eagle ford shale study november 11, 2010. overview map eagle ford shale study – area overview

26
Eagle Ford Shale Study November 11, 2010

Upload: juniper-copeland

Post on 14-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Eagle Ford Shale Study

November 11, 2010

Overview MapEagle Ford Shale Study – Area Overview

Total Historical Production Stacked by AreaEagle Ford Shale Study – Area Overview

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

1955

1956

1957

1958

1959

1960

1961

1962

1963

1964

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Tota

l Wel

lcou

nt

Dai

ly E

quiv

alen

t (M

cfe/

day)

Area 1 (South Texas) Daily Equivalent (Mcfe/day)

Area 2 (Gulf Coast Texas) Daily Equivalent (Mcfe/day)

Area 3 (Greater East Texas) Daily Equivalent (Mcfe/day)

Total Wellcount

Horizontal Well Production Stacked by AreaEagle Ford Shale Study – Area Overview

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

Jan

2007

Mar

200

7

May

200

7

Jul 2

007

Sep

2007

Nov

200

7

Jan

2008

Mar

200

8

May

200

8

Jul 2

008

Sep

2008

Nov

200

8

Jan

2009

Mar

200

9

May

200

9

Jul 2

009

Sep

2009

Nov

200

9

Jan

2010

Mar

201

0

May

201

0

Jul 2

010

Tota

l Wel

lcou

nt

Dai

ly E

quiv

alen

t (M

cfe/

day)

Area 1 (South Texas) Daily Equivalent (Mcfe/day)

Area 2 (Gulf Coast Texas) Daily Equivalent (Mcfe/day)

Area 3 (Greater East Texas) Daily Equivalent (Mcfe/day)

Total Wellcount

Area 1 (South Texas) Operator Ranking

*Notes: Above based on gross, operated data

Eagle Ford Shale Study – Area Overview

Rank OperatorActive Well

CountDaily Oil (bbl/day)

Daily Gas (Mcf/day)

Daily Equivalent (Mcfe/day) % of Total Cum %

Average Rate per Well

(Mcfe/day)

1 ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION 41 5,619 28,510 62,222 21% 21% 1,5182 ROSETTA RESOURCES INC. 15 2,953 43,620 61,335 21% 42% 4,0893 SM ENERGY COMPANY 28 1,474 39,291 48,135 16% 58% 1,7194 PETROHAWK ENERGY CORPORATION 29 1,216 39,700 46,993 16% 74% 1,6205 XTO ENERGY, INC. 4 502 12,502 15,516 5% 79% 3,8796 CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION 8 1,514 5,087 14,169 5% 84% 1,7717 EL PASO CORPORATION 5 990 3,606 9,545 3% 87% 1,9098 TALISMAN ENERGY USA INC. 5 126 8,124 8,878 3% 90% 1,7769 EOG RESOURCES INCORPORATED 5 798 1,742 6,530 2% 92% 1,306

10 LEWIS PETRO PROPERTIES, INC. 6 6 6,463 6,501 2% 94% 1,08311 SWIFT ENERGY COMPANY 2 308 2,981 4,830 2% 96% 2,41512 ESCONDIDO RESOURCES II, LLC 1 0 4,483 4,483 2% 97% 4,48313 MURPHY OIL CORPORATION 5 0 3,318 3,318 1% 98% 66414 SAN ISIDRO DEVELOPMENT CO, L. C. 1 249 783 2,275 1% 99% 2,27515 REDEMPTION OIL & GAS, LLC 1 165 0 989 0% 100% 98916 CABOT OIL & GAS CORPORATION 1 87 40 562 0% 100% 56217 NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY 3 28 268 435 0% 100% 14518 MANTI EXPLORATION OPERATING LLC 1 31 0 185 0% 100% 18519 ESPADA OPERATING LLC 1 6 0 37 0% 100% 3720 EDDY A. STACHA 1 1 0 4 0% 100% 4

Area 2 (Gulf Coast Texas) Operator Ranking

*Notes: Above based on gross, operated data

Eagle Ford Shale Study – Area Overview

Rank OperatorActive

Well CountDaily Oil (bbl/day)

Daily Gas (Mcf/day)

Daily Equivalent (Mcfe/day) % of Total Cum %

Average Rate per Well

(Mcfe/day)

1 PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY 9 1,055 14,749 21,079 26% 26% 2,3422 GEOSOUTHERN ENERGY CORPORATION 5 1,671 7,706 17,729 22% 47% 3,5463 EOG RESOURCES INCORPORATED 13 2,384 2,395 16,701 20% 67% 1,2854 CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY 1 689 3,417 7,549 9% 77% 7,5495 ENDURING RESOURCES, LLC 2 298 4,264 6,051 7% 84% 3,0256 DAN A. HUGHES COMPANY, L.P. 3 678 939 5,005 6% 90% 1,6687 RILEY EXPLORATION, LLC 2 676 722 4,778 6% 96% 2,3898 APACHE CORPORATION 26 207 204 1,443 2% 98% 569 MODERN EXPLORATION, INC. 1 168 0 1,007 1% 99% 1,007

