data concentrator board implementation concept rev 2 update

19
Data Concentrator Board Implementation Concept Rev 2 Update Tom O’Bannon University of Maryland 7/16/2013—Updated on 7/19/2013 1

Upload: tarik-chandler

Post on 01-Jan-2016

27 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Data Concentrator Board Implementation Concept Rev 2 Update. Tom O’Bannon University of Maryland 7/16/2013—Updated on 7/19/2013. Objectives. These charts are not intended to imply any decisions. T he goal here is to stimulate some dialog: Ensure understanding of key requirements - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

1

Data Concentrator Board Implementation Concept

Rev 2 Update

Tom O’BannonUniversity of Maryland

7/16/2013—Updated on 7/19/2013

2

Objectives

• These charts are not intended to imply any decisions.

• The goal here is to stimulate some dialog:– Ensure understanding of key requirements– Offer some general conceptual talking points of

the UT electronics implementation details

Operating Environment for Data Concentrator Electronics1

• Physical Environment – Ambient temperature: 20 ± 2°C– Ambient pressure: Normal Atmospheric– Ambient relative humidity: 40% (typ)– Radiation: 10 Krad

• 10-year accumulated exposure• Includes a 2x radiation safety factor

– Magnetic Field: 2,500 Gauss• Electrical Stresses

– 1000V (ie ±500 VDC) worse case detector bias potentially routed thru detector electronics assemblies

1 Per ‘Mechanical Requirements Document for the LHCb UT Upgrade Tracker” Rev 5/3/2013---WIP

4

UT Physical Location Definitions

Physical Configuration: 8 Edge Interfaces x2 for Flex Tails to Data Concentrator Boards (x2 facilitates mechanical right-left separation)

Station 0, Layer AStation 0, Layer B

Station 1, Layer AStation 1, Layer B

UT Detector is electrically divided between top and bottom

UT Detector is split apart Left-from-right for maintenance access

4.5 cm

4.5 cm27 cm

1539 mm

1349

.4 m

m

Quadrant: Lower-Left

Quadrant: Lower-Right

Quadrant: Upper-Left

Quadrant: Upper-Right

(Lower Balcony Area)

(Upper Balcony Area)

5

UT ASIC Access via Flextails1:Station 0: UTaX and UTaU

Station 0, Layer A, Upper= 496Station 0, Layer B, Upper= 496

Station 0, Layer A, Lower= 496Station 0, Layer B, Lower= 496

Station 0 has 1984 FE ASICs

1 This analysis based upon JC Wang presentation on 6/17/13

6

UT ASIC Access via Flextails1:Station 1: UTbX and UTbU

Station 1, Layer A, Upper= 552Station 1, Layer B, Upper= 552

Station 1 has 2208 FE ASICs

Station 1, Layer A, Lower= 552Station 1, Layer B, Lower= 552

1 This analysis based upon JC Wang presentation on 6/17/13

7

UT ASIC E-Link Distribution1:Station 0: UTaX and UTaU

1 This analysis based upon JC Wang presentation on 6/17/13

Station 0 has 2754 E-Links

Per Quadrant via 8 Flex Tails: 56 Hybrids ~ 350 E-Links

8

UT ASIC E-Link Distribution1:Station 1: UTbV and UTbX

1 This analysis based upon JC Wang presentation on 6/17/13

Station 1 has 3254 E-Links

Per Quadrant via 9 Flex Tails: 63 Hybrids ~ 410 E-Links

9

UT Data Interface Summary

1984 FE ASICs 2754 E-Links

Per Quadrant via 8 Flex Tails: 56 Hybrids ~ 345 E-Links ~ 35 GBTx’s

Per Quadrant via 9 Flex Tails: 63 Hybrids ~ 407 E-Links ~ 41 GBTx’s

276 GBTx’s

Station 0

2208 FE ASICs 3254 E-Links 326 GBTx’s

Station 1

4,192 FE ASICs 6,008 E-Links 608 GBTx’s

UT Total

952 Hybrids Raw Data Rate1

1,945.6 Gbps1 ( ie without data link overhead)

10

Initial Electronics Concept-Annotated

GBTX-Master

DCB

DC-DC Power

Backplane

11

Board-Level System Partition Options

• Assume standard EDAC (80 bits/frame) for GBTx operation• Total of 6008 Data E-Links (initial estimate only)

– Requires 601 GBTx’s1 dedicated for data transmission• Example Partitions:

– 12 GBTXs per board requires 51 DCBs– 8 GBTXs per board requires 75 DCBs

• What are the mechanical interface options along the left and right of the top and bottom detector plane edges?– Option: one backplane per detector plane quadrant

• Yields 16 smaller backplanes• Facilitates right-left mechanical split• Would be helpful if the 4 quadrants of each detector plane are made

symmetrical1 Note--System board-level partitioning will increase this quantity slightly

Some More Questions• Environment, Health, and status sensors?

