design and build
DESCRIPTION
Problems can be found in using design and build as a cintract procurement.TRANSCRIPT
A SURVEY ON PROBLEM FACED BY CONTRACTORS USING DESIGN & BUILD CONTRACT
NURHAJAR BT ABD RAHMAN
A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the
Requirements for the award of the degree of
Bachelor of Civil Engineering
Faculty of Civil Engineering & Earth Recources
University Malaysia Pahang
NOVEMBER 2009
“I hereby declare that I have read this thesis through this project report and in my
opinion this thesis is sufficient in terms of scope and quality in fulfillment of the
requirement for the award of the degree of Bachelor of Civil Engineering”
Signature : ....................................................
Name of Supervisor : MR. ZAHRIZAN BIN ZAKARIA
Date : …………………………………
ii
I declare that this thesis entitled “A SURVEY ON PROBLEM FACED BY
CONTRACTORS USING DESIGN & BUILD CONTRACT” is the result of my own
research except as cited in the references. The thesis has not been accepted for any
degree and is not concurrently submitted in candidature of any other degree.
Signature : ....................................................
Name : NURHAJAR BT ABD RAHMAN
Date : …………………………………
iii
“Almighty Allah, please give blessing to them...
My beloved parent Bok &Ma,
My brothers, my sisters,
My twin,
My bee,
My Lecturers,
My friends and to all Muslims...
Thanks for support….this is for us”
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Bismillahirahmanirahim...first of all, I praise and glory to Allah S.W.T, God of
all creation and greetings and salutations we bring forth to our Prophet Muhammad
S.A.W for supervision this final year project one and constantly guiding this project
towards completion.
I’m as the author of this thesis wishes and express the greatest appreciation to
Mr. Zahrizan bin Zakaria as a supervisor of this final year project. Once, nobody
believes the project will manage successfully, but with his dedication and guidance,
the project is able to complete on time. Special thanks for his for the opportunity given
and for the efforts towards the completion of the project.
I want to express my gratitude to my beloved parents and siblings for the
support given and commitment although indirectly involves in this project, for their
efforts to help me in the completion of this final year project.
I also would like to express my highest appreciation to those who sincerely
without hesitation helped me to make this final year project especially to the UMP
staff and academician, to all respondents who were willing to give good co-operation
because without their help, this study would not possible without them..
Last but not least, to my entire friends, your help and support are really
appreciated and will remember forever, InsyaALLAH. Thank you.
vi
ABSTRAK
Pembinaan Reka dan Bina proses merupakan salah satu bahagian dalam industri pembinaan. Hari ini proses tersebut tumbuh dengan cepat dalam industri tersebut. Reka dan Bina berkembang dengan terkenal, kesemuanya tumbuh dengan pelbagai. Namun begitu, Reka dan Bina tidak terkecuali menghadapi masalah oleh kontraktor dalam industri pembinaan seperti konflikantara kontraktor dan pihak lain (perunding dan pemilik), perunding kurang pengalaman dan masalah komunikasi dan koordinasi oleh kontraktor dan pihak lain.Tujuan utama kajian ini adalah untuk membuat perbandingan antara kontrak reka dan bina dan kontrak mengikut kebiasaan, mengenalpasti masalah-masalah yang biasa dan faktor yang dihadapi oleh kontraktor dan menempatkan masalah biasa dan faktor antara kontraktor. Borang kajiselidik diagihkan sendiri kepada kontraktor (kelas A) berdaftar dengan Pusat Khidmat Kontraktor (PKK), kontraktor gred 7 yang mana berdaftar dengan Lembaga Pembangunan Industri Pembinaan (CIDB) , syarikat bumiputera dan badan kerajaan. Maklumat yang telah dapat dari borang kajiselidik dianalysis menggunakan purata indek dan kekerapan analysis. Keputusan tinjauan menunjukkan lima kategori masalah yang dikenalpasti. Ianya adalah masalah dalam aspek umum, masalah dalam aspek rekabentuk, masalah dalam aspek kewangan, masalah dalam aspek kualiti dan masalah dalam aspek masa.Daripada analysis nilai yang paling tinggi dalam aspek umum adalah konflik antara kontraktor dan pihak lain (perunding dan pemilik).Diikuti dengan aspek kualiti ialah pertukaran pesanan bahan-bahan binaan oleh pemilik semasa pembinaan, masalah dari aspek rekabentuk ialah kesilapan dan perbezaan dalam dokumen rekabentuk, masalah dari aspek kewangan ialah harga semasa untuk projek tinggi dari harga sasaran oleh pemilik dan masalah dari aspek masa ialah kelewatan dalam kerja-kerja permulaan disebabkan oleh kekurangan masa untuk mendapatkan kelulusan yang telah ditetapkan oleh undang-undang. Berdasarkan maklumat yang diperolehi dari borang kajiselidik didapati masalah diantara kontraktor tidak kritikal kerana keseluruhan responden bersetuju dengan masalah tersebur. Akhirnya maklumat yang didapati dapat digunakan oleh badan kerajaan dan kontraktor untuk mengatasi masalah yang dihadapi oleh kontraktor menggunakan kontrak reka dan bina.
v
ABSTRACT
Design and build construction process has been part of the construction industry. Today, the process is growing rapidly in this industry. As it has been grown in popularity, design and build has evolved all manner of hybrids. However, Design and Build also not exclude were faced problem by contractors in the construction industry such as conflicts between contractor and other parties (consultant and owner), Inadequate experience of consultant, problems communication and coordination by contractor with other parties. The aims of the study are to study comparisons between designs & build contract and conventional contract, to identify the common problemsand the factors faced by the contractor and to rank the common problems and the factors among contractors. The questionnaires were distributed to the contractor (Class A) registered with Pusat Khidmat Kontraktor (PKK) , grade 7 contractors which registered with construction industry development board CIDB Bumiputeracompanies and government agencies by hand at Klang Valley. The data from the questionnaire was analyzes in average index and frequency analysis. Result of the survey indicated, five of category problems were identified. There are problem in general aspect, problem in design aspect, problem in financial aspect, problem in quality aspect and problem in time aspect. From the analysis the highest degree of agreement in general aspects is conflicts between contractor and other parties (consultant and owner). It is followed with in quality aspects is change materials order by owner during construction, problem in design aspects is mistakes and discrepancies in design documents, problem in financial aspects is actual price for project higher than owner’s target price and problem in time aspects is delays in commencing work because under-estimated time needed to obtain statutory approvals. Based on the result obtained from questionnaires were identified the problems among contractor are not critical because overall the respondents are agree with that problem. Finally, the information gathered can be used for government sector and contractor to overcome the problem faced by the contractor using design & build contract.
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER TITLE PAGE
TITLE
DECLARATION
DEDICATION
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ABSTRACT
ABSTRAK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Background of Study
1.3 Problem Statement
1.4 Objective
1.5 Scope of Study
1.6 Methodology
1.7 Significant of study
i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
xi
xii
xiii
1
2
5
6
6
7
8
vii
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Definition of contracts
2.3 Contract Elements
2.3.1 The Essence of a Contract
2.3.2 Basic Elements of a Contract
2.4 Types of contracts
2.4.1 Contracts based on pricing/payment criteria
2.4.1.1 Fixed price type of contracts
2.4.1.2 Cost reimbursement types of
Contracts
2.4.2 Contracts based on method of procurement
2.5 Delivery Methods
2.5.1 Conventional / Traditional Contract
2.5.1.1 Role of Owner, Contractor and Design
Professional under a conventional
Contract
2.5.1.2 Advantages
2.5.1.3 Disadvantages
2.5.2 Design and Build Contract
2.5.2.1 Role of the parties under a Design and
Build Contract
2.5.2.2 Advantages
2.5.1.3 Disadvantages
2.6 Contractor
2.7 Common Problem Faced by Contractors
2.8 Summary
3 METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Literature Review
3.3 Interview
3.3.1 Types of Interviews
9
10
10
11
12
13
14
14
17
17
21
21
22
23
25
27
29
33
33
35
35
38
39
40
41
42
viii
3.4 Questionnaires Review
3.4.1 Section A: General Information of the
Respondents
3.4.2 Section B: To identify the Common Problems
And the factors faced by
Contractors and to Rank the Problems
And the factors among Contractors
3.5 Data Analysis
3.5.1 Frequency Analysis
3.5.2 Average Index
4 RESULT & ANALYSIS
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Questionnaire Analysis
4.3 Section A: Analysis General Information of the
Respondents
4.3.1 Position in Company
4.3.2 Company Experiences
4.3.3 Respondents Experience
4.3.4 Types of Project using Design and Build
Project
4.3.5 Types of Design and Design Method
4.4 Section B: Analysis The Common Problems
And the factors faced by
Contractors
4.4.1 Problem in General Aspect
4.4.1 Problem in Quality Aspect
4.4.1 Problem in Design Aspect
4.4.1 Problem in Financial Aspect
4.4.1 Problem in Time Aspect
4.5 Analysis of Rank the Problems
And the factors among Contractors
4.6 Summary
43
44
44
45
46
46
48
49
49
50
50
51
52
53
54
56
57
59
60
62
62
65
ix
5 CONLUSION & RECOMMENDATION
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Conclusion
5.2.1 Objective 1: Study the comparisons between
Design & Build Contract and Conventional
Contract
5.2.2 Objective 2: Identify the common problems
and the factors faced by contractor
5.2.3 Objective 3:Rank the problems and the factors
among contractors
5.3 Recommendation
5.3.1 Recommendation for the study
5.3.2 Recommendation for further studies
REFERENCES
APPENDIXS
66
66
67
67
70
70
71
71
72
74
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NO. TITLE PAGE
2.1 Elements of valid/Enforceable Agreement
2.2 Conventional sequential Arrangements
4.1 Respondents by Position
4.2 Company’s Experience in Construction Industry
4.3 Respondents Experience in Construction Industry
4.4 Types of Project using Design & Build Method
4.5 Types of Design & Build Method
4.6 Rank the Problems among Contractors
13
25
50
51
52
53
54
63
xi
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO. TITLE PAGE
2.1 Definitions of Contract
2.2 The Problem faced by Contractor
3.1 The level of Agreement & Evaluation for Average
Index Analysis
4.1 Percentages of “Respondents Rate”
4.2 The level of Agreement & Evaluation for Average
Index Analysis
4.3 Problem in General Aspect
4.4 Problem in Quality Aspect
4.5 Problem in Design Aspect
4.6 Problem in Financial Aspect
4.7 Problem in Time Aspect
4.8 Percentages of “Rank the Problems
and the factors among Contractors”
5.1 Categories 1: Problem in General Aspect
5.2 Categories 2: Problem in Quality Aspect
5.3 Categories 3: Problem in Design Aspect
5.4 Categories 4: Problem in Financial Aspect
5.5 Categories 5: Problem in Time Aspect
27
36
47
49
55
55
57
59
60
62
63
68
68
68
69
69
xiii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
D & B - Design and Build
CIDB - Construction Development Board Malaysia
PKK - Pusat Khidmat Kontraktor
A.I – Average Index
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
Construction is a process whereby designers’ plans and specifications are
converted into physical structures and facilities. It involves the organization and
coordination of all the resources for the project labour, construction equipment,
permanent and temporary materials, supplies and utilities, money, technology and
methods, and time to complete the project on schedule, within budget, and according
to the standards of quality and performance specified in the contract documents. The
contractors and subcontractors play the key roles at this stage. There are also some
considerable inputs for inspection and interpretation from the architect or engineer.
Supporting roles are played by suppliers of materials and equipment, consultants,
shipping organizations etc. The construction project shall be done perfectly and wisely
in order to achieve the find result, quality product, confined completion period and
minimum cost. But problems always exist along construction process (Abdul Rahman
&Janidah,2006).
2
The successful execution of construction projects and keeping them within estimated
cost and prescribed schedules depend on a methodology that requires sound
engineering judgments. To the dislikes of owners, contractors and consultants,
however, many projects experience extensive delays and thereby exceed initial time
and cost estimates (Abdalla M. Odeh & Hussien T. Battaineh, 2002).
