fluid typing in thinly bedded reservoirs th offshore ... typing in thinly bedded reservoirs 10th...

31
Fluid Typing In Thinly Bedded Reservoirs 10 th Offshore Mediterranean Conference – OMC Ravenna, Italy, March 2011 Rl d Ch li Roland Chemali Chief Petrophysicist Sperry Drilling Maged Fam Halliburton Technology Manager

Upload: hahuong

Post on 30-May-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Fluid Typing In Thinly Bedded Reservoirs

10th Offshore Mediterranean Conference – OMCRavenna, Italy, March 2011

R l d Ch liRoland ChemaliChief Petrophysicist Sperry Drilling

Maged FamHalliburton Technology Manager

Laminated Formations

RvRhRh

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 2

Laminated ReservoirsLayers with different petrophysical properties such as interbedded sandstoneLayers with different petrophysical properties such as interbedded sandstoneand shale with thicknesses below the vertical resolution of the logging toolmeasurement

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 3

Methods for Reservoir Fluid Typing

M d L i / G Ch h- Mud Logging / Gas Chromatography

- Logs (WL & LWD)

- Pressure Gradient

Rock Sample- Rock Sample

- Fluid Sample

Gas-Liquid Contact Depth

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 4

Fluid Typing In Thinly Bedded Reservoir

1 “Visible Laminations”1. Visible Laminations Imaging Deconvolutions Methods

2. “Very Thin Laminations” Electrical Anisotropy Electrical Anisotropy Thomas Steibert

3 h d f b h “ bl ” d “ h ”3. Methods for both “Visible” and “Very Thin” Laminations Magnetic Resonance Sampling

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 5

Standard vs. High Resolution Tool Response in Laminated Shaly Sand Reservoirs

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 6

SPE 30608

Standard vs. High Resolution Interpretation in Laminated Shaly Sand Reservoirs

3’ Net Pay3’ Net Pay9’ Net Pay9’ Net Pay

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 7

Standard ResolutionHigh ResolutionSPE 30608

Fluid Typing In Thinly Bedded Reservoir

1 “Visible Laminations”1. Visible Laminations Imaging Deconvolutions Methods

2. “Very Thin Laminations” Electrical Anisotropy Electrical Anisotropy Thomas Steibert

3 h d f b h “ bl ” d “ h ”3. Methods for both “Visible” and “Very Thin” Laminations Magnetic Resonance Sampling

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 8

Anisotropy in Turbidites and LaminationsRv = “Vertical” ResistivityRh = “Horizontal” Resistivity Anisotropy Ratio = Rv/Rh

RvRRh

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 9

Anisotropy in Sand Shale SequencesThe Difference Between Micro-Anisotropy and Macro-Anisotropy

is Subjective and Depends On Measuring Instrument

Rsand= 20 Ohm-mRh ≈ 2 Ohm-m

Rshale=1 Ohm-m

Rh ≈ 2 Ohm-m

Rv ≈ 10 Ohm m

Rh ≈ 2 Ohm-m

Rv ≈ 10 Ohm-m Rv ≈ 10 Ohm-m

Anisotropy Ratio = ? On right hand side

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 10

py gAnisotropy Ratio = ? On left hand side

Anisotropy in Sand Shale SequencesThe Difference Between Micro-Anisotropy and Macro-Anisotropyis Subjective and Depends On Measuring Instrument

Rsand= 20 Ohm-mRh ≈ 2 Ohm-m

Rshale=1 Ohm-m

Rh ≈ 2 Ohm-m

Rv ≈ 10 Ohm m

Rh ≈ 2 Ohm-m

Rv ≈ 10 Ohm-m Rv ≈ 10 Ohm-m

Th V i l C il A

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 11

The Vertical Coil ArrayMeasures Only Rh i.e. 2 Ohm-m i.e. “”Wet”

Anisotropy: Historic PerspectiveAnisotropy in the 70’sAnisotropy in the 70 s

Paper/Patent for Oil Base Dipmeter

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 12

Anisotropy: Historic Perspective

Anisotropy in the 80’sExplains Separation Between Induction and Laterolog

A Nuisance to Contend WithA Nuisance to Contend With

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 13

Anisotropy: Historic PerspectiveAnisotropy in the 90’sAnisotropy in the 90 s

Klein and Mollison Increase Reserves in Kuparuk and Other Reservoirs

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 14

From Anisotropy to Saturation in Laminated Reservoirs1. Measure Rv and Rh

2 I t R h l2. Input Rshale3. Get Rsand and Vshale

RvRh

Rsand

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 15

Rshale Vshale

Azimuthal Deep ResistivityUncompensated Upper Transmitter Measurement

TL-16 TL-32 TL-48R1 R2 R3

TU-48 TU-32 TU-16

3 x Receivers

Uncompensated Upper Transmitter Measurement

Measuring Electrical Anisotropy with ADR

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 16

g py

Azimuthal Deep ResistivityUncompensated Lower Transmitter Measurement

TU-48 TU-32 TU-16 TL-16 TL-32 TL-48R1 R2 R3

TU-48 TU-32 TU-16

Uncompensated Lower Transmitter Measurement

Measuring Electrical Anisotropy with ADR

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 17

g py

Azimuthal Deep ResistivityCompensated Measurement

TU-48 TU-32 TU-16 TL-16 TL-32 TL-48R1 R2 R3

Uncompensated Upper Transmitter Measurement

Uncompensated Lower Transmitter Measurement+Uncompensated Lower Transmitter Measurement+Compensated Measurement

