nam ly th t t 0 wam n w TG t e onno IJ mo e

I

_ 20 -

1here is no asis fohe su99C5 ion a he AccU9 dAd 6.5 :

"nclJ hat the otudpnts would follow "th ir cunadS".

Thie SOl mission 5 me to imply hat r.e Bl.ek udents

had ne er hoard of guerillo oV men 5 ( ucc s.ful or

otheTuise) in Aft ica.

]!d 6.6 :The def nee version i e nowhere probative of an

-id nti fica ion ui h the

by

frelimo.

Ad 6.7 :(b) The con~ent. of the placards do not shOWany

reaction to tha id~ of a proposed rallY· At

the moat they Tefl et tfanta9Y of the writers

. I

of th poeter .state for the propo . tion that Accused .'

o sutho i ty ie ei ted by th

co~ced d thara had been an emotional reaction"

Alternativ ly the se.'. proposition i ba ad

on a mi canal C

of a Sue ti~ put to L(OUA A

.xcl t dad ore emot 0 1 th n m n

(p. 261/2-11).

dl· ..

mi 9 t ha v mad P ~ -0

individual police n i

in ul n9 rem rko

_ 21 -

f toS au miosion i.ii eo

c \ a 0 0 nn_d • B

of poli' ic 1 p ti n 0

..,0 u olY

in t u h l.apt·ng he qetP'l of an unlawfulp01'"6pec\.iv .

\JhilS lan9uage may in cot a In ei cume tall~G!:.v 0

• secondary o r i nic meaning na foundo ion for such a

pro 0 i ion ns e boen layed y he sta c.

r frain r otno u

o languD-l n t

SlO I:.;

view n cnc u agemon

o a aW u inaviout i

Ad 6.9 :- -lhe Rector did not oppashe "did no ag

re" \Ji h h rallY is iHel

e•sn

and

h rallY, lho fact tha

thi i s no ind· ea of an emb rraosmen to he sta te

or anyone e se.

Accused o. 6 - p.S6l0•

Ad 6.9(b) and (cl:-lhe attitude of the

udents ouards the police ua

one 0 compliance.

oe roaponsibill Y 0

at the person u 0 call d

SRC. Th re i no evid neethe / ••••

- 22 -

h alan 1 "Co 1 " d rt so d nd

In ul' ng y. T 1 t i r ny v n Cl u r

0 in ul in y avoca ve n uo d C n 1 II

uhe tcvr r It!nllr n C ! ua n od . h

CCl: r r .i. . • . ,. b 1,0 \I LU ....."r - !: ~ c "nrJ. u '"' . ......., .....

and Accu d o . 7 mani 00 ed, on vid nc .nc cue lo. - p . 61 /7

Ev n houg on h legal advic c ived y th m

tho olice in rven ion would b unlawful. T 5 e

ergum nt s ms 0 ug9 s offie so r of vicariouG

r apon Lb I ly.

lEO\JABA, p.2S7.

Ad 6.9(c)(i ) and {~ :

Thoro is a rp conflict bo ween he police witne ses

on the one hand and th d tes imony an LrOJP ~

on th oth r 88 to uh t ua s h cause of the sane

throwing. In he ab snee 0 any evidence the h SRC

sought or promoted hl violenc tho ao Laode , hou v

dra a not proba ive of h State ca 9. Even

applies s cn , Th meireu OU8 880n1n9 s em o

be the founda ion or the pIOpO i ion of the st t

in p ,rsgraph 6.10.

LEOUABA, p . 265.

Ad / ••••

.,

RC;:. no i UQa

u S "SA..IO dom! ati [~UA A' v i d ne r 1 i d

an hn 5 da u or ~. p opo ion.no

Ad 7. Band 7.9- . G n u C\ASO

videnc t t. hO

a in the ocu on of

not suffielCm for e

d a common in n on ui t

he S te mu h u th ",h c

The . ~~ b ~ u n ecu

r i lev n Ln h ob

we 0 acting in Lancer u

B crimin 1 design. 1 i

tate 0 how that t ey

n her memb r e of SASO.on h

was an 9greem n.of c us dIas. 6 nd/or 7 on he on hand and th

p rpetra ars of an eet which fall wi hin

of the Terrorism Ac , on the 0 h r ,

ambi t

R. v . 5, 1959, (1) S.A. p.680 at 683 (C);

H. v •1 41 OPO p.154; and

1965 (2) S.A. p.8l at 821.S. vs.

Ad 7.11 :houg P r 11 d ci· on n by

11Th o holdthe SASO Ex cu iv and St f Co i

1 /. •••

_ ~)4 -

is irrelevant in e light of LEOWA8A'sAvidence

that o . ó was 'nform d hat dse-ision had alroady'

en taken Y the SRC. T 0 law ulness o f e SRC

en rprise cannot be a feted Y the doei i no. lIy

other organisation to hold rallies in ny

they iked.

