comparison of online brand strength of leading asian tourism destinations
TRANSCRIPT
Comparison of online brand strength of leading Asian tourism destinations
Comparison of online brand strength of leading Asian tourism destinations
Introduction
Present context is marked by the gradual shrinkage of regular and conventional
media and rapid rise of digital media. A large amount of media consumptions occur
over the digital channels. Like various other industries tourism is also not insulated
from the rising significance of the digital media.
Digital Media plays a very crucial role in the entire cycle, a traveler undergoes-
selection, planning, information gathering, booking, and visit. The following table
gives a list of e-marketing activities corresponding to various stages of travel
(Nguyen N, 2007).
Stage Activity
Selection E-mail, viral promotion, social media,
videos and photo sharing sites, SEO,
banner ads
Information gathering Travel websites
Planning Click ads, travel websites,
Booking Travel portals, websites, official sites
Visit Dynamic itinerary planner, SMS, emails
Table 1: shows the e-marketing activities corresponding to various stages of travel.
In order to up their ante in this transformed tourism landscape, it is essential for
tourist destinations to have a strong presence across various web platforms- travel
websites, social media, social media, and mobile application etc. The following
report will analyze the online brand strength of leading tourist destinations from
Asia- Hong Kong, Singapore, Bangkok, Dubai and Istanbul. It will do a
comparative analysis of the online brand presence across the following platforms-
Paritosh Kashyap Page 2
Comparison of online brand strength of leading Asian tourism destinations
search engines (Yahoo and Google), travel websites (Trip Advisor, Frommer,
Virtual Tourist, official tourist websites) and social media (Face Book and You
Tube) etc.
Search Engines
Search engines play a vital role in any form of marketing. The following part provides a simple estimate of search results related to the five locations in Google and Yahoo, two of search engine giants.
Bangkok
Dubai
Istanbul
Singapore
Hong Kong
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
76.7
102
243
144
383
334
344
515
1230
1500
GoogleYahoo
Fig 1: shows the search results in millions on typing the name of the destinations in search engines.
Paritosh Kashyap Page 3
Comparison of online brand strength of leading Asian tourism destinations
Bangkok Dubai Istanbul Singapore Hong Kong0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
32.7 36.9
15.1
37.5
190
8.63 9.81
47.6
120
189
YahooGoogle
Fig 2: shows the image search results in millions for the five destination in Yahoo & Google
Bangkok Dubai Istanbul Singapore Hong Kong0
5
10
15
20
25
0.47 0.3 0.79 1 0.56
7.6
14.7
7.04
17
20.1
YahooGoogle
Fig 3: shows the video search results in millions for the five destination in Yahoo & Google
Paritosh Kashyap Page 4
Comparison of online brand strength of leading Asian tourism destinations
Istanbul
Dubai
Bangkok
Hong Kong
Singapore
0 50 100 150 200 250
16.5
35
20.1
57.5
43.8
7.93
12
13.3
176
211
GoogleYahoo
Fig 4: shows the number of search engine results in millions on typing- name of the
destination followed by hotels. Exp: Singapore Hotels
Istanbul
Dubai
Bangkok
Hong Kong
Singapore
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
14.2
31.6
19.1
42.1
56.4
2.19
1.8
4.18
31
4.5
GoogleYahoo
Fig5: shows search results in million in Google and Yahoo on typing <city name>
places to visit. For exp: Hong Kong places to visit.
Official tourist websites
Paritosh Kashyap Page 5
Comparison of online brand strength of leading Asian tourism destinations
Websites are the representation of the tourist destinations in the web world. Not
only do they build the brand image of the destination but also guide unaware
tourist by providing all the relevant information in detail. It helps traveler make
travelling decision. Some of the essential requirements of travelers are- direction
information/map, visa and policy information, local information, photo gallery,
multilingual functions, content categorization, multimedia functions, utility
functions etc (Quan Z, Rich D, 2005).
All the above mentioned information could be gathered from the websites. Out of
all the available websites, the role of an official website is always much more
significant since it represents the official view point. The given part of the report
intents to analyze the popularity of official tourist websites of the five destinations
both In terms of web analytics as well as qualitative aspects of the website. For
web analytics measurement double click ad planner is used.
