employees provident fund appellate tribunal ata no. … · 2018. 6. 12. · manikgarh cement...
TRANSCRIPT
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
ATA No. 253(07)2010
M/ s. Thanal Placement 86 Real Estate Services Appellant
Vs
APFC, Thiruvananthapuram Respondent
ORDER
Dated: 08th January, 2014
Present: None for the appellant.
Sh. Narender Kumar, Advocate for the respondent.
Notice be issued to the appellant. The case was listed for reply to the
appeal by the respondent. However, the advocate for respondent requested time
for filing the reply. The request is allowed. The case be listed for reply and
further hearing for 6th of February, 2014.
(R.L. Koli) Presiding Officer, EPFAT
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
ATA No. 469(07)2012
M/s. Shree Vijayananda Vidyapeedom Appellant
Vs
APFC, Thiruvnanthapuram Respondent
ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014
Present: Sh. Sachin Agarwal, Advocate for the appellant. Sh. Narender Kumar, Advocate for the respondent.
The case was listed for reply to the appeal by the respondent. However,
the advocate for respondent requested time for filing the reply. The request is
allowed. The case be listed for reply and further hearing for 19th of May, 2014.
M/ (R.L. KOH)
Presiding Officer, EPFAT
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
ATA No. 317(07)2012
M/s. Kallumadiyil Enterprise Pvt. Ltd. Appellant
Vs
APFC, Thiruvananthapuram Respondent
ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014
Present: Sh. Sachin Agarwal, Advocate for the appellant. Sh. Narender Kumar, Advocate for the respondent.
The case was listed for reply to the appeal by the respondent. However,
the advocate for respondent requested time for filing the reply. The request is
allowed. The case be listed for reply and further hearing for 19th of May, 2014.
(R.L. K li) Presiding Officer, EPFAT
1.1
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
ATA No. 785(09)2013
M/ s. Paradise Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Appellant
Vs
APFC, Mumbai Respondent
ORDER
Dated: 08th January, 2014
Present: Sh. S.C. Verma, Advocate for the appellant.
Sh. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Advocate for the respondent.
The case was listed for reply to the appeal by the respondent. However,
the advocate for respondent requested time for filing the reply. The request is
allowed. The case be listed for reply and further hearing for 25th of March,
2014.
(R.L. Koli) Presiding Officer, EPFAT
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
ATA No. 160(13)2011
M/s. LS Education & Charity Trust Appellant
Vs
APFC, Madurai Respondent
ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014
Present: Sh. Nirdosh Rathore, Advocate for the appellant.
Sh. S. Sasibhusan, Advocate for the respondent.
The reply in the present case has been filed. Accordingly, the case be
listed for filing of rejoinder and further hearing for 26th of May, 2014.
(R.L. Koli)
Presiding Officer, EPFAT
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
ATA No. 855(13)2011
M/s. Sun Pressing Pvt. Ltd. Appellant
Vs
APFC, Madurai Respondent
ORDER
Dated: 08th January, 2014
Present: Sh. Nirdosh Rathore, Advocate for the appellant.
Sh. S. Sasibhusan, Advocate for the respondent.
The case was listed for reply to the appeal by the respondent. However,
the advocate for respondent requested time for filing the reply. The request , is
allowed. The case be listed for reply and further hearing for 25th of March,
2014.
(R.L. Koli)
Presiding Officer, EPFAT
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
ATA No. 599(04)2011
M/s. Kathuria Goods Carrier Appellant
Vs
APFC, Delhi Respondent
ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014
Present: Sh. S.S. Pandey, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Aparna Bhat, Advocate for the respondent.
The case was listed for final hearing. However, the advocate for the
parties mutually requested for adjournment of the case. Considering that the
request is mutual, the same is allowed. The case be listed for final hearing for
27th of May, 2014.
