employees provident fund appellate tribunal ata no. … · 2018. 6. 12. · manikgarh cement...

21
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI ATA No. 253(07)2010 M/ s. Thanal Placement 86 Real Estate Services Appellant Vs APFC, Thiruvananthapuram Respondent ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014 Present: None for the appellant. Sh. Narender Kumar, Advocate for the respondent. Notice be issued to the appellant. The case was listed for reply to the appeal by the respondent. However, the advocate for respondent requested time for filing the reply. The request is allowed. The case be listed for reply and further hearing for 6th of February, 2014. (R.L. Koli) Presiding Officer, EPFAT

Upload: others

Post on 29-Sep-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ATA No. … · 2018. 6. 12. · Manikgarh Cement Appellant Vs RPFC, Nagpur Respondent ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014 Present: Sh. S.K

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

ATA No. 253(07)2010

M/ s. Thanal Placement 86 Real Estate Services Appellant

Vs

APFC, Thiruvananthapuram Respondent

ORDER

Dated: 08th January, 2014

Present: None for the appellant.

Sh. Narender Kumar, Advocate for the respondent.

Notice be issued to the appellant. The case was listed for reply to the

appeal by the respondent. However, the advocate for respondent requested time

for filing the reply. The request is allowed. The case be listed for reply and

further hearing for 6th of February, 2014.

(R.L. Koli) Presiding Officer, EPFAT

Page 2: EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ATA No. … · 2018. 6. 12. · Manikgarh Cement Appellant Vs RPFC, Nagpur Respondent ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014 Present: Sh. S.K

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

ATA No. 469(07)2012

M/s. Shree Vijayananda Vidyapeedom Appellant

Vs

APFC, Thiruvnanthapuram Respondent

ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014

Present: Sh. Sachin Agarwal, Advocate for the appellant. Sh. Narender Kumar, Advocate for the respondent.

The case was listed for reply to the appeal by the respondent. However,

the advocate for respondent requested time for filing the reply. The request is

allowed. The case be listed for reply and further hearing for 19th of May, 2014.

M/ (R.L. KOH)

Presiding Officer, EPFAT

Page 3: EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ATA No. … · 2018. 6. 12. · Manikgarh Cement Appellant Vs RPFC, Nagpur Respondent ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014 Present: Sh. S.K

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

ATA No. 317(07)2012

M/s. Kallumadiyil Enterprise Pvt. Ltd. Appellant

Vs

APFC, Thiruvananthapuram Respondent

ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014

Present: Sh. Sachin Agarwal, Advocate for the appellant. Sh. Narender Kumar, Advocate for the respondent.

The case was listed for reply to the appeal by the respondent. However,

the advocate for respondent requested time for filing the reply. The request is

allowed. The case be listed for reply and further hearing for 19th of May, 2014.

(R.L. K li) Presiding Officer, EPFAT

1.1

Page 4: EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ATA No. … · 2018. 6. 12. · Manikgarh Cement Appellant Vs RPFC, Nagpur Respondent ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014 Present: Sh. S.K

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

ATA No. 785(09)2013

M/ s. Paradise Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Appellant

Vs

APFC, Mumbai Respondent

ORDER

Dated: 08th January, 2014

Present: Sh. S.C. Verma, Advocate for the appellant.

Sh. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Advocate for the respondent.

The case was listed for reply to the appeal by the respondent. However,

the advocate for respondent requested time for filing the reply. The request is

allowed. The case be listed for reply and further hearing for 25th of March,

2014.

(R.L. Koli) Presiding Officer, EPFAT

Page 5: EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ATA No. … · 2018. 6. 12. · Manikgarh Cement Appellant Vs RPFC, Nagpur Respondent ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014 Present: Sh. S.K

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

ATA No. 160(13)2011

M/s. LS Education & Charity Trust Appellant

Vs

APFC, Madurai Respondent

ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014

Present: Sh. Nirdosh Rathore, Advocate for the appellant.

Sh. S. Sasibhusan, Advocate for the respondent.