Official Websites of tourist destination
Singapore: YourSingapore.com (www.yoursingapore.com )
Dubai: DefinitelyDubai.com (http://www.definitelydubai.com/)
Bangkok: Bangkoktourist.com (http://www.bangkoktourist.com/)
Istanbul: Istanbul.com (http://english.istanbul.com/)
Hong Kong: DiscoverHongkong.com (www.discoverhongkong.com )
Paritosh Kashyap Page 6
Comparison of online brand strength of leading Asian tourism destinations
YourSi
ngapore
Bangk
okTouris
t
Istan
bul.com
Discove
r Hong K
ong
Definite
lyDubai
050000
100000150000200000250000300000350000400000450000
050000010000001500000200000025000003000000350000040000004500000
Fig6: shows the total unique visits and page views for the five official sites, over the month of November 2011. The column chart shows unique visits, where as the line graph shows the page views. Source: double click ad planner.
BangkokTourist
YourSingapore
DefinitelyDubai
Discover Hong Kong
Istanbul.com
0:00 1:12 2:24 3:36 4:48 6:00 7:12 8:24 9:36 10:48 12:00
4:30
5:30
5:30
8:10
11:50
Fig7: shows the average time spent by a visitor in minutes: seconds. Source: double click ad planner.
Paritosh Kashyap Page 7
Comparison of online brand strength of leading Asian tourism destinations
basic info Visa info No. of languages
Info categorization
Site map
Singapore yes yes 1 yes yesDubai yes no 5 yes yesHong Kong yes yes 14 yes YesIstanbul yes no 2 yes yesBangkok yes no 4 yes yes
Table 2: Compares the home page of the five official websites across some of the basic parameters.
Search option
Social media pages
Multi media packages Geographical customization
Singapore yes yes yes yes yesDubai yes no yes yes noHong Kong yes no yes yes yesIstanbul yes yes yes no noBangkok yes yes yes no no
Table 3: Compares the home page of the five official websites across some of the advanced parameters.
In terms of unique visitors and total page views, discover Hong Kong has an
insurmountable lead over others. This is followed by Singapore; others are far
behind. Discover Hong Kong is available in 14 different languages, a unique
feature missing in other websites. The closest to this is Definitely Dubai which is
available in 5 different languages. Other than the multilingual function most of the
websites provide all the basic function listed in table 1. It is the advanced
parameters which seem to be the differentiating factor. Yours Singapore has all the
five features, followed by Hong Kong with four. The other three have three each.
All the five websites have designed very attractive website with lot of multimedia
works-videos, photos, flash etc. One of the unique features, of the two successful
website is availability of geographical customization- provision of custom made
packages for different geographies.
Travel websites
Paritosh Kashyap Page 8
Comparison of online brand strength of leading Asian tourism destinations
Travel websites play a very significant role in tourism marketing and destination
branding. Not only do they provide booking facilities for a range of tourism
activities but also share reviews for tourist destination in the form of – comments,
articles, videos and photos. These travel websites are loved by tourism enthusiast
and amateur tourists alike and some of them have huge fan following all across the
globe. A larger presence in such websites will ensure stronger brand image for
destinations. The given part of the report will compare the five destinations across
three of the most popular tourism websites- Frommer, Trip Advisor and Virtual
tourist
Frommer
Destination guides communities photos
Singapore 792 638 95
Dubai 2847 179 52
Hong Kong 822 678 152
Istanbul 635 761 57
Bangkok 9643 1110 98
Table 4: shows the no. of destination guides, communities and photos for the five
destinations in Frommer.
Trip advisor
reviews forums articles
Singapore 81, 472 45,761 255
Paritosh Kashyap Page 9
Comparison of online brand strength of leading Asian tourism destinations
DUBAI 62,520 36,794 104
HONG KONG 66,102 39,119 235
Istanbul 93,995 23,149 164
Bangkok 118,811 61,955 224
Table 5: shows the no. of reviews, forums and articles for the five destinations in
Trip Advisor.
