information needs of children whose parent has cancer
DESCRIPTION
To demonstrate Participatory Action Research (PAR) used to explore, collect and analyse data to understand children’s information experience including their perception of cancer and information culture; information needs, information seeking behaviour, barriers and enablers.TRANSCRIPT
Suzanie Adina MAT SAATPart of a PhD thesis 22 September 2014
This PhD thesis at Loughborough University explores the experiences of children whose parent has cancer and their information needs and behaviour to cope with the challenges they faced as dependent children and care-givers.
Information Needs of Children whoseParent has Cancer
A Participatory
Action Research
PARPAR
To demonstrate Participatory Action Research (PAR) used to explore, collect andAIM
analyse data to understand children’sinformation experience including their
perception of cancer and information culture; information needs, information seeking behaviour, barriers and enablers.
The study was conducted based on an extensive literature review and the experiences of ten Malay families; ten breast cancer patients and 22 dependent children.
METHOD
WHAT’S NEWUse of PAR for health and information science research within a Malay culture setting, showcasing its effectiveness in collecting rich qualitative data via participant engagement of cancer patients and their children.
PREMISE
In 2007, it was reported that there were 18,219 new adult cancer cases in Malaysia (Omar and Ibrahim, 2011, p.4-29). About 45,547 children were affected by their parents’ diagnosis.18,219 new adult
cases
45,547 children affected
PREMISE
Cancer diagnosis creates multiple problems for affected families, including major changes in living patterns, roles and relationships (Mat Saat, G. 2012; Somasundaram, 2004; Scott et. al. 2003b).
“If being informed helps people to reduce uncertainties about their health care, why do people seem not to want it and why do they prefer to obtain it from non-institutional or non-professional sources?” (Pettigrew, 1999)
PREMISE
“No study to date has examined the timing, nature, and extent of communication between parents with cancer and their children or studied why parents do or do not talk to their children about such difficult and important issues or inquired about what help parents have received or might have liked.” (Barnes et. al. 2000)
The affects of cancer to children for the Malay ethnic group were not previously documented and the burdenof caregiving and the consequences of a lack of information were greater than anticipated (Mat Saat, A.,2010; Somasundaram, 2004; Scott et. al. 2003b).
THEORTICAL SOLUTION:Knowing information preferences may help in tailoring information and in the amount of information and specific needs (Baker and Pettigrew, 1999).
“People are better able to accept and act on information when presented in a culturally acceptable intervention method” (Hodge, Fredericks and Rodriguez, 1998).
However, “clinicians elicit fewer than half of patients’ concerns and consistently fail to discuss patients’ values, goals of care, and preferences with regard to treatment” (Morrison and Meier, 2004).
PREMISE
THEREFORE: Develop a more participative framework for understanding and facilitating children’s information needs.
Participative Action Research (PAR) is useful to assess, understand and develop solutions that can result in information that is more complete, rich and as accurate as possible in health-related issues (Chevalier and Buckles, 2013; Read, 2012; Cochran et al., 2008; Erick et al., 2008; Viswanathan et al., 2004; Chiu and Wistow, 2002; Waterman et al., 2001; Green et al., 1995 and, Kemmis and McTaggart, 1988).
PREMISE
PAR Methodology Framework Participative Action Research to investigate the Information Needs of Children whose Parent has Cancer
STAGE ONE Preliminary Participant SelectionCriteria:i.Cancer patients who are parentsii.Dependent children of cancer patients aged between 5-18 years old.
Tools: Inquiry to participate form (InqE-v.04 and InqBM-v.02).
Results: 10 families actually participated.
1 STAGE TWO Session OneIntroduce research aims and objectives, research process, ground rules & participatory mechanism.
Tools: i.Scripted introduction to researcherii.‘Participant Information Sheet’iii.‘Participation Consent’ formiv.‘Statement of Confidentiality’ form
Results: 2 contact hours with 32 people.
2 STAGE THREE Session TwoInvestigate experience and information needs; knowledge and experience of “cancer”, information needs, seeking behaviour, preference and problems
Tools: Self report via illustration, written account, narratives and a 15-item questionnaire.
Results: 2 contact hours with 32 people.