The most important element in construction procurement is the contractor
selection, particularly, hiring contractors who are performers Contractor
prequalification is essential in most construction projects, and the process has been
performed by many different methods in practice. The overall objectives of contractor
selection process is to reduce project risk, maximize overall value to the project
owner, and build the close and long term relationships between members of the
project. Occasionally, projects owners in the public sector put out to tender
constructions projects of buildings, port works, roads, drainage, and waterworks as
well as formation of sites. Contractors play a major role such projects, which is why
contractor selection constitutes a critical decision for projects owners. The selection
process should embrace investigation of contractor’s potential to deliver a service of
acceptable standard, on time, and within budget (Maryam Darvish, Mehrdad Yasaei &
Azita Saeedi, 2008).
1.2 Background of Study
A general contractor is a group or individual that contracts with another
organization or individual (the owner) for the construction or renovation of a building,
road or other structure. After that, contractor also is defined as such if it is the
signatory as the builder of the prime construction contract for the project. They
responsible for the means and methods to be used in the construction execution of the
project in accordance with the documents. Contract documents usually include the
contract agreement including budget, the general and special conditions and the plans
3
and specification of the project that are prepared by a design professional. Then,
contractor usually is responsible for the supplying of all material, labor, equipment,
(engineering vehicles and tools) and services necessary for the construction of the
project. To do this it is common for the general contractor to subcontract part of the
work to other persons and companies that specialize in these types of work. These are
called subcontractors. General contractors conducting work for government agencies
are typically referred to as prime contractors. The responsibilities of a prime
contractors working under a contract are essentially identical to those outlined above.
In many cases, prime contractors will delegate portions of the contract work to
subcontractors. A contractor is someone who enters into a binding agreement to
perform a certain service or provide a certain product in exchange for valuable
consideration, monetary, goods, services, even barter arrangements. In the building
trades, a contractor is one who is engaged in the construction or building related
services for a client. The construction site is overseen by a "Prime”, General, or
Specialty contractor, who may perform the work with employees, subcontractors or
any combination there of (wikipedia, 2001-2006).
A professional contractor should also have an understanding of his or her
limitations. The client works with an architect and financier long before the first
shovel of dirt is removed by a contractor. During the bidding process, a contractor
may have to work with the building's architect to discuss potential problems with a
design element. If the complexities of the building’s design or the potential cost
overruns threaten to overwhelm a contractor's skills, he or she needs to step back and
allow other contractors to win the bid. A good contractor understands that the success
of the project depends on his or her ability to hire the right independent subcontractors
and follow the wishes of the client (Michael Pollick, 2006).
In Malaysia, the last decade has seen most of the construction projects have
been implemented using the traditional procurement method. But in recent years, as
project get more complex which demand greater emphasis on management techniques
and engineering skills, the traditional procurement approach was found not suitable to
the current needs. Design and Build procurement method is an alternative to
traditional method which is rapidly popular in Malaysia, especially in the public
4
sector. Design and Build acclaimed to be beneficial to all parties such as clients,
architect, engineers and contractors (Gwen Flora, 1998).
Design and build method suitable for both public and private clients who want
to control the stipulated overall time for the construction projects. All the operations
are subject to considerable scrutiny and governed by fairly strict procedures especially
in government funded development agencies. However, there are other reasons as to
why the design and build system should be practiced to overcome the uncompleted
projects that occur, which will lead to higher quality in the finished product, more
accurate cost estimate and time efficiency. According to Khairuddin Abdul Rashid,
2002, said that traditional lump sum (old traditional practice) is the most frequently
used procurement system in Malaysia. The system is sequential in nature and the main
advantages of the traditional practice system include that it allows price to be fixed in
advance of construction and the designer has full control of the design process.
Meanwhile, traditional practice also has some disadvantages, including that it will lead
to a more time taken to finish up the projects period and appears to encourage
adversary between the parties.
Historically, the design and build system was first launched in the Public
Works Department by the Malaysia Prime Minister in 1983. The first unit that has
applied this design and builds system was by Kuala Terengganu Hospital, which was
completed in 1985 as cited by Seng, Ng. W. and Aminah Md Yusof, 2006 and
Akinteye, A, Fitzgerald , E, 1995 added that in design and build system, there is only
single point responsibility of the contractor for both design and construction process.
According to Beard, et al., 2001 argued and added that there is no difficult to generate
more arguments and questions by the parties involved in design and build system.
5
1.3 Problem Statement
The Design and Build construction process has been part of the construction
industry. Today, the process is growing rapidly in this industry. As it has been grown
in popularity, Design and Build has evolved all manner of hybrids. However, many
contractors are less gleeful about the benefits that might be expected. In theory,
Design and Build puts the contractors in charge of the whole project. However,
Design and Build also not exclude were faced problem by contractors in the
construction industry. One of the common problems are delay in construction, this
because of a global phenomenon and the construction industry in Malaysia is no
exception (Murali Sambasivan & Yau Wen Soon, 2005). According to Nuhu Braimah
& Issaka Ndekugri, 2008 said that the delays and disruption to contractor’s progress
are a major source of claims and disputes in the construction industry. The matters
often in dispute concern the dichotomy in responsibility for delays (projects owner or
his contractors) partly because of the multifarious nature of the potential sources of
delays and disruption. With increased project complexity and requirements coupled
with multiple parties all subject to their performance exigencies, the resolution of such
claims and disputes has become a matter of the greatest difficulty. Besides that, the
factor adversely affecting the cost performances of project are conflict among project
participants, ignorance and lack of knowledge, presence of poor project specific
attributes and non existence of cooperation, hostile socio economic and climatic
condition, reluctance in timely decision , aggressive competition at tender stage and
short bid preparation time (K.C. Iyer & K.N. Jha, 2005).
6
1.4 Objective
There are three (3) objectives to be achieved in this study, which are:-
To study the comparisons between designs & build contract and conventional
contract
To identify the common problems and the factors faced by the contractor
To rank the common problems and the factors among contractors
1.5 Scope of Study
For the scope of this study, the limitation has been done in order to focus and
narrow down the topic to the specific area and subject of study. The scopes of this
case study can be stated as below:
This study is focus about design & build contract
This study is focusing on the contractor’s Bumiputera companies
The respondents are registered as a class A contractors with Pusat Khidmat
Kontraktor (PKK)
The respondents are the registered as grade 7 contractors with construction
industry development board (CIDB)
This study consists of government agencies
The area of this study is in Klang Valley.
7
1.6 Methodology
Literature reviewSources:
1. Books2. Websites3. Article4. Journal
Problem statement- The problem of delays in the construction industry is a global phenomenon and
the construction industry in Malaysia- the factor adversely affecting the cost performances
Objectives 1: To study the comparisons between designs & build contract and conventional contract Activities: 1. literature review 2. Interview
Objectives 2: To identify the common problems and the factors faced by the contractorActivities: 1. literature review 2. Interview 3. Distribute questionnaires forms
OObbjjeeccttiivveess 33:: To rank the common problems and the factors among contractorsActivities: 1. Interview 2. Distribute questionnaires forms
Research analysis and findings
Activities 1.Frequency analysis 2. Average Index (A.I)
CONCLUSION
8
1.7 Significant of study
The primary purpose of this final year project is to study comparisons between
designs & build contract and conventional contract. Besides that, to identify the
common problems and the factors faced by the contractor and to rank the common
problems and the factors among contractors. As the research is focusing on
bumiputera contractor, it is because nowadays many problem faced by the bumiputera
contractor. Contractor selection is one of the main activities of clients. Without a
proper and accurate method for selecting the most appropriate contractor, the
performance of the project will be affected. So the most important element in
construction is contractor. The information gathered can be used for government
sector to overcome the problem that faced by the contractor using design & build
contract.
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
In the previous in chapter 1, the overview of this study was explained about and
the problem was identified. Then from the overview, the aims of the study are
comparisons between designs & build contract and conventional contract, to identify
the common problems and the factors faced by the contractor and to rank the common
problems and the factors among contractors. Through the chapter, the elaborations of
the topic are clearly described. The clarification of the sub-topic will focused about
the contract, types of contract, delivery method especially in traditional /conventional
contract and design & build contract, contractor and the common problems faced by
contractor.
10
2.2 Definition of contracts
Various definitions have been proffered by different authorities for the term ‘contract’.
Sir William Anson, the learned English authority on the Law of Contract has defined a
contract as:
“A legally binding agreement between two or more parties, by which rights are
acquired by one or more to acts or forbearances on the part of the other or others”
An engineering contract dictionary defines a contract as:
“A binding agreement between two or more persons which creates mutual rights and
duties and which is enforceable at law (Ir Harbans Singh KS 1, 2007)”
2.3 Contract Elements
The legally essential elements of a construction contract include an offer, an
acceptance, and a consideration (payment for services to be provided). The offer is
normally a bid or proposal submitted by a contractor to build a certain facility
according to the plans, specification, and conditions set forth by the owner.
Acceptance takes the form of a notice of award, as stated earlier. Consideration
usually takes the form of cash payment, but it may legally be anything of value (S. W.
Nunnally, 2007).
11
There are certain elements that must be present for a legally binding contract to be in
place.
According to Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003 said that the first two are
the most obvious:
An offer: an expression of willingness to contract on a specific set of terms,
made by the offer or with the intention that, if the offer is accepted, he or she
will be bound by a contract.
Acceptance: an expression of absolute and unconditional agreement to all the
terms set out in the offer. It can be oral or in writing. The acceptance must
exactly mirror the original offer made.
A counter-offer is not the same as an acceptance. A counter-offer extinguishes
the original offer: you can’t make a counter-offer and then decide to accept the
original offer.
A request for information is not a counter-offer. If you ask the offer or for
information or clarification about the offer, that doesn’t extinguish the offer;
you’re still free to accept it if you want
2.3.1 The Essence of a Contract
According to Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003 said that the essence of a
contract has been judicially expounded to the following effect:
To constitute a valid contract, there must be separate and definite thereto; to parties
must be in agreement, that there is consensus ad idem; those parties must intend to
create legal relations in the sense that the promises of each side are to be enforceable
12
simply because they are contractual promises and the promises of each party must be
supported by consideration.
All contracts are built upon the basic premise of the meeting of minds, the idea of
assent and agreement as to the same thing. Agreement is to be established based on
objective considerations such as conduct and not inferred from the mere mental
element of intent. The other ingredients, e.g. consideration, legality, etc are then added
on to reinforce and supplement the basic premise to ensure that the essence of a valid
contract is tenable at law.
