crct probe 2011

INVESTIGATIVE TEAM

Governor’s Special Investigators

Michael J. Bowers Robert E. Wilson Richard L. Hyde

Balch and Bingham, LLP

James L. Hollis

E. Righton Johnson

Kara M. Engelberger, Paralegal Debbie Daley, Legal Assistant

Susan G. Hughes, Legal Assistant Barbara Watson, Legal Assistant

Wilson, Morton and Downs, LLC

Keri P. Ware Roslyn S. Mowatt

Linda Weaver, Paralegal

Tracey Duren, Legal Assistant Cheryl Hicks, Legal Assistant

The Alford Group

D. Lance Alford

Georgia Bureau of Investigation

Director Vernon M. Keenan Inspector John Heinen

Special Agent Heather Strickland (Case Agent)

Rocky Bigham Leigh Brooks Sean Edgar

Wesley Horne Eugene Howard

Anita Ivy

Randall McMahan Bahan Rich

Evelyn Rodgers Keith Sitton

Kristina Smalley Fred Wimberly

Keesha Walker-Intelligence Analyst

Georgia Department of Public Safety

Col. Mark McDonough, Commissioner Georgia State Patrol, Post 40, Albany

Report Limitations

This report is only an overview of our findings. It does not include every

detail or fact developed during this investigation. Nor does it include every

relevant document. All notes, documents, transcripts and interview summaries

related to this investigation will be available to you, and the appropriate authorities

for whatever action, if any, is appropriate.

Special Thanks

We wish to express our gratitude to you and Governor Perdue for your

support of our work. We also wish to extend our appreciation to Ms. Kathleen

Mathers, former Director of the Governor’s Office of Student Achievement, for her

indispensable assistance throughout this investigation.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Volume 1

Overview .................................................................................................................... 1

The CRCT .................................................................................................................. 3

Interviews and Document Review ............................................................................. 4

2009 Erasure Analysis ............................................................................................... 5

Standard Deviations Chart ......................................................................................... 6

DCSS Erasure Analysis ............................................................................................. 7

Verification of the Erasure Analysis .......................................................................... 8

Use of the Erasure Analysis in This Investigation ................................................... 11

School Summaries .................................................................................................... 11

West Town Elementary School ..................................................................... 13

New Jackson Heights Elementary School ..................................................... 21

Northside Elementary School ........................................................................ 34

Martin Luther King Elementary School ........................................................ 45

Turner Elementary School ............................................................................. 54

Alice Coachman Heights Elementary School ............................................... 65

Morningside Elementary School ................................................................... 73

Sherwood Acres Elementary School ............................................................. 79

Lamar Reese Elementary School ................................................................... 87

Sylvester Road Elementary School ............................................................... 90

Radium Springs Elementary School .............................................................. 95

Summary Chart ............................................................................................ 100

Glossary.................................................................................................................. 101

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Volume 2

2009 vs. 2010 ......................................................................................................... 106

Why Cheating Occurred......................................................................................... 107

Pressure to Meet AYP ................................................................................. 107

Fear of Failure .............................................................................................. 108

Failure of Leadership ................................................................................... 109

James Wilson Report ............................................................................................. 112

Dianne Daniels ............................................................................................. 113

Dr. Sally Whatley ........................................................................................ 113

Findings .................................................................................................................. 114

Glossary.................................................................................................................. 117

Exhibits .................................................................................................................. 122

Exhibit 1 ....................................................................................................... 122

Exhibit 2 ....................................................................................................... 148

Exhibit 3 ....................................................................................................... 194

Exhibit 4 ....................................................................................................... 196

Exhibit 5 ....................................................................................................... 233

Exhibit 6 ....................................................................................................... 262

Exhibit 7 ....................................................................................................... 292

OVERVIEW

The disgraceful situation we found in the Dougherty County School System

(DCSS) is a tragedy, sadly illustrated by a comment made by a teacher who said

that her fifth grade students could not read, yet did well on the Criterion-

Referenced Competency Tests (CRCT).

This incredible statement from a teacher in a school where the principal

flatly refused to cooperate with our investigation is indicative of what we found in

many of the schools we visited.

To our amazement, this top-level administrator would not even answer

questions about how she mishandled her duties as the person who is most

responsible, at that school, for overseeing all testing activity.

Another school principal, whose salary was over $90,000 per year, allowed

her family to falsely claim that they were eligible for a federally-funded free lunch

each school day, even though official guidelines required the annual income to be

no more than $24,089.

Yet another principal, with regard to our interviews, told a teacher: “Don’t

you tell them anything, you hear?”

Notwithstanding these examples of misconduct, there are skilled, dedicated

and well-meaning educators in this school system. But their work is often

overshadowed by an acceptance of wrongdoing and a pattern of incompetence that

1

is a blight on the community that will feel its effects for generations to come. This

is the Dougherty County School System.

Hundreds of school children were harmed by extensive cheating in the

Dougherty County School System. In 11 schools, 18 educators admitted to

cheating. We found cheating on the 2009 CRCT in all of the schools we

examined. A total of 49 educators were involved in some form of misconduct or

failure to perform their duty with regard to this test.

While we did not find that Superintendent Sally Whatley or her senior staff

knew that crimes or other misconduct were occurring, they should have known and

were ultimately responsible for accurately testing and assessing students in this

system. In that duty, they failed.

The 2009 erasure analysis, and other evidence, suggests that there were far

more educators involved in cheating, but a fair analysis of the facts did not allow

us to sufficiently establish the identity of every participant.

The statistics, and the individual student data, leave little room for any other

reasonable explanation, save for cheating. For example, the percentage of flagged

classrooms for DCSS is ten times higher than the state average.

Unlike our investigation of criminal misconduct in the Atlanta Public

Schools, officials with Dougherty County Schools (and their agents) provided, in a

timely and professional manner, access to all personnel and needed documents.

2

THE CRCT

The CRCT is a multiple choice examination given annually to all public

school students in Georgia. There are five tested subjects: reading;

English/language arts; math; social studies and science. Students are scored as

“meets standards,” “exceeds standards” or “does not meet standards.” The CRCT

is an important test. Its results help determine whether a school makes “Annual

Yearly Progress” (AYP) as required by the federal No Child Left Behind Act

(NCLB). All elementary and middle schools within a district must administer the

CRCT at the same time and in the same manner, during a nine-day window.

During the first five days, a different subject area is tested each day. The last four

days of the window are used for make-up testing.

Georgia law requires that the test be administered under tightly-controlled

conditions: the test materials are delivered to the individual schools several days

before testing begins. Each school designates a certified educator to be responsible

for test administration. This person is known as the testing coordinator, who must

ensure that the test is administered according to the test protocols. But the

principal bears ultimate responsibility for ensuring how the test is administered.

Teachers receive training on test administration using procedures that

specifically set forth how the test must be given. Any deviation from the test

protocols is prohibited.

3

In first and second grade, teachers read the test questions aloud and students

answer questions in the test booklet by marking the correct answer. (Exhibit 1).

Teachers must read each question only twice, with no voice inflection that could

suggest the answer. Third through eighth graders read the test questions for

themselves and answer questions on a separate Scantron® sheet by filling in the

appropriate bubble by pencil. (Exhibit 2). Each test section is timed and contains

between 40 and 60 questions. Only students with special accommodations may

have variances in the test administration.

First and second grade students no longer take the CRCT.

INTERVIEWS AND DOCUMENT REVIEW

On August 26, 2010, Governor Sonny Perdue appointed us as his Special

Investigators to investigate alleged test tampering, and related matters, in the

DCSS. (Exhibit 3). This order augmented his directives that we were to:

Find the truth with regard to cheating, if any, on the 2009 CRCT within DCSS;

Assist state regulators in sanctioning educators who participated in cheating;

Submit information to prosecuting authorities regarding criminal conduct, if discovered.

Governor Perdue emphasized that our mandate was to find the truth. He

also stressed that teachers who were honest in their testimony should not be

criminally prosecuted. You restated these directives to us upon assuming office.

4

In order to gain an understanding of the overall structure of DCSS, how the

testing process works and the relevant players, we first conducted benchmark

interviews of top officials in the District, including Dr. Sally Whatley, Renee

Bridges, Dianne Daniels, Carlos Keith, and Robert Lloyd. All of these officials

were interviewed again toward the end of this work. David Maschke, Rev. James

Bush, and Dr. Joshua W. Murfree, Jr. were also interviewed during this

investigation. We also interviewed the teachers, administrators and others at each

of the flagged schools.

In addition to interviews of district personnel, we met with James Wilson,

who conducted the initial “investigation” on behalf of the district and he was

wholly unqualified for that job. We conducted more than 650 interviews.

2009 ERASURE ANALYSIS

As we did in the investigation of the Atlanta Public School System, one of

the first tasks we undertook was to test the validity of the Governor’s Office of

Student Achievement (GOSA) erasure analysis. This was done with the assistance

of our expert during a visit to CTB McGraw-Hill’s test facility. The erasure

analysis is, without question, accurate and reliable.

In February 2010, GOSA produced an erasure analysis performed by CTB

McGraw-Hill on the spring 2009 CRCT. The results of this analysis showed

testing irregularities. The GOSA erasure analysis, which was performed on the

5

test answer documents for every elementary and middle school student in the State

of Georgia, compared the number of wrong to right (WTR) erasures by grade, test

subject and class, to the average number of WTR erasures state-wide for the

corresponding grade and test subject. The results of the erasure analysis showed

that in 35 Georgia school districts, including DCSS, a significant number of classes

had WTR erasures that were dramatically and disconcertingly higher than the state

average.

Specifically, CTB McGraw-Hill determined that if a class had WTR erasures

more than three standard deviations above the expected norm (i.e., the state

average), it was almost statistically impossible for such a high number of WTR

erasures to have occurred without some external force operating to cause it. For

example, at three standard deviations there is only one in 370 chance that the high

erasures occurred by coincidence and at five standard deviations there is only one

in 1.7 million. By seven standard deviations, there is only one in 390 billion chance

that such a high number of WTR erasures occurred randomly.

STANDARD DEVIATIONS CHART

Standard Deviations Chance of Occurring Randomly

3 1 / 370

4 1 / 15,788

5 1 / 1,774,278

6

6 1 / 560,800,000

7 1 /390,600,000,000

In other words, some external force operated to cause the high number of

WTR erasures. Although a WTR erasure analysis does not indicate that the

external force was cheating, it does suggest that something other than normal

student erasing occurred.

Thirty-five Georgia districts had schools with more than five percent of the

classes flagged for standard deviations higher than three. (Exhibit 4). The GOSA

study grouped schools into four categories based on the percentage of flagged

classrooms: “clear of concern”; “minimal concern”; “moderate concern”; and

“severe concern.” Eighty-percent of Georgia’s elementary and middle schools fell

into the “clear of concern” category, 10% fell into “minimal concern,” 6% fell into

“moderate concern,” and 4% fell into the “severe concern” category.

DCSS ERASURE ANALYSIS

The percentage of flagged classes in DCSS exceeded any other district in

Georgia except the Atlanta Public School System. Of the middle and elementary

schools in DCSS, 36% fell into the “severe concern” category, 27% were of

“moderate concern” and 23% were of “minimal concern.” DCSS accounts for

10.8% of the “severe” category schools in the state. West Town Elementary, with

7

77.2% of its classes flagged, was 6th in the state in percentage of classes flagged for

WTR erasures.

The erasure analysis only flagged classes that departed from the norm by

three or more standard deviations. But some classes in DCSS had standard

deviations ranging from 10 to 36. (Exhibit 5). So many WTR erasures could not

occur without human intervention.

Amazingly, many DCSS teachers had high WTR erasures in all three subject

areas: English/language arts; reading; and math. Not only did numerous teachers

do something that was virtually impossible one time, they did it three times in a

row. Even more amazing, several teachers in the same school did this multiple

times.

Dr. Gregory Cizek, our expert, analogized the chances of this occurring to

the Georgia Dome being filled to capacity, with every person in the Dome being

seven feet tall.

VERIFICATION OF THE ERASURE ANALYSIS

We verified that the results of the erasure analysis were accurate and

consistent. This study served as a guide to identify where cheating may have

occurred, and it established the foundation for this investigation. We took the

following steps to ensure its validity:

Retained an expert to review the GOSA erasure analysis;

8

Inspected the CTB McGraw-Hill facility and interviewed several members of the staff who were involved in grading the CRCT and conducting the erasure analysis;

Observed the answer document scanning process;

Compared the results of the erasure analysis to the results of a reanalysis of selected and random test documents;

Manually reviewed thousands of answer sheets and compared them to the results of the original erasure analysis; and,

Interviewed experts in the educational testing and statistics field.

Based on these efforts, we concluded that the GOSA erasure analysis is

accurate, reproducible, and reliable.

We retained Gregory J. Cizek, Ph.D., of the University of North Carolina,

who is one of the foremost experts on educational testing and statistics in the

nation. Dr. Cizek is a Professor of Educational Measurement and Evaluation in the

School of Education at UNC. He currently serves as the President of the National

Council on Measurement in Education. (Exhibit 6). After Dr. Cizek reviewed the

erasure analysis, he accompanied us to the CTB McGraw-Hill facility. When we

toured the CTB McGraw-Hill plant, we observed the answer documents being re-

scanned and interviewed CTB McGraw-Hill’s statistician and other personnel

familiar with the scanning process.

CTB McGraw-Hill’s high-optical scanner read the students’ test documents

and recorded answers and erasures for each section. A computer used special

9

software to determine when an answer was changed from WTR. This data reflected

the total number of erasures and the total number of WTR changes for each student

in each subject area measured in Georgia.

Next, CTB McGraw-Hill employed a statistical test to flag excessive

numbers of WTR erasures in a class. (Exhibit 7). The average number of WTR

erasures statewide, in a given grade and subject, were compared to the number of

WTR erasures in a specific class within the DCSS. The proximity of erasures to

the expected norm is expressed in terms of standard deviations. CTB McGraw-

Hill flagged classes that were three or more standard deviations above the state

average.

GOSA used a conservative criterion of three standard deviations. This was

done to insure that only the most severe and questionable erasures were identified.

We interviewed company officials and manually reviewed answer

documents, counted erasures, and compared our count with the computer’s

analysis. This manual count of erasures revealed more changes than the computer

scanning process. The computer is not as stringent as the human eye. The

difference is not because the scanner missed erasures, but because it is calibrated to

give the benefit of the doubt to a certain level before it considers a lighter mark.

10

To confirm the study results, we asked that CTB McGraw-Hill re-scan both

random and selected tests. The results of the re-scanned answer documents were

consistent with the results of the original erasure analysis.

USE OF THE ERASURE ANALYSIS IN THIS INVESTIGATION

The erasure data helped us prioritize interviews of educators at the schools

to allow us to efficiently focus our effort. We also used this information when we

questioned teachers and administrators.

We compared the student scores with other evidence to better understand

what occurred in classrooms. The student data listed every student in DCSS and

set forth how many total erasures, versus how many WTR erasures, appeared on

that student’s answer document. This information provided an additional

perspective for analyzing erasures.

When student-level data revealed a large number of students within a single

class with high erasures that changed from wrong to right 70%-100% of the time,

such information raised an additional suspicion that someone other than the

students could be changing answers.

SCHOOL SUMMARIES

We found cheating in all of the schools we investigated. There were a total

of 49 educators involved in some manner of misconduct with regard to the 2009

CRCT. The principals of all 11 schools we investigated were found to be ether

11

responsible for having failed in their duty to supervise testing, or to be directly

involved in criminal conduct. Surprisingly, three principals refused to answer our

questions by invoking the Fifth Amendment, which, under civil law, is an implied

admission of wrongdoing. In eight of the 11 schools, we obtained confessions of

cheating.

12

WEST TOWN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

1113 University St. Principal: Alene Pringle Albany, Georgia 31707 Testing Coordinator: David Walker I. INVESTIGATIVE SUMMARY

Cheating occurred at West Town Elementary School during the 2009 CRCT. Forty-two people were interviewed, some more than once. One person admitted cheating on the 2009 CRCT. This misconduct is indicated by the high standard deviations in flagged classrooms, a confession, witness testimony and the dramatic drop in WTR erasures from 2009 to 2010. Principal Alene Pringle was interviewed twice, and then refused to answer our questions by asserting her Fifth Amendment rights. She failed to properly monitor the administration of the 2009 CRCT. Pringle coordinated, directed and facilitated the cheating.

II. STATISTICAL DATA

A. 2009 vs. 2010

2009 2010

Percentage of Classrooms Flagged for WTR Erasures

77.2 3.7

Number of Classrooms Flagged for WTR Erasures

43 3

Number of Teachers Flagged for WTR Standard Deviations above 3.0 (Number of Teachers Flagged in Multiple Subjects)

16(15) 2(1)

Mean Flagged WTR Standard Deviations from State Norm

12.7 4.68

High Flagged Standard Deviation 36.9 6.7

Low Flagged Standard Deviation 3.7 3.6

13

B. Flagged Classrooms

Teacher Grade & Test

Standard Deviation

BANKS 1 RD 10.23397BANKS 1 LA 12.97021BANKS 1 MA 9.646991BRACKEEN 1 RD 17.46921BRACKEEN 1 LA 16.51044BRACKEEN 1 MA 12.70482CHEVERS 1 RD 10.55532CHEVERS 1 LA 12.84356WAITE 1 RD 11.02666WAITE 1 LA 9.898922WAITE 1 MA 10.89428MALLORY 2 RD 15.81229MALLORY 2 LA 11.69482MALLORY 2 MA 5.507629MITCHELL 2 RD 13.70757MITCHELL 2 LA 17.92212MITCHELL 2 MA 17.44879ALDRIDGE 3 LA 4.805527ALDRIDGE 3 MA 7.001085DOUGLAS 3 LA 12.15267WASLEY 3 RD 6.427334WASLEY 3 LA 4.116731WASLEY 3 MA 3.707342WOODHAM 3 RD 9.963333WOODHAM 3 LA 8.134703WOODHAM 3 MA 8.647957CLAY 4 RD 11.43546CLAY 4 LA 7.682805CLAY 4 MA 16.66032NEFF 4 RD 13.05013NEFF 4 LA 5.266158NEFF 4 MA 9.161786

14

ROBINSON 4 RD 11.98553ROBINSON 4 LA 6.98995ROBINSON 4 MA 11.09194MOSELY 5 RD 36.94545MOSELY 5 LA 14.00242MOSELY 5 MA 2107647SAVAGE 5 RD 27.95694SAVAGE 5 LA 23.82917SAVAGE 5 MA 13.90937WRIGHT 5 RD 24.78494WRIGHT 5 LA 15.89046WRIGHT 5 MA 6.969581

III. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE

A. Narrative

While the administration of the 2009 CRCT was underway, Principal Pringle approached fifth grade teacher Gloria Mosely and asked if she would cheat. Soon after that, Mosely says she received the students’ tests in her classroom after school hours where she changed students’ answers. Once the tests had been changed, Mosely returned the tests to the principal’s office where Pringle was waiting for her.

Mosely said another fifth grade teacher, Adrienne Savage, also cheated on the 2009 CRCT. Savage gave students the answers and reviewed sections of the test before it was administered. Principal Pringle knew of Savage’s actions at the time they occurred, but failed to report Savage to school officials and took no disciplinary action against her.

The statistical evidence at West Town indicates many more students’ answers were changed. Teachers also cheated on benchmark and unit tests by identifying those questions students correctly answered, then allowing students to change their incorrect answers.

15

B. Testimony of Witnesses

1. Gloria Mosely (Teacher)

She cheated on the 2009 CRCT at Principal Pringle’s direction. The Friday after testing was completed, Pringle asked Mosely to “look at the children’s answer sheets and make sure that most of them pass.” Mosely left the school for awhile, and when she returned, her students’ answer sheets and tests were in her classroom, and the exams were covered. She does not know who put the tests there but believes it was either Pringle or Assistant Principal David Walker.

As directed, she changed the students’ answers and then returned the test material to Pringle, who was in her office. Mosely claimed she only changed the math answers of her own homeroom students. It was Mosely’s understanding that other teachers were helping Pringle change answers, but claimed that she does not know which teachers were involved.

The upper grades at West Town were departmentalized -- one teacher taught math to all students in the grade, while another taught a different subject. Principal Pringle told teachers to enter other teacher’s classrooms while the subject they regularly taught was being tested. Savage, a science teacher, came into Mosely’s classroom during the science CRCT. Mosely saw Savage giving an answer to a student in Mosely’s class. Mosely told Savage “we don’t give students answers here.” Mosely believed that Savage cheated because she wanted to look good and reported Savage’s actions to principal Pringle. Pringle told Mosely that Savage was trying to make Pringle look bad. Principal Pringle instructed Mosely to cheat because Pringle did not want to look bad by having lower test scores in the subjects not taught by Savage.

After her interview with us, Mosely says that Pringle told her, “don’t you tell them [Governor’s investigators] anything, you hear!” Pringle also instructed Mosely not to tell us that Pringle instructed teachers to improperly go into other teachers’ classrooms during the administration of the 2009 CRCT. Mosely told teacher Teresa Hall, that she admitted that she cheated to the Governor’s investigators. Hall wanted to know if the investigators asked about “who changed the reading answers.”

2. Teresa Neff (Teacher)

In 2009 Neff was a fourth grade teacher. One morning during the administration of the 2009 CRCT, Neff noticed one of her student’s answer sheets was missing. She was sure this pupil’s answer sheet had been turned in the day

16

before with her other students’ tests. A student from Patricia Clay’s fourth grade class showed up at Neff’s door with the student’s missing answer sheet, which had been put in with Clay’s test documents.

Neff was surprised by the high scores of Alice Wright’s fifth grade students, many of whom she taught the year before. These students scored higher than Neff thought they could. She heard that Pringle had asked others to change students’ answers, but did not know who these people were.

On unit tests, Neff would tell students which questions they got correct, and would then return the tests to the students so they could re-answer the questions they missed.

3. Alice Wright (Teacher)

While administering either the science or social studies section of the 2009 CRCT, Wright noticed one of her students marking answers without reading the questions. It appeared that the students had prior knowledge of the questions on the test. Wright stated, “I better not have seen what I thought I saw.” After Wright said this to her class, it appeared the students started to read the questions more closely. Wright thinks that Savage reviewed the test with the students before it was given. She believes it was impossible for the students in her class to make the number of wrong to right erasures identified in the erasure analysis.

4. Patricia Alexander (Proctor)

Alexander was a proctor for Teresa Neff’s class. She heard that several teachers at West Town were in a room changing answers on the 2009 CRCT. This group was close to Principal Pringle, and included Felecia Hawkins, Jacqueline Cuffie, Carol Boges and Teresa Hall. Alexander heard this shortly after the school received its test results. She was surprised by West Town’s scores on the 2009 CRCT. The scores were higher than she expected.

5. Alene Pringle (Principal)

We interviewed Pringle three times. The first two times, she denied that there were any testing irregularities during the administration of the 2009 CRCT. She also said she had not heard any complaints of teachers cheating on the CRCT.

However, during her final interview, she refused to answer any questions by asserting her Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate herself.

17

6. Dr. Adrienne Savage (Teacher)

Savage denied cheating. She admitted leaving her classroom and walking through the other fifth grade classes during the administration of the CRCT. Savage agreed to take a GBI-administered polygraph examination.

During the polygraph test, Savage denied involvement in cheating on the 2009 CRCT and denied knowing of any specific teacher cheating. She further denied that she was instructed to cheat on the tests. It was the polygraphist’s opinion that her physiological responses were “indicative of deception.” Savage reiterated her denials after being informed of failing the polygraph test.

7. David Walker (Assistant Principal and Testing Coordinator)

Walker denied cheating or having any knowledge of cheating.

8. Teresa Hall (Teacher)

Hall served as a proctor for Ravien Washington during the administration of the 2009 CRCT. She denied cheating or having any knowledge of cheating. Gloria Mosely told Hall that she confessed to cheating. Hall denied asking Mosely whether the investigators inquired about who changed the answers to the reading portion of the test.

9. Jacqueline Cuffie (Teacher)

Cuffie was an exceptional student program [ESP] teacher who tested ESP students during the administration of the 2009 CRCT. She denied cheating or having knowledge of cheating. She and Pringle were friends, but had not been as close the past two or three years. When erasing stray marks, Cuffie erased bubbles that were overfilled, and filled in bubbles that were under-filled. Assistant principal David Walker told her to do this.

10. Carol Boges (Teacher)

Boges denied cheating or having any knowledge of cheating.

11. Felecia Hawkins (Counselor)

Hawkins said that only she, assistant principal Walker and principal Pringle had a key to the conference room where the tests were stored. Teachers cleaned stray marks in that conference room, or in Hawkins’ office if the conference room was full. Pringle stayed late at the school, often until nearly 7 p.m.

18

Pringle told Hawkins that Mosely confessed to cheating. Pringle further said that Savage told the Governor’s investigators that Mosely made an answer key for the CRCT and gave it to Pringle, Hawkins, and Juanita Reid. Pringle told Hawkins they needed to “get Savage.” Hawkins told Pringle that she was going to be honest with investigators and had nothing to hide.

Hawkins told us she did not receive an answer key. After consulting with her lawyer, Hawkins agreed to take a GBI-administered polygraph test. Hawkins became very nervous and the test was stopped at her request.

12. Jane Aldridge (Teacher)

Aldridge said that during the benchmark test and some unit tests, she would walk around the classroom to check on students’ answers. If a student answered a question correctly, Aldridge would put a check next to it. The student then knew to go back and change the answer to any questions not checked. Aldridge thinks this was discussed at a grade level meeting. Aldridge denied doing this on the 2009 CRCT.

13. Patricia Clay (Teacher)

Clay said that she could not recall having the answer sheet of one of Teresa Neff’s students, but added that “it may have happened.”

14. Jason Brackeen (Former Teacher)

Brackeen was a teacher at West Town in 2009. He said that Principal Pringle pressured teachers to make Adequate Yearly Progress.

15. Marilyn Banks (Teacher)

All three of Banks’ first grade classes were flagged. She denied cheating or having any knowledge of cheating. Banks agreed to take a polygraph examination. It was the polygraphist’s opinion that there was “no indication of deception” when Banks answered relevant questions.

IV. ANALYSIS OF EVIDENCE

We conclude that Principal Alene Pringle directed and allowed cheating on the 2009 CRCT at West Town Elementary School. Gloria Mosely confessed to assisting Principal Pringle in her cheating scheme. We conclude that Dr. Adrienne Savage also cheated on the 2009 CRCT.

19

Based on the evidence we found at this and other schools with similar statistical data, we believe additional individuals cheated. We lack sufficient evidence to identify who else was involved.

It is also our conclusion from the statistical data and other evidence, that principal Alene Pringle failed to properly monitor the administration of the 2009 CRCT, and failed to adequately supervise testing and test security. This resulted in, and she is responsible for, falsifying, misrepresenting, or erroneously reporting the results of the 2009 CRCT to the Georgia Department of Education.

20

NEW JACKSON HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

1305 E. 2nd Ave. Principal: Dr. Lazoria Walker Brown Albany, Georgia 31705 Testing Coordinator: Barbara Collier I. INVESTIGATIVE SUMMARY

Cheating occurred at New Jackson Heights Elementary School during the administration of the 2009 CRCT. Fifty-five people were interviewed, some more than once. Six people admitted that they cheated on the 2009 CRCT. Cheating at this school is indicated by statistical analysis of flagged classrooms, confessions, witness testimony, documentary evidence, and the dramatic drop in wrong to right erasures from 2009 to 2010. Dr. Lazoria Walker Brown, the principal, failed to properly monitor the 2009 CRCT and participated in this illegal conduct.


A. 2009 vs. 2010

2009 2010


57.9 0


33 0


16 (10) 0


10.4 0

High Flagged Standard Deviation 31.5 0

Low Flagged Standard Deviation 3.1 0



Standard Deviation

ASHLEYA 1 RD 11.61235

21

ASHLEYA 1 LA 10.34716ASHLEYA 1 MA 8.764226COAXUMA 1 LA 4.632121COAXUMA 1 MA 3.971614COLLINS 1 RD 6.999252COLLINS 1 LA 5.718765COLLINS 1 MA 4.790799MASTERS 1 RD 13.31059MASTERS 1 LA 7.132484MASTERS 1 MA 9.381473GREEN 2 RD 12.75955GREEN 2 LA 5.694527GREEN 2 MA 10.85515MORROW 2 RD 4.873879MORROW 2 LA 12.40064MORROW 2 MA 8.711068TAYLOR 2 RD 8.274935TAYLOR 2 LA 7.184775TAYLOR 2 MA 12.62086BROOKS 3 RD 10.72105HALL 3 RD 15.88019JAMES 3 RD 4.154192AKIYODE 4 MA 31.47999BOWMAN 4 MA 26.17379SUTTON 4 MA 23.98209LOUD 5 RD 9.206194LOUD 5 LA 6.937153LOUD 5 MA 16.14864SMITH 5 LA 3.075526SMITH 5 MA 4.106846WILLIAMS 5 LA 4.64269WILLIAMS 5 MA 18.23

22


A. Narrative

There was coordinated cheating at New Jackson Heights on the 2009 CRCT. Fearing that students were not performing well on that test, Principal Brown directed teachers Tanza Sutton and Vernell Lowther to enter other teachers’ classrooms and cheat. At Principal Brown’s instruction, Sutton openly cheated with Rita Akiyode and Robert Bowman by giving students the correct answers on the test. Lowther also cheated with Tinisha Loud by providing answers to students.

Cheating was a way of life at this school. On unit tests, for example, teachers would mark the correct answers, and then return the marked-up tests to the students. The teachers would do this so that the students would see which answers were wrong and make corrections.


1. Tanza Sutton (Teacher)

During the math portion of the 2009 CRCT, Sutton told Brown that her students were not performing well. Brown told Sutton to go to the other fourth grade classrooms and “keep going back and forth [between the classrooms] to check on [the other math students].” Principal Brown gave this instruction in an email attached to this summary as Attachment A. With this order, Brown indicated that Sutton should cheat. Sutton went to Robert Bowman’s class and gave students the answers on the math section of the CRCT.

Akiyode and Sutton gave answers to the students for the math test so they could change their answers that were marked from the day before. Brown entered Sutton’s classroom during testing and told a student that he answered a question incorrectly. Brown looked at Sutton, in a way that Sutton felt demonstrated that Brown expected her to cheat.

In an email to Sutton in reference to the benchmark testing, Brown told Sutton that she was stressed to have to depend on others for her success. Brown further stated that “[t]hese children don’t really care because they don’t have parents who set standards and high expectations for them. Sorry to say this but it is true.” Attachment A.

23

Teachers also cheated on unit tests. After these tests were administered, teachers and Brown would give those tests back to the students so they could correct the questions they previously missed. Sutton believed it was a common practice in the system.

2. Rita Akiyode (Former Teacher)

Akiyode was a fourth grade teacher and said she cheated on the 2009 CRCT. The day after the math section was given, Sutton came into Akiyode’s classroom and improperly gave approximately 20 test answers to her students. Sutton did this before Akiyode’s proctor, Victoria Jean Dorminey, arrived. Sutton told Akiyode that Brown directed Sutton to give the students answers on the math section of the exam.

Brown would move teachers to lower grades based on student’s low test scores. She told teachers at the beginning of the 2008-2009 school year that pupils could not get below a 60 on any schoolwork, even if a student scored below 60. Brown told teachers to return multiple-choice tests to students so they could correct their answers, even if the teacher had to do this several times.

3. Robert Bowman (Teacher)

Sutton came into Bowman’s room and wrote the correct answers to the math portion of the 2009 CRCT on a presentation board at the front of the class. She showed Bowman the email from Brown that directed Sutton to enter Bowman’s classroom. Attachment A.

On another occasion, Bowman went into Sutton’s class and wrote the correct answers on the presentation board for Sutton’s students for the social studies and science portions of the 2009 CRCT.

Bowman says he cheated because of pressure from Brown. Bowman did not have tenure and Brown would remark that teachers without tenure could be fired for any reason, including low test scores. Brown also told Bowman that tenured teachers would be moved to lower grades if their students’ test scores were bad. Moving teachers to lower grades because of poor test scores was seen as a demotion and was a common practice at this school.

4. Vernell Lowther (Part-Time Teacher)

Lowther was a part-time teacher and says she cheated on the 2009 CRCT. She went into Tinisha Loud’s classes and gave the answers to students. They

24

would ask her questions and she would nod her head to indicate whether or not the answer was correct. Lowther did this to help the students meet their promotional requirements. Lowther claims that she did not give answers to Kathy Williams’ students, as indicated by our interview of student D, as noted below.

5. Parent of Student in Tinisha Loud’s Class

A parent of a student in Tinisha Loud’s fifth grade class was allowed to sit with her child while the child took the 2009 CRCT. The parent said that Vernell Lowther came in and gave students the answers. The parent also stated that Loud pointed out answers to the students, and proctor Valerie West gave students answers. This parent attempted to report the misconduct to Principal Brown.

In a monitored conversation, Brown told the parent “I don’t know what you saw, and I don’t want to know, because I didn’t know before now so I don’t want to know.”

6. Valerie Debette West (Proctor)

West was the proctor for Vernell Lowther’s fifth grade class. She said that Lowther entered Tinisha Loud’s class and gave students answers to the 2009 CRCT by using an answer key. Loud was there when Lowther cheated. One student told Lowther “if I fail this test, I am going to tell you gave me the wrong answers.” The other students laughed. West denied giving any students the answers.

7. Faye Joan Ashley (Teacher)

Ashley, a first grade teacher, says she prompted students during the 2009 CRCT when she noticed that the students answered incorrectly. Ashley told us that she did not do this often.

8. Angela Aneshia Scott (Proctor)

Scott was the 2009 CRCT proctor for Faye Ashley’s class. She told us that she prompted students to look over particular questions when she noticed they answered incorrectly. However, she denied giving students the correct answers.

9. Lelie Alice Green (Teacher)

Green administered the 2009 CRCT to Jan Collins’ first grade students. She noticed that Collins’ students were answering the questions on the CRCT before Green read the answer choices. She asked the students if Collins had reviewed the

25

test with them and was told by the students that Collins went over it three times before the testing began. Green talked to Collins about this and Collins had no response.

Principal Brown moved Green out of positions where she was required to give academic grades because Brown thought her grades were too low. Green saw former teachers Patricia Kirk and Mary Green cheat on the unit tests by identifying the incorrect answers and returning the tests to the students so they could answer these questions again. She believed this was a district-wide practice on the unit tests, and saw evidence of this while reviewing records of transfer students.

10. Dawn Murrell Gray (Speech Teacher)

Gray was a speech teacher in 2009. She testified that a student tested by Lillie Zachary (identified as “Student A”) told Gray that she was given a list of correct answers by her teacher. This conversation took place during the week of the 2009 CRCT. Student A told Gray that Zachary “helped” her on the CRCT. While Gray did not report this conversation then, she does not believe that the student would have fabricated this information.

11. Student A

Student A was tested by Zachary on the 2009 CRCT, and said that she would help ESP students like her because Zachary believed those students “didn’t know nothing.” Zachary wrote the question numbers and the correct answers on the board for student A to copy, who was certain this occurred on the CRCT rather than some other test. The student described the differences between the CRCT and those exams.

12. Student B

Student B, in Tinisha Loud’s fifth grade class in 2009, said Lowther came into the classroom and gave students the answers to the CRCT. This student says she heard Lowther say that principal Brown told her to give students the correct answers. Loud also gave students answers on the 2009 CRCT.

13. Student C

Student C, in Tinisha Loud’s class in 2009, said that Lowther came into the classroom and gave students the answers, reading off a piece of paper she had in her hand. Loud was in the room when Lowther did this.

26

14. Student D

Student D was a student in Kathy Williams’ fifth grade homeroom in 2009, and said that Lowther helped on the 2009 CRCT by giving the answers while being tested in Williams’ classroom. Lowther did this after Williams left the room. Lowther assisted about five students in that class.

15. Dr. Lazoria Walker Brown (Principal)

Brown denied transferring teachers to lower grades based on test scores. She admitted that a student’s parent attempted to report cheating to her but that she would not allow the parent to talk about the misconduct because the parent waited three years to do so.

She does not recall Sutton telling her that Sutton’s students were having trouble with math. After we confronted Brown with emails contained in Attachment A, she admitted sending them to Sutton.

Brown denied instructing Sutton to cheat, but claimed she sent the emails only to encourage Sutton to “show her face” to her math students to help the children relax during the testing periods. Brown admitted that it was a testing violation for Sutton to enter Bowman’s and Akiyode’s classrooms during CRCT testing.

Brown denied pointing at a student’s test to indicate the correct answer. She also claims that she did not direct Lowther to assist students with the test. At the conclusion of her interview, Principal Brown asked “am I going to jail?”

16. Tinisha Loud (Teacher)

Fifth grade teacher Loud admitted that Lowther came into her class during testing. She denied that she saw Lowther give students any answers to the test, claiming that she went to the bathroom when Lowther came into the room.

17. Sandra Masters (Teacher)

Masters says that if she saw that a student had marked two answers for a question, she would tell the student to only select one answer. Masters heard that second grade teachers returned unit tests to their students so the students could correct the answers they got wrong. She also heard a teacher whose name she could not recall say, “if you just give them [students] the answer in the first place, they would not have to erase.”

27

18. Kathy E. Williams (Teacher)

Fifth grade teacher Williams denied giving any answers to students on the 2009 CRCT and denied seeing Lowther give answers to students.

19. Jan Collins (Teacher)

First grade teacher Collins denied improperly assisting any students on the 2009 CRCT. She stated that a teacher had previously accused her of cheating on the CRCT because she told the students that questions on the benchmark tests would be similar to what they will see on the CRCT.

20. Dr. Lillie Zachary (ESP Teacher)

Zachary was an Exceptional Student Program [ESP] teacher for first through third grades. After being confronted with the testimony of Student A, she denied giving any students the answers. Zachary admitted to putting correct answers on the board during other tests but denied doing this on the CRCT.

21. Victoria Smith (Teacher)

Smith, a fifth grade teacher in 2009, testified that a lot of pressure was placed on teachers countywide to pass the CRCT. She says she was demoted to teach kindergarten because her students received low scores on the science and social studies sections of that test.

22. Orson Dean Burton, Sr. (Proctor)

Burton served as a proctor during the 2009 CRCT. He says that he saw teachers placing check marks beside answers that were correct on unit tests, then returning the tests to the students so they could answer the incorrect questions again. He also saw this occur at other Dougherty County Schools and believes it is a common practice throughout the district.

23. Mary Green (Retired Teacher)

Green was a second grade teacher. She said that on unit tests, she would place a mark next to the right answers and then return the tests to her students so they could correct those answers not marked.

28

24. Valerie L. McKendrick (Proctor)

McKendrick worked in Loud’s classroom during the 2008 - 2009 school year, but was moved into Lelie Green’s room to proctor for the 2009 CRCT. McKendrick believed this was by design.

She was surprised by the high CRCT scores of many students in Loud’s classroom. She heard about “erasure parties” occurring in the past. She saw teachers return unit tests to students after having identified only the correct answers. McKendrick was saddened by parents and teachers praising high CRCT scores of students that she did not believe were accurate.

25. Rina Miller (Proctor)

Miller was the proctor for Jan Collins in 2009. She did not witness Collins using voice inflection or witness any testing impropriety during the administration of the 2009 CRCT.

26. Geraldine Crawford (Proctor)

Crawford served as proctor for Robert Bowman in 2009. She denied seeing anything improper during the 2009 CRCT. Crawford made these denials even though both Bowman and Sutton admitted cheating during the 2009 exam.


We conclude that Principal Lazoria Brown directed and participated in cheating on the 2009 CRCT. We further conclude that Tanza Sutton, Robert Bowman, Tinisha Loud, Rita Akiyode, Vernell Lowther and Valerie West assisted Brown in her cheating scheme. Lillian Zachary, Faye Ashley and Angela Scott also cheated by giving answers, or prompting students to change answers, from wrong to right.

Based on the evidence we found at this and other schools with similar statistical data, we believe other teachers cheated. We lack sufficient evidence to identify who else was involved.

It is also our conclusion from the statistical data and other evidence, that Principal Lazoria Brown failed to properly monitor the administration of the 2009 CRCT, and failed to adequately supervise testing and test security. This resulted in, and she is responsible for, falsifying, misrepresenting, or erroneously reporting the results of the 2009 CRCT to the Georgia Department of Education.

29

NORTHSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

901 14th Ave. Principal: Angela Shumate Albany, Georgia 31701 Testing Coordinator: Tinsley Dozier I. INVESTIGATIVE SUMMARY

Cheating occurred on the CRCT at Northside Elementary School in 2009 and in other years. Sixty-four witnesses at this school were interviewed, some more than once. The evidence of misconduct at Northside is strong: a high number of flagged classrooms; a confession; witness testimony; the principal’s complete refusal to cooperate with our investigation and the dramatic drop in wrong to right erasures from 2009 to 2010.


A. 2009 vs. 2010

2009 2010


52.2 18.5


36 14


13 (12) 6(4)


9.1 5.6





Standard Deviation

PRICKETT 1 RD 10.41083PRICKETT 1 LA 11.36089

34

PRICKETT 1 MA 12.66367ROBINSON, LESLIE

1 RD 8.31031

ROBINSON, LESLIE

1 LA 11.24606

ROBINSON, LESLIE

1 MA 8.080101

ROBINSON, VICTORIA

1 RD 11.4611

ROBINSON, VICTORIA

1 LA 21.46566

ROBINSON, VICTORIA

1 MA 20.95774

SEAWELL 1 RD 4.536289SEAWELL 1 LA 18.08881SEAWELL 1 MA 12.4046GOODDINE 2 RD 8.931101GOODDINE 2 LA 7.62653GOODDINE 2 MA 6.869942WHATLEY 2 RD 26.33089WHATLEY 2 LA 27.18194WHATLEY 2 MA 15.55634WILLIAMS 2 RD 7.575366WILLIAMS 2 LA 3.698946WILLIAMS 2 MA 4.835876EDWARDS 3 RD 9.748342EDWARDS 3 LA 4.074586JAMES 3 RD 5.865953JAMES 3 LA 8.643164JAMES 3 MA 5.317588JONES 3 RD 12.23092JONES 3 LA 11.61781JONES 3 MA 12.93522KELLY 4 RD 3.426359BROWN 5 RD 8.728823BROWN 5 LA 6.081663

35

BROWN 5 MA 6.769765RANDLE 5 RD 6.063686RANDLE 5 LA 4.851646RANDLE 5 MA 5.872241


A. Overview

The 2009 CRCT at Northside Elementary School was not administered in a way that ensured that the results were accurate and properly reflected the achievements of students at this school. That is reflected by the following:

1. The percentage of flagged classrooms is 52.2% for the 2009 CRCT;

2. Of the 1,857 schools in the state taking the 2009 CRCT, only 24 had a higher percentage of flagged classrooms than Northside Elementary School;

3. Removing from consideration the 84 Atlanta Public Schools taking the 2009 CRCT, there are only two non-DCSS schools that had a higher percentage of flagged classrooms than Northside Elementary School;

4. With state monitors present in 2010, the percentage of flagged classrooms dropped dramatically from 52% to 18.5%;

5. Of the 36 flagged classrooms at Northside Elementary School, 30 (83% of the total) had standard deviations that exceeded five, and 14 classrooms exceeded ten standard deviations. At five standard deviations, the probability that the number of erasures occurred by coincidence is only one in 1.7 million. At seven standard deviations the probability is only one in 390 billion;

6. In the individual student wrong-to-right (WTR) erasure analysis, 87.2% were produced by the flagged classrooms, which account for only 52.2% of the total classrooms in the school;

7. A teacher confessed to giving her students the answers while administering the 2009 CRCT;

36

8. The principal, Shumate, flatly and repeatedly refused to cooperate with our investigation by asserting her Fifth Amendment right to remain silent when asked numerous questions.

B. Narrative

Northside had extremely high numbers of WTR erasures on the 2009 CRCT. Several teachers said that students, who lacked the skills necessary to perform well on the test, met or exceeded standards. Teachers also said that Shumate encouraged them to improperly assist the students on the test.

C. Testimony of Witnesses

1. Tiffaney Randle (Teacher)

Randle said she prompted students during the 2009 CRCT, by telling them to check their answers to specific questions. However, she says she did not provide the answers.

She improperly assisted students on the test because Principal Shumate indicated at a faculty meeting that teachers should prompt students when they answered a question incorrectly by telling them to go back and check their work. Randle helped the students because it was what Shumate directed her to do, and because it would help her school make AYP.

Randle believed she was allowed to tell students to “check their work” when they missed a specific question.

2. Student A

Student A said that Tiffaney Randle assisted her on the 2009 CRCT by pointing to the correct answers, often before the student had marked the answer sheet. Furthermore, when students asked if their answers were correct, Randle would give them the answer. If a student said they did not understand the question, Randle would read the question aloud and then point to the correct answer. One hundred percent of Student A’s erasures in math and language arts were from wrong to right.

3. Student B

Student B said that Randle pointed to questions and told the students to look at the question again if the answer was wrong. Randle did that on at least two occasions with this pupil, and assisted other children in the same manner. One

37

hundred percent of Student B’s erasures in language arts were from wrong to right, 80% from wrong to right in math.

4. Natalie Bustion (Proctor)

Bustion proctored in Tiffaney Randle’s class in 2009. She said that Randle would point at a students’ test paper and tell the student to review an answer. It appeared to Bustion that Randle only pointed to the test if the child missed a question.

5. Priscilla Carter (Proctor)

Carter was a paraprofessional who proctored for Randle during the 2008 CRCT. She recalled that Randle told students to check their work during the administration of that test.

6. Student C

Student C said that fourth grade teacher Dubose assisted students during the CRCT by telling them to check a particular answer that had been marked incorrectly. This student’s erasure statistics support this statement: in math, 100% of the student’s erasures were from wrong to right; and in language arts, 64% of her erasures were from wrong to right.

7. Student D

Student D told us that in the classroom, Ford reviewed the tests and told the students which questions to go over again. Ford would lightly mark the questions that the student needed to review. She did this for all of the students.

8. Julie Walker (Counselor)

Walker did not administer or proctor the 2009 CRCT, but she was a counselor at Northside that year. Walker said that teachers felt undue pressure to meet CRCT passage rates set by the school.

Walker helped Assistant Principal Dozier with distributing and collecting the CRCT in 2009. She is not aware of any cheating, but recalls that Tia Ford and Jessica Edwards were late in returning their tests to Dozier’s office one day during the CRCT.

38

9. Deborah Weldon (Teacher)

Weldon was the media specialist in 2009. Two students say that Weldon assisted them with answering questions on the 2011 CRCT. According to the students, Weldon told the pupils to check specific questions when she noticed they had marked the wrong answer.

Weldon said that she did not administer the CRCT to any classes and denied cheating. She had no explanation for why students would say that she improperly assisted them on the CRCT. Weldon said that she administered the ITBS to Brown’s class in 2009, but that she did not improperly assist the students on that test either.

Weldon told us that Shumate told paraprofessionals at a faculty meeting to assist the students on the CRCT: “You know what our babies can do and what they can’t do.” Shumate told the paraprofessionals to walk around and if they saw that a student answered a question incorrectly, to say: “Is that what I taught you?” She felt that Shumate wanted the paraprofessionals to improperly help the students during the test.

Shortly after Weldon’s meeting with the paraprofessionals, Tinsley Dozier told them that he knew what Shumate said, but that “we are going to do things the right way.” Weldon felt that Dozier was referencing what Shumate said about improperly helping the students.

Weldon took a polygraph examination and there were no indications of deception noted.

10. Angela Shumate (Principal)

Shumate refused to answer our questions by asserting her Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate herself.

11. Vanessa Dubose (Teacher)

Dubose taught fourth grade in 2009. She was not flagged by the erasure analysis; however, as set forth in paragraph 6 above, she denied cheating.

12. Jessica Edwards (Teacher)

Edwards taught third grade and was flagged in two subject areas. She denied any form of cheating. However, Tia Ford told us that Edwards engaged in testing misconduct.

39

Edwards said that the teachers did not erase stray marks because Shumate had a “clean-up team” that would do this. Tinsley Dozier, Jane Hill, and Angela Hammock were on this “clean-up team.”

13. Tia Ford (Teacher)

Ford was not flagged by the erasure analysis but a student said she cheated. Ford denied cheating or having any knowledge of cheating. She explained that the student may be confused because she marked questions that students answered incorrectly on the unit, math and other classroom tests, but not on the CRCT.

She said that Shumate had a school policy that a teacher could not give a student any grade lower than a 60 on their report card. In 2009, Ford had three third-grade students who could not read, and when she put grades lower than 60 on their report cards, Shumate changed each grade to a 60. Ford reported the grade change to someone from “downtown,” and was told that the decision to give failing students at least a 60 was left to each school principal. She does not recall who she spoke with “downtown.”

Ford said that Edwards told her that she read benchmark test questions to her students.

She does not believe that Dozier was involved in altering test documents.

14. Tinley Dozier (Assistant Principal and Testing Coordinator)

Dozier was the assistant principal and testing coordinator in 2009. He denied cheating or having any knowledge of cheating. When asked about Shumate’s involvement in this misconduct, he stated that he has no reason to believe that Shumate encouraged anyone to cheat on the CRCT. Dozier took a GBI-administered polygraph examination and there was no deception noted.

15. Student E

While Student E told us that first grade teacher Virginia Seawell did not cheat during the administration of the CRCT, the erasure analysis for this student indicates that someone altered the answers. In language arts, this student had 27 answers erased and 20 were from wrong to right (74%). In math, this student had 18 answers erased and all were from wrong to right. In reading, this student had 6 answers erased and 4 were from wrong to right (67%).

40

16. Student F

Student F was in Helen Whatley’s class and says that she did not improperly assist on the CRCT. However, the erasure analysis for this student indicates that the answers were altered. In language arts, this student had 26 answers erased and 25 were from wrong to right (96%). In math, this student had 17 answers erased and 14 were from wrong to right (82%). In reading, this student had 20 answers erased and 9 were from wrong to right (45%).

17. Student G

Student G was in Donna Brown’s homeroom class in 2009, and says she did not improperly assist on the test. However, 100% of Student G’s erasures in math and reading were from wrong to right.

18. Jane Hill (Teacher)

Hill is an Early Intervention Program (“EIP”) teacher. She says she identified a number of students who had better results on the CRCT than their actual abilities would indicate they should have scored.

Teacher Helen Whatley once told her, “I do not see how these kids did this.” Whatley was referring to the high scores of her students.

Hill also said that once this investigation began, Shumate told the teachers that if the GBI agents came to their house, they did not have to talk to them.

19. Winifred Mack (Proctor)

Mack proctored for Johnnie James, a flagged teacher, and said that she did not see her cheating on the 2009 CRCT.

20. Donna Brown (Teacher)

Brown taught fifth grade in 2009 and was flagged in three subject areas. A former student of Brown told the GBI that she did not improperly assist with the test. Brown denied cheating.

21. April Gooddine (Teacher)

Gooddine taught second grade in 2009 and was flagged in three subject areas. She denied cheating.

41

22. Angelyn Hammack (Teacher)

Hammack taught second grade in 2009. She had no flagged classes.

She told us that three students who were in Helen Whatley’s class in 2009 struggled with class work, but passed the 2009 CRCT. Those children advanced to the next grade. Hammack did not believe that their CRCT scores in 2009 were accurate. Our review of those three students’ answers on the CRCT indicates an unusually high number of WTR erasures.

23. Johnnie James (Teacher)

James taught third grade in 2009 and was flagged in three subjects. She denied having any knowledge of cheating.

24. Christopher Jones (Teacher)

Jones taught third grade in 2009 and was flagged in three subjects. He denied having any knowledge of cheating.

25. Danielle Kelly (Teacher)

Kelly taught fourth grade in 2009 and was flagged in one subject area. She denied having any knowledge of cheating.

She told investigators that in the fall of 2010, Shumate told the teachers they should “be careful” regarding the Governor’s Investigation. She told the teachers that if a GBI agent came to their homes, they did not have to talk to them and that interviews should be conducted during school hours.

26. Leslie Prickett-Parham (Teacher)

Prickett-Parham taught first grade in 2009 and was flagged in three subjects. She denied cheating but had no explanation for the extremely high number of wrong-to-right erasures. There were pupils in her class who could not read but still passed the CRCT. She now believes there may have been cheating on that test.

Prickett-Parham saw Jane Hill, Angelyn Hammack, Marie Curry, and Yolanda Kendrick in Dozier’s office with the test answer sheets. She believes this was the “crew” that cleaned up stray marks.

42

27. Victoria Robinson (Teacher)

Robinson taught first grade in 2009 and was flagged in three subjects. She denied cheating. She took a GBI-administered polygraph examination, and the results did not indicate deception.

28. Leslie Robinson (Teacher)

Robinson taught first grade in 2009. She was flagged in three subjects. She denied having knowledge of any cheating.

29. Virginia “Faye” Seawell (Teacher)

Seawell was flagged in three subjects. Seawell denied having any knowledge of cheating. She agreed to take a polygraph and the results did not indicate deception.

30. Helen Whatley (Teacher)

Whatley taught the second grade in 2009 and was flagged in three subjects. She denied having any knowledge of cheating, but was surprised by her students’ high CRCT scores. She thinks someone improperly altered her students’ tests because she did not observe her pupils erase as many times as the analysis indicates.

31. Tracee Williams (Teacher)

Williams taught second grade in 2009, was flagged in three subject areas and denied having any knowledge of cheating.


Tiffaney Randle said she prompted her students during the administration of the 2009 CRCT. Several students said Tia Ford and Vanessa Dubose prompted students and we conclude both cheated.

Based on the evidence we found at this and other schools with similar statistical data, we believe additional people but we lack sufficient evidence to identify who else was involved.

We conclude that answers were illegally changed at Northside Elementary School. We further conclude that Principal Angela Shumate knew that teachers were cheating, and, if she did not change answers herself, sanctioned the changing

43

of answers on the 2009 CRCT. Her refusal to cooperate with this investigation, by pleading the Fifth Amendment to every question we asked her, along with the other evidence, allows no other conclusion but that she was involved in cheating at this school.

Based on the evidence we found at this and other schools with similar statistical data, we believe additional teachers cheated. We lack sufficient evidence to identify who else was involved with this misconduct.

We also conclude that Principal Shumate failed in her ultimate responsibility for supervising testing activities and for ensuring the ethical administration of, and proper security for, the 2009 CRCT. It is our conclusion from the statistical data, and other evidence found in this investigation, that Principal Shumate failed to properly monitor the 2009 CRCT and failed to adequately supervise testing activities. This resulted in, and she is responsible for, falsifying, misrepresenting or erroneously reporting the results of the 2009 CRCT to the Georgia Department of Education.

44

MARTIN LUTHER KING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

3125 Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Principal: Carolyn Scott Albany, Georgia 31707 Testing Coordinator: David Adams I. INVESTIGATIVE SUMMARY

Cheating occurred on the 2009 CRCT at Martin Luther King Elementary (MLK). Fifty-four people were interviewed at this school, some more than once. Two teachers said they prompted their pupils, and another teacher was accused by five students of giving them the correct answers on that test.

Misconduct at MLK is indicated by high standard deviations in flagged classrooms, confessions, witness testimony and the refusal by the principal, Carolyn Scott, to cooperate in our inquiry by invoking her Fifth Amendment rights. It is also reflected in the dramatic drop in wrong to right erasures from 2009 to 2010 at this school. Her lack of cooperation obstructed this investigation.


A. 2009 vs. 2010

2009 2010


45.6 0


26 0


12 (8) 0


10.9 0



45



Standard Deviation

DAVIS 4 MA 4.550983HILL 1 LA 3.009137SHAW 1 LA 3.55266SHAW 1 MA 3.387401BAKER 2 LA 3.979771BARNES 2 RD 10.06579BARNES 2 LA 3.036886BARNES 2 MA 6.516814FARR 2 MA 3.785829MANSFIELD 2 RD 10.14843MANSFIELD 2 MA 5.616854LEE 3 RD 6.972211LEE 3 LA 4.955832DAVIS 1 RD 18.43268DAVIS 1 LA 8.369227DAVIS 1 MA 10.87496WILLIAMS 1 LA 3.7065FOSTER 2 LA 8.197024FOSTER 2 MA 8.391163HIGHTOWER 2 MA 3.210162BRACKEEN 3 RD 4.618513BRACKEEN 3 LA 4.1216BRACKEEN 3 MA 4.64311DASHER 3 RD 12.40585DASHER 3 LA 5.101773FARREY 4 RD 34.24936FARREY 4 LA 36.13522FARREY 4 MA 16.03006ODOM 4 RD 11.06836ODOM 4 LA 6.147511

46

ODOM 4 MA 3.888407SMITH 4 RD 16.81551SMITH 4 LA 6.465758SMITH 4 MA 7.825243CHESTER 5 RD 6.19245LORTHRIDGE 5 RD 19.60024MALLARD 5 RD 4.317707MALLARD 5 LA 14.02387MALLARD 5 MA 9.075596


A. Overview

Every “flagged” teacher was interviewed. Some of these teachers engaged in cheating inside the classroom. Others had no knowledge of any such misconduct.

Given the extraordinarily high number of wrong-to-right erasures resulting in standard deviations such as 18.4, 19.6, 34.2, and 36.1, the probability that those erasures could have occurred merely by prompting students is low.

We conclude that some of the erasing occurred outside the classroom after school hours. There was also an opportunity to cheat when the “clean-up” committee was erasing stray marks from the tests.

Assistant Principal David Adams and Principal Carolyn Scott had the only known keys to the vault.

B. Narrative

In 2009, cheating occurred at MLK both inside and outside of the classroom. Jennifer Smith, a fourth grade teacher, says she prompted her students to change incorrect answers by using eye contact and then pointing to specific questions. She admitted that the students were familiar with her nonverbal cues based on prior classroom experience. A fifth grade teacher, Tara Mallard, said she told her students when they had marked incorrect answers. Both teachers say they assisted their students because they had received a “Needs Improvement” on their teacher evaluations.

47

Another fourth grade teacher, Gracie Farrey, denied cheating on the CRCT. However, five students in her class said she cheated in the following ways: she told them when they had the wrong answers; she circled the right answers in the test booklet; and she pointed out answers.

Farrey’s proctor, Vivian Howard, said that Farrey asked her what the correct answers were to some of the questions. Farrey called each student to her desk, where she kept each test at her desk for a few minutes and then handed the answer sheet to Howard to put in alphabetical order. Howard noticed a lot of erasures on the answer documents.

Principal Scott initially denied knowledge of cheating, and subsequently asserted her Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate herself. Assistant Principal Adams denied any knowledge of cheating, but refused to take a polygraph exam. Scott put pressure on the teachers to get scores up and gave some teachers a poor evaluation for low student performance on the CRCT. Scott also instructed the office manager to change student attendance records, presumably to help the school make AYP.


1. Jennifer Smith (Teacher)

Fourth grade teacher Jennifer Smith said she walked around her classroom and prompted her students to change answers from wrong to right. She would signal to the students that their answer to a specific question was wrong by eye contact or by pointing to the question. Students understood what these signals meant because Smith used these same methods on general classroom work.

She said that she assisted her students on the CRCT to improve their scores because she had received a “Needs Improvement” on her annual evaluation.

2. Tara Mallard (Teacher)

Mallard said she assisted her fifth grade students on the 2009 CRCT by telling students to look at a particular question again if she saw that they had marked the incorrect answer. Mallard denied erasing any answers or giving students the correct answers.

Mallard said that she assisted her students because she had previously received a “Needs Improvement” on her evaluation. She believed that receiving

48

two “needs improvements” would result in notification to the Georgia Professional Standards Commission.

3. Student A

Student A said that fourth grade teacher Gracie Farrey helped students on the CRCT by calling them to her desk one at a time and helping them change their answers. She called Student A to her desk with the test booklet and answer sheet, after which Farrey pointed out which answers were wrong and pointed to the correct answers. This student then erased and marked the correct answer as instructed.

4. Student B

Student B said that Farrey assisted pupils on the CRCT by pointing out the answers and telling students to erase and go back over a particular question. This pupil also reported that Farrey erased some answers, then “bubbling-in” the answer sheet, but was not sure if she was changing the answers or merely darkening what had been marked.

5. Student C

Student C said that in 2009, Farrey, assisted pupils on the CRCT by walking around the classroom and pointing to correct answers. If an answer was incorrect, the she would point to the question and shake her head “no” so that the students would be prompted to go back and change it.

6. Student D

Student D said that during the 2009 CRCT, Farrey assisted pupils on the CRCT by walking around the class and circling the correct answers on the test booklets. The students then would change the answer on the sheet as directed by Farrey.

7. Student E

Student E said that Farrey assisted pupils on the 2009 CRCT by indicating when they had a wrong answer. Students then erased the original answer and marked the sheet as directed. Farrey would confirm that they had the correct answer. Student E told Farrey that she was not supposed to help students, but she “shushed” this student and threatened to write this student up if they did not stay quiet.

49

8. Carolyn Scott (Principal)

Principal Scott initially answered our questions regarding the 2009 CRCT and denied having any knowledge of cheating or other test irregularities. She also said that a committee helped Assistant Principal Adams cleaning up stray marks on the tests.

However, during subsequent interviews, she invoked her Fifth Amendment rights and refused to answer our questions.

9. Gracie Farrey (Teacher)

Farrey denied any knowledge of, or involvement with, cheating on the CRCT. When confronted with the allegations from students A thru E, she said that “it could only be a case of mistaken identity.”

10. David Adams (Assistant Principal and Testing Coordinator)

Adams said that only he and Principal Scott had access to the tests after they were locked in the vault. He denied any knowledge of cheating. A “clean-up committee” would erase stray marks from answer documents after testing ended. If a student had marked two answers and it was apparent the student attempted to erase one, Adams would allow the teacher to erase the lighter one and leave the darker mark.

11. Cathy Clyde (School Counselor)

Clyde served as a hall monitor during the 2009 CRCT. After testing each day, paraprofessionals helped with cleaning stray marks from the tests in the conference room in the front office.

She said that teachers would be allowed to keep extra tests in the classroom for students who were tardy or absent to take when they returned to school.

12. Chinary Chester (Teacher)

Chester said that when she began teaching at MLK, some of her students asked her for answers on the test. They told her that other teachers had given them answers in previous years.

50

She agreed that the CRCT statistical data for her class in reading looked suspicious, but denied seeing her students erase excessively during the test. She was surprised at the high scores.

Principal Scott told Chester that Tara Mallard was going to “rub it in”

because her reading scores were so high. Chester responded that Mallard was the reading teacher.

Many of the fifth graders at MLK could not read but performed well on their

fourth grade CRCT. When they got to fifth grade, their scores would drop. Scott would admonish fifth grade teachers and question them as to why the students did so well in fourth grade, but not in fifth. She constantly told the teachers to get their test scores up.

Teachers were not required to have proctors during the administration of the

2009 CRCT. Assistant Principal Adams asked each teacher if they wanted a proctor. If a teacher did not have a proctor, it was because they declined one.

13. Valerie Dasher (Teacher)

Dasher was surprised at the high number of wrong to right erasures in her class. She said that she did not allow her students to erase during the CRCT. Students were required to raise their hands and either Dasher or the proctor would erase for the student. Because she and the proctor only erased between 50 to 100 times total for all five subjects, Dasher recognized that their erasures were not enough to account for the high number of wrong to right erasures in just her reading and language arts sections. She believes someone may have tampered with the tests. She said that she never filled-in an answer or indicated the correct answer to a student.

Dasher learned when the administration of the CRCT was concluded, that

not all teachers had proctors, and thought that this was unusual.

Dasher stated that Principal Scott told teachers “many times” that their end-of-year evaluations would be based on CRCT results.

51

14. Cheryl Foster (Teacher)

Foster told us that for the 2009 CRCT, teachers were given the option of having a proctor. Foster thought this was unusual and 2009 was the first year that had occurred.

15. Peggy Odum (Retired)

Odom did not notice students erasing in her class during the 2009 CRCT, and agreed that the high number of wrong to right erasures seemed abnormal. She denied having any knowledge of cheating.

She stated that literacy coach Felita Lockett asked teachers if they wanted a

proctor. 2009 was the first year that teachers were given this option. In the past, they had been assigned a proctor.

Principal Scott told teachers during group meetings on multiple occasions that the students’ CRCT performance would be reflected on the teachers’ end-of-year evaluations.

16. Felita Lockett (Literacy Coach)

Lockett testified that Principal Scott instructed her to ask teachers if they wanted a proctor for the 2009 CRCT. Lockett is unsure as to why teachers were being offered this option. In previous years, teachers had been assigned a proctor, even though the state rules only required one for classes with 30 or more students.

MLK received a Reading First Grant from the state, based on the school’s low CRCT scores. Lockett believes that MLK had to report student CRCT reading scores to the state as a condition for receiving this grant.

17. Helen Carson (Office Manager)

Carson said that in 2009, a “clean-up committee” was responsible for removing stray marks from the tests after the testing period concluded each day. Carson, Felita Lockett, Cathy Clyde, Assistant Principal Adams and others were on this committee.

Principal Scott and Assistant Principal Adams had keys to the vault. Scott had twenty-four hour access to the building and often worked late and on weekends.

52

18. Juanita Reese (Former Office Manager)

For two or three years while employed as office manager at MLK, Reese altered student attendance records at Principal Scott’s direction. Based on the timing of this order, Reese believes Scott instructed her to make these changes in order to meet AYP. Reese stated that she changed student attendance records in 2009 and possibly in 2007 and 2008.


We conclude that Gracie Farrey, Tara Mallard and Jennifer Smith cheated on the 2009 CRCT by prompting students to change answers or indicating to their students when they had an incorrect answer.

We also conclude that Scott and Juanita Reese illegally altered official attendance records, that were submitted to the Georgia Department of Education, in violation of O.C.G.A. § 45-11-1.

Based on the evidence we found at this and other schools with similar statistical data, we believe additional people cheated. We lack sufficient evidence to identify who else was involved with this misconduct.

We further conclude that Principal Scott and Assistant Principal David Adams failed in their ultimate responsibility for testing activities and for ensuring the ethical administration of, and proper security for, the 2009 CRCT. It is our finding, from the statistical data and the other evidence found in this investigation, that Principal Scott failed to properly monitor the administration of the 2009 CRCT and failed to adequately supervise testing activities and test security. This resulted in, and she is responsible for, falsifying, misrepresenting or erroneously reporting the results of the 2009 CRCT to the Georgia Department of Education.

53

TURNER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

2001 Leonard Avenue Principal: Dr. Linda Gail Solomon Albany, Georgia 31705 Testing Coordinator: Carrie Kirkland I. INVESTIGATIVE SUMMARY

Cheating occurred on the CRCT at Turner Elementary in 2009. Forty-three people were interviewed at this school, some more than once. Three people said they cheated on this test. Misconduct is reflected by confessions, witness testimony, statistical data and the sharp drop in CRCT erasures from wrong to right from 2009 to 2010. Principal Linda Gail Solomon failed to properly monitor the administration of the 2009 CRCT.


