inference for the mean vector - home | applied …zhu/ams577/notes2.pdf · · 2016-09-20inference...
TRANSCRIPT
Univariate Inference
Let x1, x2, … , xn denote a sample of n from the normal distribution with mean m and variance s2.
Suppose we want to test
H0: m = m0 vs
HA: m ≠ m0
The appropriate test is the t test:
The test statistic:
Reject H0 if |t| > ta/2
0xt n
s
m
2
The multivariate Test
Let denote a sample of n from the p-variate
normal distribution with mean vector and covariance
matrix S.
Suppose we want to test
1 2, , , nx x xm
0 0
0
: vs
:A
H
H
m m
m m
3
Roy’s Union- Intersection Principle
This is a general procedure for developing a
multivariate test from the corresponding univariate test.
1
i.e. observation vector
p
X
X
X
1. Convert the multivariate problem to a univariate problem by
considering an arbitrary linear combination of the
observation vector.
1 1 p pU a X a X a X
arbitrary linear combination of the observations
4
2. Perform the test for the arbitrary linear combination of the
observation vector.
3. Repeat this for all possible choices of
1
p
a
a
a
4. Reject the multivariate hypothesis if H0 is rejected for any
one of the choices for
5. Accept the multivariate hypothesis if H0 is accepted for all
of the choices for
6. Set the type I error rate for the individual tests so that the
type I error rate for the multivariate test is a.
.a
.a
5
Let denote a sample of n from the p-variate
normal distribution with mean vector and covariance
matrix S.
Suppose we want to test
1 2, , , nx x xm
0 0
0
: vs
:A
H
H
m m
m m
Application of Roy’s principle to the following situation
1 1Let i i i p piu a x a x a x
Then u1, …. un is a sample of n from the normal
distribution with mean and variance . a m a aΣ6
to test
0 0
0
: vs
:
a
a
A
H a a
H a a
m m
m m
we would use the test statistic:
0a
u
u at n
s
m
1 1
1 1Now
n n
i i
i i
u u a xn n
1 1
1 1n n
i i
i i
a x a x a xn n
7
and
222
1 1
1 1
1 1
n n
u i i
i i
s u u a x a xn n
2
1
1
1
n
i
i
a x xn
1
1
1
n
i i
i
a x x x x an
8
= 𝑎 ′1
𝑛 − 1 𝑥 𝑖 − 𝑥 𝑥 𝑖 − 𝑥
′𝑛
𝑖=1𝑎 = 𝑎 ′𝑆𝑎
Thus
00
a a x a nt n a x
a aa a
mm
SS
We will reject 0 0:aH a am m
if 0 / 2
a nt a x t
a a am
S
2
2 0 2
/ 2or a
n a xt t
a a a
m
S
9
We will reject
0 0 0: in favour of :AH Hm m m m
Using Roy’s Union- Intersection principle:
2
2 0 2
/ 2if for at least one a
n a xt t a
a a a
m
S
We accept 0 0:H m m
2
2 0 2
/ 2if for all a
n a xt t a
a a a
m
S
10
We reject
0 0:H m m
i.e.
2
0 2
/ 2if max
a
n a xt
a a a
m
S
We accept 0 0:H m m
2
0 2
/ 2if max
a
n a xt
a a a
m
S
11
Consider the problem of finding:
2
0
max maxa a
n a xh a
a a
m
Swhere
2
0 0 0n a x a x x a
h a na a a a
m m m S S
0 0 0 0
2
2 2
0
a a x x a a x x a ah a
na a a
m m m m
S S
S
0 0or a a x a x am m
S S
12
thus
2
0
maxopt
aopt opt
n a xh a
a a
m
S
1 1
0 0
0
or opt
a aa x k x a
a xm m
m
SS S
2
1
0 0
2 1 1
0 0
n k x x
k x x
m m
m m
S
S SS
1
0 0n x xm m S
13
We reject 0 0:H m m
Thus Roy’s Union- Intersection principle states:
1 2
0 0 / 2if n x x t
am m
S
We accept 0 0:H m m
1 2
0 0 / 2if n x x t
am m
S
2 1
0 0The statistic T n x xm m S
is called Hotelling’s T2 statistic 14
We reject 0 0:H m m
Choosing the critical value for Hotelling’s T2 statistic
2 1 2
0 0 / 2if T n x x t
am m
S
2
/ 2To determine t
a , we need to find the sampling
distribution of T2 when H0 is true.