10 CLAYTON ENERGY WILLIAMS, INC. 2 155 0 931 1% 100% 46511 EXPLORATION TECHNIQUES, INC. 1 5 0 28 0% 100% 2812 TDC ENGINEERING, INC. 1 2 0 11 0% 100% 1113 XTO ENERGY, INC. 1 1 0 7 0% 100% 7

Area 1 (South Texas) Operators by Drill Type

*Notes: Above based on gross, operated data

Eagle Ford Shale Study – Area Overview

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

Dai

ly E

quiv

alen

t (M

cfe/

day)

Horizontal (Mcfe/day)

Vertical (Mcfe/day)

Area 2 – Gulf Coast Texas Operators by Drill Type

*Notes: Above based on gross, operated data

Eagle Ford Shale Study – Area Overview

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

Dai

ly E

quiv

alen

t (M

cfe/

day)

Vertical (Mcfe/day)

Horizontal (Mcfe/day)

Area 1 – South Texas Type Curve Comparison by Drill TypeEagle Ford Shale Study – Area Overview

1

10

100

1,000

10,000

Year

0

Year

1

Year

2

Year

3

Year

4

Year

5

Year

6

Year

7

Year

8

Year

9

Dai

ly E

quiv

alen

t (M

cfe/

day)

Horizontal Wells - Drilled Since 2006 (Mcfe/day)

Vertical Wells (Mcfe/day)

Area 2 – Gulf Coast Texas Type Curve Comparison by Drill TypeEagle Ford Shale Study – Area Overview

1

10

100

1,000

10,000

Year

0

Year

1

Year

2

Year

3

Year

4

Year

5

Year

6

Year

7

Year

8

Year

9

Dai

ly E

quiv

alen

t (M

cfe/

day)

Horizontal Wells - Drilled Since 2006 (Mcfe/day)

Vertical Wells (Mcfe/day)

Area 1 – South Texas Type Curve for Horizontal Wells Drilled Since 2006Eagle Ford Shale Study – Area Overview

1

10

100

1,000

10,000

Mon

th 0

Mon

th 1

Mon

th 2

Mon

th 3

Mon

th 4

Mon

th 5

Mon

th 6

Mon

th 7

Mon

th 8

Mon

th 9

Mon

th 1

0

Mon

th 1

1

Mon

th 1

2

Mon

th 1

3

Mon

th 1

4

Mon

th 1

5

Mon

th 1

6

Mon

th 1

7

Mon

th 1

8

Mon

th 1

9

Mon

th 2

0

Mon

th 2

1

Mon

th 2

2

Mon

th 2

3

Dai

ly R

ate

and

Wel

lcou

ntDaily Oil (bbl/day)

Daily Gas (Mcf/day)

Number of Wells Influencing the Curve

Area 2 – Gulf Coast Texas Type Curve for Horizontal Wells Drilled Since 2006Eagle Ford Shale Study – Area Overview

1

10

100

1,000

10,000

Mon

th 0

Mon

th 1

Mon

th 2

Mon

th 3

Mon

th 4

Mon

th 5

Mon

th 6

Mon

th 7

Mon

th 8

Mon

th 9

Mon

th 1

0

Mon

th 1

1

Mon

th 1

2

Mon

th 1

3

Mon

th 1

4

Mon

th 1

5

Mon

th 1

6

Mon

th 1

7

Mon

th 1

8

Mon

th 1

9

Mon

th 2

0

Mon

th 2

1

Mon

th 2

2

Mon

th 2

3

Dai

ly R

ate

and

Wel

lcou

ntDaily Oil (bbl/day)

Daily Gas (Mcf/day)

Number of Wells Influencing the Curve

Area 1 – South Texas Horizontal Production Stacked by VintageEagle Ford Shale Study – Area Overview

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

Jan

2007

Mar

200

7

May

200

7

Jul 2

007

Sep

2007

Nov

200

7

Jan

2008

Mar

200

8

May

200

8

Jul 2

008

Sep

2008

Nov

200

8

Jan

2009

Mar

200

9

May

200

9

Jul 2

009

Sep

2009

Nov

200

9

Jan

2010

Mar

201

0

May

201

0

Jul 2

010

Wel

lcou

nt

Dai

ly E

quiv

alen

t (M

cfe/

day)

2010 - Daily Equivalent (Mcfe/day)2009 - Daily Equivalent (Mcfe/day)2008 - Daily Equivalent (Mcfe/day)2007 - Daily Equivalent (Mcfe/day)2000-2006 - Daily Equivalent (Mcfe/day)Total Wellcount

