district board of trustees - state college of florida ... district board of trustees of ... budget...

District Board of Trustees

AGENDA

The District Board of Trustees - State College of Florida,

Manatee - Sarasota

Regular Meeting, September 25, 2012

SCF Bradenton

1. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance – Chairman Beruff

2. Announcements and Recognitions - President Hafner

3. Exhibit A: Request to Consider Naming Opportunity – Ms. Lowery

4. Approval of Non-Financial Consent Agenda Items (“Consent Agenda A”) Exhibit B: Minutes of August 29, 2012 Meeting –

Exhibit C: Amended Schedule of Non Credit Courses CCD Fall 2012 – Page 19

Exhibit D: Human Resources Office Personnel Actions – Page 20

Exhibit E: SCFCS Monthly Report – Page 22

Exhibit F: Athletic Report 2012-2013 – Page 24

Exhibit G: Sea|Mester Articulation Agreement – Page 55

5. Approval of Financial Consent Agenda Items (“Consent Agenda B”)

Exhibit H: Monthly Financial Report – August 2012 – Page 61

Exhibit I: Budget Amendments FY 2012/2013 August #6-9 (SCFCS Included) – Page 65

Exhibit J: SCFCS Financial Statements August 2012 – Page 69

Exhibit K: Property Disposals – Page 79

6. Compensation RFP Vendor Presentations – Peg Beck 1) Evergreen Solutions, LLC 2) Management Advisory Group, Inc.

7. Board Comments/Updates & Adjournment

1

hugginn

Typewritten Text

Exhibit A

MINUTES THE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES -- STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA

MANATEE – SARASOTA REGULAR MEETING

Date: August 29, 2012 5:00 p.m. Location: Lakewood Ranch Proceedings: 1. The District Board of Trustees of State College of Florida, Manatee – Sarasota held its

regular meeting on Wednesday August 29, 2012 at SCF Lakewood Ranch. Board Members Present: Edward Bailey, Carlos Beruff, Joe Miller, Ann Moore, Lori Moran, Charlene Neal, Jennifer Saslaw and Dr. Craig Trigueiro. Administrators Present: President Lars A. Hafner, Vice Presidents, Don Bowman, Jack Crocker, Mike Mears and Carol Probstfeld and General Counsel, Steve Prouty.

Chairman Beruff led the Pledge of Allegiance followed by Reverend Williamson’s invocation.

2. Announcements and Recognitions:

Dr. Hafner stated he would be doing the announcements and recognitions before they start the Organizational meeting and move on to the regular Agenda. Dr. Hafner commended the critical management team. He stated they never like it when they have to go into action but with the hurricane coming and the school system closed down all the national eyes were on them so there was a lot of pressure to follow suit. He stated the committee is very structured and they work with the EOC to get reports and think it through before making a recommendation. He stated with a recommendation for closing the college and with his approval, they moved on to the alert system. He stated he is pleased that everything worked well. He stated they have a great team and they work around the clock to be sure they are doing the right thing. He commended Chief Porter, who spent the night on campus. Dr. Hafner thanked Chief Porter and the entire team. Dr. Hafner stated that the athletic season is in full swing. He stated the teams are back to practicing. He stated the volleyball team would like to invite all the board members to their opening home match on Wednesday, September 5 at 7pm. He stated the team just got back from a trip where they did extremely well against high powered, high ranked teams in the nation. He stated they defeated the 2nd ranked team from last year. Dr. Hafner passed out an invitation to a breakfast being held called Collaboration and Regional Economic Development. He stated it features the EDC directors and the Chamber presidents. He stated the breakfast will deal with the regional economic forecasts, key future developments and projects, analysts of current economic indicators and opportunities for regional collaboration between Manatee and Sarasota Counties. He stated as a state college, SCF is a player in these kinds of economic development initiatives and invited the board to attend. He stated SCF is a regional college because it represents both Manatee and Sarasota County.

2

hugginn

Typewritten Text

Exhibit B

Proceedings, August 29, 2012 | 2

Dr. Hafner’s next item was regarding creating a board liaison for SACS. He stated the college will be focused on SACS and a report is due at the end of the year that is imperative for the college to move forward and get the accreditation that is needed. Everybody needs to be on board. He stated he would provide the board with a DVD so they can begin to focus on that, but they would like a liaison to work with the committee internally to do the things necessary for SACS. Finally, Dr. Hafner explained the enrollment numbers. He stated at the end of September they announce the actual numbers to the press and anyone that wants to know them. He stated the college is currently doing flex sessions so the students can continue to enroll throughout the semester and that will continue to build the numbers. He stated before the final numbers are released in September, as of the date of the meeting, counting both lower division and upper division at SCF they are less than 300 students down. He stated there are many reasons why they could be down by those numbers but they have until the end of September to make up ground. He stated in the summertime, Pell was not given so maybe a student that did not receive Pell in the Summer decided not to come back in the Fall. He stated the uptick in job creation could have an impact. He stated a little less than 300 students has several different variations that could explain that. He stated they remain very focused on this and the traditional student enrollment numbers are actually up. It is the transfer students and the continuing students that are down. He stated Dr. Bowman is leading a team called SEM (Strategic Enrollment Management) to focus on that and by the Spring semester they should have a lot of different apparatuses in place to help move forward in enrollment. Again, Dr. Hafner stated most colleges do not release their numbers until September but he has heard that a couple of sister colleges are experiencing double digit losses in enrollment. He wanted the board to know that they are hitting that issue head on.

3. Reorganization:

Chairman Beruff gave up the Chair to Dr. Hafner for the organizational aspect of the meeting. Dr. Hafner opened the organizational meeting and asked for nominations for the position of Chairperson for the term July 1, 2012- June 30, 2013. Dr. Trigueiro nominated the current Chairman, Mr. Beruff. Mr. Bailey seconded. Dr. Hafner asked for any other nominations. Mr. Miller nominated Dr. Trigueiro. Dr. Hafner asked for a second to that motion. Dr. Trigueiro thanked Mr. Miller, but stated it was awkward to nominate someone else for the position and then run against them, “but maybe next time.” Dr. Hafner asked for any other nominations for Chair. Being none, Dr. Hafner closed the nominations and asked for a vote. The vote passed with one dissension. Dr. Hafner gave control of the meeting back to the Chairman and the Chairman asked for nominations for Vice Chairman. Mr. Bailey nominated Dr. Trigueiro and Ms. Moore seconded. Chairman Beruff asked for any further nominations. Being none, he closed the nominations and asked for a vote. The vote passed unanimously by the board.

4. Exhibit A: Approval of the SCF Board of Trustees Calendar for 2012-2013. The board discussed changing the regular board meetings to the last Tuesday of the month at 5pm.

3


Ms. Neal motioned to approve the calendar, Ms. Saslaw seconded and the board unanimously approved.

5. Approval of Non-Financial Consent Agenda Items

Exhibit B: Minutes of May 21, 2012 Special Meeting – Page 2

Exhibit C: Minutes of June 19, 2012 Special Meeting – Page 13

Exhibit D: Minutes of June 26, 2012 Regular Meeting – Page 35

Exhibit E: Amended Schedule of Non Credit Courses CCD Summer 2012 (201235) – Page 43

Exhibit F: Schedule of Non Credit Courses CCD Fall 2012 (201315) – Page 44

Exhibit G: Human Resources Office Personnel Actions – Page 56

Exhibit H: SCFCS Monthly Report – Page 59

Exhibit I: Traffic Safety Institute Meeting Minutes June 20, 2012 – 3

Exhibit J: Memorandum of Understanding Bayshore Elementary School Tutoring Program – Page 66

Exhibit K:

Approval of Acceleration and Enrichment Programs – Articulation Agreements 2012-2013 – Page 71 (packet includes a sample of private and public school agreements – all originals available at BOT meeting) a) Allendale Academy b) Bradenton Christian School c) Brickhouse Academy d) Cardinal Mooney e) Edison Academic f) Emerson Preparatory School g) Family Life Community School h) Florida Unschoolers i) Generation Harvest j) Gulf Coast Christian k) Hillcrest Academy l) Hope Presbyterian School m) Horizon Educational Systems n) Iamhomeschooling.com o) IMG Pendleton p) Learning Prep Academy q) Lemon Bay High School r) Lighthouse Preparatory Christian School s) Manatee County School Board t) New Gate School u) Palm Grove School v) Potter’s Wheel Academy w) Prew Academy x) Providence Community School y) Queen of Angels Academy z) Risen Son Academy aa) Sarasota Christian School bb) Sarasota County School Board cc) Shepherd’s Hill Christian School

4


dd) Sonhaven Preparatory School ee) State College of Florida Collegiate School ff) The Achievement Center gg) Venice Christian School hh) West Coast School ii) West Florida Christian

Chairman Beruff asked the board if they would like to pull any item from the Non-Financial Consent Agenda. Mr. Bailey made one change to the minutes of the June 26, 2012 meeting. Vice Chairman Trigueiro moved to approve, Ms. Saslaw seconded and the board unanimously approved.

6. Approval of Financial Consent Agenda Items

Exhibit L: Monthly Financial Report – June-July 2012 – Page 169

Exhibit M: Budget Amendments FY 2011/2012 June #47-50 and FY 2012/2013 July #1-5 SCFCS Included) – Page 177

Exhibit N: SCFCS Financial Statements July 2012 – Page 186

Exhibit O: Property Disposals – Page 196

Exhibit P: Gifts and Grants – Page 198

Exhibit Q: List of Presidential Memos for Change Orders and Guaranteed Maximum Price Contracts under $325,000 – Page 200

Chairman Beruff asked if there were any comments to the Financial Consent Agenda and asked for a motion to approve. Ms. Moran asked if the number of Exhibit Q changed from the $250,000 to $325,000. Ms. Steen stated it is a category 5 per the statute and it is currently $325,000. She stated there were no change orders. Chairman Beruff asked for any other questions. Hearing none, he asked for a motion to approve the Financial Consent Agenda. Vice Chairman Trigueiro moved to approve, Ms. Moore seconded and the board unanimously approved.

7. Completion of Evaluation of President Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked to move this item to the end of the Agenda after Item 12. Chairman Beruff agreed to move consideration of item number 7 to follow item number 12.

8. Exhibit R: Approval of Recommended Prequalified Construction Contractors Ms. Steen stated they are asking for approval of the prequalification of contractors that was recently completed. She stated they requested qualifications in several different categories, including general contracting, construction management, design/build, electrical, mechanical and plumbing contractors. She stated they received eleven (11) firms with applications and several provided applications for more than one category. She stated there were six (6) for general contracting, seven (7) for construction management, four (4) for design/build and one

5


(1) for electrical. She stated the prequalification contractor committee came together and looked at all of the applications and categorized them by their submittal into bonding categories and by classification of the delivery system. She stated those are set forth in the board memo for the specific categories. She stated Chairman Beruff was on the committee along with several college employees and the college’s miscellaneous architect. She stated they are asking for approval of this list for the 2012-2013 school year. Vice Chairman Trigueiro motioned to approve. Ms. Moore seconded. Chairman Beruff asked for any questions. He stated it was a good meeting, they had some great, qualified contractors from the local area and he thinks they will be able to get some good, solid pricing and they will keep the process open for further applicants. Mr. Bailey asked if this list of applicants is qualified to do work at SCF. Chairman Beruff stated they qualify in different categories for different amounts. He stated the team did a thorough analysis of the capabilities of each company. Mr. Bailey asked how many companies participated. Ms. Steen stated they had eleven (11) submittals. Chairman Beruff stated they had five (5) that will do a bid. Ms. Steen stated they had six (6) that will do general contracting on the hard bid. Chairman Beruff stated they had six (6) groups that will qualify after the board’s consent. The bid for the chemistry lab can go out. Chairman Beruff stated depending on their bonding capacity, they will be issued what they are allowed to do. Ms. Steen stated it is up to $1 million as a category1. Chairman Beruff stated they have a fair sampling and they will continue to keep the process open and go through qualifications on a case by case basis. Mr. Miller asked if Power Contracting was a local contractor. Chairman Beruff asked Ms. Steen if they were the local company that did work for the Manatee School system or Parks and Recreations. He stated there was someone in the room that commented that they knew the company. Ms. Steen stated they worked on Champs and Circuit City. Chairman Beruff stated they had a representative at the meeting. Ms. Steen stated she could get more information. Chairman Beruff stated he recalls someone at the meeting representing the company as well as someone on the committee that knew the company. Ms. Steen stated they were comfortable, as a group, with all of the firms. Chairman Beruff called for a vote. The board unanimously approved.

9. Exhibit S: #12-03 – National Science Foundation Grant - Successful Academic and Employment Pathways in Advanced Technologies (PathTech) with University of South Florida-Tampa Ms. Lock explained the Path Tech Grant with USF Tampa and stated it would involve SCF in a limited way. She stated the goal of the project is to discover how engineering technology students can better navigate pathways from high school to college to the labor market. She stated SCF will provide the USF team with a location to conduct interviews with the engineering technology students, faculty, administrators and industry partners. She stated this will take place twice a year for two years. She stated the findings from this research will assist SCF to make improvements in recruitment strategies. Chairman Beruff asked for questions and a motion to approve. Ms. Saslaw moved to approve, Vice Chairman Trigueiro seconded and the board unanimously approved.

6

Proceedings, August 29, 2012 | 6 10. Exhibit T: #12-07 National Science Foundation Grant - Educating Science Teachers in

a liberal arts setting: A partnership between New College of Florida and State College of Florida

Ms. Lock stated this Grant is the Robert Noyce teacher scholarship program which is a partnership with the New College of Florida. She stated it is a five year grant program that encourages talented undergraduate students in STEM fields to become K12 math and science teachers. She stated, if funded, this program would annually recruit up to eight SCF graduating sophomores to attend New College for their junior and senior years on the Noyce scholarship. After that, the scholars will receive scholarships to return to SCF to take part in the alternative certification program to prepare them for the teaching certificate. Chairman Beruff asked the board for any questions. Ms. Saslaw asked if there was language that tells the applicants where they have to teach. She asked if it was within the State of Florida on within our two counties. Ms. Lock stated that question has come up and she will ask New College. She stated her understanding is that it is anywhere in the State of Florida where there is high need. Mr. Bailey moved to approve, Vice Chairman Trigueiro seconded and the board unanimously approved.

11. Appointment of Audit Liaison Board Member Dr. Probstfeld explained that traditionally in the past they have asked the Chair to attend various closing audit meetings when the auditors finish the financial aid audit, financial audit and operational audit. She stated it was suggested that they appoint a board liaison that they would work with directly and who would recognize the need about three times a year to meet with the college and the auditors to go through the findings. Chairman Beruff asked Mr. Bailey if he would be interested in volunteering. Chairman Beruff asked the time that would be involved. Dr. Probstfeld stated they have three closing meetings a year that last approximately half an hour. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked what time of day it would be. Dr. Probstfeld stated it is flexible but they usually work around the timeline of the state auditors. She stated traditionally it is in the mornings between 9:00 - 10:30. She stated it is not a fixed time. Chairman Beruff asked if they could coordinate it with the liaison to be sure it fit their schedule. Mr. Bailey agreed to be the liaison.