It turns out that if H0 is true than
2 1
0 0 1 1
n p nn pF T x x
p n p nm m
S
has an F distribution with n1 = p and n2 = n - p 15
We reject 0 0:H m m
Thus
Hotelling’s T2 test
2 1 2
0 0
1, a
p nT n x x F p n p T
n pam m
S
2 ,
1
n pF T F p n p
p na
or if
16
f x
Another derivation of Hotelling’s T2 statistic
Another method of developing statistical tests is
the Likelihood ratio method.
Suppose that the data vector, , has joint density x
Suppose that the parameter vector, , belongs to
the set W. Let w denote a subset of W.
Finally we want to test 0 : vs
:A
H
H
w
w
17
ˆ̂
max max
ˆmaxmax
Lf x L
Lf x L
w wa
WW
The Likelihood ratio test rejects H0 if
ˆwhere the MLE of
0
ˆ̂and the MLE of when is true.H
18
The situation
Let denote a sample of n from the p-variate
normal distribution with mean vector and covariance
matrix S.
Suppose we want to test
1 2, , , nx x xm
0 0
0
: vs
:A
H
H
m m
m m
19
The Likelihood function is:
1
1
1
2
/ 2 / 2
1, e
2
n
i i
i
x x
np nL
m m
m
S S
S
and the Log-likelihood function is:
, ln , l Lm mS S
1
1
1ln 2 ln
2 2 2
n
i i
i
np nx x m m
S S
20
and m S
the Maximum Likelihood estimators of
are
1
1ˆ n
i
i
x xn
m
and
1
1 1ˆ n
i i
i
nx x x x S
n n
S
21
and m Sthe Maximum Likelihood estimators of
when H 0 is true are:
0
ˆ̂ˆ m m
and
0 0
1
1ˆ̂
n
i i
i
x xn
m m
S
22
The Likelihood function is:
1
1
1
2
/ 2 / 2
1, e
2
n
i i
i
x x
np nL
m m
m
S S
S
now
1
1
1
n
ni in
i
tr x x S x x
1
1
1
n
ni in
i
tr S x x x x
23
1
1
1
n
ni in
i
tr S x x x x
1 11 = 1 = n n
n ntr n I n p np
Thus
2/ 2/ 2
1
1ˆ ˆ, 2
np
nnpnn
L eS
m
S
similarly
2/ 2
/ 2
1ˆ ˆˆ ˆ, ˆ̂
2
np
nnp
L em
S
S
24
and
/ 2 / 21 1
/ 2 / 2
0 0
1
ˆ ˆˆ ˆ,
ˆ ˆ ˆ, 1ˆ
n nn nn n
n nn
i i
i
LS S
Lx x
n
m
m
m m
S
S S
/ 2
/ 2
0 0
1
1
n
nn
i i
i
n S
x xm m
25
Note:
11 12
21 22
A A u wA
A A w V
Let
1
11 22 21 11 12
1
22 11 12 22 21
A A A A AA
A A A A A
1
1u V ww
u
V u w V w
11Thus u V ww V u w V w
u
26
and
1
1
1
V www V wu
V u
/ 2
/ 2
0 0
1
1
n
nn
i i
i
n S
x x
m m
Now
and
2/
0 0
1
1 n
n
i i
i
n S
x x
m m
27
Also
0 0 0 0
1 1
= n n
i i i i
i i
x x x x x x x xm m m m
0
1 1
=n n
i i i
i i
x x x x x x xm
0 0 0
1
n
i
i
x x x n x xm m m
0 0
1
=n
i i
i
x x x x n x xm m
0 0
1
=n
i i
i
x x x x n x xm m
0 0= 1n S n x xm m
28
Then 1
0 02/ 1 1
nn x S x
n
m m
Thus to reject H0 if < a 2/i.e. n n
a
2/or n n
a
1
0 0and 1
1
nn x S x
na
m m
1
0 0or 1 -1 nn x S x n am m
This is the same as Hotelling’s T2 test if
2/1
1 -1 , np n
n T F p n pn p
a a a
31
Example
For n = 10 students we measure scores on
– Math proficiency test (x1),
– Science proficiency test (x2),
– English proficiency test (x3) and
– French proficiency test (x4)
The average score for each of the tests in previous
years was 60. Has this changed?
