e.coli over the pathway of the filter

1
Household Water Treatment with Gravity Driven Membrane Filters: Field Study Kenya 2011-12 GDM Kenya - an interdisciplinary project of Eawag, the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology Selina N. Derksen-Müller, Maryna Peter-Varbanets, Francis Kage, Joseph Owino, Regula Meierhofer, Wouter Pronk, Richard Johnston Field Study In order to test GDM filtration under real conditions, a field study was launched in Kenya in May 2011. In four different field sites where people where consuming untreated water, 24 prototypes were distributed to households. The raw water covers a broad range of water quality, from tap water in Nairobi to high-turbidity surface waters in rural areas. After one year of operation, 92% of the filters are still functioning and none have failed due to technical reasons. Despite the challenging raw water quality, the flux has stabilized in all filters. In collaboration with the Kenya Water for Health Organization (KWAHO), several water quality parameters and flux were monitored on a monthly basis. Gravity-Driven Membrane Filtration Under certain low water pressure conditions, ultra-filtration membranes can be sustainably operated for years, even without backwashing or cleaning 1 . Flux stabilization occurs due to the formation of a biofilm on the membrane surface with channels and cavities that counteract the resistance caused by deposition and fouling. While the flux of such a gravity-driven membrane (GDM) filtration would be considered inadequate for industrial applications, it is ideal for household water treatment. The GDM Kenya project aims to develop household filters for use in developing countries. Prefilter Membrane tank Membrane Micodyn-Nadir, (Germany) 150 kDa cut-off (~20nm pore size) 0.69 m2 surface area Clean water tank sampling points 2 4 3 1 References 1 Peter-Varbanets et al., Stabilization of flux during dead-end ultra-low pressure ultrafiltration. Water Research 2010, 44(12), 3607-3616. 2 Wright et al., Household drinking water in developing countries: A systematic review of microbiological contamination between source and point-of-use. Tropical Medicine and International Health. 2004;9(1):106-17 User Behavior The record from the dataloggers also reveals interesting information on the user behavior like the volume filtered and the time of day of filtration. Filter use declined somewhat in the days following the distribution but then remained stable throughout the year. Families with a median of 7 members filled their filter almost 4 times per week with a mean volume of 8.5 liters of water per filling. The median volume filtered per person almost 4 liters per week, so it is clear that filters were not used to their full capacity. Consumption per person was the lowest for tapwater in Nairobi where most people do not spend their day at home. 0 2 4 6 8 10 pond river dug well borehole tapwater 48 datasets of average 30 days in the first 9 months of the field study volume filtered per day volume per capita per week mean fills per week mean filling volume Flux Water flux was measured using pressure meter dataloggers (Solinst Levelogger Model 3001) continuously recording the water level in the membrane tank. These allow precise analysis of the flux and the behavior of the users. All filters reached stable flux within a few days and there was no systematic decrease observed over the whole year. The flux was calculated for three different heads, representing the flux shortly after filling (12 mbar), at an intermediate level (7.5 mbar) and towards the end of a filtration cycle (2.2 mbar). In the worst feedwater conditions, a filter with 0.5m 2 of membrane can still produce 20 liters of water while in more favorable conditions, 90 liters or more can be filtered per day. Water Quality In all raw water sources the fecal indicator bacteria E.Coli could be detected at times. However, the surface waters and the dug wells showed the highest contamination with geometric means from 110 to 180 CFU/100ml over all samples. In 72% of permeate samples no E.Coli was detected in 100ml. The membrane forms an absolute barrier for bacteria and the integrity of all filters was controlled. Therefore, the low levels of E.Coli observed in some of the filters are most likely Recontamination at the tap of the filter can be observed in most filters and is also known to be a problem in other water treatment systems 2 . due to recontamination from untreated water or particles entering the clean water tank in an unexpected way. Ex- amples of E.Coli counts over the pathway of the filter are displayed in the graph. Bacteria growth in the clean water tank is also plausible but is not likely the main explanation, as investigation of biofilms on the clean water tank walls yielded no E.Coli. 0 5 10 15 20 pond river dug well borehole tapwater data of one exemplary filter for each watersource, mean of 20-54 days continuous monitoring 2.2 mbar 7.5 mbar 12 mbar Outlook Based on the experience of the field trials, an improved 'second generation' GDM filter prototype is being designed in partnership with Zurich University of Arts and commercial partners. Next generation filters will be tested in the field in 2013 in a small number and the first large scale study with the final design of the filter is planned for 2014. Further research will be conducted and is already ongoing on the user acceptance, economic strategies, distribution networks and design aspects of the filter. 1 10 100 1000 1 2 3 4 raw water storage vessel membrane tank permeate tap Pond River Dug well Borehole tap (feedwater) data of one exemplary filter of each watersource E.Coli over the pathway of the filter Water and Health Conference 2012: Science, Policy and Innovation, Chapel Hill Contact Maryna Peter-Varbanets Eawag, Water and Sanitation in Developing Countries (Sandec) Überlandstrasse 133 P.O. Box 611 8600 Dübendorf Switzerland Tel. +41 (0)44 823 50 74 Fax +41 (0)44 823 53 99 [email protected] www.eawag.ch/membranefilter

Upload: others

Post on 12-Sep-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: E.Coli over the pathway of the filter

Household Water Treatment with Gravity Driven Membrane Filters: Field Study Kenya 2011-12

GDM Kenya - an interdisciplinary project of Eawag, the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology

Selina N. Derksen-Müller, Maryna Peter-Varbanets, Francis Kage, Joseph Owino, Regula Meierhofer, Wouter Pronk, Richard Johnston

Field Study

In order to test GDM filtration under real conditions, a field study

was launched in Kenya in May 2011. In four different field sites

where people where consuming untreated water, 24 prototypes

were distributed to households. The raw water covers a broad

range of water quality, from tap water in Nairobi to high-turbidity

surface waters in rural areas. After one year of operation, 92%

of the filters are still functioning and none have failed due to

technical reasons. Despite the challenging raw water quality, the

flux has stabilized in all filters.

