eoa, inc. assistant program manager 111 west evelyn avenue...
TRANSCRIPT
1111 Broadway, 6th Floor
Oakland, California 94607 PH 510.836.3034
FAX 510.836.3036
www.geosyntec.com
16 July 2018
Ms. Jill Bicknell
EOA, Inc.
Assistant Program Manager
Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program
111 West Evelyn Avenue
Suite 110
Sunnyvale, California 94086
Subject: Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Professional Civil Engineers Registered in the
State of California to Design, Review and/or Certify Storm Water Treatment Measures
and Hydromodification Control Facilities
Dear Ms. Bicknell:
Attached you will find Geosyntec Consultants’ statement of qualifications to perform design,
review, and/or certification of stormwater treatment measures and hydromodification flow control
facilities. The attached statement of qualifications includes revised information about the
California licensed civil engineering staff in our Oakland water resources practice group, and three
new examples of experience.
If you have any questions regarding this package please contact Judd Goodman at
[email protected] or (510) 285-2767.
Thank you for inviting us to participate in this process.
Sincerely,
Judd Goodman, P.E.
Senior Engineer
Lisa Austin, P.E.
Principal
Attachment: Geosyntec SOQ for SCVURPPP: two (2) hard copies and one (1) electronic copy on CD
2018 Qualifications
For the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program
Design, Review and/or Certify Storm Water Treatment Measures and Hydromodification Control Facilities
July 16, 2018 Prepared by
Judd Goodman, P.E. Lisa Austin, P.E.
1111 Broadway, 6th Floor Oakland, California 94607
(510) 285-2757
Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 2
Firm Background ........................................................................................................................... 2
Geosyntec Key Qualified Personnel ............................................................................................. 3
SCVURPPP Program Understanding ........................................................................................... 7
Overall Project Experience in Design of Stormwater Management Facilities ............................. 10
Statement of Commitment .......................................................................................................... 15
Attachment A: Proof of Personnel Training
Qualifications for SCVURPPP Design, Review, Certification of Stormwater BMPs
and Hydromodification Flow Control Facilities
July 2018 P a g e | 2
INTRODUCTION
Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. (Geosyntec) is pleased to submit this statement of qualifications of our California-licensed professional civil engineers to design, review, and/or certify stormwater treatment best management practices (BMPs) and hydromodification flow control facilities.
Contact information:
Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. 1111 Broadway, 6th Floor Oakland, CA 94607 Telephone: 510-836-3034 Fax: 510-836-3036
Year Established: 1983
Primary contact: Judd Goodman, P.E. 510-285-2767 [email protected]
Secondary contact: Lisa Austin, P.E. 510-285-2757 [email protected]
FIRM BACKGROUND
Geosyntec is an employee-owned company with offices throughout the United States. Since our founding in 1983, our business has grown around projects involving environmental studies and restoration, natural resources management, and engineering and design for the solid waste disposal, water resources, and transportation infrastructures. We are nationally known for our practice leadership, extensive experience, technological innovation, and exceptional client service.
Our water and natural resources practice group consists of approximately 112 professionals whose focus is on all aspects of natural resources, water quality, TMDLs, and stormwater management, including planning and permitting; sediment and erosion control; construction and post-construction best management practice (BMP) selection, design, and construction; hydromodification management; modeling; monitoring; training; and manual development. Geosyntec has earned a reputation for innovative work in stormwater and surface water quality management. Our personnel have helped shape the state of these practices nationally over the past two decades via joint research and project work with civil engineering faculty at outstanding academic institutions, as well as continuous involvement in original research, development, and application of techniques and technologies. Our staff excels in selection, design, and construction of stormwater treatment systems; hydromodification control impact assessment, management
Qualifications for SCVURPPP Design, Review, Certification of Stormwater BMPs
and Hydromodification Flow Control Facilities
July 2018 P a g e | 3
planning, and control; development of construction, industrial, and municipal NPDES compliance programs for a variety of public and private entities; TMDL implementation programs; and innovative water quality planning efforts. Many of Geosyntec’s projects in these areas have
contributed to setting current industry standards and guidelines. We have developed many hydromodification control and low impact development (LID) BMP design guidance documents and have extensive experience in implementation of BMPs for development projects.
GEOSYNTEC KEY QUALIFIED PERSONNEL
This section describes qualifications and experience of the key staff in Geosyntec’s Oakland office
who will be assigned to conduct reviews. Proof of training for these individuals is included in this Statement of Qualifications in Attachment A.
LISA AUSTIN, P.E. – PRINCIPAL
Lisa Austin is a licensed civil engineer registered in the State of California. Lisa has 29 years of experience in water quality and stormwater management. She has in-depth knowledge of municipal and industrial NPDES permitting; municipal stormwater program planning and operations; stormwater BMP selection, design, and maintenance; and construction site erosion control. She is active in stormwater planning, providing technical assistance to various clients on regulatory issues, developing and evaluating conceptual BMP plans, and assessing the significance of potential water quality and hydromodification impacts (CEQA analysis) in California. Ms. Austin has prepared Water Quality Management Plans/Technical Reports for numerous major new development and redevelopment projects, and TMDL Implementation Plans that integrate LID principles.
Ms. Austin has conducted and attended the following training presentations at workshops and conferences over the past three years:
• Proceedings of the Annual CASQA Conference. September 2017. Presented: “Addressing PCBs and Mercury TMDLs in San Francisco Bay through Urban Runoff Treatment Retrofits – CW4CB Pilot Project Results.”
• California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) Annual Conference. September 2016. Presented: “Measuring Effectiveness and Managing Adaptively in the Bay Area.”
• California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) Annual Conference. Monterey, California. October 2015. Presented: “TMDL Implementation and Load Reduction
Accounting through the San Francisco Bay Area Regional Municipal Stormwater Permit.”
JUDD GOODMAN, P.E. – SENIOR ENGINEER
Judd Goodman is a licensed civil engineer registered in the State of California. He has 13 years of experience related to the planning, design, and adaptive management of surface water systems. Mr. Goodman’s professional passion is providing flood and erosion protection for stream
Qualifications for SCVURPPP Design, Review, Certification of Stormwater BMPs
and Hydromodification Flow Control Facilities
July 2018 P a g e | 4
systems while preserving natural riparian and ecological processes. With Geosyntec, his most significant technical contributions have been made solving surface water problems which require an engineering and geomorphic perspective. Mr. Goodman has been involved in a variety of projects including hydromodification planning and impact analysis, geomorphic field assessment, erosion and sediment control inspection at construction sites, design of stormwater management systems, water quality and geomorphic monitoring, and storm event characterization for litigation support.
Mr. Goodman has worked closely with both public agencies and private land developers to plan and design stormwater BMPs and hydromodification control facilities throughout California. Specific projects include: authoring Hydromodification Management Plans (HMPs) for the Vallejo Public Works Department, Ventura County Watershed Protection District, and the Rancho Mission Viejo development in southern Orange County; serving as a hydromodification management (HM) technical expert for the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA) during their NPDES permit negotiations with the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFRWQCB); updating the Contra Costa Clean Water Program’s LID BMP sizing factors for HM; performing system-specific continuous hydrologic analyses and geomorphic assessments to help developers and their civil engineers iteratively size and locate HM controls; evaluating in-stream rehabilitation designs using both peak event and long-term continuous analysis; and monitoring constructed BMPs and in-stream controls using an adaptive management approach.
Mr. Goodman has attended or conducted training sessions at the following workshops and conferences over the past three years:
• US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Conservation Training Center Restoration Webinar Series. June 2018. Attended: “Floodplain Reconnection on Butano Creek - Design, Implementation and Preliminary Post-Project Results.”
• Center for Watershed Protection webcast. June 2018. Attended: “Bioretention Design
Modifications.”
• Monterey Regional Water Recovery Study Technical Stakeholder Group Meeting. Pacific Grove, California. October 2017. Presented: “Methodology Presentation”.
• California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) Annual Conference. Sacramento, California. September 2017. Presented: “Low Impact Development for Hydromodification
Management: Bioretention Sizing Factors from Direct Calculation of Erosion Potential.”
• California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) Annual Conference. San Diego, California. September 2016. Presented: “Identifying and Prioritizing In-Stream Hydromodification Control Opportunities.”
Qualifications for SCVURPPP Design, Review, Certification of Stormwater BMPs
and Hydromodification Flow Control Facilities
July 2018 P a g e | 5
• US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) Draft Technical Report webinar. May 2016. Attended: “Protecting Aquatic Life from Effects of Hydrologic Alteration.”
• California State Water Resources Control Board – Strategy to Optimize Resource Management of Storm Water (Storm Water Strategy, STORMS) Seminar. Sacramento, California. April 2016. Presented and Coordinated: “Real-Time Cloud-Based Continuous Monitoring and Adaptive Storm Water Control.”
• California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) Annual Conference. Monterey, California. October 2015. Presented: “Active Hydromodification Control.”
• Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Mitigation Workshop. Oakland, California. September 2015. Presented: “Development of Concepts in Community
Hydromodification Plans.”
• Forester University webinar. September 2015. Presented: “Hydromodification 101:
Predicting and Mitigating Stormwater Impacts to Stream Stability.”
KELLY HAVENS, P.E. – SENIOR ENGINEER
Kelly Havens is a licensed civil engineer registered in the State of California. She has a decade of experience applying her background in environmental engineering, water chemistry, and geochemistry to stormwater mitigation and water quality control. She provides management and technical support on projects focusing on urban, industrial, and construction-phase stormwater management, including stormwater best management practices (BMPs) technical guidance and feasibility studies, stormwater management planning, stormwater BMP sizing and design, stormwater BMP evaluation, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and stormwater requirements evaluation and compliance, and water quality and source control studies.
Ms. Havens has attended or conducted training sessions at the following workshops and conferences over the past three years:
• Center for Watershed Protection webcast. June 2018. Attended: “Bioretention Design
Modifications.”
• Monterey Regional Water Recovery Study Technical Stakeholder Group Meeting. Pacific Grove, California. October 2017. Presented: “Overview of Water Recovery Study”.
• Monterey Peninsula Stormwater Resource Plan Stakeholder Group Meeting. Pacific Grove, California. October 2017. Presented: “Stormwater Resource Plan”.
• Proceedings of the Annual CASQA Conference. September 2017. Presented: “Addressing PCBs and Mercury TMDLs in San Francisco Bay through Urban Runoff Treatment Retrofits – CW4CB Pilot Project Results.”
Qualifications for SCVURPPP Design, Review, Certification of Stormwater BMPs
and Hydromodification Flow Control Facilities
July 2018 P a g e | 6
• Proceedings of the Annual CASQA Conference. September 2017. Presented: “Balancing
Permit Requirements, TMDLs, and the Nexus between Green Infrastructure Plans and Stormwater Resource Plans for the San Francisco Bay Area: City of Dublin Case Study.” With Shannan Young, City of Dublin.
• Contra Costa Watersheds Stormwater Resource Plan South Contra Costa County Stakeholder Outreach Group. Moraga, CA. September 2017. Presented: “Prioritizing Projects”.
• Contra Costa Watersheds Stormwater Resource Plan East Contra Costa County Stakeholder Outreach Group. September 2017. Presented: “Prioritizing Projects”.
• Urban Greening Bay Area Regional Roundtable: Sustainable Streets. Oakland, CA. March 2017. Presented: “Common Obstacles to Funding Sustainable Streets”.
• Proceedings of the Annual CASQA Conference. September 2016. Presented: “Storm
Surge Resiliency Planning – Protecting Resources.”
• Proceedings of the International Low Impact Development Conference. August 2016. Presented: “A New Method for Sizing Flow-based Treatment Systems to Meet Volume-based Standards.”
AUSTIN ORR, P.E. – PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
Austin Orr is a licensed civil engineer registered in the State of California. He has over four years of consulting experience in urban stormwater management, hydrologic and sediment transport modeling, best management practice (BMP) sizing and performance evaluation, and geospatial analysis. He specializes in data analysis and visualization, software development, and workflow automation. Mr. Orr currently assists with regional efforts in the San Francisco Bay Area toward total maximum daily load (TMDL) compliance for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and mercury, and with software development tools to integrate geospatial data, pollutant wash off concentrations, BMP performance data from the International BMP Database, and stormwater capture performance of BMPs modeled with United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)’s stormwater management model (SWMM) software.
Mr. Orr has attended or conducted training sessions or presentations at the following workshops and conferences over the past three years:
• Center for Watershed Protection webcast. June 2018. Attended: “Bioretention Design
Modifications.”
• American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) International Low Impact Development (LID) Conference. Portland, Maine. August 2016. Presented: “Optimizing Biofiltration Media and Outlet Designs for Regional Biofiltration Facilities.”
• California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) Annual Conference, Monterey, California. October 2015. Attended.
Qualifications for SCVURPPP Design, Review, Certification of Stormwater BMPs
and Hydromodification Flow Control Facilities
July 2018 P a g e | 7
SCVURPPP PROGRAM UNDERSTANDING
Understanding of Urban Stormwater Management Practices, Issues, and Requirements
Our Oakland Water and Natural Resources staff have supported the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA) and its member agencies on a number of urban runoff control and San Francisco Bay TMDL implementation efforts required by the San Francisco Bay Region Municipal Regional Permit (MRP), Order No. R2-2015-0049. Our understanding of the stormwater management requirements for new development and redevelopment projects is summarized below.
The MRP contains treatment and flow control requirements for “Regulated Projects,” which are
defined in the MRP. A project would be considered a Regulated Project if the project creates and/or replaces 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface, collectively over the entire project site. This threshold is reduced to 5,000 square feet or more of new or replaced impervious surface for projects that have a special land use category (i.e., auto service facilities, retail gasoline outlets, restaurants, and stand-alone parking lots).
Development is defined as “construction, rehabilitation, redevelopment, or reconstruction of any
public or private residential project (whether single-family, multi-unit, or planned unit development); or industrial, commercial, retail or other nonresidential project, including public agency projects.” Where a redevelopment project results in an alteration of less than 50 percent
of the impervious surface of a previously existing development that was not subject to MS4 Permit requirements, only the new and/or replaced impervious surface of the project must be included in the treatment and flow control system design (i.e., stormwater treatment systems must be designed and sized to treat stormwater runoff from the new and/or replaced impervious surface of the project). If the project will add or replace more than 50 percent of the existing impervious area, then the treatment and flow control requirements apply to the entire site.
Regulated Projects are required to treat stormwater runoff from the 85th percentile storm event or achieve 80 percent or more capture from the Regulated Project’s drainage area with Low
Impact Development (LID) treatment measures onsite (or with LID treatment measures at a joint stormwater treatment facility). LID treatment measures are harvesting and use, infiltration, evapotranspiration, or biotreatment. A properly engineered and maintained biotreatment system may be considered only if it is infeasible to implement harvesting and use, infiltration, or evapotranspiration at a project site. Geosyntec assisted BASMAA with developing a Feasibility/ Infeasibility Criteria Report which was submitted to the Regional Water Board. Infeasibility to implement harvesting and use, infiltration, or evapotranspiration at a project site may result from conditions including the following:
Qualifications for SCVURPPP Design, Review, Certification of Stormwater BMPs
and Hydromodification Flow Control Facilities
July 2018 P a g e | 8
• Locations where seasonal high groundwater would be within 10 feet of the base of the LID treatment measure.
• Locations within 100 feet of a groundwater well used for drinking water.
• Development sites where pollutant mobilization in the soil or groundwater is a documented concern.
• Locations with potential geotechnical hazards.
• Locations with tight clay soils that significantly limit the infiltration of stormwater.
• Smart growth and infill or redevelopment sites where the density and/or nature of the project would create significant difficulty for compliance with the onsite volume retention requirement. BASMAA has adopted Special Project provisions to address these infeasibility criteria.
Biotreatment systems must be designed to have a surface area no smaller than what is required to accommodate a 5 inches/hour stormwater runoff surface loading rate. The planting and soil media for biotreatment systems must be designed to sustain plant growth and maximize stormwater runoff retention and pollutant removal. Model biotreatment soil media specifications and soil infiltration testing methods have been adopted for these systems.