3
Participative Action Research (PAR) Overview
(Kemmis and McTaggart, 1988)
RESULTS
405 forms distributed205 respondents
72 families
30 families
22 families
10 families
A parent with children between 5 – 18 years oldHad informed their children about cancer diagnosis
Willing to participateWilling for their children to participate
Willing to attend sessions
Can attend sessions
Actually attended sessions
STAGE ONEPreliminary Participant Selection
10 Female Breast Cancer Patients22 male and female children
STAGE TWOSession One x 2-hours
STAGE THREESession Two x 2-hours
STAGE FOURSession Three x 2-hours
STAGE FIVESession Four x 2-hours
STAGE SIXSession Five x 2-hours
10 families
100 contact hours with 32 people
PAR activities
STAGE FOUR Session Three:Assimilate information needs: Compare and analyse results from Session Two to develop common themes and/or issues and prioritising needs.
Tools:Participative discussions and priority lists
Results: 2 contact hours with 32 people.
4 STAGE FIVESession Four:Identify key information needs:Consensus agreement in key information needs
Tools: Participative discussions, priority lists and consensus vote.
Results: 2 contact hours with 32 people.58 issues raised.
5 STAGE SIX Session Five:Assimilate possible solutions: Compare and analyse results from Session Four to find out participants’ strategies in resolving key information needs.
Tools: Participative discussions, strategy list and consensus vote.
Results: 2 contact hours with 32 people.
6
Participative Action Research (PAR) Overview (Kemmis and McTaggart,
1988)
PAR Methodology Framework Participative Action Research to investigate the Information Needs of Children whose Parent has Cancer
RESULTS
Cancer is dangerous and can be deadly
Requires specialist doctors, complex equipment and special ward
Cancer treatment involves chemotherapy, radiotherapy and immunotherapy
Cancer develops from uncontrolled cell growth or mutation
Requires vigilant care and frequent medical check-up
Rest as a precursor to getting better
Tamoxifin causes early menopause Mastectomy causes pain Cancer damages cells
Cancer can spread and damage other parts of the body (metastases)
Chemotherapy causes nausea, vomiting and hair loss
Effects of frequent vomiting
Surgery; mastectomy or lumpectomy and/or other invasive action to save life
Parent’s bodily aches and pains
Effects of bodily aches and pains
STAGE FIVESession Four: 58 Issues Raised and/or Discussed
RESULTS
STAGE FIVESession Four: 58 Issues Raised and/or Discussed
Effects of hair loss Lifestyle Negative behaviors
Sibling Cancer prevention
Effects of early menopause
Attack Empathy Housework Health awareness
Spiritual state Test from God Increase in love
Distribution of chores
Empathy
Emotional state Negative feelings Positive behaviors
Family cohesiveness
Increase in love
History and genetic predisposition
Negative behaviors
Parent with cancer
Types of food Positive behaviors
Unhealthy habits Empathy Health parent
Preparation of food
Parent with cancer
Polluted environment
Negative feelings Self Exercise Health parent
Self Sibling Housework Distribution of chores
Family cohesiveness
RESULTS
STAGE FIVESession Four: 58 Issues Raised and/or Discussed
Types of food God’s role Wordiness as deterrent Type of information
Preparation of food
Parent as information provider
Language barrier Co-developed solution to identified problems
Exercise Doctor as information provider
Attractiveness of information
Accessibility of solutions
Cancer prevention
Other sources of information
Handyness of information
Format of solutions
Health awareness
Availability and willingness of information provider to share information
Self-reported key information needs
Prayer
Access to the Internet, cancer resources center and cancer information
Perception of cancer and self-report of experience
STAGE EIGHTReport:Report findings.
Findings:95 Codes20 themes, 13 organising themes and 6 global themes.
Results:•Consequences of children’s understanding or lack of understanding•List Of Tasks For Children Caregivers•Participant’s Issues: Identification of roles of information, information seeking behaviour, information needs, preferred source of information•Particiapnt’s Suggested Solutions:•Children’s Reactive Information Seeking Behaviour - An Integrated Model
8
Participative Action Research (PAR) Overview (Kemmis and McTaggart,
1988)
STAGE SEVEN Synthesizing participative contributions: Synthesize data to answer research aims and objectives towards development of thesis and recommendations for information provision
Tools: Coding and Thematic analysis.
