ce2004 slides(2)
TRANSCRIPT
CE 2004: Heat Transfer Dr. John Brammer
Room 214 Tel. 3380 e-mail j.g.brammer
Heat Exchanger Design – 6 lectures, 2 example classes
Radiation – 2 lectures, 1 example class
Key texts: Coulson & Richardson’s Chemical Engineering
Volume 6, Chapter 12
Holman, Heat Transfer
Butterworth, Introduction to Heat Transfer
Module topics
• Heat exchanger types
• Design of a shell and tube heat exchanger
– tube-side film coefficient
– shell-side film coefficient
– overall heat transfer coefficient
• Heat transfer from finned tubes
• Natural convection
• Radiation heat transfer
What are heat exchangers for?
• To get fluid streams to the right temperature for the next process
• To condense vapours (third year)
• To evaporate liquids (third year)
• To recover heat to use elsewhere
• To reject low-grade heat
• To drive a power cycle – i.e. to heat a working fluid
Concentric tube heat exchanger
• One tube inside another
• Normal size
– 0.25 to 200m2 (2.5 to 2000 ft2) per unit
• Built of carbon steel where possible
– Note multiple units are often used
Advantages/disadvantages of
concentric tube heat exchanger
• Advantages
– Easy to obtain counter-current flow
– Can handle high pressure
– Modular construction
– Easy to maintain and repair
• Disadvantages
– Only moderate e (0.9), T (5K)
– Becomes expensive for large duties (>1MW)
Thermal effectiveness
( )
inin
Cminout
TT
TTp
,2,1
min
e
Stream temperature rise divided by the theoretically
maximum possible temperature rise
T1,in T1,out
T2,out T2,in
Shell and tube heat exchanger
• Size per unit (10 - 1000 m2)
• Easy to build multiple units
• Made of carbon steel where possible
• Essentially multiple concentric tube
Flow in shell-and-tube heat exchanger
Complete shell and tube heat exchanger
Advantages/disadvantages of
shell-and-tube heat exchanger
• Advantages
– Extremely flexible and robust design
– Easy to maintain and repair
– Can be designed to be dismantled for cleaning
– Very many suppliers world-wide
• Disadvantages
– Only moderate e (0.9), T (5K)
– Requires large plot area (removal of bundle)
– Not cheap for lower pressures and temperatures
Plate (or gasketed plate)
heat exchanger
• Plates hung vertically and clamped in a press or frame.
• Gaskets direct the streams between alternate plates and prevent external leakage
• Plates made of stainless steel or higher quality material
• Plates corrugated to give points of support and increase heat transfer
Chevron Washboard
Plate types
• Corrugations on plate improve heat transfer and give rigidity
• Many points of contact and a tortuous flow path
Flow in plate heat exchanger
Alternate plates (often same plate types inverted)
Gaskets arranged
for each stream to
flow between
alternate plates
Advantages/disadvantages of
plate heat exchanger
• Advantages
– High heat transfer, high e (0.95), low T (1K)
– Compact, cheap
– Easily dismantled for cleaning
– Flexible, plates can be added or removed
• Disadvantages
– Limited temperature and pressure (gasket material)
– Limited capacity (port size)
– Prone to blockage (solids), leakage, gasket damage
Air cooled heat exchanger
• Air blown across finned tubes (forced draught type)
• Can suck air across (induced draught)
Finned tubes
Air cooled heat exchanger bundle
Advantages/disadvantages of air
cooled heat exchanger • Advantages
– Air is readily available always
– Low maintenance costs, negligible air side fouling
– Simple mechanical design
– Natural convection operates if power fails
• Disadvantages
– Noisy – low-noise fans are available but inefficient
– Cold weather protection problems
– Less effective than cooling tower
Plate-fin exchangers
• Formed by brazing
aluminium plates separated
by sheets of finning
• Noted for small size and
weight, but limited range
of fluids
• Very high e , very low T
• Main use in cryogenic applications (air liquefaction)
• Must only be used with clean fluids
Cooling towers
• Base filled with packing over which water is sprayed
• Cooling by air flow and evaporation
• Air flow driven by forced or natural convection
• Must make up the cooling water lost by evaporation
Agitated vessels
• Used for batch heating
or cooling of fluids
• An agitator and baffles
promote mixing
• A range of agitators are
used
• Often used for batch
chemical reaction
Distribution of types in terms of market value in Europe
Shell & Tube
42%
Other Tubular
5%
Plate & Frame
13%
Other Plate
4%
Other Proprietary
2%
Air Coolers
10%
Cooling Towers
9%
Waste Heat
Boilers
5%
Other Heat
Recovery
10%
Design method for shell-and-tube
heat exchangers
• Very wide range of temperatures (up to 600oC), pressures (up to 300/1400 bar), fluids, duties
• Can be built in many materials
• Many suppliers
• Repair can be by non-specialists
• Design methods and mechanical codes have been established from many years of experience
Over 80% of new exchangers for oil-refining, chemical,
petrochemical and power companies in Europe are S&T.