In collaboration with the Kenya Water for Health Organization

(KWAHO), several water quality parameters and flux were

monitored on a monthly basis.

Gravity-Driven Membrane Filtration

Under certain low water pressure conditions, ultra-filtration

membranes can be sustainably operated for years, even without

backwashing or cleaning1. Flux stabilization occurs due to the

formation of a biofilm on the membrane surface with channels and

cavities that counteract the resistance caused by deposition and

fouling. While the flux of such a gravity-driven membrane (GDM)

filtration would be considered inadequate for industrial applications,

it is ideal for household water treatment. The GDM Kenya project

aims to develop household filters for use in developing countries.

Prefilter

Membrane tank

Membrane Micodyn-Nadir, (Germany)

150 kDa cut-off

(~20nm pore size)

0.69 m2 surface area

Clean water tank

sampling points

2

4

3

1

References

1 Peter-Varbanets et al., Stabilization of

flux during dead-end ultra-low pressure

ultrafiltration. Water Research 2010,

44(12), 3607-3616.

2 Wright et al., Household drinking water

in developing countries: A systematic

review of microbiological contamination

between source and point-of-use.

Tropical Medicine and International

Health. 2004;9(1):106-17

User Behavior

The record from the dataloggers also reveals interesting

information on the user behavior like the volume filtered and the

time of day of filtration.

Filter use declined somewhat in the days following the distribution

but then remained stable throughout the year.

Families with a median of 7 members filled their filter almost 4

times per week with a mean volume of 8.5 liters of water per

filling. The median volume filtered per person almost 4 liters per

week, so it is clear that filters were not used to their full capacity.

Consumption per person was the lowest for tapwater in Nairobi

where most people do not spend their day at home.

02

46

81

0

[fill

s/w

ee

k] [L

/d] [L

]

pond river dug well borehole tapwater

48 datasets of average 30 days in the first 9 months of the field study

volume filtered per day volume per capita per week

mean fills per week mean filling volume

Flux

Water flux was measured using pressure meter dataloggers (Solinst Levelogger Model 3001)

continuously recording the water level in the membrane tank. These allow precise analysis of

the flux and the behavior of the users. All filters reached stable flux within a few days and

there was no systematic decrease observed over the whole year. The flux was calculated for

three different heads, representing the flux shortly after filling (12 mbar), at an intermediate

level (7.5 mbar) and towards the end of a filtration cycle (2.2 mbar). In the worst feedwater

conditions, a filter with 0.5m2 of membrane can still produce 20 liters of water while in more

favorable conditions, 90 liters or more can be filtered per day.

Water Quality

In all raw water sources the fecal indicator bacteria E.Coli could be detected at

times. However, the surface waters and the dug wells showed the highest

contamination with geometric means from 110 to 180 CFU/100ml over all samples.

In 72% of permeate samples no E.Coli was detected in 100ml. The membrane

forms an absolute barrier for bacteria and the integrity of all filters was controlled.

Therefore, the low levels of E.Coli observed in some of the filters are most likely

Recontamination at the tap

of the filter can be observed

in most filters and is also

known to be a problem in

other water treatment

systems2.

due to recontamination

from untreated water or

particles entering the

clean water tank in an

unexpected way. Ex-

amples of E.Coli counts

over the pathway of the

filter are displayed in the

graph. Bacteria growth in

the clean water tank is

also plausible but is not

likely the main

explanation, as

investigation of biofilms

on the clean water tank

walls yielded no E.Coli.

05

10

15

20

Flu

x [L/m

2/h

]

pond river dug well borehole tapwater

data of one exemplary filter for each watersource, mean of 20-54 days continuous monitoring

2.2 mbar 7.5 mbar 12 mbar

Outlook

Based on the experience of the field trials, an improved 'second

generation' GDM filter prototype is being designed in partnership

with Zurich University of Arts and commercial partners.

Next generation filters will be tested in the field in 2013 in a small

number and the first large scale study with the final design of the

filter is planned for 2014.

Further research will be conducted and is already ongoing on the

user acceptance, economic strategies, distribution networks and

design aspects of the filter.

11

01

00

100

0

E.C

oli

[CF

U /

10

0m

l]

1 2 3 4raw water storage vessel membrane tank permeate tap

Pond River Dug well

Borehole tap (feedwater)

data of one exemplary filter of each watersource

E.Coli over the pathway of the filter

Water and Health Conference 2012: Science, Policy and Innovation, Chapel Hill

Contact

Maryna Peter-Varbanets

Eawag, Water and Sanitation in

Developing Countries (Sandec)

Überlandstrasse 133

P.O. Box 611

8600 Dübendorf

Switzerland

Tel. +41 (0)44 823 50 74

Fax +41 (0)44 823 53 99

[email protected]

www.eawag.ch/membranefilter