bioprocessing of textiles (2014)
TRANSCRIPT
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 1/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 2/457
Bioprocessing of textiles
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 3/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 4/457
Bioprocessing of textiles
Dr. C. Vigneswaran
Dr. M. Ananthasubramanian
Dr. P. Kandhavadivu
WOODHEAD PUBLISHING INDIA PVT LTD
New Delhi
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 5/457
Published by Woodhead Publishing India Pvt. Ltd.
Woodhead Publishing India Pvt. Ltd.,
303, Vardaan House, 7/28, Ansari Road,
Daryaganj, New Delhi - 110002, India
www.woodheadpublishingindia.com
First published 2014, Woodhead Publishing India Pvt. Ltd.
© Woodhead Publishing India Pvt. Ltd., 2014
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded
sources. Reprinted material is quoted with permission. Reasonable efforts have
been made to publish reliable data and information, but the authors and the
publishers cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials. Neither
the authors nor the publishers, nor anyone else associated with this publication,
shall be liable for any loss, damage or liability directly or indirectly caused or
alleged to be caused by this book.
Neither this book nor any part may be reproduced or transmitted in any
form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying,
microlming and recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system,
without permission in writing from Woodhead Publishing India Pvt. Ltd.
The consent of Woodhead Publishing India Pvt. Ltd. does not extend to
copying for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works, or for
resale. Specic permission must be obtained in writing from Woodhead
Publishing India Pvt. Ltd. for such copying.
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered
trademarks, and are used only for identication and explanation, without intent
to infringe.
Woodhead Publishing India Pvt. Ltd. ISBN: 978-93-80308-42-5
Woodhead Publishing India Pvt. Ltd. e-ISBN: 978-93-80308-53-1
Typeset by Mind Box Solutions, New Delhi
Printed and bound by Replika Press Pvt. Ltd.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 6/457
Contents
Preface ix
Acknowledgement xi
1. Enzyme technology 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Enzymes and their classications 2
1.3 Enzyme structure and catalysis 3
1.4 Enzyme kinetics and their reactions 12
1.5 Present and future trends in biotechnology 15
1.6 References 17
2. Industrial enzymes 23
2.1 Introduction 23
2.2 Enzyme-manufacturing process 24
2.3 Application of enzymes in detergents, paper, leather 31
and food industries2.4 Drawback in conventional textile processing 33
2.5 Enzymes in bioprocessing of textiles 34
2.6 Applications of enzymes in textile industry 37
2.7 Features of enzyme application in textile processing 45
2.8 References 47
3. Bioprocessing of natural bres 53
3.1 Introduction 53
3.2 Bioprocessing of cotton and their characteristics 54
3.3 Bioprocessing of jute and their characteristics 87
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 7/457
3.4 Bioprocessing of ax and their characteristics 112
3.5 Bioprocessing of wool and their characteristics 125 3.6 Bioprocessing of silk and their characteristics 148
3.7 References 161
4. Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 189
4.2 Bioprocessing of polyester and their characteristics 190
4.3 Bioprocessing of polyamide and their characteristics 214
4.4 Bioprocessing of regenerated cellulosic and their 220
characteristics
4.5 Biodegradability of plastics 232
4.6 References 240
5. Enzymes in textile efuents 251
5.1 Introduction 251
5.2 Textile processing operations 252
5.3 Textile efuent characteristics 258 5.4 Present technology in treating waste efuents 260
5.5 Treatment of textile efuents by various methods 265
5.6 Difculties of operation of efuent plants 271
5.7 Advanced technology in efuent treatment practices 271
5.8 Role of enzymes in decolouration 276
5.9 Prospects and future research 288
5.10 References 289
6. Safety and precaution in handling enzymes 299
6.1 Introduction 299
6.3 Enzyme safety program 301
6.4 Safe handling of enzymes 305
6.5 Symptoms of enzyme exposure 306
6.6 Practical aspects – handling and safety 309 6.7 First-aid treatment 311
6.8 Safety in enzyme therapy 312
6.9 Routes of exposure and possible controls 312
vi Bioprocessing of textiles
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 8/457
6.10 Medical monitoring program for enzyme workers 313
6.11 Safety measures 314 6.12 References 315
7. Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 319
7.1 Introduction 319
7.2 Organic cotton 320
7.3 Biodesizing of organic cotton fabrics with alphas 323
amylase
7.4 Bioscouring of organic cotton with alkaline pectinase 333
7.5 Bioscouring of organic cotton fabric using protease 341
enzyme
7.6 Bioscouring of organic cotton fabric using lipase enzyme 346
7.6 Binary enzyme treatment on bioscouring of organic 352
cotton fabric
7.7 Bioscouring of organic cotton fabrics through specic 355
mixed enzymatic system7.8 Sonication and aerodynamic principles – enzymatic 364
activity
7.9 Biopreparation of organic cotton fabric 370
7.10 References 395
8. Biotechnology and biomaterials for hygienic and health 398
care textiles
8.1 Introduction 398
8.2 Medical textiles 399
8.3 Modern wound dressings 402
8.4 Enzymes in medical applications 408
8.5 Advanced biopolymer materials 417
8.7 Future trends in medical textiles 426
8.8 References 426
Index 435
Contents vii
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 9/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 10/457
Preface
The book mainly deals with the basic fundamentals of enzyme technology
and their applications in textile processing of both natural and synthetic bresfor enhancing their functional characteristics. With increasing awareness
about the environmental concern and usage of eco-friendly agents, today
the researchers and scientists are nding ways to treat the textile materials
without use of chemicals. To fulll the space many researchers are developing
the enzyme-based products for industrial applications to enhance the product
functional properties and uses.
The book is broadly divided into eight chapters namely enzyme technology,
industrial enzymes, bioprocessing of natural bres, synthetic bres, enzymesin textile efuents, safety and precaution in handling enzymes, bioprocessing
of organic cotton and enzyme processing for hygienic and health care textiles.
Processing of cotton fabrics in single bath and continuous operations of
desizing, scouring and bleaching processes and their efuent loads have been
discussed both enzyme- and chemical-based wet processing. This book also
describes the future scope of enzyme technology for hygienic and healthcare
textile product development and safety aspects of handling enzymes in the
textile industries.
This book would be very useful to undergraduate and postgraduatestudents of textile technology, fashion technology, textiles chemistry and textile
processing; researchers working in academic and industrial R&D, and colleges
and universities offering textile technology and biotechnology programs. In
short, this book presents a refreshingly original approach in emphasizing the
interface between enzyme technology and textile materials apart from dealing
with diverse methods and techniques used in industrial practices.
We hope that it would provide guidelines to researchers, scientists and
industrialists as well as students a useful source of information in the importanteld of textile processing through enzyme technology.
Dr. C. Vigneswaran
Dr. M. Ananthasubramanian
Dr. P. Kandhavadivu
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 11/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 12/457
Acknowledgement
We owe our gratitude to the people who have contributed to this eld of
Science and Technology enabling us to write this book. We immensely thankthe Principal, Management and Heads of our Departments, PSG College of
Technology for providing us the congenial atmosphere, facilities and the
required support for writing the book. We thank our family members for their
moral support and encouragement. We sincerely thank Woodhead Publishing
India for providing us to bring our knowledge and experience in printable
form.
Dr. C. Vigneswaran
Dr. M. AnanthasubramanianDr. P. Kandhavadivu
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 13/457
Abstract: Enzyme technology – a sub-eld of biotechnology is a developing eldin manufacturing in bulk and high added value in various industrial end uses
both in process and product developments. Enzymes are of globular proteinsand have three-dimensional structures of multi-subunit proteins. This chapterdiscusses the use of enzymes and their classications based on functions andapplications for industrial purposes. The chapter also discusses the mechanismof enzyme such as lock-and-key mechanism with substrate and briefs the rateof reactions such as temperature, pH, concentration and inhibitors. Today theapplications of enzymes in industrial uses are very wide opportunity and willpave the new spectrum in forthcoming days. Modern biotechnology is onetool that can help meet the challenge this growth poses and also contribute toeco-friendly environment and safe to health. The chapter then discusses thepresent and future trends in biotechnology and has applications in many elds
including organic synthesis, clinical analysis, textile processes and nishing,pharmaceuticals, detergents, food production and fermentation.
Keywords: biotechnology, enzyme, enzyme structure, enzyme kinetics, enzymeinhibition, textile process
1.1 Introduction
Enzymes vital to existence of life also plays important role in many aspects of
life. Mankind has used enzymes for many years without understanding what
they were or how they work (Robert 1989). Over the generations, science
has unlocked the mystery of enzymes and has applied this knowledge to
make better use of them in many numbers of applications (Gram et al 2001).
Enzymes play crucial roles in producing our food, on our clothes, even in
producing fuel for our automobiles. Enzymes are also important in reducing
both energy consumption and environmental pollution (Hayavadana and
Renuka 2003).
Enzymes are proteins, which act as a catalyst in many chemical reactions
present in almost all life forms (Hoffmann 1954; Minton 2001). Any substancethat increases the rate of chemical reaction without them changed overall in
the process is a catalyst. These catalysts act on substrates converting them into
product. Each type of enzyme chemically interacts with only one particular
substance or type of substance, termed a substrate (Warshel 1991). For
1
Enzyme technology
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 14/457
2 Bioprocessing of textiles
carryout biochemical reactions, enzymes are responsible in microorganisms,
plants, animals, and human beings. Enzymes are essential for all metabolic
processes, but are not alive. Although like all other proteins, enzymes are
composed of amino acids (Chen et al 1992), they differ in function and they
have the unique ability to facilitate in the biochemical reactions without
undergoing any change themselves (Smith 1997). This catalytic capability
is what makes enzymes unique (Warshel et al 2006). Enzymes are natural
protein molecules that act as highly efcient catalysts in biochemical
reactions, that is, they help a chemical reaction take place quickly and
efciently (Berg et al 2002). Enzymes not only work efciently and rapidly,
they are also biodegradable. Normally enzymes are highly efcient andincrease the rate of reaction in biochemical processes that otherwise proceed
very slowly, or in some cases, not at all. Most of the enzymes increase the
rate of reaction by factors of 103 to 1016 relatives to the rate of uncatalysed
reaction (Bugg 2004).
Enzymes play a diversied role in many aspects of everyday life including
aiding in digestion, the production of food and several industrial applications
(Colwell and Rita 2002). Enzymes are nature’s catalysts (Garcia-Viloca et
al 2004). Mankind has used for thousands of years to carry out chemical
reactions for product manufacturing such as cheese, beer, and wine. Bread andyogurt also owe their avor and also texture to a range of enzyme producing
organisms that domesticated many years ago.
1.2 Enzymes and their classications
Enzymes are active compounds characterized by their function as well as
by their molecular structure (Jun Ogawa and Sakavu Shimizu 1999; Wu-
Kuang Yeh 2010). Generally, enzymes names end with “ase” with exception
for some of the originally studied enzymes such as pepsin, rennin, and
trypsin (Cech 2000; Lilley 2005). The Enzyme Commission has classied
the 1,500 different enzymes into six types by their mechanism of action.
The EC number provides systematic method for classifying enzymes. It
takes a form of letters “EC” followed by four numbers separated by periods
(Nomenclature committee 1979). The rst number broadly classies the
enzyme based on the total reaction catalysed (Cech 1993). The second
number is the enzyme subclass (Table 1.1). The third indicates the sub-
subclass. It should be noted that the subclass and sub-subclass designationmeans different things in different classes (Enzyme Technical Association
2001). The last number is the serial number. Eg: EC 1.1.1.1 means alcohol
dehdrogenase.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 15/457
Enzyme technology 3
Table 1.1 Classication of enzymes
Enzymeclassication
(EC Number)
Functions Examples
Oxidoreductases (1) Catalyzes the transfer of electrons
from one molecule (the reductant,
also called the hydrogen or electron
donor) to another (the oxidant, also
called the hydrogen or electron
acceptor). This group of enzymes
usually utilizes NADP or NAD as
cofactors.
Catalases
Glucose oxidases
Laccases
Transferases (2) Transfer a functional group (e.g. a
methyl or phosphate group)
Fructosyltransferases
Glucosyltransferases
Hydrolases (3) Catalyze the hydrolysis of various
bonds
Amylases, Cellulases
Lipases, Proteases
Lyases (4) Cleave various bonds by means
other than hydrolysis and oxidation
Pectate lyases
Alpha-acetolactate
decarboxylases
Isomerases (5) Catalyze isomerization changes
within a single molecule
Glucose isomerases
Ligases (6) Join two molecules with covalent
bonds
1.3 Enzyme structure and catalysis
Most enzymes are pure proteins. These proteins are long linear chains of
amino acids fold to produce a three-dimensional product (Annsen 1973;
Fersht 1999). Protein structure is a various levels of organization of protein
molecules (Rodnina and Wintermeyer 2001). A linear sequence of aminoacids (Polypeptide chain) is a primary structure (Smith 1994). The secondary
structure refers to regular local substructure (Alpha helix, beta sheets). The
three dimensional structure of single protein molecule is called a tertiary
structure (Buchholz and Poulson 2000; Tornroth-Horseeld and Neutze
2008). Quaternary structure is three dimensional structures of a multi-subunit
protein and having subunits t together (Fig. 1.1)
Enzymes are of globular protein type i.e., relatively spherical shapes
having complex tertiary and. sometimes quaternary structures (Annsen
1973). A protein contains all its natural structural elements (polypeptide) and
possesses biological activity is a native. When a protein has been unfolded,
it no longer possesses biological activity even though the backbone and the
amino acid groups remain intact (Jaeger and Eggert 2004). Unfolding also
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 16/457
4 Bioprocessing of textiles
causes subunit dissociation if there are no intersubunit covalent links between
them unfolded, inactive proteins are denatured (Vasella et al 2002).
Fig. 1.1 Three-dimensional structure of a multi-subunit protein
Many enzymes are larger than the substrates they act on and only few
amino acids of the enzyme are involved directly in the catalysis (Eisenmesser
et al. 2002, 2005). Each specic amino acid sequence produces a specic
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 17/457
Enzyme technology 5
structure having unique properties. Individual protein chains in amino groups
may form group together to derive a protein complex (Radzicka and Wolfenden
1995; Dunaway 2008). Depending on the type of enzyme, denaturation may
be reversible or irreversible. Enzymes can be denatured that is, unfolded and
inactivated by heating or chemical denaturants, which may disrupt the three-
dimensional structure of the protein in polypeptide linkages.
The enzymes consist of a protein (apoenzyme) and a non protein
component (cofactor). If the attachment between the co factor and apoenzyme
is firm then cofactor is termed prosthetic group (Jencks 1987; Xue et al 2006).
The loosely bound cofactor is called coenzyme.
Enzymes carry out catalysis of a chemical reaction. For example ifX+Y=Z
The molecule X and Y should collide in correct orientation and should
possess enough energy for the chemical bonds to alter (Wagner Arthur 1975).
As X and Y come near, the electron clouds around them create repulsion.
An initial input energy, called Activation energy overcomes this repulsion for
them to come near and cause bond rearrangement (Bergermeyer 1974; Page
and Williams 1987). This leads to the transition state where the bonds are
stretched to their limit that leads to the formation of the product.
Enzymes can act in several ways that lowers the free energy • Lowering the activation energy by creating an environment in which
the transition state is stabilized
• Lowering the energy of the transition state, but without distorting
the substrate, by creating an environment with the opposite charge
distribution to that of the transition state.
• Providing an alternative pathway. For example, temporarily reacting
with the substrate to form an intermediate ES complex, this would be
impossible in the absence of the enzyme.• Reducing the reaction entropy change by bringing substrates together
in the correct orientation to react.
• Increases in temperatures speed up reactions. Thus, temperature
increases help the enzyme function and develop the end product even
faster. However, if heated too much, the enzyme’s shape deteriorates
and the enzyme becomes denatured. Some enzymes like thermo
labile enzymes work best at low temperatures.
For more than 100 years, the behaviour of enzymes had been explained
by the “lock-and-key” mechanism developed by pioneering German chemistEmil Fischer (1907) (Fig. 1.2). Fischer thought that the chemicals undergoing
a biological reaction t precisely into enzymes like a key into a lock. But
Koshland’s work suggested that this view was too rigid that enzymes
sometimes had to change their shape to accommodate the chemicals and that
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 18/457
6 Bioprocessing of textiles
this shape change could be part of the catalytic reaction (Fig. 1.3). He called
it the “induced t theory,” but in the late 1950s traditional journals weren’t
interested in publishing his rst paper about it.
Fig. 1.2 Lock-and-key mechanism of enzyme
Fig. 1.3 Active site and substrate reaction of enzyme
1.3.1 Rate of enzyme reactions
Energy reaction processes that generate energy are termed ‘exergonic’
reactions. Reactions that require energy to initiate the reaction with substrate
are known as ‘endergonic’ reactions. Mainly the rate of enzyme reaction is
based on temperature, pH, and substrate concentration.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 19/457
Enzyme technology 7
1.3.1.1 Temperature
Generally enzymes works at 40°C, but there are some enzymes working at –10°C and some other enzymes working at 90°C are available in nature.
Increasing temperature in the reaction that increases the kinetic energy in
and between molecules possess (Daniel et al 2010). In a uid, this means
that there are more random collisions between molecules (Bruins et al 2003).
Since enzymes catalyse reactions are randomly colliding with substrate
molecules, increasing temperature increases the rate of reaction, forming
more product. While increasing temperature that also increases the vibrational
energy between molecules, specically in this case enzyme molecules, which
puts strain on the bonds that hold them together (Walsh 1979). As temperature
increases, more bonds, especially the weaker hydrogen and ionic bonds, will
break as a result of this strain (Flomenbom et al 2005). Breaking bonds within
the enzyme will cause the active site to change shape. This change in shape
means that the active site is less complementary to the shape of the substrate,
so that it is less likely to catalyse the reaction. Eventually, the enzyme
will become denatured and will no longer function (Illanes et al 1999). As
temperature increases, more enzymes molecules‘ active sites‘ shapes will be
less complementary to the shape of their substrate, and more enzymes will bedenatured. This will decrease the rate of reaction (Fig. 1.4).
Fig. 1.4 Effect of temperature on enzyme activity
1.3.1.2 pH
The pH of the solution plays a signicant role in enzyme activity (Neet 1995).
Figure 1.5 shows the optimum pH selection for better rate of enzyme activity
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 20/457
8 Bioprocessing of textiles
in the substrate and enzyme activity in the solution. Most enzymes work at a
pH range between 7- 8 though some enzymes have optimum activity at pH 1.
Fig. 1.5 Effect of pH on enzyme activity
The pH affects the charge of the amino acids at the active site, so the
properties of the active site change and the substrate can no longer bind. For
example a carboxyl acid R groups will be uncharged a low pH (COOH), but
charged at high pH (COO – ) (Kopelman 1988; Todd and Gomez 2001).
1.3.1.3 Enzyme concentration
The reaction rate increases with the increase in enzyme concentration, (more
enzyme molecules more active sites), As a result more enzyme-substrate
complexes form (Olsson et al 2006). However, this too will only have an
effect up to a certain concentration (Fig. 1.6), where the enzyme concentration
is no longer the limiting factor (Henri 1902).
Fig. 1.6 Effect of enzyme concentration on rate of reaction
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 21/457
Enzyme technology 9
1.3.1.4 Substrate concentration
If the substrate concentration increases the rate of enzyme reaction increases because more substrate molecules interact with active sites of enzymes (Hunter
1995). Hence more substrate enzyme complex forms (Walsh 1979). Once the
enzymes are saturated with the substrates, addition of substrate makes no
difference in the reaction rate (Koshland 1958). At higher concentrations the
enzyme molecules become saturated with substrate (Fig. 1.7), and there are
few free active sites, so adding more substrate doesn’t make much difference
(though it will increase the rate of E-S collisions).
Fig. 1.7 Effect of substrate concentration on rate of reaction
1.3.1.5 Covalent modifcation
In biological systems enzymes may be in inactive state which will be modied
to active state (or vice versa) by another enzyme either by adding or deleting
a phosphate or methyl group (Irwin 1993).
1.3.1.6 Inhibitors
Inhibitors inhibit the activity of enzymes, reducing the rate of their reactions.
They are found naturally, but are also used articially as drugs, pesticides and
research tools (Changeux and Edelstein 2005)
1.3.2 Allosteric interactions (feedback inhibition)
The activity of enzymes is controlled by certain molecules binding to a
specic regulatory (or allosteric) site on the enzyme known as binding site,
distinct from the active site (Walsh 1979). Different molecules can either
inhibit or activate the enzyme, allowing sophisticated control of the rate of
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 22/457
10 Bioprocessing of textiles
biochemical reactions. Only a few enzymes can do this, and they are often
at the start of a long biochemical pathway (Tousignant and Pelletier 2004).
They are generally activated by the substrate of the pathway and inhibited
by the product of the pathway, thus only turning the pathway on when it is
needed. This process is known as ‘feedback inhibition’ (Cowan 1997). This
allosteric interaction may allow an enzyme to be temporarily inactivated in
the biochemical reactions (Fig. 1.8). The binding of an allosteric effector
changes the shape of the enzyme in binding site, inactivating it temporarily
while the effector is still bound (Jacques et al. 1963). This kind of mechanism
is commonly employed in feedback inhibition of biochemical activators.
The action of an allosteric inhibitor on the enzyme reaction may be negativecontrol for product formation in the particular biochemical reactions (Tuček
and Proška 1995; Nina et al. 2008).
Fig. 1.8 Action of Allosteric inhibitor on the enzyme reaction
1.3.3 Enzymes: Organic catalysts
Enzymes normally allow many chemical reactions to occur within the
homeostasis constraints of a living system because enzymes act as organic
catalysts in biochemical reaction (Bennett and Frieden 1969). Many enzymes
function by lowering the activation energy of biochemical reactions. By bringing
the reactants closer together, chemical bonds in reaction may be weakened andreactions will proceed faster than without the catalyst. Enzymes can act rapidly,
as in the case of carbonic anhydrase, which causes the chemicals to react 107
times faster than without the enzyme present (Pfeiffer 1954). Carbonic anhydrase
speeds up the transfer of carbon dioxide from cells to the blood. Enzymes are
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 23/457
Enzyme technology 11
substrate specic and enzyme which has peptidase (which breaks peptide bonds
in proteins) will not work on starch (Fig. 1.9). The arrangement of molecules on
the enzyme produces an area known as the ‘active site’ within which the specic
substrate(s) will “fit” and it recognizes connes and orients the substrate in a
particular direction in the catalysis system.
Fig. 1.9 Space lling model of an enzyme with binding site
1.3.4 Factors affecting enzyme activity
The basic enzyme kinetic theory is important in enzyme analysis to understand
the basic enzymatic mechanism. Several factors affect the rate at which
enzymatic reactions proceed - temperature, pH, enzyme concentration, substrate
concentration, and the presence of any inhibitors or activators (Martinek 1969).
Fig. 1.10 Saturation curve for an enzyme reaction showing the relation between the
substrate concentration (S) and rate (v).
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 24/457
12 Bioprocessing of textiles
1.3.5 Specicity of enzymes
One of the properties of enzymes that makes them as important as diagnosticand research tools is the specicity of its nature they exhibit relative to the
reactions they catalyze (Holum 1968). A few enzymes exhibit absolute
specicity; that is, they will catalyze only one particular reaction (Harrow and
Mazur 1958). Other enzymes will be specic for a particular type of chemical
bond or functional group. In general, there are four distinct types of specicity:
• Absolute specicity - the enzyme will catalyze only one reaction.
• Group specicity - the enzyme will act only on molecules that have
specic functional groups, such as amino, phosphate and methyl
groups.• Linkage specicity - the enzyme will act on a particular type of
chemical bond regardless of the rest of the molecular structure.
• Stereochemical specicity - the enzyme will act on a particular steric
or optical isomer.
1.4 Enzyme kinetics and their reactions
Many enzyme reactions may be modeled by the reaction scheme. If E, S, and
P represent the enzyme, substrate and product, respectively, and ES representan enzyme–substrate complex.
E + S — E + P [1.1]
The assumption is that the equilibrium between S and ES is established
rapidly, so that the second reaction is the one mainly determining the rate
d[P]/dt of appearance of the product P. This reaction will follow a rst-order
rate law, i.e.:
d[P]/dt = – kcat [ES] [1.2]
With a rate constant kcat called the catalytic constant or the turnover
number. At any given conditions and at given initial concentrations [E]
and [S] of enzyme and substrate, respectively, the rate of appearance of P
will typically decrease over time. The rate observed during conversion
of the rst few percent of the substrate is called the initial rate V. In 1913,
Leonor Michaelis and Maud Menten showed that the above model leads
to the following relation between the initial rate V and the initial substrate
concentration [S] at any given enzyme concentration (Michaelis and
Menten 1913).
V = max
M
V [S]K [S]+
[1.3]
Where K M
is a constant called the Michaelis constant and Vmax is
a constant dependent on the enzyme concentration. This dependence of V
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 25/457
Enzyme technology 13
on [S] leads to the characteristic curve shape (Fig. 1.10). At low substrate
concentrations the initial rate is, with good approximation, proportional to [S],
and at high values of [S] (substrate saturation) it approaches the limit value
Vmax
, aptly called the maximum rate. The calculations further show that Vmax
= k cat
[E]. The Michaelis constant is independent of the enzyme concentration,
and it can be seen from the formula above that KM can be found as the
substrate concentration for which V = Vmax
/2. In general, for a given enzyme,
different substrates and different sets of conditions (temperature, pH) will
give different values of kcat and KM and thus different initial rates will be
measured under otherwise identical conditions. This means in practice that
each enzyme has an optimum range of pH and temperature for its activity witha given substrate (Agarwal et al 2004). The presence or absence of cofactors
and inhibitors may also inuence the observed kinetics (Schnell et al 2006).
Enzyme activity is usually determined using a rate assay and expressed in
activity U/ml units. The substrate concentration, pH, and temperature are kept
constant during these assay procedures. Standardized assay methods are used
for commercial enzyme preparations.
1.4.1 Enzyme inhibition
An enzyme inhibitor is a molecule which binds to enzymes and decreases their
activity during biochemical reaction. Drug products are most manufactured
with enzyme inhibitors by blocking an enzyme’s activity known as pathogen
or correct a metabolic imbalance. Enzyme reaction rates can be decreased by
various types of enzyme inhibitors.
1.4.1.1 Competitive inhibition
In competitive inhibition, the inhibitor and substrate compete for the enzyme(cannot bind at the same time). Competitive inhibitors strongly resemble the
real substrate of the enzyme (Villa et al 2000). For example, methotrexate
is a competitive inhibitor of the enzyme dihydrofolate reductase, which
catalyzes the reduction of dihydrofolate to tetrahydrofolate. The binding
of the inhibitor need not be to the substrate binding site, if binding of the
inhibitor changes the conformation of the enzyme to prevent substrate binding
and vice versa (Ferguson et al 2002). In competitive inhibition the maximal
velocity of the reaction is not changed, but higher substrate concentrations arerequired to reach a given velocity, increasing the apparent Km. Competitive
inhibitors bind reversibly to the enzyme, preventing the binding of substrate
(Ellis 2001). On the other hand, binding of substrate prevents binding of the
inhibitor. Substrate and inhibitor compete for the enzyme reaction (Fig. 1.11).
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 26/457
14 Bioprocessing of textiles
Fig. 1.11 Enzyme reactions and inhibition
1.4.1.2 Uncompetitive inhibition
In uncompetitive inhibition the inhibitor can not bind to the free enzyme,
but only to the ES-complex. The EIS-complex thus formed is enzymatically
inactive. This type of inhibition is rare, but may occur in multimeric enzymes
(Hassan and Richter 2002).
1.4.1.3 Non-competitive inhibition
Non-competitive inhibitors can bind to the enzyme at the binding site at thesame time as the substrate, but not to the active site (Agarwal et al 2002).
Both the EI and EIS complexes are enzymatically inactive (Briggs and
Haldane 1925). The inhibitor cannot be driven from the enzyme by higher
substrate concentration (in contrast to competitive inhibition), the apparent
Vmax
changes. But because the substrate can still bind to the enzyme, the K m
stays the same.
1.4.1.4 Mixed inhibitionThis type of inhibition resembles the non-competitive, except that the
EIS-complex has residual enzymatic activity (Ellis 2001). This type of inhibitor
does not follow Michaelis-Menten equation (Savageau 1995; Vincent et al
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 27/457
Enzyme technology 15
2008). In many organisms inhibitors may act as part of a feedback mechanism
(Yang and Bahar 2005). If an enzyme produces too much of one substance
in the organism, that substance may act as an inhibitor for the enzyme at the
beginning of the pathway that produces it, causing production of the substance
to slow down or stop when there is sufcient amount (Schnell and Turner
2004; Agarwal 2005). This is a form of negative feedback. Enzymes which
are subject to this form of regulation are often multimeric and have allosteric
binding sites for regulatory substances (Passonneau 1993).
1.5 Present and future trends in biotechnology
During the twentieth century humankind has harnessed microorganisms to
produce useful biochemical including antibiotics, vitamins, amino acids,
avors and colors, as well as specic proteins (Carlier 2001). Some of these
proteins have important medical uses such as insulin, human growth hormone
and blood factors like erythropoietin. In fact, manufacturers have developed
a series of proven, safe, microbial hosts for use in the production of several
enzymes (Warke and Chandratre 2003). Further, enzymes that have not been
readily available in adequate quantity can be produced using technology.
This in turn has opened up important applications benecial to humankind.Additionally, modern techniques are leading to the development of tailored
enzymes with optimized functional properties specic for their intended use.
An example of this is the modication in specic proteases so that they work
more efciently in the alkaline environment of detergent formulations. As a
result, less of the modied protease is needed to deliver equivalent cleaning
power, while using fewer resources during the manufacturing process.
The microbial cell, a bacterium, yeast, or mold, is the key instrument
in many enzyme production processes. To optimize the microbial strains for
production of the desired enzyme, the strain’s genetic properties are often
modied either through natural evolution or through classical breeding and
selection techniques; these classical techniques have been used for decades
to improve microbial production strains. The precise methods of genetic
modication have been developed. The methods, sometimes termed genetic
engineering, are based on processes occurring in nature - the transfer of genes
between different cells.
Scientists to transfer genetic material between cells from the same or
different species, microorganisms such as yeasts, molds and bacteria withnew or improved properties for industrial applications can be developed. In
nature, genetic modication has been occurring since life began. Such genetic
changes are generally random, with a natural selection process favoring
the changes best adapted for survival. Using this process, animal, plant and
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 28/457
16 Bioprocessing of textiles
microbial breeders have likewise selected individuals within a species with
desired characteristics for further propagation.
Using the tools of modern biotechnology, modications can now be
made more precisely and with much less chance of developing unwanted
secondary changes that could potentially have undesired effects. In nature
and in our production systems, microbes do not express only single enzymes.
Rather, each microbial cell has the genetic nature to produce many different
enzymes. Frequently, only one of these enzyme activities is needed for a
specic application and the “side activities” are removed or substantially
reduced during the recovery process. Often, these side activities are unwanted
and may even be detrimental to the nal use. Additionally, scientists are nowable to discover and/or evolve enzymes that will catalyze pure compounds
for applications including textile wet processing such as enzymatic desizing
with alpha amylase, bioscouring with pectinase, protease, lipase and cellulase
enzymes, binary and mixed enzymatic system, and biopolishing with cellulase
enzymes, lipase enzyme for improving hydrophilic nature of polyester bre
both greatly reducing unwanted byproduct production as well as making the
target product potentially safer and more effective (Buschie-Diller et al 1994).
Modern biotechnology is one tool that can help meet the challenge
this growth poses and also contributed to (a) ecofriendly environment (b)safety and health, (c) reduced water demand in manufacturing processes,
(e) reduced industrial waste and (f) aided in pollution remediation. Enzymes
produced using modern biotechnology contributes to this effort by assuring
the availability of safe, pure enzymes that replace harsh chemical processes
(reducing energy consumption and environmental burden). Modern tools of
biotechnology, enzymes from nature can be accessed which are sufciently
robust to be useful at extremes of pH and temperature and thus hold great
promise for replacing certain chemical processes with much cleaner protein-catalyzed processes (Gubitz and Cavaco-Paulo 2001). Just as exciting, these
new enzymes can make the dream of converting waste biomass to useful
energy an economic reality. Overall, the use of modern biotechnology for
enzyme production can have a major impact on improving the cost and quality
of products at the same time working towards sustainability.
Enzymes have applications in many elds, including organic synthesis,
clinical analysis, textile processes, and nishing, pharmaceuticals, detergents,
food production and fermentation. The application of enzymes to organic
synthesis is currently attracting more and more attention. The discovery ofnew microbial enzymes through extensive and persistent screening will open
new, simple routes for synthetic processes and consequently, new ways to
solve environmental problems (Calafell et al 2005).
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 29/457
Enzyme technology 17
Research on enzyme systems for textile processing and nishing has
mainly focused on amylases and cellulases. However, recent biotechnology
and genetic engineering advances have opened opportunities for successful
applications of other enzyme systems, such as lipases, xylanases, laccases,
proteases and pectinases (Emilla Csiszar et al 1998). Today, enzymes can be
customized for specic target areas; for example, enzymatic degumming of
silk, bioscouring of cotton textiles and antifelting and softening of wool. The
basic mechanisms involving enzyme systems and interactions with textile
substrates are likely noticed. Using several enzyme systems and application
conditions, few researchers are being involved in studying the bre/enzyme
interactions and the compatibility of enzymes in combination (Gisela Buschle-Diller, and S. Haig Zeronian 1998).
Biotechnology offers an increasing potential for the production of goods to
meet various human needs. In enzyme technology, a subeld of biotechnology,
new processes have been and are being developed to manufacture both bulk
and high value added products utilizing enzymes as biocatalysts (Tzanko
et al 2002). Enzymes are also used to provide services, as in washing and
environmental processes, or for analytical and diagnostic purposes. The
driving force in the development of enzyme technology, both in academia and
industry, has been and will continue to be:
• The development of new and better products, processes and services
to meet these needs; and/or
• The improvement of processes to produce existing products from
new raw materials as biomass.
Enzymes from nature can be accessed which are sufciently robust to
be useful at extremes of pH and temperature and thus hold great promise
for replacing certain chemical processes with much cleaner protein-catalyzed
processes (Csiszar et al 2001). These new enzymes can make the dream of
converting waste biomass to useful energy an economic reality. Overall, the
use of modern biotechnology for enzyme production can have a major impact
on improving the cost and quality of products at the same time working
towards sustainability.
1.6 References
Agarwal, P. K. (2005). ‘Role of protein dynamics in reaction rate enhancement by
enzymes’, J Am Chem Soc, 127(43), 15248–56.
Agarwal, P. K., Billeter, S. R, Rajagopalan, P. T, Benkovic, S. J, and Hammes-Schiffer, S.
(2002). ‘Network of coupled promoting motions in enzyme catalysis’, Proc Natl Acad Sci,
USA, 99(5), 2794–9.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 30/457
18 Bioprocessing of textiles
Agarwal, P. K., Geist, A., and Gorin, A. (2004). ‘Protein dynamics and enzymatic
catalysis: investigating the peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerization activity of cyclophilin
A’, Biochemistry, 43(33), 10605–618.
Alan, F. (1999). Structure and mechanism in protein science: a guide to enzyme catalysis
and protein folding, San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, ISBN 0-7167-3268-8.
Annsen, C. B. (1973). ‘Principles that Govern the Folding of Protein Chains’, Science,
181(4096), 223–30.
Bennett, T. P., and Frieden, E. (1969). Modern Topics in Biochemistry, Macmillan, London.
Berg, J., Tymoczko, J., and Stryer, L. (2002). Biochemistry. W. H. Freeman and Company
ISBN 0-7167-4955-6.
Bergmeyer, H.U. (1974). ‘Methods of Enzymatic Analysis’, Academic Press (New York, NY:1974), 4, 2066–2072.
Briggs, G. E., and Haldane, J. B. S. (1925). ‘A note on the kinetics of enzyme action’,
Biochem. J., 19(2), 339–339.
Bruins, M. E., Strubel, M., Van Lieshout, J. F. T., Janssen, A. E. M., Boom, R. M. (2003).
‘Oligosaccharide Synthesis by the hyperthermostable â-glucosidase from Pyrococcus
furiosus: kinetics and modeling’, Enzyme Microb Technol., 33, 3–11.
Buchholz, K., and Poulson, P. B. (2000). Overview of History of Applied Biocatalysis, in:
Applied Biocatalysis, Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam.
Bugg, T. (2004). Introduction to Enzyme and Coenzyme Chemistry, (2nd edition),
Blackwell Publishing Limited, ISBN 1-4051-1452-5.
Buschie-Diller, G., Zeronian, S. H., Pan, N., and Yoon, M.Y (1994). ‘Enzymatic hydrolysis
of cotton, linen, ramie and viscose fabric’, Text Res. J, 64, 240–279.
Buschle-Diller., G., and Haig Zeronian, S. (1998). ‘Specic Enzyme Systems for Various
Areas of Textile Processing’, National Text Center Res, 12(3), 15–18.
Calafell, M., Santner, B. K., Guebitz, G., and Garriga, P (2005). ‘Dyeing Behaviour of
Cotton Fabric Bioscoured with Pectate lyase and Polygalacturonase’, Coloration Tech,
121(6), 291–297.
Carlier, F. (2001). ‘Enzymes’, Industrila Textila, 54(3), 121–123. d
Cech, T. (2000). ‘Structural biology: The ribosome is a ribozyme’, Science, 289(5481):
878–9.
Cech, T. R. (1993). ‘Catalytic RNA: Structure and mechanism’, Biochem Soc Trans, 21,
229–234.
Changeux, J. P., and Edelstein, S. J. (2005). ‘Allosteric mechanisms of signal transduction’,
Science, 308(5727), 1424–28.
Chen, L. H., Kenyon, G. L., Curtin, F., Harayama, S., Bembenek, M. E., Hajipour, G., and
Whitman, C. P. (1992). ‘Oxalocrotonate tautomerase, an enzyme composed of 62 amino
acid residues per monomer’, J Biol Chem, 267(25), 17716–21.
Colwell Rita, R. (2002). ‘Fullling the promise of biotechnology’, Biotech Advances,
215–228.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 31/457
Enzyme technology 19
Cowan, D. A. (1997). ‘Thermophilic proteins: stability and function in aqueous and organic
solvents’, Comp Biochem Physiol , 118(3), 429–38.
Csiszar, E. (1998). Gyorgy Szakacs and Istvan Rusznak, ‘Combining traditional cotton
scouring with cellulase enzymatic treatment’, Text Res J, 68(3), 163–167.
Csiszar, E., Losonsczi, A., Szakacs, G., Rusznak, I., Bezur, L. and Reicher, J. (2001).
‘Enzymes and Chelating Agents in Cotton Pretreatment’, J Biotech, 89(2), 271–279.
Daniel, R. M., Peterson, M. E., and Danson, M. J. (2010). ‘The molecular basis of the
effect of temperature on enzyme activity’, Biochem J, 425(2): 353–60.
Dunaway-Mariano, D. (2008). ‘Enzyme function discovery’, Structure, 16(11), 1599–600.
Eisenmesser, E. Z., Bosco, D. A., Akke, M., and Kern, D. (2002). ‘Enzyme dynamics
during catalysis’, Science, 295(5559), 1520–23.Eisenmesser, E. Z., Millet, O., and Labeikovsky, W. (2005). ‘Intrinsic dynamics of an
enzyme underlies catalysis’, Nature, 438(7064): 117–21.
Ellis, R. J. (2001). ‘Macromolecular crowding: obvious but underappreciated’, Trends
Biochem Sci, 26(10), 597–604.
Ellis, R. J. (2001). ‘Macromolecular crowding: obvious but underappreciated’, Trends
Biochem Sci, 26(10): 597–604.
Enzyme Technical Association (2001), Enzymes – A Primer on Use and Benets Today
And Tomorrow, 1800 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W, Washington, DC 20036.
Ferguson, S. J., Nicholls, D., and Ferguson, S. (2002). Bioenergetics, 3rd edition. San
Diego: Academic, ISBN 0-12-518121-3.
Fischer, E. (1907). ‘Synthetical chemistry in its relation to biology’, J Chem Soc Trans.,
91, 1749–1765.
Flomenbom, O., Velonia, K., and Loos, D. (2005). ‘Stretched exponential decay and
correlations in the catalytic activity of uctuating single lipase molecules’, Proc Natl Acad
Sci, USA, 102(7), 2368–2372.
Garcia-Viloca, M., Gao J., Karplus, M., and Truhlar, D. G. (2004). ‘How enzymes work:
analysis by modern rate theory and computer simulations’, Science, 303(5655): 186–95.
Goodey, N. M., and Benkovic, S. J. (2008). ‘Allosteric regulation and catalysis emerge via
a common route’, Nature Chemical Biology, 4, 474 – 482.
Gram, A., Treffenfeldt, W., Lange, U., McIntyre, T., and Wolf, O. (2001). The application
of Biotechnology to Industrial Sustainability, OECD Publications Service, Paris.
Gubitz, G. M., and Cavaco-Paulo, A. (2001). ‘Biotechnology in the Textile Industry –
Perspectives for the New Millennium’, J Biotech, 89(2), 91–94.
Harrow, B., and Mazur, A., (1958). Textbook of Biochemistry, Saunders, Philadelphia.
Hassan, A., and Richter, S. (2002). ‘Closed loop management of spent catalysts in thechemical industry’, Chem Eng Technol, 25, 1141–48.
Hayavadana, J, and Renuka, D, ‘Tissue Engineering’, Asian Text J, 2003, 12(9), 107–112.
Henri, V. (1902). ‘Theorie generale de l’action de quelques diastases’, Compt Rend Hebd
Acad Sci, Paris, 35, 916–19.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 32/457
20 Bioprocessing of textiles
Hoffmann, O. (1954). Enzymologie, Springer, Wien.
Holum, J. (1968). Elements of General and Biological Chemistry, 2nd ed., 377, Wiley,
New York.
Hunter, T. (1995). ‘Protein kinases and phosphatases: the yin and yang of protein
phosphorylation and signaling’, Cell, 80(2), 225–36.
