linfersaction-sulllfllar{ - -- ---- ~ ---- - -· --------

'



2016 No Build Weekday Evening Peak Hour

t Nsf··-

ttl+ 1375 1900

12 5.0

0.91 0.98 1.00

5019 1.00

5019 0.95 1447

25 1680

1% NA

2

29.0 30.0 0.30

6.0 3.0

1505 c0.33

1.12 35.0 0.75 58.2 84.5

F 84.0

F

r \. ~ .; NBR. -··sse SBT si3R

"i"i tf+ 245 640 1495 45

1900 1900 1900 1900 16 12 12 12

5.0 5.0 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00

3467 3559 0.95 1.00

3467 3559 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.96 258 667 1557 47

0 0 2 0 0 667 1602 0

1% 1% 1% 1% Prot NA

1 6

17.0 44.6 18.0 45.6 0.18 0.46

6.0 6.0 2.0 3.0

624 1622 c0.19 0.45

1.07 0.99 41.0 26.9 1.29 0.86 49.6 15.5

102.5 38.7 F D

57.4 E

--- -- --- - -----· ----"- ----

] E

20.0 F


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11503.00 ::Proposed Canyon Rezoning 8: Middlesex Turn~ike & Wheeler Road ~East~

.f -\.. t !" '*' * Jli6vement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SST Lane Configurations 'i ., t-r. 'i ;; Volume (vph) 140 585 1035 60 270 1690 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 1615 3545 1805 3610 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (~erm) 1805 1615 3545 1805 3610 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 152 636 1125 65 284 1779 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 8 4 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 152 628 1186 0 284 1779 Heav~ Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% Turn Type NA pt+ov NA Prot NA Protected Phases 4 4 1 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 12.0 47.7 40.3 29.7 76.0 Effective Green, g (s) 12.0 47.7 40.3 29.7 76.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.48 0.40 0.30 0.76 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 216 770 1428 536 27_43 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.39 c0.33 0.16 0.49 v/s Ratio Perm vic Ratio 0.70 0.82 0.83 0.53 0.65 Uniform Delay, d1 42.3 22.4 26.8 29.3 5.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.11 1.41 Incremental Delay, d2 8.2 6.3 5.7 0.1 0.3 Delay (s) 50.5 28.7 32.5 32.7 8.3 Level of Service D c c c A Approach Delay (s) 32.9 32.5 11.7 Approach LOS c c B

~ntersaclion summar{ HCM 2000 Control Delay 22.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.7% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group


2016 No Build Weekday Evening peak Hour

c

18.0 D


I

11503.00 :: Canyon Parcel - Adams Street 6: Adams SV~Iaza dw~ & Middlesex T~ke

__,. - ,. f - "-. '\ t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT Lane Configurations "'i ., +1+ "'i tto Volume (vph) 305 0 95 5 5 15 40 670 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 14 8 16 12 12 12 10 12 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Uti!. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.92 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 1925 1830 1726 1668 3574 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (~rm) 1925 1830 1726 1668 3574 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 332 0 103 7 7 22 43 720 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 81 0 21 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 332 0 22 0 15 0 43 720 He~ Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% Turn Type custom custom Split Prot Protected Phases 4 3 1 Perinilted Phases 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.1 18.1 3.3 4.1 46.2 Effective Green, g (s) 18.1 18.1 3.3 4.1 47.2 Actuated giC Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.04' 0.05 0.55 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 30 30 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 406 386 66 80 1964 vis Ratio Prot c0.17 c0.01 c0.03 0.20 vis Ratio Perm 0.01 vic Ratio 0.82 0.06 0.22 0.54 0.37 Uniform Delay, d1 32.3 27.1 40.1 40.0 10.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 11.5 0.0 0.6 6.8 0.5 Delay(s) 43.8 27.1 40.7 46.8 11.4 Level of Service D c D D 8 Approach Delay (s) 39.9 40.7 13.4 Approach LOS D D 8

Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 50.3 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.94 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 85.9 Sum or lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.6% ICU Level or Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group

..

1\MAWALDUd\11503.00\tech\Traflic\Synchro\Dec 2011 Adams StTests\Traffic Memo\REVISEDIPM-NB.syn VHB

/" \.. NBR SBL

"'i 0 15

1900 1900 13 12

4.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1787 0.95 1787

0.93 0.97 0 15 0 0 0 15

1% 1% Prot

5

1.3 1.3

0.02 4.0 3.0 27

001

0.56 42.0 1.00 22.5 64.5

E

D

16.0 D

+ SBT

tto 1165 1900

13 4.0

'0.80 0.96 1.00 2975 1.00

2975 0.97 1201

26 ' 1665

1%

43.4 44.4 0.52 5.0 3.0

1538 c0.56

1.08 20.8 1.00 48.9 69.7

E 69.6

E

.; SBR

475 1900

12

0.97 490

0 0

1%

11503.00 ::Canyon Parcel- Adams Street 2016 No Build Weekday PM Peak Hour

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12/29i2011

11503.00 :: Canyon Parcel- Adams Street 7: Middlesex Commons Mall & Middlesex Teke

• " t /" \. ~ Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT lane Configurations 'I 7' tf+ 'I tt Volume (vph) 45 240 470 50 300 965 Ideal Flow (vphpl) _1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Widlh 15 15 16 15 12 12 Total lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 lane Uti!. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1986 1776 3993 1787 3574 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow {2!!rm) 1986 1776 3993 1787 3574 Peak-hour factor, PHF 083 0.83 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 54 289 490 52 323 1038 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 106 8 0 0 0 lane Group Flow (vph) 54 183 534 0 323 1038 Hea!:'X Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1%

Turn Type pt"{)V Prot Protected Phases 85 5 Pennitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 21.0 51.0 39.0 25.0 69.0 Effective Green, g (s) 22.0 52.0 40.0 26.0 70.0 Actuated 9/C Ratio 0.22 0.52 0.40 0.26 0.70 Clearance Time s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 lane Grp Cap (vph) 437 924 1597 465 2502 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.10 0.13 c0.18 c0.29 v/s Ratio Perm vic Ratio 0.12 0.20 0.33 0.69 0.41 Unifonn Delay, dt 313 12.8 20.8 33.4 6.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.5 0.6 8.3 0.5 Delay (S) 31.8 13.3 21.3 41.7 6.9 Level of Se['!ice c B c D A Approach Delay (s) 16.2 21.3 15.1 Approach LOS B c B

Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 16.8 HCM level or Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.44 Actuated Cycle lenglh (s) 100.0 Sum oflost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.2% ICU Level or Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical lane Group

1\MAWALDUd\11503.00\tech\Traffic\Synchro\Dec 2011 Adams St Tests\ Traffic Memo\REVISEDIPM-NB.syn VHB

8.0 A

11503.00 ::Canyon Parcel- Adams Street 2016 No Build Weekday PM Peak Hour

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12/29/2011

WEEKDAY EVENING PEAl< HOUR BUILD WITH MITIGATION SYNCHRO

11503.00 :: Canyon Parcel -Adams Street 2: 1-95 SB Ramps & Middlesex Turn~ike

('" '- t /"' \.. + Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations 'i"'l ., ttt .,

"'"' tt

Volume (vph) 430 805 1900 500 760 1705 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Widlh 13 16 12 16 11 12 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 Lane Uti!. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Fli Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3618 1830 5187 1830 3385 3610 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (~erm) 3618 1830 5187 1830 3385 3610 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 453 847 2088 549 784 1758 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 453 847 2088 549 784 1758 Hea~ Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Turn Type Free Free Prot Protected Phases 4 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Free Free Actuated Green, G (s) 138 100.0 40.9 100.0 27.3 74.2 Effective Green, g (s) 14.8 100.0 41.9 100.0 29.3 75.2 Actuated giC Ratio 0.15 1.00 0.42 1.00 0.29 0.75 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 535 1830 2173 1830 992 2715 vis Ratio Prot c0.13 c0.40 c0.23 0.49 vis Ratio Perm 0.46 0.30 vic Ratio 0.85 0.46 0.96 0.30 0.79 0.65 Uniform Delay, d1 41.5 0.0 28.3 0.0 32.5 6.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.18 1.00 1.00 1.00 lncremenlal Delay, d2 11.4 0.8 8.4 0.3 4.1 1.2 Delay (s) 52.9 0.8 41.9 0.3 36.6 7.2 Level of Service D A D A D A Approach Delay (s) 19.0 33.2 16.3 Approach LOS B c B

Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 23.7 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.3% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group

\\MAWALDUd\11503.00\tech\Traffic\Synchro\Oclober 2011 Analysis\Summit Expansion_SAT.syn VHB

c

14.0 E

2016 Build Timing Plan: Saturday Midday

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7i23i2013

11503.00 :: Canyon Parcel -Adams Street 3: 1-95 NB Rames & Middlesex Turnpike

..)- - ~ .f - '- "" Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL Lane Configurations

"'"' t .,

"'"' t .,.,

"' Volume (vph) 100 45 55 370 55 995 35 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 10 10 12 14 14 16 12 Total Lost lime (s) 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 4.0 Lane Ulil. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 3268 1773 1615 3735 2027 3221 1805 Fit Penmitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow ~~erm) 3268 1773 1615 3735 2027 3221 1805 Peak-hour factor. PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 116 52 64 398 59 1070 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 10 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 116 52 54 398 59 1070 Heavl Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Turn Type Prot pt+Ov Prot pt+OV Protected Phases 7 45 3 81 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 8.0 12.0 19.2 16.2 20.2 45.2 Effective Green, g (s) 9.0 13.0 19.2 17.2 21.2 45.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.13 0.19 0.17 0.21 0.45 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 294 230 310 642 430 1456 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.03 0.03 c0.11 0.03 c0.33 vis Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.39 0.23 0.18 0.62 0.14 0.73 Uniform Delay, d1 42.9 39.0 33.8 38.4 32.0 22.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.2 0.1 1.3 0.1 1.7 Delay (s) 43.2 39.2 33.9 39.6 32.0 24.2 Level of Service D D c D c c Approach Delay (s) 39.8 28.5 Approach LOS D c Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 31.4 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.8% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (rnin) 15 c Critical Lane Group

1\MAWALD\Id\11503.00\tech\Traffic\Synchro\Oclober 2011 Analysis\Summit Expansion_SAT.syn VHB

0.92 38 0

38 0%

Prot 5

7.2 8.2

0.08 5.0 3.0 148

0.02

0.26 43.0 0.84 0.6

36.6 D

t !" \. NBT NBR SBL

ttt ., "'"' 1275 450 635

1900 1900 1900 12 16 12

5.0 4.0 5.0 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 5187 1830 3502 1.00 1.00 0.95

5187 1830 3502 0.92 0.92 096 1386 489 661

0 0 0 1386 489 661

0% 0% 0% Free Prot

2 1 Free

28.8 100.0 19.0 29.8 100.0 20.0 0.30 1.00 0.20

6.0 6.0 3.0 2.0

1546 1830 700 c0.27 0.19

0.27 0.90 0.27 0.94 33.6 0.0 39.5 0.77 1.00 0.88

6.1 0.2 16.7 32.0 0.2 51.5

c A D 24.0

c

c

16.0 D

+ SBT

tt 1350 1900

12 5.0

0.95 1.00 1.00

3610 1.00 3610 0.96 1406

0 1406

0%

41.6 42.6 0.43 6.0 3.0

1538 c0.39

0.91 27.0 1.00 7.5

34.6 c

39.1 D

,.1

SBR ., 70

1900 12

6.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1615 1.00

1615 0.96

73 37 36

0% pi+OV

67

49.6 49.6 0.50

801 0.02

0.05 13.0 1.11 0.0

14.5 8



11503.00 :: Canyon Parcel- Adams Street 8: Wheeler Road (East) & Middlesex Turn~ike