7
PAR Methodology Framework Participative Action Research to investigate the Information Needs of Children whose Parent has Cancer
RESULTSSTAGE SEVENCoding and Thematic analysis
STAGE EIGHT•Consequences of children’s understanding or lack of understanding•List Of Tasks For Children Caregivers•Participant’s Issues: Identification of roles of information, information seeking behaviour, information needs, preferred source of information•Participant’s Suggested Solutions•Children’s Reactive Information Seeking Behaviour - An Integrated Model
Access to information Alien thing Alone Anger Assimilation of
informationAttitude to information
Automatic assistance
Bald Being Active Book Cancer in the family Cells Chemotherapy Chores
Cleaning Comic Cooking Damage Death Depressed Disgust
Disheartened Divorce Exercise Experience Faith Fear Food
Fruits Frustrated God’s test Good deeds Hair loss Hate Health knowledge
Hospital stay Illustration Immediacy Information culture
Information problem Ironing Language
Less fat Less preservatives Less salt Love Massaging Menopause Menses
Monitoring health
Negative emotion Non fast food Non fried food Other health
practices Pain Palliative care
Pity Pollution Polygamy Poor school performance Prayer Prior knowledge Reactions
Reality drama Resentment Rest Role of doctor Role of father Role of mother Role of prayer
Role of sibling Role of to self Sadness Second-hand smoke Self-check Separation
anxietySources of
information
Spread Still love parent Stress Suggested solution Surgery Thanks to God Treatment
process
Type of information Uncaring Uncommunicative Uncooperative Vegetables Video Vomiting
What faith can do Willpower Wordiness Worry
STAGE SEVENList of 95 Codes (in alphabetical order)
STAGE SEVENThematic Analysis: Development of global themes
THEMES ORGANISING THEMES GLOBAL THEMES
1. A type of possibly deadly illness, sickness or disease Medical Inference 1. Children made sense of cancer through their experience, observations and beliefs.2. Requires hospitalisation, special medication and long
treatment process
3. Physical side effects of cancer and cancer treatment State of Parent Being Sick*4. Effects of side effects*5. Non physical side effects of cancer and cancer treatment6. Medically proven cause Causes*7. Perceived cause
8. Negative psychological impact Psychological impact to children
2. Lack of information resulted in children not knowing and/or being unprepared for cancer’s impact on their lives.*9. Positive psychological impact
10. Changes to roles of family members Changes to family dynamics 3. Cancer changed familial dynamics.
11. Familial responsibilities Changes to family processes* 12. Problems in the family
13. Changes to diet Lifestyle changes 4. Cancer changed lifestyle.
* 14. Changes to health behaviour Changes to health practices
* 15. Religious fervour Increased religious attention
16. Types of information provider Information sources 5. Children had limited access to information.
17. Problems in accessing information Information problems 6. Children reacted to a health-based situation or stimuli and required topic-based information to make sense of their situation and to guide their adult-expected behaviour.
18. Relevancy and readability of information
19. Types of information needs Prioritised information needs
20. Viability of suggested solutions Suggested solutions
STAGE EIGHTConsequences of children’s understanding or lack of understanding
POSITIVE NEGATIVE
Attitudes to information sharing
Open and accessible information Closed and inaccessible information
Outcomes Positive and indicates understanding of cancer
Negative and indicates lack of understanding of cancer
Consequences: Children's reaction to cancer and cancer treatment
• Increase in love, patience and empathy toward parent.
• Increased understanding of the importance of the cancer care continuum.
• Decrease in love, patience and empathy toward parent.
• Decreased understanding of the importance of the cancer care continuum.
Consequences: Children's reaction to changes in familial dynamics
• Understanding new roles and tasks.
• Increase in patience and willingness towards burden of care.
• Does not understand new roles and tasks.
• Decrease in patience and willingness towards burden of care.
Consequences: Children's reaction to changes in lifestyle
• Increase care, knowledge and adherence to changed diet and lifestyle changes.
• Increased observance of religious practices.