Accused o . 6 - • 5 7 •.

nne r

Ad 7.13 :There is no substance in he su mission ha t the

"major t.y of the members of the SRC" who pas d the

Res utions to hold the rallies were members and

supporters of SASOo The evidence of LEOWABA,

raf rred to does not authorise the proposi tion made.

Ad 'I. 17 - 22 :The facts reli d on by the State do not assist it.

Ad 7. 23_end 24. :ei th r o . 7' s f1 Tat in erpr ta ion of the banning,

nor he fact h t o, 7 .ought legal advice (u ich uas

positive) can a i h stat

Ad / ••••

- 25 -

d 7.25 nd 1.26 ..

TI e ac a o . 6 ua~ to "ps. k a th a 011 y d' d not

imply an 0 liga ion to dissoci te ims 1 (he e ng

the Pr s'dent) rom all SASO ac v ty. TI a ...3P of

the conversation be w n Aecuo d .OS. 2 ~ d 6 d e s

not assiat th sta e. An xchange of in orma ion

in ne jJ' lieul r conturovidas no adverse

inference .•

Ad 7.28Tho mer fact that the SRC had decided 0 organ'se

the relly im lied tha . t ua an SRC function and

not a SASOone. The state ls corr ct in eu mitting

that there ua s no necessity to exclude SASOup to

the time of benning. but this does not mean tat here

ua e a necessity to includ~ SASO.

In the light of the afDregDing it is submitted that

tne SLate has P ovided no evidence that the rally

called by the SRC consti tuted an offence al tet na tively

that Accused o . 6 ue involved in preparations for

t e rallY·

1t is accordinglY submi tted

be acqui t ted on the 2nd Cou

t Accused o- 6 ould

Accus d / ••••

- 2

00'

1.

T vid n 0

i

SC t. ot c C IU r' -~- , n boc11 u ie i not... '"'~ - -

conn C d ui a une ion u 0 :t. do And n 1 y

of 5 C;O. .. q i s \.i :"I P- on ibd i es, ig nnd

ou Lo ... 1 \J S h SRC a uni 0 1Y d c id d

0 old lly n 0 2 5 plom , 1 71l •

2.

Th i no vid nc t SRC et d in 0 c r t,....

SASO and/or 0 C. T~e d cision '0 hold I S C m Ling

ua tak null before any alk of a ban.

:;.On the 18th Sep mber Accus do. 6 inrorm d th

urfl op ASO Local Com i a of

st ff and cut'vo lo\:!t'ng. In

ha a9 told lh t th RC had air

lly on on i Lo _."".."" ........

£O\JASA - pp. 195 nd 2 4.

h docision of the

a s am moet inC)

d cided 0 hold a

ta. / ••••

II.

Pre ident of h SRf..h a r od,

- 27 -

In u u 5 n nv one SI\ 0 und \. I c

5 c c Ir t Lon .

f\ .i.iy, xn i 1 B.

Th inv i ion x ndod 0 e . 6 0 add O~D ho r 1

lJ 8 mo ve y e foe h wo tho 0 m r

before commen i n~ hi - :J!?!?~h, tha" ••6 \Jd no t aoor 01ng

the rally as a r presentat v of any org nLaa t i en ,

6.

Th ouggestion contained in Exhibi Rally B.l of a

decision to "lnfiltra th hen SRC" and di po e 0

it is lJithou substance and has been disproved and

expl&ined by State and Oefene ~ e a , Tno

pr ooo i ion is in any v nt un na 1 b ring in mind

ha tho SRC vas vo ted in in pu suance o an ordina ry

l OU B , pp. 273 and 303j

ecu d / ••••

law I .....

- ?

Accused 0.6- pp. ~71/3 and 5 7~ .

...,••

It w 5 generally b licved Il La a nn i 19 n der cil .

not apply to he SRC folly. Thor uo e no su C 0

by the Rector or any member ofarf 0 any 0

person L a L tho SRC JAS me 1 tho 001 of SA«iO or

uae uor ing in cancel' ui th SASO.

8.

It is not u rioing, in . he light of the a ave,

that Accused c • 6 sa' d to Accu ed o . 2 on h

telephone that he was not go' ng ~O say anything

"le t SWA A uill say wa organised i t".

9 •

Insofar as the preparation and arrangements for th9

holding 0 the rall y a t Turfloop are concerned o , 6

had no hand therain.

p •5599.

O.

The State testimony doe not prov

the part of the SRC to endang r ~h

n int n ion on

ain nane· 0

Uha eve the cont nt 0 f th por h r \ol no

- 2

lOLl 0 d or d r , 0.. t it c c or d

the pa of, Of • an 1c, u

capabla of ndung ng m in nenc 0 1 u nrid

ordor.

11.