A. 2009 vs. 2010

2009 2010

Percentage of Classrooms Flagged forWTR Erasures

39.4 0


26 0


12(9) 0


9.7 0





Standard Deviation

LOTT 1 RD 17.50932LOTT 1 LA 15.21882

54

LOTT 1 MA 19.72189PRICE 1 MA 7.974616WEST 1 RD 3.937991WEST 1 LA 3.226236WILLIAMS 1 RD 4.528863WILLIAMS 1 LA 5.820472WILLIAMS 1 MA 8.472736COVIN 2 RD 5.749052COVIN 2 LA 5.023066COVIN 2 MA 4.387625JOLIVETTE 2 RD 19.21061JOLIVETTE 2 LA 33.89302JOLIVETTE 2 MA 25.16814VANCE 2 MA 6.180627ASKEW 3 RD 5.743036ASKEW 3 MA 3.997514COLLINS 3 RD 3.530522COLLINS 3 LA 4.061934JACKSON 3 RD 10.36916JACKSON 3 LA 13.5966JACKSON 3 MA 11.35206LAMAR 4 RD 6.36945LAMAR 4 LA 7.858689LYONS 4 LA 3.51751


A. Overview

Several factors lead us to conclude that teachers at Turner Elementary School cheated on the 2009 CRCT and that the school was not managed to ensure the results of this test were accurately reported. This was determined by the following:

1. The percentage of flagged classrooms is 39.4% for the 2009 CRCT, but dropped to 0% in 2010, when there were state monitors in the schools.

55

2. Of the 26 flagged classrooms at Turner, 18 (69% of the total) had standard deviations that exceeded five, and nine classrooms exceeded ten standard deviations. At five standard deviations, the probability that the number of erasures occurred by coincidence is one in 1.7 million. At seven standard deviations the probability is one in 390 billion.

3. Three teachers said they prompted students to erase and change answers from wrong to right. A teacher and several students said that various proctors also cheated on this test.

B. Narrative

In 2009, 39.4% of the classrooms at this school were flagged for high wrong to right erasures. The entire first grade was flagged, as well as most of the second and third grade classes. Three teachers said they prompted their students by causing them to erase and change answers from wrong to right. When they noticed pupils with incorrect answers, they directed them to go back and check the questions they had missed. According to students, two of the proctors cheated by telling them the correct test answers.

Testing coordinator Carrie Kirkland was alerted that test tampering may have occurred in the past. She took steps to ensure that tests were secured and that stray marks were erased only under her supervision.


1. Lavonda Jolivette (Teacher)

Jolivette admitted that she cheated on the 2009 CRCT. She says she prompted numerous students who had marked incorrect answers, by telling them to “check your work.” Jolivette said that she prompted students every 2 or 3 questions, and paid particular attention to students who had struggled academically. She said she believed that was why there were a high number of erasures in her class.

She says she did not point to answers or provide answers to students. Jolivette stated that no one directed her to prompt students and that she put a lot of pressure on herself. Her proctor, Diana Onyenwoke, mirrored Jolivette’s behavior whenever she told students to check their work. She says she did not observe Onyenwoke giving answers to students.

56

2. Fatimia Jackson (Teacher)

Jackson admitted that she cheated on the 2009 CRCT. She was a third grade teacher who had transferred from Alice Coachman when the former Assistant Principal, Linda Solomon, became Principal at Turner.

Jackson said that as she walked around her classroom during testing she would tell students to go back to particular questions she noticed they had answered incorrectly. Sometimes, Jackson indicated the correct answer to students. She admitted that she may have done the same while at Alice Coachman Elementary School.

Jackson said that no one told her to prompt students. She felt pressure from Solomon to have good test scores, since Jackson had always had good scores at Alice Coachman. Solomon asked her on more than one occasion how she thought her students would perform on the CRCT. She felt that Solomon brought her to Turner Elementary School with the expectation that Jackson would perform well, and she did not want to disappoint her. Jackson thought that it was important to Solomon to have good test scores in 2009 since it was her first year as Principal.

3. Nikki Lyons (Teacher)

Lyons was a fourth grade teacher and said she cheated on the 2009 CRCT. She says she prompted students by pointing to questions they had answered incorrectly and telling them to check those questions. She also admitted that she flipped back pages in students’ test booklets and told them to go back over particular questions she saw had been incorrectly answered.

Lyons says she used positive reinforcement, such as a smile or pat on the back when a student got a correct answer. She did not provide answers. Lyons had been a student teacher at Alice Coachman in 2008.

4. Student A

Student A was in Jolivette’s second grade class in 2009. This pupil said that during the CRCT, Jolivette provided two answers and also improperly helped other students with the test. Proctor Diana Onyenwoke walked around, checking to see if students marked the correct answers, and also improperly assisted students with the test.

57

5. Student B

Student B was in Jolivette’s class in 2009, and said that Jolivette and Onyenwoke improperly helped during the CRCT. Student B’s mother told us that Student B came home after the test and reported that Jolivette and Onyenwoke had improperly helped students with the test so that the pupils could catch up with everyone else.

6. Student C

Student C was a first grade student in Jancynthia Lott’s class in 2009, and said that proctor Rosita Oliver had improperly helped during the CRCT by sitting next to the pupil during each section of the test. The proctor read the questions and pointed to the correct answers. Lott walked around the classroom, but Student C did not see Lott cheating with students.

7. Carrie Kirkland (Testing Coordinator & Assistant Principal)

Kirkland transferred to Turner Elementary as assistant principal in the 2007-2008 school year. The principal was Patricia Gilbert-Parker. Kirkland said she became concerned about security and testing protocol for several reasons. Before the administration of the 2008 CRCT, she received credible information that Principal Gilbert-Parker and others may have tampered with the CRCT tests in previous years while gathered in the administrative office after hours.

Additionally, teacher Susan Lowery approached Kirkland and asked if teachers could prompt students when they saw that they had marked wrong answers on the test. Lowery said that former Assistant Principal, Eddie Johnson, told teachers it was okay to do that. But Kirkland told Lowery that would be cheating.

Finally, Kirkland learned that Gilbert-Parker sometimes opened Kirkland’s mail and entered her office when she was not there. Kirkland relayed her concerns about Gilbert-Parker to area testing coordinator Renee Bridges, who obtained a cabinet with a built-in lock for Kirkland’s office where the test materials could be secured. Kirkland bought an additional padlock for the cabinet and kept the only key to that lock.

During the administration of the 2008 CRCT, at the end of each day’s testing, Kirkland locked the tests in the cabinet and later in the day would take the cabinet --with the tests inside-- to Bridges’ office for safekeeping overnight. Each morning Kirkland picked up the cabinet and returned to her school for testing. Due

58

to those precautions, Kirkland says that she believes cheating did not occur in 2008. Test scores dropped and Turner did not meet AYP that year.

Kirkland went to Bridges’ office with teacher Doris Greene after the 2008 CRCT concluded and cleaned stray marks from the tests. Greene pointed out to Kirkland that first grade teacher Jancynthia Lott had a high number of erasures throughout her classes’ test booklets. Kirkland approached Lott in the school parking lot and told her she could not prove Lott was cheating, but if she was, Kirkland would turn her in. Lott just stared silently at Kirkland.

In fall of 2009, Dr. Solomon replaced Gilbert-Parker as principal. During administration of the 2009 CRCT, Kirkland did not feel it necessary to take the storage cabinet to Renee Bridges at night. She kept the tests locked in the cabinet in her office during the day, and secured the cabinet at night with the secondary padlock. She did not believe that tests were altered outside of the classroom.

During the pre-test training session for the 2009 CRCT, Kirkland heard Solomon suggest to teachers that they could tell students, who had wrong answers, to go back and check over their work. This was contrary to Kirkland’s instructions.

As Kirkland was checking to make sure all the tests had been returned, she realized that third grade teacher Lisa Askew was approximately 30 minutes late bringing the tests to be secured for the day. After contacting Askew, she walked toward her classroom. Kirkland met Askew coming up the hall with the tests. Askew told Kirkland that she had been “cleaning up the tests” in her room. Kirkland was disturbed because Askew knew that teachers were only permitted to erase stray marks under Kirkland’s supervision in her office or in the multipurpose room.

8. Susan Lowery (Teacher)

Lowery was a third grade teacher in 2009. She said that it was not Eddie Johnson, but rather former Principal Gilbert-Parker who told teachers that students with wrong answers could be prompted to go back and check their work. Lowery said Gilbert-Parker was referring to unit tests, not the CRCT. She felt that Gilbert-Parker was implying that their teaching was ineffective, so teachers needed to help their students by prompting them.

Lowery heard that Principal Gilbert-Parker stayed late during testing and there was some suspicion about why she did this. Gilbert-Parker was difficult to work with and had hurt many people.

59

9. Doris Greene (Teacher)

Greene was a special education teacher in 2009. She went with Carrie Kirkland to Renee Bridges’ office to erase stray marks from the 2008 CRCT tests. Greene recalled that Ms. Lott’s test booklets had excessive erasures, but did not understand the significance of it then. The erasures stood out because she heard that Lott was not an effective teacher, but her students always passed the test.

When Greene learned that Turner’s classes were flagged and saw the erasure data, she suspected cheating. She thought that the flagged teachers were probably under a lot of pressure because Turner had not made AYP the previous year when Gilbert-Parker was principal.

Greene attended CRCT training in 2009. She vaguely recalled Solomon making a comment about prompting students during the test, but could not specifically recall her words. Wendy Hall-Bass, another special education teacher, told Greene that Solomon said that when testing students with read-aloud accommodations in the same room with students without read-aloud accommodations, that Hall-Bass should read loud enough so that the students without those accommodations could hear her. Greene told Hall-Bass that was against protocol.

10. Stephanie Blount (Proctor)

Blount was told by Wendy Hall-Bass that Solomon told her to read the test loudly to ESP students with read-aloud accommodations, so that students without read-aloud accommodations could hear as well. Blount did not know whether Hall-Bass followed Solomon’s instructions.

Solomon was very competitive. Blount says she thought it strange that Turner Elementary School had historically failed to make AYP, but managed to make AYP in 2009 with the same students and mostly the same staff.

11. Diana Onyenwoke (Proctor)

Onyenwoke was a proctor during the 2009 CRCT but said she could not recall whose class she proctored. She claimed to have great difficulty remembering anything about the 2009 CRCT and declared her mind was “a blank.”

When we told her that students had said that she helped them during the test, Onyenwoke stated that if students said she did, then she did, but she did not recall doing so. She told us that she followed the teacher’s lead – whatever the teacher

60

said to the students, Onyenwoke would repeat. For example, if the teacher said “look at number 6 again,” Onyenwoke would repeat it. Onyenwoke stated that it was a routine practice in the past to tell students to “check their work” on specific questions and she did not view that as a testing violation.

Onyenwoke was one of the least credible witnesses we found in over 2800 interviews in both the Atlanta and Dougherty County school cheating investigations, in that she claimed that she could recall absolutely nothing about anything. In essence, she refused to give any meaningful answer to us, except for her name.

12. Rosita Oliver (Proctor)

Oliver proctored for Jancynthia Lott during the 2009 CRCT. She denied cheating. When confronted with allegations that she sat next to a student during the test and gave answers, Oliver denied that she had done so. Oliver initially agreed to take a GBI-administered polygraph examination, then subsequently refused.

13. Dr. Linda Gail Solomon (Principal)

Solomon was Assistant Principal at Alice Coachman Elementary School for six years before transferring to Turner Elementary as principal in 2008-2009. She denied suggesting during 2009 CRCT training that teachers could prompt students who had marked wrong answers. She stated that you “cannot tell individual students to pay attention” to certain questions. Solomon also denied telling any special education teachers to read loudly so that students without read-aloud accommodations could hear them.

Solomon noticed that the test scores in 2009 had dropped from the previous year and assumed it was related to “poor classroom teaching.” She placed several teachers on a PDP (professional development plan), including flagged teachers Anita West, Jancynthia Lott, and Lisa Askew. When she learned Turner Elementary School was flagged, Solomon prepared charts and data concerning the flagged classes, which she shared with her teachers.

She met with the flagged teachers and solicited written explanations for their high erasures at the request of area testing coordinator Renee Bridges. Bridges was not satisfied with the teachers’ submissions and requested that they supplement their statements. We found these reports to be worthless.

Solomon agreed that the erasure data suggested cheating had occurred, and said that she was just as interested in finding the truth as we [Governor’s

61

investigators] were. She did not know why anyone would cheat and she did not direct anyone to cheat. Solomon had no reason to question the integrity of Kirkland or anyone else. She told her teachers that if they cheated she would not support them.

14. Patricia Gilbert-Parker (former Principal)

Gilbert-Parker was Principal of Turner Elementary School until 2008, when she was transferred by then-Superintendent Sally Whatley. Gilbert-Parker felt that her removal as principal was a “conspiracy” engineered by vindictive individuals at that school who wanted to get rid of her.

Before Kirkland became Assistant Principal at Turner, the tests were kept in the vault. She stated that the tests were never out of the vault after testing periods except when makeup tests were given. She denied tampering with tests or telling teachers to prompt students. She said that teachers were not allowed to do anything to prompt students or direct attention to questions they had wrong or had skipped. Gilbert-Parker refused to take a polygraph examination.

15. Wendy Hall-Bass (Teacher)

Hall-Bass was a special education teacher in 2009. She denied that Solomon told her to read loud enough during testing so that ESP students who did not have read-aloud accommodations could hear her.

16. Jancynthia Lott (Teacher)

Lott was a first grade teacher flagged with standard deviations of 17.5 in reading, 15.2 in language arts and 19.7 in math. Her 2009 proctor was Rosita Oliver. She denied improperly assisting students during testing and denied seeing Oliver sitting next to a student and assisting him. Lott refused to take a polygraph examination.

17. Lisa [Askew] Gadson (Teacher)

Askew was a third grade teacher in 2009. She was flagged in two subjects and denied cheating. She told us that students may have changed their answers when she told the class at the end of each section to go back and check their work.

She said that she did not turn-in her tests thirty minutes late and flatly denied telling Assistant Principal Kirkland that she was cleaning stray marks in her

62

classroom: “She is telling a lie. She’s wrong. That never happened. I never said that.”

She admitted that she might have turned in her tests five minutes late on one occasion, but could not recall why. She felt that she could not do anything right for Kirkland and that she was very strict.

18. Carol Price (Teacher)

Price was a first grade teacher flagged only in math. She says she was surprised by the statistics for her students and had no idea or explanation for how the erasures occurred. Price said that there was pressure from school administration to perform well and make AYP.

19. Anita West (Teacher)

West, a first grade teacher, was flagged in reading and language arts. In the statement she wrote to explain her students’ erasures, West essentially claimed the students marked answers before she finished reading and then erased their answers afterward.

20. Aletha Williams (Teacher)

Williams was flagged in all subjects and denied cheating. She said she was not surprised by her students scores, and attributed the high wrong to right erasures to “children just liking to use erasers.”

21. Gloria Covin (Teacher)

Covin, a second grade teacher, was flagged in all subjects. She denied cheating, and refused to take a polygraph examination. Covin also would not sign our voluntary statement form attesting that she did not participate in cheating and had no knowledge of cheating.

22. Yakarii Vance (Teacher)

Vance was flagged only in math, and had no explanation for her students’ erasures. She stated that her proctor, Stephanie Blount, “hovered over” students longer than Vance thought was proper, but she did not see Blount improperly assist students.

63

23. Fadara Collins (Teacher)

Collins was flagged in reading and language arts. She transferred from Alice Coachman Elementary School where she previously worked with Solomon. She denied cheating and explained her erasures by students being redirected for skipping questions or double-bubbling. She could not explain why some of her students were able to change their answers from wrong to right such a high percentage of the time.

24. Catherine Lamar (Teacher)

Lamar was a fourth grade teacher flagged in reading and language arts. Those were the subjects she taught to the entire fourth grade. Lamar denied looking at students’ test documents or telling students to check their work. However, her testimony contradicted her written statement to Solomon explaining her wrong to right erasures. In this document, Lamar described incidents that would have required her to speak to specific students or look at their test materials during test administration. Lamar denied cheating.


We find that cheating occurred at Turner Elementary School on the 2009 CRCT by the following persons: Lavonda Jolivette; Fatimia Jackson; Nikki Lyons; Diana Onyenwoke; and Rosita Oliver.

Based on the statistical data, and other evidence we have found at schools with similar statistical data, we believe that other people also cheated, but we lack sufficient evidence to identify which specific employees were involved.

We do not believe that Assistant Principal Kirkland condoned or knew of cheating at this school in 2009. When she received information about possible cheating, she immediately alerted Renee Bridges and took measures to increase security of the tests.

We further find that Principal Linda Solomon failed in her responsibility for testing activities and for ensuring the ethical administration of, and proper security for, the 2009 CRCT. It is clear from the statistical data, and the other evidence with regard to cheating at this school, that Solomon failed to properly monitor the administration of the 2009 CRCT, and failed to adequately supervise testing activities and security. This resulted in, and she is responsible for, falsifying, misrepresenting or erroneously reporting the results of the 2009 CRCT to the Georgia Department of Education.

64

ALICE COACHMAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

1425 W. Oakridge Drive Principal: Patricia H. Victor Albany, Georgia 31707 Testing Coordinator: Carla Malone I. INVESTIGATIVE SUMMARY

Cheating occurred at Alice Coachman Elementary School on the 2009 CRCT. Thirty-five people were interviewed at this school, some more than once. Three people admitted that they cheated on that test. Cheating at this school is reflected by confessions, witness testimony, statistical data and the sharp decline in wrong to right erasures from 2009 to 2010.


A. 2009 vs. 2010

2009 2010


31.7 0


19 0


9(5) 0


8.1 0





Standard Deviation

EVANS 1 RD 5.459598EVANS 1 LA 6.193679EVANS 1 MA 9.607957

65

WYATT 1 MA 3.823931ANDERSON 2 RD 9.601525ANDERSON 2 LA 15.40314ANDERSON 2 MA 23.63117FAULKNER 2 RD 10.47208FAULKNER 2 LA 7.306809FAULKNER 2 MA 9.002832WILKERSON 2 RD 7.39741WILKERSON 2 LA 4.596565WILKERSON 2 MA 7.364456WILSON 2 RD 3.18997HAYNES 3 RD 6.972211HAYNES 3 LA 7.637528HAYNES 3 MA 6.260498OLIVER 3 RD 3.161769CAMBRON 5 RD 7.371265


A. Narrative

In 2009, test cheating occurred at Alice Coachman Elementary School. The majority of classes flagged for high wrong to right erasures were first and second grades.

The tests were stored in locked cabinets in a room inside the main office. Principal Patricia Victor and Assistant Principal Carla Malone had the reputation among the teachers at this school to be “strictly by the book.”

Malone was on leave during the second week of testing, but had already returned the first and second grade tests to the testing center the previous Friday. By this time, the bulk of the cheating at this school had already taken place, in the first and second grades.

The literacy coach was placed in-charge of packing and delivering the tests for third, fourth and fifth grades to the testing center during the second week.

Trina Faulkner, Deborah Anderson, and Lisa Bardge admitted that they prompted students after noticing the students had incorrect answers.

66

Witnesses said that special education teacher Debra Warren and her proctor, Angelia Allen, cheated by prompting students or giving correct answers. Some teachers’ classes may not have been flagged for high wrong to right erasures but for Warren and Allen testing some of their pupils.


1. Trina Faulkner (Teacher)

Faulkner cheated on the 2009 CRCT, by prompting her second grade students to erase and change answers from wrong to right. When she saw that a pupil had answered a question incorrectly, Faulkner told the student to “check your work.” She claimed that she did not stay at the student’s desk to see if that answer was changed. No one had ever instructed her to tell students to go back and check their work when they had wrong answers. Faulkner stated, “that’s just what I did.” Faulkner denied providing or erasing answers. She believes that the manner in which she administered the test accounted for the high number of wrong to right erasures in her class.

Faulkner is aware that all of the second grade teachers were flagged for high wrong to right erasures and believes that their erasures could also be explained by the way they administered the test.

2. Deborah Anderson (Teacher)

Anderson is a second grade teacher who cheated on the 2009 CRCT. She admits that she prompted her students to erase and change answers from wrong to right. When she saw that a student had a wrong answer, she would tell the student to “check your work” for that particular question. Anderson claimed that she would not wait to see what action the student took but would move on or read the next question. She said that she did not give answers or tell students to erase answers. Her standard deviation in math was 23.6, the highest of any teacher at this school.

3. Lisa Bardge (Proctor)

Bardge cheated on the 2009 CRCT. She says she prompted students while serving as a proctor for third grade teacher Ashlee Haynes. She says that when she noticed a student with several wrong answers, she would tell him to “check your work.” By telling the student to check his work, she was indicating that the answers were incorrect. She did not give the correct answer or tell students to erase. Bardge did not feel that she was cheating. She thought that the students

67

were not focused and needed to take their time. Bardge was not sure if Ms. Haynes, for whom she proctored, also prompted students.

4. Student A

In 2009, student A was in the Exceptional Student Program (“ESP”) in Jordan Cambron’s fifth grade class. ESP teacher Debra Warren and proctor Angelia Allen administered the CRCT. Student A said that the question and answer choices were read to student A. This pupil was able to ask questions about test items. Warren and Allen would help students understand the questions and figure out the answers. If students got an answer wrong, Warren and Allen let them know the answer was wrong and went back over the question with the student. After the test, Warren and Allen went back over the test with the students and made sure they had the right answers. Student A said this was done during all five days of testing.

5. Student B

In 2009, student B was an ESP student in Cambron’s class and was tested by Debra Warren and Angelia Allen. Student B said that they did not assist this student during the test. However, Student B saw Allen indicating answers to another student. Student B also said that Student A said that Allen read the questions and answer choices to Student A and pointed out the correct answers.

6. Student C

Student C, a fifth grade student in Cambron’s class, was tested on the 2009 CRCT by Debra Warren and Angelia Allen. This student told us that after becoming frustrated on the math section, Allen pointed to the correct answers. Student C received answers to approximately five questions during the math test, and saw Allen providing answers to other students as well.

7. Debra Warren (Teacher)

Warren is an ESP teacher. She and proctor Angelia Allen administered the 2009 CRCT to ESP students in first, third and fifth grades. She was told that former ESP students said that she and Allen assisted them during the CRCT by providing, and pointing to, answers during the test. Warren did not explicitly state that the students were lying; however, she denied that she had cheated and also denied seeing Allen improperly assist students.

68

Certain teachers may not have been flagged for high standard deviations if the erasure data of the ESP students tested by Warren had not been incorporated into their homeroom classes’ statistics.

8. Angelia Allen (Proctor)

Allen served as a proctor on the 2009 CRCT for Debra Warren. When confronted with testimony from former ESP students that she had cheated on the 2009 CRCT, Allen denied the accusations. She also denied that Warren had assisted students during testing.

9. Elicia Evans (Teacher)

Evans was a first grade teacher flagged for high WTR erasures and cheated on the 2009 CRCT. Evans said she does not think that anyone outside of the classroom changed her students’ answers. She believes that her students’ high number of erasures could be explained by the way she administered the test. Evans testified that she read the questions to the class twice and then stated “mark the best possible answer.”

When we first asked her, Evans claimed that she did not speak to individual students. She later admitted that if she saw a student marking the wrong answer, she would say “mark the best possible answer” as she walked by the pupil’s desk. As a result, she said, some students erased their answers.

She denied giving students any answers or using suggestive voice inflection. Evans admits that prompting students to “mark the best possible answer” was not a part of the test instructions, and violated testing protocol.

10. Ashlee Haynes (Teacher)

In 2009, Haynes was a third grade teacher who was flagged for high wrong-to-right erasures. She denied changing answers or encouraging students to change answers. Haynes says that she did not notice students marking wrong answers because she did not look at their tests as she walked around. She claimed that she did not speak to individual students during testing except to tell them to “wake up” and “stay on task.” Haynes believes that her proctor, Lisa Bardge, did the same. She did not think that Bardge did anything improper during testing. Haynes did not suspect that anyone changed her students’ answers.

69

11. Letecia Wyatt (Teacher)

Wyatt was a first grade teacher in 2009, with only one class flagged. She identified two students who were tested separately by ESP teacher Debra Warren. Wyatt said that she did not cheat on the CRCT.

12. Nahali Oliver (Teacher)

Oliver taught third grade and says she was shocked to learn that she had one class flagged with a standard deviation of 3.16. She also told us that she was surprised when two students passed the CRCT. Those pupils had been tested separately by the ESP teacher.

13. Jordan Cambron (Teacher)

Cambron was a fifth grade teacher who was flagged in one subject. He had no explanation for his students’ erasures and denied cheating. Several of Cambron’s students told us that they were tested separately by Debra Warren and Angelia Allen, who gave them answers or assistance with the test. The wrong to right erasure data for those students was reported under Cambron’s name.

14. Carla Malone (Assistant Principal and Testing Coordinator)

Malone was the Assistant Principal and served as Testing Coordinator during the 2009 CRCT. The tests were stored in locked cabinets in a room inside the main office known as the “old clinic.” Only she and Principal Patricia Victor had a key to the cabinet and a master key to the old clinic. Malone was absent the second week of testing for medical leave, leaving teacher Diane Hill in charge of packing up and returning the tests for third, fourth, and fifth grades. Malone had already packed and returned the first and second grade tests the previous Friday.

Teachers cleaned stray marks as a group, while under her supervision. Malone says she was shocked by the erasure data. She told us that she did not cheat and was not aware of any motivation to cheat by administrators or teachers.

15. Diane Hill (Teacher)

Hill was a literacy coach in 2009 and was assigned by Principal Victor to receive training as a back-up to testing coordinator Carla Malone. When Malone was absent the second week of CRCT testing, Hill became responsible for returning the tests for the third through fifth grade classes to Renee Bridges. Hill said that she organized and packed up the tests on the Tuesday of the second week,

70

under the supervision of former Assistant Principal Linda Solomon, who assisted Hill. The head custodian helped Hill to deliver the tests to Bridges.

16. Patricia Victor (Principal)

Victor was principal of this school. Only she and Assistant Principal Carla Malone had access to the cabinet where the tests were locked in the old clinic. Victor was absent most of the second week of the CRCT. Since Malone was on medical leave the second week, Victor assigned Diane Hill to return the third through fifth grade tests to Renee Bridges. Victor did not see how anyone had an opportunity to alter documents.

She did not believe an adult would erase students’ answers and could not understand the motivation to cheat or what would be gained by altering test documents. Victor believed that “integrity is doing the right thing when no one is watching.” She says she did not encourage anyone to cheat and was not aware of anyone cheating.


In light of the statistical data, including the high number of flagged classrooms, the dramatic drop in flagged classrooms in 2010 and confessions, we conclude that there was cheating on the administration of the 2009 CRCT at this school.

We conclude that Trina Faulkner, Deborah Anderson, Lisa Bardge, Debra Warren and Angelia Allen cheated on the 2009 CRCT. Elicia Evans denied cheating, however, based upon her testimony and the statistical improbability of erasures in her classroom, we conclude that she also cheated.

Based on the evidence we found at this and other schools with similar statistical data, we believe additional persons cheated. We lack sufficient evidence to identify who else was involved.

We also conclude that there is no evidence that Principal Patricia Victor knew of the cheating. However, as set forth in the Georgia Department of Education Student Assessment Handbook for 2008-2009, which governs all standardized tests administered in the State of Georgia, the principal “Has ultimate responsibility for testing activities in the local school.”

71

Therefore, we conclude that Patricia Victor failed in her ultimate responsibility for supervising testing activities and for ensuring the ethical administration of, and proper security for, the 2009 CRCT.

It is our conclusion from the statistical data and other evidence found in this investigation, that Patricia Victor failed to properly monitor the administration of the 2009 CRCT and failed to adequately supervise testing activities. This resulted in, and she is responsible for, erroneously reporting the results of the 2009 CRCT to the Georgia Department of Education.

72

MORNINGSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

120 Sunset Lane Principal: Jose Roquemore Albany, Georgia 31707 Testing Coordinator: Maqueta Griswold I. INVESTIGATIVE SUMMARY

Cheating occurred on the 2009 CRCT at Morningside Elementary School. Twenty-five people were interviewed, some more than once. Misconduct at this school is reflected by the high number of flagged classrooms, witness testimony and the dramatic drop in wrong to right erasures from 2009 to 2010.

Principal Jose Roquemore directed teachers to illegally alter students’ grades. He also failed to properly monitor the administration of the 2009 CRCT.


A. 2009 vs. 2010

2009 2010


31.6 6.4


18 5


8(6) 3(1)


7.1 3.6





Standard Deviation

BULLARD 1 LA 5.199646BULLARD 1 MA 3.466305

73

DUVALL 1 RD 6.774803DUVALL 1 LA 14.41614DUVALL 1 MA 8.911365FILLINGAME 1 RD 7.361946FILLINGAME 1 LA 6.916769FILLINGAME 1 MA 3.972807THORNTON 1 RD 4.989646THORNTON 1 LA 6.674692THORNTON 1 MA 7.423882SMITH 2 LA 7.244741SMITH 2 MA 11.03923WATERS 2 MA 8.62143MITCHELL 3 RD 12.0867MITCHELL 3 LA 5.243704MITCHELL 3 MA 3.466256STOKES 4 RD 4.56493


A. Overview

Morningside Elementary School was not managed to ensure that the 2009 CRCT results were accurately reported as reflected by the following:

1. The percentage of flagged classrooms is 31.6% for the 2009 CRCT.

2. Of the approximately 1,835 non-DCSS schools in the state taking the 2009 CRCT, only 48 schools had a higher percentage of flagged classrooms than Morningside.

3. By removing from consideration the 84 Atlanta Public Schools where we found systemic cheating on the administration of the 2009 CRCT, there are only 14 non-DCSS schools that had a higher percentage of flagged classrooms than Morningside Elementary.

4. With state monitors present in 2010, the percentage of flagged classrooms dropped dramatically, from 31.6% to 6.4%.

74

5. Of the 18 flagged classrooms at Morningside, 13 (72% of the total) had standard deviations that exceeded five, and two classrooms exceeded ten standard deviations. At five standard deviations, the probability that the number of erasures occurred by coincidence is one in 1.7 million. At seven standard deviations, the probability is one in 390 billion.

6. As reflected in the individual student wrong to right (WTR) erasure analysis, of the WTR erasures, 57% were produced by the flagged classrooms, which account for only 31.6% of the total classrooms in the school.

7. Principal Roquemore violated state law on changing students’ grades. O.C.G.A. § 20-2-989.20 states that “[n]o classroom teacher shall be required, coerced, intimidated or disciplined in any manner by … any local school administrator to change the grade of a student.” None of the legal exceptions to this rule apply here. Based on the evidence which follows, Principal Roquemore violated this statute by requiring, coercing, intimidating or disciplining teachers for refusing to change students’ grades.

8. Teachers at Morningside routinely cheated on unit tests by identifying the answers that students got correct, then returning the tests to the students so they could correct the answers they missed.


1. Dr. Maqueta Griswold (Assistant Principal and Testing Coordinator)

Assistant Principal Griswold denied any knowledge of cheating. She said that in 2009, the tests were stored in the vault where student records were kept, not in a closet in her office. Only she and Principal Jose Roquemore had access to the tests. Dr. Griswold supervised the erasing of stray marks and never observed anyone changing answers. She believes that something improper happened with the tests, either in the classroom or by someone accessing the tests after hours.

She said that Principal Roquemore has a rule that no student would be given a report card grade below 60.

75

Griswold voluntarily agreed to take a GBI-administered polygraph examination. In the opinion of the polygraphist, no indications of deception were noted.

2. Lucy Duncan (Teacher)

Beginning in the 2006-2007 school year, several years after Jose Roquemore became principal, Duncan began noticing that students’ CRCT scores were higher than she thought their classroom ability indicated. She said that Roquemore told teachers they should not give low F’s to students, and should change low F’s to high F’s. Roquemore spoke to Duncan several times about her students’ low grades, saying “these scores, we just can’t have this.” Duncan denies changing any grades.

A few weeks later, Roquemore moved Duncan from third grade to teach kindergarten. Other teachers viewed Duncan’s move to kindergarten as a demotion.

Duncan told us that on unit tests, teachers would identify which answers the students got correct, and then return the tests to the pupils so they could mark the correct answers. Teachers would administer unit tests as many times as it took for the children to pass.

3. Carolanne Marie Duvall (Former Teacher)

Duvall was a first grade teacher in 2009. She said that when she was cleaning stray marks on her students’ CRCT answer sheets, she was shocked by the number of erasures she saw. She did not recall seeing her students erase to the extent she observed on the test booklets. The erasure analysis revealed that the number of wrong to right erasures in her language arts section was very high. Duvall was surprised to learn that the academically lowest achieving student in her class excelled on the math section.

4. Priscilla Mamie [Smith] Hilson (Teacher)

Hilson said she was surprised by some of her students’ high CRCT scores. Principal Roquemore told teachers that they could not give a student “a grade below a 60.” Hilson changed student’s grades from what they earned, as directed by Roquemore. She said that some teachers voiced concerns about changing grades. Roquemore said giving a child “below a 60 hurts the child’s morale.”

76

5. Lynell Kelley Hubbard (Counselor)

Hubbard said that the CRCT materials were kept in a closet, located between her office and Assistant Principal Griswold’s office.

Roquemore stressed that teachers should not give students a grade below a “60.” He also ordered teachers not to give a “low F” because a “high F” would increase the chances that a child could pull the grade above failing.

6. Delois Marting (Teacher)

Marting said that students were allowed to correct their wrong answers on unit tests.

7. Elizabeth Wolfe (School Secretary)

Wolfe testified that Assistant Principal Griswold stored the tests in a vault where student records were kept. Principal Roquemore had a key to the vault.

8. Jose Roquemore (Principal)

Roquemore denied having knowledge of cheating. He told us that Assistant Principal Griswold handled all testing procedures and that she was astute and good at her job.

He denied having access to where the tests were stored in 2009. He also denied directing or coercing teachers to change grades. He further denied prohibiting teachers from giving “low F’s.” Roquemore stated that he only encouraged teachers to work with students to help them raise their grades above failing.


We conclude that Principal Roquemore violated O.C.G.A. § 20-2-989.20 by illegally ordering teachers to change students’ grades, or by coercing, intimidating or disciplining teachers for refusing to change students’ grades.

Based on the evidence we found at this and other schools with similar statistical data, we conclude that cheating occurred. However, we lack sufficient evidence to identify who was involved in this misconduct.

Principal Jose Roquemore also failed in his ultimate responsibility for testing activities and for ensuring the ethical administration of, and proper security

77

for, the 2009 CRCT. It is our conclusion from the statistical data, and the other evidence found in this investigation, that he failed to properly monitor the administration of the 2009 CRCT, and failed to adequately supervise testing activities and security. This resulted in, and he is responsible for, falsifying, misrepresenting or erroneously reporting the results of the 2009 CRCT to the Georgia Department of Education.

78

SHERWOOD ACRES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

2201 Doncaster Dr. Principal: Eva Robinson Albany, Georgia 31707 Testing Coordinator: Eddie Johnson I. INVESTIGATIVE SUMMARY

Cheating occurred at Sherwood Acres Elementary in 2009. Forty-four people were interviewed at this school, some more than once. One person admitted cheating on the 2009 CRCT and there were four other educators accused of misconduct. Cheating at this school is reflected by the high standard deviations in flagged classrooms, a confession, witness testimony and a significant drop in wrong to right erasures from 2009 to 2010. Current Principal Eddie Johnson was the Assistant Principal and Testing Coordinator in 2009 and passed a GBI-administered polygraph examination.


A. 2009 vs. 2010

2009 2010


25 0.9


21 1


12 (5) 1


2.3 0.4





Standard Deviation

AUSTIN 1 RD 5.305965AUSTIN 1 MA 5.23867

79

HOWARD 1 MA 7.812729MOREY 1 MA 4.030297WILLIAMS 1 RD 3.520033WILLS 1 LA 3.639765KEGLER 2 RD 8.653977KEGLER 2 LA 7.468359KEGLER 2 MA 11.15982PHELPS 2 RD 15.10285PHELPS 2 LA 7.468359PHELPS 2 MA 15.2013SCOTT 2 RD 3.839409SCOTT 2 LA 3.934935SCOTT 2 MA 4.891243WALLACE 2 RD 16.18291WALLACE 2 LA 17.34773WALLACE 2 MA 21.86639HESTER 3 LA 3.279772PIERCE 3 LA 3.39151HILL, LAURA 4 LA 3.129451


A. Overview

Teachers at Sherwood Acres cheated on the 2009 CRCT and that school was not managed to ensure that the results of this test were accurately reported. This is reflected by the following factors:

1. The percentage of flagged classrooms is 25% for the 2009 CRCT, but drops to 0.9% in 2010 when there were state monitors in the schools during testing.

2. Of the 21 flagged classrooms at Sherwood Acres, 12 (48% of the total) had standard deviations that exceeded five, and six classrooms exceeded ten standard deviations. At five standard deviations, the probability that the number of erasures occurred by coincidence is one in 1.7 million. At seven standard deviations the probability is one in 390 billion.

80

3. A teacher confessed to prompting students using voice inflection. She also said other teachers did the same.

4. Based upon the extraordinarily high numbers of wrong to right erasures, resulting in standard deviations of 11, 15, 17, and 21 above the state norm, we conclude that the erasures were not done solely by the students. Teachers had the opportunity to erase and correct answers when they erased “stray marks” on their students’ tests. A number of teachers admitted to spending up to an hour darkening partially filled-in bubbles and erasing partially-erased bubbles. Because all of the teachers were erasing and darkening bubbles, some teachers could have used that opportunity to change answers from wrong to right.

B. Narrative

Teacher Alberta Wallace admitted to using voice inflection to help her pupils on the CRCT. She said three other teachers did the same. Assistant Principal Eddie Johnson called teachers to meet and erase “stray marks” by grade level. Some teachers referred to this as the “clean-up committee.” Six educators admitted that when they erased “stray marks” they would fill in partially-shaded bubbles, darken bubbles, erase partially-erased answer choices, and erase around answer choices that were filled in outside of the lines.

At least one teacher said that then-principal Eva Robinson wanted teachers to cheat and that Assistant Principal Johnson knew Robinson had encouraged teachers to cheat.


1. Alberta Wallace (Teacher)

Wallace said she used voice inflection and facial expressions to tell her students the correct answers. She was flagged in reading, language arts and math. She told us that her students’ high rate of erasures may be explained because when her students got ahead of her on the test she would tell them to erase those answers.

According to Wallace, Tekeela Austin, Marguerite Williams, and Betty Phelps also prompted students by using voice inflection.

Wallace cleaned-up stray marks with the other first and second grade teachers and would sometimes fill in partially-shaded bubbles.

81

She told us that Candace Scott kept her tests a little later than the other teachers and she does not know the reason for this.

2. Detrich Sanchez (Teacher)

Sanchez told us that when Eva Robinson was principal she often said, when discussing the CRCT, “they gonna pass, you hear me, they gonna pass.” Sanchez understood Robinson’s words to imply that teachers should cheat. Johnson, the assistant principal at the time, would say, “y’all do what you need to do, but I’m not going down.” Sanchez felt that Robinson and Johnson put undue pressure on teachers to do well on the CRCT.

When GOSA released the 2009 CRCT erasure analysis, former Principal Eva Robinson called the office manager at this school, Cassandra Crawford. Robinson told Crawford that “no one” had come to talk to her about the erasure analysis and that she was not worried because Eddie Johnson was the one who signed off on the tests. Crawford called Johnson and told him what Robinson had said. Johnson said he was not worried because he had done what Robinson told him to do.

Sanchez said that Eddie Johnson told the teachers that if they said anything other than that they did not cheat, that they would be fools. He also volunteered to provide audio recorders for their interviews with the GBI.

3. Patricia Pierce (Teacher)

Pierce taught third grade in 2009 and was not flagged. She erased stray marks with Margaret Hatcher and Eddie Johnson and denied cheating.

When the scores for the CRCT came back one year, Pierce was in the front office talking to school secretary Betty Jean Wright. When discussing the low scores of Pierce’s students, Wright told Pierce that she should consider cheating on the CRCT like the other teachers. Pierce only told Alberta Wallace about her conversation with Wright.

Pierce said that teachers would be motivated to cheat because they are competitive about their test scores. The top four teachers and the bottom four teachers’ test scores were discussed in a faculty meeting. Pierce, Dorothy Everson, Paul Griffin, and Crystal Curry were the bottom four teachers. Alberta Wallace, Betty Phelps, Tekeela Austin, and Marion Wills would also have been singled out for having low test scores.

82

4. Betty Jean Wright (Records Clerk)

As discussed above, Patricia Pierce claimed that Wright told her she should consider cheating on the CRCT like the other teachers. Wright denied making that statement and any knowledge of cheating.

5. Eva Robinson (Principal)

Robinson denied having any knowledge of cheating. She was surprised by the results of the erasure analysis and accepted responsibility for any cheating that took place under her leadership.

6. Eddie Johnson (Assistant Principal and Testing Coordinator)

Johnson is now the Principal at Sherwood Acres, but for the administration of the 2009 CRCT he was the testing coordinator and assistant principal there. He says he kept the CRCT materials locked in his office and that only Principal Eva Robinson, the school police officers, and the facilities department had keys to his office.

When he was told in 2010 that his school was flagged, he asked the teachers for an explanation for their unusually high wrong to right erasures. He also told them to write letters to explain the erasures. Johnson forwarded those letters to the district office.

Johnson stated that there was a “stray mark committee” made up of first and second grade teachers. He was on the committee with Margaret Hatcher, Pam Grecko, and Kathy McCall. If one answer choice was marked and another had the appearance of an attempt of being erased, teachers would remove the partially-erased answer choice.

Johnson had no explanation, other than cheating, for the high number of wrong to right erasures. She agreed to take a polygraph examination and the polygrapher determined there was “no indication of deception.”

7. Tekeela Austin (Teacher)

Austin taught first grade in 2009. She was flagged in reading and math and denied cheating on the CRCT.

She recalled three students that either worked ahead or frequently got off track. A review of the student-level data for these students demonstrates that those

83

erasures would not have skewed the data. There were other students with unusually high numbers of erasures as well.

8. Katrice Kegler (Teacher)

Kegler taught second grade in 2009 and was flagged in language arts, math and reading. She denied cheating. Kegler told us teachers were called in by grade level to erase stray marks. She says she erased marks on the test booklet but not on the answer sheets.

Kegler had no explanation for her high erasure numbers. She refused to take a polygraph examination.

9. Betty Phelps (Teacher)

Phelps taught second grade in 2009 and was flagged in all three subjects. She denied using voice inflection. Phelps erased stray marks with other teachers in her grade level, but says she never erased “inside the bubble.”

Phelps suggested that the high number of wrong-to-right erasures were because young students often change their answers.

10. Marguerite Williams (Teacher)

Williams taught first grade in 2009 and was flagged in reading. She says she helped erase stray marks with Margaret Hatcher and Eddie Johnson. Williams would also darken, but not erase answers. She also denied erasing partially erased bubbles.

Williams said there was one student who worked ahead on the 2009 CRCT. Principal Robinson made that pupil erase answers that he had marked and go back to where the rest of the class was. Williams believed this student’s erasures may explain the wrong to right erasures in her class. A review of that particular student’s answer sheet indicates that he had a high number of wrong to right erasures. He was not the only student in Williams’ class that did so.

11. Tammy Gregors (Teacher)

Gregors was a second grade teacher in 2009 and helped erase “stray marks” with Carolyn Howard, Patricia Pierce, Detrich Sanchez, and Kristen Cook on the CRCT while Eddie Johnson supervised them. Gregors said that she only erased marks that were outside bubbled answers.

84

12. Margaret Hatcher (Counselor)

Hatcher did not administer the 2009 CRCT, but she was on the “clean-up committee” that helped to erase stray marks. If two answers were marked and one bubble was partially erased but was not completely erased, Hatcher would fully erase the bubble. She would also, if needed, darken a bubble. She said that if two answers were fully marked, she would not erase one. She denied changing any answers but would clean-up around bubbles that were “overly-bubbled.” The teachers “cleaned-up” the tests under the supervision of either Johnson or Hatcher.

13. Jennifer Hester (Teacher)

Hester taught third grade in 2009 and was flagged in language arts. She denied cheating.

14. Laura Hill (Teacher)

Hill taught fourth grade in 2009 and was flagged in language arts. She denied cheating but has no explanation for the high number of wrong to right erasures in her classroom.

15. Carolyn Howard (Teacher)

Howard taught first grade in 2009 and was flagged in math. She denied cheating and was on the “clean-up committee” to help erase stray marks. If more than one answer appeared to have been chosen, she would erase the lighter of the marks. She would erase around the bubble if they colored outside the lines. She thinks she did this to some 30 different answers. If there were two clearly marked answers, she would leave both marked.

Her first year of teaching was 2008-2009 and she did not realize she was doing anything wrong.

16. Jennifer Morey (Teacher)

Morey taught first grade in 2009 and was flagged in math. She denied cheating.

Morey was consistently surprised that Tekeela Austin’s students always exceeded expectations on the math portion of the CRCT. Morey said that on the benchmark tests, Austin would only read two of three answer choices to the students.

85

17. Candace Scott (Teacher)

Scott taught second grade in 2009 and was flagged in all three subject areas. She is no longer in the Dougherty County school system and was not interviewed.

18. Marian Wills (Teacher)

Wills taught first grade in 2009 and was flagged in language arts. She says she erased stray marks in the afternoons with Jennifer Morey, Carolyn Howard, Tekeela Austin, Marguerite Williams, and Connie Gaskins. Wills denied cheating.


In light of the statistical data, including the high number of flagged classrooms, the dramatic drop in flagged classrooms in 2010 and a confession, we conclude that there was cheating on the administration of the 2009 CRCT at this school.

We conclude that Alberta Wallace cheated on the 2009 CRCT by both prompting students to change answers and indicating when they had a wrong answer. We believe that the statistical evidence and testimony of witnesses indicates that Tekeela Austin, Katrice Kegler, Marguerite Williams and Betty Phelps also cheated on the 2009 CRCT by assisting students.

We found no evidence that Principal Eva Robinson knew of the cheating. However, as set forth in the Georgia Department of Education Student Assessment Handbook for 2008-2009, which governs all standardized tests administered in the State of Georgia, the principal “Has ultimate responsibility for testing activities in the local school.”

Therefore, we find that Eva Robinson failed in her ultimate responsibility for supervising testing activities and for ensuring the ethical administration of, and proper security for, the 2009 CRCT.

It is our conclusion from the statistical data and other evidence found in this investigation, that Eva Robinson failed to properly monitor the administration of the 2009 CRCT and failed to adequately supervise testing activities. This resulted in, and she is responsible for, erroneously reporting the results of the 2009 CRCT to the Georgia Department of Education.

86

LAMAR REESE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

1215 Lily Pond Road Principal: Valerie Thomas Albany, Georgia 31707 Testing Coordinator: George Graham I. INVESTIGATIVE SUMMARY

Statistical data indicates that cheating occurred during the administration of the 2009 CRCT at this school. We interviewed thirty-three people, some more than once.


A. 2009 vs. 2010

2009 2010


22.7 4.8


17 4


8(5) 3(1)


5.3 5.0





Standard Deviation

BRYANT 1 LA 3.175346BRYANT 1 MA 3.439102GRADDIC 1 RD 3.150872

87

GRADDIC 1 LA 6.543435GRADDIC 1 MA 6.134411SHAVERS 1 RD 5.609636SHAVERS 1 LA 4.241622SHAVERS 1 MA 3.496533BRADFORD 2 RD 10.54907BRADFORD 2 LA 6.712665BRADFORD 2 MA 4.231286DICKERSON 2 RD 5.729666DICKERSON 2 LA 6.939085DICKERSON 2 MA 3.385414FOWLER 2 MA 5.422473WRIGHT 3 MA 4.811585BENTLEY 5 RD 6.846739


With regard to the administration of the 2009 CRCT at Lamar Reese Elementary School, 22.7% of the classes exceeded three standard deviations from the state mean for wrong to right erasures. As shown above, eight teachers accounted for 17 classes exceeding three standard deviations. In 2010, the percentage of wrong to right erasures exceeding three standard deviations dropped significantly from 22.7% to 4.8% in 2010. In 2009, all but two of the flagged classes were in first and second grade.

While some teachers prompted students during the testing but denied doing so, no witnesses admitted to prompting students or changing answers. Principal Valerie Thomas and Assistant Principal/Testing Coordinator George Graham submitted to GBI-administered polygraph examinations and showed no deception.

A. Testimony of Witnesses

1. Dr. Valerie Thomas (Principal)

Thomas served as principal at Lamar Reese Elementary from 2002 until 2010, and is currently the principal at Monroe Comprehensive High School. She says she had minimal involvement with the 2009 CRCT, other than supervising testing coordinator George Graham, by helping him organize the testing process.

88

Thomas denied any knowledge of cheating. She voluntarily submitted to a GBI-administered polygraph and showed no signs of deception.

2. George Graham (Assistant Principal and Testing Coordinator)

Graham is currently the principal at Lamar Reese Elementary School, but served as the assistant principal and testing coordinator there in 2009. Graham said he followed all testing protocols and procedures. Thomas, and possibly teacher Angie Kelly-Gardener, assisted him in collecting test documents. Graham acknowledged that on the last day of the CRCT, he and a group of teachers “cleaned-up” the stray marks from the first and second grade test booklets. He denied knowledge of cheating on the 2009 CRCT. He voluntarily submitted to a GBI-administered polygraph and showed no signs of deception.


In light of the statistical data, including the high number of flagged classrooms, and the dramatic drop in flagged classrooms in 2010, we conclude that there was cheating on the administration of the 2009 CRCT at this school. However, we are unable to conclude how the cheating occurred or by whom it was carried out, but it clearly existed.

We also conclude that there is no evidence that Principal Valerie Thomas knew of the cheating. However, as set forth in the Georgia Department of Education Student Assessment Handbook for 2008-2009, which governs all standardized tests administered in the State of Georgia, the principal “[H]as ultimate responsibility for testing activities in the local school.”

Therefore, we conclude that Valerie Thomas failed in her ultimate responsibility for supervising testing activities and for ensuring the ethical administration of, and proper security for, the 2009 CRCT.

It is our conclusion from the statistical data and other evidence found in this investigation, that Valerie Thomas failed to properly monitor the administration of the 2009 CRCT and failed to adequately supervise testing activities. This resulted in, and she is responsible for, erroneously reporting the results of the 2009 CRCT to the Georgia Department of Education.

89

SYLVESTER ROAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

2600 Trenton Lane Principal: Deborah Jones Albany, Georgia 31705 Testing Coordinator: Nancy Reimer I. INVESTIGATIVE SUMMARY

Cheating occurred on the CRCT at Sylvester Road Elementary in 2009 and other years. Thirty-five teachers at this school were interviewed, some more than once. Misconduct at this school is indicated by a high number of flagged classrooms, one confession, witness testimony, and a significant decline in WTR erasures from 2009 to 2010 with state monitors present.


A. 2009 vs. 2010

2009 2010


22.2 4.6


14 4


9(4) 2(1)


6.4 9.3





Standard Deviation

BONNER 1 RD 5.459598HUFF 1 RD 9.462215HUFF 1 LA 8.192774

90

HUFF 1 MA 10.72508KNIGHTON-HARRIS

1 RD 4.382354

KNIGHTON-HARRIS

1 MA 5.126702

COXSON 2 RD 4.586853COXSON 2 MA 5.732376DANFORD 2 LA 14.1595DANFORD 2 MA 8.982191MARTIN 2 MA 3.213902BLOCKER 4 RD 3.188283BURROUGHS 4 MA 3.395325CULLEN 4 RD 3.248371



1. Beverly Knighton-Harris (Teacher)

Knighton-Harris taught first grade in 2009 and was flagged in two subject areas. She acknowledged that she used facial expressions and voice inflection when administering the CRCT. She observed that students would change their answers whenever her facial expression indicated whether the answer was right or wrong. She claimed that she tried to minimize her tendency to use facial expressions and voice inflection and that her actions were unintentional. We find this explanation absurd, but an admission of wrongdoing.

2. Verona Fitzhugh (Teacher)

Fitzhugh was the reading intervention teacher in 2009. Five students told her they had done well on the CRCT that year because their teacher gave them correct answers. Fitzhugh responded to one student with, “That can’t be true, the teacher did not give you any answers.” The student said, “Yes she did. She told us to change them.” Fitzhugh does not recall which teacher administered the CRCT to those particular students.

She testified that she saw Deborah Flood give students answers on a test, which may have been the CRCT. She overheard Flood tell students during testing:

91

“That’s not the right answer.” She later told Flood that what she did was against the law, to which Flood claimed that she was not testing when she said that.

3. Deborah Jones (Principal)

Jones was principal of Sylvester Road Elementary in 2009 and denied cheating or having any knowledge of cheating.

She told us that there are some students who have not performed in subsequent grade levels as well as their earlier CRCT scores indicated. She acknowledged that this may be attributed to cheating on the CRCT.

4. Lula Blocker (Teacher)

Blocker taught fourth grade and was flagged in reading. Blocker denied cheating. She attributed the WTR erasures in her class to test-taking strategies.

5. Laurie Bonner (Teacher)

Bonner taught first grade in 2009 and was flagged in reading. Bonner denied cheating or having knowledge of cheating.

6. Tijuana Burroughs (Teacher)

Burroughs taught fourth grade in 2009 and was flagged in math. Burroughs denied cheating but does recall a student telling her that their teacher had helped them on the CRCT. She does not remember which year or which student told her that.

7. Sandra Coxson (Teacher)

Coxson taught second grade in 2009 and was flagged in reading and math. She is no longer with DCSS and was not interviewed.

8. Rudella Cullen (Teacher)

Cullen taught fourth grade in 2009 and was flagged in reading. Cullen denied cheating.

9. Olympia Danford (Teacher)

Danford taught second grade and was flagged in language arts and math. During the 2009 CRCT, Jacqueline Stokes administered most of the CRCT to

92

Danford’s class. Danford administered only the math portion. She stated she has no knowledge of cheating.

She was one of two teachers flagged again in 2010. She was flagged in one subject area with a standard deviation of 5.4.

10. Monica Huff (Teacher)

Huff taught first grade in 2009 and was flagged in language arts, reading, and math. She denied cheating.

She said that teachers erased stray marks in front of Nancy Reimer in the front office where the tests were picked up and dropped off. Huff denied erasing anything other than stray marks.

11. Kamina Martin (Teacher)

Martin taught second grade in 2009 and was flagged in math. Martin denied cheating.

She said she did not erase stray marks. She believed there was a “stray mark committee” but does not know who erased stray marks.

12. Nancy Reimer (Assistant Principal and Test Coordinator)

Reimer denied cheating. She said that only Principal Jones and Kathy Adams, the school’s office manager, had access to the vault where the tests were kept. Reimer had to ask Adams for a key during testing.

13. Jacqueline Stokes (Teacher)

Stokes is an Early Intervention Program (“EIP”) teacher. She administered the language arts and reading portions of the 2009 CRCT to Danford’s second grade class. Danford’s class was flagged in language arts. Stokes denied cheating.

14. April Turner (Teacher)

Turner administered the test in 2009 but was not flagged. She stated that there was a team responsible for erasing stray marks but she does not know who was on the team.

93

15. Deborah Flood (Teacher)

Flood taught third grade in 2009 and was not a flagged teacher in 2009 but was accused by Fitzhugh cheating. In 2010, Flood was the only teacher flagged in all three subject areas with standard deviations of 20.1, 3.7, and 8.1.


We conclude that Beverly Knighton-Harris prompted students to change their answers on the 2009 CRCT. We further conclude that Deborah Flood cheated on the 2009 CRCT, and likely the 2010 CRCT as well. Verona Fitzhugh stated that she witnessed Flood cheating on a test, and while Fitzhugh is not certain it was the CRCT, that witness account combined with Flood’s statistically improbable WTR erasures in 2010, lead us to conclude that Flood likely cheated on the CRCT in 2010.

Based on the evidence we found at this and other schools with similar statistical data, we believe others cheated. We lack sufficient evidence to identify who else was involved in this misconduct.

We also conclude that there is no evidence that Principal Deborah Jones knew of the cheating. However, as set forth in the Georgia Department of Education Student Assessment Handbook for 2008-2009, which governs all standardized tests administered in the State of Georgia, the principal “Has ultimate responsibility for testing activities in the local school.”

Therefore, we conclude that Deborah Jones failed in her ultimate responsibility for supervising testing activities and for ensuring the ethical administration of, and proper security for, the 2009 CRCT.

It is our conclusion from the statistical data and other evidence found in this investigation, that Deborah Jones failed to properly monitor the administration of the 2009 CRCT and failed to adequately supervise testing activities. This resulted in, and she is responsible for, erroneously reporting the results of the 2009 CRCT to the Georgia Department of Education.

94

RADIUM SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

2400 Roxanna Road Principal: Linda Gail Griffin Albany, Georgia 31707 Testing Coordinator: Yvette Simmons I. INVESTIGATIVE SUMMARY

Statistical evidence and the dramatic drop in wrong to right erasures from 2009 to 2010 indicates that cheating occurred during the administration of the 2009 CRCT at Radium Springs Elementary School. Twenty-two people were interviewed there, some more than once.


A. 2009 vs. 2010

2009 2010


21.4 5.7


18 12


7(6) 10(2)


8.3 3.7





Standard Deviation

BUSH 1 RD 9.734247BUSH 1 LA 9.095456BUSH 1 MA 6.158487

95

STAMPS 1 RD 8.07671STAMPS 1 LA 8.811517STAMPS 1 MA 8.20114WILLIAMS 1 LA 4.011852WILLIAMS 1 MA 3.167556FRAZIER 2 RD 11.66452FRAZIER 2 LA 12.25893FRAZIER 2 MA 9.905486HOUSTON 2 RD 14.21651HOUSTON 2 LA 10.98161HOUSTON 2 MA 8.197753WILLIAMS 2 RD 7.938921WILLIAMS 2 LA 8.605145WILLIAMS 2 MA 13.45703HAYNES 4 MA 3.816562


In 2009, 21.4% of the classes at this school were flagged for standard deviations above three for wrong to right erasures. Most of the classes flagged were in the first and second grades, where questions and answer choices are read aloud to the students. This suggests that students were prompted to change their answers during test administration. Paraprofessionals cleaned stray marks from the tests under the supervision of assistant principal Yvette Simmons. No witnesses admitted to prompting students or changing answers.


1. Kimberly Bush (Teacher)

Bush taught reading and language arts in 2009 for the five first grade classes. Bush was flagged in reading, language arts, and math for high wrong to right erasures. She had no explanation for the high number of erasures, and says she did not prompt her students during testing, and had no suspicion that anyone changed her students’ answers. She further says that there would be no reason for anyone to cheat on the CRCT.

96

2. Aksana Stamps (Teacher)

Stamps taught math to first grade students and was flagged in all three subjects. She said that neither she nor her proctor did anything to improperly assist students during testing. She claims that teachers were not left alone with the tests, because the testing coordinator, Yvette Simmons, delivered the exams while the students, teachers and proctors were present in the classroom before testing started and picked them up promptly afterward. There was no pressure exerted by administrators to improve test scores or to have particular students pass.

3. Lolica Williams (Teacher)

Williams says that her first grade students in 2009 were neither particularly gifted nor challenged in academic ability. She had no idea why she was flagged in math and language arts. She told us she did not use voice inflection and that neither she, nor her proctor, did anything to prompt students. Williams had no reason to believe that either Principal Linda Griffin or Assistant Principal Simmons would cheat.

4. Deborah Frazier (Teacher)

Frazier taught second grade and was flagged in all three subjects. She says there were five second grade classes and three were departmentalized. Frazier taught reading and language arts, and rotated students with Monica Ward and June Houston. Frazier had no explanation for her students’ high wrong to right erasures. She speculated that rotating among three teachers somehow caused those students to erase more frequently. The two teachers who did not rotate classes were not flagged for high wrong to right erasures.

5. June Houston (Teacher)

Houston was flagged in all three subjects. She taught science and social studies to the three departmentalized second grade classes. Houston was astonished when shown the individual student erasure data because she did not recall seeing her students erase to that extent.

She was certain neither she nor her proctor did anything in administering the test that would account for the high erasures. Houston told us that someone might have changed her students’ answers, and it only seemed logical that the clean-up committee had the best opportunity to do so. However, she did not believe that anyone at that school would do anything unethical. Principal Griffin and Assistant Principal Simmons were strict and “by the book.”

97

6. Monica Williams Ward (Teacher)

Ward taught math for the second grade departmentalized classes. She was flagged in all three subjects and realized that the high wrong to right erasures for her class put her “in a bad spot.” Ward denied using voice inflection, or doing anything improper, in administering the test. She did not suspect that anyone tampered with tests after they left her classroom.

7. Yvette Simmons (Assistant Principal and Testing Coordinator)

Simmons told us she was “very security conscious” and aware that she would be held accountable if anything happened to the tests. In 2009, the tests were locked in her office, and only she and the secretary had a key. Simmons and an assistant used a hand truck to deliver the tests to the teachers a few minutes before testing began each day. When teachers finished testing, they called the office and the tests would be picked up moments later. Teachers accounted for each test as they were distributed and returned.

Paraprofessionals cleaned the tests of stray marks in the conference room under her supervision. She says the door was open and no one was left alone with the tests. Stray marks in the bubble area of the answer sheet could only be erased after Simmons reviewed the document. She was methodical about organizing, storing and sealing the tests in such a way that any tampering would be evident. Simmons had no idea what happened to cause the high number of wrong to right erasures at this school.

Simmons could not think of any opportunity for someone to change answers. Security cameras were overhead that she says would have detected anyone entering her office. She never came back to the school after hours or on weekends during the testing period. Simmons was certain nothing had happened to the tests on her watch.

8. Linda Gail Griffin (Principal)

Griffin has been principal of Radium Springs Elementary School since 2004. She trusted and relied on her assistant principal to handle testing administration. Griffin selected the groups of paraprofessionals that assisted with test preparation and cleaning stray marks.

Testing irregularities brought to her attention would have been reported to Renee Bridges, the area test coordinator. She was at a loss to explain the erasure statistics, particularly the concentration of high wrong to right changes in the first

98

and second grades. Griffin said that there was no motivation for anyone to cheat to make AYP in those grades, as opposed to others.

She did not observe anything unusual when she circulated through the classrooms during testing. She says she did not tamper with the tests and did not believe Simmons would have done so. She had no reason to question the integrity of her faculty and staff.


In light of the statistical data and the dramatic drop in flagged classrooms from 2009 to 2010, we conclude that there was cheating on the administration of the 2009 CRCT at this school. However, we are unable to conclude how the cheating occurred or by whom it was carried out, but it clearly existed.

We also conclude that there is no evidence that Principal Linda Gail Griffin knew of the cheating. However, as set forth in the Georgia Department of Education Student Assessment Handbook for 2008-2009, which governs all standardized tests administered in the State of Georgia, the principal “Has ultimate responsibility for testing activities in the local school.”

Therefore, we conclude that Linda Gail Griffin failed in her ultimate responsibility for supervising testing activities and for ensuring the ethical administration of, and proper security for, the 2009 CRCT.

It is our conclusion from the statistical data and other evidence found in this investigation, that Linda Gail Griffin failed to properly monitor the administration of the 2009 CRCT and failed to adequately supervise testing activities. This resulted in, and she is responsible for, erroneously reporting the results of the 2009 CRCT to the Georgia Department of Education.

99

SC

HO

OL

C

LA

SS

RO

OM

F

LA

GG

ED

#

/ %

R

AN

K I

N S

TA

TE

F

OR

% O

F

FL

AG

GE

D

CL

AS

SR

OO

MS

(L

ess

AP

S)

(1

,772

sch

ools

)

T

EA

CH

ER

S

FL

AG

GE

D

(Mu

lti S

ub

j.)

%

of

CL

AS

SR

OO

MS

F

LA

GG

ED

20

09 /

2010

C

ON

FE

SS

ION

S

M

ISC

ON

DU

CT

/ C

HE

AT

ING

/ F

AIL

UR

E O

F

DU

TY

Wes

t Tow

n 44

/ 77

.2%

1

1

9 (1

7)

77.

2 / 3

.7

1

3 *

New

Jac

kson

Hei

ghts

33

/ 57

.9%

3

1

6 (1

0)

57.

9 / 6

.0

6

1

1 **

Nor

thsi

de

36 /

52.2

%

5

13

(12)

5

2.2

/ 18.

5 1

3

*

Mar

tin

Lut

her

Kin

g 26

/ 45

.6%

8

1

6 (1

0)

45.

6 / 0

.0

2

6 *

Tur

ner

26 /

39.4

%

16

11

(9)

39.

4 / 0

.0

3

6 **

*

Ali

ce C

oach

man

19

/ 31

.7%

19

9 (5

)

3

1.7

/ 6.4

3

7

***

Mor

ning

side

18

/ 31

.6%

21

8 (6

)

3

1.6

/ 6.4

0

1

****

She

rwoo

d 21

/ 25

.0%

29 (

tie)

12

(5)

25.

0 / 0

.9

1

6 **

*

Lam

ar R

eese

17

/ 22

.7%

37

8 (5

)

2

2.7

/ 4.4

0

1

***

Syl

vest

er R

oad

14 /

22.2

%

40

(ti

e)

9 (4

)

2

2.2

/ 4.6

1

3

***

Rad

ium

Spr

ings

18

/ 21

.4%

47

7 (6

)

2

1.4

/ 2.2

0

1

***

TO

TA

LS

18

48

* In

clud

es p

rinc

ipal

who

ple

d 5th

Am

endm

ent.

**

Incl

udes

pri

ncip

al w

ho s

ent e

-mai

l dur

ing

CR

CT

dir

ecti

ng te

ache

r to

hel

p st

uden

ts.

***

Incl

udes

pri

ncip

al w

ho f

aile

d in

test

ing

duti

es.

****

In

clud

es p

rinc

ipal

who

mad

e gr

ade

chan

ges.

Cur

rent

pri

ncip

al f

ound

to h

ave

daug

hter

on

free

lunc

h pr

ogra

m.

100

GLOSSARY

TERM DEFINITION AYP Adequate Yearly Progress. Part of the federal No Child

Left Behind Act of 2001, AYP is a measure of year-to-year student achievement on statewide assessments. Schools, school districts, and states must demonstrate a certain level of performance on reading and/or language arts and mathematics assessments. Schools that do not “meet AYP” for two consecutive years in the same subject area are designated as schools in “Needs Improvement.”

Certified educator Individuals trained in education who hold teaching, leadership, service, technical specialist, or permit certification issued by the PSC.

Classroom level data CRCT erasure analysis data for specific teacher or homeroom, including the subject tested, number of students, total number of wrong to right erasures, and resulting standard deviation.

Confessed Admitted to the truth of a charge or accusation. CRCT Criterion-Referenced Competency Test. A

standardized test used by Georgia as the AYP assessment tool for elementary and middle schools. Tests grades 1-8 in reading, English/language arts, and math. In addition, grades 3-8 are tested in science and social studies.

CRCT subject areas Subjects tested on the CRCT. First and second grades are tested in Reading, English Language Arts, and Math. In addition to those subjects, grades three through eight are tested in Social Studies and Science. One subject is tested per day.

Departmentalize Where a specific subject is taught by one teacher to students from different homerooms on the same grade level. The students may rotate among classrooms during the day to learn different subjects from designated teachers.

EIP Early Intervention Program – a program designed to serve students in grade K-5 who are at risk of not reaching or maintaining academic grade level, to help them to obtain the necessary academic skills to reach

101

grade level performance in the shortest possible time. ELA English /language arts Fifth (5th) Amendment The privilege against self-incrimination grounded in the

Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, providing that no person will be compelled to be a witness against himself. In a criminal case, if a defendant invokes the 5th Amendment and refuses to testify, he may not be presumed guilty based on that refusal. However, in a civil case, if a witness invokes the 5th Amendment and refuses to answer questions concerning whether he or she committed a particular act, “it creates an implied admission that a truthful answer would tend to prove that the witness had committed the act.” Perez v. Atlanta Check Cashers, Inc., 302 Ga. App. 864, 870 (2010).

