creating the 1st eu-wide guarantee of origin for...

Project supported by the FCH JU

CertifHy

Creating the 1st EU-wide

Guarantee of Origin for

Green Hydrogen

Wouter Vanhoudt

Hinicio

Stakeholder Platform 1st Plenary Session

Monday 20th November 2017

www.certifhy.eu #CertifHy

Content

1. Introduction

2. CertifHy Phase 1: Developing the 1st EU-wide Guarantee of Origin scheme for Green and Low Carbon Hydrogen (2014-2016)

3. CertifHy Phase 2: Implementing the first EU-wide Guarantee of Origin for Green Hydrogen by establishing a Stakeholder Platform and a Pilot Operation (2017 –2018/2019)

1. Project overview

2. Key aspects of the pilot

3. Stakeholder Platform operating principle

4. Stakeholder body roles and compositions

5. Working Group, Steering Group and Stakeholder Platform role in the project

6. Working group compositions

4. Q&A2

A Guarantee of Origin (GO) guarantees the origin of a product and

provides information to customers on the source of their products

Renewable electricity GO scheme Sustainable Palm Oil GO scheme

3

Source: http://www.rspo.org/

Who are we?

The CertifHy project team

4

Independent strategy consulting firm specialized in sustainable energy and transport with a

European competence centre on hydrogen and fuel cells.

The Energy research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN) is a leading independent European institute

for applied energy technology development, energy research, and policy advice.

LBST is an expert consultancy for sustainable energy and mobility founded with a European

competence centre on hydrogen and fuel cells with one of the longest track-records.

TÜV SÜD is one of the world’s leading technical service providers of testing, inspection,

certification and training solutions with the strategic business segments INDUSTRY, MOBILITY and

CERTIFICATION.

Grexel is the leading European energy certification service provider

Project leader

CertifHy phase 2

CertifHy phase 1 & 2

Phase 2Phase 1

Define a widely acceptable

definition of green hydrogen

CertifHy aims to develop the 1st European-wide Green and Low Carbon

hydrogen GO scheme

Determine how an EU wide

robust GO scheme should be

designed and implemented

2

Set-up a hydrogen GO

Stakeholders’ platform &

its Steering Group

2014 2016 2017 2018/9 2020s..

Finalise the scheme design

ensuring it can be the main route

to guarantee the origin of green

& low carbon hydrogen across

EU MS

Run a pilot scheme to test the

proposed design.

Identify actions which need to be

undertaken after the completion

of the study to achieve an EU

wide deployment of the scheme

1

2

3

4

1

Phase 3

Prepare EU wide deployment:

Implement key elements

➢ Competent authority,

➢ Issuing Body,

➢ Registry operator,

➢ Accreditation body

5

Finalise Regulation, Codes and

Standards:

➢ CEN Standard

➢ EU and national regulation

➢ “EECS for green H2”

1

2

6

Renewable energy Non renewable

energy

Low

-ca

rbo

n

CertifHy

Green H2

CertifHy

Low Carbon H2

No

t L

ow

-ca

rbo

n

Carbon intensity* limit

Stakeholders across industry have agreed on a common European

definition of Green and Low Carbon Hydrogen

* Greenhouse gas emissions (CO2 equivalent)

per unit of hydrogen over whole generation

pathway up to marketable product

The definition of green hydrogen was widely endorsed by stakeholders

7

Production device

Transport

Storage

Hydrogen GOs cover the whole generation pathway up to marketable

product

8Power-to-Gas Power-to-ChemicalPower-to-MobilityPower-to-Power

CertifHy scope

Out of scope

H2 product:≥ 99% & ≥ 30 bar

Out of scope

Renewable hydrogen will be as green as the energy input into the

production device

Hydrogen production

Electricity input10 GJ

Biomass input20 GJ

9

Total energy input : 30 GJ

Renewable *: 20 GJNon-renewable:

7 GJ

Renewable *:3 GJ

Renewable: 23 GJ

Non-renewable:7 GJ

23%

77%

Renewable H2

77%

Non-renewableH2

23%

* Via GO or direct feedstock

GO use cases to ensure that a mobility application is Green

10

GO

Mar

ket

H2 supplier GO account

HRS operator GO account

H2 H2

H2

H2

H2

Fleet operator GO account

H2

Vehicle OEM GO account

H2

H2H2


On-site production

1

2

3

4

2’H2

H2

H2

H2

Content

1. CertifHy Phase 1: Developing the 1st EU-wide Guarantee of Origin scheme for Green

and Low Carbon Hydrogen (2014-2016)

2. CertifHy Phase 2: Implementing the first EU-wide Guarantee of Origin for Green

Hydrogen by establishing a Stakeholder Platform and a Pilot Operation (2017 –

2018/2019)

1. Project overview

2. Key aspects of the pilot

3. Stakeholder Platform operating principle

4. Stakeholder body roles and compositions

5. Working Group, Steering Group and Stakeholder Platform role in the project

6. Working group compositions

3. Q&A11

Platform operationPlatform creation

Platform operational

Pla

tform

Steering Group

WG 1: GO Scheme and procedures

WG 2:

GO issuing

(Producers)

WG 3:

GO commercialisation

and use (Users)

Preliminary scheme definition

- incl. interaction with standards

and regulation

Pilot specification

Milestone

Stakeholder

group

WP1: The creation and operation of a stakeholders platform

Updating of GO scheme

Plan for EU rollout

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun M12 +

WP3: Pilot scheme development, operation and feedback

Pilot preparation- Scheme procedures

- ICT system

- Production site audits

- Monitoring plan

Preliminary GO

scheme defined

Pilot operation - Registry operation

- GO issuing and use

- Pilot monitoring and stakeholder feedback

- Cost analysis and business model

Pilot online

WG 4: Regulatory

framework

WP2: Preliminary scheme finalization & Specification of pilot

+ 6 months

if needed

GO scheme finalized

EU roll out plan adopted

Pilot scheme tested

WP4: Final GO scheme design & EU-wide implementation plan

The scheme will be developed in interaction with Stakeholder Working

Groups for consultation and approval

12

Stakeholder platform entities role and composition

13

WG2:

GO issuing (Producers)

WG 3:


and use (Users)

WG 4:

Regulatory framework

Ro

leC

om

po

sit

ion

• GO scheme experts

(including industry)

• Standardisation

experts

Define the

requirements that

will apply to the H2

production sites

Ensure alignment

between GO scheme

and the pertinent

regulation, especially

at EU level

• Define the scheme

• Provide input to

and interface with

standardisation with

regards to structure

and content

Operators of H2

production sites

• Public affairs experts

of the stakeholder

group

• Representatives of

the Commission

WG1:

GO scheme and

procedures

Specify the features

that are needed to

address market

needs in terms of

GO product and

commercialisation

All actors involved

with the distribution

and use of GOs (fleet

operators, industrials

from the automotive,

steel, glass, etc

sectors, industrial gas

companies…)

Stakeholder Platform Steering Group

• Act as a discussion

fora for stakeholder

• Endorse the overall

scheme

• All pertinent

stakeholders

• Take decisions

regarding platform

governance &

organisation

• Endorse the important

scheme decisions

• Convene Plenary

Sessions

• Working Group

Chairs and Co-chair

• European institutions

(DG Energy, DG

Clima, DG Move, DG

Environment, FCH 2

JU)

The pilot scheme

Key elements of the GO scheme procedures will be tested

➢ The Stakeholder Platform is expected

to become the competent authority,

in due time.