('" '- t !"' \. + Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations 'I rt tf+ 'I tt Volume (vph) 75 205 1510 75 180 1600 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 1615 3584 1805 3610 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (~rm) 1805 1615 3584 1805 3610 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.93 0.93 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 83 228 1624 81 191 1702 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 20 3 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 83 208 1702 0 191 1702 Heav~ Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Turn Type ptffiV Prot Protected Phases 41 1 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 8.9 27.7 60.3 12.8 79.1 Effective Green, g (s) 99 28.7 61.3 13.8 80.1 Actuated giC Ratio 0.10 0.29 0.61 0.14 0.80 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 179 464 2197 249 2892 vis Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.13 c0.47 c0.11 0.47 vis Ratio Perm vic Ratio 0.46 0.45 0.77 0.77 0.59 Uniform Delay, d1 42.5 29.2 14.3 41.6 3.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.38 0.89 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0.3 2.7 7.4 0.5 Delay (s) 43.2 29.4 17.0 64.7 3.9 Level of Service D c B E A Approach Delay (s) 33.1 17.0 10.0 Approach LOS c B B


\\MAWALDUd\11503.00\tech\Traffic\Synchro\Octob€r 2011 Analysis\Summit Expansion_SAT.syn VHB

B

15.0 c



11503.00 :: Canyon Parcel -Adams Street 6: Adams Sttelaza dw~ & Middlesex Tpke

__J- -+ .. f - ' "\ Movement EBL EBT EBR W8L WBT WBR N8L Lane Configurations 'I 4+

'10 4+ 'I

Volume (vph) 305 5 90 10 20 80 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 14 8 16 12 12 12 10 Total Lost lime (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.93 0.93 1.00 Fll Protected 0.95 0.97 0.99 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1829 1420 1750 1668 Fit Permitted 0.95 0.97 0.99 0.95 Said. Flow (~erm) 1829 1420 1750 1668 Peak·hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 332 5 98 15 15 30 86 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 39 0 0 29 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 222 174 0 0 32 0 86 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% Turn Type custom Split Prot Protected Phases 4 3 1 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.5 11.5 4.0 4.8 Effective Green, g (s) 11.5 11.5 4.0 4.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.05 0.06 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 263 204 88 100 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 c0.12 c0.02 c0.05 v/s Ratio Perm vic Ratio 0.84 0.86 0.36 0.86 Uniform Delay, d1 33.4 33.4 36.8 37.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 Incremental Delay, d2 20.4 26.9 0.9 39.1 Delay (s) 53.8 60.4 37.7 68.8 Level of Service D E D E Approach Delay (s) 57.0 37.7 Approach LOS E D

Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 22.0 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.77 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.4% JCU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group

1\MAWALDUd\11503.00\lech\Traffic\Synchro\Oclober 2011 Analysis\Summil Expansion_SAT.syn VH8

t I" \. NBT NBR SBL

tr. 'I 1185 0 25 1900 1900 1900

12 13 12 4.0 4.0

0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 3574 1787 1.00 0.95

3574 1787 0.93 0.93 0.97 1274 0 26

0 0 0 1274 0 26

1% 1% 1% Prot

6 5

44.9 2.6 45.9 2.6 0.57 0.03

5.0 4.0 3.0 3.0

2051 58 0.36 0.01

0.62 0.45 11.3 38.0 0.97 1.00

0.4 5.4 11.4 43.4

B D 15.0

8

c

16.0 D

+ SBT

tr. 1235 1900

13 4.0

0.95 0.97 1.00 3597 1.00 3597 0.97 1273

21 1520

1%

42.7 43.7 0.55 5.0 3.0

1965 c0.42

0.77 14.3 1.00 3.0

17.3 8

17.7 8

..; SBR

260 1900

12

0.97 268

0 0

1%



11503.00 ::Canyon Parcel- Adams Street 7: Middlesex Commons Mall & Middles.ex Teke

.f '- t !" \. ~ Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations 'I .,., tt+ 'I 4't Volume (vph) 90 550 715 115 620 715 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 15 15 16 15 12 12 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.88 0.95 0.91 0.91 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 Satd. Flow (prot) 1986 3127 3967 1626 3389 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 Satd. Flow (Qerm) 1986 3127 3967 1626 3389 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 108 663 745 120 667 769 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 7 16 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 108 657 849 0 467 969 Heavl Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% Turn Type pt-I{)V Split Protected Phases 8 82 6 2 2 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 6.0 53.0 17.0 42.0 42.0 Effective Green, g (s) 7.0 54.0 18.0 43.0 43.0 Actuated giC Ratio 0.09 0.68 0.22 0.54 0.54 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 174 2111 893 874 1822 vis Ratio Prot c0.05 0.21 c0.21 c0.29 0.29 vis Ratio Perm vic Ratio 0.62 0.31 0.95 0.53 0.53 Uniform Delay, d1 35.2 5.3 30.6 12.0 12.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.26 0.28 Incremental Delay, d2 6.7 0.1 19.1 1.6 0.7 Delay (s) 41.9 5.4 49.7 4.7 4.1 Level of Service D A D A A Approach Delay (s) 10.5 49.7 4.3 Approach LOS B D A

Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 18.7 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65 Actuated Cycle Length {s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.6% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group

1\MAWALDUd\ 11503.00\lech\Traffic\Synchro\October 2011 Analysis\Summit Expansion_SAT.syn VHB

B

12.0 B


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7i23/2013

SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR EXISTING SYNCHRO

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11503.00 :: Proposed Canyon Rezoning 2: Middlesex TurnBike & 1-95 SB Rames

.( '- t /"" \. + Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations ~~ ., ttt ., ~~ tt Volume (vph) 370 635 1365 440 525 1255 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 13 16 12 16 11 12 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 3618 1830 5187 1830 3385 3610 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (~erm) 3618 1830 5187 1830 3385 3610 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 389 668 1500 484 541 1294 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 389 668 1500 484 541 1294 Heav~ Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Turn Type NA Free NA Free Prot NA Protected Phases 4 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Free Free Actuated Green, G (s) 13.2 100.0 48.3 100.0 20.5 74.8 Effective Green, g (s) 14.2 100.0 49.3 100.0 22.5 75.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 1.00 0.49 1.00 0.22 0.76 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 513 1830 2557 1830 761 2736 v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 c0.29 c0.16 0.36 v/s Ratio Perm 0.36 0.26 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.37 0.59 0.26 0.71 0.47 Uniform Delay, d1 41.2 0.0 18.1 0.0 35.7 4.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.61 1.00 1.06 0.84 Incremental Delay, d2 5.7 0.6 0.1 0.0 1.8 0.4 Delay (s) 46.9 0.6 11.1 0.0 39.7 4.2 Level of Service D A B A D A Approach Delay (s) 17.6 8.4 14.7 Approach LOS B A B

!iltersectlon surrunar~ -~ ---------- --,.