Area 2 – Gulf Coast Texas Horizontal Production Stacked by VintageEagle Ford Shale Study – Area Overview

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

Jan

2007

Mar

200

7

May

200

7

Jul 2

007

Sep

2007

Nov

200

7

Jan

2008

Mar

200

8

May

200

8

Jul 2

008

Sep

2008

Nov

200

8

Jan

2009

Mar

200

9

May

200

9

Jul 2

009

Sep

2009

Nov

200

9

Jan

2010

Mar

201

0

May

201

0

Jul 2

010

Wel

lcou

nt

Dai

ly E

quiv

alen

t (M

cfe/

day)

2010 - Daily Equivalent (Mcfe/day)2009 - Daily Equivalent (Mcfe/day)2008 - Daily Equivalent (Mcfe/day)2007 - Daily Equivalent (Mcfe/day)2000-2006 - Daily Equivalent (Mcfe/day)Total Wellcount

Production Stacked by OperatorEagle Ford Shale Study – A Closer Look at South Texas

*Notes: Above based on gross, operated data

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

Jan

2008

Feb

2008

Mar

200

8

Apr

200

8

May

200

8

Jun

2008

Jul 2

008

Aug

200

8

Sep

2008

Oct

200

8

Nov

200

8

Dec

200

8

Jan

2009

Feb

2009

Mar

200

9

Apr

200

9

May

200

9

Jun

2009

Jul 2

009

Aug

200

9

Sep

2009

Oct

200

9

Nov

200

9

Dec

200

9

Jan

2010

Feb

2010

Mar

201

0

Apr

201

0

May

201

0

Jun

2010

Jul 2

010

Aug

201

0

Tota

l Wel

lcou

nt

Dai

ly E

quiv

alen

t (M

cfe/

day)

EL PASO CORPORATION

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION

XTO ENERGY, INC.

PETROHAWK ENERGY CORPORATION

SM ENERGY COMPANY

ROSETTA RESOURCES INC.

ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION

All Other Operators - Daily Equivalent (Mcfe/day)

Total Wellcount

Type Curve Comparison by Operator

*Notes: Above based on gross, operated data

Eagle Ford Shale Study – A Closer Look at South Texas

1

10

100

1,000

10,000

Mon

th 1

Mon

th 2

Mon

th 3

Mon

th 4

Mon

th 5

Mon

th 6

Mon

th 7

Mon

th 8

Mon

th 9

Mon

th 1

0

Mon

th 1

1

Mon

th 1

2

Mon

th 1

3

Mon

th 1

4

Mon

th 1

5

Mon

th 1

6

Mon

th 1

7

Mon

th 1

8

Mon

th 1

9

Mon

th 2

0

Mon

th 2

1

Mon

th 2

2

Mon

th 2

3

Mon

th 2

4

Dai

ly E

quiv

alen

t (M

cfe/

day)

ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION

ROSETTA RESOURCES INC.

SM ENERGY COMPANY

PETROHAWK ENERGY CORPORATION

XTO ENERGY, INC.

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION

EL PASO CORPORATION

INDUSTRY AVERAGE

Cumulative Production by Operator by Drill Type

*Notes: Above based on gross, operated data

Eagle Ford Shale Study – A Closer Look at South Texas

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

Cum

ulati

ve E

quiv

alen

t Pr

oduc

tion

(M

Mcf

e)

Vertical Equivalent Cum (MMcfe)

Horizontal Equivalent Cum (MMcfe)

Cumulative Production by Operator by Product

*Notes: Above based on gross, operated data

Eagle Ford Shale Study – A Closer Look at South Texas

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

Cum

ulati

ve E

quiv

alen

t Pr

oduc

tion

(M

Mcf

e)

Cumulative Oil (In Terms of Gas - MMcfe)

Cumulative Gas (MMcf)

IP AnalysisEagle Ford Shale Study – A Closer Look at South Texas

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

Equi

vale

nt I

P (M

cfe/

day)

IP Analysis - IP vs. Horizontal Length (feet) by VintageEagle Ford Shale Study – A Closer Look at South Texas

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000

(Equ

ival

ent

IP (M

cfe/

day)

Horizontal Length (feet)

2000-2007

2008

2009

2010

IP Analysis by ProductEagle Ford Shale Study – A Closer Look at South Texas

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

(Equ

ival

ent

IP (M

cfe/

day)

Oil Wells (40% or more oil by Equivalent Cum)

Gas Wells (60% or more gas by Equivalent Cum)

IP Analysis by Operator

*Notes: Above based on gross, operated data

Eagle Ford Shale Study – A Closer Look at South Texas

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000

(Equ

ival

ent

IP (M

cfe/

day)

Horizontal Length (feet)

ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION

CABOT OIL & GAS CORPORATION

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION

CORNERSTONE E & P COMPANY, LP

EL PASO CORPORATION

EOG RESOURCES INCORPORATED

ESCONDIDO RESOURCES II, LLC

ESPADA OPERATING LLC

LEWIS PETRO PROPERTIES, INC.

