control strategy for co-formulated biologics · 2018. 4. 2. · bms internal use only. 2. outline...

15
1 BMS Internal Use Only Control Strategy for Co- formulated Biologics Amit Katiyar, Tapan Das, and Reb Russell Bristol-Myers Squibb, NJ CASSS, CMC Europe, May 2017

Upload: others

Post on 28-Aug-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics · 2018. 4. 2. · BMS Internal Use Only. 2. Outline • Introduction: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics • Analytical Separation

1BMS Internal Use Only

Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics

Amit Katiyar, Tapan Das, and Reb RussellBristol-Myers Squibb, NJ

CASSS, CMC Europe, May 2017

Page 2: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics · 2018. 4. 2. · BMS Internal Use Only. 2. Outline • Introduction: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics • Analytical Separation

2BMS Internal Use Only

Outline

• Introduction: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics• Analytical Separation Methods Workflow• Case Study: Overlapping Profiles for CE-SDS-NR• Case Study: Method Bridging and Method Correlation• Analytical Challenges for Co-formulated Biologics Products with

Wider Ratios• Summary

Page 3: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics · 2018. 4. 2. · BMS Internal Use Only. 2. Outline • Introduction: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics • Analytical Separation

3BMS Internal Use Only

Co-formulated Biologics

DS #1

DS #2

Co-formulated DP

Drug Substance Control Strategy

Drug Product Control Strategy

Release and stability methods for combination product

Product Understanding: Characterization, CQA assessment

Process Understanding: In-Process Control

Page 4: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics · 2018. 4. 2. · BMS Internal Use Only. 2. Outline • Introduction: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics • Analytical Separation

4BMS Internal Use Only

Analytical Separation Methods Workflow

4

mAb-1

mAb-2

Combination Product

CQA Assessment

CQA Assessment

Analytical Methods Monitor and Control CQAs for Combination Product

Removal of Analytical Methods

Upgrading of Analytical Methods

Method Bridging

Method Correlation to Support Specifications

Page 5: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics · 2018. 4. 2. · BMS Internal Use Only. 2. Outline • Introduction: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics • Analytical Separation

5BMS Internal Use Only

Analytical Separation Methods

5

Attributes Methods Co-elution/Separation Purity/Fragments CE-SDS Co-elutionAggregates SEC Co-elutionCharge Heterogeneity iCIEF Complete separationCombination Ratio RP Complete separation

CE-SDS-R

SEC

RP

iCIEF

Page 6: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics · 2018. 4. 2. · BMS Internal Use Only. 2. Outline • Introduction: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics • Analytical Separation

6BMS Internal Use Only

Case Study: Overlapping Profiles for CE-SDS-NR

6

• Partial separation of mAb-1 and mAb-2 • Lack of accurate quantitation of product

related impurities from mAb-2

Monotherapy degradation pathways are well understood and controlled during DS release and stability

Extended Characterization for combination product on multiple lots were similar to monotherapies

Interaction study shows no significant evidence of protein-protein interactions.

SEC and CE-SDS-reduced method as a purity method on combination product

LTSS data for mAb-1 and mAb-2 showed minimal changes in the non reduced purity levels

Product Understanding and Control Strategy

Page 7: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics · 2018. 4. 2. · BMS Internal Use Only. 2. Outline • Introduction: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics • Analytical Separation

7BMS Internal Use Only

CE-SDS-R Method for Co-formulated Biologics

Page 8: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics · 2018. 4. 2. · BMS Internal Use Only. 2. Outline • Introduction: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics • Analytical Separation

8BMS Internal Use Only

Case Study: Method Bridging and Method Correlation

8

Method Correlation

mAb-1 (iCIEF)Method Bridging and Method Correlation

mAb-2 (CEX)Final Method

Combination Product (iCIEF)

Page 9: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics · 2018. 4. 2. · BMS Internal Use Only. 2. Outline • Introduction: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics • Analytical Separation

9BMS Internal Use Only

Method Bridging: CEX to iCIEF

9

• Isolation and characterization of acidic and main species from CEX method resulted in similar profile in iCIEF

• Differences in basic species were related to the presence of N-terminus pyroglutamate

• Stability indicating acidic species are captured in both methods

• Method Correlation needs to be established to support the specification for combination product

Abso

rban

ce

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

pI8.70 8.80 8.90 9.00 9.10 9.20 9.30 9.40

Page 10: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics · 2018. 4. 2. · BMS Internal Use Only. 2. Outline • Introduction: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics • Analytical Separation

10BMS Internal Use Only

Correlation between CEX and iCIEF for Specification Support

10

Page 11: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics · 2018. 4. 2. · BMS Internal Use Only. 2. Outline • Introduction: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics • Analytical Separation

11BMS Internal Use Only

Analytical Challenges for Co-formulated Biologics with Wider Ratios

11

Page 12: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics · 2018. 4. 2. · BMS Internal Use Only. 2. Outline • Introduction: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics • Analytical Separation

12BMS Internal Use Only

Charge Heterogeneity• Quantitation of stability

indicating peaks cannot be achieved for wider ratios

• Is it important to quantitate post translation modifications that are below method quantitation limit?

Abs

orba

nce

0.00

0.05

Abs

orba

nce

0.00

0.05

0.10

Abs

orba

nce

0.00

0.05

0.10

Abs

orba

nce

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

Abs

orba

nce

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

Abs

orba

nce

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

Minutes6.80 6.90 7.00 7.10 7.20 7.30 7.40 7.50 7.60 7.70 7.80 7.90 8.00 8.10 8.20 8.30 8.40 8.50 8.60 8.70 8.80

Page 13: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics · 2018. 4. 2. · BMS Internal Use Only. 2. Outline • Introduction: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics • Analytical Separation

13BMS Internal Use Only

• Overlapping profiles • Accurate quantitation of stability indicating peaks is challenging

13

Charge HeterogeneityAb

sorb

ance

-0.02

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

Minutes6.90 7.00 7.10 7.20 7.30 7.40 7.50 7.60 7.70 7.80 7.90 8.00 8.10 8.20 8.30 8.40 8.50 8.60 8.70 8.80

Page 14: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics · 2018. 4. 2. · BMS Internal Use Only. 2. Outline • Introduction: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics • Analytical Separation

14BMS Internal Use Only

Size Heterogeneity• Monomers from mAb-1 and mAb-2

are not co-eluting• Quantitation of monomer is

challenging for minor component • Presence of HMW species well

below quantitation limit does not pose the immunogenicity concern

mAb-1

mAb-2

Page 15: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics · 2018. 4. 2. · BMS Internal Use Only. 2. Outline • Introduction: Control Strategy for Co-formulated Biologics • Analytical Separation

15BMS Internal Use Only

Summary• Control strategy to support co-formulated biologics is driven by:

• Monotherapy control strategy• Interaction Study• Combination product control strategy

• Analytical method panel can be modified based for the co-formulated product ratio with suitable justification to provide comprehensive control strategy

• Method bridging and method correlation provide support to justify specifications for co-formulated product

• Approach for reporting certain CQAs might differ from conventional mAbs due to sensitivity limitations associated with certain analytical methods for a given ratio