china’s 21 st century maritime silk road and the south china sea conflict david arase professor of...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
China’s 21st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea
ConflictDavid Arase
Professor of International PoliticsJohns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing Center
“MARITIME SILK ROAD” AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA:
PRESENT SITUATION AND PROSPECTS International Conference organized by the University of Social Sciences &
Humanities (USSH), VNU-Hanoi Hilton Hotel, Hanoi
26-27 November 2015
![Page 2: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
China’s Two Silk Roads• “One Belt-One Road” initiative
– Silk Road Economic Belt• Land transportation corridors across Eurasia
– 21st Century Maritime Silk Road• China builds Eurasian maritime rim port network
• Integration via project engineering & policy dialogue, not legal engineering– Infrastructure projects, not WTO-like liberalization– “He who pays the piper names the tune”
• New Development Banks– Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank ($50-100 b.)– Silk Road Fund ($40 b.)
• Link Chinese and Eurasian development futures– Serve’s China’s comprehensive security– Develops Eurasian market for next levels of Chinese exports, FDI, finance, RMB
use– Gives China political leverage, great power status
![Page 3: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Eurasian geopolitical theory
![Page 7: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
SILK ROAD AGENDA IN ASEAN
Construction and management of land-sea transportation network that benefits China
![Page 8: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
XJP visits Indonesia in 2013
• Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank– Not just ASEAN
• 21st Century Maritime Silk Road initiative– Not just ASEAN
• Community of Common Destiny– China needs followers– Start with ASEAN & Central
Asia– Includes all Silk Road countries
![Page 9: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Maritime Silk Road Port Projects
![Page 10: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
China’s planned high speed railway network
![Page 11: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
China-Bay of Bengal corridor
![Page 12: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
BCIM Economic Corridor
![Page 13: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
China-Arabian Sea corridor
![Page 14: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The neglected East-West axis of connectivity
![Page 15: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
LKQ at 2013 China-ASEAN summit
2 principles: a package deal• Mutual trust & security
– Political-security partnership
• Economic cooperation– Deeper interdependence and
integration
7 policy coordination agendas• China-ASEAN treaty of good
neighborliness & cooperation• Security cooperation
– Defense ministers meeting– More mil-mil cooperation
• Upgraded CAFTA• AIIB • More RMB use• Maritime cooperation• Cultural exchange
![Page 16: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
LKQ at 2014 ASEAN-China summit
• Reiterates 2013 policy agenda
• Notes progress– CAFTA upgrade– AIIB– Think-tank network
• But no progress on security-political agenda
• South China Sea obstacles– Confrontations w/
Philippines & Vietnam– China changing status
quo in SCS– No progress in COC– No compromise over
territorial sovereignty– Jin SSBM operational
![Page 17: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
China gets ASEAN to ignore SCS dispute
• Side-track the dispute– Avoid SCS issue in all high level ASEAN meetings– Otherwise economic cooperation and peaceful,
non-coercive relations with China could be upset– Overall peace and stability in SCS is “jointly
upheld” by China and ASEAN, not by outside powers
![Page 18: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
What China wants
• Unlink SCS problems from silk road agenda• Sign new treaty of good-neighbourliness, friendship,
and cooperation• Create ministerial maritime cooperation forum• ASEAN-China Defence Ministers’ Meeting; • More mil-mil cooperation• Upgraded China-ASEAN Free Trade Area• Bilateral (China-ASEAN) investment treaty. • Endorsements of, support for Chinese initiatives
![Page 19: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Chinese goals in SE Asia• Wants – Isolation of rival SCS claimants– Recognition of sovereignty in SCS via bilateral
negotiation (divide & rule)ASEAN recognition of regional primacy
– ASEAN bandwagoning (economic then security-political)• Does not want – ASEAN collective bargaining– ASEAN balancing, hedging among major powers
• Not ASEAN centrality, but China-ASEAN centrality as basis for regional order
![Page 20: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
China’s political-security agenda
• New Asian Security Concept– May 2014 CICA summit
• Community of Common Destiny– China-centered
• China is ringmaster• China defends CCD
• “Finlandization?”– Do, say nothing to
displease China
![Page 21: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
US INTEREST IN THE SCS
Free trade rules and open unhindered commercial access to world’s most important growth region
![Page 22: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
![Page 23: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Freedom of Navigation
UNCLOS Art. 58: In the exclusive economic zone, all States, whether coastal or land-locked, enjoy, subject to the relevant provisions of this Convention, the freedoms referred to in article 87 of navigation and overflight and of the laying of submarine cables and pipelines, and other internationally lawful uses of the sea related to these freedoms, such as those associated with the operation of ships, aircraft and submarine cables and pipelines, and compatible with the other provisions of this Convention.
Innocent Passage
![Page 24: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
FON as a public good
• Maintenance of FON is a public good– Is non-excludable– Is shared at zero marginal cost (free rides!)– Allows everyone to trade freely
• Enforcement via multiple channels– Collective effort– Normative (name-and-shame)– Reciprocity (tit-for-tat)– Self-help– Appeal to international judicial authorities
![Page 25: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
US Pacific Command AOR
![Page 26: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Freedom of navigation permits rapid IPR integration and growth
• All states enjoy right of sea and air transit beyond coastal territory. – FON is a right in EEZs– UNCLOS Art. 58: In the exclusive economic zone, all
States, whether coastal or land-locked, enjoy, subject to the relevant provisions of this Convention, the freedoms referred to in article 87 of navigation and overflight…
• FON is regulated by international legal conventions• Enforcement is needed to make FON a reality
![Page 27: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
![Page 28: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
South China Sea is the IPR pivot
• ASEAN connectivity plan connects East Asia and Indian Ocean region
• Permits formation of a vast economic growth belt
![Page 29: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Who maintains FON when it is challenged?
