“educação para a cidadania global” - cecilia barbieri
TRANSCRIPT
Global Citizenship Education:building peaceful and sustainable societies
Cecilia Barbieri
UNESCO
REGIONAL OFFICE OF EDUCATION FOR LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN
2016
This presentation:
1. Context: education situation in LAC by 2015
2. GCED as opportunity to rethink education - Agenda E2030
3. GCED: what, why and how
General situation of education in LAC region...
Deep inequalities
The region has made progress in key aspects of education but inequalities
remain acute. The main factors of inequality are:
• socio-economic background
• ethnicity
• place of residence
Inequality and exclusion are the key challenges in the region.
Education progress has not been the same in all countries: there are marked
differences between and especially within countries.
Across the region, the most important unmet education target is that
dealing with quality of education.
Early Childhood Education
Between 2000 and 2013, enrolment rates increased from 51% to 67%.
Enrolment rates are 11 % points higher than those in other regions. As of 2013, 25% of the enrolment was private.
Significant progress in Colombia, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua and Peru.
However, there are marked differences between countries and there is inequality in access, to the detriment of the most vulnerable groups.
The main concern is the low quality of programmes and services as well as teacher training.
At this level of education, there is a ratio of 18 students per teacher. There is scant information or regulation on the programmes and their impact.
Universal Primary Education
In general, countries have made significant progress - though in some countries,
coverage has stalled since 2000.
• As of 2013, coverage in LAC was 94% while it was 95% in 2000
• Some of the affected countries during this period: Mexico, Ecuador, Peru,
Colombia, Panama, Dominica, Jamaica
Household surveys report that the completion rates for the primary cycle for
persons aged 30 to 34 increased to 88%, while it is 94% for those aged 15 to 19.
The number of school-age children who do not go to school decreased from 4
million in 1999 to 3.7 million presently
• In LA the number of out-of-school children fell by 9% while in the
Caribbean it increased by 11%
Universal primary education: inequalities in access
In some countries the gap in access
between children from poor households
and those from richer households
increased. In other there was progress:
Bolivia, Brazil.
For a student from the poorest quintile the
probability of not concluding the primary
cycle is 7 times higher than that of a
student from the richest quintile
Some 20% of children in LAC join the
ranks of child labour
• Programmes that emphasise subsidies to motivate school attendance (CCTs) in
Nicaragua, México, Brazil, have helped reduce the gaps between children from poor and
rich households.
• School feeding programmes, e.g. in El Salvador, have been successful in increasing
enrolment rates from children from poorer households.
Secondary educationCoverage increased from 61% a 76% between 2000 and 2013
• This represents an increase in access of 25 % or more in Ecuador, Guyana, Panama and Santa Lucia
• Noticeable successes in the first cycle of secondary in Antigua, Barbados, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala where gross enrolment rates increased by more than 30% in some cases
The situation is uneven between countries.
The region shows a reduction in the number of young people who complete this cycle due to repetition and dropouts, especially in lower secondary:
Repetition: 6% in 2012, 6% in 2000
Dropouts: 16% in 2012, 17% in 2000
High inequality: only 22% of young people aged 20 -24 from the poorest quintile complete the secondary cycle compared with 78% for those from the top quintile.
Higher Education increased rapidly between 2000 and 2010: 3,428 students per 100,000 inhabitants in 2013 as compared to 2,230 students in 2000.
Technical and vocational competences and skills: TVET programmes have a low priority and are not highly valued.
In 2012 only 10% of secondary students were enrolled in these programmes.
Adult education
• As of 2013, there were some 33.8 million illiterates in the region. By 2015 this figure is estimated to be 31.2 million.
• Illiteracy rate is 8% as of 2013
• Between 2000 and 2012, there has been a moderate increase in adult literacy, from 90% to 92% (in 1985 the rate was 84%)
• Differences between countries: in some countries a significant % of the population is considered illiterate (20% in Guatemala) while in others illiteracy does not exist (Uruguay)
• According to UNESCO studies, the loss of productivity due to illiteracy is sufficiently important to consider its eradication both a social objective and a economic one (migration, violence, informal economy, inequality)
Gender parity
As of 2010, data available for 22 countries showed they had achieved numerical parity at the primary level (net enrolment ratio).
In secondary, the disparities affect negatively the male population; this phenomenon is worsening.
As of 2013, in secondary, the average index of gender parity for net enrolment was 1.06 (6% in favour of girls/women).
Challenges continue to affect girls’ education: high rates of adolescent pregnancy, especially in rural areas, stereotyping in the teaching/learning process, challenges in learning outcomes, etc.
Subtle biases in training and provision of opportunities that translate later in inequalities.