\\MAWALD\Id\11503.00\tech\Traffic\Synchro\October 2011 Analysis\EX_SAT-AL T.syn VHB

2011 Existing Saturday Midday Peak Hour

B

14.0 B


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11503.00 :: Proposed Canyon Rezoning 3: Middlesex Turneike & 1-95 NB Rames

/ ...........

"" .(" +- '- "' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL

Lane Configurations "i 1+ "i 4+ Volume (vph) 65 30 45 345 25 720 30 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 10 10 12 14 14 16 12 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.86 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1685 1614 1829 1655 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (Qerm) 1685 1614 1829 1655 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.93 0.93 . 0.93 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 76 35 52 371 27 774 33 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 47 0 0 377 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 76 40 0 334 461 0 0 Heav~ Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Turn Type Split NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 4 4 3 3 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 7.7 7.7 18.0 18.0 Effective Green, g (s) 8.7 8.7 19.0 19.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.19 0.19 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 146 140 347 314 v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 0.02 0.18 c0.28 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.52 0.28 0.96 1.47 Uniform Delay, d1 43.7 42.7 40.1 40.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 0.4 38.0 226.7 Delay (s) 45.2 43.1 78.2 267.2 Level of Service D D E F Approach Delay (s) 44.1 213.3 Approach LOS D F

~ntersecfion Summar{ -- ~ - ---- ---


\\MAWALD\Idl 11503.00\tech\Traffic\Synchro\October 2011 Analysis\EX_SAT-AL T.syn VHB


t /"' NBT NBR

+tt 7' 1005 420 1900 1900

12 16 5.0 4.0

0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00

3605 1830 0.87 1.00

3145 1830 0.92 0.92 1092 457

0 0 1125 457

0% 0% NA Free

2 Free

33.1 . 100.0 34.1 100.0 0.34 1.00

6.0 3.0

1072 1830

c0.36 0.25 1.05 0.25 33.0 0.0 0.70 1.00 38.7 0.3 61.7 0.3

E A 43.9

D --- -~ ----·- ---

E

20.0 H

\. + ../ SBL SBT ·• .·. SBB

"i"i tt+ 460 1095 35

1900 1900 1900 12 12 12

5.0 5.0 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00

3502 3593 0.95 1.00

3502 3593 0.96 0.96 0.96 479 1141 36

0 2 0 479 1175 0 0% 0% 0%

Prot NA 1 6

17.2 56.3 18.2 57.3 0.18 0.57

6.0 6.0 2.0 3.0 637 2058

c0.14 0.33

0.75 0.57 38.8 13.5 0.98 0.88 3.8 1.0

41.7 12.9 D B

21.3 c

-1


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11503.00 ::Proposed Canyon Rezoning 8: Middlesex Turneike & Wheeler Road ~East~

,( '- t /"' \.. + Movement W8L WBR NBT NBR S8L S8T Lane Configurations "i 7' tf+ "i tt Volume (vph) 70 135 1280 70 115 1355 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 1615 3582 1805 3610 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow {Qerm) 1805 1615 3582 1805 3610 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.93 0.93 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 78 150 1376 75 122 1441 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 2 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 78 146 1449 0 122 1441 Heavl Vehicles{%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Turn Type NA pt+ov NA Prot NA Protected Phases 4 41 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 10.6 27.8 60.2 11.2 77.4 Effective Green, g (s) 10.6 27.8 60.2 11.2 77.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.28 0.60 0.11 0.77 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2:0 3.0 2.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 191 448 2156 202 2794 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.09 c0.40 O.D7 c0.40 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.41 0.33 0.67 0.60 0.52 Uniform Delay, d1 41.8 28.7 13.3 42.3 4.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.33 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.2 1.7 2.6 0.5 Delay (s) 42.3 28.8 15.0 44.6 1.9 Level of Service D c 8 D A Approach Delay (s) 33.4 15.0 5.3 Approach LOS c 8 A

:11ltersecfion su mmaii -HCM 2000 Control Delay 11.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.64 Actuat(;ld Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.0% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group

\\MAWALD\Id\11503.00\tech\Traffic\Synchro\October 2011 Analysis\EX_SAT-AL T.syn VH8


8

18.0 B

-I


!

11503.00 :: Canyon Parcel- Adams Street 6: Adams St!~laza dw~ & Middlesex T~ke

./' - .. f - ' ..., t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT Lane Configurations

"' to 4+

"' tt.

Volume (vph) 260 5 85 10. 10 20 75 1000 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1000 1900 Lane Width 16 8 16 12 12 12 10 12 To1allosttime (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.86 0.93 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.99 0 95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 2046 1413 1750 1685 3610 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (~rm) 2046 1413 1750 1685 3610 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.62 0.62 0.62 094 094 Adj. Flow (vph) 277 5 90 16 16 32 80 1064 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 73 0 0 30 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 277 22 0 0 34 0 so 1064 Hea:1 Vehicles(%! 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Turn Type custom Split Prot Protected Phases 4 3 1 Permilled Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.9 12.9 4.0 5.8 328 EffectiVe Green, g (s) 12.9 12.9 4.0 5.8 338 Actuated giG Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.06 0.08 0.49 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s! 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 380 262 101 141 1756 vis Ratio Prot c0.14 0.02 c0.02 0.05 c0.29 vis Ratio Perm vic Ratio 0.73 0.08 0.34 0.57 0.61 Unifomn Delay, d1 26.7 23.4 31.5 30.6 13.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 6.9 0.1 2.0 5.2 1.6 Delay(s) 335 23.5 33.4 35.8 14.6 Level or Service c c c D B Approach Delay (s) 31.0 33.4 16.0 Approach LOS c c B