Illanes, A., Wilson, L., and Raiman, L. (1999). ‘Design of immobilized enzyme reactors
for the continuous production of fructose sirup from whey permeate’, Bioprocess Eng, 21,
509–551.
Irwin, H. S. (1993). Enzyme Kinetics: Behavior and Analysis of Rapid Equilibrium and
Steady-State Enzyme Systems, Wiley-Interscience, ISBN 0-471-30309-7.
Jaeger, K. E, and Eggert, T. (2004). ‘Enantioselective biocatalysis optimized by directedevolution’, Curr Opin Biotech, 15(4), 305–13.
Jencks, W. P. (1987). Catalysis in Chemistry and Enzymology. Mineola, N.Y: Dover. ISBN
0-486-65460-5.
Kopelman, R. (1988). ‘Fractal Reaction Kinetics’, Science, 241(4873), 1620–26.
Koshland, D. E. (1958). ‘Application of a Theory of Enzyme Specicity to Protein
Synthesis’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, 44(2), 98–104.
Lilley, D. (2005). ‘Structure, folding and mechanisms of ribozymes’, Curr Opin Struct
Biol, 15(3), 313–23.
Martinek, R. (1969). ‘Practical Clinical Enzymology’, J Am Med Tech, 31, 162.
Michaelis, L., and Menten, M. (1913). ‘Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung’, Biochem, 49,
333–369.
Minton, A. P. (2001). ‘The inuence of macromolecular crowding and macromolecular
connement on biochemical reactions in physiological media’, J. Biol. Chem, 276(14):
10577–80.
Monod, J., Changeux, J., and Jacob, F. (1963). ‘Allosteric proteins and cellular control
systems’, Journal of Molecular Biology, 6(4), 306–329.
Neet, K. E. (1995). ‘Cooperativity in enzyme function: equilibrium and kinetic aspects’,
Methods in Enzymology, 249: 519–67.
Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry (NC-IUB) (1979).
Units of Enzyme Activity, Eur J Biochem, 97, 319–20.
Ogawa, J., and Shimizu, S. (1999). ‘Microbial enzymes: new industrial applications from
traditional screening methods’, Trends in Biotech, 17(1), 13–20.
Olsson, M. H., Parson, W. W., and Warshel, A. (2006). ‘Dynamical Contributions to
Enzyme Catalysis: Critical Tests of a Popular Hypothesis’, Chem. Rev, 106(5), 1737–56.
Page, M. I., and Williams, A. (Eds.) (1987). Enzyme Mechanisms, Royal Society ofChemistry. ISBN 0-85186-947-5.
Passonneau, J. V., and Lowry, O. H. (1993). ‘Enzymatic Analysis- Practical Guide’,
Humana Press (Totowa, NJ), 85–110.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 33/457
Enzyme technology 21
Pfeiffer, J. (1954), Enzymes, the Physics and Chemistry of Life, Simon and Schuster, New
York.
Radzicka, A., and Wolfenden, R. (1995). ‘A procient enzyme”. Science, 6(267), 90–931.
Robert, B. (1989). ‘History of biotechnology’, Nature, 337, 10–15.
Rodnina, M. V., and Wintermeyer, W. (2001). ‘Fidelity of aminoacyl-tRNA selection on
the ribosome: kinetic and structural mechanisms’, Annu Rev Biochem, 70, 415–35.
Savageau, M.A. (1995). ‘Michaelis-Menten mechanism reconsidered: implications of
fractal kinetics’, J Theor Biol, 176(1): 115–24.
Schnell, S., Chappell, M. J., Evans, N. D., and Roussel, M. R. (2006). ‘The mechanism
distinguish ability problem in biochemical kinetics: The single-enzyme, single-substrate
reaction as a case study’, Comptes Rendus Biologies, 329, 51–61.Schnell, S., Turner, T. E. (2004). ‘Reaction kinetics in intracellular environments with
macromolecular crowding: simulations and rate laws’, Prog Biophys Mol Biol, 85(2),
235–60.
Smith, A. L., (Ed) (1997), Oxford dictionary of biochemistry and molecular biology.
Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-854768-4.
Smith, S. (1994). ‘The animal fatty acid synthase: one gene, one polypeptide, seven
enzymes’, FASEB J, 8(15), 1248–59.
Todd, M. J., and Gomez, J. (2001). ‘Enzyme kinetics determined using calorimetry: a
general assay for enzyme activity?’, Anal Biochem, 296(2), 179–87.
Törnroth-Horseeld, S., and Neutze, R. (2008). ‘Opening and closing the metabolite gate’,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 105(50), 19565–6.
Tousignant, A., and Pelletier, J. N. (2004). ‘Protein motions promote catalysis’, Chem Biol,
11(8), 1037–42.
Tuček, S., and Proška, J. (1995). ‘Allosteric modulation of muscarinic acetylcholine
receptors’, Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 16(6), 205–212.
Tzanko, T., Costa, S. A., Gubitz, G. M., and Paulo, A. C. (2002). ‘Hydrogen Peroxide
Generation with Immobilized Glucose Oxidase for Textile Bleaching’, J Biotech, 93(1),87–94.
Vasella, A., Davies, G. J., and Bohm, M. (2002). ‘Glycosidase mechanisms’, Curr Opin
Chem Biol, 6(5), 619–24.
Villa, J., Strajbl, M., Glennon, T. M., Sham, Y. Y., Chu, Z. T., and Warshel, A. (2002). ‘How
important are entropic contributions to enzyme catalysis?’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A,
97(22), 11899–904.
Vincent, G. H., Eijsink, G., Vaaje-Kolstad., Kjell, M. V., and Svein, J. H. (2008). ‘Towards
new enzymes for biofuels lessons from chitinase research’, Trends in Biotech, 26(5), 228–
35.
Wagner Arthur, L. (1975). Vitamins and Coenzymes. Krieger Pub Co. ISBN 0-88275-258-
8.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 34/457
22 Bioprocessing of textiles
Walsh, C. (1979). ‘Enzymatic reaction mechanisms’, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman. ISBN
0-7167-0070-0.
Warke, V. V., and Chandratre, P. R. (2003). ‘Application of Biotechnology in Textiles’,
Man-made Text India, 26(4), 142–46.
Warshel, A. (1991). Computer Modeling of Chemical Reactions in enzymes and Solutions,
John Wiley & Sons Inc., ISBN 0-471-18440-3.
Warshel, A., Sharma, P. K., Kato, M., Xiang, Y., Liu, H., and Olsson, M. H. (2006).
‘Electrostatic basis for enzyme catalysis’, Chem. Rev, 106(8): 3210–35.
Wu-Kuang, Y. (2010). Enzyme technologies; metagenomics, evolution, biocatalysis and
biosynthesis’, Scitech Book News. Portland, ISBN: 9780470286241.
Xue, X., Liu, F., Ou-Yang, Z. C. (2006). ‘Single molecule Michaelis-Menten equation beyond quasistatic disorder’, Phys Rev E, 74(3), 902–912.
Yang, L. W., and Bahar, I. (2005). ‘Coupling between catalytic site and collective dynamics:
A requirement for mechanochemical activity of enzymes’, Structure, 13(6), 893–904.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 35/457
Abstract: This chapter discusses the manufacturing process of enzymes dealswith the fermentation process in which enzymatic processes usually carried
out with organism media production, Sterilization, Inoculation and down steamprocessing. Application of enzymes in detergents, paper, leather and foodindustries are outlined with commercial enzymes such as cellulase and proteases.The chapter then discusses the drawback of conventional textile wet processingand application of various types of enzymes in replacement of chemicals in wetprocessing treatments in textiles. This includes desizing, scouring, mercerization,bleaching and washing. For all these steps, the chemicals used are quite toxic.The various textile wet processing such as bio-singeing, bio-desizing, bio-scouring, integrated bio-desizing and bio-scouring, bio-bleaching, peroxidekillers, enzyme effect on color, bio-polishing, bio-carbonizing, degumming ofsilk, textile auxiliaries, decolorization of dye water efuent, nishing of cotton
knits and denim washing have been outlined with use of enzymes such as alphaamylase, pectinase, protease, lipase, and cellulase.
Keywords: Enzyme manufacturing, textile wet processing, biodesizing,bioscouring, biobleaching, denim wash
2.1 Introduction
Today environmental consciousness is one of the major importances in the
textile wet processing industries being concern. Textile industry contributes
to one of the major industrial pollution problems facing the country and the
pollution causing chemicals such as lime, sodium sulphide, salt, solvents,
synthetic pigments, etc., are arise mainly from the desizing, scouring,
bleaching and dyeing processes of textile wet processing (Cavaco-Paulo
and Gubitz 2003). In order to overcome the hazards caused by the chemical
efuents, use of enzymes as a viable alternative has been resorted to in
preparatory dyeing operations such as desizing, scouring, and bleaching
treatments (Karmakar 1998). This review focuses on the use of microbial
enzymes as an alternate technology to the conventional methods, andhighlights the importance of these enzymes in minimizing the pollution load.
Environmental pollution has been a major irritant to industrial development.
This chapter also discusses the advantages and limitations of bioprocessing
techniques in the various textile wet processing such as desizing, scouring,
2
Industrial enzymes
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 36/457
24 Bioprocessing of textiles
bleaching, biopolishing, bio-singeing and bio-decolouration in the dyeing
efuents for cellulosic and non-cellulosic materials (Abadulla 2000;
Vigneswaran and Keerthivasan 2008).
2.2 Enzyme-manufacturing process
Enzyme molecules are far too complex to synthesize by purely chemical
means, and so the only way of making them is to use living organisms. The
manufacturing process of enzymes deals with the fermentation process in
which enzymatic processes usually carried out at mild conditions (Anto et al.
2006). Furthermore, enzymatic processes have led to a range of new products
and processes. Enzymes are applied in various areas of application, the most
important ones are technical use, manufacturing of food and feed stuff,
cosmetics, medicinal products and as tools for research and development
(Whitehurst and Law 2001).
The major sources of industrial enzymes are from microbes.
Microorganisms produce enzymes inside their cells (intracellular enzymes) and
may also secrete enzymes for action outside the cell (extracellular enzymes).
The microorganisms selected are usually cultured in large fermentation
chambers (known as fermenters) under controlled conditions to maximizeenzyme production (Hema Anto et al. 2006). Manufacturing process comprise
large-scale fermentation to yield high volumes of microbes (Chandrika 1999).
Enzymes are either accumulating inside the cells or are secreted into the
media of the fermentation tanks. In subsequent steps the disrupted cells are (or
the media including the enzymes) subjected to further purication processes
using variety of chemical, mechanical and thermal techniques (concentration,
precipitation, extraction, centrifugation, ltration, chromatography). The
resulting enzyme concentrate is then formulated to the nal ready-to-sell
product by adding stabilizers, standardizing agents, preservatives and salts.
The nal enzymes preparations are usually commercially marketed in granular
or liquid forms (Pandey et al. 1999).
2.2.1 Large scale fermentation of enzymes
Use of an aerobic submerged culture in a stirred tank reactor is the typical
industrial process for enzyme production involving a microorganism that
produces an industrial enzyme. Figure 2.1 shows a owchart of a typical production process and described the role of the organism in enzyme
fermentation, the media as the raw material, the requirement of sterile
environments for enzyme production and the fermentation process itself.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 37/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 38/457
26 Bioprocessing of textiles
Type Microorganisms Enzymes Neurospora crassa Trysinase
Penicillium funiculosum Dextranase
P. notatum Glucose oxidase
Rhizopus sp. Lipase
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Invertase
S. fragilis Invertase
Trichoderma reesei Cellulase
T. viride Cellulase
2.2.1.2 Media
Microorganisms require food for their growth, called culture media. The
media should have sources for carbon, nitrogen, various nutrient salts, or
certain trace elements. Sugars are the main sources for microbial processes
for both carbon and energy (Loew 1900). Raw materials like molasses, sulte
liquor, unrened sugar, grape juice and starch materials from cereals are
being used. Besides, Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium are added in the
form of inorganic compounds such as phosphates, ammonium compounds,or potassium chloride. Some low-price nutrients include soy meal, sh meal,
cotton seed; low-quality protein materials such as casein or its hydrolysate,
millet, stillage, and especially corn steep liquor are also used as low-price
nutrients (Tzanko Tzanov 2003). This complex media also contain trace
elements and growth promoters. Downstream processing (purifying the
product) should be kept in mind while using the complex media.
2.2.1.3 SterilizationPure culture is the population of single species of cells. Mostly pure
cultures are used in the production of enzymes. Contamination (unwanted
microorganisms) will spoil the media and overall productivity of the product.
Hence aseptic conditions should be deployed for enzyme production (Pandey
1992). This is done by sterilization. It is a process that removes or kills all
forms of microbial life. The raw materials are subjected to high temperatures
for a dened period of time to kill all microbial forms. Most solid substrates
are sterilized in rooms with elevated temperatures where as liquid media aresterilized in situ (in the reaction vessels itself). The temperature normally used
is above 100°C and it is decided by factors including the raw material used,
pH, microbial load. Air used in aerobic process is usually ltered through
glass wool lters, sintered materials, or membranes of appropriate design.
Contd...
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 39/457
Industrial enzymes 27
2.2.1.4 Inoculation
Introducing the microorganism into the medium is called inoculation. Afterinoculation with the cells, they multiply exponentially. Microbes are cultured
initially in small scale and later called upto inoculate in huge cultures (Robinson
et al. 2001; Banarjee and Bhattacharyya 2003). The starter culture is kept deep
frozen (–70 to –90°C) for preservation. The bacterial cells will be thermally
activated before inoculation. In fungal inoculates proper wetting of the spores
is achieved by adding small amounts of surfactants to the broth. If inoculation
by spare suspensions is not optimal, mycelial pellets can be used for start-up.
2.2.1.5 Fermentation
The fermenters used for enzyme production ranges from 20 to 200 m3 in
volume. The use up of oxygen by microbes in the aerobic process necessitates
supply of oxygen to the culture medium in the fermenter. Enzyme synthesis
rate and microbial growth rate relationships are highly complex (Flickinger
and Drew 1998). The total enzyme synthesis rate depends both on growth
rate and biomass concentration. There are many interdependent factors and
hence be optimized in a pilot plant and further scaled to production size.Cultivation of microbes in fermenter can be carried out either by batch, batch
fed or continuous process (Mala et al. 2007). In batch process, all substrates
are added in the beginning and hence growth rate cannot be controlled by
dosed feeding (Wang et al. 1974). In fed batch, low initial biomass is used
to maintain the desired growth rate. In continuous process excess biomass
is continuously removed so that synthesis rate and biomass concentration is
optimal. However fed batch process is preferred for enzyme production as it
produces higher concentrations of enzymes.
2.2.2 Downstream processing
Enzyme collection concentration and purication from the fermented media is
an important step for both intracellular and extracellular enzymes (Fig. 2.2).
For extracellular enzymes, the enzyme should be concentrated, separated and
puried from spent media. Intracellular enzymes are obtained by breaking the
cell and further separated and puried. The degree of purity of enzymes ranges
from raw enzymes to highly puried forms and depending on its application.
High product concentrations in the supernatant or inside the cells and efcient
purication are therefore important aspects in the overall economy of enzyme
manufacture. Often enzymes may be puried several hundred-fold but the yield
of the enzyme may be very poor, frequently below 10% of the activity of the
original material (Murado et al. 1996; Pandey et al. 1999). In contrast, industrial
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 40/457
28 Bioprocessing of textiles
enzymes will be puried as little as possible, only other enzymes and material
likely to interfere with the process which the enzyme is to catalyse, will be
removed. Unnecessary purication will be avoided as each additional stage is
costly in terms of equipment, manpower and loss of enzyme activity. As a result,
some commercial enzyme preparations consist essentially of concentrated
fermentation broth, plus additives to stabilize the enzyme’s activity. However,
the content of the required enzyme should be as high as possible (e. g. 10% w/w
of the protein) in order to ease the downstream processing task.
2.2.2.1 Cell disruption
The intracellular enzymes are obtained by disruption of the cells of the microbe.
This could either achieved by mechanical or non mechanical means. The
mechanical disruption of cells is carried out by rupturing cell by shear forces
and simultaneous decompression through high-pressure homogenization
(Durand et al. 1993). Chemical, thermal or enzymatic lyses are the preferred
methods for non mechanical disruption. The drying of microorganisms and the
preparation of acetone powders are standard procedures in which the structure
of the cell wall is altered to permit subsequent extraction of the cell contents.
Animal organs Plant material
Fermentation
Microorganisms
Extracellular
Enzymes
Intracellular
Enzymes
DisruptionExtraction
Grinding
Filtration
Concentration
Purication
Drying
Enyzme
concentrate
Fig. 2.2 Flowchart of the downstream processing of enzymes
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 41/457
Industrial enzymes 29
2.2.2.2 Separation of solid matter
After cell disruption, the next step is separation of extracellular or intracellularenzymes from cells or cellular fragments, respectively. This operation is rather
difcult because of the small size of bacterial cells and the slight difference
between the density of the cells and that of the fermentation medium (Pandey
et al. 2000). Continuous ltration is used in industry. Large cells, e.g. yeast
cells, can be removed by decantation. Today, efcient centrifuges have been
developed to separate cells and cellular fragments in a continuous process.
Residual plant and organ matter can be separated with simpler centrifuges or
lters. Besides ltration and centrifugation, extraction and occulation are
also applied.
2.2.2.3 Concentration
The concentration of enzymes in the processed media is often very low.
Hence the volume of the starting material must be decreased by concentration
without inactivating the enzyme. Only mild concentration procedures
which do not inactivate enzymes can be employed (Pandey 2003). These
procedures include thermal methods, precipitation, and to an increasingextent, membrane ltration. Enzymes are thermolabile. Hence heat treatment
should be done for a short time. Precipitation of enzymes by salts (e.g.
Ammonium sulfate), polymers (Polyethylene glycols), organic solvents
(ethanol, acetone) and isoelectric points. In processing enzymes, cross-
ow ltration is used to harvest cells, whereas ultraltration is employed
for concentrating and desalting. The desalting of enzyme solutions can be
carried out conveniently by dialtration. The small salt molecules are driven
through a membrane with the water molecules and permeate is continuously
replaced by fresh water.
2.2.2.4 Purication
Partially puried enzyme preparations is sufcient for many industrial
applications, however for analytical purpose highly puried enzymes are
used. Special procedures employed for enzyme purication are crystallization,
electrophoresis, and chromatography. Crystallization and electrophoresis
are not relevant for large scale purications (Pettier and Beckord 1945).
Chromatography, in contrast, is of fundamental importance to enzyme
purication. Molecules are separated according to their physical properties
(size, shape, charge, hydrophobic interactions), chemical properties (covalent
binding), or biological properties (biospecic afnity).
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 42/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 43/457
Industrial enzymes 31
found growth in use of new enzymes and development of new enzyme
properties in enzyme manufacturing. Enzyme expression is dramatically
increased by the use of strong expression or multi-copy systems at gene level.
New enzymes not accessible before can be cloned into and produced from
a well known host organism. Thereby, enzymes from almost any source in
nature become accessible, including exotic sources such as extremozymes,
exhibiting unusual properties such as extreme thermostability (Alat 2001).
They are also an excellent illustration of how different industry structural and
market considerations can affect the uptake of enzyme technology.
2.3 Application of enzymes in detergents, paper,leather and food industries
2.3.1 Detergents
The major applications of enzymes are in the detergent industry (Showell and
Baas 1998). They work efciently in removing dirt and other stains in the
cloth particularly at low temperatures used during washing. Mainly proteases,
lipases, amylases are used in detergents (Obendorf et al. 2003). The most
widely used detergent enzymes are hydrolases, which remove soils formedfrom proteins, lipids, and polysaccharides (Fujii et al. 1986). Cellulase is a
type of hydrolase that provides fabric care through selective reactions not
previously possible when washing clothes. Cellulases clean indirectly by
hydrolyzing glycosidic bonds. Many detergent brands are based on a blend
of two, three, or even four different enzymes (Tyndall 1996; Ee et al. 1997).
2.3.2 Paper
Trees turning to white paper involve a lot of chemical processing. Organicsubstances with chlorine are one of the major toxic products of bleaching
pulp (for whitening the paper). It also produces a range of chlorinated organic
compounds in waste water deteriorating the ecosystem. Hence enzymes are
now the popular alternative to be used in the paper industry. Use of amylases
for modication of starch coating (Bernfeld 1955) and xylanases to reduce
the consumption of bleach chemicals were the most well known applications.
Lipases used for pitch control, esterases used for stickiness removal, amylases
and cellulases for deinking have become an integral part of the solutions used
in the pulp and paper industries today (De Maria et al. 2007). The enzymatic
treatment opens up the pulp matrix allowing better penetration of the
bleaching agents and better extraction or washout of lignin and the associated
dark brown compounds.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 44/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 45/457
Industrial enzymes 33
2.3.6 Enzymes for scientic and analytical use
Enzymes can be used as chemicals to determine the concentration of substrates,measure the catalytic activity of enzymes present in biological samples and serve
as labels in immunoassays to determine the concentrations of enzymatically
inert substances. For instance, enzymes are routinely used in determination of
glucose (glucose oxidase, horse-radish peroxidase), urea (urease, glutamate
dehydrogenase), and triglycerides (lipase, carboxylesterase, glycerol kinases
etc.) in clinical diagnosis (Winkler et al. 1990). Carbohydrates, organics acids,
alcohols and other food ingredients are routinely determined in food analysis
using enzymes (El-Shafei and Rezkallah 1997). Research and development
in life science is often using genetic engineering techniques which in turn are
largely depending on various types of DNA-modifying enzymes: restriction
endonucleases, ligases, and polymerases etc.
2.4 Drawback in conventional textile processing
In the conventional textile wet processing, the grey cotton fabric has to undergo
a series of chemical treatments before it turns into a nished fabric. This
includes desizing, scouring, mercerization, bleaching and washing. For allthese steps, the chemicals used are quite toxic. During fabric manufacture, the
non-cellulosic and foreign constituents are removed partially or completely in
the various pre and post operations; the extent of removal of these constituents
decides the characteristics of the nal textile fabric (Shukla and Jaipura 2004).
Besides chemical treatment, certain enzymatic treatments are also necessary
to get optimum results. Chemical and chemical-based industries are the prime
targets of the environmentalists for their crusade against pollution, and textile
industry has also not been left out of the reckoning. The generation of pollution
is signicantly high in the preparatory and dyeing operations compared to the post dyeing operations (Menzes and Desai 2004). In fact, one third of the
pollution caused by the textile industries results from the wastes generated
during desizing operations. The wastes from the dyeing houses are let out
into the drains which in turn empty into the main sewerage causing hazard to
those who use this water. Many dyeing houses have been forced to close down
because of their noncompliance with the standards laid down. In a short span
of time, Indian textile industry has faced serious challenges such as German
ban on pentachlorophenate, certain azo dyes, formaldehyde, etc. on one hand,
and court order for compliance with environmental regulations (Vigneswaran
et al. 2011). The attention of dyeing units is focused towards revamping the
processing methods, recovery systems, and efuent treatment techniques
to make textile processing eco-friendly. Intensive efforts are being directed
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 46/457
34 Bioprocessing of textiles
towards using a viable alternative technology for pre and post processes using
enzymes. This could be one of the ways of solving the industrial pollution
problems resulting from textile waste water efuents and sustainable planet.
2.5 Enzymes in bioprocessing of textiles
Today enzymes have become an integral part of the textile processing. Though
enzyme in desizing application was established decades ago, only in recent
years the application has widened with new products introduced (Gubitz and
Cavaco-Paulo 2001). With the increase in awareness and regulation about
environment concerns, enzymes are the obvious choice because enzymes
are biodegradable and they work under mild conditions saving the precious
energy (Lowe 1992). Enzymes being biocatalysts and very specic are used in
small amounts and have a direct consequence of lesser packing material used,
the transportation impact is lower. Enzymes are responsible for many essential
biochemical reactions in microorganisms, plants, animals, and human beings
(Vigneswaran et al. 2011). Enzymes are essential for all metabolic processes,
but are not alive. Although like all other proteins, enzymes are composed
of amino acids, they differ in function in that they have the unique ability
to facilitate biochemical reactions without undergoing change themselves.This catalytic capability is what makes enzymes unique (Gupta et al. 2004).
Enzymes are categorized according to the compounds they act upon. Some
of the most common include; protease which break down proteins, cellulase
which break down cellulose, lipase which split fats (lipids) into glycerol and
fatty acids, and amylase which break down starch into simple sugars (Egmond
and Van Bemmel 1997). Table 2.2 and 2.3 show the major types of hydrolase
and oxidoreductase enzymes used in the textile wet processing industries.
Table 2.2 Application of hydrolase enzyme in fabric preparation
Enzyme name Substrate attacked Textile application
Amylase Starch Starch desizing
Cellulase Cellulose Stone wash/ bio-polishing
Bionishing for hand modications
Carbonization of wood
Pectinase Pectin Bio scour replacing caustic
Catalase Peroxides In situ peroxide decomposition without
any rinse in bleach bathProtease Protein molecules /
peptide bonds
Degumming of silk
Bioantifelting of wool
Lipases Fats and Oils Hydrophilicity of cotton and polyester
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 47/457
Industrial enzymes 35
Table 2.3 Application of oxidoreductase in fabric preparation
Enzyme name Substrate attacked Textile applicationLaccase Colour
Chromophore and
pigments
Discoloration of coloured efuent
Bio-bleaching of lignin containing
bres like kenaf and jute
Bio-bleaching of indigo in denim
for various effects
Peroxidases Colour
Chromophore and
pigments
Bio-bleaching of wood pulp
Glucose oxidases Pigments In situ generation of hydrogenperoxide for bleaching of cotton
AZO reductase Colour Chromophore and
pigment
Discoloration of AZO dyes
efuent
Peroxidase ostreatus Colour Chromophore and
pigment
Discoloration of Remazol of
basic dye efuent
2.5.1 Amylase
Amylases are hydrolase class of enzymes, which hydrolyze 1–4 α glucosidic
linkage of amylase and amylopectin of starch to convert them into soluble
dextrins (Kearsley and Dziedzic 1995). Table 2.4 shows the type and
application of amylases in textile processing.
Table 2.4 Type of amylases and their applications
Type of amylases Applications
Thermostable
amylases
Amylases which catalyze starch hydrolysis in
the temperature range of 70–110°C and at pH
6.0–6.8.Conventional
amylases
Amylases which catalyze starch hydrolysis in
the temperature range of 50–70°C and at pH
6.0–6.8.
Low temperature
amylases
Majority of fungal amylases which catalyze
starch hydrolysis in the temperature range of
30–70°C and at pH 6.0–6.8.
2.5.2 CellulaseCellulases are hydrolase class of enzymes which cleavage 1–4β glucosidic
linkage of cellobiose chain or cellulose. The commercially available cellulases
are a mixture of enzymes viz., Endogluconases, Exogluconases and Cellobiases.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 48/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 49/457
Industrial enzymes 37
2H2O
2 → 2H
2O + O
2 [2.1]
Catalase is a heam-containing enzyme (Sumner and Dounce 1937;
Schroeder et al. 1969). Thus, in addition to the protein part of the molecule
the enzyme contains a non-protein part, which is a derivative of heam and
includes the metal iron (Chelikani et al. 2004). Peroxidases effectively
degrade the hydrogen peroxide at varied pH between 3 to 9 and temperature
range 30–80°C.
2.5.6 Laccase
Laccases are oxidoreductase class of enzymes, belonging to bluoxidase-
copper metalloenzymes. Laccases are generally active at pH 3–5 and in the
optimal temperature range of 30–50°C. They oxidize using molecular oxygen
as electron acceptor from the substrate. Their special property of oxidation of
indigo pigments is made use of in textile industries.
2.6 Applications of enzymes in textile industry
2.6.1 Bio-singeing
This mode of nishing has been specically developed to achieve clearer
pile on terry towel goods. A treatment with an enzyme, which is a powerful
cellulase composition, gives clearer look to the pile, improves absorbency
and softness (Koo et al. 1994). Earlier, desizing was carried out by steeping
the fabric with mineral acid, which affected the cellulose as well as the
colour. Use of enzymes here led to reaction with the starch only and thus they
assumed considerable signicance. Explaining the action of enzymes, the
food consumed by human body was digested due to secretion of the enzyme.
At the enzyme–substrate complex level, the concentration of the reactants became large and accelerated the reaction while reducing the activation
energy barrier. Thus, the reaction which took place at higher temperature and
severe conditions could be carried out at relatively lower temperatures and
milder conditions.
2.6.2 Bio-desizing
Before the fabric can be dyed, the applied sizing agent and the natural non-
cellulosic materials present in the cotton must be removed. Before the discoveryof amylase enzymes, the only alternative to remove the starch based sizing
was extended treatment with caustic soda at high temperature. The chemical
treatment was not totally effective in removing the starch (which leads to
imperfections in dyeing) and also results in a degradation of the cotton bre
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 50/457
38 Bioprocessing of textiles
resulting in destruction of the natural, soft feel, or hand, of the cotton (Etters
1999; Emre and Merih 2004). The use of amylases to remove starch-based
sizing agents has decreased the use of harsh chemicals in the textile industry,
resulting in a lower discharge of waste chemicals to the environment, improved
the safety of working conditions for textile workers and has raised the quality
of the fabric. New enzymatic processes are being developed (cellulase,
hemicellulase, pectinase and lipase), which offer the potential to totally
replace the use of other chemicals in textile preparation processes (Lange
1997; Etters et al. 2003). Complete removal of starch-containing size without
bre damage is best obtained by using enzymatic desizing agents. Formerly
amylase derived from mold, pancreas or malt where used in desizing. Todayliquid bacterial amylase preparations dominate. The enzymatic desizing
process can be divided into three stages; (a) Impregnation: enzyme solution
is absorbed by the fabric. This stage involves thorough wetting of fabric with
enzyme solution at a temperature of 70°C or higher with a liquid pick up
of 1 liter per kg fabric. Under these conditions there is sufcient enzyme
stability (temperature, pH, calcium ion level govern the stability). During
this stage gelatinization of the size (starch) is to the highest possible extent,
(b) Incubation: enzyme breaks down the size. Long incubation time allows a
low enzyme concentration, (c) After-wash: breakdown products from the sizeare removed from the fabric (Vigneswaran et al. 2012). The desizing process
is not nished until the size breakdown products have been removed from the
fabric. This is best obtained by a subsequent detergent wash (with NaOH) at
the highest possible temperature (Falholt and Olsen 1998).
2.6.3 Bio-scouring
Cotton could be treated with bioscouring enzyme although the techno-
economical parameters were not conductive (Li and Hardin 1998). But, it
had a bright future due to rigorous efuent treatment since the disposal of
both caustic soda and soda ash was causing environmental concern. The
enzymes helped removal of waxes, pectins, sizes and other impurities on the
surface of the fabric. Combination of pectinase and lipase gave best results,
but cost of the latter was a deterrent (Emilla et al. 1998; Calafell and Garriga
2004). Advantages of bioscouring were lower BOD, COD, TDS, and the
alkaline media of water, extent of cotton weight loss, which was a boon to
the knitting industry, lower alteration of cotton morphology i.e. less damagesince it was specic to pectin and waxes and not cellulose besides increased
softness (Gulrajani and Venkatraj 1986). The lone disadvantage was that
the cotton motes were not removed, which warranted peroxide bleaching.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 51/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 52/457
40 Bioprocessing of textiles
lipases were used to bleach indigo. Earlier denim was bleached with chlorine
to get lighter denim or wash down effect. Lipase combination was used
successfully and if this could be extended to other colours, this would become
an important enzyme in future (Schrag and Cygler 1997; Varanasi et al. 2001).
The advantages were environment friendly application, and cellulose was not
affected. A bio-bleaching or lipase treatment on denim gave an authentic wash
resulting in an excellent look, which was better than a neutral wash and a grey
cast, which was used in bleaching (Nalankilli and Sundar 2002). Amylase
and lipase were used for desizing and cellulase for aberration. Laccase was
introduced for bleaching of indigo.
2.6.6 Peroxide killers
It ensured shade quality particularly with reactive dyes, reduced the complexity
of treatment after peroxide bleaching and conserved water. In case of reactive
dyeing, after bleaching it was vital that the peroxide residues must be cleared
out of the system and as such there were no fool proof ways of such clearance,
which entailed several rinsing operations or reduction treatments (Isobe et al.
2006). Empirically, it was difcult to know how much quantity of reducing
agent was required to react with the peroxide left in the bath. In the event eitherof them happened to be excess, it might affect the dyeing. Therefore, after
bleaching, the bath should be neutralized with peroxide killers like peroxidase
or catalase followed dyeing with reactive dyes (Maehly and Chance 1954;
Murthy et al. 1981). They did not affect reactive dyes and only react with the
peroxide. These catalysts were fastest acting type as one molecule of catalyst
destroyed ve million molecules of peroxide or 700 times its own weight of
peroxide.
2.6.7 Enzyme effect on color
Hydrolases and oxireductases constituted important class of enzymes which
dealt with colour in textile application. Due to effect of enzyme and physical
aberration of cellulose, the exposed areas became white as well as indigo
dyed (Andreaus et al. 2000). This kind of effect on denim was called ‘salt’
and ‘pepper’ effect. The more contrast, better was the denim wash. Some of
the denims had blue or greyer cast because they were woven with one up or
two down and one of the yarn was coloured while the other wasn’t. Thus,the effect was created with the combination of the hydrolysis of 1–4 glucose
linkage in cellulose and the abrasion e.g. turbulence of friction of metal to
metal or bre to bre led to denim appearance (Tyndall 1996). Combination
of enzyme, sand blasting and bleach evolved a fashion recently. Sand blasting
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 53/457
Industrial enzymes 41
was enzyme treatments which subject the denim fabric to sand at high
pressure with consequent exposure of white area while blowing off surface
colour followed by a treatment of the fabric again with enzyme, leading to a
salt and pepper effect and bleached to reduce the colour value (Buschie-diller
et al. 1994). Furthermore, after sand blasting, treatment with enzyme followed
by over dyeing of the abraded areas produced typical effects on denim.
2.6.8 Bio-polishing
It was perceived that bio-polishing and fading or bio-polishing and wash
down were two different operations. But both of them basically employed the
same action (Hassan et al. 1996). They degraded the cellulose due to abrasion
or friction between bre to bre or bre to metal resulting in removal rst
from cellulose and then surface bleeding. Bio-polishing before dyeing could
increase depth apparently due to clarity of shade. Bio-polishing or cellulase
enzyme treatment of lyocel type of regenerated cellulose could produce peach
like effect (Kumar et al. 2008). Bio-polishing give cleaner appearance to the
garment besides wash down effect. If it was sulphur or pigment dyed goods
or ring dyed fabric, wash down effect as well as cleaning of fabric surface
could be obtained. The result surface hair was removed, reduced pilling, better print registration and colour brightness. Size of cellulase enzyme was
about 8nm as also the size of cellulose monomer, which was in similar region.
Bio-polishing, a technique rst adopted by the Danish Firm, Novo Nordisk
for the nishing treatment of cellulosic fabrics with cellulase enzymes. The
main objectives of the bio-polishing is to upgrade the quality of the fabric by
removing the protruded bres from the surface and modication of the surface
structure of the bre, thereby making it soft and smooth (Mehra et al. 1993).
In conventional process protruded bres are removed by singing process and
smoothness imparted by chemical treatment. The conventional methods are
temporary, bres return on the surface of the fabric and chemicals are removed
after few washing and fuzz is formed. The fuzz on the surface spoils the fabric
appearance and generates customer’s dissatisfaction whereas biopolishing is
permanent and it not only keeps the fabric in good condition after repeated
washing but also enhances feel, colour, drapability etc consequently products
become more attractive to the customer and fetch better prices.
Examples of some cellulases are Aspergillus Niger, Trichoderma
longibrachiatum, Fusarium solani and Trichoderma viride. The enzymes are bimolecular of about 20 amino acids with molecular weight ranging from
12,000 to 1,50,000 and therefore they are too large to penetrate the interior
of a cellulosic bre. Hence, only 1,4 β-glucosidic bonds at the surface of
cellulose bre are affected (Pedersen et al. 1992). This results in removal
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 54/457
42 Bioprocessing of textiles
of surface hairs which are responsible for improvement in the hand and
feel of the fabric due to surface etching. Biopolishing or bio nishing can
be performed continuously and in batch form but the treatment conditions
are more easily controlled in batch processes for which winches, jiggers, jet
or over ow machines are suitable. In principle, bionishing can be carried
out along with any other stage of textile nishing, with dyeing for example
provided that both processes are subject to identical conditions. However, it is
best carried out after bleaching and before dyeing.
Advantages of bio-polishing
• Improved pilling resistance
• A clearer, lint and fuzz-free surface structure • Improved drape ability and softness
• The effects are durable
• Slight improvement in absorbency
• Fashionable effects on fabric like distressed look of denim
2.6.9 Bio-carbonizing
Polyester/cellulosic blends after dyeing and/ or printing are occasionally
treated with strong solution of sulphuric acid to dissolve cellulosic component.The resultant goods are soft and have a peculiar uffy feel. This process is
risky due to highly corrosive acid that is also difcult to treat in an Efuent
Treatment Plant (ETP). The goods are treated with cellulose enzyme based
formulation to achieve dissolution of cellulosic bres. In the bio-carbonizing
process the goods are treated with a cellulose enzyme based formulation to
achieve dissolution of cellulosic component. The goods are padded in a warm
solution of this product and batched on a roll under normal conditions and are
washed off after 12–16 hours. This process offers an eco-friendly option to the
obnoxious use of strong acids.
2.6.10 Degumming of silk
Silk is made up of two types of proteins like fibroin and sericin (Ross et al.
2003). In the case of enzymatic treatment, a sericin specic protein was used
to degum the silk without causing damage, impart softness and increase dye
uptake of about 30%. If silk was degummed by alkaline treatment, there was
damage to fibroin and heavy weight loss (Puente and Lopez-Otin 2004).
2.6.11 Textile auxiliaries
Textile auxiliaries such as dyes could be produced by fermentation or from
plants in the future (before invention of synthetic dyes in the nineteenth century
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 55/457
Industrial enzymes 43
many of the colours used to dye textiles came from plants e.g. wood, indigo and
madder). Many microorganisms produce pigments during their growth, which
are substantive as indicated by the permanent staining that is often associated
with mildew growth on textiles and plastics (Paul F Hamlyn 1995). It is not
unusual for some species to produce up to 30% of their dry weight as pigment.
Several for these microbial pigments have been shown to be benzoquinone,
naphthoquinone, anthraquinone, perinaphthenone and benzo uoranthene
quinone derivatives, resembling in some instances the important group of
vat dyes. Microorganisms would therefore seem to offer great potential for
the direct production of novel textile dyes of dye intermediates by controlled
fermentation techniques replacing chemical syntheses, which have inherentwaste disposal problems (e.g. toxic heavy metal compounds). The production
and evaluation of microbial pigments as textile colorants is currently being
investigated. Another biotechnological route for producing pigments for use
in the food, cosmetics of textile industries is from plant cell culture. One of the
major success stories of plant biotechnology so far has been the commercial
production since 1983 in Japan of the red pigment shikonin, which has
been incorporated into new range of cosmetics. Traditionally, shikonin was
extracted from the roots of ve year old plants of the species Lithosperum
erythrorhiz where it makes up about 1 to 2 per cent of the dry weight of theroot, tissue culture, pigment, yields of about 15 per cent of the dry weight of
the roof cells has been achieved.
2.6.12 Decolorization of dye water efuent
In textile dyeing as well as other industrial applications, large amounts of
dyestuffs are used. As a characteristic of the textile processing industry, a
wide range of structurally diverse dyes can be used in a single factory, and
therefore efuents from the industry are extremely variable in composition
(Abadulla 2000). This underlines the need for a largely unspecic process for
treating textile waste. It is known that 90% of reactive dyes entering activated
sludge sewage treatment plants will through unchanged and be discharged in
to rivers. High COD and BOD, suspended solids and intense colour due to the
extensive use of dyes characterize wastewater from textile industry, especially
process houses. This type of water must be treated before discharging it into
the environment. The water must be decolorized; harmful chemicals must be
converted into harmless chemicals. Biological treatments have been used toreduce the COD of textile efuents (Menzes and Desai 2004). Physical and
chemical treatments are effective for colour removal but use more energy and
chemicals than biological processes. They also concentrate the pollution into
solid or liquid side streams that require additional treatments or disposal, on
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 56/457
44 Bioprocessing of textiles
the contrary biological processes completely mineralize pollutants and are
cheaper. Instead of using the chemical treatments, various biological methods
can be used to treat the water from the textile industry. These methods include,
biosorption, use of enzymes, aerobic and anaerobic treatments etc. Only
biotechnological solutions can offer complete destruction of the dyestuff, with
a co-reduction in BOD and COD. In addition, the biotechnological approach
makes efcient use of the limited development space available in many
traditional dye house sites. The synthetic dyes are designed in such a way that
they become resistant to microbial degradation under the aerobic conditions.
Also the water solubility and the high molecular weight inhibit the permeation
through biological cell membranes. Anaerobic processes convert the organiccontaminants principally occupy less space; treat wastes containing up to
30,000 mg/l of COD, have lower running costs and produce less sludge.
Azo dyes are susceptible to anaerobic biodegradation but reduction of azo
compounds can result in odor problems. Biological systems, such as biolters
and bioscrubbers, are now available for the removal of odor and other volatile
compounds. The dyes can be removed by biosorption on apple pomace and
wheat straw. The experimental results showed that one gram of apple pomace
and one gram of wheat straw, with a particle size of 600 μm, where suitable
adsorbents for the removal of dyes from efuents. Apple pomace had a greatercapacity to absorb the reactive dyes, compared to wheat straw.
2.6.13 Finishing of cotton knits
Cellulase enzyme treatments increasingly nd applications in cotton hosiery
sector to enhance aesthetic feel as well as surface clarity. Ultrazyme Super is an
enzyme –based formulation, well suited for use in winches or high turbulence
soft ow machines. Adequate caution must be exercised to deactivate residual
enzyme by elevating temperatures to around 80–85°C, otherwise the reaction
would continue to take place resulting in loss of physical strength of goods.
