Concurrent PlanningACF Regional Office Teleconference

Jan. 20, 2006

Janyce Fenton, MPANational Resource Center for Family

Centered Practice & Permanency Planningjanycefenton@msn.com

Family Centered Practice

Birth Parents,Including fathers

Informal Supports, Kin, CommunityMembers, Neighbors, Ministers, etc.

Formal Supports: Dept. & other Agencies, Resource Family

CHILDREN

Permanency Planning Framework

• Reasonable Efforts• Least Restrictive• Maintain Connections & Continuity• Assessments & Case Plans• Partnerships with Foster & Birth Parents• Frequent Visitation• Case Reviews• Timely Decision Making

Concurrent Planning

• Children in the child welfare system are most damaged by numerous moves, which exacerbate the grief and loss they experience due to their initial separation from their families.

• They are further damaged by the uncertainty and inability to plan and have hope for their future.

• Pre-verbal children are unable to attach to multiple caretakers and become unable to have successful relationships later on.

Concurrent Planning

• Kinship placements have shown us that people can care for and make lifelong commitments to children, while at the same time, encouraging and supporting reunification.

• It is the intent of concurrent planning to develop these kinds of relationships for birth families who do not have appropriate kin networks of their own.

Concurrent Planning Definitions

• Working towards reunification while at the same time, implementing an alternative permanency plan.

• Concurrent rather than sequential planning efforts to more quickly move children from the uncertainty of foster care to the security of a permanent family.

Goals of Concurrent Planning

• To support the safety and well-being of children and families

• To promote early permanency decisions for children

• To decrease children’s length of stay in foster care

• To reduce the number of moves and relationship disruptions children experience in foster care

• To develop a network of foster parents (relatives and non-relatives) who can work towards reunification and also serve as permanency resource families for children.

• To engage families in early case planning, case review and decision making about permanency options to meet children’s urgent need for stability and continuity in their family relationships.

• To maintain continuity in children’s family, sibling and community relationships.

Concurrent Planning Goals

Success Redefined

-Timely permanence via reunification or an alternative care giver

-Kinship as family preservation

-Diligent search vs. Why didn’t “they” come forward sooner?

Key Components of Concurrent Planning-Early Prognostic Assessment

-Full Disclosure/Parenting Options Counseling

-Family Conferencing/Kinship Care

-Team decision making protocols

-Availability of Resource Families

-Case Plans which delineate compliance from success

-Strong collaboration with legal system

-Immediate access to services and collaborative relationships with service providers

-Frequent Visitation

What Types of Homes do Our Children Need?

• Homes that respect their culture and ethnicity

• Homes that allow them to stay connected to their families, siblings, schools and communities

• Homes that will take the emotional risk so that the children don’t have to

• Homes that understand children’s developmental needs and recognize their grief as a normal reaction to the loss of their family

Resource Family

Refers to foster and adoptive families, relatives or caregivers who share parenting with the birth family as we seek to find permanence, safety and stability for the child. These individuals are willing to provide a permanent connection for the child whether or not the child reunifies with their birth family. They play an active role in linking the child to their past as well as helping promote family relationships in the future.

Riding the Emotional Roller Coaster

• Implies that mentally healthy adults are better able to deal with the uncertainty of attaching to someone they may have to “give up.”

• While this seems like a hard sell, it is what we have been making children do repeatedly as they have walked through the maze of foster care.

Where we will find these families?

• Many of our resource families should come from the same communities as our children.

• Imagine the difference in a child’s experience of placement if we can provide truly “frequent” visitation?

• Kin, both maternal and paternal should always be sought out and encouraged to become the concurrent placement resource for their children

Where we will find these families?

For school age children the goal should be for them not to have to change schools, a place that is usually one of the few places where they are cared for and feel connected.

What’s the gain and how do we measure best practice?

• When placement is necessary: - can the children remain in their

own community, attend the same school, stay involved with any sports teams or clubs?

- can siblings be placed together? - do workers have the ability to

match birth families to resource families?

What’s the gain and how do we measure best practice?

• Can visitation occur at least three times a week?

• Have we reduced the # of moves children have?

• How quickly can we reach permanency for children?

Community Education

• The community needs to be educated to the fact that only a very small percentage of our birth families are dangerous and would pose a threat to them.

Community Awareness

• If we recruit from a place of desperation, what message are we sending out about what our children deserve?

• While we want to increase the number of resource families available to our children, we must also maintain standards that say not just anyone is good enough to care for our children.

Combining Customer Service with High Standards

• Community members should be made to feel like being part of the resources for children is an honored thing.

