grading of technical institutions in the state of haryana (engineering colleges)
DESCRIPTION
Grading of Technical Institutions in the State of Haryana (Engineering Colleges). By Empanelled Agencies. About Us. EQUATE = Effective Quality Upgradation Assistance for Technical Education - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Grading of Technical Institutions in Grading of Technical Institutions in the State of Haryanathe State of Haryana
(Engineering Colleges)(Engineering Colleges)
ByBy
Empanelled AgenciesEmpanelled Agencies
About UsAbout Us• EQUATE = Effective Quality Upgradation
Assistance for Technical Education
• A national level Consultancy Organization set up expert academicians involved in planning, designing, implementing and facilitating World Bank funded technician/technical education projects for MHRD since 1990.
• Supported by pool of eminent educationists, scholars and educational planners.
About Us…About Us…EQUATE - brain child of EQUATE - brain child of Dr. R.N. Mathur,Dr. R.N. Mathur, Founder President and Former Central Founder President and Former Central Project Advisor, NPIU - More than 30 Project Advisor, NPIU - More than 30 years in education sector years in education sector - Contributed to a large number of - Contributed to a large number of Internationally funded Projects.Internationally funded Projects.-As Head of NPIU, took initiative to launch As Head of NPIU, took initiative to launch Quality Movement in World Bank funded Quality Movement in World Bank funded technician institutions in NE States - all technician institutions in NE States - all the institutions achieved ISO 9001:2000 the institutions achieved ISO 9001:2000 certification.certification.
EQUATEEQUATE
Grading ObjectivesGrading Objectives• Motivate the institution to enhance the quality of
education. • Generate healthy academic competition among
growing institutions• Enhance institutional image before the
stakeholders • Enable the students during admission counseling
to make clear effective choice of institution they prefer to study in and
• Build the image of the Directorate of Technical Education, Government of Haryana as a quality provider of technical education in the country.
EQUATEEQUATE
MethodologyMethodology• Structured questionnaire designed separate
questionnaire for new and old institutions• Institutional heads/representatives to be
briefed about parameters of grading – Questionnaire to be handed over with request to fill in the required information before the visit of Expert Investigators (EI)
• EIs will visit institutions for checking and verification of fact, figures and information – meet HODs, faculty, staff students, Administration and Finance Departments
MethodologyMethodology
• List of Documents to be collected by EIs provided at the end of questionnaire
• List of Documents to be kept ready for verification and review by EEIs to be kept ready by the institution before the visit of the EI
• Coordinator’s office to inform the schedule of visit of the EIs to institutions and Empanelled Agency in advance
EQUATEEQUATE
MethodologyMethodology• Five Broad Areas of Grading
• Institutional Profile (70)• Governance, Leadership and
Financial Management (150)• Infrastructure (150)• Human Resource (250)• Teaching Learning, Evaluation and
Quality Assurance Processes (380) Total
1000
• EIs selected with care, thoroughly briefed by the Empanelled Agency
• 2 EIs will visit institutions on mutually agreed dates
EQUATEEQUATE
MethodologyMethodologyGrade Code
Grade Grade Range %
A+ Outstanding More than 90
A Excellent 85 -90
B+ Very good From 80 to less than 85
B Good From 75 to less than 80
C+ Fair From 70to less than 75
C Above Average From 65 to less than 70
D+ Average From 60 to less than 65
D Below Average From 45 to less than 60
E Non Gradable Less than 45
EQUATEEQUATE
MethodologyMethodology• Institutions started in 2008-09 to provide data
from date of establishment
• Information to be provided as available up to or as on the date of the visit of the EIs
• Response to the questionnaire as:– Tick mark– Figures or information on each item where space
provided
EQUATEEQUATE
MethodologyMethodology• Scores will be calculated by EIs
• Grades received to be Presented to Grading Finalization Committee by the Empanelled Agency
• Institutions have option to get re-evaluated after 2-3 months within same academic year after initiating substantial improvements
• Separate exercise to be taken up in new academic session
EQUATEEQUATE
Broad Grading CriteriaBroad Grading Criteria• Grading not an attempt to check if AICTE
norms followed or not – institutions have to follow the AICTE norms in all circumstances
• Quality and Progress related areas included in questionnaires
EQUATEEQUATE
Broad Grading CriteriaBroad Grading Criteria(1) (1) Institutional ProfileInstitutional Profile
Faculty & Staff Profile
Accreditation - NA for New Institutions
Grant of Autonomy - NA for New Institutions
Student Profile – discipline wise
Total recurring expenditure
Maintenance mechanism
Awareness about Student Charter with the institution managers as announced by DTE and Frequency of checking email from DTE and website
Broad Grading CriteriaBroad Grading Criteria(2) (2) INSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE, LEADERSHIP AND
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Existence & composition of BOG
Frequency of meetings of BOG
significant decisions taken by BOG
Head of the Institution – Qualification, age, status