The reply in the present case has been filed. Accordingly, the case be

listed for filing of rejoinder and further hearing for 26th of May, 2014.

(R.L. Koli)

Presiding Officer, EPFAT

Page 6: EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ATA No. … · 2018. 6. 12. · Manikgarh Cement Appellant Vs RPFC, Nagpur Respondent ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014 Present: Sh. S.K

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

ATA No. 855(13)2011

M/s. Sun Pressing Pvt. Ltd. Appellant

Vs

APFC, Madurai Respondent

ORDER

Dated: 08th January, 2014

Present: Sh. Nirdosh Rathore, Advocate for the appellant.

Sh. S. Sasibhusan, Advocate for the respondent.

The case was listed for reply to the appeal by the respondent. However,

the advocate for respondent requested time for filing the reply. The request , is

allowed. The case be listed for reply and further hearing for 25th of March,

2014.

(R.L. Koli)

Presiding Officer, EPFAT

Page 7: EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ATA No. … · 2018. 6. 12. · Manikgarh Cement Appellant Vs RPFC, Nagpur Respondent ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014 Present: Sh. S.K

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

ATA No. 599(04)2011

M/s. Kathuria Goods Carrier Appellant

Vs

APFC, Delhi Respondent

ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014

Present: Sh. S.S. Pandey, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Aparna Bhat, Advocate for the respondent.

The case was listed for final hearing. However, the advocate for the

parties mutually requested for adjournment of the case. Considering that the

request is mutual, the same is allowed. The case be listed for final hearing for

27th of May, 2014.

(R.L. Koli) Presiding Officer, EPFAT

Page 8: EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ATA No. … · 2018. 6. 12. · Manikgarh Cement Appellant Vs RPFC, Nagpur Respondent ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014 Present: Sh. S.K

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

ATA No. 607(06)2006

M/s. Chinmaya Mission Hospital Appellant

Vs

APFC, Bangalore Respondent

ORDER

Dated: 08th January, 2014

Present: Sh. Amit Srivastava, Advocate for the appellant.

Sh. B.R. Murthy, Advocate for the respondent.

The case was listed for final hearing. However, the advocate for the

parties mutually requested for adjournment of the case. Considering that;; the

request is mutual, the same is allowed. The case be listed for final hearing for

27th of May, 2014.

(R.L. Koli)

Presiding Officer, EPFAT

Page 9: EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ATA No. … · 2018. 6. 12. · Manikgarh Cement Appellant Vs RPFC, Nagpur Respondent ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014 Present: Sh. S.K

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

ATA No. 854(09)2012

M/s. MP Enterprises Appellant

Vs

APFC, Pune Respondent

ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014

Present: Sh. Prashant, Advocate for the appellant.

Sh. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Advocate for the respondent.

The case was listed for final hearing. However, the advocate for the

parties mutually requested for adjournment of the case. Considering that the

request is mutual, the same is allowed. The case be listed for final hearing for

25th of March, 2014.

(R.L. Koli) Presiding Officer, EPFAT

Page 10: EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ATA No. … · 2018. 6. 12. · Manikgarh Cement Appellant Vs RPFC, Nagpur Respondent ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014 Present: Sh. S.K

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

ATA No. 533(10)2011

M/s. Governing Body Vyasanagar Auto College Appellant

Vs

APFC, Bhubaneswar Respondent

ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014

Present: Sh. Sanjeev Choudhary, Advocate for the appellant. Sh. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Advocate for the respondent.

The case was listed for final hearing. However, the advocate for the

parties mutually requested for adjournment of the case. Considering that the

request is mutual, the same is allowed. The case be listed for final hearing for

25th of March, 2014.

(R.L. Koli)

Presiding Officer, EPFAT

1C1

Page 11: EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ATA No. … · 2018. 6. 12. · Manikgarh Cement Appellant Vs RPFC, Nagpur Respondent ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014 Present: Sh. S.K

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

ATA No. 230(11)2011

M/s. Deputy Secretary PSEB Appellant

Vs

APFC, Chandigarh Respondent

ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014

Present: Sh. Rajeev Shukla, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Aparna Bhat, Advocate for the respondent.