12. Appointment of SACS liaison Dr. Probstfeld explained they would also like a board member to be a liaison to work with Mr. Davis and SCF as they spend the next several years preparing for the SACS accreditation. Chairman Beruff asked what the time commitment would be. Mr. Davis stated that the committee meets at least every 4 to 5 weeks for 2-3 hours at a time. Chairman Beruff asked if the board member would need to attend every meeting. Mr. Davis stated to be up to date they should attend all meetings. Mr. Davis stated they would meet regularly from this date through September 2014. Mr. Miller volunteered. Ms. Saslaw asked if September, 2014 is the date that the SACS documents are due. Mr. Davis stated the document is due in March, 2014 and the site visit would be sometime in the Fall. Ms. Saslaw stated this is a huge thing. Mr. Miller asked if this is done every ten years. Dr. Hafner stated the college just completed

7


a five year update. He stated they get accreditation from several different departments. Ms. Saslaw stated she would be happy to be involved on a short term basis since her term on the board will be up on May 30, 2013. She agreed to volunteer to be the liaison until her term is up.

13. Foundation Report – Quarterly Update Ms. Lowery stated the Foundation is required by Florida Statute to do four quarterly reports to the Board of Trustees and she has not done one since July so she is packing a lot into this presentation to get caught up. She stated it will cover 10 months because the Foundation fiscal year goes from October 1 through September 30. She stated the governor wanted all organizations to be able to have their audit in well in advance of the close of the fiscal year of their college. Ms. Lowery stated the statute requires that the Foundation share certain things with the board. Her first slide showed the Financials which included $95,620 in YTD Realized Losses. She stated two years ago it was worse. She said they have changed their asset allocation in their portfolio. She stated it was recommended by their asset management committee that they assume more risk in the portfolio. She stated the YTD total revenue is $1.4 million. Add the earnings and it comes to $2.2 million. YTD Expenses are $2.6 which includes some things that return to the college. She stated the YTD Net Surplus is almost $3.2 million. Chairman Beruff asked if they have $800,000 in revenue. Ms. Lowery stated $800,000 came from individual gifts. She stated some of the revenue comes from special events. Chairman Beruff asked if the $1.4 million represents gifts or revenues and investments. Ms. Lowery stated the $2.2 million has earnings from investments. She stated it is gifts and revenue. Chairman Beruff asked how much of that is new money and how much is generated from money invested. Ms. Lowery stated the difference between YTD Total Gifts and Revenue and the YTD Grand Revenue would be the earnings. She clarified that the $1.4 million was gifts over the last 10 months. The next slide broke down the investment analysis. Ms. Lowery stated the fair market value is $38,526,600.00. The assets held in trust are $6,108,547.00 and she said that is going to grow. She stated the fair market value as of July 31 was $44 million. She stated that almost 99% of the portfolio is restricted because the donors are asked to donate for specific purposes and they also have a long range view. She stated some are forever funds for the future. Ms. Lowery’s next slide was Notable Highlights. Her slide showed a picture of Joseph Vona in the Student Services Center at his naming ceremony. She stated he is a longtime donor and a former educator in the states of New Jersey and California. She stated he moved to Florida to retire. The Foundation met him because he was at the gym and met two SCF students and they invited him to a play on campus. He came to the play and he keeps coming back. This is his third gift to the foundation. Mr. Vona participated in a ribbon cutting ceremony for the Joseph P. Vona Rotunda. Ms. Lowery thanked the board for approving the naming for Mr. Vona. Ms. Lowery stated the Gulfcoast Community Foundation was asked to help with a baccalaureate degree so they funded $120,000 to the Energy Technology Management and Technology Management degrees.

8


Ms. Lowery stated the Selby Foundation funded $70,000 in scholarships. She stated the Selby scholarship is one of the most prestigious scholarships the college has. She stated it requires a 3.0 grade point average and the student must demonstrate need. Next, she explained the Summer Bridge program where students come right out of high school, first generation, into a six week, get ready for college program. She stated it is now in its tenth year and they raised $15,000 to buy iPad’s for the students in that summer program through a gift from Ms. Tana Sandefur. Ms. Lowery explained the Euros for Scholarships. She stated the Foundation has a donor who is a cousin of one of the college’s deceased faculty member and on the birthday of her cousin she sends euros for scholarship. At this point she has donated just under $40,000. Ms. Lowery stated they received $12,500 for the new IBT degree. She explained they applied for a grant to try to teach students financial responsibility and received $10,000 for the $MART grant. They also received $10,000 for the tennis program and $9,438 for the Hearing Loop grant for Neel Auditorium. Ms. Lowery stated that the Foundation benefits all of the college. She stated the value added to the college in the 2011-2012 year was $1.5 million for the past 10 months. She highlighted the year to date scholarship support of $564,865. Faculty support and/or equipment was $965,880 which includes MTSC equipment, faculty salaries and biotech equipment. Ms. Lowery explained that the Foundation has raised $1.14 million for the baccalaureate programs and she gave a breakdown of those funds. Chairman Beruff asked how much of that money was raised. Ms. Lowery stated it was all raised and put into the college. She did say that not all of it has been spent. Chairman Beruff clarified that the college has that money. Ms. Lowery stated the Foundation keeps the money until the college bills them for it. The Chairman asked for the balance of that account. Ms. Lowery stated one of the Foundation’s goals this year was to get three planned gifts. She stated they have two 7 figure deferred gift commitments, two life insurance commitments and the first Sunday’s at Neel $30,000 scholarship. She stated these are not realized funds yet but they are working with a financial planner. Ms. Lowery talked about a few special events the Foundation has sponsored for donors and the community. She closed her presentation with a video of a donor explaining what it means to her to be a part of the college.

14. Completion of Evaluation of President Chairman Beruff stated that two months ago they had a meeting where he provided the board with a lot of information regarding the President’s evaluation. He asked the board if they had anything to add. Ms. Saslaw stated she was confused because she thought they were going to complete the evaluation after they heard back from FDLE. Chairman Beruff stated he put it on hold from the last meeting so the board could review the information. Ms. Saslaw asked if it was no longer on hold even though he said he was going to wait for the FDLE to tell them what to do on this matter. Chairman Beruff stated the evaluation has nothing to do with the other issue. Ms. Saslaw stated she understood that the evaluation would be on hold until they heard back from FDLE. Chairman Beruff stated they have to do the evaluation of the President and it has nothing to do with the item that went to Tallahassee. Ms. Saslaw stated all but the last two items are within the year of doing an

9


evaluation. She asked if they were going back to evaluate the President for 2009-2010 year. Chairman Beruff stated the information he provided was solely for the board to look at and whether they use that information or not is up to them. Ms. Saslaw stated she is evaluating the President for the current year. She stated the form that she filled out prior to the June meeting was a current evaluation. She asked if the Chairman wanted to add on all the things going back to 2009 to this evaluation. Chairman Beruff stated she has the information at her fingertips to use as she sees fit. Ms. Saslaw asked if they needed to redo their evaluations because the Chairman asked them to look at what the prior board did. Mr. Bailey addressed the Board and stated he was not at the last meeting and asked if he could revisit an item. He asked if the Chairman had the ability to bring an item back to the board. Mr. Prouty stated the Chairman has discretion and input on agenda items. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if they read a form or just raise their hands and talk. Ms. Saslaw stated they have all turned in their evaluations and usually that is the end of it. She stated the Chairman clearly has some items he wants to discuss. Mr. Miller stated usually the Chairman sits with the President and goes over the evaluations and they move on and the Chairman makes a recommendation on whether they give the President a raise or not. Chairman Beruff stated the evaluation process was started prior to him sharing the information at the June 19 meeting. He stated, for obvious reasons they needed time to read through the documents and now is the time to finish the evaluation of the President. He asked how the board wanted to proceed. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated he did not read the packet until sometime in the first week of August. He stated there was information in the packet that he thought he had known by reading three years of board minutes but it turns out not to be the case, even as recently as finding out the collegiate school cost over $5 million. He thought long and hard and it is something he thinks about daily and dreams about at night. He stated it is not something that he finds to be a pleasant job but he does find it to be something that is within his responsibility as a board of trustee. Vice Chairman Trigueiro moved a vote of no confidence for Dr. Lars A. Hafner’s leadership of the State College of Florida. Mr. Bailey seconded. Chairman Beruff asked for any discussion. Ms. Saslaw stated it was outrageous. She stated that Lars has been a good leader. She stated his entrepreneurial spirit, I think, goes against some of the other members’ grain and upsets them, but she thinks they have had good conversations with Lars and she thinks he understands where this board sits, where Carlos sits and where Craig sits, and that they are putting some clamps on him that perhaps were not there that strongly before, but the board has always done their very best to guide, steer and move things forward and Lars has taken this college to huge, new steps and strides that have really helped both counties and many, many people here, and she stated she is infuriated by the suggestion and motion. Mr. Bailey stated that unfortunately he was unable to attend the last meeting but after reading through the packet there were certain things that caught his attention but the main thing was the documentation and in his field that is automatic grounds for termination. If anyone signs a contract that does not have their name on it or a power of attorney, regardless of common practices, that does not make it right. He stated in his job, if any subordinates signed something that they are not supposed to sign that is grounds for automatic termination. He stated he would imagine there would be a policy adopted by the college, especially with a state document and that he thought about it long and hard. He stated he likes Dr. Hafner, but, unfortunately, it was a state document and that means on the contract it is null and void. Ms. Saslaw stated that is why it is at the FDLE, she stated they agreed to send it there for their determination. Mr. Bailey stated they do not have to determine that because it was admitted. He stated they have affidavits that admit that Dr. Hafner signed the document. Dr.

10


Hafner and Mr. Miller stated he signed the document with permission. Mr. Bailey asked if there was a power of attorney. He stated a limited power of attorney would allow Dr. Hafner to sign it with his name. Dr. Hafner stated the Chairman authorized and directed him to sign his name as the affidavit stated. Dr. Hafner stated the Chairman is his boss. Mr. Bailey stated that means the Chairman gave him information that was incorrect. Dr. Hafner asked what he was to do. Ms. Neal asked Dr. Trigueiro if his motion was based on that action or if there are other issues. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated that was a good question and he has been thinking about that for about 4 weeks. He stated he likes Dr. Hafner and it is really sad this happened but the question of whether this was forgery or not really is only a part of it. In reverse, the fact that he went ahead and did what he did, whether it was with the former Chairman Harner’s permission or not, the affidavit said it was his best recollection he had done it, there were newspaper articles that say he couldn’t remember and he will leave that up to the FDLE. He stated the very fact that it was done that way to him is astonishingly bad judgment. He stated everything he read about other situations, including at St. Petersburg College, where Dr. Hafner came from, they would never do something like that. He stated the other part is potential for criminal charges and that is at a different level. He stated for him it boils down to the legal question and answers. He stated he does have other reasons. Ms. Neal stated she was wondering. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated the collegiate school is one issue. He stated he loves the collegiate school, he has been trying to get there while the kids are in session but what started out as a $500,000 project became over a $5 million project. He stated that is a 1000% cost overrun and that is bad financial judgment. He stated the buck stops at Dr. Hafner’s desk as to whether he signs off on that. The women’s tennis program of the State College of Florida is a Title IX thing and they did a great job, and he thinks the tennis team is here, coming in second nationally. He stated it is a great program and it is not about tennis players or timelines, it is about finance and about judgment. He stated it has nothing to do with the athletes involved or the coaches. He stated that is not what this is about. He stated in the minutes before it started out as a $70-80,000 project which became a $750,000 project, which is another 1000% cost overrun, again, bad financial judgment. He stated there was an architectural fee of $240,000 out of the amount of money spent. He stated there are six courts, side by side with chain link fence and he would have done it for a lot less than $240,000. He stated that was not a complex engineering job requiring that amount of money. Mr. Miller stated it was not just for the tennis courts. He agreed and Dr. Hafner asked him not to state it like that. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated at prior board meetings, he thinks it was said that the Foundation paid $240,000 for design fees, the packet that they got for this meeting indicated that the design fees for the tennis court were more around $160,000. He stated at any rate, it was far too much money for six tennis courts, side by side in his viewpoint. He stated that once the tennis court issue came up it then morphed into a $6 million fitness center to be primarily funded by the Foundation and there was apparently $200,000 in front money for that purpose. He stated at some point in time the donor went back to the Foundation and asked for a date certain for completion. Dr. Hafner asked where he was making this stuff up. Ms. Saslaw agreed with Dr. Hafner. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated it was in the packet. He stated there are minutes of meetings and records of meetings and if he is incorrect they can correct him. Chairman Beruff stated it is all public record and he wanted to make that clear to everyone in the room. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated if something he says is incorrect, like Joe corrected him on design fees, he can be corrected, but the problem is that the figures don’t jive. He stated that is not the best type of accounting. He stated apparently the donor that gave the seed money for the fitness center, when he could not get a date certain for completion, he asked for his money back and it turns out the college had already spent it. Ms. Lowery stated that was not correct. She stated the donor had not given the money, he had made a verbal commitment but had not given the money. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if that was right. He stated in the packet there is a reference of the State College of Florida in the minutes of a board