32
The data
Student Math Science Eng French
1 81 89 73 74
2 73 79 73 74
3 61 86 81 81
4 55 70 76 73
5 61 71 61 66
6 52 70 56 58
7 56 74 56 56
8 65 87 73 69
9 54 76 69 72
10 48 71 62 63
33
Summary Statistics
60.6
77.3
68.0
68.6
x
S
102.044 56.689 41.222 39.489
56.689 56.456 42.000 35.356
41.222 42.000 75.778 65.111
39.489 35.356 65.111 61.378
0.0245 -0.0255 0.0195 -0.0218
-0.0255 0.0567 -0.0405 0.0267
0.0195 -0.0405 0.1782 -0.1783
-0.0218 0.0267 -0.1783 0.2040
1
: S
Note
2 1
0 0 151.135T n x S xm m
0.05 0.05 0.05
1 4 9 4 9, 4,6 = 4.53 27.18
6 6
p nT F p n p F
n p
0
m
60
60
60
60
34
Simultaneous Inference for means
Recall
2 1T n x S xm m
2
2
1max max
a a
n a x at a
a S a
m
(Using Roy’s Union Intersection Principle)
35
Now
2 1P T T P n x S x Ta am m
2
1max
a
n a x aP T
a S aa
m
2
1 for all
n a x aP T a
a S aa
m
1
2
for all a S a
P a x a T an
am
1 a 36
Thus
1 1
for all a S a a S a
P a x T a a x T an n
a am
1 a
and the set of intervals
1 1
to a S a a S a
a x T a x Tn n
a a
Form a set of (1 – a)100 % simultaneous
confidence intervals for a m37
Recall
,-1
= p n pn p
T Fn p
a a
1,
-1 p n p
n pa S aa x F
n n pa
Thus the set of (1 – a)100 % simultaneous
confidence intervals for a m
1,
-1to p n p
n pa S aa x F
n n pa
38
Univariate Inference
Let x1, x2, … , xn denote a sample of n from the
normal distribution with mean mx and variance s2.
Let y1, y2, … , ym denote a sample of n from the
normal distribution with mean my and variance s2.
Suppose we want to test
H0: mx = my vs
HA: mx ≠ my
40
The appropriate test is the t test:
The test statistic:
Reject H0 if |t| > ta/2 d.f. = n + m -2
1 1pooled
x yt
sn m
2 21 1
2
x y
pooled
n s m ss
n m
41
The multivariate Test
Let denote a sample of n from the p-variate
normal distribution with mean vector and covariance
matrix S.
1 2, , , nx x x
xm
0 : vs
:
x y
A x y
H
H
m m
m m
Suppose we want to test
Let denote a sample of m from the p-variate
normal distribution with mean vector and covariance
matrix S.
1 2, , , my y yym
42
Hotelling’s T2 statistic for the two sample problem
2 11
1 1pooledT x y x y
n m
S
if H0 is true than
21
2
n m pF T
p n m
has an F distribution with n1 = p and
n2 = n +m – p - 1
1 1
2 2pooled x y
n m
n m n m
S S S
43
We reject 0 : x yH m m
Thus
Hotelling’s T2 test
21
if , 12
n m pF T F p n m p
p n ma
2 11with
1 1pooledT x y x y
n m
S
1 1
2 2pooled x y
n m
n m n m
S S S
44
Simultaneous inference for the
two-sample problem
• Hotelling’s T2 statistic can be shown to have
been derived by Roy’s Union-Intersection
principle
2 11namely
1 1pooledT x y x y
n m
S
2
2max max1 1a a
pooled
a x yt a
a an m
S
where x y m m 45
Thus
21
1 , 12
n m pP F T F p n m p
p n maa
2
2, 1
1
p n mP T F p n m p
n m pa
2P T Ta
2where , 1
1
p n mT F p n m p
n m pa a
46
Thus
2 1 1
for all 1pooledP a x y T a a an m
a a S
Hence
1 1
pooled x yP a x y T a a an m
a m m
S
1 1
for all 1pooleda x y T a a an m
a a
S
48
Example Annual financial data are collected for firms approximately 2 years prior to bankruptcy and for financially sound firms at about the same point in time. The data on the four variables
• x1 = CF/TD = (cash flow)/(total debt),
• x2 = NI/TA = (net income)/(Total assets),
• x3 = CA/CL = (current assets)/(current liabilties, and
• x4 = CA/NS = (current assets)/(net sales) are given in the following table.
