henrik halkier, aalborg university, denmark, [email protected] dieter müller, umeå university,...
TRANSCRIPT
Henrik Halkier, Aalborg University, Denmark, [email protected]
Dieter Müller, Umeå University, Sweden, [email protected]
TOURIST DESTINATION DYNAMICS IN RUSSIA
Public-private partnership and tourism development in non-metropolitan
destinations
Henrik Halkier, Aalborg University, Denmark, [email protected]
Dieter Müller, Umeå University, Sweden, [email protected]
TOURIST DESTINATION DYNAMICS IN RUSSIA
Public-private partnership and tourism development in non-metropolitan
destinations
Henrik Halkier, Aalborg University, Denmark, [email protected]
Dieter Müller, Umeå University, Sweden, [email protected]
TOURIST DESTINATION DYNAMICS IN RUSSIA
Public-private partnership and tourism development in non-metropolitan
destinations
1. Introduction: Tourism in non-metropolital Russia
2. Reconceptualising tourist destinations3. Four case-studies: Resources, actors and
collaboration4. Conclusion: Tourism in not-so-cold climates
Source: Henrik Halkier & Anette Therkelsen: Breaking out of Tourism Destination Path Dependency? Exploring the Case of Coastal Tourism in North Jutland, Denmark, German Journal of Economic Geography, 57, 1-2
Actor groups and institutions in destination development.
RECONCEPTUALISINGTOURIST DESTINATIONS
Henrik Halkier / [email protected] - Dieter Müller / [email protected]
Four case-studies of non-metropolititan tourist destinations
in Russia
Henrik Halkier / [email protected] - Dieter Müller / [email protected]
Expected key challengesMainly regional/national marketPolarised private sector: large/small firmsEmerging national framework for regional tourism development, unevenly implemented
Sources: Braden/Prudnika 2008, Mouraview/Kakabadse 2014, Usenyuk 2008, Burns 1995
Resources, actors and collaborationTOMSK
Business tourism:Knowledge institutionsCultural heritage
Private enterprises emerging, inter-firm collaboration, university as proactive event-maker
Regional government fragmented, local government disinterested
Henrik Halkier / [email protected] - Dieter Müller / [email protected]
Resources, actors and collaborationIVANOVO
Cultural tourism:Heritage, old/recent‘Golden ring’/Moscow
SME collaboration emerging, diversification from textiles
Proactive regional government within national policy framework
Henrik Halkier / [email protected] - Dieter Müller / [email protected]
Resources, actors and collaborationKEMEROVO
Winter tourism:Ski resortsSki events
SME collaboration emerging, diversification from textiles
Proactive regional government within national policy framework
Henrik Halkier / [email protected] - Dieter Müller / [email protected]
Resources, actors and collaborationALTAY
Mountain tourism:Nature/adventureHeath/spa
Private enterprises emerging, growing private spa sector, foreign investment in gambling
Henrik Halkier / [email protected] - Dieter Müller / [email protected]
Proactive regional government within national policy framework
CONCLUSIONTourism in not-so-cold climates
Case study conclusionsDiverse enterpreneurs: Large private firms vs. Small providersDiverse multi-level governance of tourism developmentWeak regions/destinations caught between private sector prioirities and Russian Federal initiativesFragmentation vs. strategic focusOther ??
Further perspectivesUncertainty of national framework for public-private collaborationImportance of domestic (rather than international) market
Accessability (transport, language)Strong image of Russia/Siberia complicates international re-branding
Henrik Halkier / [email protected] - Dieter Müller / [email protected]
http://tempus-tourism.tpu.ru/
http://www.tempus-tourism.aau.dk/
Henrik Halkier / [email protected] - Dieter Müller / [email protected]
More on tourism in Siberia…
Henrik Halkier - [email protected] Müller - [email protected]
With thanks to colleagues inTomsk, Ivanovo, Kemerovo and Altay