data analysis by kathy granite & michelle ferrer

54
Data Analysis By Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

Upload: stacey-curtis

Post on 02-Jan-2016

33 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Data Analysis By Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer. Overview. Background Information Comparison Staff Perceptions School Demographics- Enrollment Test Scores: STAR, CAHSEE, Advanced Placement, SAT and ACT Dropout and Graduation Rates A-G Completion College-Going Rates Strengths - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

Data AnalysisBy Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

Page 2: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

• Background Information Comparison• Staff Perceptions• School Demographics- Enrollment• Test Scores: • STAR, CAHSEE, Advanced Placement, SAT and ACT

• Dropout and Graduation Rates• A-G Completion• College-Going Rates• Strengths• Areas of Improvement• Recommendations

Overview

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013

Page 3: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

School Info MHHS SMHS

Title One School No NoBase API (2012) 841 863API Growth Rate 6 points -6 pointsMet 5 point Goal Increase?

Yes Yes

Statewide Rank (2010) 9 9% Fully Cred. Teachers 95 85% ELL Students 33.5 30.2% Free/Reduced Meals 50.5 44.1Total Enrollment 2,580 2,355

Background Information Comparison2012-2013

MHHS School Accountability Report Card, 2012/2013Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013

Page 4: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

Which school is our school normally compared with when considering "like schools"? 

• “Not necessarily compared with the same school each year.”

• “Several schools in our vicinity that share similar demographics.”

• Identified as a "similar” schools: “Vista High,

Rancho Buena Vista, and Escondido High.”

High School Principal

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013

Page 5: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

• A-G completion rate

• Improve A-G rates for Hispanic students living in poverty    High School Principal

• Variety of rigorous courses

• Adding courses as the interests/needs arise

• Constant improvement in A-G rates in the past 5 years

Comparison High School Counselor

What is the greatest academic strength of our school? What's the greatest area of improvement?

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013

Page 6: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

What have we done to support academic achievement?

“Academic achievement- offers afterschool tutoring, rigorous course offerings for students. College-going culture- college days, college rep visits on campus, counselor classroom guidance lessons, PACE Promise events, graduation rates- offer programs such as credit recovery, afterschool tutoring, new Personal Development class for struggling 9th graders, Link Crew mentor program.”

Comparison High School Counselor

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013

“I believe the culture of mission hills -

high expectations, nurturing environment - is the single biggest

factor in our success.  Its a culture that expects, promotes, and delivers great

things.  Its only through that, and a hard-working, dedicated and committed staff that it can happen. 

We have the same kids as other schools, but they do markedly better by being a student at Mission Hills...”

High School Principal

Page 7: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

Demographics

Page 8: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

Ethnicities MHHS Ethnicities SMHS

Teacher DemographicsMHHS vs. SMHS

2012-2013

CA Department of Ed-Data Quest Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013

1.1 1.1

8

89.8

Asian

Philipino

Hispanic

White

1.2 1.2

4.92.4

90.2

Asian

Philipino

Hispanic

Black o African American

White

Overrepresentation of White teachers in BOTH schools

Page 9: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

Ethnicities MHHS Ethnicities SMHS

Student DemographicsMHHS vs. SMHS

2012-2013

51%

1%4%0%4%

3%

35%

2%HispanicAmerican IndianAsianPacific IslanderFilipinoAfrican Amer-icanWhiteTwo or more Races

46%

0%5%

1%3%

44%

1%

HispanicAmerican IndianAsianPacific IslanderAfrican Amer-icanWhiteTwo or more Races

CA Department of Ed-Data Quest Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013

Page 10: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer
Page 11: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

CST (STAR) Results-Students ScoringProficient or Advanced-English Language Arts

All Students-Over TimeMHHS vs. SMHS, District & State

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

2011 2012 20130

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

67 65 6764

7073

6871 73

52 54 56MHHS

SMHS

Disctrict

State

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

MHHS scores are consistently higher than the CA average yet slightly lower than SMHS & District in 2012 & 2013.