Flagged Designated as being more than three (3) stand deviations outside of the state norm for wrong-to-right (WTR) erasures, as determined by the GOSA erasure analysis. A school was considered “flagged” when more than 20% of its classes had greater than three standard deviations above the norm on WTR erasures on the CRCT.

GOSA Governor’s Office of Student Achievement. State agency which provides accountability for Georgia's schools, pre-K through postsecondary levels. The intent is to improve student achievement and school completion in Georgia.

GTR ID# Unique identification number assigned to each student. IEP Individualized Education Program. Free, appropriate,

public special education services which students with certain disabilities or impairments are eligible to receive. An IEP is a written plan developed by a team of teachers, other qualified personnel, parents, guardians, and the student if appropriate.

Implicated Shown to be also involved, usually in an incriminating manner.

ITBS Iowa Test of Basic Skills – a national standardized test given to grades K-12, testing students in different subject areas. Each student is given a percentile score

102

comparing them to overall national results, and a grade equivalent indicating the student’s progress in a hypothetical academic curriculum

LA Language arts MA Mathematics Meets, exceeds Refers to a measurement, usually expressed as a

percentage, of students who “met” or “exceeded” state standards in certain core curriculum subjects (math, reading, English/language arts, science, and social students) as measured by the CRCT.

Monitors Persons assigned to a school to observe test administration procedures; e.g. test distribution, test collection, storage of test materials. Observes testing sites to see that schedules are being followed, reports unusual activity.

Names of Students and Parents

We have not used the actual names of students and parents who have provided information to us during our investigation in order to protect their privacy.

Parapro/paraprofessional A person who may have less than professional-level certification, who relates in role and function to a professional and does a portion of the professional’s job under the professional’s supervision, and whose decision-making authority is limited and regulated by the professional. O.C.G.A. § 20-2-204. Georgia paraprofessionals must be certified by the PSC.

PDP Professional Development Plan. A plan developed and implemented to correct perceived deficiencies in performance of teachers and administrators, used to encourage and support improvement in specific areas.

PEC Program for Exceptional Children. Program offering specialized, educational testing, evaluation and other services to eligible children with certain disabilities or impairments. Each eligible student must have an IEP.

Preponderance of the evidence

A standard of proof in civil cases. Evidence which is of greater weight or more convincing than the evidence which is offered in opposition to it; that is, evidence which as a whole shows that the fact sought to be proved is more probable than not.

Proctors Persons assigned to monitor classrooms or other specific

103

areas during testing; circulate to observe students and discourage misconduct; assist test examiner to maintain testing security; report unusual activity or irregularities.

Prompting Assisting students during testing by use of verbal or nonverbal cues. Examples include voice inflection, pointing to answers, repetition or rephrasing of words or passages, physical cues, movements, sounds, or signals meant to suggest or convey the answer or encourage students to erase and change an answer.

PSC Georgia Professional Standards Commission. A state agency created “to set and apply high standards for the preparation, certification, and continued licensing of Georgia public educators.” The PSC also handles the investigation and due process of cases referred for disciplinary action.

RD Reading Read Aloud Accommodation

Accommodation provided during testing for students with certain disabilities. A “standard” read aloud accommodation calls for oral reading of test questions in English by a reader or other assistive technology. A “conditional” read aloud accommodation applies to the Reading CRCT (where reading passages are read aloud), but there are stricter eligibility requirements and may not be used for 1st and 2nd grade students according to Ga. DOE.

Social promotion The practice of promoting a student from one grade level to the next on the basis of age rather than academic achievement.

Standard deviation A measure of the variability or dispersion of a distribution of scores that represents the average difference between individual scores and the mean. The more the scores cluster around the mean, the smaller the standard deviation.

Student level data CRCT erasure analysis data for each individual student for each subject tested (RD, ELA, MA) showing the total number of erasures made on that test, and the number of those erasures that changed from wrong to right.

Stray marks Pencil markings made on answer sheets that are visible

104

outside of the “bubble” or oval area where answer choices are to be marked.

Testing accommodation A change in a test administration that modifies how a student takes or responds to the assessment. Accommodations are designed to provide equity and serve to level the playing field for students with disabilities and English Language Learners.

Totality of the evidence Finding or conclusion based on all of the circumstances of a particular case, rather than any one factor.

Unit Test Test given to measure performance in a specific subject or unit of instruction.

WTR Wrong To Right = an incorrect answer choice is erased and changed to a correct answer choice on an answer sheet, as detected by erasure analysis using high speed optical scanners.

105

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Volume 1

Overview .................................................................................................................... 1

The CRCT .................................................................................................................. 3

Interviews and Document Review ............................................................................. 4

2009 Erasure Analysis ............................................................................................... 5

Standard Deviations Chart ......................................................................................... 6

DCSS Erasure Analysis ............................................................................................. 7

Verification of the Erasure Analysis .......................................................................... 8

Use of the Erasure Analysis in This Investigation ................................................... 11

School Summaries .................................................................................................... 11

West Town Elementary School ..................................................................... 13

New Jackson Heights Elementary School ..................................................... 21

Northside Elementary School ........................................................................ 34

Martin Luther King Elementary School ........................................................ 45

Turner Elementary School ............................................................................. 54

Alice Coachman Heights Elementary School ............................................... 65

Morningside Elementary School ................................................................... 73

Sherwood Acres Elementary School ............................................................. 79

Lamar Reese Elementary School ................................................................... 87

Sylvester Road Elementary School ............................................................... 90

Radium Springs Elementary School .............................................................. 95

Summary Chart ............................................................................................ 100

Glossary.................................................................................................................. 101

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Volume 2

2009 vs. 2010 ......................................................................................................... 106

Why Cheating Occurred......................................................................................... 107

Pressure to Meet AYP ................................................................................. 107

Fear of Failure .............................................................................................. 108

Failure of Leadership ................................................................................... 109

James Wilson Report ............................................................................................. 112

Dianne Daniels ............................................................................................. 113

Dr. Sally Whatley ........................................................................................ 113

Findings .................................................................................................................. 114

Glossary.................................................................................................................. 117

Exhibits .................................................................................................................. 122

Exhibit 1 ....................................................................................................... 122

Exhibit 2 ....................................................................................................... 148

Exhibit 3 ....................................................................................................... 194

Exhibit 4 ....................................................................................................... 196

Exhibit 5 ....................................................................................................... 233

Exhibit 6 ....................................................................................................... 262

Exhibit 7 ....................................................................................................... 292

2009 VS. 2010

The state-wide erasure analysis performed by the Governor’s Office of

Student Achievement (GOSA) on the 2010 CRCT is additional proof of cheating

in 2009, and other years. By the time the CRCT was administered in the spring of

2010, the GOSA 2009 erasure analysis had been made public and Governor Perdue

ordered the district to investigate the flagged schools. With public attention

focused on the district, and questions about the 2009 CRCT, the Georgia

Department of Education sent monitors to observe how the test was administered.

Following the 2010 CRCT, GOSA commissioned another erasure analysis.

That study revealed a dramatic drop in WTR erasures, and consequently, the

overall percentage of classes flagged plummeted in virtually every school in the

“moderate” and “severe” concern categories. For example, West Town

Elementary, with the 6th highest percentage of classes flagged in Georgia in 2009,

dropped from 77.2% in 2009, to 3.7% in 2010. New Jackson Heights went from

57.9% to 0%; Martin Luther King from 45.6% to 0%. These drops were huge and

strongly indicate that in 2009, significant cheating occurred.

The facts support, and the evidence indicates, that cheating occurred in

DCSS on the CRCT in 2009. The erasure analysis is no longer a mere red flag; it

has been verified by us and is supported by admissions of misconduct or other

evidence of cheating in all 11 elementary schools we investigated.

106

WHY CHEATING OCCURRED

Cheating occurred in DCSS for three primary reasons:

Pressure of meeting AYP under No Child Left Behind;

Teachers’ and principals’ fears of being perceived as a failure; and,

Failure of leadership at the principal level and, to some extent, by the system’s administration and the Board of Education.

Pressure to Meet AYP

A significant motivation for cheating in DCSS was the pressure to meet

AYP targets. This system, like many, found making AYP targets challenging. But

unlike our findings in the Atlanta Public School System, (where unrealistic internal

targets exceeded AYP targets) many in DCSS told us that meeting AYP itself

created undue pressure and was a constant emphasis and focus of principals.

In several schools, teachers reported that principals based their annual

evaluations on student test scores. At least two teachers who told us they cheated,

and explained that they did so because they received a negative evaluation for low

student test scores the previous year and feared that receiving another one would

result in job loss or sanctions by the PSC.

DCSS is reflective of many systems around the country in that the pressure

to meet AYP is constantly present and regularly emphasized by those in leadership

positions. This pressure drives some individuals to cross ethical lines. Since the

enactment of NCLB, standardized testing has become more about measuring the

107

teachers, principals and schools than accurately assessing the children’s academic

progress.

Fear of Failure

Schools, principals and teachers that fail to meet AYP become known as

failures throughout the school system and community. The majority of the

teachers and administrators we interviewed grew up in or around Dougherty

County, went to college there (or nearby) and still have generations of family there.

The combination of a relatively small system and a close knit community, with

many family ties, meant most everyone was concerned about how others viewed

them. In this regard, perception was reality.

Sixty-two percent of the flagged classes in DCSS elementary schools were

in the first and second grades. CRCT scores in those grades did not count toward

AYP. This raises the question of why anyone would cheat in these classes. Some

of those teachers wanted to move up to a higher grade. We were repeatedly told

that in DCSS, if a teacher was moved down to first or second grade, it was

considered a demotion. It became apparent that these teachers, also, were

concerned about the perception of how their students’ performance reflected on

their teaching ability. As told to us by one teacher, “Everybody wanted to be first,

and nobody wanted to be last.”

108

That teacher placed great emphasis on the “nobody wanted to be last” portion of

her statement. This was a refrain we heard many times from both teachers and

principals.

Failure of Leadership

Failure of leadership at all levels, including the Board of Education,

contributed to cheating in DCSS. This management breakdown ranged from

principals actively participating in cheating to failing to properly monitor testing.

Even though many principals had no knowledge of cheating in their school, they

are ultimately responsible for “all testing activities” in their local school.

An imbalance existed between the Board’s authority and the Superintendent,

Dr. Sally Whatley. Georgia law establishes certain lines that must be maintained

between the Board and the Superintendent. O.C.G.A. § 20-2-61 states that “the

fundamental role of a local board of education shall be to establish policy for the

local school system with the focus on student achievement.” It further states that

“the fundamental role of a local school superintendent shall be to implement the

policy established by the local board.”

More importantly, that Code section states “it shall not be the role of the

local board of education or individual members of such board to micromanage the

superintendent in executing his or her duties, but it shall be the duty of the local

109

board to hold the local superintendent accountable in the performance of his or her

duties.”

Although code section 20-2-61 did not go into effect until July 1, 2010, these

separations of responsibilities have been articulated and expected by the Southern

Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) and made part of training for school

board members and superintendents by the Georgia School Board Association

(GSBA) and the Georgia Department of Education for many years.

Apparently these lines of demarcation have a long history of being breached

by the local board of education in Dougherty County.

During Dr. Whatley’s tenure, the tendency of some board members to

micromanage, and Dr. Whatley’s unwillingness to prevent them from doing so,

placed the Board and Superintendent relationship in an unbalanced position and

weakened the authority of the Superintendent. Dr. Whatley abdicated the

authority she needed to correct, sanction or terminate educators.

Due to the Board’s failure to support the Superintendent, and her refusal to

assert herself, she could not fully and effectively administer matters of employee

discipline.

This superintendent/board relationship led to an impotent system of

employee discipline. We are aware of numerous situations that demanded prompt

termination or other significant action. The administration and the board found

110

ways to avoid terminations and often reduced punishments to an absurd sanction.

The end result was a system where there was little fear of the consequences for

wrongdoing, therefore misconduct went unabated.

This imbalance has previously been brought to the attention of DCSS. In

2007, SACS completed their five year review of DCSS. One of the points of

concern which was raised in their report was the failure of the Board and the

Superintendent to keep clear lines of demarcation between policy and

administration. Apparently the Board and Superintendent failed in the years since

then to address this issue. Unfortunately, this imbalance continues between Dr.

Whatley’s successor, Dr. Joshua Murfree, and the Board.

The failure to adhere strictly to appropriate roles weakened the authority of

the Superintendent. Many of those who worked in the system had a sense that they

could do whatever they wanted and nothing would happen to them. With the

authority of the Superintendent diminished, it enhanced the authority of principals.

Thus, the teachers and principals who were inclined to cheat had little fear of

reprisal. They developed a sense of security in their jobs that emboldened them to

cross ethical lines. We find that some believed they could cheat with impunity.

Additionally, when it came to the possibility of cheating on the CRCT, both

Superintendents Whatley and Murfree had a certain naiveté, refusing to believe

that cheating could ever occur. This blindness helped contribute to the problem.

111

These Board issues are beyond the scope of our charge, except to the extent

they created a culture whereby some principals and teachers believed they could

cheat and get away with it. We believe, however, that the issue of Board and

Superintendent roles require further review.

JAMES WILSON REPORT

When Governor Perdue ordered DCSS to conduct an investigation based on

the 2009 CRCT Erasure Analysis, the Board retained James Wilson of Education

Planners to conduct its investigation, despite his total lack of investigative

experience and his being otherwise unqualified to perform such an inquiry.

Dr. Whatley recommended Wilson because she thought that some members

of the Board, who had confidence in him, would be reluctant to approve an

“investigator” she selected.

In conducting what he called an investigation, Wilson claims he reviewed

test answer documents at the CTB McGraw-Hill facility in Indianapolis, reviewed

DCSS training procedures, assessed whether DCSS followed all testing protocols,

and interviewed witnesses (although he could not tell us who or how many). He

failed to interview principals and testing coordinators at the flagged schools who

most certainly possessed probative information that would have been useful to the

Governor and others in determining what happened in DCSS with regard to the

2009 CRCT. Not surprisingly, James Wilson found no evidence of cheating.

112

Once the new Superintendent, Joseph Murfree, was hired, Wilson met with

him. Superintendent Murfree’s position was that no cheating occurred and that

Wilson’s investigation was over.

Ultimately, Governor Perdue rejected both Wilson’s initial report dated

April 28, 2010, as well as his July 12, 2010 supplemental report.

Dianne Daniels

Daniels, Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction, answered

directly to the Superintendent. According to the management structure at DCSS,

Renee Bridges, who was the system’s test coordinator reported to Daniels.

While Daniels was the titular second-in-command and Bridges fell under her

supervision, she failed to involve herself in the testing process in any meaningful

way. Her failure to actively participate in the oversight of the testing process

helped create a leadership vacuum, and further empowered principals and teachers

to act with a level of impunity whereby cheating occurred. Thus, she cannot

absolve herself from contributing to the creation of an environment where this

misconduct could fester.

Dr. Sally Whatley

Dr. Whatley, Superintendent of the DCSS, was ultimately responsible for

honestly and accurately reporting information to the State of Georgia regarding the

evaluation of students. She certified to the Georgia Department of Education that

113

the district “adhered to all written regulations and procedures relating to testing

and test administration including the distribution and collection of test materials,

test security, use of these results and department testing dates and the reporting of

irregularities” as required by the relevant guidelines and test manuals. It is our

finding from the statistical data and other evidence that Dr. Whatley’s certification

to the state was erroneous.

Dr. Whatley failed in her leadership of, and ultimate responsibility for,

testing activities and for ensuring the ethical administration of the CRCT in 2009.

This resulted in, and she is responsible for erroneously reporting the evaluation of

students to the State Department of Education with regard to the results of the 2009

CRCT in the DCSS system.

FINDINGS

We found cheating in all of the schools we investigated. There were 49

individuals who were involved in some manner of misconduct with regard to the

2009 CRCT. The principals of all 11 schools we investigated were found to be

either responsible for having failed in their duty to supervise testing, or to be

directly involved in criminal conduct. Three principals refused to answer our

questions by invoking the Fifth Amendment, which for our purposes is an implied

admission of wrongdoing.

114

In eight of the 11 schools, we obtained confessions of cheating. A total of

18 educators confessed to cheating.

Cheating was widespread in some schools, while in others it was limited to

certain classes or grades. At many schools, the cheating was coordinated or

directed by the principal. However, at some of the schools, the cheating occurred

inside the classroom without the knowledge of the principal or test coordinator. In

many instances, the lack of discipline and oversight raised many questions

regarding the integrity of the administration of the tests. We believe the “clean-up

committees” were used as a ruse to illegally alter test documents, especially in first

and second grades where the answers are contained in the booklet.

We believe the largest proportion of the cheating occurred in first and

second grades because it was easier to cheat in these grades without getting caught.

The teachers read the tests to the students and could prompt pupils when they had

the wrong answer, use voice inflection and facial expressions to suggest the correct

answer or simply give students the answers. Additionally, both the test questions

and answers are in the same document.

Another creative way of cheating was only reading a few of the answer

options to increase the likelihood of a correct response. Although the first and

second grade test scores did not count toward AYP, the teachers in those grades

115

did not want to be looked upon as “failing” teachers or receive a negative

evaluation.

In contrast, in the third through fifth grades, the cheating occurred less

frequently and was more isolated. We believe that there was less cheating in these

grades due to the system’s Test Coordinator Renee Bridges’ efforts to strictly

enforce the testing protocols, which made it more difficult to cheat without the

principal or school test coordinator’s knowledge. Unfortunately, some educators

still found ways to circumvent the system (and Ms. Bridges) to cheat anyway.

On the other hand, Ms. Bridges acknowledged that she told test coordinators

that they could further darken answers that were lightly shaded, and further erase

answers that appeared to be incompletely erased.

The Georgia Department of Education Student Assessment Handbook,

2008-2009 which governs all standardized test administration allows for the

erasure of “all stray pencil marks and smudges from the answer documents. On

the other hand, it is a breech of test security if anyone “alters or interferes with

examinees’ responses in any way.” This instruction, while perhaps well meaning,

is questionable under these rules and afforded a shield of protection for many that

we believe acted illegally.

116

GLOSSARY

TERM DEFINITION AYP Adequate Yearly Progress. Part of the federal No Child

Left Behind Act of 2001, AYP is a measure of year-to-year student achievement on statewide assessments. Schools, school districts, and states must demonstrate a certain level of performance on reading and/or language arts and mathematics assessments. Schools that do not “meet AYP” for two consecutive years in the same subject area are designated as schools in “Needs Improvement.”

Certified educator Individuals trained in education who hold teaching, leadership, service, technical specialist, or permit certification issued by the PSC.

Classroom level data CRCT erasure analysis data for specific teacher or homeroom, including the subject tested, number of students, total number of wrong to right erasures, and resulting standard deviation.

Confessed Admitted to the truth of a charge or accusation. CRCT Criterion-Referenced Competency Test. A

standardized test used by Georgia as the AYP assessment tool for elementary and middle schools. Tests grades 1-8 in reading, English/language arts, and math. In addition, grades 3-8 are tested in science and social studies.

CRCT subject areas Subjects tested on the CRCT. First and second grades are tested in Reading, English Language Arts, and Math. In addition to those subjects, grades three through eight are tested in Social Studies and Science. One subject is tested per day.

Departmentalize Where a specific subject is taught by one teacher to students from different homerooms on the same grade level. The students may rotate among classrooms during the day to learn different subjects from designated teachers.

EIP Early Intervention Program – a program designed to serve students in grade K-5 who are at risk of not reaching or maintaining academic grade level, to help

117

them to obtain the necessary academic skills to reach grade level performance in the shortest possible time.

ELA English /language arts Fifth (5th) Amendment The privilege against self-incrimination grounded in the

Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, providing that no person will be compelled to be a witness against himself. In a criminal case, if a defendant invokes the 5th Amendment and refuses to testify, he may not be presumed guilty based on that refusal. However, in a civil case, if a witness invokes the 5th Amendment and refuses to answer questions concerning whether he or she committed a particular act, “it creates an implied admission that a truthful answer would tend to prove that the witness had committed the act.” Perez v. Atlanta Check Cashers, Inc., 302 Ga. App. 864, 870 (2010).

Flagged Designated as being more than three (3) stand deviations outside of the state norm for wrong-to-right (WTR) erasures, as determined by the GOSA erasure analysis. A school was considered “flagged” when more than 20% of its classes had greater than three standard deviations above the norm on WTR erasures on the CRCT.

GOSA Governor’s Office of Student Achievement. State agency which provides accountability for Georgia's schools, pre-K through postsecondary levels. The intent is to improve student achievement and school completion in Georgia.

GTR ID# Unique identification number assigned to each student. IEP Individualized Education Program. Free, appropriate,

public special education services which students with certain disabilities or impairments are eligible to receive. An IEP is a written plan developed by a team of teachers, other qualified personnel, parents, guardians, and the student if appropriate.

Implicated Shown to be also involved, usually in an incriminating manner.

ITBS Iowa Test of Basic Skills – a national standardized test given to grades K-12, testing students in different

118

subject areas. Each student is given a percentile score comparing them to overall national results, and a grade equivalent indicating the student’s progress in a hypothetical academic curriculum

LA Language arts MA Mathematics Meets, exceeds Refers to a measurement, usually expressed as a

percentage, of students who “met” or “exceeded” state standards in certain core curriculum subjects (math, reading, English/language arts, science, and social students) as measured by the CRCT.

Monitors Persons assigned to a school to observe test administration procedures; e.g. test distribution, test collection, storage of test materials. Observes testing sites to see that schedules are being followed, reports unusual activity.

Names of Students and Parents

We have not used the actual names of students and parents who have provided information to us during our investigation in order to protect their privacy.

Parapro/paraprofessional A person who may have less than professional-level certification, who relates in role and function to a professional and does a portion of the professional’s job under the professional’s supervision, and whose decision-making authority is limited and regulated by the professional. O.C.G.A. § 20-2-204. Georgia paraprofessionals must be certified by the PSC.

PDP Professional Development Plan. A plan developed and implemented to correct perceived deficiencies in performance of teachers and administrators, used to encourage and support improvement in specific areas.

PEC Program for Exceptional Children. Program offering specialized, educational testing, evaluation and other services to eligible children with certain disabilities or impairments. Each eligible student must have an IEP.

Preponderance of the evidence

A standard of proof in civil cases. Evidence which is of greater weight or more convincing than the evidence which is offered in opposition to it; that is, evidence which as a whole shows that the fact sought to be proved is more probable than not.

119

Proctors Persons assigned to monitor classrooms or other specific areas during testing; circulate to observe students and discourage misconduct; assist test examiner to maintain testing security; report unusual activity or irregularities.

Prompting Assisting students during testing by use of verbal or nonverbal cues. Examples include voice inflection, pointing to answers, repetition or rephrasing of words or passages, physical cues, movements, sounds, or signals meant to suggest or convey the answer or encourage students to erase and change an answer.

PSC Prossional Standards Commission. A state agency created “to set and apply high standards for the preparation, certification, and continued licensing of Georgia public educators.” The PSC also handles the investigation and due process of cases referred for disciplinary action.

RD Reading Read Aloud Accommodation

Accommodation provided during testing for students with certain disabilities. A “standard” read aloud accommodation calls for oral reading of test questions in English by a reader or other assistive technology. A “conditional” read aloud accommodation applies to the Reading CRCT (where reading passages are read aloud), but there are stricter eligibility requirements and may not be used for 1st and 2nd grade students according to Ga. DOE.

Social promotion The practice of promoting a student from one grade level to the next on the basis of age rather than academic achievement.

Standard deviation A measure of the variability or dispersion of a distribution of scores that represents the average difference between individual scores and the mean. The more the scores cluster around the mean, the smaller the standard deviation.

Student level data CRCT erasure analysis data for each individual student for each subject tested (RD, ELA, MA) showing the total number of erasures made on that test, and the number of those erasures that changed from wrong to right.

120

Stray marks Pencil markings made on answer sheets that are visible outside of the “bubble” or oval area where answer choices are to be marked.

Testing accommodation A change in a test administration that modifies how a student takes or responds to the assessment. Accommodations are designed to provide equity and serve to level the playing field for students with disabilities and English Language Learners.

Totality of the evidence Finding or conclusion based on all of the circumstances of a particular case, rather than any one factor.

Unit Test Test given to measure performance in a specific subject or unit of instruction.

WTR Wrong To Right = an incorrect answer choice is erased and changed to a correct answer choice on an answer sheet, as detected by erasure analysis using high speed optical scanners.

121

System Name School Name % of Classes Flagged_WTRSTATE AVERAGE STATE AVERAGE 4.0%APPLING COUNTY BAXLEY WILDER 0.0%APPLING COUNTY FOURTH DISTRI 0.0%APPLING COUNTY ALTAMAHA ELEM 0.0%APPLING COUNTY APPLING CO PR 0.0%APPLING COUNTY APPLING CO EL 0.0%APPLING COUNTY APPLING CO MI 15.4%ATKINSON COUNTY ATKINSON HIGH 0.0%ATKINSON COUNTY WILLACOOCHEE 0.0%ATKINSON COUNTY PEARSON ELEME 1.0%ATLANTA AREA SCHOOL ATLANTA AREA 0.0%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS HILLSIDE CONA 0.0%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS APSCEP PARTNE 0.0%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS NEIGHBORHOOD 0.0%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS CENTENNIAL PL 0.0%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS RIVERS ELEMEN 0.0%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS LIN ELEMENTAR 0.0%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUTTON MIDDLE 0.9%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS BRANDON ELEME 1.0%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS SMITH ELEMENT 1.0%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS PRICE MIDDLE 2.2%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS HOPE ELEMENTA 2.8%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS ATLANTA CHART 3.0%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS MORNINGSIDE E 3.2%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS CORETTA SCOTT 3.7%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS JACKSON ELEME 3.7%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS KIPP WEST ATL 3.9%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS THE BEST ACAD 3.9%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS INMAN MIDDLE 4.5%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS CHARLES R DRE 5.1%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS KING MIDDLE S 6.1%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS BURGESS PETER 7.1%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS BUNCHE MIDDLE 7.5%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS CONTINENTAL C 9.1%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS BROWN MIDDLE 9.3%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS GARDEN HILLS 9.7%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS SYLVAN HILLS 10.4%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS YOUNG MIDDLE 11.4%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS KIMBERLY ELEM 11.7%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS LONG MIDDLE S 12.4%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS IMAGINE WESLE 13.7%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOLTON ACADEM 15.9%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS THE BRIDGE 16.7%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS GROVE PARK EL 20.0%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS HERNDON ELEME 20.4%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS WILLIAMS ELEM 20.4%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS PARKSIDE ELEM 21.3%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS TOOMER ELEMEN 21.4%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS MILES ELEMENT 21.7%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS BETHUNE ELEME 23.1%

Office of Student Achievement

Page 1 of 37

196

ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS M A JONES ELE 23.1%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS HARPER ARCHER 24.1%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS UNIVERSITY CO 25.0%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS CLEVELAND ELE 26.1%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS ADAMSVILLE EL 27.8%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS HERITAGE ACAD 28.2%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS CASCADE ELEME 28.8%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS C W HILL ELEM 29.4%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS BENJAMIN S CA 30.0%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS SLATER ELEMEN 30.3%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS COAN MIDDLE S 31.4%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS CRIM HIGH SCH 33.3%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS DOBBS ELEMENT 33.3%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS THOMASVILLE H 39.1%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FAIN ELEMENTA 39.7%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS COOK ELEMENTA 40.7%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS EAST LAKE ELE 42.0%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS BEECHER HILLS 42.6%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS BENTEEN ELEME 43.1%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS HUMPHRIES ELE 46.7%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS HUTCHINSON EL 47.0%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS WHITE ELEMENT 47.4%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS DEERWOOD ACAD 47.8%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FINCH ELEMENT 48.0%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FICKETT ELEME 51.4%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS KENNEDY MIDDL 53.2%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS TURNER MIDDLE 54.0%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS WEST MANOR EL 54.9%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOYD ELEMENTA 56.1%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS D H STANTON E 58.3%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS WHITEFOORD EL 59.3%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS WOODSON ELEME 63.3%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS TOWNS ELEMENT 63.6%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS BLALOCK ELEME 66.7%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS PERKERSON ELE 66.7%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCOTT ELEMENT 68.0%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS DUNBAR ELEMEN 68.6%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS CONNALLY ELEM 70.5%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS CAPITOL VIEW 70.8%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS VENETIAN HILL 75.4%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS USHER ELEMENT 78.4%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS F L STANTON 83.3%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS PEYTON FOREST 86.1%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS GIDEONS ELEME 88.4%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS PARKS MIDDLE 89.5%BACON COUNTY BACON CO MIDD 0.0%BACON COUNTY BACON CO PRIM 0.0%BACON COUNTY BACON CO ELEM 0.0%BAKER COUNTY BAKER COUNTY 11.1%BALDWIN COUNTY PROJECT ADVEN 0.0%BALDWIN COUNTY OAK HILL MS 0.0%


Page 2 of 37

197

BALDWIN COUNTY EAGLE RIDGE E 0.8%BALDWIN COUNTY BLANDY HILLS 0.9%BALDWIN COUNTY MIDWAY ELEMEN 2.2%BALDWIN COUNTY CREEKSIDE ELE 2.6%BANKS COUNTY BANKS CO MIDD 0.0%BANKS COUNTY BANKS CO ELEM 0.0%BANKS COUNTY BANKS CO PRIM 2.8%BARROW COUNTY AUBURN ELEMEN 0.0%BARROW COUNTY KENNEDY ELEME 0.0%BARROW COUNTY HAYMON MORRIS 0.0%BARROW COUNTY BRAMLETT ELEM 0.0%BARROW COUNTY HOLSENBECK EL 0.0%BARROW COUNTY BETHLEHEM ELE 0.9%BARROW COUNTY WINDER BARROW 0.9%BARROW COUNTY RUSSELL MIDDL 1.0%BARROW COUNTY YARGO ELEMENT 1.0%BARROW COUNTY STATHAM ELEME 2.0%BARROW COUNTY WESTSIDE MIDD 2.9%BARROW COUNTY COUNTY LINE E 5.4%BARTOW COUNTY PINE LOG ELEM 0.0%BARTOW COUNTY EMERSON ELEME 0.0%BARTOW COUNTY WHITE ELEMENT 0.0%BARTOW COUNTY ALLATOONA ELE 0.0%BARTOW COUNTY CLEAR CREEK E 0.0%BARTOW COUNTY ADAIRSVILLE M 0.0%BARTOW COUNTY CASS MIDDLE S 0.0%BARTOW COUNTY WOODLAND MIDD 0.8%BARTOW COUNTY SOUTH CENTRAL 2.3%BARTOW COUNTY HAMILTON CROS 2.6%BARTOW COUNTY TAYLORSVILLE 2.9%BARTOW COUNTY KINGSTON ELEM 3.8%BARTOW COUNTY CLOVERLEAF EL 4.4%BARTOW COUNTY EUHARLEE ELEM 6.1%BARTOW COUNTY MISSION ROAD 6.3%BARTOW COUNTY ADAIRSVILLE E 9.2%BEN HILL COUNTY BEN HILL CO M 1.0%BEN HILL COUNTY BEN HILL CO E 1.0%BEN HILL COUNTY BEN HILL CO P 4.4%BERRIEN COUNTY BERRIEN MIDDL 0.0%BERRIEN COUNTY BERRIEN ELEME 1.9%BERRIEN COUNTY BERRIEN PRIMA 2.5%BIBB COUNTY PRICE EDUCATI 0.0%BIBB COUNTY MACON HEALTH 0.0%BIBB COUNTY INGRAM PYE EL 0.0%BIBB COUNTY BERND ELEMENT 0.0%BIBB COUNTY ROSA TAYLOR E 0.0%BIBB COUNTY HEARD ELEMENT 0.0%BIBB COUNTY SPRINGDALE EL 0.0%BIBB COUNTY SKYVIEW ELEME 0.0%BIBB COUNTY BLOOMFIELD MI 0.0%BIBB COUNTY APPLING MIDDL 0.0%


Page 3 of 37

198

BIBB COUNTY MILLER MAGNET 0.0%BIBB COUNTY WEAVER MIDDLE 0.0%BIBB COUNTY RUTLAND MIDDL 0.0%BIBB COUNTY HOWARD MIDDLE 0.9%BIBB COUNTY ALEXANDER II 1.5%BIBB COUNTY LANE ELEMENTA 1.6%BIBB COUNTY PORTER ELEMEN 1.7%BIBB COUNTY MORGAN ELEMEN 1.8%BIBB COUNTY HERITAGE ELEM 2.2%BIBB COUNTY CARTER ELEMEN 3.2%BIBB COUNTY NEW BALLARD H 5.4%BIBB COUNTY UNION ELEMENT 5.6%BIBB COUNTY RICE ELEMENTA 7.1%BIBB COUNTY BURDELL ELEME 7.4%BIBB COUNTY BARDEN ELEMEN 7.8%BIBB COUNTY VINEVILLE ACA 8.3%BIBB COUNTY RILEY ELEMENT 10.4%BIBB COUNTY BURGHARD ELEM 12.5%BIBB COUNTY HARTLEY ELEME 14.6%BIBB COUNTY BRUCE ELEMENT 18.2%BIBB COUNTY WILLIAMS ELEM 22.5%BIBB COUNTY DANFORTH PRIM 23.1%BIBB COUNTY JONES ELEMENT 24.1%BIBB COUNTY BROOKDALE ELE 27.1%BIBB COUNTY BURKE ELEMENT 40.5%BLECKLEY COUNTY BLECKLEY CO P 0.0%BLECKLEY COUNTY BLECKLEY CO M 0.0%BLECKLEY COUNTY BLECKLEY CO E 0.0%BLECKLEY COUNTY MIDDLE GEORGI 16.7%BRANTLEY COUNTY BRANTLEY CO M 0.0%BRANTLEY COUNTY NAHUNTA ELEME 0.0%BRANTLEY COUNTY NAHUNTA PRIMA 0.0%BRANTLEY COUNTY HOBOKEN ELEME 2.5%BRANTLEY COUNTY WAYNESVILLE E 12.9%BREMEN CITY BREMEN ACADE 0.0%BREMEN CITY JONES ELEMENT 0.0%BREMEN CITY BREMEN MIDDLE 0.0%BROOKS COUNTY NORTH BROOKS 0.0%BROOKS COUNTY QUITMAN ELEME 0.0%BROOKS COUNTY BROOKS CO MID 0.0%BRYAN COUNTY RICHMOND MIDD 0.0%BRYAN COUNTY BRYAN CO MIDD 0.0%BRYAN COUNTY LANIER PRIMAR 0.0%BRYAN COUNTY BRYAN CO ELEM 0.0%BRYAN COUNTY DR GEORGE WA 0.0%BRYAN COUNTY RICHMOND ELEM 0.8%BRYAN COUNTY RICHMOND PRIM 3.2%BUFORD CITY BUFORD MIDDLE 0.8%BUFORD CITY BUFORD ACADEM 2.2%BULLOCH COUNTY WILLIAM JAMES 0.0%BULLOCH COUNTY NEW NEVILS EL 0.0%


Page 4 of 37

199

BULLOCH COUNTY STILSON ELEME 0.0%BULLOCH COUNTY PORTAL MIDDLE 0.0%BULLOCH COUNTY PORTAL ELEMEN 0.0%BULLOCH COUNTY MATTIE LIVELY 0.0%BULLOCH COUNTY SALLIE ZETTER 0.0%BULLOCH COUNTY BROOKLET ELEM 0.0%BULLOCH COUNTY SOUTHEAST MID 0.0%BULLOCH COUNTY MILL CREEK EL 1.0%BULLOCH COUNTY LANGSTON C EL 1.0%BULLOCH COUNTY BRYANT ELEMEN 1.0%BULLOCH COUNTY LANGSTON CHAP 2.7%BURKE COUNTY S G A ELEMENT 1.7%BURKE COUNTY BURKE CO MIDD 1.7%BURKE COUNTY BLAKENEY ELEM 2.0%BURKE COUNTY WAYNESBORO PR 7.2%BUTTS COUNTY HAMPTON L DAU 0.0%BUTTS COUNTY JACKSON ELEME 0.0%BUTTS COUNTY HENDERSON MID 1.0%BUTTS COUNTY STARK ELEMENT 4.0%CALHOUN CITY CALHOUN ELEME 0.0%CALHOUN CITY NEW CALHOUN M 1.0%CALHOUN CITY CALHOUN PRIMA 1.1%CALHOUN COUNTY CALHOUN CO MI 4.2%CALHOUN COUNTY CALHOUN CO EL 10.4%CAMDEN COUNTY WOODBINE ELEM 0.0%CAMDEN COUNTY MATILDA HARRI 0.0%CAMDEN COUNTY SAINT MARYS E 0.0%CAMDEN COUNTY SUGARMILL ELE 0.0%CAMDEN COUNTY CROOKED RIVER 0.0%CAMDEN COUNTY MARY LEE CLAR 0.0%CAMDEN COUNTY CAMDEN MIDDLE 0.5%CAMDEN COUNTY NEW SAINT MAR 0.5%CAMDEN COUNTY KINGSLAND ELE 2.3%CAMDEN COUNTY MAMIE LOU GRO 2.5%CAMDEN COUNTY DAVID L RAINE 5.6%CANDLER COUNTY METTER INTERM 0.0%CANDLER COUNTY METTER ELEMEN 3.0%CANDLER COUNTY METTER MIDDLE 4.2%CARROLL COUNTY ROOPVILLE ELE 0.0%CARROLL COUNTY MT ZION MIDDL 0.0%CARROLL COUNTY VILLA RICA EL 0.0%CARROLL COUNTY TEMPLE MIDDLE 0.0%CARROLL COUNTY ITHICA ELEMEN 0.0%CARROLL COUNTY BOWDON ELEMEN 0.0%CARROLL COUNTY VILLA RICA MI 0.0%CARROLL COUNTY JONESVILLE MI 0.0%CARROLL COUNTY CENTRAL ELEME 0.9%CARROLL COUNTY SAND HILL ELE 1.0%CARROLL COUNTY CENTRAL MIDDL 1.8%CARROLL COUNTY SHARP CREEK E 2.2%CARROLL COUNTY MOUNT ZION EL 2.6%


Page 5 of 37

200

CARROLL COUNTY GLANTON HINDS 3.6%CARROLL COUNTY TEMPLE ELEMEN 4.8%CARROLL COUNTY BAY SPRINGS M 8.1%CARROLL COUNTY WHITESBURG EL 33.3%CARROLLTON CITY CARROLLTON JR 0.0%CARROLLTON CITY CARROLLTON EL 1.3%CARROLLTON CITY CARROLLTON MI 1.3%CARTERSVILLE CITY CARTERS MIDDL 0.0%CARTERSVILLE CITY CARTERS PRIMA 0.0%CARTERSVILLE CITY CARTERS ELEME 0.0%CATOOSA COUNTY HERITAGE MIDD 0.0%CATOOSA COUNTY LAKEVIEW MIDD 0.0%CATOOSA COUNTY WEST SIDE ELE 0.0%CATOOSA COUNTY GRAYSVILLE EL 0.0%CATOOSA COUNTY TIGER CREEK E 0.0%CATOOSA COUNTY BOYNTON ELEME 0.0%CATOOSA COUNTY RINGGOLD MIDD 0.0%CATOOSA COUNTY RINGGOLD ELEM 1.4%CATOOSA COUNTY BATTLEFIELD E 1.7%CATOOSA COUNTY RINGGOLD PRIM 1.9%CATOOSA COUNTY BATTLEFIELD P 2.1%CATOOSA COUNTY WOODSTATION E 3.7%CATOOSA COUNTY CLOUD SPRINGS 7.2%CCAT CCAT SCHOOLSL 0.0%CHARLTON COUNTY CHARLTON COUN 0.0%CHARLTON COUNTY ST GEORGE EL 0.0%CHARLTON COUNTY BETHUNE ELEME 0.0%CHARLTON COUNTY FOLKSTON ELEM 2.5%CHATHAM COUNTY UHS OF SAVANN 0.0%CHATHAM COUNTY OGLETHORPE CH 0.0%CHATHAM COUNTY POOLER ELEMEN 0.0%CHATHAM COUNTY JACOB G SMIT 0.0%CHATHAM COUNTY HAVEN ELEMENT 0.0%CHATHAM COUNTY WINDSOR FOR E 0.0%CHATHAM COUNTY BLOOMINGDALE 0.0%CHATHAM COUNTY HUBERT MIDDLE 0.0%CHATHAM COUNTY ISLE OF HOPE 0.0%CHATHAM COUNTY WHITE BLUFF E 0.0%CHATHAM COUNTY LARGO TIBET E 0.0%CHATHAM COUNTY PORT WENTWORT 0.0%CHATHAM COUNTY BARTLETT MIDD 0.0%CHATHAM COUNTY SHUMAN MIDDLE 0.0%CHATHAM COUNTY DERENNE MIDDL 0.0%CHATHAM COUNTY ELLIS ELEMENT 0.0%CHATHAM COUNTY SOUTHWEST MID 0.6%CHATHAM COUNTY MERCER MIDDLE 0.6%CHATHAM COUNTY COASTAL MIDDL 0.7%CHATHAM COUNTY W CHATHAM MID 0.7%CHATHAM COUNTY MARSHPOINT EL 0.9%CHATHAM COUNTY GEORGETOWN EL 1.0%CHATHAM COUNTY GARDEN CITY E 1.0%


Page 6 of 37

201

CHATHAM COUNTY HOWARD ELEMEN 1.2%CHATHAM COUNTY HESSE ELEMENT 1.4%CHATHAM COUNTY HEARD ELEMENT 2.2%CHATHAM COUNTY W CHATHAM ELE 2.6%CHATHAM COUNTY SOUTHWEST ELE 2.8%CHATHAM COUNTY MYERS MIDDLE 2.9%CHATHAM COUNTY EAST BROAD ST 4.1%CHATHAM COUNTY LOW ELEMENTAR 4.3%CHATHAM COUNTY ISLANDS ELEME 4.9%CHATHAM COUNTY SPENCER ELEME 5.3%CHATHAM COUNTY PULASKI ELEME 5.6%CHATHAM COUNTY BUTLER ELEMEN 5.7%CHATHAM COUNTY GOULD ELEMENT 6.7%CHATHAM COUNTY THUNDERBOLT E 7.6%CHATHAM COUNTY GADSDEN ELEME 7.8%CHATHAM COUNTY BARTOW ELEMEN 9.3%CHATHAM COUNTY GARRISON ELEM 9.7%CHATHAM COUNTY HODGE ELEMENT 15.9%CHATTAHOOCHEE COUNTY CHATTAHOO C M 0.0%CHATTAHOOCHEE COUNTY CHATTAHOO EDU 15.4%CHATTOOGA COUNTY CROSSROADS AL 0.0%CHATTOOGA COUNTY SUMMERVILLE M 0.0%CHATTOOGA COUNTY LYERLY ELEMEN 0.0%CHATTOOGA COUNTY LEROY MASSEY 1.3%CHATTOOGA COUNTY MENLO ELEMENT 1.8%CHATTOOGA COUNTY SUMMERVILLE E 1.9%CHEROKEE COUNTY FREEDOM MIDDL 0.0%CHEROKEE COUNTY CREEKLAND MID 0.0%CHEROKEE COUNTY BALL GROUND E 0.0%CHEROKEE COUNTY OAK GROVE ELE 0.0%CHEROKEE COUNTY WILLIAM G HA 0.0%CHEROKEE COUNTY RUSK MIDDLE S 0.0%CHEROKEE COUNTY MACEDONIA ELE 0.0%CHEROKEE COUNTY JOHNSTON ELEM 0.0%CHEROKEE COUNTY HICKORY FLAT 0.0%CHEROKEE COUNTY AVERY ELEMENT 0.0%CHEROKEE COUNTY TEASLEY MIDDL 0.0%CHEROKEE COUNTY BOOTH MIDDLE 0.0%CHEROKEE COUNTY WOODSTOCK MID 0.5%CHEROKEE COUNTY LIBERTY ELEME 0.6%CHEROKEE COUNTY BASCOMB ELEME 0.7%CHEROKEE COUNTY SIXES ELEMENT 0.8%CHEROKEE COUNTY J KNOX ELEME 1.0%CHEROKEE COUNTY CHAPMAN INTER 1.2%CHEROKEE COUNTY R M MOORE ELE 1.4%CHEROKEE COUNTY BOSTON ELEMEN 1.8%CHEROKEE COUNTY LITTLE RIVER 1.8%CHEROKEE COUNTY CARMEL ELEMEN 1.9%CHEROKEE COUNTY HOLLY SPRINGS 2.2%CHEROKEE COUNTY CANTON ELEMEN 2.7%CHEROKEE COUNTY FREE HOME ELE 2.8%


Page 7 of 37

202

CHEROKEE COUNTY CLAYTON ELEME 3.3%CHEROKEE COUNTY MOUNTAIN ROAD 3.4%CHEROKEE COUNTY WOODSTOCK ELE 3.5%CHEROKEE COUNTY ARNOLD MILL E 4.8%CHICKAMAUGA CITY GORDON LEE MI 0.0%CHICKAMAUGA CITY CHICKAMAUGA E 1.4%CLARKE COUNTY HILSMAN MIDDL 0.0%CLARKE COUNTY CLARKE MIDDLE 0.0%CLARKE COUNTY TIMOTHY ELEME 0.0%CLARKE COUNTY WHITEHEAD ROA 0.0%CLARKE COUNTY WINTERVILLE E 0.0%CLARKE COUNTY BARNETT SHOAL 0.0%CLARKE COUNTY CLEVELAND ROA 2.2%CLARKE COUNTY BARROW ELEMEN 2.2%CLARKE COUNTY OGLETHORPE AV 2.7%CLARKE COUNTY ALPS ROAD ELE 3.7%CLARKE COUNTY FOURTH STREET 3.9%CLARKE COUNTY CHASE STREET 4.2%CLARKE COUNTY FOWLER DRIVE 4.2%CLARKE COUNTY WHIT DAVIS RO 5.1%CLARKE COUNTY BURNEY HARRIS 5.6%CLARKE COUNTY GAINES ELEMEN 7.7%CLARKE COUNTY COILE MIDDLE 16.7%CLAY COUNTY CLAY COUNTY E 5.6%CLAY COUNTY CLAY COUNTY M 8.3%CLAYTON COUNTY UNIDOS DUAL L 0.0%CLAYTON COUNTY ANDERSON ELEM 0.0%CLAYTON COUNTY EDMONDS ELEME 0.0%CLAYTON COUNTY ROBERTA T SM 0.8%CLAYTON COUNTY KILPATRICK EL 1.3%CLAYTON COUNTY MORROW ELEMEN 1.3%CLAYTON COUNTY M D ROBERTS M 1.3%CLAYTON COUNTY ARNOLD ELEMEN 1.5%CLAYTON COUNTY POINTE SOUTH 1.6%CLAYTON COUNTY MOUNT ZION EL 2.4%CLAYTON COUNTY WILLIAM M MC 2.5%CLAYTON COUNTY SWINT ELEMENT 2.5%CLAYTON COUNTY MUNDY S MIDDL 2.6%CLAYTON COUNTY MORROW MIDDLE 2.8%CLAYTON COUNTY TARA ELEMENTA 2.9%CLAYTON COUNTY BABB MIDDLE S 3.0%CLAYTON COUNTY JAMES JACKSON 3.6%CLAYTON COUNTY EAST CLAYTON 3.7%CLAYTON COUNTY LOVEJOY MIDDL 3.9%CLAYTON COUNTY ADAMSON MIDDL 4.2%CLAYTON COUNTY JONESBORO MID 4.3%CLAYTON COUNTY HENDRIX DRIVE 4.8%CLAYTON COUNTY KENDRICK MIDD 4.8%CLAYTON COUNTY REX MILL MIDD 4.8%CLAYTON COUNTY HUIE ELEMENTA 4.9%CLAYTON COUNTY SEQUOYAH MIDD 5.6%


Page 8 of 37

203

CLAYTON COUNTY RIVERDALE MID 5.7%CLAYTON COUNTY HAWTHORNE ELE 5.8%CLAYTON COUNTY HARPER ELEMEN 6.1%CLAYTON COUNTY FOREST PARK M 6.3%CLAYTON COUNTY CALLAWAY ELEM 6.8%CLAYTON COUNTY SUDER ELEMENT 7.2%CLAYTON COUNTY LAKE CITY ELE 7.2%CLAYTON COUNTY RIVERDALE ELE 7.3%CLAYTON COUNTY KEMP ELEM SCH 7.3%CLAYTON COUNTY WEST CLAYTON 7.9%CLAYTON COUNTY KEMP PRIMARY 8.6%CLAYTON COUNTY LEE STREET EL 8.6%CLAYTON COUNTY RIVER S EDGE 9.2%CLAYTON COUNTY HAYNIE ELEMEN 10.0%CLAYTON COUNTY BROWN ELEMENT 10.1%CLAYTON COUNTY FOUNTAIN ELEM 10.7%CLAYTON COUNTY MOUNT ZION PR 11.7%CLAYTON COUNTY CHURCH STREET 11.7%CLAYTON COUNTY POINTE ELEMEN 11.8%CLAYTON COUNTY THURGOOD MARS 17.9%CLAYTON COUNTY NORTHCUTT ELE 19.8%CLAYTON COUNTY MARTIN LUTHER 20.0%CLAYTON COUNTY LAKE RIDGE EL 21.6%CLAYTON COUNTY OLIVER ELEMEN 23.1%CLAYTON COUNTY NORTH CLAYTON 26.3%CLAYTON COUNTY LEWIS ACADEMY 56.9%CLINCH COUNTY CLINCH CO HIG 0.0%CLINCH COUNTY FARGO CHARTER 0.0%CLINCH COUNTY CLINCH CO PRI 0.0%CLINCH COUNTY CLINCH CO ELE 0.0%COBB COUNTY DICKERSON MID 0.0%COBB COUNTY DURHAM MIDDLE 0.0%COBB COUNTY COOPER MIDDLE 0.0%COBB COUNTY LOVINGGOOD MI 0.0%COBB COUNTY DANIELL MIDDL 0.0%COBB COUNTY MCCLESKEY MID 0.0%COBB COUNTY HIGHTOWER TRA 0.0%COBB COUNTY LOST MOUNTAIN 0.0%COBB COUNTY PALMER MIDDLE 0.0%COBB COUNTY MABRY MIDDLE 0.0%COBB COUNTY DODGEN MIDDLE 0.0%COBB COUNTY PINE MOUNTAIN 0.0%COBB COUNTY SMITHA MIDDLE 0.0%COBB COUNTY EAST COBB MID 0.0%COBB COUNTY AWTREY MIDDLE 0.0%COBB COUNTY BARBER MIDDLE 0.0%COBB COUNTY CAMPBELL MIDD 0.0%COBB COUNTY DEVEREUX ACKE 0.0%COBB COUNTY GRIFFIN MIDDL 0.0%COBB COUNTY MCCLURE MIDDL 0.0%COBB COUNTY MCCALL PRIMAR 0.0%


Page 9 of 37

204

COBB COUNTY GARRETT MIDDL 0.0%COBB COUNTY IMAGINE INT A 0.0%COBB COUNTY CLARKDALE ELE 0.0%COBB COUNTY TIMBER RIDGE 0.0%COBB COUNTY KEHELEY ELEME 0.0%COBB COUNTY NICHOLSON ELE 0.0%COBB COUNTY EASTVALLEY EL 0.0%COBB COUNTY ROCKY MOUNT E 0.0%COBB COUNTY STILL ELEMENT 0.0%COBB COUNTY GARRISON MILL 0.0%COBB COUNTY KENNESAW ELEM 0.0%COBB COUNTY TRITT ELEMENT 0.0%COBB COUNTY FORD ELEMENTA 0.0%COBB COUNTY VARNER ELEMEN 0.0%COBB COUNTY MOUNT BETHEL 0.0%COBB COUNTY FAIR OAKS ELE 0.0%COBB COUNTY EAST SIDE ELE 0.0%COBB COUNTY NORTON PARK E 0.0%COBB COUNTY PITNER ELEMEN 0.0%COBB COUNTY LEWIS ELEMENT 0.7%COBB COUNTY KEMP ELEMENTA 0.8%COBB COUNTY POWDER SPRING 0.8%COBB COUNTY VAUGHAN ELEME 0.8%COBB COUNTY BIG SHANTY EL 0.9%COBB COUNTY CHALKER ELEME 0.9%COBB COUNTY MOUNTAIN VIEW 0.9%COBB COUNTY KINCAID ELEME 1.0%COBB COUNTY CLAY ELEMENTA 1.0%COBB COUNTY BELLS FERRY E 1.1%COBB COUNTY DOWELL ELEMEN 1.3%COBB COUNTY FREY ELEMENTA 1.3%COBB COUNTY DAVIS ELEMENT 1.4%COBB COUNTY POWERS FERRY 1.4%COBB COUNTY DUE WEST ELEM 1.4%COBB COUNTY BRUMBY ELEMEN 1.4%COBB COUNTY BULLARD ELEME 1.4%COBB COUNTY SKY VIEW ELEM 1.4%COBB COUNTY TEASLEY ELEME 1.4%COBB COUNTY MURDOCK ELEME 1.8%COBB COUNTY ACWORTH INTER 1.8%COBB COUNTY BELMONT HILLS 1.9%COBB COUNTY MILFORD ELEME 1.9%COBB COUNTY SEDALIA PARK 1.9%COBB COUNTY BLACKWELL ELE 2.0%COBB COUNTY HOLLYDALE ELE 2.2%COBB COUNTY SOPE CREEK EL 2.3%COBB COUNTY BROWN ELEMENT 2.4%COBB COUNTY NICKAJACK ELE 2.4%COBB COUNTY GREEN ACRES E 2.4%COBB COUNTY SANDERS ELEME 2.6%COBB COUNTY AUSTELL PRIMA 2.8%


Page 10 of 37

205

COBB COUNTY AUSTELL INTER 2.8%COBB COUNTY BIRNEY ELEMEN 2.8%COBB COUNTY MABLETON ELEM 2.9%COBB COUNTY PICKETT S MIL 2.9%COBB COUNTY RUSSELL ELEME 2.9%COBB COUNTY SHALLOWFORD F 3.0%COBB COUNTY KENNESAW CHAR 3.3%COBB COUNTY ADDISON ELEME 3.3%COBB COUNTY COMPTON ELEME 3.3%COBB COUNTY LABELLE ELEME 3.4%COBB COUNTY BAKER ELEMENT 3.5%COBB COUNTY RIVERSIDE INT 3.5%COBB COUNTY ARGYLE ELEMEN 3.8%COBB COUNTY CHEATHAM HILL 3.8%COBB COUNTY KING SPRINGS 4.2%COBB COUNTY HAYES ELEMENT 4.4%COBB COUNTY BRYANT ELEMEN 4.7%COBB COUNTY LINDLEY MIDDL 4.8%COBB COUNTY TAPP MIDDLE S 5.6%COBB COUNTY FLOYD MIDDLE 6.7%COBB COUNTY HARMONY LELAN 7.2%COBB COUNTY SIMPSON MIDDL 8.3%COBB COUNTY IMAGINE INTER 8.3%COBB COUNTY LINDLEY ACADE 16.7%COBB COUNTY RIVERSIDE PRI 18.2%COFFEE COUNTY BROXTON MARY 0.0%COFFEE COUNTY WEST GREEN EL 0.0%COFFEE COUNTY COFFEE MIDDLE 0.0%COFFEE COUNTY SATILLA ELEME 0.0%COFFEE COUNTY EASTSIDE ELEM 0.0%COFFEE COUNTY WESTSIDE ELEM 1.1%COFFEE COUNTY AMBROSE ELEME 2.0%COFFEE COUNTY INDIAN CREEK 2.6%COFFEE COUNTY NICHOLLS ELEM 7.4%COLQUITT COUNTY DOERUN ELEMEN 0.0%COLQUITT COUNTY HAMILTON ELEM 0.0%COLQUITT COUNTY WILLIE J WIL 0.0%COLQUITT COUNTY OKAPILCO ELEM 0.0%COLQUITT COUNTY WRIGHT ELEMEN 0.0%COLQUITT COUNTY FUNSTON ELEME 0.0%COLQUITT COUNTY NORMAN PARK E 0.0%COLQUITT COUNTY ODOM ELEMENTA 0.0%COLQUITT COUNTY SUNSET ELEMEN 0.0%COLQUITT COUNTY COX ELEMENTAR 1.5%COLQUITT COUNTY GRAY MIDDLE S 1.6%COLQUITT COUNTY STRINGFELLOW 8.3%COLUMBIA COUNTY COLUMBIA MIDD 0.0%COLUMBIA COUNTY HARLEM MIDDLE 0.0%COLUMBIA COUNTY EUCHEE CREEK 0.0%COLUMBIA COUNTY NORTH COLUMBI 0.0%COLUMBIA COUNTY EVANS ELEMENT 0.0%


Page 11 of 37

206

COLUMBIA COUNTY BEL AIR ELEME 0.0%COLUMBIA COUNTY STALLINGS ISL 0.0%COLUMBIA COUNTY MARTINEZ ELEM 0.0%COLUMBIA COUNTY BROOKWOOD ELE 0.0%COLUMBIA COUNTY BLUE RIDGE EL 0.0%COLUMBIA COUNTY RIVERSIDE MID 0.0%COLUMBIA COUNTY NORTH HARLEM 0.0%COLUMBIA COUNTY RIVER RIDGE E 0.0%COLUMBIA COUNTY RIVERSIDE ELE 0.0%COLUMBIA COUNTY GROVETOWN ELE 0.0%COLUMBIA COUNTY STEVENS CREEK 0.0%COLUMBIA COUNTY LEWISTON ELEM 0.0%COLUMBIA COUNTY EVANS MIDD SC 0.8%COLUMBIA COUNTY CEDAR RIDGE E 1.0%COLUMBIA COUNTY GREENBRIER EL 1.2%COLUMBIA COUNTY WESTMONT ELEM 1.3%COLUMBIA COUNTY SOUTH COLUMBI 1.4%COLUMBIA COUNTY GROVETOWN MID 1.7%COLUMBIA COUNTY GREENBRIER MI 1.7%COLUMBIA COUNTY LAKESIDE MIDD 2.8%COMMERCE CITY COMMERCE ELEM 0.0%COMMERCE CITY COMMERCE PRIM 0.0%COMMERCE CITY COMMERCE MIDD 1.0%COOK COUNTY COOK ELEMENTA 0.0%COOK COUNTY COOK PRIMARY 1.2%COOK COUNTY COOK COUNTY M 3.9%COWETA COUNTY GRANTVILLE EL 0.0%COWETA COUNTY JEFFERSON PAR 0.0%COWETA COUNTY MORELAND ELEM 0.0%COWETA COUNTY ATKINSON ELEM 0.0%COWETA COUNTY THOMAS CROSSR 0.0%COWETA COUNTY RUTH HILL ELE 0.0%COWETA COUNTY NORTHSIDE ELE 0.0%COWETA COUNTY EASTSIDE ELEM 0.0%COWETA COUNTY ELM STREET EL 0.0%COWETA COUNTY NEWNAN CROSSI 0.0%COWETA COUNTY CANNONGATE EL 0.0%COWETA COUNTY ARNALL MIDDLE 0.0%COWETA COUNTY MADRAS MIDDLE 0.0%COWETA COUNTY LEE MIDDLE SC 0.0%COWETA COUNTY SMOKEY ROAD M 0.6%COWETA COUNTY WELCH ELEMENT 0.9%COWETA COUNTY EVANS MIDDLE 1.0%COWETA COUNTY WILLIS ROAD E 1.0%COWETA COUNTY EAST COWETA M 1.0%COWETA COUNTY POPLAR ROAD E 1.1%COWETA COUNTY WHITE OAK ELE 1.1%COWETA COUNTY ARBOR SPRINGS 1.2%COWETA COUNTY ARNCO SARGENT 1.5%COWETA COUNTY WESTERN ELEME 1.6%CRAWFORD COUNTY CRAWFORD CO M 0.0%


Page 12 of 37

207

CRAWFORD COUNTY CRAWFORD CO E 4.0%CRISP COUNTY CRISP CO MIDD 0.0%CRISP COUNTY J S PATE ELEM 0.0%CRISP COUNTY SOUTHWESTERN 0.0%CRISP COUNTY A S CLARK ELE 1.4%CRISP COUNTY BLACKSHEAR TR 3.9%DADE COUNTY DADE MIDDLE S 0.0%DADE COUNTY DAVIS ELEMENT 0.0%DADE COUNTY DADE ELEMENTA 0.0%DALTON CITY ROAN ELEMENTA 0.0%DALTON CITY BLUE RIDGE SC 0.0%DALTON CITY CITY PARK SCH 2.9%DALTON CITY PARK CREEK EL 3.8%DALTON CITY WESTWOOD ELEM 4.5%DALTON CITY DALTON MIDDLE 5.1%DALTON CITY BROOKWOOD ELE 6.9%DAWSON COUNTY RIVERVIEW MID 0.0%DAWSON COUNTY BLACK S MILL 0.0%DAWSON COUNTY NEW DAWSON CO 0.0%DAWSON COUNTY ROBINSON ELEM 0.0%DAWSON COUNTY KILOUGH ELEME 1.5%DECATUR CITY WINNONA PARK 0.0%DECATUR CITY CLAIREMONT EL 0.0%DECATUR CITY OAKHURST ELEM 3.7%DECATUR CITY RENFROE MIDDL 4.2%DECATUR CITY GLENNWOOD ACA 5.3%DECATUR COUNTY LILLIAN E WIL 0.0%DECATUR COUNTY POTTER STREET 0.0%DECATUR COUNTY W BAINBRID EL 0.0%DECATUR COUNTY JOHN JOHNSON 0.0%DECATUR COUNTY JONES WHEAT E 0.0%DECATUR COUNTY W BAINBRID MI 0.0%DECATUR COUNTY ELCAN KING EL 1.1%DECATUR COUNTY HUTTO MIDDLE 2.9%DEKALB COUNTY PEACHTREE MID 0.0%DEKALB COUNTY DEKALB SCHOOLSL 0.0%DEKALB COUNTY DEKALB ALT SC 0.0%DEKALB COUNTY KITTREDGE MAG 0.0%DEKALB COUNTY UHS OF LAUREL 0.0%DEKALB COUNTY WADSWORTH MAG 0.0%DEKALB COUNTY ASHFORD PARK 0.0%DEKALB COUNTY LIVSEY ELEMEN 0.0%DEKALB COUNTY GRESHAM PARK 0.0%DEKALB COUNTY MIDVALE ELEME 0.0%DEKALB COUNTY BRIARLAKE ELE 0.0%DEKALB COUNTY SAGAMORE HILL 0.0%DEKALB COUNTY EVANSDALE ELE 0.0%DEKALB COUNTY KINGSLEY ELEM 0.0%DEKALB COUNTY HENDERSON MIL 0.0%DEKALB COUNTY SMOKE RISE EL 0.0%DEKALB COUNTY CHESNUT ELEME 0.0%


Page 13 of 37

208

DEKALB COUNTY CHAPEL HILL M 0.0%DEKALB COUNTY SHAMROCK MIDD 0.7%DEKALB COUNTY VANDERLYN ELE 0.9%DEKALB COUNTY NARVIE HARRIS 0.9%DEKALB COUNTY WYNBROOKE ELE 1.0%DEKALB COUNTY IDLEWOOD ELEM 1.1%DEKALB COUNTY CHAMBLEE MIDD 1.3%DEKALB COUNTY SEQUOYAH MIDD 1.3%DEKALB COUNTY HIGHTOWER ELE 1.6%DEKALB COUNTY PRINCETON ELE 1.6%DEKALB COUNTY ROBERT SHAW T 1.7%DEKALB COUNTY MONTGOMERY EL 1.9%DEKALB COUNTY BRIAR VISTA E 1.9%DEKALB COUNTY HAWTHORNE ELE 2.0%DEKALB COUNTY OAK GROVE ELE 2.2%DEKALB COUNTY KELLEY LAKE E 2.4%DEKALB COUNTY MONTCLAIR ELE 2.5%DEKALB COUNTY HUNTLEY HILLS 2.5%DEKALB COUNTY STONE MILL EL 2.6%DEKALB COUNTY ROCK CHAPEL E 2.6%DEKALB COUNTY REDAN MIDDLE 2.8%DEKALB COUNTY FERNBANK ELEM 2.9%DEKALB COUNTY MCLENDON ELEM 2.9%DEKALB COUNTY MURPHY CANDLE 3.0%DEKALB COUNTY EDWARD L BOU 3.0%DEKALB COUNTY OAKVIEW ELEME 3.0%DEKALB COUNTY HOOPER ALEXAN 3.2%DEKALB COUNTY AUSTIN ELEMEN 3.2%DEKALB COUNTY LITHONIA MIDD 3.2%DEKALB COUNTY CARY REYNOLDS 3.3%DEKALB COUNTY BROCKETT ELEM 3.5%DEKALB COUNTY LAUREL RIDGE 3.5%DEKALB COUNTY SALEM MIDDLE 3.7%DEKALB COUNTY MARY MCLEOD B 3.7%DEKALB COUNTY HENDERSON MID 3.8%DEKALB COUNTY AVONDALE MIDD 3.8%DEKALB COUNTY PLEASANTDALE 3.8%DEKALB COUNTY TUCKER MIDDLE 4.0%DEKALB COUNTY MILLER GROVE 4.1%DEKALB COUNTY STEPHENSON MI 4.4%DEKALB COUNTY SKY HAVEN ELE 4.4%DEKALB COUNTY DEKALB ACADEM 4.8%DEKALB COUNTY MIDWAY ELEMEN 4.8%DEKALB COUNTY MEDLOCK ELEME 5.1%DEKALB COUNTY COLUMBIA MIDD 5.1%DEKALB COUNTY BOB MATHIS EL 5.3%DEKALB COUNTY DEKALB TRANSI 5.6%DEKALB COUNTY CHAPEL HILL E 5.6%DEKALB COUNTY MARBUT ELEMEN 6.5%DEKALB COUNTY DRESDEN ELEME 6.7%DEKALB COUNTY THE CHAMPION 6.9%


