clrv la nuc

33
Walnut Rootstocks for Blackline Infected Areas Janet Caprile Farm Advisor UC Cooperative Extension Contra Costa & Alameda Counties Tri County Walnut Institute March 8, 2007

Upload: oleg-tirsina

Post on 13-Sep-2015

231 views

Category:

Documents


11 download

DESCRIPTION

cherry leaf roll virus in walnut

TRANSCRIPT

  • Walnut Rootstocks for Blackline Infected Areas

    Janet CaprileFarm Advisor

    UC Cooperative ExtensionContra Costa & Alameda

    Counties

    Tri County Walnut Institute March 8, 2007

  • Walnut BlacklineDisease

    Cherry leafroll virus Infected pollen Infects female bloom Virus enters tree English is tolerant

    No symptoms

    Black/Paradox are hypersensitive Virus kills cells at union

  • Walnut Blackline Disease

  • Seedling Rootstocks

    LLHBlack Line Tolerance

    MHMLArmillaria Tolerance

    MLLPhytophthora Tolerance

    MLLNematode Tolerance

    LHMLCrown Gall Tolerance

    MHLSalt Tolerance

    HHMGraftability

    HMMGrowth/Vigor

    PARADOXBLACKENGLISHCHARACTERISTICS

    L = Low M = Moderate H = High

  • Chandler on Seedling EnglishSan Joaquin County (Joe Grant)

    Tree Growth

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998

    T

    r

    u

    n

    k

    c

    r

    o

    s

    s

    s

    e

    c

    t

    i

    o

    n

    a

    l

    a

    r

    e

    a

    ,

    c

    m

    2 SpanishEurekaManregianRonde de MontignacCorne

  • Chandler on Seedling EnglishSan Joaquin County (Joe Grant)

    YIELDS

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    Eureka Manregian Spanish R d Mont. Corne

    T

    o

    n

    s

    p

    e

    r

    a

    c

    r

    e

    '93 '95 '97 Total

  • Seedling English vs. Seedling ParadoxSan Joaquin County (Joe Grant)

    TREE GROWTH

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

    T

    r

    u

    n

    k

    c

    r

    o

    s

    s

    s

    e

    c

    t

    i

    o

    n

    a

    l

    a

    r

    e

    a

    ,

    c

    m

    2

    ParadoxCarpathianWaterlooSunlandEurekaRussianChandler

  • Seedling English vs. Seedling ParadoxSan Joaquin County (Joe Grant)

    CHANDLER YIELDS

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    Paradox Carpathian Russian Waterloo Sunland Eureka Chandler

    T

    o

    n

    s

    p

    e

    r

    a

    c

    r

    e

    1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

    a

    b b b b bc

    c

  • New Rootstock Options

    Walnut Improvement ProgramUniversity of California, Davis

    Breeder: Dr. Gale McGranahan

    Improved rootstock breeding and selection program Paradox selections from the diversity study Blackline tolerant rootstocks

    Backcrosses: [Black x English] x English Own rooted English varieties (no rootstock/graft union)

    All Require clonal propagation difficult on walnut! Rooted cuttings Tissue culture (AKA Micro-propagation)

  • Micropropagation of clonal rootstock

  • New Rootstock OptionsWalnut Improvement Program, UCD

    Breeder: Dr. Gale McGranahan

    Blackline tolerant rootstocks Backcrosses: [Black x English] x English

    1st available for testing from UCD in 1995 Commercially available in 2008????

    Own rooted English varieties 1st available for testing from UCD in 1991 Commercially available in 1999

  • Sutter-Yuba Co. Rootstock Trial1991 - ongoing

    Farm Advisor: Janine Hasey Chandler

    Own root tissue culture no graft Paradox seedling graft union

    Sandy loam soil

  • TREE GROWTH

    0102030405060708090

    1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

    T

    r

    u

    n

    k

    C

    i

    r

    c

    u

    m

    f

    e

    r

    e

    n

    c

    e

    (

    c

    m

    )

    Own Rooted Paradox

    Sutter-Yuba Co. Rootstock Trial1991 - ongoing

  • Yield

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

    T

    o

    n

    s

    /

    a

    c

    r

    e

    Own Rooted Paradox

    Sutter-Yuba Co. Rootstock Trial1991 - ongoing

  • Nematode damage

  • 01000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    9000

    10000

    J

    U

    L

    Y

    1

    9

    9

    9

    O

    C

    T

    O

    B

    E

    R

    1

    9

    9

    9

    M

    A

    R

    C

    H

    2

    0

    0

    0

    J

    U

    L

    Y

    2

    0

    0

    0

    N

    O

    V

    E

    M

    B

    E

    R

    2

    0

    0

    0

    A

    P

    R

    I

    L

    2

    0

    0

    1

    N

    O

    V

    E

    M

    B

    E

    R

    2

    0

    0

    1

    M

    A

    Y

    2

    0

    0

    2

    OWNROOTED

    PARADOX

    ERROR BARS INDICATE 1 STANDARD ERROR

    0.05 0.05

    0.05

    0.050.05

    0.05

    0.05

    Lesion Nematode per Liter of Soil

    Own Rooted vs. Seedling ParadoxSutter-Yuba County (Janine Hasey)

  • Own Root vs. Seedling ParadoxSutter-Yuba County (Janine Hasey)

    Summary Own Rooted Chandler

    has potential to outperform Paradox more susceptible to nematodes than Paradox

  • University of California Cooperative Extension Agriculture & Natural Resources Central Valley Region

    Joe Connell, Farm Advisor, Butte Co.Bill Olson, Ex- Farm Advisor, Butte Co.