Intersection Summa HCM Average Con~ol Delay 25.2 HCM Level or Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82 Actuated Cycle length (s) 69.5 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.7% ICU Level or Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group

1\MAWALD~d\11503.00\tech\Traffic\Synchro\Dec 2011 Adams St Tests\ Traffic Memo\REVISED\SAT-EX.syn VHB

~ \.. NBR SBL

"' 0 25 1900 1900

13 12 4.0

1.00 1.00 0.95 1805 0.95 1805

0.94 0.98 0 26 0 0 0 26

0% 0% Prot

5

2.8 2.8

0.04 4.0 3.0 73

0.01

0.36 32.5 1.00 3.0

35.4 D

c

16.0 c

+ SBT

tt. 1035 1900

13 4.0

·o.8o 0.97 1.00 3059 1.00 3059 0.98 1056

17 1263

0%

29.8 30.8 0.44

5.0 3.0

1356 c0.41

0.93 18.4 1.00 12.8 31.1

c 31.2

c

-.1 SBR

220 1900

12

0.98 224

0 0

0%

11503.00 :: Canyon Parcel - Adams Street 2011 Existing Saturday Midday Peak Hour

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12/2912011

11503.00 :: Canyon Parcel- Adams Street 7: Middlesex Commons Mall & Middlesex T~ke

.f ' t !' \. + Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations 'i 7' tt. 'i tt Volume (vph) 90 550 525 115 620 510 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 15 15 16 15 12 12 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.97 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 1986 1776 3942 1805 3610 Fit Permitled 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (~enn) 1986 1776 3942 1805 3610 Peak·hour factor, PHF 0.96 096 0.94 0.94 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 94 573 559 122 639 526 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 80 25 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 94 493 656 0 639 526 Hea:1: Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% Turn Type p!+<lV Prot Protected Phases 85 5 Pennitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 7.0 37.0 28.0 25.0 58.0 Effeclive Green, g (s) 8.0 38.0 29.0 26.0 59.0 Actuated giG Ratio 0.11 0.51 0.39 0.35 0.79 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 50 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 212 900 1524 626 2840 vis Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.28 c0.17 c0.35 0.15 vis Ratio Perm vic Ratio 0.44 0.55 0.43 1.02 0.19 Uniform Delay, d1 31.4 12.6 16.9 24.5 2.0 Progression Faclor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 0.7 0.9 41.3 0.1 Delay (s) 32.9 13.3 17.8 65.8 2.1 Level of SeiVice c B B E A Approach Delay (s) 16.1 17.8 37.1 Approach LOS B B D

Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 26.3 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70 Actualed Cycle Length (s) 75.0 Sum of lost time (s) lnlersection Capacity Utilization 67.5% ICU Level or SeiVice Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group

1\MAWALDUd\11503.00\tech\Traffic\Synchro\Dec 2011 Adams St Tests\Traffic Memo\REVISED\SAT-EX.syn VHB

c

12.0 c

11503.00 :: Canyon Parcel- Adams Street 2011 Existing Saturday Midday Peak Hour

HCM Signalized lnterseclion Capacity Analysis 12/2912011

SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR NO BUILD SYNCHRO

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11503.00 :: Proposed Canyon Rezoning 2: Middlesex Turn~ike & 1-95 SB Ram~s

f""" ..... t r \.. + Movement WBL . IN8R NBT . NBR SBL ,·SBT Lane Configurations 'f'i , ttt , 'f'i tt Volume (vph) 420 805 1890 490 760 1695 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 13 16 12 16 11 12 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3618 1830 5187 1830 3385 3610 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (~erm) 3618 1830 5187 1830 3385 3610 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 442 847 2077 538 784 1747 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 442 847 2077 538 784 1747 Heav~ Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Turn Type NA Free NA Free Prot NA Protected Phases 4 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Free Free Actuated Green, G (s) 13.7 100.0 41.0 100.0 27.3 74.3 Effective Green, g (s) 14.7 100.0 42.0 100.0 29.3 75.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 1.00 0.42 1.00 0.29 0.75 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 531 1830 2178 1830 991 2718 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 c0.40 c0.23 0.48 v/s Ratio Perm 0.46 0.29 v/c Ratio 0.83 0.46 0.95 0.29 0.79 0.64 Uniform Delay, d1 41.5 0.0 28.1 0.0 32.5 5.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.68 1.00 0.89 0.63 Incremental Delay, d2 10.3 0.8 6.4 0.2 2.4 0.7 Delay (s) 51.7 0.8 25.4 0.2 31.4 4.4 Level of Service D A c A c A Approach Delay (s) 18.3 20.2 12.8 Approach LOS B c B

:lntE~rs~ction'Summar~ · -:,;0~ ..

HCM 2000 Control Delay 16.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88 ·Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.8% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group

\ \MAWALD\Id\ 11503. 00\tech \ T raffic\Synchro\October 2011 Analysis\N B _SA T.syn VHB

2016 No Build Saturday Midday Peak Hour

-------- ~-

B

14.0 D

,< -~

ltc

---- __ !f-______

I


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11503.00 ::Proposed Canyon Rezoning 3: Middlesex Turn[;!ike & 1-95 NB Ramr2s

_.)- --+ ..... .f +- '-. "\ h1ovement EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL Lane Configurations 'i f+ 'i +f t'r' 'i Volume (vph) 80 40 50 370 40 995 30 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 10 10 12 14 14 16 12 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.88 0.86 Frt 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1685 1626 1829 1851 3221 1552 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (Eerm) 1685 1626 1829 1851 3221 1552 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 93 47 58 398 43 1070 33 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 93 60 0 219 222 1070 30 Heav~ Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Turn Type Split NA Split NA Free Prot Protected Phases 4 4 3 3 5 Permitted Phases Free Actuated Green, G (s) 4.0 4.0 9.0 9.0 100.0 3.0 Effective Green, g (s) 5.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 100.0 4.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.10 1.00 0.04 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 84 81 182 185 3221 62 v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 0.04 0.12 c0.12 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.33 v/c Ratio 1.11 0.75 1.20 1.20 0.33 0.48 Uniform Delay, d1 47.5 46.9 45.0 45.0 0.0 47.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.15 Incremental Delay, d2 130.2 27.3 132.0 130.3 0.3 3.7 Delay (s) 177.7 74.2 177.0 175.3 0.3 57.7 Level of Service F E F F A E Approach Delay (s) 122.8 51.6 Approach LOS F D