Th pos r s found on 0 uolls of Univ r s i Y

the ex morning ue no nspi d ., - ~ 5 ( . OnI

con tory he SRC h d a ugga~ d mod 1 u ich IJ 0

bl nd . AccU ed '0. 7 wh n he sddr 5bGd 0 ud n

was UI uivoc 1 in insis ing th t 0 SRC did not

uan IIe demon ra tion" •

Aa r as the poat.ers are concerned 8 smell propor ion,

a v Y dofiniminori y. uer off nsiv - tho uork

or f nta Y 0 ex remism or youul devilm n t,

13.

indice ti on 0 U dn sday o nin9 hal t 0 d of

h ud n body h d b co in lam d and r

",a d ng r 0 h ud bodY ru 9 ",i ld or

beco ing viol n . On th- eo a y ood ua r 1 d

and / ••••

•

_ .0 -

and Gtu ent. u I' in good u 0 randr ~ i 1

nei herac or nor any 0

hr

Whi a ur 0 QC~ did no d em

on r mor 0

he po .... ers r mu .... o . ln II)' QV n

the conduc of the s udont odv anu GP.Cmher i.n

he hall. their compli nee ui h the polico r.Ques

•

mo of e s 1rnony

and the' roder' il HS ,

uhich unorringlY points to t s normality of heir

mood tho t day.

There is

IJ •

evidence Suggesting tha the violence

whi h subSequentlY b ok e 100SO on he campus uas in

any uay inopir d by he SRC. or i tG m mber ••

IS.

lhe trenscription3 of telephone convers ions discloee

no link betueon eCU do' 6 and the organi

ser of

th- TurflooP rally.

The fact hat ACCU9 dO. 7 t

o pr aid n of the

SRC, was alao

me ber 0 S SO doe no' detract from

the int gri ty and ~nd pndene of the SRC. He was

demoera iea 11 y / ••••

1 -

domoc 1, l .- c 0 ..di \ 0 n d

o r o e du t a . T .. e • f\ he wa 5 SG

u • pur c t lj . oun .3 1 n no 'I r f IC t.c • c '"

or 1 w i rt i..,...,u .I.

17.

Thore' n viden:: Id ..he ...:1j i Y 0ha RC

lly werwho passed the Resolution 0 hold h

mombers and bUP or er of SASOo

Exhibit R~ ly 8.2 rines not reveal who was and u S

not a memu~~ of S~Sn.

re.In c nclucioh . t is submitted that all h s eps

taken by the SRC and its membar call c ively or

individually are proba ive at a d~ P concern 0

avoid trouble or confronts tion nd to k ep ui thin

tho 1 t er a d splri t of tho law. The epi ode is

a plendid example of he restraint and lawfuln ss

of SASO "in actiont.

Supplem ntary / ••••

- 32 -

w on elf 0

9

"A conspiracy no mdlly 111vo1\10 éin oq.eAm

n ,

express or impliod to eommil an unlauful

act".976 (2) S.A. p.875 a 879 .

•

-Although the common deeign is the toot of 0

clln9pirbCY, iB not neceBsa Y to prove that

conspirat r s c me toge her and ae uallY agreed in

terms to h ue a common design and to pursue i by

common meane and SO cerry it into execution. lh

agreements may be shoun like any other feet b'

circumstantial evid nco".

§.. vs .. Coope!., eu a.

3 •

• con piracy to c mmit a crime requiraS an egte ment

o th part.. 0

crimins1 ct.

o ore Accused to CO i

(£R vs 15 S.C. 107'

R. 1941 OPO 154).- .

erG / ••••

4.

- 3

M re in en ion is in~U I ic:cnt :le

act in q tition . Sue 1 concur ene n ad no

nBeDasa ily D by w Y offa th agr em n to commi a er im tas any other

a "menl, can e arrived at tacitly and by conduct

"..... .R. vs. S., 1959 (1) S.A. p.680 at 683 c.

"A con piracy is an agreement betuee tuo 0 more

parsons to commi a cr ime. the pa ia8 to tha

agreament mUR be ad idam as to their obj ct ••••

S. V8. Al xander & ~ hors, 1965 (2) S. A. p . 818-

at 921 (C).

5.

The que on ls uhtJlher t con piracy alleged in

Coun 0 ha b n prov d i te 0\5 of . he dicta

s ou in

R. up •

6. / •. '

- ')

r a CP a d pu Li ea ions werThe Soa con ends

e 0 gani~atiuns, 5h~O na

lcouraging r~ci~l os iIi y, wi h he in .on

of lau and order.

7.

To succeed in ob aining a conviction Lho inton ion

must be he only r Bsonable conclusio hich ce

drawn f m he facts. The all 9 d in ontion must

be consistent ui th all the pr cv II fse c.

8. A

Uhera a number of persons, elonging 0 an org nisB ion

commitseries of crimea ~ in der to chi v an 0 jee ,

an inf r ne may b drawn that th m mbera of ouch

orgsnie tion had co~spi od 0 co mi t that crime.

