developing social equality and economic …...the widening gap between lat. am. countries and...
TRANSCRIPT
Developing social equality and economic transparency for future cities Dr Claudia Murray School of Real Estate & Planning, University of Reading
Research seminar series: research context A report from the Government Equalities Office found that wealth inequality
in the UK has increased since the 1980‘s (Hills, et a., 2010) while a report by the
Economic Commission for Latin America, revealed that the region is the most
unequal in the world (González and Martner, 2012). Inequality materialises in the
consumer society but is more evident when it affects human needs, such as food
and shelter. In the UK, increase wealth and international migration has affected
land prices, putting a strain in the affordability of housing (Nygaard, 2010). In Lat.
Am., rural to urban migration and a housing deficit of 50 million units has also
affected the market (UN-Habitat, 2011). The city is indeed triumphal for a few:
while London is one of the world’s playgrounds for the global elite (Glaser, 2011),
Mexico City is home to Carlos Slim, the richest man on earth (Harvey, 2012). In
comparing urban environments in the UK and Lat. Am. there are the obvious
differences not only in geographical scale and volume of human traffic, but also
the intensity of the urban struggle as at the bottom of the pyramid the battle for
Lat. Ams. is many times for survival (Tironi, 2009). Notwithstanding, the resulting
urban inequality manifest with striking similarities in both contexts. Compare
the London riots in the summer of 2011 with those in Buenos Aires during the
summer of 2012 or those currently taking place in Brazil and Chile.
Unlike the UK social and economic issues in Lat. Am. have long suffered from
poor institutions and weak governments (Montaner, 2002). In addition, an
inefficient tax collection system poses an insurmountable barrier for local
governments to develop a welfare system (Benardi et. al., 2007). Accoring to the
International Labour Organisation (ILO) there are 127 million people working in
the informal sector in Lat. Am. This is nearly 50% of the population with no job
security an no taxation. In addition to this large sector, colonial style clientelism
and elitism means that most rich families manage to receive tax exemptions
from government officials. This places the burden in the poorest sector of the
population as value added tax is the main source of government income (Harvey,
2012). Policymakers, academics and experts are increasingly concerned over
the widening gap between Lat. Am. countries and developed economies such as
the UK. Some claim that globalisation is mostly to blame (Chomsky, 2010) while
others maintain that the problem of inequality is not related to recent changes
in globalisation but rather rooted in the regions’ own missed opportunities and
wrong turnings in history (Fukuyama, 2008). The main question for Fukuyama
We are grateful for the participation and support of the following institutions:
Developing social equality and economic transparency for future cities | Dr Claudia Murray
is why other countries in East Asia (Taiwan/South Korea) are closing the gap
with the developed world and Lat. Am. cannot? Responding to this question
Fukuyama mentions, among other factors, the neglect of economic inequality
that so far many governments in the region have shown, and lack of property
rights. The later, he claims, hinders long term investment; the very basis of urban
development and economic growth.
Peruvian economist Hernando de Soto also argues that lack of property rights
affects Lat. Am’s poor as they are unable to use their property as collateral and
become entrepreneurs (2001). His views have been challenged by academics
(Samuelson, 2001; Gilbert, 2002; Frankema, 2006) but followed and praised by
politicians (Clift, 2003). Following de Soto, many cities have taken a proactive
attitude towards regularising land titles for squatters. The Municipality of São
Paulo, for example, holds the view that regulating land rights to the poor will
also help the environment as urban services (sewage, waste collection, water, etc.)
can be brought into informal developments. Their view is that the investment
in infrastructure is recovered by the payment of services by the beneficiaries
(Boldarini, 2008, Sehab, 2011).
So while academic debate dwells over the benefit of globalisation in Lat. Am.
(Chomsky and Fukuyama), or over the benefits of regularisation of informal
settlements (de Soto and Gilbert), the reality is that Lat. American governments
are immersed in the task of bulldozing informal developments (along with their
communities) and replacing them with new housing blocks that are not often of
best or even adequate standard (Murray, 2013). Some argue the time for debate is
over and what is needed is action to solve the problem, as a practitioner recently
put it in an urban design workshop in Rio de Janeiro: “you cannot change the
tyre while riding the bike” (quoted in Nicholson, 2013). In other words, while the
argument unfolds, urban development in the region will keep expanding.
