hydrographic surveying

31

Upload: felton

Post on 25-Feb-2016

38 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Hydrographic Surveying. Datums &Tides Why Multibeam?. Datums and Tides. Mean Low Tide versus Mean Lower Low Water. And the winner is……….!. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Hydrographic Surveying
Page 2: Hydrographic Surveying

Hydrographic Surveying

• Datums &Tides

• Why Multibeam?

Page 3: Hydrographic Surveying

Datums and Tides

Mean Low Tide versus Mean Lower Low WaterAnd the winner is……….!

Page 4: Hydrographic Surveying

The following slide is taken directly from the NOAA/TCOON web sites pages that gives the official relationships for the various Sea Level Datums (Mean Sea Level and it’s various statistical offsets) and the Land (Terrestrial) Datums (NAVD88 and Mean Low Tide) for the Rainbow Bridge on the Neches River Channel. This location has been chosen because it is one of the (currently) few NOAA tide gauge sites for which data is available in real time on the internet, and has published the relationship between the Sea and Terrestrial datums.

One thing should be borne in mind. Mean Sea Level changes both by location around the coastline of the U.S. and over long periods of time. The relationships at the Rainbow Bridge do NOT hold true anywhere else - although the differences MAY be minor.

Page 5: Hydrographic Surveying

Courtesy TCOON Web Site

The relationships shown here are given reference to an arbitrary “station datum”. Following slides have changed this to make things relative to Mean Low Low Water via high level math (addition and subtraction!!)

See slide #12 and #13 for definitions of these datums.

NAVD 88 elevation updated 5/2013, stated accuracy is 0.028m (about 1 inch). These datums are marked preliminary until the 2013 levels are run.

Page 6: Hydrographic Surveying
Page 7: Hydrographic Surveying

Confused? Lets Try an Example!

Page 8: Hydrographic Surveying
Page 9: Hydrographic Surveying

NOAA Tides & Currents Web Page

Page 10: Hydrographic Surveying
Page 11: Hydrographic Surveying

SIMPLE!

Take two aspirin and call 713-690-4626, ask for Chris or Mike and have your credit card ready!Just joking about the credit card!

Page 12: Hydrographic Surveying

The following are provided for reference purposes - if you are feeling bold.

Page 13: Hydrographic Surveying
Page 14: Hydrographic Surveying
Page 15: Hydrographic Surveying
Page 16: Hydrographic Surveying
Page 17: Hydrographic Surveying

Linkshttp://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/datum_options.htmlhttp://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/publications/tidal_datums_and_their_applications.pdf

http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/datums/vertical/VerticalDatums.shtml

http://www.cbi.tamucc.edu/cbi/data

http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/

Page 18: Hydrographic Surveying

R2Sonic 2024 Odom MB-1

Reson 7125 Geoacoustics “Geoswath”

Edgetech 4600 Swath/Sidescan

And new 2020

Why Multibeam?

Page 19: Hydrographic Surveying
Page 20: Hydrographic Surveying
Page 21: Hydrographic Surveying
Page 22: Hydrographic Surveying

Bottom Elevation Contour Chart (Multibeam)Example #1

Page 23: Hydrographic Surveying
Page 24: Hydrographic Surveying

Bottom Elevation Contour Chart (Single Beam)

Survey Lines (Single Beam)

Channel Centerline

Dock Face

Page 25: Hydrographic Surveying
Page 26: Hydrographic Surveying

Bottom Elevation Surface Chart (Multibeam)

Page 27: Hydrographic Surveying

Example #2

Page 28: Hydrographic Surveying
Page 29: Hydrographic Surveying
Page 30: Hydrographic Surveying

• Multibeam Surveys are faster to execute, especially for larger areas and in the case of busy docks.

• They give 100% bottom coverage (single beam surveys at 50 feet spacing give only 28%!)

• The data can still be sectioned and volumes calculated by the average end area method but we can now also use a full terrain modelling approach.

• New system can beam-steer and look up under docks, moored barges or shallow draft vessels (depending on space between the hull and bottom)

• Some systems also provide sidescan sonar type imagery from the amplitude returns (not as good as a specialist sidescan sonar but no co-location issues)

• More expensive than single beam (30 to 50%)• Data takes longer to edit and produce final deliverables

Page 31: Hydrographic Surveying