MURPHY OIL CORPORATION

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY

PETROHAWK ENERGY CORPORATION

REDEMPTION OIL & GAS, LLC

ROSETTA RESOURCES INC.

SAN ISIDRO DEVELOPMENT CO, L. C.

SM ENERGY COMPANY

SWIFT ENERGY COMPANY

TALISMAN ENERGY USA INC.

XTO ENERGY, INC.

Gross Acreage Leased by YearEagle Ford Shale Study – A Closer Look at South Texas

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

Jan

2007

Feb

2007

Mar

200

7A

pr 2

007

May

200

7Ju

n 20

07Ju

l 200

7A

ug 2

007

Sep

2007

Oct

200

7N

ov 2

007

Dec

200

7Ja

n 20

08Fe

b 20

08M

ar 2

008

Apr

200

8M

ay 2

008

Jun

2008

Jul 2

008

Aug

200

8Se

p 20

08O

ct 2

008

Nov

200

8D

ec 2

008

Jan

2009

Feb

2009

Mar

200

9A

pr 2

009

May

200

9Ju

n 20

09Ju

l 200

9A

ug 2

009

Sep

2009

Oct

200

9N

ov 2

009

Dec

200

9Ja

n 20

10Fe

b 20

10M

ar 2

010

Apr

201

0M

ay 2

010

Jun

2010

Jul 2

010

Aug

201

0Se

p 20

10O

ct 2

010

Nov

201

0

Gro

ss A

crea

ge (

Thou

sand

s of

Acr

es)

2010

2009

2008

2007

Permits Issued by Drill Type Since 2000Eagle Ford Shale Study – A Closer Look at South Texas

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

No.

of P

erm

its

Issu

ed

Vertical

Horizontal

Active Permits by Operator by Drill Type Since 2008Eagle Ford Shale Study – A Closer Look at South Texas

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

CHES

APE

AKE

OPE

RATI

NG

AN

AD

ARK

O E

&P

CO. L

P

LEW

IS P

ETRO

PRO

PERT

IES

PETR

OH

AW

K O

PERA

TIN

G C

O.

ROSE

TTA

RES

OU

RCES

SWIF

T EN

ERG

Y O

PERA

TIN

G

SM E

NER

GY

CO.

EL P

ASO

E &

P C

O.,

L. P

.

EOG

RES

OU

RCES

ESCO

ND

IDO

RES

OU

RCES

II

CARR

IZO

OIL

& G

AS

NEW

FIEL

D E

XPLO

RATI

ON

CO

.

TEXA

S A

MER

ICA

N R

ESO

URC

ES

XTO

EN

ERG

Y IN

C.

MU

RPH

Y EX

PL. &

PRO

D. C

O.

SAN

ISID

RO D

EVEL

OPM

ENT

CO.

LARE

DO

EN

ERG

Y

RILE

Y EX

PLO

RATI

ON

, LL

C

SHEL

L W

ESTE

RN E

&P

END

URI

NG

RES

OU

RCES

, LL

C

GO

OD

RICH

PET

ROLE

UM

CO

.

MA

TAD

OR

PRO

DU

CTIO

N C

O.

TALI

SMA

N E

NER

GY

USA

INC.

AU

RORA

RES

OU

RCES

CO

RP.

CABO

T O

IL &

GA

S CO

RP.

CHEY

ENN

E PE

TRO

LEU

M C

O.

COM

STO

CK O

IL &

GA

S, L

P

ESPA

DA

OPE

RATI

NG

LLC

EXXO

N M

OBI

L CO

RP.

TID

AL

PETR

OLE

UM

CASK

IDS

OPE

RATI

NG

CO

.

COM

MO

N R

ESO

URC

ES L

.L.C

.

HU

NT

OIL

CO

.

LMP

PETR

OLE

UM

MCD

AY

ENER

GY

CORP

.

No.

of P

erm

its

Issu

edVertical

Horizontal

Data sources:HPDI.Com

DrillingInfo.Com

Notes:

1. Production data as of August 31, 2010

2. Leasing data as of September 30, 2010 (Recording Date)

3. Permit data as of October 22, 2010

4. Production and permit data are specific to the Eagle Ford shale reservoir, while leasing data includes all reservoirs within the specified areas

5. Horizontal length estimated by distance between surface and permitted bottom hole lat/longs

6. IP’s calculated using maximum month of reported production, and converted to daily rate

Eagle Ford Shale Study