Quality of education – what is it?
In short, it defines what education should be and should do
Quality of education is recognised as most important issue in LAC region
No universal definition; instead learning outcomes are commonly used as an indicator to measure quality
However, there is consensus by all Ministers and countries on the 5 dimensions of education quality
The dimensions of Quality of Education
Relevant
Adapted to the (development) needs of society
Pertinent
Adapted to the (learning) needs of students
Effective
Achieve its objectives (development and learning outcomes) (SERCE, TERCE, PISA)
Efficient
Efficient use of resources (financial, HR, hardware, etc)
Equitable
Fair distribution of educational benefits to all sectors of society
Beyond 2015
Re-think quality of education:
- How the different dimensions are inter-related
- Which methods and contents for GCED
- Which evaluation systems, learning outcomes and instruments
- What learning for the 21st century and how.
Secondary, TVET and tertiary education: what strategy and practices to gradually transform the region and countries into knowledge societies?
Rethinking Education “The changes in the world today are characterized by new levels of complexity and contradiction” (….) Economic growth and the creation of wealth have reduced global poverty rates, but vulnerability, inequality, exclusion and violence have increased within and across societies throughout the world”.
We need to think of a
“humanistic vision of education and development based on principles of respect for life and human dignity, equal rights and social justice, respect for cultural diversity, and international solidarity and shared responsibility”,
that is, for future generations.
From “Rethinking education, Towards a global common good?” UNESCO 2015
A world increasingly more complex requires a more interconnected and democratic education
To further progress in human development, and achieve more justand democratic societies, we need action and cooperation of all.
Education helps us to understand what is happening in our world, knowing us, appreciating and learning from others, commitingourselfs and engaging others to cooperate and to take responsibledecisions that lead the transformations of our realities
Goal 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
Indicator/Target 4.7:
By 2030, ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development, including, among others, through education for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles, human rights, gender equality, promotion of a culture of peace and non-violence, global citizenship and appreciation of cultural diversity and of culture’s contribution to sustainable development
UNESCO Video
What is a Global Citizen?http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/resources/in-focus-articles/global-citizenship-education/
“Global citizenship refers to a sense of belonging to a broader community and commonhumanity. It emphasises political, economic, social and cultural interdependency andinterconnectedness between the local, the national and the global.”
GCED TLOs (p. 14)
Global citizenship
What is Global Citizenship Education?
(...) ... It is a strategic educationalfield, based on lifelong learning,..itequips learners of all ages with those values, knowledge and skills that are based on and instil respect for human rights, social justice, diversity, gender equality and environmental sustainability and that empower learners to be responsible global citizens. GCED gives learners the competencies and opportunity to realise their rights and obligations to promote a better world and future for all. »
UNESCO definition
It is one of the targets of the new SustainableDevelopment Goals
Launched as one of the strategiccomponents of the Global Education First Initiative, created by the SecretaryGeneral of the United Nations, Ban-Ki Moon, in 2012.
Why GCED?
A vision carried by a new generation
Paying attention to the shift in education discourse and practices
Aligned with international commitments
Youth are increasingly engaged in their education, which comes from different sources (school, family, community, Internet, social and cultural life, etc.)
Youth want to become active and responsible citizens and contribute to society
Youth are concerned about the future and in search for hope
GCED: provides youth with the skills to take their fate in their hands and contribute to the construction of peace and stability
A vision carried by a new generation
Education must meet the needs of the 21st century: a world which is globalized, mobile, diverse, complex, changing, under tension
Quality education = relevant education (living better)
More focus on socio-emotional and non-cognitive aspects of learning
Shift in pedagogical practices that entail changes in the role of the teacher
GCED: Opportunity to update pedagogical practices
Shift in education discourse and practices
GEFI: GCED as one of the priorities of the UN Secretary-General’s Global Education First Initiative (GEFI) launched in September 2012: http://www.globaleducationfirst.org/
SDGs: Target 4.7 of the education goal 4 https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1579SDGs%20Proposal.pdf
Incheon Declaration adopted at the 2015 World Education Forum (GCED as an element of quality education) : https://en.unesco.org/world-education-forum-2015/incheon-declaration
Lima Statement (para 13): EFA in LAC - Assessment of progress and post-2015 challenges: http://www.unesco.org/new/en/santiago/efalac-lima-meeting/lima-declaration
GCED: enshrined in the global agenda and in regional commitments
International commitments
Legal framework
• UN Charter
• UNESCO Constitution
• Article 26(2) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
• Core international human rights treaties (ICCPR, ICESCR, CRC, CEDAW, CERD etc…)
• 1974 Recommendation concerning education for international understanding, co-operation and peace and education relating to human rights and fundamental freedoms
• United Nations Declaration on Human Rights Education and Training (A/RES/66/137) and Plan of Action of the World Programme for Human Rights Education
WHY GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP EDUCATION
To understand therelationship between the
issues that are happening at local, national and global
level.
