ifrs update event 2016 - deloitte us | audit, consulting ... update event 2016 deloitte academy 28...

72
IFRS Update Event 2016 Deloitte Academy 28 November 2016

Upload: phungdang

Post on 21-May-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

IFRS Update Event 2016Deloitte Academy28 November 2016

IFRS Update Event 2016

Deloitte Academy28 November 2016

Programme

Part I 15.00 – 16.30

Break 16.30 – 17.00

Part II 17.00 – 18.30

Drinks & Snacks 18.30

IFRS Update Event 2016

Deloitte Academy28 November 2016

Agenda

Introduction

Top 5 on IFRS developments

Top 5 on IFRS 16 ‘Leases’

Top 5 on IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’

9 characteristics of good corporate reporting

IFRS Update Event 2016

Deloitte Academy28 November 2016

Ralph ter Hoeven

Partner | IFRS Centre Deloitte Nederland

Dingeman Manschot

Director | IFRS Centre Deloitte Nederland

IFRS Update Event 201628 November 2016

Introduction

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Implementation of IFRS 9, IFRS 15 & IFRS 16

Are you ready?

IFRS Update Event 201628 November 2016

Top 5 on IFRS developments

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Overview

1. IASB work plan

2. Changes to IFRS effective 1 January 2016

3. Notional cash pooling

4. Risk paragraph management board’s report

5. ESMA enforcement priorities

Top 5 on IFRS developments

7

Top 5 on IFRS developmentsNumber 1

IASB work plan

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Key features

• Completion of the remaining standard-setting projects

• Better communication in financial reporting

• Continued development of implementation support

• A more focused research programme

IASB work plan 2017-2021

9

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Standard-setting and related projects

IASB work plan

10

Conceptual FrameworkIssue Conceptual Framework

(after 6 months)

Disclosure initiative:

Materiality practice statement

Publish practice statement

(after 6 months)

Insurance contracts

Issue IFRS standard (June 2017)

Published amendments to IFRS 4

(Applying IFRS 9 Financial Instruments with

IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts)

Rate-regulated activitiesPublish discussion paper

(after 6 months)

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Research projects

IASB work plan

11

Disclosure initiative:

Principles of disclosure

Publish discussion paper

(within 6 months)

Business combinations

under

common control

Publish discussion paper

(after 6 months)

Financial instruments

with

characteristics of equity

Publish discussion paper

(after 6 months)

Dynamic risk managementPublish discussion paper

(after 6 months)

Goodwill and impairmentDecide project direction

(after 6 months)

Top 5 on IFRS developmentsNumber 2

Changes to IFRS effective

1 January 2016

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Effective 1 January 2016

Disclosure initiative (Amendments to IAS 1)

13

Materiality

• Not obscure useful information by aggregating or disaggregating information

• Materiality considerations apply to the primary statements, notes, and specific disclosure requirements

Disaggregation and subtotals

• Specific line items can be disaggregated and aggregated as relevant

• Additional guidance on the presentation of subtotals

Notes structure • Flexibility when designing the structure of the notes

Other • Presentation of OCI items

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Effective 1 January 2016

• Applying the consolidation exemption by intermediate holding & equity method exemption

• Interest in investment entity associate/joint venture

• Equity method in separate financial statements

• Accounting for acquisitions of interests in joint operations

• Clarification of acceptable methods of depreciation and amortisation

• Agriculture: Bearer plants

• Annual improvements 2012-2014 cycle

− IFRS 5

− IFRS 7

− IAS 19

− IAS 34

Other IFRS changes

14

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Amendments to IFRS 10

Applying the consolidation exemption by intermediate holding

15

IE parent

Intermediate holding (non-IE)

Subsidiary

Fair value(IFRS 10.31)

Exemption from preparing consolidated FS if its (ultimate or any intermediate) parent produces FSs that are available for public use and comply with IFRSs, in which subsidiaries are consolidated or are measured at FVTPL in accordance with IFRS 10

Accounting by IE parent in its consolidated FSs

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Amendments to IAS 28

Applying the equity method exemption by intermediate holding

16

IE parent

Intermediate holding (non-IE)