Additionally, the MRP contains Hydromodification Management (HM) requirements. These requirements apply to projects that create and/or replace one acre or more of impervious surface. Various attachments to the MRP define the HM Requirements for the different counties in the Bay Area and provide maps for determining if a project is exempt from HM requirements.
Understanding of Continuous Simulation Hydrologic Models and Analysis of Output Data
Geosyntec has extensive experience applying continuous hydrologic models to engineering and stormwater management projects. Continuous hydrologic modeling more accurately predicts the long-term flow conditions as opposed to predictions using the event-based methods traditionally used for flood control. Traditional flood control methods appropriately address infrequent large storm events to ensure storm runoff conveyance and local scour control for public safety. Continuous hydrologic modeling is better when addressing the long-term physical and ecological processes of a riparian system that are functions of the frequent hydrologic conditions (day-to-day, season-to-season), as well as, in some cases infrequent events. Research has shown that continuous hydrologic modeling and analysis of the distribution of runoff (opposed to analysis of discrete events) is the most appropriate approach to address the effects of hydromodification. Continuous hydrologic modeling can also be used as a more precise tool for sizing treatment control measures to achieve the 80 percent capture of average annual runoff volume performance goal.
The MRP requires new development and redevelopment projects to manage increases in runoff rates, volume, and duration where increases from the pre-project condition can cause increased
Qualifications for SCVURPPP Design, Review, Certification of Stormwater BMPs
and Hydromodification Flow Control Facilities
July 2018 P a g e | 9
erosion of creek beds and banks. The SCVURPPP Hydromodification Management Plan (HMP) identifies flow duration control (FDC) as the preferred method to address the MRP permit requirements.
FDC maintains the pre-project distribution of flows (typically hourly), which in turn, maintains the distribution of important geomorphically significant flows1 in the receiving waters and promotes long-term stability. This approach is designed to maintain the existing erosion and sediment transport processes and to protect the existing physical and ecological characteristics of the receiving waters.
In applying the FDC method, a time series of rainfall (typically 30 years or more of hourly data) is transformed to a time series of runoff using the continuous hydrologic model. The time series of runoff is then transformed to a frequency distribution (histogram) and compared between pre- and post-project land development scenarios. The comparison is best accomplished by comparing continuous frequency distribution curves, or flow duration curves. These curves, as well as the histograms, illustrate the changes in flow rates, volume, and duration between pre- and post-project scenarios.
Designing flow control facilities to match the post-project flow duration curve to the pre-project flow duration curve is the most common management strategy to address the effects of hydromodification and meet the HM provisions in the MRP. The Bay Area Hydrology Model (BAHM) is a tool that was developed by SCVURPPP in cooperation with the Alameda Clean Water Program and the San Mateo Countywide Clean Water Pollution Prevention Program for analyzing hydromodification and sizing FDC facilities for new development and redevelopment projects in these three counties.
An alternative HM Standard was included in the updated 2015 MRP, in addition to the HM Standard based on FDC. The additional HM Standard allows for direct simulation of Erosion Potential (Ep) if the method is submitted to the Water Board for review and is approved by the Executive Officer. Ep is expressed as the ratio of post-project to pre-project “work done” on the
creek. Direct simulation of Ep can reduce the level of conservatism for sizing distributed LID BMPs, compared to FDC, and provides a scientifically-defensible performance standard for designing in-stream hydromodification control measures via creek restoration.
While on-site flow duration controls have been the most commonly applied method for managing hydromodification, off-site regional controls and in-stream modifications are available options for new and re-development projects. All three of these implementation options (i.e., on-site, off-site, and in-stream controls, or a combination thereof) are able to satisfy the HMP’s stated
1 Geomorphically significant flows is a phrase that incorporates all important sediment transporting flows, erosive flows, and flows that influence the geomorphic character of the receiving water channel and riparian corridor.
Qualifications for SCVURPPP Design, Review, Certification of Stormwater BMPs
and Hydromodification Flow Control Facilities
July 2018 P a g e | 10
management objective to not cause an increase in the erosion potential of the receiving stream
over the pre-project (existing) condition.
OVERALL PROJECT EXPERIENCE IN DESIGN OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES
Geosyntec has extensive experience in the selection, design, and construction of stormwater treatment control measures, ranging from development of design guidance, municipal retrofitting, and design and construction of facilities for new development and redevelopment projects. Geosyntec has developed national, state, and local level stormwater technical manuals and guidance, including assisting Ventura County, Orange County, and BASMAA with the development of low impact development (LID) standards, feasibility/infeasibility analyses, control measure sizing tools, and implementation guidance documents. We have also conducted training for municipal staff and the development community on post-construction stormwater management and LID requirements. Geosyntec has been able to synthesize highly complex regulatory requirements and convert this information into technical guidance that can be understood and implemented by the design and construction communities.
Geosyntec has assisted many private developer clients with the selection and design of LID, treatment, and hydromodification control measures using continuous modeling approaches in California over the past decade. Clients include: The Irvine Company and Mercedes Benz in Santa Clara County; Rancho Mission Viejo and St. Michael’s Abbey in Orange County; Newhall
Land, Woodridge Capital Partners, JSB Development, and Centennial Founders in Los Angeles County; Tejon Ranch in Kern County; and Yokohl Ranch in Tulare County.
Geosyntec considers that the ability to conduct comprehensive inspections is enhanced by our experience with design, construction oversight, inspection, and monitoring. These activities provide our inspectors with additional insight and a broader context for conducting the inspection, and ultimately in identifying what, if any, deficiencies need to be corrected to improve performance. With this perspective we have prepared the table below to illustrate selected project experience and the Geosyntec Oakland staff who were involved in each project. The table illustrates the breath of our experience in terms of BMP types, private and public clients, and scope.
Qualifications for SCVURPPP Design, Review, Certification of Stormwater BMPs
and Hydromodification Flow Control Facilities
July 2018 P a g e | 11
Client (year) Project Name BMP type(s) Staff involved
Scope of Project
Design Construction oversight
Inspection and/or
monitoring
Alameda County Flood Control (2006)
Vasco Road Improvement Project
Flood, hydromodification, and water quality control
basin Goodman X
Alameda County Clean Water Program (2012)
Ettie Street Pump Station Retrofit Media filters Austin,
Havens X
Boeing Corporation (2011-2014)
Santa Susanna Field Laboratory -Northern
Drainage In-Stream Stabilization Goodman X X X
CaliChi Civil Engineers (2017-2018)
Mercedes Benz of Palo Alto Third Party Review
Bioretention, Source Controls Austin X
Contra Costa Clean Water Program
(2016-2017)
NPDES Compliance Assistance Bioretention Goodman,
Orr X
Irvine Company (2017-2018)
Santa Clara Square Retail Project Design
Modifications Bioretention Austin X X X
Kern County Waste Management Agency
(2011-2012) Taft Landfill Flood Control / Water
Quality Basin Goodman,
Havens X
Large National Retail Developer (2007-2015)
Nationwide NPDES Stormwater Auditing
Erosion and Sediment Controls
Goodman, Havens X X
Lehigh-Hanson (2010-2011)
Tacoma Facility Industrial BMP Design
Flow duration control facility, swales, and
bioretention
Austin, Havens X X X
Los Angeles, City of (2014) Peck Park Channel Improvements,
Bio-infiltration Basins Goodman X
Monterey One Water, City of Monterey (2018) Hartnell Gulch In-Stream Rehabilitation,
Runoff Recovery Goodman X
Newhall Land and Farming
(2012-2018)
Mission Village, Homestead South,
Potrero, Entrada South, Legacy Village, Valencia
Commercial Center
Regional Infiltration and Bio-infiltration Basins, and
In-Stream HM Controls
Goodman, Orr, Havens X
Oakland, City of (2013) Ettie Street Project Tree Wells Austin X
Orange County Public Works Department
(2018)
Saddleback Meadows Design Review
Water Quality / Hydromodification Basins Goodman X
Orange County Public Works Department
(2013-2016)
Santa Ana – Delhi Channel
In-Stream Rehabilitation and Mitigation Goodman X
Qualifications for SCVURPPP Design, Review, Certification of Stormwater BMPs
and Hydromodification Flow Control Facilities
July 2018 P a g e | 12
Client (year) Project Name BMP type(s) Staff involved
Scope of Project
Design Construction oversight
Inspection and/or
monitoring
Presidio of San Francisco (2009-2011)
Landfill E Remediation
Stream Daylighting, Bio-swales, Detention Basins,
Flow-based Filtration, Erosion and Sediment
Control BMPs
Goodman X X X
Republic Services (2010 -2014)
Vasco Road Landfill
Sedimentation Basins, Erosion and Sediment
Control BMPs Goodman X
Sacramento, City of (2007 - 2010)
North Natomas Basin No. 4
Flood and Water Quality Detention Basin Goodman X
Sun Ranch Capital Partners & USA Portola Properties (2011-2012)
Portola Center
Hydromodification BMPs including Underground Vaults and Detention
Basin
Goodman X
UDR (2011-2012) Los Alisos Apartments
Hydromodification BMPs including Underground
Pipe and Detention Basin Goodman X
Waste Management (2009-2014) Altamont Landfill
Flood Control /Water Quality / Sedimentation
Basins Goodman X
Woodridge Capital (2015-2018) North Lake
Regional Infiltration Basins, Distributed
Bioretention
Goodman, Orr X
Examples of experience in the design of stormwater treatment and flow control measures (including LID measures) within the past five years are provided below.
Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA) Hydromodification Management Technical Support
Geosyntec led a modeling analysis to evaluate the suitability of alternative hydromodification control standards, compared to the flow duration curve matching criteria included in the San Francisco Bay Area Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit (MRP). After meeting with representatives of BASMAA to gain consensus on model scenarios, Geosyntec performed long-term continuous geomorphic work calculations for a range of bioretention BMP footprints; documented assumptions, results, and conclusions in a technical memorandum; and presented findings to the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFRWQCB) and BASMAA members. Because of this work, the SFRWQCB added a hydromodification management standard in the updated MRP (Provision C3.g.iii of Order Number R2-2015-0049), which allows for direct simulation of Ep. This method, championed by Geosyntec, reduces the level of conservatism for sizing distributed LID BMPs for hydromodification management and provides a scientifically-defensible performance standard for designing in-stream hydromodification control measures.
Qualifications for SCVURPPP Design, Review, Certification of Stormwater BMPs
and Hydromodification Flow Control Facilities
July 2018 P a g e | 13
Geosyntec Personnel: Judd Goodman, Lisa Austin
Client References: Geoff Brosseau, Executive Director Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA) P.O. Box 2385 Menlo Park, CA 94026 (650) 365-8678 [email protected] [email protected]
Newhall Land Water Quality and Hydromodification Management Support
Geosyntec is assisting Newhall Land, a landowner and developer, in developing and implementing company-wide strategies for addressing stormwater runoff from its development projects. At 11,999 acres, the Newhall Ranch Specific Plan (NRSP) subregion is among the largest of the land holdings in the region having a single owner. The size and single ownership of the site provided a unique opportunity to develop a comprehensive, master-planned stormwater mitigation approach. The NRSP subregion is located in the unincorporated area of Los Angeles County approximately 30 miles north of the City of Los Angeles and is adjacent to and bisected by the Santa Clara River. The Specific Plan allows for a broad range of residential, mixed-use, and non-residential land uses. Adjacent Newhall Land projects that Geosyntec is assisting with include Entrada North, Entrada South, Legacy Village, and the build-out of the Valencia Commerce Center.
Services include development of the Newhall Ranch Specific Plan Sub-Regional Stormwater
Mitigation Plan; Water Quality Technical Reports (WQTRs) for the five villages within the Newhall Ranch Specific Plan; the Entrada North, Entrada South, and the Legacy Village projects; and entitlement support for various other Newhall Land projects. These reports provide the CEQA impact analysis and serve as the technical appendices for each project’s environmental impact
report. In addition, Geosyntec provided technical support in the CWA Section 401 water quality certification permitting process with the Regional Water Board.
The Newhall Ranch Specific Plan Sub-Regional Stormwater Mitigation Plan and Project WQTRs were developed using a watershed-based approach that addresses pollutants of concern and hydrologic conditions of concern that can affect aquatic and riparian habitat and natural resources, including species associated with these habitats and natural communities. The reports include concept-level site design, source control, low impact development (LID), and hydromodification control Best Management Practices (BMPs), consistent with the Los Angeles County MS4 Permit, but also focus on meeting existing and potential future Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs). Potential changes in water quality and hydrology are addressed for pollutants of concern and
Qualifications for SCVURPPP Design, Review, Certification of Stormwater BMPs
and Hydromodification Flow Control Facilities
July 2018 P a g e | 14
hydrologic conditions of concern based on runoff water quality and quantity modeling, literature information, and best professional judgment.
Geosyntec is also providing ongoing water quality BMP sizing and design assistance to Newhall Land for the design of regional LID facilities for the Mission Village and Landmark Village projects. Aspects of the design that are being supported or led by Geosyntec include pretreatment system selection and sizing, diversion structure sizing, flow distribution system and outlet control, biofiltration media specifications, coordination with landscape architect and/or media supplier on media and plant specifications, choking layer specifications, and construction methods and testing.
Geosyntec Personnel: Lisa Austin, Judd Goodman, Kelly Havens, Austin Orr
Client References: Corey Harpole 25124 Springfield Court, 3rd Floor Ventura, CA 91355-1088 (661) 255-4075 [email protected] Mercedes Benz Third-Party Review of Stormwater Treatment Measures
The City of Palo Alto, through its Stormwater Pollution Prevention Ordinance, requires third-party certification that a project applicant’s design submittals meet the design criteria and groundwater
protection requirements set forth in the Municipal Regional Permit (MRP). Geosyntec completed a third-party review of the design of the stormwater LID and treatment control measures in the finalized improvement plans and the stormwater quality management plan for the measures for the Mercedes Benz of Palo Alto project.
Geosyntec Personnel: Lisa Austin
Client References: Austin Hahn, Principal CaliChi Civil Engineers 1 N. LaSalle, Suite 3950 Chicago, IL 60602 (312) 940-4393 [email protected] Irvine Company Bioretention Design Modifications
Geosyntec conducted an evaluation of 15 bioretention cells at the Santa Clara Square Retail Project (Project) in the City of Santa Clara in June 2017. The team provided recommendations in
Qualifications for SCVURPPP Design, Review, Certification of Stormwater BMPs
and Hydromodification Flow Control Facilities
July 2018 P a g e | 15
a technical memorandum for modifying the cells, and in some cases, areas adjacent to the cells (such as adjacent handicapped parking stalls), to improve pedestrian safety while maintaining compliance with applicable stormwater treatment regulations. Geosyntec is currently serving as the Project Manager in charge of coordinating with the project civil engineer, the site Operations Manager, and selected contractors, to implement the recommended modifications.
Geosyntec Personnel: Lisa Austin
Client References: Gregg LaCagnina, V.P. Facilities Management Irvine Company Retail Properties 110 Innovation Irvine, CA 92617 (949) 720-3103 [email protected]
STATEMENT OF COMMITMENT
Geosyntec is committed to supporting the SCVURPPP and we wish to be included on the Qualified Consultant List. We believe that we can provide services that greatly benefit SCVURPPP due to our experience with both public services, and the private sector/developers. We have sufficient number of staff to provide timely and responsive service to requests.
Contact Us Settings
Home
Consumers
Licensees
Applicants
Publications
Online Services
About Us
Search Results for Engineers, Land Surveyors, Geologists, GeophysicistsThis information is updated Monday through Friday - Last updated: JUL-12-2018
To see all the information for a licensee, click on the highlighted name. This will also include disciplinary actions if any are present.