;lntersedfcm Summar~ · HCM 2000 Control Delay 37.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.93 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.8% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. c Critical Lane Group

\\MAWALD\Id\11503.00\tech\Traffic\Synchro\October 2011 Analysis\NB_SAT.syn VHB

2016 No l3uild Saturday Midday Peak Hour

t !" .. NBT NBR

+ttf+ 1275 450 1900 1900

12 16 5.0

0.86 0.96 1.00

4710 0.94

4420 0.92 0.92 1386 489

65 0 1813 0

0% 0% NA

2

50.0 52.0 0.52 6.0 3.0

2310 0.03

c0.38 2.78dr

19.5 0.50 1.2

10.9 B

11.6 B

D

20.0 F

\,. + ..; SBL SBT SBB 'i'i t1+ 635 1350 50

1900 1900 1900 12 12 12 5.0 5.0

0.97 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00

3502 3591 0.95 1.00

3502 3591 0.96 0.96 0.96 661 1406 52

0 3 0 661 1455 0 0% 0% 0%

Prot NA 1 6

16.0 61.0 17.0 62.0 0.17 0.62

6.0 6.0 2.0 3.0 595 2226

c0.19 0.41

1 '11 0.65 41.5 12.1 1.20 0.72 66.5 1.1

116.2 9.8 F A

43.0 D


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11503.00 ::Proposed Canyon Rezoning 8~ Middlesex Turneike & Wheeler Road (East~

.f '- t r \... + ~ovemenT wac· --- -- -. --

WBR . NBT NBR SBL . SBT Lane Configurations 'tj , tf+ 'tj tt Volume (vph) 75 205 1505 75 180 1595 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 1615 3584 1805 3610 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (~erm) 1805 1615 3584 1805 3610 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.93 0.93 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 83 228 1618 81 191 1697 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 3 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 83 227 1696 0 191 1697 Heav~ Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Turn Type NA pt+ov NA Prot NA Protected Phases 4 41 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 11.6 32.7 55.3 15.1 76.4 Effective Green, g (s) 11.6 32.7 55.3 15.1 76.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.33 0.55 0.15 0.76 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 209 528 1981 272 2758 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.14 c0.47 0.11 c0.47 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.40 0.43 0.86 0.70 0.62 Uniform Delay, d1 41.0 26.3 19.0 40.3 5.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.92 lncrenJental Delay, d2 0.5 0.2 5.0 4.3 0.7 Delay (s) 41.4 26.5 24.0 43.8 5.5 Level of Service D c c D A Approach Delay (s) 30.5 24.0 9.4 Approach LOS c c A

)r1terseclion.sulllmar~ ··. HCM 2000 Control Delay 17.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.0% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group

\\MAWALD\Id\11503.00\tech\Traffic\Synchro\October 2011 Analysis\NB_SAT.syn VHB

2016 No Build Saturday Midday Peak Hour

B

18.0 D

.1


I

I

11503.00 :: Canyon Parcel- Adams Street 6: Adams Stf~Jaza dw~ & Middlesex T~ke

/ - ,. f - ' '\ t Movement EBl EBT EBR WBl WBT WBR NBl NBT lane Configurations "'I r. 4+ "'I tr. Volume (vph) 305 5 90 10 10 20 80 1180 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 lane Wldlh 16 8 16 12 12 12 10 12 Total lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.86 0.93 1.00 1.00 Fll Protected 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 2046 1412 1750 1685 3610 Fit Pennitted 0.95 1.00 0 99 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (~erm) 2046 1412 1750 1685 3610 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.94 0 94 Adj. Flow (vph) 324 5 96 16 16 32 85 1255 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 77 0 0 30 0 0 0 lane Group Flow (vph) 324 24 0 0 34 0 85 1255 Hea~ Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Turn Type custom Split Prot Protected Phases 4 3 1 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 13.7 13.7 4.0 5.8 32.6 Effective Green, g (s) 13.7 13.7 4.0 5.8 33.6 Actuated giC Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.06 0.08 0.48 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 400 276 100 139 1730 vis Ratio Prot c0.16 0.02· c0.02 0.05 c0.35 vis Ratio Perm vic Ratio 0.81 0.09 0.34 0.61 0.73 Uniform Delay, d1 27.0 23.1 31.8 31.1 14.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 11.7 0.1 2.0 7.7 2.7 Delay (s) 38.7 23.2 33.8 38.8 17.3 Level of Service D c c D 8 Approach Delay (s) 35.0 33.8 18.6 Approach LOS D c 8


1\MAWALDUd\11503.00\tech\Traffic\Synchro\Dec 2011 Adams St Tesls\Traffic Memo\REVISEDISAT·NB.syn VHB

/" ',.