Fair value(IAS 28.18)

Fair value(IFRS 10.31)

Exemption from applying the equity method to its investment in an associate or a joint venture if its (ultimate or any intermediate) parent produces FSs that are available for public use and comply with IFRSs, in which subsidiaries are consolidated or are measured at FVTPL in accordance with IFRS 10

Accounting by IE parent in its consolidated FSs

Associate/Joint

ventureSubsidiary

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Amendments to IAS 28

Interest in investment entity associate/joint venture

17

Non-IE ParentIf an entity that is not itself an investment entity has an interest in an associate or joint venture that is an investment entity, the entity may, when applying the equity method, retain the fair value measurement applied by that investment entity associate or joint venture to the investment entity associate’s or joint venture’s interests in subsidiaries

IE Associate/Joint venture

SubsidiaryAssociate/

Joint venture

Equity method/fair value option

(IAS 28.18)

Equity method/fair value option

(IAS 28.36A)Accounting by non-IE Parent in its FSs

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Not changed

Interest in investment entity subsidiary

18

Non-IE Parent

Associate/Joint venture

Subsidiary

Equity method/fair value option

(IAS 28.18)

Consolidate(IFRS 10)

IE SubsidiaryIE Associate/Joint venture

SubsidiaryAssociate/

Joint venture

Equity method/fair value option

(IAS 28.18)

Equity method/fair value option

(IAS 28.36A)

Accounting by non-IE Parent in its consolidated FSs

Look out: A non-IE Parent shall consolidate a indirect subsidiary held by IE Subsidiary

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Amendments to IFRS 10

Investment entities

19

IE Subsidiarywhich provide investment

related services

Non-IE Subsidiary

which provide investment

related services

IE Parent shallconsolidate

(not changed)

Amended; was notclear

As a result of the amendment, intermediate investment entities are not permitted to be consolidatedby their IE Parent

IE Parent

IE Subsidiarywhich does not provide investment

related services

Non-IE Subsidiarywhich does not provide investment

related services

IE Parent shall notconsolidate these

subsidiaries;measure at fair value

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Equity method in separate financial statements

Amendments to IAS 27

If separate financial statements are prepared under IFRS an entity can measure investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates:

- at cost

- at fair value in accordance with IAS 39/IFRS 9; or

- using the equity method

Holding

Subsidiary

Separate financial statements

Consolidatedfinancial

statements

Entity

Individual financial statements

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Accounting for acquisitions of interests in joint operations (JO)

Amendments to IFRS 11

Does the activity of the JO constitute a business

under IFRS 3?

Investor acquires an interest in a

JO

Account for as the acquisition of assets

Apply the business combinations principles under IFRS 3 and other

IFRSs

No Yes

Allocate the total cost of the acquisition on the basis of relative fair value of the assets and liabilities of JO

• Fair value measurement of identifiable assets and liabilities

• Recognise goodwill, deferred tax assets and liabilities

• Expense acquisition-related costs

Top 5 on IFRS developmentsNumber 3

Notionalcash pooling

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Issue referred to the IFRIC

• A Group has multiple subsidiaries, each with a separate bank account with Bank B

• At any time, some of the accounts have a positive cash balance and others a negative balance (overdraft)

• The Group operates a notional (rather than a physical) cash pooling arrangement

− Bank B calculates the net balance on designated accounts with interest paid or received based on the net amount

− There are regular transfers of balances into a single account, but no transfer is effected at the reporting date

− Further, the Group expects that its subsidiaries will use their bank accounts before the next settlement date by placing further cash on deposit or by withdrawing cash

− The parties have the necessary legally enforceable right to set off these balances

Notional cash pooling

23

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

IFRIC issues NIFRIC

• IAS 32.46: net presentation is appropriate only when there is an intention to exercise a legally enforceable right to set off

• IAS 32.47: in assessing its intention to settle net, an entity considers its normal (usual) business practices, requirement of financial markets and other circumstances that may limit the ability to settle net

• Since the Group expects its subsidiaries to use their bank accounts in their normal course of business ► presentation on a net basis would not appropriately reflect the amount and timing of expected future cash flows