11


meeting where this topic came up and what was stated in those minutes was that the donor wanted the money back but the money had already been spent and then one of the board members became very upset with the fact. Dr. Trigueiro stated if they wanted him to spend time to look it up, he would. Dr. Hafner said yes. Chairman Beruff stated that the confusion might lie in the fact that the donor gave a verbal commitment but the money was spent based on the verbal commitment and he never followed through. Ms. Lowery said that was correct. Ms. Lowery stated he did not give the money and he did not ask for the money back. She stated that is very important for credibility with donors. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated the donor made a commitment for $200,000 and when he could not get a date certain for completion he asked for the money back but the $200,000 was spent. He stated the college spent the money. Dr. Hafner stated they brought that project in on the funding basis of what they had and then Dr. Trigueiro stated if they wanted him to spend the time to look it up he would. Dr. Hafner stated he would like him to look it up because it is not there. Ms. Lowery stated she knows the accuracy. She stated she solicited the donor for $200,000. She stated they wanted to name the fitness center because the gentleman had an interest in fitness. She asked him, he said yes. He did want to know when it was going to be completed. She stated he was not happy that it was not moving, he wanted to know how much money was raised for the facility. He did not make the gift yet, (Dr. Trigueiro and Mr. Beruff acknowledged) he made the verbal commitment. She stated she asked the Foundation board if they would forward the $200,000 because the college needed the money to proceed. The college received the $200,000 from the Foundation. Dr. Trigueiro agreed. She stated when the donor reneged she offered to repay personally the $200,000 to the Foundation and she asked if she could pay over a period of time. The donor subsequently came back and made a gift for something else. She stated they have to be very, very careful because in fundraising you only have trust and credibility to work for you. Dr. Trigueiro agreed. She stated they never took someone’s money and they never refused to give it back because it was not taken. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated that what happened was, he made a commitment but when he could not get a date certain for completion he decided he wanted to do something else. The Foundation fronted the college the $200,000. Ms. Lowery stated they fronted the money before the donor reneged. Vice Chairman Trigueiro clarified that the Foundation fronted the money and the college spent that $200,000. Chairman Beruff stated Ms. Lowery was very clear. Ms. Lowery stated that was the intent. Ms. Saslaw stated the money was spent with authorization. Chairman Beruff agreed. Dr. Trigueiro stated he could not find it right then. Dr. Hafner stated they should take the time to find it. Ms. Saslaw agreed. Dr. Trigueiro stated he could not find it. Vice Chairman Trigueiro brought up the science lab. He stated the original contract of $290,000 and $75,000 was for cabinetry and he feels that is in excess and that is bad financial judgment. He stated $22,000 to have the laboratory demolished is bad financial judgment. He stated he talked to people who do that kind of work and it should be a $4,000-$5,000 job, maybe $6,000 or $7,000 but not $22,000. He stated the contractor is in business to make money and that is fine but he thinks the college should have done a better job on the financing on that. Dr. Trigueiro brought up the Design Economic Acceleration Lab. Ms. Saslaw asked for a page in the packet on that. Dr. Trigueiro stated it is all common knowledge. He did not base all of this on the packet. He stated the Venice lab is not in there. He stated some of the women’s tennis program is, some of it is not. He stated he thinks part of the collegiate school is in there. He stated this is his stuff. Ms. Saslaw stated they are off agenda and he is giving them his story. Chairman Beruff and Dr. Trigueiro both stated no. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated they are on the agenda to evaluate Dr. Hafner and he made a motion and they are in discussion and he is answering Ms. Neal’s question. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated the

12


Design Economic Acceleration Lab had virtually no mention of any student teaching stations in the whole project. He stated the funding was to be done by selling bonds which is something that the State College of Florida had never done. Payment was to be guaranteed by that portion of student tuition for capital improvements which would have encumbered that amount of money for years. Dr. Hafner asked if this was an indictment of him or the previous board because the previous board voted in support of this. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated he would answer his question. Dr. Hafner stated he would like to direct his misgivings as Dr. Trigueiro goes because he is throwing things that are artificial. Ms. Saslaw agreed. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated that the prior board did not approve the DEAL. He stated there were questions. They said to go ahead and do the due diligence but it is not approved. Dr. Hafner asked if they spent any money on it. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated that when he is done Dr. Hafner will have a chance to talk. Dr. Hafner stated he wanted to set the record straight as he goes because he is throwing arbitrary misrepresentations out there. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated the only proformas he saw about the DEAL were like swiss cheese. He stated that is basically why it fell apart. He stated he is not indicting the board. He stated the stuff that he has read about that the previous board voted on for the collegiate school was $500,000. At one point later in the minutes it was then $1 million and it turned out to be $5 million. He stated he cannot sit there and say “gee, if you would have known it was going to be $5.1 and heading towards $5.6 million would you have still voted for it.” He stated what was done and what was said was 1000% cost overrun. He stated to Mr. Miller that he didn’t think he could stay in business with a 1000% cost overrun. He stated the women’s tennis program was presented as a $70,000-80,000 project and morphed into a whole lot of things, including a three quarter of a million dollar project. He stated that is 1000 percent overrun. He stated that is the facts and he considers that bad financial judgment. Dr. Hafner stated all those were paid for and came in on budget. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated, well yea but the point is, if you say something is going to cost $70,000-80,000 and you bring it in at three quarters of a million dollars, he questions Dr. Hafner’s financial judgment. Dr. Hafner stated they had the dollars allocated for it so they can do that. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated spending money when you shouldn’t be spending that amount of money does not make it right just because you can do it. Chairman Beruff stated this is not an open discussion, he stated he is the chair of the meeting and it needs to stop. He stated Dr. Trigueiro will continue and finish his agenda and everyone else will have their chance. Dr. Hafner stated “it is an agenda.” Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated, well yea but he has been thinking about this for four weeks. Chairman Beruff stated he was prepared. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated his last item is the Cadillac. He stated the Cadillac Escalade was a terrible public relations mistake. He stated that was actually the first thing he officially did as a board member of the college. He stated it was his first interaction with the news media when that happened. He stated when you get to the part that FDLE has, to him, in his opinion only, is going to be a legal question down the road. If it were forgery and that was the only thing on this item and Dr. Hafner plead or was convicted of forgery, yes, it is a pretty bad deal. He stated he does not think it was good common sense and astonishingly bad judgment but it is not just that. From his viewpoint as a board member with a fiduciary responsibility including the financial matters of this college, it was a pattern, it was repetitive bad financial judgment. Twice with 1000 percent cost overrun. Mr. Miller stated that if Dr. Trigueiro was a sitting board member for the past four years he could understand him making those statements, but he wasn’t. He stated he only has half the truth, if any of it is true. He stated the tennis courts were tied in with the baseball fields, the softball fields, the parking lot, all tied in together. He stated he knew what was going on with the DEAL. He stated Dr. Hafner kept every board member abreast of what was going on with DEAL. He stated if they had a problem with it, they would have stopped it. He stated they knew what was going on with the collegiate school. He stated they had briefings with

13


the president. He stated if they wanted to stop it, they would have stopped it. He stated they are there to promote the college and the good business of the college and the good works of the college and for the past year, the Chairman and Vice Chairman have basically done everything they could do to destroy the college. Chairman Beruff asked the audience for no more outbursts. He stated they are conducting a meeting and they respect their emotions, but this is a meeting and clapping and booing is inappropriate and he would recommend if they have to show those emotions to step outside. Mr. Miller stated he is offended as a sitting board member that Dr. Trigueiro is attacking the past board. He stated it is totally uncalled for and unprofessional. He stated he doesn’t know of a negative evaluation that Dr. Hafner received from the past board. Not one. He does not remember a negative comment coming from the past chairmen of the board in regard to the president and he is appalled. Chairman Beruff stated he has served on the board for the past four years and unfortunately, the pattern with the tennis is very clear to him because he was involved in that discussion and he is happy to relive it, but it is really not necessary and suffice it to say that the two ladies on the board at the time, Christine Robinson and Beverly Beall, were adamant about that program and the three people that were there to vote that day that were gentlemen were himself, Ron Allen and Mr. Miller. He stated the two ladies had questions. He stated it was a ladies thing and if they have questions then those questions should be satisfied before they vote. He stated the reason he mentions that is because he said if they are going to go to vote he is going to be with the ladies on it because it is a ladies tennis team and they are the ones that should be more involved. He stated because of that discussion he remembers the numbers. He categorically remembers the dollars and cents that were committed to the tennis courts and he also remembers the commitment and it is on record of the amount of money and any excess money above that, the Foundation was going to go raise. He stated they discussed at some length that they were not going to build new tennis courts. Dr. Hafner stated that was not true. Chairman Beruff stated he was at that meeting. He stated they were going to build courts with the Foundation’s money or the Foundation had a relationship with IMG and they felt comfortable and were in the spirit of getting it done and the Foundation felt that the dollars would be there. What happened in reality is, for whatever reason, the economy, the recession, the funds were not there from the Foundation and the board took it out of college capital and started spending dollars to finish the facilities and because of the funding mechanisms, the way they are in the college, they were below the threshold where they could be funded in pieces, under the $325,000. He stated that is not transparency in a government agency of this magnitude. He stated it is that simple. He was at those board meetings and he could prove his attendance records because he has not missed that many meetings. He addressed Ms. Saslaw and restated he had not missed that many meetings. He stated those are the kinds of issues that they are referring to and the issues that he has had is the lack of and as far as the DEAL and Mr. Miller being informed, he wants to say that Mr. Miller might have been very well informed but he was not. Dr. Hafner stated that he met the Chairman in his office several times. Chairman Beruff stated that was after the fact. Dr. Hafner stated it was prior to that and he has records of the appointments. Chairman Beruff stated the DEAL was not brought to him until after it was scheduled for media. Dr. Hafner stated the Chairman was backing up because he said it wasn’t until after but now he was admitting it happened before the meetings. He asked him to get his facts straight. Chairman Beruff stated to Dr. Hafner that he had set up the DEAL and broke it to the board days before it went to the media. He stated Dr. Hafner had been working on it for a few months before he even knew about it. The Chairman stated it does not matter, the discussion is for clarification. Dr. Hafner asked to address the chair. The

14


Chairman told him to wait and asked the other board members if they had any comments. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated it was his understanding of public meetings that if the audience is admonished not to have any outbursts and they have another outburst that they can be removed. He asked if that was correct. He stated it certainly is for the School Board of Manatee County and Manatee County Government. He stated once they are admonished by the Chair if there is any further outbursts the Chair could have them removed. Mr. Prouty stated if there is such turmoil that it is interfering with the meeting, he is correct. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if that interpretation is done by the Chair. Mr. Prouty stated it is by the board. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if it can be done by vote of the board or if the Chairman can do it by himself. Chairman Beruff stated that the Chair runs the meeting and he does not have to worry about that. He stated the people understand the dynamics of what they are discussing and he is sure they will control themselves accordingly now that they have been advised accordingly. He stated they are all adults and they will comport themselves as adults and he is not worried about it. He stated everyone knows the rules. Chairman Beruff gave Dr. Hafner the floor. Dr. Hafner stated he hoped he would let the audience speak before they go for a vote. He addressed Dr. Trigueiro and stated he always says he is a man of the people and he embraces the audience and he wants to give so he hopes he will give and let them speak on behalf of his motion. He stated that would be really giving back. Dr. Hafner stated he wanted to call to attention of the board that it was cowardly of Dr. Trigueiro without telling him of cancelling an appointment that they had established to have lunch with LECOM the past Friday because he wanted to further that partnership, the things that he so eloquently brought forward to the board at the last meeting that they have worked on together for the students, but he was dreaming and thinking about all this so much that he didn’t care to give him the common courtesy to cancel a lunch that he had to cancel with LECOM because he chose not to attend after it was set up at Dr. Trigueiro’s request. He stated he thinks that is poor misjudgment on a board member’s part. Dr. Hafner stated on the tennis he wanted to clarify that yes, the Chairman was correct that the women first asked questions and during that meeting it was stated that the college would bring back answers at the next meeting. They brought back a booklet with the answers to those questions and tennis was moved forward and passed unanimously with Christine Robinson and the others at that meeting to go forward with that project. He stated the bigger scope here and he wanted to pass out because he thinks it is time to see the other side of what the Chairman had put in that book and give the basis of the facts in the matter compared to that. He stated the bottom line is, and Mr. Miller and Ms. Saslaw brought this up, he hopes that the other comments and the board members will understand this. He stated this is an annual evaluation of the president, which would mean from the time Chairman Beruff started until now. Not going back two, three or four years ago and saying that they think the other board is wrong. He stated what Mr. Beruff and Dr. Trigueiro are doing is basically stating that they disagree with the other board’s policies. He stated that is fine, but that in no way should reflect on the current board and the annual evaluation. He stated that done on the forms was a relatively good evaluation of him. Except for Mr. Beruff’s, which was read to the crowd at the last meeting. Again, Dr. Hafner stated if they are to put it in perspective, he would like them to please consider and remember that they have gone to an annual evaluation. He addressed Mr. Bailey and stated he seconded the motion based on some of the things that happened two, three or four years ago. He stated that is not the role of a current board member in the evaluation of the president. He stated they may not like him, they may choose to disagree and that is okay. But when has this board set and given him the goals of what you have said. He stated that they have met the goals of which they have set. He stated they said they did not want tuition in the budget increased, so they didn’t. They said they did not want fees in the budget, so

15


they did not do that. He stated several of them said that budget mismanagement was a weakness of his, but they just unanimously approved the current year’s budget that he brought forward to the board. He asked if he is such a bad budget manager, why did each of the current board members, Mr. Bailey included, support the budget. Mr. Bailey stated he did not say anything about the budget management. Dr. Hafner stated he did on the evaluation. He stated he is bringing it forward because if they are true to what they all did in the evaluations and not after the fact of what Mr. Beruff is bringing up that happened over the previous board’s course of direction to the college and to the president, then they would have a different perspective and say let’s set goals and let’s move forward as one to continue to make the college the best college that it is. He addressed Mr. Beruff and stated Mr. Beruff knows good and well, and he shared another private conversation that they had. He stated at the Tampa airport when they were flying up for the Trustee orientation he sat next to Mr. Beruff. He stated he asked if he could sit by him and Mr. Beruff said yes. Dr. Hafner asked to talk. He asked what can he do as president of the college to help move his agenda forward and for him to please let him know. Dr. Hafner stated that Mr. Beruff said he didn’t trust him so therefore he cannot work with him so he’s not setting goals or thoughts for him. Dr. Hafner asked him to please give him an opportunity to try to do what is right and to tell him what he and the Governor are talking about and see if they can do this. He stated Mr. Beruff once again said no, he’s not working with him. He stated that to him is irresponsibility. He stated that to him is not leading in the direction of the college and moving forward to where the college has made leaps and bounds as you will read in the document. Dr. Hafner said he will not take the whole time to read the whole document now. He stated the search committee that selected him as president selected him, not to come in and be a caretaker or babysitter of this tremendously well run college. They selected him as a transformational leader and over the three or four years of the former board, as Mr. Miller stated, those evaluations were excellent to outstanding because he met the criteria for which they hired him. He stated now they are trying to go back and do revisionist history. He stated they are now saying that they think the other board and he himself were mismanaging money. Dr. Hafner stated if they were doing that, the quality of the community leaders that were on that board, from Ron Allen to Steve Harner to Christine Robinson, would have called him on the carpet. He stated they have done everything by the book, brought everything back to the board, and that is why that board gave him such high marks. Now you, as a board, after a whole year of coming to them and asking for information upon information, and they have given them the quality information in which all of you have embraced and made no changes here at the college, he stated that is what is astonishing, that you could not find a thing wrong with the management of this college that was enough to say, Dr. Hafner, you are doing a horrible job. He stated that Mr. Beruff is going back two, three and four years ago on things that he voted for and things that he passed as a unanimous part of the vote and did not level reservations at that time. He addressed Dr. Trigueiro and stated that he says he likes him (Dr. Hafner) as a person but he comes back around and slaps him down. He stated they cannot have it both ways. Chairman Beruff asked Dr. Hafner if he was almost complete. Dr. Hafner stated he would be complete when he has said what he has to say. Dr. Hafner stated what is happening now is that those two (Mr. Beruff and Dr. Trigueiro) are caught in the frenzy of going back out of the prior year. Dr. Hafner stated the car was a mistake. He stated he apologized for that. He stated it was bad timing, they were trying to get the right trade-in value but the bottom line is that it would have come back to the board so the board would have voted on it. He stated anything and everything that he has done, the board has been informed and the board has supported unanimously, except he believes Chairman Beruff voted against last year’s budget and that was not because it was the wrong budget but because Mr. Beruff did not have enough time to review it. He stated other than that, Mr. Beruff was in lockstep with the other board members for four years. Chairman Beruff stated he did not agree with everything Dr. Hafner was saying. Dr. Hafner asked him to please go

