Department of English and Foreign Languages

School of Liberal Arts

B.A. in English EducationCIP Code 13.1203Program Code 125

1Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011

Student-Learning Outcomes1. Students will demonstrate knowledge of, and skills in the use of, the English language (NCTE).2. Students will demonstrate knowledge of the practices of oral, visual, and written literacy (NCTE).3. Students will demonstrate knowledge of reading processes (NCTE).4. Students will demonstrate knowledge of different composing processes (NCTE).5. Students will demonstrate knowledge of, and uses for, an extensive range of literature (NCTE).6. Students will demonstrate knowledge of the range and influences of print and non-print media and technology in contemporary culture (NCTE).7. Students will demonstrate knowledge of research theory and findings in English language arts (NCTE).8. Students will demonstrate effective computer literacy.9. Students will adopt and strengthen professional attitudes needed by English language arts teachers (NCTE).10. Students will acquire the disposition and skills needed to integrate knowledge

of English language arts, students, and teaching (NCTE).

2Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011

Program goals and objectivesAlignment with Mission and Strategic Plan

• University Mission Statement• Prepares students for professional success;• Diversity;• Regional Development

• School of Liberal Arts Mission Statement• Student centered academic environment;• Partnership with the community

• Department of English and Foreign Languages Mission Statement• Exposure to a broad array of studies;• Development of individual critical and analytical capacities

• Plan 2013• Personal Growth• Community Leadership• Diversity

3Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011

Measures of Learning Outcomes

Measurement Type Objectives

Oklahoma Subject Area Test Direct 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Major Portfolio Direct 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Unit Plan Direct 9, 10

Student Teaching Report Direct 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10

Teacher Work Sample Direct 9, 10

Residency Year Follow-up Survey

Direct 9, 10

Literary History Exam Direct 1, 5

Student Essay Response Direct 1, 4, 7

Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 4

Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 5

Actions taken on previously chosen priority outcomes

Objective 5: Students will demonstrate knowledge of, and uses for, an extensive range of literature.

Review sessions for students taking Oklahoma Subject Area Test;

Comprehensive review added to ENGL 4773, Teaching of English;

No data yet available.

Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 6

Actions taken on previously chosen priority outcomes

Objective 7: Students will demonstrate knowledge of research theory and findings in English language arts.

Follow up with public school mentor teachers and continue to monitor data collection;

Continue to work with the teacher education council to improve delivery of secondary education pedagogy.

Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 7

Actions taken on previously chosen priority outcomes

Objective 10: Students will acquire the disposition and skills needed to integrate knowledge of English language arts, students, and teaching.

Follow up with public school mentor teachers and continue to monitor data collection;

Continue to work with the teacher education council to improve delivery of secondary education pedagogy.

Outcome 2

PROGRAM OUTCOME

CURRICULUM AREA OR TARGET AUDIENCE

MEASUREMENTS OF STUDENT LEARNING OR SERVICE OUTCOME

Measurements

Methods used to determine validity of measurement instruments

Methods used to determine reliability of measurements

Schedule for measurements

Students will demonstrate knowledge of the practices of oral, visual, and written literacy (NCTE)

Upper Division Literature courses

Upper Division Literature courses

Student Teaching Semester

OSAT (direct)

Major Portfolio (direct)

Student Teaching Report (direct)

Competencies aligned with objectives

Students articulate alignment of artifact with objective

NCATE Aligned Scoring Rubric

State Test

Inter-rater reliability

Inter-rater reliability

Each semester

Annually

Each semester

88Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011

Outcome 2Portfolio Data

Objective 2.1 2.2 2.4 2.5 Average

Student 1 5 5 3 3 4

Student 2 5 5 3 3 4

Student 3 5 5 3 3 4

Student 4 5 5 3 3 4

Student 5 5 5 3 3 4

Average 5 5 3 3 4

Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 9

Outcome 2Analysis

Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 10

• Insufficient data available for comparison

Outcome 2Action Plan

• Continue to collect data and measure outcomes.

Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 11

Outcome 5

PROGRAM OUTCOME

CURRICULUM AREA OR TARGET AUDIENCE

MEASUREMENTS OF STUDENT LEARNING OR SERVICE OUTCOME

Measurements

Methods used to determine validity of measurement instruments

Methods used to determine reliability of measurements

Schedule for measurements

Students will demonstrate knowledge of, and uses for, an extensive range of literature

Upper division literature courses

Upper division literature courses

ENGL 4773

Student teaching semester

OSAT (direct)

Major Portfolio (direct)

Unit Plan (direct)

Student Teaching Report (direct)

Competencies aligned with objectives

Students articulate alignment of artifact with objective

NCATE Aligned Scoring Rubric

NCATE Aligned Scoring Rubric

State Test

Inter-rater reliability

Inter-rater reliability

Inter-rater reliability

Each semester

Annually

Each semester

Each semester

1212Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011

Outcome 5Portfolio Data

Objective 5.1 5.2 5.4 Average

Student 1 5 5 3 4.3

Student 2 3 3 3 3

Student 3 3 3 3 3

Student 4 3 3 3 3

Student 5 3 3 3 3

Student 6 3 3 3 3

Student 7 3 3 3 3

Student 8 3 3 3 3

Student 9 3 3 3 3

Student 10 3 3 3 3

Average 3.2 3.2 3 3.13

Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 13

Outcome 5Analysis

Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 14

• Insufficient data available for comparison

Outcome 5Action Plan

• Continue collecting data and measuring outcomes.

Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 15

Outcome 9

PROGRAM OUTCOME

CURRICULUM AREA OR TARGET AUDIENCE

MEASUREMENTS OF STUDENT LEARNING OR SERVICE OUTCOME

Measurements

Methods used to determine validity of measurement instruments

Methods used to determine reliability of measurements

Schedule for measurements

Students will adopt and strengthen professional attitudes needed by English language arts teachers

ENGL 4773

Student Teaching semester

Practicum and Assessment course

Program Graduates

Unit Plan

Student Teaching Report

Teacher Work Sample

Residency Year Follow-up survey

NCATE Aligned Scoring Rubric

NCATE Aligned Scoring Rubric

NCATE Aligned Scoring Rubric

NCATE Aligned Scoring Rubric

Inter-rater reliability

Inter-rater reliability

Inter-rater reliability

Inter-rater reliability

Each semester

Each semester

Annually

Annually

1616Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011

Outcome 9Residency Year Follow-up Data

Objective Student 1

Administrator Mentor University Average

9.1 3 3 3 3

9.2 3 3 3 3

9.3 3 3 3 3

9.4 3 3 3 3

9.5 3 3 3 3

9.6 3 3 3 3

Average 3 3 3 3

Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 17

Outcome 9Analysis

Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 18

• Insufficient data available for comparison

Outcome 9Action Plan

• Continue collecting data as more students complete the program.

Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 19

Ancillary Actions

• Arrange Chalk and wire training for faculty members.

20Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011

Published information on graduates

21

Academic Year 09-10 Entered Graduate School Working In Discipline Other

Summer 2009

Fall 2009

Spring 2010 1

Total 1

Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011