Page 14 of 37

209

DEKALB COUNTY FAIRINGTON EL 7.0%DEKALB COUNTY CLIFTON ELEME 7.0%DEKALB COUNTY PANOLA WAY EL 7.1%DEKALB COUNTY INTL COMM SCH 7.4%DEKALB COUNTY WOODWARD ELEM 7.4%DEKALB COUNTY ROCKBRIDGE EL 7.6%DEKALB COUNTY AVONDALE ELEM 7.8%DEKALB COUNTY ELDRIDGE L M 7.9%DEKALB COUNTY RONALD E MCNA 8.1%DEKALB COUNTY DEKALB ROCKDA 8.3%DEKALB COUNTY ALLGOOD ELEME 8.3%DEKALB COUNTY PINE RIDGE EL 8.3%DEKALB COUNTY FLAT ROCK ELE 8.3%DEKALB COUNTY MCNAIR MIDDLE 8.5%DEKALB COUNTY BROWNS MILL E 8.6%DEKALB COUNTY ROWLAND ELEME 8.8%DEKALB COUNTY COLUMBIA ELEM 9.7%DEKALB COUNTY OAKCLIFF ELEM 10.0%DEKALB COUNTY PEACHCREST EL 10.3%DEKALB COUNTY TONEY ELEMENT 11.1%DEKALB COUNTY CANBY LANE EL 11.1%DEKALB COUNTY JOLLY ELEMENT 12.3%DEKALB COUNTY STONE MOUNT E 12.7%DEKALB COUNTY REDAN ELEMENT 13.3%DEKALB COUNTY DUNAIRE ELEME 14.1%DEKALB COUNTY ACADEMY OF LI 14.4%DEKALB COUNTY FLAT SHOALS 17.8%DEKALB COUNTY CEDAR GROVE E 17.8%DEKALB COUNTY INDIAN CREEK 17.8%DEKALB COUNTY HAMBRICK ELEM 17.9%DEKALB COUNTY MEADOWVIEW EL 19.0%DEKALB COUNTY ATHERTON ELEM 20.3%DEKALB COUNTY SNAPFINGER EL 20.3%DEKALB COUNTY FREEDOM MIDDL 20.8%DEKALB COUNTY WOODRIDGE ELE 20.8%DEKALB COUNTY STONE MOUNTAI 21.2%DEKALB COUNTY RAINBOW ELEME 21.7%DEKALB COUNTY KNOLLWOOD ELE 22.2%DEKALB COUNTY INTERNATIONAL 23.3%DEKALB COUNTY DEKALB PATH A 25.0%DEKALB COUNTY CEDAR GROVE M 35.0%DEKALB COUNTY SHADOW ROCK E 40.0%DEKALB COUNTY GLEN HAVEN EL 44.9%DEKALB COUNTY STONEVIEW ELE 48.1%DEKALB COUNTY DEKALB TRUANC 66.7%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI EASTMAN YOUTH 0.0%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI GAINESVILLE R 0.0%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI SUMTER YOUTH 0.0%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI SAVANNAH RIVE 0.0%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI GRIFFIN REGIO 0.0%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI GWINNITT REGI 0.0%


Page 15 of 37

210

DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI MARIETTA REGI 0.0%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI MUSCOGEE YOUT 0.0%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI BILL E IRELAN 0.0%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI AUGUSTA REGIO 0.0%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI CLAYTON REGIO 0.0%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI CLAXTON REGIO 0.0%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI DALTON REGION 0.0%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI DEKALB REGION 0.0%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI EASTMAN REGIO 0.0%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI WAYCROSS REGI 0.0%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI SAVANNAH REGI 0.0%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI BLAKELY REGIO 0.0%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI BOB RICHARDS 0.0%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI AUGUSTA YOUTH 0.0%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI PAULDING REGI 0.0%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI AARON COHN RE 0.0%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI MACON YOUTH D 5.6%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI CRISP YDC 5.9%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI T J LOFTISS I 9.1%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI ALBANY REGION 11.1%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI MACON REGIONA 11.1%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI METRO REGIONA 22.2%DEPARTMENT OF JUVENI SANDERSVILLE 25.0%DEPARTMENT OF LABOR WARMS SPRING 0.0%DHR APPALACHIAN DHR OUTDOOR A 0.0%DODGE COUNTY DODGE CO MIDD 0.0%DODGE COUNTY SOUTH DODGE E 3.3%DODGE COUNTY NORTH DODGE E 7.2%DOOLY COUNTY DOOLY CO ELEM 0.0%DOOLY COUNTY DOOLY CO MIDD 6.7%DOUGHERTY COUNTY ROBERT A CRO 1.5%DOUGHERTY COUNTY INTERNATIONAL 3.5%DOUGHERTY COUNTY LAKE PARK ELE 5.3%DOUGHERTY COUNTY LIVE OAK ELEM 5.8%DOUGHERTY COUNTY DOUGHERTY MID 6.3%DOUGHERTY COUNTY MERRY ACRES M 7.4%DOUGHERTY COUNTY RADIUM SPR MI 8.3%DOUGHERTY COUNTY SOUTHSIDE MID 9.7%DOUGHERTY COUNTY ALBANY MIDDLE 13.1%DOUGHERTY COUNTY LINCOLN ELEME 14.3%DOUGHERTY COUNTY MAGNOLIA ELEM 18.2%DOUGHERTY COUNTY RADIUM SPRING 21.4%DOUGHERTY COUNTY SYLVESTER ROA 22.2%DOUGHERTY COUNTY LAMAR REESE S 22.7%DOUGHERTY COUNTY SHERWOOD ACRE 25.0%DOUGHERTY COUNTY MORNINGSIDE E 31.6%DOUGHERTY COUNTY ALICE COACHMA 31.7%DOUGHERTY COUNTY TURNER ELEMEN 39.4%DOUGHERTY COUNTY MARTIN LUTHER 45.6%DOUGHERTY COUNTY NORTHSIDE ELE 52.2%DOUGHERTY COUNTY NEW JACKSON H 57.9%


Page 16 of 37

211

DOUGHERTY COUNTY WEST TOWN ELE 77.2%DOUGLAS COUNTY INNER HARBOUR 0.0%DOUGLAS COUNTY FAIRPLAY MIDD 0.0%DOUGLAS COUNTY BURNETT ELEME 0.0%DOUGLAS COUNTY BEULAH ELEMEN 0.0%DOUGLAS COUNTY DORSETT SHOAL 0.0%DOUGLAS COUNTY ANNETTE WINN 0.0%DOUGLAS COUNTY MOUNT CARMEL 0.0%DOUGLAS COUNTY SOUTH DOUGLAS 0.0%DOUGLAS COUNTY BRIGHT STAR E 0.0%DOUGLAS COUNTY FACTORY SHOAL 0.0%DOUGLAS COUNTY FACTORY SHL M 0.0%DOUGLAS COUNTY SWEETWATER EL 0.0%DOUGLAS COUNTY CHAPEL HILL E 0.0%DOUGLAS COUNTY YEAGER MIDDLE 0.0%DOUGLAS COUNTY BILL ARP ELEM 0.0%DOUGLAS COUNTY CHESTNUT LOG 0.0%DOUGLAS COUNTY MIRROR LAKE E 1.0%DOUGLAS COUNTY ARBOR STATION 1.1%DOUGLAS COUNTY HOLLY SPRINGS 1.2%DOUGLAS COUNTY LITHIA SPRING 1.3%DOUGLAS COUNTY WINSTON ELEME 1.9%DOUGLAS COUNTY BRIGHTEN ACAD 2.1%DOUGLAS COUNTY EASTSIDE ELEM 2.2%DOUGLAS COUNTY NEW MANCHESTE 2.3%DOUGLAS COUNTY NORTH DOUGLAS 3.2%DOUGLAS COUNTY CHAPEL HILL M 3.3%DOUGLAS COUNTY TURNER MIDDLE 3.3%DOUGLAS COUNTY STEWART MIDDL 3.9%DUBLIN CITY COMMUNITY HOP 0.0%DUBLIN CITY MOORE STREET 0.0%DUBLIN CITY SAXON HEIGHTS 1.3%DUBLIN CITY DUBLIN MIDDLE 2.0%DUBLIN CITY SUSIE DASHER 16.7%EARLY COUNTY EARLY CO ELEM 2.0%EARLY COUNTY EARLY CO MIDD 2.4%ECHOLS COUNTY ECHOLS CO HIG 0.0%EFFINGHAM COUNTY SAND HILL ELE 0.0%EFFINGHAM COUNTY BLANDFORD ELE 0.0%EFFINGHAM COUNTY EFFINGHAM CO 0.0%EFFINGHAM COUNTY RINCON ELEMEN 0.0%EFFINGHAM COUNTY EBENEZER ELEM 0.0%EFFINGHAM COUNTY MARLOW ELEMEN 0.0%EFFINGHAM COUNTY S EFFINGHAM M 0.0%EFFINGHAM COUNTY EBENEZER MIDD 0.0%EFFINGHAM COUNTY SPRINGFIELD E 0.9%EFFINGHAM COUNTY GUYTON ELEMEN 1.1%EFFINGHAM COUNTY S EFFINGHAM E 2.5%ELBERT COUNTY BOWMAN ELEMEN 0.0%ELBERT COUNTY BLACKWELL ELE 0.0%ELBERT COUNTY FALLING CREEK 0.0%


Page 17 of 37

212

ELBERT COUNTY DOVES CREEK E 0.0%ELBERT COUNTY BEAVERDAM ELE 0.0%ELBERT COUNTY ELBERT CO MID 2.2%EMANUEL COUNTY SWAINSBORO MI 0.7%EMANUEL COUNTY SWAINSBORO EL 0.8%EMANUEL COUNTY SWAINSBORO PR 2.8%EMANUEL COUNTY EMANUEL CO IN 3.9%EMANUEL COUNTY ADRIAN SCHOOLSL 5.1%EMANUEL COUNTY TWIN CITY ELE 6.9%EVANS COUNTY CLAXTON ELEME 5.1%EVANS COUNTY CLAXTON MIDDL 6.0%FANNIN COUNTY FANNIN CO MID 0.0%FANNIN COUNTY WEST FANNIN E 0.0%FANNIN COUNTY BLUE RIDGE EL 3.2%FANNIN COUNTY EAST FANNIN E 3.6%FAYETTE COUNTY BENNETT S MIL 0.0%FAYETTE COUNTY TYRONE ELEMEN 0.0%FAYETTE COUNTY HOOD AVENUE P 0.0%FAYETTE COUNTY FAYETTE MIDDL 0.0%FAYETTE COUNTY WHITEWATER MI 0.0%FAYETTE COUNTY PEACHTREE CIT 0.0%FAYETTE COUNTY FLAT ROCK MID 0.0%FAYETTE COUNTY BROOKS ELEMEN 0.0%FAYETTE COUNTY OAK GROVE ELE 0.0%FAYETTE COUNTY FAYETTEVILLE 0.0%FAYETTE COUNTY CRABAPPLE LAN 0.0%FAYETTE COUNTY INMAN ELEMENT 0.0%FAYETTE COUNTY BRAELINN ELEM 0.0%FAYETTE COUNTY HUDDLESTON EL 0.0%FAYETTE COUNTY SARA HARP MIN 0.0%FAYETTE COUNTY ROBERT J BUR 0.0%FAYETTE COUNTY BOOTH MIDDLE 0.0%FAYETTE COUNTY CLEVELAND ELE 1.3%FAYETTE COUNTY KEDRON ELEMEN 1.3%FAYETTE COUNTY NORTH FAYETTE 1.6%FAYETTE COUNTY PEEPLES ELEME 2.1%FAYETTE COUNTY SPRING HILL E 2.8%FAYETTE COUNTY RISING STARR 3.2%FLOYD COUNTY PEPPERELL ELE 0.0%FLOYD COUNTY MODEL MIDDLE 0.0%FLOYD COUNTY ARMUCHEE MIDD 0.0%FLOYD COUNTY COOSA MIDDLE 0.0%FLOYD COUNTY PEPPERELL MID 0.0%FLOYD COUNTY MIDWAY PRIMAR 0.0%FLOYD COUNTY MCHENRY PRIMA 0.0%FLOYD COUNTY GLENWOOD PRIM 0.0%FLOYD COUNTY CAVE SPRING E 0.0%FLOYD COUNTY ALTO PARK ELE 0.0%FLOYD COUNTY PEPPERELL PRI 0.0%FLOYD COUNTY ARMUCHEE ELEM 1.3%FLOYD COUNTY JOHNSON ELEME 1.4%


Page 18 of 37

213

FLOYD COUNTY MODEL ELEMENT 2.3%FLOYD COUNTY GARDEN LAKES 4.0%FORSYTH COUNTY RIVERWATCH MI 0.0%FORSYTH COUNTY VICKERY CREEK 0.0%FORSYTH COUNTY LIBERTY MIDDL 0.0%FORSYTH COUNTY PINEY GROVE M 0.0%FORSYTH COUNTY NORTH FORSYTH 0.0%FORSYTH COUNTY OTWELL MIDDLE 0.0%FORSYTH COUNTY MIDWAY ELEMEN 0.0%FORSYTH COUNTY COAL MOUNTAIN 0.0%FORSYTH COUNTY MATT ELEMENTA 0.0%FORSYTH COUNTY SILVER CITY E 0.0%FORSYTH COUNTY CUMMING ELEME 0.0%FORSYTH COUNTY SAWNEE ELEMEN 0.0%FORSYTH COUNTY LITTLE MILL M 0.0%FORSYTH COUNTY S FORSYTH M 0.0%FORSYTH COUNTY DAVES CREEK E 0.8%FORSYTH COUNTY JOHNS CREEK E 0.8%FORSYTH COUNTY CHESTATEE ELE 0.8%FORSYTH COUNTY BIG CREEK ELE 0.9%FORSYTH COUNTY CHATTAHOO ELE 0.9%FORSYTH COUNTY MASHBURN ELEM 1.1%FORSYTH COUNTY VICKERY CRK E 1.1%FORSYTH COUNTY SHILOH POINT 1.3%FORSYTH COUNTY SETTLES BRIDG 1.6%FORSYTH COUNTY SHARON ELEMEN 3.0%FRANKLIN COUNTY ROYSTON ELEME 0.0%FRANKLIN COUNTY CARNESVILLE E 0.0%FRANKLIN COUNTY LAVONIA ELEME 0.0%FRANKLIN COUNTY FRANKLIN CO M 0.0%FRANKLIN COUNTY CENTRAL FRANK 1.6%FULTON COUNTY FULTON SCIENC 0.0%FULTON COUNTY RIVER TRAIL M 0.0%FULTON COUNTY HOPEWELL MIDD 0.0%FULTON COUNTY TAYLOR ROAD M 0.0%FULTON COUNTY HAYNES BRIDGE 0.0%FULTON COUNTY MEDLOCK BRIDG 0.0%FULTON COUNTY SANDY SPRINGS 0.0%FULTON COUNTY RIDGEVIEW CHA 0.0%FULTON COUNTY ELKINS POINTE 0.0%FULTON COUNTY GEORGIA BAPTI 0.0%FULTON COUNTY NORTHWESTERN 0.0%FULTON COUNTY HOLCOMB BRIDG 0.0%FULTON COUNTY AMANA ACADEMY 0.0%FULTON COUNTY LAKE FOREST E 0.0%FULTON COUNTY ALPHARETTA EL 0.0%FULTON COUNTY STATE BRIDGE 0.0%FULTON COUNTY HEMBREE SPRIN 0.0%FULTON COUNTY JACKSON ELEME 0.0%FULTON COUNTY CRABAPPLE CRO 0.0%FULTON COUNTY FINDLEY OAKS 0.0%


Page 19 of 37

214

FULTON COUNTY OCEE ELEMENTA 0.0%FULTON COUNTY WILSON CREEK 0.0%FULTON COUNTY CREEK VIEW EL 0.0%FULTON COUNTY DOLVIN ELEMEN 0.0%FULTON COUNTY SUMMIT HILL E 0.0%FULTON COUNTY MCNAIR MIDDLE 0.0%FULTON COUNTY WEBB BRIDGE M 0.5%FULTON COUNTY SWEET APPLE E 0.7%FULTON COUNTY MOUNTAIN PARK 0.8%FULTON COUNTY COGBURN WOODS 0.9%FULTON COUNTY E C WEST ELEM 1.0%FULTON COUNTY SHAKERAG ELEM 1.0%FULTON COUNTY RENAISSANCE M 1.1%FULTON COUNTY RIVER EVES EL 1.1%FULTON COUNTY BARNWELL ELEM 1.1%FULTON COUNTY HILLSIDE ELEM 1.1%FULTON COUNTY LAKE WINDWARD 1.3%FULTON COUNTY NORTHWOOD ELE 1.8%FULTON COUNTY MOUNT OLIVE E 1.9%FULTON COUNTY CAMPBELL ELEM 2.0%FULTON COUNTY WOODLAND ELEM 2.0%FULTON COUNTY KIPP S FULTO 2.6%FULTON COUNTY MANNING OAKS 2.6%FULTON COUNTY PALMETTO ELEM 2.7%FULTON COUNTY LIBERTY POINT 2.7%FULTON COUNTY MIMOSA ELEMEN 2.7%FULTON COUNTY DUNWOODY SPRI 3.4%FULTON COUNTY SPALDING DRIV 3.4%FULTON COUNTY ABBOTTS HILL 4.2%FULTON COUNTY RENAISSANCE E 4.4%FULTON COUNTY NEW PROSPECT 4.9%FULTON COUNTY HEARDS FERRY 6.3%FULTON COUNTY OAKLEY ELEMEN 6.3%FULTON COUNTY HAPEVILLE ELE 6.4%FULTON COUNTY HIGH POINT EL 6.7%FULTON COUNTY HERITAGE ELEM 6.7%FULTON COUNTY COLLEGE PARK 6.9%FULTON COUNTY CRABAPPLE MID 7.1%FULTON COUNTY SANDTOWN MIDD 7.4%FULTON COUNTY OAK KNOLL ELE 7.7%FULTON COUNTY BETHUNE ELEME 8.0%FULTON COUNTY AUTREY MILL M 8.3%FULTON COUNTY PARKLANE ELEM 8.3%FULTON COUNTY ROSWELL NORTH 8.8%FULTON COUNTY BROOKVIEW ELE 10.3%FULTON COUNTY PAUL D WEST 12.3%FULTON COUNTY BEAR CREEK MI 12.5%FULTON COUNTY STONEWALL TEL 12.6%FULTON COUNTY LEE ELEMENTAR 12.6%FULTON COUNTY NOLAN ELEMENT 13.0%FULTON COUNTY HAMILTON E H 13.2%


Page 20 of 37

215

FULTON COUNTY TUBMAN ELEMEN 13.6%FULTON COUNTY CAMP CREEK MI 18.5%FULTON COUNTY CONLEY HILLS 19.6%FULTON COUNTY S L LEWIS ELE 22.5%FULTON COUNTY RANDOLPH ELEM 23.6%FULTON COUNTY WOODLAND MIDD 29.9%FULTON COUNTY HAPEVILLE CHA 44.4%FULTON COUNTY GULLATT ELEME 44.9%GAINESVILLE CITY ENOTA ELEMENT 0.0%GAINESVILLE CITY CENTENNIAL EL 0.0%GAINESVILLE CITY GAINESVILLE M 2.9%GAINESVILLE CITY NEW HOLLAND E 4.5%GAINESVILLE CITY FAIR STREET E 13.9%GAINESVILLE CITY GAINESVILLE E 25.6%GEORGIA ACADEMY FOR GEORGIA ACADE 4.2%GEORGIA SCHOOLS GEORGIA SCHOOLS 0.0%GILMER COUNTY OAKLAND ELEME 0.0%GILMER COUNTY ELLIJAY PRIMA 0.0%GILMER COUNTY MOUNTAIN VIEW 0.0%GILMER COUNTY ELLIJAY ELEME 0.0%GILMER COUNTY GILMER MIDDLE 0.0%GILMER COUNTY CLEAR CREEK M 0.0%GLASCOCK COUNTY GLASCOCK COUN 0.0%GLYNN COUNTY MORNINGSTAR T 0.0%GLYNN COUNTY RISLEY MIDDLE 0.0%GLYNN COUNTY BURROUGHS MOL 0.0%GLYNN COUNTY STERLING ELEM 0.0%GLYNN COUNTY GLYNDALE ELEM 0.0%GLYNN COUNTY ST SIMONS EL 0.0%GLYNN COUNTY GOODYEAR ELEM 0.0%GLYNN COUNTY OGLETHORPE PO 0.0%GLYNN COUNTY GLYNN MIDDLE 0.0%GLYNN COUNTY NEEDWOOD MIDD 0.0%GLYNN COUNTY JANE MACON MI 0.8%GLYNN COUNTY GOLDEN ISLES 1.1%GLYNN COUNTY GREER ELEMENT 1.3%GLYNN COUNTY ALTAMA ELEMEN 1.3%GLYNN COUNTY SATILLA MARSH 2.2%GORDON COUNTY DOWNING CLAR 0.0%GORDON COUNTY FAIRMOUNT ELE 0.0%GORDON COUNTY SWAIN ELEMENT 0.0%GORDON COUNTY TOLBERT ELEME 0.0%GORDON COUNTY BELWOOD ELEME 0.0%GORDON COUNTY RED BUD ELEME 0.0%GORDON COUNTY ASHWORTH MIDD 4.8%GORDON COUNTY SONORAVILLE E 5.3%GRADY COUNTY WASHINGTON MI 0.0%GRADY COUNTY WHIGHAM ELEME 0.0%GRADY COUNTY EASTSIDE ELEM 0.0%GRADY COUNTY NORTHSIDE ELE 2.1%GRADY COUNTY SOUTHSIDE ELE 2.2%


Page 21 of 37

216

GRADY COUNTY SHIVER ELEMEN 3.6%GREENE COUNTY LAKE OCONEE C 0.0%GREENE COUNTY ANITA WHITE C 0.0%GREENE COUNTY UNION POINT E 0.0%GREENE COUNTY GREENSBORO EL 9.0%GWINNETT COUNTY GWINNETT INTE 0.0%GWINNETT COUNTY NEW LIFE ACAD 0.0%GWINNETT COUNTY GWINNETT EDUC 0.0%GWINNETT COUNTY MULBERRY ELEM 0.0%GWINNETT COUNTY HARMONY ELEME 0.0%GWINNETT COUNTY MOUNTAIN PARK 0.0%GWINNETT COUNTY ANNISTOWN ELE 0.0%GWINNETT COUNTY DYER ELEMENTA 0.0%GWINNETT COUNTY PARTEE ELEMEN 0.0%GWINNETT COUNTY SIMPSON ELEME 0.0%GWINNETT COUNTY HARRIS ELEMEN 0.0%GWINNETT COUNTY ARCADO ELEMEN 0.0%GWINNETT COUNTY SUWANEE ELEME 0.0%GWINNETT COUNTY CAMP CREEK EL 0.0%GWINNETT COUNTY ROSEBUD ELEME 0.0%GWINNETT COUNTY FIVE FORKS MI 0.0%GWINNETT COUNTY GRAYSON ELEME 0.0%GWINNETT COUNTY TAYLOR ELEMEN 0.0%GWINNETT COUNTY SUGAR HILL EL 0.0%GWINNETT COUNTY LILBURN MIDDL 0.0%GWINNETT COUNTY JACKSON ELEME 0.0%GWINNETT COUNTY FRANK N OSBO 0.0%GWINNETT COUNTY MARGARET WINN 0.5%GWINNETT COUNTY SIMONTON ELEM 0.5%GWINNETT COUNTY RIVERSIDE ELE 0.5%GWINNETT COUNTY SYCAMORE ELEM 0.5%GWINNETT COUNTY MCCONNELL MID 0.6%GWINNETT COUNTY MINOR ELEMENT 0.6%GWINNETT COUNTY PHARR ELEMENT 0.6%GWINNETT COUNTY DUNCAN CREEK 0.6%GWINNETT COUNTY LEVEL CREEK E 0.6%GWINNETT COUNTY BETHESDA ELEM 0.6%GWINNETT COUNTY HARBINS ELEME 0.6%GWINNETT COUNTY SUSAN STRIPLI 0.6%GWINNETT COUNTY PUCKETT S MIL 0.6%GWINNETT COUNTY PARSONS ELEME 0.7%GWINNETT COUNTY BRITT ELEMENT 0.7%GWINNETT COUNTY ROCK SPRINGS 0.7%GWINNETT COUNTY GWIN OAKS ELE 0.7%GWINNETT COUNTY CREEKLAND MID 0.7%GWINNETT COUNTY ALCOVA ELEMEN 0.7%GWINNETT COUNTY DULUTH MIDDLE 0.8%GWINNETT COUNTY FORT DANIEL E 0.8%GWINNETT COUNTY CHARLES BRANT 0.8%GWINNETT COUNTY TRIP ELEMENTA 0.8%GWINNETT COUNTY IVY CREEK ELE 0.9%


Page 22 of 37

217

GWINNETT COUNTY GLENN C JONE 0.9%GWINNETT COUNTY LANIER MIDDLE 0.9%GWINNETT COUNTY SHILOH ELEMEN 0.9%GWINNETT COUNTY TRICKUM MIDDL 1.0%GWINNETT COUNTY HULL MIDDLE S 1.0%GWINNETT COUNTY ALTON C CREW 1.0%GWINNETT COUNTY MEADOWCREEK E 1.1%GWINNETT COUNTY CRAIG ELEMENT 1.2%GWINNETT COUNTY LOVIN ELEMENT 1.2%GWINNETT COUNTY FREEMAN S MIL 1.2%GWINNETT COUNTY J A ALFORD EL 1.2%GWINNETT COUNTY MCKENDREE ELE 1.3%GWINNETT COUNTY SNELLVILLE MI 1.3%GWINNETT COUNTY DACULA ELEMEN 1.3%GWINNETT COUNTY BERKELEY LAKE 1.3%GWINNETT COUNTY SHILOH MIDDLE 1.4%GWINNETT COUNTY LILBURN ELEME 1.4%GWINNETT COUNTY NORCROSS ELEM 1.4%GWINNETT COUNTY CEDAR HILL EL 1.5%GWINNETT COUNTY M H MASON ELE 1.6%GWINNETT COUNTY BENEFIELD ES 1.7%GWINNETT COUNTY BROOKWOOD ELE 2.0%GWINNETT COUNTY DACULA MIDDLE 2.0%GWINNETT COUNTY PATRICK ELEME 2.2%GWINNETT COUNTY RICHARDS MIDD 2.2%GWINNETT COUNTY SWEETWATER MI 2.2%GWINNETT COUNTY NORTON ELEMEN 2.3%GWINNETT COUNTY PINCKNEYVILLE 2.4%GWINNETT COUNTY CHATTAHOOCHEE 2.4%GWINNETT COUNTY CENTERVILLE E 2.6%GWINNETT COUNTY SUMMEROUR MID 2.6%GWINNETT COUNTY LAWRENCEVILLE 2.6%GWINNETT COUNTY BEAVER RIDGE 2.7%GWINNETT COUNTY BERKMAR MIDDL 2.8%GWINNETT COUNTY HOPKINS ELEME 2.9%GWINNETT COUNTY W J COOPER 3.0%GWINNETT COUNTY WALNUT GROVE 3.0%GWINNETT COUNTY MAGILL ELEMEN 3.1%GWINNETT COUNTY LOUISE RADLOF 4.0%GWINNETT COUNTY ROCKBRIDGE EL 4.5%GWINNETT COUNTY HEAD ELEMENTA 4.6%GWINNETT COUNTY PEACHTREE ELE 4.7%GWINNETT COUNTY KANOHEDA ELEM 4.8%GWINNETT COUNTY KNIGHT ELEMEN 5.1%GWINNETT COUNTY CORLEY ELEMEN 5.8%GWINNETT COUNTY NESBIT ELEMEN 6.6%HABERSHAM COUNTY HAZEL GROVE E 0.0%HABERSHAM COUNTY LEVEL GROVE E 0.0%HABERSHAM COUNTY CORNELIA ELEM 1.3%HABERSHAM COUNTY DEMOREST ELEM 1.7%HABERSHAM COUNTY NORTH HABERSH 1.7%


Page 23 of 37

218

HABERSHAM COUNTY SOUTH HABERSH 1.9%HABERSHAM COUNTY CLARKESVILLE 5.3%HABERSHAM COUNTY BALDWIN ELEME 6.7%HABERSHAM COUNTY WOODVILLE ELE 7.7%HABERSHAM COUNTY FAIRVIEW ELEM 11.8%HALL COUNTY LANIER CAREER 0.0%HALL COUNTY ALPINE PSYCHO 0.0%HALL COUNTY CHICOPEE ELEM 0.0%HALL COUNTY LULA ELEMENTA 0.0%HALL COUNTY FLOWERY BRANC 0.0%HALL COUNTY NORTH HALL MI 0.0%HALL COUNTY EAST HALL MID 0.0%HALL COUNTY SPOUT SPRINGS 0.8%HALL COUNTY CHESTATEE MID 1.0%HALL COUNTY FRIENDSHIP EL 1.0%HALL COUNTY SARDIS ELEMEN 1.0%HALL COUNTY C W DAVIS MID 1.1%HALL COUNTY TADMORE ELEME 1.1%HALL COUNTY LANIER ELEMEN 1.1%HALL COUNTY OAKWOOD ELEME 1.5%HALL COUNTY MCEVER ELEMEN 1.8%HALL COUNTY RIVERBEND ELE 2.1%HALL COUNTY MYERS ELEMENT 2.1%HALL COUNTY WEST HALL MID 2.1%HALL COUNTY MARTIN ELEMEN 2.2%HALL COUNTY SOUTH HALL MI 2.4%HALL COUNTY WAUKA MOUNTAI 2.5%HALL COUNTY MOUNT VERNON 3.2%HALL COUNTY WORLD LANGUAG 4.4%HALL COUNTY SUGAR HILL EL 5.1%HALL COUNTY JONES ELEMENT 5.6%HALL COUNTY CHESTNUT MOUN 6.1%HALL COUNTY LYMAN HALL 6.3%HALL COUNTY WHITE SULPHUR 6.9%HANCOCK COUNTY HANCOCK MIDDL 6.3%HANCOCK COUNTY LEWIS ELEMENT 17.3%HARALSON COUNTY TALLAPOOSA P 0.0%HARALSON COUNTY BUCHANAN ELEM 0.0%HARALSON COUNTY HARALSON CO M 0.0%HARALSON COUNTY BUCHANAN PRIM 1.6%HARALSON COUNTY WEST HARALSON 1.9%HARRIS COUNTY HARRIS CO CAR 0.0%HARRIS COUNTY PARK ELEMENTA 1.4%HARRIS COUNTY PINE RIDGE EL 2.3%HARRIS COUNTY MULBERRY CREE 4.2%HARRIS COUNTY NEW MOUNTAIN 8.7%HART COUNTY HART COUNTY A 0.0%HART COUNTY HARTWELL ELEM 0.0%HART COUNTY SOUTH HART EL 0.0%HART COUNTY HART COUNTY M 0.8%HART COUNTY NORTH HART EL 3.4%


Page 24 of 37

219

HEARD COUNTY CENTRALHATCHE 0.0%HEARD COUNTY HEARD CO MIDD 0.9%HEARD COUNTY EPHESUS ELEME 3.7%HEARD COUNTY HEARD ELEMENT 5.8%HENRY COUNTY COTTON INDIAN 0.0%HENRY COUNTY PATE S CREEK 0.0%HENRY COUNTY MOUNT CARMEL 0.0%HENRY COUNTY STOCKBRIDGE M 0.0%HENRY COUNTY NEW HOPE ELEM 0.0%HENRY COUNTY FLIPPEN ELEME 0.0%HENRY COUNTY LOCUST GROVE 0.0%HENRY COUNTY WOODLAND MIDD 0.0%HENRY COUNTY UNITY GROVE E 0.0%HENRY COUNTY OLA MIDDLE SC 0.3%HENRY COUNTY WALNUT CREEK 1.2%HENRY COUNTY MCDONOUGH ELE 1.2%HENRY COUNTY PLEASANT GROV 1.3%HENRY COUNTY LUELLA MIDDLE 1.5%HENRY COUNTY HENRY CO MIDD 1.6%HENRY COUNTY DUTCHTOWN MID 1.7%HENRY COUNTY STOCKBRIDGE E 1.9%HENRY COUNTY DUTCHTOWN ELE 2.2%HENRY COUNTY LUELLA ELEMEN 2.5%HENRY COUNTY AUSTIN ROAD E 2.9%HENRY COUNTY EAGLE S LANDI 2.9%HENRY COUNTY HAMPTON ELEME 3.1%HENRY COUNTY UNION GROVE M 3.3%HENRY COUNTY BETHLEHEM ELE 3.6%HENRY COUNTY PATRICK HENRY 3.7%HENRY COUNTY EAST LAKE ELE 3.8%HENRY COUNTY HICKORY FLAT 4.0%HENRY COUNTY OLA ELEMENTAR 4.2%HENRY COUNTY WOODLAND ELEM 4.9%HENRY COUNTY RED OAK ELEME 5.1%HENRY COUNTY WESLEY LAKES 5.4%HENRY COUNTY TUSSAHAW ELEM 5.9%HENRY COUNTY OAKLAND ELEME 6.7%HENRY COUNTY SMITH BARNES 7.4%HENRY COUNTY AUSTIN ROAD M 8.5%HENRY COUNTY ROCK SPRING E 8.6%HENRY COUNTY TIMBER RIDGE 11.7%HENRY COUNTY FAIRVIEW ELEM 12.5%HOUSTON COUNTY MOSSY CREEK M 0.0%HOUSTON COUNTY FEAGIN MILL M 0.0%HOUSTON COUNTY NORTHSIDE MID 0.0%HOUSTON COUNTY WATSON CENTER 0.0%HOUSTON COUNTY HUNTINGTON MI 0.0%HOUSTON COUNTY PERRY PRIMARY 0.0%HOUSTON COUNTY BONAIRE MIDDL 0.0%HOUSTON COUNTY LINWOOD ELEME 0.0%HOUSTON COUNTY LAKE JOY PRIM 0.0%


Page 25 of 37

220

HOUSTON COUNTY WESTSIDE ELEM 0.0%HOUSTON COUNTY TUCKER ELEMEN 0.0%HOUSTON COUNTY KINGS CHAPEL 0.0%HOUSTON COUNTY PERDUE ELEMEN 0.0%HOUSTON COUNTY PARKWOOD ELEM 0.0%HOUSTON COUNTY EAGLE SPRINGS 0.0%HOUSTON COUNTY RUSSELL ELEME 0.0%HOUSTON COUNTY PERRY MIDDLE 1.0%HOUSTON COUNTY CENTERVILLE E 1.2%HOUSTON COUNTY HILLTOP ELEME 1.2%HOUSTON COUNTY BONAIRE ELEME 1.3%HOUSTON COUNTY QUAIL RUN ELE 1.3%HOUSTON COUNTY MATTHEW ARTHU 1.3%HOUSTON COUNTY LAKE JOY ELEM 1.3%HOUSTON COUNTY MORNINGSIDE E 1.5%HOUSTON COUNTY SHIRLEY HILLS 1.5%HOUSTON COUNTY LINDSEY ELEME 1.8%HOUSTON COUNTY WARNER ROBINS 2.1%HOUSTON COUNTY NORTHSIDE ELE 2.6%HOUSTON COUNTY THOMSON MIDDL 2.8%HOUSTON COUNTY DAVID A PERDU 5.8%HOUSTON COUNTY MILLER ELEMEN 5.8%HOUSTON COUNTY PEARL STEPHEN 9.5%IRWIN COUNTY IRWIN CO MIDD 0.0%IRWIN COUNTY IRWIN CO ELEM 0.0%IVY PREP IVY PREPARATO 5.6%JACKSON COUNTY W JACKSON PRI 0.0%JACKSON COUNTY W JACKSON INT 0.0%JACKSON COUNTY EAST JACK ELE 0.0%JACKSON COUNTY BENTON ELEMEN 0.0%JACKSON COUNTY MAYSVILLE ELE 0.0%JACKSON COUNTY KINGS BRIDGE 0.0%JACKSON COUNTY EAST JACK MID 0.0%JACKSON COUNTY GUM SPRINGS E 0.0%JACKSON COUNTY W JACKSON MID 0.0%JACKSON COUNTY NORTH JACKSON 2.0%JACKSON COUNTY SOUTH JACKSON 2.2%JASPER COUNTY WASHINGTON PA 0.0%JASPER COUNTY JASPER CO PRI 1.8%JASPER COUNTY JASPER CO MID 3.2%JEFF DAVIS COUNTY JEFF DAVIS MI 0.0%JEFF DAVIS COUNTY JEFF DAVIS EL 0.0%JEFF DAVIS COUNTY JEFF DAVIS SC 3.8%JEFFERSON CITY JEFFERSON ELE 0.0%JEFFERSON CITY JEFFERSON ACA 1.1%JEFFERSON CITY JEFFERSON MID 1.7%JEFFERSON COUNTY CARVER ELEMEN 0.0%JEFFERSON COUNTY LOUISVILLE MI 4.0%JEFFERSON COUNTY WRENS MIDDLE 10.4%JEFFERSON COUNTY WRENS ELEMENT 11.1%JEFFERSON COUNTY LOUISVILLE AC 12.8%


Page 26 of 37

221

JENKINS COUNTY JENKINS CO MI 3.6%JENKINS COUNTY JENKINS CO EL 7.8%JOHNSON COUNTY JOHNSON CO MI 0.0%JOHNSON COUNTY JOHNSON CO EL 1.4%JONES COUNTY WELLS PRIMARY 0.0%JONES COUNTY MATTIE WELLS 0.0%JONES COUNTY GRAY ELEMENTA 0.0%JONES COUNTY DAMES FERRY E 1.0%JONES COUNTY GRAY STATION 4.0%JONES COUNTY CLIFTON RIDGE 5.1%LAMAR COUNTY LAMAR CO MIDD 0.0%LAMAR COUNTY LAMAR CO ELE 1.2%LAMAR COUNTY LAMAR CO PRIM 3.0%LANIER COUNTY LANIER CO MID 0.0%LANIER COUNTY LANIER CO ELE 0.0%LAURENS COUNTY EAST LAUREN M 0.0%LAURENS COUNTY EAST LAUREN E 0.0%LAURENS COUNTY W LAURENS MID 2.8%LAURENS COUNTY SOUTHWEST LAU 4.3%LAURENS COUNTY EAST LAUREN P 4.5%LAURENS COUNTY NORTHWEST LAU 8.7%LEE COUNTY KINCHAFOONEE 0.0%LEE COUNTY TWIN OAKS ELE 0.0%LEE COUNTY LEE COUNTY EL 0.0%LEE COUNTY LEE COUNTY MI 0.6%LEE COUNTY LEE COUNTY PR 1.4%LIBERTY COUNTY LYMAN HALL EL 0.0%LIBERTY COUNTY MIDWAY MIDDLE 0.0%LIBERTY COUNTY LIBERTY ELEME 1.0%LIBERTY COUNTY SNELSON GOLDE 1.2%LIBERTY COUNTY JOSEPH MARTIN 1.4%LIBERTY COUNTY LEWIS FRASIER 2.3%LIBERTY COUNTY TAYLORS CREEK 2.5%LIBERTY COUNTY WALDO PAFFORD 2.7%LIBERTY COUNTY BUTTON GWINNE 3.7%LIBERTY COUNTY JORDYE BACON 5.1%LIBERTY COUNTY FRANK LONG EL 6.0%LINCOLN COUNTY LINCOLN CO MI 0.0%LINCOLN COUNTY LINCOLN CO EL 1.4%LONG COUNTY WALKER MIDDLE 0.0%LONG COUNTY SMILEY ELEMEN 3.1%LOWNDES COUNTY HAHIRA MIDDLE 0.0%LOWNDES COUNTY CLYATTVILLE E 0.0%LOWNDES COUNTY DEWAR ELEMENT 0.0%LOWNDES COUNTY MOULTON BRANC 0.0%LOWNDES COUNTY WESTSIDE ELEM 0.0%LOWNDES COUNTY LAKE PARK ELE 0.0%LOWNDES COUNTY HAHIRA ELEMEN 1.1%LOWNDES COUNTY PINE GROVE EL 1.1%LOWNDES COUNTY LOWNDES MIDDL 1.5%LUMPKIN COUNTY BLACKBURN ELE 0.0%


Page 27 of 37

222

LUMPKIN COUNTY LONG BRANCH E 1.5%LUMPKIN COUNTY LUMPKIN CO EL 2.2%LUMPKIN COUNTY LUMPKIN CO MI 22.2%MACON COUNTY MACON CO ELEM 2.4%MACON COUNTY MACON CO MIDD 6.7%MADISON COUNTY MADISON CO MI 0.0%MADISON COUNTY COMER ELEMENT 0.0%MADISON COUNTY ILA ELEMENTAR 0.0%MADISON COUNTY HULL SANFORD 0.0%MADISON COUNTY COLBERT ELEME 0.0%MADISON COUNTY DANIELSVILLE 0.0%MARIETTA CITY MARIETTA SCH 0.0%MARIETTA CITY MARIETTA CHAR 0.0%MARIETTA CITY MARIETTA CENT 0.0%MARIETTA CITY HICKORY HILLS 0.0%MARIETTA CITY BURRUSS ELEME 0.0%MARIETTA CITY WEST SIDE ELE 0.0%MARIETTA CITY SAWYER ROAD E 0.0%MARIETTA CITY PARK STREET E 0.0%MARIETTA CITY DUNLEITH ELEM 2.8%MARIETTA CITY LOCKHEED ELEM 3.2%MARIETTA CITY MARIETTA MIDD 6.3%MARION COUNTY MARION MIDDLE 0.0%MARION COUNTY L K MOSS PRIM 5.7%MCDUFFIE COUNTY THOMSONMCDUFF 0.0%MCDUFFIE COUNTY THOMSON MIDDL 0.0%MCDUFFIE COUNTY DEARING ELEME 0.0%MCDUFFIE COUNTY NORRIS ELEMEN 0.0%MCDUFFIE COUNTY THOMSON ELEME 1.0%MCDUFFIE COUNTY MAXWELL ELEME 4.8%MCINTOSH COUNTY OAK GROVE INT 0.0%MCINTOSH COUNTY TODD GRANT EL 3.0%MCINTOSH COUNTY MCINTOSH CO M 5.6%MERIWETHER COUNTY GREENVILLE MI 0.0%MERIWETHER COUNTY GEORGE E WAS 0.0%MERIWETHER COUNTY MANCHESTER MI 0.0%MERIWETHER COUNTY UNITY ELEMENT 1.8%MERIWETHER COUNTY MOUNTAIN VIEW 2.0%MILLER COUNTY MILLER CO MID 0.0%MILLER COUNTY MILLER CO ELE 2.1%MITCHELL COUNTY BACONTON COMM 3.2%MITCHELL COUNTY WALKER INMAN 6.7%MITCHELL COUNTY MITCHELL CO P 7.8%MITCHELL COUNTY MITCHELL CO M 9.3%MONROE COUNTY T G SCOTT ELE 0.0%MONROE COUNTY BANKS STEPHEN 2.7%MONROE COUNTY WILLIAM M HUB 3.1%MONROE COUNTY SAMUEL E HUBB 3.8%MONTGOMERY COUNTY NEW MONTGOMER 2.8%MONTGOMERY COUNTY MONTGOMERY CO 4.2%MORGAN COUNTY MORGAN CO MID 0.0%


Page 28 of 37

223

MORGAN COUNTY MORGAN CO PRI 0.0%MORGAN COUNTY MORGAN CO ELE 5.7%MURRAY COUNTY MOUNTAIN CREE 0.0%MURRAY COUNTY NORTHWEST ELE 0.0%MURRAY COUNTY GLADDEN MIDDL 0.0%MURRAY COUNTY WOODLAWN ELEM 0.0%MURRAY COUNTY COKER ELEMENT 0.9%MURRAY COUNTY ETON ELEMENTA 1.1%MURRAY COUNTY NEW BAGLEY MI 2.7%MURRAY COUNTY CHATSWORTH EL 2.9%MURRAY COUNTY SPRING PLACE 3.2%MUSCOGEE COUNTY DOUBLE MIDDLE 0.0%MUSCOGEE COUNTY VETERANS MEMO 0.0%MUSCOGEE COUNTY RICHARDS MIDD 0.0%MUSCOGEE COUNTY BLACKMON ROAD 0.0%MUSCOGEE COUNTY DOUBLE CHURCH 0.0%MUSCOGEE COUNTY CLUBVIEW ELEM 0.0%MUSCOGEE COUNTY MIDLAND ACADE 0.0%MUSCOGEE COUNTY DIMON ELEMENT 0.0%MUSCOGEE COUNTY MATHEWS ELEME 0.0%MUSCOGEE COUNTY GENTIAN ELEME 0.0%MUSCOGEE COUNTY ALLEN ELEMENT 0.0%MUSCOGEE COUNTY BLANCHARD ELE 0.0%MUSCOGEE COUNTY FORT MIDDLE S 0.0%MUSCOGEE COUNTY NORTH COLUMBU 0.0%MUSCOGEE COUNTY ROTHSCHILD MI 0.8%MUSCOGEE COUNTY FOX ELEMENTAR 1.3%MUSCOGEE COUNTY EAGLE RIDGE A 1.4%MUSCOGEE COUNTY HANNAN ELEMEN 1.6%MUSCOGEE COUNTY SOUTH COLUMBU 1.6%MUSCOGEE COUNTY BRITT DAVID E 1.7%MUSCOGEE COUNTY ARNOLD MIDDLE 2.0%MUSCOGEE COUNTY WYNNTON ELEME 2.1%MUSCOGEE COUNTY KEY ELEMENTAR 2.2%MUSCOGEE COUNTY BENNING HILLS 3.0%MUSCOGEE COUNTY WESLEY HEIGHT 3.3%MUSCOGEE COUNTY DAWSON ELEMEN 3.7%MUSCOGEE COUNTY RIGDON ROAD E 4.2%MUSCOGEE COUNTY JOHNSON ELEME 4.2%MUSCOGEE COUNTY MIDLAND MIDDL 4.3%MUSCOGEE COUNTY RIVER ROAD EL 4.8%MUSCOGEE COUNTY EDDY MIDDLE S 5.3%MUSCOGEE COUNTY REESE ROAD EL 5.6%MUSCOGEE COUNTY LONNIE JACKSO 5.6%MUSCOGEE COUNTY FORREST ROAD 7.4%MUSCOGEE COUNTY ST MARYS VID 7.9%MUSCOGEE COUNTY DOWNTOWN ELEM 8.3%MUSCOGEE COUNTY BAKER MIDDLE 9.8%MUSCOGEE COUNTY EDGEWOOD ELEM 10.5%MUSCOGEE COUNTY MARSHALL MIDD 11.1%MUSCOGEE COUNTY EAST COLUMBUS 12.1%


Page 29 of 37

224

MUSCOGEE COUNTY GEORGETOWN EL 12.3%MUSCOGEE COUNTY CUSSETA ROAD 14.3%MUSCOGEE COUNTY MARTIN LUTHER 19.2%MUSCOGEE COUNTY WADDELL ELEME 19.7%MUSCOGEE COUNTY BREWER ELEMEN 21.7%MUSCOGEE COUNTY DAVIS ELEMENT 29.2%MUSCOGEE COUNTY MUSCOGEE ELEM 51.9%NEWTON COUNTY PROJECT ADVEN 0.0%NEWTON COUNTY CHALLENGE CHA 0.0%NEWTON COUNTY INDIAN CREEK 0.0%NEWTON COUNTY MANSFIELD ELE 0.0%NEWTON COUNTY PORTERDALE EL 0.0%NEWTON COUNTY PALMER STONE 0.0%NEWTON COUNTY OAK HILL ELEM 0.0%NEWTON COUNTY LIVINGSTON EL 0.0%NEWTON COUNTY FAIRVIEW ELEM 0.0%NEWTON COUNTY FICQUETT ELEM 0.0%NEWTON COUNTY COUSINS MIDDL 0.7%NEWTON COUNTY SOUTH SALEM E 0.9%NEWTON COUNTY WEST NEWTON E 1.0%NEWTON COUNTY VETERANS MEMO 1.4%NEWTON COUNTY ROCKY PLAINS 1.8%NEWTON COUNTY MIDDLE RIDGE 2.0%NEWTON COUNTY EAST NEWTON E 2.6%NEWTON COUNTY HEARD MIXON E 2.8%NEWTON COUNTY CLEMENTS MIDD 2.9%OCONEE COUNTY MALCOM BRIDGE 0.0%OCONEE COUNTY OCONEE CO MID 0.0%OCONEE COUNTY OCONEE CO PRI 0.0%OCONEE COUNTY ROCKY BRANCH 0.0%OCONEE COUNTY MALCOM ELEMEN 0.0%OCONEE COUNTY OCONEE CO ELE 0.0%OCONEE COUNTY COLHAM FERRY 3.7%ODYSSEY ODYSSEY SCH 1.4%OGLETHORPE COUNTY OGLETHORPE MI 0.0%OGLETHORPE COUNTY OGLETHORPE CO 0.0%OGLETHORPE COUNTY OGLETHORPE EL 0.0%PAULDING COUNTY NEW GEORGIA E 0.0%PAULDING COUNTY RITCH ELEMENT 0.0%PAULDING COUNTY DALLAS ELEMEN 0.0%PAULDING COUNTY ABNEY ELEMENT 0.0%PAULDING COUNTY MCGARITY ELEM 0.0%PAULDING COUNTY NORTHSIDE ELE 0.0%PAULDING COUNTY HIRAM ELEMENT 0.0%PAULDING COUNTY SAM D PANTER 0.0%PAULDING COUNTY BESSIE L BAG 0.0%PAULDING COUNTY BURNT HICKORY 0.0%PAULDING COUNTY SAMMY MCCLURE 0.0%PAULDING COUNTY C A ROBERTS 0.0%PAULDING COUNTY LILLIAN C POO 0.0%PAULDING COUNTY ROLAND W RUS 0.0%


Page 30 of 37

225

PAULDING COUNTY IRMA C AUSTIN 0.0%PAULDING COUNTY NEBO ELEMENTA 0.0%PAULDING COUNTY J A DOBBINS M 0.0%PAULDING COUNTY CONNIE DUGAN 0.0%PAULDING COUNTY EAST PAUL MID 0.0%PAULDING COUNTY LENA MAE MOSE 0.0%PAULDING COUNTY HERSCHEL JONE 0.0%PAULDING COUNTY S PAULDIN MID 0.7%PAULDING COUNTY ALLGOOD ELEM 0.9%PAULDING COUNTY FLOYD L SHEL 1.5%PAULDING COUNTY UNION ELEMENT 3.8%PEACH COUNTY BYRON MIDDLE 0.0%PEACH COUNTY HUNT ELEMENTA 0.0%PEACH COUNTY BYRON ELEMENT 0.0%PEACH COUNTY FORT VALLEY M 1.6%PEACH COUNTY HUNT PRIMARY 5.8%PELHAM CITY PELHAM CITY M 1.1%PELHAM CITY PELHAM ELEMEN 1.1%PICKENS COUNTY PICKENS CO MI 0.0%PICKENS COUNTY JASPER MIDDLE 0.0%PICKENS COUNTY TATE ELEMENTA 0.0%PICKENS COUNTY HILL CITY ELE 0.0%PICKENS COUNTY HARMONY ELEME 2.0%PICKENS COUNTY JASPER ELEMEN 2.7%PIERCE COUNTY PATTERSON ELE 0.0%PIERCE COUNTY PIERCE CO MID 0.0%PIERCE COUNTY BLACKSHEAR EL 8.9%PIKE COUNTY PIKE COUNTY P 0.0%PIKE COUNTY PIKE COUNTY E 0.9%PIKE COUNTY PIKE COUNTY M 0.9%PIONEER RESA PIONEER RESA 0.0%POLK COUNTY CEDARTOWN MID 0.0%POLK COUNTY ROCKMART MIDD 0.0%POLK COUNTY HARPST ACADEM 0.0%POLK COUNTY GOODYEAR ELEM 1.3%POLK COUNTY EASTSIDE ELEM 1.7%POLK COUNTY WESTSIDE ELEM 3.7%POLK COUNTY CHEROKEE ELEM 3.7%POLK COUNTY NORTHSIDE ELE 4.9%PULASKI COUNTY PULASKI CO MI 0.0%PULASKI COUNTY PULASKI CO EL 0.9%PUTNAM COUNTY PUTNAM CO MID 0.0%PUTNAM COUNTY PUTNAM CO ELE 2.5%QUITMAN COUNTY NEW QUITMAN C 42.4%RABUN COUNTY RABUN CO MIDD 0.0%RABUN COUNTY RABUN GAP COM 0.0%RABUN COUNTY SOUTH RABUN E 0.0%RABUN COUNTY RABUN CO ELEM 0.0%RANDOLPH COUNTY RANDOLPH MIDD 6.3%RANDOLPH COUNTY RANDOLPH CO E 6.9%RICHMOND COUNTY AUGUSTA A AN 0.0%


Page 31 of 37

226

RICHMOND COUNTY LIGHTHOUSE CA 0.0%RICHMOND COUNTY GARRETT ELEME 0.0%RICHMOND COUNTY DAVIDSON MAGN 0.0%RICHMOND COUNTY HAINS ELEMENT 0.0%RICHMOND COUNTY TUTT MIDDLE S 0.0%RICHMOND COUNTY WALKER TRADIT 0.0%RICHMOND COUNTY MORGAN ROAD M 0.0%RICHMOND COUNTY MURPHEY MIDDL 0.0%RICHMOND COUNTY SEGO MIDDLE S 0.0%RICHMOND COUNTY LANGFORD MIDD 0.9%RICHMOND COUNTY GLENN HILLS E 0.9%RICHMOND COUNTY GOSHEN ELEMEN 1.6%RICHMOND COUNTY HEPHZIBAH ELE 1.7%RICHMOND COUNTY SOUTHSIDE ELE 1.8%RICHMOND COUNTY TERRACE MANOR 2.1%RICHMOND COUNTY DEER CHASE EL 2.2%RICHMOND COUNTY HEPHZIBAH MID 2.4%RICHMOND COUNTY LAKE FOREST H 2.9%RICHMOND COUNTY WINDSOR SPRIN 3.0%RICHMOND COUNTY SPIRIT CREEK 3.2%RICHMOND COUNTY TUBMAN MIDDLE 3.3%RICHMOND COUNTY MEADOWBROOK E 3.4%RICHMOND COUNTY MERRY ELEMENT 3.9%RICHMOND COUNTY MCBEAN ELEMEN 4.3%RICHMOND COUNTY GRACEWOOD ELE 4.8%RICHMOND COUNTY WILLIS FOREMA 5.0%RICHMOND COUNTY SUE REYNOLDS 5.9%RICHMOND COUNTY MONTE SANO EL 6.7%RICHMOND COUNTY WILKINSON GAR 6.7%RICHMOND COUNTY TOBACCO ROAD 6.7%RICHMOND COUNTY GLENN HILLS M 6.8%RICHMOND COUNTY ROLLINS ELEME 7.0%RICHMOND COUNTY NATIONAL HILL 7.1%RICHMOND COUNTY EAST AUGUSTA 7.2%RICHMOND COUNTY BARTON CHAPEL 7.4%RICHMOND COUNTY FREEDOM PARK 9.0%RICHMOND COUNTY BLYTHE ELEMEN 9.8%RICHMOND COUNTY WHEELESS ROAD 11.1%RICHMOND COUNTY JAMESTOWN ELE 11.7%RICHMOND COUNTY DIAMOND LAKES 12.5%RICHMOND COUNTY WARREN ROAD E 12.5%RICHMOND COUNTY COLLINS ELEME 13.0%RICHMOND COUNTY BAYVALE ELEME 14.9%RICHMOND COUNTY CRAIG HOUGHTO 17.4%RICHMOND COUNTY COPELAND ELEM 17.5%RICHMOND COUNTY MILLEDGE ELEM 19.6%RICHMOND COUNTY LAMAR ELEMENT 26.2%RICHMOND COUNTY HORNSBY ELEME 45.1%ROCKDALE COUNTY HONEY CREEK E 0.0%ROCKDALE COUNTY HOUSE ELEMENT 0.0%ROCKDALE COUNTY EDWARDS MIDDL 0.0%


Page 32 of 37

227

ROCKDALE COUNTY GENERAL RAY D 1.0%ROCKDALE COUNTY SHOAL CREEK E 1.1%ROCKDALE COUNTY PEEK S CHAPEL 1.2%ROCKDALE COUNTY PINE STREET E 1.5%ROCKDALE COUNTY MEMORIAL MIDD 2.5%ROCKDALE COUNTY FLAT SHOALS E 2.7%ROCKDALE COUNTY CONYERS MIDDL 3.1%ROCKDALE COUNTY LORRAINE ELEM 3.4%ROCKDALE COUNTY SIMS ELEMENTA 4.3%ROCKDALE COUNTY HIGHTOWER TRA 4.4%ROCKDALE COUNTY BARKSDALE ELE 5.8%ROCKDALE COUNTY HICKS ELEMENT 10.3%ROME CITY ANNA K DAVIE 0.0%ROME CITY ROME MIDDLE S 2.2%ROME CITY WEST END ELEM 2.8%ROME CITY ELM STREET EL 3.7%ROME CITY MAIN ELEMENTA 7.7%ROME CITY EAST CENTRAL 8.7%ROME CITY WEST CENTRAL 11.5%ROME CITY NORTH HEIGHTS 12.8%ROME CITY SOUTHEAST ELE 19.6%SCHLEY COUNTY SCHLEY COUNTY 0.0%SCHLEY COUNTY SCHLEY MIDDLE 2.6%SCHOLARS ACADEMY SCHOLARS ACAD 20.0%SCREVEN COUNTY SCREVEN CO MI 0.0%SCREVEN COUNTY SCREVEN CO EL 7.9%SEMINOLE COUNTY SEMINOLE CO M 2.6%SEMINOLE COUNTY SEMINOLE CO E 6.1%SOCIAL CIRCLE CITY SOCIAL PRIMAR 0.0%SOCIAL CIRCLE CITY SOCIAL ELEMEN 0.0%SOCIAL CIRCLE CITY SOCIAL CIRCLE 0.0%SPALDING COUNTY JACKSON ROAD 0.0%SPALDING COUNTY COWAN ROAD MI 0.0%SPALDING COUNTY CARVER ROAD M 0.9%SPALDING COUNTY FUTRAL ROAD E 1.3%SPALDING COUNTY JORDAN HILL R 1.5%SPALDING COUNTY BEAVERBROOK E 1.6%SPALDING COUNTY ORRS ELEMENTA 2.5%SPALDING COUNTY KENNEDY ROAD 2.7%SPALDING COUNTY TAYLOR STREET 3.1%SPALDING COUNTY COWAN ROAD EL 3.4%SPALDING COUNTY CRESCENT ROAD 3.5%SPALDING COUNTY ANNE STREET E 6.1%SPALDING COUNTY MORELAND ROAD 7.2%SPALDING COUNTY ATKINSON ELEM 28.6%SPALDING COUNTY MOORE ELEMENT 31.7%STEPHENS COUNTY STEPHENS CO M 0.0%STEPHENS COUNTY EASTANOLLEE E 0.0%STEPHENS COUNTY BIG A ELEMENT 0.0%STEPHENS COUNTY LIBERTY ELEME 0.0%STEPHENS COUNTY TOCCOA ELEMEN 1.3%


Page 33 of 37

228

STEWART COUNTY STEWART CO MI 0.0%STEWART COUNTY STEWART CO EL 14.3%SUMTER COUNTY SARAH COBB EL 0.0%SUMTER COUNTY STALEY MIDDLE 0.0%SUMTER COUNTY SUMTER CO PRI 0.0%SUMTER COUNTY SUMTER CO ELE 0.0%SUMTER COUNTY CHEROKEE ELEM 2.1%SUMTER COUNTY SUMTER CO MID 3.1%TALBOT COUNTY CENTRAL ELEME 15.0%TALIAFERRO COUNTY TALIAFERRO CO 11.1%TATTNALL COUNTY GLENNVILLE MI 0.0%TATTNALL COUNTY COLLINS MIDDL 0.0%TATTNALL COUNTY COLLINS ELEME 0.0%TATTNALL COUNTY GLENNVILLE EL 0.0%TATTNALL COUNTY REIDSVILLE EL 2.7%TATTNALL COUNTY REIDSVILLE MI 3.7%TAYLOR COUNTY GEORGIA CENTE 0.0%TAYLOR COUNTY TAYLOR CO PRI 0.0%TAYLOR COUNTY TAYLOR CO MID 0.0%TAYLOR COUNTY TAYLOR CO UPP 0.0%TELFAIR COUNTY TELFAIR CO MI 0.0%TELFAIR COUNTY TELFAIR CO EL 6.3%TERRELL COUNTY COOPER PRIMAR 0.0%TERRELL COUNTY TERRELL MIDDL 2.2%TERRELL COUNTY CARVER ELEMEN 5.3%THOMAS COUNTY CROSS CREEK E 0.0%THOMAS COUNTY THOMAS CO MID 0.7%THOMAS COUNTY GARRISON PILC 1.4%THOMASTONUPSON COUNT UPSON LEE NOR 0.0%THOMASTONUPSON COUNT UPSON LEE MID 0.0%THOMASTONUPSON COUNT UPSON LEE SOU 0.6%THOMASVILLE CITY MACINTYRE PAR 0.0%THOMASVILLE CITY JERGER ELEMEN 0.0%THOMASVILLE CITY SCOTT ELEMENT 3.8%THOMASVILLE CITY HARPER ELEMEN 12.0%TIFT COUNTY NORTHSIDE PRI 0.0%TIFT COUNTY OMEGA ELEMENT 0.0%TIFT COUNTY G O BAILEY PR 0.0%TIFT COUNTY LEN LASTINGER 0.0%TIFT COUNTY CHARLES SPENC 0.0%TIFT COUNTY EIGHTH STREET 1.3%TIFT COUNTY MATT WILSON E 1.3%TIFT COUNTY ANNIE BELLE C 1.8%TIFT COUNTY J T REDDICK E 6.2%TOOMBS COUNTY TOOMBS CENTRA 0.0%TOOMBS COUNTY TOOMBS CO MID 0.0%TOOMBS COUNTY LYONS UPPER E 4.2%TOOMBS COUNTY LYONS PRIMARY 4.8%TOWNS COUNTY TOWNS CO MIDD 0.0%TOWNS COUNTY TOWNS CO ELEM 0.0%TREUTLEN COUNTY TREUTLEN MIDD 0.0%


Page 34 of 37

229

TREUTLEN COUNTY TREUTLEN ELEM 0.0%TRION CITY TRION MIDDLE 0.0%TRION CITY TRION ELEMENT 0.0%TROUP COUNTY BRADFIELD CEN 0.0%TROUP COUNTY MOUNTVILLE EL 0.0%TROUP COUNTY WEST POINT EL 0.0%TROUP COUNTY HOLLIS HAND E 0.0%TROUP COUNTY HILLCREST ELE 0.0%TROUP COUNTY LONG CANE ELE 0.0%TROUP COUNTY ROSEMONT ELEM 0.0%TROUP COUNTY CALLAWAY ES 0.0%TROUP COUNTY WEST SIDE MAG 0.0%TROUP COUNTY CALLAWAY MIDD 0.0%TROUP COUNTY GARDNER NEWMA 0.8%TROUP COUNTY LONG CANE MID 1.5%TROUP COUNTY WHITESVILLE R 1.7%TROUP COUNTY FRANKLIN FORE 1.8%TROUP COUNTY HOGANSVILLE E 2.1%TROUP COUNTY UNITY ELEMENT 2.1%TROUP COUNTY BERTA WEATHER 2.1%TROUP COUNTY CANNON STREET 3.7%TROUP COUNTY ETHEL KIGHT M 5.3%TURNER COUNTY TURNER CO MID 0.0%TURNER COUNTY TURNER CO SPE 0.0%TURNER COUNTY TURNER CO ELE 4.5%TWIGGS COUNTY TWIGGS MIDDLE 3.9%TWIGGS COUNTY JEFFERSONVILL 8.9%UNION COUNTY WOODY GAP HIG 0.0%UNION COUNTY UNION CO MIDD 0.0%UNION COUNTY UNION CO ELEM 0.0%UNION COUNTY UNION CO PRIM 1.6%VALDOSTA CITY VALDOSTA EARL 0.0%VALDOSTA CITY VALDOSTA MIDD 0.0%VALDOSTA CITY SALLAS MAHONE 0.0%VALDOSTA CITY S L MASON ELE 3.5%VALDOSTA CITY SOUTHEAST ELE 4.2%VALDOSTA CITY J L LOMAX ELE 5.6%VALDOSTA CITY NUNN ELEMENTA 10.3%VALDOSTA CITY NEWBERN MIDDL 15.4%VIDALIA CITY J R TRIPPE MI 0.0%VIDALIA CITY SALLY DAILEY 0.0%VIDALIA CITY J D DICKERS P 16.7%WALKER COUNTY FAIRYLAND ELE 0.0%WALKER COUNTY ROSSVILLE MID 0.0%WALKER COUNTY CHATTANOOGA V 0.0%WALKER COUNTY GILBERT ELEME 0.0%WALKER COUNTY CHATTANOOGA E 0.0%WALKER COUNTY LAFAYETTE MID 0.0%WALKER COUNTY NORTH LAFAYET 1.4%WALKER COUNTY NAOMI ELEMENT 1.7%WALKER COUNTY STONE CREEK E 1.8%


Page 35 of 37

230

WALKER COUNTY ROCK SPRING E 3.9%WALKER COUNTY ROSSVILLE ELE 5.3%WALKER COUNTY CHEROKEE RIDG 7.6%WALTON COUNTY LOGANVILLE MI 0.0%WALTON COUNTY CARVER MIDDLE 0.0%WALTON COUNTY YOUTH MIDDLE 0.0%WALTON COUNTY SHARON ELEMEN 0.0%WALTON COUNTY YOUTH ELEMENT 0.0%WALTON COUNTY ATHA ROAD ELE 1.1%WALTON COUNTY WALKER PARK E 1.8%WALTON COUNTY MONROE ELEMEN 2.0%WALTON COUNTY BAY CREEK ELE 2.3%WALTON COUNTY WALNUT GROVE 3.3%WALTON COUNTY LOGANVILLE EL 4.2%WALTON COUNTY BLAINE ST ELE 11.1%WARE COUNTY WILLIAMS HEIG 0.0%WARE COUNTY CENTER ELEMEN 0.0%WARE COUNTY WARESBORO ELE 0.0%WARE COUNTY WARE COUNTY M 0.0%WARE COUNTY WAYCROSS MIDD 0.0%WARE COUNTY RUSKIN ELEMEN 1.5%WARE COUNTY WACONA ELEMEN 2.2%WARE COUNTY WARE MAGNET S 2.8%WARE COUNTY MEMORIAL DRIV 3.9%WARREN COUNTY FREEMAN ELEME 2.0%WARREN COUNTY WARREN CO MID 6.5%WASHINGTON COUNTY T J ELDER M 0.0%WASHINGTON COUNTY SANDERSVILLE 0.0%WASHINGTON COUNTY CRAWFORD PRIM 4.8%WASHINGTON COUNTY ELDER PRIMARY 7.4%WAYNE COUNTY THOMAS P JAM 0.0%WAYNE COUNTY SCREVEN ELEME 0.0%WAYNE COUNTY ODUM ELEMENTA 0.0%WAYNE COUNTY BACON ELEMENT 0.0%WAYNE COUNTY ARTHUR WILLIA 0.0%WAYNE COUNTY MARTHA PUCKET 0.0%WAYNE COUNTY MARTHA RAWLS 0.0%WAYNE COUNTY JESUP ELEMENT 1.9%WEBSTER COUNTY WEBSTER COUNT 0.0%WHEELER COUNTY WHEELER CO HI 0.0%WHEELER COUNTY WHEELER CO EL 7.0%WHITE COUNTY JACK P NIX PR 0.0%WHITE COUNTY MOUNT YONAH E 0.0%WHITE COUNTY MOSSY CREEK E 0.0%WHITE COUNTY WHITE CO INT 0.0%WHITE COUNTY WHITE CO MIDD 0.0%WHITFIELD COUNTY EASTBROOK MID 0.0%WHITFIELD COUNTY NEW HOPE MIDD 0.0%WHITFIELD COUNTY COHUTTA ELEME 0.0%WHITFIELD COUNTY VARNELL ELEME 0.0%WHITFIELD COUNTY NEW HOPE ELEM 0.0%


Page 36 of 37

231

WHITFIELD COUNTY WESTSIDE MIDD 0.0%WHITFIELD COUNTY VALLEY PT MID 0.8%WHITFIELD COUNTY BEAVERDALE EL 1.0%WHITFIELD COUNTY WESTSIDE ELEM 1.1%WHITFIELD COUNTY NORTH WHITFIE 2.0%WHITFIELD COUNTY PLEASANT GROV 2.2%WHITFIELD COUNTY DAWNVILLE ELE 2.3%WHITFIELD COUNTY ANTIOCH ELEME 2.9%WHITFIELD COUNTY VALLEY POINT 3.2%WHITFIELD COUNTY DUG GAP ELEME 3.5%WHITFIELD COUNTY TUNNEL HILL E 4.8%WHITFIELD COUNTY EASTSIDE ELEM 11.1%WILCOX COUNTY WILCOX CO MID 0.0%WILCOX COUNTY WILCOX CO ELE 9.0%WILKES COUNTY WASHINGTON EL 0.0%WILKES COUNTY WASHINGTON MI 3.6%WILKES COUNTY WASHINGTON WI 4.5%WILKINSON COUNTY WILKINSON COU 0.0%WILKINSON COUNTY WILKINSON ELE 0.0%WILKINSON COUNTY WILKINSON PRI 1.9%WORTH COUNTY WORTH CO PRIM 0.0%WORTH COUNTY WORTH CO MIDD 0.0%WORTH COUNTY SYLVESTER ELE 0.8%


Page 37 of 37

232

Syst

emN

ame

Scho

olN

ame

Gra

deC

onte

ntTe

ache

rNam

eN

_stu

dent

s#_

WTR

Mea

n_cl

assr

ooSt

d_cl

assr

oM

in_M

ax_

P10_

P25_

P50_

P75_

P90_

P95_

Mea

n_st

ate

Std_

stat

ecr

it_3S

Dfla

g_3S

DFl

ag_Z

STA

TE A

VER

AG

EST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

1R

DST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

128,

257

138,

593

1.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

80

230

01

23

41.

