ionisation energy

17

Upload: tirzah

Post on 24-Feb-2016

36 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Ionisation Energy. Based on the position of calcium & copper in the periodic table, make comparisons with respect to their: Atomic radius ionisation energy Metallic character Order in the Activity Series (more likely to oxidize) Extraction method for each - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ionisation  Energy
Page 2: Ionisation  Energy

Ionisation Energy

Page 3: Ionisation  Energy
Page 4: Ionisation  Energy
Page 5: Ionisation  Energy

Based on the position of calcium & copper in the periodic table, make comparisons with respect to their:– Atomic radius – ionisation energy– Metallic character– Order in the Activity Series (more likely to oxidize)

– Extraction method for each– Possible experiment(s) that will help to compare

their reactivity

Page 6: Ionisation  Energy

Problem #1

• Avoid personification

“…because he has a larger nucleus….”

Page 7: Ionisation  Energy

Problem #2

• Stating the obvious

“…both elements differ in their radius and number of protons….”

Page 8: Ionisation  Energy

Problem #3

• Positions don’t mean anything!

“…because it is above, it is more reactive….”

The apple must be more reactive, it is found above. I am found

below, therefore, I must be less reactive

Page 9: Ionisation  Energy

Problem #4

• Cause and Effect

“…because it is on the ‘left’, it is more reactive”

versus

“…because it is more reactive, it is on the left”

Page 10: Ionisation  Energy

Problem #5

• Extraction with Carbon or CO

Used for metals that are slightly more reactive than copper.

Page 11: Ionisation  Energy

Problem #6

• Froth floatation & electrolysis of Cu

These are not methods of extraction; these points are irrelevant

(floatation is to mechanically separate Cu; electrolysis is to purify it in the very end)

Page 12: Ionisation  Energy

Atomic Radius

• Atomic radii decrease across a period as each subsequent element gains an additional proton, creating a greater attraction to its valence shell.

• Ca, having less protons than copper, has a weaker attraction for its outer electrons.

• This results in Ca having a weaker nuclear attraction and a larger radius than that of Cu

Page 13: Ionisation  Energy

Ionisation Energy

• Ionisation energy is the energy required to remove an electron from an atom

• Since Ca has a larger radius, it requires less energy to remove the valence electron as it is further away from the oppositely charged nucleus

• Cu, having a smaller radius, exerts a greater attraction for is electrons that are closer to the nucleus. This makes it difficult to remove the attracted electron which makes the I.E. greater for Cu

Page 14: Ionisation  Energy

Metallic Character

• Metals in Group 2 will readily lose their valence electrons to achieve noble gas configurations due to its larger atomic radii and lower ionisation energies

• The ease to which is loses electrons makes Ca more metallic in character in comparison to Cu which doesn’t readily lose its electron

Page 15: Ionisation  Energy

Activity Series

• When comparing the reactivity series of metals, Ca, with the lower ionisation energy, will readily lose its electron making it more reactive compared to Cu

• Therefore, Ca will readily oxidize to form an ion compared to Cu

Page 16: Ionisation  Energy
Page 17: Ionisation  Energy

ExperimentsMetal Air water Weak acid

Calcium Burns & turns white Reacts to produce H2 gas and hydroxide

Reacts to produce H2 gas

Copper No change No change No change

React each metal with each other’s metal ion, as follows:

Ca (s) + Cu+2 (aq) Ca+2 (aq) + Cu (s)

Cu (s) + Ca+2 (aq) No REACTION (copper is not reactive enough to displace Calcium ions in solution)