16


back to the minutes. The minutes do not lie. He stated he looked back to see if Chairman Beruff had any dissenting votes. Chairman Beruff stated he was not in lockstep when they talked about the DEAL project. Dr. Hafner stated he voted to support going forward with the request from the state to allow the college to put their name in the hat for bonding purposes. He stated Mr. Beruff never stood in the way. Dr. Hafner stated if he said that he could. Chairman Beruff interrupted and asked Dr. Hafner to not raise his voice. Dr. Hafner stated he wants to be sure the people in the room can hear. Chairman Beruff stated if they cannot they can raise their hand. He said if Dr. Hafner cannot lower his voice he will not let him speak. Dr. Hafner asked him if he would cut him off. Chairman Beruff stated if he keeps raising his voice he will. Dr. Hafner asked why he would cut him off. Chairman Beruff stated because he is raising his voice and this should be a civilized situation. He stated it is a terrible example to show these people. Dr. Hafner stated if it was civilized he wouldn’t have shut up the audience. He stated he has students, faculty. Chairman Beruff stated they were clapping. Dr. Hafner stated if they were cheering on the Chairman’s points he wouldn’t have had a problem with it. Dr. Hafner stated faculty, staff, students and the community are there. Ms. Moran stated she wanted to make a comment about just this year, which they were focusing on. She stated currently she is on a subcommittee which is in the process, with Peg Beck of talking about salaries and compensation and the way things are and they are still in the process of making changes based on what they have learned over the year. She stated they have not moved forward with everything as is, so far. She stated as far as the budget, talking about no tuition and no fees that that just makes sense. She stated when they talk about this year, it has been very intense and she finds the patterns of situations to be very disturbing and she thinks the leadership at the school should be one that the board, the staff, the faculty, the students are proud of and speaking to the motion, with that statement being made, she would support Dr. Trigueiro’s motion. Dr. Hafner stated the Chairman should let the audience speak. Chairman Beruff stated it was a board meeting. Dr. Hafner stated that now the Chairman wants to shut them down. Chairman Beruff stated he does not want to shut them down. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated that Dr. Hafner raised a couple of good points. He stated he has done a lot of good at the college. He has had some new programs and he has worked with him on developing some of those innovative programs. He stated it is not a black heart and a black soul and that is what this is all about. He stated this is about financial judgment and some other areas that did not involve finance which he considers really bad judgment and the fact that he signed former Chairman Harner’s name on some documents that were submitted to the state of astonishingly bad judgment. He stated he can understand why the prior board members feel attacked. He stated that is not it. He stated nowhere in the minutes was there a proposal that the tennis courts would cost three quarters of a million dollars. He stated it was $70,000 to 80,000. He stated nowhere in the minutes did it say that the collegiate school would be over $5 million and the meter is still running. He stated it is not in there. He stated it starts off at $500,000 and ends up $5 million. He stated the prior board never passed and said that they were going to spend in excess, somewhere north of $5 million for the collegiate school. He stated it is not in the minutes. He stated it did not happen that way. He stated the board did not vote for those things but they happened, which is his point. He stated he is the president of a club and on Friday his calendar went off for that and it did not go off for LECOM and he apologized. He stated there were two conflicts and one he knew about and one he didn’t. He stated the tennis courts is another example of 1000 percent cost overlay. He stated the budget is balanced, the board has been fiscally proactive and the college even came up with $800,000 for e-learning, which is great. He stated he puts all of that in Dr. Probstfeld’s office and her staff. Dr. Hafner stated they have a budget committee and a president who brings the budget forward. Chairman Beruff closed the budget discussion. He stated very clearly, the minutes will reflect that they repeatedly said that they want to cooperate with the accounting department and the budget process. He stated it was a budget and everybody in the room understood as they got

17


completely wrapped around it, that they would make changes as they felt needed. He stated the budget is something to accommodate the statutory requirements of the state of Florida. He stated it is not that they adopted the budget, it is that everybody understands it is a budget and it is not written in stone. He stated they did the statutory requirements of the stated while they continue to address and make the necessary changes to the budget and that was said very clearly so the adoption of the budget is just a formality. Chairman Beruff stated there was a motion and a second on the table and asked if there was any further discussion. Mr. Miller asked if Dennielle True was present. He stated he would like her to speak on behalf of the staff. Chairman Beruff stated if Mr. Miller was the Chair of the meeting he could invite anyone he likes to speak but they are having a meeting and he should respect that. Mr. Miller stated he thinks it is important to find out if they have a vote of confidence with staff. Chairman Beruff stated that is not going to happen. He stated they have a motion. Dr. Hafner asked the Chairman if he is going to deny the faculty that gave him a vote of confidence their right to say so. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated that based on the amount of applause that they had that they support Dr. Hafner. Dr. Hafner stated some of the faculty gave a vote of confidence to his leadership. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated that they are not the board of trustees and the board of trustees has one employee and that is the president of the college. He stated that is the only employee they have. That is the person that they hire and they set the financial terms of, they renew the contract of or they decline to renew a contract or they terminate. He stated what they are doing is what state law says they are supposed to do. Chairman Beruff stated they have a motion and a second. Ms. Neal stated she is uncomfortable without the determination by the FDLE. She stated one of the major things that she said at the meeting is that she did not feel they should be calling witnesses so they sent it to the FDLE. She stated if everyone on the board gave a vote of confidence on his annual evaluation and the FDLE came out with anything she would regret giving him a vote of confidence. She wonders if they should leave it until they have more information. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated if the sole reason for him to decide whether to vote for a vote of no confidence of Dr. Hafner was whether the FDLE felt that there was criminal activity and referred it for further judicial action then he would not have made the motion. Ms. Neal stated that answered her question. Chairman Beruff called for individual votes. Ms. Moran – Aye Ms. Moore - Nay Ms. Saslaw – Nay Mr. Beruff – Aye Dr. Trigueiro – Aye Mr. Bailey- Aye Ms. Neal - Nay Mr. Miller – Nay

15. Chairman Beruff announced it a tie vote, and the meeting was adjourned.

__________________________________ ____________________________________ Carlos M. Beruff, Chair Lars A. Hafner, Secretary Board of Trustees Board of Trustees

18

1 of 1| P a g e B o a r d o f T r u s t e e s 9 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 2

AMENDED SCHEDULE OF NON-CREDIT COURSES, CORPORATE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, FALL 2012 (2013-15)

Course Number Course Title Start Date End Date Start Time End Time Instructor Total Fees

15495 HLTZ 70159 BD2 Phlebotomy Certificate Program 9/20/2012 9/23/2012 800 1700 Weaver $ 75.00

15496 WRTZ 70232 BE1 Publishing 101: To Subsidy or 10/8/2012 10/10/2012 1800 2000

$ 65.00

15497 WRTZ 70232 LD1 Publishing 101: To Subsidy or 10/16/2012 10/18/2012 1000 1200

$ 65.00


$ 65.00


$ 65.00


$ 65.00


$ 65.00

15502 MOWZ 70212 LD1 Project Manage (PMP) Prep Crs 10/22/2012 10/26/2012 800 1700

$ 1,895.00

15504 MFTZ 70102 LE1 Certified Quality Imp Assoc (CQIA) 9/11/2012 10/18/2012 1800 2100

$ 199.00

15506 MRCZ 70151 BWS First Run 9/30/2012 9/30/2012 700 1000

$ 55.00

15507 CDAZ 70202 VD1 Redirecting Children Behavior 9/4/2012 12/18/2012 1100 1230

$ 15.00

15510 MUSZ 70228 BD1 Private Guitar/Marc Mannino 9/5/2012 10/17/2012 1200 1300 Mannino $ 300.00

15511 MUSZ 70247 BD1 Private Voice/Randolph Locke 9/5/2012 10/17/2012 1100 1200 Locke $ 300.00

15512 GRNZ 70117 LD1 Bldg Energy Sustain Tech(BEST) 11/12/2012 11/16/2012 800 1700

$ 2,795.00

15515 SBAZ 70192 LD1 Finance Fair 10/11/2012 10/11/2012 1130 1330

$ 50.00

15516 MUSZ 70217 BD1 Private Voice/Dickerson 9/5/2012 10/17/2012 1600 1700 Dickerson $ 300.00

15519 MUSZ 70203 BD1 Piano/Turon 9/11/2012 10/23/2012 1600 1700 Turon $ 300.00

15536 HLTZ 70214 LD1 BLS Skills Assessment 9/1/2012 12/31/2012

$ 30.00

15538 MUSZ 70225 BD1 Classical Guitar/Rex Willis 9/14/2012 10/26/2012 800 830 Willis Jr $ 150.00

15539 EXEZ 70223 BE1 Yoga 101 9/27/2012 11/15/2012 1815 1930

$ 75.00

15545 SJDZ 70106 VW2 Private Investigator Intern- 1 11/16/2012 11/18/2012 800 1700 Kemper $ 235.00

15546 SJDZ 70107 VW2 Private Investigator Intern-2 12/1/2012 12/2/2012 800 1700 Kemper $ 165.00

15547 SBAZ 70193 LD Exporters Roundtable 10/3/2012 10/3/2012 830 1100

$ 12.00

15551 MRCZ 70151 0 First Run 9/29/2012 9/29/2012 1030 1300

$ 55.00

19

hugginn

Typewritten Text

Exhibit C

State College of Florida Manatee - Sarasota

Human Resources Office Personnel Actions Board Exhibits: August 29, 2012

Appointmentsl Professionall Career

Changesl Professional

Separationsl None

20

hugginn

Typewritten Text

Exhibit D

Personnel Actions Board Exhibits August 29, 2012

Name Effective Date Classification Classification Title Department Site

AppointmentsSeth Barendse 8/20/12 Carrer Lab Assistant - PT Ceramics VeniceKathrine Cruz 8/20/12 Career Lab Assistant - PT Graphics VeniceBritani Wright 8/20/12 Career Lab Assistant - PT Science BradentonAllison Nash 8/28/12 Professional Coordinator, Foundation Institutional Development BradentonJennifer Elliott 8/28/12 Career Academic Dept. Secretary Nursing BradentonBetty Ann Geary 8/28/12 Career Staff Assistant III, PT Human Resources BradentonIsreal Benavides 9/10/12 Careeer Staff Assistant, Collegiate School Collegiate School BradentonJules Jean-Pierre 9/10/12 Career Advisor II, Advising Center BradentonScott Martin 9/24/12 Professional Progammer/Analyst Information Technology Services Bradenton

ChangesAnderson, Blake 9/4/12 From: Profesional Programmer/ReportWriter Information Technology Services Bradenton

To: Professional Programmer/Analyst Information Technology Services Bradenton

Separations

None

21

StateCollegeofFloridaCollegiateSchoolBoardofTrusteesReport‐September2012

The beginning of the school year has been fantastic. We added the highschool students this fall and have 198 middle grade students, 73 ninth gradestudents,and59highschooljuniorstakingapproximately885collegeloadhoursontheSCFcampus.Withtheadministrativepreparationsmadeoverthesummerandthequalityandreadinessofourinstructors,studentshavesuccessfullybeguntheiracademicstudies.SCFCSCurriculumUpdate:

The SCFCS coaching class is an integral part of the curriculum focused onpersonal and groupmentoringnot normally found in the traditional school. Thisyear’sfocusisonguidingandnurturingourstudentstobecomethoughtful,efficientandcapableindependentlearners.Teachersspendanhoureachdaywithaclassof22students,instillingthefundamentalprincipalsoftheCollegiateSchool.Studentsnormally remain with the same teacher (coach) every year they are enrolled atSCFCS. This teacher‐student mentoring relationship provides stability andfamiliarity, increasing the likelihood of individual student success and retentionthrough themiddle school ‐ high school ‐ college transition. Inaddition, teachersspendatleast15minutesweeklywitheachstudent,individuallyaddressingspecificacademicchallengesandproblem‐solvingstrategiesforpersonalstudentacademicsuccess. This year, the coaching class has a weekly theme for all classes and allstudents receive the same message at the same time. Teaching weekly themesunderscorestheimportanceofthethemestothestudentsandtheinstructionthenbecomesmore relevant to them. Coaching themeexamples for the first sixweeksinclude: a welcome to SCFCS introducing policies and procedures, technologyresources and netiquette, anti‐bullying, study skills and organization,communicationandcollegereadiness,andstressmanagement.MovingtotheCommonCoreStandards: TheCommonCore Standardsarenewnational standards in LanguageArtsandMathematicsthatwereadoptedbytheFloridaStateBoardofEducationin2010.Thestandardsbuilduponthepreviousstatestandardswithanincreaseinrigorandapplication, a focus on college readiness, and student preparation to competeinternationally. Last year our teachers became familiar with the standards andbeganthe implementationof literacystandards inall contentareasatSCFCS.Thisyear is a more focused implementation of literary standards, including ensuringappropriatetextcomplexityandrequiringconsistentwritingandgrammarskillstobe demonstrated in all core subjects. Ourmodel encourages time for formal andinformal curriculum planning so that our instructors can collaborate, implementandmonitorhowtheysuccessfullyadheretothestandards.TeachersareadaptingeasilytothenewCommonCoreStandardsbyemphasizingliteracyintheirprevious

22

hugginn

Typewritten Text

Exhibit E

lessons that already incorporated college readiness, cross‐curricular projects andglobalskillsandawareness.Interest in specific details regarding curriculum and classroom instruction can befoundinourmonthlynewsletters:http://scfcs.scf.edu/news‐events/newsletter/SCFCSHeadofSchoolKellyMonod

23

State College of Florida,

Manatee – Sarasota

2011 – 2012

Final Athletic Report

24

hugginn

Typewritten Text

Exhibit F

2

Manatees Athletics A Tradition of Excellence

Baseball

42 State Tournament

Appearances*

31 Conference Championships*

10 District Championships*

13 State Championships*

10 JUCO World Series

Appearances*

Basketball

6 Conference Championships

2 Regional Championships

1984-85 State Championships

Softball


2005 and 2012 District

Champions

2010 Gulf District Runner-Up

2005 and 2012 State

Runner-Up

2 National Tournament Appearances

Tennis

2011 State/Region Runner

up

2012 State/Region

Champion

2012 National Runner Up

Volleyball


1988 State Champion

* State record

25

3

Manatees Athletics 2011‐2012 Year in Review

Manatees athletics has enjoyed a tradition of excellence over its fifty plus years of supporting student‐athletes. Through the achievements of the 2011‐2012 Manatees, this tradition continues. Student‐athletes earned both athletic and academic accolades while pursuing championship levels. Athletically, three of our five intercollegiate teams qualified and competed in Florida College System Activities Association (FCSAA) State and National Junior College Athletic Association (NJCAA) Region VIII tournaments. Tennis captured the college’s first State/Region championship and earned a berth to the NJCAA National Tournament in Tyler, Texas. The team performed well finishing as National Runner‐up. The softball team won the FCSAA Gulf District/NJCAA Region VIIIb in heroic fashion as Ashley Burney hit a walk off homerun to win the game and earn a berth in the NJCAA national tournament. In St. George, Utah the softball team competed well and earned a seventh place finish. Also making an impression, the baseball team qualified and played in their record seventeenth straight FCSAA State Tournament. The tradition of excellence goes far beyond the field and court. The Manatees proved to be high achievers in the classroom and earned conference, state, and national honors for their efforts. Fifty‐two percent of Manatees student‐athletes earned Suncoast Academic All Conference honors by earning a 3.0 or higher. Additionally, thirty‐three percent of student athletes earned a 3.3 or higher. Five sophomores were recognized by the NJCAA, as Athletes of Distinction for having earned GPA’s greater than a 3.6. Included in this recognition is Sarah Geraldson who earned the Pinnacle Award for Academic Excellence for maintaining a perfect 4.0 through her career at SCF. Sarah is a second recipient of this honor over the past two years. Baseball, Tennis, and Volleyball were also recognized as NJCAA All‐Academic Teams for their outstanding accomplishments in the classroom. Finally, our student‐athletes’ hard work and dedication to their studies continues to provide academic success. This is evidenced by a graduation rate of seventy‐seven percent, with half of the graduates coming as result of attendance in summer session. In the community, coaches and student‐athletes remained active service partners. The Manatees supported elementary schools, the Arthritis Foundation, local food banks, and other community organizations. In support of the Leukemia Foundation and a family member of one of our student‐athletes the students organized Fall Fest. This fair like event brought friends, family, and community members together on our campus to help support those in need. It was inspiring to see our student‐athletes organize themselves to support something greater than each of them individually. The program continues to demonstrate the college’s commitment to gender equity in athletics as our ratio of male to female participants closely resembles that of the student body which they represent.