➢ TÜV SÜD will audit 4 pilot hydrogen

production sites & verify production

batches.

➢ GREXEL will adapt an existing GO

registry.

➢ GREXEL will issue and allow for

trading of the associated GOs.

➢ Final customers will purchase the

GOs.

14

Stakeholder platform

Operating principles

Stakeholder Platform

Steering Group

Project team

ConsultationFeedback and/or

endorsement

Support

by S

ecre

tari

at

Presentation of

results to Steering

Group

Steering Group

Feedback and

endorsement

5

1 2 3 4

1 1 1

222

15

WG 1: GO Scheme

and procedures

1

2

WG 2: GO issuing

(Producers)

WG 3: GO

Commercialisation

and use (Users)

WG 4: Regulatory

framework

34

Presentation to

Stakeholder

Platform

5

6

Stakeholder

Platform

feedback and

endorsement

6

M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12

Overview of work plan and interactions with the WGs

16

Standard scheme documents & implementation plan ➢ Endorsement by WG1➢ Recommendations wrt to

feasibility/practicality by WG2

WG3: User requirements

Pilot specification➢ Feedback from plenary

Scheme procedures➢ Feedback from WG2➢ Endorsement by WG1

Pilot monitoring plan➢ Endorsement by WG2 & by WG3

WG1: input on scheme procedures

Pilot online

WG2&3: Adhocinput

Standard scheme documents ➢ Endorsement by WG1,

Steering Group, Stakeholder Platform

Cost & Business model ➢ Endorsement by WG2

Pilot results➢ Endorsement by WG 2 & WG3

WG2, WG3, WG4: recommendations for updated GO scheme

WG1: input to update of GO

Plenary session

WG1: Input to general scheme design

WG2: Input for pilot

specification

Preliminary GO

scheme

Pilot

specification

Pilot preparation

Pilot operation

Updating of GO

scheme

Planning for EU

rollout

WG1&2: Input to pilot evaluation

Input to cost model

EU rollout plan ➢ Endorsement by


+ 6 months

if needed

Working group composition – WG1

WG

1

GO

schem

e a

nd p

rocedure

s

Members

Category Sub-category Stakeholders

Industry

Industrial gas suppliers Air Liquide

Utilities EDF, Engie, HYGRO, Statkraft Markets, Uniper, Verbund

Oil&Gas Shell

Other operators Colruyt

Equipment manufacturers Hydrogenics, Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems Europe

Automotive Daimler

GO Scheme experts AGCS, AIB, I-REC Standard, Energinet, Vertogas

Standardisation experts NEN

Associations H2NL

Regulators VREG

Research organisationsEuropean Marine Energy Centre (EMEC), Groupe Européen de

Recherche sur le Gaz (GERG), NREL

Consultancies Deloitte Tohmatsu Consulting, Patch LLTD

Legend

Member

Chair/co-chair candidate

Observer

17


Please adapt as you see fit

WG

2

GO

iss

uin

g

Members


Industry

Industrial gas suppliers Air Liquide, Air Products, Linde

UtilitiesBischoff & Ditze Energy GmbH, CNR, Enertrag, Engie, Electrabel,

Enovos, HYGRO, Uniper

Oil&Gas OMV, Q8

Other operators Colruyt, Group Machiels, HYOP, Wind to Gas SüderMarsch

Equipment manufacturersFLD Technologies, Hygear, ITM Power, NEL, Hydrogen Technologies

d.o.o

Chemicals Akzo Nobel

Standardisation experts H&R GmbH

Cities / Regions Aberdeen city council

Associations Wind Europe

Research OrganisationsEMEC, European Gas Research Group (GERG), ICSI Rm. Valcea,

University of Valladolid, Japan Petroleum Energy Center, NREL

Consultancies Deloitte Tohmatsu Consulting

Other METI

Legend

Member


Observer

18

Working group composition – WG3W

G3

GO

Com

merc

ialisa

tion a

nd u

se

Members


Industry

Industrial gas Air Products, Air Liquide, Linde

UtilitiesBischoff & Ditze Energy, EnerTrag, Engie, Engie Electrabel, Enovos,

HYGRO, Statkraft Markets, Verbund

O&G Q8, Shell

Other operators Colruyt, Group Machiels, Wind to Gas SüderMarsch

Equipment

manufacturerSolenco Power, Hydrogen Technologies d.o.o

Automotive Daimler, Toyota Motor Europe

Fleet operators PitPoint

Cities/Regions Aberdeen City Council

Associations European Hydrogen Association (EHA), HyER, NOW, WaterstofNet

GO scheme experts AIB, RECS International

Research organisationsEMEC, Japan Petroleum Energy Centre, Mizuho information and research

institute

Consultancies Ecofys, EEI, Deloitte Tohmatsu Consulting

Other METI

Legend

Member


Observer

19


G4

Regula

tory

fra

mew

ork

Members


Industry

Industrial gasses Air Liquide, Linde

Utility EDF, Engie

O&G Shell, OMV

Equipment manufacturersFLD Technologies, Hydrogenics, Mitsubishi Hitachi Power

System Europe

Industry associations Wind Europe


Associations H2NL, Hydrogen Europe, NOW, WaterstofNet

GO scheme experts CEN, ICSI Rm. Valcea, NEN

Standardisation experts AIB, H&R, RECS International

Research organisations Bilbao Faculty of engineering, GERG, EMEC


Legend

Member


Observer

20

Q&A

Q&A

21


CertifHy –

Implementing the first EU-wide

Guarantee of Origin for Green

Hydrogen by establishing a

Stakeholder Platform and a Pilot

Operations

WG1

Consortium Working document

20/11/2017

WG1 – morning 1 hour work session agenda

How to start?

1. Welcome (WG1 coordinator: Matthias Altmann)

2. WG1 member presentation round: name, affiliation, motivation & expertise (all)

3. Presentation of (co)chair candidates (Guy de Réals, Phil Moody)

4. WG1 work programme and timeline (Matthias)

5. Election of (co)chair during lunch break (all WG1 members)

2

Working group composition – WG1 W

G1

GO

schem

e a

nd p

rocedure

s

Members


Industry

Industrial gas suppliers Air Liquide

Utilities EDF, Engie, HYGRO, Statkraft Markets, Uniper, Verbund

Oil&Gas Shell


Equipment manufacturers Hydrogenics, Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems Europe

Automotive Daimler

GO Scheme experts AGCS, AIB, I-REC Standard, Energinet, Vertogas

Standardisation experts NEN

Regulators VREG

Associations H2NL

Research organisationsEuropean Marine Energy Centre (EMEC), Groupe Européen de

Recherche sur le Gaz (GERG), NREL

Consultancies Deloitte Tohmatsu Consulting, Keith Patch

Legend

Member


Observer

Working group election rules

➢ Each working group member may can vote once for 1 chair and 1 co-chair.