• What can they do to be part of this special group of people who gets to care for our wonderful children?

How Can We Ensure Good

Casework Practice based

on relationships

and collaboration

not just documentation & data entry?

STEPS TO IMPLEMENTATION

• Assess Data• Review

Laws/Polices/ Regulations

• Strengthen Commitment to Philosophy

• Provide Leadership• Develop

Stakeholder Support

• Develop Specialized Recruitment/ Retention Strategies

• Build Community Linkages

• Develop Review Process/Team Decision Making

• Provide Training & Support

Identifying Stakeholders

• Legislators• Judges/Lawyers/Court Liaison• Foster and Adoptive Families• Treatment Providers• Community Leaders/Child Advocates• Staff including administrators• Clients/Extended Family• Schools/Law Enforcement/Churches• Media

Identification of Systemic Barriers

Do workers have what they need to take advantage of the proposed changes?

ORWill they be frustrated by learning new

practice that they can’t implement?

Administrative Support

-Reinforcement of the philosophy of birth parent-foster parent partnerships.

-Recruitment efforts which have high standards and are focused in communities

-Manageable Caseloads and/or secondary workers

-Adequate supervision ratios so that supervisors can be present at reviews/staffings, providing support & mentoring

-Collaboration with other agencies/MOP (memorandum of procedure) with courts, CASA’s, service providers, etc.

Administrative Support

- Acceptance of Non-traditional adoptive families

-Availability of Post Adoption Services

-Training for all levels of agency and other agencies

-Implementation of Family Team Meetings and other forms of non-adversarial conflict resolution

-Support for “outside the box” thinking

-Pro-active vs. reactive policy

Best Practice: Tools of the Trade

• Prognostic Guide which Includes Assessment of Ambivalence.

• Protective Orders for Immediate Psychological and/or Substance Evaluations & Child Specific Evaluations.

• Diligent Search Protocol for Fathers and Relatives and Timely Kinship Studies.

Best Practice: Tools of the trade

• Immediate ICWA Determination Protocol

• Family Group Decision Making

• Social Histories Which Identify Strengths as Well as Needs

• Inclusive Staffings/Case Reviews/Team Decision Making/Collaboration

Best Practice: Tools of the Trade

• Open Adoption/Co-parenting/Post Adoption Counseling

• Case Plans Which Include Measurable Criteria's of Success

• Increased Visitation/Case Aides/CASAs

• Technology/Voice & E- Mail/Internet Search Software

Best Practice: Tools of the Trade

• Mediation and Other Non-adversarial Forms of Conflict Resolution

• Full Disclosure

• Placement Options Which Include Trained and Committed Fost-Adopt Families

• Parenting Options/ Relinquishment Counseling.

Challenges

• Safety is Paramount/Success Vs. Compliance.

• Risk Can Be Both Emotional and Physical.

• Frequent Visitation is a Predictor.

• Initial Attachment/Prior Parent-Child Relationship.

• ICWA Must Be Immediately Determined.

• ICPC May Require Court Order to Expedite.

Challenges

• Mental Illness/Sub. Abuse can be Progressive

• Front Loading Services is Necessary but Should be Balanced with Client Overwhelm

• FGDM-Gauge Support vs. Pressure without Offers of Concrete Help

• Ambivalence is a worker dynamic as well as a client dynamic

EXPECTED LONG TERM OUTCOMES OF CONCURRENT PERMANENCY

PLANNING

• Children who are in fost-adopt homes are less damaged because they have not suffered from continual moves.

• Fewer adoption disruptions. Fewer post-adoption high level/high cost placements.

• Adopted children don’t experience identify issues in adolescence because they know “who they are,” and “where they came from,” and in most cases, have some type of ongoing relationship with their birth families.

EXPECTED LONG TERM OUTCOMES

• The elimination of the “waiting child” phenomena, as most TPR and/or Relinquishment Hearings don’t occur until the child has already been placed with their permanent family.

• Cases move through the quagmire quicker, resulting in overall cost savings to all involved systems.

EXPECTED LONG TERM OUTCOMES

• The fact that someone was ” in the system” themselves, as a child, does not predispose them to being unable to have successful relationships and parent effectively.

• Participants are empowered and proud of their work.

• Children who are going home spend less time in placement.

EXPECTED LONG TERM OUTCOMES

• New extended families will be formed as fost-adopt families remain involved with children who go home and act as an ongoing resource to the birth family.

• The protection of children becomes a community issue and responsibility.

• Extended family members are involved, respected and proactive.