50
The data are given in the following table:
Bankrupt Firms Nonbankrupt Firms
x1 x2 x3 x4 x1 x2 x3 x4
Firm CF/TD NI/TA CA/CL CA/NS Firm CF/TD NI/TA CA/CL CA/NS
1 -0.4485 -0.4106 1.0865 0.4526 1 0.5135 0.1001 2.4871 0.5368 2 -0.5633 -0.3114 1.5314 0.1642 2 0.0769 0.0195 2.0069 0.5304 3 0.0643 0.0156 1.0077 0.3978 3 0.3776 0.1075 3.2651 0.3548 4 -0.0721 -0.0930 1.4544 0.2589 4 0.1933 0.0473 2.2506 0.3309
5 -0.1002 -0.0917 1.5644 0.6683 5 0.3248 0.0718 4.2401 0.6279 6 -0.1421 -0.0651 0.7066 0.2794 6 0.3132 0.0511 4.4500 0.6852 7 0.0351 0.0147 1.5046 0.7080 7 0.1184 0.0499 2.5210 0.6925 8 -0.6530 -0.0566 1.3737 0.4032 8 -0.0173 0.0233 2.0538 0.3484 9 0.0724 -0.0076 1.3723 0.3361 9 0.2169 0.0779 2.3489 0.3970 10 -0.1353 -0.1433 1.4196 0.4347 10 0.1703 0.0695 1.7973 0.5174 11 -0.2298 -0.2961 0.3310 0.1824 11 0.1460 0.0518 2.1692 0.5500 12 0.0713 0.0205 1.3124 0.2497 12 -0.0985 -0.0123 2.5029 0.5778 13 0.0109 0.0011 2.1495 0.6969 13 0.1398 -0.0312 0.4611 0.2643 14 -0.2777 -0.2316 1.1918 0.6601 14 0.1379 0.0728 2.6123 0.5151 15 0.1454 0.0500 1.8762 0.2723 15 0.1486 0.0564 2.2347 0.5563 16 0.3703 0.1098 1.9914 0.3828 16 0.1633 0.0486 2.3080 0.1978
17 -0.0757 -0.0821 1.5077 0.4215 17 0.2907 0.0597 1.8381 0.3786 18 0.0451 0.0263 1.6756 0.9494 18 0.5383 0.1064 2.3293 0.4835 19 0.0115 -0.0032 1.2602 0.6038 19 -0.3330 -0.0854 3.0124 0.4730 20 0.1227 0.1055 1.1434 0.1655 20 0.4875 0.0910 1.2444 0.1847 21 -0.2843 -0.2703 1.2722 0.5128 21 0.5603 0.1112 4.2918 0.4443 22 0.2029 0.0792 1.9936 0.3018 23 0.4746 0.1380 2.9166 0.4487 24 0.1661 0.0351 2.4527 0.1370 25 0.5808 0.0371 5.0594 0.1268
51
Hotelling’s T2 statistic for the two sample problem
2 11
1 1pooledT x y x y
n m
S
1 1where
2 2pooled x y
n m
n m n m
S S S
53
2
2 2max max1 1a a
pooled
a x yT t a
a an m
S
: 1 1
pooled
a x a yt a
a an m
Note
S
is the test statistic for testing:
0 : vs :x y A x yH a a a H a a am m m m
54
Hotelling’s T2 statistic for the two sample problem
2 1 21 1, ,pooled M pooledT x y x y d x y
n m
S S
2 11
1 1pooledT x y x y
n m
S
1
pooled
nmx y x y
n m
S
2 , ,M pooled
n md x y
nm
S
62
Popn A
Popn B
X1
X2
Case I
Popn A
Popn B
X1
X2
Case II
In Case I the Mahalanobis distance between the mean
vectors is larger than in Case II, even though the
Euclidean distance is smaller. In Case I there is more
separation between the two bivariate normal
distributions
65
Related websites
• SAS & R-code:
• http://www.public.iastate.edu/~maitra/stat501/RSAS.html
• https://onlinecourses.science.psu.edu/stat505/node/124
• Wikipedia:
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hotelling%27s_T-
squared_distribution
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Hotelling
• Multivariate Observations, by G. A. F. Seber
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9780470316641
• Applied Multivariate Statistics with SAS® Software, 2nd
Edition, By Ravindra Khattree and Dayanand N. Naik
66