2.6.14 Bio-denim washing
Another use of cellulase enzyme is in the fading of denims. Denims are
manufactured from indigo dyed warp yarns. The dyes are mainly absorbed on
the surface of the bre, a phenomenon technically termed as ring dyeing. The
bre surface etching with cellulase enzymes results in exposure of the undyedcore of the bres which gives a faded look to the denim. The dye removal is
further facilitated by the mechanical abrasion. Earlier the effect was obtained
by washing denim with pumice stones. Pumice stones are soft, light and
porous in nature. About 1–2 kg pumice stones per pair of jeans were used to
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 57/457
Industrial enzymes 45
get the desired worn out look. Though stone washing gives the desired result
but it has got several disadvantages. The major problem with stone washing is
that lot of sludge gets deposited in the efuent tank due to worning of pumice.
The sludge has to be separated from efuent water and disposed off. The use
of stones was, therefore, replaced by cellulase enzymes. When indigo dye is
released to the wash liquor during washing, the solution turns dark blue. Indigo
dye has two amino groups which are capable of getting protonated in an acidic
media. Due to protonation, the dyestuff gains an overall positive charge on the
contrary; cellulose maintains its negative charges in an acidic media. Positive
and negative charges attract one another in solution. Therefore, in acidic pH
the afnity of indigo for cotton increases. Some of this indigo redeposit on thewhiter parts of the denim fabric which spoils the colour contrast of the stone
wash effect. This phenomenon is known as “back-staining”. Back-staining
problem is more evident with acid cellulases. The use of neutral cellulases
is recommended to control the back staining problem because of their better
control in decolouration effect and resistance to back staining. Some auxiliary
chemicals help in controlling the back staining effect, for e.g. Sandoclear IDS
Liq is claimed to be very efcient in removing back-staining. Treatment with
proteases during rinsing or at the end of the cellulase washing step results
in signicant reduction of back staining and improved contrast. The use ofenzyme for denim washing has the following advantages over pumice stone
washing.
Advantages of bio-denim washing
• Superior garment quality
• Increased load handling (30–35%)
• Environment friendly processing
• Less damage to seams, edges and badges
• Extra softener not required • Less equipment wear
• Easy handling of oors and sewers
• No handling of pumice/ceramic stones
2.7 Features of enzyme application in textile
processing
Biotechnology is a multidisciplinary eld, which has been considered in
several national development programs as one of the strategic areas and as
source of considerable amount of new products with high impact in textile
industries (Kirk 2005). Enzymes are a sustainable alternative to the use of harsh
chemicals in industry. Because enzymes work under moderate conditions,
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 58/457
46 Bioprocessing of textiles
such as warm temperatures and neutral pH, they reduce energy consumption
by eliminating the need to maintain extreme environments, as required by
many chemically catalyzed reactions. Reducing energy consumption leads to
decreased greenhouse gas emissions by power stations. Enzymes also reduce
water consumption and chemical waste production during manufacturing
processes (Lopmundra and Nayak 2004). Because enzymes react specically
and minimize the production of by-products, they offer minimal risk to
humans, wildlife, and the environment. Enzymes are both economically and
environmentally feasible because they are safely inactivated and create little
or no waste; rather than being discarded, end-product enzymatic material may
be treated and used as fertilizer for farmers’ crops. Bioprocessing done withenzymes on organic cotton fabrics will produce 100% eco-friendly garments
and apparel, which is very advantageous for the health of the consumers and
the environment (Nallankilli 1992). Bioprocessing with its pervasive eld of
application surely going to conquer the world of textiles and will make it to
rich the pinnacle of its performance. There are few to enunciate, however
many such potentials are yet to explore. Bio-processing in textiles provides to
be a boon to the ever changing conditions of the ecology as well as economy
(Vigneswaran and Keerthivasan 2009).
• Extremely specic nature of reactions involved, with practically noside effects.
• Low energy requirements, mild conditions of use, safe to handle,
non-corrosive in their applications.
• On account of lesser quantities of chemicals used in process as well
as ease of biodegradability of enzymes results in reduced loads on
ETP plants.
• Enzymes under unfavorable conditions of pH or temperatures
chemically remain in same form but their physical congurationmay get altered i.e. they get “denatured” and lose their activity. For
this reason live steam must never be injected in a bath containing
enzymes and any addition of chemicals to the enzymes bath must be
done in pre-diluted form.
• Compatibility with ionic surfactants is limited and must be checked
before use. Nonionic wetting agents with appropriate cloud points
must be selected for high working efciency as well as for uniformity
of end results.
• High sensitivity to pH, heavy metal contaminations and also toeffective temperature range.
• Intense cautions are required in use.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 59/457
Industrial enzymes 47
2.8 References
Abadulla, A., ‘Enzymatic decolourization of Textile Dyeing Efuents’, Text Res J, 2000,70(5), 409–414.
Aebi, H., ‘Catalase in vitro’, Meth Enzymol, 1984, 105, 121–126.
Alat, D.V., ‘Recent Developments in the Processing of Textiles Using Enzymes’,
Colourage, 2001, 48(2), 33–36.
Alves, M.H., Takaki, G.M.C., Porto, A.L.F. and Milanez, A.I., ‘Screening of Mucor spp for
the Production of Amylase, Lipase, Polygalacturonase and Protease’, Brazilian Journal of
Microbiology, 2002, 33(4), 325–330.
Andreaus, J., Campos, R., Gübitz, G., and Cavaco-Paulo, A., ‘Inuence of cellulases on
Indigo Back staining’, Text Res J, 2000, 70, 628–632.
Anto, H., Trivedi, U. and Patel, K., ‘Alpha Amylase Production by Bacillus cerens MTCC
1305 using Solid State Fermentation’, Food Technology Biotechnology, 2006, 44(2), 241
– 245.
Anto, H., Trivedi, U., and Patel, K., ‘Alpha Amylase Production by Bacillus cereus MTCC
1305 Using Solid-State Fermentation’, Food Technology Biotech, 2006, 44(2), 241–245.
Banarjee, R., Bhattacharyya, B.C., ‘Evolutionary operation as a tool optimization for solid
state fermentation’, Biochem Engg J, 2003, 13, 149–155.
Barrett, A.J., Rawlings, N.D., Woessner, J.F., The Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes, 2nd
ed. Academic Press, 2003. ISBN 0-12-079610-4.
Bernfeld, P., ‘Amylases, alpha and beta’, Method Enzymology, 1955, 1(3), 149–158.
Bindslev Jensen, C., Skov, P.S., Roggen, E.L., Hvass, P., and Brinch, D.S., ‘Investigation
on possible allergenicity of 19 different commercial enzymes used in the food industry’,
Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2006, 4(1), 1909–1915.
Buchert, J., Peter, J., Puolakka, A. and Nousiainen, P., ‘Scouring of Cotton with Pectinases,
Proteases and Lipases’, Textile Chemists and Colorists and American Dyestuff Reporter,
2000, 32(5), 48–52.
Buschie-diller, G., Zeronian, S.H., Pan, N., and Yoon, M. Y., ‘Enzymatic hydrolysis ofcotton, linen, ramie and viscose fabric’, Text Res J, 1994, 64, 240–279.
Calafell, M., and Garriga, P., ‘Effect of Some Process Parameters in the Enzymatic Scouring
of Cotton using Acid Pectinases’, Enzyme and Microbial Tech, 2004, 34(3), 326–331.
Cavaco-Paulo, A., Gubitz, G., ‘Textile processing with enzymes’, Woodhead Publishing
Limited, 2003, ISBN-13: 978 1 85573 610 8.
Chandrika, G,P., ‘Cross linking of enzymes for improved stability and performance’,
Current Opinion in Biotech, 1999, 10, 331–335.
Chelikani, P., Fita, I., Loewen, P.C., ‘Diversity of structures and properties among
catalases’, Cell Mol Life Sci, 2004, 61(2), 192–208.
Churi, R.Y., Khadilkar, S.M, and Sule, S., ‘Enzyme Systems for processing cellulosic
textiles’, Colourage, 2004, 5, 37–42.
Csiszar, E., Szakacs, G., and Rusznak, I., ‘Combining traditional cotton scouring with
cellulase enzymatic treatment’, Text Res J, 1998, 68(3), 163–167.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 60/457
48 Bioprocessing of textiles
Dalvi, P., Anthappan, P., Darade, N., Kanoonge, N., and Adivarekar, R., ‘Amylase and
Pectipase from Single Source for Simultaneous Desizing and Scouring’, Indian J Fibre and
Text Res, 2007, 32(4), 459–465.
De Maria, L., Vind, J., Oxenboll, K.M., and Svendsen, A., ‘Phospholipases and their
industrial applications’, Appl Microbiol Biotech, 2007, 74, 290–300.
Durand, A., Renaud, R., Almanza, S., Maratray, J., Diez, M., Desgranges, C., ‘Solid-state
fermentation reactors: from lab scale to pilot plant’, Biotechnol Adv, 1993, 11, 591–597.
Ee, J.H., Misset, O., and Baas, E.J., ‘Enzymes in Detergency’, Surfactant Science Series,
1997, 2(1), 69–75.
Egmond, M.R., and Van Bemmel, C.J., ‘Impact of Structural Information on Understanding
of Lipolytic Function’, Methods Enzymol, 1997, 284: 119–129.
Eisisi, F.F., Haz, S.A.A., Rae, M.H. and Hebeish, A., ‘Development of a One-step
process for Desizing, Scouring, Bleaching Cotton Based Textiles’, American Dyestuff
Reporter, 1990, 79(10), 39–43.
El-Shafei, H.A., and Rezkallah, L.A., ‘Production, purication and characterization of
Bacillus lipase’, Microbiology Resource, 1997, 152(2), 199–208.
Etters, J.N., ‘Cotton Preparation with Alkaline Pectinase: An Environmental Advance’,
Textile Chemists and Colorists and American Dyestuff Reporter, 1999, 1(3), 33–36.
Etters, J.N., Husain, P.A., and Lange, N.K., ‘Alkaline pectinase: an eco friendly approach
to cotton preparation’, Textile Asia, 2003, 1, 83–86.
Falholt, P., and Olsen, H.S., ‘The Role of Enzymes in Modern Detergency’, J Surfact
Detergency, 1998, 1, 555–67.
Flickinger, M.C., and Drew, S.W., ‘The Encyclopedia of Bioprocess Technology:
Fermentation, Biocatalysis & Bioseparation’, John Wiley & Sons, 1998.
Fujii, T., Tarara, T. and Minagawa, M., ‘Studies on Applications of Lipolytic Enzyme
in Detergent - Effect of Lipase from Candidacylindracea on Removal of Olive Oil from
Cotton Fabrics’, J American Oil Chemists Society, 1986, 63, 6, 796–799.
Gaffar Hossain, M., ‘Multifunctional modication of wool using an enzymatic process in
aqueous- organic media’, J Biotech, 2009, 141(1), 47–59.
Gubitz, G.M., and Cavaco-Paulo, A., ‘Biotechnology in the Textile Industry – Perspectives
for the New Millennium’, J Biotech, 2001, 89(2), 91–94.
Gulrajani, M.L., and Venkatraj, R., ‘A Low Temperature Scouring / Bleaching Process for
Cotton’, Text Res J, 1986, 56(8), 476–483.
Gupta, R., Beg, Q.K. and Lorenz, P., ‘Bacterial Alkaline Proteases: Molecular Approaches
and Industrial Applications’, Applied Microbiology and Biotech, 2002, 59(1), 15–32.
Gupta, R., Gupta, N. and Rathii, P., ‘Bacterial lipases: An overview of production,
purication and biochemical properties’, Applied Microbiology Biochemistry, 2004,664(6), 764–769.
Hamlyn, P.F., ‘The Impact of Biotechnology on the Textile Industry’, Textiles Magazine,
1995, 3, 6–10.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 61/457
Industrial enzymes 49
Hedstrom, L., ‘Serine Protease Mechanism and Specicity’, Chem Rev, 2002, 102, 4501–
4523.
Ho, Y.S., Xiong, Y., Ma, W., Spector, A., and Ho, D., ‘Mice Lacking Catalase Develop
Normally but Show Differential Sensitivity to Oxidant Tissue Injury’, J Biol Chem, 2004,
279 (31), 32804–812.
Hooper, N.M., ‘Proteases in Biology and Medicine’, Portland Press, London, 2002. ISBN
1-85578-147-6.
Hsieh, Y.L., and Cram, L., ‘Protease as Scouring Agents for Cotton’, Text Res J, 1999,
69(8), 590–597.
Isobe, K., Inoue, N., Takamatsu, Y., Kamada, K., and Wakao, N., ‘Production of catalase
by fungi growing at low pH and high temperature’, J Biosci Bioengg, 2006, 101 (1), 73–6.
Karapinar, E., and Sariisik, M.O., ‘Scouring of cotton with cellulase, Pectinases and
proteases’, Fibres and Textiles Eastern Europe, 2004, 12, 79–84.
Karapinar, E., and Sariisik, M.O., ‘Scouring of Cotton with Cellulases, Pectinases and
Proteases’, Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe, 2004, 12(3), 79–82.
Karmakar, S.R., ‘Application of Biotechnology in the Pretreatment Process of Textiles’,
Colourage Annual, 1998, 45(12), 75–86.
Kearsley, M.W., and Dziedzic, S.Z., ‘Handbook of Starch Hydrolysis Products and Their
Derivatives’, Blackie Academic & Professional, 1995.
Kirk, O., ‘Enzyme in Industrial Applications’, 5th ed., Wiley Interscience, 2005, 10, 248–
317.
Kokusho, Y., Machida, H. and Iwasaki, S., ‘Studies on Alkali Lipase: Isolation and
Identication of Lipase Producing Microorganism’, Agricultural and Biological Chemistry,
1982, 46(5), 1159–1164.
Koo, H., Ueda, M., Wakida, T., Yoshimura, Y., and Igarashi T., ‘Cellulase Treatment of
Cotton Fabrics’, Text Res J, 1994, 64(2), 70–74.
Kumar, V.S., Meenakshisundaram, S., and Selvakumar, N., ‘Conservation of cellulase
enzyme in biopolishing application of cotton fabrics’, J Text Inst, 2008, 1(14), 339–346.
Kunanmneni, A., Permaul, K., and Singh, S., ‘Amylase Production in Solid State
Fermentation by the Thermophilic Fungus Thennomyces lanuginosus’, J Bioscience and
Engg, 2005, 100(2), 168–171.
Lange, N.K., ‘Lipase Assisted Desizing of Woven Cotton Fabrics’, AATCC Review, 1997,
29(6), 23–26.
Lee, L., Evans, B.R. and Woodward, J., ‘The Mechanism of Cellulase Action on Cotton
Fibres - Evidence from Atomic Force Microscopy’, Ultramicroscopy, 2000, 82(1), 213–
221.
Li, Y., and Hardin, I.R., ‘Enzymatic Scouring of Cotton Surfactants, Agitation, andSelection of Enzymes’, Text Chemists and Colorists, 1998, 30(9), 23–29.
Li, Y., and Hardin, I.R., ‘Treating Cotton with Cellulase and Pectinases: Effects on Cuticle
and Fibre Properties’, Text Res J, 1998, 68(9), 671–679.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 62/457
50 Bioprocessing of textiles
Loew, O., ‘A New Enzyme of General Occurrence in Organisms’, Science (journal), 1900,
11 (279), 701–702.
Lopmundra, N., and Nayak, P.S., ‘A part of ensuring Eco-Standard’, Clothesline, 2004,
2(1), 87–93.
Lowe, M.E., ‘The catalytic site residues and interfacial binding of human pancreatic
lipase’, J Biol Chem, 1992, 267 (24), 17069–73.
Maehly, A., and Chance, B., ‘The assay of catalases and peroxidases’, Methods Biochem
Anal, 1954, 1, 357–424.
Mala, J.G.S., Oliver, N.G.E., Kamini, N.R., and Puvanakrishnan, R., ‘Mixed Substrate
Solid State Fermentations for Production and Extraction of Lipase from Aspergillus niger
MTCC 2594’, J General and Applied Microbiology, 2007, 53(4), 247–253.
Martin, N., De Souza, S.R., Silva, R., and Gomes, E., ‘Pectinase Production by Fungal
Strains in Solid State Fermentation using Agro industrial Byproduct’, Brazilian Archives
of Biology and Tech, 2004, 47(5), 813–819.
Mehra, R.H., Mehra Anil, R., Mehra Arun, R, and Mehra Sanjay, R., ‘Enzymatic Softening
of Textiles’, Indian Text Annual and Directory, 1993, 77–84.
Menzes, E., and Desai, B., ‘Water in Textile Wet processing-Quality and Measures’,
Clothesline, 2004, 4(3), 56–61.
Mori, R., Haga, R., and Takashishi, T., ‘Bending and Shear Properties of Cotton Fabrics
Subjected to Cellulase Treatment’, Text Res J, 1999, 69(10), 742–746.
Murado, M.A., Gonz´alez, M.P., Torrado, A., Pastrana, L.M., ‘Amylase production by solid
state culture of Aspergillus oryzae on polyurethane foams: Some mechanistic approaches
from an empirical model’, Proc Biochem, 1996, 32, 35–42.
Murthy, M.R., Reid, T.J., Sicignano, A., Tanaka, N., Rossmann, M.G., ‘Structure of beef
liver catalase’, J Mol Biol, 1981, 152 (2), 465–99.
Nagodawithana, T., and Reed, G., ‘Enzymes in Food Processing’, 3rd ed., Academic Press,
1993.
Nalankilli, G., and Sundar, A.E., ‘Biobleaching’, Asian Text J, 2002, 2(7), 33–34.
Nallankilli, G., ‘Enzymes in Textile wet processing’, Text Industrial and Trade J, 1992,
30, 51–55.
Obendorf, S.K., Varanashi, A., Mejldal, R. and Nielsen, V.S., ‘Lipid Distribution of Cotton
Textiles in Relation to Washing with Cellulase’, J Surfactants and Detergents, 2003, 6, 1,
1–5.
Ooijkaas, L.P., Weber, F.J., Buitelaar, R., Tamper, J., and Rinzema, A., ‘Dened media
and inert supports: their potential as solid-state fermentation production systems’, Trends
Biotechnol, 2000, 18, 356–360.
Pandey, ‘Recent process developments in solid-state fermentation’, Proc Biochem, 1992,27, 109–117.
Pandey, A., ‘Solid-state fermentation’, Biochem Engg J, 2003, 13, 81–84.
Pandey, A., Selvakumar, P., Soccol, C.R. and Nigam, P., ‘Solid State Fermentation for the
Production of Industrial Enzymes’, Current Science, 1999, 77(1), 149–162.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 63/457
Industrial enzymes 51
Pandey, A., Selvakumar, P., Soccol, C.R., Nigam, P., ‘Solid state fermentation for the
production of industrial enzymes’, Curr Sci, 1999, 77, 149–162.
Pandey, A., Soccol, C.R, and Mitchell, D., ‘New developments in solid state fermentation-
Bioprocesses and products’, Proc Biochem, 2000, 35, 1153–1169.
Pardeshi, P.D., ‘Recent Developments in Bleaching of Cotton’, Indian Text J, 2000, 112(1),
29–32.
Pastrana, L.M., Gonzalez, M.P., Pintado, J., and Murado, M.A., ‘Interactions affecting
gibberellic acid production in solid-state culture: a factorial study’, Enzyme Microb
Technol, 1995, 17, 784–790.
Paulo, A.C., and Almeida, L., ‘Kinetic Parameters Measured during Cellulase Processing
of Cotton’, J Text Inst, 1996, 1(1), 227–233.
Pedersen, G. L., Screws, G.A., and Cedroni, D.M., ‘Biopolishing of cellulosic fabrics’,
Can Text J, 1992, 109, 31–35.
Pettier, G.L., and Beckord, L.D., ‘Sources of Amylase Producing Bacteria’, J Bacteriology,
1945, 50(6), 711–714.
Presa, P., and Forte Tavcer, P., ‘Pectinases as agents for Bioscouring’, Tekstilec, 2007, 50,
16–34.
Puente, X.S., and Lopez-Otin, C., ‘A Genomic Analysis of Proteases and Protease
Inhibitors’, Genome Biol, 2004, 14, 609–622.
Robinson, T., McMullan, G., Marchant, R., Nigam, P., ‘Remediation of dyes in textile
efuent: a critical review on current treatment technologies with a proposed alternative’,
Bioresour Technol, 2001, 77, 247–255.
Rodríguez Couto, S., Sanromán, M.A., ‘Application of solid-state fermentation to
ligninolytic enzyme production’, Biochemical Engg J, 2005, 22(3), 211–219.
Ross, J., Jiang, H., Kanost, M.R., Wang, Y., ‘Serine proteases and their homologs in
the Drosophila melanogaster genome: an initial analysis of sequence conservation and
phylogenetic relationships’, Gene, 2003, 304, 117–31.
Schrag, J., and Cygler, M., ‘Lipases and alpha/beta hydrolase fold’, Methods Enzymol,
1997, 284, 85–107.
Schroeder, W.A., Shelton, J.R., Shelton, J.B., Robberson, B., Apell, G., ‘The amino acid
sequence of bovine liver catalase: a preliminary report’, Arch Biochem Biophys, 1969,
131(2), 653–5.
Sharmaa, R., Chisty, Y. and Banerjee, U.C. “Production, Purication, Characterisation and
Applications of Lipases”, Biotechnology Advances, 2001, 19(8), 627–662.
Showell, M.S., and Baas, E.J., ‘Powdered Detergents’, Surfactant Science Series, 1998,
71(6), 245–280.
Shukla, S.R., and Jaipura, L., ‘Estimating Amylase Activity for Desizing by DNSA’, Textile Asia, 2004, 35(11), 15–20.
Southan, C., ‘A genomic perspective on human proteases as drug targets’, Drug Discov
Today, 2001, 6, 681–688.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 64/457
52 Bioprocessing of textiles
Sreenath, H.K., Shah, A.B., Yang, V.W., Gharia, M.M., and Jeferies, T.W., ‘Enzymatic
polishing of jute/cotton blended fabrics’, J Ferm Bioengg, 1996, 81(1), 18–20.
Sumner, J.B., and Dounce, A.L., ‘Crystalline catalase’, Science (journal), 1937, 85 (2206),
366–367.
Svendsen, A., ‘Lipase protein engineering’, Biochem Biophys Acta, 2000, 1543 (2), 223–
228.
Tyndall, R.M., ‘Application of cellulase enzymes to cotton fabrics and garments’, Text
Chem Color, 1996, 24, 23–26.
Tyndall, R.M., ‘Improving the Softness and Surface Appearance of Cotton Fabrics and
Garments by Treatment with Cellulase Enzymes’, Text Chemists and Colorists, 1996,
24(6), 23–26.
Tzanov, T., ‘Protein interactions in enzymatic processes in textiles’, J Biotech, 2003, 6(3),
85–93. ISSN: 0717-3458.
Varanasi, A., Obendorf, S.K., Pedersen, L.S., and Mejldal, R., ‘Lipid Distribution on
Textiles in Relation to Washing with Lipases”, Journal of Surfactants and Detergents’,
2001, 4(2), 135–146.
Vigneswaran, C., Ananthasubramanian, M., Anbumani, N., and Rajendran, R., ‘Prediction
of optimum process parameter to achieve eco-friendly desizing of organic cotton fabrics
with indigenously produced alpha-amylase and their enzyme kinetics’, J Text Inst, 2012,
103(4), 422–433.Vigneswaran, C., Ananthasubramanian, M., and Anbumani, N., ‘Biovision in Textile
wet processing Industry – Technological Challenges’, J Textile, Apparel Technology and
Management, 2011, 7(1), 1–12.
Vigneswaran, C., Anbumani, N., Ananthasubramanian, M., and Rajendran, R., ‘Prediction
and process optimization of pectinolytic reaction on organic cotton fabrics for bioscouring
with alkaline pectinase’, Indian J Fibre and Text Res, 2012, 37(2), 183–190.
Vigneswaran, C., and Keerthivasan, D., ‘Bio-processing of cotton fabrics with commercial
enzymes’, Melliand International, 2008, 14(5), 308–311.
Vigneswaran, C., and Keerthivasan, D., ‘Eco-standards in garment processing through eco-auditing’, Indian Text J, 2009, 6, 22–26. ISSN 0019-6436.
Wan, Q., Fan, X., Hua, Z., Gao, W. and Chen, J., ‘Degradation Kinetics of Pectins by
an Alkaline Pectinase in Bioscouring of Cotton Fabrics’, Carbohydrate Polymers, 2007,
67(4), 572–575.
Wang, D.I.C., Cooney, C.L., Demain, A.L., ‘Fermentation and enzyme technology’, Wiley,
New York, 1979. ISBN 0471919454.
Wang, H.L., Vespa, J.B., and Hesseltine, C.W., ‘Acid Protease Production by Fungi Used
in Soybean Food Fermentation’, Applied Microbiology, 1974, 27(5), 906–911.
Whitehurst, R., and Law, B.A., ‘Enzymes in food technology’, Shefeld Food Technology,
2001, 8.
Winkler, F.K., D’Arcy, A., and Hunziker, W., ‘Structure of human pancreatic lipase’,
Nature, 1990, 343 (6260), 771–774.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 65/457
Abstract: This chapter discusses the need and scope biotechnology for enzymatictreatment (bioprocessing) of natural textile bres such as cotton, jute, ax, wool
and silk to improve their physical and functional properties and also brief thechemical structural changes and improvement of surface characteristics havebeen outlined. The chapter also discusses the previous researchers and scientistsinvolved in production and characterization of various enzymes such as alphaamylase, lipase, protease, pectinase and cellulase, with various factors thatinuence the growth of microbes and yield of enzymes. Firstly, the applicationof enzymes on cotton fabric such as desizing, scouring and bleaching, theirinuence on structure and properties of bres and fabrics have also discussed.The chapter then discusses the enzyme treatment of jute and ax both bre andfabric forms have been discussed on their improvement of functional and physicalcharacteristics. Secondly, the application of wool and silk natural bres have
been discussed with previous researchers and scientists who have made attempton process like degumming and wool nishing on improvement of quality andfunctional aspects.
Keywords: Natural bre, cotton, jute, ax, wool nishing, silk degumming,pectinase, lipase, protease
3.1 Introduction
The awareness regarding environment conscious among the people has
made the scientists and technologists to look at textile processing in adifferent perspective. The textile industry was identied as a key sector
where opportunities available from adapting biotechnology are high but
current awareness of biotechnology is less. At present in textile processing
for cotton fabric the alpha amylase enzyme can be successfully used for
preparatory process like desizing. These enzymatic processes are gives
the similar results as that of conventional methods. Enzymatic desizing
processes can also identify for reduce the water consumption, power energy,
pollution, time, and increasing quality. Recently, considerable efforts have been put to use enzymes in the ax retting process to control the process
to produce linen bres of consistent quality. Previously pre-treatment of
the ax with sulphur dioxide gas brings breakdown of the woody straw
material and now to speed up enzyme retting whilst preventing excessive
3
Bioprocessing of natural bres
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 66/457
54 Bioprocessing of textiles
bacterial or fungal deterioration of the ax bre. Wool bre pretreatments,
the carbonization process in which vegetable matter in wool is degraded
by treatment with strong acid and then subjected to mechanical crushing
can, in principle, be replaced by selective enzyme degradation of the
impurities.
The international wool secretariat (IWS) together with, Novozymes,
has been developing the use of protease enzymes for a range of wool
nishing treatments aimed at increased comfort (reduced prickle, greater
softness) as well as improved surface appearance and pilling performance.
The improved enzyme treatments will allow more selective removal of
parts of the wool cuticle, there by modifying the luster, handle and feltingcharacteristics without degradation or weakening of the wool bre as a
whole and without the need for environmentally damaging pre-chlorination
treatment. Silk is made up of two types of proteins like broin and sericin.
In the case of enzymatic treatment, a sericin specic protein was used to
degum the silk without causing damage, impart softness and increase dye
uptake of about 30%. If silk was degummed by alkaline treatment, there
was damage to broin and heavy weight loss. Protease enzymes similar
to those being developed for wool processing are already being used for
the degumming of silk and for producing sand washed effects on silkgarments. Treatment of silk/cellulosic blend is claimed to produce some
unique effects. Proteases are also being used to wash down printing screens
after use in order to remove the proteinaceous gums, which are used for
thickening of printing pastes. The use of enzymes in textile processing
and after care is already the best established example of the application of
biotechnology to textiles and is likely to continue to provide some of the
most immediate and possibly dramatic illustrations of its potential in the
near- to medium-term future.
3.2 Bioprocessing of cotton and their
characteristics
3.2.1 Cotton bres physical and chemical properties
3.2.1.1 Physical properties of cotton
Cotton morphology
A cotton bre appears as a very ne, regular, look like a twisted ribbonor a collapsed and twisted tube structure under normal microscope view
(Fig. 3.1). These twists are called as ‘convolutions’ , about sixty convolutions
per centimeter in a normal cotton bre. The cross sectional view of a cotton
bre is having ‘bean’ or ‘kidney-shaped’ structure. The cotton bre is a single
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 67/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 55
plant cell and composed of concentric layers. A mature cotton bre has the six
parts namely (i) cuticle, (ii) primary wall, (iii) winding layer, (iv) secondary
wall, (v) lumen wall, and (vi) lumen. The ‘cuticle’ is the outer waxy layer,
which contains pectin’s and proteinous materials. It serves as a smooth, water
resistant coating, which protects the bre. This cuticle layer is removed from
the bre by scouring during textile wet processing. The “primary wall”
is the original thin cell wall, mainly cellulose; made up of a network of
ne brils. The “winding layer” is the rst layer of secondary thickening
(Fig. 3.2). It differs in structure from both the primary wall and the remainder
of the secondary wall. It consists of brils aligned at 40–70 degree angles
to the bre axis in an open netting type of pattern. The “secondary wall”consists of concentric layers of cellulose, which constitute the main portion
of the cotton bre. After the bre has attained its maximum diameter, new
layers of cellulose are added to form the secondary wall and the brils
are deposited at 70–80 degree angles to the bre axis. The “lumen wall”
separates the secondary wall from the lumen and appears to be more
resistant to certain reagents than the secondary wall layers. The “lumen”
is the hollow canal that runs the length of the cotton bre. It is lled with
living protoplast during the growth period. After the cotton bre matures and
the boll opens, the protoplast dries up, and the lumen naturally collapses,leaving a central void, or pore space, in each bre. This internal structure
makes cotton bres accessible to liquids and vapors. The capillary action of
the brils pulls liquid in, where it is held in pores between the brils. This
structure accounts for cotton’s wickability and unique absorbing capacity.
The cotton bre is tapered on one end and brillated on the other, where
it was joined to the cotton seed and it provides the cotton bre with a soft
touch or feel to human skin.
Fig. 3.1 Microscopic view of cotton bre (longitudinal view)
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 68/457
56 Bioprocessing of textiles
Fig. 3.2 Morphological structure of cotton bre
Cotton bre length and uniformity
The cotton bre length and uniformity is basically depending on the type of
variety, cultivation environment and plantation period. Usually, cotton bre
length is described as “the average length of the longer one-half of the bres
(upper half mean length)”. Typical lengths of upland cottons might range from
0.79 to 1.36 inches (Fig. 3.3). The length of the cotton bre which determinesthe neness of the yarn and quality of fabric can be producable in the textile
process. Length uniformity or uniformity ratio is determined as “a ratio
between the mean length and the upper half mean length of the bres and is
expressed as a percentage”. Typical comparisons are illustrated in Table 3.1.
Low uniformity index shows that there might be a high content of short bres,
which lowers the quality of the textile product manufacturing.
Fig. 3.3 Cotton bre length and uniformity
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 69/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 70/457
58 Bioprocessing of textiles
ner bre result in more bres per cross section, which may turn to produce
stronger yarns. Dye absorbency and retention varies with the maturity of the
cotton bres. The greater the maturity, the better the absorbency and retention
behavior for water and other liquids.
Table 3.4 Cotton bre micronaire measurements
Cotton quality Micronaire
Fine 3.7–4.2
Average 4.3–4.9
Coarse >5.0
Color and trash
The color of cotton bres is basically determined from two parameters such as
(i) degree of reectance (Rd) and (ii) yellowness (+b). Degree of reectance
(Rd) shows the brightness of the cotton bres and yellowness depicts the
degree of cotton pigmentation. The color of the cotton bres is affected by
climatic conditions, impact of insects and fungi, type of soil, storage conditions
etc. There are ve recognized groups of color for cotton bres namely white,
gray, spotted, tinged, and yellow stained. A trash measurement describes the
amount of non-lint materials in the cotton bre. The values of trash contentshould be within the range from 0 to 1.6% for high quality cotton. Trash
content is highly correlated to leaf grade of the cotton sample.
Neps
A nep is a small tangled bre knot often caused by processing. The neps can
be measured by the AFIS (Advanced Fibre Information System) tester and
reported as the total number of neps per 0.5 grams of the bre and average size
in millimeters. Usually, the nep formation reects the mechanical processing
stage, especially from the point of view of the quality and condition of themachinery used.
Optical properties
The cotton bres show double refraction when observed in polarized light.
Even though various effects can be observed; second order yellow and
second order blue are the characteristic colors of cellulosic bres. A typical
birefringence value of cotton is 0.047.
3.2.1.2 Chemical properties of cotton
The cotton bre swells in a high humidity environment, in water and in
concentrated solutions of certain acids, salts and bases. The swelling effect
is usually attributed to the sorption of highly hydrated ions. The moisture
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 71/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 59
regain for cotton is about 7.1~8.5% and the moisture content is 7~8%. Cotton
is attacked by hot dilute or cold concentrated acid solutions. Acid hydrolysis
of cellulose produces hydro-celluloses. The cold weak acids do not affect the
cotton bre. The cotton bres show excellent resistance to alkalis and also
there are a few other solvents that will dissolve cotton completely. One of
them is a copper complex of cuprammonium hydroxide and cupriethylene
diamine (Schweitzer’s reagent). Cotton degradation is usually attributed to
oxidation, hydrolysis or both. Also, cotton bre can degrade by exposure to
visible and ultraviolet light, especially in the presence of high temperatures
around 250~397°C and humidity. Especially the cotton bres are extremely
susceptible to any biological degradation (microorganisms, fungi etc.)Chemical structure and composition of cotton bres
Cellulose chemistry
Cellulose is a polymer made up of a long chain of glucose molecules linked
by C-1 to C-4 oxygen bridges with elimination of water (glycoside bonds).
The anhydroglucose units are linked together as beta-cellobiose; therefore,
anhydro-beta-cellobiose is the repeating unit of the polymer chain (Fig. 3.4).
The number of repeat units linked together to form the cellulose polymer
is referred to as the “degree of polymerization” (DP). The cellulose chainswithin cotton bres tend to be held in place by hydrogen bonding. These
hydrogen bonds occur between the hydroxyl groups of adjacent molecules
and are most prevalent between the parallel, closely packed molecules
in the crystalline areas of the cotton bre. The three hydroxyl groups, one
primary and two secondary, in each repeating cellobiose unit of cellulose
are chemically reactive. These groups can undergo substitution reactions in
procedures designed to modify the cellulose bres or in the application of
dyes and nishes for cross linking. The hydroxyl groups are also serving as
sorption sites for water molecules, response of their strength to variations incotton bre moisture content.
Fig. 3.4 Chemical structure of cotton cellulose (one repeat unit of cellobiose unit)
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 72/457
60 Bioprocessing of textiles
In contrast, the strength of cotton generally increases with increased
moisture content. The cotton bre is not a thermoplastic bre; therefore, it
has no glass transition temperature and remains exible even at very low
temperatures. At elevated temperatures, cotton decomposes instead of
melting; long exposure to dry heat above 300°F (149°C) causes cotton bres
to decompose gradually, and temperatures above 475°F (246°C) cause rapid
deterioration. The degree of polymerization (DP) of cotton is range 5,000–
12,000. The cellulose shows approximately 66% crystallinity, which can be
determined by X-ray diffraction, infrared spectroscopy and density methods.
Each crystal unit consists of ve chains of anhydroglucose units, parallel to
the cotton bril axis.Cotton chemical composition
The chemical composition of cotton bre consists of cellulose, protein, ash,
wax, sugar, organic acids, and water (Table 3.5). The non-cellulose chemicals
of cotton are usually located in the cuticle of the cotton bre. The non-
cellulose chemicals of cotton consist of protein, ash, wax, sugar and organic
acids (Peterson 1977). In the cotton bre, wax is found on the outer surface
of the bre; primarily long chains of fatty acids and alcohols. The cotton
wax serves as a protective barrier for the cotton bre (Church and Woodhead2006). The sugar comes from two sources plant sugar and sugar from insects.
The plant sugars occur from the growth process of the cotton plant. The plant
sugars consist of monosaccharide, glucose and fructose. The insect sugars
are mainly for whiteies, the insect sugars can cause stickiness, which can
lead to problems in the textile mills. The organic acids are found in the cotton
bre as metabolic residues. The non-cellulose chemicals of cotton bre are
removed by using selective solvents. Some of these solvents include: hexane,
chloroform, sodium hydroxide solutions, non-polar solvents, hot ethanol, and
plain water (Wakelyn et al. 1975; Edward and Bharat 2004). After removingall the non-cellulose chemicals, the cotton bre is approximately ninety-nine
percent cellulose.
Table 3.5 Cotton bre composition
Composition percent
Cellulose 80–90%
Water 6–8%
Waxes and fats 0.5–1%Hemicelluloses and pectin’s 4–6%
Proteins 0–1.5%
Ash 1–1.8%
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 73/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 61
The chemical composition of cotton, when picked, is about 94 percent
cellulose; in nished fabrics is 99 percent cellulose. The cotton bre contains
carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen with reactive hydroxyl groups. Glucose is the
basic unit of the cellulose molecule. The cotton bre may have as many as
10,000 glucose monomers per molecule. The molecular chains are arranged
in long spiral linear chains within the bre. The strength of a cotton bre is
directly related to chain length. Hydrogen bonding occurs between cellulose
chains in a cotton bre. There are three hydroxyl groups that protrude from
the ring formed by one oxygen and ve carbon atoms. These groups are
polar meaning the electrons surrounding the atoms are not evenly distributed
(Allen et al. 2006). The hydrogen atoms of the hydroxyl group are attracted tomany of the oxygen atoms of the cellulose. This attraction is called ‘hydrogen
bonding’ . The bonding of hydrogen’s within the ordered regions of the brils
causes the molecules to draw closer to each other which increases the strength
of the cotton bre. Hydrogen bonding also aids in moisture absorption. Cotton
ranks among the most absorbent bres because of hydrogen bonding which
contributes to cotton’s comfort. The chemical reactivity of cellulose is related
to the hydroxyl groups of the glucose unit. The moisture, dyes, and many
chemical nishes cause these groups to readily react. Chemicals like chlorine
bleaches attack the oxygen atom between or within the two ring units breakingthe molecular chain of the cellulose substances.
3.2.2 Desizing of cotton fabric
For cotton fabrics, traditional desizing is being carried out by high temperature
washing process and high concentrations of surfactants (Lu 2005). As the
process proceeds, the viscosity of the washing liquor rises rapidly because
sizing agents dissolve. Therefore, large amounts of hot water are required.
The use of industrial enzymes for desizing represents a major improvement
because they cleave the biopolymers used a sizing agents into sub units as
oligosaccharides (Warke and Chandratre 2003). In some cases, this is a rst
step in bio-preparation of cotton fabrics (Buschie-Diller et al. 1994; Tzanko
et al. 2001). Anaerobial microbial cultures in the desizing of cotton fabrics
was studied and reported that the bioreactor from wastewater and microbial
culture for desizing of cotton was performed up to 73% desizing efciency
at 55°C and time of 60 min and it depends mainly on the temperature and
reaction time of the process and need for optimizing the process conditions forachieving better desizing and low energy (Heikinheimo et al. 2003).
The mechanical properties of synthetic size materials are better than
starch-based materials. Among different synthetic sizes, polyvinyl alcohol
(PVA) exhibits overall better performance (Bayard 1983). Sizing is a process
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 74/457
62 Bioprocessing of textiles
used for the application of a lm forming polymer to provide temporary
protection to the warp yarns from abrasive and other types of stresses
generated on the weaving machines in order to reduce the warp breakages.
Sizing helps in forming a coating which encapsulates the yarn, embeds the
protruding bres and also causes some inter-bre binding by penetration.
The spun yarns being hairy usually require size add on exceeding 8–10%;
depending on the fabric to be woven. The small addition of synthetic binder
to starch causes plasticization and increases the adhesion. Major drawback
of the starch, brittleness of the lm, can be reduced by providing internal
plasticization (Shah et al. 1976; Moghe and Khera 2005).
Enzymatic degradation of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) was studied in thedesizing of cotton fabrics. A mixture of two different PVA-degrading enzyme
activities, including PVA oxidizing, was partially puried from the culture
ltrate of a PVA-degrading mixed culture by ionic exchange chromatography.
Optimum conditions for PVA-degradation by using this enzyme mixture were
reported at pH 8·0 and temperatures ranging from 30°C to 55°C. The cotton
fabrics sized with a PVA solution (25 g dm –3) were desized with the enzyme
mixture after a 1 h treatment at 30°C and pH 8·0. In this case, similar amounts
of residual PVA in cotton fabrics were detected in comparison with the
conventional desizing process which uses hot water at 80°C, 30 min (TatsumaMori et al. 1999). Several factors affecting the starch-size removal were
studied and are (a) the effectiveness of enzymatic desizing can be enhanced
by raising the desizing temperature up to 70°C; prolonging the desizing time
up to 60 min; increasing the material-to-liquor ratio up to 20:1; increasing
the Aquazym® 240-L dosage up to 6 g/L; treating at pH 7 (Nabil et al. 2004;
Csiszar et al. 2001). All enzymes work within a range of temperature specic
to the organism. Increases in temperature generally lead to increase in reaction
rates (Daniel et al. 2010). Most enzymes are sensitive to pH and have specicranges of activity. The pH can stop enzyme activity by denaturating (altering)
the three dimensional shape of the enzyme. Most enzymes function between
a pH of 6 and 10 (Li and Hardin 1999).
