deborah schaler - ehpr 2014 - patient feedback research
TRANSCRIPT
Listening, Learning, Improving
The patient voice in health care.
Deborah Schaler, MHPol, PhD Candidate
Menzies Centre for Health Policy
University of Sydney
Partnering with patients – policy drivers
• Health services are urged/required to partner with patients at:– individual level– service level– organisational level
• Drivers include national quality and safety standards and frameworks, accreditation standards, and local consumer participation policies and consumer advocacy organisations.
Partnering – why and how?
• The overarching aim of health services partnering with patients is to improve individual patient experience and to improve the safety and quality of health care services.
• ‘Partnering’ strategies include a range of patient feedback methods:– Consumer feedback management;– Patient and carer surveys; and– Collection of narrative.
Research aims
• To assess the effectiveness of 3 patient feedback methods (complaints, satisfaction/experience surveys and collection of narrative) in facilitating improvement to health service safety or quality.
• To develop a method for health services to analyse and link patient feedback data to service improvement and meet the new Australian National Safety & Quality in Healthcare Standards (Standards 1 & 2) related to patient feedback.
NSQHC Standards 1 & 2
• Standard 1 (Governance)– 1.15 Implementing a complaints system that includes
partnership with patients and carers
• Standard 2 (Partnering with Consumers)– 2.9 Consumers and/or carers participate in the evaluation of
patient feedback data and development of action plans.
Methods
• Case study (ACT Health) - Mixed Methods including Grounded Theory and situational analysis mapping
• Review of peer reviewed and grey literature including policy documents; case study: review of patient feedback data; and safety & quality governance
• Semi-structured interviews/ focus groups with health service staff – 44 staff comprising clinical, administrative, and safety & quality staff.
• Development of a method to analyse aggregated patient feedback and incident data to facilitate linking of the data to service improvement.
Results
• A more personal and immediate approach to managing complaints (core theme from staff interviews: degree of separation).
• Challenge: current policy treats complaints the same way regardless of clinical/other seriousness; bureaucratic process.
• Opportunity: risk management approach to complaints.
• Patient feedback as a service improvement tool.• Challenge: differences in priorities across professional groups.• Opportunity: patient feedback in a patient safety intelligence
network.
Results (cont)
• Narrative = powerful; drives service improvement.• Challenge: balance of + and - stories; data reports lack narrative.• Opportunity: narrative in data reports; capture & report compliments
better. Community based services implement multi-service QI wrapped around ‘types’ of patient journeys.
• Tools • Challenge: patient satisfaction surveys• Opportunity: new tools e.g. Patient Experience Trackers; patient
experience surveys. Improve quality of data reports.
Results (cont)
• Patient feedback data analysis• Challenge: data silos; no method to aggregate and analyse patient
feedback or to link patient feedback and incident data.• Opportunity: study to develop method to aggregate and analyse
data across sources that will also meet the new NSQHC Standards.
Opportunities to improve
• Risk management approach to complaints:– Risk matrix applied to complaints.– Level of risk determines type and timeframe for response.
• Patient feedback data system and reports:– Data reports include narrative; reports provided at service level.– Consistent data codes enable aggregation of data.
• Governance related to quality/service improvement:– Governance structure facilitates analysis of patient feedback to
drive service improvement.
Policy implications of project
• Health agencies might re-consider:– their selection of patient feedback methods.– their processes related to patient feedback management.– governance structure to facilitate translation of patient feedback
to service improvement.
• Clinicians and health service managers have an effective method to analyse aggregated patient feedback data and link it directly to quality and safety improvement activity.
References
• Ward, JK; Armitage, G. (2012). Can patients report patient safety incidents in a hospital setting? A systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf 2012;21: 685-699
• King, A; Daniels, J; Lim, J; Cochrane DD; Taylor, A; Ansermino, JM; (2010). Time to listen: a review of methods to solicit patient reports of adverse events. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19 148-157
• Reader, TW; Gillespie, A, Roberts, J. (2014) Patient complaints in healthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;0: 1-12
• Roberts, G; Cornwell, J; (2011) What matters to patients? Policy recommendations . Department of Health and NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement
• Coulter, A; Fitzpatrick, R; Cornwell, J; (2009) The Point of Care: Measures of patient’s experience in hospital: purpose, methods and uses. London. The King’s Fund
• Goodrich, J; Cornwell, J (2008): Seeing the person in the patient. The Point of Care review paper. London. The Kings Fund www.healthissuescentre.org.au
• Davies, E; Cleary, PD; (2004) Hearing the patient’s voice? Factors affecting the use of patient survey data in quality improvement. Qual Saf Health Care 2005: 14:428-432
• Davies et al Factors affecting the use of patient survey data for quality improvement in the Veteran Health Administration BMC Health Services Research 2011, 11:334
• Coulter, A; Ellins, J ; (2006) Patient-focused interventions. A review of the evidence. Picker Institute Europe • Draper et al (2001) Seeking consumer views: what use are results of hospital patient satisfaction surveys?
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2001; Volume 13, Number 6: pp.463-468• Luxford et al (2011) Promoting patient-centred care: a qualitative study of facilitators and barriers in healthcare
organizations with a reputation for improving the patient experience International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2011; Volume 23, Number 5:pp510-515