Name TypeNumberStatusAddress City Zip CountyAUSTIN LISA JOC 74663 CLEAR 648 ELSIE AVENUESAN LEANDRO94577ALAMEDARecord 1
First Previous
DisclaimerAll information provided by the Department of Consumer Affairs on this web page, and on its other web pages and internet sites, is made available to provide immediate access for the convenience of interested persons. While the Department believes the information to be reliable, human or mechanical error remains a possibility, as does delay in the posting or
Page 1 of 2Board Information - Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists
7/13/2018http://www2.dca.ca.gov/pls/wllpub/WLLQRYNA$LCEV2.ActionQuery
updating of information. Therefore, the Department makes no guarantee as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, currency, or correct sequencing of the information. Neither the Department, nor any of the sources of the information, shall be responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the use or results obtained from the use of this information. Other specific cautionary notices may be included on other web pages maintained by the Department. All access to and use of this web page and any other web page or internet site of the Department is governed by the Disclaimers and Conditions for Access and Use as set forth at California Department of Consumer Affairs' Disclaimer Information and Use Information.
Back New Search Main Page
Page 2 of 2Board Information - Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists
7/13/2018http://www2.dca.ca.gov/pls/wllpub/WLLQRYNA$LCEV2.ActionQuery
12
CASQA Technical Program Agenda Wednesday, October 21, 2015
Wednesday
7:15a–8:15a TRAINER OF RECORD FORUM (Spyglass), Moderator: Marvin Sachse, Brash IndustriesModerator led discussion open to all conference attendees to share successful training techniques, exchange ideas for topics that are consistently diffi cult to present, and make suggestions for subsequent program improvements for the forthcoming new Construction General Permit.
7:30a–8:00a ROOM MONITOR TRAINING (Oak Tree)
7:30a–8:15a THE NEXT FRONTIER FOR STORMWATER: FORMING A NATIONAL ORGANIZATION TO MOVE US FORWARD (Big Sur) Scott Taylor, Michael Baker International; Seth Brown, George Mason University
7:30a–3:00p REGISTRATION DESK (Regency Foyer)
8:00a–8:30a EXHIBITOR FOCUS (Regency Grand Ballroom)
8:00a–12:00p EXHIBIT HALL OPEN (Regency Grand Ballroom)
8:00a–1:20p POSTER SESSION (Mark Thomas Foyer)
SESSION
4Municipal Permits: Navigating Requirements and Overcoming ObstaclesOvercoming ChallengesTrack A, Room: Spyglass
Stormwater TreatmentBMP Development and StudiesTrack B, Room: Big Sur
SustainabilityStormwater Sustainability InitiativesTrack C, Room: Oak Tree
Construction Stormwater ManagementConstruction Stormwater AssessmentTrack D, Room: Cypress
The Science and Policy of TMDLsSan Francisco Bay Hg and PCB EffortsTrack E, Room: Windjammer
MODERATORTracy Ingebrigtsen,City of Laguna Beach
Anna Lantin,Michael Baker International
Laura Prickett, Horizon Water and Environment, LLC
Dave Mercier,Michael Baker International
Donna Bodine,Geosyntec Consultants
8:30a–9:00a
Overcoming Signifi cant Obstacles: Technology, Funding and Community Support – A Case Study in Malibu Creek WatershedEwelina Mutkowska,County of Ventura
Field-Scale Column Testing of Engineered Soils and Bioretention Confi gurations for the Removal of Nutrients and Lesser-Studied ConstituentsDipen Patel, Water Programs at Sacramento State
Stormwater and Resiliency: How San Francisco’s Stormwater Management Ordinance is Spurring Non-Potable ReuseKerry Rubin,AECOM
Challenges and Lessons Learned on a 200-Mile 500kV Electrical Transmission Line Construction ProjectHazem Gabr,Southern California Edison
TMDL Implementation and Load Reduction Accounting through the San Francisco Bay Area Regional Municipal Stormwater PermitJon Konnan,EOA, Inc.
9:05a–9:35a
Phase II – Lessons Learned Organizing Locally and Regionally in the North BaySandy Mathews, Larry Walker Associates
A Proposal for Statewide Knee-of-the-Curve BMP Sizing CriteriaMaureen Kerner,Water Programs at Sacramento State
Sustainability Rating of Stormwater BMPsLisa Skutecki, Brown and Caldwell
A Construction Managers Approach to Storm Water ComplianceMitchel Whitson,Whitson CM
Stormwater Control Programs to Address PCBs and Mercury (60 minutes)Khalil Abusaba,AMEC Foster Wheeler;Lisa Austin,Geosyntec Consultants;Rebecca Tuden,City of Oakland
9:40a–10:10a
Implementing Green Infrastructure Requirements in the New Bay Area Municipal Regional PermitJill Bicknell, Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program
Minimizing Cost and Maximizing Load Reduction by Targeting the First FlushDavid Kirby,Ventura County Watershed Protection District
Sustainable Funding for Stormwater ServicesMitch Avalon,County Engineers Association of California
An Active Case for Passive TreatmentTanya Bilezikjian,Michael Baker International
10:10a–10:55a BREAK, EXHIBITOR FOCUS AND PRIZE DRAWING (Regency Grand Ballroom)
SESSION
5Municipal Permits: Navigating Requirements and Overcoming ObstaclesCompliance SuccessTrack A, Room: Spyglass
Stormwater TreatmentBMPs and Urban StreamsTrack B, Room: Big Sur
Meeting ASBS RequirementsExploring the DataTrack C, Room: Oak Tree
QSD/QSP ForumTrack D, Room: Cypress
Regional Treatment andWatershed ManagementAlternative ComplianceTrack E, Room: Windjammer
MODERATORClaudia Steiding, Riverside County
Cory Jones,SCS Engineers
Brian Currier, Water Programs at Sacramento State
Melanie Sotelo, CASC Engineering and Consulting
Andrea Crumpacker,Weston Solutions, Inc.
10:55a–11:25a
The Stormwater Finance Game – Focused Compliance with Fewer DollarsChad Praul,Environmental Incentives
Urban Stream Floodplain Restoration and Associated Water Quality Improvements In Yreka, CaliforniaTom Hesseldenz,Tom Hesseldenz and Associates
ASBS Natural Water Quality: Translating Narrative Objectives Into Numerical GuidelinesKenneth Schiff,Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
QSD/QSP Forum (Panel)Jarrod Gibbon,Riverside County;Dave Mercier, Michael Baker International;Rich Muhl,Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board;Kadi Whiteside,Southern California Edison
Offsite Alternative Compliance For Priority Development Projects – What Constitutes “Greater” Water Quality Benefi t?Christina Arias,San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
11:30a–12:00p
How Integrated Asset Management Can Assist in Meeting Your MS4 NPDES Permit RequirementsTerrence Chen,Michael Baker International
Active Hydromodifi cation ControlJudd Goodman,Geosyntec Consultants
Special Protections Meet Real Data: Quandaries for ComplianceDane Hardin,Applied Marine Sciences, Inc.
Stream Rehabilitation Equivalency for Alternative ComplianceEric Mosolgo,City of San Diego
12:00p–1:20p LUNCH (Monterey Ballroom and Garden Terrace Courtyard – included with registration)
10
CASQA TRAINING WORKSHOPS AGENDA Monday, September 12, 2016(continued)
10:00a–10:30a BREAK (Sunset Ballroom Deck and Bay View Deck) AND POSTER PRESENTATION AUTHORS AVAILABLE (Palm Corridor and Garden Foyer)
TRAININGWORKSHOPS
Stormwater MonitoringTrends in Stormwater Monitoring
Stormwater Management Through Natural Treatment Systems
Legal Update TrashApproaches for Trash Capture and Compliance(Limited to 80 people)
Watershed Planning The Realities of Watershed Management Plan and Green Infrastructure Plan Implementation
Bacteria TMDLs and ComplianceHow Do We Get There?
Industrial General Permit
MORNING (continuation) Room: Garden
MORNING (continuation) Room: Dockside
MORNING (continuation) Room: Bay View
FULL DAY (continuation) Room: Sunset I & II
FULL DAY (continuation) Room: Sunset III
FULL DAY (continuation) Room: Sunset IV
FULL DAY (continuation) Room: Sunset V
MODERATOR J. Michael Trapp Michael Baker International; Sean Porter Brown and Caldwell
Ashmita Sengupta Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Rebecca Andrews Best Best & Krieger LLP
Karen Ashby Larry Walker Associates
Richard Watson, Richard Watson & Associates
Andrea Crumpacker Weston Solutions, Inc.
Matt Lentz GSI Environmental; Katharine Wagner Attorney
10:30a–12:00p
Regional Cooperative Monitoring Programs – Southern California Bio-Assessment Eric Stein, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Perspective on the Watershed-Based Monitoring and Participating in Multiple Efforts Jon Ball, City of Los Angeles
Panel Discussion: Trends in Stormwater Monitoring
Plant Selection for Stormwater Capture SystemsRich Ambrose, University of California, Los Angeles
Nofilter MaintenanceMeg Rippy, University of California, Irvine
Catchment Scale In-Stream Nitrate ManagementAsal Askarizadeh, University of California, Los Angeles
Nitrate Removal in BiofiltersEmily Payne, Monash University
Green House Gases in BiofiltersAndrew Mehring, Scripps, University of California, San Diego
Discussion
Developments in State and Federal Policy Jonathan Bishop, State Water Resources Control Board
Impacts of State and Federal Policies on Local Regulatory Approaches Laurie Walsh, San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
Implications for Implementing Regulatory Approaches Through the Lens of the Phase II Remand Rule Karen Ashby, Larry Walker Associates
Panel Discussion
How Do I Implement My Approach? Municipal Case Studies/Panel
IntroductionChris Sommers, EOA
Panel Members:Con Kontaxis, California Department of Transportation;Rachael Keish, Keish Environmental; Amanda Carr, County of Orange;Rob Carson, County of Marin
Panel Discussion: Overcoming Limitations of Watershed-Scale Plans
Panel Members:Huub Cox, City of Los Angeles; Helen Davies, City of Escondido;Matt Fabry, San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program
Panel Discussion: Tracking Progress, Measuring Effectiveness, and Managing Adaptively
Panel Members:Lisa Austin, Geosyntec Consultants; William Johnson, County of Los Angeles; Jon Van Rhyn, County of San Diego
Panel Discussion: Tools for Compliance
Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA)Jeff Soller, Soller Environmental, LLC
Natural Source ExclusionLB Nye, Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board
Cost Benefit AnalysisGretchen Greene, Rambol Environ
Reference System ApproachMartha Sutula, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Non-Industrial Sources – Technical Challenges and Expectations
Solely Attributable or Not – Is Aerial Deposition Driving NAL Exceedances?Brandon Steets, Geosyntec Consultants, Inc.
Panel Discussion on Advanced BMPs and Storm Water Treatment for Industrial Sites
Tim Bauters, Golder; Jeremy Laurin, PG&E; Tim Simpson, GSI Environmental
12:00p–1:35p EXHIBITOR FOCUS (Paradise Ballroom) AND LUNCH (Sunset Pavilion)
Andy Lipkis, keynote speaker for the 2016
CASQA Conference, is a practical visionary
who has dedicated his life to healing the envi-
ronment while improving the lives of individuals
and communities.
He founded TreePeople in Los Angeles in
1973 at age 18 and continues to serve as its
President. Andy has spearheaded an approach
using trees and forest-inspired technologies
to make cities sustainable while mitigating
floods, drought, pollution, and global warming.
This approach is being demonstrated in
Los Angeles as a model for cities everywhere.
KEYNOTE SPEAKER Tuesday, September 13 at 8:30 a.m.
Phot
o co
urte
sy o
f And
y Li
pkis
35
Conference Co-Chairs:
Lisa Austin and Sharon Gosselin
CASQA Board of Directors:
Jill Bicknell: Chair
Daniel Apt: Vice-Chair, Executive Program
Committee Chair, Vision Committee Chair
Stephanie Reyna-Hiestand: Treasurer,
Finance Committee Chair
Sandy Mathews: Secretary,
Bylaws Committee Chair
Brian Currier: Program Coordinator
Delyn Ellison-Lloyd: Events Committee Chair
Jeff Endicott: Awards Committee Chair
Matt Fabry
Cathleen Garnand:
Membership Committee Chair
Dave Tamayo
Frank Wu
CASQA Executive Director: Geoff Brosseau
CASQA Events Manager, CASQA App and Website Manager: Amy Porter
CASQA Executive Assistant: Shelley Larson
Advance Booking, Promotions Coordinator: Chris Crompton
Audio Visual Coordinator: Jason Lawrence (Advanced Media Works, Inc.)
Exhibitor Coordinator: Karen Ashby
Graphic Design: Bev Catli Manzano (Beverly Catli Design)
Moderator Coordinator (Tue-Wed): Nicole West
Poster Session Coordinator: Dave Mercier
Professional Development Coordinator: Daniel Apt
Registration Coordinator: April Krieg
Social Media Coordinators: Tanya Bilezikjian, Lisa Skutecki
Sponsor Coordinator: Matt Lentz
Technical Program Coordinator: Kristina Hysler
Training Workshop Coordinator: Sara Huber
Abstract Reviewers: (Session Moderators are listed in the agenda)
Omar Al-Shafi e, Tim Bauters, Jeff Endicott,
Mark Grey, Venkat Gummadi, Matt Hillyard,
Heather Krish, Stuart Kuhn, Amy Margolis,
Brianna Martin, Eric Mosolgo, Kevin Murphy,
Dawn Petschauer, Youn Sim, Melissa
Turcotte, Matt Zucca
THANK YOU TO THE 2017 CASQA CONFERENCE SUBCOMMITTEE
From: Mark SchillingerTo: [email protected]: Emily Campbell; Judd GoodmanSubject: USFWS/NOAA Floodplain Presentation on Butano CreekDate: Thursday, June 21, 2018 12:46:07 PM
Jen,
My colleagues Emily Campbell, Judd Goodman, and I enjoyed today’s presentation: FloodplainReconnection on Butano Creek - Design, Implementation and Preliminary Post-Project Results
Would you be able to send us PDH certificates?
Mark
Mark W. Schillinger, PE, CFMLicensed PE in SCProject EngineerGeosyntec Consultants, Inc.1255 Roberts Boulevard NW, Suite 200Kennesaw, GA 30144Office: 678.202.9503Cell: 509.863.6211
From: Lisa WelshTo: Lisa Austin; Kelly Havens; Donna L. Bodine; Judd Goodman; Neftali Romero; Elai Fresco; Austin OrrSubject: RE: Center for Watershed Protection "Bioretention Design Modifications" webcast - LUNCH!Date: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 12:18:53 PM
Hi Team, For those attending the webinar, I’ll coordinate the lunch order from Annapurna:https://www.ezdineinn.com/restaurants/annapurna Please let me know your meal selection by 10am tomorrow. I’ll include a few orders of naan for thegroup. Thanks! Lisa WelshSenior Staff Scientist510-285-2660 -----Original Appointment-----From: Lisa Welsh Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 3:55 PMTo: Lisa Welsh; Lisa Austin; Kelly Havens; Donna L. Bodine; Judd Goodman; Neftali Romero; ElaiFresco; Austin OrrSubject: Center for Watershed Protection "Bioretention Design Modifications" webcast When: Thursday, June 21, 2018 11:30 AM-1:00 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).Where: Glacier Point Viewing of the webcast we missed last week. I’ll coordinate lunch, too, and have it arrive at noon.Thanks! ---------------------------- Hello,Thanks for attending the webcast! Attached are the resources mentioned during the webcast. This includes a pdf Certificate ofCompletion, a Resource sheet with links to good materials and the speaker contact information, andthe slides in a pdf format with a 6 slides per page view. The pdf Certificate of Completion for ourwebcasts includes a blank name field where you can type in the names of any attendees from yourlocation who are interested in PDH's. The online webcast archive is ready. Here is the link to access the whole recording of the webcast:http://cwp.adobeconnect.com/prj2yj15qo7x/. The links to the recorded webcasts will allow you toview the webcast till July 31, 2018. After that the link will be deactivated, and the webcast made
available for purchase to those who may want to view and did not register. You must sign in using the User Name and Password originally sent to the person who registered forthe webcast.User Name: The email address where this invitation arrivedPassword: CWP2018webcast! We would also appreciate it if attendees who have not done so already could take a quick onlinesurvey to provide feedback to us on your webcast experience. The link is:http://survey.constantcontact.com/survey/a07efdjonffjgz9m9uh/start. I wanted to briefly remind everyone of our PDH policy. Professional Development Hours (PDHs) areavailable for attending CWP webcasts. The PDH is a nationally recognized measure of participation innon-credit continuing education programs that meet established criteria for increasing competency.Attendance for each entire webcast is required to earn the PDH certificate. We provide a pdfCertificate of Completion for our webcasts that includes a blank name field where you can type inthe names of any attendees from your location who are interested in PDH's. While our training programs are developed with IACET criteria in mind, the varying nature ofcertification requirements for each state means we cannot guarantee that PDH's will be awarded.We are happy to provide documentation to help individuals obtain credit for attending our trainings,but it is up to the individual to determine if PDH's will be awarded based on the policies of their localcertifying board. Thanks,CWP
TechnicalStakeholderMeeting_Agenda_101717 1
Monterey Regional Water Recovery Study - Part of the Stormwater Resource Plan for the Monterey Peninsula, Carmel Bay, and South
Monterey Bay Integrated Regional Water Management Planning Region
Technical Stakeholder Group Meeting Tuesday, October 17, 2017, 12:00 pm – 2:00 pm
Hilltop Park Center 871 Jessie St., Monterey, CA
AGENDA
12:00 pm 1. Meeting Sign-In, Welcome, and Introductions Jeff Condit (Monterey One Water)
12:10 pm 2. Meeting Objective and Overview of Water Recovery Study Kelly Havens (Geosyntec)
12:30 pm 3. Lunch Arrives
12:45 pm 4. Methodology Presentation Judd Goodman (Geosyntec)
1:00 pm 5. Technical Stakeholder Group Input All
1:50 pm 6. Review Action Items and Schedule Kelly Havens
2:00 pm 7. Adjourn
Judd Goodman, PE | Geosyntec Consultants | [email protected]
Introduction
Low Impact Development for Hydromodification Management: Bioretention Sizing Factors from Direct
Calculation of Erosion Potential
Acknowledgements
Thank you to the project team: CCCWP staff, Dan Cloak,Tony Dubin, and Austin Orr (Geosyntec) for theircontributions.
