fargomoorhead area diversion project plan b vs. plan … · diversion channel plan b alignment ......

1
± Limit of Unsteady HEC-RAS Model £ ¤ 81 ! ( 294 ¤ £ 81 £ 10 £ ¤ 10 ¤ ! ( 10 § ¦ ¨ 94 ? A @ 336 § ¨ ¦ 94 £ ¤ 81 § ¨ ¦ 29 £ ¤ 75 * # ! ( Floodplain with or without Project (Based on # 100-yr Flood = 33,000 cfs) * New 100-year Floodplain with Project * # ! ( 100-year Floodplain Removed with Project (i.e., Benefitted Area) * # Pre-Task Force With Project 100-year Floodplain ! ( 46 * # Upstream Mitigation Structures ) " Residential ! ( Non-Residential Cemetery Impact ! ( ! ( Impacted by Plan A, Not Impacted by Plan B * # * # Impacted by Plan A and Plan B ! ( * # Organ ( ! ic Farms (Impacts To Be Determined) 18 Organic Farms (No Longer Impacted with Plan B) Diversion Channel Plan B Alignment Plan A Southern Embankment Levee River Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community FM Area Diversion Project Plan B vs. Plan A Comparison 0 1 2 4 Miles Created By: enelson Date Created: 01/19/2018 Date Exported: 4/6/2018 Image: 2012 County NAIP Elevation Data: - Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 14N Datum: NorthAmerican 1983 µ H:\Fargo\JBN\7400\7438\13_7438_015\Minnesota Dam Safety Permit\Small Team\2017-11-13 TechAdvisory Com\GIS\Mapping_BG_Overal031618.mxd April 2018

Upload: buitu

Post on 06-Aug-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

±

Limit of

Unsteady HEC-RASModel

£¤81 !(294 ¤£81

£10 £¤10 ¤!(10 §¦̈94 ?A@336

§̈¦94

£¤81

§̈¦29 £¤75

*#

!(

Floodplain with or without Project (Based on #100-yr Flood = 33,000 cfs) *

New 100-year Floodplain with Project *# !(100-year Floodplain Removed with Project(i.e., Benefitted Area)

*#Pre-Task Force With Project 100-year Floodplain !(46 *#

Upstream Mitigation Structures )" Residential !( Non-Residential

Cemetery Impact !(

!( Impacted by Plan A, Not Impacted by Plan B *#

*# Impacted by Plan A and Plan B !( *#

Organ(!ic Farms (Impacts To Be Determined)18

Organic Farms (No Longer Impacted with Plan B)Diversion ChannelPlan B AlignmentPlan A Southern EmbankmentLeveeRiver Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN,

GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

FM Area Diversion Project Plan B vs. Plan A Comparison 0 1 2 4

Miles CreatedBy:enelson DateCreated:01/19/2018 DateExported:4/6/2018 Image:2012CountyNAIP ElevationData: -CoordinateSystem:NAD1983UTMZone14N Datum:NorthAmerican1983 µ H:\Fargo\JBN\7400\7438\13_7438_015\MinnesotaDam Safety Permit\SmallTeam\2017-11-13TechAdvisory Com\GIS\Mapping_BG_Overal031618.mxd April 2018