The design procedure (single phase)
1. Specification
2. Physical properties
3. Overall heat transfer coefficient estimation
4. Pass arrangement, mean temperature difference
5. Heat transfer area
6. Allocation of fluids
7. Tube size and number
8. Tube-side heat transfer coefficient
9. Tube layout (inc. baffle spacing), shell type
10. Bundle and shell diameter
11. Shell-side heat transfer coefficient
12. Overall heat transfer coefficient
13. Tube-side and shell-side pressure drops
14. Cost estimation
15. Optimisation
Estimate tube-side heat
transfer coefficient
Calculate shell diameter
Estimate tube-side heat
transfer coefficient
• For process fluid, we usually know
– type, mass flow, inlet and outlet temperature, pressure, PMAX
• For service fluid, we usually know
– type, mass flow, inlet temperature, pressure, PMAX
• We must estimate fouling factors
– e.g. water 0.0001-0.00025 m2K/W, air 0.0001-0.0002 m2K/W
• We must calculate duty (i.e. overall heat transfer rate)
– from Q = m1 CP1 T1 for process fluid (CP at mean temp.)
• We must calculate outlet temperature for service fluid
– from T2OUT = (Q / m2 CP2) + T2IN for fluid 2, iterating for CP
• For each fluid, we will need (at mean temperature):
– specific heat, thermal conductivity, density, viscosity
Specification and physical properties
Estimating UO, overall heat transfer
coefficient
• We need to estimate overall heat transfer coefficient at
this stage to allow an initial calculation of total heat
transfer area. A better value will eventually be
calculated, and iterations can be performed if necessary.
• Typical values for overall heat transfer coefficients in
shell-and tube heat exchangers may be obtained from
various sources, e.g.:
– C&R6 Table 12.1 and Figure 12.1
– Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook, Table 11.3 (7th Edn.)
– Engineering Science Data Unit (Data Item 92013)
Shell-side and tube-side passes
• Generally one or two shell-side passes
• Tube-side passes usually achieved by header partitions
One-pass shell (Type E) Two-pass shell (Type F)
Longitudinal baffle
One tube pass two tube passes four tube passes
Calculation of total heat transfer area
We estimate the area (based on tube O/D) from
)(
)(ln
)()(
INOUT
OUTIN
INOUTOUTINLM
tT
tT
tTtTT
TAUQ OO
For pure counter-flow heat exchangers LMTT
where
For shell-and tube heat exchangers, pure counter-flow only obtained for 1:1 and 2:2 designs (shell:tube passes).
What about other (more common) designs?
