1
Delta Company METL Assessment
2
Overall AssessmentLast Year This Year
Academic B A
Military B C
Moral-Ethical A B
Physical Fitness B B
3
Academic Assessment
• A• Strengths– High focus on academics– Guard not conflicting with class– Inter company tutor system
• Weaknesses– To much freedom to upper class during ESP – Not promoting already existing resources
4
Academic Assessment
Cum GPA last year
Cum GPA this year – Fall 14 only
Class Absences last yearE/U=T
Class Absences this yearE/U=T
Number Academically Deficient last year
Number Academically Deficient this year
1C 2.99 3.06 207/119=326 74/46=120 1 1
2C 2.90 2.95 214/197=411 319/44=363 0 0
3C 2.86 3.25 343/262=605 174/61=235 2 0
4C 3.21 3.07 72/56=128 154/22=176 1 0
Total 3.05 3.09 836/634=1470 721/173=894 4 1
5
Academic Pillar Strategy
• Productive ESP environment• Squad leaders monitoring progress• Company tutors by major
6
Military Assessment
• C• Strengths– SMIs – Not bring back contraband– Professional attitude
• Weaknesses– Accountability (All-ins)– Corps squad rumors vs. white/blue book – Parade
7
Military Assessment
Avg parade results last year
Avg parade results this year
Class I Offenses last year
Class I Offenses this year
Suitability Boards last year
Suitability Boards this year
1C 0 0 0 0
2C 0 2 0 1
3C 0 9 0 0
4C 0 0 0 0
Total 15 0 11 0 1
8
Military Pillar Strategy
• New accountability formations• Standards across all 4 classes• Focus on Parades
9
Moral-Ethical Assessment
• B• Strengths– No alcohol/drugs violations – Going to honor training– Approachable honor reps
• Weaknesses– All-ins, eyes on policy – Rising honor reps were BT
10
Moral-Ethical Assessment
Number of honor accusations this year
Number of honor accusations last year
Number of “in violation” honor findings last year
Number of “in violation” honor findings this year
Number of sexual harassment/assault incident reports last year
Number of sexual harassment/assault incident reports this year
1C 1 0 1 0 0 0
2C 0 0 0 0 0 0
3C 0 0 0 0 0 0
4C 1 0 0 0 0 0
Total 2 0 0 0 0 0
11
Moral-Ethical Pillar Strategy
• Continue training • Enforcing standards• All-In procedures done correctly
12
Physical Effectiveness Assessment
• B• Strengths– Large percentage of Corps Squad – Focus on intermural sports – Large percentage of Hess majors
• Weaknesses– Former Corps Squad athletes with H/W– Poor diet – No incentives to max CPFT
13
Physical Effectiveness Assessment
CPFT avg last year
CPFT avg this year
Number of CPFT failures last year
Number of CPFT failures this year
Number of H & W failures last year
Number of H & W failures this year
1C 247 0 1 0 3
2C 232 2 3 1 7
3C 249 5 3 1 5
4C 268 0 1 0 1
Total 249 7 8 2 16
14
Physical Effectiveness Pillar Strategy
• Squad Leaders identify PT test issues in their squad
• All 4 classes participate in intramurals• Incentives for maxing PT Test
15
Company Commander/TAC Comments
• Strong company after facing a number of problems.
• Strong class of Juniors (2016). • A lot of promises in class of 2018.