To motivate ourselves to act and be empowered to lead the transformation
of our realities and ensure the welfare and
social justice in ourcommunities
To think and analyzecreatively and critically
To be more committed, supporting and responsible
citizens
To make better decitions
To know, appreciate and respect other
cultures and stories
To build consensus and collective actions
To develop our sense of belonging and identity
To develop feelings of solidarity, empathy and respectfor differences. LIVE TOGETHER
UNESCO’s vision of GCED
• A component of quality education
• Link between education and the realization of the other development goals
• GCED is based on the conviction that sustainable peace is built in the minds of human beings and not only through ceasefire
UNESCO’s vision of GCED (cont’d)GCED – ESD – HRE – PE Commonalities
Linked, complementary and mutually reinforcing
• Human rights-based: promoting education as a right and contribute to realizing other rights,based on human rights principles (human dignity, equality, participation, non-discrimination,inclusion, mutual respect, accountability)
• Holistic approach: addressing learning contents and outcomes, pedagogy and the learning environment in formal, non-formal and informal learning settings and seeking to be inclusive
• Empowering: empower learners to realize their rights and fundamental freedoms through the acquisition of knowledge, skills, values and attitudes that cultivate critical thinking, collaborative skills, a sense of responsibility, solidarity, empathy, respect, understanding, etc.
• Transformative: enabling learners to transform themselves and society, contributing to just, peaceful and sustainable development
• Pedagogy: promoting learner-centered, action-oriented pedagogies
• E2030: included in one of the targets of the Education goal (4.7)
UNESCO’s vision of GCED (cont’d)Specificities
Different agendas, discourses, frameworks Different thematic emphases Partly different stakeholder groups
GCED ESD HRE Peace Education
• One of the three priorities of the UN Secretary-General’s Global Education First Initiative (GEFI), launched in 2012
• A broad framing paradigm encompassing and based on the principles of HRE and ESD
• Entails knowledge about global issues, sense of belonging to a common humanity, feelings of empathy, solidarity and respect, and taking action at national and global level
• Global Action Programme on ESD (GAP) (A/RES/69/211)
• UN Framework Convention on Climate Change; Convention on Biological Diversity; Hyogo Framework for Action • UN Sustainable Lifestyles and Education Programme of the 10-Year Framework of Programmes on Sustainable Consumption and Production (10YFP) 2012-2021
• Legal duty for States and fundamental right for individuals, enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) and in all major human rights treaties and instruments
• Recommandation 1974 concerning education for international understanding, co-operation and peace and education relating to human rights and fundamental freedoms
• Plan of Action of the World Programme for HRE: Phase I: 2005-2009, Phase 2: 2010-2014, Phase 3: 2015-2019
• Entails specific monitoring and reporting duties and procedures on HRE
• Peace as an overall objective of the UN according to UN Charter and UNESCO Constitution
• Article 26 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)
• 1974 Recommendation
What are thecharacteristics of a Global
Citizen?
It is unique as each of us
He/she respects him/herself and others
Has skills, values and knowledge to live with
people in their community, their
nation and the world
Is concerned and acts for the welfare of people
Take care of him/herself and
others
As a world citizen: understand its
complexities and dynamics
Recognizes to live in a diverse world and recognizes others
Practice everyday the citizenship, in all
dimensions, in all decisions respecting human rights
Global Citizenship Education: Topics and learning objectives
30
• Addressed to curriculum developers, educators,policy makers and other key education stakeholdersworking in the formal, non-formal and informaleducation
• Developed and piloted by experts and keystakeholders in education: teachers, curriculumdevelopers, etc.
• Adaptable and flexible in different contexts.
• It suggests ways to implement Global CitizenshipEducation in formal, no formal and informal education.