• Resent and feel forced to adhere to changed diet and lifestyle changes.
• No indication of negative change towards religious practices.
FINDINGS
LIST OF PARTICIPANT’S ISSUES RAISED AND/OR DISCUSSED
PARTICIPANTS’ ISSUES
LANGUAGE PREFERANCE
Written: Bahasa Malaysia Verbal: Bahasa Malaysia
CANCER SPECIFIC INFORMATION
Definition of Cancer Definition of Disease Types of CancerIs cancer dangerous? Is cancer contagious? Cancer detection
Treatment process flow List of possible side effects of cancer treatment Cancer preventionWhy does cancer take a long time to recover
from? Why does cheomothearpy cause vomitting? Why does cheomothearpy cause hair loss
How to ask parents about cancer? How to tell children about cancer? How to tell children about diagnosis?
FORMAT
Interaction with ill parent Interaction with healthy parent Interaction with attending doctorInteraction with other children in a similar
situation Interaction with counselors at cancer centers Talks at school
Comic book with problem-solving setting Reference book with many pictorial references Easy-to-read guide book
Dramatised story of a family with cancer Dramatised problem solving situationReality television of coping with cancer
in the familyMagazine article Newspaper article
CHILDREN’S CONCERNS
How to care for a cancer patient List of possible ways to help parent with cancer List of possible changes to familial roles
How to take care of self How to take care of younger siblings How to talk to parents about the parents’ cancer experience?
Assurance of continuation of care and love towards the child
How to talk to parents about what made the parent upset
How to talk to parents about what made the child upset
How children can show their caretowards the ill parent Why are household chores unequal Why girls have to do more caregiving tasks
Why is father less helpful / less supportive? How to approach ill parent when the ill parent looks bad/disgusting/not normal How to not be scolded often
Why is ill parent emotional? How to make ill parent to be less emotional How to calm ill parent when ill parent is angry or upset
FINDINGS
LIST OF PARTICIPANT’S ISSUES RAISED AND/OR DISCUSSED
PARTICIPANTS’ SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
LANGUAGE PREFERANCE
Written: Bahasa Malaysia Verbal: Bahasa Malaysia
TOPICS: CHILDREN’S CONCERNS
Easy to follow guide on how to care for a cancer patient
Easy to follow guide on how children may help parent with cancer
Explain list of possible changes to familial roles
Easy to follow guide on how to take care of self
Easy to follow guide on how to take care of younger siblings
Easy to follow guide on how to talk to parents about the parents’ cancer
experience?
Easy to follow guide on how to get assurance of continuation of care and
love towards the child
Guide for parents’ expectation of children’s’ abilities as a caregiver
Guide for parents to be aware of children’s needs
TOPICS: CANCER SPECIFIC INFORMATION
Explain how is cancer dangerous Explain treatment process flow Explain why side effects happen
Explain why ill parent may get emotional
Explain how children can cope with side effects
INFORMATION MEDIUM
Interaction with ill parent Interaction with healthy parent Interaction with attending doctor
Interaction with other children in a similar situation
Interaction with counselorsat cancer centers
Talks at school
Comic book with problem-solving setting
Pictorial reference book with easy to understand explanations about cancer Easy-to-read guide book
LIST OF TASKS FOR CHILDREN CAREGIVERS
TASKS ELDEST FEMALE CHILD
OTHERFEMALE
CHILDREN
MALE CHILDREN
A. Household chores Preparing food for the family ✓ ✓ Purchasing food for the family ✓ ✓Setting a meal for the family ✓ ✓ Clearing and cleaning up after a meal ✓ ✓ Cleaning the house ✓ ✓ ✓Laundry ✓ ✓ ✓Minor house repairs ✓Moving furniture to make way for wheel chair or providingsupport posts for parent to move inside the house
✓ ✓ ✓
B. Caregiver tasks Accompanying parent to the hospital or clinic ✓ ✓ ✓Accompanying parent for a hospital stay ✓ Accompanying parent to sleep in a more comfortable areain the house
✓