2.3.2 Basic Elements of a Contract
According to Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003 said that the basic elements
which are necessary for the creation of a legally binding and enforceable contract are
essentially as represented in figure 2.1 and listed here under:
a clear or firm offer or proposal
an unqualified acceptance of the offer/proposal
intention to create legal relations: both parties must show an intention to enter
into a legally binding agreement
consideration: each party must contribute something in reciprocation of the
other’s promise
certainty : the terms of an agreement must be certain or capable of being made
certain
capacity : the parties must have a legal capacity to contract
consent : the parties must contract with free consent, i.e. consent must no be
obtained by coercion, fraud , duress, misrepresentation, undue influence, etc
legality : the contract must be formed within the boundaries of the law, e.g. its
object or consideration must not be unlawful
13
possibility : the contract must be capable of performance both physically and
legally
+
+
+
Figure 2.1: Elements of a Valid/Enforceable Agreement
(Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003)
2.4 Types of contracts
a) contracts based on the pricing/payment criteria
b) contracts based on the method of contract procurement
c) miscellaneous types of contracts
FIRM OFFER/PROPOSAL
UNQUALIFIED ACCEPTANCE
CONSIDERATION
FIRM OFFER/PROPOSALFIRM OFFER/PROPOSAL
LAWFUL OBJECT & CONSIDERATION
CERTAINTY OF TERMS
PHYSICAL/LEGAL POSSIBILITY
LEGAL CAPACITY TO CONTRACT
VALID/ENFORCEABLE AGREMEENT
14
2.4.1 Contracts based on pricing/ payment criteria
One of the principal methods of classifying contracts is based on the method
by which the contract price is established and subsequently payment is made to the
contractor. Here, although there exists traditional terminology to describe the
methodology adopted in specific applications, recent practices in the industry have led
to the blurring of precise definitions thereby creating considerable confusion on part
of the practitioners (Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
According to Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003 said that it is the
intent of this chapter to look at the traditional approach whilst at the time, to address
possible areas of confusion. The starting point is the further sub-classification of
contracts under this category into the following types:
a) fixed price type of contracts
b) cost reimbursement types of contracts
c) miscellaneous type of contracts
2.4.1.1 Fixed price type of contracts
A fixed price contract is a contract in which the contractor quotes a price for the whole
of the work. In essence, the contractor takes the risk of judging how much work is
involved and its cost. In practice, if the contractor is entitled to a variation in the
contract sum. Then fixed price items may be defined as items paid for on the basic of
a predetermined estimate of the cost of the work, an allowance for the risk involved
and the market situation in relation to the contractor’s workload, the estimated price
being paid by the client irrespective of the cost incurred by the contractor (Frederick
E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
15
According to Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003 said that the common
species of fixed prices contracts encountered in the engineering/ construction industry
include the following:
(a) lump sum contracts
Lump Sum contract where a party undertakes to complete the whole of the work for a
stated and fixed amount of money payable by the other. this is so even though it may
contain express stipulations permitting adjustment of the contract sum for
eventualities such as variations, payment for extended preliminaries, etc. what is
important is that at the time of contracting, both parties must have agreed upon a lump
sum price to be payable for a defined scope/quantity of work to be undertaken. It
should be noted that most of the common Standard Forms of Contract used in the
country such as the JKR Forms, IEM Forms, etc are essentially entire contracts for a
lump sum with modifications to ameliorate to rig ours of strict entirety. The two
principal types of lump sum are with bills of quantities and with drawings and
specification.
(b) Measure and value contracts
This type of contract is utilized principally where the exact scope and quality of the
work cannot reasonably be determined accurately at the time of tendering. To enable
the tenderers to establish a price, a basic is provided by the employer in the invitation
to tender documents. Either during the currency of the contract or upon completion of
the works, the works are measured, valued or payment effected to the contractor. Such
contracts are common, rather than an exception in civil engineering and infrastructure
projects especially those involving earthworks, work below ground level, etc. Measure
and value contracts come in the two basic forms based on either a bill of approximate
quantities or a schedule of prices.
(c) ‘Turnkey’ contracts
Going under various labels such as ‘package’ deal type of contracts, ’design and build/
design and construct’ contracts, EPCC type of contracts, etc the defining characteristic
16
is the combining of all the fundamental tasks of the project, i.e. design, production
(construction or building) and management in a single package. The contractor takes
full responsibility and carries sole liability for design and construction.
In such typical contract, the employer approaches a contractor with a set requirements
may be mere brief statements or detailed specification, drawings, schedules, etc
depending on the nature and complexity of the project or the extent to which the
employer has the expression of his wants.
The contractor responds to the employer with an offer called the ‘contractor’s
proposals’ which will include production as well as design work, contract price and
the manner in which the contract price has been calculated, e.g. the contract price
analysis, etc. bills of quantities are strictly not applicable in a ‘Turnkey’ contract and
if something akin to these are used, they are merely for the purposes of the contract
sum analysis or for making payment to the contractor.
Though ‘turnkey’ contracts can be on fixed price or cost reimbursement basis, the
accepted practice in this country favors the fixed price approach. The norm is for the
contractor to contractor to contract on the basic of a predetermined estimate of the cost
of the complete work. this is in line with the selling point of such an arrangement,
whereby the contractor bears all risks, inclusive of costs and pricing risks subject to
adjustments occasioned by variations ordered by the employer, extended
preliminaries, etc. another feature sometimes encountered in such contracts is a
guaranteed maximum sum, a sum offering assurance to the employer on his maximum
price exposure.
17
2.4.1.2 Cost reimbursement type of contracts
Cost reimbursement is a term used to describe one of the two principal
methods of making payment under contract. Cost reimbursement contracts are not
popular in this country as it burdens the employer with all the risk and with no
advance notion of the eventual financial commitment. It general imposes no incentive
on the contractor to maximize efficiency and keep the costs down since he is already
assured of his fee in advance. Seemingly with this arrangement, the employer bears
the brunt of this disadvantage whilst simultaneously guaranteeing the contractor of his
fee with little or no attendant risks (Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
The types of cost reimbursement contracts are:
cost plus fixed fee contracts
cost plus percentage fee contracts
cost plus fluctuating fee contracts
2.4.2 Contracts Based On Method of Procurement
a. Traditional General Contracts (TGC)
Appearing under various labels such as general contract, ‘employer-design’ contracts
and the like, traditional general contracts are basically characterized by the separation
of the design form the manufacture (i.e. construction or installation) elements of the
contract. The employer causes the design to be prepared by his professional designers
and thereby takes full responsibility for the design. Depending on the contractual
18
arrangement selected, the employer may also cause bills of quantities to be prepared
(Ir Harbans Singh KS , 2007).
Under thus methods of contract procurement, the contractor builds or manufactures
what the designers have designed and/or specified. he is only responsible for the
material and workmanship aspects of the contract and for the performance of his sub-
contractors (inclusive of any nominated sub-contractors) not with standing its ‘time-
tested’ credentials such contracts are slowly losing favor with the onslaught of
increasingly complex projects preferring the newer paths of contracts procurement,
e.g. ‘package’ deal type, construction management, etc (Ir Harbans Singh KS , 2007).
b. Management contracts
A management contract has bee described as a form of contractual arrangement
whereby a contractor is paid a fee to manage the building of a project on behalf of a
client. It is, in essence, a contract to manage rather than contracts build (Ir Harbans
Singh KS , 2007).
The characteristics of a management contracts are that the employer engages the
contractor design to participate in the project at an early stage contribute construction
expertise to the design and manage the construction process, the latter being
undertaken by a number of works (or ‘trade’) contractors. The management contractor
is paid a fee, which fee may be on a fixed lump sum basic or a pre-agreed percentage.
Depending on the nature of the contracts entered between the employer, the
management contractor and the ‘trade’ contractors, the management contractor may or
may not carry liability for the defaults and/or omissions of the latter, delay inclusive
(Ir Harbans Singh KS , 2007).
c. Construction management contracts
According to Ir Harbans Singh KS, 2007 said that as aptly named, construction
management contracts are a sub-set of the general corpus of management type of
19
contracts and such share common characteristics with management contracts
discussed above. There essential differences are namely:
the employer has direct contracts with the ‘works’/’trade’ contractors
the employer pays such ‘works’/’trade’ contractors directly
the construction manager us not liable for he acts and/or defaults of the
‘works’/’trade’ contractors
The construction manager essentially acts as a mere consultant instead of a
contractor in the general sense
d. ‘Package’ Deal Type of Contracts
According to Ir Harbans Singh KS, 2007 said this method of the procurement where
the contractor is responsible for both design and construction (and in some cases for
even financing, complete fitting out, ‘technology’ transfer, etc). The common
variations include:
Design and Build (D&B) contracts
Design and Construct (D&C) contracts
Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) contracts
Engineering, Procurement, Installations and Construction (EPIC) contracts
Engineering, Procurement, Construction and Commissioning (EPC) contracts
Selection of the contractor is normally based on competitive tendering or
negotiation and payment effected on either an interim, milestone or lump sum
basic.
e. Build, Operate and Transfer Contracts
According to Ir Harbans Singh KS, 2007 said that this novel method of contract
procurement surfaced on the local scene directly as a result of the government’s
privatization policy. Under the scheme, the contractor is responsible for:
20
financing the project at all stages
undertaking the relevant design and construction
operating and maintaining the works over a stipulated period
on the lapse of the agreed period, reassigning it to the employer at no further
charge
f. New Types of Contracts
According to Ir Harbans Singh KS, 2007 said that with the recent building boom, the
local industry experienced some ‘non-traditional’ Forms of Contract procurement
including the so called ‘Fast Tracking Contracts’, Partnering Contracts’ and ‘Fee
Contracting’
Fast Tracking Contracts as their name aptly describes them are nothing more
than contracts undertaken on a fast track basis with overlapping or concurrent
stages instead of the traditional sequential of activities. The ultimate objective
is to complete the project in the shortest time possible.
Partnering Contracts are in essence an extension to the normal serial contracts.
Under this system of the contract procurement, over a pre-determined or an
indefinite period of time’ the contractor automatically receives all new
contracts from the employer with payment to be made by reference to an
initially agreed formula.
Fee Contracting were made to introduce this species of the contract locally in
the late nineties, the economic ‘meltdown’ at the material time thwarted such
efforts. Nevertheless it is one type contract that may become significant in the
near future involving large and technically complex projects.
21
2.5 Delivery Methods
The term delivery method refers to the owner’s approach to organizing the project
team that will manage the entire design and construction process. This selection
process in governed to a large extent by risk but also by the owner’s desire to find a
method that will deliver the project on time, budget, and in a form that will meet the
owner’s needs most effectively (Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
A number of proven strategies can be used to accomplish these ends. The three most
common are traditional, design/build and construction management. Combinations of
these strategies may be employed well. Each has its distinct advantages and
disadvantages, but the choice is not always clear and simple. The owner must
carefully weigh his or her options to ensure the right choice for the specific project
(Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
2.5.1 Conventional/Traditional Contract
In this arrangement, the owner first hires a design professional, who then
prepares a design, including complete contracts documents. The design professional is
typically paid a fee that is either a percentage of the estimated construction cost or a
lump sump amount, or he or she is reimbursed for costs at an agreed-upon billing rate.
With a complete set of documents available, the owner either conducts a competitive
bid opening to obtain the lowest price from contractors to do the work or negotiates
with a specific contractor. The contractor is then responsible for delivering the
completed project in accordance with the dictates of he contract documents. The
contractor may choose to subcontractor much of the work or may have the forces in
house to accomplish the task. That choice usually depends on the contractor remains
solely responsible for execution of the work. This delivery mode become popular near
22
the turn of the twentieth century in response to the increasing specialization of the
various building profession and until recently it was the predominant mode of delivery
(Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
During the construction process, the owner may hire the architect to administer
the contract or may choose to have in-house employees do this task. Administering the
contract consists of observing the work to monitor quality, carrying out the change
order process, certifying payment to the contractor and ensuring that the owner is
receiving the product called in the contract documents. If the owner hires the architect,
he or she does so through an agency relationship that is, the architect is bound by the
legal rules of this relationship and as such is empowered to act in the owner’s name.
The contractor, on the other hand, is hired in a simple commercial contract and as such
is charged with carrying out the terms of the construction contract. There is no
contract between the architect and the contractor. The relationship is once in which the
architects acts for the owner during any dealings with the contractor. Nor are there
contract agreements between the architect/owner and the specialty subcontractors. The
relationship exists only with the contractor, who is solely responsible for the
contractor performances (Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
2.5.1.1 Role of Owner, Contractor and Design Professional under a Conventional
Contract
Normally the outside independent architect or engineer prepares the plan and
specifications for the owner prior to tendering. This means that the architect or
engineer id legally responsible to the owner for design defects according to his
professional services contract. Generally, the design professional has no liability for
defective construction, other than for defects that should have been reasonably
observed from field services & inspections which he has carried out. Most important
of all, the independent architect or engineer has contractual obligations to protect the
23
owner. One result is that the architect or engineer frequently acts as agent for the
owner during construction phase (Bryan S. Shapiro, 1994).