No. of meetings held with HODs & Faculty
Three significant contributions
Broad Grading CriteriaBroad Grading Criteria(2) (2) INSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE, LEADERSHIP AND
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Nature and source of funding
Number of students received/receiving freeship & Scholarships
Process for fee collection
Role of Head of Institution in Financial Planning
Delegation of Financial Power
Purchase procedures
Broad Grading CriteriaBroad Grading Criteria(2) (2) INSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE, LEADERSHIP AND
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Involvement of Faculty in Purchases decision
Average time taken in procurement
Availability of Institutional Strategic Plan – Vision, Mission etc
Availability of Institutional calendar
Availability of campus wide networking
Leadership Role of Chairman of the Institution - NA for New Institutions
Broad Grading CriteriaBroad Grading Criteria(3) (3) INFRASTRUCTURE
Infrastructure Condition
Facilities
Library Resources
Laboratory & workshop
Broad Grading CriteriaBroad Grading Criteria(4)(4) HUMAN RESOURCES
Adequacy of Teacher pupil ratio
Availability of AICTE Pay Scale
Faculty recruitment mechanism
Faculty & Staff trainings
Availability of Promotion and incentive schemes/policies, insurance, PPF etc
Analysis of University examination results and corrective action
Broad Grading CriteriaBroad Grading Criteria(4)(4) HUMAN RESOURCES
Faculty output
IRG & Utilization
Annual Newsletter Published
Average percentage of marks of students admitted through Centralized Counseling
Percentage of students graduating after admission NA for New Institutions
Value Addition Inputs to students
Broad Grading CriteriaBroad Grading Criteria(4)(4) HUMAN RESOURCES
Students insurance
Students Attendance
No. of rank holders
Total no of working days
Existence of Alumni Association - NA for New Institutions
Regular conduct of Tracer Studies NA for New Institutions -
Broad Grading CriteriaBroad Grading Criteria(4)(4) HUMAN RESOURCES
Placement Record - NA for New Institutions
Average annual salary of the students/ pass outs placed - NA for New Institutions
Broad Grading CriteriaBroad Grading Criteria(5) (5) TEACHING LEARNING, EVALUATION &
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCESSES
Classroom Strategy and Planning by Teachers
Development of competency and skills among students
Learning through Laboratories and Workshops
Evaluation Process
Networking with reputed Institutions in India and abroad - NA for New Institutions
Broad Grading CriteriaBroad Grading Criteria(5)(5) TEACHING LEARNING, EVALUATION & QUALITY
ASSURANCE PROCESSES Internal Review Mechanism to ensure quality
Activities undertaken by the Institution as part of Community Development and Social Works - NA for New Institutions
Faculty Appraisal System - NA for New Institutions
Documents to be collected by Expert Investigators Team
• Institutional recognition by AICTE.• University affiliation.• Composition of BOG of the Institute.• Minutes of the last 2 BOG meetings.• List of Head of Institution since starting. • Minutes of last two meeting of HODs with Head of
Institution.• Delegation of financial power to Principal, HOD,
Faculty.• Office order regarding library hours.• A copy of latest News Letter.
Documents and facts to be reviewed by Experts Investigators Team
• Payroll of faculty and other staff• Match no. of labs with AICTE norms.• See documents indicating building maintaining
committee or cell.• Equipments maintenance cell.• Fund availability in corpus fund. • No. of students receive free ship.• No. of students receive scholarship in current
year.
Documents and facts to be reviewed by Experts Investigators Team
• Involvement of faculty in purchasing.• Institutional strategic plan, vision, mission, Institutional
quality policy.• Annual calendar of activities.• Working of Institutional MIS.• Campus wide networking and internet facilities.• Networking availability in hostels.• Check all infrastructure facility including cleanliness,
power supply, power backup, condition of class rooms, common rooms, tutorial, library, administrative block, water supply.
• Availability of digital library, internet facility in library.
Documents and facts to be reviewed by Experts Investigators Team
• Availability of distance education and mechanism.
• Hard copies and electronics journals.• Availability of stock register, lab manuals.• Check some appointments orders of faculty.• Check evidence of training conducted for
faculty and other staff.• See orders for faculty qualification
improvement with salary.• Evidence of consultancy projects.
Documents and facts to be reviewed by Experts Investigators Team
• Evidence of incentive for innovative work.• Availability of Insurance, Provident Fund and
Medical facilities.• Evidence of publication, patent, research
projects, paper presentation, award for faculty.• Evidence of Revenue Generated and
Utilization.• Student percentage of marks at admission.• Check foreign students if available.• Check attendance of class and sessionals.• Check no. of working days.
Documents and facts to be reviewed by Experts Investigators Team
• Documents of Alumni association.
• Documents of tracer study.
• Check all aspects of classroom strategy planning.
• Check all facts related to competency and skills.
• Check all evidence related to lab and workshops.
EQUATEEQUATE
THANK YOU