(R.L. Koli) Presiding Officer, EPFAT
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
ATA No. 607(06)2006
M/s. Chinmaya Mission Hospital Appellant
Vs
APFC, Bangalore Respondent
ORDER
Dated: 08th January, 2014
Present: Sh. Amit Srivastava, Advocate for the appellant.
Sh. B.R. Murthy, Advocate for the respondent.
The case was listed for final hearing. However, the advocate for the
parties mutually requested for adjournment of the case. Considering that;; the
request is mutual, the same is allowed. The case be listed for final hearing for
27th of May, 2014.
(R.L. Koli)
Presiding Officer, EPFAT
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
ATA No. 854(09)2012
M/s. MP Enterprises Appellant
Vs
APFC, Pune Respondent
ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014
Present: Sh. Prashant, Advocate for the appellant.
Sh. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Advocate for the respondent.
The case was listed for final hearing. However, the advocate for the
parties mutually requested for adjournment of the case. Considering that the
request is mutual, the same is allowed. The case be listed for final hearing for
25th of March, 2014.
(R.L. Koli) Presiding Officer, EPFAT
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
ATA No. 533(10)2011
M/s. Governing Body Vyasanagar Auto College Appellant
Vs
APFC, Bhubaneswar Respondent
ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014
Present: Sh. Sanjeev Choudhary, Advocate for the appellant. Sh. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Advocate for the respondent.
The case was listed for final hearing. However, the advocate for the
parties mutually requested for adjournment of the case. Considering that the
request is mutual, the same is allowed. The case be listed for final hearing for
25th of March, 2014.
(R.L. Koli)
Presiding Officer, EPFAT
1C1
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
ATA No. 230(11)2011
M/s. Deputy Secretary PSEB Appellant
Vs
APFC, Chandigarh Respondent
ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014
Present: Sh. Rajeev Shukla, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Aparna Bhat, Advocate for the respondent.
The ease was listed for final hearing. However, the advocate for the
parties mutually requested for adjournment of the case. Considering that the
request is mutual, the same is allowed. The case be listed for final hearing for
27 1 h of May, 2014.
(R.L. Koli) Presiding Officer, EPFAT
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
ATA No. 104(11)2012
M/s. The Punjab State Coop. Supply & Marketing Fed. Ltd. Appellant
Vs
RPFC, Chandigarh Respondent
ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014
Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.
Ms. Aparna Bhat, Advocate for the respondent.
The case was listed for final hearing. However, the advocate for the
parties mutually requested for adjournment of the case. Considering that the
request is mutual, the same is allowed. The case be listed for final hearing for
27th of May, 2014.
Ofr (R.L. Koli)
Presiding Officer, EPFAT
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
ATA No. 870(13)2013
M/s. Joseph College of Education 86 St. Joseph Teacher Training Appellant
Vs
APFC, Tirunelveli Respondent
ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014
Present: Sh. Nirdosh Rathore, Advocate for the appellant.
Sh. S. Sasibhusan, Advocate for the respondent.
The case was listed for final hearing. However, the advocate for the
parties mutually requested for adjournment of the case. Considering that the
request is mutual, the same is allowed. The case be listed for final hearing for
24th of February, 2014.
( R. L. Koli) Presiding Officer, EPFAT
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
ATA No. 774(13)2007
M/s. Chapslee School Appellant
Vs
APFC, Shimla Respondent
ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014
Present: Sh. Prabhat clerk for Advocate for the appellant.
Ms. Aparna Bhat, Advocate for the respondent.
The case was listed for final hearing. However, the clerk for the appellant
and the advocate for the respondent mutually requested for adjournment of the
case. Considering that the request is mutual, the same is allowed. The case be
listed for reply and final disposal of the appeal for 17th of February, 2014.
(R.L. Koli) Presiding Officer, EPFAT
g3
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
ATA No. 610(18)2011
M/s. Uranium Corp. of India Appellant
Vs
RPFC, Jamshedpur Respondent
ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014
Present: Sh. Hardeep Singh, Advocate for the appellant.