3.2.2.1 Alpha amylase enzyme
Alpha amylase enzymes used in the desizing of cotton fabrics, are obtained
from different sources with different activity levels (Bernfeld 1955). There
are two kinds of amylases available in sources namely endoamylase andexoamylases. The endoamylases cleave α, 1-4 glycosidic bonds present in the
inner parts of amylose, while exoamylases act on external glucose residues of
starch molecules (Naik and Paul 1997). Exo-enzymes include alpha amylases
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 75/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 63
(1,4 β D glucan glucanohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.2): exomaltotriohydrolases
(EC 3.2.1.95), exomaltohexohydrolases (EC 3.2.1.98) and glucoamylases
(EC 3.2.1.3). Endo enzymes include alpha amylases (1, 4 β D glucan,
glucanohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.1), pullulanases (pullulan 6 glucanohydrolase EC
3.2.1.41) and isoamylases (glycogen 6 glucanohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.68).
3.2.2.2 Alpha amylases – culture and production
Alpha amylase used in the desizing of cotton fabric for hydrolyzing the starch
component were cultured from many sources like bacterial, fungal and yeast.
Many published reports on amylase production concentrate on bacterial sources
like Bacillus subtilis (Pettier and Beckord 1945; Tomazic and Klibanov 1969;
Asgar et al. 2007), Bacillus cerens (Anto et al. 2006), Bacillus lichenijormis
(lyer 2004), Bacillus stearothermophilus (Hartman and Tetrault 1955;
Srivastava and Baruah 1986), Bacillus amyloliquifaciens (Declerck et al. 2000;
Declerck et al. 2003; Gangadharan et al. 2006), Bacillus thennooleovorans
(Malhotra et al. 2000), Bacillus macerans, Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus
circulans (Okudubo et al. 1964; Bliesmer and Hartman 1973; Mamo and
Gessesse 1999; Lee et al. 2000; Teodoro and Martins 2000; Santos and
Martins 2003; Kiran et al. 2005; Ajayl and Fagade 2008). Fungal sources like Aspergillus awaniori, Aspergillus niger (Abu et al. 2005), Thermoactinomyces
thalpophilus (Shaw et al. 1995) and Saccharomyces cerevisae, Penicillium
fellutanum and Thennomyces lanoginosus (Kunanmneni et al. 2005) due to
wide distribution and simple nutritional requirements, though amylases have
been isolated from mammalian pancreas and yeasts.
Growth of microorganisms and production of alpha amylases, in the
ferment, are highly inuenced by moisture, temperature and pH of the culture
medium (Mamo and Gessesse 1999; Teodoro and Martins 2000; Hartman and
Tetrault 1955; Kiran et al. 2005; Ajayl and Fagade 2008; Anto et al. 2006;
Gangadharan et al. 2006). At lower incubation temperatures higher yields
are observed, which reduce with increase in temperatures (Shaw et al. 1995;
Horikoshi 1999). Many alpha amylases have calcium, in their structure, for
maintaining the structural integrity and stability during hydrolytic reaction
(Hartman and Tetrault 1955; Vallee et al. 1959; Srivastava and Baruah 1986;
Malhotra et al. 2000; Hagihara et al. 2001; Lan et al. 2007). However, certain
alkali mutant Bacillus sp strains, thermophile amylases do not contain calcium
ions, whose activities are dependent on sodium ions, and they exhibit optimumactivities at 85–90°C with higher diffusion rate and lower contamination risks
(Campbell 1955; Hyun and Zeikus 1985; Mamo and Gessesse 1999; Hagihara
et al. 2001; Richardson et al. 2002; Varavinit et al. 2002; Callen et al. 2007).
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 76/457
64 Bioprocessing of textiles
3.2.2.3 Enzymatic desizing of cotton fabric
Activity of alpha amylases have been studied extensively using pure starch asa model compound (Opwis et al. 2000; Aranjo et al. 2004; Ibrahim et al. 2004;
Baks et al. 2006; Lee et al. 2006; Liu et al. 2000; Reshmi et al. 2006; Tester
2006; Shewale and Pandit 2007) and attempts have been made to analyse
the hydrolytic activities of pancreatic, malt, bacterial amylases and cellulases,
in desizing (Appleyard 1953; Fetouh et al. 1974; Khalil et al. 1974; Shah
and Sadhu 1976; Bayard 1983; Bhatawdekar 1983; Levene and Prozan 1992;
Hahn et al. 1998; Opwis et al. 2000; Feitkenhauer and Meyer 2003; Ali and
Khan 2005). Amylase assisted desizing of textile materials is carried out in
machines such as jigger, jets, pad-batch and pad-stream ranges, employing
different levels of mechanical agitations (Radhakrishnaiah et al. 1999).
Among various steps involved in enzyme reaction, hydrolysis of starch needs
longer time, depending upon the activity levels of enzyme and temperature
conditions used in desizing. Composition, properties of starch (Azevedo et
al. 2003; Aranjo et al. 2004; Moghe and Khera 2005), ingredients added in
size mix (Tomazic and Klibanov 1969; Shah and Sadhu 1976; Lange 1997;
Azevedo et al. 2003; Declerek et al. 2003) and process conditions employed
in desizing (Fetouh et al. 1974; Khalil et al. 1974; Levene and Prozan 1992;Mori et al. 1997; Ibrahim et al. 2004) have marked inuence on the efciency
of desizing. Common waxes do not inactivate amylases but prevent quick
wetting, penetration of enzymes and, other factors that affect the efciency
of size removal include viscosity of starch, amount of size applied, fabric
construction and method of washing off (Shamey and Hussein 2005).
3.2.2.4 Assessment of enzyme desizing
The assessment of alpha amylase enzyme-based desized cotton fabric has been carried out by two methods namely (a) Tegawa scale, a qualitative
spotting test using iodine solution and (b) percent weight loss (Fielf 1931;
Scott 1940; Lorentz and Oltmanns 1970; Bayard 1983; Hyun and Zeikus
1985; Shukla and Jaipura 2004). Amylose binds, ~20% of its weight of iodine
at 20° C, shows deep blue colour, violet and reddish brown, pale yellowish
brown for undegraded starch, partially degraded dextrin, degraded dextrin and
completely hydrolyzed starch, while amylopectin binds 2% iodine only.
3.2.3 Scouring of cotton fabrics
The scouring process is to make the cotton material hydrophilic, before it
undergoes other processes like bleaching, dyeing and printing in the textile
wet processing (Holme 2001; Thiagarajan and Selvakumar 2008). A desired
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 77/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 65
hydrophilicity during the scouring can be achieved by removing non-cellulosic
material from the cotton fabric, especially from the cuticle (waxes and fats)
and the primary wall (e.g. pectin, protein and organic acids). More precisely
scouring not only removes non-cellulosic material from cotton bres but also
removes substances that have adhered to the cotton bres during the production
of the yarn or fabric. Substances like, dirt, lint, pesticides, oils, and any sizing
agent applied to yarns to facilitate weaving (Eisisi et al. 1990; Ammayappan
et al. 2003). Effective scouring is essential for subsequent processing of any
cotton made substrate, regardless of its natural source. Even today, alkaline
scouring of cotton is still the most widespread commercial technique for
removing or rupturing the bre cuticle to make the bre absorbent for thecotton processing (Churi et al. 2004). Although sodium hydroxide is used
generally for the scouring, sodium carbonate and calcium hydroxide are
also mentioned as a scouring agent (Hsieh and Cram 1999). Scouring of
cotton fabric is typically done with a hot solution (90°C to 100°C) of sodium
hydroxide (± 1 mol/L) for up to one hour (Emilla Csiszar et al. 1998). The
concentration of alkali used and the time and temperature conditions needed
depend on the desired quality of the scoured fabric. Other chemicals for
instance, wetting agents, emulsifying agents and chelating agents (Nallankilli
et al. 2008; Tyndall 1996) are also included in typical preparation baths forscouring. Wetting agents act by reducing the surface tension of water enabling
improved penetration of the chemicals into the cotton fabric (Gulrajani and
Venkatraj 1986). Emulsifying agents assist in removing waxy materials.
Chelating agents remove polyvalent metal ions such as calcium, magnesium,
iron or other salts that can have a harmful effect on subsequent wet-processing
operations.
3.2.3.1 Drawbacks associated with alkaline scouring The scouring process requires large quantities of chemicals, energy and water
and is rather time consuming (Yonghua and Hardin 1997). Owing to the high
sodium hydroxide concentration and its corrosive nature, intensive rinsing is
required that leads to high water consumption. The use of high concentrations
of sodium hydroxide also requires the neutralization of wastewater, which
requires additional acid chemicals. Furthermore, the alkaline efuent requires
special handling because of very high BOD and COD values. Apart from the
above wet processing problems, the biggest drawback of alkaline scouringis a non-specic degradation of cellulose that produces fabrics of lower
tensile strength and therefore of lower quality (Wang et al. 2006). Moreover
alkaline scouring is hazardous to the workers and creates an unpleasant work
atmosphere. Although, alkaline scouring is effective and the costs of NaOH
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 78/457
66 Bioprocessing of textiles
are low, this process can be improved considerably to meet today’s energy and
environmental demands (Anon 1982).
3.2.3.2 Overview of enzymatic scouring
Enzymes are substrate specic bio-catalysts; they operate best at ambient
pressures, mild temperatures and often at a neutral pH range. Enzymes are
gaining an increasingly important role as a tool in various wet textile pre-
treatment and nishing processes (Alat 2001; Anon 2001; Carlier 2001).
Biocatalysts have been proven to be a exible and reliable tool in wet
textile processing and a promising technology to fulll the expected future
requirements. Enzymatic scouring has been investigated extensively by
various institutes and laboratories now for nearly one decade (Hartzell and
Hsieh 1998; Emilla Csiszar et al. 1998; Qiang Wang et al. 2006). Initial
investigations explored the possibility of cotton scouring with enzymes, to
see if cotton could be made hydrophilic in a reasonable time. Extracellular
enzymes involved in the degradation of the plant cell wall’s outer layer during
the invasion of the plant, excreted by phyto-pathogenic fungi and by bacteria
have been considered as candidates. Different enzymes like pectinases such
as lyases (EC 4.2.2.2); polygalacturonase endo acting type (EC 3.2.1.15)and polygalacturonase exo acting type (EC 3.2.1.67), proteases (EC 3.4.21-
25), cellulases such as endoglucanases (EC 3.3.1.4); cellobiohydrolases (EC
3.2.1.91), xylanases (EC 3.2.1.8), lipases (EC 3.1.1.3) and recently cutinases
(EC 3.1.1.74) have been examined to degrade and subsequently remove the
natural component present in the outer layer of cotton bres (Buschie-Diller
et al. 1998; Hartzell and Hsieh et al. 1998; Yonghua and Hardin 1997). These
studies incorporated staining tests, scanning electron microscopy (SEM),
weight loss analysis, cotton wax residue and nitrogen content analysis.
The scheme essentially contains the impregnation of cotton fabric with
one or more enzymes in presence or absence of surfactants and chelators,
followed by a high temperature rinsing step. The enzyme incubation time
used was up to 24 hours depending on other process conditions and the
density of the fabric. Lipases were found to be less effective in fullling this
task (Dahod 1987; El-Shafei and Rezkallah 1997). Proteases were found to
be efcient to improve whiteness rather than hydrophilicity (Ellaiah et al.
2002; Hsieh and Cram 1999). Cellulases were the only enzymes reported to
improve the wettability efciently when applied without any other treatmentor in combination with other enzymes. However, cellulase also cause a
decrease in bre strength and hence a decrease in fabric quality (Ghose 1987;
Emilla Csiszar et al. 1998; Emre Karapinar and Merih 2004). The best results
have been obtained by alkaline pectinases or pectinases in combination with
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 79/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 67
cellulase (Agarwal et al. 2007). Especially bacterial alkaline pectinase, a
pectate lyase (EC 4.2.2.2) has been proven to be effective (Ghanem et al. 2000;
Etters et al. 2003). Pectin acts as cement in the primary wall of cotton bres.
After enzymatic destabilisation of a pectin structure, the different components
present in the primary wall layer can be removed easily in subsequent rinsing
steps (Hardin and Kim 2000). A proper interpretation of the enzymatic action
on cotton bres on a molecular basis was not possible because of the lack of
structural knowledge of cotton bre (Bora and Kalita 2007).
The effect of scouring with enzymes and caustic soda on the mechanical
and surface characteristics of cotton ring-and rotor-spun yarns have been
studied (Tyagi et al. 2007). For yarn structures, the exural rigidity, hairiness,yarn-to-metal friction and dye uptake increase markedly on scouring with
enzymes and sodium hydroxide. Conventional scouring with NaOH renders
the yarns strikingly strong and less extensible. However, the tenacity of both
types of yarns is considerably reduced on enzymatic scouring. Scouring
causes a marked increase in dye uptake of ring-and rotor-spun yarns; the
increase is, however, more in NaOH scoured yarns than in the yarns spun with
identical processing conditions but scoured with enzymes (Tyagi and Sharma
2008). The dye uptake decreases marginally with increasing rotor speed. The
effect of opening roller speed on uptake of dye is also minimal. The physical properties of different varieties of cotton bres of various origins have been
studied after extraction using solvents and alkali scouring with reference to
enzyme scouring process (Nallankilli et al. 2008). Enzyme scoured cotton
samples show comparable results with that of solvent extracted and alkali
scoured samples in terms of bre neness, weight loss, moisture regain,
strength and elongation. The scouring processes improve the properties of the
bres in the order: solvent extraction < enzyme scouring < ammonium oxalate
extraction < alkali scouring. Three different scouring methods are applied to open-end and ring
spun yarns prior to hydrogen peroxide bleaching with and without metal
ions present. The scouring procedures include a penetrating treatment with
aqueous sodium hydroxide solution, a non-swelling solvent extraction, and a
bre surface affecting treatment with pectinase enzymes (Hathway and Sekins
1958). Properties of the treated yarns and bre damage are studied after each
process step. Conventional scouring with sodium hydroxide followed by
peroxide bleaching causes the highest deterioration on the molecular level, but
results in a high level of whiteness, solvent extracted yams exhibit superiortensile strength, which is preserved more or less unchanged throughout any
subsequent treatment. The bioscouring process with enzymes renders the
yams strikingly soft. The effects are generally more pronounced for open-end
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 80/457
68 Bioprocessing of textiles
spun yams, suggesting that differences in yarn structure may have an impact
on effective scouring (Buschle-Diller et al. 1998).
Cellulases and pectinases are used to treat raw cotton bres and unscoured
cotton fabrics (Kumar et al. 2008). The structural changes in the surfaces of
cotton caused by the enzymatic treatments and resulting properties are the main
focus of this study. Both staining tests and microscopy observations conrm
that the cuticle is removed by the pectinases and cellulases. All evidence
of bre weight loss and fabric water absorbency shows that signicant
changes in cotton bre and fabric properties occur with mild treatment
conditions. Physical changes in the cotton surfaces are clearly revealed by
scanning electron micrographs. All bre weight loss values stemming fromthe enzymatic treatments are smaller than or near the cotton cuticle weight.
Sufcient water absorbency for textile processing is obtained with mild
enzymatic treatments, corresponding to a small but statistically signicant
bre weight loss (Yonghua and Hardin 1998).
Yonghua and Hardin (1998) have also studied the application of cellulase
and pectinase enzymes on the cotton bres and resulting that the cuticle is
removed by the pectinases and cellulase combination. All evidence of bre
weight loss and fabric water absorbency shows that signicant changes
in cotton bre and fabric properties occur with mild treatment conditions.Sufcient water absorbency for textile processing is obtained with mild
enzymatic treatments, corresponding to a small but statistically signicant bre
weight loss (Aiteromem 2008). Commercial cellulases may contain mixtures
of different cellulase components and properties of cotton fabrics treated with
cellulases vary with the nature of these mixtures. The study reports the effect
of treatments with cellulase monocomponents such as endoglucanase I and
II and cellobiohydrolase I and II from Trichoderma reesei on the molecular
and supramolecular structures of cotton cellulose as revealed by hydrogen bonding patterns, and bre pore size distribution (Marie-Alice et al. 2003).
Relationships between the hydrolysis rate with cellulase and the swelling
degree of the cellulose bres of different samples was studied (Chahal 1985).
The water retention value (WRV) determined by the centrifugal method was
used as a measure of the swelling degree. A linear relationship was observed
between the hydrolysis rate and the WRV of the untreated pulps of different
chemical composition and crystallinity. A similar linearity was observed also
for pulps treated mechanically or chemically, but the slope of the regression
line differed with the treating methods, and it decreased in proportion with thedegree of degradation of the bre structure (Yoshitaka and Kenichiro 1968;
Reese et al. 1957). The effect of scouring at a higher temperature is to increase
the rate of enzymatic degradation without affecting the relative and important
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 81/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 69
differences in the resistance to biodegradation of the different regions of the
secondary wall (Kassenbeck 1970; Rousselle 1998).
3.2.3.3 Pectinases in bioscouring of cotton
Pectinase is an enzyme that catalyses hydrolysis/depolymerisation of the
glycosidic bonds in the pectin polymers, classied according to their preferential
substrates (high or low methylesteried pectin and polygalacturonic acid /
pectate) and their reaction mechanism (Kristensen 2001; Jayam et al. 2005).
Pectinases are either endo-acting, cutting the polymer at random sites within
the chain to give a mixture of oligomers or exo-acting attacking from one end
of the polymer and producing monomers or dimers, identied by the rate of
release of reducing sugars (Friend and Chang 1982). Pectinases have been
produced using solid state and submerged fermentation (Arguelles et al. 1995;
Pandey et al 1999; Maldonado and Saad 2000; Andersen et al. 2001; Alves
et al. 2002; Pererra et al. 1993; Martin et al. 2004; Csiszar et al. 2007), with
various bacterial (Bjo et al. 2002; Andersen et al. 2002; Vallee et al. 1959),
fungal (Arguelles et al. 1995; Sharma and Gupta 2001; Alves et al. 2002; Pyc
et al. 2003; Csiszar et al. 2007) sources and different schools of thought exist
to demonstrate their relative merits and demerits.Alkaline pectinases are produced predominantly from Bacillus and
Pseudomonas (Lawson and Hsieh 2000; Shuen-Fuh et al. 1996), while
Aspergillus appears to be the major acid pectinase producer (Csiszar et al.
2007). Comparisons have been made in the past, to assess the performance
of acid pectinases (Pyc et al. 2003; Calafell and Garriga 2004; Canal et al.
2004; Sahin and Gursoy 2005; Agrawal et al. 2007) and alkaline pectinases
(Bruhlmann 1995; Etters 1999; Etters et al. 1999; Almeida et al. 2003; Canal
et al. 2004; Agrawal et al. 2007; Wan et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2007a; Wang
et al. 2007b; Wang et al. 2007c). Effects of various carbon sources, carbon
supplements and other components in the culture medium have been well
documented (Pererra et al. 1993; Kashyap et al. 2000; Maldonado and Saad
2000; Miller et al. 2003; Presa 2007).
Pectin
Pectin is a complex carbohydrate, which is found both in the cell walls of
plants, and between the cell walls, helping to regulate the ow of water
in between cells and keeping them rigid (Solbak et al. 2005). Pectins are
considered as intracellular adhesives, combining hydrophobic molecules
like proteins, waxes, hemicelluloses with various degrees of branching and,
the three dimensional structure of pectin breaks the cellulose array in cotton
bres (Mc Call and Jurgens 1951; Anon 1954; Potikha et al. 1999; Hardin and
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 82/457
70 Bioprocessing of textiles
Kim 2000; Lawson and Hsieh 2000; Devries and Visser 2001; Brushwood
2003; Gambler 2003). Pectic acid, present in the primary wall of cotton bres,
contains negatively charged galacturonic acid residues, forms a bridge with
calcium (pectates), thereby holding the inner primary wall of cotton that
gives stability at high temperature (Whistler et al. 1940; Chandrika 1999).
Figure 3.5 shows the pectolytic activity of pectin lyase, pectin methyl esterase
and polygalacturonase enzymes.
Fig. 3.5 Pectolytic activity of pectin lyase, pectin methyl esterase and
polygalacturonase enzymes
Pectinase treatments and evaluation methods
In enzymatic scouring of cotton, nonionic surfactants are used to overcome
hydrophobicity of the substrate, which assist enzymes to penetrate through
micro-pores or cracks and help them to orient themselves in favorable
positions for catalytic actions (Sahin and Gursoy 2005), while ionic surfactants
complex with enzymes and disrupt their structure to different extents (Tzanov
et al. 2000). Concentration of pectinase, pH, time and temperature range usedin scouring, inuence efciency of the process (Etters et al. 1999; Canal et al.
2004). Microscopic observations (Li and Hardin 1998b; Sahin and Gursoy
2005), absorbency (Li and Hardin 1998b; Lenting et al. 2002; Wang et al.
2007b; Wang et al. 2007c), selective staining methods (Li and Hardin 1998a;
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 83/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 71
Canal et al. 2004; Calafell et al. 2005), weight loss (Hathway and Sekins 1958;
Li and Hardin 1999; Lenting et al. 2002; Lenting and Warmoeskerken 2004;
Ramasamy and Kandasamy 2004; Calafell et al. 2005; Sahin and Gursoy
2005; Schnitzhofer et al. 2006), residual cotton wax and nitrogen content
have been used for the assessment of bio-scoured fabrics (Boer 1980; Etters
et al. 1999; Lawson and Hsieh 2000; Degari et al. 2002; Lenting et al. 2002;
Brushwood 2003; Choe et al. 2004; Chung et al. 2004; Church and Woodhead
2005; Bargel et al. 2006).
3.2.3.4 Lipases in processing of cotton fabrics
Lipases (triacylglycerol acylhydrolases, EC 3.1.1.3) are widely distributed
among the animals, plants and microorganisms, capable of hydrolyzing ester
bonds of oils, fats and certain waxy substances (Gupta et al. 2004; Pera et al.
2006). Lipases catalyse reactions including synthesis, transesterication of
glycerides and phosphoglycerides as well as a variety of non-glycerides, ester
bonds (Inoue et al. 2003; Sammour 2005).
Lipase – culture medium
Amount of lipases produced, in a medium, depends on several environmental
factors such as incubation temperature, pH, nitrogen and carbon sources,
concentration of inorganic salts, availability of moisture and oxygen (Lie et
al. 1991; Ghanem et al. 2000; Sharmaa et al. 2001; Kashmiri et al. 2006; Mala
et al. 2007). Plant oils like olive, soybean, sunower, sesame, cottonseed,
rapseed, corn and peanut, have been attempted for lipase production with
Ophiostolna piceae (fungal source) (Sharmaa et al. 2001; Sammour 2005).
Bacillus sp also produces equivalent activity levels as that of fungi at relatively
lower nutritional levels (Shah et al. 2007; Abada 2008). It has been reported
that lipases produced from Penicillium chrysogenum exhibit activity in the pH range of 6.0 to 8.2 and, about 80% of activity retention in the pH range of
5.0 - 6.0 (Sharmaa et al. 2001; Schafer et al. 2006), while lipases produced by
Bacillus exhibit maximum activity at 37° C with stability in the temperature
range of 30–50°C and wider pH range 5 to 12 (Shah et al. 2007; Abada 2008).
Applications of lipases in cotton processing
The term cotton wax includes all lipids found in the cotton bre surface,
including waxes, fats and oils (Lawson and Hsieh 2000; Brushwood 2003;
Bargel et al. 2006). Cuticular lipids, of cotton, are complex mixtures ofaliphatic and aromatic components, most of them resembling derivatives
of nacyl alkanes. Benzene, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, ethanol,
isopropyl alcohol, alcohol-benzene mixture, and trichloroethylene have been
recommended for extraction of the cotton wax (Kettering et al. 1946). Lipase
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 84/457
72 Bioprocessing of textiles
activity is often determined with reagents comprising a low concentration of
buffer and a diglyceride dissolved therein (Dahod 1987; Kokusho et al. 1982;
Obendorf et al. 2001; Varanasi et al. 2001; Obendorf et al. 2003; Pera et al
2006; Imamura 2007). Lipases with, activity of pH > 6.5 at 30–60°C, ability to
withstand many surfactants (linear alkyl benzene sulphonates) and proteases,
meant for detergent formulations, can also withstand bleaching agents like
hydrogen peroxide and peracids (Fujii et al. 1986). Lipases increase lipid
removal from all morphological locations on the cotton bres including lumen
and bre surfaces (Obendorf et al. 2003).
3.2.3.5 Proteases in cotton fabric processing Proteins that occur (~ 1.3%) in the lumen and primary wall of the cotton bres,
are the residual, dead protoplasm from biosynthesis, composed of several
proteins and peptides, formed by various amino acids, rather than single
protein (Usharani and Muthuraj 2010). Proteases belong to the sub-class of
peptide hydrolase or peptidase and more conveniently proteases are classied
into serine, cysteine, aspartic and metalloproteases (Gupta et al. 2002).
Protease culture
Proteases are generally produced by submerged fermentation, though solid
state fermentation offers certain advantages in terms of reduced energy
consumption during extraction of enzymes from the culture (Battaglino et
al. 1991; Dahot 1993; Uttrup and Conrad 1999; Alves et al. 2002). Though
addition of glucose to the media increases the growth of Penicillium
aeruginosa, Penicillium expansum, there is a marked reduction in the amount
of protease production, due to catabolite repression (Wang et al. 1974). Rice
husk is used as the carbon source and corn steep liquor increases the yield
of protease signicantly (Battaglino et al. 1991). Soybean meal, corn steepliquor, tryptone and casein serve as excellent nitrogen sources in protease
production. Though low pH of the medium does not limit the growth of
Aspergillus oryzae, it limits protease yields, slightly above 6.5. Attempts have
been made to analyse the gene coding for the expression of enzymes, for
inserting into a suitable host cell or organism for the development of detergent
formulations and cleaning agents (Lassen et al. 2007).
Removal of cotton proteins and proteases
Most of the nitrogen containing compounds of cotton can be removed by amild alkali boil and a very low residue remains in scoured and bleached cotton
(Wakelyn 1975; Hartzell and Hsieh 1998; Naja et al. 2005). Denaturation
of protein substances by ageing, heating and oxidation makes them less
accessible to enzymatic degradation (Andrade et al. 2002). Pretreatments with
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 85/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 73
boiling water enhance the accessibility of proteins in cotton beneath the waxes
and improve scouring efciency. Since protein contents are high among the
non-cellulosics in cotton bre, potential of proteolytic enzymes as scouring
agents for raw cotton cannot be underestimated (Hartzell and Hsieh 1998;
Silva et al. 2006). Hydrolysates produced in the protease reactions depend on
the source of proteases with 9 - 12 major amino acids (Wang et al. 2007a).
Nitrogen content of untreated cotton ~ 0.4% reduces to ~ 0.2% after treatment
with proteases (Andrade et al. 2002). Water absorption and retention capacity
and K/S values have also been advocated for characterization of protease
treated fabrics (Sae et al. 2007). Though protease treatments in both scouring
and detergency offer a range of advantages, there are certain limitations, also,in terms of proteolysis of enzymes in the crude cultures (Pererra et al. 1993).
3.2.3.6 Fabric weight loss and strength loss
Cotton bres, free from pectic substances show, no damage in tensile strength
and uidity (Whistler et al. 1940). Pectinase of Aspergillus niger, at pH 4.2,
40° C shows weight loss ~ 4 to 5.5%, however, lower weight losses in the
range of 0.31% to 1.04% has also been reported. Strength loss of about 3.23%
(warp) and 2.24% (weft) has been reported in fabrics, while the loss of singleyarn strength has been reported at 2.6% (Calafell and Garriga 2004; Calafell
et al. 2005; Sahin and Gursoy 2005; Schnitzhofer et al. 2006).
3.2.3.7 Fabric absorbency, wettability and dyeability
Practically no difference in absorbency and wettability has been reported
between alkali and bioscoured samples, alkaline pectinases and certain acidic
pectinases (Etters 1999; Lenting et al. 2002; Pyc et al. 2003; Canal et al.
2004; Calafell et al. 2005; Sahin and Gursoy 2005; Schnitzhofer et al. 2006;Agrawal et al. 2007). Drop absorbency, similar to that of alkali scour, (~ 1
sec), has been reported in most of the literature, except in certain cases where
acidic pectinases have been used in the process (Calafell and Garriga 2004).
Degree of whiteness (CIE) of bioscoured fabrics shows lower value compared
to alkali scoured cotton fabrics (Canal et al. 2004; Calafell et al. 2005). When
long chain pectin (fully methylated pectic acid) is completely degraded to
galacturonic acid, the iodine reducing value increases from zero to 8.95
(Karmakar 1998). Dyeing of samples scoured with commercial pectinasesshows no difference in absorbance values and colour depth compared to
the alkali scoured samples however, substantively of the dyes is lower on
bioprepared fabric, due to ‘benecial wax’ that remains in the bres (Etters
1999; Calafell et al. 2005). Ruthenium red, a basic dye, selectively binds the
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 86/457
74 Bioprocessing of textiles
carboxyl oxygen of galacturonide moiety and hydroxy oxygen of an adjacent
galacturonide in the pectate chain, a characteristic reaction that helps to
measure free carboxyl groups available in cotton bres (Li and Hardin 1998a;
Li and Hardin 1999; Lenting et al. 2002; Calafell et al. 2005; Chinnadurai and
Selvakumar 2009).
3.2.3.8 Mixed enzymatic process in scouring of cotton
fabrics
Binary combinations of enzymes
Combinations of pectinases with protease, hemicellulase, cellulase and lipasehave been attempted, which are not efcient in scouring process when used
alone. Combinations of amylases with other enzymes, preparatory chemicals
have been attempted in the past to combine scouring or bleaching (Etters
1999; Tzanov et al. 2000; Lu 2005; Opwis et al. 2006; Kuilderd and Wu
2008; Lenting 2008). In the case of amylase desizing, addition of hydrogen
peroxide improves whiteness, while neutral cellulases increase weight
loss and desizing efciency. Alkaliphile amylases with sodium hydroxide
and hydrogen peroxide have been recommended for a combined desizing-
scouring-bleaching process (Etters 1999; Csiszar et al. 2007). Integrateddesizing and scouring using a-amylase and polygalacturonate lyase process
involves two steps, in which fabrics are desized rst, using a-amylases, then
by a combination treatment of amylase and pectate lyase at 45 – 55° C at
pH of 8.5 - 9.0, followed by washing in presence of chelating agent at 90 –
100° C (Lenting 2008). Simultaneous desizing and scouring using amylase
and pectinase obtained from single source, i.e. Bacillus and different sources
have been attempted in the past (Lenting and Warmoeskerken 2004; Dalvi et
al. 2007). Higher weight loss values (7.0 to 15.3%), better drop absorbency(~1 sec), dye absorption ( KIS values of 7.45 against 6.9 of acid desized
samples) have been reported with higher concentration of enzymes and longer
incubation time (Dalvi et al. 2007). Whenever a very high whiteness in the
fabrics is not required, desizing is combined with bleaching and scouring,
incorporating protease, cellulase and pectinase enzymes (Lange et al. 2001;
Miller et al. 2003).
Combinations of pectinase or cellulase with hemicellulases like
arabinases or, pectinases with hemicellulase activities have been used for
scouring. Crude mixtures of xylanase, cellulolytic and pectinolytic enzymesdestroy lignocellulosic structure of the seed coat fragments, produce soluble
forms of lignin (Kalum and Andersen 2000; Csiszar et al. 2001a; Lange et al.
2001 Opwis et al. 2006). However, such combinations does not improve the
drop absorbency (~ 290 sec), while no differences are observed in terms of
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 87/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 75
strength loss, whiteness index, compared to commercially scoured samples.
Hemicellulases, in the pectinase scouring is expected to give strong action
against seed coat fragments but their combinations with cellulase prove to
show detrimental effects in terms of strength loss (Csiszar et al. 2001 b).
Pectinase and cellulase act synergistically to improve the wettability within
shorter process time, in which addition of non-ionic surfactants, mechanical
agitations enhance their reactions (Saravannan et al. 2008). Presence of
cellulase does not increase the pectin removal but results in higher weight
losses (Lu 2005; Schnitzhofer et al. 2006). Cellulase containing pectinases
results in at ridges, concave grooves with polished surface in presence of
surfactants, while alkali scoured fabrics often show fuzzy and blurred surface(Li and Hardin 1998b; Li and Hardin 1999; Hsieh et al. 2002; Lu 2005;
Schnitzhofer et al. 2006). In cellulase assisted protease scouring, hydrolysis
of cellulosic chains in primary wall is expected to enhance scouring action of
protease synergistically (Diller et al. 1999; Guha and Shah 2001).
Scouring using acid and alkaline pectinases, combined bleaching together
with peracetic acid has been attempted in one bath, as one step or two step
processes to yield commercially acceptable whiteness (Liu et al. 2000; Patra
et al. 2004; Wan 2007). Combined scouring and bleaching process using
peroxide in a single step or two steps has also been advocated, by addinghydrogen peroxide at the end of pectinase scouring at higher pH (Tavcer
et al. 2005) and such process is capable of retaining fabric strength up to
~ 90% with Hunter whiteness index and yellowness index of 84 and 16,
respectively. An attempt has been made to utilize desize bath for bleaching
using immobilized glucose oxidase in an aerated system at pH 10–11 and
temperature of 90° C (Diller et al. 1999; Tzanko et al. 2000; Kuilderd and
Wu 2008). However, such combined desizing and bleaching using glucose
oxidase, often, results in non-uniform wetting properties, though wicking(~2.0 cm) and average drop absorbency (~1 sec) show similar values as that
of commercial processes (Kuilderd and Wu 2008). Single bath dyeing and
biopreparation either simultaneously or sequentially using pectate lyase, at
alkaline pH ( > 8), suitable for reactive dyes which result in wash fastness,
rubbing fastness grades at least 3.5 to 4.0 (Liu et al. 2000).
Ternary and quadruplet combinations of enzymes
In many situations, combinations of three or four different enzymes including
alpha amylase, pectinase, protease, cellulase, glucose oxidase and varioushemicellulases have been attempted since pectinases alone is often ineffective
in removal of impurities from cotton bres and to improve absorbency of the
scoured samples (Cziszar et al. 1998; Diller et al. 1999; Traore and Diller
2000; Degari et al. 2002). Presence of xylanase and pectinase in commercial
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 88/457
76 Bioprocessing of textiles
cellulase preparations also facilitates removal of seed coats up to 70 - 85%
(Cziszar et al. 1998). Protease and lipase are used together with pectate lyase
to remove spinning, coning and slashing lubricants from the fabrics (Li and
Hardin 1998a; Lange et al. 2001; Miller et al. 2003; Wang et al. 2007a). Lipase
or protease treatments, alone, do not improve wetting or water retention
values (Buchert et al. 2000). Few research have been carried out (Diller et
al. 1999; Traore and Diller 2000) to study the effects of combined enzymes
on the efciency of scouring, using lipase, pectinase, xylanase and cellulase,
with strong agitation levels that result in weight loss up to 13.9%. Higher
wickability is observed in the case of pectinase and xylanase combinations
than pectinase and cellulase, pectinase and lipase combinations and thehighest wicking observed in all-enzymes combination (Kim et al. 2005).
Two-step scouring of cotton has also been suggested, with lipase and protease
in the rst step and cellulase in the second step. Pectinase scouring produces 18-
fold higher amounts of reducing sugars and galacturonic acid than any of the
two step processes, while lipase / proteases / cellulase scouring produces 5-fold
higher amounts of amino acids than the pectinase scouring (Sae et al. 2007;
Karapinar and Sariisik 2004). Pectinase - cellulase or, pectinase - cellulase with
protease, or pectinase - cellulase - xylanase produces better scouring results than
those individual enzymes, in terms of dyeability, K/S and fastness properties.However, after hydrogen peroxide bleach, all the combinations (Wang et al.
2007a) shows similar CIE whiteness index (68 – 70).
3.2.4 Bleaching of cotton fabrics
Conventional bleaching methods have been reviewed in many occasions,
(Shenai 1996; Dickinson 1979; Chinta et al. 1993; Hayhurst and Smith
1995; Chakraborthy et al. 1998; Pardeshi 2000; Singh 2000; Menezes and
Chaudhari 2005; Maekawa et al. 2007), oxidative chemical pretreatments are
effective in degrading colourants and other impurities, though such methods
often lead to oxidative degradation of substrates. However, peroxide bleaches
are often referred to as the “colour safe bleaches”, due to minimal degradation
of substrates.
3.2.4.1 Enzymatic bleaching
Many attempts have been made to utilize various enzymes that belongto oxidoreductases, in bleaching of cotton fabrics (Nalankilli and Sundar
2002; Tzanko et al. 2002; Opwis et al. 2006; Diller and Traore 1998; Anis
et al. 2009; Anis et al. 2009) and post-bleaching processes (Jensen 1998).
Peroxidases are used to activate oxidizing agents like hydrogen peroxide,
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 89/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 77
however rapid deactivation of these agents in bleaching process does not
guarantee satisfactory bleaching effects (Bernards et al. 2004). The bleaching
was done with a commercial desized and alkaline scoured cotton fabric.
As described in the introduction peroxidases (POD) are used in textile
decoloration processes (Xia and Li 2009), but their activity is limited by the
hydrogen peroxide concentration, which attack the POD during the reactions
(Allen et al. 2006). To maintain the activity of the POD over a long time
period the new combined system of Glucose Oxidase GOD and glucose as
the hydrogen peroxide source and additional the POD as an oxidation catalyst
was used exemplarily for the slow decoloration of Sirius Supra Blue® FGG
200%. Figure 3.6 shows the results of different bleaching procedures of cotton.The starting material has a degree of whiteness (according to Berger) of 55.
Bleaching of cotton with POD (Baylase®RP) in the presence of hydrogen
peroxide fails, the degree of whiteness remains at 55, because the POD is
inactivated by H2O
2 after a short time. Using the combined system with GOD,
glucose and POD (Baylase®RP) the degree of whiteness increases up to 64.
Applying GOD and the new chlor-peroxidase from ASA-Spezialenzyme
simultaneously in the presence of glucose a degree of whiteness of 66 can be
reached. Compared to a conventional non-enzymatic bleaching process using
only hydrogen peroxide at high pH-value and high temperature the bleachingresult is not satisfactory but the investigations show that this environment-
friendly enzymatic bleaching procedure at low temperature and a pH-value
near to neutral basically works.
Fig. 3.6 Bleaching of cotton with glucose oxidase, glucose and different peroxidases
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 90/457
78 Bioprocessing of textiles
An enzymatic cotton bleaching process is not realized up to now because
of different problems such as the use of catalase contaminated GODs
or the inactivation of PODs by hydrogen peroxide (Gubitz and Cavaco
2001). Therefore a new concept was developed combining the use of two
oxidoreductases, GOD and POD, in textile decoloration and bleaching
processes. Under gentle conditions in terms of temperature, pH-value and
even the peroxide concentration different peroxidases (commercial POD from
Lanxess and a new chloro-peroxidase from ASA-Spezialenzyme) are stable
over a long period of time, what offers the possibility to use this enzyme
cascade also in heterogeneous systems such as the bleaching of cotton fabrics.
In future further investigations have to be carried out to open this environment-friendly concept for an even economic attractive application in large-scale
industrial manufacturing.
3.2.4.2 Effects of process parameters on enzyme
treatments
Besides the nature of substrates, efciency of hydrolysis is also inuenced
by process conditions (Hemmpel 1991; Tyndall 1996; Paulo et al. 1996;
Andreaus et al. 1999), co-reactants present in the process (Cavedon et al.1990; Hemmpel 1991; Ueda et al. 1994; Traore and Diller 1999; Heikinheimo
et al. 2003) and mechanical agitations employed in the reaction systems
(Pendersen et al. 1992; Tyndall 1996; Koo et al. 1994; Lee et al. 1996; Paulo
1998; Andreaus et al. 1999; Traore and Diller 1999; Lee et al. 2000; Cortez
et al. 2001; Tzanko et al. 2001; Heikinheimo et al. 2003). Material to liquor
ratio of process bath alters the efciency of all the components exhibited by
weight loss values and, little changes are observed in the range of 1: 10 to 1:
40 (Paulo et al. 1996). Mechanical actions, winch machines and jet systems, between fabrics and equipment or surface to surface contact of fabrics enhance
reactivity of cellulases by improving two way mass transfers and enhance
weight loss, removal of weakened bres from surfaces of yams and fabrics,
thereby facilitating a clean surface to the fabrics (Ogiwara and Arai 1968;
Tyndall 1996; Paulo and Almeida 1994; Lee et al. 1996; Gama et al. 1998;
Andreaus et al. 1999; Traore and Diller 1999; Lee et al. 2000; Heikinheimo et
al. 2003; Ramkumar and Abdalah 2001).
3.2.5 Cellulases on cotton fabrics
The cotton fabric, treated with cellulases, is aimed to remove cellulosic
impurities, individual and loose bre ends that protrude from fabric surfaces
and to provide an enhanced appearance and handle, with or without the aid
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 91/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 79
of mechanical agitations but without degrading the properties of the cotton
fabrics signicantly. Cellulase enzymes are complex mixtures of three
major constituents enzymes namely, endo l-4 α D glucanases (ED) (EC
3.2.1.4), which randomly cleave internal glucosidic bonds, 1-4, α D glucan
cellobiohydrolases (CBH) (EC 3.2.1.91), which cleave them into cellobiases.
Hydrolysis of cellobiose into the glucose end product is completed by β
glucosidases or cellobiases (EC 3.2.1.21), which split cellobiose units into
soluble glucose monomers and complete hydrolysis of native celluloses,
largely, depends on the synergistic actions of these three component enzymes.
Figure 3.7 shows the structure of cellulose and catalysis of cellulase enzyme
on cotton structure.