➢ Each vote for a candidate for the « chair » position gives him 2 votes.

➢ Each vote for a candidate for the «co-chair » position gives him 1 vote.

➢ The candidate with the most votes is the default working group chair.

➢ The candidate with the 2nd most votes is the default working group co-chair.

➢ Once elected, the chair and co-chair may exchange their positions upon mutual consent. This can only be done once.

Updated WG role and composition

5

WG2:


WG 3:


and use (Users)

WG 4:


Ro

leC

om

po

sit

ion • GO scheme experts


• Standardisation

experts

Define the

requirements that


production sites

Ensure alignment

between GO scheme

and the pertinent


at EU level


and procedures


and interface with



and content

Operators of H2

production

sites

• Public affairs

experts of the

stakeholder group


the Commission

WG1:

GO scheme and

procedures

Specify the

features that are

needed to

address market

needs in terms of

GO product and

commercialisation

All actors involved





steel, glass, etc


companies…)




• Validate the overall

scheme

• All pertinent

stakeholders

• Take decisions

regarding platform

governance &

organisation

• Validate the important

scheme decisions

• Convene Plenary

Sessions

• Working Group

Chairs and Co-chair


(DG Energy, DG

Clima, DG Move, DG

Environment, FCH 2

JU)

WG1: GO Scheme & Procedures - Work programme

6

Task Objectives Key questions Outputs

• Which standardization frameworks are important (notably

CEN/CENELEC)?• How should the existing standards framework be expanded or modified to

include H2 GOs?• Are there any conflicts or barriers that need to be overcome? • Interaction with regulatory aspects (WG4)?

Definition of

a preliminary

GO scheme

Definition of a preliminary GO scheme laid down in the standard scheme documents

• Preliminary scheme design documents in (Month 4)

• Draft strategy for scheme

implementation

• What is already available from CertifHy documents (D2.4, D3.1, D3.2, D 4.1, D4.2, D5.1)?

• How to use other established schemes and standards (notably EECS)?

Standardization

Leveraging of the European standardisation framework for supporting adoption of the CertifHy scheme

• Proposed way forward for having the H2 GO scheme covered by a CEN standard (Month 4)

• Proposed content

Definition of

preliminary

procedures

Developing all necessary procedures for the GO scheme and to define on this basis the procedure for the pilot system

• Detailed reference procedure documents (Month 5)

• Pilot procedures (reduced scope)

• Rely on available CertifHy documents (D2.4, D3.1, D3.2, D 4.1, D4.2, D5.1) • Preparation and auditing of plants, verification of production batches,

registry operation, Issuing Body procedures over the full life cycle of a GO, complaints handling and resolution

• Adaptation to hydrogen from other established schemes (notably EECS)?• Reduced scope for pilot procedures

Update of GO

scheme

& procedures

Final design of the GO scheme, standard scheme and reference procedure documents, ready for implementation

First complete set of standard scheme documents & reference procedure documents (Month 10/12)

• Update based on experiences and feedback from the pilots• Endorsement of standard scheme documents and reference procedure

documents by WG1, Steering Group and Stakeholder Platform

M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12

WG1: GO Scheme & Procedures - Timeline

7

Preliminary GO scheme

Standardization

Preliminary procedures

Update of GO scheme &

procedures

Due date documents

Meetings / Plenary

Webinars

Standard scheme documents (M4)

- Strategy for implementation (M4)> Endorsement by WG1

- CertifHy deliverables

- Other schemesInterface - task 2.2/2.3 (standards & regulations)

- Standardization frameworks- Participation CEN TC6 / (ErGar)?- Contact with standardization bodiesInterface - Task 2.1

- Way forward for having H2 GOs covered by a CEN standard> Endorsement by WG1

- Proposed content for CEN standard > Endorsement by WG1

- Based on task 2.1

- CertifHy deliverables- Other schemesInterface - task 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.3.1, 3.3.2 (Registry, pilot site certification, production batch verification

Procedures (M5)> Endorsement by WG1

Standard scheme & reference procedure documents (M10)- Endorsement by WG1- Endorsement by Stakeholder Platform

- Adjust documents

based on feedback from WG2 & WG3 & pilotsInterface - task 3.3 (pilots)

+ 6 months

if needed

Tasks & WG roles (1/4)

8

Task WG1 role WG2 role WG3 role WG4 role Steering GroupStakeholder

Platform

Defining a

preliminary GO

scheme

1.Inputs to the GO

preliminary scheme

design

2.Endorses the GO

preliminary scheme

design

1.Consulted on the GO

preliminary scheme

design wrt practical

feasibility.

2.Recommendations wrt

to practical feasibility.

• Inputs to the

preliminary GO

Scheme wrt user

functional

requirements

Consulted to ensure that

the GO preliminary

scheme design

compatible with EU

regulation

1.Endorses the GO

preliminary scheme

design

2.Submits to


Endorses the GO

preliminary scheme

design

Interacting with

the regulatory

frameworks

N/A

• Identifies show

stoppers and barriers

in EU regulation

• Addresses the need to

amend EU legislation

N/A

Interacting with

other

standardisation

frameworks

Endorses approach for

strategic leverage of

standardisation and

interfaces with the

relevant standardisation

groups

N/A

Pilot specification N/A

Endorses the pilot

specifications from a

producer perspective

Endorses the pilot

specification from a user

perspective

N/AEndorses the Pilot

specificationsN/A


9


Platform

Managing the pilot

set-up and

operation

N/A

N/A

Pilot preparation

Defining the

pilot scheme

procedures

1.Inputs to scheme

procedures

2.Endorses scheme

procedures

Inputs scheme

procedures wrt practical

feasibility

Informed on the pilot

proceduresN/A

Designing and

setting up the

ICT System N/A

Production site

audits

Defining the

pilot

monitoring and

feedback

collection plan

N/AInputs on what should be

monitored

Inputs on what should be

monitoredN/A


10

Task WG1 role WG2 role WG3 role WG4 roleSteering

Group

Stakeholder

Platform

Pilot operationInformed of pilot

operation advancesN/A

Registry operation

N/A

N/A

Production batch

certification

Pilot monitoring N/A

Input to analysis of

pilot results from the

producer’s perspective

for identification of

lessons learned

Inputs to analysis of


users’ perspective for

identification of

lessons learned

N/A

Cost analysis & business

modelsN/A

• Validate cost inputs

• Recommend and provide feedback on proposed

business models

N/A

• Informed of pilot

results & business

cases

• Endorses the pilot

results

Endorses pilot results

& business cases


11


Group

Stakeholder

Platform

Updating the GO scheme &

preparing the

documentation

1.Updates GO scheme

based upon pilot

results and WG2 and

WG3

recommendations

2.Endorses the GO

scheme

1.Provides

recommendations to

WG1

2.Comments the GO

scheme wrt practical

feasibility.