Theory and Sizing
Per the most recent MS4 permit (R2-2015-0049) Contra CostaPermittees are required to update their requirements forimplementing HM. The Contra Costa Clean Water Program(CCCWP) proposes to meet this requirement by recalculatingthe HM sizing factors using direct simulation of ErosionPotential (Ep) in place of Flow Duration Control (FDC), asallowed per the latest MS4 permit. During 2016-2017, theCCCWP worked with Regional Board staff to develop, justify,and document sizing factor updates.
For a decade, Contra Costa County and its 19 cities and townshave used LID Integrated Management Practices (IMPs),including bioretention, to meet hydromodification management(HM) requirements for new development. Project proponentsuse simple factors, to size IMP facilities.
On-site LID-type IMPs are not ideal for FDC.
Ep is expressed as the ratio of post-project to pre-project(post/pre) long-term "work done" on the stream. If themanagement goal is to mimic the pre-project erosive work,then an appropriate performance standard is Ep = 1.0.
Ep =( Post / Pre)∑ ∑
When Ep is calculated for a range of sizing factors a trend lineis used to interpolate IMP size with Ep = 1.0.
Field Work & Geospatial Analysis
Field observations and GIS calculations characterized therange of geomorphic and watershed land use conditions ofchannels which are susceptible to hydromodification impactsand downgradient of anticipated future development.
Modeling Parameter Variability
Ranges of hydrologic and geomorphic parameter values wereevaluated from field work, geospatial analysis, and literature.
Parameter Range of Representative Values Analysis Type
Rain Gage
FCD STATION 19 – PITTSBURG - 11.9 in/yr,FCD STATION 11 – MARTINEZ – 16.7 in/yr (baseline),
FCD STATION 20 -- SAN RAMON – 17.0 in/yr,FCD STATION 18 -- ORINDA FIRE STATION – 28.2 in/yr,
FCD STATION 12 -- MORAGA – 28.3 in/yr
Hydrology
HydrologicSoil Group
A, B, C, and D (baseline) Hydrology
IMP percolation into D soils
0.024, 0.08, 0.12, and 0.24 in/hr (baseline) Hydrology
Low flow threshold 0.1Q2, 0.2Q2 (baseline), and 0.4Q2 Hydrology &Geomorph
Existing watershed imperviousness
0 (baseline), 10, and 40% Hydrology
Watershed Protected Open
Space0% (baseline), 30%, and 50% Hydrology
Receiving channel tributary area
0.1, 1 (baseline), 10, and 100 square miles Geomorph
Channel bankfullwidth
5.0, 10.0, and 16.3 (baseline) feet Geomorph
Channel bankfulldepth
0.6, 1.5 (baseline), and 4.0 feet Geomorph
Mid channel roughness
n = 0.035 (baseline), 0.045, and 0.055 Geomorph
Longitudinal slope 0.19 (baseline), 1.4, and 3.5 % Geomorph
Overbank side slope
50:1, 10:1 (baseline), and 2:1 (H:V) Geomorph
Effective work equation
Effective Work Function (LARWQCB, 2012) (baseline),Competent or Limiting Velocity Function (Pemberton and
Lara, 1984),Meyer Peter Muller Function (1948)
Geomorph
Isolated Parameter SensitivityModeling parameters were varied one by one, from a basecase, to evaluate which variables have the greatest influenceon IMP sizing. Due to the large number of model runscalculations were batch processed with Python programmingcode.
There is demonstrated correlation between calculated Ep andfield designated geomorphic stability.
Compounded Parameter SensitivityThe sensitive parameters, for which adjustment factorequations are not currently provided, were the focus of thecompounded parameter sensitivity analysis.
Findings• Ep control reduces IMP sizing by 15 to 30% compared to
FDC.• Most sensitive parameters to IMP sizing are hydrologic
soil group (HSG) and mean annual precipitation (MAP),which are accounted for in current sizing factor equation.
• Low flow threshold, IMP percolation rate, and watershedprotected open space are sensitive parameters for whichadjustment factor equations are not currently provided.
• Other geomorphic receiving channel parameters are notsensitive.
FindingsIMP sizing overall expected to be similar to previous, if:
• updated precipitation records (~8% increase)• Ep Control, instead of FDC (~22% reduction)• 10%Q2 low flow threshold, instead of 20%Q2 (~29% increase)• 0.12 to 0.16 in/hr D soil IMP percolation, instead of 0.024 in/hr
(~12% to 16% reduction).With system-specific determination of low flow threshold, IMPpercolation rate, and watershed protected open space, smallerIMP sizes could be justified. Additional adjustment factors couldadd for such flexibility. CCCWP is pursuing a simpler approachwhich avoids over-conservatism associated with compoundedfactors of safety and is consistent in format to the current sizingfactor tool.
Judd Goodman, PE | Geosyntec Consultants | [email protected]
Introduction
Identifying and Prioritizing In-Stream Hydromodification Control Opportunities
The suggested approach starts with a straightforward GIS screening to: • Map receiving streams that are susceptible to
hydromodification impacts; • Evaluate the level of hydromodification that susceptible
channels have experienced in the past and will likely experience in the future at buildout conditions;
• Identify channels that are clearly unstable and in need of rehabilitation;
• Classify property ownership of candidate in-stream and regional control opportunities.
After the initial desktop screening, field screening is performed for candidate receiving stream reaches to: • Characterize basic receiving channel geometry and
bed/bank material; • Evaluate channel stability; • Assess the level of vertical and lateral susceptibility of the
channel; • Determine if candidate streams require consideration of bed
sediment supply reductions based on whether they are live-bed alluvial channels or threshold channels.
As California MS4 permittees begin looking at regional alternative compliance options for meeting water quality and hydromodification requirements with off-site BMPs, while rehabilitating geomorphically unstable channel reaches, watershed managers are eager to find precedents in the state for comprehensive watershed-based stormwater management. While there is not much precedent for such projects driven by MS4 regulations, there is when it comes to CEQA impact analysis. Based on lessons learned from managing several hydromodification technical impact studies and writing three Hydromodification Management Plans for MS4 permit compliance, this poster suggests a step-wise approach for identifying and prioritizing in-stream rehabilitation for alternative compliance.
Step 1: GIS Screening
Subsequent prioritization of the top ranked candidates is based on preliminary sizing and configuration of potential rehabilitation projects and calculation of success metrics, which are representative of rehabilitation goals, such as: • Peak Event Flood and Scour Control • Long-Term Geomorphic Stability • Habitat Improvement • Recreational Use • Construction and Maintenance Cost
By comparing the cost of and in-stream project to what it would cost for on-site hydromodification control of tributary parcels zoned for development, watershed managers can assess whether there will be monetary incentive for project proponents to fund an alternative compliance project with a fee-in-lieu.
Step 4: Prioritize Based on Conceptual Design
Step 2: Field Screening
Step 3: Rank Candidates Based on Screening
Legend Tributary
Imperviousness Map
(Step 1)
(Step 2)
(Step 3)
(Step 4)
Please fix me !
Objective Metric of Success Metric of Success Result
Reach A Reach B Reach C Reach D Reach E
Peak Events
Conveyed Return Period at Brimful Condition
(years) 7 358 262 472 320
Scour Potential for Q100 (ft*ft)
36,440 20,319 26,300 24,271 21,411
Habitat
Net Vegetation Habitat Value
(grade points*acres) 0.0 13.1 19.8 21.1 25.4
Floodplain Connectivity (acre*days)
123.1 17.0 216.1 274.3 380.0
Long-Term Erosion and Sedimentation
Effective Work on Bed (ft*ft*days)
180,360 3,163 89,371 76,524 33,435
Sediment Supply from Banks (tons/yr)
4,433 85 195 83 38
Cost Project Cost ($) 0.5 M 8.0 M 6.1 M 7.0 M 10.9 M
Maintenance Cost ($/yr) 75 K 39.0 K 42.8 K 43.3 K 44.5K
Schedule Project Duration (months)
12 58 40 40 40
Recreation Presence of Access Trail (yes/no)
no yes yes yes yes
Screening for Geomorphic Conditions of Concern Based on Tributary Land Use
Screening for Geomorphic Impacted Channels in South Orange County
Example Comparison of Success Metrics
Candidate channels for rehabilitation are ranked based on the results of GIS and Field Screening.
Channel Rehabilitation Prioritization Flow Chart
1
Judd Goodman
Subject: Webinar: EPA-USGS Draft Technical Report: Protecting Aquatic Life from Effects of Hydrologic Alteration
Location: El Capitan conference room
Start: Thu 5/12/2016 11:00 AMEnd: Thu 5/12/2016 12:00 PM
Recurrence: (none)
Meeting Status: Meeting organizer
Organizer: Judd GoodmanRequired Attendees:Judd Goodman; Office-Oakland Scientists & EngineersOptional Attendees:Rosemarie Thomas; Jennifer Nyman; Lea Kane; Lisa Austin; Kelly Havens; Daniel Kahn; Alkan Bektur;
Andrew Torkelson; Lauren Deutsch; Ehsan Rasa; Syed Rehan; Jay Merani; John Gallinatti; Nate Mullaugh; McKinley Olsen; Bruce Marvin; Jeffrey Austin; Mike Minch; Chris Scott; Adrienne Miller; BillyLinker; Elisabeth Hawley
I will be showing this free EPA USGS webinar on hydromodification in the El Capitan conference room. The webinar is most applicable to the 1640 group, but all are welcome to attend.
Judd Goodman, P.E. Senior Engineer Geosyntec Consultants Direct: 510.285.2767
_____________________________________________ From: Adrienne Nemura Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 7:04 AM To: AG-WNRAG Subject: FW: Webinar: EPA-USGS Draft Technical Report: Protecting Aquatic Life from Effects of Hydrologic Alteration From: McGuire, Patrick [mailto:mpmcguire@acwa‐us.org] Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 8:50 AM To: Adrienne Nemura <[email protected]> Subject: Webinar: EPA‐USGS Draft Technical Report: Protecting Aquatic Life from Effects of Hydrologic Alteration
To ACWA MSA Committee Members:
Webinar: EPA‐USGS Draft Technical Report: Protecting Aquatic Life from Effects of Hydrologic Alteration May 12, 2016, 2:00‐3:00 EST https://epawebconferencing.acms.com/epa‐usgs/ Point of Contact Ashley Harper [email protected]
2
On May 12, 2016, EPA and USGS will host a webinar on the Draft Technical Report: Protecting Aquatic Life from Effects of Hydrologic Alteration. The agencies will discuss the contents, purpose and scope of the report; which describes the relationship between hydrologic condition and water quality, and gives examples of what states have done to address flow concerns using current Clean Water Act authorities, as well as other Clean Water Act programs that could be used to support the natural flow regime and maintain aquatic life. The report also provides a flexible, nonprescriptive, conceptual framework for states, tribes, territories, and others who may want to translate narrative flow criteria into quantifiable flow targets for the preservation of aquatic life and habitat. To participate in the hour‐long webinar simply go to https://epawebconferencing.acms.com/epa‐usgs/ on May 12, 2016 at 2:00pm EST. No registration is necessary.
SharePoint for the Geosyntec family of companies Judd Goodman
Title Geosyntec and OptiRTC to present "Real-Time Cloud-Based Continuous Monitoring and Adaptive Storm Water Control” Seminar for the California State Water Resources Control Board
Body
Judd Goodman, PE (Oakland) and Eric Strecker, PE, BCEE (Portland) will lead a seminar
with a free webcast on April 18th from 10:00am - 12:00pm PST to educate Regional Water Board staff and other interested parties about innovation in stormwater management via continuous monitoring and adaptive control (CMAC). Judd and Eric organized the seminar with OptiRTC Co-Founder and VP of Operations Owen Cadwalader.
The focus of this seminar will be to summarize and explain the technologies, provide different applications with case examples, demonstrate performance and added value, and open a dialogue about the merits of CMAC for active management of storm water and resulting stream energy and water quality.
This seminar is part of the STORMS Seminar Series and State Water Boards' Storm Water Strategy to educate Water Board staff, regulators, and the public about Stormwater management strategies and tools.
Please register online for the event here:
Event Name: Continuous Monitoring and Adaptive Stormwater Control
Page 1 of 2Business & Practice News - Geosyntec and OptiRTC to present "Real-Time...
6/29/2018http://home.geosyntec.com/Lists/Announcements/DispForm.aspx?ID=1335
Password: April18
For more information about the STORMS Seminar Series and Water Boards' Storm Water Strategy please visit their website.
For more information about his presentation, contact Judd at [email protected] or 510.285.2767 .
Expires
Image
Created at 3/30/2016 12:13 PM by Last modified at 3/30/2016 12:13 PM by
CloseLiberty FranksLiberty Franks
Page 2 of 2Business & Practice News - Geosyntec and OptiRTC to present "Real-Time...
6/29/2018http://home.geosyntec.com/Lists/Announcements/DispForm.aspx?ID=1335
Real-Time Continuous Monitoring and Adaptive Control (CMAC)
Improving Stormwater Systems Performance
April 18, 2016
Speakers
Eric StreckerJudd Goodman
Chad Helmle
Owen Cadwalader
2
12
CASQA Technical Program Agenda Wednesday, October 21, 2015
Wednesday
7:15a–8:15a TRAINER OF RECORD FORUM (Spyglass), Moderator: Marvin Sachse, Brash IndustriesModerator led discussion open to all conference attendees to share successful training techniques, exchange ideas for topics that are consistently diffi cult to present, and make suggestions for subsequent program improvements for the forthcoming new Construction General Permit.