Fig. 3.7 Structure of cellulose and catalysis of cellulase enzyme on cotton structure
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 92/457
80 Bioprocessing of textiles
The cellulase producing bacteria include Cellulomonas, Clostridium,
Pseudomonas, Streptomyces, Thermonospora, Ruminococcus but bacterial
cellulases digest cotton bres to lower levels compared to amorphous celluloses
(Cavedon et al. 1990; Lu et al. 2005; Ray et al. 2006). Cellulases have two
functionally distinct domains, in their structure namely catalytic domain and
cellulose substrate binding domain, linked by an inter domain, glycosylated
linker peptide either at the N or C terminal of the protein; cellulose binding
domains exhibit different afnities, specicities, some binding to crystalline
cellulose, while others restrict themselves to the disordered regions. Catalytic
domain has an active site in the shape of a tunnel or cleft where hydrolytic
reactions take place (Cavedon et a1 1990; Lee et al. 1996).
3.2.5.1 Biotreatment with cellulase and xylanase
Recently published results indicate that enzymes, mainly cellulases and
several non-cellulolytic enzymes like lipases, proteases, and pectinases
may be used effectively in the cleaning processes of cotton (Hartzell and
Hsieh 1998). Raw cotton contains approx. 10% of non-cellulosics such as
waxes, pectins, proteins, non-cellulosic polysaccharides, inorganics, lignin
containing impurities, colouring materials, etc. Depending upon variety andcultivation conditions, these impurities are mainly located in the outer layers
of the bre in the cuticle and the primary wall. Traditional cleaning procedure
applies concentrated sodium hydroxide solution alkaline scouring and
additional hydrogen peroxide and or sodium hypochlorite solutions bleaching
to eliminate these impurities (Li and Hardin 1998). The cellulase enzymatic
treatment prior to the alkaline scouring process enhanced both the removal
and degradation of seed coat fragment impurities of cotton fabrics. When
consecutive cellulase treatment and conventional alkaline scouring were
combined, the increase in whiteness of the fabrics was signicantly improved
(Csiszar et al. 1998). Cellulase pretreatment also allowed the reduction of the
hydrogen-peroxide consumption in the consecutive chemical bleaching step.
The effect of seven commercial cellulase and hemicellulase enzymes
was tested on fabric weight loss, reducing sugar liberation and change in
degree of polymerisation (DP) of desized cotton fabrics. The changes in bre
surface were monitored by scanning electron microscopy (Csiszar 2001).
Greige cotton fabric, 122 GSM was used for the experiments after amylase
enzymatic desizing. Cellusoft L, Viscozyme 120 L, Celluclast 1.5 L, CellulaseEBT, Pulpzyme HC, Denimax L and Denimax Acid L enzymes were supplied
by Novo-Nordisk, Copenhagen, Denmark. The enzyme activities were
measured at 50°C from the products using internationally recognized methods
(Table 3.6). Desized cotton fabric was subjected to biotreatment with seven
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 93/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 81
commercial cellulase and hemicellulase enzymes in non-agitated and agitated
systems at 50°C for 0.5–4 h. The enzymes performed better in agitated bath
than in non-agitated ones. All enzymes at 1 grl concentration in 2 h caused
weight loss less than 6%. Those three enzymes Celluclast 1.5, Cellusoft L and
Cellulase EBT which exhibited the highest lter paper activity FPA showed
the most aggressive action on cotton in agitated system at 1 grl concentration
when time of treatment exceeded 2 h.
Table 3.6 Activity values of commercial enzymes
Enzyme Cellulase Endoglucanase Xylanase Glucosidase
Cellusoft L 100 37,000 5,000 76Viscozyme 120L 8 12,700 800 5
Celluclast 1.5L 67 28,000 2300 11
Pulpzyme HC 0.02 33 120,000 0.2
Denimax L 7 2500 16,700 87
Denimax Acid L 18 6300 1000 12
Cellulase (EBT) 108 73,200 12,900 81
Note: Enzyme activity unit IU/ml at pH 4.8
Effect of enzymatic treatment on fabric weight loss
Enzymatic degradation of cotton is generally characterized by weight loss.
Enzymes Celluclast 1.5L and Cellulase EBT cause the most signicant
weight losses nearly 2.5% in 4 hours biotreatment. There is no signicant
effect of increase in enzyme concentration from 0.5 to 1 gpl on weight loss
of cotton fabric in non-agitated system. In agitated system at 0.5 gpl enzyme
concentrations the cotton fabric weight losses are less than 1.5% for enzymes
Viscozyme 120L, Pulpzyme HC and Denimax enzymes. Except for Denimax
Acid L, the weight loss is practically independent from the treatment time.Enzymes Celluclast 1.5L and Cellulase EBT caused the highest weight losses.
Increase in reaction time resulted in increase in fabric weight loss. In agitated
system, Cellulase EBT is the most aggressive and higher weight loss on the
cellulosic materials. Depending on the time of treatment, the weight loss
is 1.8–6.3%. These data suggest that agitation has a signicant impact on
enzymatic degradation of raw cotton fabric (Ghose 1987). Weight loss values
are much higher in agitated solutions than in non agitated ones. The increase
of enzyme concentration from 0.5 to 1 gpl has smaller effect on weight loss
than the agitation of the solution.
Reducing sugars released by enzymatic treatment
There is a close correlation between the weight loss of cotton fabric and the
amount of liberated reducing sugars measured in the bath. In non-agitated
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 94/457
82 Bioprocessing of textiles
system, enzymes Cellusoft L, Pulpzyme HC, Denimax L and Denimax Acid L
do not produce reducing end groups in the solutions. Enzymes Celluclast 1.5L
and Cellulase EBT having high FPA which cause the highest fabric weight
loss and liberate the most reducing sugars. The amount of released reducing
sugar by these two enzymes increases with the time of treatment. Increase in
reaction time also results in increase in reducing sugar production (Cavaco-
Paulo 1996). The amount of reducing sugars liberated by the different enzymes
is higher in agitated system than those of in non-agitated one. Cellulase
EBT produces the highest level of reducing sugars of all enzymes tested.
The amount of reducing sugars formed by Celluclast 1.5L increases almost
linearly with the time of treatment. The maximum weight loss values are near2%, and the reducing sugar liberation is also not signicant. It is likely that
mainly the surface brils, small protruding bres, seed-coat fragments and
certain constituents of cuticle are degraded. At longer duration e.g. 4 h., these
enzymes, especially Cellulase EBT liberate signicant amount of reducing
sugars. Due to the damage of the outer layer of cotton bre, cellulase can
reach the primary cell wall and start to degrade the less crystalline cellulose
constituents, releasing reducing sugars into the solution. Agitation of the
enzyme solution increases the cellulose degrading effect for all enzymes. The
degradation of crystalline cellulose components in the cotton primary wall issignicant when the treatment time exceeds 1 h.
Figures 3.8–3.10 represent the scanning electron microscope view of
desized, cellulase enzyme treated cotton fabrics, after biotreatment of cotton
fabric, cracks and cavities, which might be the consequence of a serious damage
in the main body of cotton bre and the bre surface variations are consistent
with the results of the activity nature of the applied enzymes (Csiszar et al.
2001). The effect of seven commercial cellulase and hemicellulase enzymes
was investigated on the weight loss and reducing sugar liberation of desizedcotton fabrics. The bre surface was characterized by scanning electron
microscopy. Biotreatment in non-agitated system at 0.5–1.0 gpl enzyme
concentration for 0.5–4 h did not cause signicant degradation in cotton bre.
The weight loss was less than 3% and only a small amount of reducing sugar
was produced. These results suggest that mainly the surface brils, small
bres, seed-coat fragments, water-extractable materials and other natural
impurities have been degraded signicantly (Bailey and Nevalainen 1981;
Ioelovich and Leykin 2008).
Biopolishing of cotton fabric with commercial enzymes
The research work has been made to process the cotton fabrics with commercial
enzymes with specic treatment conditions which are available in the
commercial market (Gubitz and Cavaco2001). The physical properties of bio-
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 95/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 83
processed cotton fabrics and their fastness properties such as washing, rubbing
and perspiration characteristics were studied before and after treatments with
cellulase enzymes. The cotton fabric particulars 3/1 twill weave, 220 GSM,
and fabric width 120 cm was selected for commercial enzymatic treatments.
The functions of commercial enzyme and process conditions are given in
Table 3.7.
Table 3.7 Process conditions for bio-processing of cotton fabric
Parameter Bio-desizing Bio-
scouring
Bio-
bleaching
Bio-washing
Enzyme Palkozyme HT Lixazyme D Palkoperox Palkostone ultra
Concentration 6 g/l 0.5–1% 0.5–1 g/l 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%
pH 5.5–7.5 6.5–7.0 5–10 4.5–5.0
Temperature 50–75°C 55–65°C 60–75°C 45–55°C
Time 30 min 45 min 30 min 30 min
MLR 1 : 8 1 : 8 1 : 8 1 : 8
Other
chemicals(concentration)
Wetting agent
(1–3 g/l)
Stabilizer
(0.5–1%)
Stabilizer
(0.1–0.3%)
Non-ionic
detergent(0.5–1 g/l)
Fig. 3.8 Scanning electron micrograph of desized cotton fabrics
[Source: Csiszar et al. 2001]
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 96/457
84 Bioprocessing of textiles
Fig. 3.9 Scanning electron micrograph of a cotton bre treated with celluclast1.5l
enzyme at 1gpl, 2 h, agitated bath [Source: Csiszar et al. 2001]
Fig. 3.10 Scanning electron micrograph of cotton bre treated with cellulase (EBT)
enzyme at 1 gpl, 2 h, agitated bath [Source: Csiszar et al. 2001]
Process sequence for bio-processing of cotton fabrics is given below:
Desizing→ Defuzzing→ Scouring→ Bleaching→ Dyeing→ Enzyme
washing à Dryer
Procedure
Load the fabric→ add water→ heat to 50–55°C→ add cellulase (required %)
→ treat for specic time and pH→ drain à rinse twice→ dry
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 97/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 85
The bio-processing of 100% cotton fabric was processed with commercial
enzymes and their physical properties such as tensile behavior, elongation to
break, fabric thickness and fabric mass of grey stage and after Bioprocessing
are given in Table 3.8.
Table 3.8 Physical properties of grey and bio-processed cotton fabrics
Properties Grey fabric Bioprocessed cotton fabric
Tensile strength (lbs)
(a) Warp direction 133.5 132
(b) Weft direction 94 92Elongation to break (%)
(a) Warp direction 17.7 18.5
(b) Weft direction 15.3 15.8
Fabric thickness (mm) 0.454 0.425
Fabric GSM 124.5 122.5
Hypothesis 1: The tensile strength of the bio-processed cotton fabric was
noticed loss in warp and weft way direction of 1.12% and 2.23% respectivelywhen compared with grey cotton fabric. It may be due to loss of fabric weight
in bio-scouring and bio-washing process. The cellulase enzymes break the
cellubiose structure in the cotton bre during biopolishing (Hassan et al.
1996). The elongation to break behavior of the bio-processed cotton fabric
was noticed improvement in warp and weft way direction of 4.52% and
3.26% respectively when compared to grey cotton fabric. The fabric mass (in
terms of grams per square meter) of the bio-processed cotton fabric was also
decreased as 6.28% when compared to grey cotton fabric, it may be due to theconcentration of the enzymes and treatment conditions.
Hypothesis 2: Fastness properties of the bioprocesses cotton fabrics dyed
with reactive blue dye with 3% shade and then treated with various concentrations
of enzyme washing of 0.5%, 1% and 1.5% using acid enzyme. The washing
fastness ISO-method 3 reactive blue dye and various concentrations of 0.5%,
1% and 1.5% with acid enzyme washed cotton fabrics show good value of
3.5–4.0. The rubbing fastness of reactive dyed fabric & enzyme washed fabric
of both wet rubbing and dry rubbing shows 3.5–4.5 (Fig. 3.11). Bio-processed
cotton fabric tested with acid and alkali perspiration was noticed well (Fig.3.12). From the above research work, the processing of enzyme for treatment
at various stages to be taken special care for getting good quality of the bio-
processed cotton fabrics and also the processes are mainly depends on the
enzymes concentration, treatment time, temperature and pH of the system.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 98/457
86 Bioprocessing of textiles
Fig. 3.11 Rubbing fastness of bio-processed cotton fabric
Fig. 3.12 Acid and alkali perspiration fastness of bio-processed cotton fabric
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 99/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 87
3.3 Bioprocessing of jute and their characteristics
3.3.1 Jute bre grades, properties and applications
3.3.1.1 Jute bre – grading and classication
Jute bre, the current grading system rst separates C. capsularis and C.
olitorius into white and tossa categories respectively and then further classies
each into ve grades denoted by the letters A to E. The highest prices are
paid for Grade A, although a special grade may be introduced for which a
higher price can be demanded. The principal criteria are color, luster, strength,
cleanliness, and freedom from retting defects. From a spinning point of view,color is irrelevant but certain end-users traditionally prefer bres in particular
colors for the sake of appearance.
3.3.1.2 Physical properties of jute bres
Jute is 100% bio-degradable and thus environment friendly and it has some
unique physical properties like high tenacity, bulkiness, sound & heat
insulation property, low thermal conductivity, antistatic property etc. Due
to these qualities, jute bre is more suited for the manufacture of technicaltextiles in certain specic areas. Moreover, the image of jute as a hard and
unattractive bre does not affect its usage in technical textiles. The use of jute
was primarily conned to marginal and small manufacturers and growers, but
now it is used as important raw materials for several industries. At present
time, jute is termed as a favorite fabric for packaging materials and furnishings
and also as golden bres for national and international fashion world. Jute
bres are used for making mats, gunny cloth, cordage, hangings, paper, and
decorative articles. Prevalent uses of jute in handicraft stuff, in order to give an
aesthetic appeal, have made it popular across the globe. It is the second most
important vegetable bre after cotton, in terms of usage, global consumption,
production and availability. The jute characteristics are listed below;
• 100% biodegradable, environmental friendly and recyclable.
• High tensile strength and low extensibility
• Better breathability of fabrics suitable for packaging of agricultural
commodities
• High insulating and anti static properties
• Moderate moisture regain and low thermal conductivity• High moisture absorption capacity
• Flexibility
Jute bre has some standard physical properties. These are
• Ultimate jute length: 1.5 to 4 mm
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 100/457
88 Bioprocessing of textiles
• Ultimate diameter of jute: 0.015 to 0.002 mm
• Jute bre length: 150 to 300 cm (5 to 12 feet)
• Jute Color: Jute bre can be white, yellow, brown or grey
• Strength of jute: 3.5 to 5 grams per denier
• Moisture regain of jute: 13.75% (Standard)
• Elasticity: Breaking extension 1.8% and elastic recovery very low
• Resiliency: Poor
• Dimensional stability of jute: Good on average
• Fibre density: 1.47 grams/cc
• Fibre tenacity: 4.2 grams per denier
• Average toughness index: 0.02 • Average stiffness: 330 grams per denier
3.3.1.3 Jute bre structure
In jute plant, the rings of bre cell bundles form a tubular mesh that encases
the entire stem from top to bottom. Two layers can usually be distinguished,
connected together by lateral bre bundles, so that the whole sheath is really
a lattice in three dimensions. The cell bundles form the links of the mesh,
but each link extends only for a few centimeters before it divides or joins upwith another link. After extraction from the plant, the bre sheath forms a at
ribbon in three dimensions. When a transverse section of a single jute bre is
examined under the microscope, the cell structure is seen clearly. Each cell is
roughly polygonal in shape, with a central hole, or lumen, comprising about
10% of the cell area of cross section.
• In longitudinal view, the bre appears the overlapping of the cells
along the length of the bre. The cells are rmly attached to one
another laterally, and the regions at the interface of two cells are
termed the middle lamella. Separation of cells can be effected by
chemical means, and they are then seen to be threadlike bodies
ranging from 0.75 to 5 mm in length, with an average of about 2.3
mm. The cells are some 200 times longer than they are board, and
in common terminologies are referred to as ‘ultimale cells’ . A single
bre thus comprises a bundle of ultimates.
• Transverse selections of single bres show that the number of ultimate
cells in a bundle ranges from a minimum of 8 or 9 to a maximum
of 20–25. Bundles containing up to 50 ultimate cells are sometimesreported, but in such cases whether the bre is truly single in the
botanical sense or is comprised of two bres adhering together. A
minimum number of cells in the cross section are evidently necessary
to provide a coherent and continuous overlapping structure.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 101/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 89
3.3.1.4 Chemical structure and composition of jute bres
Chemical structure of jute breJute is a strong, stiff, natural bre. Jute bres are aggregates of single cells
consisting of α-cellulose, which are cemented by lignin and hemicellulose.
Lignin is responsible for the dark colour, branching patterns and harshness.
The spinnability of the bre is greatly reduced due to poor elongation and
high exural rigidity. Jute is the common name given to the bre extracted
from the stems of plants belonging to the genus Corchorus, family Tiliaceae.
A retted jute bre has three principal chemical constituents, namely cellulose,
hemicelluloses, and lignin. The lignin can be almost completely removed by
chlorination methods in which a soluble chloro-lignin complex is formed,
and the hemicelluloses are then dissolved out of the remaining holocellulose
by treatment with dilute alkali. The nal insoluble residue is the cellulose
constituent, which invariably contains traces of sugar residues other than
glucose. The hemicelluloses consist of polysaccarides of comparatively low
molecular weight built up from hexoses, pentoses, and uronic acid residues. In
jute, capsularis and olilorius have similar analyses, although small differences
occur among different bre samples.
For bre extracted from jute plants grown in Bangladesh, the range ofcomposition has been given as lignin, 12–14%; alpha-cellulose, 58–63%;
and hemicellulose, 21–24% (Kundu et al. 1996). In addition, analysis of the
hemicellulose isolated from alpha-cellulose and lignin gives xylan, 8–12.5%;
galactan, 2–4%; glucuronic acid, 3–4%; together with traces of araban and
rhamnosan. The chemical composition of jute at different stages of plant
growth is given in Table 3.9. The insoluble residue of cellulose has the
composition glucosan, 55–59%; xylan, 1.8–3.0%; glucuronic acid, 0.8–1.2%;
together with traces of galactan, araban, mannan, and rhamnosan. As well
as the three principal constituents, jute contains minor constituents such as
fats and waxes, 0.4–0.8%; inorganic matter, 0.6–1.2%; nitrogenous matter,
0.8–1.5%; and traces of pigments. In total, these amount to about 2%. The
detailed molecular structure of the hemicellulose component is not known
with certainty, although in the isolated material the major part is stated to
consist of a straight chain of D-xylose residues, with two side-branches of
D-xylose residues, whose position and length are uncertain (Ghosh and Dutta
1983). In addition, there are other side branches formed from single residues
of methyl glucuronic acid, to the extent of one for every seven xylose units.The third major constituent, lignin, is a long-chain substance of high molecular
weight which, like the hemicelluloses, varies in composition from one type
of vegetable material to another. The molecular chains are built up from
comparatively simple organic units which may differ from different sources
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 102/457
90 Bioprocessing of textiles
as well as in the way in which they are combined. Most of the studies in lignin
have been concerned with wood; the bast bres have been rather neglected.
It seems unlikely, however, any major differences will exist between jute
and wood lignin, but in any case many details of the molecular structure still
remain unresolved. Later, Mukherjee et al. (1993) working at the Indian Jute
Industries Research Association in Calcutta, studied the surface characteristics
of jute bre at different stages of growth (Emilia Csiszar et al. 1998). At the
early stages of growth, they found that there was an incomplete formation of
the middle lamella in the cell wall and that the parallel bundles of brils were
oriented as an angle with respect to the bre axis that gradually decreased
with growth.
Table 3.9 Chemical composition of jute at different stages of plant growth
Component Pre-bud Bud Flower Small pod Large pod
α cellulose 58.3 57.6 59.4 58.7 59.1
Holocellulose 86.8 87.8 87.3 87.1 86.8
Xylan 15.5 14.8 14.4 13.7 13.9
Lignin 12.1 12.7 12.4 12.0 12.0
Ash 0.57 0.53 0.47 0.67 0.47
Iron 0.020 0.018 0.009 0.011 0.008
Reed Length (ft) 6.6 9.1 9.3 9.6 10.7
Chemical composition of jute bre
Cellulose > 65%
Hemi-cellulose > 22.5%
Lignin > 11%
Fat and Wax > 0.3%
Water Soluble Materials > 1.2%Total = 100%
3.3.2 Changing scenario in multifunctional applications
Today jute can be dened as an eco-friendly natural bre with versatile
application prospects ranging from low value geo-textiles to high value
carpet, apparel, composites, decorative, upholstery furnishings, fancy non-
woven for new products, decorative color boards etc. Possible application
areas for technical textiles and suitable jute products are given in Table 3.10.Jute with its unique versatility rightfully deserves to be branded as the “bre
for the future”. Jute bre has deserved for many advantages such as (a) good
insulating and antistatic properties, (b) low thermal conductivity, (c) moderate
moisture regain, (d) acoustic insulating property and (e) can be blended with
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 103/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 104/457
92 Bioprocessing of textiles
productivity have indeed taken place. But it is now timely to consider what
new innovations would assist the spread of jute materials into textile uses
outside the traditional elds of packaging and carpets. Developments to
breed Corchorus or Hibiscus plants containing bres of signicantly lower
linear density would allow yarns of lower count than is now feasible, to be
spun and so enable the production of light-weight fabrics. Such jute fabrics
could have increased potential for decorative and furnishing uses, especially
if the constraint of color instability could rst be removed and a process
devised to produce additional elasticity that is more permanent basis than
that of woolenized jute. Research is being conducted in the areas of paper
and composite production in several countries, and it is expected that wholenew markets will be developed for jute as well as for many other agro-based
bres.
3.3.2.2 Chemical modication for jute property
improvement
The performance of any lingo-cellulosic bre is restricted by the properties of
the bre itself. Agro-based substances will change dimensions with changes in
moisture content, will burn, and will be degraded by organisms and ultravioletradiation. The agro-based jute bre can be used in property enhanced
applications, it is important to understand the properties of the components of
the cell wall and their contributions to bre properties. All agro-based bres
are three-dimensional, polymeric composites made up primarily of cellulose,
hemicelluloses, lignin, and small amounts of extractives and ash (Coll et al.
1993). The cell wall polymers and their matrix make up the cell wall and in
general are responsible for the physical and chemical properties of the jute
bre (Fig. 3.13). Agro-based bres change dimensions with changing moisture content
because the cell wall polymers contain hydroxyl and other oxygen-containing
groups that attract moisture through hydrogen bonding. The hemicelluloses
are mainly responsible for moisture sorption, but the accessible cellulose,
non-crystalline cellulose, lignin, and surface of crystalline cellulose also play
major roles. Moisture swells the cell wall, and the bre expands until the cell
wall is saturated with water. Beyond this saturation point, moisture exists as
free water in the void structure and does not contribute to further expansion.
This process is reversible, and the bre shrinks as it loses moisture. Agro-basedbres are degraded biologically because organisms recognize the carbohydrate
polymers (mainly by hemicelluloses) in the cell wall and have very specic
enzyme systems capable of hydrolyzing these polymers into digestible units.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 105/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 93
Biodegradation of the high molecular weight cellulose weakens the bre cell
wall because crystalline cellulose is primarily responsible for the strength of
the cell wall. Strength is lost as the cellulose polymer undergoes degradation
through oxidation, hydrolysis, and dehydration reactions (Basu and Rekha
1962).
Fig. 3.13 Chemical structure of jute bre
Jute bres are exposed outdoors to ultraviolet light undergo photochemical
degradation. This degradation takes place primarily in the lignin component,
which is responsible for the characteristic color changes. The lignin acts as an
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 106/457
94 Bioprocessing of textiles
adhesive in the cell walls, holding the cellulose bres together. The surface
becomes richer in cellulose content as the lignin degrades. In comparison
to lignin, cellulose is much less susceptible to ultraviolet light degradation.
After the lignin has been degraded, the poorly bonded carbohydrate-rich
bres erode easily from the surface, which exposes new lignin to further
degradative reactions. In time, this “weathering” process causes the surface
of the composite to become rough and can account for a signicant loss in
surface bres. Dimensional stability can be greatly improved by bulking the
bre cell wail either with simple bonded chemicals or by impregnation with
water-soluble polymers. For example acetylation of the cell wall polymers
using acetic anhydride produces a bre composite with greatly improveddimensional stability and biological resistance. The same level of stabilization
can also be achieved by using water-soluble phenol formaldehyde polymers
followed by curing.
Biological resistance of jute fibre-based materials can be improved by
several methods (Chakraborty et al. 1995). Bonding chemicals to the cell
wall polymers increases resistance due to the lowering of the equilibrium
moisture content below the point needed for microorganism attack and by
changing the conformation and configuration requirements of the enzyme-
substrate reactions. Toxic chemicals can also be added to the compositeto stop biological attack. This is the basis for the wood preservation
industry (Chakraborty and Sinha 2001). Resistance to ultraviolet radiation
can be improved by bonding chemicals to the cell wall polymers, which
reduces lignin degradation, or by adding polymers to the cell matrix to
help hold the degraded fibre structure together so that water-leaching of
the undegraded carbohydrate polymers cannot occur. Fire retardants can
be bonded to the fibre cell wall to greatly improve the fire performance.
Soluble inorganic salts or polymers containing nitrogen and phosphoruscan also be used.
3.3.3 Chemical and bio-chemical softening treatment of
jute fabric
Samanta et al. 2006 have been studied the untreated and H2O
2 bleached
jute fabrics subjected to softening treatment with selective chemical and
bio-chemical agents like NaOH, HCl, K 2S
2O
8 , cellulase enzyme/mixed
enzyme (mixture of cellulase, xylanase and pectinase), cationic softener,amino-silicone softener and poly-oxo-ethylene emulsion softener under
specied treatment conditions (Chattopadhaya et al. 1997; Basu et al.
2007). Plain-weave raw jute fabric with 67ends/dm and 59 picks/dm having
warp count 207 Tex and weft count 241 Tex and fabric aerial density of
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 107/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 95
256 g/m2 with thickness of 0.90 mm were used for desizing and scouring
and conventional 3% H2O
2 bleaching processes (Basu and Chattopadhyay
1996).
3.3.3.1 Alkali treatment on jute fabric
Raw untreated jute fabric was treated with 1%, 5%, 10% and 18% aqueous
solution of NaOH using material to liquor ratio (MLR) 1:20 for 1 min or 30
min duration either at room temperature or at boil (100°C). NaOH treated
jute fabric samples were neutralized in each case by dipping the treated fabric
in 1.5% acetic acid solution for 15 min and then washed with plain water
followed by squeezing and nal air drying (Pedersen et al. 1992).
3.3.3.2 Enzyme treatment with cellulase and specic
mixed enzyme
Conventional scouring and H2O
2 bleaching enhances enzyme activity on
jute or jute/cotton union fabrics and hence all the enzyme treatment was
performed on bleached jute fabrics. 3% H2O
2 bleached jute fabric was treated
with cellulase enzyme and also with mixed enzyme (mixture of a xed proportion of cellulase, xylanase and pectinase enzyme) varying over all
enzyme application dosages of 2%, 4%, 6% and 8% (owf) at 55ºC for 2 h with
pH 4.8–5.0 as per method using 1/20th part of sodium-acetate and acetic acid
buffer solution) in rotating (with 40 rpm) beakers using SASMIRA launder-
o-meter. After 2 h enzyme treatment, in each case temperature was raised to
90ºC for 15 min for de-activation of the enzyme (Kyohei et al. 2002). Then the
enzyme treated fabric samples were thoroughly washed with plain water and
dried in air. In a separate set of experiment 1 ml, 2 ml, and 3 ml of cellulase
enzyme (35 unit/ml) was added in commercially available said mixed enzyme
to prepare a specic mixed enzyme enriched in cellulase enzyme content and
4%(owf) over all dose of this specic mixed enzyme was applied on bleached
jute fabric.
3.3.3.3 Effect of treatment with alkali
Action of alkali (NaOH) and consequent effect on jute is commonly
known, however, to utilize this treatment for softening of jute fabric priorto its bleaching is a relatively new approach (Fig. 3.14). With increase
in concentrations of NaOH (1%-18%w/w) or with increase of treatment
temperature for dilute NaOH (1%-5%) treatment, there is increase in
weight loss, treatment shrinkage, elongation at break, crease recovery
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 108/457
96 Bioprocessing of textiles
angle, yellowness index and K/S value along with consequent reduction
in initial modulus, tenacity, bending length, exural rigidity, bending
modulus, whiteness index and brightness index. However, 18% NaOH
treatment of jute fabric (under slack condition) at room temperature
(30°C) for 30 min renders the fabric an optimum balance parameters
with maximum reduction in bending length, exural rigidity and bending
modulus with moderate loss of tenacity and maximum increase in breaking
extension, despite substantial weight loss and maximum surface browning
(causing maximum increase in yellowness index value); while this surface
darkening can be eliminated by post bleaching treatment with H2O
2 under
specic conditions (Fig. 3.15).
Fig. 3.14 Chemical structure of jute bre after alkali treatment
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 109/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 97
Fig. 3.15 Degrading the lignin composition by chemical treatment of jute bre
3.3.3.4 Effect of treatment with cellulase enzyme and
specic mixed enzyme system
Scoured and conventional 3% H2O
2 bleached jute fabric is more responsive to
enzyme action than untreated or even alkali pretreated jute fabric (Pedersenet al. 1992). Hence, a comparative study of softening action of scoured and
bleached jute fabric has been studied using different concentrations of (a)
single cellulase enzyme solution (35 unit/ml) and (b) commercially available
mixed enzyme solution (a mixture of 35 unit/ml of cellulase, 96 unit/ml of
xylanase and 136 unit/ml of pectinase) and (c) specic mixtures of varying
amount of (a) with prexed amount of (b) ie, cellulase enriched formulations
of specic mixed enzyme.
3.3.4 Biosoftening of jute bre with white rot fungi and
specic enzymatic systems
The research investigated the effect of using white rot fungi namely,
Phanerochaete chrysosporium (Kerem et al. 1992) and Ceriporiopsis
subvermispora (Blanchette et al. 1997), cellulase enzyme and a mixture of
enzymes (cellulase, xylanases and pectinases), under specic treatment
conditions on the physical characteristics of jute bres (Akin et al. 1995).
Raw jute reed of Tossa Daisee variety (grade TD3) having average neness of2.4 Tex was used for the study. Biosoftening of jute with commercial enzymes
such as cellulase (35 unit/ml) and mixed enzymes (mixture of 35 unit /ml of
cellulase; 96 unit/ml of xylanase; 136 unit/ml of pectinase) were used.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 110/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 111/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 99
tartrate (pH 5) supplemented with 0.1 mM H2O
2 (Wariishi 1992). One unit
of enzyme activity is dened as the amount of the enzyme required for the
transformation of 1 μmol of substrate per minute.
3.3.4.3 Evaluation of physical characteristics
The physical characteristics such as tenacity, elongation % and exural
rigidity for the raw jute and enzyme treated jute bres were evaluated using
standard textile testing instruments following standard testing procedures.
Tensile properties of bre
Tensile properties, such as tenacity and elongation % were evaluated using acomputer aided Instron tensile tester after conditioning the sample at 65 ± 2%
RH and 27 ± 2°C for 24 hours. A total length of 100 mm of bre was tested
for tenacity and elongation %.
Flexural rigidity measurement
The 5 mg weight of 7 cm long jute bres in bundle form were mounted on
a horizontal platform in such a way that it overhung in the front for a xed
length of 5 cm like a cantilever. A small vertical load of 2.5 mg in the form of
a xed pre-weighted synthetic gum tape was stuck to the free end of the bre bundle. It was observed that the bre bundle bends downward on application
of the known load. The exural rigidity in (mg/mm2) was calculated from the
angular deection of the bre bundle measured on a circular scale tted round
the horizontal platform (Samanta et al. 2005). Flexural rigidity was calculated
using the formula;
Flexural rigidity (mg.mm2) = (L2 / 2Ø)x (W2 + (W
1/3)) [3.1]
Where, L – length of overhung bre bundle (in mm), Ø – angle deection
(in radian), W1
– weight of the bundle in (mg/mm), W2
– the xed load (in mg)
at the free end of bre bundle.
Color spectroscopy analysis
The whiteness index, yellowness index, brightness index and reectance
value of the enzyme bre samples were measured using JAYPAK Color
Spectroscopy (Model 4800) with CIE 76, observer 10 degree at D65 light
source in the range between 400nm and 700nm.
The Brightness Index (ISO-2470-1977) was calculated using the
following formula,
Brightness Index =Reectance value of the substrate at 457 nm
Reectance value of the standard white tile at 457 nm
× 100 [3.2]
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 112/457
100 Bioprocessing of textiles
Scanning electron microscopy
The morphological structure of the bre samples were studied using JEOL
scanning electron Microscopy (Model JSM -5200) with magnications of
500X.
3.3.4.4 Effect of white rot fungi on Lignin degradation
Cellulose and lignin contents in raw jute were 51.54% and 11.50%,
respectively. Reduction of lignin was observed to be 44.16% and 25.91%
for P. chrysosporium and C. subvermispora respectively after a period of
30 days. P. chrysosporium exhibited a higher cellulose reduction of 32.63%
in comparison with 27.92% reduction by C subvermispora in 30 days
(Table 3.11). Degradation of lignin by white rot fungi enables them to gain
access to the holocellulose, the actual carbon and energy source of the fungi
(Ghosh and Gangopadhyay 2000). The mycelium which had grown over the
solid substrate jute bre had depleted the available nitrogen and in turn had
triggered the development of ligninolytic system.
Table 3.11 Effect of white rot fungi on lignin and cellulose content of jute
Incubation period (days)
Lignin Cellulose
Treatments 30 45 60 30 45 60
Control 9.99 ±
0.449
8.39 ±
0.215
8.05 ±
0.353
34.76 ±
0.05
29.46 ±
0.11
28.68 ±
0.330
P .
chrysosporium
7.75 ±
0.355
7.62 ±
0.808
7.39 ±
0.465
28.78 ±
0.05
27.15 ±
0.132
25.71 ±
0.005
C
subvermispora
8.52 ±
0.638
8.29 ±
1.010
7.89 ±
0.397
34.72 ±
0.10
29.00 ±
0.112
28.37 ±
0.200
Note: Mean values of 3 replicates; Values in % w/w
Optimization of incubation period for biosoftening
Biosoftening of the jute bre was carried out using P. chrysosporium and
C. subvermispora for varying incubation periods of 30, 45 and 60 days.
Maximum improvement in color and softness of the bre was achieved in 30
days with both the organisms. Change in color was not observed visually in
less than 30 days. No signicant increase in lignin degradation was observed
in the samples incubated for 45 and 60 days. As the incubation time increases,
there is a chance of deterioration of the bre strength due to the production of
cellulolytic and pectinolytic enzymes. Hence, 30 days incubation time can be
considered as the optimum period required for degrading lignin effectively.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 113/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 114/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 115/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 103
Flexural rigidity
It is tangible that the stiffness of raw jute bre, as indicated by the exural
rigidity value of 60.69 cN/mm2 is reduced substantially to 37.81 cN/mm2 in
case of P. chrysosporium and to 34.14 cN/mm2 in case of C. subvermispora due
to biosoftening (Kundu et al. 1993; 1996). This marked reduction in exural
rigidity in terms of percentage is 37.84% and 34.14% for P. chrysosporium
and C. subvermispora respectively. It is chiey responsible for bringing in
suppleness and softness in the biosoftened jute bres. This behavior is in
agreement with the ndings of Ghosh et al. (2004), who had employed caustic
alkali and softened jute bres by oxidation at different operating conditions.
Lignin is the component, which imparts brittleness to the bre. Decrease inlignin content causes an increase in the softness of bre, which enhances the
cross linking and adhesion forces between the jute bres. From Table 3.14,
it is quite noticeable that the stiffness of raw jute bre, as indicated by the
exural rigidity value of 60.69 mg.mm2 is reduced substantially to 20.49%,
25.47% & 34.67% in case of cellulase and 13.61%, 29.87% & 36.97% in case
of mixed enzyme at 2%, 3% & 4% concentration due to biosoftening
Scanning electron microscopy
The SEM photographs of raw jute and biosoftened jute bres are depicted(Fig. 3.16) and jute bre was treated with P. chrysosporium enzyme and
Fig. 3.16(b) shows that the brils in the peripheral cells are opened up in
biosoftened bres (Vigneswaran and Jayapriya 2008). Delignication
is initiated by hyphae growing on the inner surface of the cell wall and
penetrating into the secondary wall towards the middle lamellae as a result
of which the cells tend to separate. From Fig. 3.16(c) and (d), it is jute bre
with cellulase enzymes and Fig. 3.16(e) and (f), it is jute bres treated with
mixed enzyme system, it is seen that the surface, when compared to that of
raw bres, becomes even in case of biosoftened bres. The smoothness ofthe surface is sensed while handling the bres. It is quite noticeable that the
rate of degradation of jute bres at the surface level was observed at higher
rate as the concentration of the enzyme increases. In biosoftening process,
some weight loss was observed, which however does not yet indicate any
bre damage. Only with prolonged treatment duration, degradation occurs in
the accessible bre surfaces. This process can eventually lead to signicant
bre deterioration, indicated by a high weight and strength loss or cracks in
brillar direction and can lead to extensive surface peeling.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 116/457
104 Bioprocessing of textiles
(a)
(d)
(b)
(e)
(c)
(f)
Fig. 3.16 SEM images of (a) raw jute bre, (b) jute bre treated with fungus
phanerochaete chrysosporium, (c) jute bre treated with 2% cellulase, (d) jute bre
treated with 4% cellulase, (e) jute bre treated with 2% mixed enzyme, (f) jute bre
treated with 4% mixed enzyme [Source: Vigneswaran and Jayapriya 2008]
Statistical analysisANOVA (at 95% condence interval) was performed in order to statistically
compare the extent of variation between the treated and the control bres as
shown in Table 3.15.
Table 3.15 Anova analysis
Samples P-value Tenacity,
(cN/tex)
P-value Elongation
(cN/tex)
Control and 2% cellulase 0.157385 0.203454
Control and 3% mixed enzyme 0.037583 0.029658
Control and 4% mixed enzyme 0.008798 0.486811
Control and 2% mixed enzyme 0.012679 0.012679
Control and 3% cellulase 0.157385 0.057583
Control and 4% cellulase 3.46E-05 0.008798
Articial Neural Network (ANN)
Neural networks are used for modeling non-linear problems and to predict theoutput values for a given input parameters from their training values. Most
of the textile processes and the related quality assessments are non-linear
in nature and hence neural networks nd application in textile technology.
ANNs are typically composed of interconnected “units” which serve as
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 117/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 118/457
106 Bioprocessing of textiles
(ii) Input parameters
(i) Enzyme concentration
(ii) Process time
(iii) Process temperature
(iii) Output parameters
(i) Jute bre tenacity
(ii) Jute bre elongation to break
(iii) Jute bre exural rigidity
(b) Training of neural network
For training, the raw jute bres were treated with various concentration andtime and temperatures with cellulase and mixed enzyme system. Then the
physical characteristics such as tenacity, elongation to break and exural
rigidity of the jute bres were evaluated with standard testing procedures and
their values are trained by using feed backward propagation algorithm. For the
error back propagation net, the sigmoid function is essentially for non linear
function. Training process of the neural network developed was started with
5000 preliminary cycles to optimize the ANN prediction accuracy. The best
structure is one that gives lowest training error and it is found to be minimum
error percent (Fig. 3.18). The training of the network was further continuedin order to reduce the training error. The average training error of 1%was
obtained and terminated at this stage since beyond this reduction in training
error was not appreciable.
Fig. 3.18 Schematic diagram of ANN used in the study
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 119/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 107
(c) Testing of neural network
For testing the prediction accuracy of the neural network a known specications
and process parameters were evaluated and their error percentage was
compared with predicted sample values which are given in Table 3.16. It can
be observed that mean absolute error with respect prediction is around 1%.
Figure 3.19 represents the neural network training of cellulase and mixed
enzymatic systems and their performance levels.
Fig. 3.19 Neural network training of cellulase enzyme system
and their performance level
Table 3.16 Articial neural network (ANN) analysis
Cellulase enzyme system
Input layers Trained sample results (actual) ANN output results (predicted) Error %
Conc. Temp Time Tenacity Elongat ion Flexural Tenacity Elongation Flexural Tenacity Elongation Flexural
2% 40 60 35.17 1.878 48.25 34.819 1.899 48.099 0.998 1.134 0.312
2% 50 90 33.24 1.897 46.57 33.655 1.904 47.044 1.248 0.395 1.017
2% 60 120 32.45 1.905 45.24 33.075 1.922 45.730 1.928 0.939 1.083
3% 40 60 32.96 1.932 45.23 32.844 1.922 45.247 0.350 0.471 0.037
3% 50 90 31.45 1.978 44.85 31.174 1.951 43.687 0.877 1.339 2.592
3% 60 120 31.01 1.997 42.54 31.364 1.977 41.849 1.142 0.991 1.623
4% 40 60 31.00 1.958 39.65 30.317 1.933 40.127 2.202 1.270 1.203
4% 50 90 30.47 1.998 38.61 30.258 2.012 39.328 0.693 0.715 1.859
4% 60 120 29.45 2.004 37.56 29.396 2.039 37.387 0.181 1.781 0.459
Average 1.068 1.004 1.131
Contd...