HEAT EXCHANGER
SHELL SIDE
TUBE SIDE
TIN TOUT
tIN tOUT
Area for non-counter-flow exchangers
• Theoretical correction factors, FT, have been derived for
each non-counter-flow design of heat exchanger:
LMTOO TFAUQ
• FT values are less than 1, but do not design for FT < 0.8
R=0.1 R=0.8 R=3.0 R=15
FT
0.6
1.0
0.0 1.0 0.5 S
ININ
INOUT
tT
ttS
INOUT
OUTIN
tt
TTR
Allocation of fluids
• Put dirtier stream on the tube side - easier to clean inside the tubes
• Put high pressure stream in the tubes to avoid thick, expensive shell
• When special materials required for one stream (e.g. due to corrosion or very high temperatures), put that one in the tubes to avoid expensive shell
• Cross-flow gives higher film coefficients than flow in tubes, hence put fluid with lowest film coefficient on the shell side
• If no obvious benefit, try streams both ways and see which gives best design
Tube size, tube-side velocity
• Most common tube O/Ds 19.05 and 25.40 mm, with tube
thicknesses 2.11 and 2.77 mm (carbon steel)
• Standard tube lengths 2.44, 3.66, 4.88, 6.10 and 7.31 m
• Total number of tubes given by:
• Tube side velocity then given by:
• For liquids, typically 1.0 < uT < 2.5 m/s
• For vapours and gases, 5 < uT< 70 m/s depending on
pressure
ld
AN
o
OT
2
4
iT
PT
dN
Nmu
Tube-side heat transfer coefficient
• The Dittus-Boelter equation
for non-viscous liquids
n0.8PrReuN 023.0
n = 0.4 for heating, 0.3 for cooling
• The Sieder-Tate equation for viscous liquids
14.0
027.0
W
0.330.8PrReuN
• Useful general form (Colburn)
14.0
W
0.330.8PrReCuN
C = 0.021 (gases), 0.023 (non-viscous liquids), 0.027 (viscous liquids)
Fully developed turbulent flow in smooth pipes (Re > 8000)
NB properties evaluated at mean bulk temperature along pipe
Tube-side heat transfer coefficient
• Heat transfer coefficient for viscous flow can be estimated from:
14.033.0
33.0)(86.1
W
i
L
dPrReuN
or 3.5, whichever larger
• For non-viscous flow, coefficient is 1.62, no correction
• Note that tube length-to-diameter ratio has a large
effect on heat transfer coefficient below ~ 500
• For transition flows (2000 < Re < 8000), evaluate h for
both laminar and turbulent flows and use lower value
Laminar flow in smooth pipes (Re < 2000)
Heat transfer factor, jh
• Heat transfer data may be usefully correlated using a
heat transfer factor, jh, which allows laminar and
turbulent regimes to be represented on one graph
• We then have for non-viscous flow:
33.0
67.0Re62.1
L
dj ih
2.0023.0 eRjh
Laminar:
Turbulent:
PrRe
NuSt,PrSt
14.0
67.0
W
hj
Definition:
Tube arrangements
• Recommended pitch = 1.25 x tube O/D
• Triangular and rotated triangular arrangements give
more tubes per unit area
• Square arrangement gives lower heat transfer rates
• Square and rotated square layouts give cleaning lanes
pitch, p
Triangular Rotated
triangular
Square Rotated
square
transverse pitch, ptr Flow
Tube bundle diameter
• Tube bundle outside diameter given by n
ToB
K
NdD
1
where K and n are empirically derived for triangular and
square arrangements, p = 1.25 do
Tube shell diameter
• Derived from tube bundle diameter plus shell-to-bundle
clearance (shell inside diameter minus bundle outside
diameter)
• Shell-to-bundle
clearance depends on
shell design
– tube bundle removal
(cleaning, tube
repair/replacement)
– differential expansion
Bundle diameter, m
0.2 1.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
100
0
80
60
40
20 S
he
ll I/
D -
bu
nd
le O
/D, m
m
Pull-through floating head
Split-ring floating head
Outside packed head
Fixed and U-tube
Baffle design
• Typical ratio (DS /lB) 5
• Gives good heat transfer and
acceptable pressure drop
lB
DS
Shell-side (cross-flow) velocity
• The shell-side velocity uS is calculated at the shell equator
using the “minimum cross-flow area” AS
• This is the area without tubes, (DS lB), multiplied by a
blockage factor b which is a function of tube arrangement
p
db o1
p
db o1155.1
p
db o1414.1
Triangular, square
Rotated triangular
Rotated square
• uS is then calculated
using:
S
SA
mu
• typically for liquids,
0.3 m/s < uS < 1.0 m/s
Shell-side heat transfer coefficient using Bell’s method
• Method originally set out by Bell (1960, 1963)
• “Ideal” cross flow coefficients are corrected for
non-idealities which occur in real shell-side flows
• Reasonably accurate while remaining simple and
suitable for manual calculations
• Other methods exist – e.g. Kern’s method (less
accurate), Tinker’s method (complex and tedious)
• Bell gives a similar method for shell-side pressure
drop (see later)
Shell-side non-idealties
Window
effects
Tube
bundle
bypass
Baffle
leakage
Number
of rows
crossed
Bell’s method for shell-side heat
transfer coefficient
LBWNoco FFFFhh
Where
hoc is the heat transfer coefficient for cross-flow over
an idealised tube bank
FN allows for the number of tube rows crossed
FW corrects for some tubes being in the window
FB corrects for bypass flow around the bundle
FL corrects for leakage through and around the baffle
Ideal cross-flow coefficient
14.0
33.0
W
hooc PrRej
k
dhNu
As for tube-side
coefficient:
• Definition of jh same as for tube-side
• jh is similarly plotted against Re - C&R Figure 12.31
• But values are NOT the same as for tube-side !