NBR SBl

"'I 0 25

1900 1900 13 12

4.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1805 0.95 1805

0.94 0.98 0 26 0 0 0 26

0% 0% Prot

5

2.8 2.8

0.04 4.0 3.0 72

0.01

0.36 32.8 1.00 3.1

35.9 D

D

16.0 D

+ SBT

t1+ 1230 1900

13 4.0

·o.8o 0.97 1.00

3059 1.00

3059 0.98 1255

17 1503

0%

29.6 30.6 0.44 5.0 3.0

1335 c0.49

1.13 19.7 1.00 66.9 86.6

F 85.8

F

..; SBR

260 1900

12

0.98 265

0 0

0%

11503.00 :: Canyon Parcel - Adams Street 2016 No Build Saturday Midday Peak Hour

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12/2912011

11503.00 :: Canyon Parcel - Adams Street 7: Middlesex Commons Mall & Middlesex Teke

.f '- t /"' '. ~ Movement WBL IMlR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations 'I 7' tr. 'I tt Volume (vph) 90 550 710 115 620 710 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1goo Lane Width 15 15 16 15 12 12 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Uti!. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 o.g5 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1986 177.6 3966 1805 3610 Fit Penmitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (~erm) 1986 1776 3966 1805 3610 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.94 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 94 573 755 122 639 732 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 40 17 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 94 533 860 0 639 732 Hea!X Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% Turn Type pt+ov Prot Protected Phases 85 5 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 7.0 37.0 28.0 25.0 58.0 Effective Green, g (s) 8.0 38.0 29.0 26.0 59.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.51 0.39 0.35 0.79 Clearance Time s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 212 900 1534 626 2840 vis Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.30 c0.22 c0.35 0.20 vis Ratio Perm vic Ratio 0.44 0.59 . 0.56 1.02 0.26 Uniform Delay, d1 31.4 130 18.0 24.5 2.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 6.6 2.9 1.5 41.3 0.2 Delay (s) 38.0 15.9 19.5 65.8 2.4 Level of Service D B 8 E A Approach Delay (s) 19.0 19.5 31.9 Approach LOS 8 8 c Intersection Summ HCM Average Control Delay 25.2 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.77 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 75.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.6% ICU Level or Service Analysis Pertod (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group

1\MAWALDVd\ 11503.00\techiTraffic\Synchro\Dec 2011 Adams St Tests\ Traffic Memo\REVtSEDISAT-NB.syn VHB

c

12.0 c

11503.00 ::Canyon Parcel- Adams Street 2016 No Build Saturday Midday Peak Hour

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Ana~sis 12J2gl2011

SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR BUILD WITH MITIGATION SYNCHRO

11503.00 :: Canyon Parcel -Adams Street 2: 1-95 ss Rames & Middlesex Turneike ., ' t I" \. ~ Movement WBL W8R NBT N8R S8L S8T Lane Configurations "i"i (I ttt (I "i"i tt Volume (vph) 255 380 1680 875 875 1915 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 13 16 12 16 11 12 Total Lost lime (s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 Lane UUI. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3618 1830 5136 1812 3385 3610 Fit Permilted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (~erm) 3618 1830 5136 1812 3385 3610 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 283 422 1768 921 972 2128 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 283 422 1768 921 972 2128 Heav~ Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% Turn lype Free Free Prot Protected Phases 1 6 Permitted Phases Free Free Actuated Green, G (s) 11.8 100.0 39.1 100.0 31.1 76.2 Effective Green, g (s) 12.8 100.0 40.1 100.0 33.1 77.2 Actuated giC Ratio 0.13 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.33 0.77 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 463 1830 2060 1812 1120 2787 vis Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.34 c0.29 0.59 vis Ratio Perm 0.23 c0.51 vic Ratio 0.61 0.23 0.86 0.51 0.87 0.76 Uniform Delay, d1 41.2 0.0 27.4 0.0 31.4 6.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.72 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.7 0.3 2.7 0.5 7.1 2.0 Delay (s) 42.9 0.3 22.3 0.5 38.5 8.4 Level of Service D A c A D A Approach Delay (s) 17.4 14.8 17.8 Approach LOS 8 B 8

lntersection,Summa HCM Average Control Delay 16.5 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.4% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group

\\MAWALDUd\11503.00\tech\Traffic\Synchro\October 2011 Anatysis\Summit Expansion_PM.syn VH8

B

9.0 D

2016 Build Timing Plan: Weekday Evening


11503.00 :: Canyon Parcel -Adams Street 3: 1-95 NB Rames & Middlesex Turneike

_,J - .,. .f - '-Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Lane Configurations "i"' t .,

"'"' t .,.,

Volume (vph) 415 200 165 355 50 705 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 Total Lost lime (s) 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 3385 1837 1561 3351 1818 2720 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said. Flow (~erm) 3385 1837 1561 3351 1818 2720 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 451 217 179 386 54 766 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 7 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 451 217 172 386 54 766 Hea~ Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% Turn Type Prot pt-I{)V Prot pt-I{)V Protected Phases 7 4 45 3 8 81 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 15.6 16.0 23.0 11.0 11.4 34.1 Effective Green, g (s) 16.6 17.0 23.0 12.0 12.4 34.1 Actuated giC Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.23 0.12 0.12 0.34 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 562 312 359 402 225 928 v/s"Ratio Prot c0.13 c0.12 0.11 0.12 0.03 c0.28 vis Ratio Perm vic Ratio 0.80 0.70 0.48 0.96 0.24 0.83 Uniform Delay, d1 40.1 39.1 33.3 43.8 39.5 30.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 8.1 5.4 0.4 34.5 0.2 5.8 Delay (s) 48.2 44.4 33.7 78.3 39.7 36.0 Level of Service D D c E D D Approach Delay (s) 44.2 49.7 Approach LOS D D


\\MAWALD~d\11503.00\tech\Traffic\Synchro\October 2011 Analysis\Summit Expansion_PM.syn VHB

""\ t !' NBL NBT NBR

"' ttt .,

35 1375 245 1900 1900 1900

11 11 11 5.0 5.0 4.0

1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1728 4964 1546 0.95 1.00 1.00 1728 4964 1546 0.95 0.95 0.95

37 1447 258 0 0 0

37 1447 258 1% 1% 1%

Prot Free 5

Free 7.0 32.3 100.0 8.0 33.3 100.0

0.08 0.33 1.00 6.0 6.0 3.0 3.0 138 1653 1546 0.02 c0.29

0.17 0.27 0.88 0.17 43.2 31.4 0.0 0.78 0.72 1.00 0.6 4.2 0.1

34.4 26.8 0.1 c c A

23.0 c

D

21.0 D

\.. + SBL SBT

"'"' tt

60 1495 1900 1900

12 12 5.0 5.0

0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 3467 3574 0.95 1.00 3467 3574 0.96 0.96