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 18

Measuring Electrical Anisotropy with ADR

Anisotropic FormationRh = 1 Ohm-m Rv = 2 Ohm-m

Relative Dip = 0 deg

Relative Dip = 90 deg

Compensated Azimuthal ResistivityADR 16 in; 2 MHz Up Down and AverageO

hm-m

-ADR 16 in; 2 MHz, Up, Down and Average-ADR 48 in; 500 KHz, Up, Down and Average

O

Uncompensated Geosignal10

eg GeosignalUncompensated GeosignalUpper Transmitter

Compensated Geosignal

5

0

de Geosignal

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 19

Uncompensated GeosignalLower Transmitter

- 5

10

Anisotropic FormationRh = 1 Ohm-m Rv = 3 Ohm-m

Relative Dip = 0 deg

Relative Dip = 90 deg

Compensated Azimuthal ResistivityADR 16 in; 2 MHz Up Down and AverageO

hm-m

-ADR 16 in; 2 MHz, Up, Down and Average-ADR 48 in; 500 KHz, Up, Down and Average

O

Uncompensated GeosignalU T itt

10

eg GeosignalUpper Transmitter

Compensated Geosignal

5

0

de Geosignal

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 20

Uncompensated GeosignalLower Transmitter

- 5

10

Isotropic FormationRh = 1 Ohm-m Rv = 1 Ohm-m

Relative Dip = 0 deg

Relative Dip = 90 deg

Compensated Azimuthal ResistivityOhm

-m

Compensated Azimuthal Resistivity-ADR 16 in; 2 MHz, Up, Down and Average-ADR 48 in; 500 KHz, Up, Down and Average

O

10

eg GeosignalUncompensated Geosignal

Upper TransmitterUncompensated Geosignal

Lower TransmitterCompensated Geosignal

5

0

de Geosignal

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 21

- 5

10

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 22

Fluid Typing In Thinly Bedded Reservoir

1 “Visible Laminations”1. Visible Laminations Imaging Deconvolutions Methods

2. “Very Thin Laminations” Electrical Anisotropy Electrical Anisotropy Thomas Steibert

3 h d f b h “ bl ” d “ h ”3. Methods for both “Visible” and “Very Thin” Laminations Magnetic Resonance Sampling

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 23

MRIL T1 & T2 Response to Fluids & Reservoir Conditions

M

Time, sec Pola

rizat

ion

T1

W t

e, sec

.2983TTT

BB 12

Water:

Oil: Poro

sity

.298

1.2TTT BB 12

Gas:1025TT

3 . Incr

emen

tal

T2

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 24

T1025TT 1.17

BB 12

Time, msec

EMI & MRIL Data Integration

nSe

ctio

nna

ted

SLa

mi

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 25 MRIL ResistivityTotal Image 60 mEnhanced Image

2.6 m

EMI & MRIL Interpretation

nSe

ctio

nin

ated

SLa

mi

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 26 MRIL InterpretationEMI DIP Enhanced Image

Fluid Typing & Sampling in Laminated Reservoirs

RDTDual Probe 1”

RDTDual Probe 1”

RDTOval Pad 7.25”

RDTOval Pad 7.25”

7.25 ”

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 27

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 28

Fluid Typing & Sampling in Laminated Reservoirs

LWD G T IDS O l P d O tiLWD G T IDS O l P d O tiLWD GeoTap IDS Oval Pad OptionLWD GeoTap IDS Oval Pad Option

3”

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 29

Fluid Typing & Sampling in Laminated Reservoirs

RDT - Dual Packer / Straddle Packer OptionRDT - Dual Packer / Straddle Packer OptionRDT Dual Packer / Straddle Packer OptionRDT Dual Packer / Straddle Packer Option

~ 40”

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 30

Fluid Typing In Thinly Bedded Reservoir

1 “Visible Laminations”1. Visible Laminations Imaging Deconvolutions Methods

2. “Very Thin Laminations” Electrical Anisotropy Electrical Anisotropy Thomas Steibert

3 h d f b h “ bl ” d “ h ”3. Methods for both “Visible” and “Very Thin” Laminations Magnetic Resonance Sampling

© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 31