R. ., 1956 (3) S. A. ap· 365'

R. ve. SOf 1959 (I) S.A. p.6BO a p.6B3 (C).

8.

Th' St t i i ub i d h 9 11 d to prov

any r ei 1 oatili Y or hatred wancour 9 d.

9. / ••.•

(0 ) Th (ntH - racu.... "" .B .. ,,--0 ur nnI'ur

o a d

- -s -

g.

aim 0 u ~ in for c ng e nno t (n race

co mi ion of crim nol ac in ho a nc ur an

xp r ce e or te c i agrconcn 0 mpLov u 1 t.:.l

means in th ox cu ion of heir progra me.

(b) Any infor ne of onspiraey mube d aun ui hin

he framework of the Indi~tman uhich r main

fou nR • onal 0 th 5a case. The in r enc

mu t be p ov d trom 8 ~uur~c cf n~~r~r tion

all ged, and this h 5 a e has failod 0 do.

he iabili Y of any eeue d i atrie ly

d p den on pr of hot h 0 ganies ion had

smb rked on an illegal cons 1racy wiLhin tho

n

me ning of tAct

(e) On he ue ion f rio th que tion m Y be posed,

did 0 gan1SB ions intend to endang r the

mainnee 0 la and order by the cation 0

tur oil 0 r Lo 7 W

poli le log nl n e b nc 0

of some or 0 ana chi t 1deology 0 a y 0 r

o iv I ....··

_ :5 1 -

motivo, would da i o the r .nk' 9 o Jric ou.

beha'J iour . C rtainty in he casu of PC and 5n~O

el' is cv id nc. d i r .c or indir ct t at the

organi tion ou h 0 promo urmoil or ot.

(d) lh~ st, e ha. subm. ed that the SASOand PC

organizations intended the c ,,_~on of en " cion

or entated" bloc. lhis it is submi ed is a

dengeroUS misnomer becauee it implie the c. ea ion

f an organ1

.tion or mas. of people uhO have

been prepared a d rained to adop g,oY me~,

no matter hou illegel , no metter hoU desperete.

But en in ention to creete euch a bloc cannot be

inferred from the ordinary proc.'. of conecl enti.in9

which emoun

' 0 no more hen en attempt to

ln8tl1 8elf

reliance, pride and a renewed concern

in the 1 ck communi y. Such a peycholOgical

re8tructuring does not begin to have nh rent

in it, the promp ing of it, or prep8ratio

for

+urmoil, rio or illegal r09istanc .

10.

A uming that certain of the document or utt ~ance

a G properlY con tru d 8

eonS itu ing an inci .~men

of I ....

• I

,

lo

I wa barn on tha 18 h Augua, 1950 in Alaxandra

Toun hp, Johannaebu I ee ou h up by Y

..ater al grand o' r.er and . y Mn har.

I attended h [ntokozweni Nursary Schuul an Cr

Alexandra ToynshiP, then a pri ary school in

Alaxandra and later he Savent Day Advanl t Church

School in both Alexandra and Orlando Ua t.

2.

3.

Uhen 1 wa 13 yaara old· or rath r 12 Y ar old·

in e rly 1963 w yore re-set led fro- Ala .ndr.

T .,n ip 0 1 pkloo f • lough to ak an lon h.ra

or n incident th will high ight Y parception of

a police an • this had o do w h Y arra.t (rudalY

tha ) on ist ken iden i ty. 1 h a" to hev

a cou ln who 1. y na e. ke • and a w b.ing ought.

by the olic •• Uh n the pollC called dur!" the

d Y th Y did not ind hl in,y (c ll.d)

r ld d our noin h • rly hour 0

h orn!n •

1t wa.bou 2••• wh n we were wo "by t •

no or ou rud ab 82 n nocking 0

• polle on

hl· •· ·

• door • a opened 0 la ..n li in d y

de. nde Aba 0 r- neH" nd .y grand 0 her pain d...

1ft ou • 1 IJ a only r - ou h

r8811aad t lJe no e hey \I r loo ing or t bu

.y cou _n. H r pi f 11 on d r a r and ay

•• lolt I.. I uc eu r8011 e as "gqo a dod ,

IIzokhulu.a pha bil i". ..y " s aka ",a 0 put on

1 / ••••

ror thelong pants and that sealed .Y ra

h culprit.i.pudent polic. ",ar8 conv nc d I

I lol. handcuf fad and •• d. 0 trudg. hrough

h.raiding other

location b rafaat - ha cope w

ho.sa and picking up paopl on t air "wantad 1•

Thia ",ae tt 0hu_ili tin expert n e 8

.Y rrlanda .aw .a in an unk pt condition and b n

prodd d by pol ico •• n , Wo r lnolly won to tho ehoe 0

office at about 07.00 hra. and y ",ara ado i

under 0•• v.randah and w. w.ra furthar ax?O ad 0

y 0- ",ara fro b ten tUhi a an thar. w 0 a ••• d 0 ba in

I poka to 0

ch rga, about Y r r a t. t axpl Inad to i. 1

qu lif1 t.o b n th raa nd Y na e nd 8 a ",ar

'tafl ctad on h hOU a par i i ad t ly

r al d th blund l' and h h ould r pr a d

thO who ar1' d .. nd la 'lo. I ca

giva a nu b r 0 axa pla 0 c de " r I

u rad hu il tion t nds 0 ha pol c an.

lough o add ha uch parlonce ar eo onp ca

4.