7:30a–8:00a ROOM MONITOR TRAINING (Oak Tree)
7:30a–8:15a THE NEXT FRONTIER FOR STORMWATER: FORMING A NATIONAL ORGANIZATION TO MOVE US FORWARD (Big Sur) Scott Taylor, Michael Baker International; Seth Brown, George Mason University
7:30a–3:00p REGISTRATION DESK (Regency Foyer)
8:00a–8:30a EXHIBITOR FOCUS (Regency Grand Ballroom)
8:00a–12:00p EXHIBIT HALL OPEN (Regency Grand Ballroom)
8:00a–1:20p POSTER SESSION (Mark Thomas Foyer)
SESSION
4Municipal Permits: Navigating Requirements and Overcoming ObstaclesOvercoming ChallengesTrack A, Room: Spyglass
Stormwater TreatmentBMP Development and StudiesTrack B, Room: Big Sur
SustainabilityStormwater Sustainability InitiativesTrack C, Room: Oak Tree
Construction Stormwater ManagementConstruction Stormwater AssessmentTrack D, Room: Cypress
The Science and Policy of TMDLsSan Francisco Bay Hg and PCB EffortsTrack E, Room: Windjammer
MODERATORTracy Ingebrigtsen,City of Laguna Beach
Anna Lantin,Michael Baker International
Laura Prickett, Horizon Water and Environment, LLC
Dave Mercier,Michael Baker International
Donna Bodine,Geosyntec Consultants
8:30a–9:00a
Overcoming Signifi cant Obstacles: Technology, Funding and Community Support – A Case Study in Malibu Creek WatershedEwelina Mutkowska,County of Ventura
Field-Scale Column Testing of Engineered Soils and Bioretention Confi gurations for the Removal of Nutrients and Lesser-Studied ConstituentsDipen Patel, Water Programs at Sacramento State
Stormwater and Resiliency: How San Francisco’s Stormwater Management Ordinance is Spurring Non-Potable ReuseKerry Rubin,AECOM
Challenges and Lessons Learned on a 200-Mile 500kV Electrical Transmission Line Construction ProjectHazem Gabr,Southern California Edison
TMDL Implementation and Load Reduction Accounting through the San Francisco Bay Area Regional Municipal Stormwater PermitJon Konnan,EOA, Inc.
9:05a–9:35a
Phase II – Lessons Learned Organizing Locally and Regionally in the North BaySandy Mathews, Larry Walker Associates
A Proposal for Statewide Knee-of-the-Curve BMP Sizing CriteriaMaureen Kerner,Water Programs at Sacramento State
Sustainability Rating of Stormwater BMPsLisa Skutecki, Brown and Caldwell
A Construction Managers Approach to Storm Water ComplianceMitchel Whitson,Whitson CM
Stormwater Control Programs to Address PCBs and Mercury (60 minutes)Khalil Abusaba,AMEC Foster Wheeler;Lisa Austin,Geosyntec Consultants;Rebecca Tuden,City of Oakland
9:40a–10:10a
Implementing Green Infrastructure Requirements in the New Bay Area Municipal Regional PermitJill Bicknell, Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program
Minimizing Cost and Maximizing Load Reduction by Targeting the First FlushDavid Kirby,Ventura County Watershed Protection District
Sustainable Funding for Stormwater ServicesMitch Avalon,County Engineers Association of California
An Active Case for Passive TreatmentTanya Bilezikjian,Michael Baker International
10:10a–10:55a BREAK, EXHIBITOR FOCUS AND PRIZE DRAWING (Regency Grand Ballroom)
SESSION
5Municipal Permits: Navigating Requirements and Overcoming ObstaclesCompliance SuccessTrack A, Room: Spyglass
Stormwater TreatmentBMPs and Urban StreamsTrack B, Room: Big Sur
Meeting ASBS RequirementsExploring the DataTrack C, Room: Oak Tree
QSD/QSP ForumTrack D, Room: Cypress
Regional Treatment andWatershed ManagementAlternative ComplianceTrack E, Room: Windjammer
MODERATORClaudia Steiding, Riverside County
Cory Jones,SCS Engineers
Brian Currier, Water Programs at Sacramento State
Melanie Sotelo, CASC Engineering and Consulting
Andrea Crumpacker,Weston Solutions, Inc.
10:55a–11:25a
The Stormwater Finance Game – Focused Compliance with Fewer DollarsChad Praul,Environmental Incentives
Urban Stream Floodplain Restoration and Associated Water Quality Improvements In Yreka, CaliforniaTom Hesseldenz,Tom Hesseldenz and Associates
ASBS Natural Water Quality: Translating Narrative Objectives Into Numerical GuidelinesKenneth Schiff,Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
QSD/QSP Forum (Panel)Jarrod Gibbon,Riverside County;Dave Mercier, Michael Baker International;Rich Muhl,Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board;Kadi Whiteside,Southern California Edison
Offsite Alternative Compliance For Priority Development Projects – What Constitutes “Greater” Water Quality Benefi t?Christina Arias,San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
11:30a–12:00p
How Integrated Asset Management Can Assist in Meeting Your MS4 NPDES Permit RequirementsTerrence Chen,Michael Baker International
Active Hydromodifi cation ControlJudd Goodman,Geosyntec Consultants
Special Protections Meet Real Data: Quandaries for ComplianceDane Hardin,Applied Marine Sciences, Inc.
Stream Rehabilitation Equivalency for Alternative ComplianceEric Mosolgo,City of San Diego
12:00p–1:20p LUNCH (Monterey Ballroom and Garden Terrace Courtyard – included with registration)
Active Hydromodification ControlJudd Goodman, P.E.
Region IX “MitiGATOR Clubhouse” Meeting “Who’s on first?”
Federal Building ‐ 1301 Clay St, Oakland, CA September 15 – 17, 2015
“Understanding what we do and how we work together as a Team”
Tuesday, September 15, 2015 8:00 AM Registration and Refreshments 8:30 AM Welcome and Introductions – Facilitator 8:45 AM Welcome Message from Bob Fenton, Regional Administrator and Jeff Lusk, Mitigation
Division Director 9:15 AM Message from Branch Chiefs – Gregor Blackburn, Robert McCord and Juliette Hayes 10:00 AM Break 10:15 AM Facilitator explains agenda and sets expectations. Discussions will follow on how we fit
together and face our common challenges. 12:00 Noon Lunch
Start End
1:00
4:30
Branch Program Business Meetings RAB/Rm A HMA/ Rm B FM&I/Rm C
RiskMAP Program Update LAMP, Regulatory and Non-Regulatory Mapping Priorities CTP Program Updates Collaboration Site, Building State Capacity, ND Grants Review, Reporting Requirements, Program Outlook Data, Tools & Planning for Risk Reduction News in GIS Planning Session
HMA Unified Guidance and Program Updates Get Funding Faster
Working with your Plan
Queue up Projects Expediting Reviews
Quarterly State Meetings
ASCE 24 Building codes Losses Avoided as a Result of Adopting and Enforcing Flood-Resistant Building Codes
What to Expect When You’re Expecting a LOMR Speaker: Shilpa Mulik, FEMA Region IX
CIS : Juanita Thompson, FEMA HQ
Wednesday, September 16, 2015 8:30 AM “The Super Circular” 2 CFR Part 200
Speaker: JP Henderson, Region IX Legal Counsel
Afternoon Breakout Sessions: Choose one of the three topics to attend during each time slot
Classroom A Classroom B Classroom C
1:00 Insurance Advocate What’s new Speaker: Edie Lohmann
Environmental Compliance: ESA Q&A Speaker: XXX
Climate Adaptation Tools Speaker; Aaron McGregor, USACE
2:00 State and Local Planning Outreach Approach and State Consultations Speaker: Juliette Hayes
Super Circular, Q & A Speakers: JP Henderson & Michelle Weaver
CRS - new aspects to program Speaker: Patricia Rippe
3:00 Break Break Break 3:30 FFRMS Update on implications
across the mitigation spectrum Speakers: Rachel Orellana, USACE and Paul Amato, EPA
Community Engagement and Risk Communication Speaker: Maryam Hariri CERC Contractor
“Past, Present & Future of the FIRM” Speaker: Scott McAfee
4:30
Integrating Public Assistance and Mitigation Activity (404 and 406 Programs): Speaker: Brian Wilsey, FEMA HQ
Bay Model…..TBD
THIRA - Comparisons with Hazard Mitigation Plan: Speaker: Joel Palmer
Start End Plenary - State Panel Discussions
9:30 10:00
ARIZONA SHMO, State Planner, NFIP Coordinator, State Emergency Manager Moderators: Patricia Rippe and Bob Bezek
10:00
10:30
NEVADA State Planner, NFIP Coordinator, State Emergency Manager Moderators: Michael Hornick and Chris Poehlmann
10:30 10:45 BREAK
10:45 11:15
CALIFORNIA SHMO, Planner, NFIP Coordinator, State Emergency Manager Moderators: Michael Bishop and Joan Flack
11:15 11:45
HAWAII NFIP Coordinator Moderators: Sarah Owen and Eric Simmons
Thursday, September 17, 2015 8:30 AM Development of Concepts in Community Hydromodification Plans Speaker: Judd Goodman, Geosyntec Water Resources 9:45 AM Break 10:00 AM General Discussion - led by Jeff Lusk
Develop a team approach to improve workflow efficiencies Executing coordination to external stakeholders Feedback on Business Meetings, Panels and Break-outs
Wrap up, distribute Evaluations
12:00 Dismiss
Development of Concepts in Community Hydromodification Plans
Presented byJudd Goodman, P.E.
6/29/2018 Judd Goodman, P.E. - Forester University | CEU and PDH for Professionals in Stormwater Erosion Control Energy and Waste Managem…
https://www.foresteruniversity.com/content/Judd-Goodman.aspx 1/2
Judd Goodman
Hydromodi�cation 101—Predicting & Mitigating Stormwater Impacts to Stream
Stability (/ProductDetails.aspx?ProductID=495)
BIOGRAPHY (HTTPS://WWW.FORESTERUNIVERSITY.COM/CONTENT/JUDD-GOODMAN.ASPX#TA…
COURSES (HTTPS://WWW.FORESTERUNIVERSITY.COM/CONTENT/JUDD-GOODMAN.ASPX#TAB-…
On-Demand Webcast(s):
Judd GoodmanP.E. Senior Water Resources Engineer Geosyntec Consultants
Hydromodification 101 – Predicting & Mitigating Stormwater Impacts to Stream Stability Judd Goodman, PE, Geosyntec Consultants
#Hydromodification
Hydromodification 101 Predicting & Mitigating Stormwater Impacts
to Stream Stability
Speaker:Judd Goodman, PEGeosyntec Consultants
#Hydromodification
7/6/2018 2016 Low Impact Development Conference
https://www.eventscribe.com/2016/LIDConference/aaSearchByDay.asp?h=Full%20Schedule&BCFO=P|G 1/6
F U L L S C H E D U L E
TIME TITLE
SUNDAY, AUGUST 28 , 2016
MONDAY, AUGUST 29 , 2016
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM Green Infrastructure and LID Construction and Inspection Training
Presenter: Jason Wright, PE – Tetra Tech
Presenter: Karen Bishop – San Antonio River Authority
Presenter: Troy Matthew Dorman, PhD, PE, CFM – Tetra Tech
Presenter: Dan Christian – Tetra Tech Inc
Presenter: Bradley J. Wardynski
1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Gravel Wetland Design Workshop
Presenter: Thomas P. Ballestero, PhD PE PH PG CGWP – University of New
Hampshire Stormwater Center
Presenter: James Houle, PhD, CPSWQ, CPESC – UNH Stormwater Center
1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Meeting Urban Stormwater Management Goals with WinSLAMM
Presenter: Robert Pitt, Ph.D., P.E., BCEE, D. WRE – The University of Alabama
Presenter: John Voorhees
Presenter: Caroline Burger
4:00 PM - 5:30 PM The Nature Conservancy Focus Group
Presenter: Nathan Woiwode
8:00 AM - 10:00 AM Opening Plenary Session
Invited: Howard Neukrug
Invited: Angela Licata
Invited: Jeffrey Seltzer
Invited: John Sullivan
Invited: Nancy Gallinero
8:30 AM - 5:00 PM 0 – Monday Poster Session
10:30 AM - 12:00 PM 1-1 – Panel Discussion: Regulatory Developments for TMDLs,
Nutrient Management, and Stormwater Permitting
Moderator: Rachel Rouillard
Moderator: Curtis Bohlen
10:30 AM - 12:00 PM 1-2 – Regulatory Developments for TMDLs, Nutrient Management,
and Stormwater Permitting-2
Moderator: Beth Dutton
10:30 AM - 12:00 PM 1-3 – LID Performance, Research, and Cold Regions Design (Mini-
Symposium)
Moderator: Tim Puls – UNH Stormwater Center
7/6/2018 2016 Low Impact Development Conference
https://www.eventscribe.com/2016/LIDConference/aaSearchByDay.asp?h=Full%20Schedule&BCFO=P|G 2/6
TUESDAY, AUGUST 30 , 2016
10:30 AM - 12:00 PM 1-4 – Green Infrastructure and LID Case Studies-01
Moderator: William F. Hunt – North Carolina State University
10:30 AM - 12:00 PM 1-5 – Modeling and Tools for Green Infrastructure Planning and
Design-1
1:00 PM - 4:45 PM Watershed Management Optimization Support Tool (WMOST)
Workshop
Author: Naomi E. Detenbeck, PhD – US EPA Atlantic Eco. Div.
2:00 PM - 3:30 PM 2-1 – Public Outreach and Education-1
Moderator: Eric D. Loucks – City of Austin Watershed Protection
2:00 PM - 3:30 PM Panel Discussion: Water, Food, Energy, People: The Broader Picture:
Co-benefits of Green Infrastructure
Invited: Charlene E. Johnston, PE – AECOM
Invited: Adam Whelchel
Invited: Emily McCoy
Invited: Harris Trobman
2:00 PM - 3:30 PM 2-3 – LID Performance, Research, and Cold Regions Design (Mini-
Symposium)-1
Moderator: Renee L. Bourdeau, PE – Wright-Pierce
2:00 PM - 3:30 PM 2-4 – Green Infrastructure and LID Case Studies-02
2:00 PM - 3:30 PM 2-5 – Modeling and Tools for Green Infrastructure Planning and
Design-2
Moderator: Thomas P. O’Connor, P.E., BCEE – US Environmental Protection
Agency
2:00 PM - 3:30 PM 2-6 – Adapting to Climate Change Using Green Infrastructure and LID
Measures-1
Moderator: Cory Rayburn, CPESC, CFM, EnvSP – City of Atlanta
3:45 PM - 4:45 PM 3-1 – Municipal Programs for Green Infrastructure Planning, Design,
Construction and Operations (Mini-Symposium)-1
Moderator: Bill Arcieri, CPESC, CPSWQ – Vanasse Hangen Brustlin
3:45 PM - 4:45 PM 3-2 – Public Outreach and Education-2
Moderator: James Houle, PhD, CPSWQ, CPESC – UNH Stormwater Center
3:45 PM - 4:45 PM 3-3 – LID Performance, Research, and Cold Regions Design (Mini-
Symposium)-2
Moderator: David James. Sample, Ph.D., P.E., D.WRE – Virginia Tech
3:45 PM - 4:45 PM 3-4 – Economics and Benefits of GI-1
Moderator: Robert C. French – Water Environment Federation
3:45 PM - 4:45 PM 3-5 – Modeling and Tools for Green Infrastructure Planning and
Design-3
Moderator: Jay Dorsey – Ohio EPA, Div. of Surface Water
3:45 PM - 4:45 PM 3-6 – Green Infrastructure and LID Case Studies-03
Moderator: Pedro M. Avellaneda, MSc, PhD – Kent State University
8:30 AM - 10:00 AM 4-1 – Municipal Programs for Green Infrastructure Planning, Design,
Construction and Operations (Mini-Symposium)-2
7/6/2018 2016 Low Impact Development Conference
https://www.eventscribe.com/2016/LIDConference/aaSearchByDay.asp?h=Full%20Schedule&BCFO=P|G 3/6
8:30 AM - 10:00 AM 4-2 – Adapting to Climate Change Using Green Infrastructure and LID
Measures-2
Moderator: Russell David Dudley – Tetra Tech, Inc.
8:30 AM - 10:00 AM 4-3 – INVITED PANEL: Green Infrastructure and LID Construction and
Operations and Maintenance
Moderator: Keith Lichten
Moderator: James H. Lenhart, PE, D.WRE – Contech Engineered Solutions
8:30 AM - 10:00 AM 4-4 – Economics and Benefits of GI-2
Moderator: Geoffrey Kuter, PhD – Agresource Inc.