• Many different types of cash-pooling arrangements exist in practice. Consequently, the determination of what constitutes an intention to settle on a net basis would depend on the individual facts and circumstances of each case

• IFRIC decided that neither an Interpretation nor an amendment to a Standard was necessary. Consequently, the Interpretations Committee decided not to add this issue to its agenda

Notional cash pooling

24

Top 5 on IFRS developmentsNumber 4

Risk paragraphmanagement board’s report

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

RJ 400.110c

• The risks to which the company is exposed

• The related uncertainties

• How those risks are managed

• The (potential) impact of those risks and uncertainties

Risk paragraph management board’s report

26

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Good practices

The risk paragraph in the management board’s report

27

Top 5 on IFRS developmentsNumber 5

ESMA enforcement

priorities

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Listed companies’ 2016 financial statements

• Presentation of financial performance (and use of alternative performance measures)

• Financial instruments: distinction between equity instruments and financial liabilities

• Disclosures of the impact of the new standards on IFRS financial statements

− IFRS 9

− IFRS 15

− IFRS 16

• Disclosure of impact of Brexit

ESMA enforcement priorities

29

IFRS Update Event 201628 November 2016

Top 5on

IFRS 16

Top 5 on IFRS 16

Introduction

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Major changes to lessee accounting

Introduction

32

Lessee accounting

IAS 17 IFRS 16

Operating lease vs

Finance lease

Right-of-use assetand

Lease liability

IAS 17 IFRS 16

Lessor accounting

~

Operating lease vs

Finance lease

Effective date: 1 January 2019

Limited changes to scope of IAS 17Enhanced guidance on identifying a lease

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Impact on financial statements

Introduction

33

IAS 17 IFRS 16

Balance Sheet FY 2019

Lease assets xxx

Lease liabilities xxx

Income statement FY 2019

Low-value/short-termleases xxx

EBITDA xxx

Depreciation and amortisation xxx

Finance cost xxx

Profit before tax xxx

Cash flow statement FY 2019

Operating activitiesFinancing activities

xxxxxx

Balance Sheet FY 2018

Income statement FY 2018

Lease payments xxx

EBITDA xxx

Profit before tax xxx

Cash flow statement FY 2018

Operating activities xxx

Top 5 on IFRS 16Number 1

Determination of lease term

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Determination of lease term

Introduces subjectivity

35

Option to terminate

Option to extend

Consider all facts and circumstances that create an economic incentive, including expected changes:• Contractual terms for optional periods

• Significant leasehold improvements

• Costs of termination and return

• Importance to operations (specialised, location, alternatives)

• Conditionality associated with option

Non-cancellable period

‘reasonably certain’

Reassess significant event or change in circumstances that lessee controls and affects whether exercise ‘reasonably certain’Revise: change in non-cancellable period

Top 5 on IFRS 16Number 2

Measurementof right-of-use

asset & lease liability

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Measurement of right-of-use asset & lease liability

Right-of-use asset measured at cost

37

Measurement of lease liability

Commencement date

Discounted at:Rate implicit in the lease or Incremental

borrowing rate

Cost of right-of-use asset

Payments made less incentives receivable aftercommencement date

Payments made less incentives received before commencement date

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Measurement of right-of-use asset & lease liability

Connected at initial measurement

38

Lease liability

Exercise price of

purchase option

(reasonably certain)

Fixed payments

less incentives

Variable payments

(e.g. CPI/rate)

Penalty for terminating

(if reasonably

certain)

Expected residual value

guarantee

Right-of-use asset

Initial direct costs

Payments less

incentives before

commence-ment date

Estimated cost for

dismantling restoring

asset

Lease liability

Top 5 on IFRS 16Number 3

Subsequentmeasurement

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Subsequent measurement

Adjustment of lease liability & right-of-use asset

40

Any change in lease

liability leads to an

adjustment to the right-of-use asset If right-of-use asset is reduced to zero,

any remaining re-measurement goes to P&L

Original discount rate (unless changes result from floating interest rates) if changes in:• Residual value guarantees expectation• Payments due to changes in an index or rate (when they take effect)