1.Provides

recommendations to

WG1

2.Comments the GO

scheme wrt

functional

requirements

Reviews regulatory

alignment of the final

scheme

1.Endorses the GO

scheme

2.Submits the GO

scheme to the


Endorses the GO

scheme

Preparing EU rollout

Inputs to the rollout

plan

Endorses/Comments

EU rollout plan

1.Inputs to the rollout

plan

2.Endorses/Comments

EU rollout plan

1.Inputs to the rollout

plan

2.Endorses/comments

EU rollout plan

Validates proposed

regulatory

amendments required

for EU-wide rollout

1.Endorses the

roadmap for EU roll-

out

2.Submits the roadmap

for EU roll-out to


Endorses the roadmap

for EU roll-out

WG1 – afternoon 1 hour work session agenda

How to start?

1. Expectation of WG1 members?

2. CertifHy GO scheme development: What is EECS? Approach to synergies of CertifHy with

EECS? How can CertifHy benefit from and collaborate with EECS?

3. CertifHy GO scheme alignment with standards: What is CEN/CENELEC TC6 WG2 „Hydrogen

GO“, how is it working? Approach to synergies of CertifHy with CEN? How can CertifHy

benefit from and collaborate with CEN?

4. Interplay and alignment between EECS (scheme) and standard?

5. CertifHy approach to procedures?

6. Next steps

12


CertifHy –



Hydrogen

Frederic Barth - Hinicio

Working Group 2 Session

20/11/2017

Agenda

2


Please adapt as you see fit

WG

2

GO

iss

uin

g

Members


Industry

Industrial gas suppliers Air Liquide, Air Products, Linde

UtilitiesBischoff & Ditze Energy GmbH, CNR, Enertrag, Engie, Electrabel,

Enovos, HYGRO, Uniper

Oil&Gas OMV, Q8

Other operators Colruyt, Group Machiels, HYOP, Wind to Gas SüderMarsch

Equipment manufacturers FLD Technologies, Hygear, ITM Power, NEL, Hydrogen Technologies

Chemicals Akzo Nobel

Standardisation experts H&R GmbH

Cities / Regions Aberdeen city council,

Associations Wind Europe

Research OrganisationsEMEC, European Gas Research Group (GERG), ICSI Rm. Valcea,

University of Valladolid, Japan Petroleum Energy Center, NREL


Other METI

Legend

Member


Observer

3


WG2 Work Programme



Pla

tform

Steering Group


WG 2:

GO issuing

(Producers)

WG 3:


and use (Users)



and regulation

Pilot specification

Milestone

Stakeholder

group



Plan for EU rollout




- ICT system


- Monitoring plan

Preliminary GO

scheme defined





Pilot online

WG 4: Regulatory

framework


+ 6 months

if needed

GO scheme finalized


Pilot scheme tested


The scheme will be developed in interaction with stakeholder WGs for

consultation and approval

5


6

WG2:


WG 3:


and use (Users)

WG 4:


Ro

leC

om

po

sit

ion



• Standardisation

experts

Define the

requirements that


production sites

Identify regulatory

barriers and ensure

alignment between

GO scheme and the

pertinent regulation,

especially at EU level



and interface with



and content

Operators of H2

production sites


of the stakeholder

group


the Commission

WG1:

GO scheme and

procedures


that are needed to

address market

needs in terms of

GO product and

commercialisation

All actors involved





steel, glass, etc


companies…)





scheme

• All pertinent

stakeholders

• Take decisions

regarding platform

governance &

organisation


scheme decisions

• Convene Plenary

Sessions

• Working Group

Chairs and Co-chair


(DG Energy, DG

Clima, DG Move, DG

Environment, FCH 2

JU)

WG2: GO issuing - Work programme

7

• What is the perimeter of the pilot production devices?

• Estimated quantity & cost of GOs that could be made available

• Will the data required for pilot scheme operation be available?

• Data needs for the different ways of addressing the res. mix issue

Definition of a

preliminary

GO scheme

Define how Plant and Product certification criteria will be practically implemented

Scheme appendix: Practical ways of measuring and processing the data required (incl. H2 from chlor-alkali electrolysis)

• How is the perimeter of the production device defined?

• How do we measure and collect the data required for plant certification and batch certification?

• Is all the information required to be included in the GO disclosable?

Pilot

specification

• Define the pilot production devices,

• Forecast amount & cost of GOs per type and site

• Pilot specification document:

- Pilot sites definition- GO quantity forecast- Methods for addressing res. mix.

Pilot monitoring

plan

Input on what needs to be monitored and on how to collect the data

Pilot monitoring plan- data to be collected with regards to GO issuing

• What are the scheme evaluation criteria?

• What data and events do we need to record for evaluating the scheme?

Pilot monitoringContribute to analysis of pilot results for identification of lessons learned

MoM on business models• Are the cost inputs correct?

• Which business models are the most realistic and attractive?

Update of GO

scheme

Provide recommendations for update of GO scheme and procedures

Recommendations for update of GO scheme and procedures

• Are the defined scheme procedures feasible and optimal?

• How should they be adapted for the pilot?

Scheme

proceduresOptimise scheme procedures and validate their feasibility

• What are the proposed changes?

Contribute to costs and business model analysis

Business models

• What did we learn from the pilot phase?

• What issues remain to be addressed?

MoM on feasibility and optimisation of preliminary procedures

Pilot evaluation report


Criteria (i) on past production and (ii) on production batch

for issuing CertifHy GOs

8

Timet2t2 – 12 mths

H2 Production

12 months

t1

ProductionBatch

Non-renewable share

Renewable share

CertifHyLow Carbon H2 GOs

CertifHyGreen H2 GOs

(i) Average GHG intensity since t2-12 months

of Non-CertifHy H2 must not exceed 91 gCO2/MJH2

Past Production

H2 withGreen GO

H2 withLC GO

Grey H2

< 91 gCO2/MJH2 ?

(ii) Average GHG intensity of H2 covered by a CertifHy GOmust not exceed 36.4 gCO2/MJH2

< 36.5 gCO2/MJH2 ?

< 36.5 gCO2/MJH2 ?

Oct ‘17 Nov ‘17 Dec ‘17 Jan ‘18 Feb ‘18 Mar ‘18 Apr ‘18 May ‘18 June ‘18 Dec’18 Jan ‘19 Feb ‘19

Overview of work plan and interactions with the WGs

9

Standard scheme documents & implementation plan ➢ Endorsement by WG1➢ Recommendations wrt to

feasibility/practicality by WG2

WG3: User requirements

Pilot specification➢ Feedback from plenary

Scheme procedures➢ Feedback from WG2➢ Endorsement by WG1

Pilot monitoring plan➢ Endorsement by WG2 & by WG3

WG1: input on scheme procedures

Pilot online

WG2&3: Adhocinput

Standard scheme documents ➢ Endorsement by WG1,

Steering Group, Stakeholder Platform

Cost & Business model ➢ Endorsement by WG2

Pilot results➢ Endorsement by WG 2 & WG3

WG2, WG3, WG4: recommendations for updated GO scheme

WG1: input to update of GO

Plenary session

WG1: Input to general scheme design

WG2: Input for pilot

specification

Preliminary GO

scheme

Pilot

specification

Pilot preparation

Pilot operation

Updating of GO

scheme

Planning for EU

rollout

WG1&2: Input to pilot evaluation

Input to cost model

EU rollout plan ➢ Endorsement by


+ 6 months

if needed


10


Platform

Defining a

preliminary GO

scheme

1. Inputs to the GO

preliminary scheme

design

2. Endorses the GO

preliminary scheme

design

1. Consulted on the GO

preliminary scheme


feasibility.