Page 12: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

MHHSCST (STAR) Results-Students Scoring

Basic: English Language Arts9th Graders-Over time

2011 2012 20130

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2024

31

35% increase in ELA competency

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 13: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

CST (STAR) Results-Students Scoring Below Basic: English Language Arts

10th Graders-Over TimeMHHS vs. SMHS, District & State

2011 2012 20130

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

6 83

6 7 56 7 5

14 13 11

MHHSSMHSDISTRICTSTATE

In 2013, 10th graders at MHHS scored higherin ELA compared to SMHS, District and CA

10 grade students consistently scored higherthan the CA State average

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 14: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

CST (STAR) Results-Students Scoring Far Below Basic: English Language Arts

11th Graders-Over TimeMHHS vs. SMHS, District & State

2011 2012 20130

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2 3 34 4 46 4 4

12 11 10

MHHS

SMHS

DISTRICT

STATE

11th graders at MHHS are consistently scoring at least 30% higher in ELA compared to the State average

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 15: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

CST (STAR) ResultsProficient or Advanced: Mathematics

All Students-Over TimeMHHS vs. SMHS, District & State

2011 2012 20130

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

4144

4045

48 46

6568 67

48 50 51MHHS

SMHS

Disctrict

State

MHHS math scores are consistently lower than the district by as much as 40%!

37% Lower

35% Lower

40% Lower

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 16: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

CST (STAR) ResultsBelow Basic: Geometry

All Students By Grade LevelMHHS vs. SMHS, District & State

Below basic Geometry test scores have decreased73% from 2010-2013.

9 10 110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

11

3541

6

28

44

9

32

42

18

3946

MHHS SMHS DISTRICT STATEKathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

11th grade students are taking Geometry three times!

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 17: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

CST (STAR) ResultsProficient: Physics

11th Graders-Over TimeMHHS vs. SMHS, District & State

2011 2012 20130

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

31

50

58

24 242728

33 333229

33 MHHS

SMHS

DISTRICT

STATE

Almost 50% more MHHS students tested in 2013 compared to 2011.

The physics proficiency scores consistently increased by 47% between 2011-2013

MHHS’s physics proficiency towers over SMHS, District & State!

WOW!

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 18: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

CST (STAR) ResultsAdvanced: Physics

11th Graders-Over TimeMHHS vs. SMHS, District & State

2011 2012 20130

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

38

22

8

71

73

63

5155

52

2427 25

MHHS

SMHS

DISTRICT

STATE

In 2013, 87% fewer MHHS students scored “Advanced” in physicscompared to SMHS

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

There is a consistentdecrease in students scoring“Advanced” in physics

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 19: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer
Page 20: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

2011 2012 20130

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

90 91 93

6165

59

All StudentsELL Students

MHHSCAHSEE Passing Rate Combined

by Program Math-Over TimeAll Students vs. ELL Students

ELL students consistently pass math at lower rates than non-ELL students

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 21: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

MHHSCAHSEE Passing Rate Combined by Program English-Over Time

All Students vs. ELL Students

2011 2012 20130

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

90 91 92

54 53 52All StudentsELL Students

CAHSEE passing rate for ELL students in English are consistently lower than non-ELL students

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 22: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

MHHSCAHSEE Passing Rate Combined

by Program Math-Over TimeELL Students vs. Reclassified

2011 2012 20130

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

6165

59

93 95 96

ELL StudentsReclassified

Reclassified students surpass ELL students as much as 39% in math!

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 23: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

MHHSCAHSEE Passing Rate Combined by Program English-Over Time

ELL Students vs. Reclassified

2011 2012 20130

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

54 53 52

97 9996

ELL StudentsReclassified

Reclassified students surpass ELL students as much as 46% in English!

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 24: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

MHHS CAHSEE Passing Rate Combined

by Program Math-Over TimeEconomically Disadvantaged vs.

Non Economically Disadvantaged

2011 2012 20130

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

74

86 8995 96 96

Economically Disadvantaged

Non Economically Disadvantaged

Over time, MHHS’s economicallydisadvantaged CAHSEE passing rate in math continues to increase.

