computerized adaptive testing for students with disabilities in k-12: promises and challenges marty...
TRANSCRIPT
Computerized Adaptive Testing for Students with Disabilities in K-12:
Promises and Challenges
Marty McCallSmarter Balanced Assessment Consortium
CCSSO – NCSAJune, 2015 – San Diego, CA
Conceptual Model of the Smarter Balanced Accessibility and Accommodations Framework
Embedded Tools
Universal tools
•Breaks•Calculator•Digital Notepad•English Dictionary•English Glossary•Expandable Psgs•Global Notes•Highlighter•Keyboard Navg.•Mark for Review•Math Tools•Spell Check•Strikethrough•Writing Tools•Zoom
Designated supports
• American Sign Language
• Braille
• Closed Captioning
• Streamline
• Text-to-Speech
• Color Contrast
• Masking
• Text-to-Speech
• Translated Test Directions
• Translations (Pop-up Glossary)
• Translations (Stacked)
• Turn off Any Universal Tools
Accommodations
Non-Embedded Tools
Universal tools
• Breaks
• English Dictionary
• Scratch Paper
• Thesaurus
Designated supports
• Abacus
• Alternate Response Options
• Calculator
• Multiplication Table
• Print on Demand
• Read Aloud
• Scribe
• Speech-to-Text
• Bilingual Dictionary
• Color Contrast
• Color Overlay
• Magnification
• Read Aloud
• Noise Buffers
• Scribe
• Separate Setting
• Translated Test Directions
• Translations (Glossary)
Accommodations
Change from paper to online
Advantages
• New ways to present items– audio– large print– filters – ASL, Braille, embossing
printers
• Expanded response modes– Input devices/keyboards– Interaction/engagement– Electronic supports
• Ability to standardize accommodations
Issues
• Innovative item types may not be universal
• Controversy over some tools
• Plethora of solutions causes high volume and complexity
Comfort levels change
• Used to be controversial– Electronic calculators– Keyboards– Spellcheck
• Still controversial– Not requiring decoding in reading– Translations
Accommodations available only to those who need them
Not controversial
Controversial
Making tests adaptive
• Components– Test blueprint
– Item Pool
– Algorithm
Advantages
• More precise scores, particularly for high and low performers
• Better information for growth models
• Student experience is more engaging– Questions are at an
appropriate level
Issues
• Enormous item pools, limited budgets. Need to prioritize
• Legal framework– Does every item need to
be available in every mode?
– Are translations all or none?
• Belief that students will not show skills
Thank you for your attention