fransisco v. iac

2
FRANSISCO V. IAC 177 SCRA 527 FACTS: The Malinta estate was co-owned by two sisters who later donated 1/3 of the proper their niece, 1/3 to the heirs of their deceased sister, and 1/3 was solely conveye Cornelia. Adjoining this estate was property of Fransisco, fronting the Paradas ro new co-owners then partitioned the lot. All the frontage went to the niece. Cornel subsequently sold her property to Eugenio sisters who then sold it to Ramos. Ramos wanted a right of way through Fransisco’s property. HELD: If the enclosure or isolation was due to the proprietor’s own acts, then there cou compulsory right of way.

Upload: nylinad-etnerfacir-obmil

Post on 03-Nov-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

CASE

TRANSCRIPT

FRANSISCO V. IAC177 SCRA 527FACTS:The Malinta estate was co-owned by two sisters who later donated 1/3 of the property to their niece, 1/3 to the heirs of their deceased sister, and 1/3 was solely conveyed to Cornelia. Adjoining this estate was property of Fransisco, fronting the Paradas road. The new co-owners then partitioned the lot. All the frontage went to the niece. Cornelia subsequently sold her property to Eugenio sisters who then sold it to Ramos. Ramos wanted a right of way through Fransiscos property.HELD:If the enclosure or isolation was due to the proprietors own acts, then there couldnt be any compulsory right of way.