1

Delta Company METL Assessment

2

Overall AssessmentLast Year This Year

Academic B A

Military B C

Moral-Ethical A B

Physical Fitness B B

3

Academic Assessment

• A• Strengths– High focus on academics– Guard not conflicting with class– Inter company tutor system

• Weaknesses– To much freedom to upper class during ESP – Not promoting already existing resources

4

Academic Assessment

Cum GPA last year

Cum GPA this year – Fall 14 only

Class Absences last yearE/U=T

Class Absences this yearE/U=T

Number Academically Deficient last year

Number Academically Deficient this year

1C 2.99 3.06 207/119=326 74/46=120 1 1

2C 2.90 2.95 214/197=411 319/44=363 0 0

3C 2.86 3.25 343/262=605 174/61=235 2 0

4C 3.21 3.07 72/56=128 154/22=176 1 0

Total 3.05 3.09 836/634=1470 721/173=894 4 1

5

Academic Pillar Strategy

• Productive ESP environment• Squad leaders monitoring progress• Company tutors by major

6

Military Assessment

• C• Strengths– SMIs – Not bring back contraband– Professional attitude

• Weaknesses– Accountability (All-ins)– Corps squad rumors vs. white/blue book – Parade

7

Military Assessment

Avg parade results last year

Avg parade results this year

Class I Offenses last year

Class I Offenses this year

Suitability Boards last year

Suitability Boards this year

1C 0 0 0 0

2C 0 2 0 1

3C 0 9 0 0

4C 0 0 0 0

Total 15 0 11 0 1

8

Military Pillar Strategy

• New accountability formations• Standards across all 4 classes• Focus on Parades

9

Moral-Ethical Assessment

• B• Strengths– No alcohol/drugs violations – Going to honor training– Approachable honor reps

• Weaknesses– All-ins, eyes on policy – Rising honor reps were BT

10

Moral-Ethical Assessment

Number of honor accusations this year

Number of honor accusations last year

Number of “in violation” honor findings last year

Number of “in violation” honor findings this year

Number of sexual harassment/assault incident reports last year

Number of sexual harassment/assault incident reports this year

1C 1 0 1 0 0 0

2C 0 0 0 0 0 0

3C 0 0 0 0 0 0

4C 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total 2 0 0 0 0 0

11

Moral-Ethical Pillar Strategy

• Continue training • Enforcing standards• All-In procedures done correctly

12

Physical Effectiveness Assessment

• B• Strengths– Large percentage of Corps Squad – Focus on intermural sports – Large percentage of Hess majors

• Weaknesses– Former Corps Squad athletes with H/W– Poor diet – No incentives to max CPFT

13

Physical Effectiveness Assessment

CPFT avg last year

CPFT avg this year

Number of CPFT failures last year

Number of CPFT failures this year

Number of H & W failures last year

Number of H & W failures this year

1C 247 0 1 0 3

2C 232 2 3 1 7

3C 249 5 3 1 5

4C 268 0 1 0 1

Total 249 7 8 2 16

14

Physical Effectiveness Pillar Strategy

• Squad Leaders identify PT test issues in their squad

• All 4 classes participate in intramurals• Incentives for maxing PT Test

15

Company Commander/TAC Comments

• Strong company after facing a number of problems.

• Strong class of Juniors (2016). • A lot of promises in class of 2018.