– Type, quantity, update rates• Failsafes and interlock approach?• FE ASIC control interfaces via GBT-SCA:

– Interface port type? • I2C, JTAG, parallel port, SPI

– Data update rates? – Number of FE ASICs per GBT-SCA?– Initial prototype effort/support?

• DC-DC power distribution and regulation– FE ASICS– DCBs– Control Board

• Test Equipment plan?• Any dedicated handshake signal interfaces required between FE ASICs and

GBTs?– Data Valid / tx Rdy / rx_Rdy

13

Digital Control Interface Signal Details/Options

• GBT-SCA—Control via one 80 Mbps E-Port– SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface)

• Serial Clock• Serial Data out• Serial Data in• 1 select line per slave

– I2C (Inter-Integrated Circuit)• Serial clock• Serial Data (bidir)• Signals are open drain to allow multiple bus masters

– JTAG– Memory interface– Parallel Port– Interrupts

• GBTx (Master)– 32 ports available at 80 Mbps– Provides FE ASIC TFC interface– E-Ports (AKA E-Links)

• Data In (to GBTx) • Data Out (from GBTx)• Clock Out (from GBTx)

Preferred Choice

14

GBT-SCA Analog Interface Signal Details1

• 12-bit ADC– Input range: GND < Vin < 1 V– Max. conversion rate ≈ 3.5 KHz

• 32 Multiplexed Input channels– 31 general user input channels– 1 channel dedicated to on-chip temperature

sensor

1 Per Dec 15, 2011 [email protected] summary charts

Need to identify sensor specifics and any associated signal conditioning circuitry requirements to accommodate the GBT-SCA defined analog interface.

15

DCBFE ASIC Interconnect Concept…

16

DC Power Conversion, Regulation, and Filtering

Split the FE ASIC and DCBs DC power rails– What are the preferred distributed DC power rail voltages

• Input = 9V (11.5V at counting room)?• Backplane rails: ____?• GBTx=1.5V, FE ASIC= ___?, VL= 2.5V

– Select a standard (ie w/ CERN Heritage) rad-tolerant LDO to facilitate local power regulation and switching noise filtering

17

Board Function Summary• GBTx-Master

– Bi-direction control interface via GBTx and versatile link ASICs– FPGA-Based Local Manager allows for local support functions

• DC-DC converter power segmented control (isolation/sequencing)• switch mode frequency synchronization/coordination• Autonomous failsafes and interlocks to protect hardware

– Local low drop out regulators• Data Concentrator Board

– E-link to GBTx to VL– Local low drop out regulators

• DC-DC Converter Board– High voltage EMI filtering + local isolation switch controls– Low voltage DC-DC conversion + EMI filtering– Low drop out regulators for FE ASICS

• Backplane– Fully Passive– EMI filtering for EMI isolation and suppression– Interconnect signal routing to match flex tail E-Links to DCBs

Initial concepts and functional placeholders to be refined by on-going system definition development as well as cost and schedule constraints

18

An Alternate ‘Back Burner’ Approach

• Alternate prototype approach using intermediate FPGAs between FE ASICs and GBTx.– Flexibility since it can be remotely

re-programmed– Potential GBT SERDES alternate via

SF2 SOC effort if GBTs not readily available

– Potential to reduce risks by accommodating unexpected ‘design features’ between FE ASICs and GBTs

Above excerpt from CMS ngCCM (Terry Shaw)

Potentially useful in the initial prototype detector slice proof-of-concept build

19

Near Term Path Forward

• Discuss support needs for prototype development

• Continue system partition efforts– Signal tabulations at all interfaces– Power rollups– Estimate board areas– Define mechanical interfaces