Virtual Tourist
Tips & reviews photos videos
Singapore 13,254 25,185 41
Dubai 2,580 5,721 34
Hong Kong 10,072 18,707 92
Istanbul 8,850 17,851 154
Bangkok 11,643 20,703 44
Table 6: shows the no. of tips and reviews, forums and articles for the five
destinations in virtual tourist.
With the help of the three tables it could be concluded that none of the destination
emerges as a true winner. There is a lot of variability across the three websites.
While Frommer and Trip Advisor are dominated by Bangkok; Singapore has
stronghold in Virtual Tourist. Even within the sites there are lots of variations. For
instance, Istanbul has the 2nd least number of tips & reviews in virtual tourist
where as highest number of videos. Another point to be considered is that if there
is no winner, there is no loser as well. All the five destinations have substantial
presence across the three websites in the form of- reviews, photos, videos, forums
and communities.
Digital media landscape itself is transforming with social media playing a very
pivotal role. One of the most popular social media site across the globe is Facebook
Paritosh Kashyap Page 10
Comparison of online brand strength of leading Asian tourism destinations
or FB. FB which is available in more than 70 languages has more than 800 million
active users across the world. More than 50 percent of active users log on to FB on
any given day. On an average every user is connected to 130 friends and 80
communities, events etc (Facebook statistics, 2011).
Due to its phenomenal popularity and sheer volume across the globe, FB provides
a very vibrant platform for marketers to communicate and interact with their
target customers. It also plays a very prominent role in building brand image for
tourist destinations. The given part of the report will compare the brand strength
of the five tourist destinations on FB. Since there are many FB pages related to the
destinations and comparing all of them not possible; most popular page for all the
destinations have been selected. The pages are:
Dubai: I Love Dubai
Istanbul: Istanbul, tours/ sightseeing
Singapore: YourSingapore
Bangkok: Bangkok, public places
Hong Kong: Hong Kong, Attractions, things to do
Bangkok
Hong Kong
Singapore
Dubai
Istanbul
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000
246
775
825
7386
9775
15,375
32,501
163,233
111,311
209,129
LikesTalking about
Paritosh Kashyap Page 11
Comparison of online brand strength of leading Asian tourism destinations
Fig8: Shows number of likes and people talking about the given destinations on
their FB pages. Source: FB pages
Marketing a destination on FB also requires a lot of activities and updates on the
group page, besides just having a page. In order to comprehend the level of
activities done on each page, a seven day period- 19th Dec to 25th Dec, has been
selected under which all the activities- updates, likes, comments and shares have
been recorded.
Updates Comments Likes (for
individual
updates)
Shares
Dubai 14 1214 12,370 3125
ISTANBUL 37 848 4,311 778
Singapore 3 49 490 27
Hong Kong 40 75 1037 22
Bangkok 22 25 232 21
Table 7: shows the number of updates, comments, likes and shares during 19th to
25th Dec, for individual pages of tourist destinations. (Only updates related to
tourism has been included)
On FB, Dubai seems to have an edge over other destinations. Properly moderated,
it comes up with regular updates of photos and videos, reflecting the grandiose
and extravagance of Dubai. The beautiful photo graphs attract a large number user
likes comments and shares.
Other cities which come close to Dubai could be Istanbul and Singapore
(YourSingapore). Istanbul like Dubai is well moderated but is also fraught with lot
of irrelevant updates- political spoofs, funny pictures etc. Another flaw for page
Paritosh Kashyap Page 12
Comparison of online brand strength of leading Asian tourism destinations
“Istanbul” could be predominant use of Turkish language, which deprives it of an
international appeal. YourSingapore is well managed page but needs more
updates. For the other two lots more is required. Large number of user generated
updates which include greetings and adieus, contradict with the professional
outlook expected out of such pages.
You tube
Another powerful social media tool is “You Tube”. Over 800 million of unique users
visit You Tube every month. Over 100 million of users take social actions such as
like, share and comment on You Tube every week (Youtube.com press statistics,
2011). You tube does not only play a pivotal role in branding a tourist destination,
but also absorb negative perception by interacting directly with the tourists (Sofia
R, Brain H, 2010).
