dimensions of argumentation in social media ekaw2012 2012 10 11

41
Copyright 2011 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie Enabling Networked Knowledge Dimensions of Argumentation in Social Media Jodi Schneider 1 , Brian Davis 1 , and Adam Wyner 2 1 Digital Enterprise Research Institute, NUI Galway 2 Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool Ireland Thursday 11 th 1

Upload: jodischneider

Post on 11-May-2015

640 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Paper presentation for EKAW 2012, The 18th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Position paper with Brian Davis and Adam Wyner: http://jodischneider.com/pubs/ekaw2012.pdf Conference website: http://ekaw2012.ekaw.org/ Abstract: Mining social media for opinions is important to governments and businesses. Current approaches focus on sentiment and opinion detection. Yet, people also justify their views, giving arguments. Understanding arguments in social media would yield richer knowledge about the views of individuals and collectives. Extracting arguments from social media is difficult. Messages appear to lack indicators for argument, document structure, or inter-document relationships. In social media, lexical variety, alternative spellings, multiple languages, and alternative punctuation are common. Social media also encompasses numerous genres. These aspects can confound the extraction of well-formed knowledge bases of argument. We chart out the various aspects in order to isolate them for further analysis and processing.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Copyright 2011 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved.

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Dimensions of Argumentation in Social Media

Jodi Schneider1, Brian Davis1, and Adam Wyner2

1Digital Enterprise Research Institute, NUI Galway2Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool

EKAW, Galway, Ireland Thursday 11 th October 2012

1

Page 2: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Want to reuse social media data

Growing amount of social media data Want to reuse data Need to analyse & structure it

Page 3: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Key Point

The overall popularity of an opinion is not as important as the reasons supporting it

Image: http://www.nickmilton.com/2012/03/when-people-trust-crowds.html

Page 4: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Arguments

Claim: Jaffa Cakes are cakesJustification: official EU ruling; cakes go hard when

stale

4

https://twitter.com/robeastaway/status/135838892694839296

Page 5: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Arguments

5

Claim: If Canon does not make the repair, you should take them to small claims court.

Justification: it’s easy, cheap, and can be done online; it’s within your rights

Page 6: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Knowledge bases of social media

Growing amount of social media data Want to reuse data Need to analyse & structure it

Envision:Knowledge bases of social media Query Make a representation we can reason with

– even in the face of inconsistency.

Page 7: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Oops!

People disagree Inconsistency is bad for knowledge bases! How do we reconcile & resolve the inconsistencies?

Page 8: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Argumentation to the Rescue!

People disagree Inconsistency is bad for knowledge bases! How do we reconcile & resolve the inconsistencies?

Argumentation! Claims Justifications Contrary Claims & Disagreements…

Page 9: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Formal Representations

Argumentation Frameworks

Variety of Semantics – can be used to choose best options

Page 10: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Calculate best options (non-contradictory opinions)

10

Wyner, van Engers, & Bahreini. From Policy-making Statements to First-order Logic. EGOV 2010

Page 11: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Formal Representations

Argumentation Schemes Appeal to Expert Opinion Appeal to Popular Opinion From Analogy Slippery Slope ....

Indicate Relevant “Critical Questions” for a discussion Patterns for Information Extraction (SWAIE 2012)

Page 12: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

John Danaher, http://philosophicaldisquisitions.blogspot.ie/2010/03/argumentation-schemes-part-1.html

Page 13: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Goal

Extract arguments from text. Reconstruct argumentation into formal

representations. Make a representation that we can reason with even

in the face of inconsistency.

Page 14: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

How to automate?

What aspects of social media are relevant to extracting and representing argumentation?

Page 15: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Dimensions of (Argumentative) Expression

Genre Metadata Properties of users Goals of a particular dialogue Context Informal language Implicit info Sentiment techniques Subjectivity and objectivity

Page 16: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Genre

16

Page 17: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Metadata

17

Page 18: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Properties of Users

18

Page 19: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Goals

19

Page 20: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Goals of #election2012 tweets?

20

Page 21: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Related Papers

Schneider and Wyner. “Identifying Consumers' Arguments in Text”, SWAIE 2012 at EKAW 2012.

Wyner, Schneider, Atkinson, and Bench-Capon. “Semi-Automated Argumentative Analysis of Online Product Reviews.” In 4th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2012).

Wyner and Schneider. ''Arguing from a point of view'', Agreement Technologies 2012.

October 9, 201221

Page 22: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Acknowledgments

Project Funding Science Foundation Ireland Grant No. SFI/08/CE/I1380 (Líon-2) Short-term scientific mission (STSM 1868) from the COST Action

ICO801 on Agreement Technologies FP7-ICT-2009-4 Programme, IMPACT Project, Grant Agreement

Number 247228

22

Page 23: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Thanks!

Questions? Contacts:

Jodi Schneider [email protected]@jschneider

Brian Davis [email protected] Adam Wyner [email protected]

Page 24: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Copyright 2011 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved.

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Examples of Arguments in Social Media

24

Page 25: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

25

Page 26: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Arguments

Claim: Jaffa Cakes are cakesJustification: official EU ruling; cakes go hard when

stale

26

https://twitter.com/robeastaway/status/135838892694839296

Page 27: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

27http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Heath_Totten

Page 28: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Arguments

Claim: does not merit an articleJustification: hasn’t played

since 2008, mediocre record

28

Page 29: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

29

Page 30: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

30

http://www.amazon.co.uk/review/R34F9M7871K2W0/ref=cm_cr_rev_detmd_pl?ie=UTF8&asin=B004M8S152&cdForum=FxM7A99WYT0UJ9&cdMsgID=Mx35ZEPGH4SV7JK&cdMsgNo=1&cdPage=1&cdSort=oldest&cdThread=Tx1C124R97075W9&store=photo#Mx35ZEPGH4SV7JK

Page 31: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Arguments

31

Claim: If Canon does not make the repair, you should take them to small claims court.

Justification: it’s easy, cheap, and can be done online; it’s within your rights

Page 32: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

http://www.vangrondelle.com/2010/10/ekaw-2010/

Page 33: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Arguments

33

Claim: The in-use paper category is important. Justification: Provides a platform for research scaling up

to enterprise scale.

Page 34: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Copyright 2011 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved.

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge34

etc

Page 35: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge35

Using Argumentation

Mark & help resolve inconsistencies Provide justifications & explanations

Page 36: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Formalism: Abstract argumentation frameworks

AF = hA; attacki, where A is a set of arguments and attack a binary relation on A.

A variety of semantics are available to evaluate the arguments.

Page 37: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Formalism: argumentation schemes

Presumptive patterns of reasoning

Position To Know 1. Ms. Peters is in a position to know whether Mr. Jones was at

the party. 2. Ms. Peters asserts that Mr. Jones was at the party. 3. Therefore, presumptively, Mr. Jones was at the party.

Page 38: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Key Point

The overall popularity of an opinion is not as important as the reasons supporting it

Image: http://www.nickmilton.com/2012/03/when-people-trust-crowds.html

Page 39: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Key Point

overwhelming numbers of people may not matter

Photograph DAVID GILES/PA NEWS WIRE/AP PHOTO - February 7, 2011 New Yorker via http://www.vincentskeltis.com/blog/2011/2/7/crowd-crush.html

Page 40: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge

Key Point

as much as a particular reason against it

http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/crowd-crush-mars-jls-no1-431245

Page 41: Dimensions of argumentation in social media EKAW2012 2012 10 11

Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

Enabling Networked Knowledge