26

4

Academic Honors

Suncoast Conference All‐Academic Team

3.0 GPA or above with a minimum of 24 hours passed during the current year

Baseball Daniel Bodziak 3.88 Evin Lynch 3.20 Dalton Busby 3.22 Andrew McNett 3.22 Jeff Dally 3.54 Tyler Rocklein 3.59 Victor Diaz 3.40 Dayan Rodriguez 3.0 Omar Garcia 3.53 Joshua Russell 3.16 Conner Hale 3.33 Bryan Voelkl 3.53 Robby Kalaf 3.22 Andrew Widell 3.0 Basketball Reggie Baity 3.21 Oneykachukwu Odi 3.12 Elias Gutierrez 3.32 Ryan Steed 3.3 Javaris Jackson 3.13 Softball Gianni Artidiello 3.76 Melissa Phillips 3.13 Emma Barlow 3.30 Kayla Schappacher 3.18 Kayla Bjorge 3.65 Kirstin Toole 3.32 Holly Jones 3.43 Danielle Wayt 3.50 Chelsea Oglevie 3.90 Chelsea Wildey 3.86 Tennis Jana Johnson 3.38 Mariana Palacios 3.50 Lacey Lapp 3.74 Mia Popaja 3.75 Laura Lapp 3.50 Ann‐Sophie Porry 3.26 Abigail Martinez 3.80 Laurence Porry 3.11 Flora Nicholoudis 3.19 Volleyball Rachel Arnason 3.63 Diedre Noble 3.44 Sarah Geraldson 4.0 Victoria Overmeyer 3.59 Julia Huck 3.50 Kierston Smith 3.40 Nicole McDonald 3.63 Chelsea Williams 3.89

Total: 46 of 89 = 52 %

27

5

FCSAA All‐Academic Team

3.3 GPA or above in current year or accumulation of multiple years

Baseball Omar Garcia 3.53 Daniel Bodziak 3.88 Conner Hale 3.33 Jeff Dally 3.54 Tyler Rocklein 3.59 Victor Diaz 3.40 Bryan Voelkl 3.53 Basketball Ryan Steed 3.33 Softball Gianni Artidiello 3.76 Chelsea Oglevie 3.90 Emma Barlow 3.30 Kirstin Toole 3.32 Kayla Bjorge 3.65 Danielle Wayt 3.50 Holly Jones 3.43 Chelsea Wildey 3.86 Tennis Jana Johnson 3.38 Abigail Martinez 3.80 Lacey Lapp 3.74 Mariana Palacios 3.50 Laura Lapp 3.50 Mia Popaja 3.75 Volleyball Rachel Arnason 3.63 Diedre Noble 3.44 Sarah Geraldson 4.0 Victoria Overmeyer 3.59 Julia Huck 3.50 Kierston Smith 3.40 Nicole McDonald 3.63 Chelsea Williams 3.89

Total: 29 of 89 = 33 %

28

6

NJCAA Athletes of Distinction

Minimum of three terms completed

Exemplary Academic Achievement

Victoria Overmeyer – Volleyball – 3.63 GPA

Tyler Rocklein – Baseball – 3.67 GPA

Jeff Dally – Baseball – 3.7 GPA

Superior Academic Achievement

Chelsea Oglevie – Softball – 3.9 GPA

Pinnacle Award for Academic Excellence

Sarah Geraldson – Volleyball – 4.0 GPA

NJCAA All‐Academic Teams

Baseball 3.07 – 2nd in highest GPA of teams in Florida

Tennis 3.36 – 2nd in highest GPA of teams in Florida

Volleyball 3.28 – 2nd in highest GPA of teams in Florida

29

7

Student‐Athlete Spotlight

Sarah Geraldson came to State College of Florida from Bradenton Christian School where she was a

standout volleyball player. She joined the team in 2010 and immediately made an impact on the court.

As the setter, she played an important role in the direction and success of the team. For her success on

the court, Sarah was named to the All‐Conference team twice in her career as a Manatees student‐

athlete.

While Sarah enjoyed great success on the court, she also excelled in the classroom. Sarah earned her

Associate in Arts while maintaining a perfect 4.0 GPA throughout her academic career. Due to her

success in the classroom, Sarah was named the Robert Stokes Volleyball Scholar Athlete of the Year for

2011‐2012. As if that honor was not enough, Sarah was then nominated and then named the FCSAA

Female Scholar‐Athlete of the Year. Both of these scholar athlete awards consider academic record,

leadership, and community involvement as conditions of the award.

30

8

Community Service Projects

As a department, Manatees Athletics participated in a number of community service projects in the 11 –

12 academic year. Because a number of student/athletes are local residents, many were also involved

in other projects through church groups, civic clubs, classes and families besides the ones listed below:

1. Umpiring for Manatee West Little League (MWLL) – served as umpires for little league games

2. Arthritis Foundation Jingle Bell Run – course marshals and water station attendees 3. 2012 SCF Scholarship Flea Market volunteers 4. 2011 SCF Baseball Showcase ‐ volunteer to set up field 5. 2011 Florida Burn High School Travel Ball team tryout – field set up for a youth travel

team tryout 6. Hosted the Bloomingdale Bandits Youth League Team 7. Manatee HEAT baseball workshop 8. Canned food drive for local food pantry 9. American Heart Association – Heart Walk 10. Fall Fest – Leukemia and Lymphoma Society – put on a fall fair to raise money 11. Manatee Girls Softball – youth softball camp counselors 12. YMCA youth volleyball camps – mentored middle school students through volleyball 13. Volley for Snooty – raised funds to support the Manatee at South Florida Museum. 14. Longboat Key 5K – served as race marshals and water station volunteers 15. Ashton Elementary – read to 2nd grade class

31

9

Athletic Honors

Suncoast Conference All‐Conference Team

Baseball – 1st Team Tyler Rocklein Outfield Andrew Widell Catcher Orlando Rivera Infield Dayan Rodriguez Pitcher Conner Hale Infield

Baseball – 2nd Team Omar Garcia Infield Robby Kalaf Pitcher

Baseball – Fireman of the Year Devin Raftery Pitcher

Basketball – 1st Team Odi Onyekachukwu Denzel Myers

Basketball – 2nd Team Elias Gutierrez Giannis Stavrianidis

Softball – 1st Team Paige Mathews Pitcher Chelsea Oglevie Pitcher Dani Wayt Infield Gianni Artidiello Infield Angie Dascoli Catcher

Softball – 2nd Team Kirsten Toole Pitcher Ashley Burney Infield Chelsea Wildey Infield Kayla Bjorge Outfield Kathleen Gavern Outfield

Softball – Honorable Mention Ashley Brooks DP/Utility

Softball – Pitcher of the Year Paige Mathews Pitcher

Volleyball – First Team Jordan Raulerson

Volleyball – Second Team Nicole McDonald Kierston Smith Sarah Geraldson

32

10

FSCAA All State & NJCAA Region VIII All – Region Team

Baseball – 2nd Team Tyler Rocklein Outfield Dayan Rodriguez Pitcher

Fireman of the Year Devin Raftery Pitcher

Softball – 1st Team Paige Mathews Pitcher Angie Dascoli Catcher

Softball – 2nd Team Dani Wayt Infield

Tennis Marianna Palacios #2 Singles Lai Wei #3 Singles Ann‐Sophie Porry #4 Singles Abigail Martinez #5 Singles Lacey Lapp #6 Singles

All – Tournament Teams

Softball – Gulf District Tournament Paige Mathews Pitcher Angie Dascoli Catcher Laura Taricano Outfield Ashley Burney Infield Dani Wayt Infield Gianni Artidiello Infield Ashley Brooks DP/Utility Softball – FCSAA Tournament Paige Mathews Pitcher Angie Dascoli Catcher Ashley Burney Infield Ashley Brooks DP/Utility Softball – FCSAA Tournament Co‐MVP Paige Mathews Pitcher Ashley Burney Infield Softball – NJCAA National Tournament Paige Mathews Pitcher

33

11

Coach Honors

Meredith Headings – Softball

Suncoast Conference Softball Coach of the Year

Betsy McCormack

FCSAA State and NJCAA Region VIII Tennis Coach of the Year

Team Win/Loss Record (Includes Post Season)

Team Suncoast Conference Overall

Baseball 14 – 7 33 – 17 – 1

Basketball 2 – 7 8 – 20

Softball 13 – 3 50 – 13

Tennis N/A* 11 – 5

Volleyball 2 – 6 12 – 17

*All of the tennis teams in the FCSAA play

FSCAA/Region VIII

Tournament Appearances

Baseball – 42nd appearance in the state tournament, recorded one win with two losses in 2012

Softball – won second Gulf District/Region 8b Championship and FCSAA State Runner‐up

Tennis – won first state championship winning 5 of 6 singles matches and 2 of 3 double matches

NJCAA

National Tournament Appearances

Softball – St George, Utah finished in 7th place

Tennis – Tyler, Texas finished as National Runner‐up, won more matches on championship day

than the national champion

34

12

Four – Year

Scholarship & Matriculation Information

Baseball Basketball Softball Tennis Volleyball Total

Total # Participants

26 14 25 10 14 89

# 2nd Year Participants

8 7 14 4 6 39

# 2nd Year Graduates

6 5 10 3 6 30

# 2nd Year Transfers to 4‐yr Colleges

7 4 14 2 4 31

# 1st Year Transfers to 4‐yr Colleges

0 0 0 1 0 1

Cumulative Graduation Rate: 77%

Cumulative Transfer Rate: 79%

Baseball

Josh Allen University of West Florida

Luis Benitez Talladega College

Daniel Bodziak Florida Tech

Josh Clemen Montevallo University

Victor Diaz Old Dominion University

Tyler Rocklein Florida Atlantic University

Dayan Rodriguez University of West Florida

Josh Russell Carson Newman

Cedric Walker Alcorn State

Basketball

Elias Gutierrez University of Maine‐ Machias

Onyekachukwu Odi Florida A & M University

Alexandros Stavrianidis Rochester College

Bobby Thomas Wesley College

Softball

Gianni Artidiello Florida Southern University

Ashley Brooks University of South Florida

Ingrid Cabrera Policy Academy (Miami, FL) & Miami Dade College

Taylor Carlton University of Central Florida

35

13

Tina Campbell University of South Florida

Softball (con’t)

Angela Dascoli Kennesaw State University

Kathleen Gavern Coastal Georgia College

Chelsea Oglevie Florida Southern College

Melissa Phillips Florida Gulf Coast University

Katie Pietranton Florida Southern College

Kayla Schappacher University of Central Florida

Laura Taricano Lincoln Memorial University

Kirstin Toole Lincoln Memorial University

Dani Wayt University of South Florida

Tennis

Lacey Lapp State College of Florida to complete pre‐requisites for Bachelors

Degree

Flora Nicholoudis Northeastern University

Mariana Palacios University of Illinois, Chicago (Spring Term)

Ann‐Sophie Porry University of Central Florida

Laurence Porry Florida State University

Volleyball

Sarah Geraldson University of Florida

Jamie Goff St. Augustine College

Julia Huck Seminole State College

Kayleigh Laderman University of Central Florida

Deidre Noble Webber International University

Victoria Overmyer State College of Florida to complete pre‐requisites for Bachelors

Degree

36

14

EDDIE Award

2011 – 2012

The EDDIE Award is named in honor of a very special member of the Manatees Athletic Family. The

Reverend E.L. “Fast Eddie” Williams drove the Manatee Community College bus from June 1970 until his

retirement in April 1998. But he was so much more than just a bus driver. Eddie was our most

noticeable fan, our team captain, our loyal supporter and a teacher in life’s lessons, our counselor and

our friend. It is the only award given by the Athletic Department. Each year one sophomore

student/athlete from each sport is nominated for the award based on Effort, Dedication, Determination,

Inspiration and Enthusiasm. This year’s nominees were:

Baseball Tyler Rocklein

Basketball Onyekachukwu Odi

Softball Melissa Phillips

Tennis Lacey Lapp

Volleyball Sarah Geraldson

Lacey Lapp was a sophomore on the tennis team this year that grew to embody the characteristics

inherent of this award. Her success as a student‐athlete was demonstrated through effort, dedication,

determination, and enthusiasm. Her coach often spoke of her as the player that improved the most

throughout her career as a member of the Manatees tennis team. These characteristics helped her to

become FCSAA State/NJCAA Region VIII #6 singles champion, a member of the All‐State/All Region team,

and FCSAA State/NJCAA Region VIII #3 double champion. Lacey is leader amongst her peers and truly a

team player. Fast Eddie would be honored to have her serve as the EDDIE winner for the 2011‐2012

school year.