0805

8819

41.

4903

398

N/A

N/A

N/A

STA

TE A

VER

AG

EST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

1LA

STA

TE A

VER

AG

E12

8,22

620

5,55

11.

6030

3682

61.

9473

378

030

00

12

45

1.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

8N

/AN

/AN

/AST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

STA

TE A

VER

AG

E1

MA

STA

TE A

VER

AG

E12

8,43

422

4,50

71.

7480

3401

2.04

8946

60

300

01

34

61.

7480

3401

2.04

8946

6N

/AN

/AN

/AST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

STA

TE A

VER

AG

E2

RD

STA

TE A

VER

AG

E12

9,36

511

8,28

80.

9143

7405

81.

3817

850

280

00

12

30.

9143

7405

81.

3817

85N

/AN

/AN

/AST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

STA

TE A

VER

AG

E2

LAST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

129,

328

170,

610

1.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

10

430

01

23

41.

3192

0388

51.

7325

901

N/A

N/A

N/A

STA

TE A

VER

AG

EST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

2M

AST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

129,

540

223,

945

1.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

044

00

12

45

1.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

N/A

N/A

N/A

STA

TE A

VER

AG

EST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

3R

DST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

128,

837

151,

060

1.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

10

350

01

23

41.

1724

8926

91.

8664

211

N/A

N/A

N/A

STA

TE A

VER

AG

EST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

3LA

STA

TE A

VER

AG

E12

8,76

719

4,15

01.

5077

6208

22.

0531

70

370

01

24

51.

5077

6208

22.

0531

7N

/AN

/AN

/AST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

STA

TE A

VER

AG

E3

MA

STA

TE A

VER

AG

E12

9,04

624

1,82

21.

8739

2092

72.

4330

609

041

00

13

56

1.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

9N

/AN

/AN

/AST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

STA

TE A

VER

AG

E4

RD

STA

TE A

VER

AG

E12

5,26

712

4,59

00.

9945

9554

41.

6385

729

036

00

01

34

0.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

9N

/AN

/AN

/AST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

STA

TE A

VER

AG

E4

LAST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

125,

239

175,

974

1.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

60

410

01

24

51.

4051

0543

82.

0332

046

N/A

N/A

N/A

STA

TE A

VER

AG

EST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

4M

AST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

125,

470

235,

186

1.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

70

470

01

35

61.

8744

4010

52.

4446

497

N/A

N/A

N/A

STA

TE A

VER

AG

EST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

5R

DST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

124,

798

141,

789

1.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

80

370

01

23

41.

1361

4801

51.

8284

998

N/A

N/A

N/A

STA

TE A

VER

AG

EST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

5LA

STA

TE A

VER

AG

E12

4,74

417

8,96

71.

4346

7421

32.

0406

349

034

00

12

45

1.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

9N

/AN

/AN

/AST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

STA

TE A

VER

AG

E5

MA

STA

TE A

VER

AG

E12

5,01

922

8,14

61.

8248

9061

72.

5360

989

045

00

12

46

1.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

9N

/AN

/AN

/A

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

1RD

EVANS

2058

2.9

2.35

9750

20

90

1.5

24

6.5

81.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.08

0339

F5.

4595

98DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

1LA

EVANS

2086

4.3

2.84

8822

50

100.5

2.5

47

7.5

91.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.90

9351

F6.

1936

79DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

1MA

EVANS

2012

36.15

4.34

4082

50

161

35

9.5

1215

1.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.12

2509

F9.

6079

57DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

1RD

HAMON V

10

00

00

00

00

01.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

85.55

1608

-0.7

2506

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

1LA

HAMON V

10

00

00

00

00

01.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

87.44

505

-0.8

2319

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

1MA

HAMON V

10

00

00

00

00

01.74

8034

012.04

8946

67.89

4874

-0.8

5313

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

1RD

NELSO

N16

291.81

252.

0726

392

06

00

13

56

1.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.19

8343

1.96

4416

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

1LA

NELSO

N16

392.43

752.

6323

310

100

0.5

23.5

610

1.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

83.06

354

1.71

4059

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

1MA

NELSO

N16

432.68

752.

4418

231

08

01

25

68

1.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.28

4744

1.83

4047

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

1RD

WYA

TT20

412.05

1.98

6136

20

70

0.5

23

56.5

1.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.08

0339

2.90

8962

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

1LA

WYA

TT20

572.85

2.45

5391

50

90

12.5

46

7.5

1.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.90

9351

2.86

3699

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

1MA

WYA

TT20

703.5

1.90

5670

20

81

23.5

55.5

71.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.12

2509

F3.

8239

31DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

2RD

ANDER

SON

2180

3.80

9523

813.

2499

084

114

12

35

89

0.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.81

8965

F9.

6015

25DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

2LA

ANDER

SON

2115

07.14

2857

143

4.10

2264

21

192

57

910

131.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.45

345

F15

.403

14DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

2MA

ANDER

SON

2125

812

.285

7142

95.

6933

545

323

58

1314

2023

1.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.06

8985

F23

.631

17DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

2RD

FAULKNER

2083

4.15

3.49

8495

91

141

23

59.5

130.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.84

1304

F10

.472

08DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

2LA

FAULKNER

2083

4.15

3.06

5512

80

111

23.5

69

111.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.48

1461

F7.

3068

09DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

2MA

FAULKNER

2011

75.85

3.51

3507

81

152.5

3.5

4.5

7.5

1113

1.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.10

2082

F9.

0028

32DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

2RD

WILKERSON

2064

3.2

3.45

8018

90

120

12

3.5

912

0.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.84

1304

F7.

3974

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

2LA

WILKERSON

2062

3.1

2.63

3788

50

110

1.5

34

68.5

1.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.48

1461

F4.

5965

65DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

2MA

WILKERSON

2010

25.1

4.08

9781

90

151

24.5

7.5

1113

1.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.10

2082

F7.

3644

56DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

2RD

WILSO

N20

381.9

1.80

3505

40

70

11.5

2.5

4.5

60.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.84

1304

F3.

1899

7DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

2LA

WILSO

N20

331.65

1.87

1531

90

80

0.5

12

3.5

61.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.48

1461

0.85

3846

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

2MA

WILSO

N20

532.65

2.32

3223

70

80

0.5

2.5

46

71.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.10

2082

2.01

2426

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

3RD

DAVIS

1911

0.57

8947

368

0.90

1590

50

30

00

12

31.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.45

7048

-1.3

8617

7DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

3LA

DAVIS

1926

1.36

8421

053

1.49

8537

30

40

01

34

41.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.92

0851

-0.2

9582

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

3MA

DAVIS

1926

1.36

8421

053

2.08

7277

09

00

12

39

1.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.54

8468

-0.9

0561

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

3RD

HAYN

ES19

794.15

7894

737

3.18

4391

81

131

23

511

131.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.45

7048

F6.

9722

11DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

3LA

HAYN

ES19

975.10

5263

158

3.16

0427

80

111

35

79

111.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.92

0851

F7.

6375

28DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

3MA

HAYN

ES19

102

5.36

8421

053

2.90

9954

71

121

45

711

121.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.54

8468

F6.

2604

98DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

3RD

OLIVE

R19

482.52

6315

789

3.07

9834

40

110

12

310

111.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.45

7048

F3.

1617

69DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

3LA

OLIVE

R19

442.31

5789

474

2.47

3248

70

80

01

47

81.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.92

0851

1.71

545

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

3MA

OLIVE

R19

583.05

2631

579

3.15

3017

70

141

12

37

141.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.54

8468

2.11

1694

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

3RD

TOLBER

T21

361.71

4285

714

2.23

9260

10

80

01

34

61.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.39

4349

1.33

0259

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

3LA

TOLBER

T21

532.52

3809

524

2.24

9867

70

70

12

46

71.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.85

1877

2.26

7769

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

3MA

TOLBER

T21

482.28

5714

286

1.41

9255

30

51

12

34

51.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.46

6733

0.77

5597

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

4RD

BASLEY

2530

1.2

1.77

9513

08

00

12

34

0.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.97

7739

0.62

6779

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

4LA

BASLEY

2545

1.8

1.75

5942

30

70

11

25

51.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

6250

280.

9711

14DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

4MA

BASLEY

2547

1.88

2.48

8640

90

110

11

26

61.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.34

123

0.01

1372

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

4RD

BELL K

10

00

00

00

00

00.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

95.91

0314

-0.6

0698

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

4LA

BELL K

10

00

00

00

00

01.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

67.

5047

19-0

.691

079

233

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

4MA

BELL K

10

00

00

00

00

01.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

79.20

8389

-0.7

6675

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

4RD

DAVIS

11

11

11

11

11

10.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

95.91

0314

0.00

3298

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

4LA

DAVIS

10

00

00

00

00

01.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

67.

5047

19-0

.691

079

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

4MA

DAVIS

10

00

00

00

00

01.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

79.20

8389

-0.7

6675

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

4RD

FLORE

NCE

2427

1.12

51.

6500

988

05

00

02

44

0.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.99

8012

0.38

9881

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

4LA

FLORE

NCE

2436

1.5

2.08

5144

10

80

01

24

61.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

6501

840.

2286

47DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

4MA

FLORE

NCE

2440

1.66

6666

667

2.18

0280

50

90

01

2.5

46

1.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.37

1476

-0.4

1637

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

4RD

RYNDER

S24

321.33

3333

333

1.00

7220

30

30

0.5

12

33

0.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.99

8012

1.01

2753

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

4LA

RYNDER

S24

331.37

51.

7398

776

07

00

11.5

35

1.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

6501

84-0

.072

539

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

4MA

RYNDER

S24

482

1.76

9303

50

50

11.5

3.5

55

1.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.37

1476

0.25

1617

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

5RD

CAMBR

ON

2083

4.15

2.64

1271

60

91

2.5

45.5

8.5

91.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.36

2743

F7.

3712

65DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

5LA

CAMBR

ON

2048

2.4

2.01

0498

80

60

0.5

23.5

5.5

61.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.80

3574

2.11

5551

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

5MA

CAMBR

ON

2070

3.5

3.45

6496

60

171

23

3.5

5.5

121.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.52

6158

2.95

3874

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

5RD

HARV

EY20

281.4

1.35

3358

40

50

0.5

12

3.5

4.5

1.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.36

2743

0.64

5328

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

5LA

HARV

EY20

271.35

1.56

5247

60

50

01

24

4.5

1.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.80

3574

-0.1

8556

7DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

5MA

HARV

EY20

271.35

1.95

4078

10

80

01

23.5

61.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.52

6158

-0.8

3741

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

5RD

MITCH

ELL

2020

11.

1239

030

40

01

12.5

41.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.36

2743

-0.3

3299

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

5LA

MITCH

ELL

2036

1.8

3.77

8053

017

00

12

3.5

111.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.80

3574

0.80

0627

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALICE

COACH

MA

5MA

MITCH

ELL

2011

0.55

0.82

5577

90

30

00

11.5

2.5

1.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.52

6158

-2.2

4813

2

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

1RD

CORD

OBA

D17

271.58

8235

294

1.90

5873

30

70

01

25

71.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.16

497

1.40

4433

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

1LA

CORD

OBA

D17

251.47

0588

235

1.23

0733

90

40

11

24

41.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

83.01

9933

-0.2

8043

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

1MA

CORD

OBA

D17

412.41

1764

706

2.31

9989

90

80

12

37

81.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.23

8862

1.33

5629

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

1RD

DELL C

1914

0.73

6842

105

0.93

3458

60

30

00

12

31.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.10

631

-1.0

0537

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

1LA

DELL C

1913

0.68

4210

526

0.67

1038

30

20

01

12

21.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.94

3287

-2.0

5669

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

1MA

DELL C

1941

2.15

7894

737

2.03

4785

20

90

12

34

91.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.15

8216

0.87

1932

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

1RD

GITHEN

S J

1913

0.68

4210

526

1.15

723

04

00

01

34

1.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.10

631

-1.1

5931

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

1LA

GITHEN

S J

1932

1.68

4210

526

2.00

1461

50

60

01

35

61.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.94

3287

0.18

1698

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

1MA

GITHEN

S J

1936

1.89

4736

842

1.59

4948

20

60

12

35

61.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.15

8216

0.31

2093

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

1RD

WALKER

K19

160.84

2105

263

0.68

8247

20

20

01

12

21.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.10

631

-0.6

9750

7DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

1LA

WALKER

K19

331.73

6842

105

2.28

1376

40

80

01

37

81.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.94

3287

0.29

9508

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

1MA

WALKER

K19

291.52

6315

789

1.50

4379

60

50

02

24

51.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.15

8216

-0.4

7168

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

1RD

WASH

INGTO

N L

2013

0.65

1.08

9422

80

40

00

12

31.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.08

0339

-1.2

9208

7DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

1LA

WASH

INGTO

N L

2037

1.85

1.38

6969

40

40

0.5

23

3.5

41.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.90

9351

0.56

716

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

1MA

WASH

INGTO

N L

2038

1.9

1.11

9210

20

41

12

33.5

41.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.12

2509

0.33

1689

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

2RD

DAVIS A

199

0.47

3684

211

0.90

4827

90

30

00

12

30.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.86

5384

-1.3

9017

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

2LA

DAVIS A

1916

0.84

2105

263

1.11

8687

60

40

00

22

41.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.51

1654

-1.2

0029

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

2MA

DAVIS A

1922

1.15

7894

737

1.06

7872

10

30

01

23

31.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.13

7758

-1.2

1550

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

2RD

GILMER

R15

130.86

6666

667

0.99

0430

40

30

01

22

30.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.98

47-0

.133

718

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

2LA

GILMER

R15

120.8

1.14

6423

04

00

01

24

1.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.66

1262

-1.1

6061

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

2MA

GILMER

R15

332.2

1.74

0279

10

61

11

35

61.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.31

4534

0.89

1487

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

2RD

JACK

SON L

1813

0.72

2222

222

0.95

828

03

00

01

23

0.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.89

1444

-0.5

8998

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

2LA

JACK

SON L

1820

1.11

1111

111

1.93

6913

50

70

00

15

71.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.54

433

-0.5

0956

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

2MA

JACK

SON L

1829

1.61

1111

111

1.68

5191

20

60

01

24

61.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.17

6368

-0.2

4383

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

2RD

MCC

OMAS J

1713

0.76

4705

882

0.90

3424

90

30

01

12

30.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.91

977

-0.4

4659

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

2LA

MCC

OMAS J

1714

0.82

3529

412

0.88

2843

03

00

11

23

1.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.57

9848

-1.1

7957

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

2MA

MCC

OMAS J

1720

1.17

6470

588

1.13

1110

90

40

01

23

41.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.21

8336

-1.1

1233

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

2RD

TUCK

ER B

1611

0.68

750.

7041

543

02

00

11

22

0.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.95

0713

-0.6

5675

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

2LA

TUCK

ER B

1615

0.93

751.

0626

225

04

00

11

24

1.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.61

8646

-0.8

8123

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

2MA

TUCK

ER B

1617

1.06

251.

4818

344

05

00

11

45

1.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.26

4179

-1.3

0181

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

3RD

ANTC

ZAK D

1828

1.55

5555

556

1.82

2158

50

70

01

24

71.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.49

2248

0.87

0764

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

3LA

ANTC

ZAK D

1831

1.72

2222

222

2.29

5918

50

80

01

36

81.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.95

9573

0.44

3157

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

3MA

ANTC

ZAK D

1831

1.72

2222

222

2.53

9234

60

110

01

23

111.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.59

4355

-0.2

6452

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

3RD

CRITTENDEN

L19

130.68

4210

526

1.10

8183

30

30

00

23

31.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.45

7048

-1.1

4034

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

3LA

CRITTENDEN

L19

301.57

8947

368

1.67

7159

90

60

01

34

61.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.92

0851

0.15

1127

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

3MA

CRITTENDEN

L19

402.10

5263

158

2.53

6286

40

80

02

27

81.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.54

8468

0.41

4456

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

3RD

HER

NANDEZ S

1715

0.88

2352

941

1.57

6481

60

40

00

14

41.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.53

051

-0.6

4093

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

3LA

HER

NANDEZ S

1718

1.05

8823

529

1.08

8036

50

40

01

22

41.50

7762

082

2.05

317

3.00

1663

-0.9

0154

3

234

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

3MA

HER

NANDEZ S

1725

1.47

0588

235

1.62

4717

20

50

01

25

51.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.64

4233

-0.6

8349

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

3RD

WILLIAMS E

1719

1.11

7647

059

0.99

2619

80

30

01

23

31.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.53

051

-0.1

2115

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

3LA

WILLIAMS E

1722

1.29

4117

647

1.40

3776

40

40

01

24

41.50

7762

082

2.05

317

3.00

1663

-0.4

2903

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

3MA

WILLIAMS E

1732

1.88

2352

941

1.69

1240

40

60

11

35

61.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.64

4233

0.01

4289

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

4RD

CLEM

ENTS S

2216

0.72

7272

727

1.35

1606

40

60

00

12

20.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.04

263

-0.7

6521

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

4LA

CLEM

ENTS S

2231

1.40

9090

909

1.84

2852

10

80

01

14

41.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7055

470.

0091

94DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

4MA

CLEM

ENTS S

2282

3.72

7272

727

3.42

5142

60

111

12.5

610

111.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.43

8043

F3.

5549

29DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

4RD

JACK

SON D

2227

1.22

7272

727

1.90

0672

06

00

02

45

0.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.04

263

0.66

6039

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

4LA

JACK

SON D

2245

2.04

5454

545

2.47

8042

10

80

01

46

71.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7055

471.

4772

26DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

4MA

JACK

SON D

2257

2.59

0909

091

3.92

3786

90

160

01

36

111.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.43

8043

1.37

465

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

4RD

THOMAS S

1890

53.

2719

845

012

13

46

1012

0.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.15

3242

F10

.370

91DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

4LA

THOMAS S

1845

2.5

4.11

9537

40

160

01

39

161.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

8427

982.

2846

91DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

4MA

THOMAS S

1844

2.44

4444

444

2.28

0924

07

01

1.5

47

71.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.60

3069

0.98

9231

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

5RD

JONES EVA

NGELA

2828

11.

1221

672

04

00

12

23

1.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.17

281

-0.3

9399

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

5LA

JONES EVA

NGELA

2838

1.35

7142

857

1.25

3566

30

50

01

23

31.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.59

1605

-0.2

0104

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

5MA

JONES EVA

NGELA

2831

1.10

7142

857

1.37

0030

70

50

01

23

41.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.26

2724

-1.4

9756

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

5RD

LEWIS V

2832

1.14

2857

143

1.48

3596

40

50

01

24

51.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.17

281

0.01

9416

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

5LA

LEWIS V

2831

1.10

7142

857

1.39

6802

80

60

01

23

31.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.59

1605

-0.8

4931

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

INTERN

ATIONAL

5MA

LEWIS V

2872

2.57

1428

571

3.57

3861

60

160

01

48

81.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.26

2724

1.55

7631

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

1RD

ANDER

SON

12

22

22

22

22

21.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

85.55

1608

0.61

6914

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

1LA

ANDER

SON

15

55

55

55

55

51.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

87.44

505

1.74

4414

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

1MA

ANDER

SON

12

22

22

22

22

21.74

8034

012.04

8946

67.89

4874

0.12

2973

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

1RD

BONNER

2121

11

03

00

12

22

1.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.05

6245

-0.2

4779

7DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

1LA

BONNER

2128

1.33

3333

333

0.96

6091

80

40

11

22

21.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.87

7869

-0.6

3468

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

1MA

BONNER

2139

1.85

7142

857

1.93

0950

90

70

11

25

61.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.08

9384

0.24

4028

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

1RD

FLAGG

1940

2.10

5263

158

1.82

2536

07

01

23

57

1.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.10

631

2.99

6937

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

1LA

FLAGG

1963

3.31

5789

474

2.26

2069

60

81

23

57

81.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.94

3287

F3.

8338

06DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

1MA

FLAGG

1944

2.31

5789

474

1.56

5341

06

01

24

46

1.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.15

8216

1.20

7835

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

1RD

WILLIAMS

2233

1.5

1.79

2842

90

80

01.5

23

31.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.03

3813

1.31

9978

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

1LA

WILLIAMS

2240

1.81

8181

818

1.76

3015

90

60

02

33

61.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.84

8558

0.51

8205

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

1MA

WILLIAMS

2254

2.45

4545

455

2.15

4226

70

60

02

46

61.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.05

8545

1.61

7335

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

2RD

BOWLES

1717

10.

8660

254

03

00

11

23

0.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.91

977

0.25

5499

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

2LA

BOWLES

1716

0.94

1176

471

0.82

6936

20

30

01

12

31.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.57

9848

-0.8

9960

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

2MA

BOWLES

1724

1.41

1764

706

1.50

2449

04

00

13

44

1.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.21

8336

-0.6

3845

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

2RD

BROWN

1710

0.58

8235

294

1.06

4120

70

40

00

12

40.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.91

977

-0.9

7316

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

2LA

BROWN

1729

1.70

5882

353

2.75

6009

50

110

01

25

111.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.57

9848

0.92

0192

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

2MA

BROWN

1738

2.23

5294

118

1.88

8432

30

60

12

26

61.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.21

8336

1.02

0143

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

2RD

CHEA

THAM

166

0.37

50.

7187

953

02

00

00.5

22

0.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.95

0713

-1.5

6138

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

2LA

CHEA

THAM

1619

1.18

752.

1045

585

08

00

01.5

38

1.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.61

8646

-0.3

0406

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

2MA

CHEA

THAM

1633

2.06

251.

8427

787

06

00.5

23

56

1.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.26

4179

0.65

2066

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

2RD

HOWELL

11

11

11

11

11

10.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

5.05

9729

0.06

1968

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

2LA

HOWELL

10

00

00

00

00

01.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

16.51

6974

-0.7

6140

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

2MA

HOWELL

11

11

11

11

11

11.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

7.87

0404

-0.3

5598

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

2RD

SMITH

167

0.43

750.

6291

529

02

00

01

12

0.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.95

0713

-1.3

8045

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

2LA

SMITH

1611

0.68

751.

1954

776

04

00

01

34

1.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.61

8646

-1.4

5840

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

2MA

SMITH

1611

0.68

751.

0781

929

03

00

01

33

1.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.26

4179

-2.0

3451

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

3RD

BRADSH

AW

1820

1.11

1111

111

1.27

8275

04

00

0.5

23

41.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.49

2248

-0.1

3952

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

3LA

BRADSH

AW

1837

2.05

5555

556

2.36

3253

50

90

01.5

36

91.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.95

9573

1.13

1952

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

3MA

BRADSH

AW

1887

4.83

3333

333

6.15

7253

028

02

46

728

1.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.59

4355

F5.

1604

64DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

3RD

GLEATO

N18

583.22

2222

222

2.21

1083

21

91

22.5

47

91.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.49

2248

F4.

6593

35DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

3LA

GLEATO

N18

502.77

7777

778

2.62

4669

30

80

11

58

81.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.95

9573

2.62

4342

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

3MA

GLEATO

N18

512.83

3333

333

2.81

2785

90

120

12

45

121.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.59

4355

1.67

2972

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

3RD

MAPLES

1925

1.31

5789

474

1.37

6494

40

50

01

24

51.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.45

7048

0.33

4668

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

3LA

MAPLES

1926

1.36

8421

053

1.30

0022

50

40

01

24

41.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.92

0851

-0.2

9582

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

3MA

MAPLES

1954

2.84

2105

263

3.30

4259

20

110

02

49

111.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.54

8468

1.73

453

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

3RD

RIGGINS

1819

1.05

5555

556

1.30

4842

70

40

00.5

23

41.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.49

2248

-0.2

6580

7DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

3LA

RIGGINS

1830

1.66

6666

667

1.68

0336

10

60

11

34

61.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.95

9573

0.32

8358

235

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

3MA

RIGGINS

1821

1.16

6666

667

1.20

0490

10

40

01

23

41.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.59

4355

-1.2

3327

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

4RD

BISCHOFF

2212

0.54

5454

545

0.91

1684

60

30

00

12

20.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.04

263

-1.2

8566

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

4LA

BISCHOFF

2215

0.68

1818

182

1.12

9111

10

40

00

12

31.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7055

47-1

.668

557

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

4MA

BISCHOFF

2250

2.27

2727

273

2.22

9281

70

60

01.5

55

61.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.43

8043

0.76

4172

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

4RD

LANE

2127

1.28

5714

286

2.53

2644

011

00

01

34

0.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.06

7293

0.81

4168

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

4LA

LANE

2125

1.19

0476

192.

0154

168

09

00

12

23

1.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7361

5-0

.483

746

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

4MA

LANE

2142

22.

7202

941

08

00

12

68

1.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.47

4839

0.23

5366

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

4RD

TURN

ER22

160.72

7272

727

1.03

1956

90

40

00

12

20.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.04

263

-0.7

6521

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

4LA

TURN

ER22

190.86

3636

364

1.39

0287

90

60

00.5

12

31.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7055

47-1

.249

119

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

4MA

TURN

ER22

431.95

4545

455

2.81

9612

80

100

00.5

36

71.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.43

8043

0.15

3694

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

5RD

FRETWELL

2633

1.26

9230

769

2.06

9931

30

80

01

14

71.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.21

1943

0.37

1119

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

5LA

FRETWELL

2636

1.38

4615

385

1.44

4352

40

50

01

33

41.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.63

5279

-0.1

2508

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

5MA

FRETWELL

2629

1.11

5384

615

1.36

6072

40

60

01

23

31.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.31

7-1

.426

516

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

5RD

MOORE

WILLIAMS

2640

1.53

8461

538

1.60

5758

90

60

01

23

51.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.21

1943

1.12

1906

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

5LA

MOORE

WILLIAMS

2651

1.96

1538

462

1.92

8331

30

70

11

36

61.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.63

5279

1.31

6498

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

5MA

MOORE

WILLIAMS

2676

2.92

3076

923

3.61

0241

80

130

12

410

131.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.31

72.

2079

87DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

5RD

WALTER

2635

1.34

6153

846

2.05

8005

09

00

11

55

1.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.21

1943

0.58

563

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

5LA

WALTER

2630

1.15

3846

154

1.73

6486

30

70

00.5

23

51.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.63

5279

-0.7

0171

7DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAKE

PARK

ELE

5MA

WALTER

2637

1.42

3076

923

1.70

1130

80

60

01

24

51.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.31

7-0

.807

877

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

1RD

BRYA

NT

2130

1.42

8571

429

1.28

7300

60

50

01

23

31.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.05

6245

1.06

9997

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

1LA

BRYA

NT

2162

2.95

2380

952

2.53

9216

20

100

13

46

71.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.87

7869

F3.

1753

46DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

1MA

BRYA

NT

2169

3.28

5714

286

2.88

3450

30

100

22

57

91.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.08

9384

F3.

4391

02DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

1RD

CHILDS

1818

11.

0846

523

03

00

12

33

1.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.13

4418

-0.2

2941

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

1LA

CHILDS

1825

1.38

8888

889

1.61

3869

60

50

01

24

51.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.98

0013

-0.4

6656

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

1MA

CHILDS

1822

1.22

2222

222

0.80

8452

10

30

11

22

31.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.19

6858

-1.0

8876

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

1RD

GRA

DDIC

1941

2.15

7894

737

1.74

0471

10

81

12

34

81.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.10

631

F3.

1508

72DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

1LA

GRA

DDIC

1986

4.52

6315

789

3.13

3482

60

111

23

89

111.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.94

3287

F6.

5434

35DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

1MA

GRA

DDIC

1988

4.63

1578

947

2.85

2105

012

13

46

812

1.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.15

8216

F6.

1344

11DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

1RD

SHAVE

RS20

592.95

1.60

5090

60

60.5

23

45

5.5

1.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.08

0339

F5.

6096

36DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

1LA

SHAVE

RS20

693.45

2.03

8446

30

91

24

45.5

7.5

1.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.90

9351

F4.

2416

22DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

1MA

SHAVE

RS20

673.35

2.49

7893

80

80

13

57

81.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.12

2509

F3.

4965

33DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

1RD

WARR

EN17

211.23

5294

118

1.25

1469

70

40

01

24

41.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.16

497

0.42

8002

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

1LA

WARR

EN16

372.31

251.

8518

009

06

01

23

66

1.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

83.06

354

1.45

7299

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

1MA

WARR

EN17

382.23

5294

118

1.64

0480

60

50

12

45

51.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.23

8862

0.98

0516

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

2RD

BRADFO

RD21

864.09

5238

095

3.84

5838

80

150

13

59

100.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.81

8965

F10

.549

07DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

2LA

BRADFO

RD21

813.85

7142

857

3.53

9572

20

120

13

79

101.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.45

345

F6.

7126

65DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

2MA

BRADFO

RD21

763.61

9047

619

2.65

4735

20

101

23

58

81.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.06

8985

F4.

2312

86DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

2RD

DICKERSON

2359

2.56

5217

391

1.70

0964

60

51

12

45

50.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.77

874

F5.

7296

66DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

2LA

DICKERSON

2388

3.82

6086

957

2.28

9346

40

112

24

56

71.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.40

3014

F6.

9390

85DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

2MA

DICKERSON

2373

3.17

3913

043

2.47

9959

21

101

12

47

81.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.00

939

F3.

3854

14DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

2RD

FOWLER

2340

1.73

9130

435

1.71

1389

40

60

01

34

50.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.77

874

2.86

2524

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

2LA

FOWLER

2350

2.17

3913

043

1.96

9129

30

70

11

45

51.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.40

3014

2.36

5846

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

2MA

FOWLER

2393

4.04

3478

261

2.88

3783

21

122

23

68

81.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.00

939

F5.

4224

73DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

2RD

GRIFFIN

2321

0.91

3043

478

1.31

1246

60

50

00

13

30.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.77

874

-0.0

0461

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

2LA

GRIFFIN

2337

1.60

8695

652

1.72

5191

20

70

01

33

41.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.40

3014

0.80

1317

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

2MA

GRIFFIN

2366

2.86

9565

217

2.34

1412

70

100

12

45

61.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.00

939

2.67

2444

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

2RD

WALLACE

2218

0.81

8181

818

0.95

7992

10

30

01

12

30.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.79

8167

-0.3

2652

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

2LA

WALLACE

2221

0.95

4545

455

1.39

6501

50

50

00

22

41.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.42

7372

-0.9

8719

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

2MA

WALLACE

2251

2.31

8181

818

2.16

8746

90

70

01.5

45

61.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.03

8172

1.35

0414

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

3RD

BURN

S17

191.11

7647

059

1.53

6324

90

50

01

14

51.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.53

051

-0.1

2115

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

3LA

BURN

S17

181.05

8823

529

1.19

7423

70

30

01

23

31.50

7762

082

2.05

317

3.00

1663

-0.9

0154

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

3MA

BURN

S17

181.05

8823

529

1.14

4038

30

40

01

22

41.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.64

4233

-1.3

8127

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

3RD

CRIM

BLEY

1939

2.05

2631

579

3.18

8062

50

120

01

38

121.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.45

7048

2.05

5512

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

3LA

CRIM

BLEY

1950

2.63

1578

947

2.87

1517

70

90

01

48

91.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.92

0851

2.38

5874

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

3MA

CRIM

BLEY

1951

2.68

4210

526

2.58

3121

10

90

12

48

91.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.54

8468

1.45

1657

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

3RD

LUNSFORD

10

00

00

00

00

01.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

16.77

1753

-0.6

2820

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

3LA

LUNSFORD

11

11

11

11

11

11.50

7762

082

2.05

317

7.66

7272

-0.2

4730

6

236

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

3MA

LUNSFORD

10

00

00

00

00

01.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

99.17

3104

-0.7

7019

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

3RD

WHITMIRE

2133

1.57

1428

571

2.63

7639

60

120

01

23

41.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.39

4349

0.97

9505

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

3LA

WHITMIRE

2139

1.85

7142

857

2.76

1986

90

110

01

34

71.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.85

1877

0.77

9801

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

3MA

WHITMIRE

2139

1.85

7142

857

1.74

0279

10

50

01

34

51.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.46

6733

-0.0

3160

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

3RD

WILLIAMSO

N19

170.89

4736

842

1.24

2521

50

50

01

12

51.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.45

7048

-0.6

4867

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

3LA

WILLIAMSO

N19

211.10

5263

158

0.93

6585

80

30

01

23

31.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.92

0851

-0.8

5450

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

3MA

WILLIAMSO

N19

311.63

1578

947

1.83

2136

80

70

01

25

71.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.54

8468

-0.4

3416

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

3RD

WRIGHT

2121

11.

2649

111

05

00

11

23

1.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.39

4349

-0.4

2350

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

3LA

WRIGHT

2147

2.23

8095

238

2.40

6340

80

90

02

35

61.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.85

1877

1.63

0068

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

3MA

WRIGHT

2193

4.42

8571

429

4.88

4377

40

170

12

612

131.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.46

6733

F4.

8115

85DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

4RD

DAVIS

10

00

00

00

00

00.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

95.91

0314

-0.6

0698

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

4LA

DAVIS

10

00

00

00

00

01.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

67.

5047

19-0

.691

079

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

4MA

DAVIS

10

00

00

00

00

01.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

79.20

8389

-0.7

6675

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

4RD

GORE

2122

1.04

7619

048

0.80

4747

80

20

01

22

20.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.06

7293

0.14

829

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

4LA

GORE

2121

11.

2247

449

04

00

12

33

1.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7361

5-0

.913

054

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

4MA

GORE

2140

1.90

4761

905

2.42

7030

30

100

01

24

61.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.47

4839

0.05

6839

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

4RD

MELTO

N RUEN

ETTE

2115

0.71

4285

714

0.84

5154

30

30

01

12

20.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.06

7293

-0.7

8393

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

4LA

MELTO

N RUEN

ETTE

2115

0.71

4285

714

0.90

2377

80

30

00

12

21.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7361

5-1

.557

017

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

4MA

MELTO

N RUEN

ETTE

2143

2.04

7619

048

2.10

8937

90

80

02

35

51.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.47

4839

0.32

463

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

4RD

MITCH

ELL

2218

0.81

8181

818

1.00

6472

60

40

01

12

20.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.04

263

-0.5

0498

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

4LA

MITCH

ELL

2231

1.40

9090

909

2.15

2719

09

00

12

44

1.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7055

470.

0091

94DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

4MA

MITCH

ELL

2236

1.63

6363

636

2.30

0009

40

80

01

24

81.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.43

8043

-0.4

5678

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

4RD

RAGIN

2215

0.68

1818

182

0.89

3700

90

30

00

12

20.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.04

263

-0.8

9532

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

4LA

RAGIN

2223

1.04

5454

545

1.13

2938

60

40

01

13

31.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7055

47-0

.829

681

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

4MA

RAGIN

2242

1.90

9090

909

1.87

4873

70

60

01

35

51.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.43

8043

0.06

6483

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

5RD

BENTLEY

2591

3.64

2.79

7022

20

111

23

57

91.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.23

3248

F6.

8467

39DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

5LA

BENTLEY

2535

1.4

1.22

4744

90

50

11

23

31.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.65

9055

-0.0

8495

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

5MA

BENTLEY

2560

2.4

1.70

7825

10

70

12

44

41.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.34

655

1.13

3847

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

5RD

DAVIS

2547

1.88

1.48

0990

70

50

12

34

41.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.23

3248

2.03

405

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

5LA

DAVIS

2552

2.08

2.1

07

00

23

57

1.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.65

9055

1.58

1189

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

5MA

DAVIS

2555

2.2

1.60

7275

10

50

12

44

51.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.34

655

0.73

954

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

5RD

GLANTO

N24

492.04

1666

667

2.01

0389

70

80

0.5

23

46

1.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.25

5871

2.42

6097

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

5LA

GLANTO

N24

612.54

1666

667

2.60

3996

40

100

12

3.5

59

1.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.68

4303

2.65

7572

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

5MA

GLANTO

N24

793.29

1666

667

2.75

8058

013

12

2.5

46

81.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.37

7928

2.83

337

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

5RD

STANLEY

2439

1.62

51.

7398

776

06

00

1.5

24

61.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.25

5871

1.30

9749

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

5LA

STANLEY

2448

22.

1869

176

010

01

1.5

24

61.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.68

4303

1.35

7185

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LAMAR RE

ESE S

5MA

STANLEY

2458

2.41

6666

667

1.76

7254

50

60

12

3.5

55

1.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.37

7928

1.14

3133

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

1RD

GLASS

2114

0.66

6666

667

1.01

653

03

00

01

23

1.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.05

6245

-1.2

7274

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

1LA

GLASS

2127

1.28

5714

286

1.38

3577

10

50

01

23

41.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.87

7869

-0.7

4674

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

1MA

GLASS

2128

1.33

3333

333

1.31

6561

20

40

01

33

31.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.08

9384

-0.9

275

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

1RD

HOLLOWAY

2127

1.28

5714

286

1.00

7117

50

30

01

22

31.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.05

6245

0.63

0733

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

1LA

HOLLOWAY

2145

2.14

2857

143

2.12

8044

08

01

13

56

1.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.87

7869

1.27

0333

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

1MA

HOLLOWAY

2158

2.76

1904

762

1.72

9299

30

50

13

45

51.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.08

9384

2.26

7575

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

1RD

MCINVA

LE21

90.42

8571

429

0.59

7614

30

20

00

11

11.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.05

6245

-2.0

0485

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

1LA

MCINVA

LE21

190.90

4761

905

0.94

3650

50

30

01

22

21.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.87

7869

-1.6

4321

7DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

1MA

MCINVA

LE21

251.19

0476

191.

1670

068

04

00

12

23

1.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.08

9384

-1.2

4700

7DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

1RD

PAYN

E19

191

1.20

1850

40

40

01

13

41.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.10

631

-0.2

3570

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

1LA

PAYN

E19

361.89

4736

842

1.79

1794

20

70

02

34

71.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.94

3287

0.65

2938

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

1MA

PAYN

E19

432.26

3157

895

1.88

0960

30

60

12

46

61.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.15

8216

1.09

5867

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

1RD

YERB

Y20

201

1.41

4213

60

60

01

1.5

24

1.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.08

0339

-0.2

4182

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

1LA

YERB

Y20

412.05

1.53

8112

30

50

12

34.5

51.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.90

9351

1.02

6468

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

1MA

YERB

Y20

402

1.68

5854

50

50

02

3.5

44.5

1.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.12

2509

0.54

9954

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

1RD

YOUNGBLOOD

2012

0.6

0.82

0782

70

30

00

11.5

2.5

1.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.08

0339

-1.4

4212

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

1LA

YOUNGBLOOD

2023

1.15

1.49

6487

10

60

01

13

51.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.90

9351

-1.0

4041

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

1MA

YOUNGBLOOD

2041

2.05

1.43

1782

10

50

12

34

4.5

1.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.12

2509

0.65

9086

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

2RD

BELL

2121

11.

1401

754

04

00

12

23

0.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.81

8965

0.28

3971

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

2LA

BELL

2143

2.04

7619

048

2.90

6478

80

130

01

34

51.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.45

345

1.92

6606

237

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

2MA

BELL

2161

2.90

4761

905

2.60

5854

20

121

12

45

51.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.06

8985

2.63

2395

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

2RD

COOPER

1918

0.94

7368

421

1.07

8769

10

40

01

22

40.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.86

5384

0.10

4082

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

2LA

COOPER

1927

1.42

1052

632

1.70

9963

90

60

01

25

61.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.51

1654

0.25

6234

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

2MA

COOPER

1926

1.36

8421

053

1.30

0022

50

40

01

33

41.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.13

7758

-0.7

6725

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

2RD

HUGGINS

225

0.22

7272

727

0.42

8932

01

00

00

11

0.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.79

8167

-2.3

3233

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

2LA

HUGGINS

229

0.40

9090

909

0.73

4139

70

20

00

12

21.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.42

7372

-2.4

6383

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

2MA

HUGGINS

2219

0.86

3636

364

0.99

0211

80

30

01

12

31.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.03

8172

-1.9

8213

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

2RD

RICH

ARD

S23

482.08

6956

522

2.27

4623

70

90

12

24

80.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.77

874

F4.

0697

42DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

2LA

RICH

ARD

S23

733.17

3913

043

2.36

7433

90

91

22

46

91.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.40

3014

F5.

1338

59DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

2MA

RICH

ARD

S23

723.13

0434

783

2.73

5363

50

100

12

57

81.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.00

939

F3.

2835

62DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

2RD

SHORT

ER20

412.05

1.31

6894

31

51

11.5

34

4.5

0.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.84

1304

F3.

6754

44DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

2LA

SHORT

ER20

854.25

2.09

9498

70

91

35

5.5

67.5

1.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.48

1461

F7.

5649

28DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

2MA

SHORT

ER20

572.85

1.95

4078

10

70

1.5

34.5

56

1.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.10

2082

2.44

9327

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

2RD

SMALL

2238

1.72

7272

727

1.69

5422

90

50

01.5

34

50.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.79

8167

2.75

9353

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

2LA

SMALL

2296

4.36

3636

364

3.87

3542

20

120

13

710

111.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.42

7372

F8.

2417

96DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

2MA

SMALL

2290

4.09

0909

091

4.24

1620

20

170

13.5

58

121.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.03

8172

F5.

4119

53DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

3RD

HURST

2019

0.95

1.14

5931

04

00

11.5

2.5

3.5

1.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.42

4523

-0.5

3310

7DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

3LA

HURST

2029

1.45

2.28

2081

20

100

01

1.5

3.5

71.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.88

507

-0.1

2581

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

3MA

HURST

2034

1.7

1.80

9332

50

70

01

2.5

45.5

1.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.50

6068

-0.3

1967

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

3RD

JOHNSO

N21

120.57

1428

571

0.87

0139

60

30

00

12

21.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.39

4349

-1.4

7576

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

3LA

JOHNSO

N21

261.23

8095

238

1.44

5847

90

40

01

24

41.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.85

1877

-0.6

0188

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

3MA

JOHNSO

N21

381.80

9523

813.

4295

633

013

00

11

410

1.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.46

6733

-0.1

2128

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

3RD

LEWIS POLITE

2123

1.09

5238

095

1.22

0850

60

40

01

23

31.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.39

4349

-0.1

8967

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

3LA

LEWIS POLITE

2117

0.80

9523

811.

0779

169

04

00

01

22

1.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.85

1877

-1.5

5843

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

3MA

LEWIS POLITE

2146

2.19

0476

192.

1591

445

07

01

24

66

1.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.46

6733

0.59

622

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

3RD

ROQUEM

ORE

2033

1.65

2.85

2053

70

110

00

25.5

8.5

1.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.42

4523

1.14

4165

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

3LA

ROQUEM

ORE

2024

1.2

1.00

5249

40

40

11

1.5

2.5

3.5

1.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.88

507

-0.6

7035

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

3MA

ROQUEM

ORE

2029

1.45

1.35

6272

04

00

13

33.5

1.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.50

6068

-0.7

7919

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

3RD

RUSSELL

2317

0.73

9130

435

0.96

3770

60

30

00

12

31.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.34

0016

-1.1

1353

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

3LA

RUSSELL

2328

1.21

7391

304

1.16

6054

80

40

01

22

41.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.79

2109

-0.6

7825

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

3MA

RUSSELL

2359

2.56

5217

391

1.70

0964

60

71

22

35

61.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.39

5906

1.36

2622

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

3RD

SIBLEY

2023

1.15

3.08

2633

90

140

00

11.5

81.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.42

4523

-0.0

5388

7DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

3LA

SIBLEY

2013

0.65

0.93

3302

03

00

01

22.5

1.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.88

507

-1.8

6834

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

3MA

SIBLEY

2030

1.5

1.46

8977

40

50

01

33

41.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.50

6068

-0.6

8729

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

4RD

HART

215

0.23

8095

238

0.43

6435

80

10

00

01

10.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.06

7293

-2.1

1569

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

4LA

HART

2165

3.09

5238

095

5.41

2067

60

230

11

26

131.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7361

5F

3.80

9337

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

4MA

HART

2117

0.80

9523

810.

8728

716

03

00

11

22

1.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.47

4839

-1.9

9622

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

4RD

HURLEY

2215

0.68

1818

182

0.77

9887

90

30

01

11

20.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.04

263

-0.8

9532

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

4LA

HURLEY

2218

0.81

8181

818

1.22

0318

60

40

00

13

31.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7055

47-1

.353

979

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

4MA

HURLEY

2233

1.5

1.79

2842

90

70

01

24

41.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.43

8043

-0.7

1841

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

4RD

JONES

2120

0.95

2380

952

0.86

4649

70

30

01

12

20.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.06

7293

-0.1

1806

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

4LA

JONES

2121

10.

8944

272

03

00

12

22

1.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7361

5-0

.913

054

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

4MA

JONES

2111

85.61

9047

619

2.61

6795

62

113

45

710

101.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.47

4839

F7.

0193

89DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

4RD

OWEN

S20

261.3

1.49

0319

60

50

01

23.5

4.5

0.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.09

3784

0.83

3536

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

4LA

OWEN

S20

180.9

1.41

0487

06

00

0.5

12

41.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7690

21-1

.111

005

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

4MA

OWEN

S20

552.75

2.55

2088

90

80

12

56.5

81.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.51

4361

1.60

1711

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

4RD

PICK

ETT

2213

0.59

0909

091

0.85

4071

02

00

01

22

0.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.04

263

-1.1

5555

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

4LA

PICK

ETT

2227

1.22

7272

727

1.63

1003

70

60

00.5

23

41.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7055

47-0

.410

244

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

4MA

PICK

ETT

2250

2.27

2727

273

1.63

8286

50

71

12

34

51.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.43

8043

0.76

4172

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

5RD

BARN

ES25

341.36

1.60

4161

30

60

01

24

51.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.23

3248

0.61

2119

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

5LA

BARN

ES25

361.44

1.50

2220

60

60

01

24

41.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.65

9055

0.01

3049

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

5MA

BARN

ES25

672.68

2.34

0227

90

91

12

46

81.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.34

655

1.68

5875

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

5RD

BERG

OZZA

2329

1.26

0869

565

1.28

6905

80

50

01

23

31.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.27

9954

0.32

7123

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

5LA

BERG

OZZA

2334

1.47

8260

871.

5036

188

06

00

12

34

1.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.71

118

0.10

2436

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

5MA

BERG

OZZA

2346

21.

9540

168

06

00

24

55

1.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.41

133

0.33

1137

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

5RD

FORD

2427

1.12

51.

4540

050

50

01

14

41.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.25

5871

-0.0

2986

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

5LA

FORD

2448

22.

8590

056

011

00

13

68

1.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.68

4303

1.35

7185

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

5MA

FORD

2448

22.

1467

873

06

00

13

66

1.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.37

7928

0.33

8259

238

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

5RD

KIRB

Y23

562.43

4782

609

2.23

2529

90

70

02

46

71.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.27

9954

F3.

4060

89DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

5LA

KIRB

Y23

713.08

6956

522

2.98

3485

50

90

12

58

91.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.71

118

F3.

8831

38DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

5MA

KIRB

Y23

994.30

4347

826

3.15

4142

80

130

24

58

91.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.41

133

F4.

6887

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

5RD

POWELL

2232

1.45

4545

455

1.56

5316

70

40

01

34

41.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.30

566

0.81

6744

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

5LA

POWELL

2222

11.

2344

268

04

00

12

24

1.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.73

9869

-0.9

9910

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LINCO

LN ELEME

5MA

POWELL

2253

2.40

9090

909

2.30

2360

90

70

11.5

46

71.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.44

6985

1.08

0456

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

1RD

BUTLER

C18

301.66

6666

667

1.60

8799

30

50

01

34

51.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.13

4418

1.66

8425

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

1LA

BUTLER

C18

362

20

70

01.5

35

71.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.98

0013

0.86

4859

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

1MA

BUTLER

C18

412.27

7777

778

1.70

8303

40

60

12

35

61.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.19

6858

1.09

6911

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

1RD

THORN

E17

191.11

7647

059

1.26

8973

60

40

01

23

41.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.16

497

0.10

2525

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

1LA

THORN

E17

452.64

7058

824

2.39

6382

10

90

12

46

91.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

83.01

9933

2.21

0512

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

1MA

THORN

E17

331.94

1176

471

1.85

3057

90

50

01

45

51.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.23

8862

0.38

8662

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

1RD

WADDELL

177

0.41

1764

706

0.61

8346

90

20

00

11

21.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.16

497

-1.8

5033

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

1LA

WADDELL

1721

1.23

5294

118

1.60

1929

06

00

11

46

1.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

83.01

9933

-0.7

7862

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

1MA

WADDELL

1720

1.17

6470

588

1.33

3945

90

40

01

24

41.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.23

8862

-1.1

5016

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

1RD

YOUNGBR

OWN

1821

1.16

6666

667

1.61

7914

40

60

00.5

23

61.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.13

4418

0.24

5045

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

1LA

YOUNGBR

OWN

1818

11.

0289

915

03

00

12

33

1.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.98

0013

-1.3

1382

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

1MA

YOUNGBR

OWN

1834

1.88

8888

889

1.45

0715

40

40

02

34

41.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.19

6858

0.29

166

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

1RD

YOUNGLE

1818

11.

2366

939

05

00

11

25

1.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.13

4418

-0.2

2941

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

1LA

YOUNGLE

1824

1.33

3333

333

1.53

393

06

00

12

36

1.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.98

0013

-0.5

876

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

1MA

YOUNGLE

1822

1.22

2222

222

1.43

7135

90

50

01

23

51.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.19

6858

-1.0

8876

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

2RD

BUTLER

D20

180.9

1.25

2366

20

40

00

1.5

33.5

0.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.84

1304

-0.0

4652

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

2LA

BUTLER

D20

251.25

1.20

8522

40

40

01

23

3.5

1.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.48

1461

-0.1

7862

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

2MA

BUTLER

D20

391.95

1.73

1291

05

00.5

1.5

3.5

4.5

51.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.10

2082

0.48

3275

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

2RD

CARM

ICHAEL

2064

3.2

3.65

0522

70

130

0.5

24.5

912

0.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.84

1304

F7.

3974

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

2LA

CARM

ICHAEL

2076

3.8

3.33

4035

013

0.5

13

5.5

811

1.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.48

1461

F6.

4033

94DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

2MA

CARM

ICHAEL

2010

75.35

4.38

0278

80

151

24.5

813

151.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.10

2082

F7.

9105

81DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

2RD

LEE

2017

0.85

0.93

3302

02

00

0.5

22

20.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.84

1304

-0.2

0834

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

2LA

LEE

2029

1.45

1.43

1782

10

50

01.5

23.5

4.5

1.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.48

1461

0.33

7609

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

2MA

LEE

2047

2.35

1.63

1112

05

11

23.5

55

1.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.10

2082

1.35

7076

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

2RD

VENABLE

2017

0.85

0.87

5094

03

00

11

22.5

0.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.84

1304

-0.2

0834

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

2LA

VENABLE

2016

0.8

0.95

1453

20

30

00.5

1.5

22.5

1.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.48

1461

-1.3

4016

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

2MA

VENABLE

2044

2.2

1.32

1880

60

50.5

12

34

4.5

1.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.10

2082

1.02

9401

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

3RD

FOWLER

2325

1.08

6956

522

0.94

9308

04

00

12

22

1.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.34

0016

-0.2

1977

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

3LA

FOWLER

2353

2.30

4347

826

1.79

4810

30

60

12

45

51.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.79

2109

1.86

0679

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

3MA

FOWLER

2378

3.39

1304

348

2.60

6619

70

101

23

57

81.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.39

5906

2.99

093

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

3RD

KING

2229

1.31

8181

818

1.42

7163

80

60

01

23

31.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.36

6256

0.36

6133

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

3LA

KING

2251

2.31

8181

818

2.60

7431

90

100

01.5

36

61.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.82

0974

1.85

1384

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

3MA

KING

2236

1.63

6363

636

1.64

8822

20

60

01

24

51.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.43

0112

-0.4

5795

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

3RD

LUNSFORD

10

00

00

00

00

01.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

16.77

1753

-0.6

2820

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

3LA

LUNSFORD

10

00

00

00

00

01.50

7762

082

2.05

317

7.66

7272

-0.7

3435

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

3MA

LUNSFORD

10

00

00

00

00

01.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

99.17

3104

-0.7

7019

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

3RD

TIMMONS

2333

1.43

4782

609

1.47

1736

40

50

01

33

41.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.34

0016

0.67

3972

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

3LA

TIMMONS

2332

1.39

1304

348

1.37

3089

80

40

01

24

41.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.79

2109

-0.2

7202

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

3MA

TIMMONS

2343

1.86

9565

217

1.89

0270

50

70

01

34

51.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.39

5906

-0.0

0858

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

4RD

BELL K

10

00

00

00

00

00.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

95.91

0314

-0.6

0698

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

4LA

BELL K

13

33

33

33

33

31.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

67.

5047

190.

7844

24DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

4MA

BELL K

12

22

22

22

22

21.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

79.20

8389

0.05

1361

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

4RD

BICE

2012

0.6

0.82

0782

70

30

00

11.5

2.5

0.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.09

3784

-1.0

7696

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

4LA

BICE

2029

1.45

1.98

6136

20

70

01

24.5

6.5

1.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7690

210.

0987

48DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

4MA

BICE

2023

1.15

1.13

6708

10

40

01

22.5

3.5

1.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.51

4361

-1.3

2525

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

4RD

CALD

WELL

206

0.3

0.57

1240

60

20

00

0.5

11.5

0.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.09

3784

-1.8

9575

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

4LA

CALD

WELL

2017

0.85

1.18

2103

40

30

00

23

31.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7690

21-1

.220

982

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

4MA

CALD

WELL

2035

1.75

2.04

8748

08

00

13

46.5

1.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.51

4361

-0.2

2764

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

4RD

DAVIS

12

22

22

22

22

20.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

95.91

0314

0.61

3585

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

4LA

DAVIS

17

77

77

77

77

71.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

67.

5047

192.

7517

62DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

4MA

DAVIS

113

1313

1313

1313

1313

131.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

79.20

8389

F4.

5509

83

239

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

4RD

JOHNSO

N L

2033

1.65

3.57

2924

50

160

00.5

23.5

100.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.09

3784

1.78

8787

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

4LA

JOHNSO

N L

2018

0.9

1.07

1152

80

30

00.5

22.5

31.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7690

21-1

.111

005

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

4MA

JOHNSO

N L

2017

0.85

0.93

3302

03

00

11.5

22.5

1.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.51

4361

-1.8

7406

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

4RD

YOUNGLYY

2129

1.38

0952

381

1.74

5743

10

60

01

23

60.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.06

7293

1.08

0519

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

4LA

YOUNGLYY

2136

1.71

4285

714

1.92

7248

20

70

01

25

51.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7361

50.

6968

52DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

4MA

YOUNGLYY

2151

2.42

8571

429

2.73

0777

012

01

23

56

1.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.47

4839

1.03

8737

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

5RD

BARFIELD

2325

1.08

6956

522

1.41

1415

90

40

00

23

41.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.27

9954

-0.1

2902

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

5LA

BARFIELD

2336

1.56

5217

391

1.61

8812

30

60

01

24

41.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.71

118

0.30

6798

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

5MA

BARFIELD

2353

2.30

4347

826

2.18

3299

90

80

02

45

51.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.41

133

0.90

6667

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

5RD

GABB

ARD

2333

1.43

4782

609

1.70

0964

60

50

01

24

51.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.27

9954

0.78

3266

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

5LA

GABB

ARD

2341

1.78

2608

696

1.99

9011

60

80

01

24

61.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.71

118

0.81

7704

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

5MA

GABB

ARD

2348

2.08

6956

522

2.92

1908

50

120

01

36

61.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.41

133

0.49

5574

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

5RD

ROBINSO

N22

311.40

9090

909

1.14

0555

04

01

12

34

1.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.30

566

0.70

0145

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

5LA

ROBINSO

N22

421.90

9090

909

1.63

034

06

01

1.5

25

51.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.73

9869

1.09

0451

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

5MA

ROBINSO

N22

452.04

5454

545

1.46

3110

60

51

11.5

34

41.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.44

6985

0.40

7924

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

5RD

WILLIAMS

2224

1.09

0909

091

1.34

1963

40

50

01

23

31.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.30

566

-0.1

1604

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

5LA

WILLIAMS

2228

1.27

2727

273

1.35

1606

40

40

01

24

41.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.73

9869

-0.3

7223

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

LIVE

OAK ELEM

5MA

WILLIAMS

2234

1.54

5454

545

1.53

4593

90

50

01

24

51.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.44

6985

-0.5

1680

6

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

1RD

HAYES

2029

1.45

1.63

7552

70

70

01

23

51.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.08

0339

1.10

8512

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

1LA

HAYES

2025

1.25

1.83

1737

70

80

01

22.5

5.5

1.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.90

9351

-0.8

1076

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

1MA

HAYES

2043

2.15

1.78

5172

90

50

0.5

24

4.5

51.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.12

2509

0.87

7352

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

1RD

HILL

1919

11.

2472

191

03

00

02

33

1.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.10

631

-0.2

3570

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

1LA

HILL

1956

2.94

7368

421

2.14

6668

80

70

22

47

71.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.94

3287

F3.

0091

37DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

1MA

HILL

1946

2.42

1052

632

1.86

5350

40

60

12

46

61.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.15

8216

1.43

177

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

1RD

SETTLE

1917

0.89

4736

842

1.14

9624

90

30

00

23

31.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.10

631

-0.5

4357

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

1LA

SETTLE

1928

1.47

3684

211

1.12

3903

04

01

12

34

1.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.94

3287

-0.2

8954

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

1MA

SETTLE

1945

2.36

8421

053

2.19

1157

10

70

02

46

71.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.15

8216

1.31

9802

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

1RD

SHAW

2035

1.75

1.65

0358

80

50

01.5

34.5

51.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.08

0339

2.00

8737

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

1LA

SHAW

2063

3.15

3.32

8900

60

110

0.5

2.5

49

111.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.90

9351

F3.

5526

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

1MA

SHAW

2066

3.3

2.47

3012

20

80

13

57

81.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.12

2509

F3.

3874

01DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

2RD

BAKER

1820

1.11

1111

111

1.23

1397

50

40

01

14

40.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.89

1444

0.60

4063

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

2LA

BAKER

1853

2.94

4444

444

2.07

1436

61

81

12

47

81.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.54

433

F3.

9797

71DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

2MA

BAKER

1852

2.88

8888

889

2.02

5975

11

71

12

47

71.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.17

6368

2.40

4229

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

2RD

BARN

ES19

784.10

5263

158

3.19

5391

40

141

23

68

140.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.86

5384

F10

.065

79DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

2LA

BARN

ES19

482.52

6315

789

2.48

0332

07

00

15

67

1.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.51

1654

F3.

0368

86DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

2MA

BARN

ES19

914.78

9473

684

3.66

0281

50

120

24

711

121.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.13

7758

F6.

5168

14DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

2RD

FARR

1828

1.55

5555

556

1.78

9585

05

00

12

55

0.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.89

1444

1.96

8687

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

2LA

FARR

1840

2.22

2222

222

1.76

7535

90

60

12

36

61.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.54

433

2.21

1246

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

2MA

FARR

1864

3.55

5555

556

2.91

4915

40

120

23

66

121.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.17

6368

F3.

7858

29DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

2RD

HAMON V

10

00

00

00

00

00.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

5.05

9729

-0.6

6173

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

2LA

HAMON V

11

11

11

11

11

11.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

16.51

6974

-0.1

8423

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

2MA

HAMON V

10

00

00

00

00

01.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

7.87

0404

-0.8

4445

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

2RD

MANSFIELD

2081

4.05

2.72

3677

90

80.5

1.5

46.5

88

0.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.84

1304

F10

.148

43DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

2LA

MANSFIELD

2047

2.35

2.05

8998

20

60

0.5

24

5.5

61.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.48

1461

2.66

0676

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

2MA

MANSFIELD

2086

4.3

3.29

4333

31

121

23

5.5

9.5

111.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.10

2082

F5.

6168

54DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

3RD

JOHNSO

N19

90.47

3684

211

0.69

6692

30

20

00

12

21.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.45

7048

-1.6

3201

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

3LA

JOHNSO

N19

170.89

4736

842

1.82

2536

07

00

02

37

1.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.92

0851

-1.3

0145

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

3MA

JOHNSO

N19

382

3.34

9958

50

130

01

38

131.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.54

8468

0.22

5874

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

3RD

LEE

1979

4.15

7894

737

3.94

7758

30

110

04

811

111.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.45

7048

F6.

9722

11DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

3LA

LEE

1973

3.84

2105

263

4.72

8908

20

170

12

515

171.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.92

0851

F4.

9558

32DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

3MA

LEE

1965

3.42

1052

632

3.43

6984

90

120

12

411

121.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.54

8468

2.77

1731

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

3RD

MCK

ENZIE

2018

0.9

1.58

6124

07

00

0.5

12

4.5

1.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.42

4523

-0.6

5291

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

3LA

MCK

ENZIE

2017

0.85

1.18

2103

40

40

00

1.5

2.5

3.5

1.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.88

507

-1.4

3271

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

3MA

MCK

ENZIE

2047

2.35

1.87

1531

90

60

12

45

5.5

1.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.50

6068

0.87

5067

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

3RD

MOSELY

2127

1.28

5714

286

1.67

7583

30

60

01

13

51.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.39

4349

0.27

7998

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

3LA

MOSELY

2128

1.33

3333

333

1.35

4006

40

60

11

13

31.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.85

1877

-0.3

8931

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

3MA

MOSELY

2150

2.38

0952

381

2.31

2492

07

01

24

67

1.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.46

6733

0.95

4974

240

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

4RD

HAMILTO

N24

170.70

8333

333

0.80

6450

40

30

01

12

20.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.99

8012

-0.8

5586

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

4LA

HAMILTO

N24

502.08

3333

333

1.79

1687

70

70

11.5

34

51.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

6501

841.

6341

81DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

4MA

HAMILTO

N24

572.37

51.

8838

559

06

01

2.5

35

61.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.37

1476

1.00

3102

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

4RD

HARR

IS21

231.09

5238

095

1.41

0842

40

50

01

23

30.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.06

7293

0.28

1466

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

4LA

HARR

IS21

311.47

6190

476

1.66

1897

90

50

01

24

51.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7361

50.

1602

16DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

4MA

HARR

IS21

512.42

8571

429

2.24

8809

20

100

12

34

51.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.47

4839

1.03

8737

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

4RD

HEN

DER

SON

2123

1.09

5238

095

1.44

5847

90

50

01

23

40.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.06

7293

0.28

1466

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

4LA

HEN

DER

SON

2115

0.71

4285

714

1.05

5597

30

40

00

12

21.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7361

5-1

.557

017

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

4MA

HEN

DER

SON

2128

1.33

3333

333

1.35

4006

40

50

01

23

41.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.47

4839

-1.0

1432

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

4RD

JENKINS

44

11.

1547

005

02

00

12

22

0.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

93.45

2455

0.00

6597

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

4LA

JENKINS

41

0.25

0.5

01

00

00.5

11

1.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

64.

4549

12-1

.136

241

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

4MA

JENKINS

413

3.25

4.03

1128

90

90

0.5

26

99

1.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

75.54

1415

1.12

5364

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

4RD

TARV

ER24

371.54

1666

667

1.74

4037

50

60

01

2.5

45

0.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.99

8012

1.63

5625

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

4LA

TARV

ER24

351.45

8333

333

1.44

4003

10

60

11

23

51.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

6501

840.

1282

52DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

4MA

TARV

ER24

512.12

51.

8489

127

06

00.5

23.5

46

1.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.37

1476

0.50

2112

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

5RD

HARV

EY19

321.68

4210

526

1.91

6380

60

70

01

34

71.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.39

4608

1.30

6508

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

5LA

HARV

EY19

261.36

8421

053

1.38

2852

40

40

01

24

41.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.83

9135

-0.1

4152

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

5MA

HARV

EY19

371.94

7368

421

1.84

0099

20

70

12

35

71.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.57

0354

0.21

0508

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

5RD

JAMES

2018

0.9

1.02

0835

60

40

01

12

31.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.36

2743

-0.5

7757

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

5LA

JAMES

2019

0.95

0.88

7041

20

30

01

1.5

22.5

1.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.80

3574

-1.0

6218

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

5MA

JAMES

2027

1.35

1.22

5818

70

40

0.5

12

3.5

41.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.52

6158

-0.8

3741

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

5RD

ROBE

RTS

2019

0.95

1.43

1782

10

50

00

1.5

34.5

1.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.36

2743

-0.4

5528

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

5LA

ROBE

RTS

2044

2.2

3.30

2311

80

140

01

3.5

510

1.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.80

3574

1.67

7243

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

5MA

ROBE

RTS

2029

1.45

1.93

2410

50

70

01

2.5

46

1.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.52

6158

-0.6

6107

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

5RD

TOSO

N17

211.23

5294

118

1.52

1899

06

00

12

36

1.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.46

6577

0.22

3566

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

5LA

TOSO

N17

281.64

7058

824

1.49

7547

05

00

13

35

1.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.91

9454

0.42

9123

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MAGNOLIA ELEM

5MA

TOSO

N17

462.70

5882

353

2.64

0187

20

110

12

45

111.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.67

0174

1.43

2287

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER1

RDDAVIS

1813

67.55

5555

556

4.57

9008

72

202

47

1013

201.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.13

4418

F18

.432

68DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER1

LADAVIS

1898

5.44

4444

444

3.32

9409

50

111

35.5

811

111.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.98

0013

F8.