Revised discount rate if:• Change in the lease term• Significant change in circumstances within the control of the lessee regarding an option

to purchase

Right-of-use asset

Lease liability

Number 4Top 5 on IFRS 16

Exemptions

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Exemptions

To reduce administrative costs

42

Short-term leases (12 months or less)

Low-value leases

A lease that contains a purchase option is not a short-term lease

Assessment on an absolute basis

Election by class of underlying asset Election on a lease-by-lease basis

Top 5 on IFRS 16Number 5

Presentation

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Presentation

Accounting policy choice

44

Balance Sheet 2019

Lease assets xxx

Lease liabilities xxx

OR

Balance Sheet 2019

Property, plant and equipment xxx

Liabilities xxx

Present separately (except if

investment property)

Present in the line item it would have

been if it was owned

Disclose the line item in which they

are included

IFRS Update Event 201628 November 2016

Top 5on

IFRS 15

Top 5 on IFRS 15

Introduction

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

New requirements

Introduction

47

IAS 11 Construction ContractsIAS 18 GoodsIAS 18 ServicesIFRIC 15 Construction Real Estate

IAS 18 Royalties

IFRIC 13 Customer Loyalty Programmes

IFRIC 18 Transfers of Assets to CustomersSIC 31 Barter Transactions

IAS 18 Interest and Dividends

IFRS 15

IAS 39 or IFRS 9

New specific guidance

at a point in time

or

over time

New requirements (2018)Current requirements

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Control approach

Recognise revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services

Introduction

48

Identify the contract with a

customer

(Step 1)

Identify the performance obligations in the contract

(Step 2)

Determine the

transaction price

(Step 3)

Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations

(Step 4)

Recogniserevenue when a performance obligation is

satisfied

(Step 5)

Top 5 on IFRS 15Number 1

Identify the performance

obligations in the contract

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Disctinct good/service

Identify the performance obligations in the contract (step 2)

50

Identify all (incl. implicit) promised goods/services in the contract

Can the customer benefit from the good

or service on its own or together with other

readily available resources?

Is the good or service separately identifiable from other promises in

the contract?

CAPABLE OF BEING DISTINCT

DISTINCT IN CONTEXT OF CONTRACT

Is the good/service distinct?

AND

Account for as a separate performance

obligation

Combine two or more promised goods or

services

YES NO

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Distinct in the context of the contract

• No significant service of integrating the good or service with other goods or services promised in the contract into a bundle of goods or services that represent the combined output for which the customer has contracted

• The good or service does not significantly modify or customise another good or service promised in the contract

• The good or service is not highly dependent on, or highly interrelated with, other goods or services promised in the contract

Identify the performance obligations in the contract (step 2)

51

Top 5 on IFRS 15Number 2

Variableconsideration

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Examples

Variable consideration

53

Variableconsideration

Discounts

Refunds

Credits

Performance bonusses

Incentives

Penalties

Price concessions

Rebates

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Estimating

Variable consideration

54

Which method to use?

Expected value Most likely amount

The same method should be used to estimate the transaction price throughout the life of a contract

OR

Do not include in the transaction price an estimate of sales or usage-based royalties from licences of intellectual property until

the customer’s subsequent sales or usage occur

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Constraining estimates of variable consideration

Variable consideration

55

Estimate variable consideration (150)

Highly probable (90%) that a significant

reversal will not occur (100)

Not highly probable that a significant reversal will not occur (50)

Variable consideration is included in the transaction price to the extent that it is:

highly probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved

Not included in transaction price

Included in transaction price

Top 5 on IFRS 15Number 3

Recogniserevenue when a

performance obligationsatisfied

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Transfer of control

Recognise revenue when a performance obligation satisfied (step 5)

57

The seller’s performance creates

or enhances an asset controlled by

the customer

The customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefit of the

seller’s performance as the seller

performs

The seller creates an asset that does

not have an alternative use to the seller and the seller has the right

to be paid for performance to date

Revenue recognised at a point in time

IF NOT

or or

Performance satisfied over time = Revenue recognised over time

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Methods for measuring progress

• The objective when measuring progress is to depict the entity’s performance in transferring control of goods or services to the customer

• Appropriate methods of measuring progress include output methods and input methods