Under a conventional contract, the owner employs plans and specifications by way of
a competitive bidding format to obtain tender bid and to select the successful
contractor. This means that the owner warrants the sufficiency of the plans (full
disclosure of information), and assumes any liability for defects n the plans and
specifications that he provides to the contractor. Conversely, the contractor is
responsible for defective construction and workmanship, but has no liability for design
defects (Bryan S. Shapiro, 1994).
The typical construction contract approach leaves a big hole between the design
professional and the contractor. These two parties are not linked by contract: they do
not owe any contractual duties each other, although recent jurisprudence suggests that
in certain circumstances, the design professional may indeed owe a legal duty in tort
to a bidding contractor. Also, their bonding and insurance requirements are arranged
independently. Legally, in this typical construction approach, the design professional
and the contractor occupy positions that are on the “opposite side of the table” (Bryan
S. Shapiro, 1994).
2.5.1.2 Advantages
The traditional method is a known quantity to owners, designers and
constructors. This probably its greatest strength. For many years, the mode of delivery
was the predominant one for the construction in the United States. The procedures and
contractual rules of conduct have been worked out and are well understood. Many
professionals prefer this well-d4efined relationship, which reduces their level of risk
because it reduces uncertainty. Under the right circumstance, this means that a project
24
is more likely to proceed smoothly from beginning to end (Frederick E. Gould &
Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
The mood also contains considerable contractual protection for the owner. The
allocation of risk for construction performance rests almost completely on the
contractor and subcontractors. The owner is insulated from many of the risks of cost
overruns, such as labor inefficiencies, nonperforming subs, inflation and other
vagaries of the larger economic picture. In most instances, the owner knows the final
cost at the beginning of construction, and the risks of cost overruns are borne by the
contractor. However, the risk of cost increases depends to large extent on the accuracy
and completeness of the contract documents. If they are unclear or not well done, the
changes that must ensue can raise the owner’s costs considerably (Frederick E. Gould
& Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
Additionally, the traditional method provides the owner with all the benefits of
open market competition. The open bidding procedure, in which the lowest bidder is
the “winners”, gives the owner the lowest price available in the marketplace and
presumably the greatest economic efficiency (Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce,
2003).
Finally the owner does not have to be heavily involved in the construction
process. He or she must be involved in the design process to make key decisions about
whether or not to accept the design but once construction actually begins, the owner is
represented by professionals empowered to act in his or her name and to make
recommendations. Day to day interaction is no necessary (Frederick E. Gould &
Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
.
25
2.5.1.3 Disadvantages
Nevertheless, several elements of the traditional method can work against the
owner. First, the construction professional does not enter the process until the design
is complete, meaning that the design is not usually reviewed for constructability
before it is finished. Design features that could have been built more economically or
effectively often result in higher costs. Some design firms overcome this problem by
hiring preconstruction consultants or having construction professionals on their staffs.
Although this benefits the project it is not as effective as having the design reviewed
by the person who will actually have to build it (Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E.
Joyce, 2003).
Second, with the traditional approach it is difficult to reduce the time required
to do both design and construction. As figure 2.2 shows, the process is sequential and
linear; there is no opportunity to overlap tasks and thus reduce overall time. This may
raise interest expenses on construction loans and other costs and can expose the
project to greater risks of inflation. The time element problem is one of the primary
reasons for the recent decline in the use of the traditional method (Frederick E. Gould
& Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
Figure 2.2 conventional sequential arrangements
(Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003)
CONSTRUCTIONPROCUREMENTDESIGN
26
Finally, all parties work autonomously in this mode. The designer designs the
project based on the owner’s instructions. The general contractor prices and schedules
the project based on the construction documents alone. This approach provides little
opportunity for interaction and team building among the participants and can lead to
major breakdowns relationships (Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
For example, when the contract must be interpreted, the parties involved view
the situation from fundamentally different perspectives. A firm fixed-price contract
can considerably exacerbate the problem because the contractor had to competitively
bid for the job and thus interprets details as cost-effectively as possible. The owner
and the designer, on the other hand, want to receive the most for their money. Such
differences in interpretation lead to conflicts that can quickly escalate, creating
adversarial relationship (Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
Unforeseen conditions on a job can also be a source of conflict and may lead to
changes in the contract. A through design process and complete set of drawings
attempt to minimize these conditions. Conducting additional soil borings or opening
up walls in renovation work can help to properly identify actual conditions and avoid
future conflicts. Unfortunately, no every condition can be identified and when
unforeseen conditions or events occur the contract may have to be renegotiated. This
takes away any advantage to the owner in terms of know costs when construction
begins (Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
27
2.5.2 Design & Build Contracts
Table 2.1: Definitions of Contract
AUTHOR DEFINITION
Turner (1990)
and Jansen
(1991)
A Design and Build contract is one in which a single entity, usually a
contractor
assumes responsibility for the design in whole or in part and for the
construction and completion of a construction project
Master man
(1992)
The term Design and Build has almost been unanimously interpreted and
defined as being an arrangement where one contracting organization takes
sole responsibility, normally on a lump sum fixed price basis, for the
bespoke design and construction of a client’s project. This contains three
main elements the responsibility for design and construction, contractor’s
reimbursement is generally by means of a fixed price lump sum and the
project is designed and built specifically to meet the clients’ needs.
David Chappell
(1997)
Design and Build contracts place responsibility for both design and erection
in the hands of the contractor one point of responsibility for everything. In
this system contractor will carry out two functions design and construct
The Chartered
Institute of
Building
(CIOB-1983)
Design and Build as the process where the client deals directly with the
contractor for the complete building and it is the contractor who is not only
responsible for but also coordinates the separate design and construction
process, including engagement of the design team who are, therefore
contractually linked with the contractor and not the client
The design-builds concept as originally conceived was based on the concept that a
single firm had the in-house staff and expertise to perform all planning, design, and
construction tasks. Later, increased interest in the concept had engineers, architect and
conventional contractors seeking to compete with he original design0build firms to
meet the growing interest by owners in the project delivery process (Frederick E.
Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
Under the current approach, instead of limiting design-build to firms with in house
capability in both areas, the fields has now been opened up to permit contracts with
28
engineers who subcontract the construction portion to a contracting firm, with
construction contractors that subcontract design services to an engineer or architect
and with engineers and architect in joint venture with contractors that subcontractor
design services to an engineer or architect and with engineers and architects in joint
venture with contractors firms (Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
There are basically three types of design-build firms today, contractor led, and
designer led and single firm. Contractor-led firms tend to dominate due to their
experience in estimating, purchasing. Cost control and construction supervision, not to
mention the contractor’s better financial backing and ability to manage risk (Frederick
E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
For the owner, the design and build method provides a single point of contact and
responsibility throughout the life of the project. The firm hires by the owner will
perform both design and construction. Entities offering this service may be
design/build firms with in-house employees or joint-ventures firms that come together
contractually to perform a single project. In either case, the design/build entity can
hire subcontractors who perform the actual construction in the field (Frederick E.
Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
This mode is used extensively in certain industries, particularly industrial
construction. The complexity of the industrial projects such as oil refineries and power
plants makes them a good candidate for design/build. Before the traditional method
become popular, design/build was actually the preferred mode of delivery for almost
all projects, although it was not named as such. An owner hired a master builder, who
designed the project, acquired the materials, and hired and supervised the craft
workers on the site. This mode of delivery became less popular as professional tasks
became more specialized (Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
In general, it can be summarized that Design and Build provides single point
responsibility for the whole design and construction. Contractors, who are responsible
for the implementation of the project, have power to control all over the projects. This
nonetheless does not deter the involvement of the client. The client’s need and
29
requirements are always been taken into consideration, which this consequently
presents uniqueness of the system (Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
2.5.2.1Role of the Parties under a Design/Build Contract
The first major change that one observes in a design/build contractual arrangement is
that the owner signs a single agreement with the contractor. Under this agreement, the
contractor agrees to provide both design and construction work, usually for lump sum
fee. This means that the design professional is either employed by the contractor, or is
working with the contractor in a joint venture style arrangement (Bryan S. Shapiro,
1994).
Second, the owner initiates the design/build process by laying out its own functional
or performance requirements. The owner’s requirements are usually sent to
contractors by way of a Request for Proposals (RFP), and the responses are then
evaluated to select he successful contractor, based upon various criteria, including but
not restricted to price and design innovation. Under a design/build contract, the
contractor’s primary legal obligation is to satisfy the owner’s broad performance
specifications. The contractor is not building the facility or project to rigid
specifications or to plans prepared by a design professional. This approach means that
the contractor is responsible for both faulty workmanship in construction and for
defects or deficiencies in design (Bryan S. Shapiro, 1994).
With a design/build approach, the outside independent architect or engineer no longer
is employed by the owner. Therefore, owners that don’t have the internal expertise
relative to their project’s design and construction may have to engage an additional
independent advisor. The advisor’s role would be to offer advice to the owner on
design adequacy, to inspect critical parts of construction, to ascertain that construction
30
generally complies with the projects design and to prepare evaluations used for
interim payment purposes (Bryan S. Shapiro, 1994).
(a) The Role of the Employer
The difficulty with the preparation of the employer’s requirements does not end at
preparation stage. Many employers do not realise that the employer's requirements
only amount to a schematic design of the end product. In traditional form contracts,
the supervising consultant would also prepare the detailed design before issuing
relevant instructions to the contractor. The concept behind design and build a contract
assumes that the contractor takes care of the detailed design and is conferred a
relatively wide mandate when interpreting the employer's requirements (Tan, Daniel,
1997).
Employer's new to the design and build concept seem to find this mandate difficult to
accept when they realise that they do not have the exclusive say or a free hand in
deciding the implementation or outcome of the end product. There is an unfortunate
tendency for employers new to the concept to issue through their representatives
numerous instructions without realising the full implications of such instructions.
(Tan, Daniel, 1997).
Prudent design and build contractors will often ensure that their contractual rights are
protected by notifying of claims for delay, time related damages and actual costs for
having to implement such instructions that are tantamount to variation instructions
(Tan, Daniel, 1997).
Disputes as to whether an instruction constitutes a variation often revolve around the
employer's requirements. Has there been non-compliance of the requirements or
otherwise? It would appear that the new employers that wish to have more say in the
end product would have more detailed employer's requirements prepared. Inevitably
higher costs to the employer will result in preparation of Employer's requirements
which defeats one of the benefits of adopting a design and build contract in the first
place (Tan, Daniel, 1997).
31
Some employers when providing too much detail may realise that they are doing what
their contractor is being paid to do. Some may not realise that they may also be
prejudicing their contractual position by assuming responsibility for parts of the
design, particularly so if a detailed design is imposed on their contractor. Sure,
virtually all design and build contracts place "full" responsibility for design on the
contractor. It is submitted however that such provisions only operate if "full" design is
undertaken by them; otherwise the employer will be liable for the detailed design
(Tan, Daniel, 1997).
(b) The Role of the Contractor
The major difference for a contractor in a design and build contract is that it assumes
liability for design. It is incumbent on the contractor to engage a design team to come
up with a design that complies with the employer's requirements (Tan, Daniel, 1997).
For the inexperienced design and build contractor the selection of designers for the
design team is vital. Not only should the contractor select team members that know
how to integrate their portion of works into the overall design intended by the
contractor, it is imperative that each team member knows how to receive instructions
from the contractor (Tan, Daniel, 1997).
It may sound surprising but a vast number of consultants in Malaysia are not
accustomed to receiving instructions from a contractor. Irrespective of the terms and
conditions of the contract at hand, some consultants either consciously or sub-
consciously attach more weight to the requirements of employers rather than
contractors. These consultants appear to be entrenched in the traditional form
arrangements and are inflexible, so it seems when taking instructions from contractors.
The "employer vs. contractor" and siding of the former stereotype should be broken to
cater for services that are now rendered to the "opposing" party (Tan, Daniel, 1997).
As it is the role of the contractor to form the design team, the selection process for
design consultants must be exercised with great care to ensure that they are able and
willing to receive instructions from a contractor (Tan, Daniel, 1997).