Helping parent to change clothes ✓ Helping parent to move around in the house ✓ ✓ ✓Feeding parent and monitoring nutritional intake ✓ Monitoring consumption of medication ✓ Identifying health issue(s) and providing solution(s) ✓ Relieving bodily aches and pains ✓ ✓ ✓Cleanliness of “sick” room ✓ Management of parent’s nausea ✓ ✓
LIST OF TASKS FOR CHILDREN CAREGIVERS
TASKS ELDEST FEMALE CHILD
OTHERFEMALE
CHILDREN
MALE CHILDREN
Holding up parent and providing containers when parent wastoo ill to vomit in the bathroom
✓ ✓
Supporting parent to go to the toilet ✓ ✓ Changing the bed ✓ Preparing clothes ✓ ✓ Collecting parent’s hair ✓ Cutting parent’s nails ✓ Being with the parent in free time ✓ ✓ Listening to parent’s complaints ✓ ✓ Praying for the parent to get better ✓ ✓ ✓Remembering or taking down notes on doctors’ instruction or advice
✓
Coordinating parental care among siblings ✓ Ensuring parent is presentable to receive visitors ✓ ✓ C. Other tasks Monitoring siblings’ homework ✓ Taking care of ill siblings ✓ Entertain and provide for guests ✓ Management of new familial diet ✓ Management of new lifestyle changes ✓
TOTAL NUMBER OF TASKS 35 17 9
STAGE EIGHTCHILDREN’S REACTIVE
INFORMATION SEEKING BEHAVIOUR
-AN INTEGRATED MODEL
Explains the observed relationship between children participants’ reaction to a health
situation and the subsequent processes
they undergo to resolve their state of
information need.
CONCLUSIONSPAR was useful in obtaining rich data about 10 Malay cancer patients and their 22 dependent children. PAR helped to identify that: • Cancer seemed to affect parenting abilities.
• Participants’ challenging experiences seemed to convey that a lack of culturally relevant and age-appropriate information and the shift in caregiving responsibilities to dependent children necessitated a more assessable, supportive and sensitive information system.
CONCLUSIONS• Children’s understanding of cancer seemed to be influenced
by their experiences and observations, many of which resulted in misconceptions about cancer, its causes, treatment and preventative measures.
• It seemed that children participant’s reaction to a health situation triggered their information behaviour.
• Children seemed to have more dimensions of concern and their cancer experience highlighted the myriad challenges they faced.
CONCLUSIONS• The burden of caregiving and the consequences of a lack of
information were greater than anticipated.
• Children’s experiences identified that a lack of children-centric information about the affect of cancer to them and, parental expectations in the face of illness necessitated a more assessable, attractive and sensitive information system.
• A synthesis of the data contributed to the development of a “Children’s Reactive Information Seeking Behaviour – An Integrated Model” was developed to explain the observed relationship between children participants’ reaction to a health situation and the subsequent processes they undergo to resolve their state of information need.
Barnes et. al. 2000Barnes, J., Kroll, L., Burke, O., Lee, J., Jones, A. and Stein, A. (2000) Qualitative Interview between parents and children about maternal breast cancer. BMJ. [Internet] 2000;321;479-482 Available from: <http//www.bmj.com > [Accessed 2 September 2005].
Baker and Pettigrew, 1999Baker, L. M. and Pettigrew, K. E. (1999) Theories for practitioners: Two frameworks for studying consumer health information-seeking behaviour. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. [Internet] October; 87(4), pp. 444-450. Available from: < http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/piorender.fegu?arbid=226619&action-stream&blobtype=pdf.> [Accessed 12 December 2004].
Chevalier and Buckles, 2013Chevalier, J. M. and Buckles, D. J. (2013) Participatory Action Research: Theory and Methods for Engaged Inquiry. New York: NY: Routledge.
Chiu and Wistow, 2002Chiu, L.F. and Wistow, G. (2002) Improving Access to Cancer Information for Doncaster Residents. [Internet]. Doncaster, Nuffield Institute for Health. Available from:< http://www.nuffield.leeds.ac.uk/downloads/cancer_info.pdf > [Accessed 1 December 2004].
Cochran et al., 2008Cochran PA, Marshall CA, Garcia-Downing C, Kendall E, Cook D, McCubbin L (2008) Indigenous ways of knowing: implications for participatory research and community. Am J Public Health 2008; 98(1): 22–7.