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 25: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

MHHSCAHSEE Passing Rate Combined by Program English-Over Time

Economically Disadvantaged vs. Non Economically Disadvantaged

2011 2012 20130

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

78

87 8894 96 95

Economically Disadvantaged

Non Economically Disadvantaged

Over time, MHHS’s economicallydisadvantaged CAHSEE passing rate in English continues to increase.

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 26: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

Advanced Placement

Page 27: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

English Foreign Language

Mathematics Science Social Science0

20

40

60

80

100

41

5345

49

40

59

4755

51

60

MaleFemale

Females are enrolling in AP classes at a higher rate than males

Advanced Placement Course EnrollmentBy Gender

2011-2012

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 28: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-20120

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

49 49 4651 50 53

43 43 42

25 27 29

MHHSSMHSDistrictState

Less than half of the students at MHHS who are enrolled in an AP course, take the corresponding AP exam.

Advanced Placement Test Exam TakersOver Time

MHHS vs. SMHS, District & State

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 29: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-20120

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

60 62 6261 6369

53 55 56

27 29 31

MHHSSMHSDistrict State

MHHS is out performing the state and the district but is under performing in comparison to SMHS.

Advanced Placement Test Passage Rate Over Time (score 3 or higher)

MHHS vs. SMHS, District & State

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 30: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer
Page 31: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

SAT Data OverviewMHHS Students Who Took the SAT

Over Time

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-20120

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

4752

56

Only 56% of 12th grade MHHS students took the SAT.

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 32: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

Comparing SAT Scores by Subject

MHHS vs. SMHS, District & State2011-2012

Critical Reading Math Writing480

485

490

495

500

505

510

515

494

497499

502

510

502

491

510

491

MHHSSMHSState

MHHS is out performing the state in writing and critical reading, but is under performing in math.

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

SAT

Scor

es

Page 33: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

Comparing Students who Scored Greater or Equal to 1500 on SATs

MHHS vs. SMHS, & State

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-20120

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

55

434851

47 4650 48 46

MHHSSMHSState

At MHHS only 48% of students that take the SAT exam pass it with a score of 1500 or more.

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

The national average for the new SAT is 1500

Page 34: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer
Page 35: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

ACT Data OverviewPercentage of 12th grade MHHS students who took the ACT

Over Time

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-201248

50

52

54

56

58

60

62 61

53

61 Only 61% of 12th grade MHHS students took the ACT.

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 36: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

Comparing Average ACT Scores

of 21 or Higher-Over Time

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-20120

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

6153

616165 67

57 56 57MHHSSMHSState

The national average for the ACT is 20 & 21

At MHHS, 61% of 12th grade students that take the ACT exam pass with a 21 or higher.

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 37: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

Drop Out Rates

Page 38: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

Adjusted Drop Out RatesAll Students 9th-12th

Over Time

MHHS SMHS DISTRICT STATE

2010 1.8 2.7 3.2 4.6

2011 0 0 0.5 4.2

2012 0.4 0 0.6 4

5

15

25

35

45

55

65

75

85

95MHHS’s adjusted drop out rate decreased by 22% between 2010 & 2012.

MHHS’s adjusted drop out rate is 25% less than the state average.

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 39: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

Graduation Rate

Page 40: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

Graduation RateAll 12th Grade Students

Over Time

2010 2011 20120

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100 9599 9796

99 9993

97 97

75 77 79

MHHSSMHSDistrictState

MHHS’s graduationrate remains up to 26% higher than the CA average each year

MHHS’s graduationrate remains consistentWith SMHS & District

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 41: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

A-G Completion

Page 42: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

Male Female0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

49

63

50

62

43

55

34

43

MHHSSMHSDistrictState

Females are outperforming males in A-G completion

A-G Completion Rateby Gender

MHHS vs. SMHS, District, & State2011-2012

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 43: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-20120

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

10093

63

49

98

6963

MaleFemale

Over the past 3 years A-G completion has decreased 44% for males and 35% for females.