Istanbul Hong Kong Dubai Singapore Bangkok0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
107,000
478,000
212,000
504,000473,000
Fig9: shows the total number of tourism related searches and total views for top 10
searches for the five destinations. Column chart shows the no. of searches,
whereas line chart with data labels show the total no. of views. Source: You Tube
Conclusion and Suggestions
Paritosh Kashyap Page 13
Comparison of online brand strength of leading Asian tourism destinations
It could be comprehended from various charts and tables that none of the five
destinations emerges as a clear winner. However, someone close to the numero
uno position could Hong Kong followed by Singapore. Both the city states appear
to be comparatively well equipped in building their brand on the web world. Based
on the analysis, there are following suggestion, which could help these states
further enhance their brand image -
Bangkok: With an intake of 10.2 million tourists it is Asia’s most visited
city. (enjoyyourholiday.com, 2011). The city also enjoys a high no of user
generated reviews, communities, photos and other user generated contents
in travel sites such as trip advisor, virtual tourist etc. However it has
comparatively lesser web presence as estimated from the search engine
section. In the social media segment it has strong base in You Tube, but
needs to use Face Book more aptly. It can also work on its website by adding
custom made packages.
Istanbul: Is the only city in the globe, stretched across two continents- Asia
and Europe. In most of the sections Istanbul has shown a moderate show-
neither too good nor too bad. An area where it needs to put some extra
efforts could be You Tube. Another could be official tourist page. The English
version (the Turkish version is doing good with 2,00,000 visitors over
November 2011) which is definitely engaging as reflected from the average
time spent, is still not attracting large volume of visitors like its counterpart,
Singapore and Hong Kong. One possible measure could be annexing a
Russian and German version as Turkey receives quite a good number of
tourist arrivals from the two countries.
Dubai: like Istanbul, Dubai has also showcased moderate performance
across most of the sections. One area where it has been exceptional could be
FB page “I love Dubai”. With arsenal of spellbinding photographs of Dubai,
Paritosh Kashyap Page 14
Comparison of online brand strength of leading Asian tourism destinations
the page has been successful in its attempts of engaging and communicating
with people. Besides working on platforms like virtual tourists, Dubai can
rework on its official tourist site. Adding custom made packages and an
Arabic version can help in more traffics.
Hong Kong and Singapore: are already strong on the web. A small advice
for Hong Kong could be linking social pages with the official tourist website.
Limitations
The given report has some fundamental limitations such as:
Search engines: Based on the keywords the number of searches, give only
an approximate estimation of web content available. More ever the total
number of searches keeps on varying with time to time.
Reviews: Reviews themselves are not 100 % accurate estimation of the
brand presence since it is not just the numbers but quality of reviews that
also matters. More over a negative review can be detrimental to the brand
value.
Google double ad click: he unique visitors, page views and average time
spent, calculated by Google double ad click are just estimation rather than
the exact data. However out of many website measurement tools available
Paritosh Kashyap Page 15
Comparison of online brand strength of leading Asian tourism destinations
on the internet, it is considered as the most authentic by many web media
evangelist.
Reference
1> Nguyen N, 2007,tourism trends and the effect of online booking for Vietnam
travel market, available <
http://www.findvietnamresorts.com/company/advertise/research.pdf>
2> Quan Z, Rich D, 2005, Usability issue in city tourism websites: content
analysis, p-3, available at http://www.arlt-lectures.com/cross-cult-city-
tour.pdf
3> Facebook statistics center, 2011, available at
http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics
4> Youtube.com, 2011,press statistics, available at <
http://www.youtube.com/t/press_statistics>
5> Sofia r, Brain H, 2010, the use of you tube as tourism marketing tool,
available at < http://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/2315/1/2315.PDF>
6> Enjoyyourholiday.com, 2011, top 10 visited cities in the world, available at <
http://www.enjoyourholiday.com/2011/04/18/top-10-most-visited-cities-in-
the-world/>
Paritosh Kashyap Page 16