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 120/457
108 Bioprocessing of textiles
Mixed enzyme system
Input layers Trained sample results(actual) ANN output results(predicted) Error %
Conc. Temp Time Tenacity Elongat ion Flexural Tenacity Elongation Flexural Tenacity Elongation Flexural
2% 40 60 34.04 1.924 52.43 34.711 1.881 52.610 1.972 2.203 0.343
2% 50 90 33.82 1.877 46.57 33.509 1.910 47.680 0.915 1.795 2.384
2% 60 120 31.45 1.805 43.24 32.180 1.843 44.438 2.322 2.105 2.772
3% 40 60 33.46 1.953 42.56 33.332 1.939 43.810 0.384 0.701 2.931
3% 50 90 30.50 1.998 44.85 30.949 1.972 43.438 1.474 1.261 3.148
3% 60 120 31.01 2.197 38.54 30.586 2.155 38.114 1.362 1.911 1.105
4% 40 60 29.46 1.962 38.25 29.735 2.002 38.476 0.933 2.054 0.591
4% 50 90 28.47 2.004 34.61 28.457 2.033 35.360 0.045 1.462 2.169
4% 60 120 26.45 2.004 32.56 26.332 2.060 32.618 0.453 2.824 0.178
Average 1.095 1.818 1.738
Color spectroscopy analysis
Whiteness index of the cellulase and mixed enzyme treated jute bres
showed signicant improvement when compared to raw jute (Fig. 3.20).The percentage improvement of the whiteness index of cellulase enzyme
treated jute bres were noticed at 12.35%, 16.02% & 23.47% and those of
the mixed enzyme treated jute bres were noticed at 14.66%, 15.49% &
26.37% respectively at 2%, 3% and 4% concentration levels. The reason for
the improvement of whiteness index are mainly due to the delignication of
the jute bres and uniform/smooth surface obtained by enzymatic hydrolysis
of the specic enzyme treatment conditions. The yellowness characteristics
of the raw jute bres are mainly reduced by the cellulase and mixed enzyme
hydrolysis treatment. It was noticed that reduction level of cellulase treated
jute bres were shown at 54.90%, 58.02% & 54.97% and for the mixed
enzyme system it was noticed at 52.84%, 55.58% & 58.02% respectively
at various concentration of the enzyme/s. Further research is required to
improve the whiteness and reduction level of yellowness of the jute bres for
the making them apparel worthy. The brightness index of the cellulase and
mixed enzyme treated jute bres were better when compared to raw jute and
control bleached jute bres (Reid and Paice 1998). It is also observed that
the brightness values increase as the concentration of the enzyme treatmentincreases because of the reduction of yellowness index and the improvement
of the surface smoothness of the jute bres.
Contd...
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 121/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 122/457
110 Bioprocessing of textiles
Fig. 3.21 Reectance characteristics of raw jute, cellulase andmixed enzyme treated jute bres
Practical application of the developed neural network
When the target of the physical properties of the jute bres is predetermined
then we can start the input parameters such as the enzyme concentration, time
and temperature of the process condition which will predict the desired quality
of the jute bre properties in either cellulase or mixed enzymatic systems.
3.3.4 Prospective research
The mixed enzyme treated jute bres have noticed a higher rate of surface level
degradation when compared to the cellulase enzyme treatment (Vigneswaran
and Jayapriya 2008). The improvement in elongation, as a result of the
breakdown of cellulase and mixed enzyme in the jute bres, was noticed up to
5.26% and 5.48% respectively at 4% concentration of the enzyme treatments.
The exural rigidity of the mixed enzyme treated jute bres was noticed
signicant reduction level than the raw jute and cellulase enzyme treated jute
bres (Ghosh and Dutta 1983). Due to the reduction in the exural rigidity,
soft and smooth texture has been observed more in the enzyme treated jute
bres than in raw jute (Ghosh and Dutta 1980 and 1983). The white rot fungi
Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Ceriporiopsis subvermispora are found to
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 123/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 111
be degrading lignin effectively without any loss of appreciable cellulose in
the biosoftening process spanning for a period of 30 days which is considered
as the optimum period of incubation (Tien and Kirk 1988). Biosoftening of
jute bres using these fungi decreases the tensile characteristics of jute bre
with 12.26% decrease in tenacity and 14.62% increase in elongation in case
of P. chrysosporium, while the usage of C.subvermispora as 16.86% decrease
in tenacity and a 6.45% increase in elongation with respect to raw jute. The
bending characteristics of the jute bre, when compared with that of raw jute,
are affected favorably by reduction in exural rigidity to the extent of 37.84%
in case of P. chrysosporium and 34.14% in case of C. subvermispora. These
improvements, with respect to increase in tenacity and elongation percentageand decrease in exural rigidity will essentially improve the spinnability of the
bre. This research work has proven that biosoftening of jute bre can be done
effectively in an ecofriendly manner using Phanerochaete chrysosporium and
Ceriporiopsis subvermispora.
The action of these enzymes is limited to the surface level degradation,
while the white rot fungi increases the high degree of depolymerization of lignin
and this improves the quality of the jute bres thereby making the development
of the apparel worthy and it widened the scope for using the bre effectively in
the manufacture of value added products like jute-based fabrics and composites(Macmillan et al. 1995). The neural network trained using the input and the
output parameters related to application of cellulase and mixed an enzymatic
system which gives an average error of 1% with respect to the enzymatic
process. The trained network also gives the same error% when testing of the
network was carried out with an enzyme and jute bres, which were not used
for training the network. Hence, the neural network developed can be used to
determine the tenacity, elongation to break and exural rigidity of the jute bres
for producing the expected quality with enzymatic treatment on the jute bres. Hassan et al. (1996) studied the jute-cotton blended fabric treated
with commercial cellulases, xylanases and pectinases individually and in
combination at various concentrations in order to smooth and soften the fabric.
Enzyme treatment was carried out at 50°C in the presence of 0.1 M phosphate
buffer (pH 7.0), for 3 h. Enzymatic activities were evaluated by the release of
reducing sugars and changes in surface appearance of the fabric. Addition of
commercial cellulases alone extensively removed protruding jute and cotton
bres from the fabric, whereas addition of commercial pectinases or xylanases
mainly loosened the protruding long jute bre bundle. Combined treatment
of pectinases and xylanases with reduced amounts of cellulases was equally
effective as high levels of cellulases in the removal of surface protruding bres.
The amount of reducing sugar released correlated with removal of bres from
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 124/457
112 Bioprocessing of textiles
the fabric surface. Thus, the fabric surface was smoother in enzyme-treated
samples compared to untreated control and treated with mixtures of enzymes
were more effective than cellulase alone.
With increase in the concentration of enzyme solutions for either single
(a) cellulase enzyme or (b) specic mixed enzyme or (c) mixture of (a) and
(b) with higher cellulase concentration, there is notable increase in weight loss
and treatment shrinkage, marginal increase in breaking extension, whiteness
index (with consequent small reduction in yellowness index and K/S value) and
brightness index, showing a measurable reduction in bending length, overall
exural rigidity and overall bending modulus with consequent decrease in fabric
tenacity to some extent. A close look on to the overall bending property indicatethat, treatment with the specic mixed enzyme system (c) mixture of 105 unit/
ml of cellulase, 96unit/ml of xylanase and 136 unit/ml of pectinase enzymes
give an overall balanced improvement in the physical property parameters,
while further increase in the cellulase concentrations do not show any further
notable improvement besides a marginal improvement in brightness index with
small increase in weight loss and tenacity loss (Samanta et al. 2006).
3.4 Bioprocessing of ax and their characteristics
3.4.1 Flax bre
Flax ( Linum usitatissimum L., Linaceae), which has been grown throughout the
world for millennia, is the source of products for existing, high-value markets in
the textile, composites, paper/pulp, and industrial/nutritional oil sectors (Sharma
and Van Sumere 1992). Flax is the source of industrial bres and, as currently
processed, results in long-line and short (i.e., tow) bres (Van den Oever et al.
2000). Long line bre is used in manufacturing high value linen apparel, while
short staple bre has historically been the waste from long line bre and usedfor lower value products. Flax is a bast bre and length varies from about 25
to 150 cm (18 to 55inches) and average 12–16 micrometers in strand diameter.
There are two varieties of ax available, (a) shorter tow bres used for coarser
fabrics and (b) longer line bres used for ner fabrics. Flax bres can usually be
identied by their “nodes” which add to the exibility and texture of the fabric.
The cross-section of the linen bre is made up of irregular polygonal shapes
which contribute to the coarse texture of the fabric.
3.4.1.1 Flax bre structure
The physical ax bre form being present in composite materials ranges
from bre bundles to elementary bres, or to even further opened-up shapes
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 125/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 113
(Fig. 3.22). The mechanical properties of these different bre forms differ
strongly. Flax bre bundles are being obtained after the rst isolation
processes called ‘breaking’ and ‘scutching’. These bres bundles have an
acceptable price-performance ratio and are often commercially used in
natural bre mat reinforced thermoplastic (NMT) and thermoset composites
(Heijenrath and Peijs 1996). Their lateral strength is rather poor compared
with their axial strength, mainly due to the weak pectin bonds between the
so-called ‘technical bres’. The really strong bres are the elementary bres,
which have an average tensile strength up to 1500 MPa (Van den Oever et al.
2000). Flax bres look like small lengths of bamboo under a microscope. The
cellulose molecules in ax bres are folded back and forth in a fairly regulararrangement and responsible properties of crystallinity. The ax bres are
composed of closely packed “ultimate cells” of the brillar structure that are
cemented together with holocellulose and lignin. The ultimate cells under a
microscope and abraded bres often show ultimate cells sticking away from
the surface.
Fig. 3.22 Flax bre structure
3.4.1.2 Flax properties
Finer ax bres are called as ‘linen’. Linen fabric feels cool to the touch. It
is smooth, making the nished fabric lint-free and gets softer the more it is
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 126/457
114 Bioprocessing of textiles
washed. Linen has poor elasticity and does not spring back readily, explaining
why it wrinkles so easily (Domier 1997). Linen fabrics have a high natural
luster; their natural color ranges between shades of ivory, ecru, tan, or grey.
Pure white linen is created by heavy bleaching. Linen typically has a thick
and thin character with a crisp and textured feel to it, but it can range from
stiff and rough, to soft and smooth. When properly prepared, linen fabric has
the ability to absorb and lose water rapidly. It can gain up to 20% moisture
without feeling damp. It is a very durable, strong fabric, and it is stronger
in wet than dry. The bres do not stretch and are resistant to damage from
abrasion. However, because linen bres have a very low elasticity, the fabric
will eventually break if it is folded and ironed at the same place repeatedly.Mildew, perspiration, and bleach can also damage the ax fabric, but it is
resistant to moths and carpet beetles. Linen is relatively easy to take care of,
since it resists dirt and stains, has no lint or pilling tendency, and can be dry-
cleaned, machine-washed or steamed. It can withstand high temperatures, and
has only moderate initial shrinkage.
3.4.1.3 Applications
Linen fabrics are being used for wide range from bed and bath fabrics (tablecloths, dish towels, bed sheets, etc.), home and commercial furnishing items
(wallpaper/wall coverings, upholstery, window treatments, etc.), apparel items
(suits, dresses, skirts, shirts, etc.), to industrial products (luggage, canvases,
sewing thread, etc.). A linen handkerchief, pressed and folded to display the
corners, was a standard decoration of a well-dressed man’s suit during most
of the rst part of the 20th century. Currently researchers are working on a
cotton/ax blend to create new yarns which will improve the feel of denim
during hot and humid weather. Linen fabric is one of the preferred traditional
supports for oil painting (Burger et al. 1995). Linen is also used extensively
by artisan bakers. Paper made of linen can be very strong and crisp that is
made from 25% linen and 75% cotton. The excellent mechanical properties
of ax, combined with the added functionalities they bring, make them a very
attractive potential material for bre reinforced composites. Over the past 30
years the end use for linen has changed dramatically. Approximately 70% of
linen production in the 1990s was for apparel textiles whereas in the 1970s
only about 5% was used for fashion fabrics.
3.4.2 Need of bioprocessing of ax
Natural bres are mainly formed out of cellulose which is surrounded by a
hydrophobic layer inhibiting their wetting. This hydrophobic layer constituted
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 127/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 115
from so called “natural impurities” (pectin, hemicellulose, lignin, proteins,
waxes, fats and mineral compounds) must be removed to render a valuable
hydrophilic property to natural bres. Flax bres, which together with ramie,
jute, hemp belong to the grow-up of bast bres, are special among textile
materials due to their properties. Flax bres, besides cellulose (65 - 80%)
contain non-cellulosic substances such as hemicellulose and lignin. Lignin
being a constituent of this non-cellulosic matter is a large, cross-linked
macromolecule with molecular mass in excess of 10,000 amu. It is relatively
hydrophobic and aromatic in nature. In primary ax bre, lignin occurs in the
primary wall and in the outer part of the secondary wall. Lignin is resistant
to mineral acid activity and it is sparingly soluble. It can dissolve when itis initially transformed into derivatives by chlorination and oxidation and
then by bleaching. Lignin presence in ax bre affects its rigidity due to
incrustation in amorphous areas of cellulose. Traditionally these “impurities”
are effectively removed by chemical scouring in water solutions of sodium
hydroxide at an elevated temperature of 98°C, and time of 60 min.), which is
harmful for the environment. Application, for this purpose, of equally efcient
ecological biotechnological methods eliminates these problems.
Many researchers are made attempts in the application of enzymatic pre-
treatment of fabrics made of natural bres showed a possibility of substitutingtraditional alkali scouring of cotton woven fabrics. In particular, the
employment of pectinolytic enzymes happened to be effective in removing
non-cellulosic substances from cotton and linen fabrics (Sójka-Ledakowicz
et al. 2005). Enzyme such as laccase is active during the decomposing of the
lignin-cellulose complex. Hence, the research task attempts to apply laccase
complex in the treatment of woven fabrics made of ax bres. Laccase (EC
1.10.3.2, p-diphenol oxidase) is an extracellular blue oxidase capable of
oxidizing phenols and aromatic amines by reducing molecular oxygen to water by a multicopper system (Thurston 1994). Laccase occurs in certain plants
and bacteria, but the enzyme is particularly abundant in white-rot fungi and
it is assumed to comprise a lignin biodegradable complex. From among other
microorganisms it is the best lignin degrader (Hatakka 2001). It degrades wood
by a simultaneous attack of lignin and cellulose/hemicellulose or selectively
degrades lignin far more than polysaccharides (Eriksson et al. 1990; Kuhad et
al. 1997). Laccase seems to be one of the most important enzymes in lignin
degradation (Kawai and Ohashi 1993) since it can attack polymeric lignin,
degrade the framework structure loosely, introduce additional hydrophilicgroups, and produce water-soluble material (Iimura et al. 1999). In the
presence of suitable redox mediators (e.g. 1-hydroxybenzotriazole), laccase
is even able to oxidize recalcitrant non-phenolic lignin units. This capability
has generally extended their use to a series of biotechnological applications,
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 128/457
116 Bioprocessing of textiles
all of them related to the degradation of structurally diverse aromatic
compounds. Laccase is currently being investigated by many researchers with
respect to litter mineralization (Dedeyan et al. 2000), dye detoxication and
decolorisation (Abadulla et al. 2000; Wesenberg et al. 2003), the bleaching
of paper pulp (Bourbonnais et al. 1997; Ander and Messner 1998) and
bio-scouring of ax bre (Ossola and Galante 2004). Sharma et al. (2005)
conducted tests on enzyme application for scouring dew retted ax roving.
From literature analysis it turns out that research performed up to now has
referred mainly to ax roving. Former research carried out by the Textile
Research Institute concerned the removal of impurities from fabrics made of
natural bres applying pectinolytic enzyme complex.
3.4.2.1 Flax rippling and retting
The quality of the linen fabric is mainly dependent upon growing conditions
and harvesting techniques. For getting the longest possible bres, ax is either
hand-harvested by pulling up the entire plant or stalks are cut very close to
the stem root. After harvesting, the seeds are removed through a mechanized
process called ‘rippling’ or ‘winnowing’. The ax bres must then be loosened
from the stalk. This is achieved through retting. This is a process which uses bacteria to decompose the pectin that binds the bres together. Natural retting
methods take place in tanks and pools, or directly in the elds. There are
also chemical retting methods; these are faster, but are typically more harmful
to the environment and to the bres themselves. After retting, the stalks are
ready for scutching, it removes the woody portion of the stalks by crushing
them between two metal rollers, so that the parts of the stalk can be separated.
The bres are removed and the other parts such as linseed, shive, and tow are
set aside for other uses (Friesen 1986). Next the bres are heckled: the short
bres are separated with heckling combs by ‘combing’ them away, to leave
behind only the long, soft ax bres. After the ax bres have been separated
and processed, they are typically spun into yarns and woven or knit into linen
textiles. These textiles can then be bleached, dyed, printed on, or nished with
a number of treatments or coatings.
Retting, which is the separation of bast bres from the core tissues, is
preeminent in ax bre processing, as it affects quality and yield (Pallesen
1996). Two traditional methods used commercially to ret ax for industrial
grade bres are water- and dew-retting (Sharma and Van Sumere 1992).Water-retting results in high quality bre but was discontinued in western
countries several decades ago because of the extensive stench and pollution
from fermentation products and the high cost of drying. Dew-retting is now
the accepted practice in most countries and supplies the linen used in high
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 129/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 117
quality textiles. Enzymes have been considered as a method to improve retting
(Van den Oever et al. 2000).
In water-retting, ax stems are submerged in rivers and lakes, and
anaerobic bacteria colonize the ax stems and degrade pectins and other
matrix compounds, thus freeing bres from the core tissues. Dew-retting is
an art that depends upon the removal of matrix materials from the cellulosic
bres before cellulolytic, and therefore weakening, of the bres occurs. This
process is dependent mostly upon plant cell-wall degrading enzymes produced
by indigenous, aerobic fungal consortia (Henriksson et al. 1997a; Fila et al.
2001). In dew-retting, ax plants are pulled from the soil and laid out in elds
for selective attack by the fungi over several weeks.Disadvantages of dew-retting are its dependence on particular geographical
regions that have the appropriate moisture and temperature ranges for retting,
coarser and lower quality bre than water retting, poor consistency in bre
characteristics, and occupation of agricultural elds for several weeks (Van
den Oever et al. 2000). Further, dew-retting results in a heavily contaminated
bre that is dusty and particularly problematic in textile mills. Chemical retting
(Van Sumere 1992), enzyme-retting (Akin et al. 1996), and steam explosion
techniques (Kessler and Kohler 1996) are bre extraction methods that have
previously been investigated. Because of problems with both water- and dew-retting, a long-term objective for improving the ax bre industry has been
development of enzyme-retting (Hamilton 1986; Schunke et al. 1995). In
the 1980s, extensive research was undertaken in Europe to develop enzyme-
retting as a method to replace dew-retting. The strategy of the research was
to replace the anaerobic bacteria with enzyme mixtures in controlled tanks,
thereby producing ax of water-retted quality but without the negative aspects
of stench and pollution.
Research resulted in development of the commercial enzyme mixtureFlaxzyme from Novo Nordisk (Denmark), several patents pertaining to enzyme-
retting (Akkawi 1990), and a pilot scale, tank method (Van den Oever et al.
2000). Enzyme-retting produced bres having the neness, strength, color, and
waxiness comparable to the best water-retted bre. Advantages of the enzyme
method were: (1) time savings of 4–5 days, (2) increased yield of ca 2% over
water-retting, and (3) bre consistency. The ax plant supplies both industrial
oil (i.e., linseed oil) and bast bre used to produce textiles, composites, and
paper/pulp. Linen has occupied a prominent place in textiles for centuries.
Flax can be grown in many locations and is environmentally friendly.Flax production in the South Atlantic region has the potential to enhance rural
economic growth and to supply a domestic source to the bre industries of the
United States. Flax is well known to grow in a cool and moist climate (Sharma
and Van Sumere 1992; Elhaak et al. 1999).
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 130/457
118 Bioprocessing of textiles
3.4.3 Bioscouring of ax bres
The nature of the ax bres and their characteristics were examined using ascanning electron microscope, it was evident that large bre bundles could
be observed as well as big hollow and porous structures and cracks were
clearly visible. Moreover, the surface of these ax bres dose not appears to
be smooth and totally free of debris. At maturity, the typical bast bres show
high cellulose content (60% to 70%), but not as high as cotton. Moreover,
in the bast tissue, these cells are part of a three dimensional structure rich in
pectin (Bledzki et al. 1996). By attacking this macromolecule (pectin), it eases
the decortication process and liberates bre bundles with few cells per bundle,
if retting is optimal.
3.4.3.1 Pectin, pectate lyase and bioscouring process
Pectin is found in the middle lamella of the primary cell wall of practically all
higher plant tissues. It is composed of a homo-galacturonan backbone (smooth
region) interrupted by heavily branched regions of rhamno-galacturonan
(hairy region). Homogalacturonan consists of α-1,4-linked D-galacturonic
acid (GalpA) residues, which can be methyl-esteried. Both pectin lyase (EC4.2.2.10) and pectate lyase (EC 4.2.2.2) are able to depolymerize the smooth
region of pectin by ß-elimination (Kozlowski et al. 2006). Although pectate
lyase cleaves between two α-1,4-D-GalpA residues and pectin lyase cleaves
between two methylesteried α-1,4-D-GalpA residues, this distinction on
substrate specicity is not strict. Pectate lyase is generally active on pectin
with a moderate degree of methyl esterication (DM) (0–50%), whereas
pectin lyase activity often increases with increasing DM. Developing a
biotechnology based on the utilization of an engineered enzyme (pectate
lyase) for the production of high quality bast bres from ax straw, i.e. betterneness and cleanliness, proper strength, modulus and length (Denis Rho
et al. 2008). Pectate lyases are secreted enzymes produced by a variety of
plant-pathogenic bacteria. These pectinolytic enzymes, as well as various
endo-polygalacturonase, are useful retting or bioscouring catalysts for the
processing of natural hemp and ax bres, and cotton fabric.
The bast bre bundles were then treated by soaking, using the newly
engineered pectate lyase (Fig. 3.23). Bioscouring of bast bre bundles was
performed at 37ºC and pH 8.5 in a non-agitated system. Scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) was used as a technique to monitor the bre surface
morphology and a chemical method was used to monitor the progress of the
enzymatic reaction. The tests show that the enzyme treatment produced an
effect that translates in a signicant increase of the relative percent of cellulose
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 131/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 119
from 34% to 58%, with a concomitant decrease of the relative pectin content
from 7.5% to 4.5% (Rana et al. 1998). However, the apparent efciency
of the bioscouring process was not as efcient as the chemical scouring
process (end point results: cellulose 68% and pectin 1.6%). An improvement
in bre cleanliness and separation of the bre bundles (diameter of 60 µm
to 100 µm) into ultimate bres (diameter of 17 µm) can also be observed
(Fig. 3.24). A commercial enzyme preparation (Bioscour 3000, used
traditionally in the cotton industry for degumming cotton bres) was used as a
control experiment. An improvement in bre cleanliness and separation of the
bre bundles into ultimate bres were observed but, bioprocessing conditions,
such as, enzyme-bre ratio, Ca++ concentration, temperature, and pH, as wellas the utilization of a cutinase for a better surface treatment of the bres is
among other parameters that need to be optimized.
Fig. 3.23 Mechanically decorticated ax bres, the bath in which the bres are
soaked, and the enzyme-treated bres [Source: Denis Rho et al. 2008]
Fig. 3.24 SEM micrographs show the ax bres before (left) and after (right) the
enzyme treatment performed with the engineered pectate lyase at a concentration of
1.2% (2.5 IU/ml). [Source: Denis Rho et al. 2008]
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 132/457
120 Bioprocessing of textiles
3.4.3.2 Eco-friendly approach for ax processing
John et al. (2002) have made an attempt to develop an enzyme-retting pilot plant method to replace traditional methods thus producing ax bres
with specic properties for industrial uses. Fundamental knowledge of the
structural and chemical characteristics of ax are important for designing
a strategy using enzymes to produce bres with specic properties
required for industrial applications. Flax bres, which occur in the bast
(cortex) region of the stem, lay between the protective cuticle/epidermis
barrier and the lignied core tissues (Van den Oever et al. 2000). The
ultimate bres (i.e., individual elongated bre cells) occur in bundles
that, intermixed with parenchyma tissues, form a ring around the lignied
core cells of the stem (Akin et al. 1997). Pectin serves as a glue to hold
bres together in bundles and the bundles to non-bre tissues (Van den
Oever et al. 2000). Calcium levels are especially high in the protective
barrier of the ax stem and likely help stabilize pectins and thereby plant
tissues in that location. These structural/chemical characteristics indicate
specic regions that serve well to protect the stem and must be breached
by enzymes for effective retting.
The new environment-friendly processing system requires harvestedax stems to be crimped between uted rollers thus splitting the stalk
both longitudinally and transversely. Briey, the procedure uses a
pectinase-rich, commercial enzyme mixture plus chelator, e.g., 50 mM
ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA), applied to crimped ax stems
that are then incubated for 24 hours at 40°C. Enzyme was required for
ease of bre removal with chelator (e.g. EDTA) scavenging and binding
exposed calcium ions. During incubation, the chelators and enzymes work
concurrently to further separate the bre bundles. Following incubation,
the enzyme-retted ax stalks are rinsed with water to remove the enzyme
solution and the solubilized portion of stalk. Retted ax stalks are then
dried with circulating heated air (Foulk et al. 2004). By controlling all
processing steps, uniform ax bres of known properties are produced.
Enzyme-retted bres were then mechanically cleaned and characterized
for properties relevant to textile bres. In contrast to traditional linen
production, the current US textile industry requires short staple, rened
bres. Enzyme-retting and additional processing produces short staple
bres of more consistent quality reduces the environmental pollutionthrough excess dirt and dust of dew-retted ax, does not limit the process
to geographical regions of particular temperature and moisture, and allows
elds to be harvested and made ready for subsequent crops in a known
time-frame. This retting could be carried out in facilities near farms to
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 133/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 134/457
122 Bioprocessing of textiles
et al. 2000). Color was measured for both dew-retted and enzyme-retted
bre and seed ax (Table 3.18). Enzyme retting produced bres that were
substantially lighter than dew-retted bres for both bre and seed ax, with
enzyme retted bre ax the lightest. Color data for the samples varied, with
the seed ax having considerably greater redness and yellowness (Table
3.18). Results suggest opportunities to modify color properties of ax by
retting methods and ax type. Comparing various enzyme- and dew-retted
bre samples indicated that signicantly different properties of strength and
neness resulted with the various formulations.
Table 3.17 Properties of Flax bres retted and processed by various means
[Akin et al. 2000]
Sample Strength
(g/tex)
Fineness
(micronaire)
European long line, dew-retted 38 ± 5 8.0
South Carolina grown, dew-retted 24 ± 2 4.2
Ariane bre ax, spray-enzyme retted 27 ± 4 7.1
Shirley-cleaned 18 ± 2 4.6
Ariane bre ax, spray-enzyme retted 33 ± 5 7.8
Shirley-cleaned 27 ± 2 4.8
Seed ax. Spray-enzyme retted 21 ± 1 4.1
Upland cotton 21 to 25 3.7 to 4.2
Table 3.18 CIELAB color of dew- and enzyme-retted ax bres [Akin et al. 2000]
Retted sample CIELAB values
L* a* b*
Fibre ax
Dew 59.9 2.5 10.3
Enzyme 76.2 2.3 14.0
Seed ax
Dew 60.5 3.9 13.0
Enzyme 67.9 4.6 17.1
3.4.4 Bio-scouring of linen fabrics with laccase complex
Presently biotechnology plays an important role especially in the eld of
environmental protection. In the textile industry enzymes are often used in
many technological processes as they are ecological. Flax bres are special
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 135/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 123
among textile raw materials due to their properties (Buschie-Diller et al.
1994). Flax bres, besides cellulose, contain non-cellulosic substances such
as hemicellulose, lignin, pectins, waxes and fats. Enzyme such as laccase
is active during the decomposing of lignin-cellulose complex. Hence, the
research task attempts to apply laccase complex in the treatment of woven
fabrics made of ax bres (Kan et al. 2007). The possibility and effectiveness
of applying laccase complex produced by Cerrena unicolor strain in the
scouring processes of linen fabrics was studied. The tests performed proved
that the pre-treatment with laccase complex from Cerrena unicolor provides
a high level of water sorption capabilities in of linen fabrics and with laccase
can be an alternative to traditional chemical scouring. Jadwiga et al. 2007was made attempt using linen woven fabric (plain weave, mass per unit area
223 g/m2) with laccase enzymes. In the enzymatic treatment of ax bres,
laccase enzyme produced by Cerrena unicolor (Bull. Ex Fr.) strain 137, which
belongs to white rot fungi, was used.
3.4.4.1 Enzymatic pre-treatment of linen fabric
Linen woven fabric before enzymatic treatment was washed in water bath
at 60–65°C for 60 min in order to remove sizing agents. Linen woven fabricwas subjected to pre-treatment in Linitest laboratory dyeing apparatus,
using different amounts of laccase enzymes produced by Cerrena unicolor .
Enzymatic pre-treatment of woven fabric was performed in baths of varying
concentration of laccase enzymes from 2.4 to 7.5 U/g fabric in optimal
treatment conditions: pH 5.3 (acetate buffer), temperature of 60°C, time 30–
120 min; liquid ratio 10:1. Enzymes inactivation occurred in water bath at a
temperature of 98°C for 5 min.
3.4.4.2 Traditional alkali treatment
Traditional alkali-scouring pre-treatment was performed in Linitest laboratory
dyeing apparatus at the liquid ratio of 10:1 in a bath containing sodium
hydroxide 1.8 g/l. Process conditions: temperature of 98°C, time of 60 min;
rinsing temperature of 80°C, time of 10 min.
3.4.4.3 Bleaching treatment
Linen woven fabrics after the bio- and chemical scouring were subjected to
two-stage bleaching in baths containing hydrogen peroxide 35%, 10.0 ml/l
stabilizer, anionic agent 0.7 g/l sodium hydroxide 2.0 g/l process conditions:
temperature of 98°C, time of 60 min, liquid ratio of 10:1.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 136/457
124 Bioprocessing of textiles
3.4.4.4 Enzyme stability, temperature and pH optima
Laccase from Cerrena unicolor was found to be relatively thermostable.Surprisingly, at 50°C, the enzyme did not lose almost any activity within 1
hour and at 70°C still 10% of its activity remained after 60 min of incubation.
A higher temperature of 80°C, however, caused the rapid inactivation
of laccase (95% activity loss within 10 min). Laccase also seems to be
relatively stable during long time storage in a refrigerator at 4°C. After 6
months, the activity of laccase was almost unchanged. At an alkaline pH of
10, the enzyme was also stable while an acidic pH of 3 caused the partial
inactivation of laccase.
3.4.4.5 Water sorption characteristics
The water sorption ability of linen fabrics was determined on the basis of
sorption coefcients dened by the method of sorption curve analysis. For
comparison purposes the tests of raw woven fabrics and fabrics after traditional
alkali boiling off were performed. It has been stated that woven fabric made
of ax bres after enzymatic pre-treatment (using laccase from Cerrena
unicolor ) are characterized with higher sorption values when compared towoven fabrics after alkali boiling-off.
3.4.4.6 Whiteness characteristics of linen fabrics
For woven fabrics made of ax bres and bleached after enzymatic pre-
treatment, comparable or even higher whiteness degree was obtained when
compared to fabrics bleached after traditional alkali treatment (Table 3.19).
This conrms the effectiveness of applied bio-treatment. Pretreatment with
laccase complex from Cerrena unicolor provides a high level of watersorption capabilities in linen fabrics. As is known, the ability of bres to
absorb liquids is an important parameter of flax textile fabrics during their
processing (bleaching, dyeing). The tests performed have conrmed the
usefulness of laccase produced by Cerrena unicolor in purifying woven
fabrics made of ax bres (Jadwiga et al. 2007). Efcient removal of lignin
from ax bre facilitates the penetration of oxidizing whitening agents
into bre structure. After bio-treatment, comparable whiteness degrees are
obtained as compared to the ones after alkali scouring. From the results
conrm that linen woven fabric treatment with laccase enzymatic complex
from Cerrena unicolor can be used as better alternative to traditional
chemical treatment.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 137/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 125
Table 3.19 Comparison of bleaching of linen fabric with alkali and bio-treatments
[Jadwiga et al. 2007]
Process conditions Whiteness
coefcient (W)
Whiteness digital
assessment (TV)
Fabric after alkali scouring 36.5 –3.5
Bio-pre-treatment 2.4 U/g
fabric
30 min 37.2 –3.1
60 min 37.9 –3.0
90 min 38.1 –3.0
Bio-pre-treatment 5.0 U/g
fabric
30 min 37.9 –3.0
60 min 35.6 –3.2
90 min 38.3 –3.0
3.5 Bioprocessing of wool and their characteristics
3.5.1 Wool bre and their classication
The wool bre is natural hair grown on sheep and is composed of protein
substance called as ‘keratin’ . Wool is composed of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen
and this is the only animal bre, which contains sulfur in addition. The wool
bres have crimps or curls, which create pockets and give the wool a spongyfeel and create insulation for the wearer (Feughelman 1997). The outside
surface of the wool bre consists of a series of serrated scales, which overlap
each other like the scales of a sh. Wool is the only bre with such serration’s
which make it possible for the bres to cling together and produce felt for
extreme cool climatic condition (Morton and Hearle 1993).
3.5.1.1 Wool bre – Classication
The quality of wool bres produced is based on the breeding conditions, theweather, food, general care etc. For example, excessive moisture dries out
natural grease. Similarly the cold weather produces harder and heavier bres.
The wool could be classied in two different ways.
3.5.1.2 Classication by sheep
The wool is classied according to the sheep from which it is sheared as given
below:
Merino wool: Merino sheep originated in Spain yields the best quality
wool. These bres are strong, ne and elastic bre which is relatively short,
ranging from 1 to 5 inches (25–125 mm). Among the different wool bres,
merino wool has the greatest amount of crimp and has maximum number
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 138/457
126 Bioprocessing of textiles
of scales. These two factors contribute to its superior warmth and spinning
qualities. Merino is used for the best types of wool clothing.
Class – Two wool: This class of sheep originates from England, Scotland,
Ireland and Wales. The bres are comparatively strong, ne, and elastic and
range from 2 to 8 inches (50–200mm) in length. They have a large number of
scales per inch and have good crimp.
Class – Three wool: This class of sheep originates from United Kingdom.
The bres are coarser and have fewer scales and less crimp when compared
to earlier varieties of wool bres and are about 4 to 18 inches long. They are
smoother, more lustrous, less elastic and resilient. They are of good quality,
used for clothing. Class – Four wool: This class is a group of mongrel sheep sometimes
referred to as half-breeds. The bres are about 1 to 16 inches (25–400 mm)
long, are coarse and hair like, and have relatively few scales and little crimp.
The bres are smoother and more lustrous. This wool is less desirable, with
the least elasticity and strength. It is used mainly for carpets, rugs, and
inexpensive low-grade clothing.
3.5.1.3 Classication by eece
Wool shearing is the process by which the woolen eece of a sheep is
removed. Sheep are generally shorn of their eeces in the spring, but the time
of shearing varies in different parts of the world (Heine and Hocker 1995).
Sheep are not washed before shearing. They are sometimes dipped into an
antiseptic bath as required conditions.
The classication by eece is as follows:
Lamb’s wool: The eece obtained by shearing the lamb of six to eight months
old for the rst time is known as lamb’s wool. It is also referred to as eece
wool, or rst clip. As the bre has not been cut, it has a natural, tapered end
that gives it a softer feel.
Hogget wool: Hogget wool is the one obtained from sheep about twelve
to fourteen months old that have not been previously shorn. The bre is ne,
soft, resilient, and mature, and has tapered ends. These are primarily used for
warp yarns.
Wether wool: Wether wool is the one obtained from the sheep older than
14 months. The shearing is not done for the rst time and in fact these eeces
are obtained after the rst shearing. These eeces contain much soil and dirt. Pulled wool: Pulled wool is taken from animals originally slaughtered for
meat. The wool is pulled from the pelt of the slaughtered sheep using various
chemicals. The bres of pulled wool are of low quality and produce a low-
grade cloth.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 139/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 127
Dead wool: This is the wool obtained from the sheep that have died of age
or accidentally killed. This type of wool bre known should not be confused
for pulled wool. Dead wool bre is decidedly inferior in grade; it is used in
low-grade cloth.
Cotty wool: This type of wool is obtained from the sheep that are exposed
to severe weather. As discussed; the severe weather conditions hamper the
qualities of the eece obtained. The cotty wool is of a poor grade and is hard
and brittle.
Tag locks: The torn, ragged, or discolored parts of a eece are known as
tag locks. These are usually sold separately as an inferior grade of wool.
3.5.2 Wool bres properties and their composition
3.5.2.1 Physical and chemical properties of wool bres
Wool morphology
Wool is the thick, wavy and brous protective covering of sheep. It consists
of the insoluble protein, known as ‘keratin’ . The wool bre grows from the
follicle situated in the dermis (the middle layer of skin). Wool bre consists
mainly of three morphological components: the cuticle or skin, the cortex, andmedulla in the centre (Lowry et al. 1951). High quality wool bre (ne wool)
does not contain the medulla (central core of hard cells) and has a hollow
centre. Fleece obtained from sheep is called grease wool or raw wool. Though
wool bres are more or less cylindrical, the surface consists of overlapping
and interlocking scales of the cuticle (El-Sayed et al. 2002). The serrated wool
bres tend to interlock and cling together imparting felting qualities to the
wool (Fig. 3.25).
Fig. 3.25 Longitudinal view of wool bre
The cortex comprises spindle-shaped cortex cells that are separated from
each other by a cell membrane complex. Wool cuticle cells (overlapping cells
that surround the cortex) are subdivided into two main layers, namely the
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 140/457
128 Bioprocessing of textiles
exocuticle and endocuticle (Fig. 3.26). The outer surface of the scale of the
cuticle is covered by a very thin membrane called the epicuticle (Jones and
Leeder 1975). Below this hydrophobic epicuticle is the exocuticle, a cystine-
rich component forming about two-thirds of the scale structure. The exocuticle
just below the epicuticle is referred to as the ‘A’ layer, having a distinctly
higher cystine component than the rest of the exocuticle (known as the ‘B’
layer). Below the exocuticle, forming the remainder of the scale structure is
the endocuticle and then a thin layer of intercellular cement (Feughelman
1997). Figure 3.27 shows the cell membrane structure of wool bre.
Fig. 3.26 Cross-section diagram of a merino wool bre
Fig. 3.27 Schematic of a wool bre showing cuticle and cortical cells
Staple length: It is the total length of a bre in its natural condition. It is
obtained by measuring the natural staple without stretching the crimps out of
the bre.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 141/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 129
Fibre length: It is the total length of a wool bre after removing the
crimps or waviness by straightening it.
Crimpiness: It refers to the waviness of the wool bre. Its number varies
from 2 to 12 per cm depending upon the quality. It is a valuable property in
spinning and increases the elasticity of the yarn and fabric. Crimps are more
pronounced in ne wool.
Elasticity: The property of wool bres to return to their original or natural
form after being stretched or compressed. Wool is quite elastic, and therefore,
resists wrinkling, bagging and tearing.
Lustre: It is the ability of wool to reect light. Wool with lustre, when
dyed, has a brighter appearance than wool without lustre. Coarse wool withfewer scales has more lustre than ne wool because of smoothness of bre.
Strength: It is the property of wool bre to undergo processing without
breaking. Wool bre and fabrics are usually strong and durable.
Conductivity: Wool is one of the best bres for retaining body heat and
also for keeping external heat out. This is because of its insulating nature i.e.
it is a poor conductor of heat.
Dyeing properties: Wool is one of the easiest bres to dye because dyes
penetrate the bre easily and remain permanently.
Softness: Softer bres consist of numerous, small scales which t overone another loosely and produce fabrics which are softer to touch.
Inammability: Wool is slower to burn, and on burning, it gives off a
pungent odour and forms a bead when burning ceases.
Action of chemicals: Alkalis weaken the wool and may even dissolve it
completely. Dilute acids do not act upon wool, and wool is generally dyed
with acid colours.
Moisture: Wool readily absorbs and gives off moisture. Under normal
conditions, the moisture content varies from 12% to 17%. Warm: You only have to look at a Highland sheep breed in its dense,
long eece standing in the show to understand the special thermal capacity of
wool. It seems warm to the touch, while cotton feel cool, for example.
Hygroscopic: Wool absorbs, retains and releases moisture without
affecting its thermal properties. This makes is perfect for use in breathable
ancient structures, and anywhere where moisture is a concern.
Acoustic absorption: Wool is very good at soaking up reverberated sound,
particularly in the range of the human voice. It makes a fabulous acoustic
cloud material and why it is so good inside quality speakers. Biodegradable: As a completely natural material made from keratin, like
human hair, wool will eventually break down completely, leaving no residue
and damaging nothing. It is therefore good for gardening and use in places
where safe, chemical-free environment are important.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 142/457
130 Bioprocessing of textiles
Nitrogen slow release – As it biodegrades, wool releases nitrogen slowly
into its surroundings, feeding nearby plants and organisms that need nitrogen-
rich conditions.
3.5.2.2 Properties of woollen clothing
Wool, one of the oldest textile bres known, has survived the test of time because
of its unique natural properties. Today there are many other textile bres, but as
yet science has not been able to produce another bre containing all the natural
properties of wool. Wool remains unique; a masterpiece of design.
Wool insulates against heat and cold Wool absorbs moisture vapor and wool clothing provides superior comfort in
both hot and cold weather. In cold weather even a little moisture on the skin
becomes cold, quickly reducing body temperature (Rippon 2003). However,
by absorbing body moisture a dry layer of air is left next the skin and it helps
to hold in body heat. In addition the crimp in the wool bres makes them stand
apart from each other.
As a result, little pockets of still air are trapped between the bres. This
lining of air trapped inside the fabric acts as an insulator. Still air is one of
the best insulators found in nature. The absorption/evaporation process works
in hot weather to help keep the body cooler. Evaporation of perspiration is
the body’s natural cooling device. Wool helps this process along. Its thirsty
cells absorb body vapour and help reduce skin temperature. Also, much of the
outdoor heat is blocked out because of wool’s insulating barrier of air pockets.
This means that the body is kept at an even temperature.
Wool – healthy in nature
Wool has the ability to insulate against heat and cold, it protects against
sudden changes of temperature, and it lets body breathe. Wool can absorb up
to 30 percent of its own weight in moisture before it becomes really damp. As
moisture is absorbed; heat is generated so that the wool remains warm rather
than cold and clammy.
Wool – water repellent property
While wool can absorb moisture, it repels liquids. The scales on the outside of
the bre cause liquid to roll off the surface of the wool fabric.
