dr. header implant 2

29
Operative surgery of dental implant Header Dakhel Al- muala .BDS , M Sc , F I C M S Al –sadder teaching hospital Department of Oral and maxillofacial surgery.certificate oral and maxillofacial surgery , Bristol university hospital Foundation trust U.K E –mail : header.dakhel @yahoo.com

Upload: fatima-alaa

Post on 13-Apr-2017

130 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Dr. header implant 2

Operative surgery of dental implant

Header Dakhel Al- muala .BDS , M Sc , F I C M S

Al –sadder teaching hospital Department of Oral and maxillofacial surgery.certificate oral and maxillofacial surgery,

Bristol university hospital Foundation trust U.K

E –mail : header.dakhel @yahoo.com

Page 2: Dr. header implant 2

There are different approaches.

1 .Immediate post-extraction implant placement .

2 .Delayed immediate post-extraction implant placement

( 2 weeks to 3 months after extraction.)

3.Late implantation ( 3 months or more after tooth extraction .)

Page 3: Dr. header implant 2

According to the timing of loading of dental

implants, the procedure loading could be classified into:

1 .Immediate loading procedure . 2 .Early loading (1 week to 12 weeks) .

3 .Delayed loading (over 3 months)

Page 4: Dr. header implant 2
Page 5: Dr. header implant 2

Osseointegration

the formation of a direct interface between an implant and bone, without intervening soft tissue.

a direct connection between living bone and load bearing endosseous implant.

Osseointegrated implant is a type of implant defined as

"an endosteal implant containing pores into which osteoblasts and supporting connective tissue can

migrate.

peri-implantitis

Page 6: Dr. header implant 2

There are four main factors necessary to achieve

a successful osseointegrated bone to implant interface.

1 -A biocompatible material. 2- Precisly adapted implant to the prepared bony site.

3 .Atraumatic surgery , to minimize tissues damage. 4 .An immobile implant, un disturbed healing phase .

Page 7: Dr. header implant 2

Peri-implantitis is usually, but not always,

associated with: A. A chronic infection .

B. Heavy smokers. C. Patients with diabetes.

D. Patients with poor oral hygiene. E. Cases where the mucosa around the implant is

thin .

Page 8: Dr. header implant 2

A recent theory argues that rather than being an active

biological tissue response.

The integration of bone with an implant is the lack of a negative tissue response.

Page 9: Dr. header implant 2

Anatomic considerations include

Bone density. A. The volume of bone .

B. Height of bone available. The failure rate of implantation is greater for regions with very low density which in result in low

primary stability.

Page 10: Dr. header implant 2

Particularly for mandibular mental foramen

there must be sufficient alveolar bone above the mandibular canal.

Page 11: Dr. header implant 2

Such insult may cause irreparable damage to the nerve.

often felt as a paresthesia (numbness) or dysesthesia (painful numbness) of the gum, lip

and chin .

This condition may persist for life and may be accompanied by unconscious drooling

Page 12: Dr. header implant 2

Use of CT scanningcomputed tomography

cone beam computed tomography or CBCT (3D X-ray imaging) is used

preoperatively to accurately pinpoint vital structures, the zone of safety may be reduced

to 1 mm through the use of computer-aided design and production of a surgical drilling

and angulation guide.

Page 13: Dr. header implant 2
Page 14: Dr. header implant 2
Page 15: Dr. header implant 2
Page 16: Dr. header implant 2

Surgical incisions.

Flap design Crestal incision.

an incision is made over the crest of the site where the implant is to be placed. This is referred to as a

'flap .'

Page 17: Dr. header implant 2
Page 18: Dr. header implant 2

'flapless' surgery. where a piece of mucosa is punched-out from over

the implant site.

Proponents of 'flapless' surgery believe that it decreases recovery time.

Page 19: Dr. header implant 2

while its detractors believe it increases complication rates because the edge of bone cannot be visualized.

Because of these visualization problems flapless surgery is often carried out using a surgical guide constructed following computerized 3D planning of a pre-operative CT scan.

Page 20: Dr. header implant 2

Drilling procedures.

maximum heat production 47 C for one min.

The speed of the drill measured at 345 rpm and 2900 rpm did not seem to affect the temperature .

low speed high torque hand piece.

Factors controlling heat production during bone cutting. 1. The use of sharp drills.

2. Fluid cooling of the drill .

Page 21: Dr. header implant 2

In soft bone use of final drill of half depth only.

with minimal use of countersink use of smaller drill diameter than standard.

In dense bone use of oversized drill diameters .

Page 22: Dr. header implant 2

Soft tissues closure. when top of the implant is exposed through the

mucosa , bone never grow over the exposed portion.

Suture materials. Non absorbable material.

absorbable material.

Page 23: Dr. header implant 2
Page 24: Dr. header implant 2

Healing phase.

non loading phase 3 -6 months. 3 months for mandible

and 6 months for maxilla .

Page 25: Dr. header implant 2

Post-Operative complication A. surgical

1 -Pain. 2 .minor bleeding or OOZING.

3 .Try to avoid smoking completely. 4 .Swelling.

5 .Fluid intake is very important, Please avoid hot liquids until the numbness has worn off, and the bleeding has stopped.

6 .Oral Hygiene. 7 .Your Medications.

Page 26: Dr. header implant 2

B.Early implant loss.

1.disability of the host to achieve osseointegration. 2.reduced bone quality.

3 .inflammation. 4 .smooth implant surface.

5.burned bone . 6 .loading during healing period .

Page 27: Dr. header implant 2

C. esthetic .

D. Prosthodontic.

E. biologic.

Page 28: Dr. header implant 2

F. Late implant loss. 1.errors in surgical phase.

A.unfavorable position of the implant. B. insufficient interproximal distance.

C.deficient primary stability. D. thermal damage of bone.

E. contamination of the surface. 2 .unfavorable implant design.

3 .errors in functional phase. 4 .peri- implatitis.

Page 29: Dr. header implant 2