I a tended the Orlando ~e

I .a tr lcula ted ther. Artar Matr icula t1ng lOC m•

• clerk", h FrankiDile (p y.) Li.it.d and later

\Ii k cl IIt the inin9 & M., ur ctur inn Co.

In ( anderon tein.

5.

uring 1970 I ~~e nQti,tAd that 1 h.d a tr.ce or TB

and 1 ",aa treated as n a.bul,tory pa ien a

8 rag",anath Hoap1t 1 nd he local clinic. I then

atarted ael ng 1 dias clo hing p rt tiMa, pri •• rily

living and secondly to aavto be able to .ake

a.nough 0 babi o go to Unlversi ty. ~~ ~ rkct

",.8 in and ound Th bi.a and 0 her alae ::eae.

6.

Our ng 1972 1th L • thuli-ka-Shezi in The •

b • ",ho • Jl -- t ._. h u 8 h ari UIC.-,-u ...", .,

Pr d nt 0 SPC brie .d 9 n rally • ou

aec. H v ually ·lgn d n a epe bar and

9 v. copy or the Con i u ion.

7. / ••••

\

/to hi.

la I.. "'elol

by ft

1018 rand

ap

t

8.

0" .y r.t~rn 'roan~_ bou thPa

4,;,. Bile tonore

tno .".y of1

I r e.l" Cl thethUll ...k .... Sh zI.

el the 'uner I hfOlloW1ngP 0Pl ft.

t IIICOffIn

o C/o ho o.

to / ••••

7.

rt wa th n cl r 8 PC u bo Y

which ai.ad a uni ing 81 c paopl- n 0U"l i

voic- that will p ak gainst the ill an avils

of South Af'ri 1t w s ..y concarn or.y popI

that apurrad a on to work and rl tor th

1iber tion un de he aagia8 (7) of' h epc y

e 0 ng in it. This w 8de p rticularly aa,

beoausa 1t waa, as far as 1 knaw, a 1 gal and

•

The let meeting of significanca or BPC which I

att ndad wa . ha fir National Cong a

~a •• anakraal on the 15th 0 ca bar, 1972. 1 was

only ob~orv r th re. Fro the b ginning I b -

longed to the The bi • Br nehd 1 .y job,

in .y epara ti a, to talk to oth r about the epc

and t Y to lndueto nrol vlth the 8PC.

9.

On y r the BPe tDngt 1. ree lv d he

1. va 0 hu i·. -Sh zl.

u p.

I n ur lly a . end d h un r 0110\11 0

w a end ar r t a tongt U 1 rri ved hi

ho people v re 11 p- i e l- a do 0 ga

o / ." •

/

(a1

to hilft and joined he proe s ion. Ther af .ar

forw 1 rt/the c urch wh a • .rvic "'. a

conduc d

by f. thar " r)( , a i te P i st , F r0'" h Chure

nd ".th.bul. - the SR p aidan

.poka, •• 1nl, about ~thull. rather "or' orrlc'a od at

tho gr.va

y.rd. Art.r the grav h.d b.en covarad

there waa .n • biry th t wae placed a_anget

l . IIJf) ,., fJ'j, ,

tha wr.atha

_ lt wa • rar larg.r alz than tho

a~hlblta tho •• =11.~ad to have ba.n dlatr nu ad

t tha gr.va

,ard. t did not aaa any dl.tribut on

or pa.phl.ta

0 hetwia.. I would hava racalvad on.

LO.

10.poln d Ad.inletraltV.

Aaaiatant

to tha 5 cr.tary-Gan r 1 or BPe - 5ipho

Buthalezi

• Yhila I hald th poat or Ad lnlatratl vO

Aaeiatant w receivedlet .1' fro'" preaidant

Loopold 5 dar songhor whOhad baon lnvi ad to ba th• S cond sPt tongre e. lh.

gu et peak I' at t.r was the h. could not.f act 0 hia replY/ he S at. Pr. id nt,att nd a he waa hOS ing t

Jl fouche. 1h1 w 11 1 0 P ove to be • lie the

state' ub is ion bout u ain .1ning cotrespond nc.

with foreign b. ed p ople 0 tile to the Republic.

(rur h r Par icul r- tp.9. re 2( ) .

11. / ••••

wa. Ton.oed by .e ahe s. in y .nd I hand dcapla

i i .

