implications of new technologies for democratic change in iran
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
1/36
Implications of New Technologies forDemocratic Change
in Iran
Cyrus Farivarhttp://[email protected]
Global Voices 2010May 7, 2010
http://www.ickr.com/photos/yahyanatanzi/3837114239/
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
2/36
0. Who am I?
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
3/36
I. A Twitter Revolution?
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
4/36
I. A Twitter Revolution?
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
5/36
Not so much: Web Ecology Project (June 26, 2009)
Source: http://ww w.webecologyproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/WEP-twitterFINAL.pdf
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
6/36
Irans Internet Statistics
2000: One million Internet users2008: 23 million Internet users
Growth rate: 48 percentInternet penetration rate: 35 percent
Average Middle East Internet penetration rate: 26 percentSource: OpenNet Initiative (http://opennet.net/research/proles/iran)
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
7/36
Dear subscriber,access to this site is
not possible. In casethis site has been
mistakenly lteredplease email
[email protected] with thedomain name and
necessaryexplanation.
Internet Filtering in Iran
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
8/36
God is with us / Are you ltering him too? (2009)
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
9/36
II. How we got here
Islamic Revolution:1978-1979
Islamic Republic Declared: April 1, 1979
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
10/36
II. How we got here
Iran-Iraq War: 1980-1988
~ 500,000 dead
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
11/36
March 1989: World Wide Web Invented
Tim Berners-Lee (UK), a
visiting scientist at CERN(Switzerland) invents
World Wide Web.
1990:2 mil Internet users
(~85% are American)
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
12/36
June 1989:Khomeini dies, Khamenei now Supreme Leader
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
13/36
1992: Iran gets online
1988: Dr. Siavash Shahshahani uses Internet inItaly for rst time
1992: Mohammad-Javad Larijani (Director of Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics andMathematics, Tehran), authorizes rst connectionto Internet.
1992: Iran connects to Internet (via Austria)
1995: 30,000 Iranians online
2010: M-J Larijani is a Khamenei adviser, headof human rights council in Judiciary Dept.Brother Ali Larijani was chief Iranian nuclearnegotiator and is currently speaker of Iranian
parliament. Other brother Sadeq Larijani is thenew head of Iranian Judiciary.
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
14/36
1992: Iran gets online
According to the Internet Society, in the rst half of this yearIran had the world's second highest increase in numbers of reachable computers hooked up to the Internet.
But will the mullahs -- once they gure out the full extent of what's going on -- allow it?
-- Carroll Bogert, Chat Rooms and Chadors: Iran: Will theInternet open a closed society? , Newsweek , August 21, 1995
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
15/36
May 23, 1997: Mohammed Khatami Elected
No, no, I don't like to hear slogans likethat, [President Khatami] exclaimed. Idon't like to hear 'Death to opponents' or death to anybody, because as matters standin our society at present, it will beinterpreted in a very negative way, asmeaning that anybody who does not shareyour views should be silenced, and that'snot right at all. The Iran we want should beone where there will be room for all thedifferent viewpoints, for all ideologies, eventhose that oppose the President. They, too,must have the right to express themselves.
John F. Burns, As Iran's Reformer Speaks, Anti-ReformersSit and Scowl, The New York Times, September 30, 1999
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
16/36
Montazeri.com vs. Montazery.com: Ayatollahs wage war on InternetFriday 15 December 2000 - Agence France Presse
PARIS, Dec 15 (AFP) - Dissident cleric Hossein Ali Montazeri, once in lineto be Iran's supreme leader, this week dropped a political bombshell by
publishing his memoirs on the Internet and provoking a cyber war with theleadership in Tehran.
Montazeri, 79, who had been chosen to succeed Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini,founder of the Islamic republic, has been living under house arrest in Qom,south of Tehran, ever since he was forced to resign weeks before Khomeini'sdeath in 1989.
. . .
But he struck a hard blow on Monday when he published a 600-page memoir onan Internet site based in Britain, which his sons veried as his work. The document,
published in Persian and available at www.montazeri.com, provides importanttestimony to some of the most dramatic moments of the revolution and the war withIraq.
Authorities in Tehran have so far not publicly reacted to Montazeri's memoirs but on
Thursday a counter-site -- www.montazery.com -- appeared on the internet anddescribed itself as representing the office of Khamenei.
December 2000: Montazeri.com vs. Montazery.com
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
17/36
September/October 2001: First Persian Blogs
http://www.globalpersian.com/archive/010901.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20080730053406/http://i.hoder.com/archives/2001/10/011007_005490.shtml
Salman JaririSeptember 7, 2001
Hossein Hoder Derakhshan
October 7, 2001
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
18/36
May 2001: Four hundred Tehran cybercafsshut down
June 2001: Iran TelecommunicationsCompany bans children under 18 from
accessing Internet
November 2001: Supreme Council for Cultural Revolution declares all ISPs should
be state-controlled
September 2002: Then-Judiciary Chief Ayatollah Seyed Mahmoud HashemiShahroudi (pictured) calls for the creation of a special committee for legal investigationon Internet-related crimes and offenses.