• A hegemon has a rational incentive to defend FON rights of all states
• What happens after hegemon weakens?– New and old powers that share norms & values can
cooperate– But antagonistic powers will compete for advantage
• US asks China to cooperate, but China refuses• SCS is the test of China’s intentions and a struggle
could change the future of international order
![Page 30: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
![Page 31: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
![Page 32: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
![Page 33: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Chinese aims
• Normalize Chinese occupation, use, and defense of 9 dash line zone– Fishing & energy development– More active coast guard & military patrols– Effective control of foreign presence
• Create a new status quo that others must recognize (or face consequences)
• Gain legal recognition (only via bilateral agreements with each rival claimant)
• Gain national sovereignty over the SCS
![Page 34: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Benefits for China?
• New energy & food resources
• Safe sea lanes and Hainan SSBN base
• Control of first island chain• Platform for distant sea
operations (IOR & WPac)• Leverage over others
dependent on access to SCS• “End cold war thinking”• A regional order governed
by Chinese norms
![Page 35: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
SCS has become a vortex sucking in big power navies
• Democratic powers are hedging against a possible threat to rights and interests by China– US– Japan– India– Australia
![Page 36: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Impact of China’s claim
• Vital SLOCs in SCS must be secured by individual efforts– Inefficient
• Duplication of effort• No sharing of burden
– Self-defeating• Naval competition = less
security = less growth
• Small states lose free ride– Must pay for protection
• Build own navy• Pay a big power for security
Every man for himself!
![Page 37: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
US stake in the SCS
• PACOM needs FON to perform missions
• Alliances and defense partnerships depend on continuing US presence
• $5.3 trillion of trade flows across the SCS
• US cares about the process of resolving territorial disputes, but not who owns which territory
![Page 38: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
US is settling on an approach
• SCS is not a bilateral management issue– It is an IPR issue– US-China collusion, even if it happened, could not secure
their individual interests in this region• How should the US deal with SCS issue?– US strategic primacy has ended – Must accept new limitations– Must accept multilateral governance scheme– Need not accept loss of existing rights & interests– Need not accept end of liberal economic & political order
![Page 39: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
The need for IPR strategy
• Put China’s rise in an IPR strategy framework• Aim for cooperative (multilateral) regional
governance to maintain FON and other legal rights and obligations
• Avoid armed conflict using deterrence, not appeasement
• Assume defensive posture– Cooperate with like-minded partners to defend
legal rights and norms
![Page 40: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Strategic rebalancing progress
• Singapore-U.S. Strategic Framework Agreement (2005); Strategic Partnership Dialogue, 2012
• Philippines: EDCA, 4/2014• U.S.-Australia Force Posture Agreement, 8/2014• U.S.- Indonesia Comprehensive Partnership Agreement,
2010; Defense Institution Reform Initiative, 1/2015• US-Japan Defense Cooperation Guidelines, 4/2015• India: 10-year defense framework agreement, 6/2015• Vietnam: Joint Vision Statement on Defense Relations,
6/2015
![Page 41: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
What difference can ASEAN make?
![Page 42: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
ASEAN cannot guarantee the security of its members
• Most members face no loss of rights or territory– So not motivated to resist
• SCS members face large direct/indirect losses– But unsure how to act, no framework for
consultation• Each member must find its own solution• Thus, China’s maritime grab meets little
resistance
![Page 43: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
SE Asian claimant states’ problem
• Share basic interest– Five could lose maritime
claims (national territory or EEZ) to China
– All risk losing important rights and protections of international law if Chinese hegemony is established
– All have reason to align with pro-FON powers
• But lack unified stance– They face different
degrees of loss– Capacities to resist differ– China has different
degrees of leverage over them
– Their affinities with external powers are different
![Page 44: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
What options do they have?
• Appease demanding power
• Find another power for protection– Formal security treaty to
gain a security guarantee• Philippines w/ US
– Implicit security tie• E.g., encourage
economic, military presence to deter threatening power
• Build own capacity to deter aggression
• Appeal to international community– Like-minded countries– International tribunals– International public opinion– International NGOs
• Seek external aid– Diplomatic support– Material resources
![Page 45: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Devising a self-help strategy• Geography gives each local state a share of control over
SCS• US and China are in a standoff• Whether and how each local state uses this leverage will
decide:– How much China succeeds– How much the US succeeds– How large a role India, Japan, and Australia can play– Whether they lose rights– Survival of FON and international rule of law – The future of international governance
![Page 46: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
China needs followers to be a leader
• China needs SCS states’ cooperation to: – Avoid appeal to third-party adjudication, arbitration,
or mediation to settle disputes with China– Gain recognition of the 9-dash line claims– End US strategic access to the region– Enjoy the right to manage Asian affairs
• Is willing to pay money to own SCS• But SCS states will lose sovereignty & some
independence
![Page 47: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
The US also needs help to succeed• Small state cooperation is needed to maintain– Strategic access– Economic access– Political influence– The continuing force of international norms and
institutions• But US only needs willing partners with shared
interests• Cooperation deters lawless behavior and should
aim for shared regional governance
![Page 48: China’s 21 st Century Maritime Silk Road and the South China Sea Conflict David Arase Professor of International Politics Johns Hopkins SAIS—Hopkins Nanjing](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/5697bff81a28abf838cbf435/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Key points
• The Indo-Pacific is one strategic & economic space• The lynchpin is the South China Sea• Geo-politics aside, IPR has a bright future• But rise of assertive China creates geopolitical
competition in SCS• Best future scenario is multilateral regional
governance according to Int’l Law• Local states will tip the balance in the SCS and
shape the future of the IPR