Wool – re resistant propertyWool is naturally safe. It does not have to be specially treated to become non-
ammable. While it can catch alight, it will not are up nor support a ame.
Instead of burning freely, once the ame is removed a cold ash is left which
can be brushed away immediately. Wool for clothing (particularly children)
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 143/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 131
will protect from accidents associated with re. Firemen wear wool uniforms,
and re-ghters in rural areas should always ensure they dress themselves in
wool before rushing to ght a re. Wool is self extinguishing because of its
high Limiting Oxygen Index (LOI=25.2), which means to completely burn
wool an oxygen content of 25.2% is necessary whereas normal air only has a
21% content.
Wool – elastic property
Wool has natural elasticity, greater than that of any other bre, makes it
comfortable to wear because it ts the shape of the body. Wool can be twisted,
turned and stretched, and yet it returns to its natural shape. A wool bre
when dry can be extended by about 30 percent. When wet it will stretch by between 60 and 70 percent. This means that a wool garment gives freedom of
movement, especially important for children’s clothes and sportswear, when
ease of movement is all important.
Wool – static electricity
Wool naturally absorbs moisture from the air; the tendency to collect static
electricity is reduced. Walking across a wool carpet, less likely to receive a
shock when touch a grounded object. Wool garments are much less likely to
“spark” or cling to the body.
Wool – noise insulating property
Wool is a wonderful insulator against noise; because it absorbs sound and
reduces noise level considerably. For this reason wool wallpaper is often used
in ofces, restaurants, airport terminals, etc. Wool is also an ideal material
used in such places as concert halls to attain the best acoustics possible.
Wool resists dirt
Wool resists dirt, retains its appearance, and stays cleaner longer. Its abilityto absorb moisture prevents a build-up of static electricity and therefore wool
does not attract lint and dust from the air. Furthermore the crimp in the wool
bre and the scales on the outside of the bre assist in keeping dirt from
penetrating the surface.
3.5.2.3 Wool quality – assessment
Fineness/Grade: In general, grade refers to the average diameter or thickness
of the wool bre. Three systems of wool grading are commonly used namely(i) the American or Blood system; (ii) the English or Spinning Count system;
and (iii) the Micron system. The American Blood Grade System was developed
in the early 1800s and originally represented the amount of ne-wool Merino
genetics (Spanish origin) present in the native coarse-wool sheep. The English
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 144/457
132 Bioprocessing of textiles
system of grading wool uses a measurement called the “spinning count” and is
based on the number of “hanks” of yarn which could be spun from one pound
of clean wool on the equipment available at the time the system was developed.
Increased emphasis on an exact and highly descriptive method of describing
wool grade has produced a measuring system in which individual bres are
accurately measured. The unit of measure is the micron. Traditionally, the
standard method of measuring wool bres is by a micro-projection technique
in which short longitudinal sections of the bres are projected onto a screen at
500-fold magnication. Technological advancements like electro-optical and
image analysis machines have greatly improved the efciency and accuracy
of bre diameter measurement. All three systems are measures of averagebre diameter and can be used interchangeably as shown in Table 3.20, but
the micron system is the system used internationally and preferred by wool
buyers and manufacturers.
Table 3.20 Classication of wool bres based on quality/grade
Type of Wool American (or)
Blood Grade
English or Spinning
Count Grade
Microns
(average bre
diameter)
Fine Fine Finer than 80s Under 17.70
Fine Fine 80s 17.70–19.14
Fine Fine 70s 19.15–20.59
Fine Fine 64s 20.60–22.04
Medium 1/2 Blood 62s 22.05–23.49
Medium 1/2 Blood 60s 23.50–24.94
Medium 3/8 Blood 58s 24.95–26.39
Medium 3/8 Blood 56s 26.40–27.84
Medium 1/4 Blood 54s 27.85–29.29
Medium 1/4 Blood 50s 29.30–30.99
Coarse Low 1/4 Blood 48s 31.00–32.69
Coarse Low 1/4 Blood 46s 32.70–34.39
Coarse Common 44s 34.40–36.19
Very coarse Braid 40s 36.20–38.09
Very coarse Braid 36s 38.10–40.20
Very coarse Braid Coarser than 36s Over 40.20
3.5.3 Chemical structure of wool bre
The principal component of wool is a protein molecule called ‘keratin’. All
protein molecules consist of long chains of small molecular units, known
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 145/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 133
as ‘amino acids’. Figure 3.28 shows the general structure of an amino acid .
Each keratin molecule in wool consists of many hundreds of amino acid units,
arranged in an irregular order, although not a random one by analogy (De Boos
1988). The order in keratin determines how the molecules t together, giving
the bre strength and exibility. It has been estimated that wool contains more
than 170 different proteins. These are not uniformly distributed throughout the
bre; proteins of different structures are located in specic regions (Fig. 3.29).
This heterogeneous composition is responsible for the different physical and
chemical properties of the various regions of wool. The proteins in wool are
composed of amino acids; so called because they contain basic amino (-NH)
and acidic carboxyl (–COOH) groups.
Fig. 3.28 General structure of an amino acid
Fig. 3.29 Formation of a polypeptide by reaction of amino acids (R1, R
2 and R
3 may
be the same or different side groups)
In wool, individual polypeptide chains are joined together to form
proteins by a variety of covalent (chemical bonds), called ‘cross links’ , and
non-covalent physical interactions (Fig. 3.30). The most important cross
links are the sulphur containing disulphide bonds, which are formed duringbre growth by a process called “keratinisation”. These make keratin bres
insoluble in water and more stable to chemical and physical attack than
other types of proteins (Schafer 1994). Disulphide bonds are involved in
the chemical reactions that occur in the ‘setting’ of fabrics during nishing.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 146/457
134 Bioprocessing of textiles
In this process, disulphide cross links are rearranged to give wool fabrics
smooth-drying properties so that ironing is not required after laundering.
Another type of crosslink is the isopeptide bond, formed between amino
acids containing acidic or basic groups. In addition to the chemical cross
links, some other types of interactions also help to stabilize the bre under
both wet and dry conditions. These arise from interactions between the side
groups of the amino acids that constitute wool proteins. Thus, hydrophobic
interactions occur between hydrocarbon side groups; and ionic interactions
occur between groups that can exchange protons. These ionic interactions or
‘salt linkages’ between acidic (carboxyl) and basic (amino) side chains are the
most important of the non-covalent interactions. The most important of thenon-covalent interactions are the ionic, or ‘salt linkages’ between acidic
(carboxyl) and basic (amino) side groups.
Fig. 3.30 Bonding structure of wool bre
3.5.4 Wool bre – enzyme reactions
The necessity to use more environmental friendly processes leads to the
replacement of conventional chemical textile bre treatments by enzymatic
ones. In the case of wool bre, there are many attempts to substitute
the conventional chlorine treatment by an enzymatic process capable of
providing the fabric with the same characteristics, like anti-shrinking andanti-pilling behaviour. This could be achieved by using proteases, which
would degrade the outermost layer of wool bre (the cuticle) responsible
for wool’s undesirable physical properties (Silva and Cavaco Paulo 2003).
The wool cuticle resistance is thought to be due to the naturally occurring
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 147/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 135
covalent isopeptide cross links, as well as to covalently attached lipid (Heine
and Hocker 1995). Alkali, chlorination and amine treatments are capable of
removing some of the bound lipid (Earle et al. 1971). These treatments alter
the surface properties of the bre by reducing its hydrophobic nature and
enhance textile properties such as dye uptake, polymer adhesion in shrink
resist treatments and electrical conductivity (Brack 1998). The diffusion of
serine proteases into wool fabrics and yarns was studied (Carla et al. 2005)
and reported that the proteases used free subtilisin and subtilisin- PEG (the
same enzyme that was covalently cross linked to polyethylene glycol) were
shown the adsorption and diffusion facilitated by the pre-treatment performed,
being the alkaline surfactant washing and bleaching the most effective inwhat concerns enzyme adsorption. Furthermore, this study suggests that
the diffusion of proteases into wool is dependent on the size of the protease
(Grebeshova et al. 1999). The free enzyme penetrates into wool bre cortex
while the modied bigger enzyme is retained only at the surface, in the cuticle
layer. Also, proteins without proteolytic activity do not adsorb considerably
on wool due to its hydrophobic nature, therefore the diffusion is facilitated by
hydrolytic action (Cortez et al. 2004). These results have important practical
implications for the establishment of enzymatic wool nishing processes,
since they allow for control of the enzyme hydrolysis, which was the majordrawback of this environmental friendly option to the conventional chlorine
treatments (Pascual and Julia 2001).
Heine and Hocker (1995) have suggested that either the enzyme has to be
controlled (for example, diffusion control by enzyme immobilization) or the
enzyme has to be specially “designed” (for example, by genetic engineering)
in such a way that only a distinct part of the substrate is altered. The research
work analyses and compares the behaviour of two proteases, native subtilisin
and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-subtilisin, which differ essentially in theirsize, in the hydrolytic attack to wool bres. To contrast with the adsorption
and diffusion of the enzymes, two water soluble proteins without catalytic
activity, namely bovine serum albumin (BSA) and carbonic anhydrase,
were used. The major objective of the study was to understand the nature of
enzyme–wool interactions which lead to wool degradation, and investigate the
possibility of using an enzymatic process for wool nishing, which would be
an environmental friendly alternative to the conventional chlorine treatments.
3.5.4.1 Enzymes, proteins and reagents
The enzymes used in the study were the proteases Subtilisin Carlsberg
(Protease type VIII), (E.C.3.4.21.62) and PEG-subtilisin, a subtilisin that
was modied by covalent coupling to polyethylene glycol (6 moles PEG/
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 148/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 149/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 137
Fig. 3.32 SEM microphotographs of the wool bres after the alkaline pre-treatments:
(a) surfactant washing, and (b) surfactant and bleaching washing [Source: Silva et al.
2005]
3.5.4.3 Effect of enzyme size
The subsequent studies were performed with 100% wool fabric subjected toan alkaline surfactant washing followed by bleaching. The enzymes used were
the native subtilisin and subtilisin-PEG. The protein concentrations used were
low, so that the surface was never saturated with the enzyme. The research study
was performed using an enzyme concentration of 40 mg/l and for this reason
a longer time had to be employed in order to better understand the differences
in the behaviour of the two enzymes (Silva et al. 2005). Therefore, a study
conducted for 168 h was performed, where protein adsorption and Tyrosine
formation were monitored. The study observed that the subtilisin-PEG is not
being adsorbed (only about 7% of protein adsorption was attained) while free
subtilisin had about 50% of adsorption into wool fabric. The differences are
also noticeable in the formation of Tyrosine equivalents. The subtilisin that
was covalently coupled to PEG showed a very low release of amino-acids
into media. Comparing to free subtilisin, the amount of amino-acids produced
in Tyrosine equivalents was much higher, indicating wool bre degradation
by the enzyme. The control test run simultaneously with free subtilisin and
the inhibitor anti pain showed no adsorption and no Tyrosine formation,
conrming that the adsorption of the protease into wool was assisted by theenzymatic action. This result was also conrmed by the determination of the
bres strength resistance using a dynamometer.
The maximum tensile strength supported by the yarns was lower for
free subtilisin, indicating higher bre degradation. To follow the diffusion of
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 150/457
138 Bioprocessing of textiles
the enzymes into fabrics, they were uorescently labelled with FITC. After
covalently coupling the enzymes to a uorescent dye (FITC), an extensive
dialysis was performed until no release of free dye into solution was veried.
Then, after enzymatic treatment, a microtome was used to cut thin layers
of the wool bre entrapped in a non-uorescent resin. The free subtilisin
penetrates completely inside the bre cortex while uorescently labeled
subtilisin-PEG only appears at the surface of some bres (in the cuticle layer).
A similar result was found by Nolte et al. 1996 when studying the effect of
Alcalase, a commercial protease, in wool tops in untreated and Hercosett-
treated wool (wool that was treated by the application of a water-soluble resin
after chlorination). They found that after a 50 h treatment, the uorescentlylabeled alcalase had fully penetrated the untreated-bre cortex, while it was
retained only at or near the surface of Hercosett-treated bres after an identical
treatment process. To compare with the adsorption of the different size
enzymes, the proteins BSA and Carbonic Anhydrase, with average molecular
weights of 66 and 29 kDa, respectively, were also tested for adsorption on
wool at several concentrations (Fig. 3.33). These two proteins showed no
adsorption on wool, thus the isotherms could not be formulated.
Fig. 3.33 Fluorescence microphotographs of bre cross-sections of wool treated with
FITC-labeled subtilisin (a) and subtilisin-PEG (b) [Source: Silva et al. 2005]
The large enzyme molecule is not able to enter in contact with substrate
and to form the intermediate enzyme-substrate complex, because of steric
constraints. It is known that proteases hydrolyze mainly the inside of thebre rather than cuticle (Sawada and Ueda 2001). This fact is due to the high
hydrophobicity of the external surface of wool on one hand, and the fatty layer
overlapping the cuticles, on the other. Thus, proteases degrade preferentially
the intercellular cement, penetrating under favorable conditions relatively
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 151/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 139
quickly into the bre cortex (Nolte et al. 1996). In this study it seems that
subtilisin-PEG hydrolyzed just the cuticle layer of wool bre, explaining the
low release of amino-acids and the higher tensile strength resistance of the
bre. To support this idea, wool bre samples treated with these two enzymes
were washed for 3 consecutive cycles in a rota-wash machine and felting was
evaluated visually. It seems that wool bre treated with subtilisin-PEG felted
less, highlighting the idea that it had its cuticle layer partially removed. This
fact could be very useful in wool nishing, where only the cuticle layer is
intended to be hydrolyzed. The dimension of the protease is a self-limiting
factor for the undesirable hydrolysis of wool bre cortex, thus overcoming
the major drawback of wool enzymatic nishing: the difculty in controllingenzyme hydrolysis process.
Hypothesis: The adsorption of a native and a modied subtilisin on
wool was studied (Suzana Jus 2007) and reported the alkaline peroxide pre-
treatment improves the enzyme diffusion on wool. This diffusion seems to
be facilitated by the hydrolytic attack, since proteins without activity could
not adsorb considerably on wool. Subtilisin-PEG, the protease, hydrolyzed
just the cuticle layer of wool, fact that was conrmed by the lower release
of amino acids into media and the higher tensile strength and lower felting
of the bre. Thus, the production of diffusion-controlled enzymes might bea solution for a future enzymatic wool treatment process, which would be an
environmental friendly alternative to the conventional chlorine treatments.
3.5.5 Wool nishing – surface modication
The use of proteases modied with the soluble polymer polyethylene glycol
(PEG) in the bio-nishing process of wool bres was studied to analyse the
enzyme action on the outer parts of wool bres. Different proteolytic enzymes
from Bacillus lentus and Bacillus subtilis in native and PEG-modied forms
were investigated and their inuence on the modication of wool bres
morphology surface, chemical structure, as well as the hydrolysis of wool
proteins, the physico-mechanical properties, and the sorption properties of
1:2 metal complex dye during dyeing were studied (Suzana jus et al. 2007).
Modied enzyme products have a benet effect on the wool bres felting
behaviours (14%) in the case when PEG-modied B. lentus is used, without
markedly bre damage expressed by tensile strength and weight loss of the
bre.Handle improvement and shrink-proong treatment are the most
important quality enhancing steps in wool nishing processes (Riva et al.
1999; Heine 2002). However one of the most important of the shrink-proong
treatments (chlorine-Hercosett) still use chlorine, which leads to the pollution
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 152/457
140 Bioprocessing of textiles
of efuents with adsorbable organic halogen (AOX) by-products and water
pollution (Haefely 1989). This process involves a chlorination treatment
to modify the surface of the wool bres, followed by the application of a
cationic polyamide, and has led to the availability of machine washable wool
garments (Lewis 1992). Looking after alternative, bre-processing enzymes
have an important role in an ecological and economic way (Simpson and
Crawshaw 2002; Gaertner and Puigserver 1992). Numerous investigations
have indicated that proteolytic enzymes mostly subtilisin or papain (serine-
proteases and sulphydryl proteases) preferential degrade the inner parts of
the wool bre (Heine and Hocker 1995; Rao et al. 1998). Nevertheless there
is currently considerable interest in the use of proteases to achieve highershrinking resistance, increasing substrate smoothness and softness, as well as
better dyeability of the enzymatically treated wool bres (Shen et al. 1999;
Heine et al. 1998).
Enzyme diffusion plays a much more decisive role in the heterogeneous
system of soluble enzyme and solid substrate than it does in a homogenous
system, where both enzyme and substrate are soluble (El-Sayed et al. 2001).
The kinetics does not only depend on the concentration of the reaction
partners, the temperature and the pH value of the liquor, but also on the
diffusion of the enzyme to, and into, the solid phase of the substrate and the
diffusion of the reaction products out of the solid phase into the liquor (Silva
et al. 2005; Tzanov et al. 2003). The problem of the enzymatic treatment on
wool with proteases, which having diffused into the interior of the bre, is
that the protease hydrolysis is not limited to the bre surface but it hydrolysis
parts of the endocuticle and proteins in the cell membrane complex (CMC)
causing unacceptable strength and weight lost of the bre (Schroeder et al.
2006). Heine et al. (1998) describes the hydrolytic attack of protease enzymes
on wool, which attacks preferential the non-keratinous parts, i.e. parts of theendocuticle, inter macro-brillar material and the CMC of the wool (Heine
et al. 1998). The uncontrolled degradation of the CMC led to a complete
disintegration of the wool structure resulting in the bre brillation. Heine
and Hocker have suggested that the enzyme diffusion could be controlled
with the possibility of enzyme immobilization or with genetic engineering of
microorganisms. Kodera et al. (1998) published the possibility of chemical
modication of proteins by conjunction with synthetic macromolecules.
Chemically modied proteases (Silva et al. 2005; Schroeder et al. 2006)showed important improvement in the wool quality after treatment. Polymers
attached onto the proteins, namely increase the molecular mass, occupy larger
volumes in an aqueous environment, and restrict the enzyme action on the
bre surface affecting the diffusion behaviour of wool bres (Bahi et al. 2007).
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 153/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 141
In this contribution, the effects of two alkaline proteases ( Bacillus lentus and
Bacillus subtilis) and their PEG conjugates with different molecular weights,
on the hydrolytic attack to the wool bre surface were studied.
The inuence of two protease enzymes from different sources ( B. lentus
and B. subtilis) and their PEG conjugates of the same specic proteolytic
activity were studied. The impact of enzyme treatment on the wool bres
morphology, physico-mechanical properties and the sorption properties using
the 1:2 metal complex dyes were evaluated (Suzana jus et al. 2007). Australian
merino wool-top was used which having the following characteristics: neness
of bre 19.5 microns, width of bre 70 mm, the pH of water extract 7.1, and
0.4% of fat content. Enzyme treatment was performed using alkalophilic andthermostable proteases from B. lentus (Genencor, Netherlands) and B. subtilis
(Novozymes, Denmark) used without further purication except during the
chemical modication procedure.
3.5.5.1 Application of protease enzyme
Enzymes are applied potentially to all stages of textile processing, starting
from bre retting to fabric nishing since 1970s, and its application has also
reached a wide range of textile products (Buchert and Pere 2000; Heine andHocker 1995). Protease enzymes constitute a major application in the detergent
industry for removing protein stains (Grebeshova et al. 1999; Moreira et al.
2002). Alkaline-stable protease enzymes are applied to woolen textiles under
alkaline conditions, i.e., pH from 8.2 to 8.8, for improving softness, handle,
drape, and pilling resistance with a slight reduction in mechanical properties
(Heine 2002; Riva et al. 1993; Sawada and Ueda 2000). It penetrates into the
amorphous region of wool bre and decreases the amount of the ordered alpha
helix region (Wojciechowska et al. 2004), as well as removes the surface
fatty acids (Kantouch et al. 2005). It decreases the resistance of wool bre
against dye diffusion and therefore decreases the apparent activation energy
for the dyestuff during dyeing when compared with the untreated fabric (Riva
et al. 2002). Neutral-stable protease enzymes are also applied under neutral
reducing conditions, i.e., pH from 6.2 to 6.8, to preferentially modify the
cuticle scales of wool and thus have been used to impart softness and antishrink
nish (El-Sayed et al. 2002; Riva et al. 2006). Even though enzymes impart
a good handle to woolen textiles, their industrial application is limited, since
they need special care and also reduce the mechanical properties of treated products.
Ammayappan et al. (2011) have studied the wool/cotton union fabric
treated with specic selected enzymes namely Savinase-16.0L-Ex (EC
3.4.21.62) and Papain-URPP (EC3.4.22.2) for analyzing the mechanical and
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 154/457
142 Bioprocessing of textiles
handle properties of wool/cotton union fabrics. The weight loss due to savinase
and papain enzyme treatments is 3.6% and 3.9%, respectively, and so there is
no signicant difference in the weight loss due to these two enzyme treatments.
The extent of modication of cuticle scales in wool bre is generally better in
papain enzyme treatment than in savinase enzyme treatment, since papain is
applied in the presence of a reducing agent. Along with enzyme modication,
the reducing agent also generates more acidic functional groups on wool bre,
which additionally inuence the adhesion, spreading and xation of nishing
chemicals on the surface of the wool bre (Cardamone et al. 2005; Walawska
et al. 2006). The selected alkaline stable and neutral-stable enzyme treatments
on this union fabric have distinct and progressive effects on its performance properties such as handle, softness, comfort, and mechanical properties. The
extent of modication of wool bre in cuticle as well as in cortical level
is better in papain enzyme treatment than in savinase enzyme treatment
(Fig. 3.34).
(a) (b)
Fig. 3.34 SEM photographs of (a) Savinase-treated wool bre and (c) Papain-treated
wool bre [Source: Silva et al. 2005]
3.5.5.2 Enzymatic treatment of wool
Wool top was incubated with the proteases or their conjugates at 50°C at
medium bath migration, for 30–180 min in a solution of 0.1M sodium borate
buffer (pH 8.5), using the same amount of proteolytic activity (25 mU/ml)
against azocasein. After the enzymatic treatment a solution of distilled water
and acetic acid (100 ml/l) was used to reduce the pH of the treatment baths
in order to denaturate the enzymes. Reference samples (REF) were run with
wool top treated in the buffer solution without the enzymes. The proteolytic
autolysis of the used enzymes (E-BL, E-MBL, E-BS and E-MBS) was
monitored in the absence of wool.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 155/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 143
3.5.5.3 Effectiveness of wool felting
The effectiveness of PEG-modied proteases from different sources wasanalyzed and to change wool bres morphology in order to increase anti-
felting properties of wool. In order to elaborate the effect of chemical
modication of proteases on wool bres morphology and chemical changes,
the enzymatic treatment was performed with an equal amount of proteolytic
activity (25 mU/ml) using native and modied protease against azocasein
were used. Treatment of wool bres with native proteases from (BL and BS)
showed an increased release of proteins from wool bres compared to their
modied forms (MBL and MBS) (Fig. 3.35). Native proteases from B. lentus
exhibit higher activity (8.5%) on wool bre than the protease from B. subtilis.
The attachment of PEG onto the proteases reduced their activity towards high
molecular weight substrates, resulting in reduced bre destruction (Suzana
Jus et al. 2007; Jovancic et al. 2001).
Fig. 3.35 SEM images of enzyme-treated wool bres using native and PEG-modied
proteases of B. Lentus (BL) and B. Subtilis (BS) and their corresponding conjugates(MBL and MBS) after 180 min of incubation [Source: Suzana Jus et al. 2007]
The higher rate of native enzyme diffusion into the inner part of the wool
bre resulted in almost complete degradation of the bre at longer incubation
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 156/457
144 Bioprocessing of textiles
time (180 min) due to nearly complete hydrolytic degradation of the non-
keratinous parts of the wool bre deviating and creasing of the cuticle scales
(Fig. 3.35). After 180 min of incubation time the native B. subtilis enzyme (BS)
showed a high weight loss (15%), compared to the reference sample (REF),
whereas negligible increasing weight (1%) is obtained using its modicated
form (MBS). The B. lentus protease (BL) showed similar but considerable
lower impact on wool bre degradation. The negligible weight increase in
the case of modied proteases could be the consequence of the deposition of
PEG-modied enzymes or even free remaining PEG on the bre surface.
3.5.5.4 Tensile strengthThe analysis of tensile strength on the enzymatic treated wool bres have
conrmed a high degree of bre damage after long-term incubation period
and a benet impact at bre surface with smoothness by shorter incubation
period. However, the enzymatic treatment had a limited effect on the felting
behaviour of wool bres (Riva et al. 1993). It was obvious that the diameter
of the felt-ball increased after the enzymatic treatment which was more
pronounced after the application of native B. lentus protease (from 22.78mm
for untreated wool to 24.16mm after 30 min incubation period) indicatinga decrease in wool felting by 27.6%. Using the PEG conjugate of the B.
lentus protease the felting behaviour did not decrease signicantly and was
comparable to the sample treated with modied B. lentus for 180 min. In
the case of native B. subtilis protease the felting of wool decreased for 5.6%
after 30 min and 19.9% after longer incubation time (180 min). Unfortunately
the high loss of tenacity and weight of the wool bre are useless for bre
processing. Consequently, after 30 min of treatment the application of native
B. subtilis protease was observed less impact on the wool felting (23.18 mm)
compared to the native B. lentus protease (24.16 mm), but in comparison
with the untreated wool sample (22.78 mm) a felting decrease about 8% was
obtained. Based on test results of PEG onto the protease enzymes resulted in
a successful treatment of the wool bre surface without markedly changes of
the weight loss and the bre tenacity, and with improvement of felting in all
cases, compare to the untreated and native proteases treated wool.
3.5.6 Handle and dyeability of wool
Hand and dyeing behaviour are important quality aspects for wool (Chapman
1976). Common nishing processes, such as oxidation of the wool surface by
means of chlorination to increase the dyeing afnity or application of softening
agents to modify the handle, improve these properties (Denby 1974). A great
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 157/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 145
disadvantage of these processes is the environmental pollution. Enzymes can
be used in order to develop environmentally friendly alternative processes.
Since wool mainly consists of proteins and lipids especially proteases and
lipases have been investigated for wool bre modication. Wool treatment
with Mesophilic proteases leads to a reduced felting tendency and an increased
dyeing afnity (Heine et al. 1998). Both the cuticle and the cortex of the bre
are modied by proteolytic enzymes. Moreover, the handle of wool top and
yarn can be improved by the reduction of the bending modulus as a result
of a partial hydrolysis caused by proteases (Bishop et al. 1998). Enzymes
from extremophilic micro-organisms (extremozymes) such as thermo-, halo-
, psychro-, alkali-, or acidophilic micro-organisms perform best under thecorresponding extreme conditions (Sunna et al. 1996; Sunna and Antranikian
1997). Therefore, the industrial use of extremozymes is regarded as promising.
Aqueous treatments under constant temperature and pH conditions are most
suitable for application of these enzymes. In the textile industry alkaliphilic
enzymes could be used in alkaline washing processes and thermophilic and/
or acidophilic enzymes under high temperature conditions and in acid dyeing
processes respectively (Bajaj 2002). A positive side effect of the high process
temperatures suitable for thermophilic enzymes is the elevated diffusion rate.
For economical reasons it is aimed at combining the extremozymes treatmentwith the procedures already established in the textile industry.
3.5.7 Properties of wool bre after esperase enzyme
treatment
Karin Schumacher et al. (2001) have studied the handle and dyeability of
wool bres and material used in the study was merino wool top, average
bre diameter 21.3 µm. The enzyme used was Esperase 8.0 L, type A (Novo Nordisk) 8.0 U g−1 resp. 7.8 U ml−1.
3.5.7.1 Degree of whiteness
Wool top and fabric were treated under the conditions of the pre-washing
step on the laboratory dyeing machine either with or without adding protease
(Chikkodi 1995). The degree of whiteness of the wool samples increases with
the amount of protease used. The reference wool top and reference fabric
show the lowest degree of whiteness. The difference between the degree ofwhiteness of references and samples is signicant. Increasing the amount of
protease from 9.8 to 19.5 mU g−1 does not signicantly enhance the degree
of whiteness though.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 158/457
146 Bioprocessing of textiles
3.5.7.2 Dye uptake
Dyeing kinetics using the dyestuff Lanasol Blue was monitored during wooltop and fabric dyeing processes. The protease treated fabric absorbs approx.
17% more dyestuff than the reference. The residual dye content of the control
sample bath is about 50%. Fabric treatment with 19.5 mU g−1 protease leads
to a 20% higher dyestuff uptake compared with the control sample (about
53% uptake). Even though protease treatment of wool with both 9.8 and
19.5 mU g−1 of enzyme increases the dye uptake the resulting differences in
colour values (DE D65) to the corresponding references only amount to about
1.5 for wool top as well as for fabric. This can be explained by the fact that the
way of dye uptake of reference and protease treated wool is different. Figures
3.36 and 3.37 show bre cross sections of dyed control sample and protease
treated fabric respectively. The increased dyestuff uptake of the protease
treated fabric leads to a more even and more intensive dyeing. Additionally
more bres of the protease treated fabric are completely dyed whereas most
bres of the control sample show merely ring dyeing.
Fig. 3.36 Cross-sections of pre-washed reference; 2% (owf) Lanasol Blue 8G dyeing
(1 h) [Source: Karin Schumacher et al. 2001]
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 159/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 147
Fig. 3.37 Cross-sections of protease treated (19.5 mU g –1) pre-washed sample; 2%
(owf) Lanasol Blue 8G dyeing (1 h) [Source: Karin Schumacher et al. 2001]
3.5.7.3 Tensile strength
Compared with the control sample the loss in tensile strength of the enzyme
treated (9.8 and 19.5 mU g−1) bre bundles of wool top amounts to approx.
30%. The values of the tensile strength of yarn bundles of control sample
and protease (9.8 and 19.5 mU g−1) treated wool fabric measured before
and after dyeing does not differ signicantly (De Boos and White 1978). The
prewashing step leads to a loss in tensile strength of 10% and the dyeing step
to another 10% compared to standard wool top for reference as well as for
enzyme pre-treated fabric.
3.5.7.4 Colour fastness
The wash fastness and the acid and alkaline fastness to perspiration were
determined for all wool fabrics. The values of wash fastness of control and
protease treated wool fabric do not differ. The fastness values are optimal (it is
5) for staining of wool and polyester. However the colour change is 4 for both.
The acid fastness to perspiration shows the same tendencies as the alkaline
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 160/457
148 Bioprocessing of textiles
fastness to perspiration though on the whole better values are obtained. The
values of alkaline fastness to perspiration for the references of fabric 1–3
are about 0.5–1 higher than the corresponding values of the protease pre-
treated samples for the staining of wool, polyester and cotton. The values for
staining on cotton are the worst (2–3 and 2 respectively) while the values for
colour change are 4–5 for both references and enzyme treated samples (Karin
Schumacher et al. 2001).
3.6 Bioprocessing of silk and their characteristics
3.6.1 IntroductionSilk is a natural protein bre which composed mainly of broin and produced
by certain insect larvae to form cocoons. The best known type of silk is obtained
from the cocoons of the larvae of the mulberry silkworm Bombyx mori reared
in captivity (sericulture). The shimmering appearance of silk is due to the
triangular prism-like structure of the silk bre, which allows silk cloth to
refract incoming light at different angles, thus producing different colors. Silk
proteins belong to a class of unique, high molecular weight, block copolymer
like proteins that have found widespread use in biomaterials and regenerativemedicine. The useful features of these proteins, including self-assembly,
robust mechanical properties, biocompatibility and biodegradability can be
enhanced through a variety of modications. These modications provide
attachment of growth factors, cell binding domains and other polymers to
silk, expanding the range of cell and tissue engineering applications.
3.6.2 Types of silk
There are two main types of the silk: ‘mulberry silk’ (produced by the Bombyx Mori) (Fig. 3.38), also called ‘cultivated silk’, and second namely ‘wild silk’,
also called as ‘Tussah silk’. Mulberry silk is produced by silkworm larvae
cultivated in provided habitats and fed with freshly picked mulberry leaves
(Li et al. 2005). Cultivated silk is different from Tussah silk as the Tussah
variety is purely fed on oak leaves. Cultivated silks are ne, almost white
(when degummed) with soft laments of lustre (Tan et al. 2001). Wild silks,
on the other hand, are coarser, more irregular and brownish in appearance,
and are never as white as the cultivated silk lament. Nearly 80–85% of the
world’s silk production consists of cultivated silk. Mulberry silkworms can be
divided in three groups: (a) univoltine breed (one generation per year) which
is usually found in Europe where due to the cold climate the eggs are dormant
in winter and they are hatched in spring, (b) bivoltine breed (two generations
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 161/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 149
per year) usually found in Japan China and Korea, where the climate is
suitable for developing two life cycle per year and (c) multivoltine breed
(up to eight generations per year) usually found in tropical zone. The major
groups of silkworms fall under the univoltine and bivoltine categories. Silk
producing insects have been classied on the basis of morphological clues,
such as follicular imprints on the chorine egg, arrangement of tubercular setae
on the larvae, and karyo typing data (Jolly and Sen 1969; Jolly et al. 1970).
Classication based on phenotypic attributes is sometimes misleading because
morphological features may vary with the environment (Souche and Patole
2000). Molecular marker-based analysis has been developed to distinguish
genetic diversity among silkworm species (Tan et al. 2001; Mahendran et al.2005 and 2006). Most commercially exploited silk moths belong to either the
family Bombycidae or Saturniidae, in the order lepidoptera.
Fig. 3.38 Mulberry silkworms
The nest quality raw silk and the highest bre production are obtained
from the commonly domesticated silkworm, Bombyx mori, which feeds on
the leaves of the mulberry plant, Morus spp. Other than the domesticated B.
mori, silk bre production is reported from the wild non-mulberry saturniid
variety of silkworms. Saturniid silks are of three types: tasar, muga, and eri
(Table 3.21).
Table 3.21 Commercially exploited sericigenous insects of the world
Common Name Scientic Name Origin
Mulberry Silkworm Bombyx mori China
Tropical Tasar Silkworm Antheraea Mylitta India
Oak Tasar Silkworm Antheraea proylel India
Eri Silkworm Philosamia ricini India
Muga Silkworm Antheraea assama India
Oak Tasar Silkworm Antheraea yamamal Japan
Oak Tasar Silkworm Antheraea pernyi China
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 162/457
150 Bioprocessing of textiles
The tasar silkworms are of two categories namely (i) Indian tropical
tasar, Antheraea mylitta, which feeds on the leaves of Terminalia arjuna,
Terminalia tomantosa, and Shorea robusta, and (ii) the Chinese temperate
oak tasar, Antheraea pernyi, which feeds on the leaves of Quercus spp. and
Philosamia spp. Indian tropical tasar (Tussah) is copperish colour, coarse silk
mainly used for furnishings and interiors. It is less lustrous than mulberry silk,
but has its own feel and appeal. Oak tasar is a ner variety of tasar silk (Kundu
et al. 2008). Muga silk is produced by the multivoltine silkworm, Antheraea
assamensis (also called A. assama), which feeds mainly on Machilus spp.
Muga is a golden yellow colour silk. Muga culture is specic to the state of
Assam (India) and an integral part of the tradition and culture of that state.The muga silk, a high value product is used in products like sarees, mekhalas,
chaddars, etc. Eri silk is produced by Philosamia spp (Samia spp.), whose
primary host plant is the castor ( Ricinus spp.). The luster and regularity of B.
mori silk makes it superior to the silk produced by the non mulberry saturniid
silkworms, although non-mulberry silk bres are also used commercially due
to their higher tensile strength and larger cocoon sizes. Spider also produced
silk bres that are strong and ne, but have not been utilized in the textile
industries (Kundu et al. 2008).
3.6.3 Physical properties of silk
Silk, from the bombyx mori silkworm, have a triangular cross section with
rounded corners which is having 5–10 μm wide. The at surfaces of the brils
reect light at many angles, giving silk a natural shine; has a soft texture and
smooth surface. Silk is one of the strongest natural bres but it loses up to
20% of its strength when wet. It has a good moisture regain of 11% and its
elasticity is moderate to poor. Silk material can be weakened if exposed to too
much sunlight and it may also be attacked by insects due its protein content.
The commercial silk which is available in market for moth and spider variety
is given in Table 3.22.
Table 3.22 Physical properties of silk bres derived from moth and spider variety
Comparison of silk bres Linear density
(dtex)
Diameter
(μm)
Coefcient
variation (%)
Moth: 1.17 12.9 24.8%
Spider: Argiope aurentia 0.14 3.57 14.8%
Some of the physical properties of silk are given below:
1. Color: The color of silk bre could be yellow, brow, green or grey.
2. Tensile strength: The strength of silk is greatly affected by moisture;
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 163/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 151
the wet strength is 75–85%, which is higher than dry strength.
3. Elongation at break: 20–25% at break.
4. Specic gravity: 1.25 to 1.34
5. Moisture regain: 11–13%
6. Effect of heat: Silk will withstand at higher temperatures than wool.
It will remain unaffected for prolonged periods at 140°C. Silk
decomposes at 175°C.
7. Effect of sun light: Sun light tends to encourage the decomposition of
silk by atmospheric oxygen.
8. Lustre: Silk is bright due to its triangular cross section.
3.6.4 Chemical properties of silk
The chemical properties of the silk bre are given below:
1. Effect of acids: The Fibroin of silk can be decomposed by strong
acids into its constitute amino acids. In moderate concentration, acids
cause a contraction in silk. Dilute acids do not attack silk under mild
conditions.
2. Effect of alkalis: Silk is less readily damaged by alkalis than wool.
Weak alkalis such as soap, borax and ammonia cause little appreciabledamage. Silk dissolves in solutions of concentrated caustic alkalis.
3. Effect of organic solvent: Silk is insoluble in the dry-cleaning solvents
in common use.
5. Effect insects: Insect does not affect silk.
6. Effect of mildew: Silk is affected by mildew slightly.
3.6.5 Chemical composition of silk
The chemical composition of raw silk obtained from the silk worm Bombyxmori is presented (Table 3.23). Silk is produced in several countries and
the bres from different regions contain different amounts of sericin which
exhibits diverse chemical and physical properties (Gulrajani 1992).
Table 3.23 Composition of raw silk from the silk worm Bombyx mori
Component %
Fibroin 70–80
Sericin 20–30Wax 0.4–0.8
Carbohydrate 1.2–1.6
Inorganic matter 0.7
Pigments 0.2
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 164/457
152 Bioprocessing of textiles
3.6.6 Structure of the silk bre
Silk lament extruded from silk worm consists of two main proteins, namely(i) sericin and (ii) broin. Fibroin is being the structural center of the silk,
and sericin being the sticky material surrounding it. Fibroin is made up of the
amino acids Gly-Ser-Gly-Ala-Gly-Ala and forms beta pleated sheets. High
proportion (50%) of glycine, which is an amino acid, allows tight packing;
strong and resistant to breaking. The tensile strength of silk is due to the many
interceded hydrogen bonds and when stretched the force is applied to these
numerous bonds resist and they do not break. The silk lament is resistant
to most mineral acids, except for sulfuric acid; and chlorine bleach destroys
silk fabrics. The cocoons of the mulberry silkworm B. mori are composed of
two major types of proteins: broins and sericin. Fibroin, the ‘core’ protein
constitutes over 70% of the cocoon and is a hydrophobic glycoprotein
(Sinohara et al. 1971) secreted from the posterior part of the silk gland (PSG)
(Prudhomme et al. 1985). The broin, rich in glycine (43.7%), alanine (28.8%)
and serine (11.9%), is composed of a heavy chain (~325 kDa), a light chain
(~25 kDa) and a glycoprotein, P25, with molar ration of 6:6:1. The heavy and
light chains are linked by a disulde bond. P25 associates with disulde-linked
heavy and light chains primarily by non-covalently hydrophobic interactions,and plays an important role in maintaining integrity of the complex (Inoue
et al. 2000). The light chain has a non-repetitive sequence and plays only a
marginal role in the bre. The heavy chain contains very long stretches of
Gly-X repeats (with residue X being Ala in 64%, Ser in 22%, Tyrin 10%,
Val in 3%, and Tyrin 1.3%) that consist of 12 repetitive domains (R01–R12)
separated by short linkers. It is an antiparallel, hydrogen bonded β-sheet and
yields the X-ray diffracting structure called the “crystalline” component of
silk broin (Zhou et al. 2001). Silk is a typical representative of β-sheet.
Each domain consists of sub-domain hexapeptides including: GAGAGS,
GAGAGY, GAGAGA or GAGTGA (G is glycine, A is alanine, S is serine and
Y is tyrosine) (Vepari and Kaplan 2007). In contrast, the 151 residues of the
N-terminal, 50 residues of the C-terminal, and the 42–43 residues separating
the 12 domains are non-repetitive and ‘amorphous’ (Li et al. 2012). Silk
broin can exist as three structural morphologies termed silk I, II, and III;
where silk I is a water soluble form and silk II is an insoluble form consisting
of extended β-sheets. The silk III structure is helical and is observed at the
air-water interface. In the silk II form, the 12 repetitive domains form anti- parallel b-sheets stabilized by hydrogen bonding (Teramoto et al. 2006). Due
to the highly oriented and crystalline structure of Silk II, silk broin bre is
hydrophobic and has impressive mechanical properties. When controllably
spun, its mechanical property may be nearly as impressive as spider dragline
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 165/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 153
silk (Shao and Vollrath 2002).
Sericin is a protein that surrounds broin, which becomes silk. The section
indicated in blue represents sericin, which surrounds broin depicted in red
(Fig. 3.39). Sericin, the ‘glue’ proteins constitute 20–30% of the cocoon, and
are hot water-soluble glycoproteins that hold the bres (broin) together to
form the environmentally stable broin-sericin composite cocoon structure
(Jin and Kaplan 2003; Sinohara 1979; Vollrath and Knight 2001). Sericin,
secreted in the mid-region of the silk gland, comprises different polypeptides
ranging in weight from 24 to 400 kDa depending on gene coding and post-
translational modications and are characterized by unusually high serine
content (40%) along with signicant amounts of glycine (16%), (Sprague1975; Takasu et al. 2002). Three major fractions of sericin have been isolated
from the cocoon, with molecular weights 150, 250, and 400 kDa (Colomban
et al. 2008). Sericin remains in a partially unfolded state, with 35% β-sheet
and 63% random coil, and with no α-helical content (Teramoto et al. 2006).