Ms. Shrabani Chakrabarty, Advocate for the respondent.
The case was listed for final hearing. However, the advocate for
respondent requested for adjournment of the case. The request is allowed. The
case be listed for final hearing for 7th of May, 2014.
(R.L. Koli) Presiding Officer, EPFAT
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
ATA No. 56(01)2008
M/s. Southern Power Distribution Company of AP Ltd. Appellant
Vs
APFC, Kadapa. Respondent
ORDER
Dated: 08th January, 2014
Present: None for the appellant.
Sh. B.S. Pradhan, Advocate for the respondent.
Notice be issued to the appellant. It is noticed that the Hon'ble High
Court has passed an order in this case directing this Tribunal to consider the
matter on merits. Hence, the case be listed for further hearing for 27.05.2014.
(R.L. Koli) Presiding Officer, EPFAT
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
ATA No. 354(04)2013
M/s. Flarish Sahni Appellant
Vs
RPFC, Delhi Respondent
ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014
Present: Sh. A.K. Tewari, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Aparna Bhat, Advocate for the respondent.
The appellant in the present case has filed a Miscellaneous Application
for early hearing of the case. The application is allowed. The case be listed for
reply and final disposal of the appeal for 12th of February, 2014.
(R.L. Koli) Presiding Officer, EPFAT
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
ATA No. 529(09)2011
M/s. Manikgarh Cement Appellant
Vs
RPFC, Nagpur Respondent
ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014
Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.
Sh. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Advocate for the respondent.
The appellant in the present case has filed a Miscellaneous Application for
refund of amount. The advocate for respondent submitted that a copy of the
application be handed over to him and time be granted for filing of reply to the
application. The submission is legal and is allowed. The advocate for appellant is
directed to hand over a copy of application to the counsel for respondent. The case be
listed for reply to the application and disposal of the same for 25th of Marcy, 2014.
sc4 1,- (R.L. Koli)
Presiding Officer, EPFAT
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
ATA No. 466(15)2012
M/s. Looksun Tea Estate Appellant
Vs
RPFC, Jalpaiguri Respondent
ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014
Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.
Sh. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Advocate for the respondent.
The appellant in the present case has filed a Miscellaneous Application for
refund of amount. The advocate for respondent submitted that a copy of the
application be handed over to him and time be granted for filing of reply to the
application. The submission is legal and is allowed, The advocate for appellant is
directed to hand over a copy of application to the counsel for respondent. The case be
listed for reply to the application and disposal of the same for 25th of Marcy, 2014.
Sof (R.L. Koli)
Presiding Officer, EPFAT
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
ATA No. 468(15)2012
M/s. Looksun Tea Estate Appellant
Vs
RPFC, Jalpaiguri Respondent
ORDER Dated: 08th January, 2014
Present: Sh. S.K. Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.
Sh. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Advocate for the respondent.
The appellant in the present case has filed a Miscellaneous Application for
refund of amount. The advocate for respondent submitted that a copy of the
application be handed over to him and time be granted for filing of reply to the
application. The submission is legal and is allowed. The advocate for appellant is
directed to hand over a copy of application to the counsel for respondent. The case be
listed for reply to the application and disposal of the same for 25th of Marcy, 2014.
(R.L. Koli)
Presiding Officer, EPFAT
aR
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
ATA No. 13(20)2013
M/s. Techforce India Pvt. Ltd. Appellant
Vs
APFC, Goa Respondent
ORDER
Dated: 08th January, 2014
Present: Sh. S.S. Pandey, Advocate for the appellant. None for the respondent.
The appellant in the present case has filed a Miscellaneous Application
for early hearing of the case. As the counsel for respondent is not present, the
advocate for appellant submitted that he undertakes to convey the date of
hearing to the advocate for respondent. In view of the submission, the
application for early hearing is allowed. The case be listed for further hearing
for 6.2.2014.
cd/ (R.L. Koli)
Presiding Officer, EPFAT