37

15

Intercollegiate Athletic Annual Summary

Baseball

Seasons 1st Year Athletes

2nd Year Athletes

2nd Year Athletes Graduating

2nd Year Athletes, Graduation, Transferred, or Signed

TEAM GPA

2002‐2003 15 5 1 3 2.43

2003‐2004 15 10 6 9 2.87

2004‐2005 14 10 8 8 2.98

2005‐2006 9 13 5 13 2.70

2006‐2007 18 7 2 7 2.49

2007‐2008 15 12 4 9 3.18

2008‐2009 11 14 10 13 3.32*

2009‐2010 14 10 4 10 3.06

2010‐2011 13 12 8 11 3.04

2011‐2012 18 8 6 7 2.93

38

16

Basketball


2nd Year Athletes



TEAM GPA

2002‐2003 7 5 2 4 2.09

2003‐2004 9 4 2 3 2.83

2004‐2005 7 4 4 4 2.11

2005‐2006 8 2 1 2 2.72

2006‐2007 7 6 3 5 2.51

2007‐2008 7 5 3 5 2.73

2008‐2009 9 6 1 5 2.62

2009‐2010 9 4 0 2 2.11

2010‐2011 9 5 4 4 2.49

2011‐2012 7 7 5 4 2.72

39

17

Softball


2nd Year Athletes



TEAM

GPA

2002‐2003 15 8 6 7 2.92

2003‐2004 10 12 12 12 3.16

2004‐2005 20 5 5 5 3.39

2005‐2006 14 7 2 7 3.01

2006‐2007 9 10 4 4 2.91

2007‐2008 11 8 1 3 2.92

2008‐2009 11 10 9 9 2.99

2009‐2010 17 8 7 11 3.26

2010‐2011 13 9 8 10 3.17

2011‐2012 11 14 10 10 2.97

40

18

Tennis


2nd Year Athletes



TEAM GPA

2010‐2011* 9 0 0 0 3.43

2011‐2012 8 4 3 2 3.35

*Inaugural year of program

41

19

Volleyball


2nd Year Athletes



TEAM

GPA

2002‐2003 5 7 5 7 3.15

2003‐2004 9 5 5 5 3.16

2004‐2005 7 7 7 7 3.25

2005‐2006 8 6 4 5 3.12

2006‐2007 8 4 6 9 3.20

2007‐2008 9 8 1 5 3.08

2008‐2009 12 4 0 4 3.04

2009‐2010 5 9 4 8 3.44

2010‐2011 5 9 7 9 3.51

2011‐2012 11 14 10 14 2.97

42

20

GPA Analysis 2011 – 2012

Sport Hours

Attempted

Hours Passed % of Hours

Passed

QP GPA

Baseball 704 673 95.6% 2062 2.93

Basketball 367 343 93.5% 1000 2.72

Softball 772 746 96.6% 2291 2.97

Tennis 280 280 100% 939 3.35

Volleyball 409 394 96.3% 1295 3.17

Total 2532 2436 96.2% 7587 3.00

43

21

GPA of 3.0 or Above 2011 – 2012

Team Participants 3.0 or Above Percentage

Baseball 26 14 58%

Basketball 14 5 36%

Softball 25 10 42%

Tennis 10 9 90%

Volleyball 14 8 57%

Total 89 46 52%

44

22

Student‐ Athlete Spotlight

Onyekachukwu Odi came to SCF to in the Fall of 2010 from Nigeria to play basketball, but more importantly to earn his education. Odi, as he is know by his friends, began in developmental courses and diligently worked his way through the requirements to be awarded an Associate in Art degree in the Summer of 2012. One of the most impressive academic accomplishments speaks to Odi’s dedication and drive to succeed. While pursuing his degree, he never dropped (earned a W) or failed a course. On the court Odi proved himself to be quite a defensive threat, particularly as a shot blocker. Odi earned Suncoast Conference All‐Conference honors in both years he participated on the basketball team. For his accomplishments on the court and in the classroom Odi was recruited to play NCAA Division I basketball by many schools. He accepted a full scholarship and will continue his schools while playing basketball for the Florida A&M Rattlers.

45

23

Intercollegiate Athletic Annual Summary Program Academic Achievements

Season # Athletes

Academic

All – Conference

3. 0 or Above

# Athletes

Academic

All – State 3.3

or Above

Load Hours

Attempted by

All Teams

Total Hours

Successfully

Complete by

All Teams

Cumulative

GPA All Teams

2002‐2003 21/68

31%

9/68

13%

1,783 1,688

95%

2.65

2003‐2004 30/73

41%

12/73

16%

1,975 1,715

87%

2.83

2004‐2005 34/41

48%

19/71

27%

1,933 1,857

96%

2.91

2005‐2006 37/71

52%

21/71

30%

1,800

1,743

99%

3.07

2006‐2007 24/73

33%

15/73

21%

2,742 2,561

93%

2.75

2007‐2008 41/73

56%

27/73

37%

2,182 2,127

97%

3.04

2008‐2009 31/73

42%

23/73

32%

2,056 1,997

97%

3.07

2009‐2010 30/74

41%

23/74

31%

2,069 1920

93%

2.88

2010‐2011 48/82

59%

35/82

43%

2,297 2,216

96%

3.09

2011‐2012 46/89

52%

29/89

33%

2532 2436

96%

3.00

46

24

SCF Intercollegiate Athletics 2010 – 2011 Season Athletic Home Residence

Manatee

County

Sarasota

County

Florida

(excluding M/S)

Out‐of‐state Total

Baseball 8 3 11 4 26

Basketball 3 4 3 4 14

Softball 5 4 15 1 25

Tennis 2 0 3 5 10

Volleyball 3 1 5 5 14

Total 21 12 37 19 89

33/89 from two‐county area = 37 % 37/89 from Florida (excluding Manatee and Sarasota County = 42 % 70/89 Florida residents = 79 % 19/89 Out‐of‐State = 21 %

Intercollegiate Athletics Overall Winning Percentage

2011‐2012

Overall Win/Loss

Overall

Conference

Win/Loss

Number of Teams who made

State Tournament

Appearance

114/72 31/23 3

61% 57% 60%

47

25

Team Record History

Baseball

Season

Overall

Record

Win/Loss

Conference

Record

Win/Loss

State

Win/Loss

Athletic

Home

Residence

Manatee

Athletic

Home

Residence

Sarasota Out of State

2002‐2003 26/24 19/10 1/2 3 3 5

2003‐2004 36/18 18/5 7 5 5 5

2004‐2005 41/12 20/5 2/2 10 4 5

2005‐2006 38/19 17/5 4/2 4 5 9

2006‐2007 33/20 17/2 2/2 5 4 6

2007‐2008 40/16 17/8 3/2 11 2 6

2008‐2009 34/16/1 19/6 0/2 9 3 6

2009‐2010 37/15 19/6 4/1 6 2 3

2010‐2011 33/20 12/9 0/2 7 2 5

2011‐2012 33/17/1 14/7 1/2 8 3 4

Baseball Head Coach: Tim Hill Assistant Coaches: Tim Hill II, Barry Batson, Dave Moates Athletic Trainer: Lora Stelzer Equipment Manager: Brian Newberry

48

26

Basketball

Season

Overall

Record

Win/Loss

Conference

Record

Win/Loss

State

Win/Loss

Athletic

Home

Residence

Manatee

Athletic

Home

Residence


2002‐2003 11/19 n/a 0/0 0 2 1

2003‐2004 19/12 n/a 0/0 0 2 3

2004‐2005 15/15 15/15 0/0 0 1 3

2005‐2006 4/12 4/8 0/0 2 2 6

2006‐2007 7/20 6/6 0/0 3 2 4

2007‐2008 16/14 7/5 0/1 2 1 4

2008‐2009 16/14 7/5 0/1 2 1 4

2009‐2010 12/14 2/10 0/0 1 3 3

2010‐2011 10/15 3/6 0/0 1 3 6

2011‐2012 8/20 2/7 0/0 3 4 4

Basketball Interim Head Coach: Joe Whelton Assistant Coaches: Lem Andrews, Altron Jackson, Cassie Rodriguez Athletic Trainer: Lora Stelzer Equipment Manager: Brian Newberry

49

27

Softball

Season

Overall

Record

Win/Loss

Conference

Record

Win/Loss

State

Win/Loss

Athletic

Home

Residence

Manatee

Athletic

Home

Residence


2002‐2003 37/15 n/a n/a 7 9 2

2003‐2004 50/13 n/a n/a 9 6 4

2004‐2005 50/14 n/a n/a 12 5 1

2005‐2006 47/10 18/6 2/2 11 4 6

2006‐ 2007 50/12 20/4 1/2 6 6 5

2007‐2008 40/9 22/2 0/2 6 2 3

2008‐2009 29/26 13/7 2/2 3 4 4

2009‐2010 33/24/1 15/5 3/2 5 5 1

2010‐2011 30/26 10/6 1/2 4 4 0

2011‐2012 50/13 13/3 4/1 5 4 1

Softball Head Coach: Meredith Headings Assistant Coaches: Dave Machen, Michelle Puls Athletic Trainer: Lora Stelzer Equipment Manager: Brian Newberry

50

28

Tennis

Season

Overall

Record

Win/Loss

Athletic

Home

Residence

Manatee

Athletic

Home

Residence


2010‐2011 8/3 2 0 5

2011‐2012 11/5 2 0 5

Volleyball Head Coach: Betsy McCormack Assistant Coaches: Herbert Pitts Athletic Trainer: Lora Stelzer Equipment Manager: Brian Newberry

51

29

Volleyball

Season

Overall

Record

Win/Loss

Conference

Record

Win/Loss

State

Win/Loss

Athletic

Home

Residence

Manatee

Athletic

Home

Residence


2002‐2003 18/13 0/0 2/2 2 1 2

2003‐2004 20/5 n/a n/a 1 2 6

2004‐2005 25/2 10/0 2/2 3 4 5

2005‐2006 16/8 7/3 1/2 5 2 4

2006‐2007 8/20 2/8 0/0 4 3 1

2007‐2008 12/15 2/8 0/0 8 4 1

2008‐2009 17/18 2/8 0/0 7 2 4

2009‐2010 6/29 1/9 0/0 7 1 2

2010‐2011 35‐7 8‐0 3‐2 5 1 2

2011‐2012 12/17 2/6 0/0 3 1 5

Volleyball Head Coach: Carmine Garofalo Assistant Coaches: Sylvie Garofalo, Billie Stiscak. Nathan Pickett Athletic Trainer: Lora Stelzer Equipment Manager: Brian Newberry

52

30

SCF Intercollegiate Athletics 2011-2012

Substance Abuse Education and Testing Program

Date Total # Tested Total Positives 09/06/2011 20 0 09/12/2011 19 1 10/25/2011 20 4 11/28/2011 19 2 12/01/2011 20 0 01/19/2012 15 1 02/13/2012 14 1 04/20/2012 14 0

For the conclusion of the 2011-2012 seasons, we are reporting 9 positive results from 141 total student-athletes tested. The results shows 6.4% of student-athletes tests came up positive. This percentage is up for the previous year (5.6%). During this season, we had the addition of synthetic marijuana markers for our tests and a new testing crew started at the beginning of 2012. The addition of synthetic marijuana came from a conversation with Drug Free Sport and their awareness of an increase nationally of synthetic drugs use. Our results from 2011 helped direct our substance abuse education session for the spring with the addition of information about synthetic marijuana. Educating the student-athletes appeared to have an impact on the number of positive synthetic marijuana results.

As per Substance Abuse and Education Policy, we will continue our mandatory substance abuse education session in the fall and spring by providing workshops and presentations professionals in the field.

53

31

Gender Equity in Athletics

Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 as amended

Florida Education Equity Act of 1993

State College of Florida

Title IX Fall 2009 and Spring 2010 Summary

Gender Equity in Athletics

2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009 /10

2010/11 2011/12

Male/Female Male/Female Male/Female Male/Female Male/Female Male/Female Male/Female

Total 36 44 39 45 41 42 36 43 39 42 40 50 41 48

% 45% 55% 46.4% 53.6% 48.8% 50.6% 45.6% 54.4% 48.1% 51.8% 44.4% 55.6% 46.1% 53.9%

(80) (84) (83) (79) (81) (90) (89)

Full – Time Fall Enrollment

Fall 2006 Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011

Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Male Male Male Male Female

Total 1724 2392 1799 2602 2136 2944 2361 3312 2235 1724 2175 2706

% 41.9% 58.1% 40.9% 59.1% 42.1% 57.9% 41.6% 58.4% 43.2% 41.9% 44.6% 55.4%

Compliance Variance

2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/2012

4.50% *8.5% 3.50% *6.6% 1.2% 1.5%

Compliance of Title IX gender equity ratio requires the ratio of male/female student‐athletes be

within 5% of the male/female ratio of the full‐time enrollment. During the 2011/2012 school

year, the compliance variance between student‐athletes and full‐time enrollment was a mere

1.5%. This can largely be attributed to the addition of women’s tennis and the large numbers of

student‐athletes participating on the softball team.

54

55

hugginn

Typewritten Text

Exhibit G

09/25/12

OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT OF BUSINESS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

Carol F. Probstfeld, Vice President

TO: State College of Florida, Manatee – Sarasota District Board of Trustees FROM: Carol F. Probstfeld Vice President of Business and Administrative Services SUBJECT: Monthly Financial Report – August, 2012

Two Year Programs The report for Two Year Programs presents the Budget and Year-To-Date Revenue and Expense for this fiscal year and last fiscal year as of August 31, 2012. Presented is the Original Budget, Adjusted Budget, Year to Date Revenue and Expense, and the Percent Year-To-Date is of the Adjusted Budget. Noteworthy is the fact that total student fees assessed through August are less than those of last year by 11.48% due to a decrease in the enrollment. Other Student Fees are greater than last year by 2.17%. Overall, Revenues are $1,204,144.08 less than those reported last August. In the category of Expenses, overall Personnel Costs are down 3.13%. Other Personnel Expense is down 12.52% and the Fringe Benefits are up 22.19%. These changes are due to many factors such as timing differences in pay dates. Even though the year is only 16.67% complete, personnel costs are at 7.85% of the amount budgeted for the current year. Current Expenses represent 12.31% of the amount budgeted and Capital Outlay expended is 1.54% of the amount budgeted.

61

hugginn

Typewritten Text

Exhibit H

09/25/12

In summary, with the year 16.67% complete:

• Year–To-Date Actual Revenue is 27.32% of the Adjusted Budget. • Year-To-Date Actual Expense is 9.06% of the Adjusted Budget. • Therefore, Revenues are greater than and Expenses are less than what

would be expected on a percentage of budget basis.

Baccalaureate Programs Total Revenue is $325,421.39 with Student Fees totaling $296,085.89 and Other Student Fees totaling $29,335.50. Expenses total $61,031.17, with Personnel totaling $50,370.49 and Current Expense totaling $10,660.68. Total Revenue is 29.81% of that budgeted and Total Expense is 6.59% of that budgeted.

