Created by Jen Brown for UNM, Center for Development & Disability Early Childhood Learning Network, December, 2012

1) Are at least 3 age zones completely scored across all developmental domains?

2) Are the criteria and associated age-ranges appropriate for the number of credited items?

3) Is the number of missed starred

items reasonable? (i.e. – none or

1-3 or so; not 6, etc.)

2

2

2

2

2

2

4

2 1

1

1 0

2

2

2

2

2

2

4

2 1

1

1 0

EXAMPLE

1

Created by Jen Brown for UNM, Center for Development & Disability Early Childhood Learning Network, December, 2012

Review the actual “scoring” of items within

and across developmental domains:

1) Are ALL of the items from at least

3 age zones scored?

2) Are all cross-referenced items

scored appropriately across

domains? (See IDA

Administration Manual for more

information)

+

+

+

+

+

+

-

Em

-

-

RI - Relationship to

Inanimate Objects

L - Language/

Communication

Created by Jen Brown for UNM, Center for Development & Disability Early Childhood Learning Network, 2012; updated September, 2014.

1) Are the domains marked “Competent”

also at age level?

2) Are the domains that are below age-

level, marked “Of Concern”?

3) Was Table 6 used as the primary table

for calculating the 25% percent delay

needed for FIT Program eligibility?

Created by Jen Brown for UNM, Center for Development & Disability Early Childhood Learning Network, 2012; updated September, 2014.

Is the Developmental and

Behavioral Concerns page

completed or marked with “None”

if there are no concerns?

X X

X