32
(c)Novation of Consultants
The concept of novation of consultants is usually only attributed to negotiated
contracts as opposed to those for an open tender (Tan, Daniel, 1997).
The contractor's problem with consultants' inflexibility in receiving instructions is
sometimes amplified when there is a requirement for a novation of the design team
from the employer to the contractor. The designers who originally prepared the
employer's requirements in schematic form now have to prepare the contractor's
detailed design. The progression may seem natural for the designers, but different
problems as posed not only to the contractor but also the employer (Tan, Daniel,
1997).
For the employer, there may be a need to re-engage an auditing team of consultants or
at least one consultant to assume the role as the employer's agent or representative to
administer the contract for purposes of certification and issuance of instructions. The
employer could also lose the benefit of the contractor's independent design and
expertise as the contractor would eventually be constructing a project based on the
same source as the employer's original design team that prepared the employer's
requirements (Tan, Daniel, 1997).
The contractor's main worry when consultants are novated is the allowable time before
actual commencement of work at site. The typical employer who has already
completed preparation of all its own documentation would only be too eager to have
the contractor commence physical work on site soonest possible. Contractors have to
be weary to ensure that there is sufficient time not only for the design team to prepare
the detailed design prior to commencement of physical work on site, but there must
also be sufficient time to enable the formalities of the novation exercise itself to be
finalised (Tan, Daniel, 1997).
The hasty employer or contractor is likely to end up in disputes relating to division or
apportionment of design responsibility, the relationship between the consultants,
professional indemnity or responsibility of design team in obtaining approvals from
relevant authorities (Tan, Daniel, 1997).
33
2.5.2.2Advantages
One major reason for choosing a design/build arrangement is to benefit from the good
communication that can occur between the design team and the construction team.
Many of the largest design/build companies specialize in particular areas and have
developed a smooth flow between design and construction phases of the project. This
collaboration allows the project be easily fast racked, cutting down on overall
schedule for the project (Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
Good communication between the designer and the construction professionals
also allows construction input early in the design phase. Such input includes
constructability analyses, value engineering and subcontractor pricing. Cost
estimating, scheduling, long lead item identification, and ordering all become part of
the overall project planning (Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
In general, this arrangement allows easier incorporation of changes due to
scope or unforeseen conditions since their coordination occurs within the same
contractual entity. The owner is less heavily involved and sits outside the direct day-
to-day communication between designer and constructor. This keeps owner staffing to
a minimum and puts the full responsibility for good communication, problem solving,
and project delivery on the design/build team (Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce,
2003).
2.5.2.3 Disadvantages
Although it is possible to give the owner a fixed, firm price before the project
begins, this generally does not happen in a design/build arrangement. Because the firm
is hired before the design has started, any real pricing is not possible. Instead, an
34
owner usually enters this arrangement with a conceptual budget but without the
guarantee of a firm price. Firming up the price too soon puts the design/build team in
the position of making the scope fit the price, which carries the risk of sacrificing
quality to protect profit. If the project is fast-tracked, the owner may not have a good
idea about the final price until part of the project, such as the foundation is complete
(Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
The owner’s ability to remain marginally involve can be both an advantage
and disadvantage. When design/build Company has an organization that is efficient at
performing the work, the project can move very fast. If the owner does not stay
consistently involved throughout the process, he or she may have to make decision
without fully understanding the issues. Once a project develops a rhythm, it is difficult
to change that rhythm. If the owner is not moving to the same rhythm, the project may
take a direction that he or she does not want but is not aware of until too late
(Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
Another disadvantage is the lack of checks and balances. In the traditional
arrangement, the designer prepares a complete set of contract documents, which is
then used to measure and evaluate the performance of the contractor in the field. The
owner often hires the designer to oversee the work of the contractor and to ensure that
deficient work is identified and corrected. But in the design/build arrangement the
designer works for the same company as the builder. Similarly, during construction
the builder sometimes uncovers certain design deficiencies, errors or missions. The
designer is contract bound by contract to correct these deficiencies without additional
costs to the owner. In design/build the design and construction professionals are put in
position of critiquing their co-workers and perhaps affecting their bottom line by that
critique. The owner must rely more heavily on the quality and ethics of the firm since
most of the checks and balances will likely take place behind the company’s door
(Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce, 2003).
35
2.6 Contractor
A contractor is someone who enters into a binding agreement to perform a certain
service or provide a certain product in exchange for valuable consideration, monetary,
goods, services, even barter arrangements. In the building trades, a contractor is one
who is engaged in the construction or building related services for a client. The
construction site is overseen by a "Prime", General, or Specialty contractor, who may
perform the work with employees, subcontractors or any combination (Wikipedia,
2001-2006).
2.7 Common problem faced by contractor
Some of the problems unfortunately only surface after commencement of a project
and if not expected, can pose real problems to unsuspecting employers and
contractors. A few of the several potential problems are mentioned below (Tan,
Daniel, 1997).
The unsuspecting employer may find that he still has to engage his own consultants
for technical guidance and preparation of material setting out the employer's
requirements. The unsuspecting contractor may find that his costs and effort for
tendering would be quite high especially if he is unsuccessful in the tender exercise.
Also, a contractor's perception of liability assumed for design could be much wider
than anticipated (Tan, Daniel, 1997).
36
Table 2.2: The problem faced by contractor
No. Author Problem
1. (Murali Sambasivan & Yau Wen Soon,
2005)
The problem of delays in the construction
industry is a global phenomenon and the
construction industry in Malaysia is no
exception
2. (Nuhu Braimah & Issaka Ndekugri, 2008) Delays and disruption to contractor’s
progress are a major source of claims and
disputes in the construction industry. The
matters often in dispute concern the
dichotomy in responsibility for delays
(projects owner or his contractors) partly
because of the multifarious nature of the
potential sources of delays and disruption.
With increased project complexity and
requirements coupled with multiple parties
all subject to their performance exigencies,
the resolution of such claims and disputes
has become a matter of the greatest
difficulty
3. (K.C. Iyer & K.N. Jha, 2005) The factor adversely affecting the cost
performances of project are conflict among
project participants, ignorance and lack of
knowledge, presence of poor project
specific attributes and non existence of
cooperation, hostile socio economic and
climatic condition, reluctance in timely
decision , aggressive competition at tender
stage and short bid preparation time
4. (M.S. Mohd Danuri, M.E. Che
Munaaim,H.Abdul Rahman & M.Hanid,
2006)
Late and non-payment will cause severe
cash flow problems especially to
contractors.
5. (Abdul Rahman Ayub & Janidah Eman,
2006)
Some common types of problem faced by
bumiputera contractors in Malaysia
construction industry are shown as follows:
37
i. Lack of expertise and experiences
ii. Over-optimistic estimation in tender bids
iv. Material price escalation
v. Financial Problems
vi. Materials supply networking
vii. Lack of skilled workers
viii. Lack of construction materials and
machineries
ix. Inefficient and ineffective planning and
management
x. Communication problems
6. (Abdul Rahman Ayub & Janidah Eman,
2006)
Delays or late deliveries, sub-standard
workmanship and materials, poor safety
management on sites and cost over-run of
government’s projects are some the issues
that been seriously discussed by the
government
7. (Abdul Rahman Ayub & Janidah Eman,
2006)
Failures to perform to the quality
expectations
8. (Mansfeild NR, Ugwu OO & Doran T, 1994) Delays causes are financing of and payment
for completed works, poor contract
management, changes in site condition and
shortages in materials
9. (Odeyinka HA & Yusif A, 1997) Delay via project participants and
extraneous factors
10. (Wellington Didibhuku Thwala & Mpendulo
Mvubu, 2008)
financial constraints
Late payment by clients
relationships between emerging
contractors and suppliers
difficulties when running a
business
38
2.8 Summary
In this chapter, the definitions of the Design & Build contract were discussed. It can
be conclude that Design & Build contracts place responsibility for both design and
erection in the hands of the contractor one point of responsibility for everything. In
this system contractor will carry out two functions design and construct. This thesis is
more to study the common problems faced by the contractor. The following are just a
few problems faced by the contractor:
a) Lack of expertise and experiences
b) Over-optimistic estimation in tender bids
c) Material price escalation
d) Financial Problems
e) Materials supply networking
f) Lack of skilled workers
g) Lack of construction materials and machineries
h) Inefficient and ineffective planning and management
i) Communication problems
j) Delays
k) cost
l) Late and non-payment
CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
The research design, instrumentation method and statistical method for analysis
would be discussed clearly in this chapter with more elaboration and explanation.
Other than that, the sample of the study is also focused on the through this chapter
followed by the statistical method for analysis. This chapter is important as it
described the methodology which is designed in achieving the research objective that
to study the comparisons between designs & build contract and conventional contract,
to identify the common problems and the factors faced by the contractor and to rank
the common problems and the factors among contractors. In general, this study was
used distributing the questionnaires and interview by the respondent from the
contractor class A companies are registered with Pusat Khidmat Kontraktor (PKK),
grade 7 contactors which registered with construction industry development board
(CIDB), government agencies and construction Bumiputera companies at Klang
Valley.
40
3.2 Literature Review
The literature reviews is doing by reading of the related books, journals, thesis,
magazine, newspaper and the other resources which can be obtained from the internet,
pamphlet, and browser. Most of the sources of the literature review can be found in
the library.
This research was conducted by distributing a set of the questionnaire to the
persons in the construction industry contractor class A companies are registered with
Pusat Khidmat Kontraktor (PKK), grade 7 contactors which registered with
construction industry development board (CIDB), government agencies and
construction Bumiputera companies at Klang Valley.
The advantage of using questionnaire form are the data information required
can be obtained directly from questionnaire and require little time duration to answer
questionnaire form in more convenient to the respondent due to limited time they have
and a lot of work to do. This is because all require answers needed need to be
organized in the form and the respondent just need to tick the appropriate answer.
Therefore the questionnaire survey is the most effective method to be applied in order
to obtain the data collection.
Before examining the method used in this study, it is important to observe and
to know the background of the study. This is in order to know about comparisons
between designs & build contract and conventional contract, to identify the common
problems faced by the contractor and to rank the problems among contractors to
achieve the objectives. According to Burgess, 2001 said that the selection of suitable
question is important because it is a key aspect that needs to be addressed. Within
empirical research, two types of method which are interview and questionnaires
survey.
41
3.3 Interview
Interview is one of the most popular and simple method to achieve the objective of
this study. The "instrument" can be affected by factors like fatigue, personality, and
knowledge, as well as levels of skill, training, and experience. (Q,Patton,1987) points
out that any face-to-face interview is also an observation. The skilled interviewer is
sensitive to nonverbal messages, effects of the setting on the interview, and nuances of
the relationship. While these subjective factors are sometimes considered threats to
validity, they can also be strengths because the skilled interviewer can use flexibility
and insight to ensure an in-depth, detailed understanding of the participant's
experience. The interviewer can pursue in-depth information around a topic.
Interviews may be useful as follow-up to certain respondents to questionnaires, e.g., to
further investigate their responses. Usually open-ended questions are asked during
interviews.
42
3.3.1 Type of Interviews:
1. Informal, conversational interview - no predetermined questions are asked, in
order to remain as open and adaptable as possible to the interviewee's nature
and priorities; during the interview, the interviewer "goes with the flow".
2. General interview guide approach - the guide approach is intended to ensure
that the same general areas of information are collected from each interviewee
this provides more focus than the conversational approach, but still allows a
degree of freedom and adaptability in getting information from the interviewee
3. Standardized, open-ended interview - here, the same open-ended questions are
asked to all interviewees (an open-ended question is where respondents are
free to choose how to answer the question, i.e., they don't select "yes" or "no"
or provide a numeric rating, etc.), this approach facilitates faster interviews
that can be more easily analyzed and compared.
4. Closed, fixed-response interview - where all interviewees are asked the same
questions and asked to choose answers from among the same set of
alternatives. This format is useful for those not practiced in interviewing.