8:30 AM - 10:00 AM 4-5 – Modeling and Tools for Green Infrastructure Planning and
Design-4
Moderator: Robert Traver, PhD – Villanova University
8:30 AM - 10:00 AM Ensuring Bioretention System Performance Success: Guidance for
Verification of Bioretention Media via Quality Assurance and Control
Testing
Primary Author: Mindy Hills, Masters of Science – Contech Engineered Solutions
8:30 AM - 10:00 AM A New Method for Sizing Flow-based Treatment Systems to Meet Volume-
based Standards
Author: Kelly L. Havens, Professional Engineer – Geosyntec Consultants
Author: Zachary J. Kent – Bio Clean Environmental & Modular Wetlands
Author: Aaron Poresky, Professional Engineer – Geosyntec Consultants
8:30 AM - 10:00 AM The Effect of Particle Size Distribution on the Design of Urban Stormwater
Control Measures
Author: Judy Ann Horwatich – U.S. Geological Survey
Author: William Selbig – U.S. Geological Survey
8:30 AM - 10:00 AM Quantifing Drainage Layer Effects on Living Roof Peak Flow Mitigation
Author: Lei Lei – Stevens Institute of Technology
Author: Elizabeth A. Fassman-Beck – Stevens Institute of Technology
8:30 AM - 10:00 AM Using LID to Achieve a Zero Surface Discharge Site
Author: Steven David Trinkaus, PE – Trinkaus Engineering, LLC
8:30 AM - 10:00 AM 4-6 – Green Infrastructure and LID Case Studies-04
Moderator: Matthew P. Jones, PhD, PE – Hazen and Sawyer
8:30 AM - 5:00 PM 1 – Tuesday Poster Session
10:30 AM - 12:00 PM 5-1 – Municipal Programs for Green Infrastructure Planning, Design,
Construction and Operations (Mini-Symposium)-3
Moderator: Tanjina Afrin – Clemson University
10:30 AM - 12:00 PM INVITED SPEAKER: Regulator, Regulated, Designer, and Innovator
Share Perspectives from the District of Columbia on Stormwater
Retention in Public Right of Way Networks
Author: Meredith Upchurch, ASLA – District Department of Transportation
Author: Rebecca C. Stack – DesignGreen LLC
Author: Alisha Goldstein, PE – DC Department of Energy and Environment
Author: Carmen Franks, PhD, A.M.ASCE – AECOM
7/6/2018 2016 Low Impact Development Conference
https://www.eventscribe.com/2016/LIDConference/aaSearchByDay.asp?h=Full%20Schedule&BCFO=P|G 4/6
10:30 AM - 12:00 PM 5-3 – Green Infrastructure and LID Construction and Operations and
Maintenance-1
Moderator: Steven Roy – Ramboll
10:30 AM - 12:00 PM 5-4 – Green Infrastructure and LID Case Studies-05
Moderator: J Todd Kennedy – Tetra Tech
10:30 AM - 12:00 PM 5-5 – Modeling and Tools for Green Infrastructure Planning and
Design-5
Moderator: Virginia A. Roach, P.E. – CDM Smith
10:30 AM - 12:00 PM 5-6 – Regulatory Developments for TMDLs, Nutrient Management,
and Stormwater Permitting-4
Moderator: Jane Kees. Clary – Wright Water Engrs Inc
2:00 PM - 3:30 PM 6-1 – Municipal Programs for Green Infrastructure Planning, Design,
Construction and Operations (Mini-Symposium)-4
Moderator: Carmen Franks, PhD, A.M.ASCE – AECOM
2:00 PM - 3:30 PM 6-2 – Adapting to Climate Change Using Green Infrastructure and LID
Measures-3
Moderator: Jason Wright, PE – Tetra Tech
2:00 PM - 3:30 PM Permeable Pavements Panel
Panelist: David R. Smith, MURPl – Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute
Panelist: James Houle, PhD, CPSWQ, CPESC – UNH Stormwater Center
Panelist: Scott Struck – Geosyntec Consultants
Panelist: Andrew Potts, P.E., LEED AP – CH2M
2:00 PM - 3:30 PM 6-4 – Green Infrastructure and LID Case Studies-06
Moderator: Richard McLaughlin, PhD – North Carolina State University
2:00 PM - 3:30 PM 6-5 – Modeling and Tools for Green Infrastructure Planning and
Design-6
Moderator: Thomas P. Ballestero, PhD PE PH PG CGWP – University of New
Hampshire Stormwater Center
2:00 PM - 3:30 PM 6-6 – Municipal Programs for Green Infrastructure Planning, Design,
Construction and Operations (Mini-Symposium)-5
Moderator: James Riggs – Washington Conservation District
4:00 PM - 5:30 PM 7-1 – Municipal Programs for Green Infrastructure Planning, Design,
Construction and Operations (Mini-Symposium)-6
Moderator: James Houle, PhD, CPSWQ, CPESC – UNH Stormwater Center
4:00 PM - 5:30 PM 7-2 – LID Performance, Research, and Cold Regions Design and
Performance (Mini-Symposium)-3
Moderator: Elizabeth A. Fassman-Beck – Stevens Institute of Technology
4:00 PM - 5:30 PM 7-3 – Green Infrastructure and LID Construction and Operations and
Maintenance-2
Moderator: Christopher Olson, P.E. – Colorado State University
4:00 PM - 5:30 PM 7-4 – Green Infrastructure and LID Case Studies-07
Moderator: Brian Kuchar, PE, RLA, LEED-AP – Horsley Witten Group
4:00 PM - 5:30 PM 7-5 – Modeling and Tools for Green Infrastructure Planning and
Design-7
Moderator: Amir Ehsaei, PhD – AECOM
7/6/2018 2016 Low Impact Development Conference
https://www.eventscribe.com/2016/LIDConference/aaSearchByDay.asp?h=Full%20Schedule&BCFO=P|G 5/6
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 31 , 2016
4:00 PM - 5:30 PM 7-6 – Green Infrastructure and LID Construction and Operations and
Maintenance-3
Moderator: David R. Smith, MURPl – Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute
8:30 PM - 10:00 AM Municipal Programs for Green Infrastructure Planning, Design,
Construction and Operations (Mini-Symposium)
Moderator: Dahlia Thompson, PE – Hazen and Sawyer
8:30 AM - 10:00 AM 8-1 – Municipal Programs for Green Infrastructure Planning, Design,
Construction and Operations (Mini-Symposium)-7
Moderator: Tim Puls – UNH Stormwater Center
8:30 AM - 10:00 AM 8-2 – Adapting to Climate Change Using Green Infrastructure and LID
Measures-4
Moderator: Bill Arcieri, CPESC, CPSWQ – Vanasse Hangen Brustlin
8:30 AM - 10:00 AM 8-3 – Green Infrastructure and LID Construction and Operations and
Maintenance-4
Moderator: James Houle, PhD, CPSWQ, CPESC – UNH Stormwater Center
8:30 AM - 10:00 AM 8-4 – Green Infrastructure and LID Case Studies-08
Moderator: Scott Struck – Geosyntec Consultants
8:30 AM - 10:00 AM 8-5 – Modeling and Tools for Green Infrastructure Planning and
Design-8
Moderator: Rebecca C. Stack – DesignGreen LLC
8:30 AM - 10:00 AM 8-6 – Green Infrastructure and LID Case Studies-09
Moderator: Dustin Atchison, PE – CH2M
10:30 AM - 12:00 PM Green Infrastructure/Low Impact Development: What is the Next
Step in the Green Revolution
Panelist: Thomas P. Ballestero, PhD PE PH PG CGWP – University of New
Hampshire Stormwater Center
Panelist: Marcus Quigley, DWRE, PE – OptiRTC, Inc.
Panelist: Keith Lichten
Panelist: William F. Hunt – North Carolina State University
Panelist: Rob Roseen, PE, DWRE – Waterstone Engineering
Panelist: Robert Traver, PhD – Villanova University
10:30 AM - 12:00 PM 9-2 – Green Infrastructure and LID Case Studies-10
Moderator: Margot Walker – NYCDEP
10:30 AM - 12:00 PM 9-3 – LID Performance, Research, and Cold Regions Design and
Performance (Mini-Symposium)-4
Moderator: Mikael J. Isensee – Middle St. Croix Watershed Management
Organization
10:30 AM - 12:00 PM 9-4 – Green Infrastructure and LID Case Studies-11
Moderator: Stephen Edward White, EIT, A.M.ASCE – Philadelphia Water
Department
10:30 AM - 12:00 PM 9-5 – Advancing Green Infrastructure Implementation in
Transportation Planning and Engineering Standards
10:30 AM - 12:00 PM 9-6 – Economics and Benefits of GI-3
Moderator: Curtis Hinman – Herrera Environmental Consultants
1:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0-3 – Tour
7/6/2018 2016 Low Impact Development Conference
https://www.eventscribe.com/2016/LIDConference/aaSearchByDay.asp?h=Full%20Schedule&BCFO=P|G 6/6
16
12:00p–1:15p LUNCH (Sunset Pavilion)
1:15p–1:35p EXHIBITOR FOCUS (Paradise Ballroom)
SESSION
2Stormwater and Climate Change
San Diego Spotlight Innovative Approaches to Watershed and Coastal Stormwater Management
Low Flow Capture, Diversion, and Use Technology Transfer
Industrial General Permit TMDLs and Treatment System Effectiveness
Regulatory Panel Discussion Municipal
Trash Understanding the New Regulations
Trainer of Record Forum Construction General Permit
Track A Room: Garden
Track B Room: Dockside
Track C Room: Bay View
Track D Room: Sunset I & II
Track E Room: Sunset III
Track F Room: Sunset IV
Track G Room: Sunset V
MODERATOR Nancy Gardiner Haley and Aldrich
Lisa Skutecki Brown and Caldwell
Cory Jones SCS Engineers
Nicole West LSA
Jason Drew NCE
Trevor Alsop Geosyntec Consultants, Inc.
Marvin Sachse Brash Industries
1:35p–2:05p
Managing Water Quality in the Face of Uncertainty: A Case Study of the Effects of Future Land Use and Climate Change on Stormwater Management in the Los Angeles Region
John Riverson Paradigm Environmental
Offsite Stormwater Alternative Compliance Program
Eric Mosolgo City of San Diego
Diversionary Tactics: Pilot Testing Wet and Dry Weather Flow Diversions to Sanitary Sewer as a Means of Reducing PCBs from Stormwater
Cece Sellgren Contra Costa County Watersheds Program
Statewide Stormwater Industrial General Permit – Total Maximum Daily Loads Implementation
Shuka Rastegarpour State Water Resources Control Board
Regulatory Panel Discussion Municipal – The Evolution of Regulations
Chris Beegan State Water Resources Control Board
Adam Fischer Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board
Michael Rhoades County of Santa Clara
David Smith U.S. EPA Region 9
Todd SnyderSan Diego County
Development of a Monitoring Study Design to Quantify the Trash Load Reduction Associated with On-Land Cleanups
Donna Bodine Geosyntec Consultants, Inc.
CGP ToR: Improved Training Improves Permit Compliance
John Filipoff Lennar Homes
Mark Grey Building Industry Association of Southern California/Construction Industry Coalition on Water Quality
Lisa Haney Orange County Sanitation District
Russell Hansen State Water Resources Control Board
Matt O’Malley San Diego Coastkeeper
2:10p–2:40p
Storm Surge Resiliency Planning–Protecting Resources
Kelly Havens Geosyntec Consultants, Inc.
Evaluating Urban and Naval Base Stormwater Impacts on Coastal Sediment Recontamination in San Diego Bay
Brandon Steets Geosyntec Consultants, Inc.
A New Look at Stormwater – Utilizing Existing Infrastructure to Harvest Flows for Drinking Water Use
Shawn Dent Carollo Engineers
Industrial Stormwater Treatment Solutions: How Effective Are They?
Mehran Ebrhimi GSI Environmental Inc.
Trash Amendments Cost Compliance Considerations for San Francisco
Erica Keyser Tetra Tech, Inc.
2:45p–3:15p
Climate Change is Risky Business. Learn More About Tools, Rules, and FAQs
Kathryn Hubbard Haley & Aldrich
Municipal Planning for Alternative Compliance
Richard Lucera Michael Baker International
Dry Weather Flow Capture and Potable Reuse
Sean Porter Brown and Caldwell
Cost and Pollutant Reduction Benefit for an Industrial Stormwater Treatment System
Scott Bourne CDIM Engineering, Inc.
Trash Full Capture Design and Determination of Compliance
Anna Lantin Michael Baker International
3:15p–3:45p BREAK AND EXHIBITOR FOCUS (Paradise Ballroom)
CASQA TECHNICAL PROGRAM AGENDA Tuesday, September 13, 2016 (continued)
San Diego photos left to right: recreation on the Bay; waterfront skyline at night; USS Midway Museum, venue for the Monday evening Networking Event
Phot
os b
y Ch
ris C
rom
pton
20
17 C
AS
QA
TH
IRT
EE
NT
H A
NN
UA
L C
ON
FE
RE
NC
ES
EP
TE
MB
ER
25
–27,
20
17
|
SA
CR
AM
EN
TO
CO
NV
EN
TIO
N C
EN
TE
R /
HY
AT
T R
EG
EN
CY
SA
CR
AM
EN
TO
WWW.CASQA.ORG
CASQA IN THE CAPITAL: BUILDING BRIDGES FOR WATER
Program© T
odd Q
uam
- D
igital S
ky A
eri
al Im
agin
g
23
SESSION
3IndustrialIndustrial Stormwater Treatment and Case Studies
Collecting, Managing, and Using DataAdvances In Monitoring and Assessment Techniques
Municipal ProgramsImplementing Green Infrastructure
SustainabilityStormwater as a Resource
Stormwater BMP ImplementationImplementing BMPs for Challenging Water Quality
Room: Convention Center Hall D Room: Convention Center 103–105 Room: Convention Center 202 Room: Convention Center 203 Room: Convention Center 204
MODERATOR Matt LentzGSI Environmental, Inc.
Christian CarletonOffi ce of Water Programs at Sacramento State
Reid BogertSan Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program
Brian CurrierOffi ce of Water Programs at Sacramento State
Cory JonesCValdo Corporation
3:45p–4:15p
Industrial Stormwater Treatment 101
Tim BautersTBI Engineering
Let Data Do the Heavy Lifting – Meaningful Dry Weather Flow Reductions Using Remote Telemetry and Collaboration
Garth EngelhornAlta Environmental
Construct the Low Maintenance BMP That You Designed: Green Infrastructure Construction and Inspection
Merrill TaylorTetra Tech
From Channel to Tap – Stormwater as a Potable Water Supply
Lisa SkuteckiBrown and Caldwell
Cooperative Implementation of the Las Lomitas Elementary School Water Capture Project
Richard WatsonRichard Watson & Associates, Inc.
4:20p–4:50p
Confi dential Plastics Manufacturer: A Case Study for Zinc
Kathryn HubbardHaley & Aldrich
Novel Techniques for Successful Stormwater Treatment BMP Effectiveness Monitoring
Thomas ArthurAmec Foster Wheeler
Carl Savage California Department of Transportation
Bridging Divides and Integrating Watershed Management into San Francisco–10 Years Later
Scott DurbinLotus Water
San Diego Regional Stormwater Resource Plan – Integrating Stormwater Capture and Use with Stormwater and Watershed Management
Stephanie GainesCounty of San Diego
Signifi cant New BMP Performance Dataset Available for EWMP/ Water Quality Improvement Plan (WQIP) BMP Design, IGP Level 2 Planning, and PCB RAA Modeling
Brandon SteetsGeosyntec Consultants
4:55p–5:25p
Waste Facilities on Protected Waterways
Nathan HollowayClear Water Services
Advances In Drone (UAV) Technology for Stormwater Quality and Watershed Management Applications
Bruce PhillipsPACE Advanced Water Engineering
Greening the Los Angeles Public Right-of-Way: Prioritizing Green Stormwater for Multiple Benefi ts
Ken SusiloGeosyntec Consultants
Non-Potable Reuse and Stormwater Ordinance Synergy: San Francisco’s Approach
Eric ZicklerLotus Water
Addressing PCBs and Mercury TMDLs in San Francisco Bay through Urban Runoff Treatment Retrofi ts – CW4CB Pilot Project Results
Kelly HavensGeosyntec Consultants
5:30p–7:30p EXHIBITOR RECEPTION (Convention Center Hall E and West Lobby)
CASQA TECHNICAL PROGRAM AGENDA Tuesday, September 26 (continued)
KEYNOTE SPEAKER Tuesday, September 26 at 8:30 a.m.