Collegiate School (Reported under separate cover)

62

State College of FloridaTwo Year Revenue and Expense Comparison Report

As of August

Lower Level Programs

Acct. Type Description Orig Budget Adj Budget YTD Actual Orig Budget Adj Budget YTD Actual

PercentYTD Actual / Adj Budget

YTD Actual / Adj Budget

Percent

August , FY 2012August , FY 2013

Revenue41 Student Fees 20,702,611.00 8,239,517.3220,702,611.00 20,625,601.00 9,308,264.4020,625,601.0039.80% 45.13%42 Other Student Fees 3,524,131.00 1,340,946.103,524,131.00 3,269,457.00 1,312,426.663,269,457.0038.05% 40.14%44 State Support 21,294,443.00 2,959,106.0621,294,443.00 21,487,541.00 3,127,043.2621,487,541.0013.90% 14.55%45 Federal Support 87,830.00 425.5087,830.00 43,500.00 6,005.0043,500.000.48% 13.80%46 Gif ts, Private Grants & Contracts 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 47 Sales and Services Department 528,661.00 105,909.32528,661.00 549,578.00 84,930.59549,578.0020.03% 15.45%49 Other Revenue 157,070.00 18,356.20157,070.00 111,800.00 28,394.43111,800.0011.69% 25.40%4A Non-Revenue Receipts 67,450.00 8.0067,450.00 67,448.00 1,348.2467,448.000.01% 2.00%

Total : Revenue 46,362,196.00 46,362,196.00 12,664,268.50 46,154,925.00 46,154,925.00 13,868,412.5827.32% 30.05%

Grand Total : Revenue 46,362,196.00 46,362,196.00 12,664,268.50 27.32% 46,154,925.00 46,154,925.00 13,868,412.58 30.05%

ExpensePersonnel

51 Salaries-Full Time & Perm Part Time 21,730,362.00 1,717,831.3121,835,908.00 21,722,992.00 1,897,165.2921,736,595.007.87% 8.73%52 Other Personnel Exp P/T (Non-Perm) 4,640,900.00 237,356.284,630,167.00 5,205,093.00 271,318.695,205,093.005.13% 5.21%53 Personnel Benef its 7,362,457.00 702,126.107,391,062.00 7,577,238.00 574,622.117,579,243.009.50% 7.58%

Total : Personnel 33,733,719.00 33,857,137.00 2,657,313.69 34,505,323.00 34,520,931.00 2,743,106.097.85% 7.95%

Current Expense61 Services 9,238,119.00 1,216,136.149,587,722.00 8,436,130.00 1,218,911.538,863,599.0012.68% 13.75%62 Materials and Supplies 3,269,225.00 412,888.983,266,132.00 2,174,341.00 341,911.992,372,304.0012.64% 14.41%63 Other Current Charges 379,200.00 28,289.43379,272.00 392,060.00 32,293.75392,060.007.46% 8.24%69 Transfers 229,000.00 0.00229,000.00 218,700.00 0.00218,700.000.00% 0.00%

Total : Current Expense 13,115,544.00 13,462,126.00 1,657,314.55 11,221,231.00 11,846,663.00 1,593,117.2712.31% 13.45%

Capital71 Capital Outlay 389,473.00 5,422.16352,335.00 250,029.00 7,112.45432,336.001.54% 1.65%

Total : Capital 389,473.00 352,335.00 5,422.16 250,029.00 432,336.00 7,112.451.54% 1.65%

Grand Total : Expense 47,238,736.00 47,671,598.00 4,320,050.40 9.06% 45,976,583.00 46,799,930.00 4,343,335.81 9.28%

Report created: 9/6/2012 8:11:05 AM Page 1 of 1SCF.Production Reports.Finance.Board Reports.Two Year Revenue and Expense Comparison.Two Year Revenue and Expense Comparison - Report

63

State College of FloridaTwo Year Revenue and Expense Comparison Report

As of August

Upper Level Programs

Acct. Type Description Orig Budget Adj Budget YTD Actual Orig Budget Adj Budget YTD Actual

PercentYTD Actual / Adj Budget

YTD Actual / Adj Budget

Percent

August , FY 2012August , FY 2013

Revenue41 Student Fees 845,936.00 296,085.89845,936.00 364,541.00 86,545.80364,541.0035.00% 23.74%42 Other Student Fees 67,674.00 29,335.5067,674.00 48,993.00 10,266.3048,993.0043.35% 20.95%44 State Support 178,164.00 0.00178,164.00 178,342.00 0.00178,342.000.00% 0.00%4A Non-Revenue Receipts 0.00 0.000.00 352,931.00 0.00352,931.00 0.00%

Total : Revenue 1,091,774.00 1,091,774.00 325,421.39 944,807.00 944,807.00 96,812.1029.81% 10.25%

Grand Total : Revenue 1,091,774.00 1,091,774.00 325,421.39 29.81% 944,807.00 944,807.00 96,812.10 10.25%

ExpensePersonnel

51 Salaries-Full Time & Perm Part Time 443,233.00 38,686.44443,233.00 434,020.00 28,715.05434,020.008.73% 6.62%52 Other Personnel Exp P/T (Non-Perm) 71,136.00 1,528.4671,136.00 144,612.00 1,924.91144,612.002.15% 1.33%53 Personnel Benef its 101,925.00 10,155.59101,925.00 139,425.00 8,650.88139,425.009.96% 6.20%

Total : Personnel 616,294.00 616,294.00 50,370.49 718,057.00 718,057.00 39,290.848.17% 5.47%

Current Expense61 Services 207,982.00 10,503.88199,682.00 167,250.00 13,229.30172,067.005.26% 7.69%62 Materials and Supplies 72,846.00 156.8081,146.00 52,800.00 1,947.6952,800.000.19% 3.69%63 Other Current Charges 14,000.00 0.0014,000.00 6,700.00 0.006,700.000.00% 0.00%

Total : Current Expense 294,828.00 294,828.00 10,660.68 226,750.00 231,567.00 15,176.993.62% 6.55%

Capital71 Capital Outlay 15,000.00 0.0015,000.00 0.00 0.000.000.00%

Total : Capital 15,000.00 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00%

Grand Total : Expense 926,122.00 926,122.00 61,031.17 6.59% 944,807.00 949,624.00 54,467.83 5.74%

Report created: 9/6/2012 8:16:24 AM Page 1 of 1SCF.Production Reports.Finance.Board Reports.Two Year Revenue and Expense Comparison.Two Year Revenue and Expense Comparison - Report

64

RESOLUTION NUMBER: Six (6) FISCAL YEAR: 2012-2013AMENDMENT NUMBER: Six (6) August 2012

FUND NAME: CURRENT UNRESTRICTED FUND NUMBER: 11000

PRESENT REVISED CATEGORY BUDGET INCREASE DECREASE BUDGET

--------- ----------------------------------------------------- - --------------------------- ----- --------------------- ----- --------------------- ------- ------------------------------Beginning Fund Balance $ 8,232,861 $ $ $ 8,232,861

REVENUES 46,362,196 46,362,196 (Detail Attached)

--------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- ------------------------------TOTAL TO BE ACCOUNTED FOR $ 54,595,057 $ 0 $ 0 $ 54,595,057

=============== ============ ============ =================

SALARIES $ 33,733,719 $ 123,418 $ $ 33,857,137 (Detail Attached)

CURRENT EXPENSES 13,559,652 97,526 13,462,126 (Detail Attached)

CAPITAL OUTLAY 378,227 25,892 352,335 (Detail Attached)

ENDING FUND BALANCE 6,923,459 6,923,459--------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- ------------------------------

TOTAL ACCOUNTED FOR $ 54,595,057 $ 123,418 $ 123,418 $ 54,595,057=============== ============ ============ =================

JUSTIFICATION: To realign budget to meet departmental needs.

Certified ____________________________________________________________ Adopted: September 25, 2012 Stephen J. Korcheck, President Lars A. Hafner, President===== ============================== = =============== === ============ === ============ ==== =================

BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUESTSTATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA, MANATEE - SARASOTA

65

hugginn

Typewritten Text

Exhibit I

RESOLUTION NUMBER: Seven (7) FISCAL YEAR: 2012-2013AMENDMENT NUMBER: Seven (7) August 2012

FUND NAME: GENERAL RESTRICTED FUND NUMBER: TWO


--------- ----------------------------------------------------- ------- --------------------------- ------ --------------------- -------- --------------------- ------------- --------------------------Beginning Fund Balance $ 7,597 $ 16,040 $ $ 23,637

REVENUES 4,236,807 33,991 4,202,816 (Detail Attached)

--------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- --------------------------TOTAL TO BE ACCOUNTED FOR $ 4,244,404 $ 16,040 $ 33,991 $ 4,226,453

=============== ============ ============ ===============

SALARIES $ 1,948,784 $ $ 48,817 $ 1,899,967 (Detail Attached)

CURRENT EXPENSES 2,101,295 26,166 2,127,461 (Detail Attached)

CAPITAL OUTLAY 194,325 4,700 199,025 (Detail Attached)

ENDING FUND BALANCE 0 0--------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- --------------------------

TOTAL ACCOUNTED FOR $ 4,244,404 $ 30,866 $ 48,817 $ 4,226,453=============== ============ ============ ===============

Justification: To realign budget to meet departmental needs.Fund Balance: Due to use of fund balance for SBDC Program Income expenses - $11,900 and roll budget for AHEC grant - $4,140 .Revenue: Due to budget of SBDC Program Income of $13,750, initial budget for Crop grant of $39,294, decrease for BAS Early Childhood Foundation of $(7,430), adjustment for dollars spent in 2011-12 from Foundation for Tech. Mgmt. - $(27,825), BAS Homeland Security - $(15,301), Energy Tech. Mgmt. - $(11,199), BAS Hlth. Svcs. Admin. - $(10,117), and BAS Early Childhood - $(15,163).

Certified ____________________________________________________________ Adopted: September 25, 2012 Stephen J. Korcheck, President Lars A. Hafner, President===== ============================== ==== =============== === ============ ==== ============ ======= ===============

BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUESTSTATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA, MANATEE - SARASOTA

66

BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST

RESOLUTION NUMBER: Eight (8) FISCAL YEAR: 2012-2013AMENDMENT NUMBER: Eight (8) August 2012

FUND NAME: UNEXPENDED PLANT FUND FUND NUMBER: Seven


--------- ----------------------------------------------------- ------ --------------------------- ----- --------------------- ----- --------------------- ------ ---------------------------Beginning Fund Balance $ 4,336,907 $ $ $ 4,336,907


--------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- ---------------------------TOTAL TO BE ACCOUNTED FOR $ 16,315,507 $ 0 $ 0 $ 16,315,507

=============== ============ ============ ===============

SALARIES $ 235,966 $ $ $ 235,966 (Detail Attached)

CURRENT EXPENSES 376,775 49,325 426,100 (Detail Attached)

CAPITAL OUTLAY 15,702,766 49,325 15,653,441 (Detail Attached)

ENDING FUND BALANCE 0 0--------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- ---------------------------


JUSTIFICATION: To realign budgets to meet departmental needs.

Certified ____________________________________________________________ Adopted: September 25, 2012 Stephen J. Korcheck, President Lars A. Hafner, President===== ============================== === =============== == ============ === ============ === ===============

STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA, MANATEE - SARASOTA

67

BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST

RESOLUTION NUMBER: Nine (9) FISCAL YEAR: 2012-2013AMENDMENT NUMBER: Nine (9) August 2012

FUND NAME: Collegiate School FUND NUMBER: 23000


--------- ----------------------------------------------------- ------ --------------------------- ----- --------------------- ----- --------------------- ------ ---------------------------Beginning Fund Balance $ 0 $ 0 $ $ 0


--------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- ---------------------------TOTAL TO BE ACCOUNTED FOR $ 1,869,598 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,869,598

=============== ============ ============ ===============

SALARIES $ 1,377,360 $ $ $ 1,377,360 (Detail Attached)

CURRENT EXPENSES 492,238 2,600 489,638 (Detail Attached)

CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 2,600 2,600 (Detail Attached)

ENDING FUND BALANCE 0 0--------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- ---------------------------


JUSTIFICATION:

To realign budgets to meet departmental needs.

Certified ____________________________________________________________ Adopted: September 25, 2012 Stephen J. Korcheck, President Lars A. Hafner, President===== ============================== === =============== == ============ === ============ === ===============

STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA, MANATEE - SARASOTA

68

ASSETS

Current Assets

Cash $ 158,567.64

Accounts Receivable -

Total Current Assets 158,567.64

Depreciable Capital Assets, Net of Acumulated Depreciation

of $18,184.70 169,903.51

Total Assets $ 328,471.15

LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS

Current Liabilities

Accounts Payable $ 598.90

Deferred Wages -

Accrued Compensated Absences 2,107.79

Total Current Liabilities 2,706.69

Non-Current Liabilities

Accrued Compensated Absences 25,293.40

Total Liabilities 28,000.09

Net Assets

Invested in Capital Assets, net of related debt 169,903.51

Unrestricted 130,567.55

Total Net Assets 300,471.06

Total Liabilities and Net Assets $ 328,471.15

As of August 31, 2012

STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS

A CHARTER SCHOOL AND RESTRICTED FUND OF STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA, MANATEE-SARASOTA

STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA COLLEGIATE SCHOOL

August 31, 2012

As of

169

hugginn

Typewritten Text

Exhibit J

For the Month Ended

August 31, 2012

REVENUES

Operating Revenues $ - $ -

Total Operating Revenues - -

EXPENSES

Operating Expenses

Salaries 21,888.29 31,477.35

Benefits 13,438.90 19,631.91

Contractual Services 1,296.00 1,296.00

Other Services and Expenses 130,072.33 130,193.53

Materials and Supplies 29,409.87 29,409.87

Total Operating Expenses 196,105.39 212,008.66

Operating Loss (196,105.39) (212,008.66)

Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses)

State Appropriations From County School District 136,787.60 273,554.67

Subsidy from SCF Auxiliary - -

Federal Grant - -

Private Gifts and Grants - -

Other Nonoperating Revenues 2,698.16 3,665.81

Total Nonoperating Revenues 139,485.76 277,220.48

(56,619.63) 65,211.82

Capital Appropriations 6,176.00 6,176.00

Total Other Revenues 6,176.00 6,176.00

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets (50,443.63) 71,387.82

Net Assets at Beginning of Month/Year 350,914.69 229,083.24

Net Assets at End of Month/Year $ 300,471.06 $ 300,471.06

Income (Loss) Before Other Revenues, Expenses, Gains or

Losses

For the Two Months Ended August 31, 2012

STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN NET ASSETS



August 31, 2012

Year To Date

270

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Payments to Suppliers for Goods and Services $ (160,895.39)

Payments to Employees (89,857.10)

Payments for Benefits (19,631.91)

Net Cash Used By Operating Activities (270,384.40)

CASH FLOWS FROM NONCAPITAL FINANCING ACTIVITIES

State Appropriations Through County 273,554.67

Subsidy from SCF Auxiliary -

Federal Grant -

Private Gifts and Grants -

Other Nonoperating receipts 3,665.81

Net Cash Provided By Noncapital Financing Activities 277,220.48

CASH FLOWS FROM CAPITAL AND RELATED FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Capital Appropriations 6,176.00

Purchase of Capital Assets -

Net Cash Provided By Capital and Related Financing Activities 6,176.00

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents 13,012.08

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year 145,555.56

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Month $ 158,567.64

RECONCILIATION OF NET OPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES)

TO NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Operating (Loss) Income $ (212,008.66)

Adjustments To Reconcile Net Operating Loss To Net Cash

Provided (Used) By Operating Activities

(Decrease) Increase in Accounts Payable 4.01

(Decrease) Increase in Accrued Payroll Expenses (58,379.75)

Net Cash Used By Operations $ (270,384.40)

For the Month Ended August 31, 2012

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS



371



NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AUGUST 31, 2012

4

NOTE A – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Reporting Entity: The State College of Florida Collegiate School (the “Charter School”) is a restricted fund of State

College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota (the “College”). The general operating authority of the Charter School is

contained in Section 1002.33, Florida Statutes. The Charter School operates under a charter with the sponsoring

school district, The School Board of Manatee County, Florida (Sponsor). The initial charter is effective until June 30,

2015, and may be renewed pursuant to Section 1002.33, Florida Statutes, for such duration as may be established

by mutual written consent of the parties and by successful completion of the renewal process. At the end of the

term of the charter, the Sponsor may choose not to renew the charter, in which case, the Sponsor is required to

notify the Charter School in writing at least 90 days prior to the charter’s expiration. During the term of the

charter, the Sponsor may also terminate the charter if good cause is shown. The Charter School shall notify the

Sponsor in writing at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the charter as to its intent to renew or not renew.