3692

27DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER1

MA

DAVIS

1812

67

3.89

5699

218

34

78

1218

1.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.19

6858

F10

.874

96DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER1

RDEM

ERSO

N1

11

11

11

11

11

1.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

85.55

1608

-0.0

5407

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER1

LAEM

ERSO

N1

00

00

00

00

00

1.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

87.44

505

-0.8

2319

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER1

MA

EMER

SON

12

22

22

22

22

21.74

8034

012.04

8946

67.89

4874

0.12

2973

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER1

RDWILLIAMS J

1531

2.06

6666

667

1.38

7014

60

40

12

34

41.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.23

52.

5625

47DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER1

LAWILLIAMS J

1552

3.46

6666

667

1.95

9105

70

71

24

56

71.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

83.11

1438

F3.

7065

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER1

MA

WILLIAMS J

1547

3.13

3333

333

2.41

6215

10

81

13

57

81.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.33

5141

2.61

8536

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER1

RDWILLIAMS S

1832

1.77

7777

778

1.83

2887

60

50

01

45

51.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.13

4418

1.98

4732

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER1

LAWILLIAMS S

1849

2.72

2222

222

2.21

7724

20

70

12

47

71.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.98

0013

2.43

8355

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER1

MA

WILLIAMS S

1853

2.94

4444

444

1.79

7783

70

71

22.5

45

71.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.19

6858

2.47

7341

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER2

RDFO

STER

1826

1.44

4444

444

1.68

8097

50

50

01

35

50.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.89

1444

1.62

7531

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER2

LAFO

STER

1884

4.66

6666

667

3.80

4022

60

161

24

79

161.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.54

433

F8.

1970

24DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER2

MA

FOSTER

1810

45.77

7777

778

4.35

9648

60

191

44.5

711

191.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.17

6368

F8.

3911

63DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER2

RDHAMON

11

11

11

11

11

10.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

5.05

9729

0.06

1968

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER2

LAHAMON

14

44

44

44

44

41.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

16.51

6974

1.54

7277

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER2

MA

HAMON

10

00

00

00

00

01.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

7.87

0404

-0.8

4445

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER2

RDHARR

IS18

140.77

7777

778

0.80

8452

10

20

01

12

20.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.89

1444

-0.4

1940

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER2

LAHARR

IS18

181

1.49

509

06

00

11

36

1.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.54

433

-0.7

8164

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER2

MA

HARR

IS18

351.94

4444

444

1.89

3401

07

00

23

57

1.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.17

6368

0.44

6962

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER2

RDHIGHTO

WER

1832

1.77

7777

778

2.86

0595

50

110

01

17

110.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.89

1444

2.65

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER2

LAHIGHTO

WER

1842

2.33

3333

333

2.76

5331

60

120

12

26

121.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.54

433

2.48

3327

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER2

MA

HIGHTO

WER

1859

3.27

7777

778

3.99

7139

50

180

22

45

181.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.17

6368

F3.

2101

62DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER3

RDBE

LL1

11

11

11

11

11

1.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

16.77

1753

-0.0

9241

7DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER3

LABE

LL1

11

11

11

11

11

1.50

7762

082

2.05

317

7.66

7272

-0.2

4730

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER3

MA

BELL

12

22

22

22

22

21.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

99.17

3104

0.05

1819

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER3

RDBR

ACK

EEN

2062

3.1

2.33

7339

90

101

22

3.5

6.5

8.5

1.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.42

4523

F4.

6185

13DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER3

LABR

ACK

EEN

2068

3.4

2.43

6563

60

81

13

57.5

81.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.88

507

F4.

1216

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER3

MA

BRACK

EEN

2088

4.4

3.57

4765

40

121

23.5

611

121.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.50

6068

F4.

6431

1

241

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER3

RDBR

OWN

1724

1.41

1764

706

2.06

3335

40

80

01

24

81.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.53

051

0.52

8583

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER3

LABR

OWN

1726

1.52

9411

765

2.37

4806

50

100

01

23

101.50

7762

082

2.05

317

3.00

1663

0.04

3476

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER3

MA

BROWN

1725

1.47

0588

235

1.69

9913

50

70

01

23

71.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.64

4233

-0.6

8349

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER3

RDDASH

ER20

127

6.35

6.05

4793

71

231

24

817

211.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.42

4523

F12

.405

85DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER3

LADASH

ER20

773.85

2.71

9810

40

111

23

57.5

101.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.88

507

F5.

1017

73DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER3

MA

DASH

ER20

643.2

2.62

7786

70

100

13

56

81.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.50

6068

2.43

7426

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER4

RDDAVIS

24

20

22

22

22

22

0.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

94.47

0534

0.86

7741

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER4

LADAVIS

22

11.

4142

136

02

00

12

22

1.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

65.

7181

84-0

.281

775

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER4

MA

DAVIS

213

6.5

4.94

9747

53

103

36.5

1010

101.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

77.06

0325

2.67

5856

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER4

RDFA

RREY

1825

614

.222

2222

27.

1993

101

425

57

1421

2425

0.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.15

3242

F34

.249

36DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER4

LAFA

RREY

1833

718

.722

2222

28.

0132

651

134

913

2024

3134

1.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

8427

98F

36.1

3522

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER4

MA

FARR

EY18

200

11.111

1111

16.

9780

234

221

24

1117

2121

1.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.60

3069

F16

.030

06DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER4

RDODOM

2010

15.05

2.41

6500

31

101.5

3.5

5.5

77.5

90.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.09

3784

F11

.068

36DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER4

LAODOM

2084

4.2

2.66

7543

70

100.5

2.5

46

7.5

91.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7690

21F

6.14

7511

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER4

MA

ODOM

2080

43.

4488

747

014

12

34.5

9.5

121.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.51

4361

F3.

8884

07DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER4

RDSM

ITH

1913

97.31

5789

474

4.08

3199

11

151

47

1014

150.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.12

2339

F16

.815

51DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER4

LASM

ITH

1984

4.42

1052

632

2.69

3939

50

101

24

78

101.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

8044

53F

6.46

5758

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER4

MA

SMITH

1911

96.26

3157

895

3.94

1828

52

142

35

913

141.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.55

6963

F7.

8252

43DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER5

RDCH

ESTER

1766

3.88

2352

941

3.37

0503

50

130

24

58

131.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.46

6577

F6.

1924

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER5

LACH

ESTER

1726

1.52

9411

765

1.77

1921

50

50

01

25

51.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.91

9454

0.19

1417

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER5

MA

CHESTER

1733

1.94

1176

471

1.78

4327

20

60

11

35

61.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.67

0174

0.18

9054

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER5

RDLO

RTHRIDGE

2018

39.15

2.49

7893

85

145.5

89

1113

141.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.36

2743

F19

.600

24DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER5

LALO

RTHRIDGE

2038

1.9

1.65

1155

90

50

11

3.5

4.5

51.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.80

3574

1.01

9781

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER5

MA

LORT

HRIDGE

2048

2.4

2.85

4359

50

90

01

47

91.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.52

6158

1.01

4143

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER5

RDMALLARD

1956

2.94

7368

421

2.54

8936

30

90

12

57

91.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.39

4608

F4.

3177

07DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER5

LAMALLARD

1915

28

4.96

6554

81

183

48

1218

181.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.83

9135

F14

.023

87DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MART

IN LUTH

ER5

MA

MALLARD

1913

57.10

5263

158

4.82

9248

10

171

37

1016

171.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.57

0354

F9.

0755

96

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

1RD

BULLARD

1736

2.11

7647

059

2.57

1049

20

100

01

35

101.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.16

497

2.86

9079

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

1LA

BULLARD

1769

4.05

8823

529

2.58

5309

20

80

24

78

81.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

83.01

9933

F5.

1996

46DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

1MA

BULLARD

1759

3.47

0588

235

2.67

2022

80

81

22

68

81.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.23

8862

F3.

4663

05DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

1RD

DUVA

LL17

603.52

9411

765

1.84

1115

41

81

24

55

81.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.16

497

F6.

7748

03DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

1LA

DUVA

LL17

143

8.41

1764

706

4.50

0816

90

162

68

1116

161.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

83.01

9933

F14

.416

14DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

1MA

DUVA

LL17

105

6.17

6470

588

3.46

8344

21

161

46

79

161.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.23

8862

F8.

9113

65DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

1RD

FILLINGAME

1866

3.66

6666

667

2.78

6522

20

101

13

68

101.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.13

4418

F7.

3619

46DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

1LA

FILLINGAME

1886

4.77

7777

778

3.02

0626

30

121

35

78

121.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.98

0013

F6.

9167

69DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

1MA

FILLINGAME

1866

3.66

6666

667

2.44

9489

70

80

23.5

67

81.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.19

6858

F3.

9728

07DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

1RD

THORN

TON

1851

2.83

3333

333

2.57

2478

80

90

12

47

91.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.13

4418

F4.

9896

46DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

1LA

THORN

TON

1884

4.66

6666

667

2.52

0504

20

91

34

78

91.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.98

0013

F6.

6746

92DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

1MA

THORN

TON

1896

5.33

3333

333

4.74

0315

20

171

24

715

171.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.19

6858

F7.

4238

82DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

2RD

DUNCA

N18

201.11

1111

111

1.07

8609

60

30

01

23

30.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.89

1444

0.60

4063

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

2LA

DUNCA

N18

160.88

8888

889

0.83

2352

40

20

01

22

21.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.54

433

-1.0

5372

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

2MA

DUNCA

N18

422.33

3333

333

1.60

8799

30

60

12

35

61.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.17

6368

1.25

2895

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

2RD

SMITH

1820

1.11

1111

111

1.13

1832

90

30

01

23

30.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.89

1444

0.60

4063

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

2LA

SMITH

1877

4.27

7777

778

3.04

4871

40

131

24

67

131.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.54

433

F7.

2447

41DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

2MA

SMITH

1812

77.05

5555

556

4.20

7447

52

163

45.5

916

161.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.17

6368

F11

.039

23DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

2RD

TRICE

1931

1.63

1578

947

1.53

5162

90

60

01

33

60.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.86

5384

2.26

2453

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

2LA

TRICE

1934

1.78

9473

684

1.27

2746

30

50

12

24

51.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.51

1654

1.18

3118

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

2MA

TRICE

1938

22

08

01

13

58

1.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.13

7758

0.57

7498

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

2RD

WATERS

1818

11.

2833

779

05

00

12

25

0.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.89

1444

0.26

2906

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

2LA

WATERS

1828

1.55

5555

556

1.58

0105

10

50

01

34

51.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.54

433

0.57

8761

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

2MA

WATERS

1810

65.88

8888

889

3.75

5605

80

111

26

911

111.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.17

6368

F8.

6214

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

3RD

LEGGETT

1923

1.21

0526

316

1.18

2227

10

40

01

23

41.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.45

7048

0.08

8833

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

3LA

LEGGETT

1929

1.52

6315

789

1.74

3827

90

60

01

24

61.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.92

0851

0.03

939

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

3MA

LEGGETT

1936

1.89

4736

842

1.62

9408

10

60

12

25

61.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.54

8468

0.03

7292

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

3RD

MITCH

ELL

2112

86.09

5238

095

4.92

8536

90

201

26

911

121.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.39

4349

F12

.086

7DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

3LA

MITCH

ELL

2181

3.85

7142

857

2.81

5771

90

110

24

47

91.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.85

1877

F5.

2437

04DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

3MA

MITCH

ELL

2178

3.71

4285

714

2.57

1825

40

81

24

57

81.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.46

6733

F3.

4662

56

242

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

3RD

RUCK

ER19

201.05

2631

579

1.02

5978

40

30

01

23

31.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.45

7048

-0.2

7991

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

3LA

RUCK

ER19

271.42

1052

632

1.46

4991

10

50

01

24

51.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.92

0851

-0.1

8408

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

3MA

RUCK

ER19

361.89

4736

842

1.66

3154

20

70

12

33

71.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.54

8468

0.03

7292

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

3RD

WILLIAMS

2124

1.14

2857

143

1.31

4751

50

50

01

12

41.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.39

4349

-0.0

7275

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

3LA

WILLIAMS

2117

0.80

9523

811.

3273

676

05

00

01

23

1.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.85

1877

-1.5

5843

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

3MA

WILLIAMS

2127

1.28

5714

286

1.30

9307

30

50

01

22

41.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.46

6733

-1.1

0786

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

4RD

ADAMS

2734

1.25

9259

259

1.37

5404

60

60

01

23

30.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.94

0626

0.83

9287

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

4LA

ADAMS

2736

1.33

3333

333

1.20

8941

04

00

12

33

1.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

5789

77-0

.183

424

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

4MA

ADAMS

2776

2.81

4814

815

2.80

1607

20

130

12

46

61.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.28

5859

1.99

8785

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

4RD

DAVIS

10

00

00

00

00

00.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

95.91

0314

-0.6

0698

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

4LA

DAVIS

10

00

00

00

00

01.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

67.

5047

19-0

.691

079

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

4MA

DAVIS

10

00

00

00

00

01.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

79.20

8389

-0.7

6675

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

4RD

HAIRE

2720

0.74

0740

741

0.81

2999

80

20

01

12

20.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.94

0626

-0.8

0501

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

4LA

HAIRE

2731

1.14

8148

148

1.89

5413

60

70

00

14

61.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

5789

77-0

.656

692

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

4MA

HAIRE

2741

1.51

8518

519

1.62

5999

60

70

01

24

41.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.28

5859

-0.7

5651

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

4RD

STOKES

2664

2.46

1538

462

2.12

0957

70

80

12

45

60.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.95

8647

F4.

5649

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

4LA

STOKES

2661

2.34

6153

846

2.22

6069

30

80

12

46

61.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

6013

382.

3600

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

4MA

STOKES

2648

1.84

6153

846

1.66

5948

60

60

02

34

51.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.31

2746

-0.0

5899

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

5RD

BUTLER

2519

0.76

1.09

0871

20

30

00

13

31.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.23

3248

-1.0

2857

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

5LA

BUTLER

2537

1.48

1.53

0795

05

00

13

44

1.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.65

9055

0.11

1058

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

5MA

BUTLER

2551

2.04

2.16

9485

30

80

11

25

71.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.34

655

0.42

4095

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

5RD

MCG

HEE

2417

0.70

8333

333

0.85

8672

70

30

00.5

12

21.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.25

5871

-1.1

4621

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

5LA

MCG

HEE

2434

1.41

6666

667

2.51

8050

80

120

01

1.5

34

1.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.68

4303

-0.0

4323

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

5MA

MCG

HEE

2434

1.41

6666

667

2.71

7362

30

130

01

1.5

34

1.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.37

7928

-0.7

8856

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

5RD

WILLIAMS

2524

0.96

0.84

0634

70

30

01

12

21.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.23

3248

-0.4

8167

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

5LA

WILLIAMS

2533

1.32

1.46

4012

80

50

01

14

51.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.65

9055

-0.2

8097

7DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MORN

INGSIDE E

5MA

WILLIAMS

2547

1.88

2.33

3095

20

110

11

34

41.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.34

655

0.10

865

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

1RD

ASH

LEYA

2110

24.85

7142

857

3.03

7856

40

101

34

79

91.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.05

6245

F11

.612

35DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

1LA

ASH

LEYA

2112

66

3.13

0495

20

122

56

810

101.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.87

7869

F10

.347

16DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

1MA

ASH

LEYA

2111

95.66

6666

667

2.78

0887

11

144

45

68

111.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.08

9384

F8.

7642

26DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

1RD

COAXU

MA

2137

1.76

1904

762

1.67

0471

80

60

11

25

51.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.05

6245

2.09

4948

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

1LA

COAXU

MA

2175

3.57

1428

571

1.96

3961

17

22

34

77

1.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.87

7869

F4.

6321

21DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

1MA

COAXU

MA

2174

3.52

3809

524

2.50

2379

80

80

23

57

81.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.08

9384

F3.

9716

14DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

1RD

COLLINS

1966

3.47

3684

211

3.11

5702

50

120

13

59

121.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.10

631

F6.

9992

52DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

1LA

COLLINS

1979

4.15

7894

737

2.98

6323

60

90

23

78

91.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.94

3287

F5.

7187

65DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

1MA

COLLINS

1976

42.

6457

513

09

02

46

79

1.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.15

8216

F4.

7907

99DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

1RD

MASTER

S19

107

5.63

1578

947

3.46

7476

31

121

35

811

121.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.10

631

F13

.310

59DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

1LA

MASTER

S19

914.78

9473

684

2.63

6895

20

91

35

78

91.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.94

3287

F7.

1324

84DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

1MA

MASTER

S19

117

6.15

7894

737

3.32

1029

90

132

45

813

131.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.15

8216

F9.

3814

73DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

2RD

GRE

EN L

1819

1.05

5555

556

1.30

4842

70

50

01

22

50.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.89

1444

0.43

3485

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

2LA

GRE

EN L

1814

0.77

7777

778

1.16

5966

20

40

00

13

41.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.54

433

-1.3

2580

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

2MA

GRE

EN L

1842

2.33

3333

333

1.94

0285

06

01

24

66

1.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.17

6368

1.25

2895

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

2RD

GRE

EN M

1582

5.46

6666

667

3.56

3037

80

111

34

910

110.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.98

47F

12.7

5955

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

2LA

GRE

EN M

1558

3.86

6666

667

3.20

4164

011

01

36

811

1.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.66

1262

F5.

6945

27DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

2MA

GRE

EN M

1511

27.46

6666

667

4.74

8934

71

162

39

1113

161.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.31

4534

F10

.855

15DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

2RD

HAYES

1724

1.41

1764

706

1.46

0257

80

50

01

24

50.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.91

977

1.48

4163

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

2LA

HAYES

1724

1.41

1764

706

1.22

7743

04

01

12

44

1.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.57

9848

0.22

027

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

2MA

HAYES

1738

2.23

5294

118

1.88

8432

30

60

12

45

61.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.21

8336

1.02

0143

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

2RD

MORR

OW

1438

2.71

4285

714

2.36

7360

50

70

12

37

70.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

2.02

2267

F4.

8738

79DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

2LA

MORR

OW

1510

36.86

6666

667

5.69

2936

30

182

26

1118

181.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.66

1262

F12

.400

64DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

2MA

MORR

OW

1595

6.33

3333

333

4.09

9941

92

172

45

713

171.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.31

4534

F8.

7110

68DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

2RD

TAYLOR

1558

3.86

6666

667

2.53

1703

70

70

14

67

70.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.98

47F

8.27

4935

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

2LA

TAYLOR

1568

4.53

3333

333

3.37

7798

70

121

24

89

121.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.66

1262

F7.

1847

75DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

2MA

TAYLOR

1512

68.4

5.77

9273

32

243

56

1216

241.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.31

4534

F12

.620

86DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

3RD

BROOKS

1810

65.88

8888

889

4.24

1099

90

141

26

713

141.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.49

2248

F10

.721

05DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

3LA

BROOKS

1836

21.

8470

963

07

01

12

57

1.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.95

9573

1.01

7153

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

3MA

BROOKS

1856

3.11

1111

111

4.65

1235

020

01

1.5

37

201.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.59

4355

2.15

7346

243

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

3RD

HALL

2015

67.8

3.28

6335

31

134

58

10.5

1213

1.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.42

4523

F15

.880

19DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

3LA

HALL

2042

2.1

3.37

0147

60

120

01

28

111.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.88

507

1.28

999

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

3MA

HALL

2029

1.45

1.95

9457

50

80

01

23.5

61.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.50

6068

-0.7

7919

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

3RD

JAMES

1854

32.

6788

935

09

00

3.5

56

91.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.49

2248

F4.

1541

92DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

3LA

JAMES

1838

2.11

1111

111

3.12

2760

60

130

01.5

35

131.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.95

9573

1.24

6752

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

3MA

JAMES

1832

1.77

7777

778

2.34

0325

70

80

01

45

81.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.59

4355

-0.1

6764

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

3RD

KIRK

195

0.26

3157

895

0.45

2413

90

10

00

11

11.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.45

7048

-2.1

2368

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

3LA

KIRK

1930

1.57

8947

368

3.45

3111

10

150

00

23

151.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.92

0851

0.15

1127

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

3MA

KIRK

1927

1.42

1052

632

2.19

3824

40

90

01

24

91.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.54

8468

-0.8

1132

7DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

4RD

AKIYO

DE

2426

1.08

3333

333

1.31

6010

70

40

01

23

40.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.99

8012

0.26

5307

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

4LA

AKIYO

DE

2443

1.79

1666

667

1.91

0592

10

60

01

44

51.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

6501

840.

9314

14DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

4MA

AKIYO

DE

2442

217

.583

3333

39.

3897

107

032

211

2025

2829

1.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.37

1476

F31

.479

99DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

4RD

BOWMAN

2619

0.73

0769

231

1.00

2305

03

00

01

23

0.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.95

8647

-0.8

2099

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

4LA

BOWMAN

2664

2.46

1538

462

3.42

0301

40

180

12

34

41.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

6013

382.

6494

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

4MA

BOWMAN

2637

514

.423

0769

27.

5374

960

293

1015

1924

261.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.31

2746

F26

.173

79DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

4RD

SUTTON

2531

1.24

1.61

4517

50

50

01

15

50.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.97

7739

0.74

8836

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

4LA

SUTTON

2526

1.04

1.64

5195

06

00

01

44

1.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

6250

28-0

.897

857

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

4MA

SUTTON

2534

013

.67.

7995

726

029

410

1219

2527

1.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.34

123

F23

.982

09DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

5RD

LOUD

2110

14.80

9523

814.

8746

184

021

12

35

1012

1.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.33

3182

F9.

2061

94DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

5LA

LOUD

2195

4.52

3809

524

3.41

4953

10

152

24

68

81.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.77

0583

F6.

9371

53DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

5MA

LOUD

2122

610

.761

9047

64.

3232

483

117

59

1114

1616

1.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.48

5157

F16

.148

64DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

5RD

SMITH

2227

1.22

7272

727

1.34

2769

60

50

01

23

41.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.30

566

0.23

3751

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

5LA

SMITH

2261

2.77

2727

273

2.91

0274

40

90

01.5

47

81.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.73

9869

F3.

0755

26DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

5MA

SMITH

2289

4.04

5454

545

2.39

9945

90

91

23.5

67

81.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.44

6985

F4.

1068

46DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

5RD

WILLIAMS

2249

2.22

7272

727

2.22

3935

10

70

02

46

61.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.30

566

2.79

8922

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

5LA

WILLIAMS

2276

3.45

4545

455

2.46

3587

60

80

23.5

67

71.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.73

9869

F4.

6426

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NEW

JACK

SON H

5MA

WILLIAMS

2225

711

.681

8181

86.

5711

227

425

57

9.5

1522

251.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.44

6985

F18

.23

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

1RD

ORR

10

00

00

00

00

01.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

85.55

1608

-0.7

2506

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

1LA

ORR

10

00

00

00

00

01.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

87.44

505

-0.8

2319

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

1MA

ORR

10

00

00

00

00

01.74

8034

012.04

8946

67.89

4874

-0.8

5313

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

1RD

PRICKETT

2091

4.55

2.62

5281

91

122

34

67.5

101.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.08

0339

F10

.410

83DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

1LA

PRICKETT

2013

16.55

3.87

2643

62

153

45.5

8.5

1415

1.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.90

9351

F11

.360

89DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

1MA

PRICKETT

2015

17.55

3.99

3086

12

193

5.5

79

1317

1.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.12

2509

F12

.663

67DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

1RD

ROBINSO

N J

2077

3.85

3.37

5998

90

120

13.5

6.5

811

1.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.08

0339

F8.

3103

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

1LA

ROBINSO

N J

2013

06.5

4.86

1232

20

180

35.5

1012

161.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.90

9351

F11

.246

06DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

1MA

ROBINSO

N J

2010

95.45

4.18

613

014

0.5

25

812

141.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.12

2509

F8.

0801

01DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

1RD

ROBINSO

N R

2098

4.9

3.30

7089

70

121.5

25

7.5

9.5

111.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.08

0339

F11

.461

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

1LA

ROBINSO

N R

2021

910

.95

4.69

5742

83

214

8.5

1113

.518

201.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.90

9351

F21

.465

66DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

1MA

ROBINSO

N R

2022

711

.35

5.51

8151

93

243.5

811

13.5

1922

1.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.12

2509

F20

.957

74DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

1RD

SEAWELL

1950

2.63

1578

947

2.16

5654

30

80

13

37

81.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.10

631

F4.

5362

89DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

1LA

SEAWELL

1918

49.68

4210

526

5.45

7437

70

203

68

1418

201.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.94

3287

F18

.088

81DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

1MA

SEAWELL

1914

47.57

8947

368

5.79

5743

50

181

27

1118

181.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.15

8216

F12

.404

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

2RD

GOODDINE

2278

3.54

5454

545

3.17

3210

40

130

13.5

56

90.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.79

8167

F8.

9311

01DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

2LA

GOODDINE

2291

4.13

6363

636

3.65

5334

70

120

13.5

78

91.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.42

7372

F7.

6265

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

2MA

GOODDINE

2210

44.72

7272

727

3.49

3965

10

121

25

611

111.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.03

8172

F6.

8699

42DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

2RD

POLLOCK

23

1.5

0.70

7106

81

21

11.5

22

20.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

3.84

5583

0.59

937

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

2LA

POLLOCK

21

0.5

0.70

7106

80

10

00.5

11

11.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

14.99

4582

-0.6

6866

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

2MA

POLLOCK

23

1.5

2.12

1320

30

30

01.5

33

31.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

6.07

1561

-0.1

5803

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

2RD

WHATLEY

2018

19.05

4.61

6617

63

204.5

68.5

1017

200.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.84

1304

F26

.330

89DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

2LA

WHATLEY

2023

711

.85

6.62

7494

63

253.5

6.5

1116

2224

1.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.48

1461

F27

.181

94DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

2MA

WHATLEY

2017

78.85

3.95

0682

83

153.5

59

1215

151.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.10

2082

F15

.556

34DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

2RD

WILLIAMS

1963

3.31

5789

474

2.60

4539

40

101

22

48

100.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.86

5384

F7.

5753

66DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

2LA

WILLIAMS

1953

2.78

9473

684

2.52

9359

80

90

12

47

91.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.51

1654

F3.

6989

46DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

2MA

WILLIAMS

1976

42.

6666

667

09

02

36

89

1.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.13

7758

F4.

8358

76DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

3RD

EDWARD

S21

108

5.14

2857

143

2.95

4415

60

132

45

69

101.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.39

4349

F9.

7483

42DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

3LA

EDWARD

S21

703.33

3333

333

3.36

6501

60

110

13

68

91.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.85

1877

F4.

0745

86DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

3MA

EDWARD

S21

401.90

4761

905

2.79

1142

50

120

01

24

51.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.46

6733

0.05

8088

244

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

3RD

FORD

2015

0.75

1.40

9553

90

60

00

12

41.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.42

4523

-1.0

1232

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

3LA

FORD

2038

1.9

3.25

8995

60

130

01

26

101.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.88

507

0.85

4358

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

3MA

FORD

2024

1.2

1.50

7874

10

50

01

23.5

4.5

1.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.50

6068

-1.2

3871

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

3RD

HESTER

12

22

22

22

22

21.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

16.77

1753

0.44

3368

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

3LA

HESTER

10

00

00

00

00

01.50

7762

082

2.05

317

7.66

7272

-0.7

3435

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

3MA

HESTER

10

00

00

00

00

01.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

99.17

3104

-0.7

7019

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

3RD

JAMES

1970

3.68

4210

526

2.49

5610

20

91

23

57

91.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.45

7048

F5.

8659

53DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

3LA

JAMES

1910

65.57

8947

368

2.77

5203

51

111

45

810

111.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.92

0851

F8.

6431

64DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

3MA

JAMES

1992

4.84

2105

263

1.97

9426

31

82

35

67

81.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.54

8468

F5.

3175

88DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

3RD

JONES

1510

67.06

6666

667

5.41

7783

81

192

25

1015

191.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.61

8213

F12

.230

92DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

3LA

JONES

1511

57.66

6666

667

5.43

3581

60

212

27

1015

211.50

7762

082

2.05

317

3.09

8141

F11

.617

81DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

3MA

JONES

1515

010

6.49

1753

024

35

916

2024

1.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.75

8562

F12

.935

22DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

3RD

ORR

11

11

11

11

11

11.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

16.77

1753

-0.0

9241

7DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

3LA

ORR

11

11

11

11

11

11.50

7762

082

2.05

317

7.66

7272

-0.2

4730

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

3MA

ORR

12

22

22

22

22

21.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

99.17

3104

0.05

1819

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

4RD

BURR

OUGHS

53

0.6

0.89

4427

20

20

00

12

20.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

93.19

2972

-0.5

3848

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

4LA

BURR

OUGHS

52

0.4

0.54

7722

60

10

00

11

11.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

64.

1329

36-1

.105

39DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

4MA

BURR

OUGHS

516

3.2

3.27

1085

40

70

03

67

71.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

75.15

4282

1.21

2461

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

4RD

DUBO

SE22

401.81

8181

818

2.36

3136

80

110

11

24

40.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.04

263

2.35

7516

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

4LA

DUBO

SE22

261.18

1818

182

1.62

2354

70

60

01

24

41.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7055

47-0

.515

103

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

4MA

DUBO

SE22

683.09

0909

091

2.34

8436

08

11

34

77

1.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.43

8043

2.33

3973

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

4RD

KELLY

2045

2.25

1.91

5999

10

60

0.5

24

4.5

5.5

0.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.09

3784

F3.

4263

59DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

4LA

KELLY

2040

22.

0261

449

09

01

1.5

2.5

46.5

1.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7690

211.

3085

01DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

4MA

KELLY

2049

2.45

3.37

9115

40

160

12

24

101.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.51

4361

1.05

2904

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

4RD

ORR

28

44.

2426

407

17

11

47

77

0.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

94.47

0534

2.59

3894

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

4LA

ORR

26

31.

4142

136

24

22

34

44

1.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

65.

7181

841.

1093

43DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

4MA

ORR

25

2.5

0.70

7106

82

32

22.5

33

31.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

77.06

0325

0.36

1882

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

4RD

SADLER

2320

0.86

9565

217

0.96

7863

10

30

01

12

30.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.01

9594

-0.3

6594

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

4LA

SADLER

2331

1.34

7826

087

1.74

7951

90

80

01

23

31.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

6769

63-0

.135

108

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

4MA

SADLER

2367

2.91

3043

478

1.67

6388

16

11

34

56

1.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.40

3674

2.03

7497

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

5RD

BROWN

2197

4.61

9047

619

6.61

4198

30

250

01

910

161.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.33

3182

F8.

7288

23DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

5LA

BROWN

2187

4.14

2857

143

6.61

2758

20

240

01

514

171.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.77

0583

F6.

0816

63DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

5MA

BROWN

2111

75.57

1428

571

6.40

7584

80

190

13

916

171.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.48

5157

F6.

7697

65DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

5RD

CRAVE

Y20

241.2

1.70

4483

30

70

01

23

51.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.36

2743

0.15

6169

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

5LA

CRAVE

Y20

251.25

1.44

6411

20

50

01

23.5

4.5

1.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.80

3574

-0.4

0472

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

5MA

CRAVE

Y20

412.05

1.60

5090

60

60.5

11.5

34.5

5.5

1.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.52

6158

0.39

6956

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

5RD

RANDLE

2277

3.5

5.68

8333

90

260

12

36

121.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.30

566

F6.

0636

86DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

5LA

RANDLE

2278

3.54

5454

545

3.46

0350

60

141

12

67

101.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.73

9869

F4.

8516

46DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

NORT

HSIDE ELE

5MA

RANDLE

2211

05

4.61

8802

20

201

24

710

121.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.44

6985

F5.

8722

41

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

1RD

BUSH

KIM

BERLY

1881

4.5

4.35

5523

90

140

12.5

811

141.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.13

4418

F9.

7342

47DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

1LA

BUSH

KIM

BERLY

1810

45.77

7777

778

4.35

9648

60

140

26

911

141.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.98

0013

F9.

0954

56DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

1MA

BUSH

KIM

BERLY

1885

4.72

2222

222

3.70

6997

40

140

24

610

141.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.19

6858

F6.

1584

87DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

1RD

DURH

AM

11

11

11

11

11

11.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

85.55

1608

-0.0

5407

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

1LA

DURH

AM

10

00

00

00

00

01.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

87.44

505

-0.8

2319

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

1MA

DURH

AM

12

22

22

22

22

21.74

8034

012.04

8946

67.89

4874

0.12

2973

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

1RD

NELSO

N18

241.33

3333

333

1.32

8422

30

40

01

24

41.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.13

4418

0.71

9505

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

1LA

NELSO

N18

281.55

5555

556

1.42

3426

80

40

01.5

34

41.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.98

0013

-0.1

0344

7DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

1MA

NELSO

N18

402.22

2222

222

2.18

4317

20

70

01.5

36

71.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.19

6858

0.98

1875

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

1RD

STAMPS

1768

44.

4581

386

118

11

34

1018

1.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.16

497

F8.

0767

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

1LA

STAMPS

1798

5.76

4705

882

3.56

2467

81

152

45

711

151.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

83.01

9933

F8.

8115

17DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

1MA

STAMPS

1799

5.82

3529

412

3.67

8234

91

152

35

712

151.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.23

8862

F8.

2011

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

1RD

TESTON

1810

0.55

5555

556

0.61

5698

80

20

00.5

11

21.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.13

4418

-1.4

9464

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

1LA

TESTON

1817

0.94

4444

444

1.05

5641

60

30

01

23

31.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.98

0013

-1.4

3486

7DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

1MA

TESTON

1816

0.88

8888

889

1.27

8275

04

00

01

34

1.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.19

6858

-1.7

7898

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

1RD

WILLIAMS L

1829

1.61

1111

111

1.85

1514

10

60

01

35

61.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.13

4418

1.51

0272

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

1LA

WILLIAMS L

1862

3.44

4444

444

2.63

9568

21

91

12

68

91.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.98

0013

F4.

0118

52DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

1MA

WILLIAMS L

1859

3.27

7777

778

2.65

2536

10

110

23

47

111.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.19

6858

F3.

1675

56

245

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

2RD

CAMPB

ELL CH

ARLE

1912

0.63

1578

947

0.95

5133

90

30

00

12

30.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.86

5384

-0.8

9208

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

2LA

CAMPB

ELL CH

ARLE

1923

1.21

0526

316

1.22

8320

80

40

01

14

41.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.51

1654

-0.2

7341

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

2MA

CAMPB

ELL CH

ARLE

1938

21.

9148

542

07

00

23

57

1.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.13

7758

0.57

7498

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

2RD

FRAZIER

DEB

ORA

H17

824.82

3529

412

3.14

7127

50

121

35

69

120.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.91

977

F11

.664

52DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

2LA

FRAZIER

DEB

ORA

H17

110

6.47

0588

235

3.67

6235

30

131

47

812

131.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.57

9848

F12

.258

93DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

2MA

FRAZIER

DEB

ORA

H17

113

6.64

7058

824

4.47

1313

81

172

37

914

171.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.21

8336

F9.

9054

86DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

2RD

HAMON

11

11

11

11

11

10.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

5.05

9729

0.06

1968

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

2LA

HAMON

10

00

00

00

00

01.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

16.51

6974

-0.7

6140

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

2MA

HAMON

10

00

00

00

00

01.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

7.87

0404

-0.8

4445

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

2RD

HESTER

10

00

00

00

00

00.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

5.05

9729

-0.6

6173

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

2LA

HESTER

10

00

00

00

00

01.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

16.51

6974

-0.7

6140

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

2MA

HESTER

11

11

11

11

11

11.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

7.87

0404

-0.3

5598

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

2RD

HOUSTON

1910

35.42

1052

632

4.16

7543

81

172

24

712

170.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.86

5384

F14

.216

51DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

2LA

HOUSTON

1910

85.68

4210

526

4.80

8009

90

151

24

915

151.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.51

1654

F10

.981

61DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

2MA

HOUSTON

1910

65.57

8947

368

4.36

2921

91

151

25

715

151.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.13

7758

F8.

1977

53DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

2RD

KINSA

UL

2017

0.85

1.46

0893

70

60

00

12.5

4.5

0.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.84

1304

-0.2

0834

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

2LA

KINSA

UL

2019

0.95

1.05

0062

70

40

01

12.5

3.5

1.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.48

1461

-0.9

5298

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

2MA

KINSA

UL

2028

1.4

1.50

0876

90

50

01

2.5

3.5

4.5

1.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.10

2082

-0.7

1820

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

2RD

WILLIAMS M

1863

3.5

2.47

9326

30

111

23.5

46

110.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.89

1444

F7.

9389

21DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

2LA

WILLIAMS M

1887

4.83

3333

333

4.30

1162

60

181

23.5

79

181.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.54

433

F8.

6051

45DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

2MA

WILLIAMS M

1814

88.22

2222

222

5.09

3889

71

203

48.5

1016

201.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.17

6368

F13

.457

03DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

3RD

BROWNING

1918

0.94

7368

421

1.22

3550

60

40

00

23

41.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.45

7048

-0.5

2575

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

3LA

BROWNING

1916

0.84

2105

263

1.01

4514

50

30

01

13

31.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.92

0851

-1.4

1319

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

3MA

BROWNING

1939

2.05

2631

579

1.74

7178

20

60

02

35

61.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.54

8468

0.32

0165

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

3RD

LUNSFORD

11

11

11

11

11

11.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

16.77

1753

-0.0

9241

7DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

3LA

LUNSFORD

13

33

33

33

33

31.50

7762

082

2.05

317

7.66

7272

0.72

6797

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

3MA

LUNSFORD

10

00

00

00

00

01.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

99.17

3104

-0.7

7019

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

3RD

LUSTER

1821

1.16

6666

667

1.33

9446

80

50

01

23

51.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.49

2248

-0.0

1323

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

3LA

LUSTER

1840

2.22

2222

222

2.01

6273

70

70

02

45

71.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.95

9573

1.47

635

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

3MA

LUSTER

1824

1.33

3333

333

2.11

4376

60

80

00

24

81.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.59

4355

-0.9

4264

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

3RD

ROSECR

ANS

1832

1.77

7777

778

1.26

2842

50

50

12

23

51.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.49

2248

1.37

5907

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

3LA

ROSECR

ANS

1830

1.66

6666

667

1.74

8949

30

70

11

24

71.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.95

9573

0.32

8358

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

3MA

ROSECR

ANS

1835

1.94

4444

444

1.73

1107

20

50

02

35

51.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.59

4355

0.12

2975

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

3RD

SMITH

1835

1.94

4444

444

3.15

2444

80

130

01

26

131.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.49

2248

1.75

4764

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

3LA

SMITH

1839

2.16

6666

667

2.99

5094

011

00

14

711

1.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.95

9573

1.36

1551

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

3MA

SMITH

1850

2.77

7777

778

3.09

7542

80

100

01.5

48

101.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.59

4355

1.57

6097

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

3RD

WILLIAMS A

1921

1.10

5263

158

1.28

6456

70

50

01

23

51.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.45

7048

-0.1

5700

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

3LA

WILLIAMS A

1948

2.52

6315

789

1.83

6918

30

81

12

45

81.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.92

0851

2.16

2399

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

3MA

WILLIAMS A

1948

2.52

6315

789

1.71

1673

06

01

33

66

1.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.54

8468

1.16

8784

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

4RD

CRAWFO

RD22

241.09

0909

091

1.23

0914

90

50

01

22

30.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.04

263

0.27

5698

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

4LA

CRAWFO

RD22

431.95

4545

455

1.78

5584

40

70

11

33

61.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7055

471.

2675

08DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

4MA

CRAWFO

RD22

582.63

6363

636

1.94

0678

70

70

12

45

61.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.43

8043

1.46

1861

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

4RD

DAVIS

10

00

00

00

00

00.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

95.91

0314

-0.6

0698

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

4LA

DAVIS

10

00

00

00

00

01.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

67.

5047

19-0

.691

079

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

4MA

DAVIS

16

66

66

66

66

61.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

79.20

8389

1.68

7587

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

4RD

HAYN

ES22

301.36

3636

364

1.59

0012

10

70

01

22

40.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

92.04

263

1.05

638

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

4LA

HAYN

ES22

271.22

7272

727

1.60

1541

50

50

00.5

24

41.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

7055

47-0

.410

244

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

4MA

HAYN

ES22

853.86

3636

364

3.53

6146

10

120

13

68

111.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.43

8043

F3.

8165

62DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

4RD

LITTLETO

N25

281.12

1.45

2583

90

40

00

33

40.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.97

7739

0.38

2664

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

4LA

LITTLETO

N25

230.92

1.32

0353

50

60

01

12

31.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

6250

28-1

.192

958

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

4MA

LITTLETO

N25

361.44

1.87

2609

60

90

01

22

41.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.34

123

-0.8

8855

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

4RD

WILLIAMS P

2417

0.70

8333

333

0.90

7896

10

30

00

12

20.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.99

8012

-0.8

5586

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

4LA

WILLIAMS P

2444

1.83

3333

333

2.59

8773

40

90

01

26

81.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

6501

841.

0318

09DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

4MA

WILLIAMS P

2468

2.83

3333

333

3.50

9820

60

160

11.5

47

71.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.37

1476

1.92

1583

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

5RD

PHILLIPS

2433

1.37

51.

3452

816

05

00

12

34

1.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.25

5871

0.63

994

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

5LA

PHILLIPS

2445

1.87

54.

2967

379

021

00

12

45

1.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.68

4303

1.05

7096

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

5MA

PHILLIPS

2457

2.37

52.

5844

434

08

00

23

88

1.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.37

7928

1.06

2646

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

5RD

POOLE

2555

2.2

2.29

1287

80

80

11

36

71.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.23

3248

2.90

9084

246

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

5LA

POOLE

2549

1.96

1.64

5195

07

01

13

45

1.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.65

9055

1.28

7163

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

5MA

POOLE

2545

1.8

2.44

9489

70

100

01

35

61.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.34

655

-0.0

4907

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

5RD

REESE

2625

0.96

1538

462

1.18

2565

70

40

01

22

41.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.21

1943

-0.4

8692

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

5LA

REESE

2623

0.88

4615

385

0.99

3052

80

30

01

22

31.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.63

5279

-1.3

7445

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

5MA

REESE

2668

2.61

5384

615

2.84

3616

30

110

12

46

101.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.31

71.

5893

48DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

5RD

ROBINSO

N25

261.04

1.27

4101

05

00

12

33

1.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.23

3248

-0.2

6291

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

5LA

ROBINSO

N25

401.6

1.52

7525

20

50

01

24

51.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.65

9055

0.40

5084

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

ING

5MA

ROBINSO

N25

682.72

2.15

0968

80

80

12

36

71.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.34

655

1.76

4737

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E1

RDAUSTIN

1955

2.89

4736

842

3.36

4764

10

130

02

48

131.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.10

631

F5.

3059

65DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E1

LAAUSTIN

1954

2.84

2105

263

3.77

5110

90

170

12

36

171.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.94

3287

2.77

3517

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E1

MA

AUSTIN

1980

4.21

0526

316

3.73

5400

41

151

23

510

151.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.15

8216

F5.

2386

7DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E1

RDGASKINS

1614

0.87

51.

2583

057

05

00

11

25

1.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.19

8343

-0.5

5178

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E1

LAGASKINS

1615

0.93

751.

0626

225

04

00

11

24

1.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

83.06

354

-1.3

6707

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E1

MA

GASKINS

1622

1.37

51.

1474

610

40

0.5

12

34

1.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.28

4744

-0.7

2824

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E1

RDHOWARD

1634

2.12

51.

5864

005

06

11

1.5

34

61.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.19

8343

2.80

3151

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E1

LAHOWARD

1647

2.93

752.

3514

180

70

13

4.5

77

1.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

83.06

354

2.74

1103

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E1

MA

HOWARD

1692

5.75

3.54

9647

92

132

35

813

131.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.28

4744

F7.

8127

29DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E1

RDMORE

Y16

241.5

1.26

4911

10

40

0.5

1.5

24

41.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.19

8343

1.12

5681

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E1

LAMORE

Y16

301.87

51.

50

60

12

24

61.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

83.06

354

0.55

8636

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E1

MA

MORE

Y16

613.81

252.

9713

914

010

01.5

46

710

1.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.28

4744

F4.

0302

97DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E1

RDWILLIAMS

1740

2.35

2941

176

1.93

4592

20

70

12

45

71.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.16

497

F3.

5200

33DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E1

LAWILLIAMS

1743

2.52

9411

765

2.06

5116

40

60

12

46

61.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

83.01

9933

1.96

1417

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E1

MA

WILLIAMS

1745

2.64

7058

824

2.52

3419

70

80

11

56

81.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.23

8862

1.80

9112

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E1

RDWILLS

1632

21.

7511

901

05

00.5

22.5

55

1.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.19

8343

2.46

7657

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E1

LAWILLS

1654

3.37

53.

0304

015

010

01

26

710

1.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

83.06

354

F3.

6397

65DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E1

MA

WILLS

1647

2.93

751.

8786

076

06

11.5

2.5

4.5

66

1.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.28

4744

2.32

2102

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E2

RDGRE

GORS

2323

11.

3816

986

04

00

01

34

0.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.77

874

0.29

7186

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E2

LAGRE

GORS

2324

1.04

3478

261

1.42

9502

80

50

00

23

41.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.40

3014

-0.7

6321

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E2

MA

GRE

GORS

2320

0.86

9565

217

1.05

7628

04

00

11

23

1.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.00

939

-2.0

1279

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E2

RDHESTER R

10

00

00

00

00

00.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

5.05

9729

-0.6

6173

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E2

LAHESTER R

12

22

22

22

22

21.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

16.51

6974

0.39

2935

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E2

MA

HESTER R

10

00

00

00

00

01.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

7.87

0404

-0.8

4445

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E2

RDKEGLER

2174

3.52

3809

524

3.38

5543

50

131

12

49

100.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.81

8965

F8.

6539

77DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E2

LAKEGLER

2187

4.14

2857

143

2.47

5595

21

102

24

57

81.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.45

345

F7.

4683

59DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E2

MA

KEGLER

2114

16.71

4285

714

4.39

4802

11

173

46

712

171.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.06

8985

F11

.159

82DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E2

RDPH

ELPS

2211

85.36

3636

364

4.35

9395

50

151

24

812

140.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.79

8167

F15

.102

85DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E2

LAPH

ELPS

2293

4.22

7272

727

3.59

8039

40

131

23.5

69

121.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.42

7372

F7.

8726

37DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E2

MA

PHELPS

2218

48.36

3636

364

6.65

8653

21

222

45.5

1419

211.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.03

8172

F15

.201

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E2

RDSCOTT

2245

2.04

5454

545

1.81

2056

80

60

12

35

50.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.79

8167

F3.

8394

09DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E2

LASCOTT

2261

2.77

2727

273

2.02

2064

40

71

12.5

46

61.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.42

7372

F3.

9349

35DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E2

MA

SCOTT

2285

3.86

3636

364

3.38

4776

20

110

03.5

69

91.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.03

8172

F4.

8912

43DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E2

RDWALLACE

2212

55.68

1818

182

3.77

1905

70

152

36

711

110.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.79

8167

F16

.182

91DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E2

LAWALLACE

2217

07.72

7272

727

3.95

4284

22

172

58.5

1012

141.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.42

7372

F17

.347

73DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E2

MA

WALLACE

2224

811

.272

7272

75.

5393

125

325

58

1116

1819

1.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.03

8172

F21

.866

39DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E3

RDANDER

SON

2011

0.55

0.68

6332

70

20

00

11.5

21.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.42

4523

-1.4

9154

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E3

LAANDER

SON

2037

1.85

1.72

5200

20

60

0.5

13

45

1.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.88

507

0.74

5449

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E3

MA

ANDER

SON

2046

2.3

1.68

8973

50

50

13

3.5

4.5

51.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.50

6068

0.78

3163

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E3

RDCU

RRY

2029

1.45

0.94

4513

20

40.5

11

22.5

3.5

1.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.42

4523

0.66

4944

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E3

LACU

RRY

2053

2.65

4.98

7088

60

230

02

2.5

414

1.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.88

507

2.48

7979

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E3

MA

CURR

Y20

402

2.02

6144

90

80

02

34.5

6.5

1.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.50

6068

0.23

1742

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E3

RDEV

ERSO

N19

291.52

6315

789

1.80

6421

30

70

01

25

71.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.45

7048

0.82

6338

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E3

LAEV

ERSO

N19

221.15

7894

737

1.64

1921

60

70

01

13

71.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.92

0851

-0.7

4277

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E3

MA

EVER

SON

1930

1.57

8947

368

1.30

4513

10

40

11

34

41.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.54

8468

-0.5

2845

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E3

RDGRIFFITH

1912

0.63

1578

947

0.83

0697

60

30

00

12

31.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.45

7048

-1.2

6325

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E3

LAGRIFFITH

1922

1.15

7894

737

1.74

0471

10

60

01

15

61.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.92

0851

-0.7

4277

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E3

MA

GRIFFITH

1925

1.31

5789

474

1.29

3257

40

40

01

23

41.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.54

8468

-0.9

9990

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E3

RDHESTER

1932

1.68

4210

526

1.63

4782

70

50

01

35

51.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.45

7048

1.19

509

247

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E3

LAHESTER

1958

3.05

2631

579

4.14

2914

80

170

12

38

171.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.92

0851

F3.

2797

72DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E3

MA

HESTER

1952

2.73

6842

105

2.76

5704

80

110

12

38

111.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.54

8468

1.54

5948

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E3

RDPIER

CE19

281.47

3684

211

2.09

1475

30

80

01

25

81.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.45

7048

0.70

342

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E3

LAPIER

CE19

593.10

5263

158

3.81

3641

30

120

01

511

121.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.92

0851

F3.

3915

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E3

MA

PIER

CE19

371.94

7368

421

1.89

9522

90

70

01

34

71.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.54

8468

0.13

1583

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E4

RDBU

RROUGHS

22

11.

4142

136

02

00

12

22

0.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

94.47

0534

0.00

4664

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E4

LABU

RROUGHS

23

1.5

2.12

1320

30

30

01.5

33

31.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

65.

7181

840.

0660

05DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E4

MA

BURR

OUGHS

27

3.5

3.53

5533

91

61

13.5

66

61.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

77.06

0325

0.94

0376

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E4

RDHILL

2747

1.74

0740

741

2.73

9912

90

100

01

28

90.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.94

0626

2.36

6135

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E4

LAHILL

2771

2.62

9629

633.

2598

743

012

00

15

89

1.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

5789

77F

3.12

9451

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E4

MA

HILL

2786

3.18

5185

185

3.15

0543

80

130

12

49

91.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.28

5859

2.78

6015

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E4

RDLO

NG

2617

0.65

3846

154

0.97

7437

80

30

00

12

30.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.95

8647

-1.0

6036

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E4

LALO

NG

2634

1.30

7692

308

1.28

9006

80

40

01

24

41.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

6013

38-0

.244

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E4

MA

LONG

2632

1.23

0769

231

1.30

5609

20

50

01

23

31.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.31

2746

-1.3

4256

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E4

RDNORM

AN

2647

1.80

7692

308

1.91

8733

60

70

11

25

70.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.95

8647

2.53

0248

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E4

LANORM

AN

2638

1.46

1538

462

1.50

2817

90

60

01

23

41.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

6013

380.

1415

27DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E4

MA

NORM

AN

2649

1.88

4615

385

3.01

1005

50

140

01

25

71.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.31

2746

0.02

1223

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E4

RDYO

UNG

2512

0.48

0.71

4142

80

20

00

12

20.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.97

7739

-1.5

7025

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E4

LAYO

UNG

2535

1.4

1.55

4563

20

50

01

24

41.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

6250

28-0

.012

555

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E4

MA

YOUNG

2531

1.24

1.58

8500

30

60

01

23

41.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.34

123

-1.2

9760

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E5

RDGODWIN

2435

1.45

8333

333

1.55

9798

40

50

01

2.5

44

1.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.25

5871

0.86

321

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E5

LAGODWIN

2426

1.08

3333

333

1.24

8187

10

50

01

1.5

33

1.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.68

4303

-0.8

4346

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E5

MA

GODWIN

2443

1.79

1666

667

1.99

9547

10

80

11

24

71.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.37

7928

-0.0

6417

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E5

RDHOOKS

2027

1.35

1.42

4411

20

40

01

24

41.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.36

2743

0.52

3038

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E5

LAHOOKS

2021

1.05

1.87

7147

90

80

00

1.5

2.5

5.5

1.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.80

3574

-0.8

4302

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E5

MA

HOOKS

2028

1.4

1.53

5543

80

50

01

2.5

3.5

4.5

1.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.52

6158

-0.7

4924

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E5

RDMCE

WEN

2426

1.08

3333

333

1.28

2547

30

50

01

23

31.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.25

5871

-0.1

4150

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E5

LAMCE

WEN

2447

1.95

8333

333

2.33

0873

40

80

01

35

71.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.68

4303

1.25

7155

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E5

MA

MCE

WEN

2449

2.04

1666

667

1.42

8869

06

01

23

44

1.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.37

7928

0.41

8746

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E5

RDMINCE

Y24

160.66

6666

667

0.81

6496

60

30

00.5

12

21.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.25

5871

-1.2

5785

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E5

LAMINCE

Y24

220.91

6666

667

0.97

4307

60

30

01

1.5

23

1.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.68

4303

-1.2

4358

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E5

MA

MINCE

Y24

371.54

1666

667

1.74

4037

50

70

01

24

51.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.37

7928

-0.5

4710

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E5

RDSA

NCH

EZ24

361.5

1.86

5009

60

70

01

24

51.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.25

5871

0.97

4845

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E5

LASA

NCH

EZ24

391.62

51.

6368

714

05

00

13

44

1.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.68

4303

0.45

6918

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SHER

WOOD ACR

E5

MA

SANCH

EZ24

281.16

6666

667

1.37

2609

90

50

01

23

31.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.37

7928

-1.2

7149

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A1

RDBO

NNER

LOURIE

2058

2.9

2.93

6162

90

110

1.5

23

810

1.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.08

0339

F5.

4595

98DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A1

LABO

NNER

LOURIE

2057

2.85

2.92

4938

10

100

12

3.5

89

1.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.90

9351

2.86

3699

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A1

MA

BONNER

LOURIE

2061

3.05

2.21

1810

40

70.5

12

56

6.5

1.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.12

2509

2.84

1738

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A1

RDHILL ANGELA

1930

1.57

8947

368

1.38

7074

80

40

01

24

41.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.10

631

1.45

7585

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A1

LAHILL ANGELA

1948

2.52

6315

789

2.01

0207

90

70

12

46

71.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.94

3287

2.06

6657

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A1

MA

HILL ANGELA

1956

2.94

7368

421

2.17

2394

60

80

23

47

81.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.15

8216

2.55

1446

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A1

RDHUFF

1982

4.31

5789

474

3.11

0066

71

121

24

59

121.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.10

631

F9.

4622

15DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A1

LAHUFF

1910

05.26

3157

895

3.36

3895

011

13

49

1111

1.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.94

3287

F8.

1927

74DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A1

MA

HUFF

1912

96.78

9473

684

4.47

9322

20

141

37

1113

141.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.15

8216

F10

.725

08DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A1

RDKN

IGHTO

NHARR

IS19

492.57

8947

368

3.06

0787

70

100

01

59

101.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.10

631

F4.

3823

54DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A1

LAKN

IGHTO

NHARR

IS19

472.47

3684

211

3.00

6814

90

130

02

45

131.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.94

3287

1.94

8847

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A1

MA

KNIGHTO

NHARR

IS19

794.15

7894

737

3.33

7716

40

131

13

69

131.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.15

8216

F5.

1267

02DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A2

RDCA

LDWELL K

1920

1.05

2631

579

1.17

7270

10

40

01

23

40.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.86

5384

0.43

6139

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A2

LACA

LDWELL K

1921

1.10

5263

158

1.32

8940

10

50

01

23

51.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.51

1654

-0.5

3823

8DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A2

MA

CALD

WELL K

1946

2.42

1052

632

1.80

4801

90

60

12

45

61.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.13

7758

1.47

3998

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A2

RDCO

XSON S

1945

2.36

8421

053

1.57

0934

80

50

12

45

50.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.86

5384

F4.

5868

53DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A2

LACO

XSON S

1943

2.26

3157

895

2.05

0531

20

70

02

45

71.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.51

1654

2.37

4826

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A2

MA

COXSON S

1984

4.42

1052

632

3.13

2549

40

121

24

610

121.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.13

7758

F5.

7323

76DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A2

RDDANFO

RD OLYMPIA

1934

1.78

9473

684

1.75

0522

10

70

02

34

70.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.86

5384

2.76

0539

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A2

LADANFO

RD OLYMPIA

1913

26.94

7368

421

5.01

6347

50

161

26

1115

161.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.51

1654

F14

.159

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A2

MA

DANFO

RD OLYMPIA

1911

35.94

7368

421

5.51

2346

61

181

23

1018

181.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.13

7758

F8.

9821

91DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A2

RDMART

IN20

221.1

1.02

0835

60

30

01

22

2.5

0.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.84

1304

0.60

0777

248

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A2

LAMART

IN20

412.05

1.50

3504

70

50

12

34

4.5

1.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.48

1461

1.88

632

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A2

MA

MART

IN20

643.2

2.33

0574

80

100.5

23

4.5

5.5

81.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.10

2082

F3.

2139

02DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A2

RDOSENI O

LUWATO

YI19

231.21

0526

316

1.35

7241

80

50

01

23

50.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.86

5384

0.93

4225

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A2

LAOSENI O

LUWATO

YI19

301.57

8947

368

1.53

8967

50

50

11

24

51.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.51

1654

0.65

347

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A2

MA

OSENI O

LUWATO

YI19

452.36

8421

053

1.73

8790

30

50

13

45

51.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.13

7758

1.36

1936

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A3

RDDEB

ORA

H FLO

OD

2132

1.52

3809

524

1.66

1897

90

50

01

24

51.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.39

4349

0.86

2588

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A3

LADEB

ORA

H FLO

OD

2122

1.04

7619

048

1.39

5571

20

50

01

13

31.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.85

1877

-1.0

2701

7DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A3

MA

DEB

ORA

H FLO

OD

2150

2.38

0952

381

2.63

5833

70

100

02

45

61.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.46

6733

0.95

4974

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A3

RDLASTER

2127

1.28

5714

286

1.05

5597

30

40

11

22

31.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.39

4349

0.27

7998

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A3

LALASTER

2135

1.66

6666

667

1.65

3279

60

50

11

25

51.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.85

1877

0.35

4667

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A3

MA

LASTER

2144

2.09

5238

095

1.37

4945

90

50

12

34

41.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.46

6733

0.41

6842

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A3

RDMCC

RAY

2118

0.85

7142

857

1.19

5228

60

40

00

22

31.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.39

4349

-0.7

7426

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A3

LAMCC

RAY

2126

1.23

8095

238

1.26

1140

80

50

01

22

31.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.85

1877

-0.6

0188

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A3

MA

MCC

RAY

2128

1.33

3333

333

1.27

8019

30

40

01

23

41.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.46

6733

-1.0

1817

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A3

RDMORR

ISS

2126

1.23

8095

238

1.17

9184

50

40

01

23

31.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.39

4349

0.16

1081

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A3

LAMORR

ISS

2124

1.14

2857

143

1.90

4880

90

80

01

13

41.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.85

1877

-0.8

1445

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A3

MA

MORR

ISS

2125

1.19

0476

191.

0779

169

04

00

12

23

1.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.46

6733

-1.2

8724

2DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A4

RDBLOCK

ER27

542

2.35

3393

60

80

01

36

70.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.94

0626

F3.

1882

83DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A4

LABLOCK

ER27

612.25

9259

259

4.43

4069

10

200

01

26

131.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

5789

772.

1829

15DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A4

MA

BLOCK

ER27

552.03

7037

037

2.96

7535

60

120

01

27

91.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.28

5859

0.34

5603

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A4

RDBU

RROUGHS

33

11

02

00

12

22

0.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

93.83

2687

0.00

5713

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A4

LABU

RROUGHS

35

1.66

6666

667

1.15

4700

51

31

11

33

31.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

64.

9267

190.

2228

19DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A4

MA

BURR

OUGHS

320

6.66

6666

667

8.14

4527

81

161

13

1616

161.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

76.10

8698

F3.

3953

25DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A4

RDCU

LLEN

2653

2.03

8461

538

4.04

4559

50

180

01

24

120.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.95

8647

F3.

2483

71DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A4

LACU

LLEN

2656

2.15

3846

154

3.15

8383

20

160

01.5

34

51.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

6013

381.

8777

47DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A4

MA

CULLEN

2648

1.84

6153

846

3.74

9051

20

190

01

23

61.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.31

2746

-0.0

5899

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A4

RDHEA

RD26

461.76

9230

769

2.37

1627

20

90

01

26

80.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.95

8647

2.41

0561

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A4

LAHEA

RD26

471.80

7692

308

2.60

7975

90

100

01

25

91.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

6013

381.

0096

37DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A4

MA

HEA

RD26

622.38

4615

385

2.98

0965

30

130

01.5

36

81.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.31

2746

1.06

4117

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A5

RDJOHNSO

N22

442

2.79

4552

50

120

01

35

61.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.30

566

2.21

5929

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A5

LAJOHNSO

N22

331.5

2.90

7297

90

140

01

22

21.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.73

9869

0.15

0152

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A5

MA

JOHNSO

N22

532.40

9090

909

3.36

1676

012

00

13

412

1.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.44

6985

1.08

0456

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A5

RDJONES

1826

1.44

4444

444

1.78

9585

07

00

12

47

1.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.42

9093

0.71

5336

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A5

LAJONES

1837

2.05

5555

556

1.92

4217

90

60

02

35

61.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.87

7621

1.29

0861

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A5

MA

JONES

1832

1.77

7777

778

1.47

7500

10

60

12

24

61.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.61

8183

-0.0

7881

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A5

RDPH

ILLIPS

1725

1.47

0588

235

1.54

5867

40

50

01

24

51.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.46

6577

0.75

4133

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A5

LAPH

ILLIPS

1742

2.47

0588

235

4.15

5081

90

150

00

310

151.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.91

9454

2.09

3066

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A5

MA

PHILLIPS

1740

2.35

2941

176

3.35

3005

70

140

12

26

141.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.67

0174

0.85

8487

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A5

RDRO

QUEM

ORE

SER

IT21

281.33

3333

333

1.42

595

05

00

12

34

1.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.33

3182

0.49

4185

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A5

LARO

QUEM

ORE

SER

IT21

211

1.30

3840

50

40

00

23

31.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.77

0583

-0.9

7613

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SYLVESTER RO

A5

MA

ROQUEM

ORE

SER

IT21

140.66

6666

667

0.85

6348

80

30

00

12

21.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.48

5157

-2.0

9284

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

1RD

LOTT

2315

06.52

1739

133.

0580

678

114

24

78

1010

1.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.01

286

F17

.509

32DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

1LA

LOTT

2317

97.78

2608

696

3.94

2271

21

143

57

1113

141.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.82

1181

F15

.218

82DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

1MA

LOTT

2323

410

.173

9130

45.

2712

963

214

58

1617

171.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.02

9739

F19

.721

89DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

1RD

PRICE

2435

1.45

8333

333

1.69

3444

30

60

01

24

51.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

81.99

3231

1.24

1707

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

1LA

PRICE

2461

2.54

1666

667

1.84

1057

50

60

12.5

45

51.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.79

5533

2.36

1341

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

1MA

PRICE

2412

25.08

3333

333

3.38

6888

60

141

34

79

111.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.00

2752

F7.

9746

16DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

1RD

WEST

2353

2.30

4347

826

2.07

6596

50

80

12

35

51.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.01

286

F3.

9379

91DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

1LA

WEST

2367

2.91

3043

478

3.13

2136

10

150

12

34

81.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.82

1181

F3.

2262

36DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

1MA

WEST

2367

2.91

3043

478

2.13

0152

40

81

13

45

71.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.02

9739

2.72

6859

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

1RD

WILLIAMS

2459

2.45

8333

333

1.47

3805

10

50

13

44

41.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

81.99

3231

F4.

5288

63DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

1LA

WILLIAMS

2494

3.91

6666

667

2.55

2350

40

91

24

67

71.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.79

5533

F5.

8204

72DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

1MA

WILLIAMS

2412

75.29

1666

667

2.82

0409

61

102

2.5

57

910

1.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.00

2752

F8.

4727

36DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

2RD

COVIN

1952

2.73

6842

105

2.23

2141

60

80

12

47

80.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.86

5384

F5.

7490

52DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

2LA

COVIN

1963

3.31

5789

474

2.53

9742

60

81

12

67

81.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.51

1654

F5.

0230

66DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

2MA

COVIN

1972

3.78

9473

684

2.46

2585

51

91

23

59

91.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.13

7758

F4.

3876

25DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

2RD

HALL V

2017

0.85

1.22

5818

70

40

00

13

3.5

0.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.84

1304

-0.2

0834

6

249

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

2LA

HALL V

2029

1.45

1.87

7147

90

70

01

24

61.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.48

1461

0.33

7609

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

2MA

HALL V

2028

1.4

1.95

7441

90

70

00.5

24

5.5

1.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.10

2082

-0.7

1820

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

2RD

HESTER

10

00

00

00

00

00.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

5.05

9729

-0.6

6173

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

2LA

HESTER

11

11

11

11

11

11.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

16.51

6974

-0.1

8423

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

2MA

HESTER

16

66

66

66

66

61.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

7.87

0404

2.08

6365

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

2RD

JOLIVE

TTE

2013

76.85

3.19

9917

81

123

46.5

1011

120.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.84

1304

F19

.210

61DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

2LA

JOLIVE

TTE

2028

914

.45

5.51

0516

33

226

1215

17.5

2222

1.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.48

1461

F33

.893

02DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

2MA

JOLIVE

TTE

2026

513

.25

6.06

8685

80

226

914

1822

221.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.10

2082

F25

.168

14DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

2RD

VANCE

1912

0.63

1578

947

0.83

0697

60

30

00

12

30.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.86

5384

-0.8

9208

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

2LA

VANCE

1939

2.05

2631

579

1.39

3384

50

50

12

35

51.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.51

1654

1.84

5178

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

2MA

VANCE

1988

4.63

1578

947

3.53

0982

31

151

24

79

151.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.13

7758

F6.

1806

27DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

3RD

ASKEW

1969

3.63

1578

947

2.13

9847

51

71

23

67

71.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.45

7048

F5.

7430

36DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

3LA

ASKEW

1947

2.47

3684

211

2.69

5024

70

100

02

46

101.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.92

0851

2.05

0662

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

3MA

ASKEW

1978

4.10

5263

158

2.57

9723

010

12

46

810

1.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.54

8468

F3.

9975

14DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

3RD

COLLIN S

1951

2.68

4210

526

2.33

4586

10

70

12

47

71.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.45

7048

F3.

5305

22DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

3LA

COLLIN S

1965

3.42

1052

632

3.76

1143

30

130

12

411

131.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.92

0851

F4.