Kamyar Guivetchi was appointed Manager
of the Division of Statewide Integrated Water
Management in August 2008 with the California
Department of Water Resources (DWR). During
his 39 years with DWR, Kamyar has worked
on many technical and planning projects with
the North-Central Region Offi ce, Division of
Planning, Bay-Delta Offi ce, and Division of
Environmental Services managing the Suisun
Marsh Program.
For the past 17 years, Kamyar managed
DWR staff work and coordinated the participa-
tion of numerous government agencies,
Native American Tribes, stakeholders, and public
to prepare the California Water Plan Updates
2005, 2009 and 2013 using a collaborative and
consensus-seeking approach. He chairs the
30-member State Agency Steering Committee
for preparing Water Plan Update 2018, and is
the State Co-chair of the California Biodiversity
Council’s Executive Committee.
Kamyar has a Bachelor of Science in Civil
Engineering and completed post graduate work
in Environmental Engineering at the University
of California, Davis; and he is a California-
registered Civil Engineer.
24
WEDNESDAY
7:30a–3:00p REGISTRATION DESK AND CONFERENCE SERVICES (Convention Center West Lobby)
8:00a–8:35a EXHIBITOR FOCUS (Convention Center Hall E and West Lobby)
8:00a–12:00p EXHIBIT HALL OPEN (Convention Center Hall E and West Lobby)
8:00a–1:20p POSTER SESSION (Convention Center 2nd Floor Landing)
SESSION
4IndustrialDemonstrating Compliance Through the ERA Process
ConstructionData Download
Municipal ProgramsWatershed Planning
SustainabilityAssessment Tools
Stormwater BMP ImplementationBenefi ts of Green Infrastructure Implementation
Stormwater Science and PlanningBacteria and Pathogens
Collecting, Managing, and Using DataAdvances in Assessment and Reporting Tools
Room: Convention Center Hall D
Room: Convention Center 103–105
Room: Convention Center 202
Room: Convention Center 203
Room: Convention Center 204
Room: Hyatt Regency –Regency Ballroom A & B
Room: Hyatt Regency –Regency Ballroom C
MODERATOR Lori PettegrewFarallon Consulting
Sandy MathewsLarry Walker Associates
James ScanlinAlameda Countywide Clean Water Program
Lisa SkuteckiBrown and Caldwell
Jacqueline McMillenAlta Environmental
Vicki KalkirtzCity of San Diego
Michelle MattsonWeston Solutions, Inc.
8:35a–9:05a
Demonstrating Compliance with Level 2 ERA Process Using a Combination of Volume and Flow-Based Treatment Control BMPs
Patrick GalvinGeosyntec Consultants
More Data, More Problems?
Dave MercierMichael Baker International
Balancing Permit Requirements, TMDLs, and the Nexus between Green Infrastructure Plans and Stormwater Resources Plans for the San Francisco Bay Area: City of Dublin Case Study
Shannan YoungCity of Dublin
Envision Tools Help Public Agencies Meet Sustainability Goals
Suzanne WilkinsCDM Smith, Inc.
The Martha Gardens Green Alleys Pilot Project: A Successful Collaboration of City and State to Improve Water Quality
Carol BolandCity of San Jose
Two Perspectives on the Cost Benefi t Analysis for San Diego Regional Bacteria TMDLs
Chris Crompton County of Orange
A Fistful of Projects: A Cloud-Based System for BMP Tracking and Visualization
Dustin Bambic Paradigm Environmental
9:10a–9:40a
Demonstrating Natural Background in Stormwater
David DixonRoux Associates, Inc.
Regulatory Panel: Construction (invited panel)
Julia DyerCentral Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board
Debra Mahnke and Richard MuhlCentral Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
Michelle Rembaum-FoxSan Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board
Mona DoughertyNorth Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board
Russell HansenState Water Resources Control Board
South Orange County Water Quality Improvement Plan (WQIP): A Roadmap for Watershed Rehabilitation
Richard BoonRiverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
Stormwater Recharge and Managed Aquifer Recharge: Finding the Link between Improving Groundwater Resources and Stormwater Water Quality Improvement
Laura FogliaLarry Walker Associates
Fill 3 Needs with 1 BMP–Integrating Flood Control, Construction and Post Construction Water Quality Strategies at San Diego Airport
Jarrod MillerWSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff
A Sea Change Ahead for Bacteria TMDL Implementation
Brandon SteetsGeosyntec Consultants
Improving the Statistical Soundness of Monitoring Programs
Eric BollensCloudCompli
9:45a–10:15a
Infi ltration at Industrial Sites Overcoming Institutional Barriers
Timothy SimpsonGSI Environmental, Inc.
Out on a Limb but in Front of the Line: Preparing the First Stormwater Resource Plan in the San Francisco Bay Area
Steve CarterParadigm Environmental
A Watershed Scale Life Cycle Assessment Framework for Stormwater Management
Hassan Tavakol-DavaniGeosyntec Consultants
Green Streets and Creek Rehabilitation to Transform a Dense Urban Neighborhood
Brianna MartinD-Max Engineering, Inc.
Evaluation of Various Filter Media in Removing Human Pathogens from Stormwater (title to be confi rmed)
Nabiul AfroozStanford University
A Pragmatic Approach to Measuring Stormwater Program Effectiveness
Nicole Beck 2NDNATURE
10:15a–11:00a BREAK, EXHIBITOR FOCUS AND PRIZE DRAWING (Convention Center Hall E and West Lobby)
CASQA TECHNICAL PROGRAM AGENDA Wednesday, September 27
7/6/2018 Balancing Permit Requirements, TMDLs, and the Nexus between Green Infrastructure Plans and Stormwater Resource Plans for the San …
https://www.casqa.org/asca/balancing-permit-requirements-tmdls-and-nexus-between-green-infrastructure-plans-and-stormwater 1/3
Balancing Permit Requirements, TMDLs, and the Nexus betweenGreen Infrastructure Plans and Stormwater Resource Plans for theSan Francisco Bay Area: City of Dublin Case StudyView or Download Presentation (https://app.box.com/s/g3vrwza5ta32d0l8dgt2avdissnte7ri)
Date / Time:Wednesday, Sep 27 8:35am to 9:05am
Location:Convention Center 202
Track / Session:Municipal Programs Track / Watershed Planning
Description/Abstract: Cities have challenges and opportunities related to implementation of green infrastructure and multiple benefitprojects. In the San Francisco Bay Area, this includes implementation of green infrastructure that can achievepermit goals related to load reduction of pollutants addressed by Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) andidentifying potential opportunities for implementation of multiple benefit projects that can be incorporated intoa Stormwater Resource Plan. City of Dublin has begun to examine the integration between theseimplementation objectives. The San Francisco Bay Area Municipal Regional Permit (MRP) provision C.3.j. requires permittees to developa Green Infrastructure Plan, to be submitted with the 2019 Annual Report. The MRP requires a number ofcomponents to be included in the Green Infrastructure Plan, including but not limited to: a mechanism toprioritize and map areas for potential and planned projects for 2020, 2030, and 2040 (consistent withassessing load reductions specified in Provisions C.11 and C.12); outputs from the selected mechanism; andtargets for the amount of impervious surface (public and private) to be retrofitted within the identified time
LOG IN
KHavens
••••••••••••
Forgot Password?
Missing an Email?
Create an Account
7/6/2018 Balancing Permit Requirements, TMDLs, and the Nexus between Green Infrastructure Plans and Stormwater Resource Plans for the San …
https://www.casqa.org/asca/balancing-permit-requirements-tmdls-and-nexus-between-green-infrastructure-plans-and-stormwater 2/3
frames (i.e., by 2020, by 2030, and by 2040). A framework or workplan which outlines the purposes, tasks,and timeframes to complete the elements described in the Green Infrastructure Plan must be approved by thepermittee’s governing body by June 30, 2017. Preliminary targets for public impervious surfaces to be retrofitted by the identified timeframes to meet therequirements were calculated for input into the Green Infrastructure Framework for the City of Dublin. TheCity of Dublin spatially identified all public and private green infrastructure projects that had been installedsince 2002 or were planned to be installed before 2040. City of Dublin Specific Plans and the General Planwere identified geospatially and assumed to represent future green infrastructure installations for thepurposes of calculation. All existing, planned, and future projects were mapped using GIS and categorized bycompletion dates. The San Francisco Bay Area Interim Accounting Methodology was utilized to calculate theload reduction attributable to each project. Based on the total load reduction calculated for each timeframe,the remaining impervious area retrofits required to achieve compliance with MRP and/or TMDL goals wascalculated. Following this calculation, a GIS-based green infrastructure opportunity analysis was conducted to identifypotential locations for public green infrastructure retrofit locations. Rights of way, parcel, and regional basedprojects were identified. Utilizing prioritization parameters provided by City of Dublin, identified projects wereprioritized based on calculated potential load reduction and other City goals. Planning level cost estimates arealso prepared to identify the potential financial implications of implementation of green infrastructure to meetthe load reduction requirements for the City. In addition to the Green Infrastructure Plan analyses, City of Dublin is examining the potential to integratetheir Green Infrastructure Plan with a Stormwater Resource Plan for the City. A comparison of the GreenInfrastructure Plan requirements and the Stormwater Resource Plan requirements is being conducted toexamine the additional components needed to prepare a Stormwater Resource Plan. This presentation will discuss City of Dublin’s approach to preparing and planning for their GreenInfrastructure Plan and longer term Green Infrastructure Implementation goals and will describe the methodsconducted to assist the City and the results of those analyses. Additionally, the presentation will describe thefindings of the comparison between the Green Infrastructure Plan and Stormwater Resource Planrequirements, and the City of Dublin’s decision relative to developing a subsequent Stormwater ResourcePlan.
Primary Speaker:Shannan Young, City of Dublin
Supporting Speaker 1:Kelly Havens, Geosyntec Consultants
Supporting Speaker 2:Austin Orr, Geosyntec Consultants
Primary Speaker Biography: Shannan Young is a stormwater, pollution prevention, and sustainability professional with 20 years’experience in the public sector. Shannan started her career with the City of Hayward in Water PollutionSource Control and worked for the Union Sanitary District and the City of Fremont, managing NPDESstormwater requirements. Shannan is the Environmental Coordinator for City of Dublin, serving as theStormwater Program Manager and leading the City’s energy efficiency, air quality, and Climate ActionPlanning efforts. Shannan has a BA in Biology from the University of California, Riverside and a Masters inEnvironmental Management from the University of San Francisco.
7/6/2018 Balancing Permit Requirements, TMDLs, and the Nexus between Green Infrastructure Plans and Stormwater Resource Plans for the San …
https://www.casqa.org/asca/balancing-permit-requirements-tmdls-and-nexus-between-green-infrastructure-plans-and-stormwater 3/3
Supporting Speakers Biographies: Kelly Havens, P.E., has eight years of experience in management and technical support of projects focusingon urban, industrial, and construction-phase stormwater management, including stormwater BMP sizing,design, and evaluation, NPDES permit compliance, and development of BMP technical guidance manuals.She received her B.S. in Engineering Geology and her M.S. in Civil Engineering from UCLA.
Austin Orr, EIT, has four years of experience providing technical support on stormwater managementprojects, including stormwater control measure design and monitoring, biological nutrient processing, andhydrologic modeling to regional stormwater mitigation projects and development of water quality controlguidance. Austin received his B.S. and M.S. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the University ofUtah.
© 2018 California Stormwater Quality Association ® | Refund Policy | Privacy/Security | Terms of Use CASQA is the registered service mark of the California Stormwater Quality Association ®
California Stormwater Quality Association, P.O. Box 2105, Menlo Park, CA 94026-2105
Phone: (650) 366-1042 E-mail: [email protected]
SWRP Stakeholder Meeting#1 Agenda draft_10-17-17_final.docx 1
Stormwater Resource Plan for the Monterey Peninsula, Carmel Bay, and South Monterey Bay Integrated Regional Water Management Planning Region
Stakeholder Group Meeting #1
Tuesday, October 17, 2017, 9:45 am – 12:00 pm
Hilltop Park Center 871 Jessie St., Monterey, CA
AGENDA
9:45 am 1. Registration/Refreshments
10:00 am 2. Welcome/Introductions Jeff Condit (Monterey One Water)
10:10 am 3. Background
Purpose of Stormwater Resource Plan
Role of Monterey One Water, MRSWMP, and Consultant Team
Stakeholder Role
Format for Today’s Meeting
Jeff Condit
10:25 am 4. Overview of Project
Description of Project Area Watersheds
Description of Stormwater Resource Plan Report
Overview of Methodology for Identifying, Evaluating, and Prioritizing Local and Regional Stormwater Capture Projects
Description of Project Concept Designs
Overview of Request for Planned Projects
Kelly Havens (Geosyntec)
10:50 am 5. Summary and Schedule of Stakeholder Input Requested throughout the Project
Vishakha Atre (EOA)
10:55 am 6. Stakeholder Input All
11:50 am 7. Review Action Items Vishakha Atre
12:00 pm 8. Adjourn
1
Regional Roundtable: Sustainable Streets FINAL DRAFT Agenda
1515 Clay Street, Oakland, Room 1 Tuesday, March 28, 2017 8:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
Registration and Continental Breakfast 8:30 – 9:00
1. Opening Remarks
Welcome from Bay Area Stormwater ManagersGeoff Brosseau, Executive DirectorBay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association
Welcome from the Regional Water BoardDr. Newsha Ajami, Board MemberSan Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board
9:00 – 9:10
2. Keynote Remarks: The Need to Fund Sustainable Streets
Green Infrastructure Planning in Bay Area CitiesThomas Mumley, Assistant Executive OfficerSan Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board
Complete Streets Implementation in the Bay AreaJeff Tumlin, Director of TransportationCity of Oakland