(Carter McNamara, 1997-2008)
The Standardized, allowed open-ended questions respondents to record down
their answers to the questions. In this method, the open-ended questions to achieve the
objective of this study.
43
3.4 Questionnaires Review
Questionnaire survey is one of the most popular and simplest methods in order
to achieve the objectives of this study. Questionnaire is defines as a formal set of
question or statement designed together the information from respondents that will
accomplish the goals of the research project (Redzuan, 2006).The questionnaire
designed need to meet the objective and aim of the study. The design decisions depend
on the purposes of the study, the nature of the problem, and the alternatives
appropriate for its investigation (Isaac, 1971). A design is a strategy for constructing
the research structure using concise notation that summarize a complex design
structure efficiently, to show all of the major parts of the research project the
background problems theoretical frameworks, hypothesis, research questions,
methodology-work together to try to address the center research objective (King et al.,
1994).Three fundamental considered before design the question:
What is the purpose of the survey?
What kind of question the survey developed to answer?
What sorts of results consider from the questionnaires?
Two type of question that used in the questionnaire survey, open-ended and
close-ended. Open-ended question do not provide respond choice and sensitive to the
respondents desire for expression. The close-ended sub divided to dichotomous and
multiple choices question. The close-ended questions supply response choices and
reduce in interpreter bias and easy to analysis. Dichotomous question are close-ended
question that offer to response choices and suitable to understand the respondents
demographic compassion (Redzuan, 2006).
This method was used closed ended questions with scaled question method.
Collection data of the study topic is doing by referred to the distribution of the
questionnaire form to the targeted person at the Bumiputera contractor’s. There are
100 sets of the questionnaire form were distributed for this study.
44
The questionnaire form has been produce by use the Likert Scale to ease the person to
answer the questionnaire. The questionnaire forms are creating in a structure form and
have divided into 2 parts.
3.4.1 Section A: General Information of the Respondent
Section A is to obtain the information on the background of the respondents. The
questionnaire includes the following:
• The position of the respondent in the company.
• The experience of the respondent in construction project.
• The experience of the company in construction industry.
• The types of project using Design & Build Method
• The types of Design & Build Method
3.4.2 Section B: To identify the common problems and the factors faced by the
contractor and to rank the common problems and the factors among contractors
This section is focus to identify the common problems and the factors faced by the
contractor and to rank the common problems and the factors among contractors. The
respondents were asked to rank the common problem based on frequency by using to
their own judgment and working experience. The sampling frame is obtained from the
directory of Pusat Khidmat Kontraktor Malaysia, (PKK) and the Construction
Industry Development Board Malaysia (CIDB) directory (2005-2006). The directory
45
contains the list of Bumiputera contractors in Klang Valley. The questionnaire is
mainly based on Likert’s scale of five (5) ordinal measures from one (1) to five (5)
according to level of frequent. Each scale represents the following rating ordinal
measures from one (1) to five (5) according to level of frequent.
(5) = Strongly Agree
(4) = Agree
(3) = Neutral
(2) = Less Agree
(1) = Not Agree
3.5 Data Analysis
Data analysis step is very important to give the result of the study. By this
analysis also, the conclusion of the project can be made to determine either the
objective of thesis is achieved or not.
In this study analysis, all the result data from table are analyzed using
frequency analysis and average index. The discussions were mainly to evaluate the
results obtained from the survey and rank the factors. The summary of the study then
presented with the conclusion of the study, recommendation from the conclusion
along with the recommendation for further studies in this area.
46
3.5.1 Frequency Analysis
The frequency analysis used to represent results of data analysis of the number
of response that the respondent gives to different variables in the questionnaire. The
result tabulated in the form of frequency number and percentage according to the total
respondents. For graphic result presentation, pie chart and bar graph is used as
summary.
3.5.2 Average Index
In average index analysis, the results further summarized to obtain the level
of problem among the contractor. The questionnaires are based on five-point scale
starting with 5 for strongly agree to 1 for not agree. The average index analysis for
each variable can calculate by using formula by (AlHammad,A.Mohsen and Assaf S,
1996) as below:
Average index (A.I) = ∑aixi
∑xi
Where,
ai = constant expressing the weight given to i
xi = variable expressing the frequency of response for i= 1,2,3,4,5,….n
i = 1,2,3,4,5 similar to explanation below
x1= respondent frequent for “Not Agree” for a1 = 1
x2= respondent frequent for “agree” for a2 = 2
x3= respondent frequent for “Neutral” for a3 = 3
x4= respondent frequent for “Agree” for a4 = 4
x5= respondent frequent for “Strongly Agree” for a5 = 5
47
The overall level of agreement by the respondents to the factors which
influences the problems faced by the contractor is summarized based on the
classification of the rating scale which has been modified (Abd Majid & Ronald Mc
Caffer, 1997). The classifications of the rating scale are as shown in table 3.
Table 3.1: The level of agreement and evaluation for average index analysis
(Abd. Majid M.Z. and Ronald Mc Caffer, 1997)
Average index Level of agreement of evaluation
1.0≤ Average index<1.5 Not Agree
1.5≤ Average index<2.5 Less Agree
2.5≤Average index<3.5 Neutral
3.5≤ Average index<4..5 Agree
4.5≤ Average index≤5.0 Strongly Agree
48
CHAPTER 4
RESULTS & ANALYSIS
4.1 Introduction
This chapters discussed on the analysis of the results from the return questionnaire
form which were distributed to the contractor, owner, consultant and government at
Klang Valley on study the comparisons between designs & build contract and
conventional contract, to identify the common problems and the factors faced by the
contractor and to rank the common problems and the factors among contractors. All
the data from the questionnaires were analyzed by using average index analysis and
frequency analysis.
49
4.2 Questionnaire Analysis
In the previous in chapter 3, the questionnaire forms are divided into three
sections. For the first section are Questionnaire cover and general information and
instructions to the respondents. In section A, the Respondent’s Background and in
section B, the questionnaire.
The questionnaire were distributed to the respondent about 80 questionnaire
paper but were received only in 62 papers. The responses rate is summarized in the
table 4.1.
Table 4.1: Percentages of “Respondents rate”
No of sent out : 80 Questionnaires
No of returned : 62 Questionnaires
Respondents rate : 77.5 %
4.3 Section A- Analysis for General Information of the Respondent
In section A, of the study questionnaire is about position in company, company
experience, respondent’s experience, types of project using Design & Build Method
and Types of Design & Build Method.
4.3.1 Position in company
Position in company of the is classified to
From figure 4.1 illustrates the composition of respondents by profession. From
the total 62 responses received, 26 responses (42%) re
responses (10%) received from technical assistant, 3 responses (5%) received from
technician and 27 responses (43%) received from others such as quantity surveyor.
4.3.2 Company experiences
Number of year the organization/company ha
the respondents is classified to four categories as shown in Figure 4.2.
engineer
Position in company
Position in company of the is classified to four categories as shown in Figur
Figure 4.1: Respondents by position
From figure 4.1 illustrates the composition of respondents by profession. From
the total 62 responses received, 26 responses (42%) received from engineer, 6
responses (10%) received from technical assistant, 3 responses (5%) received from
technician and 27 responses (43%) received from others such as quantity surveyor.
experiences
Number of year the organization/company has experience in construction of
the respondents is classified to four categories as shown in Figure 4.2.
42%
10%5%
43%
Position in company
engineer technical assistant technician others
50
categories as shown in Figure 4.1
From figure 4.1 illustrates the composition of respondents by profession. From
ceived from engineer, 6
responses (10%) received from technical assistant, 3 responses (5%) received from
technician and 27 responses (43%) received from others such as quantity surveyor.
s experience in construction of
Figure 4.2
From figure 4.2 it shows that 13 companies (21%) have experiences less than
0– 5 years, 4 companies (6%) , 5 companies (8%) have experiences at least 11
years and finally 40 companies (65%) have experiences in construction industry more
than 15 years.
4.3.3 Respondent Experiences
Number of working in the construction industry of the respondents is classified to
four categories as shown in Figure 4.3.
65%
Number of year the organization/company has experience
0-5 years
Figure 4.2: Company’s experiences in construction industry
it shows that 13 companies (21%) have experiences less than
5 years, 4 companies (6%) , 5 companies (8%) have experiences at least 11
years and finally 40 companies (65%) have experiences in construction industry more
ondent Experiences
Number of working in the construction industry of the respondents is classified to
four categories as shown in Figure 4.3.
21%
6%
8%65%
Number of year the organization/company has experience in construction
5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years more than 15 years
51
: Company’s experiences in construction industry
it shows that 13 companies (21%) have experiences less than
5 years, 4 companies (6%) , 5 companies (8%) have experiences at least 11 - 15
years and finally 40 companies (65%) have experiences in construction industry more
Number of working in the construction industry of the respondents is classified to
Number of year the organization/company has experience
Figure 4.3:
From figure 4.3, you can see that the respondent
the respondents (31 responses), for 6
responses), for 11-15 years there are 8% of the respondents (6 responses) and more
than 15 years are 16% of respondents (10 responses) whic
questionnaire form have working experiences in construction industry.
qualifications ranging of certificate and diploma from polytechnics until had bachelor
of university where there are field in engineering
4.3.4 Types of Project using Design & Build Method
Respondents have involved in various type of Project using Design & Build
method such as education project, health project, civil engineering project and
commercial project. The result is shown below in figure 4.4.
8%
Number of working in the construction industry
0-5 years
Figure 4.3: Respondent experiences in construction industry
, you can see that the respondent under 0 – 5 years only 50% of
the respondents (31 responses), for 6 – 10 years there are 26% of the respondents (16
15 years there are 8% of the respondents (6 responses) and more
than 15 years are 16% of respondents (10 responses) which is answered the
questionnaire form have working experiences in construction industry.
qualifications ranging of certificate and diploma from polytechnics until had bachelor
of university where there are field in engineering
oject using Design & Build Method
Respondents have involved in various type of Project using Design & Build
method such as education project, health project, civil engineering project and
commercial project. The result is shown below in figure 4.4.
50%
26%
16%
Number of working in the construction industry
6-10 years 11-15 years more than 15 years
52
Respondent experiences in construction industry
5 years only 50% of
10 years there are 26% of the respondents (16
15 years there are 8% of the respondents (6 responses) and more
h is answered the
questionnaire form have working experiences in construction industry. They had
qualifications ranging of certificate and diploma from polytechnics until had bachelor
Respondents have involved in various type of Project using Design & Build
method such as education project, health project, civil engineering project and
Figure 4.4
From figure 4.4 shows that 19 responses (21%) have experiences involved in
for education project, 14 responses (15%) have involved in health project, 31
responses (33%) have involved in civil engine
involved in commercial project and 20 responses (22%) have involved in others
project. Major of the respondents involved the civil projects such
4.3.5 Types of Design & Build Method
Many types of Design & Build Method are using in the construction
traditional design and build, develop and construct, turnkey, design, construct and
manage, and design and manage.
9%
Type of project using Design & Build Method
Education
Types of Project using Design & Build Method
shows that 19 responses (21%) have experiences involved in
for education project, 14 responses (15%) have involved in health project, 31
responses (33%) have involved in civil engineering project, 8 responses (9%) have
involved in commercial project and 20 responses (22%) have involved in others
Major of the respondents involved the civil projects such as design structures.
Types of Design & Build Method
types of Design & Build Method are using in the construction such as
traditional design and build, develop and construct, turnkey, design, construct and
manage, and design and manage. The result is shown below in figure 4.5.
21%
15%
33%
9%
22%
Type of project using Design & Build Method
Education Health Civil Engineering Comercial Others
53
Types of Project using Design & Build Method
shows that 19 responses (21%) have experiences involved in
for education project, 14 responses (15%) have involved in health project, 31
ering project, 8 responses (9%) have
involved in commercial project and 20 responses (22%) have involved in others
as design structures.
such as
traditional design and build, develop and construct, turnkey, design, construct and
The result is shown below in figure 4.5.