I want 0 d 1 lol. h 8 incid h 1

•I II)

n n

• ern Town hip n the 24 or 27 h ave ber.

1 s :ua h 1 was t t tell nd h.t

\aI/O Daan lireyliny óiiórched ,.Il r nd h w

round ay e",befshlP ca U. C..t..!.~lt r.': non .e.

12.

I now want to deal lollth tha Sacond Annual Congre

ur the epe hald at S • Pe ar' Sa.in.ry, Ha. ans-

kraal in Oece.ber, 1973. I t wa. t this ConOra••

where I "'8. elected tha secratary-Caneral of the

.ova nt. ~ay 1 JUS ~oint out h ra ha there wa.

no parrot.anc• of "Shanti" s .ppe.ring on the

Ag "da at this Congr s. The unveil ng of "thuli-ka-

Shezi' 8 tOMbatone did tek P ce in The.bis

rur her 1 would lik. ~O pol t nu har. tha epe l.2

he. (SPC l.2) to b. di tribu ed al th unv I11ng

or the to bs ona. 1 wae a two P g. docu.ent

that

t. d bee. nt' pared by t & 1973 epe Execu iv. and

r r ad or i ece on. I no ru tne

t I. doeu· an "I po d to Br neh • for e

foll0 ,1.ng y er 1 wa 8 0 be t " s.eretary-C aral

and th r· or t po i la ror cort· pondence and I

of 1. t to tho "Iwere laaving for The bi58 for

never / ••••

nev u n ore

I no", ",.n 0 d 1 1 0 0 • ocu n

•• en 9 r 0 9 abov n Lon Conqr 8 - ept •

...cce ti Ann Th i copy 0 Cf) on •

R u r 8bied 8 h Co 9

At ention i being drawn 0 • R.por 0' th

-/(' publica ione to •• l sion. Th cl rly how

struc ur the waa to b follo,", d ",1 th r. Ida 0

the iasuing of n w 1 tt r e end/or publiC on iii

th n•• a ar ~hA aec , This show he E tb! G

.nd other pTOPO ed naw l.t ar cou.ld nul b. c r

wera not y.t ept docu ant • The er nc r port ye

to prov • 0 th S •• ub 18S10n the 1...

baen • recur Ing t e in he proe eding 0 our

(ii~_f.f._,tf.~;" org ne nd brench ing 0 dol

Call it the act 118g d 0 p , 0' th fur h.r

p r icu1 r s , par IS • 2(bb) - ( ) .

14.

1 no., .,an to deal ",1 h 0 0 0 •

Ra oth b Tiro' runerel il .. t _f~_!,"At~ !"'1.1 .,.,

1974 t In 80 n •• The 0 • 0" I 1 r u d

y pllc io down 0 h v a pa 0 p t 1 ing

0 r v 0 Bo '" na d 0 1 could 0 • d •

.0

I

runatal. 1 ~a to tt nd on b hal' or tha 8pe.

ever 18a , 1 aen a ma on h 1 or h. 8pe

rs on p.4a or Ann xur a 4. ThB hen

a ape. Rev bel n Coop r , had aeked ~e to

llo~ed to attend. We had (..t cutive

JO'burg/Ourban o.atime in february, 1974

k the is ~hera 1 h.nded hi. the copy or

e that waa aent to eotawana. The .eaaeQe

in figurative t.rMe an with a lot or

One hae to underatand the tradition.l

an Afr ican funeral, eapaciall y that 0 f •

ierarchy. Ha would have eo a or h aub-

ad 0 be buried along with hi. as hie

to tha "other world". Thafa is thereror.,

ion or killing 0' Uhit 8. lougho add

nd d the comma oration rvica that W.8

;lata.

15.

0 d.al w1th Hart! inoh' rip ovar ••••:'0 Co ti tution only the 8tion.l

pow d to u dr ! 'or t • P •

I iv. a ing - e.rly In 19 4 - w agt ad

. ra oure. nd a8 is h a 10 .1

fund-r i Ing. Th P\I

o 00- Ina 11 er or by div dual • bare

of / ••

funeral. I was to a tt nd on behal f or the epC.

&verthe18a , I e an a ",a ag 0 b f of' h. epC

which pp.ar8 en p.48 of Annexure 4. The h n

Pro. of the epe, R.vahalan Cooper, had 8ked me to

prepar .n • t' cl 011 T ro ' 8 funeral - hoping that 1

would be allow doe tend. Ua had n Executlv

aeating In Jo' burg/Durban aoeetiMe in February, 1974

and 1 think that ia where 1 handed hiM the copy ofThe e888ge

the •• aa8g. that W88 8en to B t uan

i couchad in f igur ti ve t.r.a .nd with a lot of

1.8gary. One haa to underat nd L la tra

ional

aatting o' an •• rican runeral, especially the of a

Chi.' or hierarchy. H. would have aOD• or his aub-

ject

killed to be buriad .long wi h hia aa hi'

r tinua .nto th .other world". Thare is tharefora,

no .ugg.a

ion o' killing 0' Uhi a. 1 ought to add

th.t 1 at ndad th co .a.oration a.rvica

that w.'

h id ln soweto •

.' 15.