9:10 – 9:25
9:25 – 9:40
3. How Do Funding Programs Promote Benefits of Sustainable Streets?
IntroductionMatt Fabry, Board MemberBay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association
Funding Agency PresentationsFunding Agency RepresentativesModerated by Laura Prickett, Senior AssociateHorizon Water and Environment
9:40 – 10:45
BREAK 10:45‐ 11:00
2
4. Obstacles to Funding Sustainable Streets – Roundtable Discussion
Introduced and moderated byLaura Prickett, Senior AssociateHorizon Water and Environment
Common Obstacles to Funding Sustainable StreetsKelly Havens, Project EngineerGeosyntec Consultants
11:00 – 11:30
5. Brainstorm Funding Solutions to Case Studies – Roundtable Discussion
Introduced and moderated byAdrienne Miller, Senior EngineerGeosyntec Consultants
Rumrill Boulevard Green Street Project, City of San PabloAmanda Booth, Environmental Program AnalystCity of San Pablo
San Pablo Avenue Spine ProjectJosh Bradt, Watershed Specialist & Project ManagerSan Francisco Estuary Partnership
11:30 – 11:35
11:35 – 12:05
12:05 – 12:35
LUNCH ‐‐ Discuss potential solutions to case studies in small groups over lunch –
12:35 – 1:05
6. Roundtable Participant Input on Potential Solutions – RoundtableDiscussion
Introduced and moderated byAdrienne Miller, Senior EngineerGeosyntec Consultants
Potential Solutions to ObstaclesKelly Havens, Project EngineerGeosyntec Consultants
1:05 – 1:40
7. Review Obstacles and Potential Solutions to Develop Further –Roundtable DiscussionModerated by Laura Prickett, Senior AssociateHorizon Water and Environment
1:40 – 1:55
8. Closing Remarks and Next Steps
Matt Fabry, Board MemberBay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association
1:55 – 2:00
Agenda
Contra Costa Watersheds Stormwater Resource Plan East Contra Costa County Stakeholder Outreach Workshop
Tuesday, September 12, 2017 9:30-11am
Big Break Visitor Center at the Delta
69 Big Break Road, Oakley
9:30 Welcome and Introductions – All
9:35 Overview of Stormwater Resource Plan (SWRP) – Mitch Avalon
9:45 Overview of East County Planning Area and Stakeholders – Sarah Puckett
9:50 Stormwater Project Identification – Mitch Avalon
10:00 Prioritizing Projects – Kelly Havens, Geosyntec
10:20 Verify Submitted Projects/Identify New Projects – Mitch Avalon
10:40 Next Steps – Mitch Avalon
10:50 Questions
11:00 Adjourn
CONTRA COSTA WATERSHEDS STORMWATER RESOURCE PLAN(SWRP)
South County Planning UnitStakeholder Outreach MeetingTown of MoragaSeptember 11, 2017
Agenda
Items Planned Time Welcome and Introductions All 5 minutesOverview of Stormwater Resource Plan (SWRP) Mitch 10 minutesOverview of South County Planning Area and Stakeholders
Sarah 5 minutes
Stormwater Project Identification Mitch 10 minutesPrioritizing Projects Kelly 20 minutesWorkshop Activity:Verify Submitted Projects/Identify New Projects
Mitch 20 minutes
Next Steps Mitch 10 minutesQuestions All 10 minutes
2
WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS
3
Introductions• Rachel Kraai – Grant Project Director, Contra Costa Clean Water Program
• Mitch Avalon – Assisting Project Director, Consultant to Contra Costa County
• Consultant Team:o Sarah Puckett, Water Resources Consulting – Stakeholder Outreach
o Sandy Mathews, Larry Walker Associates – Project Management and SWRP Development
o Kelly Havens and Lisa Austin, Geosyntec – Stormwater Maps, GIS Analysis, Scoring, and Quantification
o Psomas – GIS mapping and tools
o Technical Advisors: Dan Cloak, Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting, Khalil Abusaba, AMEC FosterWheeler
4
TechnicalStakeholderMeeting_Agenda_101717 1
Monterey Regional Water Recovery Study - Part of the Stormwater Resource Plan for the Monterey Peninsula, Carmel Bay, and South
Monterey Bay Integrated Regional Water Management Planning Region
Technical Stakeholder Group Meeting Tuesday, October 17, 2017, 12:00 pm – 2:00 pm
Hilltop Park Center 871 Jessie St., Monterey, CA
AGENDA
12:00 pm 1. Meeting Sign-In, Welcome, and Introductions Jeff Condit (Monterey One Water)
12:10 pm 2. Meeting Objective and Overview of Water Recovery Study Kelly Havens (Geosyntec)
12:30 pm 3. Lunch Arrives
12:45 pm 4. Methodology Presentation Judd Goodman (Geosyntec)
1:00 pm 5. Technical Stakeholder Group Input All
1:50 pm 6. Review Action Items and Schedule Kelly Havens
2:00 pm 7. Adjourn
�������� ��� �������� � ��� �� ��������� ���������� ��� ����� ��� �� !�������
"��#$��%%%�&�'&'&���#���%��#�(�)��*+,-./�0�1�&.'���*��� ���
2345675 89 :;55<4=9> >?3@;2349A@;B9C<7;49;;9DEEF<76459GAHF<765<349I4F<4; :;BJ<7;9DH3A5 89:;6B7K L;9AF59 M3B N4=<4;;B9O C64P :ABJ;Q3B9OR;3F3=<959O R;3EKQ9<7<959STUV UWXYZ[\]UYW UV _\]a bYW\c ]TZYdT eZU\c f g\V] _\]ah ijgfklfmknop3 9;; 6FF 5K; <4M3B@65<34 M3B 6 F<7;49;;O 7F<7q 34 5K; K<=KF<=K5;P 46@;r pK<9 s<FF 6F93 <47FAP; P<97<EF<46BQ675<349 <M 64Q 6B; EB;9;45rt\[a Sc_at[uaZv]\]Vw ZaVV xU]c yU_ xYW]cILL D8:pz{ |DLpz{2 }~~�� 2CNDL���� |2�z{CN� D�N�NL�NCN���~��DCD|N�DL;73BP ��<B95 GB;J<3A9�UV��\U[aZ DFF <4M3B@65<34 EB3J<P;P HQ 5K; �;E6B5@;45 3M 2349A@;B D�6<B9 34 5K<9 s;H E6=;O 64P 34 <59 35K;B s;HE6=;9 64P <45;B4;5 9<5;9O <9 @6P; 6J6<F6HF; 53 EB3J<P; <@@;P<65; 677;99 M3B 5K; 734J;4<;47; 3M <45;B;95;PE;B9349r �K<F; 5K; �;E6B5@;45 H;F<;J;9 5K; <4M3B@65<34 53 H; B;F<6HF;O KA@64 3B @;7K64<76F ;BB3B B;@6<496 E399<H<F<5QO 69 P3;9 P;F6Q <4 5K; E395<4= 3B AEP65<4= 3M <4M3B@65<34r pK;B;M3B;O 5K; �;E6B5@;45 @6q;9 43=A6B645;; 69 53 5K; 677AB67QO 73@EF;5;4;99O 5<@;F<4;99O 7ABB;47QO 3B 73BB;75 9;�A;47<4= 3M 5K;<4M3B@65<34r {;<5K;B 5K; �;E6B5@;45O 43B 64Q 3M 5K; 93AB7;9 3M 5K; <4M3B@65<34O 9K6FF H; B;9E349<HF; M3B64Q ;BB3B9 3B 3@<99<349O 3B M3B 5K; A9; 3B B;9AF59 3H56<4;P MB3@ 5K; A9; 3M 5K<9 <4M3B@65<34r I5K;B 9E;7<M<776A5<346BQ 435<7;9 @6Q H; <47FAP;P 34 35K;B s;H E6=;9 @6<456<4;P HQ 5K; �;E6B5@;45r DFF 677;99 53 64P
�������� ��� �������� � ��� �� ��������� ���������� ��� ����� ��� �� !�������
"��#$��%%%�&�'&'&���#���%��#�(�)��*+,-./�0�1�&.'���*��� ���
234 56 7893 :4; <=>4 =?@ =?A 5784B :4; <=>4 5B 9?74B?47 3974 56 784 C4<=B7D4?7 93 >5E4B?4@ ;A 784C93FG=9D4B3 =?@ H5?@9795?3 65B IFF433 =?@ J34 =3 347 65B78 =7 H=G965B?9= C4<=B7D4?7 56 H5?32D4B IK=9B3LC93FG=9D4B M?65BD=795? =?@ J34 M?65BD=795?NO=FP Q4: R4=BF8 S=9? T=>4
�������� �������� ����������� �������������
������������������������� �������������������� �����!"��"����#$�"%��&������'���$�"%(�$���$�"'!�)*%+ ���
,-./.0121340/�405678697:;<�:=>=9?�@A<�BCAD?EF6 ?E?G6(H�IH �JKL�JMNM O�&�L�����PQ@C�:F�R�ACQCC�:F PRA�S�FTUVWVXYZ�[\]\Y_ �a]\�>\bbU�EUa\Yc\TWcT\b�[ZYUUVU<�7bVU<d]Uc\TWcV]U�YUe�fXb\YcV]U�gFVUVR9h_X]VT_iRjF]eb\Yc]\Q�?V_�[TZ�S�=8k�9c]\_lYcb\�dbUcb\PQ@C�:F�R�ACQCC�:F PRB�S�:eYXcVU�c]�dZV_Ycb�dmYUb�=VU�>\bbU�EUa\Yc\TWcT\b�YUe�GE7FbYT\bRnF]eb\Yc]\Q�oVZZ�:\WVb\V<�d[69d<�d[95p�S�qYUY b�kYUbU�o\TcZVUPQ@C�:F�R�ACQCC�:F PR@�S�>\bbU�EUa\Yc\TWcT\b�YUe�GE7�d]Uc\TWcV]U�YUe�fXb\YcV]U�YUeFYVUcbUYUWbRnF]eb\Yc]\Q�rY_b�k]TZb<�[m7<�d[95p<�d[69d�S�=8k�9c]\_lYcb\�dbUcb\PQ@C�:F�R�ACQCC�:F PRn�S�>\bbU�EUa\Yc\TWcT\b�YUe�GE7�dYb�9cTeVbRCPF]eb\Yc]\Q�9W]cc�9c\TWs�S�>b]hUcbW�d]UTZcYUcPQ@C�:F�R�ACQCC�:F 6tYZTYcV]U�]a�Y�GbYa�d]ZZbWcV]U�YUe�9c\bbc�dZbYUVU�[\]\Y_�Y�Y�5Yh�c]ubeTWb�8Tc\VbUc�VU�=\vYU�uTU]aa[\V_Y\h�:Tcm]\Q�5VZZVY_�9bZvV�S�=w9w�>b]Z]VWYZ�9T\tbh�PQ@C�:F�R�ACQCC�:F 9mYeb�]a�>\bbU�EUa\Yc\TWcT\bR�d9f�d]__TUVcVb�?Ysb�7Vaab\bUc:XX\]YWmb�a]\�cmb�9Y_b�>]YZ:Tcm]\Q�qV\VUVY�:w�u]YWm<�[w6w�S�d7F�9_Vcm:Tcm]\Q�9W]cc�GYUe\bU�PQ@C�:F�R�ACQCC�:F fXcV_VxVU�oV]aVZc\YcV]U�FbeVY�YUe�fTcZbc�7bVUQ�FYcb\VYZ�9T\tbh<�?bcd]ZT_U<�YUe�d]Uc\TWcV]U�9XbWVaVWYcV]U�a]\�ubV]UYZ�oV]aVZc\YcV]UyYWVZVcVb:Tcm]\Q�:TcVU�f\\�S�>b]hUcbW�d]UTZcYUc�PQ@C�:F�R�ACQCC�:F ubc]\VU�FVZZ�d\bbs�VU�dmbZbY<�FY YWmTbccQ�E_XZb_bUcVU�>\bbUEUa\Yc\TWcT\b�YUe�6W]Z]VWYZ�ubc]\YcV]U�VU�YU�6UtV\]U_bUcYZ�rTcVWbd]__TUVch:Tcm]\Q�rbUUVab\�ubZcYv<�[6�S�k]\Zbh�5VccbU�>\]TX:Tcm]\Q�u]bYUU�o]UV]tYUUV�S�dmbZbY�d]ZZYv]\YcVtb<�EUWw�PQ@C�:F�R�ACQCC�:F =\vYU�5Ycb\mbe�ubUblYZQ�6aabWcVtb�E_Xb\tV]T�d]tb\�ubeTWcV]U�YUe6W]hcb_�ubX]Ub:Tcm]\Q�u]v�u]bbU<�[6<�75u6�S�5Ycb\c]Ub�6UVUbb\VU:Tcm]\Q�?m]_Y�[w�oYZZbcb\]<�[m7�[6�[k�[>�d>5[�S�=UVtb\Vch�]a�8blkY_XmV\b�9c]\_lYcb\�dbUcb\:Tcm]\Q�rY_b�k]TZb<�[m7<�d[95p<�d[69d�S�=8k�9c]\_lYcb\�dbUcb\:Tcm]\Q�qVsc]\�kZY�
�������� �������� ����������� �������������
������������������������� �������������������� �����!"��"����#$�"%��&������'���$�"%(�$���$�"'!�)*%+ ���
,-./�01�2�3/-//�01 ,24�5�16789:;<�=;7�>669?�@6A�BA88;�C;@A=?DAEFDEA8�G9=;;:;<�=;7H8?:<;2,1678A=D6A-�I8J8FF=�KL�MD=FN�5�H8?:<;BA88;�OOK,-./�01�2�3/-//�01 ,2P�5�BA88;�C;@A=?DAEFDEA8�=;7�OCH�K=?8�MDE7:8?2/Q1678A=D6A-�HE?D:;�0DFR:?6;S�GT�5�KUV13/-./�01�2�3V-//�G1 BA88;�C;@A=?DAEFDEA8WO6X�CYZ=FD�H8[896ZY8;D-�\R=D�:?�DR8�]8DMD8Z�:;�DR8�BA88;�I8[69ED:6;G=;89:?D-�>R6Y=?�GL�_=998?D8A6S�GRH�GT�GU�GB�KB\G�5�;:[8A?:Da�6@�]8XU=YZ?R:A8�MD6AYX=D8A�K8;D8AG=;89:?D-�1=AFE?�bE:<98aS�H\ITS�GT�5�cZD:I>KS�C;FLG=;89:?D-�d8:DR�O:FRD8;G=;89:?D-�\:99:=Y�eL�UE;D�5�]6ADR�K=A69:;=�MD=D8�;:[8A?:DaG=;89:?D-�I6J�I6?88;S�GTS�H\IT�5�\=D8A?D6;8�T;<:;88A:;<G=;89:?D-�I6J8AD�>A=[8AS�GRH�5�f:99=;6[=�;:[8A?:Da�3/-./�01�2�3V-//�G1 Q2V�5�BA88;�C;@A=?DAEFDEA8�=;7�OCH�K=?8�MDE7:8?23/1678A=D6A-�1=A<6D�\=9N8A�5�]gKHTG3/-./�01�2�3V-//�G1 Q2.�5�OCH�G8A@6AY=;F8S�I8?8=AFRS�=;7�K697�I8<:6;?�H8?:<;�=;7G8A@6AY=;F8�h1:;:2MaYZ6?:EYi2j1678A=D6A-�1:N=89�kL�C?8;?88�5�1:7798�MDL�KA6:�\=D8A?R87�1=;=<8Y8;DcA<=;:l=D:6;3/-./�01�2�3V-//�G1 Q2j�5�BA88;�C;@A=?DAEFDEA8�=;7�OCH�K=?8�MDE7:8?2331678A=D6A-�MD8ZR8;�T7X=A7�\R:D8S�TC>S�0L1L0MKT�5�GR:9=789ZR:=�\=D8AH8Z=ADY8;D3/-./�01�2�3V-//�G1 Q24�5�07[=;F:;<�BA88;�C;@A=?DAEFDEA8�CYZ98Y8;D=D:6;�:;>A=;?Z6AD=D:6;�G9=;;:;<�=;7�T;<:;88A:;<�MD=;7=A7?3/-./�01�2�3V-//�G1 Q2P�5�TF6;6Y:F?�=;7�_8;8@:D?�6@�BC2.1678A=D6A-�KEAD:?�U:;Y=;�5�U8AA8A=�T;[:A6;Y8;D=9�K6;?E9D=;D?3-//�G1�2�4-//�G1 /2.�5�>6EA
��������� ����� ����� ����������� ��������������������������������������� !�"""#����$%&���'(�)��*�+,-.���#��������/��01,,2$�3
����� ����� ����������� ��������������������������������������� !�"""#����$%&���'(�)��*�+,-.���#��������/��01,,2$���#4�����3 ���
5��6���6�� ������6���6�����6�� ����64��6���������67��6189:86���68�����61��7���� ��6 ;��64���6/��6$���6 6
6<=>?=6@@AB6=CCDEF6<GCHIJICKI.���L64��67��6�����������65��6���6 ��7�����67��189:86���68�����61��7���� ��2����68����6/��6+���������60M�6�N���!��+�����O6 �����O6��6����64���6�����������P�6���L67������6�6������64��6�6��6����Q66R�6����6��7�������6��6��6��6���6���62$P*�����6$���6R����Q6.�6� ���6��64���6���������� �O6 �� L6����SBIC����!����N6T6���������N8��6�6*461�������SBIJI;4�6+���� 46*�����46�6/��6R��761�����6+���6*�����4O61���7�����6!�!"�6U��6�6��6���6���� ����6�6������O6 �� L6�����<GCAEKA&�����6V N�W6� T��"�60�������6��6������64���6���6�����6661�� L6�����X6���� .����6�76Y��&���� 46&��� 48���61��� :�� LO6���46���6�77�������6������6����6����������6���6�������������6��7����67��6���6����6��Z���
��������� ����� ����� ����������� ��������������������������������������� !�"""#����$%&���'(�)��*�+,-.���#��������/��01,,2$�3
����� ����� ����������� ��������������������������������������� !�"""#����$%&���'(�)��*�+,-.���#��������/��01,,2$���#4�����3 ���