• IMPORTANT: Re is calculated using us, the shell-side velocity calculated at the minimum cross-flow area AS at the equator of the bundle. Also Re and Nu use tube O/D do.
Correction FN:
number of tube rows crossed
Mean h depends on the number of rows
crossed, because of the turbulence generated
as the fluid flows through the bundle
• Re > 2000, turbulent: use C&R Figure 12.32
• 100 < Re < 2000, transition: use FN = 1.0
• Re < 100, laminar: not well established
Note: no. of rows Ncv is
between adjacent baffle tips Ncv
• Use C&R Figure 12.33:
FW plotted against RW, the ratio of the number of tubes in the window zones to the total number in the bundle
Correction FW: window correction factor
Accounts for the flow through
the window zones not being
ideal cross-flow
Example:
RW = 8/28
= 0.286
FW = 1.08
Correction FB: bypass correction factor
Accounts for flow that bypasses the
bundle in a vertical sense – i.e.
through the gap between the bundle
and the shell wall
• Use C&R Figure 12.34:
FB plotted against (AB/AS)
AB is the bundle-shell clearance area = lB(DS – DB)
AS is the minimum cross-flow area
Correction FL: leakage correction factor
Accounts for horizontal leakage flow –
i.e. through the gaps between tube and
baffle, and between baffle and shell
• Atb is the tube-to-baffle clearance area, per baffle
Asb is the shell-to-baffle clearance area, per baffle
AL = Atb + Asb, and AS is the minimum cross-flow area
L
sbtbLL
A
AAF
21
• C&R Figure 12.35 gives
L plotted against (AL/AS)
Overall heat transfer coefficient
UO defined on basis of tube outside area:
i
o
w
o
i
oi
i
o
oO d
d
k
d
d
dr
hr
hUln
2
111
yw
Thot
Tcold
di
do
yw
Next steps
• Compare calculated UO with assumed value
• If necessary, modify design in second iteration
using calculated UO
• But also need to consider tube-side and shell-
side pressure drops – these must remain within
specification
• P = f (velocity, dimensions, friction factor)
Tube-side from familiar pipe flow equations (fluids)
Shell-side using Bell’s method (similar to h)
Tube side pressure drop
• General equation 2
42uρ
d
Lfp
i
837Re,Re
16f
837Re,Re
264.00035.0
42.0f
• Laminar flow
• Turbulent flow in
a rough tube
• Result is corrected by various factors accounting for
tube inlets and outlets, header flow reversal, and
header ports
Shell-side pressure drop by
Bell’s method
• Similar in concept to Bell’s method for hO
• Cross-flow, window, end zone and nozzle pressure
drops calculated separately and summed
OUTIN NNEWBCBS ppppNpNp 2)1(
pC
pW pE
pN
Shell-side pressure drop by
Bell’s method
• Cross-flow and end pressure drops from
correlation for ideal tube bank, corrected for
by-pass and leakage
• Window pressure drop from specific
correlation for window flows, corrected for
leakage only
• Nozzle pressure drops from correlations for
sudden expansions/contractions
Estimating cost
• The cost estimation method given here is based only on equipment cost
• Note: installation costs can be as high as equipment cost in some cases
• Cost estimation often done by multiplying the calculated area, A, by a “cost per unit area”
• But, when comparing exchangers, U and A vary widely from type to type. It is also difficult to define A if there is a complicated extended surface.
• Hence, ESDU give tables of C values where C is the “cost per UA” - using 1992 prices
Heat transfer from finned tubes
• For tube heat transfer where the external fluid is a
gas, and coefficients are very low
• Aim is to maximise heat transfer area per unit tube
volume, by adding transverse fins to outside of tube
L-fins
Formed by tightly
winding L-shaped
strip
G-fins
Formed by locking
strip into groove
on tube
Extruded fins
Formed by
extruding fins on
outer tube
Local heat transfer coefficient for
finned tubes
• Briggs and Young correlation for
banks of tubes in cross-flow with
plain transverse fins
• Length term in Nu and Re is tube o.d.