2. Recommendations

wrt to practical

feasibility.

• Inputs to the

preliminary GO

Scheme wrt user

functional

requirements


the GO preliminary

scheme design

compatible with EU

regulation

1. Endorses the GO

preliminary scheme

design

2. Submits to

Stakeholder

Platform

Endorses the GO

preliminary scheme

design

Interacting with

the regulatory

frameworks

N/A

• Identifies show


in EU regulation



N/A

Interacting with

other

standardisation

frameworks



standardisation and

interfaces with the


groups

N/A


Endorses the pilot



Endorses the pilot


perspective


specificationsN/A


11


Platform

Managing the pilot

set-up and

operation

N/A

N/A

Pilot preparation

Defining the

pilot scheme

procedures

1. Inputs to scheme

procedures

2. Endorses scheme

procedures

Inputs scheme


feasibility


proceduresN/A

Designing and

setting up the

ICT System N/A

Production site

audits

Defining the

pilot

monitoring and

feedback

collection plan


monitored


monitoredN/A


12


Group

Stakeholder

Platform



Registry operation

N/A

N/A

Production batch

certification






lessons learned




identification of

lessons learned

N/A


modelsN/A


• Recommend and provide feedback on

proposed business models

N/A


results & business

cases


results


& business cases


13


Group

Stakeholder

Platform


preparing the

documentation

1. Updates GO

scheme based

upon pilot results

and WG2 and WG3

recommendations

2. Endorses the GO

scheme

1. Provides

recommendations

to WG1

2. Comments the GO

scheme wrt

practical

feasibility.

1. Provides

recommendations

to WG1

2. Comments the GO

scheme wrt

functional

requirements

Reviews regulatory


scheme

1. Endorses the GO

scheme

2. Submits the GO

scheme to the

Stakeholder

Platform

Endorses the GO

scheme



plan

Endorses/Comments

EU rollout plan

1. Inputs to the

rollout plan

2. Endorses/Commen

ts EU rollout plan

1. Inputs to the

rollout plan

2. Endorses/comment

s EU rollout plan

Validates proposed

regulatory

amendments required

for EU-wide rollout

1. Endorses the

roadmap for EU

roll-out

2. Submits the

roadmap for EU

roll-out to

Stakeholder

Platform


for EU roll-out

M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12

WG2: GO issuing - Timeline

14

Due date documents

Meetings / Plenary

Webinars

Producer input

Pilot specification> Feedback from plenary

Monitoring plan> Endorsement by WG2

Prelim proced.

(WG1)

Pilot onlineCost and bus. model > Endorsed by WG2

Pilot operation results> Endorsed by WG2

Adhoc meetings

Periodic review of

pilot results

Preliminary GO

scheme

Pilot

specification

Preliminary

procedures

Pilot monitoring

Updating of GO

scheme

Monitoring plan

CertifHy deliv.

Business models

Doc. on practical

implementation of certification criteria

CertifHy deliv.

> Recommendations by WG2 wrtto feasibility and practicality

> Recommandations wrt to feasibility/practicality by WG2

Prelim. scheme(WG1)

Prelim study of business models

Recommended changes to scheme and procedures

Oct ‘17 Nov ‘17 Dec ‘17 Jan ‘18 Feb ‘18 Mar ‘18 Apr ‘18 May ‘18 June ‘18 Dec’18 Jan ‘19 Feb ‘19

+ 6 months

if needed


WG2 Chair an Co-chair election


WG2 & WG3 joint work session


Essential requirements for

determining H2 quantity, carbon

intensity, and renewable share


Residual mix &

Use of GOs with hydrogen from

non-participating sources

GO trading creates an undetermined residual mix for all consumers

using hydrogen without a GO

19

1

2 2

3 3

2 2

2

4

3

4

4

4

1

2

1

4

2

1

2

3

4

1

2 2

3 3

2 2

2

4

3

4

4

4

1

2

1

4

2

1

2

3

4

Group of consumers supplied from sources participating to CertifHy scheme

n H2 source nH2 consumerfrom source n

High carbon BenchmarkRenewableand low carbon

Participating to CertifHy scheme

CertifHyGreen H2

No GO Scheme

• Use of green / low carbon H2 is restricted to vicinity of low carbon source

• Any user can request to be informed by the supplier of the carbon intensity of the supplied H2

CertifHy GO Scheme

• Label stimulates demand for H2 from low carbon / renewable sources

• Green/Low Carbon H2 can be provided to any user supplied from a participating source

• However, the carbon intensity of all non-CertifHy H2 becomes undetermined / that of the residual mix.

• Nonetheless, plant certification requirements ensure that the residual mix does not exceed benchmark carbon intensity

Undeterminedresidual mix

GO trading with application of GOs to hydrogen from non-participating sources

can lead to a loss of accountability for the supply/use of high carbon H2

20

1

2 2

3 3

2 2

2

4

3

4

4

4

1

2

1

4

2

1

2

3

4



High carbon BenchmarkRenewable and low carbon


CertifHyGreen H2

CertifHy GO Schemewith application of GOs to H2 from participating sources only

• Plant certification requirements ensure that the residual mix does not exceed benchmark carbon intensity

• However, part of the market is excluded

• Applying conditions on the physical supply of hydrogen for using GOs generates an administrative burden


1

2 2

3 3

2 2

2

4

3

4

4

4

1

2

1

4

2

1

2

3

4

CertifHy GO Schemewith application of GOs to H2 from non-participating sources

• Increases demand for H2 from LC / renewable sources

• However, accountability for the supply/use of high carbon hydrogen is lost ; supply continues without any user having to accept the high carbon intensity any longer

• The carbon intensity of the hydrogen supplied without a GO (residual mix) is increased, although not visibly due to dilution

Information to be collected for evaluating residual mix approaches

Option

Evaluation criteria

1: No consideration of

physical supply

2: Physical supplier must also

be part of the GO scheme

3: Physical supplier from a

non-participating source

must provide GHG intensity

4: … ?

Credibility Market study:

H2 market volume fraction supplied

from high carbon sources?

Projected evolution?

Inclusiveness Pilot:

- Identification of GO pilot users

supplied from a non participating

source

- Carbon intensity of that physical

supply

Market study:

- H2 market volume fraction

supplied from high carbon

sources?

- Projected evolution?