Basis of Presentation: The records of the Charter School are maintained as a restricted fund on the books of the

College and accordingly, they follow the same basis of presentation. The Charter School’s accounting policies

conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to colleges and

universities as prescribed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The National Association of

College and University Business Officers (NACUBO) also provides the College with recommendations prescribed in

accordance with generally accepted accounting principles promulgated by GASB and the Financial Accounting

Standards Board (FASB), such as GASB Statement No. 35, Basic Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion

and Analysis for Public Colleges and Universities. GASB Statement No. 35 includes public colleges and universities

within the financial reporting guidelines of GASB Statement No. 34, Basic Financial Statements and Management

Discussion and Analysis for State and Local Governments. GASB Statement No. 35 allows public colleges and

universities the option of reporting as a special-purpose government either engaged in only business-type

activities, or engaged in both governmental and business-type activities. The College elected to report as an entity

engaged in only business-type activities. Therefore, these special-purpose financial statements are presented

accordingly.

Basis of Accounting: Basis of accounting refers to when revenues, expenses and related assets and liabilities are

recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements. Specifically, it relates to the timing of the

measurements made, regardless of the measurement focus applied. The Charter School’s financial statements are

presented using the economic resources measurement focus and accrual basis of accounting. Revenue, expenses,

gains, losses, assets, and liabilities resulting from exchange and exchange-like transactions are recognized when

the exchange takes place. Revenues, expenses, gains, losses, assets, and liabilities resulting from non-exchange

activities are generally recognized when all applicable eligibility requirements, including time requirements, are

met. The Charter School’s principal activity is instruction. Operating revenues and expenses include all fiscal

transactions related to instruction as well as administration, academic support, student services, physical plant

operations, and depreciation of capital assets. Non-operating revenues include state appropriations from the

county school district, subsidies from the College, federal grants, Charter School Capital Outlay Funds (when

available), and other grants. The Charter School follows GASB pronouncements and FASB pronouncements issued

on or before November 30, 1989, unless the FASB pronouncements conflict with GASB pronouncements. Under

GASB Statement No. 20, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Proprietary Funds and Other Governmental

72





5

Entities That Use Proprietary Fund Accounting, the College has the option to elect to apply all pronouncements of

FASB issued after November 30, 1989, unless those pronouncements conflict with GASB pronouncements. The

College has elected not to apply FASB pronouncements issued after November 30, 1989.

Cash and Cash Equivalent: Amounts reported as cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand and cash in

demand deposit accounts. Cash deposits of the Charter School are held by banks qualified as public depositories

under Florida law. All such deposits are insured by Federal depository insurance, up to specified limits, or

collateralized with securities held in Florida’s multiple financial institution collateral pool required by Chapter 280,

Florida Statutes. For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Charter School considers all unrestricted and

restricted highly liquid investments, such as money market accounts, to be cash equivalents.

Capital Assets: The Charter School uses the policies of the College for capitalization and depreciation. The Charter

School has a capitalization threshold of $5,000 for tangible personal property and $25,000 for improvements other

than buildings. All capital assets are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. A

useful life of 5 years is being used for equipment.

Net Assets: When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available to fund certain programs or expenses, it

is the Charter School’s policy to first apply restricted resources to such programs or expenses followed by the use

of the unrestricted resources.

Revenue Sources: Revenue for current operations is received primarily from The School Board of Manatee County,

Florida pursuant to the funding provisions included in the Charter. In accordance with the funding provisions of the

Charter and Section 1002.33(18) (b), Florida Statutes, the Charter School reports its student enrollment to the

Sponsor. State appropriations and grant funding are classified as non-operating revenue.

Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

73





6

NOTE B – CAPITAL ASSETS

Capital asset activity for the month ended August 31, 2012, was as follows:

Beginning Ending

Balance Additions Deletions Balance

Capital assets, being depreciated

Equipment 181,844.16$ 6,244.05$ -$ 188,088.21$

Total capital assets being depreciated 181,844.16 6,244.05 - 188,088.21

Less accumulated depreciation for

Equipment 18,184.70 - - 18,184.70

Total accumulated depreciation 18,184.70 - - 18,184.70

Capital assets, net 163,659.46$ 6,244.05$ -$ 169,903.51$

Depreciation is booked at the end of the fiscal year, depreciation expense for the year ended June 30, 2012, was

$18,184.70.

NOTE C – COMPENSATED ABSENCES

Charter School employees may accrue vacation and sick leave based on length of service, subject to certain limitations regarding the amount that will be paid upon termination. The Charter School reports a liability for the accrued leave; however, State appropriations fund only the portion of accrued leave that is used or paid in the current fiscal year. Although the Charter School expects the liability to be funded primarily from future appropriations, generally accepted accounting principles do not permit the recording of a receivable in anticipation of future appropriations. Compensated absences are booked at the end of the fiscal year. At June 30, 2012, the estimated liability for compensated absences, which includes the Charter School’s share of the Florida Retirement System and FICA contributions, totaled $27,401.19. Of this amount, $2,107.79 is estimated to be paid in fiscal year 2012/2013. NOTE D – STATE RETIREMENT PROGRAMS

Florida Retirement System Most employees working in regularly established positions of the College, including the Charter School, are eligible to enroll as members of the state-administered Florida Retirement System (FRS). Provisions are established by Chapters 121 and 122, Florida Statutes; Chapter 112, part IV, Florida Statutes; Chapter 238, Florida Statutes; and Florida Retirement Systems Rules, Chapter 60S, Florida Administrative Code; wherein eligibility, contributions, and benefits are defined and described in detail. FRS is a single retirement system administered by the Department of Management Services, Division of Retirement, and consists of two cost-sharing multiple-employer retirement plans and other nonintegrated programs. These include a defined benefit pension plan (Plan), a Deferred

74





7

Retirement Option Program (DROP), and a defined contribution plan, referred to as the Public Employee Optional Retirement Program (PEORP). Employees in the Plan vest at eight years of service. All vested members are eligible for normal retirement benefits at age 62 or at any age after 30 years of service, which may include up to 4 years of credit for military service. The Plan also includes an early retirement provision; however, there is a benefit reduction for each year a member retires before his or her normal retirement date. The Plan provides retirement, disability and death benefits, and annual cost-of living adjustments. DROP, subject to provisions of Section 121.091, Florida Statutes, permits employees eligible for normal retirement under the Plan to defer receipt of monthly benefit payments while continuing employment with an FRS employer. An employee may participate in DROP for a period not to exceed 60 months after electing to participate. During the period of DROP participation, deferred monthly benefits are held in the FRS Trust Fund and accrue interest. As provided in Section 121.4501, Florida Statutes, eligible FRS members may elect to participate in the PEORP in lieu of the FRS defined benefit plan. Employees already participating in the State College System Optional Retirement Program or the DROP are not eligible to participate in this program. Employer contributions are defined by law, but the ultimate benefit depends in part on the performance of investment funds. The PEORP is funded by employer contributions that are based on salary and membership class. Contributions are directed to individual member accounts, and the individual members are allocated contributions and account balances among various approved investment choices. Employees in PEORP vest at one year of service. There were no Charter School employees participating in the PEORP for the month ended August 31, 2012 The State of Florida establishes contribution rates for participating employers. Contribution rates effective July 1, 2012, are presented in the following table:

Class or Plan Percent of Gross SalaryEmployee Employer

(A)

Florida Retirement System, Regular 3.00 5.18Florida Retirement System, Senior Management Service 3.00 6.30Deferred Retirement Option Program - Applicable to Members from All of the Above Classes or Plan 0.00 5.44Florida Retirement System, Reemployed Retiree (B) (B)

Notes: (A)

(B)

Employer rates include 1.11 percent for the postemployment health insurance

subsidy. Also, employer rates, other than for DROP participants, include .03

percent for administrative costs of the Public Employee Optional Retirement

Program.Contribution rates are dependent upon retirement class or plan in which

reemployed.

The Charter School’s liability for participation in the Plan is limited to the payment of the required contributions at

the rates and frequencies established by law on future payrolls of the Charter School. The Charter School’s

contributions to the Plan for the month ended August 31, 2012, were $1,630.54

75





8

Financial statements and other supplementary information of the FRS are included in the state’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, which may be obtained by contacting the State of Florida, Department of Financial Services in Tallahassee, Florida. Also, an annual report on the FRS, which includes its financial statements, required supplementary information, actuarial report, and other relevant information, may be obtained from the State of Florida, Department of Management Services, Division of Retirement in Tallahassee, Florida. State College System Optional Retirement Program Section 1012.875, Florida Statutes, provides for an Optional Retirement Program (Program) for eligible instructors and administrators of the College, including the Charter School. The Program is designed to aid colleges in recruiting employees by offering more portability to employees not expected to remain in the FRS for six or more years. The Program is a defined contribution plan, which provides full and immediate vesting of all contributions submitted to the participating companies on behalf of the participant. Employees in eligible positions can make an irrevocable election to participate in the Program, rather than the FRS, and purchase retirement and death benefits through contracts provided by certain insurance carriers. The College contributes, on behalf of the participant, 10.43 percent of the participant’s salary, less a small amount used to cover administrative costs. The remaining contribution is invested in the company or companies selected by the participant to create a fund for the purchase of annuities at retirement. The participant may contribute, by payroll deduction, an amount not to exceed the percentage contributed by the college to the participant’s annuity account. The Charter School made no contributions to the Plan for the month ended August 31, 2012.

NOTE E – OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS The College, including the Charter School, follows Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 45, Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Post-employment Benefits Other Than Pensions, for certain other post-employment healthcare and life insurance benefits provided by the Florida College System Risk Management Consortium (Consortium). Plan Description: The Charter School contributes to an agent multiple-employer defined-benefit plan administered by the Consortium. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 112.0801, Florida Statutes, former employees who retire from the Charter School are eligible to participate in the College’s healthcare and life insurance benefits. The Charter School subsidizes the premium rates paid by retirees by allowing them to participate in the plan at reduced or blended group (implicitly subsidized) premium rates for both active and retired employees. These rates provide an implicit subsidy for retirees because, on an actuarial basis, their current and future claims are expected to result in higher costs to the plans on average than those of active employees. The Charter School does not offer any explicit subsidies for retiree coverage. Retirees are required to enroll in the Federal Medicare program for their primary health coverage as soon as they are eligible. Neither the Charter School nor the Consortium issue a stand-alone annual report for the plan and the plan is not included in the annual report of a public employees’ retirement system or another entity. Funding Policy: Plan benefits are pursuant to the provisions of Section 112.0801, Florida Statutes. The Board of Trustees for the College can amend the benefits and contribution rates. The Charter School has not advance- funded or established a funding methodology for the annual other post-employment benefit (OPEB) costs or the net OPEB obligation, and the plans are financed on a pay-as-you-go basis. For the 2011-12 fiscal year, there were no retirees of the Charter School receiving post-employment healthcare or life insurance benefits.

76





9

Annual OPEB Cost and Net OPEB Obligation: Annual OPEB cost (expense) is calculated based on the annual required contribution (ARC), an amount actuarially determined in accordance with the parameters of Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 45. The ARC represents a level of funding that if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover normal cost each year and amortize any unfunded actuarial liabilities over a period not to exceed 30 years.

NOTE F – FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF EXPENSES Operating expenses on the statement of revenues, expenses, and changes in net assets are presented in the natural classifications. Presented below are those same expenses shown in functional classification as recommended by the National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO). The functional classification is assigned to a department based on the nature of the activity, which represents the material portion of the activity attributable to the department. Functional classification of expenses for the month ended August 31, 2012, are summarized in the following table:

Functional Classification Amount

Instruction 175,531.68$

Academic support 5,970.07

Institutional support 30,506.91

Total operating expenses 212,008.66$

NOTE G – Risk Management Programs

The College is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts, theft of, damage to, and destruction of assets; errors

and omissions, injuries to employees, and natural disasters. The College provided coverage for these risks

primarily through the Florida College System Risk Management Consortium (Consortium), which was created

under authority of Section 1001.64(27), Florida Statutes, by the boards of trustees of the Florida public colleges for

the purpose of joining a cooperative effort to develop, implement, and participate in a coordinated Statewide

College Risk Management Program: The Consortium is self-sustaining through member assessments (premiums)

and is reinsured through commercial companies for claims in excess of specified amounts. Insurance coverage

obtained through the Consortium included health, life, fire and extended property, general and automobile

liability, workers’ compensation, and other liability coverage. Settled claims resulting from these risks have not

exceeded coverage during this fiscal year. The Charter School, as part of the College, is covered under the

Consortium’s plan.

77





10

NOTE H – Litigation

The College is involved in several pending and threatened legal actions. The range of potential loss from all such

claims and actions, as estimated by the College’s legal counsel, should not materially affect the Charter School’s

financial position.

NOTE I – Transportation

The Charter School has an agreement with the School Board of Manatee County, Florida to provide transportation

services to students. The Charter School made no payments to the School Board of Manatee County, Florida for

the month ended August 31, 2012.

NOTE J – Related Parties

The College’s Unexpended Plant Fund is being used to remodel and renovate an existing College classroom

building to be used by the Charter School. In addition, the College’s Auxiliary Fund is being used to supplement

funds for the initial start-up costs and operation of the Charter School, until such time as it becomes self-

supporting. It is the intention of the College to formalize a pay-back plan and/or lease arrangement once the

Charter School is well established. Currently, there is no formal plan in place. For the month ended August 31,

2012 the College did not provide funds for the Charter School. Auxiliary Fund transfers are as follows:

Fiscal Year Amount

2009-10 78,867.51$

2010-11 327,228.22

2011-12 337,213.74

Total Transfers 743,309.47$

78

79

hugginn

Typewritten Text

Exhibit K

district board of trustees - state college of florida ... district board of trustees of ... budget...

Documents