• Cross-flow Re taken at AS (no fins)
• h is referenced to fin area
tf pf
lf
1134.02.0
33.0681.0134.0
f
f
f
ff
t
p
l
tpPrReuN
Overall heat transfer coefficient
from finned tubes
i
o
w
o
i
oi
i
o
oO d
d
k
d
d
dr
hr
hUln
2
111
o
o
rh
1is referenced to un-finned tube area BUT assumes
We use:
f
of
ff
o
o A
Ar
hEr
h
111
Af = fin area
Ao = bare tube area,
Ef = fin effectiveness
(< 1, typically 0.95)
( )Pr,GrNu f
Heat
high density
low density
where Gr is Grashof number
2
23
Gr
Tlg
forcesviscous
forcesbuoyancy
From a dimensional analysis of natural convection:
= coefficient of volume expansion g = gravity
l = characteristic length T = Tsurface Tdistant fluid
Natural convection
( )nPrGrNu C
Many workers have studied
natural convection from
various surfaces to a range
of fluids. Generally:
Natural convection
where values for C and n
are tabulated for different
geometries and regimes –
see C&R Vol. 1 Table 9.5 Results for natural convection from
horizontal surfaces
Natural convection
Fluids between two surfaces
For heat transfer between two large parallel plates where
surface dimensions are large compared to separation:
1kQ
Q
( ) 25.0PrGr15.0
kQ
Q
( ) 33.0PrGr05.0
kQ
Q
Gr Pr < 103
104 < Gr Pr < 106
Gr Pr > 106
Where Qk is the rate heat
would be transferred by
conduction alone, and Q
is the actual rate.
Characteristic length in
Gr is plate separation.
Natural convection from pipes to air
Calculation of heat loss to environment from pipes
Geometry Gr Pr C'' n
Vertical
tubes
109 1.37 0.25
> 109 1.24 0.33
Horizontal
tubes
109 1.32 0.25
> 109 1.24 0.33
then h = C'' (T )n l (3n-1) where
Assume the environment is air at 294K
Radiation heat transfer
• Black body radiation
• Radiation properties
• Grey bodies and real surfaces
• The view factor
• Radiation exchange between two surfaces
• Two-surface enclosures
• Gas radiation
• Furnaces and fired heaters
Radiation heat transfer
The Electromagnetic Spectrum
3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 -11 -12
Thermal
radiation
Infrared Ultra-
violet
rays
X-rays
Radio
wavesVisible
log , m
3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 -11 -12
Thermal
radiation
Infrared Ultra-
violet
rays
X-rays
Radio
wavesVisible
3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 -11 -123 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 -11 -123 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 -11 -12
Thermal
radiation
Infrared Ultra-
violet
rays
X-rays
Radio
wavesVisible
log , m
Energy density of radiation per
unit area per unit wavelength
f (wavelength,
temperature) =
Stefan-Boltzmann law for
black body radiation
If we integrate the function for energy density over all
wavelengths, the total energy Eb (W/m2) is given by:
4TEb
= 5.669 x 10-8 W/m2K4 (Stefan-Boltzmann constant)
T is absolute temperature, K
Eb is the emissive power of an ideal radiator, i.e one that
absorbs all radiation incident on it and radiates across the
whole spectrum – the so-called black body
Energy distribution - black body
Wien’s law:
Tmax = 0.00288
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0
2 4 6 8 10
Wavelength (m)
1400K
1100K
850K
550K
Mo
nochro
matic e
mis
siv
e p
ow
er
(kW
/m2.
m)
Radiation properties
= reflectivity
(fraction reflected)
= absorptivity
(fraction absorbed)
= transmissivity
(fraction transmitted)
+ + = 1
Incident radiation Reflected
Absorbed
Transmitted
• For opaque bodies, = 0 (we will only consider opaque bodies)
• For black bodies, = 0, = 0, = 1
• Reflected radiation can be diffuse (uniform in all directions) or
specular (angle of reflection = angle of incidence)
Kirchhoff’s identity
Body of area A in a black enclosure,
receiving radiant flux G and emitting
emissive power E, at equilibrium.
is the emissivity of the
body, e
EA = GA
If replace body with black body of
same size,
EbA = GA (as = 1)
GA EA
body
black enclosure
bE
E
bE
E
and e =
Thus
Grey bodies and real surfaces
The monochromatic emissivity, e, is defined as the
ratio of the monochromatic emissive power of the
body to that of a black body at the same temperature
and wavelength:
ebE
E
• For grey bodies, e = constant (< 1) and
• For real surfaces, e = f (, T) constant
• Tabulated values for many real surfaces
4εTσE
Energy distribution - real surfaces
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Mo
nochro
matic e
mis
siv
e p
ow
er
(kW
/m2.
m)
0
2 4 6 8 10
Wavelength (m)
e = e = 1 (black body)
e = e = 0.6 (grey body)
real surface
The view factor
(also known as shape, angle or geometric factor)
The view factor, Fij, is the fraction of the radiation
leaving surface i that strikes surface j directly.