• Levels: pre-primary, upper primary, lower secondaryand upper secondary
The first pedagogical guidance from UNESCO on global citizenship education
Key learning outcomes of GCED
Source: Global Citizenship Education: Topics and Learning Objectives; UNESCO 2015; p.15
Implementation: teaching and learning methods
• Active: places emphasis on learning by doing• Interactive: based on the debate and democratic exchange
between students• Relevance: raises real situation problems youth encounter in
society or in their community• Critical : encourages to think critically by themselves, on the
basis of facts• Collaborative: working groups• Participative: involves youth in the teaching and in school life• Access to learning: evaluation system tailored to learning
outcomes• Values teachers (role models)
Implementation
• Should be adapted to the context: depending on country dynamics, the capacities of students/teachers/administrators; available resources
• At all levels: classroom, school, local, national and international community (exchanges); didactical practices, content, policies, environment
• At all ages: through life; formal / non-formal/informal (involvement of other sectors: cultural sector, media)
Implementation: selected examples
• Approach through curricula. Integrated : GCED integrated into existing subjects (ethics, geography, languages, civic education, religious education, health, etc.); eg: Republic of Korea, Colombia, the Philippines. Cross-cutting / stand-alone subject
• Whole-school approach: UNESCO Teaching Respect for All; GEM Global Study Pass
• Use of ICTs, e.g. TIGed: http://www.tigweb.org/tiged/?npc
• Use of arts: http://www.edutopia.org/arts-music-curriculum-child-development
• Physical and sports education: International Olympic Committee
• Community approach: link the community with the school
Implementation approaches
• Integrated approach =
• Cross-cutting approach =
• Whole-school approach =
• Stand-alone subject/activities =
+ -• more flexible
•coherence of messages
•Benefits the whole school community. Improves the quality of education
•Covers several aspects of GCED
• capacities of teachers
• capacities of school, administration and teachers
• global investment (training, mobilisation, etc.)
• programme overload
Global CitizenshipEducation in LatinAmerica and theCaribbean
Regional Forum, Santiago de Chile, September 2015.
State of the Art and Identification of challenges :
- Raise awareness about the importance of the topic
- Integration in the curriculum- Resources identification- Expand the practice of Global Citizenship
Education-Creation of integrated spaces of formal, non-formal and informal education
- Teacher´s training, school authorities, families, policy makers, civil society leaders, researchers, etc.
Main Outcome
Creation of Regional Plan to promote a joint
Agenda for Global CitizenshipEducation
Global Citizenship Education and LAC
GCED is trans-disciplinary rather than a separate or overlapping discipline
In LAC: not a new concept; emerging and very relevant considering the particularities and socio-economic situation: MIC trap, violence, pervasive inequality (especially within countries), unmet targets, etc.
In LAC, a pragmatic approach
Values and democracy Thinking skills for learners to imagine possible, positive
futures in the context of uncertainty and change Cognitive skills to think critically and creatively Non-cognitive and social skills: empathy, conflict resolution,
communication skills and aptitudes for networking and interacting with people of different backgrounds, origins, cultures
Knowing one’s own values and universal values: justice, equality, dignity, solidarity and respect
Behavioral capacities to act collaboratively and responsibly to find solutions to local and global challenges
Ability to motivate oneself and others for action
What instruments?
Innovative programmes and curricula focusing on young peoplefor a culture of peace (“learning to live together”), civic education, physical education and sports, sexuality education, students’ participation, respect for teachers and families, conflict resolution e.g. Central America, Regional Strategy on Teachers
Intercultural and multicultural education programmes in pedagogical, linguistic and institutional terms e.g. Bolivia, Ecuador.
Education systems enriched with contents and methods on Sustainable Development, green practices, climate change, disaster prevention, as a follow-up to Rio+20.
How can educational institutions participate?
Create and strengthen institutionalized spaces to increase and improve studentsparticipation in the educational processe, encouraging debate, the concept of "living together" and collaboration.
Create opportunities to perform learning projects and support services at thecommunity level, and in collaboration with other educational institutions. To promoteparticipation of families and community.
Establish and support education professionals’ networks within and betweeneducational institutions.
Create and/or participate in local, national and global educational institutions’ networks, to share experiences and develop joint projects - "School Movement for WorldCitizenship" or "Global School”
Organize workshops and discussion fora on GCED and related themes within the school, and/or other institutions at local, national and international levels.
At the global level – our partners
• UN Secretary-General Global Education First Initiative launched in 2012 Youth Advisory Group (GEFI-YAG http://www.globaleducationfirst.org/
• Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Education for Peace and Sustainable Development (MGIEP), UNESCO Category I Institute, India
• Asia-Pacific Centre of Education for International Understanding (APCEIU) UNESCO category 2 centre, Republic of Korea
• Learning Matrix Task Force – Working Group on GCED (UNESCO and Brookings Institute)
• North-South Centre (CNS) - Council of Europe
Available Resources
Publications:
- Global Citizenship Education: An Emerging perspective (2013)
- Global Citizenship Education: Preparing learners for the challenges of the twenty-first century (2014)
- Global Citizenship Education: Topics and Learning Objectives(2015)
- Clearinghouse: www.gcedclearinghouse.org (Asia Pacific Centre of Education for International Understanding – South Korea)
Conceptual definition
Conpetenciesdefinition
Learningstandards
Experiencesharing