Administrative

burden

Burden of

- identifying source of physical

supply?

- applying condition on source of

physical supply?

Burden of

- obtaining source of physical

supply?

- providing GHG intensity of

“greened” H2 physical supplied

from a non participating source?

- processing of this GHG intensity

data


Discussion of GO use cases

GO use cases for providing that a mobility application is green or low

carbon

23

GO

Mar

ket



H2 H2

H2

H2

H2


H2


H2

H2H2


On-site production

1

2

3

4

2’H2

H2

H2

H2


CertifHy –



Hydrogen

Wouter Vanhoudt- Hinicio


20/11/2017

Agenda

2


G3

GO

Com

merc

ialisa

tion a

nd u

se

Members


Industry

Industrial gas Air Products, Air Liquide, Linde

UtilitiesBischoff & Ditze Energy, EnerTrag, Engie, Engie Electrabel, Enovos,

HYGRO, Statkraft Markets, Verbund

O&G Q8, Shell

Other operators Colruyt, Group Machiels, Wind to Gas SüderMarsch

Equipment

manufacturerSolenco Power, Hydrogen Technologies d.o.o

Automotive Daimler, Toyota Motor Europe

Fleet operators PitPoint

Cities/Regions Aberdeen City Council

AssociationsH2 Mobility FR, WaterstofNet, European Hydrogen Association (EHA),

HyER, NOW

GO scheme experts AIB, RECS International

Research organisations EMEC, Japan Petroleum Energy Centre

Consultancies Ecofys, EEI, Deloitte Tohmatsu Consulting

Other METI

Legend

Member


Observer


WG3 Work Programme



Pla

tform

Steering Group


WG 2:

GO issuing

(Producers)

WG 3:


and use (Users)



and regulation

Pilot specification

Milestone

Stakeholder

group



Plan for EU rollout




- ICT system


- Monitoring plan

Preliminary GO

scheme defined





Pilot online

WG 4: Regulatory

framework


+ 6 months

if needed

GO scheme finalized


Pilot scheme tested


The scheme will be developed in interaction with stakeholder WGs for

consultation and approval

5


6

WG2:


WG 3:


and use (Users)

WG 4:


Ro

leC

om

po

sit

ion



• Standardisation

experts

Define the

requirements that


production sites

Ensure alignment

between GO scheme

and the pertinent


at EU level



and interface with



and content

Operators of H2

production sites


of the stakeholder

group


the Commission

WG1:

GO scheme and

procedures


that are needed to

address market

needs in terms of

GO product and

commercialisation

All actors involved





steel, glass, etc


companies…)





scheme

• All pertinent

stakeholders

• Take decisions

regarding platform

governance &

organisation


scheme decisions

• Convene Plenary

Sessions

• Working Group

Chairs and Co-chair


(DG Energy, DG

Clima, DG Move, DG

Environment, FCH 2

JU)

WG3: GO commercialisation & use - Work programme

7


• What are the use configurations and user features that should

be implemented in pilot phase?

• Who will be pilot GO users?

• For addressing the res. mix issue: are users able to get information on the GHG intensity of their current supply of H2?

Definition of a

preliminary

GO scheme

Provide a GO user perspective on the scheme requirements

Expression of needs from user perspective

• What are the different types of actors that will use GOs?

• How should GOs be made available?

• What information should be accessible to GO users and to H2 end-users? By what means?

Pilot

specificationDefine user aspects which will be tested with the pilot

Description of Pilot user configuration

Pilot monitoring

plan

Input on what needs to be monitored and on how to collect the data

Pilot monitoring plan- data to be collected with regards to GO use

• What are the scheme evaluation criteria?

• What data and events do we need to record for evaluating the scheme?

Pilot monitoringContribute to analysis of pilot results for identification of lessons learned

MoM on business models• Are the cost inputs correct?

• Which business models are the most realistic and attractive?

Update of GO

scheme

Provide recommendations for update of GO scheme and procedures

WG3 recommendations

• Are the defined scheme procedures on the user side practical and user friendly?

Scheme

proceduresValidate practicality of procedures on user side

• What are the proposed changes?

Contribute to costs and business model analysis

Business models

• What did we learn from the pilot phase?

• What issues remain to be addressed?

MoM on practicality of scheme and pilot procedures

Pilot evaluation report

M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12

WG3: GO commercialisation & use - Timeline

8

Due date documents

Meetings / Plenary

Webinars

Pilot specification

Monitoring plan> Endorsement by WG3

Prelim proced.

(WG1)

Pilot online Cost and bus. model > Endorsed by WG3

Pilot monitoring results> Endorsed by WG3

Adhoc meetings

Periodic review of

pilot results

Preliminary GO

scheme

Pilot

specification

Preliminary

procedures

Pilot monitoring

Updating of GO

scheme

Monitoring plan

CertifHy deliv.

Business models

User

requirements

Prelim. scheme(WG1)

Prelim study of business models

+ 6 months

if needed

Recommended changes to scheme and procedures

Pilot users and use

configuration


9


Platform

Defining a

preliminary GO

scheme

1. Inputs to the GO

preliminary scheme

design

2. Endorses the GO

preliminary scheme

design

1. Consulted on the GO

preliminary scheme


feasibility.

2. Recommendations

wrt to practical

feasibility.

• Inputs to the

preliminary GO

Scheme wrt user

functional

requirements


the GO preliminary

scheme design

compatible with EU

regulation

1. Endorses the GO

preliminary scheme

design

2. Submits to

Stakeholder

Platform

Endorses the GO

preliminary scheme

design

Interacting with

the regulatory

frameworks

N/A

• Identifies show


in EU regulation



N/A

Interacting with

other

standardisation

frameworks



standardisation and

interfaces with the


groups

N/A


Endorses the pilot



Endorses the pilot


perspective


specificationsN/A


10


Platform

Managing the pilot

set-up and

operation

N/A

N/A

Pilot preparation

Defining the

pilot scheme

procedures

1. Inputs to scheme

procedures

2. Endorses scheme

procedures

Inputs scheme


feasibility


proceduresN/A

Designing and

setting up the

ICT System N/A

Production site

audits

Defining the

pilot

monitoring and

feedback

collection plan


monitored


monitoredN/A


11


Group

Stakeholder

Platform



Registry operation

N/A

N/A

Production batch

certification






lessons learned




identification of

lessons learned

N/A


modelsN/A


• Recommend and provide feedback on

proposed business models

N/A


results & business

cases


results


& business cases


12


Group

Stakeholder

Platform


preparing the

documentation

1. Updates GO

scheme based

upon pilot results

and WG2 and WG3

recommendations

2. Endorses the GO

scheme

1. Provides

recommendations

to WG1

2. Comments the GO

scheme wrt

practical

feasibility.