62 1557 0 0

62 1557 1% 1%

Prot 1 6

16.7 42.0 17.7 43.0 0.18 0.43 6.0 6.0 2.0 3.0

614 1537 0.02 c0.44

0.10 1.01 34.5 28.5 1.19 0.98 0.0 21.9

41.0 49.8 D D

47.9 D

..; SBR .,

65 1900

11 6.0

1.00 0.85 1.00 1546 1.00 1546 0.96

68 23 45

1% pt-I{)V

67

57.6 57.6 0.58

890 0.03

0.05 9.3

1.17 0.0

10.8 8



11503.00 ::Canyon Parcel- Adams Street 8: Wheeler Road ~East) & Middlesex Turneike

.f '- t /"" \. + Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations 'I ., tt+ 'I H Volume (vph) 140 585 1040 60 280 1710 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frl 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 1615 3545 1805 3610 Fit Pennilled 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (penn) 1805 1615 3545 1805 3610 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 152 636 1130 65 295 1800 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 16 4 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 152 620 1191 0 295 1800 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% Turn Type p!TOV Prot Protected Phases 4 41 2 1 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 12.0 44.2 43.8 26.2 76.0 Effective Green, g (s) 12.0 44.2 43.8 26.2 76.0 Actuated giC Ratio 0.12 0.44 0.44 0.26 0.76 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 217 714 1553 473 2744 vis Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.38 c0.34 0.16 0.50 vis Ratio Penn vic Ratio 0.70 0.87 0.77 0.62 0.66 Unifonn Delay, d1 42.3 25.3 23.8 32.6 5.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.41 0.48 Incremental Delay, d2 8.1 10.5 3.7 0.6 0.4 Delay (s) 50.3 35.8 27.5 46.4 3.1 Level of Service D D c D A Approach Delay (s) 38.6 27.5 9.2 Approach LOS D c A

Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 202 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost lime (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.9% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group

1\MAWALDUd\11503.00\tech\Traffic\Synchro\October 2011 Analysis\Summit Expansion_PM.syn VHB

c

12.0 D



11503.00 :: Canyon Parcel -Adams Street 13: Adams Stlelaza dw~ & Middlesex Tpke

.,}- - .,. f - "'- ...., Movement EBl EBT EBR WBl WBT WBR NBl Lane Configurations 'I 4+ 4+ 'I Volume (vph) 305 0 95 5 5 15 40 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 lane Width 14 8 16 12 12 12 10 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane UUI. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.93 0.92. 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 0.97 0.99 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1829 1414 1726 1668 Fit Permitted 0.95 0.97 0.99 0.95 Satd. Flow (eerm) 1829 1414 1726 1668 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 332 0 103 7 7 22 43 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 43 0 0 21 0 0 lane Group Flow (vph) 222 170 0 0 15 0 43 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% Turn Type custom Split Prot Protected Phases 4 3 1 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.7 11.7 3.0 3.6 Effective Green, g (s) 11.7 11.7 3.0 3.6 Actuated giC Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.04 0.05 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 267 207 65 75 vis Ratio Prot c0.12 0.12 c0.01 c0.03 vis Ratio Perm vic Ratio 0.83 0.82 0.23 Uniform Delay, d1 33.2 33.1 37.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 18.5 21.5 0.7 Delay (s) 51.7 54.6 38.0 Level of Service 0 0 0 Approach Delay (s) 53.2 38.0 Approach LOS 0 D

lntersecUon Summary HCM Average Control Delay 21.4 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.6% ICU level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c CrtUcallane Group

1\MAWALD\Id\11503.00\tech\Traffic\Synchro\Oclober 2011 Analysis\Summit Expansion_PM.syn VHB

0.57 37.4 0.62

9.4 32.6

c

t t' NBT NBR

tt. 675 0

1900 1900 12 13

4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00

3574 1.00 3574 0.93 0.93 726 0

0 0 726 0 1% 1%

6

44.9 45.9 0.57

5.0 3.0

2051 0.20

0.35 9.1

0.95 0.1 8.8 A

10.1 B

c

16.0 c

\. SBL

'I 15

1900 12

4.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1787 0.95 1787 0.97

15 0

15 1%

Prot 5

3.4 3.4

0.04 4.0 3.0 76

0.01

0.20 37.0 1.00

1.3 38.3

0

! SBT

tt. 1180 1900

13 4.0

0.95 0.96 1.00 3533 1.00 3533 0.97 1216

48 1663

1%

44.7 45.7 0.57

5.0 3.0

2018 c0.47

0.82 13.9 1.00 4.0

17.9 B

18.0 B

..; SBR

480 1900

12

0.97 495

0 0

1%



11503.00 :: Canyon Parcel -Adams Street 14: Middlesex Commons Mall & Middlesex Tpke

.f '- t I'" \.. + Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations

"' tf tt+

"' .tt

Volume (vph) 45 240 475 50 300 980 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 15 15 16 15 12 12 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.88 0.95 0.91 0.91 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1986 3127 3993 1626 3419 FltPennitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (~erm) 1986 3127 3993 1626 3419 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 54 289 495 52 323 1054 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 31 10 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 54 258 537 0 291 1086 Heav~ Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% Turn Type pt+OV Split Protected Phases 82 2 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 6.3 54.8 15.2 43.5 43.5 Effective Green, g (s) 7.3 55.8 16.2 44.5 44.5 Actuated giC Ratio 0.09 0.70 0.20 0.56 0.56 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 181 2181 809 904 1902 vis Ratio Prot c0.03 0.08 c0.13 0.18 c0.32 vis Ratio Perm vic Ratio 0.30 0.12 0.66 0.32 0.57 Uniform Delay, d1 34.0 4.0 29.4 9.6 11.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.34 0.38 Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 0.0 2.1 0.6 0.8 Delay (s) 34.9 4.0 31.4 3.8 5.1 Level of Service c A c A A Approach Delay (s) 8.9 31.4 4.9 Approach LOS A c A


1\MAWALDUd\11503.00\tech\Traffic\Synchro\Oclober 2011 Analysis\Summit Expansion_PM.syn VHB

B

12.0 B



ite trip generation summary - burlington · ite trip generation worksheet (9th edition, updated...

Documents