0619

34DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

3MA

COLLIN S

1939

2.05

2631

579

2.06

7572

07

01

12

67

1.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.54

8468

0.32

0165

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

3RD

JACK

SON

2011

05.5

3.92

6964

80

182

2.5

57

9.5

141.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.42

4523

F10

.369

16DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

3LA

JACK

SON

2015

57.75

3.71

1646

214

35

7.5

1014

141.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.88

507

F13

.596

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

3MA

JACK

SON

2016

18.05

3.54

6310

20

132

6.5

910

.512

131.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.50

6068

F11

.352

06DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

3RD

LOWER

Y20

140.7

0.73

2695

10

20

01

12

21.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.42

4523

-1.1

3213

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

3LA

LOWER

Y20

160.8

1.15

1657

80

40

00

12.5

3.5

1.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.88

507

-1.5

4162

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

3MA

LOWER

Y20

211.05

0.88

7041

20

30

01

22

2.5

1.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.50

6068

-1.5

1442

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

3RD

SIMMONS

1929

1.52

6315

789

2.41

2201

010

00

12

510

1.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.45

7048

0.82

6338

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

3LA

SIMMONS

1932

1.68

4210

526

2.08

3070

20

60

01

35

61.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.92

0851

0.37

4602

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

3MA

SIMMONS

1920

1.05

2631

579

1.47

0966

60

60

01

22

61.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.54

8468

-1.4

7136

4DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

4RD

JENKINS

31

0.33

3333

333

0.57

7350

30

10

00

11

10.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

93.83

2687

-0.6

9898

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

4LA

JENKINS

32

0.66

6666

667

0.57

7350

30

10

01

11

11.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

64.

9267

19-0

.629

063

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

4MA

JENKINS

318

65.

5677

644

112

11

512

1212

1.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

76.10

8698

2.92

2987

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

4RD

LAMAR

2475

3.12

53.

8028

879

019

11

23.5

57

0.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.99

8012

F6.

3694

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

4LA

LAMAR

2411

24.66

6666

667

2.89

9275

31

111

24.5

78

91.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

6501

84F

7.85

8689

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

4MA

LAMAR

2447

1.95

8333

333

1.87

6147

08

00.5

23

44

1.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.37

1476

0.16

8119

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

4RD

LYONS

2637

1.42

3076

923

2.13

8655

20

100

01

24

40.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.95

8647

1.33

3377

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

4LA

LYONS

2673

2.80

7692

308

1.74

4000

70

71

12.5

45

61.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

6013

38F

3.51

751

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

4MA

LYONS

2674

2.84

6153

846

2.69

3582

10

141

12

44

61.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.31

2746

2.02

6788

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

4RD

PAYTON

2518

0.72

1.17

3314

40

40

00

13

30.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.97

7739

-0.8

3791

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

4LA

PAYTON

2532

1.28

1.69

6073

90

70

01

24

41.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

6250

28-0

.307

656

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

4MA

PAYTON

2558

2.32

1.90

8751

80

70

12

35

61.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.34

123

0.91

1296

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

5RD

ALVEY

12

22

22

22

22

21.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

86.62

1647

0.47

2438

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

5LA

ALVEY

11

11

11

11

11

11.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

97.55

6579

-0.2

1300

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

5MA

ALVEY

10

00

00

00

00

01.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

99.43

3187

-0.7

1956

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

5RD

BSUTTON

2545

1.8

1.55

4563

20

60

12

24

51.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.23

3248

1.81

5291

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

5LA

BSUTTON

2541

1.64

1.93

3908

08

00

13

45

1.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.65

9055

0.50

3093

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

5MA

BSUTTON

2560

2.4

2.39

7915

80

90

12

46

71.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.34

655

1.13

3847

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

5RD

ELLIS

2639

1.5

1.20

8304

60

50

11

23

31.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.21

1943

1.01

4651

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

5LA

ELLIS

2663

2.42

3076

923

4.64

9069

40

240

01

34

51.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.63

5279

2.46

9763

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

5MA

ELLIS

2634

1.30

7692

308

1.01

0711

90

30

11

23

31.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.31

7-1

.039

866

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

5RD

HODGE

2419

0.79

1666

667

1.21

5092

30

50

00

1.5

22

1.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.25

5871

-0.9

2294

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

5LA

HODGE

2427

1.12

51.

3613

452

05

00

12

34

1.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.68

4303

-0.7

4343

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

TURN

ER ELEMEN

5MA

HODGE

2433

1.37

51.

7147

062

06

00

12

36

1.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.37

7928

-0.8

6905

3

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

1RD

BANKS

M23

984.26

0869

565

2.78

3349

70

112

23

68

91.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.01

286

F10

.233

97DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

1LA

BANKS

M23

158

6.86

9565

217

4.63

4890

90

181

37

1012

121.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.82

1181

F12

.970

21DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

1MA

BANKS

M23

135

5.86

9565

217

3.48

1174

72

132

35

911

121.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.02

9739

F9.

6469

91DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

1RD

BRACK

EEN J

2114

26.76

1904

762

2.32

1739

92

93

58

99

91.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.05

6245

F17

.469

21DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

1LA

BRACK

EEN J

2118

18.61

9047

619

4.69

5489

21

173

59

1215

161.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.87

7869

F16

.510

44DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

1MA

BRACK

EEN J

2115

67.42

8571

429

4.56

6962

12

193

56

912

171.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.08

9384

F12

.704

82DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

1RD

CHEV

ERS TO

WNES

2410

34.29

1666

667

3.91

7398

90

130

13.5

6.5

1112

1.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

81.99

3231

F10

.555

32

250

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

1LA

CHEV

ERS TO

WNES

2416

16.70

8333

333

4.82

2764

60

181

3.5

610

1315

1.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.79

5533

F12

.843

56DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

1MA

CHEV

ERS TO

WNES

2458

2.41

6666

667

1.97

6309

07

01

23.5

66

1.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.00

2752

1.59

8684

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

1RD

WAITE

2198

4.66

6666

667

3.46

8909

50

152

24

69

91.08

0588

194

1.49

0339

82.05

6245

F11

.026

66DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

1LA

WAITE

2112

25.80

9523

813.

9194

266

011

02

69

1011

1.60

3036

826

1.94

7337

82.87

7869

F9.

8989

22DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

1MA

WAITE

2113

96.61

9047

619

4.27

1723

20

172

46

912

131.74

8034

012.04

8946

63.08

9384

F10

.894

28DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

2RD

FOURN

IER P

2137

1.76

1904

762

1.86

8281

60

50

01

35

50.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.81

8965

2.81

0766

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

2LA

FOURN

IER P

2120

0.95

2380

952

1.20

3170

40

40

01

13

31.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.45

345

-0.9

7022

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

2MA

FOURN

IER P

2161

2.90

4761

905

2.40

6340

80

100

13

45

71.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.06

8985

2.63

2395

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

2RD

MALLORY

HAYES

2011

65.8

3.20

5258

82

132

36

7.5

1113

0.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.84

1304

F15

.812

29DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

2LA

MALLORY

HAYES

2011

75.85

2.94

2877

20

112

46.5

710

111.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.48

1461

F11

.694

82DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

2MA

MALLORY

HAYES

2085

4.25

2.86

3104

70

111.5

23.5

5.5

911

1.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.10

2082

F5.

5076

29DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

2RD

MITCH

ELL

2110

65.04

7619

048

4.15

3025

30

161

34

78

150.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.81

8965

F13

.707

57DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

2LA

MITCH

ELL

2117

08.09

5238

095

6.17

1748

20

192

45

1319

191.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.45

345

F17

.922

12DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

2MA

MITCH

ELL

2120

09.52

3809

524

7.20

1521

028

24

914

1919

1.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.06

8985

F17

.448

79DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

2RD

WASH

INGTO

N18

140.77

7777

778

0.73

2084

50

20

01

12

20.91

4374

058

1.38

1785

1.89

1444

-0.4

1940

6DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

2LA

WASH

INGTO

N18

261.44

4444

444

1.14

9026

30

40

11

23

41.31

9203

885

1.73

2590

12.54

433

0.30

668

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

2MA

WASH

INGTO

N18

201.11

1111

111

1.32

3493

10

50

01

23

51.72

8771

036

2.04

7211

3.17

6368

-1.2

8003

9DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

3RD

ALD

RIDGE

1842

2.33

3333

333

2.11

4376

60

80

12

37

81.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.49

2248

2.63

8764

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

3LA

ALD

RIDGE

1869

3.83

3333

333

2.77

0644

40

100

23.5

510

101.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.95

9573

F4.

8055

27DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

3MA

ALD

RIDGE

1810

65.88

8888

889

3.84

8435

70

161

35.5

810

161.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.59

4355

F7.

0010

85DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

3RD

DOUGLAS

1820

1.11

1111

111

1.32

3493

10

40

01

24

41.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.49

2248

-0.1

3952

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

3LA

DOUGLAS

1813

37.38

8888

889

4.21

6757

71

152

47

1113

151.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.95

9573

F12

.152

67DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

3MA

DOUGLAS

1847

2.61

1111

111

1.46

0817

21

61

12.5

35

61.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.59

4355

1.28

5473

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

3RD

WASLEY

1872

43.

5313

720

161

23

56

161.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.49

2248

F6.

4273

34DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

3LA

WASLEY

1863

3.5

2.64

0187

20

80

22.5

58

81.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.95

9573

F4.

1167

31DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

3MA

WASLEY

1872

43.

7100

817

012

01

3.5

511

121.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.59

4355

F3.

7073

42DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

3RD

WOODHAM

1810

05.55

5555

556

8.78

6501

80

350

22.5

522

351.17

2489

269

1.86

6421

12.49

2248

F9.

9633

33DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

3LA

WOODHAM

1898

5.44

4444

444

4.32

8051

10

130

15

1012

131.50

7762

082

2.05

317

2.95

9573

F8.

1347

03DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

3MA

WOODHAM

1812

36.83

3333

333

3.69

8171

21

132

37

1112

131.87

3920

927

2.43

3060

93.59

4355

F8.

6479

57DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

4RD

CLAY

2812

74.53

5714

286

7.49

0646

70

240

0.5

13.5

2224

0.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.92

3579

F11

.435

46DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

4LA

CLAY

2812

24.35

7142

857

7.10

3542

60

300

02

4.5

1521

1.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

5578

24F

7.68

2805

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

4MA

CLAY

2826

89.57

1428

571

5.56

7289

20

234

58.5

1417

191.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.26

0426

F16

.660

32DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

4RD

JENKINS

23

1.5

0.70

7106

81

21

11.5

22

20.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

94.47

0534

0.43

6203

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

4LA

JENKINS

22

10

11

11

11

11

1.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

65.

7181

84-0

.281

775

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

4MA

JENKINS

23

1.5

2.12

1320

30

30

01.5

33

31.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

77.06

0325

-0.2

1661

1DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

4RD

NEFF

2814

15.03

5714

286

3.99

5202

10

141

24

712

130.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.92

3579

F13

.050

13DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

4LA

NEFF

2896

3.42

8571

429

3.61

5077

20

190

13

46

81.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

5578

24F

5.26

6158

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

4MA

NEFF

2817

16.10

7142

857

6.91

3964

90

251

23.5

720

251.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.26

0426

F9.

1617

86DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

4RD

ROBINSO

2612

64.84

6153

846

4.67

9250

40

191

23

610

180.99

4595

544

1.63

8572

91.95

8647

F11

.985

53DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

4LA

ROBINSO

2610

94.19

2307

692

4.74

9898

80

211

22.5

412

151.40

5105

438

2.03

3204

62.

6013

38F

6.98

995

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

4MA

ROBINSO

2618

77.19

2307

692

7.21

1209

21

321

35

812

261.87

4440

105

2.44

4649

73.31

2746

F11

.091

94DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

5RD

MOSELY

2637

414

.384

6153

85.

4485

001

424

711

1419

2122

1.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.21

1943

F36

.945

15DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

5LA

MOSELY

2618

37.03

8461

538

4.66

8882

30

181

46.5

914

151.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.63

5279

F14

.002

42DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

5MA

MOSELY

2632

012

.307

6923

17.

3798

061

030

36

1218

2126

1.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.31

7F

21.0

7647

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

5RD

SAVA

GE

2528

411

.36

4.93

1869

24

265

912

1316

221.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.23

3248

F27

.956

94DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

5LA

SAVA

GE

2527

911

.16

7.43

1240

42

263

69

1624

261.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.65

9055

F23

.829

17DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

5MA

SAVA

GE

2522

28.88

8.37

8146

20

261

16

1621

211.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.34

655

F13

.909

37DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

5RD

WRIGHT

2525

510

.26.

4226

163

024

25

1112

1922

1.13

6148

015

1.82

8499

82.23

3248

F24

.784

94DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

5LA

WRIGHT

2519

87.92

5.19

5510

90

202

47

1115

161.43

4674

213

2.04

0634

92.65

9055

F15

.890

46DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

WEST TO

WN ELE

5MA

WRIGHT

2513

45.36

4.68

9349

60

161

14

912

131.82

4890

617

2.53

6098

93.34

655

F6.

9695

81

251

Syst

emN

ame

Scho

olN

ame

Gra

deC

onte

ntTe

ache

rNam

eN

_stu

dent

s#_

WTR

Mea

n_cl

assr

ooSt

d_cl

assr

oM

in_M

ax_P

10_P

25_P

50_P

75_P

90_

P95_

Mea

n_st

ate

Std_

stat

ecr

it_3S

Dfla

g_3S

DFl

ag_Z

STA

TE A

VER

AG

EST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

6R

DST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

120,

336

98,5

870.

8192

6439

31.

3027

204

029

00

01

23

0.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

42N

/AN

/AN

/AST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

STA

TE A

VER

AG

E6

LAST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

120,

283

115,

767

0.96

2455

211.

5489

992

036

00

01

34

0.96

2455

211.

5489

9919

N/A

N/A

N/A

STA

TE A

VER

AG

EST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

6M

AST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

120,

478

171,

897

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

10

430

01

24

51.

4267

9161

31.

9623

9411

N/A

N/A

N/A

STA

TE A

VER

AG

EST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

7R

DST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

120,

692

97,5

790.

8084

9600

61.

2652

424

033

00

01

23

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

36N

/AN

/AN

/AST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

STA

TE A

VER

AG

E7

LAST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

120,

629

110,

213

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3114

041

00

01

34

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

95N

/AN

/AN

/AST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

STA

TE A

VER

AG

E7

MA

STA

TE A

VER

AG

E12

0,77

714

3,48

71.

1880

3249

1.77

2432

30

410

01

23

41.

1880

3249

1.77

2432

33N

/AN

/AN

/AST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

STA

TE A

VER

AG

E8

RD

STA

TE A

VER

AG

E12

0,85

911

1,59

60.

9233

5697

1.38

5090

30

350

01

12

30.

9233

5697

1.38

5090

26N

/AN

/AN

/AST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

STA

TE A

VER

AG

E8

LAST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

120,

724

125,

520

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

70

410

01

13

41.

0397

2698

11.

6325

6567

N/A

N/A

N/A

STA

TE A

VER

AG

EST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

8M

AST

ATE

AVE

RA

GE

120,

953

186,

083

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

50

450

01

24

51.

5384

7362

22.

1363

2549

N/A

N/A

N/A

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6RD

BELL STEWART

2534

1.36

1.60

4161

30

50

01

24

50.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.60

0897

2.07

5409

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6LA

BELL STEWART

2520

0.8

0.81

64966

03

00

11

22

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.89

1855

-0.5

2439

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6MA

BELL STEWART

2543

1.72

2.18

93682

010

00

12

45

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.60

4228

0.74

7068

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6RD

PORT

ER24

200.83

3333

333

0.86

8114

70

30

01

12

20.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.61

7014

0.05

2907

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6LA

PORT

ER24

381.58

3333

333

2.18

52602

010

00

12

35

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.91

102

1.96

3635

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6MA

PORT

ER24

321.33

3333

333

1.65

9404

50

50

00.5

2.5

44

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.62

8508

-0.2

3331

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6RD

SMITH

2517

0.68

1.02

9563

03

00

01

33

0.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.60

0897

-0.5

3451

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6LA

SMITH

2515

0.6

0.76

3762

60

30

00

11

20.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.89

1855

-1.1

6997

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6MA

SMITH

2538

1.52

1.61

0383

06

00

13

34

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.60

4228

0.23

7486

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6RD

THOMAS J

2510

0.4

0.70

7106

80

30

00

11

10.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.60

0897

-1.6

0919

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6LA

THOMAS J

2526

1.04

1.36

86977

05

00

11

33

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.89

1855

0.25

0306

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6MA

THOMAS J

2538

1.52

1.68

62186

06

00

13

45

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.60

4228

0.23

7486

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6RD

THOMAS P

1111

11.

1832

160

30

01

23

30.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.99

7619

0.46

0139

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6LA

THOMAS P

1116

1.45

4545

455

1.03

5725

50

30

11

23

30.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.36

3578

1.05

3634

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6MA

THOMAS P

1117

1.54

5454

545

1.21

35598

04

01

12

34

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

113.20

1844

0.20

0551

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6RD

WHITE D

2112

0.57

1428

571

0.97

8336

80

40

00

11

20.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.67

2095

-0.8

7181

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6LA

WHITE D

2126

1.23

8095

238

2.46

7889

010

00

01

36

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.97

6513

0.81

5456

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6MA

WHITE D

2117

0.80

9523

811.16

70068

04

00

01

23

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.71

148

-1.4

4144

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6RD

WHITFIELD

2531

1.24

2.06

7204

20

90

01

12

60.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.60

0897

1.61

4835

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6LA

WHITFIELD

2529

1.16

1.86

3688

10

90

01

13

30.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.89

1855

0.63

7653

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6MA

WHITFIELD

2549

1.96

3.38

4769

80

170

01

24

41.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.60

4228

1.35

8566

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6RD

WHITLO

W24

251.04

1666

667

1.36

6657

80

60

01

13

30.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.61

7014

0.83

6361

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6LA

WHITLO

W24

321.33

3333

333

1.68

54019

07

00

12

44

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.91

102

1.17

2967

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

6MA

WHITLO

W24

371.54

1666

667

2.18

65034

09

00

12

46

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.62

8508

0.28

6778

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7RD

BASS AEC

28

40

44

44

44

44

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

363.49

248

F3.

5672

76DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7LA

BASS AEC

22

11.41

42136

02

00

12

22

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

954.05

9812

0.08

2336

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7MA

BASS AEC

25

2.5

3.53

55339

05

00

2.5

55

51.18

8032

491.77

2432

334.94

7929

1.04

6811

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7RD

BLOCK

ER26

250.96

1538

462

1.18

25657

03

00

02

33

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.55

2899

0.61

6772

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7LA

BLOCK

ER26

261

1.57

4801

60

70

00.5

12

40.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.78

624

0.29

6867

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7MA

BLOCK

ER26

481.84

6153

846

2.52

49524

012

00

13

45

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.23

084

1.89

3316

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7RD

BROWN AEC

11

11

11

11

11

10.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

364.60

4223

0.15

1358

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7LA

BROWN AEC

10

00

00

00

00

00.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

955.36

2994

-0.6

1604

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7MA

BROWN AEC

11

11

11

11

11

11.18

8032

491.77

2432

336.50

5329

-0.1

0609

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7RD

COX

2317

0.73

9130

435

0.96

37706

03

00

01

23

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.59

996

-0.2

6293

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7LA

COX

238

0.34

7826

087

0.48

69848

01

00

01

11

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.84

1405

-1.8

2967

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7MA

COX

239

0.39

1304

348

0.65

63764

02

00

01

12

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.29

6766

-2.1

5578

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7RD

JONES EDWARD

S24

170.70

8333

333

1.12

2077

50

50

00

12

20.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.58

3296

-0.3

8783

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7LA

JONES EDWARD

S24

451.87

52.80

2367

013

00

12

45

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.82

1871

F3.

1754

95DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7MA

JONES EDWARD

S24

371.54

1666

667

1.50

3016

30

50

0.5

12

45

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.27

3421

0.97

744

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7RD

LOCK

ETT

2326

1.13

0434

783

1.74

0019

50

70

01

14

40.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.59

996

1.22

0291

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7LA

LOCK

ETT

2319

0.82

6086

957

0.98

40627

03

00

11

23

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.84

1405

-0.2

8315

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7MA

LOCK

ETT

2327

1.17

3913

043

1.11

40497

04

00

12

33

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.29

6766

-0.0

382

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7RD

REGISTER

2419

0.79

1666

667

1.10

2533

30

40

00

12

30.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.58

3296

-0.0

6516

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7LA

REGISTER

2433

1.37

52.22

266

09

00

02

45

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.82

1871

1.52

3909

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7MA

REGISTER

2422

0.91

6666

667

1.71

73454

08

00

01

23

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.27

3421

-0.7

5005

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7RD

ROBINSO

N28

240.85

7142

857

1.48

35964

06

00

01

25

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.52

5821

0.20

3451

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7LA

ROBINSO

N28

180.64

2857

143

0.98

93614

03

00

01

33

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.75

4499

-0.9

6615

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7MA

ROBINSO

N28

170.60

7142

857

1.06

59472

04

00

01

23

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.19

2907

-1.7

3422

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7RD

SAMUELS AEC

17

77

77

77

77

70.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

364.60

4223

F4.

8935

32

252

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7LA

SAMUELS AEC

13

33

33

33

33

30.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

955.36

2994

1.40

6734

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7MA

SAMUELS AEC

11

11

11

11

11

11.18

8032

491.77

2432

336.50

5329

-0.1

0609

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7RD

SHOR

55

11.22

4744

90

30

01

13

30.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

362.50

5997

0.33

8446

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7LA

SHOR

83

0.37

50.74

4023

80

20

00

0.5

22

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

952.48

6733

-1.0

2726

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7MA

SHOR

73

0.42

8571

429

0.78

67958

02

00

01

22

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

333.19

7782

-1.1

3367

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7RD

STUBB

S26

170.65

3846

154

0.89

18434

03

00

01

22

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.55

2899

-0.6

2325

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7LA

STUBB

S26

170.65

3846

154

1.12

9329

30

50

00

11

30.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.78

624

-0.8

9323

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

7MA

STUBB

S26

391.5

1.44

9137

70

40

01

24

41.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.23

084

0.89

7483

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8RD

BATTLE BLU

E25

240.96

0.97

80934

03

00

12

23

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.75

4411

0.13

2277

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8LA

BATTLE BLU

E25

301.2

1.47

19601

06

00

12

34

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.01

9266

0.49

0862

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8MA

BATTLE BLU

E25

200.8

1.04

0833

04

00

11

23

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.82

0269

-1.7

2837

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8RD

FLOWER

S23

753.26

0869

565

5.58

5837

50

200

01

314

160.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.78

9791

F8.

0935

64DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8LA

FLOWER

S23

713.08

6956

522

5.65

6155

50

190

00

215

151.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.06

0967

F6.

0139

5DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8MA

FLOWER

S23

853.69

5652

174

5.75

5904

30

210

01

410

191.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.87

4838

F4.

8426

45DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8RD

GULLEY

2531

1.24

1.12

8420

70

40

01

23

30.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.75

4411

1.14

3041

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8LA

GULLEY

2523

0.92

0.99

6661

10

30

01

13

31.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.01

9266

-0.3

6668

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8MA

GULLEY

2535

1.4

1.82

5741

90

70

01

24

51.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.82

0269

-0.3

2409

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8RD

HAINES

2429

1.20

8333

333

1.10

2533

30

40

01

23

30.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.77

1548

1.00

7944

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8LA

HAINES

2438

1.58

3333

333

1.74

24787

06

00

12

46

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.03

9465

1.63

1246

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8MA

HAINES

2449

2.04

1666

667

1.94

44272

09

01

22.5

45

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.84

671.

1539

12DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8RD

JOHNSO

N26

351.34

6153

846

1.62

33868

06

00

12

44

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.73

8273

1.55

6469

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8LA

JOHNSO

N26

321.23

0769

231

1.10

66234

04

01

12

34

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.00

0244

0.59

6685

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8MA

JOHNSO

N26

331.26

9230

769

1.11

5623

30

40

01

23

31.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.79

5377

-0.6

4263

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8RD

RICH

ARD

SON

85

0.62

51.06

0660

20

30

00

13

30.92

3356

971.38

5090

262.39

2467

-0.6

0926

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8LA

RICH

ARD

SON

84

0.5

0.75

5928

90

20

00

12

21.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.77

1324

-0.9

3508

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8MA

RICH

ARD

SON

86

0.75

1.16

49647

03

00

01.5

33

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

493.80

4389

-1.0

4391

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8RD

SIMS

2356

2.43

4782

609

4.28

34362

014

00

12

1013

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.78

9791

F5.

2332

64DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8LA

SIMS

2383

3.60

8695

652

5.24

61166

017

00

17

1415

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.06

0967

F7.

5466

13DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8MA

SIMS

2311

24.86

9565

217

7.54

5645

026

00

16

1620

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.87

4838

F7.

4779

59DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8RD

TILLMAN

2043

2.15

4.55

6949

60

200

01

25

140.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.85

2504

F3.

9605

47DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8LA

TILLMAN

2036

1.8

4.67

4679

80

210

00.5

13.5

131.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.13

4885

2.08

2639

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8MA

TILLMAN

2072

3.6

5.62

326

019

00.5

12

1417

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.97

1564

F4.

3155

53DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8RD

WHEELER

2229

1.31

8181

818

1.32

32846

04

00

12

34

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.80

9264

1.33

702

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8LA

WHEELER

2241

1.86

3636

364

2.00

7022

30

60

01

35

51.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.08

3919

2.36

7119

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ALBANY MIDDLE

8MA

WHEELER

2226

1.18

1818

182

1.13

96058

04

00

12

33

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.90

4872

-0.7

8306

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

RDBA

NKS

2456

2.33

3333

333

3.86

3617

016

00

12.5

710

0.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.61

7014

F5.

6937

72DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

LABA

NKS

2444

1.83

3333

333

2.61

54502

012

00

12

45

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.91

102

2.75

4304

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

MA

BANKS

2451

2.12

51.98

49981

07

00

23

56

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.62

8508

1.74

3028

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

RDCLEM

ONS

76

0.85

7142

857

0.69

0065

60

20

01

12

20.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

422.29

6411

0.07

6929

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

LACLEM

ONS

77

10.81

6496

60

20

01

22

20.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.71

8855

0.06

4128

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

MA

CLEM

ONS

711

1.57

1428

571

1.51

18579

04

00

13

44

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

113.65

1937

0.19

5003

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

RDDAY

1927

1.42

1052

632

1.46

4991

10

50

01

24

50.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.71

5858

2.01

3582

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

LADAY

1922

1.15

7894

737

1.16

72931

04

00

12

34

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.02

855

0.54

9969

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

MA

DAY

1948

2.52

6315

789

2.43

51231

08

01

14

68

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.77

7404

2.44

2279

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

RDHALL

1820

1.11

1111

111

1.18

2663

40

30

01

23

30.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.74

0427

0.95

0473

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

LAHALL

1827

1.5

1.79

04978

06

00

12

56

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.05

7763

1.47

2312

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

MA

HALL

1837

2.05

5555

556

1.62

59738

06

01

1.5

34

61.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.81

4414

1.35

937

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

RDHOLSEY

1728

1.64

7058

824

1.61

7914

40

60

02

23

60.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.76

7133

2.61

9967

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

LAHOLSEY

1722

1.29

4117

647

1.57

1810

50

50

01

24

50.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.08

9518

0.88

2815

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

MA

HOLSEY

1724

1.41

1764

706

1.32

56519

04

00

13

34

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.85

4643

-0.0

3157

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

RDKR

UPA

VARA

M20

351.75

2.14

9051

20

80

01

2.5

4.5

6.5

0.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.69

3156

F3.

1951

42DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

LAKR

UPA

VARA

M20

190.95

1.39

45382

06

00

11

24

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.00

1555

-0.0

3596

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

MA

KRUPA

VARA

M20

472.35

2.27

7464

07

00.5

1.5

46

6.5

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.74

3206

2.10

3917

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

RDMAYB

ERRY

2219

0.86

3636

364

1.45

7181

10

50

00

12

50.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.65

2487

0.15

976

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

LAMAYB

ERRY

2213

0.59

0909

091

1.14

0555

04

00

01

23

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.95

3198

-1.1

2505

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

MA

MAYB

ERRY

2223

1.04

5454

545

1.46

31106

06

00

11

33

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.68

1943

-0.9

1145

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

RDPO

RTER

2426

1.08

3333

333

1.28

2547

30

40

01

23

30.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.61

7014

0.99

3051

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

LAPO

RTER

2432

1.33

3333

333

1.34

05601

04

00

12.5

34

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.91

102

1.17

2967

253

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

MA

PORT

ER24

441.83

3333

333

1.73

6229

50

60

0.5

13

45

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.62

8508

1.01

4903

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

RDTR

IVED

I ZIEMBA

2536

1.44

2.00

1666

07

00

12

46

0.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.60

0897

2.38

2459

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

LATR

IVED

I ZIEMBA

2523

0.92

1.49

77761

07

00

11

23

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.89

1855

-0.1

3704

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

MA

TRIVED

I ZIEMBA

2532

1.28

1.42

94521

04

00

12

44

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.60

4228

-0.3

7401

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

RDWILKINS

1933

1.73

6842

105

3.34

7339

015

00

12

315

0.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.71

5858

F3.

0702

13DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

LAWILKINS

1937

1.94

7368

421

3.82

20658

016

00

02

616

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.02

855

2.77

1555

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID6

MA

WILKINS

1924

1.26

3157

895

1.44

6916

50

50

01

24

51.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.77

7404

-0.3

6347

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

RDBA

LL29

321.10

3448

276

1.61

12291

08

00

11

24

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.51

3345

1.25

5385

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

LABA

LL29

361.24

1379

311.92

0847

50

90

01

23

50.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.73

9875

1.18

9971

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

MA

BALL

2946

1.58

6206

897

1.91

8281

30

60

01

35

61.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.17

543

1.20

977

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

RDBA

SS AEC

44

11.15

4700

50

20

01

22

20.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

362.70

636

0.30

2715

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

LABA

SS AEC

42

0.5

0.57

7350

30

10

00.5

11

10.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

953.13

8324

-0.5

5782

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

MA

BASS AEC

43

0.75

0.5

01

00.5

11

11

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

333.84

6681

-0.4

9427

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

RDBR

OWN

2330

1.30

4347

826

1.55

02136

06

00

12

34

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.59

996

1.87

9499

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

LABR

OWN

2326

1.13

0434

783

0.91

97009

03

00

12

22

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.84

1405

0.70

0992

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

MA

BROWN

2348

2.08

6956

522

3.35

63108

012

00

12

711

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.29

6766

2.43

2301

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

RDBR

OWN AEC

10

00

00

00

00

00.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

364.60

4223

-0.6

39DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

LABR

OWN AEC

10

00

00

00

00

00.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

955.36

2994

-0.6

1604

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

MA

BROWN AEC

12

22

22

22

22

21.18

8032

491.77

2432

336.50

5329

0.45

8109

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

RDBU

TLER

AEC

56

1.2

1.09

54451

03

01

11

33

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

362.50

5997

0.69

1907

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

LABU

TLER

AEC

54

0.8

0.83

666

02

00

11

22

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

952.90

3459

-0.1

7135

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

MA

BUTLER

AEC

59

1.8

2.48

99799

06

00

12

66

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

333.56

60.

7720

47DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

RDFA

IR23

220.95

6521

739

0.92

8256

50

30

01

12

30.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.59

996

0.56

1083

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

LAFA

IR23

321.39

1304

348

1.43

77739

05

00

12

34

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.84

1405

1.54

4546

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

MA

FAIR

2322

0.95

6521

739

1.52

1908

50

70

01

12

31.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.29

6766

-0.6

2642

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

RDJACK

SON

2121

11.04

88088

03

00

12

23

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.63

6792

0.69

3607

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

LAJACK

SON

2117

0.80

9523

811.03

04876

04

00

11

22

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.88

4579

-0.3

2174

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

MA

JACK

SON

2136

1.71

4285

714

2.28

34811

08

00

13

55

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.34

8362

1.36

0613

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

RDJONES

2928

0.96

5517

241

1.37

53638

05

00

02

34

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.51

3345

0.66

8319

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

LAJONES

2924

0.82

7586

207

1.03

74751

04

00

11

23

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.73

9875

-0.3

1251

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

MA

JONES

2984

2.89

6551

724

4.83

5470

30

180

01

214

161.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.17

543

F5.

1909

78DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

RDMOORE

2429

1.20

8333

333

1.21

5092

30

50

01

22

30.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.58

3296

1.54

8158

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

LAMOORE

2435

1.45

8333

333

1.99

95471

09

00

12

44

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.82

1871

1.79

9174

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

MA

MOORE

2442

1.75

2.32

65948

010

00

12

55

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.27

3421

1.55

3271

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

RDRE

YNOLD

S28

170.60

7142

857

0.78

59547

02

00

01

22

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.52

5821

-0.8

421

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

LARE

YNOLD

S28

381.35

7142

857

1.70

43362

05

00

0.5

24

50.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.75

4499

1.58

2299

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

MA

REYN

OLD

S28

381.35

7142

857

1.59

19772

05

00

12

45

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.19

2907

0.50

487

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

RDSA

MUELS AEC

23

1.5

0.70

71068

12

11

1.5

22

20.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

363.49

248

0.77

2923

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

LASA

MUELS AEC

23

1.5

0.70

71068

12

11

1.5

22

20.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

954.05

9812

0.55

9108

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

MA

SAMUELS AEC

24

21.41

42136

13

11

23

33

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

334.94

7929

0.64

7864

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

RDSH

OR

41

0.25

0.5

01

00

00.5

11

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

362.70

636

-0.8

8283

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

LASH

OR

30

00

00

00

00

00

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

953.48

2481

-1.0

6701

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

MA

SHOR

42

0.5

10

20

00

12

21.18

8032

491.77

2432

333.84

6681

-0.7

7637

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

RDWILLIAMS

2131

1.47

6190

476

2.01

54168

09

00

12

33

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.63

6792

2.41

832

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

LAWILLIAMS

2134

1.61

9047

619

1.85

6776

50

70

01

34

40.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.88

4579

2.17

9553

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID7

MA

WILLIAMS

2150

2.38

0952

381

2.17

89032

07

01

24

56

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.34

8362

F3.

0842

62DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

RDANDER

SON

2425

1.04

1666

667

1.30

1476

30

50

01

23

30.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.77

1548

0.41

8454

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

LAANDER

SON

2427

1.12

51.48

36061

06

00

11.5

34

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.03

9465

0.25

5886

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

MA

ANDER

SON

2438

1.58

3333

333

1.38

05061

05

00

22

34

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.84

670.

1028

71DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

RDBO

ZEMAN

2218

0.81

8181

818

1.05

27227

03

00

02

23

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.80

9264

-0.3

5616

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

LABO

ZEMAN

2235

1.59

0909

091

2.32

2951

50

90

00.5

24

61.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.08

3919

1.58

3565

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

MA

BOZEMAN

2239

1.77

2727

273

1.87

54509

07

00

13

45

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.90

4872

0.51

4316

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

RDGRE

EN28

200.71

4285

714

0.97

59001

03

00

01

23

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.70

8629

-0.7

9872

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

LAGRE

EN28

321.14

2857

143

2.03

1498

09

00

0.5

13

61.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

671.96

5305

0.33

4267

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

MA

GRE

EN28

291.03

5714

286

1.17

00631

04

00

12

33

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.74

9656

-1.2

4529

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

RDHUFFAKER

2629

1.11

5384

615

1.50

5375

07

00

12

22

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.73

8273

0.70

6923

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

LAHUFFAKER

2642

1.61

5384

615

2.00

15379

07

00

13

55

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.00

0244

1.79

7961

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

MA

HUFFAKER

2627

1.03

8461

538

1.18

25657

04

00

12

33

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.79

5377

-1.1

9344

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

RDNEW

BERR

Y27

250.92

5925

926

1.17

42731

05

00

11

33

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.72

3039

0.00

9637

254

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

LANEW

BERR

Y27

281.03

7037

037

1.09

12759

04

00

12

23

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

671.98

2289

-0.0

0856

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

MA

NEW

BERR

Y27

542

1.64

0825

30

70

12

34

51.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.77

1882

1.12

2564

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

RDOKEDIJI

2844

1.57

1428

571

2.36

37474

012

00

12

35

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.70

8629

2.47

5848

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

LAOKEDIJI

2862

2.21

4285

714

2.91

0481

011

00

1.5

3.5

610

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

671.96

5305

F3.

8070

02DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

MA

OKEDIJI

2862

2.21

4285

714

1.95

0444

30

80

12

34

71.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.74

9656

1.67

3931

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

RDRICH

ARD

SON

74

0.57

1428

571

0.78

67958

02

00

01

22

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

262.49

3902

-0.6

7224

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

LARICH

ARD

SON

77

10.81

64966

02

00

12

22

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.89

0882

-0.0

6438

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

MA

RICH

ARD

SON

88

11.41

42136

04

00

0.5

1.5

44

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

493.80

4389

-0.7

1292

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

RDSM

ITH

2124

1.14

2857

143

1.01

41851

03

00

12

23

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.83

0111

0.72

6217

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

LASM

ITH

2124

1.14

2857

143

1.15

26367

04

00

11

24

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.10

8492

0.28

9484

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

MA

SMITH

2138

1.80

9523

811.80

60744

06

00

13

45

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.93

7027

0.58

1423

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

RDSTELMACK

2826

0.92

8571

429

1.30

32316

05

00

0.5

13

40.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.70

8629

0.01

9921

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

LASTELMACK

2830

1.07

1428

571

1.21

49858

05

00

12

33

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

671.96

5305

0.10

2752

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

DOUGHER

TY M

ID8

MA

STELMACK

2841

1.46

4285

714

1.89

50646

06

00

12

56

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.74

9656

-0.1

8376

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6RD

ABB

OTT

2221

0.95

4545

455

1.64

6851

90

70

00

22

30.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.65

2487

0.48

7076

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6LA

ABB

OTT

2233

1.5

1.47

19601

05

00

12

44

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.95

3198

1.62

7702

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6MA

ABB

OTT

2234

1.54

5454

545

2.15

42267

08

00

12

45

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.68

1943

0.28

3622

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6RD

BROWNE

141

0.07

1428

571

0.26

7261

20

10

00

00

10.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.86

3764

-2.1

4792

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6LA

BROWNE

141

0.07

1428

571

0.26

72612

01

00

00

01

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.20

4418

-2.1

523

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6MA

BROWNE

144

0.28

5714

286

0.82

5420

30

30

00

01

31.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

113.00

0207

-2.1

7567

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6RD

BUMGARD

NER

120

00

00

00

00

00

0.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.94

7453

-2.1

7853

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6LA

BUMGARD

NER

127

0.58

3333

333

0.79

2961

50

20

00

12

20.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.30

3928

-0.8

4785

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6MA

BUMGARD

NER

1213

1.08

3333

333

1.72

9862

50

60

00.5

1.5

26

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

113.12

6275

-0.6

0629

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6RD

COLLINS

1615

0.93

751.

3400

871

04

00

0.5

14

40.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.79

6305

0.36

3042

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6LA

COLLINS

1616

11.89

73666

07

00

01

47

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.12

4205

0.09

6952

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6MA

COLLINS

1685

5.31

254.22

24598

012

11

59

1212

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.89

8587

F7.

9203

43DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6RD

CUTLIFF

2124

1.14

2857

143

1.85

1640

20

60

00

15

50.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.67

2095

1.13

8301

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6LA

CUTLIFF

2147

2.23

8095

238

4.34

6317

50

200

01

23

60.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.97

6513

F3.

7738

67DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6MA

CUTLIFF

2146

2.19

0476

192.61

95238

09

00

13

67

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.71

148

1.78

3353

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6RD

DANIEL

2019

0.95

1.82

0208

20

80

00

12

50.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.69

3156

0.44

8805

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6LA

DANIEL

2010

0.5

1.05

1315

04

00

00.5

23

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.00

1555

-1.3

3516

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6MA

DANIEL

2023

1.15

0.98

80869

03

00

12

2.5

31.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.74

3206

-0.6

3079

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6RD

DYD

ELL

1920

1.05

2631

579

1.07

8769

10

30

01

23

30.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.71

5858

0.78

0846

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6LA

DYD

ELL

196

0.31

5789

474

0.47

75669

01

00

01

11

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.02

855

-1.8

1972

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6MA

DYD

ELL

1939

2.05

2631

579

2.04

05251

08

00

23

58

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.77

7404

1.39

0125

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6RD

HARP

E13

131

0.70

7106

80

20

11

12

20.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.90

3193

0.50

0224

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6LA

HARP

E13

151.15

3846

154

1.21

42318

03

00

12

33

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.25

130.

4454

94DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6MA

HARP

E13

211.61

5384

615

1.38

6750

50

40

11

24

41.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

113.05

9602

0.34

6506

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6RD

HOLM

ES12

10.08

3333

333

0.28

8675

10

10

00

00

10.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.94

7453

-1.9

5694

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6LA

HOLM

ES12

20.16

6666

667

0.38

9249

50

10

00

01

10.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.30

3928

-1.7

7966

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6MA

HOLM

ES12

40.33

3333

333

0.49

2366

01

00

01

11

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

113.12

6275

-1.9

3022

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6RD

HOLSEY

1731

1.82

3529

412

2.27

0333

09

01

13

49

0.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.76

7133

F3.

1784

95DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6LA

HOLSEY

1727

1.58

8235

294

2.45

09902

09

00

12

59

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.08

9518

1.66

5693

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6MA

HOLSEY

1754

3.17

6470

588

3.18

65988

011

01

35

911

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.85

4643

F3.

6761

79DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6RD

SHEPPA

RD17

362.11

7647

059

2.78

1239

70

100

01

27

100.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.76

7133

F4.

1093

77DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6LA

SHEPPA

RD17

301.76

4705

882

1.75

10501

05

00

13

55

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.08

9518

2.13

542

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6MA

SHEPPA

RD17

362.11

7647

059

2.28

8076

50

70

11

27

71.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.85

4643

1.45

1528

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6RD

SIZEMORE

1112

1.09

0909

091

1.04

4465

90

30

01

22

30.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.99

7619

0.69

1586

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6LA

SIZEMORE

119

0.81

8181

818

1.07

87198

03

00

02

23

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.36

3578

-0.3

0891

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6MA

SIZEMORE

1120

1.81

8181

818

1.32

80197

05

11

22

35

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

113.20

1844

0.66

1485

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6RD

THOMAS

411

2.75

2.75

3785

30

60

0.5

2.5

56

60.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

422.77

3345

2.96

416

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6LA

THOMAS

42

0.5

0.57

7350

30

10

00.5

11

10.96

2455

211.54

8999

193.28

5954

-0.5

971

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6MA

THOMAS

48

21.82

57419

04

00.5

23.5

44

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

114.37

0383

0.58

4193

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6RD

TURN

ER22

241.09

0909

091

1.57

0838

10

60

01

12

50.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.65

2487

0.97

8051

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6LA

TURN

ER22

200.90

9090

909

0.97

1454

04

00

11

22

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.95

3198

-0.1

6159

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6MA

TURN

ER22

341.54

5454

545

1.53

45939

06

00

1.5

23

41.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.68

1943

0.28

3622

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6RD

UDOTO

2134

1.61

9047

619

3.07

3697

90

120

00

24

80.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.67

2095

2.81

3395

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6LA

UDOTO

2117

0.80

9523

811.86

0619

50

80

00

12

30.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.97

6513

-0.4

5243

255

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

6MA

UDOTO

2155

2.61

9047

619

3.04

09898

013

01

23

66

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.71

148

2.78

4152

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7RD

ARM

ONA

1325

1.92

3076

923

2.17

79784

07

01

12

67

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.86

1241

F3.

1762

13DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7LA

ARM

ONA

1317

1.30

7692

308

1.43

6698

50

40

01

24

40.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

952.14

7678

0.95

7937

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7MA

ARM

ONA

1312

0.92

3076

923

1.11

51636

04

00

11

24

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.66

2785

-0.5

3898

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7RD

BANKO

LE25

240.96

1.13

57817

03

00

12

33

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.56

7641

0.59

8715

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7LA

BANKO

LE25

160.64

0.99

49874

03

00

01

23

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.80

3521

-0.9

2256

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7MA

BANKO

LE25

301.2

1.29

09944

04

00

12

34

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.25

1492

0.03

376

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7RD

BASS AEC

57

1.4

2.60

7681

06

00

01

66

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

362.50

5997

1.04

5367

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7LA

BASS AEC

55

11.41

42136

03

00

02

33

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

952.90

3459

0.13

0185

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7MA

BASS AEC

57

1.4

1.51

65751

03

00

13

33

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

333.56

60.

2674

14DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7RD

BRINSO

N DEA

TRIC

2421

0.87

51.19

09989

05

00

11

23

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.58

3296

0.25

7501

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7LA

BRINSO

N DEA

TRIC

2434

1.41

6666

667

1.71

73454

08

00

12

33

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.82

1871

1.66

1542

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7MA

BRINSO

N DEA

TRIC

2440

1.66

6666

667

1.88

04871

07

00

12

46

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.27

3421

1.32

2939

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7RD

BROWN AEC

55

11.22

47449

03

00

11

33

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

362.50

5997

0.33

8446

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7LA

BROWN AEC

52

0.4

0.54

77226

01

00

01

11

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

952.90

3459

-0.7

7443

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7MA

BROWN AEC

56

1.2

0.83

666

02

01

12

22

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

333.56

60.

0150

98DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7RD

BRYA

NT

2118

0.85

7142

857

1.19

52286

04

00

02

23

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.63

6792

0.17

6194

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7LA

BRYA

NT

217

0.33

3333

333

0.57

7350

30

20

00

11

10.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.88

4579

-1.7

9309

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7MA

BRYA

NT

2118

0.85

7142

857

1.35

22468

05

00

02

23

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.34

8362

-0.8

5551

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7RD

BUTLER

AEC

24

20

22

22

22

22

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

363.49

248

1.33

1793

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7LA

BUTLER

AEC

21

0.5

0.70

71068

01

00

0.5

11

10.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

954.05

9812

-0.3

9444

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7MA

BUTLER

AEC

22

11.41

42136

02

00

12

22

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

334.94

7929

-0.1

5003

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7RD

CLARK

155

0.33

3333

333

0.89

97354

03

00

00

23

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.78

8549

-1.4

545

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7LA

CLARK

1512

0.8

0.94

11239

03

00

11

23

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

952.06

2468

-0.2

9679

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7MA

CLARK

1514

0.93

3333

333

1.75

11901

07

00

11

17

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.56

0953

-0.5

5655

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7RD

MACO

N23

220.95

6521

739

1.36

44266

04

00

02

34

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.59

996

0.56

1083

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7LA

MACO

N23

210.91

3043

478

0.84

81554

03

00

11

22

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.84

1405

-0.0

0197

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7MA

MACO

N23

271.17

3913

043

1.55

65747

07

00

11

33

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.29

6766

-0.0

382

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7RD

REY

2025

1.25

1.33

2785

05

00

12

34.5

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.65

7246

1.56

0544

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7LA

REY

2024

1.2

0.89

44272

03

00.5

12

22.5

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.90

8556

0.86

3443

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7MA

REY

2045

2.25

2.09

94987

06

00

2.5

45

5.5

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.37

7016

2.67

9517

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7RD

RIVE

RS23

301.30

4347

826

1.14

55361

04

01

12

34

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.59

996

1.87

9499

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7LA

RIVE

RS23

251.08

6956

522

0.94

9308

03

00

12

23

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.84

1405

0.56

04DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7MA

RIVE

RS23

291.26

0869

565

1.13

68774

04

00

12

33

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.29

6766

0.19

7082

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7RD

SAMUELS AEC

45

1.25

2.5

05

00

02.5

55

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

362.70

636

0.69

7896

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7LA

SAMUELS AEC

43

0.75

0.95

74271

02

00

0.5

1.5

22

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

953.13

8324

-0.2

2069

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7MA

SAMUELS AEC

44

10.81

64966

02

00.5

11.5

22

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

333.84

6681

-0.2

1217

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7RD

SHOR

81

0.12

50.35

35534

01

00

00

11

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

362.15

0488

-1.5

2794

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7LA

SHOR

96

0.66

6666

667

0.86

60254

02

00

01

22

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

952.39

6767

-0.4

996

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7MA

SHOR

77

10.81

64966

02

00

12

22

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

333.19

7782

-0.2

8068

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7RD

STOLZE

2120

0.95

2380

952

1.11

69687

04

00

11

23

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.63

6792

0.52

1136

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7LA

STOLZE

2126

1.23

8095

238

1.97

2429

07

00

11

36

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.88

4579

1.00

2474

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7MA

STOLZE

2127

1.28

5714

286

1.38

35771

04

00

12

34

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.34

8362

0.25

2554

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7RD

TESTER

2323

11.31

4257

50

50

01

23

30.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.59

996

0.72

5885

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7LA

TESTER

2332

1.39

1304

348

2.98

08347

014

00

01

34

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.84

1405

1.54

4546

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7MA

TESTER

2353

2.30

4347

826

2.93

00137

010

00

13

79

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.29

6766

F3.

0205

16DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7RD

WILES

137

0.53

8461

538

0.87

7058

03

00

01

13

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.86

1241

-0.7

6952

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7LA

WILES

131

0.07

6923

077

0.27

73501

01

00

00

01

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

952.14

7678

-2.0

3415

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7MA

WILES

1313

11.29

09944

04

00

11

34

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.66

2785

-0.3

825

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7RD

WILLIAMS

2335

1.52

1739

132.25

36751

08

00

11

66

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.59

996

2.70

3509

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7LA

WILLIAMS

2322

0.95

6521

739

1.63

7022

30

60

00

13

50.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.84

1405

0.13

8623

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

7MA

WILLIAMS

2328

1.21

7391

304

1.20

44056

04

00

12

33

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.29

6766

0.07

9439

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8RD

BLACK

2451

2.12

52.60

9556

010

01

12.5

78

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.77

1548

F4.

2501

38DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8LA

BLACK

2427

1.12

51.48

36061

05

00

11.5

44

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.03

9465

0.25

5886

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8MA

BLACK

2444

1.83

3333

333

2.33

4368

30

100

01

34

61.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.84

670.

6761

66DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8RD

DUCK

911

1.22

2222

222

1.56

34719

04

00

02

44

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

262.30

8447

0.64

7319

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8LA

DUCK

922

2.44

4444

444

3.46

81087

011

01

13

1111

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.67

2293

2.58

1307

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8MA

DUCK

919

2.11

1111

111

2.42

09732

08

01

22

88

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

493.67

4799

0.80

4144

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8RD

GOSH

A22

241.09

0909

091

1.10

87999

04

00

11

33

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.80

9264

0.56

7392

256

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8LA

GOSH

A22

291.31

8181

818

1.08

61186

03

00

12

33

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.08

3919

0.80

001

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8MA

GOSH

A22

462.09

0909

091

2.81

00007

012

00

13

56

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.90

4872

1.21

2901

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8RD

GUYTON

1214

1.16

6666

667

1.80

0673

30

60

00.5

1.5

36

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

262.12

288

0.60

8516

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8LA

GUYTON

1115

1.36

3636

364

1.20

60454

03

00

13

33

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.51

6438

0.65

8035

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8MA

GUYTON

119

0.81

8181

818

1.25

0454

50

40

00

12

41.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

493.47

0853

-1.1

1825

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8RD

HART

ER20

231.15

1.66

3066

30

60

01

1.5

3.5

5.5

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.85

2504

0.73

1778

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8LA

HART

ER20

190.95

1.53

8112

30

60

00

13

4.5

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.13

4885

-0.2

4579

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8MA

HART

ER20

381.9

1.37

2665

50

50

12

33.5

4.5

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.97

1564

0.75

6811

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8RD

HOUSSEL

2430

1.25

1.39

0964

60

50

01

23

40.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.77

1548

1.15

5316

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8LA

HOUSSEL

2434

1.41

6666

667

1.90

9169

30

60

00.5

2.5

55

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.03

9465

1.13

1115

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8MA

HOUSSEL

2443

1.79

1666

667

2.99

24422

014

00

12

36

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.84

670.

5806

17DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8RD

MART

IN21

170.80

9523

811.03

04876

04

00

11

13

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.83

0111

-0.3

7662

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8LA

MART

IN21

211

1.04

88088

04

00

11

23

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.10

8492

-0.1

1151

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8MA

MART

IN21

231.09

5238

095

1.44

58479

05

00

12

34

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.93

7027

-0.9

5077

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8RD

MCP

HER

SON

2442

1.75

2.52

37998

010

00

13

56

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.77

1548

2.92

3786

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8LA

MCP

HER

SON

2435

1.45

8333

333

2.41

33536

010

00

0.5

1.5

55

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.03

9465

1.25

6148

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8MA

MCP

HER

SON

2447

1.95

8333

333

3.12

74266

012

00

0.5

37

81.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.84

670.

9628

14DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8RD

PHILLIPS

127

0.58

3333

333

0.66

85579

02

00

0.5

11

20.92

3356

971.38

5090

262.12

288

-0.8

504

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8LA

PHILLIPS

129

0.75

0.96

5307

30

30

00.5

12

31.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.45

357

-0.6

1476

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8MA

PHILLIPS

1226

2.16

6666

667

2.51

6611

50

70

01

46

71.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

493.38

8586

1.01

863

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8RD

ROBE

RTS

2142

23.54

96479

014

00

12

69

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.83

0111

F3.

5620

77DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8LA

ROBE

RTS

2146

2.19

0476

192.42

11371

09

01

23

67

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.10

8492

F3.

2301

28DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8MA

ROBE

RTS

2140

1.90

4761

905

2.09

5346

30

80

11

25

61.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.93

7027

0.78

5715

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8RD

ROBINSO

N21

100.47

6190

476

1.12

3345

30

50

00

11

10.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.83

0111

-1.4

7945

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8LA

ROBINSO

N21

281.33

3333

333

1.23

82784

04

00

12

33

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.10

8492

0.82

4147

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8MA

ROBINSO

N21

251.19

0476

191.12

3345

30

50

11

22

21.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.93

7027

-0.7

4648

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8RD

SMITH

157

0.46

6666

667

0.91

54754

03

00

01

23

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.99

6243

-1.2

77DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8LA

SMITH

1510

0.66

6666

667

0.89

97354

03

00

01

23

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.30

4307

-0.8

8502

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8MA

SMITH

1510

0.66

6666

667

1.17

5139

30

40

00

12

41.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

493.19

3264

-1.5

8051

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8RD

TABO

R21

221.04

7619

048

1.32

19754

05

00

11

33

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.83

0111

0.41

1121

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8LA

TABO

R21

221.04

7619

048

1.07

12698

03

00

12

23

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.10

8492

0.02

2153

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

MER

RY ACR

ES M

8MA

TABO

R21

381.80

9523

811.69

1716

50

60

02

34

41.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.93

7027

0.58

1423

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6RD

BURG

ESS

259

0.36

0.7

03

00

01

11

0.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.60

0897

-1.7

6271

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6LA

BURG

ESS

2528

1.12

1.30

12814

05

00

11

34

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.89

1855

0.50

8537

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6MA

BURG

ESS

2540

1.6

1.63

29932

06

00

13

35

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.60

4228

0.44

1319

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6RD

DAVIS

68

1.33

3333

333

1.50

5545

30

40

01

24

40.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

422.41

4765

0.96

6598

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6LA

DAVIS

65

0.83

3333

333

1.32

91601

03

00

02

33

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.85

9584

-0.2

0419

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6MA

DAVIS

65

0.83

3333

333

0.75

27727

02

00

11

22

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

113.83

0224

-0.7

4076

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6RD

DYSON

2514

0.56

0.96

0902

40

40

00

12

20.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.60

0897

-0.9

9509

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6LA

DYSON

2525

11.19

02381

04

00

12

33

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.89

1855

0.12

119

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6MA

DYSON

2536

1.44

1.85

02252

08

00

12

44

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.60

4228

0.03

3654

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6RD

EZEA

MII

2643

1.65

3846

154

2.03

8476

10

100

01

23

40.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.58

5718

F3.

2666

63DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6LA

EZEA

MII

2635

1.34

6153

846

1.85

34791

07

00

0.5

24

50.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.87

3806

1.26

3065

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6MA

EZEA

MII

2636

1.38

4615

385

1.44

43524

06

00

12

44

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.58

1363

-0.1

0959

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6RD

FORD

2424

11.

3513

278

05

00

11

34

0.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.61

7014

0.67

967

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6LA

FORD

2423

0.95

8333

333

1.65

4484

50

70

00

13

40.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.91

102

-0.0

1304

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6MA

FORD

2428

1.16

6666

667

1.57

88457

06

00

11

44

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.62

8508

-0.6

4938

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6RD

HAMILTO

N25

230.92

1.25

5653

90

50

01

13

30.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.60

0897

0.38

6636

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6LA

HAMILTO

N25

381.52

2.36

50229

08

00

02

58

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.89

1855

1.79

9694

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6MA

HAMILTO

N25

281.12

1.48

09907

06

00

11

33

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.60

4228

-0.7

8168

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6RD

HANSEN

2522

0.88

0.97

1253

50

40

01

12

20.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.60

0897

0.23

3111

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6LA

HANSEN

2535

1.4

1.93

64917

08

00

12

36

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.89

1855

1.41

2347

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6MA

HANSEN

2537

1.48

1.22

88206

04

00

12

33

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.60

4228

0.13

557

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6RD

HARR

ELL

2624

0.92

3076

923

1.05

5389

10

40

01

12

30.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.58

5718

0.40

6336

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6LA

HARR

ELL

2639

1.5

1.86

0107

50

60

01

25

50.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.87

3806

1.76

9498

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6MA

HARR

ELL

2638

1.46

1538

462

1.44

86068

05

01

12

44

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.58

1363

0.09

0285

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6RD

NASH

2544

1.76

2.20

3784

60

70

01

26

70.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.60

0897

F3.

6106

58DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6LA

NASH

2527

1.08

1.93

47696

09

00

01

24

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.89

1855

0.37

9422

257

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6MA

NASH

2537

1.48

1.35

76941

05

01

12

44

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.60

4228

0.13

557

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6RD

ROBE

RTS

1410

0.71

4285

714

0.72

6273

02

00

11

22

0.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.86

3764

-0.3

0152

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6LA

ROBE

RTS

1410

0.71

4285

714

0.91

3873

50

30

00.5

12

30.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.20

4418

-0.5

9946

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

6MA

ROBE

RTS

1412

0.85

7142

857

0.94

9262

30

30

01

12

31.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

113.00

0207

-1.0

8614

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7RD

ARR

INGTO

N25

311.24

1.36

25956

04

00

12

34

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.56

7641

1.70

5223

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7LA

ARR

INGTO

N25

210.84

1.24

7664

50

50

00

12

30.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.80

3521

-0.2

483

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7MA

ARR

INGTO

N25

291.16

1.86

36881

08

00

02

44

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.25

1492

-0.0

7908

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7RD

BASS AEC

24

21.41

42136

13

11

23

33

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

363.49

248

1.33

1793

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7LA

BASS AEC

25

2.5

0.70

71068

23

22

2.5

33

30.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

954.05

9812

1.51

2651

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7MA

BASS AEC

21

0.5

0.70

71068

01

00

0.5

11

11.18

8032

491.77

2432

334.94

7929

-0.5

4898

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7RD

BROWN AEC

31

0.33

3333

333

0.57

7350

30

10

00

11

10.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

362.99

996

-0.6

5047

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7LA

BROWN AEC

32

0.66

6666

667

0.57

7350

30

10

01

11

10.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

953.48

2481

-0.2

8844

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7MA

BROWN AEC

35

1.66

6666

667

2.08

1666

04

00

14

44

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

334.25

7975

0.46

7729

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7RD

BUTLER

AEC

45

1.25

1.5

03

00

12.5

33

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

362.70

636

0.69

7896

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7LA

BUTLER

AEC

43

0.75

0.95

74271

02

00

0.5

1.5

22

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

953.13

8324

-0.2

2069

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7MA

BUTLER

AEC

43

0.75

0.95

74271

02

00

0.5

1.5

22

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

333.84

6681

-0.4

9427

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7RD

COX

2420

0.83

3333

333

1.04

9499

50

30

00.5

13

30.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.58

3296

0.09

6169

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7LA

COX

2436

1.5

1.79

37088

07

00

12

45

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.82

1871

1.93

6806

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7MA

COX

2443

1.79

1666

667

1.76

87914

06

00

1.5

2.5

55

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.27

3421

1.66

8437

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7RD

DANIELS

2625

0.96

1538

462

1.56

15574

06

00

02

34

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.55

2899

0.61

6772

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7LA

DANIELS

2624

0.92

3076

923

1.64

7375

50

70

00

13

40.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.78

624

0.03

2401

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7MA

DANIELS

2650

1.92

3076

923

2.09

6150

30

70

01

45

51.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.23

084

2.11

4612

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7RD

DUKES

2346

22.77

97972

010

00

13

69

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.59

996

F4.

5163

3DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7LA

DUKES

2349

2.13

0434

783

3.91

1572

018

00

12

48

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.84

1405

F3.

9346

15DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7MA

DUKES

2345

1.95

6521

739

2.38

32419

09

00

13

66

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.29

6766

2.07

9371

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7RD

LONG

2634

1.30

7692

308

1.51

70822

06

00

12

34

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.55

2899

2.01

1798

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7LA

LONG

2639

1.5

1.72

62677

06

00

12

45

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.78

624

2.01

5892

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7MA

LONG

2633

1.26

9230

769

1.28

24256

04

00

12

34

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.23

084

0.23

3595

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7RD

MORG

AN

2328

1.21

7391

304

2.13

108

010

00

12

23

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.59

996

1.54

9895

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7LA

MORG

AN

2317

0.73

9130

435

0.86

43122

03

00

11

22

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.84

1405

-0.5

6434

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7MA

MORG

AN

2331

1.34

7826

087

2.26

85337

010

00

12

35

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.29

6766

0.43

2368

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7RD

POOLE

2427

1.12

52.29

01016

011

00

0.5

13

30.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.58

3296

1.22

5494

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7LA

POOLE

2449

2.04

1666

667

4.92

09328

024

00

11.5

55

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.82

1871

F3.

7260

24DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7MA

POOLE

2416

0.66

6666

667

1.00

7220

30

40

00

12

21.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.27

3421

-1.4

4105

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7RD

SADLER

2423

0.95

8333

333

1.54

57984

06

00

01.5

34

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.58

3296

0.58

0166

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7LA

SADLER

2417

0.70

8333

333

0.95

45847

03

00

01

23

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.82

1871

-0.6

782

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7MA

SADLER

2443

1.79

1666

667

1.66

75722

05

01

12.5

55

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.27

3421

1.66

8437

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7RD

SAMUELS AEC

47

1.75

1.25

83057

03

01

22.5

33

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

362.70

636

1.48

8259

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7LA

SAMUELS AEC

414

3.5

5.74

45626

012

00

17

1212

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

953.13

8324

F3.

4877

26DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7MA

SAMUELS AEC

43

0.75

1.5

03

00

01.5

33

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

333.84

6681

-0.4

9427

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7RD

SHOR

10

00

00

00

00

00.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

364.60

4223

-0.6

39DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7LA

SHOR

20

00

00

00

00

00

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

954.05

9812

-0.8

7121

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

7MA

SHOR

20

00

00

00

00

00

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

334.94

7929

-0.9

4792

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8RD

JONES DEA

DRA

2520

0.8

0.95

74271

03

00

11

23

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.75

4411

-0.4

453

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8LA

JONES DEA

DRA

2519

0.76

1.01

15994

03

00

01

23

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.01

9266

-0.8

5671

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8MA

JONES DEA

DRA

2530

1.2

1.60

72751

05

00

12

45

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.82

0269

-0.7

9219

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8RD

JONES LINDA

2732

1.18

5185

185

1.64

16932

05

00

12

55

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.72

3039

0.98

2246

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8LA

JONES LINDA

2728

1.03

7037

037

1.45

39464

07

00

11

23

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

671.98

2289

-0.0

0856

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8MA

JONES LINDA

2734

1.25

9259

259

1.40

30898

05

00

12

44

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.77

1882

-0.6

7913

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8RD

MCD

ONALD

2026

1.3

2.00

26298

09

00

12

25.5

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.85

2504

1.21

6093

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8LA

MCD

ONALD

2025

1.25

1.58

5294

30

50

00.5

2.5

3.5

4.5

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.13

4885

0.57

6007

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8MA

MCD

ONALD

2041

2.05

1.95

9457

50

70

0.5

23

56.5

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.97

1564

1.07

0818

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8RD

ODOM

2523

0.92

1.75

40429

07

00

01

35

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.75

4411

-0.0

1212

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8LA

ODOM

2537

1.48

2.06

39767

010

00

12

33

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.01

9266

1.34

8408

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8MA

ODOM

2530

1.2

1.60

72751

07

00

12

34

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.82

0269

-0.7

9219

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8RD

PANDARINATH

AN

1825

1.38

8888

889

1.68

51912

06

00

11

56

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.90

2764

1.42

5961

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8LA

PANDARINATH

AN

1847

2.61

1111

111

3.56

68224

015

01

22

715

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.19

4125

F4.

0836

45DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8MA

PANDARINATH

AN

1835

1.94

4444

444

1.89

3401

06

01

13

56

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

493.04

9084

0.80

6239

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8RD

PIER

CE22

200.90

9090

909

0.97

1454

03

00

11

23

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.80

9264

-0.0

4831

258

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8LA

PIER

CE22

281.27

2727

273

1.95

6231

07

00

02

36

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.08

3919

0.66

9418

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8MA

PIER

CE22

371.68

1818

182

1.58

52404

06

01

12

44

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.90

4872

0.31

4721

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8RD

RICH

ARD

SON

107

0.7

0.48

30459

01

00

11

11

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

262.23

7369

-0.5

0994

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8LA

RICH

ARD

SON

1010

11.88

56181

05

00

01

4.5

51.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.58

8515

-0.0

7695

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8MA

RICH

ARD

SON

107

0.7

0.67

49486

02

00

11

1.5

21.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

493.56

517

-1.2

4114

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8RD

WALKER

2322

0.95

6521

739

1.91

82914

09

00

01

22

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.78

9791

0.11

4832

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8LA

WALKER

2316

0.69

5652

174

0.87

5670

30

30

01

11

31.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.06

0967

-1.0

1076

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8MA

WALKER

2341

1.78

2608

696

2.37

32701

08

00

13

66

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.87

4838

0.54

8058

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8RD

WINGFIELD

2448

22.08

51441

07

00.5

13

66

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.77

1548

F3.

8080

21DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8LA

WINGFIELD

2443

1.79

1666

667

2.08

47097

07

00

13.5

55

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.03

9465

2.25

641

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

RADIUM SPR

MI

8MA

WINGFIELD

2453

2.20

8333

333

1.69

3444

30

70

12

35

51.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.84

671.

