how to make the recovery sustainable?
DESCRIPTION
What can policy makers do to make the recovery more sustainable?TRANSCRIPT
Regulating for a fair recovery, July 8th 2011
HOW TO MAKE THE RECOVERY SUSTAINABLE?Ekkehard ERNST
OVERVIEW
How inequality threatens the recovery
• The two-speed recovery is giving way to global coolingLoss in income (growth) has lowered disposable revenues and
aggregate demand around the globe
• Recovery remains protracted in advanced economiesOnly few advanced economies have managed to take
advantage of the global recovery
• Tightening speed limits in emerging countriesCommodity prices on the rise again Wages and disposable incomes have still not recovered Domestic demand falters in the absence of stronger world
trade
Global cooling is underway....partly due to lack of income generation
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Arab countries
Advanced economies
Latin America Africa Emerging Asia Emerging Europe
Real
dis
posa
ble
inco
me
grow
th(p
.a.,
in %
)
Pre-crisis growth (2002-2007)
Post-crisis growth (2008-2010)
Structural change starts to bite
• Global rebalancing has led to structural changeThe slowdown in activity has further exacerbated labour market
inequalities
• Restructuring is particularly severe in countries with large imbalances
Earlier housing booms give rise to sharp sectoral adjustments Often, structural change comes with long-lasting and high
structural unemployment
• Demand-led policies can help speed up internal restructuring
New job demands in service-related sectors (e.g. health care, personal services) can mitigate the impact, in particular for young people
New jobs are needed as job reallocation has accelerated
Q1-2001 Q1-2002 Q2-2003 Q3-2004 Q4-2005 Q1-2007 Q2-2008 Q3-2009 Q4-2010
TurkeyD enmark
U nited KingdomI reland
Slov ak R epublicSlov enia
EstoniaH ungary
SpainGreece
N ew Z ealandPoland
C zech R epublicPortugal
U nited StatesAustra lia
F ranceN orwayC anada
N etherlandsI ta ly
KoreaAustria
BelgiumC hile
F inlandSweden
SwitzerlandJapan
Housingdepression
Housingbubble
Inequality lowers policy effectiveness
• Policy space becomes more limitedRising inequalities limit policy effectiveness
• Traditional macroeconomic policies need to be replaced
But even activation policies work less effectively when structural unemployment is high
Early action is necessary, but the window of opportunity might have gone already
Emerging structural challenges complicate labour market interventions-20
-10
01
02
03
0C
oe
ffic
ien
t e
stim
ate
Low Intermediate HighStructural unemployment rate
Note: Iterated estimates
Government consumption
01
02
03
04
0
Co
eff
icie
nt
estim
ate
Low Intermediate HighStructural unemployment rate
Median of coefficient
5% confidence interval
Note: Iterated estimates
Non-wage government consumption
-50
05
01
00
15
0C
oe
ffic
ien
t e
stim
ate
Low Intermediate HighStructural unemployment rate
Note: Iterated estimates
Hiring incentives
-20
02
04
06
0
Co
eff
icie
nt
estim
ate
Low Intermediate HighStructural unemployment rate
Note: Iterated estimates
Training expenditures
-20
-10
01
02
03
0C
oe
ffic
ien
t e
stim
ate
Low Intermediate HighStructural unemployment rate
Note: Iterated estimates
Government consumption
01
02
03
04
0C
oe
ffic
ien
t e
stim
ate
Low Intermediate HighStructural unemployment rate
Median of coefficient
5% confidence interval
Note: Iterated estimates
Non-wage government consumption
-50
05
01
00
15
0C
oe
ffic
ien
t e
stim
ate
Low Intermediate HighStructural unemployment rate
Note: Iterated estimates
Hiring incentives
-20
02
04
06
0C
oe
ffic
ien
t e
stim
ate
Low Intermediate HighStructural unemployment rate
Note: Iterated estimates
Training expenditures
Equality-enhancing fiscal measures work
• Income-led recovery possibleAn income-led fiscal stimulus can still help Use spending measures with the largest multiplier attached,
such as social spending (e.g. unemployment benefits)
• Tightening of social spending is likely to worsen both the economic and the fiscal situation
Austerity measures fall heavily on low-income earners The demand-depressing effects cause second-round
deflationary effects that further worsens fiscal positions
Coordinated stimulus would still help
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
Em
ploy
men
t gr
owth
(in
% p
.a.)
2005 2010 2015 2020
Baseline scenario Early withdrawal
Additional spending for3 years (3% of GDP)
Additional tax reductionsfor 3 years (3% of GDP)
Employment recovery in G20 countries