December 2002: Committee Responsible for Determining Unauthorized Sites established
2001 - 2002: Crackdown, Part I
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
19/36
April 20, 2003: Sina Motalebi arrested
http://web.archive.org/web/20040422231903/www.rooznegar.com/archives/2003_04.php
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
20/36
http://www.iranhrdc.org/httpdocs/English/pdfs/Reports/Forced%20Confessions%20-%20Targeting%20Iran%27s%20Cyber-Journalists.pdf
2004: Crackdown, Part II
September - October 2004: Many bloggers, online journalists arrested
Including: Omid Memarian(pictured, center)
Source: Iran Human RightsDocumentation Center September 2009
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
21/36
November 2005: We Are Iran released
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
22/36
August 8, 2006: Pres. Ahmadinejad begins blog
http://web.archive.org/web/20070509211753/http://www.ahmadinejad.ir/en/autobiography/
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
23/36
April 2008: John Kelly & Bruce Etling study released
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/publications/2008/Mapping_Irans_Online_Public
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
24/36
March 18, 2009: Omid Reza Mirsaya dies in prison
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
25/36
III. Potential for Democratic Change?
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
26/36
III. Potential for Democratic Change?
http://gerdab.ir/fa/pages/?cid=422June 21, 2009
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
27/36
III. Potential for Democratic Change?
http://gerdab.ir/fa/pages/?cid=504September 7, 2009
Iranian Revolutionary Guards ready to ght cyber and Internet war
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
28/36
III. Potential for Democratic Change?
http://gerdab.ir/fa/pages/?cid=517October 1, 2009
An Internet battle report in the defeated velvet coup
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
29/36
III. Potential for Democratic Change?
December 3, 2009
In recent months, Iran has been conducting a campaign of harassing and intimidatingmembers of its diaspora world-wide -- not just prominent dissidents -- who criticize theregime, according to former Iranian lawmakers and former members of Iran's elite securityforce, the Revolutionary Guard, with knowledge of the program.
Part of the effort involves tracking the Facebook, Twitter and YouTube activity of Iraniansaround the world, and identifying them at opposition protests abroad, these people say.
Interviews with roughly 90 ordinary Iranians abroad -- college students, housewives, doctors,lawyers, businesspeople -- in New York, London, Dubai, Sweden, Los Angeles and otherplaces indicate that people who criticize Iran's regime online or in public demonstrations arefacing threats intended to silence them.
Source: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125978649644673331.html
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
30/36
III. Potential for Democratic Change?
On their own, new technologies do not takesides in the struggle for freedom and progress,but the United States does. We stand for a singleinternet where all of humanity has equal access
to knowledge and ideas. And we recognize thatthe worlds information infrastructure willbecome what we and others make of it.
-- Secretary of State Hilary ClintonWashington, D.C., January 21, 2010
Source: http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2010/01/135519.htm
http://www.state.gov/statecraft/
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
31/36
III. Potential for Democratic Change?
February 2, 2010
Do you have a representative or a spokesperson outside the country?
In the green movement, every citizen is a media outlet. But the green path does not have arepresentative or spokesperson outside the country. This is one of its beauties. Everyone can talkabout their ideas and the movement expands within a collaborative environment. As one of themembers of the movement, I, too, will express my comments and suggestions in this environment.
Source: http://www.kaleme.org/1388/11/13/klm-10327
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
32/36
III. Potential for Democratic Change?
http://gerdab.ir/fa/pages/?cid=607February 2, 2010
Computer Crimes ActArticle 1: Any unauthorized access of data, information or the Internet & Telecommunicationssystems which are under security measures will be sentenced to ninety days to one yearin prison, or nes of ve to twenty million rials ($500 - $2,000), or both.
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
33/36
III. Potential for Democratic Change?
Source:http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-02-04/iran-says-cut-disrupts-internet-opposition-blames-government.html
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
34/36
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
35/36
III. Potential for Democratic Change?
1995: Nicholas Negroponte (Professor, MIT):
The Internet can:atten organizations, globalize society,
decentralize control and harmonize people.The nation-state may go away.
~1858: Henry Field (pastor, author, brother of Cyrus Field)
The Telegraph: unites distant nations, making them feelthat they are members of one great family
By such strong ties does it tend to bind the human race inunity, peace and concord.
-
8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran
36/36
What we have seen, time and time again, isthat physical coercion by government thehallmark of a traditional legal system remains far more important than anyoneexpected. This may sound crude and ugly and even depressing. Yet at a fundamental level, itsthe most important thing missing from most
predictions of where globalization will lead,and the most significant gap in predictionsabout the future shape of the Internet.
III. Potential for Democratic Change?
Tim Wu and Jack Goldsmith, Who Controls the Internet? (Oxford University Press, 2006), 180