Others
Figure 4.5
From figure 4.5 shows that 40 responses (49%) have experiences involved in
Traditional Design and Build method, 5 responses (6%) have involved in Develop and
Construct method, 15 responses (18%) have involved in Turnkey method, 14
responses (17%) have involved in Design, Construct and Manage method, 5 responses
(6%) have involved in Design and Manage,
method.
4.4 Section B-Analysis the common problem
contractor
For this question, the
in General Aspect, Problem in Quality Aspect,
in Financial Aspect and Problems in Time Aspect
questionnaire was analyzed as below
Traditional Design and Build
Turnkey
Design and Manage
Figure 4.5 Types of Design & Build Method
shows that 40 responses (49%) have experiences involved in
Traditional Design and Build method, 5 responses (6%) have involved in Develop and
Construct method, 15 responses (18%) have involved in Turnkey method, 14
(17%) have involved in Design, Construct and Manage method, 5 responses
(6%) have involved in Design and Manage, 2 responses (2%) have involved in others
Analysis the common problems and the factors faced by the
this question, the five of the problems was identified. There are
Problem in Quality Aspect, Problems in Design Aspect,
Problems in Time Aspect. Analysis of the returned
analyzed as below using classification of the rating scale which h
49%
6%
19%
18%
6%
2%
Type of Design& Build Method
Traditional Design and Build Develop and Construct
Turnkey Design, Construct and Manage
Design and Manage Others, please specify
54
shows that 40 responses (49%) have experiences involved in
Traditional Design and Build method, 5 responses (6%) have involved in Develop and
Construct method, 15 responses (18%) have involved in Turnkey method, 14
(17%) have involved in Design, Construct and Manage method, 5 responses
2 responses (2%) have involved in others
faced by the
five of the problems was identified. There are: Problem
Problems in Design Aspect, Problems
Analysis of the returned
classification of the rating scale which has
Develop and Construct
Design, Construct and Manage
Others, please specify
55
been modified (Abd Majid & Ronald Mc Caffer, 1997). The classifications of the
rating scale are as shown in table 4.2.
Table 4.2: The level of agreement and evaluation for average index analysis
(Abd. Majid M.Z. and Ronald Mc Caffer, 1997)
Average index Level of agreement of evaluation
1.0≤ Average index<1.5 Not Agree
1.5≤ Average index<2.5 Less Agree
2.5≤Average index<3.5 Neutral
3.5≤ Average index<4..5 Agree
4.5≤ Average index≤5.0 Strongly Agree
56
4.4.1 Problem in General Aspect
There are five major problems that contributed to the causes of the problem in
General Aspect that shows the results of the average index at Table 4.3.
Table 4.3: Problem in General Aspect
1 = Not Agree 2 = Less Agree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Categories 1: Problem in General Aspect
No Problems 1 2 3 4 5 average index Rank
1 Conflicts between contractor and
other parties (consultant and
owner)
1 7 15 30 9 3.63 1
2 Problems communication and
coordination by contractor with
other parties
8 20 27 7 3.53 2
3 Inadequate experience of
consultant
6 11 17 22 6 3.18 5
4 Lack of staff and labors 4 11 19 19 9 3.29 4
5 Changed conditions/differing site
conditions
1 8 24 22 7 3.42 3
From table 4.3, the results show that the highest degree of agreement in
general aspects is conflicts between contractor and other parties (consultant and
owner). It indicated the range in 3.63 of the average index. The range index shows the
respondents agree with that problem. The research from Oberlender, 1993 said that
contractors are independent business organization and are awarded the projects to
produce the required end product as stipulated in the contract documents. In the case
of the owner and the contractor may disagree on certain things, the achievement of the
end product must always be the top priority of both parties This is happen because
contractor and other parties have a different opinion about their project. A good
57
relationship between owner and the project contractor must be maintained so that the
contractor’s expertise, labor and equipment can be utilized to achieve the objectives of
the project.
However, the lowest degree of agreement in general aspects is inadequate
experience of consultant with the average index is 3.18 and neutral in range index.
According to Ng Weng Seng and Aminah Md Yusof, 2006 said that the contractor’s
design consultants should have a good grasp of build ability fro design development.
If designers fail to work within budget and on schedule, poor performance would be
expected. Design consultants should understand the construction process and develop
a cost-effective.
4.4.2 Problem in Quality Aspect
There are six major problems that contributed to the causes of the problem in
Quality Aspect that shows the results of the average index at Table 4.4.
Table 4.4 Problem in Quality Aspect
1 = Not Agree 2 = Less Agree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Categories 2 : Problem in Quality Aspect
No Problems 1 2 3 4 5 average
index
Rank
1 Project done not follow
owner’s specification
5 15 19 19 4 3.03 5
2 Contractor disregards
quality of material in the
way to get profit
3 8 22 26 3 3.29 2
3 Ineffective planning and
scheduling of project by
contractor
5 7 19 29 2 3.26 3
58
4 Change materials order by
owner during construction
2 9 23 21 7 3.35 1
5 Low productivity level of
labors
3 12 24 19 4 3.15 4
6 Lack of construction
materials and machineries
3 17 26 15 1 2.90 6
From table 4.4, the results show that the highest degree of agreement in quality
aspects is change materials order by owner during construction with average index
3.35. The range index shows the respondents neutral with that problem. According to
Timothy, et al.,1994) said that owner Using Design & Build no one actually knows
the final project price until the project is completed. Using change orders to amend a
decision is a time-consuming and expensive undertaking (for example, reintroducing
the more expensive, and more efficient, heating system). The design services provider
must amend the drawings and specifications, and draft the change order. The
contractor must gather supplier and subcontractor information, put the system out to
bid and issue its own change orders. Since change orders occur in a competition-free
environment, that is, the contractor has already been selected; there is no incentive to
make the change at the least possible cost.
However, the lowest degree of agreement in quality aspects is lack of
construction materials and machineries. is neutral with average index of 2.9.
According to Murali Sambasivan, 2007 said that lack in basic materials like sand,
cement, stones, bricks and iron can cause delays in projects. Since Malaysia is a
country that is demand exceeds the supply and this causes prices to increase. The
contractors postpone the purchase activities until the prices decrease. They also said
many of contractors do not own equipments that are required for construction work
such as machineries. They rent the equipments when required. During the season
when there are many construction projects, the equipments are in short supply and are
poorly maintained. This leads to failure of the equipments causing the progress to be
hampered.
59
4.4.3 Problem in Design Aspect
There are six major problems that contributed to the causes of the problem in
Design Aspect that shows the results of the average index at Table 4.5.
Table 4.5 Problem in Design Aspect
1 = Not Agree 2 = Less Agree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Categories 3:Problems in Design Aspect
No Problems 1 2 3 4 5
average
index Rank
1
Contractor takes control of
design compare to
consultant 2 11 27 16 6 3.21 3
2
Consultant submits
construction drawing late. 3 9 24 18 8 3.31 2
3
Contractors always do an
additional works compare
with consultant 4 9 29 15 5 3.13 4
4
Mistakes and discrepancies
in design documents 2 7 25 23 5 3.35 1
5
Owner less involve in
controlling design 6 15 18 17 6 3.03 6
6
Insufficient instruction and
information in the contract
specification, drawing and
design 6 6 28 18 4 3.13 5
From table 4.5, the results show that the highest degree of agreement in design
aspects is mistakes and discrepancies in design documents with average index 3.35.
The range index shows the respondents neutral with that problem. Inadequate
planning in design causes mistakes and discrepancies in design documents. They are
60
common reasons for redoing designs and drawings and may take a long time to make
necessary corrections.
However, the lowest degree of agreement in quality aspects is problems is
owner less involves in controlling design is neutral with average index of 3.03. This is
because the owners not possess any knowledge and experienced of the construction
industry. The owner no longer has a direct contract with the lead design professional
on the project, that responsibility its is necessarily imputed to the holder of the Design
& Build Contract without regard to that entity’s specific professional qualification.
The intent here is to ensure that the design is completed by a qualified design
professional while preserving privities of the Design & Build Contract.
4.4.4 Problem in Financial Aspect
There are six major problems that contributed to the causes of the problem in
Financial Aspect that shows the results of the average index at Table 4.6.
Table 4.6 Problem in Financial Aspect
1 = Not Agree 2 = Less Agree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Categories 4 : Problems in Financial Aspect
No Problems 1 2 3 4 5
average
index Rank
1
Contractor does not having
good cash flow or good
financial planning 4 5 22 26 5 3.37 2
2
Contractor’s submit claims for
items not clearly stated in the
contract documents 2 11 24 19 6 3.26 4
61
3
Quantity Surveyor/ Consultant
does not estimate work done
and material on site correctly 2 11 34 14 1 3.02 6
4
Sometimes progress payment
for contractor not in time. 2 10 21 25 4 3.31 3
5
Actual price for project higher
than owner’s target price 1 8 25 20 8 3.42 1
6
Delay in progress payment by
owner to the contractors 1 11 27 18 5 3.24 5
From table 4.6, the results show that the highest degree of agreement in
financial aspects is actual price for project higher than owner’s target price. It
indicated the range in 3.42 of the average index. The range index shows the
respondents neutral on that problem. According to (Rosli Abdul Rashid,et al.2006)
said that apart from the fact those very limited contractors are invited to submit
tenders, the lack of design and specification detailing during tender, has made the
contractors to jack up the price to allow for many uncertainties. This is because once
accepted, the tender price will be the final contract sum. It is not subject to change,
unless there are variations required or instructed by the client. Such additional cost
cannot avoid because under this procurement system the contractor will to take much
of the financial risk.
However, the lowest degree of agreement in financial aspects is Quantity
Surveyor/ Consultant does not estimate work done and material on site correctly is
neutral with average index of 3.02. Producing design documents on time by Quantity
Surveyor/Consultant is important for completion the project.
62
4.4.5 Problem in Time Aspect
There are five major problems that contributed to the causes of the problem in
Time Aspect that shows the results of the average index at Table 4.7.
Table 4.7 Problem in Time Aspect
1 = Not Agree 2 = Less Agree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Categories 5 : Problems in Time Aspect
No Problems 1 2 3 4 5
average
index Rank
1
Insufficient time to prepare
tender documents 6 14 23 18 1 2.90 3
2
Insufficient time to evaluate
tenders 7 15 22 17 1 2.84 4
3
Time is limited to establish if
using design and build contract 4 19 29 6 4 2.79 5
4
Project finish not in time as
agreement 5 11 24 17 5 3.10 2
5
Delays in commencing work
because under-estimated time
needed to obtain statutory
approvals. 3 11 24 18 6 3.21 1
From table 4.7, the results show that the highest degree of agreement in time
aspects is delays in commencing work because under-estimated time needed to obtain
statutory approvals. It indicated the range in 3.21 of the average index. The range
index shows the respondents neutral that problem. Delay in construction can have a
serious effect on field’s costs and project time. The contractor must be able to
establish the cause of the delay on commencing work because its total impact on
individual activities and on the project as a whole.
63
However, the lowest degree of agreement in financial aspects is time is limited
to establish if using design and build contract neutral with average index of 2.79.
Design and Build is a quick project because the contractor to be involved in the
project at an early stage and proceed with the design works in parallel with the
construction activities, the project re-development time could be reduced.
4.5 Analysis of rank the problems and the factors among contractor.
For this question, the respondents should to rank the level of the problems
among contractor. The data shown using the table and figure where represented by the
rating scale 1 to 5. It is an analysis the level of the problems among contractor using
Design & Build method at Klang Valley and was shown in data using frequency
analysis. Table 4.8, shows the percentage of rank the problems and the factors among
contractors as below:
Table 4.8: Percentage of “rank the problems and the factors among
contractors”
No Problems Frequency Percentage
1 Problem In General Aspect 30 48
2 Problem In Quality Aspect 6 10
3 Problem In Design Aspect 16 26
4 Problem In Financial Aspect 8 13
5 Problem In Time Aspect 2 2
64
Figure 4.6: rank the problems and the factors among contractors
From figure 4.6 shows, the problems in General Aspect are highest
48% than other problems faced by contractor using Design & Build method. This is
because most of the respondents agree problems in General Aspect always happen in
construction industry for example problems communication and coordination by
contractor with other parties. It is followed by problem in Design Aspect are 26%,
problem in Financial Aspect are 13%, problem in Quality Aspect are 10% and 2 %
problem in time aspect. Other than that, based on the result obtained from
questionnaires were identified the problems among contractor are not critical because
overall the respondents are agree with that problem and the average index less than
4.5.