The ease was listed for final hearing. However, the advocate for the

parties mutually requested for adjournment of the case. Considering that the

request is mutual, the same is allowed. The case be listed for final hearing for

27 1 h of May, 2014.

(R.L. Koli) Presiding Officer, EPFAT

Page 12: EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ATA No. … · 2018. 6. 12. · Manikgarh Cement Appellant Vs RPFC, Nagpur Respondent ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014 Present: Sh. S.K

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

ATA No. 104(11)2012

M/s. The Punjab State Coop. Supply & Marketing Fed. Ltd. Appellant

Vs

RPFC, Chandigarh Respondent

ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014

Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.

Ms. Aparna Bhat, Advocate for the respondent.

The case was listed for final hearing. However, the advocate for the

parties mutually requested for adjournment of the case. Considering that the

request is mutual, the same is allowed. The case be listed for final hearing for

27th of May, 2014.

Ofr (R.L. Koli)

Presiding Officer, EPFAT

Page 13: EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ATA No. … · 2018. 6. 12. · Manikgarh Cement Appellant Vs RPFC, Nagpur Respondent ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014 Present: Sh. S.K

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

ATA No. 870(13)2013

M/s. Joseph College of Education 86 St. Joseph Teacher Training Appellant

Vs

APFC, Tirunelveli Respondent

ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014

Present: Sh. Nirdosh Rathore, Advocate for the appellant.

Sh. S. Sasibhusan, Advocate for the respondent.

The case was listed for final hearing. However, the advocate for the

parties mutually requested for adjournment of the case. Considering that the

request is mutual, the same is allowed. The case be listed for final hearing for

24th of February, 2014.

( R. L. Koli) Presiding Officer, EPFAT

Page 14: EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ATA No. … · 2018. 6. 12. · Manikgarh Cement Appellant Vs RPFC, Nagpur Respondent ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014 Present: Sh. S.K

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

ATA No. 774(13)2007

M/s. Chapslee School Appellant

Vs

APFC, Shimla Respondent

ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014

Present: Sh. Prabhat clerk for Advocate for the appellant.

Ms. Aparna Bhat, Advocate for the respondent.

The case was listed for final hearing. However, the clerk for the appellant

and the advocate for the respondent mutually requested for adjournment of the

case. Considering that the request is mutual, the same is allowed. The case be

listed for reply and final disposal of the appeal for 17th of February, 2014.

(R.L. Koli) Presiding Officer, EPFAT

g3

Page 15: EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ATA No. … · 2018. 6. 12. · Manikgarh Cement Appellant Vs RPFC, Nagpur Respondent ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014 Present: Sh. S.K

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

ATA No. 610(18)2011

M/s. Uranium Corp. of India Appellant

Vs

RPFC, Jamshedpur Respondent

ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014

Present: Sh. Hardeep Singh, Advocate for the appellant.

Ms. Shrabani Chakrabarty, Advocate for the respondent.

The case was listed for final hearing. However, the advocate for

respondent requested for adjournment of the case. The request is allowed. The

case be listed for final hearing for 7th of May, 2014.

(R.L. Koli) Presiding Officer, EPFAT

Page 16: EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ATA No. … · 2018. 6. 12. · Manikgarh Cement Appellant Vs RPFC, Nagpur Respondent ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014 Present: Sh. S.K

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

ATA No. 56(01)2008

M/s. Southern Power Distribution Company of AP Ltd. Appellant

Vs

APFC, Kadapa. Respondent

ORDER

Dated: 08th January, 2014

Present: None for the appellant.

Sh. B.S. Pradhan, Advocate for the respondent.

Notice be issued to the appellant. It is noticed that the Hon'ble High

Court has passed an order in this case directing this Tribunal to consider the

matter on merits. Hence, the case be listed for further hearing for 27.05.2014.