1. Provides

recommendations

to WG1

2. Comments the GO

scheme wrt

functional

requirements

Reviews regulatory


scheme

1. Endorses the GO

scheme

2. Submits the GO

scheme to the

Stakeholder

Platform

Endorses the GO

scheme



plan

Endorses/Comments

EU rollout plan

1. Inputs to the

rollout plan

2. Endorses/Commen

ts EU rollout plan

1. Inputs to the

rollout plan

2. Endorses/comment

s EU rollout plan

Validates proposed

regulatory

amendments required

for EU-wide rollout

1. Endorses the

roadmap for EU

roll-out

2. Submits the

roadmap for EU

roll-out to

Stakeholder

Platform


for EU roll-out


WG2 Chair an Co-chair election


WG2 & WG3 joint work session

WG2 & WG3 joint work session - Agenda

1. Essential requirements for determining H2 quantity, carbon intensity, and renewable

share

2. Options for addressing “residual mix issue” and information to be collected during the

pilot for evaluating these options

3. Discussion of GO use cases

4. Essential requirements from the users’ side

15


Essential requirements for

determining H2 quantity, carbon

intensity, and renewable share


Residual mix &

Use of GOs with hydrogen from

non-participating sources

GO trading creates an undetermined residual mix for all consumers

using hydrogen without a GO

18

1

2 2

3 3

2 2

2

4

3

4

4

4

1

2

1

4

2

1

2

3

4

1

2 2

3 3

2 2

2

4

3

4

4

4

1

2

1

4

2

1

2

3

4



High carbon BenchmarkRenewableand low carbon


CertifHyGreen H2

No GO Scheme

• Use of green / low carbon H2 is restricted to vicinity of low carbon source

• Any user can request to be informed by the supplier of the carbon intensity of the supplied H2

CertifHy GO Scheme

• Label stimulates demand for H2 from low carbon / renewable sources

• Green/Low Carbon H2 can be provided to any user supplied from a participating source

• However, the carbon intensity of all non-CertifHy H2 becomes undetermined / that of the residual mix.

• Nonetheless, plant certification requirements ensure that the residual mix does not exceed benchmark carbon intensity


GO trading with application of GOs to hydrogen from non-participating sources

can lead to a loss of accountability for the supply/use of high carbon H2

19

1

2 2

3 3

2 2

2

4

3

4

4

4

1

2

1

4

2

1

2

3

4



High carbon BenchmarkRenewable and low carbon


CertifHyGreen H2

CertifHy GO Schemewith application of GOs to H2 from participating sources only

• Plant certification requirements ensure that the residual mix does not exceed benchmark carbon intensity

• However, part of the market is excluded

• Applying conditions on the physical supply of hydrogen for using GOs generates an administrative burden


1

2 2

3 3

2 2

2

4

3

4

4

4

1

2

1

4

2

1

2

3

4

CertifHy GO Schemewith application of GOs to H2 from non-participating sources

• Increases demand for H2 from LC / renewable sources

• However, accountability for the supply/use of high carbon hydrogen is lost ; supply continues without any user having to accept the high carbon intensity any longer

• The carbon intensity of the hydrogen supplied without a GO (residual mix) is increased, although not visibly due to dilution

Information to be collected for evaluating residual mix approaches

Option

Evaluation criteria

1: No consideration of

physical supply

2: Physical supplier must also

be part of the GO scheme

3: Physical supplier from a

non-participating source

must provide GHG intensity

4: … ?

Credibility Market study:

H2 market volume fraction supplied

from high carbon sources?

Projected evolution?

Inclusiveness Pilot:

- Identification of GO pilot users

supplied from a non participating

source

- Carbon intensity of that physical

supply

Market study:

- H2 market volume fraction

supplied from high carbon

sources?

- Projected evolution?

Administrative

burden

Burden of

- identifying source of physical

supply?

- applying condition on source of

physical supply?

Burden of

- obtaining source of physical

supply?

- providing GHG intensity of

“greened” H2 physical supplied

from a non participating source?

- processing of this GHG intensity

data


Discussion of GO use cases

GO use cases for providing that a mobility application is green or low

carbon

22

GO

Mar

ket



H2 H2

H2

H2

H2


H2


H2

H2H2


On-site production

1

2

3

4

2’H2

H2

H2

H2


CertifHy –



Hydrogen


20/11/2017

20/11/2017

Karina Veum - ECN

WG4 – 1 hour work session agenda (morning/afternoon)

Morning session

1. Round table introduction of participants

2. Work programme & timeline

3. Introduction chair & co-chair

Afternoon session

1. EU policy context of H2 GoO introduction

2. Discussion on REDII showstoppers

3. Date & action points for next meeting

2


Morning session

WG4: Regulatory frameworkWork programme

4


• In the medium –term perspective (up to 2030) what are possible alignment issues between EU acquis and a proper functioning of the green hydrogen GO scheme.

• Identify and elaborate on how to ensure that barriers / frictions are removed, e.g. in new EU legislation.

Interaction with the

regulatory framework

(1)

Identify and address potential showstoppers in forthcoming EU-legislation, .e.g. REDII, provide input to the pilot H2 GO design/specs

• Recommendations for short-term regulatory amendments

• Input to the design/specifications for the H2 GO pilot scheme

• What are potential showstoppers (i.e. barriers/frictions) in the proposed legislation in the 2016 ‘Winter package’, e.g. related to GO definition(s), purpose, uses, etc.

• NB! WG4 will need to take into account amendment proposals in ongoing co-decision procedure

• Identify and address any frictions between pilot H2 GO scheme design and existing regulatory framework

Interaction with the

regulatory framework

(2)

Address needed medium-term regulatory amendments needed to accommodate well-functioning green H2 GO scheme

• Recommendations for regulatory amendments in medium-term EU

GO scheme update &

Roadmap/EU roll-out

Translation of required regulatory amendments into Roadmap

Provide recommendations on proposed regulatory changes needed and how to fit into Roadmap

• Final review of regulatory alignment issues based on• learnings from pilot case, and • any input from the three other WGs

➢ What unsolved issues need to be taken on board in revised roadmap,• What are outstanding alignment issues• How to address these (who would be responsible, what milestones,

etc)

M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12

WG4: Regulatory frameworkTimeline

5

Regulatory Framework

(short-term)(1)

Regulatory Framework

(medium-term) FW (2)

Update of GO scheme &

procedures

Due date documents

Meetings / Plenary

Webinars

Output- Recommendations addressing regulatory issues in short-term- List showstoppers

Interface - Task 2.1/3.1 > regarding (pilot) design specs

- Overview and details further regulatory alignment issues

Interface- on request from other WG

Output- Recommendations addressing medium-term regulatory issues

- AdjustInterface - Task 4.1 on GO design update

Output- Recom. for RM- Approval from

SC


Afternoon session

EU legislative background (TFEU, RED, FQD)

• TFEU:• COM to develop EU-wide energy policy coordination initiatives to ensure functioning of internal

energy market, supply security, energy savings, RES development, interconnectivity (TFEU Art.