5361

09

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6RD

COOPER

2711

0.40

7407

407

0.63

6049

10

20

00

11

20.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.57

139

-1.6

4277

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6LA

COOPER

2712

0.44

4444

444

0.64

05126

02

00

01

12

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.85

677

-1.7

3768

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6MA

COOPER

2723

0.85

1851

852

1.37

85082

05

00

02

34

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.55

978

-1.5

2236

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6RD

DRA

KE24

160.66

6666

667

0.76

1387

03

00

11

12

0.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.61

7014

-0.5

7386

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6LA

DRA

KE24

200.83

3333

333

0.96

30868

03

00

11

23

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.91

102

-0.4

0837

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6MA

DRA

KE24

441.83

3333

333

2.61

54502

012

00

12

55

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.62

8508

1.01

4903

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6RD

HARR

OLD

2724

0.88

8888

889

0.93

3699

60

30

01

12

30.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.57

139

0.27

7711

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6LA

HARR

OLD

2722

0.81

4814

815

1.52

0046

50

70

00

13

30.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.85

677

-0.4

9526

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6MA

HARR

OLD

2739

1.44

4444

444

1.50

21352

06

00

12

34

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.55

978

0.04

6742

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6RD

KIMBE

R28

180.64

2857

143

1.31

1326

30

60

00

12

30.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.55

7837

-0.7

1655

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6LA

KIMBE

R28

170.60

7142

857

0.78

59547

02

00

01

22

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.84

0655

-1.2

1377

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6MA

KIMBE

R28

391.39

2857

143

2.69

89612

014

00

11.5

25

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.53

9364

-0.0

915

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6RD

LOCK

HART

279

0.33

3333

333

0.62

0173

70

20

00

11

20.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.57

139

-1.9

3823

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6LA

LOCK

HART

2717

0.62

9629

631.39

0853

30

60

00

12

40.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.85

677

-1.1

1647

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6MA

LOCK

HART

2728

1.03

7037

037

1.15

96247

04

00

12

23

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.55

978

-1.0

3202

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6RD

MORR

IS27

190.70

3703

704

0.86

8899

20

30

00

12

20.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.57

139

-0.4

6094

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6LA

MORR

IS27

190.70

3703

704

0.86

88992

03

00

01

22

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.85

677

-0.8

6799

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6MA

MORR

IS27

391.44

4444

444

2.08

1666

08

00

12

55

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.55

978

0.04

6742

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6RD

STEW

ART

2219

0.86

3636

364

1.72

6418

10

80

00

12

20.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.65

2487

0.15

976

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6LA

STEW

ART

2236

1.63

6363

636

2.61

03358

09

00

03

57

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.95

3198

2.04

0615

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6MA

STEW

ART

2221

0.95

4545

455

1.25

27027

05

00

11

23

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.68

1943

-1.1

2874

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6RD

WASH

INGTO

N27

230.85

1851

852

1.23

1125

30

40

00

13

30.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.57

139

0.12

9981

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6LA

WASH

INGTO

N27

240.88

8888

889

1.12

08971

05

00

11

22

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.85

677

-0.2

4678

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

6MA

WASH

INGTO

N27

351.29

6296

296

1.63

64787

08

00

12

24

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.55

978

-0.3

4553

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

7RD

EADY

2616

0.61

5384

615

0.89

78607

03

00

01

23

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.55

2899

-0.7

7825

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

7LA

EADY

2622

0.84

6153

846

1.37

67297

06

00

0.5

12

40.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.78

624

-0.2

3206

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

7MA

EADY

2629

1.11

5384

615

1.17

7350

30

40

01

23

31.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.23

084

-0.2

09DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

7RD

FLOYD

2423

0.95

8333

333

0.99

90938

03

00

12

23

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.58

3296

0.58

0166

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

7LA

FLOYD

2417

0.70

8333

333

1.19

70677

05

00

01

23

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.82

1871

-0.6

782

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

7MA

FLOYD

2428

1.16

6666

667

2.49

63742

012

00

01

33

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.27

3421

-0.0

5905

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

7RD

HAYSLIP

2527

1.08

1.28

84099

04

00

12

34

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.56

7641

1.07

2933

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

7LA

HAYSLIP

2431

1.29

1666

667

1.62

7993

30

50

01

1.5

55

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.82

1871

1.24

8645

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

7MA

HAYSLIP

2417

0.70

8333

333

0.99

90938

03

00

01

23

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.27

3421

-1.3

2588

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

7RD

JOSEY

2624

0.92

3076

923

1.35

41958

04

00

02

34

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.55

2899

0.46

1769

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

7LA

JOSEY

2625

0.96

1538

462

1.11

28619

04

00

11

33

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.78

624

0.16

4634

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

7MA

JOSEY

2632

1.23

0769

231

1.72

76039

06

00

12

55

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.23

084

0.12

2947

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

7RD

POSTELL

2547

1.88

3.55

1056

20

160

01

25

90.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.56

7641

F4.

2343

82DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

7LA

POSTELL

2523

0.92

1.93

4769

60

90

00

13

30.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.80

3521

0.02

1399

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

7MA

POSTELL

2538

1.52

2.41

7298

80

90

00

25

71.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.25

1492

0.93

6474

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

7RD

SCOTT

2510

0.4

0.64

5497

20

20

00

11

20.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.56

7641

-1.6

143

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

7LA

SCOTT

258

0.32

1.02

9563

05

00

00

11

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.80

3521

-2.0

0137

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

7MA

SCOTT

2515

0.6

0.91

2870

90

40

00

11

21.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.25

1492

-1.6

5883

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

7RD

WALTER

S25

251

1.75

5942

30

80

00

13

30.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.56

7641

0.75

6788

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

7LA

WALTER

S25

180.72

0.93

63048

03

00

01

23

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.80

3521

-0.6

5286

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

7MA

WALTER

S25

502

2.23

6068

010

01

13

45

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.25

1492

2.29

0546

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

8RD

GIBSO

N23

160.69

5652

174

0.87

5670

30

30

00

12

20.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.78

9791

-0.7

8842

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

8LA

GIBSO

N23

241.04

3478

261

1.18

62186

04

00

12

33

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.06

0967

0.01

102

259

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

8MA

GIBSO

N23

532.30

4347

826

2.14

12567

08

11

13

67

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.87

4838

1.71

9309

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

8RD

GORT

IANI G

ORT

I23

220.95

6521

739

1.82

10452

08

00

01

24

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.78

9791

0.11

4832

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

8LA

GORT

IANI G

ORT

I23

180.78

2608

696

0.85

0482

30

30

01

12

21.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.06

0967

-0.7

5531

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

8MA

GORT

IANI G

ORT

I23

441.91

3043

478

1.83

1865

50

70

02

24

61.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.87

4838

0.84

0871

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

8RD

HUNT

2228

1.27

2727

273

1.38

63902

05

00

12

33

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.80

9264

1.18

3094

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

8LA

HUNT

2214

0.63

6363

636

0.65

79517

02

00

11

12

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.08

3919

-1.1

5888

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

8MA

HUNT

2248

2.18

1818

182

2.73

66362

09

00

14

67

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.90

4872

1.41

2497

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

8RD

MED

LOCK

2011

0.55

0.82

55779

02

00

01

22

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.85

2504

-1.2

0548

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

8LA

MED

LOCK

2011

0.55

0.88

70412

03

00

01

22.5

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.13

4885

-1.3

4152

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

8MA

MED

LOCK

2031

1.55

1.27

63022

05

01

12

34

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.97

1564

0.02

4129

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

8RD

MORINE

2216

0.72

7272

727

0.82

7032

50

20

00.5

12

20.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.80

9264

-0.6

6401

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

8LA

MORINE

2220

0.90

9090

909

1.19

16012

04

00

11

24

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.08

3919

-0.3

7532

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

8MA

MORINE

2241

1.86

3636

364

1.64

15862

06

01

13

45

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.90

4872

0.71

3912

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

8RD

WALKER

2216

0.72

7272

727

1.07

7113

30

40

00

12

30.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.80

9264

-0.6

6401

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

8LA

WALKER

2223

1.04

5454

545

1.55

76928

06

00

02

33

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.08

3919

0.01

6455

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

8MA

WALKER

2227

1.22

7272

727

1.65

99431

06

00

12

44

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.90

4872

-0.6

8326

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

8RD

WISE

2211

0.5

0.67

25927

02

00

01

12

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.80

9264

-1.4

3364

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

8LA

WISE

2213

0.59

0909

091

0.95

91212

03

00

01

23

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.08

3919

-1.2

8947

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

ROBE

RT A CRO

8MA

WISE

2239

1.77

2727

273

1.63

10037

06

01

13

35

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.90

4872

0.51

4316

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6RD

BUSH

HSH

AWN

2024

1.2

1.15

1657

80

40

01

23

3.5

0.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.69

3156

1.30

7035

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6LA

BUSH

HSH

AWN

2018

0.9

1.16

52874

03

00

02

2.5

30.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.00

1555

-0.1

8032

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6MA

BUSH

HSH

AWN

2036

1.8

1.43

63697

05

01

1.5

33.5

4.5

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.74

3206

0.85

0511

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6RD

CLEM

ONS

1011

1.1

1.59

5131

50

50

00.5

23.5

50.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

422.05

5133

0.68

1469

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6LA

CLEM

ONS

109

0.9

0.87

5595

02

00

12

22

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.43

1965

-0.1

275

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6MA

CLEM

ONS

1011

1.1

1.19

7219

03

00

12

33

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

113.28

8482

-0.5

266

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6RD

FORE

MAN SHAUN

1613

0.81

250.

9810

708

03

00

11

33

0.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.79

6305

-0.0

2077

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6LA

FORE

MAN SHAUN

1611

0.68

750.94

64847

03

00

01

23

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.12

4205

-0.7

1002

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6MA

FORE

MAN SHAUN

1632

22.75

68098

09

00.5

11.5

79

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.89

8587

1.16

8386

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6RD

GIVEN

S RO

SIE

2126

1.23

8095

238

1.70

0140

10

60

01

23

50.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.67

2095

1.47

332

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6LA

GIVEN

S RO

SIE

2114

0.66

6666

667

0.96

60918

03

00

01

23

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.97

6513

-0.8

7506

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6MA

GIVEN

S RO

SIE

2138

1.80

9523

812.24

98677

08

00

13

56

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.71

148

0.89

3755

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6RD

JOHNSO

N DORO

THY

1926

1.36

8421

053

1.11

6070

80

30

01

23

30.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.71

5858

1.83

7477

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6LA

JOHNSO

N DORO

THY

1914

0.73

6842

105

0.99

1189

30

30

00

13

30.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.02

855

-0.6

3488

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6MA

JOHNSO

N DORO

THY

1924

1.26

3157

895

1.48

48159

05

00

12

45

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.77

7404

-0.3

6347

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6RD

MACO

N ELIJAH

2110

0.47

6190

476

0.92

8388

30

40

00

11

10.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.67

2095

-1.2

0683

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6LA

MACO

N ELIJAH

219

0.42

8571

429

0.67

61234

02

00

01

12

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

191.97

6513

-1.5

7945

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6MA

MACO

N ELIJAH

2117

0.80

9523

810.87

28716

03

00

11

22

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.71

148

-1.4

4144

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6RD

MONTG

ERARD

CARO

1823

1.27

7777

778

1.17

8511

30

30

01

23

30.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.74

0427

1.49

3266

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6LA

MONTG

ERARD

CARO

1830

1.66

6666

667

1.81

49704

06

00

13

46

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.05

7763

1.92

8804

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6MA

MONTG

ERARD

CARO

1815

0.83

3333

333

0.98

51844

03

00

0.5

22

31.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.81

4414

-1.2

8304

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6RD

STYLES SHARO

N18

372.05

5555

556

1.89

3401

06

00

23

56

0.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.74

0427

F4.

0262

97DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6LA

STYLES SHARO

N18

301.66

6666

667

2.32

632

08

00

13

68

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.05

7763

1.92

8804

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6MA

STYLES SHARO

N18

201.11

1111

111

1.32

34931

05

00

12

35

1.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.81

4414

-0.6

8249

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6RD

VILLALTA ELIZA

B10

111.1

1.72

8840

30

50

00

24

50.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

422.05

5133

0.68

1469

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6LA

VILLALTA ELIZA

B10

111.1

1.28

66839

04

00

12

34

0.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.43

1965

0.28

0797

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6MA

VILLALTA ELIZA

B10

121.2

2.14

99354

07

00

0.5

14.5

71.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

113.28

8482

-0.3

6546

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6RD

WHITFIELD SHUNT

2035

1.75

1.80

2775

60

50

01.5

2.5

55

0.81

9264

393

1.30

2720

421.69

3156

F3.

1951

42DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6LA

WHITFIELD SHUNT

2037

1.85

1.42

44112

06

0.5

11.5

2.5

3.5

50.96

2455

211.54

8999

192.00

1555

2.56

2442

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

6MA

WHITFIELD SHUNT

2064

3.2

2.96

64794

013

11.5

24

6.5

111.42

6791

613

1.96

2394

112.74

3206

F4.

0409

97DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7RD

BASS AEC

23

1.5

0.70

71068

12

11

1.5

22

20.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

363.49

248

0.77

2923

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7LA

BASS AEC

23

1.5

0.70

71068

12

11

1.5

22

20.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

954.05

9812

0.55

9108

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7MA

BASS AEC

22

11.41

42136

02

00

12

22

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

334.94

7929

-0.1

5003

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7RD

BROWN AEC

51

0.2

0.44

72136

01

00

00

11

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

362.50

5997

-1.0

754

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7LA

BROWN AEC

54

0.8

0.83

666

02

00

11

22

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

952.90

3459

-0.1

7135

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7MA

BROWN AEC

59

1.8

1.78

88544

04

00

23

44

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

333.56

60.

7720

47DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7RD

BROWN KAYLA

2226

1.18

1818

182

1.18

06521

05

00

12

22

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.61

7748

1.38

3953

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7LA

BROWN KAYLA

2233

1.5

1.73

89104

06

00

12

36

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.86

2255

1.85

435

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7MA

BROWN KAYLA

2222

11.90

2379

50

90

01

12

21.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.32

1684

-0.4

9759

260

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7RD

BUTLER

AEC

46

1.5

0.57

7350

31

21

11.5

22

20.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

362.70

636

1.09

3078

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7LA

BUTLER

AEC

42

0.5

10

20

00

12

20.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

953.13

8324

-0.5

5782

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7MA

BUTLER

AEC

41

0.25

0.5

01

00

00.5

11

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

333.84

6681

-1.0

5847

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7RD

DAVIS Q‐YAVIA

2632

1.23

0769

231

1.30

56092

05

00

12

33

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.55

2899

1.70

1792

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7LA

DAVIS Q‐YAVIA

2628

1.07

6923

077

1.41

20362

05

00

11

34

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.78

624

0.56

1332

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7MA

DAVIS Q‐YAVIA

2641

1.57

6923

077

2.11

98694

09

00

12

55

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.23

084

1.11

8779

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7RD

HODGES PATR

ICE

2717

0.62

9629

630.74

15238

02

00

01

22

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.53

8984

-0.7

3458

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7LA

HODGES PATR

ICE

2728

1.03

7037

037

1.48

01632

05

00

02

34

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.76

9929

0.43

2283

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7MA

HODGES PATR

ICE

2744

1.62

9629

631.75

73614

07

00

13

45

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.21

1347

1.29

4609

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7RD

JOHNSO

N TAMARA

2424

11.31

87609

06

00

11.5

22

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.58

3296

0.74

1498

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7LA

JOHNSO

N TAMARA

2419

0.79

1666

667

1.69

3444

30

80

00

12

20.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.82

1871

-0.4

0294

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7MA

JOHNSO

N TAMARA

2425

1.04

1666

667

1.45

89802

06

00

11.5

24

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.27

3421

-0.4

0455

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7RD

MOULTRIE TYRO

NE

2631

1.19

2307

692

1.67

37797

07

00

11

35

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.55

2899

1.54

6789

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7LA

MOULTRIE TYRO

NE

2621

0.80

7692

308

1.23

35066

04

00

01

34

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.78

624

-0.3

643

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7MA

MOULTRIE TYRO

NE

2652

22.01

9901

08

00

14

44

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.23

084

2.33

5908

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7RD

POSTELL WALTER

2620

0.76

9230

769

1.10

66234

05

00

0.5

12

20.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

361.55

2899

-0.1

5824

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7LA

POSTELL WALTER

2631

1.19

2307

692

1.09

61471

04

00

12

33

0.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

951.78

624

0.95

803

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7MA

POSTELL WALTER

2641

1.57

6923

077

1.65

34347

06

00

13

45

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.23

084

1.11

8779

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7RD

RICH

ARD

SON LIND

1049

4.9

2.33

09512

08

1.5

45

77.5

80.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

362.00

881

F10

.226

08DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7LA

RICH

ARD

SON LIND

1032

3.2

2.25

09257

18

12

2.5

47

80.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

952.32

0658

F4.

8749

22DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7MA

RICH

ARD

SON LIND

1028

2.8

1.87

37959

07

0.5

23

35.5

71.18

8032

491.77

2432

332.86

9509

2.87

5985

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7RD

SAMUELS

46

1.5

1.29

0994

40

30

0.5

1.5

2.5

33

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

362.70

636

1.09

3078

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7LA

SAMUELS

44

11.15

4700

50

20

01

22

20.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

953.13

8324

0.11

6441

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7MA

SAMUELS

43

0.75

0.95

74271

02

00

0.5

1.5

22

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

333.84

6681

-0.4

9427

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7RD

SHOR

41

0.25

0.5

01

00

00.5

11

0.80

8496

006

1.26

5242

362.70

636

-0.8

8283

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7LA

SHOR

51

0.2

0.44

7213

60

10

00

01

10.91

3652

604

1.48

3113

952.90

3459

-1.0

7596

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

7MA

SHOR

52

0.4

0.54

77226

01

00

01

11

1.18

8032

491.77

2432

333.56

6-0

.994

17DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8RD

BACO

N LATO

SHA

2341

1.78

2608

696

1.90

5888

50

70

01

34

50.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.78

9791

2.97

5132

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8LA

BACO

N LATO

SHA

2343

1.86

9565

217

2.61

6457

50

100

01

26

71.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.06

0967

2.43

7736

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8MA

BACO

N LATO

SHA

2310

84.69

5652

174

3.57

30657

115

12

36

912

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.87

4838

F7.

0875

42DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8RD

BARN

ES KATH

Y22

200.90

9090

909

1.01

92944

03

00

0.5

22

20.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.80

9264

-0.0

4831

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8LA

BARN

ES KATH

Y22

231.04

5454

545

1.13

29386

04

00

12

23

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.08

3919

0.01

6455

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8MA

BARN

ES KATH

Y22

321.45

4545

455

1.53

45939

05

00

12

44

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.90

4872

-0.1

8427

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8RD

BREN

NAN BRIAN

1228

2.33

3333

333

2.83

91206

09

00.5

13.5

69

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

262.12

288

F3.

5263

42DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8LA

BREN

NAN BRIAN

1216

1.33

3333

333

2.30

94011

07

00

01.5

57

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.45

357

0.62

2996

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8MA

BREN

NAN BRIAN

1217

1.41

6666

667

1.72

9862

50

60

01

23

61.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

493.38

8586

-0.1

9751

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8RD

CAWTH

ON

2325

1.08

6956

522

1.27

61107

04

00

12

33

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.78

9791

0.56

6458

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8LA

CAWTH

ON

2214

0.63

6363

636

0.90

21379

03

00

01

22

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.08

3919

-1.1

5888

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8MA

CAWTH

ON

2226

1.18

1818

182

1.53

1770

30

70

01

12

31.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.90

4872

-0.7

8306

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8RD

HALL LYN

N26

461.76

9230

769

1.63

2365

05

01

12

55

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.73

8273

F3.

1139

68DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8LA

HALL LYN

N26

441.69

2307

692

2.09

3212

50

90

01

24

61.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.00

0244

2.03

8216

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8MA

HALL LYN

N26

501.92

3076

923

1.95

8021

07

01

1.5

25

71.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.79

5377

0.91

7978

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8RD

HART

JESSICA

1118

1.63

6363

636

2.15

74396

07

00

12

47

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

262.17

6218

1.70

7308

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8LA

HART

JESSICA

1133

32.48

99799

08

11

24

78

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.51

6438

F3.

9823

76DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8MA

HART

JESSICA

1112

1.09

0909

091

1.64

03991

04

00

02

44

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

493.47

0853

-0.6

9484

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8RD

HUSTON BRE

NDA

2125

1.19

0476

191.16

70068

05

00

12

22

0.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.83

0111

0.88

3765

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8LA

HUSTON BRE

NDA

2133

1.57

1428

571

1.98

92569

07

00

12

45

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.10

8492

1.49

2475

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8MA

HUSTON BRE

NDA

2146

2.19

0476

191.96

5173

06

01

23

66

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.93

7027

1.39

8594

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8RD

JAMES DIANE

2022

1.1

1.58

6124

06

00

0.5

23

50.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.85

2504

0.57

0339

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8LA

JAMES DIANE

2021

1.05

1.46

8081

50

60

01

1.5

2.5

4.5

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.13

4885

0.02

8141

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8MA

JAMES DIANE

2021

1.05

1.19

09748

04

00

11.5

33.5

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.97

1564

-1.0

2256

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8RD

PRICE WALTON CA

2022

1.1

1.02

08356

03

00

12

2.5

30.92

3356

971.38

5090

261.85

2504

0.57

0339

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8LA

PRICE WALTON CA

2023

1.15

1.22

58187

04

00

12

34

1.03

9726

981

1.63

2565

672.13

4885

0.30

2074

DOUGHER

TY COUNTY

SOUTH

SIDE MID

8MA

PRICE WALTON CA

2031

1.55

1.50

35047

05

00

12

44.5

1.53

8473

622

2.13

6325

492.97

1564

0.02

4129

261

GREGORY J. CIZEK HOME ADDRESS: 111 Middlebrook Ct.

Chapel Hill, NC 27514

Telephone: (919) 408-0181 OFFICE ADDRESS: 112 Peabody Hall

School of Education, CB 3500 University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3500

Telephone: (919) 843-7876 Fax: (919) 962-1533 Email: [email protected]

262

2

EDUCATION

Ph.D. 1991 - Michigan State University; East Lansing, MI Major: Measurement, Evaluation, and Research Design Emphasis Areas: Educational Measurement, Quantitative Research Methods, Educational Policy

M.A. 1983 - Michigan State University; East Lansing, MI Major: Curriculum and Instruction Emphasis Areas: Curriculum, Learning Theory

B.A. 1979 - Michigan State University; East Lansing, MI Major: Elementary Education Emphasis Areas: Social Studies major, Math/Science minor

A.A. 1977 - Northwestern Michigan College; Traverse City, MI Major: Journalism

CERTIFICATES AWARDED

1979 - Michigan Elementary Provisional Teaching Certificate (K-9) 1983 - Michigan Continuing Elementary Teaching Certificate (K-9) 1987 - Iowa Professional Elementary Certificate 1988 - Iowa Elementary Principal Certificate 1992 - Ohio Elementary Teacher Certificate (K-9)

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCES

Professor of Educational Measurement and Evaluation (tenured) - School of Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (2002-present).

Associate Professor of Educational Measurement and Evaluation (tenured) - School of Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (1999-2001).

Associate Professor of Educational Research and Measurement (tenured) - College of Education, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH (1995-1999).

Assistant Professor of Educational Research and Measurement - College of Education, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH (1991-1995). Taught graduate courses in testing, psychometric theory, statistics, and research design; provided research and measurement consultation to other faculty; advised graduate students; served on departmental and college-level committees; conducted research in areas of specialization and developed service relationships with local school districts

Program Manager - American College Testing Program, Inc. (ACT); Iowa City, IA (1987-1991). Provided measurement expertise and program management for medical and allied health licensure and certification programs. Responsibilities included test development, client consultation, statistical analyses of test results, supervision of item writing, equating examination forms, conducting client meetings, preparing and delivering instructional seminars to health professions groups, conducting passing score studies, scheduling, proposal writing, budget monitoring, and consultation with other ACT departments

263

3

Test Development Consultant - Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP); Lansing, MI (1985-1986). Assisted in development of objectives-based, state-wide, every-pupil testing in Michigan State Board of Education approved subjects. Responsibilities included: participation in Reading and Career Development test development projects; supervision of item writing teams; item editing; psychometric consultation; participation in scoring, formatting, and reporting decisions; composing Requests for Proposals and evaluation of responses

Educational Policy Researcher - Michigan Senate Policy and Programs Office; Lansing, MI (1985). Performed research, analyses, policy option development and recommendations on pending/proposed legislation on education issues (emphases on student testing, dropout prevention, liability insurance, teacher shortages, home schooling, and teacher competency testing)

Statistics Instructor - Michigan State University; East Lansing, MI (1987, 1988, 1991, 1994). Taught graduate-level courses in statistics and educational research methods on the MSU campus, in Thailand, in Brazil, and in the Philippines.

Educational Psychology Instructor - Michigan State University; East Lansing, MI (1984-1987). Taught undergraduate educational psychology course.

Elementary and Middle School Teacher - Traverse City, MI (1979-1984). Taught grades 2, 4, 4/5, and 6/7. Taught all subjects in grades 2 and 4; computer science and physical education for grades 6 and 7.

COMMITTEE WORK, PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS, SERVICE, AND HONORS

* Vice-President (2011-2012), President-elect, National Council on Measurement in Education * Member, American Educational Research Association, 1986-present * Member, National Council for Measurement in Education, 1986-present * Member, North Carolina Association for Research in Education, 2000-2002 * Secretary, Professional Licensure and Certification-SIG, 1999-2002 * Secretary, AERA Division D (Measurement and Research Methodology) 2004-2006 * Member, program participant, Classroom Assessment-SIG (AERA), 1995-present * Member, program participant, Families as Educators-SIG (AERA), 1987-1992; program

committee 1988, 1990-1991 * Proposal Reviewer, NCME, AERA Divisions D, H, I, J, and various Special Interest

Groups, 1991-present * Manuscript Reviewer, American Educational Research Journal, 1994-1997 * Manuscript Reviewer, Applied Measurement in Education, 1992-present * Manuscript Reviewer, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1999 * Manuscript Reviewer, Educational Assessment, 1997-present * Manuscript Reviewer, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1993 * Manuscript Reviewer, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1991-present

264

4

Committee Work, Professional Memberships, Service, and Honors (cont=d)

* Manuscript Reviewer, Educational Policy, 1990, 1993 * Manuscript Reviewer, Educational Researcher, 1994-present * Manuscript Reviewer, Journal of Educational Measurement, 1992-present * Manuscript Reviewer, Journal of Educational Psychology, 1992-1995 * Manuscript Reviewer, Review of Educational Research, 1998 * Manuscript Reviewer, Applied Psychological Measurement, 2003-present

* Member, Chair, AERA E. F. Lindquist Award Committee, 2008-2010 * Member, Chair, AERA Palmer O. Johnson Award Committee, 2006-2008 * Member, AERA Outreach and Professional Liaison Committee, 2001-2004 * Member, AERA Review of Research Award Committee, 1991-1993 * Member, AERA Publications Committee, 1992-1995 * Member, NCME Nominations Committee, 2001-2002 * Member, NCME Standards and Test Use Committee, 1995-1999 * Member, NCME Career Award Committee, 1999-2000 * Chair, NCME Standards and Test Use Committee, 2008-present * Co-Chair, Joint Committee on Testing Practices, 2003-2006 * Editorial Board, Journal of Educational Measurement, 2003-2008 * Editorial Board, Educational Researcher, 2007-2009 * Editorial Board, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2003-2008 * Editorial Board, Applied Measurement in Education, 2001-present * Editorial Board, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2004-present * Editorial Board, Home School Researcher, 1990-present * Editorial Board, NCME Newsletter, 1999-2003 * Editor, special issue on vertically moderated standard setting, Applied Measurement in Education, 2005

* Member, Smarter/Balanced Assessment Consortium Technical Advisory Panel, 2010- * Member, National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB), 2007-2009 * Member, United States Department of Education, Advisory Council on Education

Statistics, 2001-2003 * Member, United States Department of Education, National Technical Advisory Council,

2008-2009 * Member, National Advisory Committee, Buros Institute of Mental Measurement, 2004- present * Contributor, Standards for Educational Evaluation of Students (Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation) * Member, NCME Ad-Hoc Committee on ITEMS publication, 2000-2002. * Elected Member, Vice-President, Sylvania (OH) Public Schools Board of Education, 1997- 1999 * Advisory Board, National Home Education Research Institute, 1990-present * Member, North American Business Research Advisory Board, University of Toledo, 1996- 1999

* Awardee, Buros Institute for Mental Measurement, Distinguished Reviewer Award, 2005

* Awardee, AERA Division D award for Significant Contribution to Educational Measurement and Research Methodology, 2006 * Awardee, NCME Award for Outstanding Dissemination of Educational Measurement

265

5

Concepts, 2007

266

6

BOOKS, BOOK CHAPTERS, and MONOGRAPHS Cizek, G. J. (Ed.) (in preparation). Setting performance standards: Foundations, methods, and innovations. New York: Routledge. Cizek, G. J., & Natriello, G. (Eds.). (in preparation). Handbook of teacher evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Cizek, G. J., & Rosenberg, S. L. (2011). Psychometric methods and high stakes assessment: Contexts and methods for promoting ethics in testing. In A. T. Panter & S. Sterba (Eds.), Handbook of ethics in quantitative methodology (pp. 211-240). New York: Routledge. Cizek, G. J., Rosenberg, S. L., & Koons, H. K. (in press). Finding validity evidence: An analysis using Mental Measurements Yearbook. In J. A. Bovaird, K. F. Geisinger, & C. W. Buckendahl (Eds.), High stakes testing in education: Science and practice in K-12 settings. Washington, DC: APA Books. Andrade, H., & Cizek, G. J. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of formative assessment. New York: Taylor and Francis. Cizek, G. J. (2010). An introduction to formative assessment: History, characteristics, and challenges. In H. Andrade & G. Cizek, (Eds.) Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 3-17). New York: Taylor and Francis. Cizek, G. J. (2007). Formative classroom assessment and large-scale assessment: Implications for future research and development. In J. A. McMillan (Ed.), Formative classroom assessment (pp. 99-115). New York: Teachers College Press. Cizek, G. J., & Bunch, M. (2007). Standard setting: A practitioner=s guide to establishing and evaluating performance standards on tests. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Cizek, G. J. (2006). Standard setting. In S. M. Downing & T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 225-258). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Cizek, G. J. (2006). Detecting and dealing with academic dishonesty. In W. Buskist & S. F. Davis (eds.), Handbook of the teaching of psychology (pp. 238-244). Boston: Blackwell. Cizek, G. J. (2005). Personal and systemic influences on integrity in testing. In J. O=Reilly (ed.), Current guidance for integrity in testing: 2005 Proceedings of the National Association of Test Directors (pp. 1-32). Mesa, AZ: NATD. Cizek, G. J., & Burg, S. S. (2005). Addressing test anxiety in a high-stakes environment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Cizek, G. J. (2005). High-stakes testing: Contexts, characteristics, critiques, and consequences. In R. Phelps (Ed.), Defending standardized testing (pp. 23-54). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Cizek, G. J. (2004). Achievement tests. In C. Spielberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied psychology (pp. 41-46). San Diego, CA: Academic. Cizek, G. J. (2004). Cheating in academics. In C. Spielberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied psychology (pp. 307-311). San Diego, CA: Academic.

267

7

Books, Book Chapters, and Monographs (continued)

Cizek, G. J. (2003). Detecting and preventing classroom cheating: Promoting integrity in schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Cizek, G. J. (2003). Setting performance standards: Selected-response formats. In R. Fernandez-Ballesteros (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychological assessment (pp. 690-695) London: Sage. Cizek, G. J. (2003). Educational testing integrity. In J. E. Wall & G. R. Walz (Eds). Measuring up: Assessment issues for teachers, counselors, and administrators (pp. 363-386). Greensboro, NC: ERIC Counseling and Student Services Clearinghouse. Cizek, G. J., & Page, B. A. (2003). The concept of reliability in the context of automated essay scoring. In M. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 125-146). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Bergin, D. A., & Cizek, G. J. (2001). Alfred Binet. In J. A. Palmer (ed.), 100 great thinkers on education (pp. 160-164). London, Routledge. Cizek, G. J. (Ed.) (2001). Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Cizek, G. J. (2001). Conjectures on the rise and call of standard setting: An introduction to context and practice. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 3-17). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Mehrens, W. A., & Cizek, G. J. (2001). Standard setting and the public good: Benefits accrued and anticipated. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 477-485). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Camilli, G. A., Cizek, G. J., & Lugg, C. A. (2001). Psychometric theory and the validation of performance standards: History and future perspectives. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 445-475). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Cizek, G. J. (2001). An overview of issues concerning cheating on large-scale tests. In J. O'Reilly (Ed.), 2001 Proceedings of the National Association of Test Directors (pp. 1-30). Mesa, AZ: NATD. Cizek, G. J. (1999). Cheating on tests: How to do it, detect it, and prevent it. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Cizek, G. J., Kenney, P. A., Kolen, M. J., Peters, C. & van der Linden, W. J. (1999). An investigation of the feasibility of linking scores on the proposed Voluntary National Tests and the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: National Assessment Governing Board. Cizek, G. J. (Ed.) (1999). Handbook of educational policy. San Diego, CA: Academic. Cizek, G. J., & Ramaswamy, V. (1999). American educational policy: Constructing crises and crafting solutions. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Handbook of educational policy. (pp. 497-519). San Diego, CA: Academic. Cizek, G. J. (1999). The tale wagging the dog: Narrative and neo-pragmatism in teacher education

268

8

and research. In J. Raths & A. McAninch (Eds.). Advances in teacher education, Vol. 5, What counts as knowledge in teacher education? (pp. 47-68). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Books, Book Chapters, and Monographs (continued) Cizek, G. J. (1998). Filling in the blanks: Putting standardized tests to the test. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation. Cizek, G. J. (1997). Learning, achievement, and assessment: Constructs at a crossroads. In G. D. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of classroom assessment: Learning, achievement, and adjustment (pp. 1-33). New York: Academic.

269

9

JOURNAL ARTICLES and REVIEWS Cizek, G. J., Bowen, D., & Church, K. (2010). Sources of validity evidence in educational and psychological tests: A follow-up study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 732-743. Cizek, G. J. (2010). Review of Measures of Academic Progress. In R. A. Spies, J. F. Carlson & K. F. Geisinger (Eds.), Eighteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 327-332). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. Cizek, G. J. (2009). The past of test-based educational accountability. [Review of The future of test-based educational accountability]. Educational Researcher, 38, 467-468. Cizek, G. J. (2009). Response to “Accountability testing: Getting situated.” Educational Researcher, 38, 471-472. . Cizek, G. J. (2009). Reliability and validity of information about student achievement: Comparing the contexts of large-scale and classroom testing. Theory Into Practice, 48, 63–71. Cizek, G. J., Rosenberg, S., & Koons, H. (2008). Sources of validity evidence for educational and psychological tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 397-412. Cizek, G. J. (2008). Assessing educational measurement: Ovations, omissions, opportunities. [Review of Educational Measurment, 4th edition]. Educational Researcher, 37(2), 96-100. Cizek, G. J. (2007). Review of Mechanical Technician B Examination. In K. F. Geisinger, R. A. Spies, J. F. Carlson, & B. S. Plake (Eds.), Seventeenth mental measurements yearbook. (pp. 518-522). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. Burke, J. N., & Cizek, G. J. (2006). Effects of composition mode and self-perceived computer skills on essay scores of sixth graders. Assessing Writing, 11, 148-166. Cizek, G. J., Crocker, L., Frisbie, D. A., Mehrens, W. A., & Stiggins, R. J. (2006). A tribute to Robert L. Ebel: Scholar, teacher, mentor, and statesman. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25(1), 23-32. Cizek, G. J. (2005). Review of TerraNova, Second Edition. In R. A. Spies & B. S. Plake (Eds.), Sixteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 1025-1030). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement. Cizek, G. J. (2005). Adapting testing technology to serve accountability aims: The case of vertically-moderated standard setting. Applied Measurement in Education, 18(1), 1-10. Cizek, G. J., Bunch, M. B., & Koons, H. (2004). Setting performance standards: Contemporary methods. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 23(4), 31-50. Cizek, G. J. (2003). Review of Woodcock-Johnson III. In J. C. Impara, B. S. Plake, and R. A. Spies (Eds.), Fifteenth Mental Measurements Yearbook (pp. 1019-1024). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement. Cizek, G. J. (2003). E. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(1), 40-44. Cizek, G. J., Hirsch, T., Trent, R., & Crandell, J. (2002). A preliminary investigation of pupil

270

10

proficiency testing and state education reform initiatives. Educational Assessment, 7(4), 283-302.

271

11

Articles and Reviews (continued) Cizek, G. J. (2001). More unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(4), 19-27. Cizek, G. J. (2001). Review of Brigance Comprehensive Inventory of Basic Skills--Revised. In B. S. Plake & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Fourteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 172-176). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement. Cizek, G. J. (2001). Review of Developmental Indicators for the Assessment of Learning--Third Edition. In B. S. Plake & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Fourteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 394-398). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement. Cizek, G. J. (2001). Detecting and preventing cheating on credentialing examinations. CLEAR Exam Review, 12, 14-21. Cizek, G. J. (2001). Cheating to the test. Education Matters Journal, 1(1), 40-47. Cizek, G. J. (2000). Review of Contemporary assessment for educators [book review]. Journal of Educational Measurement, 37, 179-185. Cizek, G. J. (2000). Pockets of resistance in the assessment revolution. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 19(2), 16-23, 33. Cizek, G. J., & Fitzgerald, S. M. (1999). An introduction to logistic regression. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 31, 223-245 Cizek, G. J., & Robinson, K. L., & O'Day, D. M. (1998). Nonfunctioning options: A closer look. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(4), 605-611. Cizek, G. J. (1998). Review of Office Skills Series. In J. C. Impara & B. S. Plake (Eds.), Thirteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 706-708). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements. Cizek, G. J. (1998). Review of Team Development Survey. In J. C. Impara & B. S. Plake (Eds.), Thirteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 1002-1003). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements. Cizek, G. J., Rachor, R. E., & Fitzgerald, S. F. (1996). Teachers' assessment practices: Preparation, isolation, and the kitchen sink. Educational Assessment, 3(2), 159-179. Cizek, G. J. (1996). Setting passing scores. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 15(2), 20-31. Cizek, G. J. (1996). Standard-setting guidelines. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 15(1), 13-21, 12. Cizek, G. J. (1996). The hegemony of the narrative: Reflections on the contours of social science research. Review of Higher Education, 19(2), 227-236. Cizek, G. J. (1995). Review of Professional Employment Test. In J. J. Kramer & J. C. Conoley (Eds.), Twelfth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 818-820). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of

272

12

Mental Measurements.

273

13

Articles and Reviews (continued) Cizek, G. J. (1995). Review of Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test (Revised). In J. J. Kramer & J. C. Conoley (Eds.), Twelfth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 374-376). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements. Cizek, G. J., & Ray, B. D. (1995). An analysis of home education research and researchers. Home School Researcher, 11(2), 1-9. Cizek, G. J., Webb, L. C. & Kalohn, J. (1995). The use of cognitive taxonomies in licensure and certification test development: Reasonable or customary? Evaluation & the Health Professions, 18(1), 77-91. Cizek, G. J. (1995). Crunchy granola and the hegemony of the narrative. Educational Researcher, 24(2), 26-28. Cizek, G. J. (1995). On the limited presence of African-American teachers: An assessment of research, synthesis, and policy implications. Review of Educational Research, 65(1), 78-92. Cizek, G. J. & O'Day, D. (1994). Further investigation of non-functioning options in a multiple choice examination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(4), 861-872. Cizek, G. J. (1994). In defense of the test. American Psychologist, 49(6), 525-526. Cizek, G. J. (1994). The effect of altering the position of options in a multiple-choice examination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(1), 8-20. Cizek, G. J. (1994). Religious education in home schools: Goals/outcomes mismatch? Religious Education, 89(1), 43-51. Cizek, G. J. & Rachor, R. E. (1994). The real testing bias: The role of values in educational assessment. NASSP Bulletin, 78(560), 83-93. Cizek, G. J. (1993). Alternative assessment: Yes, but why? Educational Horizons, 72(1), 36-40. Cizek, G. J. (1993). The mismeasure of home schooling effectiveness. Home School Researcher, 9(3), 1-4. Cizek, G. J. (1993). Testing for learning: A remonstrance [book review]. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(4), 40-41. Cizek, G. J. (1993). Reconsidering standards and criteria. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30(2), 93-106. Cizek, G. J. (1993). Some thoughts on educational testing: Measurement policy issues into the next millennium. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(3), 10-16, 22. Cizek, G. J. (1993). Rethinking psychometricians' beliefs about learning. Educational Researcher, 22(4), 4-9. Cizek, G. J. (1993). The place of psychometricians' beliefs in educational reform: A rejoinder to Shepard. Educational Researcher, 22(4), 14-15.

274

14

Articles and Reviews (continued) Cizek, G. J. (1992). Alternative assessments: Promises and problems for home-based education policy. Home School Researcher, 7(4), 13-21. Cizek, G. J. (1992). Review of Test of Legible Handwriting. In J. J. Kramer & J. C. Conoley (Eds.), Eleventh mental measurements yearbook (pp. 966-968). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements. Cizek, G. J. (1992). Review of VITAL Checklist and Curriculum Guide. In J. J. Kramer and J. C. Conoley (Eds.), Eleventh mental measurements yearbook (pp. 1003-1004). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements. Cizek, G. J. & Bridges, J. A. (1991). Task analysis: Foundation for a valid examination. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, 19(4), 245-246. Cizek, G. J. (1991). Confusion effusion: A rejoinder to Wiggins. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(2), 150-153. Cizek, G. J. (1991). Innovation or enervation: Performance assessment in perspective. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(9), 695-699. Reprinted in K. M. Cauley, F. Linder, & J. H. McMillan (Eds.) (1992), Annual editions in educational psychology, 92-93 (pp. 232-236), Guilford, CT: Dushkin; In A. E. Woolfolk (Ed.) (1993), Readings and cases in educational psychology (pp. 238-243), Boston: Allyn and Bacon; In K. M. Cauley, F. Linder, & J. H. McMillan (Eds.) (1993), Annual editions in educational psychology, 92-93 (pp. 232-236), Guilford, CT: Dushkin; In H. F. Clarizio, W. A. Mehrens, & W. G. Hapkiewicz (Eds.) (1994), Contemporary issues in educational psychology, 6th ed. (pp. 256-261), New York: McGraw-Hill; In W. C. Martin & G. Franklin (Eds.), Analyzing multicultural teaching and learning styles (pp. 236-245), Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt. Cizek, G. J. (1990). The case against the SAT: A review and comment [Review of The Case Against the SAT]. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50(3), 701-707. Cizek, G. J. (1990). Home education alternatives vs. accountability: A tractable problem? Educational Policy, 4(2), 109-125. Cizek, G. J. (1989). Norms, standards, and nonsense: Testing policy gone bad. Home School Researcher, 5(4), 1-6. Cizek, G. J. (1988). Applying standardized testing to home-based educational programs: Reasonable or customary? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 7(3), 12-19.

275

15

OTHER PUBLICATIONS AND REPORTS Cizek, G. J. (2010, March). Error of measurement: Validity and the place of consequences. NCME Newsletter, 18(1). Available at http://www.ncme.org/pubs/pdf/vol_18_num_1.pdf Cizek, G. J. (2010, 30 March). Eight questions for Gregory Cizek: On the role of testing in America's education system. The Economist. Available on-line at http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2010/03/testing_and_assessment Cizek, G. J., & Plake, B. S. (2009). Setting performance standards for the Defense Language Proficiency Tests: Final Report. Available from the Defense Language Institute, Monterey, CA. Plake, B. S., Impara, J. C., Cizek, G. J., & Sireci, S. G. (2008, June). Advanced Placement examinations standard-setting pilot studies: Final report. Available from The College Board, New York. Cizek, G. J. (2007). Fostering healthy views about testing. The Score [APA Division 5 Newsletter], 29(2), 1, 12. Linn, R. L., Cizek, G. J., Kolen, M. J., & Swaminathan, H. (2007). Recommendations to the Delaware Department of Education on the Next Generation of Statewide Assessment System. Available from Delaware Department of Education, Dover, DE. Cizek, G. J. (2006, January). Evaluation of College Board Advanced Placement best practices study methodology. Available from The College Board, New York, NY. Cizek, G. J. (2005. July). Final report: Review and recommendations related to test security. Report prepared for the Texas Education Agency, Austin, TX. Available from www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/admin/texasreport.pdf Cizek, G. J., Engelhard, G. Jr., & Moody, M. (2005, January). Final report: Review of Delaware Student Testing Program assessments and performance standards. Available from Office of The Governor, Dover, DE. Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy. (2003). National physical therapy examination (NPTE) commission report. Alexandria, VA: Author. New York State Education Department. (2003). Final report to the New York State Board of Regents and the New York State Commissioner of Education, Independent Panel on Math A. Albany, NY: Author. Cizek, G. J. (2003, September 21). High-stakes testing must pass the integrity test. Memphis Commercial Appeal, p. A-7. Cizek, G. J. (2002/2003). When educators cheat. NAESP Streamlined Seminar, 21(2), 1-3. [Reprinted as Cizek, G. J. (2003). When teachers cheat. Education Digest, 68(6), 28-31.] Cizek, G. J. (2002). A report to the Dayton area chamber of commerce on pupil achievement in Dayton area charter schools, 2001-2002 academic year. Chapel Hill, NC: Author. Cizek, G. J. (2000, December 6). School politics 101: It's not really about the children. Education Week, pp. 35-36.

276

http://www.ncme.org/pubs/pdf/vol_18_num_1.pdf�

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2010/03/testing_and_assessment�

16

Other Publications and Reports (continued) Cizek, G. J. (2000, January/February). Academic Notebook: Standards and Testing, Michigan Learning, 11(2), 7-8. Cizek, G. J. (2000, January/February). A user-friendly guided to standards and testing terms, Michigan Learning, 11(2), 9-10. Cizek, G. J. (1999, December 8). How cartoons and calculators resolved the class-size debate. Education Week, pp. 26, 30. Cizek, G. J. (1999). Give us this day our daily dread: Manufacturing crises in American education. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(10), 737-743. Cizek, G. J. (1998). The assessment revolution's unfinished business. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 34(4), 138-143. Cizek, G. J. (1996). Grades: The final frontier in assessment reform. NASSP Bulletin, 80(584), 103-110. Donmoyer, R., Eisner, E., Gardner, H., Stotsky, S., Wasley, P., Tillman, L., Cizek, G., & Gough, N. (1996). Viewpoints: Should novels count as dissertations in education? Research in the Teaching of English, 30(4), 403-427. Cizek, G. J. (1996, April 17). There's no such thing as grade inflation. Education Week, 15(30), 32, 22. Cizek, G. J. (1996). Voices in education. Midwestern Educational Researcher, 9(2), 43. Cizek, G. J. (1996). Voices in education. Midwestern Educational Researcher, 9(1), 34-35. Cizek, G. J. (1995). The big picture in assessment and who ought to have it. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 246-249. Cizek, G. J. (1995, February). An evaluation of "An Integrated Curricular Approach to Teaching about the Great Lakes Region, 1993-1994." Available from Lucas County Office of Education, Toledo, OH. Cizek, G. J. (1994, December). An evaluation of nature education/ environmental workshops, 1993-1994. Available from Lourdes College, Sylvania, OH. Cizek, G. J. (1994). Voices in education. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 7(4), 35. Cizek, G. J. (1994, September 21). SAT scores recentered: Baby boomers get a break. Education Week, 14(3), pp. 40, 34. Cizek, G. J. (1994, December 7). S.A.T. recentering redux. [Response] Education Week, 14(14), 38. Cizek, G. J. (1993, November 10). On the disappearance of standards. Education Week, 13(10), pp. 32, 24.

277

17

278

18

Other Publications and Reports (continued) Cizek, G. J. (1993, March). Evaluation of General Accounting Office report on national assessment of educational progress achievement levels. Available from National Assessment Governing Board, Washington, DC. Cizek, G. J. (1993, May). Evaluation of Ohio ninth-grade proficiency test technical characteristics. Columbus, OH: Ohio Legislative Office of Education Oversight. Cizek, G. J. (1993, September). Evaluation and comment on National Academy of Education report on National Assessment of Educational Progress achievement levels setting. Available from National Assessment Governing Board, Washington, DC. Cizek, G. J. and others (1993, September). Setting achievement levels on the 1992 National Assessment of Educational Progress in mathematics, reading, and writing: A technical report on reliability and validity. Iowa City, IA: American College Testing. Cizek, G. J., Jurs, S. G. & Maynard, J. (1993, April). Report on content analysis of responses to "Teacher Education and Certification Discussion Guide." Columbus, OH: Ohio Department of Education, Standards Revision Committee for Teacher Education. Cizek, G. J. (1992). Evaluation of the Davenport (IA) Community School District Performance Assessment Program. Toledo, OH: Author. Cizek, G. J. & Butman, A. M. (1992). Essentials for teaching EMTs: An instructor's guide to better teaching. In J. D. Heckman (Ed.), Emergency care and transportation of the sick and injured, 5th ed., (pp. 247-271). Park Ridge, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Cizek, G. J. (Speaker). (1992). Conversations about authentic assessment (Instructional Cassette; Project RP91002002). Charleston, WV: Appalachian Educational Laboratory. Cizek, G. J. (1992, April 8). From a 'Card-carrying Psychometrician'. Education Week, 11(29), p. 27. Cizek, G. J. (1992). Standardized tests should not be eliminated from schools. In C. P. Cozic (Ed.), Education in America: Opposing viewpoints (pp. 51-54). San Diego, CA: Greenhaven. Cizek, G. J. & Hartnett, S. (1991). Nuclear Medicine Technology ready for task analysis revalidation. NMTCB News, 4(1), pp. 2, 4. Cizek, G. J. (1991). Reasoning about testing. Educational Digest, 56(5), 56-58. Reprinted in (1996) Educated in the USA, J. Nelson, C. Hass, & S. Greene (Eds.), Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt. Cizek, G. J., Webb, L. C., & White, A. S. (1990). Criterion-referenced standard setting: A User's Guide. Iowa City, IA: ACT Publications. Cizek, G. J. (1990, April 4). The 'sloppy' logic of test abolitionists. Education Week, p. 64. Reprinted in (1996) Issues in literacy, J. Nelson (Ed.), Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt. Cizek, G. J. (1990). Sloppy reasoning about testing. California School Boards Journal, 49(2), 9-11. Cizek, G. J. (1990). Using standardized tests to evaluate educational quality. The Teaching Home, 8(1), 35-36.

279

19

280

20

Other Publications and Reports (continued) Beechick, R., Cizek, G. J., & Bumcrot, C. (1990). Glossary of testing terms. The Teaching Home, 8(1), 30. Beechick, R., Karman, D., & Cizek, G. (1990). Test-taking tips. The Teaching Home, 8(1), 31. Cizek, G. J. (1989). Planning and presenting a lesson. The Teaching Home, 7(5), 25-28. Cizek, G. J. (1989). GSCORE/EQANAL User's Manual. Iowa City, IA: American College Testing Program. Numerous proposals, technical reports, evaluation reports, and research reports.

281

21

CONFERENCE PAPERS AND PROFESSIONAL PRESENTATIONS Cizek, G. J. (2010, November). Toward a reconceptualization of validity theory: Validation of score inferences and justification of test use. Invited presentation for inaugural distinguished lecture series, College of Education, University of Texas—Austin. Cizek, G. J. (2010, October). Translating standards into assessments: The opportunities and challenges of a common core. Invited paper presentation to a symposium on Common Core Assessments. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Cizek, G. J. (2010, October). Reconceptualizing validity and the place of consequences. Invited keynote address to the ASI Annual Research Conference, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Cizek, G. J., Church, K., & Bowen, D (2010, September).Sources of validity evidence for educational and psychological tests: A follow-up study. Poster presented at the UNC School of Education 125th anniversary research symposium, Chapel Hill, NC. Cizek, G. J., Bowen, D., & Church, K. (2010, May). Sources of validity evidence for educational and psychological tests: A follow-up study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Denver, CO. Cizek, G. J. (2009e, November). Error of measurement: Validity and the place of consequences. Invited lecture, University of Minnesota, College of Education, Minneapolis, MN. Cizek, G. J. (2009d, October). Error of measurement: Reconsidering validity theory and the place of consequences. Invited address, National Institute of Testing and Evaluation, Jerusalem, Israel. Cizek, G. J. (2009c, October). Fundamentals of psychometrics. Invited presentation to the Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy, San Diego, CA. Cizek, G. J. (2009b, October). Setting performance standards on licensure examinations. Invited presentation to the Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy, San Deigo, CA. Cizek, G. J. (2009a, April). Reliability and validity of information about student achievement: Comparing large-scale and classroom testing contexts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. Cizek, G. J. (2008, October a). Error of measurement: Reconsidering validity theory and the place of consequences. Invited address, 12th annual William E. Coffman Invited Lecture, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA. Cizek, G. J. (2008, October b). An introduction to setting performance standards. Invited presentation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA. Cizek, G. J. (2008, September). Test security: A primer and current issues. Keynote address for the annual meeting of the National College Testing Association, Baltimore, MD. Cizek, G. J. (2008, June). State assessment programs and the problem of cheating: How to fail. Presentation at the National Conference on Student Assessment, Orlando, FL. Cizek, G. J. (2008, March c). AERA, unaffiliated organizations, and remora: An introduction to NCME. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.

282

22

Conference Papers and Professional Presentations (continued) Cizek, G. J. (2008, March b). Standard setting challenges in the context of augmented achievement testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY. Cizek, G. J. (2008, March a). The future of educational measurement. Invited presentation at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York, NY. Cizek, G. J. (2008, February). Reconsidering the place of consequences in validity theory and practice. Invited presentation to MetaMetrics, Durham, NC. Cizek, G. J. (2007f, October). Fundamentals of test item writing and analysis. Invited presentation to the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC. Cizek, G. J. (2007e, August). Introduction to modern validity theory and practice. Invited presentation to the National Assessment Governing Board, McLean, VA. Cizek, G. J. (2007d, May). Chronicling and questioning validity: Mental Measurements Yearbook as a context for investigating sources of evidence for high-stakes tests. Paper presented at the Invitational Conference of the Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, Lincoln, NE. Cizek, G. J., Rosenberg, S., & Koons, H. (2007c, April). Sources of validity evidence for educational and psychological tests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Cizek, G. J. (2007b, March). Fundamentals of psychometrics. Invited presentation to the Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy, Milwaukee, WI. Cizek, G. J. (2007a, March). Setting performance standards on licensure examinations. Invited presentation to the Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy, Milwaukee, WI. Cizek, G. J. (2006e, July). Possibly intended consequences of high-stakes testing. Keynote address, annual meeting of the New York Schools Data Analysis Group, Saratoga Springs, NY. Cizek, G. J. (2006f, July). Setting standards, including vertically-moderated standard setting. Invited presentation at the annual meeting of the New York Schools Data Analysis Group, Saratoga Springs, NY. Cizek, G. J. (2006e, April). Test consequences, test validity, and testing policy. Symposium presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Cizek, G. J. (2006d, April). Tricks of the trade: Decisions made, risks taken, and opportunities seized by accomplished researchers throughout their careers. Inhibited presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Cizek, G. J. (2006c, April). A systemic approach to test security. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Francisco, CA. Cizek, G. J. (2006b, February). Enhancing test security: A comprehensive approach Invited workshop, Association of Test Publishers annual meeting, Orlando, FL.

283

23

Conference Papers and Professional Presentations (continued) Cizek, G. J. (2006a, January). Enhancing and monitoring Test Security: Individual and systemic aspects. Invited presentation to the National Council on Education Statistics/Council of Chief State School Officers Joint Conference, LaJolla, CA. Cizek, G. J. (2005a, August). Cheating on tests: A systemic perspective. presentation at the 2nd annual Lexile National Reading Conference, Durham, NC. Cizek, G. J. (2005b, August). Testing myths. Keynote address, 2nd Annual Lexile National Reading Conference, Durham, NC. Cizek, G. J. (2005c, September). Psychometrics of the National Physical Therapy Examination. Invited presentation, annual meeting of the Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy, Austin, TX. Cizek, G. J. (2005d, April). Setting and reviewing the passing standard. Keynote address, annual meeting Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy, Austin, TX. Cizek, G. J. (2005e, April). Testing myths. Invited presentation, annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, PQ, Canada. Cizek, G. J. (2005f, April). Portrait of the artist as a young psychometrician. Presentation to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, PQ, Canada. Cizek, G. J. (2005g, April). Personal and systemic influences on integrity in testing. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, PQ, Canada. Cizek, G. J. (2005h, April). A look the other way: From measurement practice to theory. Presentation to the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, PQ, Canada. Cizek, G. J. (2005i, April). Formative classroom assessment and large-scale testing: The state of the union. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, PQ, Canada. Cizek, G. J. (2005j, April). High-stakes testing: Contexts, characteristics, critiques, and consequences. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, PQ, Canada. Cizek, G. J. (2005k, February). Individual vs. systemic aspects of cheating: Test score corruption in context. Invited address, 19th annual Texas Assessment Conference, Austin, TX. Cizek, G. J. (2004a, November). High-stakes testing: Myths and consequences. Keynote address, Florida Educational Research Association annual meeting, Tampa, FL. Cizek, G. J. (2004b, November). Setting performance standards: Concepts and methods. Invited presentation, Florida Educational Research Association annual meeting, Tampa, FL. Cizek, G. J. (2004c, July). More unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Invited presentation to the Council of Chief State School Officers annual curriculum and assessment conference, Baltimore, MD.

284

24

Conference Papers and Professional Presentations (continued) Cizek, G. J. (2004d, April). Protecting the integrity of computer-adaptive tests: Results of a legal challenge. Presentation to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. Cizek, G. J. (2004e, April). Robert Ebel: Educational statesman. Presentation to the annual conference of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Diego, CA. Cizek, G. J. (2004f, February). Test cheating: Problems and solutions. Presentation to the annual conference of the Association of Test Publishers, Palm Springs, CA. Cizek, G. J. (2003, November). PhDs say the darndest things (about testing). Invited address to the annual meeting of the Virginia Association of Test Directors, Richmond, VA. Cizek, G. J. (2003a, October). Three critical issues in assessment. Invited Keynote Address to the annual meeting of the Arizona Educational Research Organization, Phoenix, AZ. Cizek, G. J. (2003b, October). Contemporary methods and issues in setting performance standards. Invited workshop presentation for the annual meeting of the Arizona Educational Research Organization, Phoenix, AZ. Cizek, G. J. (2003a, February). More unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Invited address to the Joint Meeting of the Texas Association of Collegiate Testing Personnel and the Texas Annual Assessment Conference, Austin, TX. Cizek, G. J. (2003b, February). Consequences of Testing: There=s the rub. Invited presentation to the Joint Meeting of the Texas Association of Collegiate Testing Personnel and the Texas Annual Assessment Conference, Austin, TX. Cizek, G. J. (2002, November). High-stakes testing consequences: There=s the rub. Invited plenary presentation to the Virginia Association of Test Directors, Richmond, VA. Cizek, G. J. (2002a, May). Accountability for what? Rounding out the accountability picture. Presentation at the Ohio Charter Schools Annual Conference, Columbus, OH. Cizek, G. J., & Pinkerton, T. (2002b, May). The Dayton assessment project. Presentation at the Ohio Charter Schools Annual Conference, Columbus, OH. Cizek, G. J., & Pammer, M. (2002c, May). Choosing valid instruments for effective assessment. Presentation at the Ohio Charter Schools Annual Conference, Columbus, OH. Cizek, G. J. (2002a, April). Standard setting using the item mapping approach. Invited presentation to the Texas State Board of Education, Austin, TX. Cizek, G. J. (2002b, April). (Re)forming the triennial travesties. Presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Cizek, G. J. (2002, February). Unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Invited presentation to the Buffalo area Phi Delta Kappa chapter, Williamsville, NY.

285

25

Conference Papers and Professional Presentations (continued) Cizek, G. J. (2001a, April). Testing accommodations: Raising a white flag or waving a checkered one? Symposium presentation at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Seattle, WA. Cizek, G. J. (2001b, April). Disseminating stories in education: Power and the physicist's plea. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA. Cizek, G. J. (2001c, April). An overview of issues concerning cheating on large-scale tests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Seattle, WA. Cizek, G. J. (2001d, April). Unintended consequences of high-stakes pupil testing programs. Invited presentation, Virginia Commonwealth University College of Education, Richmond, VA. Cizek, G. J. (2001a, March). High-stakes testing and accountability systems: Unintended consequences, unrecognized benefits. Invited presentation to the New York State Education Department Conference on Validity in Testing, Albany, NY. Cizek, G. J. (2001b, March). Accountability and assessment for charter school operators. Invited presentation to the annual meeting of the New York Charter Schools Association, New York, NY. Cizek, G. J. (2001c, March). Elements of an effective assessment component for charter schools. Invited presentation to the New York Charter Schools Resource Center Conference, New York, NY. Cizek, G. J. (2001, January). Unanticipated consequences of high-stakes testing. Paper presented at the annual North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Accountability Conference, Greensboro, NC. Cizek, G. J. (2000, November a). When the alarms should go off when test results are reported. Presentation to the Education Writers Association, Cleveland, OH. Cizek, G. J. (2000, November b). The problem of cheating on tests in education. Invited keynote address to the Dutch Testing Society, Zuthphen, Netherlands. Cizek, G. J. (2000, September). Cheating on credentialing examinations: Who, why, how, detecting, and preventing. Presentation at the annual meeting of the National Council on Licensure, Enforcement, and Regulation (CLEAR), Key Biscayne, FL. Cizek, G. J., Trent, E. R., Crandell, J., Hirsch, T., & Keene, J. (2000, April). Research to inform policy: An investigation of pupil proficiency testing requirements and state education reform initiatives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ED 443 873) Cizek, G. J. (2000, April). Factors affecting linkage of the Voluntary National Tests and the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA.(ED 447 196) Cizek, G. J. (2000, April). You do your work and you do my work: Bearing one another=s burdens in classroom assessment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on

286

26

Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA. Conference Papers and Professional Presentations (continued) Cizek, G. J. (2000, February). Cheating on tests and its threat to school accountability programs. Invited presentation to the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction 2000 Accountability Conference, Greensboro, NC. Cizek, G. J. (1999, April). The role and uses of assessment in charter schools. Invited presentation to the New York State Charter Schools Conference, New York, NY. Cizek, G. J. (1999, April). (Re)Forming the AERA Annual Meeting. Address presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada. Cizek, G. J. & Husband, T. H. (1997, March). A Monte Carlo investigation of the contrasting groups standard setting method. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Cizek, G. J. (1996a, June). Developing and evaluating tests for nurse educators. Invited presentation, Medical College of Ohio, Toledo, OH. Cizek, G. J., & Fitzgerald, S. M. (1996b, April). A comparison of group and independent standard setting. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York. [ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. TM025679] Rachor, R. E., & Cizek, G. J. (1996c, April). Reliability of raw gain, residual gain, and estimated true gain scores: A simulation study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York. Cizek, G. J. (1996d, April). Statistical detection of answer copying: Getting a focus on the big picture. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York. Cizek, G. J. (1996e, April). Comment on proposed revisions to the AERA/APA/NCME Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York. Cizek, G. J. (1996f, April). Yes, but is it research? Should a novel count as a dissertation in education? Symposium presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York. Cizek, G. J. (1996g, April). Can we talk? An attempted conversation across research paradigms, purposes and perspectives. Symposium presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York. Stiggins, R., & Cizek, G. J. (1996h, February). Assessment: The key to high quality student learning. Invited presentation to the John P. Rusel Center for Educational Leadership, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH. Cizek, G. J. (1995, May). Future directions for the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Invited paper prepared for the National Assessment Governing Board, Washington, DC.

287

27

Cizek, G. J. (1995, April). Standard setting as psychometric due process: Going further down an uncertain road. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Francisco, CA (ED 384 614). Conference Papers and Professional Presentations (continued) Cizek, G. J., Rachor, R. E., & Fitzgerald, S. M. (1995, April). Further investigation of teachers' grading practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA (ED 384 613). Cizek, G. J. (1995, April). On the relevance of intelligence: Theory and practice in education. Remarks presented at symposium presentation, annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Cizek, G. J. & Rachor, R. E. (1995, April). Nonfunctioning options in multiple-choice tests: A closer look. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Cizek, G. J. (1995, May). Home school assessment: Obligations, alternatives, and interpretations. Invited address to the annual meeting of Christian Home Educators of Ohio, Columbus, OH. Cizek, G. J. (1995, January). Preparing good tests and using them well. Invited presentation, Davis College Faculty In-Service, Toledo, OH. Cizek, G. J. & Rachor, R. E. (1994, October a). Non-functioning options in multiple-choice tests: Another look. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Rachor, R. E. & Cizek, G. J. (1994, October b). An empirical investigation of the reliability of gain scores and modified gain scores. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Cizek, G. J. & Rachor, R. E. (1994, October c). Teachers' grading practices: Who's doing what, and why? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Cizek, G. J. (1994, May). What is standard setting? Current conceptualizations and future issues. Invited presentation, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ. Cizek, G. J. (1994, April). Whatever happened to the measurement of intelligence? Symposium presentation at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA. Sun, A., & Cizek, G. J. (1994, April). Development of an instrument for measuring high school student resistance to schooling. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Cizek, G. J. (1994, February). Issues in establishing standards of performance for a credentialing program. Invited presentation to the PES Annual Invitational Conference on Licensure and Certification, Seattle, WA. Cizek, G. J. (1993, November). A critical look at the 1992 NAEP achievement levels setting process. Invited presentation to the National Assessment Governing Board, San Francisco, CA.

288

28

Cizek, G. J. (1993, October). Setting levels: Those little devils. Invited presentation to the Council of Chief State School Officers, Education Information Advisory Committee Meeting, Alexandria, VA.

289

29

Conference Papers and Professional Presentations (continued) Cizek, G. J. (1993, April). Home education research: On the right road? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA (ED 360 331). Cizek, G. J., Webb, L. C. & Kalohn, J. (1993, April). The use of cognitive taxonomies in licensure and certification test development: Reasonable or customary? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA. Cizek, G. J. (1993, April). Cheating on educational assessments: An introduction to frame investigations. Introductory remarks, session chair, presented at the annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association & National Council on Measurement in Education, Atlanta, GA. Cizek, G. J. (1993, January). Constructing and evaluating tests for nurse educators. Faculty presentation, Mercy College of Nursing, Toledo, OH. Cizek, G. J. (1992, September). Evaluating the quality of test items: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Invited seminar for the University of Toledo Department of Health Promotion and Human Performance, Toledo, OH. Cizek, G. J. (1992, August). Utilizing testing data in regular and special education. Invited seminar presentation for the Ottawa County (Ohio) schools Annual Administrators' Symposium, Avon Lake, OH. Cizek, G. J. (1992, March). Issues in educational testing. Invited address to the University of Toledo Annual Conference on Testing, Toledo, OH. Cizek, G. J. (1992, January). Performance assessment: Uses, abuses, excuses. Keynote address presented to the annual meeting of the Michigan Educational Research Association, Novi, MI. Cizek, G. J. (1992, January). Performance assessment: Questions and answers. Symposium presentation at the annual meeting of the Michigan Educational Research Association, Novi, MI. Cizek, G. J. (1991, April). The effect of altering the position of options in a multiple-choice examination. Paper presented to the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 333 024).

290

30

BOOK/PUBLICATION PROPOSAL REVIEWS Cizek, G. J. (2009). Equating groups: Modern matching and other methods. Routledge. Cizek, G. J. (2004). Validity and Accommodations. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cizek, G. J. (2002). Classroom assessment: Enhancing the quality of teacher decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cizek, G. J. (2001). Statistical methods in education and psychology (3rd ed.). Allyn and Bacon. Cizek, G. J. (2000). The charter school landscape: Politics, policies, and prospects. Teachers College Press. Cizek, G. J. (1999). Issues, research, and recommendations for large-scale Assessment programs. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cizek, G. J. (1998). Testing in American schools: Getting the right answers. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cizek, G. J. (1997). Educational testing and measurement (5th ed.). Harper-Collins. Cizek, G. J. (1995). Computer-based tutorials on statistical concepts. Longman. Cizek, G. J. (1993). Authentic testing in the classroom. Harper-Collins. Cizek, G. J. (1992). Practical statistics for educators. Longman.

291

crct probe 2011

Documents