Erick et al., 2008Erick W, Mooney-Somers J, Akee A, Maher L. Resilience to blood borne and sexually transmitted infections: the development of a participatory action research project with young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Townsville. Aboriginal and Islander Health Worker Journal 2008; 32(6): 5–8.
Green et al., 1995 Green, L.W., George, M.A., Daniel, M., Frankish, C.J., Herbert, C.P., Bowie, W.R. and O’Neill, M. (1995) Study of Participatory Research in Health Promotion: Review and Recommendations for the Development of Participatory Research in Health Promotion. Ottowa: Royal Society of Canada. In Hughes, I. (2008). Action research in healthcare. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook for Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice (pp. 381-393). London: Sage
REFERENCES
Hodge, Fredericks and Rodriguez, 1998Hodge, F. S., Fredericks, L. & Rodriguez, B. (1998) American Indian women’s talking circle: A cervical cancer screening and prevention project. Cancer. [Internet] 78(S7), pp. 1592-1597. Available from: < www3.interscience.wiley.com> [Accessed 7 May 2005].
Kemmis and McTaggart, 1988emmis, S. and McTaggart, R. (Eds) (1988) The action research planner (3 rd ed.) Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
Morrison and Meier, 2004Morrison, R. S. and Meier, D. E. (2004) Palliative Care. The New England Journal of Medicine. [Internet] The New England Journal of Medicine 2004, 350(25), pp. 2582-2590. Available from: <http:// http://content.nejm.org/> [Accessed 7 November 2004].
Omar and Ibrahim, 2011, p.4-29Omar, Z. A. and Ibrahim, N. S (2011) National Cancer Registry Report 2007, Ministry of Health Malaysia 2011. Available from :< http://www.makna.org.my/PDF/MalaysiaCancerStatistics2007.pdf> > [Accessed 20 July 2013]
Mat Saat, A. 2010Mat Saat, A. (2010). Interview with the author on 5 June 2010. [Discussion about cancer experience among Malay patients].
Mat Saat, G. 2012Mat Saat, G (2012). Interview with the author on 14 September 2012. [Discussion about psychological impact of cancer to adult patients and their dependent children.]
Read, 2012Read, Clancy and Curtin University (2012). Applying a participatory action research model to assess and address community health concerns among tribal communities in Gujarat, Western India: the potential and challenges of participatory approaches. [Doctoral Thesis] [Internet] Centre for International Health. Available from: <http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/175518870?selectedversion=NBD50509503. [Accessed 30 June 2013]
Somasundaram, 2004Somasundaram, S. (2004) Welcome Remarks. [Launch]. Launch of ‘A Parent’s Guide to Children with Cancer’. Kuala Lumpur
REFERENCES
Scott et. al. 2003bScott, J. T., Prictor, M. J., Harmsen, M., Broom, A., Entwistle, Vv, Sowden, A. and Watt I. (2003b) Interventions for improving communication with children and adolescents about a family member's cancer. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD004511. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004511.
Viswanathan et al., 2004Viswanathan, M., Ammerman, A., Eng, E., Gartlehner, G., Lohr, K.N., Griffith, D., et al. (2004a) Community based Participatory Research: Assessing the Evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 99 (No. AHRQ Publication 04-E022-2). Rockville, MD: Agency for HealthcareResearch and Quality. In Hughes, I. (2008). Action research in healthcare. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook for Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice (pp. 381-393). London: Sage.
Waterman et al., 2001Waterman, H., Tillen, D., Dickson, R. and de Koning, K. (2001) ‘Action research: a systematic review and guidance for assessment’, Health Technology Assessment, 5 (23): 1–166. In Hughes, I. (2008). Action research in healthcare. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook for Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice (pp. 381-393). London: Sage.
REFERENCES
MAT SAAT, S. A. (2014) A Participatory Action Research: Information Needs of Children whose Parent has Cancer [Doctoral Thesis] Loughborough University
This PhD thesis at Loughborough University explores the experiences of children whose parent has cancer and their information needs and behaviour to cope with the challenges they faced as dependent children and care-givers.
THANK YOU
Information Needs of Children whose Parent has Cancer