By definition, the energy leaving surface 1 and arriving
at surface 2 is Q12 = Eb1A1F12
And the energy leaving surface 2 and arriving at
surface 1 is Q21 = Eb2A2F21
So the net exchange is Qnet 12 = Eb1A1F12 – Eb2A2F21
The view factor
Net exchange is Qnet 12 = Eb1A1F12 – Eb2A2F21
But if T1 = T2, then Qnet 12 = 0 and Eb1= Eb2
So A1F12 = A2F21, or more generally AmFmn = AnFnm
This is known as The Reciprocity Rule
F can be easily derived
for simple geometries:
otherwise results are
presented graphically dA1
A2
D
R
e.g. small-area
element to disk
22
2
124 DR
DF
The view factor
The Summation Rule
The sum of the view factors from surface i of an enclosure to all
surfaces of the enclosure, including to itself, must equal unity
11
N
j
ijF
The Superposition Rule
The view factor from a surface i to a surface j is equal to the
sum of the view factors from surface i to the parts of surface j
Nijijijij FFFF ...21
The Symmetry Rule
Two or more surfaces that possess symmetry about a third
surface will have identical view factors from that surface
Radiation exchange between two
“enclosed” surfaces
“Enclosed” surfaces exchange heat with each other only
One or both surfaces
grey:
More complex – we use the
concept of radiosity
Both black surfaces: Easy, as no radiation is reflected,
re-absorbed, re-reflected etc. etc.
( )4
2
4
1121
4
2212
4
112121 TTFATFATFAQnet
4
112121 TFAQ
4
221212 TFAQ and:
Radiation exchange between
two “enclosed” grey surfaces
( )( ) ( ) 222121111
4
2
4
112
/1/1/1 AFAA
TTQ
eeee
We will consider four special cases of a two-surface enclosure:
• Small convex object in a large enclosure
• Infinitely large parallel plates
• Infinitely long concentric cylinders
• Concentric spheres
Making use of the concept of radiosity, the total flux leaving a
surface, we can show that for two enclosed grey surfaces:
Two-surface enclosures
( )( ) ( ) 222121111
4
2
4
112
/1/1/1 AFAA
TTQ
eeee
1
2 Q Small convex object in a large enclosure
F12 = 1, A1/A2 0 ( )4
2
4
11112 TTAQ e
1
2
Q
Infinitely large parallel plates
F12 = 1, A1 = A2 ( )1/1/1 21
4
2
4
112
ee
TT
A
Q
Two-surface enclosures
( )( ) ( ) 222121111
4
2
4
112
/1/1/1 AFAA
TTQ
eeee
Infinitely long concentric cylinders
F12 = 1
A1/A2 = r1/r2
( )( ) 2121
4
2
4
1
1
12
/1/1/1 rr
TT
A
Q
ee
Concentric spheres
F12 = 1
A1/A2 = (r1/r2)2
2
1
Q
2
1
Q ( )( )( )2
2121
4
2
4
1
1
12
/1/1/1 rr
TT
A
Q
ee
Gas radiation
• Most monatomic and diatomic gases are transparent to
thermal radiation.
• HOWEVER many polyatomic gases are not, both
absorbing and emitting considerable amounts at
certain frequencies
• and e are functions of (Pgl), where Pg is gas partial
pressure and l is path length through gas. Curves are
available for certain gases (e.g. H2O).
• If the gas is particle-laden (e.g. flame), then further
emission/absorption, f(particle concentration, size)
Furnace and fired heater design
Radiant heat exchangers, in which the
source of heat is the combustion of a fuel
• Fired heaters
Process stream heated by passage through a
coil or tube-bank enclosed in a furnace: wide
variety of applications
• Steam boilers
For raising saturated or superheated steam for
use in processes or for power generation
Fired heaters
Radiant
tubes
Radiant
coil
Radiant
tubes
Convection
bank
Burner Burner Burners
all radiant,
vertical tubes
all radiant,
helical coil
radiant/convective,
helical coil