MHHS A-G Completion Rateby GenderOver Time

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 44: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

A-G completion has decreased by 49% for Hispanic students and 33% for White students

MHHS A-G Completion Rateby Ethnicity

Over Time

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-20120

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

10093

54

44

98

75

65

HispanicWhite

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 45: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-20120

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100 98

5750

98

78

70

A-G completion has decreased by 48% for Hispanic females, 28% for White females, 51% for Hispanic males and 41% White males

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-20120

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

89

50

38

98

71

57Hispanic

White

CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Females Males

MHHS A-G Completion Rate: by Gender & Ethnicity-Over TimePe

rcen

tage

of S

tude

nts

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013

Page 46: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

College Going Rates

Page 47: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

MHHSCollege Going Rate

Enrollment in CA Public Postsecondary Institutions2006-2007

2006-20070

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

67 6561

51 MHHSSMHSDISTRICTSTATE

MHHS students’ enrollment in college is consistent to SMHS, District & is 24% higher than CA

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 CA Department of Ed-Data Quest

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 48: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

76% more MHHS students enrolled in a community college compared to a UC or CSU

University of Cali-fornia

California State University

CA Community College

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

8

21

34MHHS

MHHS College Going Rate

Graduates Entering CA Public Postsecondary Institutions2009

(California Post Secondary Education Commission, 2011)Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 49: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

MHHS A-G Completion & UC/CSU Preparedness

2012/2013

0

20

40

60

80

100 8866

88% MHHS students are enrolled in A-G

classes

Why?

However, only 66% are graduating college- ready.

MHHS students are not meeting theUC/CSU admission requirements

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013 MHHS School Accountability Report Card, 2012/2013

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s

Students Enrolled in CoursesRequired for UC/CSU

Admission

Graduates Who Completed AllCourses Required for UC/CSU

Admission

Page 50: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

Strengths• High expectations, graduation expectancy, and college- going culture

• CST scores in English Language Arts consistently increase

• Reclassified and economically disadvantage students’ CAHSEE passing rate in Math and English continues to increase

• MHHS students are outperforming the State in Writing and Critical Reading

• Adjusted drop out rates are 25% less than the State average

• Hispanic students have a lower adjusted drop out rate than White students

• Graduation rates remain consistently above 95%

• 11th grade students consistently increase their proficiency in physics

• College enrollment is high

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013

Page 51: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

Areas of Improvement

• 9-12 Math instruction and comprehension

• Education and resources for economically disadvantaged and ELL students

• Advanced placement enrollment for male students

• Students taking the advanced placement test exam

• Increasing SAT practice testing

• Implementing ACT practice testing

• A-G course completion and 4-year college-going rates

• A-G course enrollment and completion for Hispanic students

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013

Page 52: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

Recommendations

• School demographics-Enrollment• Examine hiring practices of staff/faculty to incorporate more diversity

• Improvement in math instruction and tutoring opportunities

• Provide more resources and opportunities for economically disadvantaged & ELL students

• Advanced Placement• Consider reasons why some students are not taking or passing

AP exams• Do survey assessments for males and see the reasons for low

AP enrollment

• SAT/ACT• Continue to offer practice SAT tests• Implement ACT practice tests

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013

Page 53: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

• A-G Completion• Counselor-generated guidance lesson on A-G requirements for all grades

and on four-year plans starting in 9th grade• Consider reasons why students may not be passing with a “C” or better• Consider reasons why math tests are consistently low in 9-12

• College-Going Rates• Continue with the school’s college-going culture• Obtain current college-going enrollment rate• Consider researching why students are enrolling in courses required for

4-year college admission but are enrolling in community colleges

• Other recommendations• Develop and conduct needs assessment with Hispanic/Latino students in

order to create further interventions• Implement evidence-based interventions for Hispanic/Latino students

Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer, 2013

Recommendations

Page 54: Data Analysis By  Kathy Granite & Michelle Ferrer

Thank you!