Revenue recognised over time

58

•Costsincurred

•Labour hours

Input

•Surveys

•Units produced or delivered

Output

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Input methods

• Inefficiencies and wasted materials

• Costs incurred not proportionate to the entity’s progress in satisfying the performance obligation

• Incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue recognised over time

59

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Indicators

Revenue recognised at a point in time

60

Present right to payment for the asset

Legal title to the asset

Transfer of physical possession of the asset

Customer acceptance

Significant risks and rewards of ownership

Top 5 on IFRS 15Number 4

Principal vs agent

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Presentation of revenue

Principal vs agent

62

Is the entity a principal or a agent?

Analysisrequired

Principal Agent

Present revenue at the gross amount

Present revenue at the net amount

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Comparison with IAS 18

Principal vs agent

63

Under IAS 18 Under IFRS 15

Purpose of indicators:

To identify whether the entity has exposure to the significant risks and rewards associated with the sale of goods or the rendering of services

Purpose of indicators:

To determine whether the entity controls the goods or services before they are transferred to the customer

The entity has the primary responsibility for providing the goods or services to the customer or for fulfilling the order

The entity is primarily responsible for fulfilling the promise to provide the specified good or service

The entity has inventory risk before or after the customer order, during shipping or on return

The entity has inventory risk before the specified good or service has been transferred to a customer or after transfer of control to the customer

The entity has latitude in establishing prices, either directly or indirectly

The entity has discretion in establishing the price for the specified good or service

The entity bears the customer’s credit risk for the amount receivable from the customer

Indicator not used

Top 5 on IFRS 15Number 5

Contract costs

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Two types

Contract costs

65

Costs of obtaining a contract

Costs of fulfilling a contract

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Costs of obtaining a contract

• The incremental costs of obtaining a contract are capitalised if the entity expects to recover those costs

• As a practical expedient, an entity may choose to expense the costs to obtain a contract if the amortisation period is one year or less

• Costs that will be incurred regardless of whether the entity obtains the contract are expensed as incurred, unless they are explicitly chargeable to the customer

Contract costs

66

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Costs of fulfilling a contract

• If costs incurred to fulfil a contract are covered under another standard, an entity accounts for those costs in accordance with the other standards

− IAS 2 relating to inventories

− IAS 16 relating to PPE

• Costs to fulfil a contract should be capitalised if they meet all the following criteria:

− relate directly to the contract (or specific anticipated contract);

− generate/enhance a resource that will be used to satisfy obligations in the future; and

− are expected to be recovered

Contract costs

67

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Amortisation

Contract costs

68

Amortise on a systematic basis consistent with the transfer of the related goods or services

Contract period

Commencement of transfer of

goods or services

Expected renewal period

Impairment of either type of capitalised costs should be recognised immediately if the costs are not deemed to be recoverable

IFRS Update Event 201628 November 2016

9 characteristics

of good corporate

reporting

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands

Annual review of corporate reporting 2015/2016 – FRC

1. A single story

2. How the money is made

3. What worries the board

4. Consistency

5. Cut the clutter

6. Clarity

7. Summarise

8. Explain change

9. True and fair

9 characteristics of good corporate reporting

70

Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee (“DTTL”), its network of member firms, and their relatedentities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) does not provide services to clients.Please see www.deloitte.nl/about for a more detailed description of DTTL and its member firms.

Deloitte provides audit, consulting, financial advisory, risk management, tax and related services to public and private clients spanning multiple industries. Deloitte serves fourout of five Fortune Global 500® companies through a globally connected network of member firms in more than 150 countries bringing world-class capabilities, insights, andhigh-quality service to address clients’ most complex business challenges. To learn more about how Deloitte’s approximately 225,000 professionals make an impact thatmatters, please connect with us on Facebook, LinkedIn, or Twitter.

This communication contains general information only, and none of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, its member firms, or their related entities (collectively, the “DeloitteNetwork”) is, by means of this communication, rendering professional advice or services. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your finances or yourbusiness, you should consult a qualified professional adviser. No entity in the Deloitte Network shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relieson this communication.

© 2016 Deloitte The Netherlands