This is inevitable, cities produce 50% of gross domestic product that manifests
in increasing competition to attract development and RE investment (World
Bank, 2013). Still, parallel growth in inequality suggests that this expansion is
not benefiting all citizens (Lima, 2006). Urban sprawl has been directly related
to social fragmentation as well as to environmental disasters, and yet urban
planning systems in Lat. Am. have not responded to this combined problem
(Romero and Ordenes, 2004). Furthermore, there is a lack of relation between
planning, regional geographies, climates and cultural habits which is directly
affecting urban air quality (Romero et al, 1999). The main question is how to solve
these problems? Are methodologies used in the developed world transferable
to areas of rapid urbanisation (Jenks and Bugess, 2000, de la Torre et. al, 2009)?
There are several who outline the difficulties in adapting advanced methods
to the region. For example social fragmentation manifests not only in the
development of gated neighbourhoods but also in the widespread use of private
cars (Onursal and Gautam, 1997). So how to curb the carbon emission and bring
sustainable transport without addressing this refusal to mingle with others?
Another matter is whether Lat. Am. has the technology to develop greener urban
environments, some claim this is unrealistic (Lankao, 2007). Furthermore, what
financial mechanisms emerging markets have to adopt strategies employed
in the developed world (Satterthwaite, 2007)? In this context how can Lat. Am.
cities secure the provision of social housing with an inefficient tax collection
that historically constrained the welfare system (Montaner, 2002, Bird, 2003,
Benardi et. al., 2007, Harvey, 2012)? There are also critical questions regarding the
implementation of sustainable planning systems and the lack of power of local
authorities over certain elites (Bulkely and Betsill, 2005). Equally, in a divided
society the politics of planning encounter daily confrontations from lower income
sectors that see no benefit in strong neoliberal approaches that aim at attracting
private and foreign investment (Burgess et al. 1997).
The proposed seminar series will address these questions. Simultaneously it will
engage users (governments, policymakers and practitioners) in finding relevant
sustainable drivers that can be used to design practical tools to best guide ongoing
urban transformations and keep economic growth. In the past, the so called
import substitution industrialisation, which was supposed to help the region
closing the developing gap, generated a culture of poor quality products and bad
service for consumers (Macario, 1964). The necessity to keep riding the bicycle to
reach a forecasted GDP should not be this time an excuse to deliver poor quality
urban environments. The research seminars will therefore evaluate current
theories of sustainable development in planning policy, architecture, housing and
real estate valuations and investment, to evaluate their adaptability to Lat. Am.
The interaction with the UK, a country that despite its own mistakes and
shortcomings has a wider experience in developing design quality indicators,
affordable housing, securing property rights and implementing more
sophisticated and transparent mechanisms for long term real estate investment,
will be beneficial to Lat. Am. Simultaneously it will encourage UK academics
and practitioners to evaluate their own system by receiving comments and
criticism from a region that experiences higher levels of urban inequality and can
therefore better explain its dangers. It is timely and necessary for the UK and for
Lat. Am to change or patch the urban development wheel while at the same time
keep exploring new ways of addressing economic and social inequality, whatever
the intensity or degree of the problem that each region faces at home.
Developing social equality and economic transparency for future cities | Dr Claudia Murray
BibliographyBernardi, L., Barreix, A., Marenzi, A., Profeta, P. (2007) “Tax Systems and Tax Reforms in
Latin America” Societá Italiana di Economía Pública, Working paper 591.
Bird, R. (2003) “Taxation in Latin America: Reflections on Sustainability and the Balance
Between Equity and Efficiency” Bakcground paper for World Bank Study on Inequality and
the State in Latin America and the Caribbean. SSRN paper 1393962
Boldarini Arquitetura e Urbanismo (ed) (2008) Urbanização de Favelas. A Experiência de São
Paulo. São Paulo. Prefeitura de São Paulo. Habitação.
Bulkeley, H. and Betsill, M. (2005) “Rethinking Sustainable Cities: Multilevel Governance
and the “Urban” Politics of Climate Change” Environmental Politics, 14, 1, pp. 42-63.
Burgess, R., Carmona, M. and Kolstee, T. (1997) The Challenge of Sustainable Cities:
Neoliberalism and Urban Strategies in Developing Countries. London Zed Books.
Chomsky, N. (2010) Hopes and Prospects. London, Hamish Hamilton.