    Cooperators:Samuel Metcalf, Joe Limberg, CSUC Farm, and Diamond Foods

    Butte County Rootstock Trial1999 - ongoing

  • Butte County Rootstock Trial1999 - ongoing

    TREATMENTS:

    1. Chandler own rooted via tissue culture.

    2. Chandler grafted on own rooted Chandler.

    3. Chandler grafted on english Waterloo.

    4. Chandler grafted on common paradox.

    5. Chandler grafted on Trinta paradox.

    6. Chandler grafted on Px1 clonal paradox.

  • Butte County Rootstock Trial1999 - ongoing

    Mean Trunk Cross Sectional Area (cm 2)

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    'Chandler'own rooted

    'Chandler'grafted

    English'Waterloo'

    CommonParadox

    'Trinta'Paradox

    'Px1'Paradox

    Rootstock

    C

    m

    2

    2004 2005 2006

    a

    a

    a

    cc

    c

    bb

    bb

    b b

    bc

    bcbc

    bc

    bbc

  • Butte County Rootstock Trial1999 - ongoing

    6th to 8th Leaf Mean Yield per Tree

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    'Chandler'own

    rooted

    'Chandler'grafted

    English'Waterloo'

    CommonParadox

    'Trinta'Paradox

    'Px1'Paradox

    Rootstock

    P

    o

    u

    n

    d

    s

    I

    n

    s

    h

    e

    l

    l

    2004 2005 2006

    aaa

    b

    a

    ns

    ns

    a

  • Butte County Rootstock Trial1999 - ongoing

    Walnut Quality: % Edible Kernel

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    55

    'Chandler'own rooted

    'Chandler'grafted

    English'Waterloo'

    CommonParadox

    'Trinta'Paradox

    'Px1'Paradox

    Rootstock

    P

    e

    r

    c

    e

    n

    t

    2004 2006

    cd d

    abc

    NS

    ab ab

  • Butte County Rootstock Trial1999 - ongoing

    Walnut Quality: % Extra Light Kernels

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    'Chandler'own rooted

    'Chandler'grafted

    English'Waterloo'

    CommonParadox

    'Trinta'Paradox

    'Px1'Paradox

    Rootstock

    P

    e

    r

    c

    e

    n

    t

    2004 2006

    a

    ab

    b b

    ab

    b

    aa

    a

    b b

    ab

  • Butte County Rootstock Trial1999 - ongoing

    Walnut Quality: Relative Value

    0.82

    0.84

    0.86

    0.88

    0.9

    0.92

    0.94

    0.96

    0.98

    1

    'Chandler'own rooted

    'Chandler'grafted

    English'Waterloo'

    CommonParadox

    'Trinta'Paradox

    'Px1'Paradox

    Rootstock

    V

    a

    l

    u

    e

    $

    /

    L

    b

    .

    2004 2006

    a

    bb

    b

    ab ab

    aab

    bc

    cd

    d

    bc

  • Butte County Rootstock Trial1999 - ongoing

    Own rooted trees (vs. all grafted trees) Size: Bigger Yields: same once orchard filled Catkins: the catkins Leafing: Delayed about 5 days

  • Butte County Rootstock Trial1999 - ongoing

    English vs. Paradox Size: grafted English ~ all Paradox Yields: same once orchard filled % Ex Light: all English > all Paradox $/Lb: all English > all Paradox

    8th leaf & 3rd harvest

  • Stanislaus Co. Rootstock Trial1999 - ongoing

    Farm Advisor: Kathy Kelley Anderson Location: Modesto Jr College Soil: Hanford/Dinuba sandy loam Treatments: Vina on:

    Paradox (Vlach) clonal Paradox (84-121) clonal Paradox seedling OR Vina clonal not grafted OR Vina grafted clonal OR Chandler clonal English (Waterloo) seedling

  • Stanislaus Co. Rootstock Trial1999 - ongoing

    2006 Tree Growth

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    Paradox(Vlach)

    Paradox(84121)

    Paradox(Seedling)

    OR Vina OR Vina(Grafted)

    OR Chandler English(Seedling)

    T

    r

    u

    n

    k

    C

    i

    r

    c

    u

    m

    f

    e

    r

    e

    n

    c

    e

    a a ab abc

    cd bcdd

  • Stanislaus Co. Rootstock Trial1999 - ongoing

    2006 Green Harvest Weight

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    Paradox(Vlach)

    Paradox(84121)

    Paradox(Seedling)

    OR Vina OR Vina(Grafted)

    OR Chandler English(Seedling)

    T

    o

    n

    s

    /

    a

    c

    r

    e

    a ababc bc

    cbc bc

  • Rootstock Trial SummarySacramento Valley Own Rooted Chandlers1. Bigger trees & higher yields than seedling

    Paradox until the nematodes hit!

    2. Bigger but same yields as seedling or clonalParadox or seedling English

    All English had improved color & value over all Paradox

    No. San Joaquin Valley Own Rooted Vinas Slightly smaller than Paradox & slightly larger than

    grafted English - NS Yields similar to other English & Paradox but < Vlach

  • More UC Rootstock Trials 2002: San Joaquin Co (Joe Grant)

    OR Chandler 2002: Sutter-Yuba Co (Janine Hasey)

    OR Chandler, OR Vina 2003: UC Davis

    OR Phytophthora screening trial 2003: UC Kearney Ag Center, Parlier

    OR nematode screening trial 2005: Contra Costa Co. (Janet Caprile)

    Blackline tolerant WIP backcrosses

  • Janet Caprile, Farm AdvisorUC Cooperative Extension, Contra Costa County