1 now w nt 0 d al with Harri ingh' a trip ovara a.

ccording to he Con tltution onlY tha .tlon•1

Orgen i pow red to u dr t for t • Ope.

t n (x cu lv. ing - • 1 ln 1974 - '" gr .d

to pool our r 80U ce nd 88 ition 1

Org nl r wit und ..r i ing. T • Pra id n w

0 co-ord ne all h er ot by 1 ~dividu.l • b.r

ot / •••.

0 c Lv Th P id n"o r d

•I"

th r oul • !O 0 v C) rOl' ov 0

fund-raia on our b ar ..

Presid'," infor.ed a t e ould p c --~QU -

unde hrou il lie pne0 i t e Rel iuO

orr ieer in Duro Il •T d' ~ tGCe v 0 on Y I" ".:U

.lots f'ro. ourben r(Jug hf' po "'. plu I

in 5 t\ tOO. a • f'ro It Pro. nd ce -

pr h."eiv full rep r u 0 i 1 ou. Unro· ..y •

",e w.l'e _t'Tee ed b. or he ( cu iv eoul d

c .p~l COMpoeite repor or con L li:' •

Qt.,.,-r...:i h. ",hol r r a g en or 1-\ r r i t" I" h '

tr p overe 8e ""ndled by !Jr

IIInd h

h ~, Pro. - a8 f r • 1 eoul ga h r •

16.

f1 no"" ",an t 0 d ui r de t our ion 1 0 Le

by h r euri Y polie Th .rli'. r.id "".r

i une, 1 13 h h Seer ...G I" ra , ,"phO

au h81 z1, og hLo 1 org nie. •

"oslbudogan • "" t

a oed • J." · Sq r • T •

. 0- org i t "". eubs.qu n y co vie ,d und.r

" -h T trori

u b r ° oo""v-:~ ",er

con 1. ca d 1'0 ° let rai w r

in ugu 197 . 1 ""d 1 i r iv i an

dl· .. ·

r o a 1 ara con-nu b t" 0 00

rieca ad - hey h d

r hi , he 0 ic

Ln October/ ova b.r.

gain conr e t d tt nti

on ha P 1'.2 n 1.

r o b r i • 1n

973 nd 0 a docu.n w 1"

u ~ n 0 J. V. Squ r.

Paas law ••

In May, 197~ he orric.a wer. onca aga n r idad

and a lot or docu.ent~ w.r. conr i ca .d includingolJr t . I a.0•• or the xh bi te ow bGrora n

gain taken on this occa ion tu J.V. Squer wh.r.

1 was .e.ault.d, in .r ali., and tore cl tG ube_t

.ra or the Ex.cut .V8en anri

.ign that docu nt on whichh.d witten.

17.

I would li to poin out here h on • 11 thea •

ece ione the po' ic. eft • under the pra xt th

th.y w.r. \.rw.stigating a cri • and thay would

t conti ca t.a the docu .nte. Th y would nor 11

r urn tha docu nta thin d Y or two wi thou any

charg. b lng preferrad on anybody. t • edoCU anta e n b id 0 b

surprl ing th t ha.aplY bee u • Lh

. I '....

" • Gou rn.n of 0% hiqu - r r 11 e .olidarlty wi h

18.

I n o doel ith h Sixth General S ude 5n

Council (GSe) ha wa held in July t 1974. y

attendance at this GSe was rather v.ry sporadic ror

1 was only thera on two avanin a-aa ~ad 8 ti ht

ach.dul. at tha orrica. The only ruil aa.aion I

attended waa the laat day of thB cse - and I .ay hava

.a t in a co •• i aaion on spar t or religion the t day.

I had r ce ved an inviAation lo lt8nd &6 n bs V~

for and on behal r 0 r the BPe.

19.

1 now went to deal wi th an 1 d.nt In July, 1974

involving the wi tness Saoka about the all.ged

aMuggling of Sipho Buthelezi into Botswana.

20.

On a Tueaday artarnoon 1 had left tha BPe head

office a 25 Fox Street and gone to th.1it office

at Diakonia Hou.a in BraaMfontein where 1 had a

number ot (d ant) phon calls to _ake. The Rev.

"ayathul and Seak who were bo h training 0 be

pr et, ware in th building a d t Y joined

ua wh.re W8 wer t k1~g~! , y colleagu •••!! .

1 understood fro t hat t Y h d arrivad i

Jo' burg / ••••

Jo'burq on h d Y or nd y old a

Siphc Bu ha1az1 w in . ow 0 no l t

to vary n gh on hi e w y 0 0 w n I d no :1.ror eo.ati.e that 5 pho had D en conv c ad ror

contravention or hie Sann ng Ord r n a under

a euepended ean enc

etaying in SoA.