Clift, J. (2003) “Hearing the Dogs Bark. Jeremy Clift Interviews Development Guru
Hernando de Soto” IMF Papers, Finance & Development, available at http://www.imf.org/
external/pubs/ft/fandd/2003/12/pdf/people.pdf
de la Torre, A., Fajnzylber, P. and Nash, J. (2009) Low Carbon, High Growth: Latin American
responses to Climate Change. An Overview. Washington, The World Bank.
de Soto, H. (2001) The Mystery of Capital. Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails
Everywhere Else. London, Black Swan. First published 2000.
Frankema, E.H. P (2006) “The Colonial Roots of Latin American Land Inequality in a Global
Comparative Perspective: Factor Endowments, Institutions or Political Economy? Paper
of the Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen, available at
http://www.econ.ucdavis.edu/seminars/papers/186/1861.pdf
Fuluyama, F. (2008) Falling Behind. Explaining the Development Gap Between Latin
America and the United States. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Gilbert, A. (2002) “On The Mistery of Capital and the Myths of Hernando de Soto: What
Difference does Legal Title Make?” International Development Planning Review, 24, 1, pp.
1-20.
Glazer, E. (2011) The Triumph of the City. London, Macmillan.
González, I. Martner, R. (2012) “Superando el “Síndrome del Casillero Vacío” Determinantes
de la Distribución del Ingreso en América Latina”, Revista CEPAL, 108, pp. 7-25.
Harvey, D. (2012) Rebel Cities. From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London,
Verso.
Hills, J., Brewer, M., Jenkins, S., et. al. (2010) An Anatomy of Economic Inequality in the UK.
Government Equalities Office, London.
Jenks, M. and Burgess, R. eds. (2000) Compact Cities: Sustainable Urban Forms for
Developing Countries. London, Spon Press.
Lankao, P. (2007) “Are We Missing the Point? Particularities of Urbanisation, Sustainability
and Carbon Emissions in Latin American Cities” Environment & Urbanisation, 19, 1, pp.
159-175.
Lima, J. (2006) “Urban Reform and development Regulation: The Case of Belem, Brazil” in
Zetter, R. and Butina Watson, G. eds. Designing Sustainable Cities in the Developing World.
Hampshire, Ashgate.
Developing social equality and economic transparency for future cities | Dr Claudia Murray
Macario, S (1964) “Protectionism and Industrialization in Latin America.” Economic Bulletin
for Latin America 9, pp. 61-101.
Montaner, C. (2001) Las Raíces Torcidas de América Latina. Barcelona, Plaza Janés.
Murray, C. (2013) “Social Housing in Latin America: Red Road Flats of Tomorow?” Academy
of Urbanism Journal, in print.
Nicholson, R. (2013) Minha Casa Minha Vida. Unpublished Report from Workshops,
December 2012.
Nygaard, C. (2011) “International Migration, Housing Demand and Access to Home
Ownership”, Urban Studies, 48, 11, pp. 2211-2229.
Onusal, B. and Gautam, S. (1997) “Vehicular Air Pollution. Experiences from Seven Latin
American Urban Centres” World Bank Technical paper 373.
Romero, H., et. al. (1999) “Rapid Urban Growth, Land-use Changes and Air Pollution in
Santiago, Chile. Atmospheric Environment, 33, 24/25, pp. 4039-4047.
Romero, H. and Ordenes, F. (2004) “Emerging Urbanisation in the Southern Andes.
Environmental Impacts of Urban Sprawl in Santiago de Chile on the Andean Piedmont.”
Mountain Research and Development, 24,3, pp. 197-201.
Sacks, J. (2006) “The Challenge of Sustainable Development in Latin America” Lecture Series
of the Americas, Transcript. Organisation of American States, Washington. March 14.
Samuelson, R. (2001) “The Spirit of Capitalism,” Foreign Affairs, 80, 1, pp. 205-211
Satterthwaite, D. et al (2007) Adapting to Climate Change in Urban Areas. The Possibilities
and Constrains in Low-and-Middle-Income Nations. International Institute for Environment
and Development. Human Settlements Discussion Paper series.
Secretaria de Habitação (Sehab) (2011) Plano Municipal de Habitação Social de Sao Paulo
2009-2024. Sao Paulo: Prefeitura da Cidade de Sao Paulo.
UN-Habitat (2011) Affordable Land and Housing in Latin America and the Caribbean.
World Bank, (2013) Planning Connecting and Financing. Cities-Now. Priorities for City
Leaders. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. The World Bank.
Tironi, M. (2009) “The Lost Community? Public Housing and Social Capital in Santiago de
Chile, 1985 - 2001” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33, 4, pp. 974- 996.
Developing social equality and economic transparency for future cities | Dr Claudia Murray