chomsky grammar

16
GRAMMAR

Upload: jurgeastra

Post on 18-Apr-2015

123 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

N. Chomsky: Grammar Theories

TRANSCRIPT

Page 2: Chomsky Grammar

THE AIM

• To present the approach to the study of syntax taken in traditional and universal grammar as developed by N. Chomsky.

Page 3: Chomsky Grammar

THE OBJECTIVES

• To define the key terms pertaining to grammatical terminology;

• To discuss the peculiarities of traditional grammar;

• To consider the study of Universal Grammar developed by Noam Chomsky.

Page 4: Chomsky Grammar

CONTENTS

• Definitions concerned with the study of grammar;

• The syntactic analysis in the framework of traditional grammar;

• The approach to syntax within the theory of Universal Grammar.

Page 5: Chomsky Grammar

DEFINITIONS

• Grammar – any systematic account of the structure of a

language (Matthews 2005, 150).

• Morphology - the study of how words are formed out of

smaller units (Radford 2005, 1).

• Syntax – the study of the way in which phrases and sentences

are structured out of words (ibid.).

Page 6: Chomsky Grammar

TRADITIONAL GRAMMAR

• The syntax of language is described in terms of a taxonomy of the range of different types of syntactic structures found in language.

• Phrases and sentences are built up of a series of constituents each of which belongs to a specific grammatical category and serves a specific grammatical function.

• The tasks of a linguist:

to identify each of the constituents in the sentence;

to determine what category it belongs to;

to define what function it serves.

Page 7: Chomsky Grammar

GRAMMATCAL CATEGORIES

• Words are assigned to grammatical categories called parts of speech on the basis of:

semantic properties (i.e. meaning);

morphological properties (i.e. the range if different forms they have) ;

syntactic properties (i.e. word-order properties relating to the positions they can occupy within sentences).

Page 8: Chomsky Grammar

GRAMMATICAL FUNCTIONS

• Subject – a syntactic element which is traditionally seen as representing someone or something of which something is said or predicated (Matthews 2005, 358).

• Predicate – a part of the clause or sentence traditionally seen as representing what is said of, or predicated of, the subject (Matthews 2005, 291).

• Complement – a syntactic element seen as completing the construction of another element (Matthews 2005, 63).

• Adjunct – any element in the structure of a clause which is not part of its nucleus or core (Matthews 2005, 8).

Page 9: Chomsky Grammar

UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR

• In contrast to the taxonomic approach Noam Chomsky takes a cognitive approach to the study of grammar.

• Native speakers have grammatical competence or tacit knowledge of the grammar of their language, i.e. of how to form and interpret words, phrases and sentences in the language.

• The study of grammar - a study of a cognitive internalised linguistic system within the brain of a native speaker.

• The ultimate goal - a theory of Universal Grammar/UG, i.e. the theory of human I-languages that identifies the I-languages that are humanly accessible under normal conditions (Radford 1995, 8)

Page 10: Chomsky Grammar

THE LANGUAGE FACULTY

•A theory of language acquisition is concerned with the question of how children acquire grammars of their native language. •Innateness hypothesis – the course of language acquisition

is determined by the innate language faculty.

(Radford 1995, 11)

Experience of Language

Language Faculty

Grammar of

Language

Page 11: Chomsky Grammar

PARAMETRIC VARIATION

• The language faculty incorporates a set of universal principles which guide the child in acquiring grammar.

• Language acquisition involves not only lexical learning but also grammatical.

• The grammatical learning is limited to those parameters of grammar which are subject to language-particular variation and hence vary from one language to another.

• The syntactic learning task which children face involves parameter-setting – i.e. determining which of two possible settings is the appropriate one for each parameter in the language being acquired.

Page 12: Chomsky Grammar

TWO TYPES OF EVIDENCE

Evidence used to set parameters

POSITIVE EVIDENCE

NEGATIVE EVIDENCE

DIRECT NEGATIVE EVIDENCE

INDIRECT NEGATIVEEVIDENCE

Page 13: Chomsky Grammar

CONCLUSIONS (1)

• The traditional grammar could be defined as taxonomic system in which the syntax of language is essentially described in terms of a list of phrase, clause and sentence types found in the language.

• Noam Chomsky applies the cognitive approach to the study of grammar. Thus, the study of language could be understood as the study of cognition.

• According to Chomsky, native speakers have grammatical competence in their native language that is internalised within the brain of the native speaker.

Page 14: Chomsky Grammar

CONCLUSIONS (2)

• The attempt to uncover the internalised linguistic system led to the theory of Universal Grammar - universal, explanatory and constrained system which provides descriptively adequate grammars which are minimally complex and hence learnable.

• Language faculty incorporates a set of universal principles which guide the child in acquiring grammar. However, there are also language-particular aspects of grammar that children have to learn.

• The grammatical learning is limited to those parameters of grammar which are subject to language-particular variation and hence vary from one language to another.

• The syntactic learning task which children face involves parameter-setting with the help of certain type of evidence.

Page 15: Chomsky Grammar

REFERENCES

•  Matthews, P.H. (2005). Concise Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

• Radford, A. (2005). Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Page 16: Chomsky Grammar

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION