chem 125 lecture 9 9/22/08 this material is for the exclusive use of chem 125 students at yale and...
Post on 20-Dec-2015
217 views
TRANSCRIPT
Chem 125 Lecture 99/22/08
This material is for the exclusive use of Chem 125 students at Yale and may not
be copied or distributed further.
It is not readily understood without reference to notes from the lecture.
Reward for Finding
Knowledge of Everythinge.g.
Allowed EnergiesStructureDynamicsBonding
Reactivity
Single- vs. Double MinimumFor Hooke's Lawthe Blue Energy
is too Lowand
the Red Energyis too High.
The Correct LowestEnergy must lie
between these values.
Single-Mimimum
Actuallythis is aDouble-
Minimum.
The Blue and Reds are correct!
What if the wells were further apart?
Closer wells givelowered minimum energy
and higher next energy
~ same as single-minimum
solution
“Splitting”
in A in B
Wells farapart
Wells farapartT
otal
Ene
rgy
of P
arti
cle
"Mixing" localized s for double minimum
Wells closetogether
in AB
Antibonding
HoldsA & B
together
Black line is energy
Blue line is
Bonding!Sta
bilz
atio
nof
Par
ticl
e
Dynamics:Tunneling
Dynamics:Tunneling
The word "Tunneling" is one of my pet peeves:
It is misleading and mischievous because it suggests that there is something weird about the potential energy in a double minimum.
.
In fact it simply involves the same negative kinetic energy that one sees in the tails of EVERY bounded wavefunction.
The word reveals naiveté about quantum mechanics.
1.4 kcal/molesplitting
~410-14 sec to get from well to well.
Well-to-Well time 510-14 sec
Energy (kcal/mole)Assertion
from time-dependent q. mech.
Dynamics:Tunneling
Reward for Finding
Knowledge of Everythinge.g.
Allowed EnergiesStructureDynamicsBonding
ReactivityComing
soonAfter Exam,
Atoms, Molecules
Morse Quantization
"Erwin" can find s for any complicated V(x)
7 Å
and rank them by energy / "curvature" / # of nodes
Don’t cross 0 in “forbidden” continuum.
Don’t slope out and away in “forbidden” continuum.
What’s wrong with this picture?
EvenMultipleMinima
This curve-tracing recipe won't work in more dimensions (e.g. 3N).
But Schrödinger had no trouble finding solutions for the 3-dimensional H atom, because they were familiar from a long tradition of physicists studying waves.
When there are many curvatures, it is not clear how to partition the kinetic energy among the different (d2 / dxi
2) / contributions to Etotal.
E. F. F. Chladni(1756-1827)
Acoustics (1803)
e.g. Chladni Figures in 2 Dimensions
SandCollectsin Nodes
Touch inDifferent
Places
Bow inDifferent
Places
Click for Short Chladni Movie (3MB)
Click for Longer Chladni Movie (9.5MB)
Crude Chladni Figures
3 Diameters / 1 Circle3 Circles
1 Diameter / 2 Circles
4 Diameters / 1 Circle from in-class demo
Chladni’sNodal
Figures for a
Thin Disk
Portion inside outer circular nodeCf. http://www.kettering.edu/~drussell/Demos/MembraneCircle/Circle.html
(1,2)
Chladni’sNodal
Figures for a
Thin Disk
Number of Diametrical Nodes
Num
ber of Circular N
odes
PITCH
47 Patterns!
"These pitch relationships agree approximately with the squares of the following numbers:"
Frequency ≈ (Diametrical Nodes + 2 Circular Nodes) 2
Note: Increasing number of ways to get a higher frequencyby mixing different numbers of circles and lines
8 Lines
4 Circles
2 Circles4 Lines3 Circles
2 Lines
1 Circle6 Lines
Num
ber of Circles
Number of Diameters
1 Circle2 Lines
Great Mathematicians Worked on Chladni’s 2-D Problems:
e.g. Daniel Bernoulli
s for one-electron atomsinvolve
“Spherical Harmonics”
(3D-Analogues of Chladni Figures)
3-Dimensional H-Atom Wavefunctions
(,,) = R(r) () ()
Adrien-Marie Legendre(1752 -1833)
() is the normalized“Associated Legendre Polynomial”
Edmond Laguerre(1834-1886)
R(r) is the normalized“Associated Laguerre Function”
Available from other old-time mathematicians
Table for H-like Atoms V(x,y,z) =sqrt(x2 + y2 + z2)
1
simplifies V(r,,) =r
c
Name byquantum numbers (n > l ≥ m)
or by nickname (1s, etc.)
= Rnl(r) lm() m()
product of simple functionsof only one variable each
and
(x,y,z) is very complicated
change coordinate
system:x,y,z r
x
y
z
n
er
Table for H-like Atoms = R(r) () ()
1s
r2Znao
Why instead of r?
Allows using the same e2
for any nuclear charge (Z)and any n.
= K e-/2N.B. No surprise forCoulombic Potential
x
y
z
n
er
Note: all contain (Z / ao)3/2
Squaring gives a number, Z
3 per unit volume (units of probability density)
r2Znao
exp-
r = 2Z
nao
r1H = 2
0.53Å
r1C = 12
0.53Å
All-Purpose Curveshrunk by Z; expanded by n
Å (1sH)
(0.26 Å)
0.5 1.0
Increasing nuclear chargesucks standard 1s function
toward the nucleus
0.1Å (1sC) 0.2
(renormalization keeps probability density
constant) 1/6
6(0.044 Å)
Å (1sC) 0.1 0.2
(0.044 Å)
Different Å scalesCommon Å scale
H1s
C1s
Rel
ativ
e E
lect
ron
Den
sity
+5
0.5 1.0
Increasing nuclear chargesucks standard 1s function
toward the nucleus
0.1 0.2
(renormalization keeps total probability
constant)
Common Å scale
Summary r2Znao
What would the exponential part
of……. look like?
C2s
+5
For Wednesday:
1) Why are there no Chladni Figureswith an odd number of radial
nodes? (e.g. 3 or 5 radii)
2) Why are the first two cells [(0,0) and (1,0)] in Chladni's tables vacant?
3) Compare 1sH with 2sC+5 in Energy
4) Do the 6 atomic orbital problemsClick Here
2
2 2
Table for H-like Atoms
1s = K e-/2
2s = K'(2-) e-/2
Shape of H-like
= K'''( cos()) e-/22pz zGuess what 2px and 2py look like.
Simpler (!) than Erwin 1-D Coulombic
x
y
z
n
er
The angular part of a p orbital
Polar Plot of cos() vs.
0.5- 0.5- 1 0 1• •
•
••
•
•
•
= 0°
0.86
0.86
0.71
0.710.5
0.5
= ±30° = ±60° = ±45° = ±90°
+
cos2() vs.
e-/2 cos()
Find Max:
=0
de-/2)/d
-e-/2/2 + e-/2 (-/2 + 1) e-/2
Polar 2p Contour Plot
•
•
Atom-in-a-Box
Shape of H-like
Specialthanks to
Dean Dauger(physicist/juggler) http://dauger.com
Dean at AppleWorld Wide
Developers Conference2003
permission D. Dauger
Link to Video of Dauger Juggling at Apple Developer's Conference
QuickTime™ and aMPEG-4 Video decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Information from Atom-in-a-Box
r2 R(r)2
ProbabilityDensity
SurfaceWeighting
Where is the density highest?What is the most likely distance?
n,l,m (nickname)
Schrödinger Equation
Energy (ev)
Formula
Which shell (1 or 2) has higher density?
12
Which shell contains more stuff (probability)?
2 has ~ 3 the radius ~9 the volume of 1.
Information from Atom-in-a-Box
Single Slice
3D 2D
at different levels
near
far
Information from Atom-in-a-Box
Nodes (Shape & Energy)
?3d4d
Cf.
End of Lecture 9Sept 23, 2008