48
10
26
132
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Problem in General Aspect
Problem in Quality Aspect
Problem in Design Aspect
Problem in Financial Aspect
Problem in Time Aspect
Rank the problems and the factors among contractors
Series1
65
4.6 Summary
From the analysis through questionnaires and interview, it revealed the
common problems and the factors faced by the contractor and to rank the problems
and the factors among contractors. Based on the result obtained from questionnaire,
five of category problems were identified. So from that category will been identify the
common problem faced by contractor using design & build are problem in general
aspect. It is followed by problem in design aspect, problem in financial aspect,
problem in quality aspect and problem in time aspect. Majority of the respondents
agree with those problems. Next, the last chapter would discuss the overall study then
some conclusion would be made and recommendations would be provided to the
construction industries parties
CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
5.1 Introduction
This chapter consists of two (2) main sections. The first section is the
conclusion of the study and the second section is the recommendation. For the
conclusion section, this section will conclude the result of the study based on the
objectives of this study.
5.2 Conclusion
Based on the overall result, the study has come out with the conclusion based
on objectives that have been set up. Those three (3) objectives are on study the
comparisons between designs & build contract and conventional contract, to identify
the common problems and the factors faced by the contractor and to rank the common
problems and the factors among contractors.
67
5.2.1 Objective 1: Study the comparisons between designs & build contract and
conventional contract
The first objective of this research was on study the comparisons between
designs & build contract and conventional contract. This objective has been
successfully achieved. Design & Build Contract one in which a single entity, usually a
contractor assumes responsibility for the design in whole or in part and for the
construction and completion of a construction project, main contractor have the right
to decide the design of the works follow the concept design and no need to wait for
consultant decision. Otherwise for the traditional method owner first hires a design
professional, who then prepares a design, including complete contracts documents.
The design professional is typically paid a fee that is either a percentage of the
estimated construction cost or a lump sump amount, or he or she is reimbursed for
costs at an agreed-upon billing rate. With a complete set of documents available, the
owner either conducts a competitive bid opening to obtain the lowest price from
contractors to do the work or negotiates with a specific contractor. The contractor is
then responsible for delivering the completed project in accordance with the dictates
of he contract documents.
5.2.2 Objective 2: To identify the common problems and the factors faced by the
contractor
The second objective of the study has been successfully identified. Based on
the result obtained from questionnaire, five of category problems were identified.
There are problem in general aspect, problem in quality aspect, problem in design
aspect, problem in financial aspect and problem in time aspect. The problems were
then grouped into 5 categories as table in below:
68
Table 5.1: Categories 1: Problem in General Aspect
Categories 1: Problem in General Aspect
No Problems
1 Conflicts between contractor and other parties (consultant and owner)
2 Problems communication and coordination by contractor with other
parties
3 Inadequate experience of consultant
4 Lack of staff and labors
5 Changed conditions/differing site conditions
Table 5.2: Categories 2: Problem in Quality Aspect
Categories 2 : Problem in Quality Aspect
No Problems
1 Project done not follow owner’s specification
2 Contractor disregards quality of material in the way to get profit
3 Ineffective planning and scheduling of project by contractor
4 Change materials order by owner during construction
5 Low productivity level of labors
6 Lack of construction materials and machineries
Table 5.3: Categories 3: Problems in Design Aspect
Categories 3:Problems in Design Aspect
No Problems
1 Contractor takes control of design compare to consultant
2 Consultant submits construction drawing late.
3
Contractors always do an additional works compare with
consultant
4 Mistakes and discrepancies in design documents
5 Owner less involve in controlling design
6
Insufficient instruction and information in the contract
specification, drawing and design
69
Table 5.4: Categories 4: Problems in Financial Aspect
Categories 4 : Problems in Financial Aspect
No Problems
1
Contractor does not having good cash flow or good financial
planning
2
Contractor’s submit claims for items not clearly stated in the
contract documents
3
Quantity Surveyor/ Consultant does not estimate work done and
material on site correctly
4 Sometimes progress payment for contractor not in time.
5 Actual price for project higher than owner’s target price
6 Delay in progress payment by owner to the contractors
Table 5.5: Categories 5: Problems in Time Aspect
Categories 5 : Problems in Time Aspect
No Problems
1 Insufficient time to prepare tender documents
2 Insufficient time to evaluate tenders
3 Time is limited to establish if using design and build contract
4 Project finish not in time as agreement
5
Delays in commencing work because under-estimated time
needed to obtain statutory approvals.
70
5.2.3 Objective 3: To rank the common problems and the factors among
contractors
The third objective of this study was to rank the common problems and the factors
among contractors has been successfully achieved. Based on the result obtained from
questionnaire, five of category problems were identified. So from that category will
been identify the main problem faced by contractor using design & build are problem
in general aspect. It is followed by problem in design aspect, problem in financial
aspect, problem in quality aspect and problem in time aspect. Based on the result
obtained from questionnaires were identified the problems among contractor are not
critical because overall the respondents are agree with that problem and the average
index less than 4.5.
5.3 Recommendation
For overall, this study achieves the purpose, need and objective that have been
setup earlier. Nevertheless, there have certain infirmity and weaknesses while doing
this study. Thus, the recommendation is provided into 2(two) recommendation to
improve the quality and the effectiveness. The recommendations are; recommendation
for this study and the recommendation for further studies.
71
5.3.1 Recommendation for this study
The recommendation to overcome the problems faced by contractor using
design and build method
1) Effective communication and more coordination between contractor and
consultant.
2) Owner hired another team such as PMC (private management consultant) to
control contractor.
3) Main contractor will have the advantage to select their project team and these
will ensure smooth delivery of project to enable project to complete in time,
less problem and saving cost.
5.3.2 Recommendation for further studies
1) Increase the number of respondent and questionnaire for the site study in
order to obtain more accurate and precise data.
2) Expand the area of the study. The study will be more effective if it is being
conducted in the area at Malaysia that has a rapidly prospering
development such as the Kuala Lumpur, Penang or Shah Alam for to
identify all the problems faced by contractor using design & build method.
3) Identify the suitable method use analysis hierarchy process (AHP) for
selecting which method suitable with the project.
72
REFERENCES
Abd. Majid M.Z. and Ronald Mc Caffer. (1998). Factors of Non Excusable Delays That Influence Contractor's Performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,ASCE.
Abdalla M. Odeh & Hussien T. Battaineh. (2002). Causes of Construction Delay: Traditional Contracts. International Journal of Project Management ,20,67-73.
Abdul Rahman Ayub & Janidah Eman. (2006). Identification of Challenges faced by Bumiputra Contractors & Roles of Local Government in ensuring a successfull completion of a Project. sabah.
Akinteye, A, Fitzgerald , E. (1995). Design and Build : A survey of Architects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management , 2 (1), 27-44.
AlHammad,A.Mohsen and Assaf S. (1996). Assessment of work Performance of Maintenance Contractor in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Mangement in Engineering , 16 (1).
Beard, J.L.,Loulakis, M.C.,& Wundram, E.C. (2001). Design-build : planning through deveploment.
Bryan S. Shapiro. (1994). Project Managemet. Design/Build Construction- An Innovetive Contracting Approach , 52, 581.
Burgess, T. F. (2001). A general Introduction to the Design of Questionnaires for Survey Research. Retrieved November 6, 2002, from Information System Services: http;//www.leeds.ac.uk.iss/documentation/top/top2.pdf
Carter McNamara, M. P. (1997-2008). General Guidelines for Conducting Interviews Retrieved from General Guidelines for Conducting Interviews : http://managementhelp.org/evaluatn/intrview.htm
Frederick E. Gould & Nancy E. Joyce. (2003). Construction Project Management. Prentice Hall.
Gwen Flora, J. J. (1998). Field-Level Management’s Prespective of Design/Build. American Society of Civil Engineers.
73
Ir Harbans Singh KS . (2007). Engineering and Construction Contracts Management (Law and Principles). Singapore: LexisNexis.
Isaac, S. (1971). Handbook in Research and Evaluation. San Diego, Calfornia: EdITS Publishers.
K.C. Iyer & K.N. Jha. (2005). Factors affecting cost performance: evidence from Indian construction projects. International Journal of Project Management , 23, 283-295.
Khairuddin Abdul Rashid. (2002). Construction Procurement in Malaysia processes and systems constraints and strategies. Research Centre , IIUM .
King G, K. e. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry. USA: Princeton University Press.
M.S. Mohd Danuri, M.E. Che Munaaim,H.Abdul Rahman & M.Hanid. (2006). Late and Non-Payment Issues in the Malaysian Construction Industry - Contractor's Perspective. 613-623.
Mansfeild NR, Ugwu OO & Doran T. (1994). Causes of delay and cost overruns in Nigerian construction projects. International Journal of Project Management , 12 (4), 254-60.
Maryam Darvish, Mehrdad Yasaei & Azita Saeedi. (2008). Application of the graph theory and matrix methods of contractor ranking. International Journal of Project Management .
Michael Pollick. (2006). wiseGEEK articles. Retrieved february thursday, 2009, from what is a contractor?: http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-contractor.htm.
Murali Sambasivan & Yau Wen Soon. (2005). Causes and effects of delays in Malaysian construction industry. International Journal of Project Management, 25, 517-526.
Murali Sambasivan, Y. W. (2007). Causes and effects of delays in Malaysian construction industry. International Journal of ProjectManagement , 25, 517- 526.
Ng Weng Seng and Aminah Md Yusof. (2006). The Success Factors of Design and Build Procurement Method: A Literature Visit. Proceedings of the 6th Asia-Pacific Structural Engineering and Construction Conference (APSEC 2006),5-6 september 2006, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia .
Nuhu Braimah & Issaka Ndekugri. (2008). Factors nfluencing the selection of delay analysis methodologies. International Journal of ProjectManagement , 26, 789-799.
74
Oberlender. (1993). Project Management For Engineering and Management.
Odeyinka HA & Yusif A. (1997). The causes and effects of construction delay on
completion cost housing projects in Nigeria. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction , 2 (3), 31-44.
Q, P. M. (1987). How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluataion. California: California Seage Publications,Inc.
Redzuan. (2006). Significant Usage of Slab and Wall Form Technique in Industrial Building Systems (IBS) for Low Cost High-Rise Apartments Construction.Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Rosli Abdul Rashid, Ismail Mat Taib, Wan Basiron Wan Ahmad, Md. Asrul Nasid, Wan Nordiana Wan Ali & Zainab Mohd Zainordin. (2006). Effect of Procurument Systems on the Performance of Constructions Projects.
S. W. Nunnally. (2007). Construction Methods and Management.
Seng, Ng. W. and Aminah Md Yusof. (2006). Success factors of design and build procurement method:a literature visit. Proceedings of the 6-th Asia Pacific Strutural Engineering and Conference (ASPEC 2006), (pp. C1-111). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Tan, Daniel. (1997)Problems With Design & Build Contracts In Malaysia. Malaysia.
Timothy D. Hover & Eugene, OR. (1994). Allowing the Design/Build Delivery Method in the procurement of Public Construction Contracts.
Wellington Didibhuku Thwala & Mpendulo Mvubu. (2008). Current challenges and problems facing small and medium size contractors in Swaziland. African Journal of Business Management , 2 (5).
wikipedia. (2001-2006). wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved february thursday, 2009, from general contractor: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/general_contractor
75