(R.L. Koli) Presiding Officer, EPFAT

Page 17: EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ATA No. … · 2018. 6. 12. · Manikgarh Cement Appellant Vs RPFC, Nagpur Respondent ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014 Present: Sh. S.K

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

ATA No. 354(04)2013

M/s. Flarish Sahni Appellant

Vs

RPFC, Delhi Respondent

ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014

Present: Sh. A.K. Tewari, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Aparna Bhat, Advocate for the respondent.

The appellant in the present case has filed a Miscellaneous Application

for early hearing of the case. The application is allowed. The case be listed for

reply and final disposal of the appeal for 12th of February, 2014.

(R.L. Koli) Presiding Officer, EPFAT

Page 18: EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ATA No. … · 2018. 6. 12. · Manikgarh Cement Appellant Vs RPFC, Nagpur Respondent ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014 Present: Sh. S.K

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

ATA No. 529(09)2011

M/s. Manikgarh Cement Appellant

Vs

RPFC, Nagpur Respondent

ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014

Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.

Sh. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Advocate for the respondent.

The appellant in the present case has filed a Miscellaneous Application for

refund of amount. The advocate for respondent submitted that a copy of the

application be handed over to him and time be granted for filing of reply to the

application. The submission is legal and is allowed. The advocate for appellant is

directed to hand over a copy of application to the counsel for respondent. The case be

listed for reply to the application and disposal of the same for 25th of Marcy, 2014.

sc4 1,- (R.L. Koli)

Presiding Officer, EPFAT

Page 19: EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ATA No. … · 2018. 6. 12. · Manikgarh Cement Appellant Vs RPFC, Nagpur Respondent ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014 Present: Sh. S.K

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

ATA No. 466(15)2012

M/s. Looksun Tea Estate Appellant

Vs

RPFC, Jalpaiguri Respondent

ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014

Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.

Sh. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Advocate for the respondent.

The appellant in the present case has filed a Miscellaneous Application for

refund of amount. The advocate for respondent submitted that a copy of the

application be handed over to him and time be granted for filing of reply to the

application. The submission is legal and is allowed, The advocate for appellant is

directed to hand over a copy of application to the counsel for respondent. The case be

listed for reply to the application and disposal of the same for 25th of Marcy, 2014.

Sof (R.L. Koli)

Presiding Officer, EPFAT

Page 20: EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ATA No. … · 2018. 6. 12. · Manikgarh Cement Appellant Vs RPFC, Nagpur Respondent ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014 Present: Sh. S.K

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

ATA No. 468(15)2012

M/s. Looksun Tea Estate Appellant

Vs

RPFC, Jalpaiguri Respondent

ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014

Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.

Sh. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Advocate for the respondent.

The appellant in the present case has filed a Miscellaneous Application for

refund of amount. The advocate for respondent submitted that a copy of the

application be handed over to him and time be granted for filing of reply to the

application. The submission is legal and is allowed. The advocate for appellant is

directed to hand over a copy of application to the counsel for respondent. The case be

listed for reply to the application and disposal of the same for 25th of Marcy, 2014.

(R.L. Koli)

Presiding Officer, EPFAT

aR

Page 21: EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ATA No. … · 2018. 6. 12. · Manikgarh Cement Appellant Vs RPFC, Nagpur Respondent ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014 Present: Sh. S.K

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

ATA No. 13(20)2013

M/s. Techforce India Pvt. Ltd. Appellant

Vs

APFC, Goa Respondent

ORDER

Dated: 08th January, 2014

Present: Sh. S.S. Pandey, Advocate for the appellant. None for the respondent.

The appellant in the present case has filed a Miscellaneous Application

for early hearing of the case. As the counsel for respondent is not present, the

advocate for appellant submitted that he undertakes to convey the date of

hearing to the advocate for respondent. In view of the submission, the

application for early hearing is allowed. The case be listed for further hearing

for 6.2.2014.

cd/ (R.L. Koli)

Presiding Officer, EPFAT