194(1))

• MS responsible for developing their energy resources, energy mix and energy supply structure

(TFEU Art. 194(2))

• RED• Defines RES & sets 2020 targets for RES share in (i) total GFEC and (ii) FEC in transport

• Establishes a framework for use of RES energy to limit GHG and to promote cleaner transport

• Defines framework for GO scheme for RES

• REDII for 2020-2030 timeframe in the pipeline

• FQD• Tightens environmental quality standards for fuel parameters, requires reduction in GHG

intensity of fuels used in vehicles, imposes stricter sustainability criteria

• Not applicable after 2020

7

• Recital 43: GO has sole function of showing to a final customer that a given share or quantity of

energy was produced from renewable sources

• Art 2(g): ‘GO’ means an electronic document which has the sole function of providing proof to a

final customer that a given share or quantity of energy was produced from renewable sources

• Art 19(2): MS shall ensure that no GOs are issued to a producer that producer receives financial

support from a support scheme for the same production of energy from renewable sources. MS

shall issue such guarantees of origin and transfer them to the market by auctioning them. The

revenues raised as a result of the auctioning shall be used to offset the costs of renewables

support.

• Art 19(7): GO shall specify at least: (a) the energy source from which the energy was produced

and the start and end dates of production; (b) whether it relates to: (i) electricity; or (ii)

heating or cooling; (iii) gas; (iv) hydrogen; (v) renewable liquid and gaseous transport fuels

from non-biological origin

• Art 25.1(b) for the calculation of the numerator, the energy content of advanced biofuels and

other biofuels and biogas produced from feedstock listed in Annex IX, hydrogen from

renewable energy sources and renewable liquid and gaseous transport fuels of non-

biological origin ……….

8

Recast REDII proposal – showstoppers?

Discussion

• Showstoppers

• Next steps

9


CertifHy –

Implementing an EU-wide


Hydrogen

Pilot plant specification

20/11/2017



SMR Port Jerome – France

Air Liquide

Guy de Reals

AIR LIQUIDE– SMR – Port Jerome

3

Key characteristics

• H2 production capacity: ~4500 kg/h

• H2 utilisation: Refining Industry, Merchant

• CO2 utilisations: Food industry, Water treatment

PH control, Green houses.

Production process diagram

4

Key parameters

• Product H2 pressure: 25 bar

• Product H2 purity: > 99,9%

• CO2 Capture capacity: 100 000 t/y

HDS + Prereforming

Ref

orm

ing

Shift & Syngascooling

H2 PSA

CryocapTM

Storages

H2 Export

CO2 Export

Natural Gasimport

SteamExport


5General view


6PSA CRYOCAPTM


7

SMR

Presentation video

../Meetings/2017-11-20/CRYOCAP_DEF_VERSION PRESSE VA_1.mp4

Expected GO issuing and use during pilot (6 Months)

8

Expected hydrogen production volume

Up to 100 000 kg/d

Green Hydrogen GOs

Up to TBD kgDepending on Green BioM available and need

Low Carbon Hydrogen GOs

Up to 900 000 kg

Available for GO market

Up to TBD kgDepending on Green BioM available and need

Available for GO market

Up to 900 000 kg



H2 by water electrolyser –

Belgium

Colruyt Group

Jonas Cautaerts

Colruyt Group – Electrolysis (Alkaline + PEM)

10

Key characteristics

• H2 production capacity: 8 kg/h

• PEM (3 kg/h) + Alkaline (5 kg/h)

• Storage

• 85 kg

• Fuel Cell: 120 kW


11

Key parameters

• 400 bar 75 forklifts / heavy duty

• 900 bar min 5 passenger cars

• Purity min 99,998 %

https://youtu.be/e3xKfyc_iEU


12


Max 190 kg/d

Green Hydrogen GOs

Up to 190 kg


Up to 0 kg

Share available for GO market

0 %


0 %



H2 from Chlor-Alkali - Botlek

Netherlands

Akzo Nobel / Air Products

Joost Sandberg – Frank Schnitzeler

Akzo Nobel / Air Products – H2 from Chlor-Alkali Botlek Netherlands

14

Key characteristics AkzoNobel

• Chlor-Alkali plant, 200 MW

• H2 Production capacity: 18 kt p.a.

• H2 utilisation:

• Delivery to Air Products

• Use in steam generation

Key characteristics Air Products

• Over 40 km H2 pipeline

• Feed-in by AkzoNobel and HyCO4 (SMR)

• Supply to various refineries/chemical

industry and to customers with liquid

H2 trailers (ex. Botlek) and gaseous H2

trailers (ex. Pernis)


15

Key parameters

• Pressure: 2 bar ex Chlor-Alkali;

40 bar in H2-pipeline

• Purity: > 98% ex Chlor-Alkali;

>99% in H2-pipeline

• Production capacity: 2 t/hr

Chlor-alkaliprocess

brine

NaOHChlorine

H2

Compression&

Purification H2

Liquefaction &

Storage

Trailer loadingCUSTOMER

AKZO AP

http://apps.carleton.edu/campus/facilities/sustainability/wind_turbine/?module_api=image_detail&module_identifier=module_identifier-mcla-ImageSidebarModule-mloc-sidebar-mpar-dcca48101505dd86b703689a604fe3c4&image_id=60759

Rotterdam Botlek Membrane Electrolysis Plant

16

Salt Water Power

Brine

Electrolysis

Chlorine Caustic Hydrogen


17


40 t/d

Green Hydrogen GOs

100 t (up to 18 kt production capacity)



50 %




Windgas Falkenhagen - Germany

Uniper

Timo Eickelkamp

Uniper WindGas Falkenhagen – Electrolysis

19

Key characteristics

Electrolysis

• H2 production capacity 32 kgH2/h

360 m³H2/h

2 MWel

Methanation

• H2 utilisation 19 kgH2/h

210 m³H2/h

• CO2 (biogenic) utilisation 104 kgCO2/h

52,5 m³CO2/h

• SNG1 production capacity 41 kgSNG/h

57 m³SNG/h

Source: Google maps 1 SNG = Synthetic Natural Gas


20

Key parameters

Electrolysis

• Product H2 pressure 10 bar

• Product H2 purity 5.0

• Feed in either into gas grid

(certified as biogas) or in

future into methanation

plant

• Prequalified for secondary

control reserve

Methanation

• Catalytic methanation

• Product SNG1 purity G260

6 Electrolysis container

2 MWel, 10 bar(g)360 Nm³/h

Methanation210 Nm³/h H2

57 Nm³/h SNG1

Measuring and control system

SNG1 (methane)

Measuring and control system

Hydrogen

CompressorHydrogen and/or SNG (methane)10 55 bar(g)

CO2 Source(biogenic origin) O

NTR

AS

gas

pip

elin

e

Electricity grid incl. wind farm

connection(green el. GOs)

Possible certification boundary

Possible certification boundary

1 SNG = Synthetic Natural Gas

WindGas Falkenhagen

21


22


Up to 38,000 kgH2/a (max. 456 kgH2/d)1

Green Hydrogen GOs

Up to 38,000 kg


0 kg


Up to 100 %


0 %

1 In addition up to 192,000 kgH2 / a (direct feed in / no methanation)

creating the 1st eu-wide guarantee of origin for...

Documents