1 0 e w unh ppy bou

2! .

Rev. ~aye hul told e h Si pho wan t d to tal to

.e and 0 givII "i ,""truct.on~ (wd"'co) h c"u a ha

rora I h d held ehad b en Secra ry-Gen ra

po s t 0 T

t a offi

dvico concer h • iniatr tion or

22.

1 wan t ou t o SO\Jsto ",i th the two gan la en

(~8ya hula and Saoks) and. t Sipho h r • 1h Y

were keen to get going nd Sipho nd 1 did no h va

ti •• to dl cuae attera I drove wi h the in h c r

h 1 ad o .a on the way. R \I • aye ul

sta ad b hind nd w 1 hl h hou • 1 waa

\Il. hi (Si nc ) 0 1 ny u o ha t) hi t-

a ve h eoun y, bu bee u 1 h o b pr 1 d

of e rt 1 d lnl r Lv r r rdi ha 0 le 0

2 0 / o. 0 •

2 .\Jhen w 0 0 na r h bo r: 0,

h would go cro !!S nd e c , '"i H fry

n wen ulu boc u Sip 0 d "h uoul 11

5eOKl1 0 (} \.I H rry aaseg . T e O5e ge IJ -

th .1pho wa3 cw~.inl'\ C' TI" "1411, YOU d rry

h il!! ~t: .. AA C; oho d d no know e w and h w n d

Harry 0 ge him he 6 a u of 8 politic 1 r rug It •

24.

5 oka ",ant o,r in 0 Bo awana end e .e beck end said

H rry had !!S id h ipho ehould aa to i solr

Id th t Her y could no h lp hi_ h ra. On hearing

the t, Slpho ",an of f in 0 the nuen anu w "':-0\:0 b9,.1<

0 Jo' t' 9 • H l(ln . n 0 th bu h on ha S. . 8 d

of the border.

25.

I now ",ant to da 1 with tha National Councila ing

and the Se icon held at Ha .anakr 1 t the nd 0

Auguat, 1974. I loln to d al ~rsi h 8a".·.

evidence i c nn ction 'loll h ttlia. 1 n tu lly

attended th ational Council eeting bu 1 did no

nd ny co i ' on - thougn 1 "'ti__ ,...... 0 ti rlnQ.... ..,-- -

th :r port b ck of on or 0 co 1 10n8. lh r

rther no co 1 ren on Blac youth 8 8 ".

a1.d. / ••••

id. Th !5 ion 1 ce nci •• ing '" r ly

r ou in ting ",hich "'. h.ldi

e s t.he Selaicon • 1 '" nt to ra r op. of Exhlbi

BPC. 0•• which doa not sp. k of Black you h

cOIII,1i8 lun.

26.

1 explha t a tional Counc 11 "aetings

J are only for ation 1 Ex.cU ive ~. ber~ 0 C

plusAnch Cheir en nd confirmed conveners of

Br nch8a. (Saa "inut. or Fourth atiDnal CDUcl1

~•• tinQ. "arch, 1914). lh public 1 oxcludod a

f et that th me.b ra and tho 8 0r P op le

ar Dth r epe ember. lh se. icon wa. f ere

•• b r e nd ny Dthor P opl. -. b r e Dr tho public -

who ",ere invited.

27.

lhoro ia, thar rDr , no hing lni t r bou tho

nding tho Sa Icon wor 1 t Dut Dr thO • lDnal

Counei tinge

28.

e ndly, 1 wano d 1 wl H r i in •

vid no

thion 1 Council

wi h r g rd 0 proc ding

InQ prop r. 1 1 nu h

r , ehlo khulu

" / ...·

Collection Number: AD1719

State v S Cooper and 8 others.

PUBLISHER: Publisher:- Historical Papers, University of the Witwatersrand Location:- Johannesburg ©2012

LEGAL NOTICES:

Copyright Notice: All materials on the Historical Papers website are protected by South African copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, or otherwise published in any format, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner.

Disclaimer and Terms of Use: Provided that you maintain all copyright and other notices contained therein, you may download material (one machine readable copy and one print copy per page) for your personal and/or educational non-commercial use only.

People using these records relating to the archives of Historical Papers, The Library, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, are reminded that such records sometimes contain material which is uncorroborated, inaccurate, distorted or untrue. While these digital records are true facsimiles of paper documents and the information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to be accurate and reliable, Historical Papers, University of the Witwatersrand has not independently verified their content. Consequently, the University is not responsible for any errors or omissions and excludes any and all liability for any errors in or omissions from the information on the website or any related information on third party websites accessible from this website.

DOCUMENT DETAILS:

Document ID:- AD1719-H Document Title:- Advice on Evidence