The amino acid compositions of broin and sericin have been published,
with somewhat differences from paper to paper for some specic amino acid
contents (Freddi et al. 1999; Gulrajani 1992).
Fig. 3.39 Cross-sectional view of silk
3.6.7 Need and industrial practice of degumming
processThe silk lament spun by the silkworm (Bombyx mori) is composed
of two broin laments held together by a cementing layer of sericin.
Fibroin and sericin account for about 75 wt% and 25 wt% of the raw silk,
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 166/457
154 Bioprocessing of textiles
respectively. The degumming process consists in removing the sericin layer
prior to dyeing or printing and nishing to get bright lustrous fabrics and
garment. The degumming of silk has conventionally been carried out under
alkaline conditions at a pH of 10 to 11 near boil. In recent years two new
processes have emerged. They are the “H.T.-H.P. Degumming” and “Enzyme
Degumming”. High temperature high pressure degumming requires special
pressured equipment and is energy-intensive process. Enzymatic degumming
is emerging as an eco-friendly bre-gentle process where proteolytic enzymes
that are effective under alkaline, neutral as well as acidic conditions are being
used (Fabiani et al. 1996). With the local availability of the enzymes at a
reasonable price this process has a commercial potential in India. Being largemolecules, enzymes do not penetrate into the interstices of the fabric and
hence are suitable for yarn degumming only. A critical control of the pH and
temperature is required to realize the full potential of the enzymes requiring
use of sophisticated machinery. Since most of the enzymes are effective at a
comparatively low temperature of about 60°C, they are less energy-intensive.
The degumming waste liquor that is rich in sericin content is being used
as a raw material for the production of sericin powder (Vaithanomsat and
Kitpreechavanich 2008). The sericin powder is being used in the cosmetic
industry as moisturizer, in hair-care products and also as a sustainable naturaltextile nishes. Removal of sericin from the waste degumming liquor also
substantially reduces the efuent.
3.6.8 Degumming of silk – chemical and enzyme
methods
Degumming is at the heart of the wet processing of raw silk due to the fact
that the raw silk contains the two components broin and sericin which coversthe lament. Sericin contains some impurities, such as, waxes, fats, mineral
salts and pigments. Sericin has the same amino acid residues as broin but
the proportions contained in both components are quite different. As a result
of this, the degumming process on silk must be carefully carried out in the
appropriate conditions otherwise the broin may be damaged. The main
purposes of the degumming process are; 1) to remove the sericin from the
bre, 2) to remove impurities (eg. waxes, fats and mineral salts) affecting both
the dyeing and printing processes, 3) to make the bre highly absorbent for
dyes and chemicals, and 4) to reveal the lustre of broin while improving theappearance of the bre (Saligram 1993). The sericin has to be removed from
the bre but the broin must not be damaged in the process. Silk degumming
is a high resource consuming process as far as water and energy are concerned.
Moreover, it is ecologically questionable for the high environmental impact
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 167/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 155
of efuents. The development of an effective degumming process based on
enzymes as active agents would entail savings in terms of water, energy,
chemicals, and efuent treatment. This could be made possible by the milder
treatment conditions, the recycling of processing water, the recovery of
valuable by-products such as sericin peptides, and the lower environmental
impact of efuents (Freddi et al. 2003). However, the limitations of higher
cost of enzymes compared to chemicals and the necessary continuous use of
enzymes may limit the development of industrial processes using proteolytic
degumming methods (Long et al. 2008; Chopra et al. 1996). Silk processing
from cocoons to the nished clothing articles consists of a series of steps which
include: reeling, weaving, degumming, dyeing or printing, and nishing.Degumming is a key process during which sericin is totally removed and
silk bres gain the typical shiny aspect, soft handle, and elegant drape highly
appreciated by the consumers. In addition, the existence of sericin prevents
the penetration of dye liquor and other solutions during wet processing of
silk. Also, it is the main cause of adverse problems with biocompatibility and
hypersensitivity to silk. Furthermore, to prepare pure silk broin solution for
silk-based biomaterials, separation of silk broin bre from the sericin glue,
is a critical step, since (a) residual sericin causes inammatory responses and
(b) non-degummed bres are resistant to solubilization (Wray et al. 2011).The industrial process takes advantage of the different chemical and physical
properties of the two silk components, broin and sericin. While the former is
water-insoluble owing to its highly oriented and crystalline brous structure,
the latter is readily solubilized by boiling aqueous solutions containing soap
(Gulrajani 1992), alkali, and synthetic detergents (Syilokos and Colonna
1992). However, the higher temperature (95°C) and an alkaline pH (8–9) in the
presence of harsh chemicals in the treatment bath impose a markedly unnatural
environment on the silk, and thus cause partial degradation of broin. Fibredegradation often appears as loss of aesthetic and physical properties, such
as dull appearance, surface brillation, poor handle, drop of tensile strength,
as well as uneven dyestuff absorption during subsequent dyeing and printing
(Freddi et al. 2003). More importantly, the large consumption of water and
energy contribute to environmental pollution.
The increasing awareness of legislators and citizens for the ecological
sustainability of industrial processes has recently stimulated the interest of
scientists and technologists for the application of biotechnology to textile
processing (Gubitz and Cavaco-Paulo 2001). In recent years, various studieshave dealt with the removal of sericin by using proteolytic enzymes since
they can operate under mild conditions and low temperatures which save
energy in comparison to the traditional method (Mahmoodi et al. 2010).
Enzymes act selectively and can attack only specic parts of sericin to cause
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 168/457
156 Bioprocessing of textiles
proteolytic degradation. So the pattern of soluble sericin peptides obtained by
degumming silk changes as a function of the kinds of enzyme used, attributing
to the different target cleavage of the enzymes. Several acidic, neutral, and
alkaline proteases have been used on silk yarn as degumming agents. Alkaline
proteases performed better than acidic and neutral ones in terms of complete
and uniform sericin removal, retention of tensile properties, and improvement
of surface smoothness, handle, and lustre of silk (Gulrajani et al. 1998 and
2000). Enzyme degummed silk fabric displayed a higher degree of surface
whiteness, but higher shear and bending rigidity, lower fullness, and softness
of handle than soap and alkali degummed fabric, owing to residual sericin
remaining at the cross over points between warp and weft yarns (Chopraet al. 1996). Freddi et al. (2003) have applied acidic, neutral, and alkaline
proteases to silk degumming and found that alkaline and neutral proteases
performed better than acidic proteases in terms of complete sericin removal.
After complete sericin removal with proteolytic methods, the quality of
appearance and retention of tensile properties is expected to be superior to
those silks degummed through traditional methods due to less chemical and
physical stress applied to the silk during enzymatic processing. Nakpathom
et al. (2009) have studied the degumming of Thai Bombyx mori silk bres
with papain enzyme and alkaline/soap and reported that the former exhibitedless tensile strength drop and gave higher color depth after natural lac dyeing,
especially when degumming occurred at room temperature condition.
Alcalase, savinase, (two commercial proteolytic preparations) and their
mixtures were also proved to be feasible for degumming applications (Arami
et al. 2007). Gulrajani et al. (2000) have also studied the degumming of silk
with the combination of protease and lipase enzymes, and obtained efcient
de-waxing and degumming effects, while maintaining favorable wettability of
silk bres.Since the silk of Bombyx mori apart of the proteins broin and sericin,
also contains fats, wax etc., the combined effect of proteolytic enzymes with
a lipolytic one was investigated. Combined action of protease with lipase
(Lipolase® Ultra 50T) resulted in lower degumming efciency compared
(under the same conditions) with protease treatment only, but generated silk
fabrics with signicant improvement in whiteness after bleaching. As far as
the properties measured in the Kawabata evaluation system the combination of
proteolytic with lipolytic enzymes resulted in silk fabrics with extremely low
bending rigidity, reduced shear stiffness and with higher elasticity comparedto Marseille soap treated. This means that the fabrics were softer, less rigid
with better drape compared to conventionally treat. Addition of lipolase
caused decrease in bending and increase in shear rigidity and elasticity of
the silk fabrics compared to those treated only with protease. One of the least
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 169/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 157
explored areas for the use of proteases is the silk industry and only a few
patents have been led describing the use of proteases for the degumming of
silk (Kanehisa 2000). Sericin, which is about 25% of the total weight of raw
silk, covers the periphery of the raw silk bres, thus providing the rough texture
of the silk bres. This sericin is conventionally removed from the inner core
of broin by conducting shrink-proong and twist-setting for the silk yarns,
using starch. The process is generally expensive and therefore an alternative
method suggested is the use of enzyme preparations, such as protease, for
degumming the silk prior to dyeing. The silk-degumming efciency of an
alkaline protease from Bacillus sp. RGR-14 was studied and results were
analyzed gravimetrically (bre weight reduction) and by scanning electronmicroscopy (SEM) of treated silk bre. After 5 h of incubation of silk bre
with protease from Bacillus sp., the weight loss of silk bre was 7.5% (Puri
2001).
Increased awareness and concerns about the environment and pollution
have paved way for Eco-friendly processes in chemical processing.
Conventional soap- soda boiling method of degumming silk has many
disadvantages coupled with the convenience of time. The enzymatic
degumming processes have been attempted earlier and are gaining importance
due to less degradation of silk, ease of process control, better hand properties ofsilk besides being environmental friendly process. An attempt is made to apply
neutrol-alkaline protease enzyme Serinzyme for degumming of 4-ply lature
silk yarn and compared with the control soap-soda boil method (Yuksek et al.
2012). The degummed silk yarn is analysed for properties related to strength
and weight loss. The enzymatic degummed silk yarn showed better control
over the conventional process based on the dosage of enzyme and degumming
weight loss. Tenacity and breaking force at 1% and 2% enzyme dosage was
superior in comparison to the soap soda method, whiteness of the enzymaticdegummed samples was satisfactory.
Papain is used for boiling off cocoons and degumming of silk. Raw silk
must be degummed to remove sericin, a proteinaceous substance that covers
the bre. Degumming is typically performed in an alkaline solution containing
soap, a harsh treatment that also attacks broin structure. Several alkaline,
acidic and neutral proteases have been studied as degumming agents since
they can dissolve sericin, but are unable to affect silk bre protein. Alkaline
proteases seem to be the best for removing sericin and improving silk surface
properties like handle, shine and smoothness (Freddi et al. 2003; Arami et al.2007), although this is not in commercial use. In the past, papain was also used
to ‘shrink-proof’ wool. A successful method involved the partial hydrolysis
of the scale tips. This method also gave wool a silky lustre and added to its
value. The method was abandoned a few years ago for economic reasons.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 170/457
158 Bioprocessing of textiles
Mulberry silk fabric has been degummed by using ve different methods
(acid, alkali, triethylamine, soap and enzyme) and the results compared in
terms of handle properties. Low stress mechanical properties tested on the
Kawabata Evaluation System (KES) system have been used to evaluate the
hand values. Soap has been taken as the standard method of degumming
and the other treatments have been compared with this method. Signicant
differences in the low stress properties have been observed for the different
treatments. Soap, alkali and triethylamine methods score over the acid and
enzymatic methods in terms of handle properties, Low shear and surface
properties characterise the acid and enzyme degummed samples indicating
non-uniform removal of gum from the interlacing areas (Chopra et al. 1996).
3.6.8.1 Silk degumming process – comparative study
A crêpe silk fabric was treated with different alkaline (3374-L, GC 897-H),
neutral (3273-C), and acid (EC 3.4 23.18) proteases with the aim to study their
effectiveness as degumming agents (Giuliano et al. 2003). Proteases were used
under optimum conditions of pH and temperature, while enzyme dosage (0.05–
2 U/g fabric) and treatment time (5–240 min) were changed in order to study
the kinetics of sericin removal. Degumming loss with soap and alkali was 27wt%. The maximum amount of sericin removed in 1 h was 17.6, 24, and 19
wt.% for 3374-L (2 U/g fabric), GC 897-H (1 U/g fabric), and 3273-C (0.1 U/g
fabric), respectively. Under the experimental conditions adopted, EC 3.4 23.18
was almost ineffective as a degumming agent. Degumming loss increased as a
function of the treatment time, reaching a value of 25 wt% with 1 U/g fabric
of 3374-L. The feasibility of degumming Persian silk with alcalase, savinase,
and mixtures of these enzymes with different alcalase/savinase weight ratios
(0/1, 0.25/0.75, 0.5/0.5, 0.75/0.25, and 1/0 g/L) was investigated (Mokhtar et
al. 2007). The enzymatic degumming process was performed at 55°C with an
operation time of approximately 30 min, whereas the soap degumming process
was carried out around the boiling point in 120 min. The evaluation of the data
was carried out through the measurement of the weight loss, strength, and
elongation of the samples. The optimum amount of sericin removed was 21.52
wt % for alcalase in 30 min, 20.08 wt % for savinase in 60 min, and 22.58 wt
% for soap in 120 min. Also, the enzymatic treatment improved properties of
the silk yarn such as the strength (33.76 cN/tex for alcalase and 32.03 cN/tex
for savinase) and elongation (20.08% for alcalase and 18.42% for savinase).The obtained values were better than the strength (29.90 cN/tex) and elongation
(18.59%) from the soap degumming method. Through the use of an enzyme
mixture (0.5/0.5 g/L), good weight loss (22.43%), strength (33.22 cN/tex), and
elongation (17.74%) were achieved in 30 min.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 171/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 159
3.6.8.2 Silk waste water characterization
Jin-Hong et al. (2007) have developed a new effective technology for theextraction of sericin from silk wastewater. Sericin was extracted with 75%
(v/v) ethanol to obtain crude powder. Silk manufacturing is one of the textile
industrial sectors where intensive water consumption involved and therefore
a large volume of wastewater is produced. The degumming process is used to
remove external sericin prior to dyeing and is a source of waste water. This
process generally uses a synthetic soap solution at 95°C for 1 h, with 100 kg
of silk producing 22 kg of sericin. Sericin is a globular protein in the form of
a tube outside the silk broin with its molecular weight ranging between 10
and 300 kDa (Fabian et al. 1996; Zhang et al. 2004). When subjected to the
alkaline degumming process, sericin is degraded into sericin peptide. Both
the peptide and the hydrolysate of sericin have excellent moisture absorption
properties and are also involved in a lot of biological activities such as
antioxidation, tyrosinase activity inhibition and anticancer activity (Kato
et al. 1997; Chang-Kee et al. 2002). As a result, they can be used in many
elds including cosmetics, biomaterials, textiles and pharmaceuticals (Zhang
2002). High concentrations of BOD, COD and nitrogen in the degumming
waste solution make it complicated and costly to treat (Rigoni-Stern et al.1996; Fabiani et al. 1996). However, the high nitrogen and protein content in
this wastewater derived from sericin products could be recovered and used.
Vaithanomsat et al. (2008) applied Ultraltration to recover sericin from silk
degumming waste which was further hydrolyzed into sericin hydrolysate of a
similar quality to that of commercially-available sericin hydrolysate used for
cosmetics purposes. It would also be very advantageous if such a waste solution
could be used as a substrate for microbial growth or enzyme production. In
most cases, the growth media makes up approximately 40% of the production
cost of industrial enzymes. Organic nitrogen substrates such as casein, yeast
extract, soy protein or gelatin are widely used in many microbial applications
due to their favorable amino acid balance and high protein content.
3.6.8.3 Microbial protease production
As waste solution from the silk degumming process contains high nitrogen
levels, this wastewater must be treated prior to discharge. In this study, waste
solution was prepared and tested as a nutrient substrate for microbial growth
and protease production by Bacillus licheniformis TISTR 1010 and Aspergillus
avus TISTR 3130, TISTR 3366, TISTR 3135 and TISTR 3041 (Pilanee et
al. 2008). All strains were preliminarily screened for their protease activity by
growing on casein-agar plates with B. licheniformis TISTR 1010 being chosen
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 172/457
160 Bioprocessing of textiles
as the best producer of protease. Cultivation in a silk degumming solution
as the nutrient source demonstrated that the highest protease activity was
achieved at an optimum pH of 10 for 36 h. Among the culture media used, the
specic activity of released protease was best with a medium containing 6%
protein from the silk degumming waste, 1% malt extract, 1% polypeptone and
1% Na2CO
3. This study was the rst to report the use of silk degumming waste
as a nitrogen source for microorganism growth and protease production. As
such it could suggest an alternative way to convert wastes into more valuable
and marketable products.
3.6.8.4 Applications of alkaline proteasesAlkaline proteases account for a major share of the enzyme market all over
the world (Godfrey and West 1996; Kalisz 1988). Alkaline proteases from
bacteria nd numerous applications in various industrial sectors and different
companies worldwide have successfully launched several products based on
alkaline proteases (Aramwit et al. 2012). The success of detergent enzymes
has led to the discovery of a series of detergent proteases with specic uses.
Alkazym (Novodan, Copenhagen, Denmark) is an important enzyme for the
cleaning of membrane systems. Other enzymes used for membrane cleaningare Tergazyme (Alconox, New York, USA), Ultrasil (Henkel, Dusseldorf,
Germany) and P3-pardigm (Henkel-Ecolab, Dusseldorf, Germany). Pronod
153L, a protease enzyme-based cleaner is used to clean surgical instruments
fouled by blood proteins. Subtilopeptidase A is an enzyme-based optical
cleaner, presently marketed in India (Kumar et al. 1998). Sakiyama et al.
(1998) have reported the use of a protease solution for cleaning the packed
columns of stainless steel particles fouled with gelatin and lactoglobulin. In
addition to these major applications, alkaline proteases are also used to a lesser
extent for other applications, such as contact lens cleaning (Nakagawa 1994),
molecular biology for the isolation of nucleic acid (Kyon et al. 1994), pest
control (Kim et al. 1999), and degumming of silk (Kanehisa 2000; Puri 2002).
3.6.8.5 Application of silk broin
Silk broin from the silkworm, Bombyx mori, has excellent properties such
as biocompatibility, biodegradation, non-toxicity, and adsorption properties.
As a kind of ideal biomaterial, silk broin has been widely used since it wasrst utilized for sutures a long time ago. The degradation behavior of silk
biomaterials is obviously important for medical applications (Cao and Wang
2009). It can be used as a biomaterial in various forms (Chitrangada et al.
2008), such as lms (Minoura et al. 1995; Acharva et al. 2008; Kundu et al.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 173/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 174/457
162 Bioprocessing of textiles
Abu, E.A., Ado S.A., and James, D.B., ‘Raw Starch Degrading Amylase Production by
Mixed of Aspergillus niger and Saccharomyces cerevisae Growth on Sorghum Pomace’,
African J Biotech, 2005, 4(8), 785–790.
Acharya, C., Ghosh, S.K., Kundu, S.C, ‘Silk broin protein from mulberry and nonmulberry
silkworms: cytotoxicity, biocompatibility and kinetics of L929 murine broblast adhesion’,
J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2008, 19, 2827–36.
Agarwal, P.B., Nierstrasz, V.A., Santuer B.G.K., Gubitz G.M., Lenting H.B. and
Varmoeskerken M.M., ‘Wax Removal for Accelerated Cotton Scouring with Alkaline
Pectinases’, Biotech J, 2007, 2(3), 306–315.
Aiteromem, A.L., ‘Sustainable Textile Manufacturing with New Enzyme Based Processes’,
Int Dyer, 2008, 7(1), 15–19.
Ajayl, A., and Fagade, B., ‘Growth Pattern and Structural Nature of Amylases Produced
by Some Bacillus Species in Starch Substrates’, African J Biotech, 2008, 5(5), 440–444.
Akin, D., Epps, H., Archibald, D., and Sharma, H., ‘Color measurement of ax retted by
various means’, Text Res J, 2000, 70, 852–858.
Akin, D., Foulk, J., and Dodd, R., ‘Inuence on ax bre of components in enzyme-retting
formulations’, Text Res J, 2002, 72, 510–514.
Akin, D., Foulk, J., Dodd, R., and Mc Alister, D., ‘Enzyme-retting of ax and characteristics
of processed bres’, J Biotech, 2001, 89, 193–203.
Akin, D., Gamble, G., Morrison, W., Rigsby, L., and Dodd, R., ‘Chemical and structuralanalysis of bre and core tissues from ax’, J Sci Food Agr, 1996, 72, 155–165.
Akin, D., Morrison, W., Gamble, G., Rigsby, L., Henriksson, G., and Eriksson, K., ‘Effect
of retting enzymes on the structure and composition of ax cell walls’, Text Res J, 1997,
67, 279–287.
Akin, D.E., Rigsby, L.L., Sethuraman, A., Morrison, W.H., Gamble, G.R, and Eriksson,
K.E., ‘Biodegradability of grass lignocellulosic treated with the white rot fungi Ceriporiopsis
subvermispora and Cyathus stercoreus’, Appl Environ Microbiol, 1995, 61, 1591–98.
Alat, D.V., ‘Recent Developments in the Processing of Textiles Using Enzymes’,
Colourage, 2001, 48(2), 33–36.
Ali, S.L., and Khan, A.F., ‘Development of Stabilized Vegetable Amylases for Enzymatic
Desizing of Woven Fabric with Starch Containing Sizes’, Pakistan J Sci and Ind Res, 2005,
48(2), 128–130.
Allen, A.M., Foulk, J.A. and Gamble, G.R., (2006), Fourier Transform Infrared
Spectroscopy Analysis of Modied Cotton Trash Extraction’, Proceedings of Beltwide
Cotton Conferences, Texas, 5, 1–10.
Almeida, C., Branyik, T., Ferreira, P.M. and Teixeira, J., ‘Continuous Production of
Pectinase by Immbolized Yeast Cells on Spent Grains’, J Biosci and Bioengg, 2003, 96(6),
513–518.
Alves, M.H., Takaki, G.M.C., Porto, A.L.F. and Milanez, A.I., ‘Screening of Mucor spp for
the Production of Amylase, Lipase, Polygalacturonase and Protease’, Brazilian J Microbio,
2002, 33(4), 325–330.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 175/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 163
Amanda, R., Murphy, S., and David, L.K., ‘Biomedical applications of chemically-
modied silk broin’, J Mater Chem, 2009, 19(36), 6443–6450.
Ammayappan, L., Jeyakodi Moses, J., Asok Senthil, K., and Jimmy Lam, K.C., ‘Effect of
Alkaline and Neutral Protease Enzyme Pretreatment Followed by Finishing Treatments on
Performance Properties of Wool/Cotton Union Fabric: A Comparative Study’, J Natural
Fibres, 2011, 8, 272–88.
Ammayappan, L., Muthukrishnan, G. and Saravana P.C., ‘A Single Stage Preparatory
Process for Woven Cotton Fabric and its Optimization’, Man Made Textiles in India, 2003,
47(1), 29–35.
Ander, P., and Messner, K., ‘Oxidation of hydroxy benzotriazole by laccase and lignin
peroxidase’, Biotech Technique, 1998, 12, 191–195.
Andersen, L.N., Schulein, M. and Lange, N.E.K. 2001. Pectate Lyase. US Patent No. 628
4524.
Andersen, L.N., Schulein, M., Lange, N.E.K., Ranvan M.E.B., Fler S.M., Glad S.O.,
Kauppinen M.S., Schnorr K. and Kongsbak L. 2002. Pectate Lyases. US Patent No. 6 368843.
Andrade, V.S., Sarubho, L.A., Fukushima, K., Myaji, M., Nishimura, K. and Takaki,
G.M.C, ‘Production of Extracellular Proteases by Mucor circinelloides using D-glucose
as Carbon Source Substrate’, Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 2002, 33(2), 106–110.
Andreaus, J., Azevedo, H., and Paulo, A.C., ‘Effects of Temperature on Cellulose Binding
Activity of Cellulase Enzymes’, J Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymes, 1999, 7(4), 233–239.Andreaus, J., Campos, R., Gübitz, G., and Cavaco-Paulo, A., ‘Inuence of cellulases on
Indigo Back staining’, Text Res J, 2000, 70, 628–32.
Anis, P., Davulcu, A. and Erien, H.A., ‘Enzymatic Pretreatment of Cotton. Part 2 - Peroxide
Generation in Desizing Liquor and Bleaching’, Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe,
2009, 17(2), 87–90.
Anon., ‘Cotton Preparation - A New Enzymatic Concept’, Novozyme Catalogue, 23105-0
l, 2001.
Anon., ‘Evaluating Combined Preparation Processes for Energy and Material Conservation’,
Textile Chemists and Colorists, 1982, 14(1), 23–35.
Anon., ‘Raw Cotton’, Text Res J, 1954, 24(8), 744–747.
Anto, H., Trivedi, U., and Patel, K., ‘Alpha Amylase Production by Bacillus cerens MTCC
1305 using Solid State Fermentation’, Food Tech Biotech, 2006, 44(2), 241–245.
Appleyard, H., ‘Enzyme Actions in Desizing’, Dyer and Text Printer, 1953, 5(2), 685–688.
Arami, M., Rahimi, S., Mivehie, L., Mazaheri, F., Mahmoodi, N.M., ‘Degumming of
Persian Silk with Mixed Proteolytic Enzymes’, J Applied Polymer Science, 2007, 106,
267–275.
Arami, M., Rahimi, S., Mivehie, L., Mazaheri, F., Mahmoodi, N.M., ‘Degumming ofPersian silk with mixed proteolytic enzymes’, J Appl Polym Sci, 2007, 106, 267–275.
Aramwit, P., Siritientong, T., Srichana, T., ‘Potential applications of silk sericin, a natural
protein from textile industry by-products’, Waste Management and Res, 2012, 30(3), 217–
224.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 176/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 177/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 165
Bernfeld, P., ‘Amylases, alpha and beta’, Method Enzymology, 1955, 1(3), 149–158.
Bhatawdekar, S.P., ‘Studies of Optimum Continuous of Enzymatic Desizing of LTKP
Sized Fabrics by Cellulase – Steeping and Cellulase Padding Methods’, J Text Association,
1983, 43(5), 83–86.
Bishop, D.P., Shen, J., Heine, E., Hollfelder, B., ‘The use of proteolytic enzymes to reduce
wool bre stiffness and prickle’, J Text Inst, 1998, 89(3), 546–53.
Bjo, M.E., Anderssen, J.T., Schnorr, K., Schulein, M., and Kongsback, L., 2002. Pectate
Lyases, US Patent No.6 399 351.
Blanchette, R.A., Kueger, E.W., Haight, J.E., Akhtar, M.E, and Akin, D E, ’Cell
wall alterations in loblolly pine wood decayed by the white rot fungus Ceriporiopsis
subvermispora’, J Biotechnol, 1997, 53: 203–213.
Bledzki, A., Reihmane, S., and Gassan, J., ‘Properties and modication methods for
vegetable bres for natural bre composites’, J App Polymer Sci, 1996, 59, 1329–36.
Bliesmer, B.O., and Hartman, P.A., ‘Differential Heat Stabilities of Bacillus Amylases’, J
Bacteriology, 1973, 113(1), 526–528.
Boer, D., ‘The Wettability of Scoured and Dried Cotton Fibres’, Text Res J, 1980, 50(10),
624–631.
Bora, L., and Kalita, M.C., ‘Production and optimization of thermostable lipase from a
thermophilic Bacillus sp.LBN4’, Int J Microbiology, 2007, 4(1), 1–12.
Bourbonnais, R., Paice, M.G., Freiermuth, B., Bodie, E., Borneman, S., ‘Reactivities of
various mediators and laccases with kraft pulp and lignin model compounds’, Appl Environ
Microbiol, 1997, 63, 4627–32.
Brack, N., Lamb, R., Pham, D., Turner, P., ‘Nonionic surfactants and the wool bre
surface’, Colloids Surf Physicochem Eng Aspects, 1999, 146, 405–15.
Bruhlmann, F., ‘Purication and Characterization of an Extracellular Pectate Lyase from
an Amycolata Sp’, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1995, 61(10), 3580–3585.
Brushwood, D.E., ‘Non-Cellulosic Constituents on Raw Cotton and Their Relationship to
Fibre Physical Properties’, Text Res J, 2003, 73(10), 912–916.
Buchert, J., and Pere, J., ‘Scouring of cotton with pectinases, proteases and lipases, Textile
Chemist and Colorist & American Dyestuff Reporter, 2000, 31, 48–52.
Buchert, J., Peter, J., Puolakka, A. and Nousiainen, P., ‘Scouring of Cotton with Pectinases,
Proteases and Lipases’, Text Chemists and Colorists and American Dyestuff Reporter,
2000, 32(5), 48–52.
Burger, H., Koine, A., Maron, R., and Mieck, K., ‘Use or natural bres and environmental
aspects’, Int Polymer Sci Tech, 1995, 22(8), 25–34.
Buschie-Diller, G, Zeronian, S.H., Pan, N., and Yoon, M.Y. “Enzymatic hydrolysis of
cotton, linen, ramie and viscose fabric”, Text Res J, 1994, 64, 240–279.
Buschle-Diller, G., El Mogahzy, Y., Inglesby, M.K., and Zeronian, S.H., ‘Effects of
Scouring with Enzymes, Organic Solvents, and Caustic Soda on the Properties of Hydrogen
Peroxide Bleached Cotton Yarn’, Text Res J, 1998, 68(12), 920–29.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 178/457
166 Bioprocessing of textiles
Calafell, M. and Garriga, P., ‘Effect of Some Process Parameters in the Enzymatic Scouring
of Cotton using Acid Pectinases’, Enzyme and Microbial Tech, 2004, 34(3), 326–331.
Calafell, M., Santner, B.K., Guebitz, G. and Garriga, P., ‘Dyeing Behaviour of Cotton
Fabric Bioscoured with Pectate lyase and Polygalacturonase’, Coloration Tech, 2005,
121(6), 291–297.
Callen, W., Richardson, T., Frey, G., Miller, C., Kazaoka, M., Short, J.M., and Mathur, E.,
2007.
Enzymes having a Amylase Activity and Methods of use thereof, US Patent No.7 273 740.
Campbell, L.L., ‘Purication and Properties of an alpha amylase from Facultative
Thermophilic Bacteria’, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 1955, 54(1), 154–161.
Canal, J.M., Navarro, A., Calafell, M., Rodriguez, C., Caballero, G., Vega, B., Canal,C. and Paul, R., ‘Effect of various Bioscouring systems on the accessibility of dyes into
cotton’, Coloration Tech, 2004, 120(6), 311–315.
Cardamone, J.M., Yao, J., and Phillips, J.G., ‘Combined bleaching, shrinkage prevention
and biopolishing of wool fabrics’, Textile Research Journal, 2005, 75, 169–74.
Carla, J.S.M., Prabaharan, M., Georg Gubitz., Artur Cavaco-Paulo, ‘Treatment of wool
bres with subtilisin and subtilisin-PEG’, Enzyme and Microbial Tech, 2005, 36, 917–922.
Carlier, F., ‘Enzymes’, Industrila Textila, 2001, 54(3), 121–123.
Cavaco-Paulo A, Almeida L, ‘Hydrolysis of cotton cellulose by engineered cellulases from
Trichoderma’, Text Res J, 1996, 66, 287–93.
Cavaco-Paulo, A., Gubitz Graz., Textile processing with enzymes, Wood head Publishing
Limited, 2003, ISBN-13: 978 1 85573 610 8.
Cavedon, K., Leschine, S.B. and Parola, E.C., ‘Characterization of the Extracellular
Cellulases from a Mesophilic Clost6dium (strain C7)’, J Bacteriology, 1990, 172(8),
4231–4238.
Chahal, D.S., ‘Solid State Fermentation with Trichoderma reesei for Cellulase Production’,
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1985, 49(1), 205–210.
Chakraborthy, M., Dayal, A., and Gulrajani, M.L., ‘Optimization of Non-silicate Stabilizersfor Bleaching of Cotton Knitted Goods’, Indian J Fibre and Text Res, 1998, 23(4), 250–
256.
Chakraborty, S.K., and Sinha, S.N., ‘Enzyme Additive Technology for Productivity
Improvement and Cost Reduction in Jute Processing’, J Inst Engrs (India), TX, 2001, 82,
1–10.
Chakraborty, S.K., Ghosh, B.S., ‘Adhikari D and Kundu A B, Brightening of Grey Jute
Mechanism and Application’, Indian J Fibre and Text Res, 20, 1995, 60.
Chandrika, G.P., ‘Cross linking of enzymes for improved stability and performance’,
Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 1999, 10, 331–335.
Chapman, B.M., ‘The role of external polymer in improving the wrinkle recovery of wool
fabrics, J Text Inst, 1996, 67, 43–49.
Chattopadhaya, S.N., Day, A., Sanyal, S.K., Kundu, A.B., Pan, N.C., and Mitra, B.C., ‘Jute
for Apparel Use: Mixed Enzyme Treatment’, Indian Text J, 1997, 107, 14–18.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 179/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 167
Chikkodi, S.V., Khan, S., and Mehta, R.D., ‘Effects of bionishing on cotton/wool blended
fabrics’, Text Res J, 1995, 65: 564–569.
Chinnadurai, S., and Selvakumar, N., ‘Determination of Treatment Time to Achieve
Required Absorbency in the Enzymatic Scouring of Cotton Fibres’, Indian J Fibre and
Text Res, 2009, 34(2), 175–178.
Chinta, S.K., Wasif, A.I., and Vijayakumar, M.C., ‘Recent Developments in the Bleaching
Process - A Review’, Colourage, 1993, 40(8), 7–8.
Chitrangada, A., Boris, H., Subhas, C.K., ‘The effect of lactose-conjugated silk biomaterials
on the development of brogenic broblasts’, Biomaterials, 2008, 29, 4665–75.
Choe, E.K., Nam, C.W., Kook, S.Y., Chung, C. and Paulo, A.C., ‘Implementation of Batch
wise Bioscouring of Cotton Knits’, Biocatalysis and Biotransformations, 2004, 22(5),
375–382.
Chopra, S., Chattopadhyay, R., and Gulrajani, M.L., ‘Low Stress Mechanical Properties of
Silk Fabric Degummed by Different Methods’, J Text Inst, 1996, 87, 3, 245–52.
Chopra, S., Chattopadhyay, R., Gulrajani, M.L., ‘Low stress mechanical properties of silk
fabric degummed by different methods’, J Text Inst, 1996, 87, 542–553.
Chung, C., Lee, M. and Choe, E.K., ‘Characterization of Cotton Scouring using FTIR ATR
Spectroscopy’, Carbohydrate Polymers, 2004, 58(4), 417–420.
Church, J.S. and Woodhead A.L., ‘Discovery of Pectin Degrading Enzymes and Directed
Evolution of a Novel Pectate Lyase for Processing of Cotton Fabrics’, J BiologicalChemistry, 2005, 280(10), 9431–9438.
Church, J.S. and Woodhead, A.L., ‘Spectroscopic Assessment of Australian Cotton Waxes’,
Applied Spectroscopy, 2006, 60(1), 1334–1340.
Churi, R.Y., Khadilkar, S.M., and Sule, S., ‘Enzyme Systems for processing cellulosic
textiles’, Colourage, 2004, 37–42.
Clarkson, K.A., Swanson, B. and Sinetzky, D., 2002, Cellulase for Use in Industrial
Processes, US Patent No.6 451 063.
Coll, P.M., Fernández, J.M., Villanueva, J.R., Santamaría, R, and Pérez, P., ‘Purication and
characterization of a phenol oxidase (laccase) from the lignin-degrading basidiomycete’,
Appl Environ Microbiol, 1993, 59, 2607–13.
Colomban, P., Dinh, H.M., Riand, J., Prinsloo, L.C., Mauchamp, B., ‘Nanomechanics of
single silkworm and spider bres: a Raman and micro-mechanical in situ study of the
conformation change with stress’, J Raman Spectroscopy, 2008,39(12), 1749–64.
Cortez, J., Bonner, P.L.R., Grifn, M., ‘Application of transglutaminases in the modication
of wool textiles’, Enzyme Microbial Technol, 2004, 34, 64–72.
Cortez, J.M., Ellis, J. and Bishop, D.P., ‘Cellulase Finishing of Woven Cotton Fabrics in Jet
and Winch Machines’, J Biotech, 2001, 89(2), 239–245.Csiszar, E., Losonsczi, A., Szakacs, G., Rusznak, I., Bezur, L. and Reicher, J., ‘Enzymes
and Chelating Agents in Cotton Pretreatment’, J Biotech, 2001, 89(2), 271–279.
Csiszar, E., Szakacs, G. and Koczka, B., ‘Biopreparation of Cotton Fabric with Enzymes
Produced by Solid State Fermentation’, Enzyme and Microbial Tech, 2007, 40(7), 1765–71.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 180/457
168 Bioprocessing of textiles
Csiszar, E., Szakacs, G., Rusznak, I., ‘Combining traditional cotton scouring with cellulase
enzymatic treatment’, Text Res J, 1998, 68, 163–72.
Csiszar, E., Urbanszki, K. and Szakacs, G., ‘Biotreatment of Desized Cotton Fabric by
Commercial Cellulase and Xylanase Enzymes’, J Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymes, 2001,
11(4), 1065–1072.
Csiszar, E., Urbanszki, K., Szakacs, G., ‘Biotreatment of desized cotton fabric by
commercial cellulase and xylanase enzymes’, J Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic, 2001,
11, 1065–72.
Dahod, S.K., 1987. Improved Process for Conducting Lipase Enzyme Hydrolysis,
European Patent No. 257 716.
Dahot, M.U., ‘Cultivation of Penicillium expansum on Rice Husk Powder for Protease
Production’, J Islamic Academy of Sciences, 1993, 6(3), 193–196.
Dalpra, I., Freddi, G., Minic, J., Chiarini, A., Armato, U., ‘De novo engineering of reticular
connective tissue in vivo by silk broin nonwoven materials’, Biomaterials, 2005, 26,
1987–99.
Dalvi, P., Anthappan, P., Darade, N., Kanoonge, N. and Adivarekar, R., ‘Amylase and
Pectipase from Single Source for Simultaneous Desizing and Scouring’, Indian J Fibre
and Text Res, 2007, 32(4), 459–465.
Daniel, R.M., Peterson, M.E. and Danson, M.J., ‘The molecular basis of the effect of
temperature on enzyme activity’, Biochemical J, 2010, 425(2), 353–360.De Boos, A.G., ‘Finishing wool fabrics to improve their end-use performance’, Textile
Progress, 1988, 20, 1–89.
De Boos, A.G., and White, M.A., ‘The stiffness of polymer treated wool fabric, J Text Inst,
1978, 69, 194–97.
Declerck, N., Machius, M., Wiegand, G., Huber, R. and Gaillardin, C., ‘Probing Structural
Determinants Specifying High Thermostability in Bacillus lichenifonnis Alpha-amylase’,
J Molecular Biology, 2000, 301(4), 1041–1057.
Declerek, N., Machius, M., Joyet, P., Wiegand, G., Huber, R. and Gaillardin, C., ‘Hyper
Thermostabilisation of Bacillus licheniformis a Amylase and Modulation of Its StabilityOver a 50° C Temperature Range’, Protein Engg, 2003, 16(4), 287–293.
Dedeyan, B., Klonowska, A., Tagger, S., Tron, T., Iacazio, G., Gil, G., Petit, J., ‘Biochemical
and molecular characterization of laccase from Marasmius quercophilus’, Appl Environ
Microbiol, 2000, 66, 925–29.
Degari, O., Gepstein, S. and Dosoretz, G., ‘Potential Use of Cutinase in Enzymatic Scouring
of Cotton Fibre Cuticle’, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2002, 102(1), 277–289.
Denby, E.F., ‘The wrinkle resistance of wool fabrics treated with external polymers’, J Text
Inst, 1974, 65: 660–661.
Devries, R.P. and Visser, J., ‘ Aspergillus Enzymes Involved in Degradation of Plant Cell
Wall Polysaccharides’, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 2001, 65(4), 497–
522.
Dickinson, K., ‘Economic and Technical Factors Inuencing the Selection of Bleaching
Process for Cellulose Textiles’, J Society of Dyers and Colourists, 1979, 95(4), 119–123.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 181/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 169
Diller, G.B., Walsh, W.K., and Radhakrishnaiah, P., ‘Effect of Enzymatic Treatment
on Dyeing and Finishing of Cellulose Fibres: A Study of the Basic Mechanisms and
Optimization of the Process’, National Textile Center, Annual Report No. C96, 1999, 1–9.
Domier, K., ‘The current status of the eld crop’, Euroax Newslett, 1997, 8, 8–10.
Dutta, A.K., Ghosh, B.L, and Aditya, R., ‘The enzymatic softening and upgrading of
lignocellulosic bres Part III: Pretreatment of jute with enzymes for ne yarn spinning’, J
Text Inst, 2000, 1, 28–32.
Earle, R.H., Saunders, R.H., and Kangas, L.R., ‘The chemistry of the chlorination/
Hercosett resin shrink proong process’, Applied Polymer Symposium, 1971, 18: 707–714.
Edward Menzes and Bharat Desai, Water in Textile Wet processing-Quality and Measures,
Clothesline, 2004, 5(1), 42–49.
Eisisi, F.F., Haz, S.A.A., Rae, M.H. and Hebeish, A., ‘Development of a One-step
process for Desizing, Scouring, Bleaching Cotton Based Textiles’, American Dyestuff
Reporter, 1990, 79(10), 39–43.
Elhaak, M., El-Shourbagy, N., and El-Nagar, R., ‘Effect of Edaphic factors on technical
properties of ax bre’, J Agron Crop Sci, 1999, 182, 113–120.
Ellaiah, P., Adinarayana, K., Pardhasaradhi, S.V., Srinivasulu, B., ‘Isolation of alkaline
protease producing bacteria from Visakhapatnam soil’, Industrial J Microbiology, 2002,
42(3), 173–175.
El-Sayed, H., Hamed, R., Kantouch, A., Heine, E., and Hocker, H., ‘Enzyme based felt proong of wool’, AATCC Review, 2002, 2, 25–28.
El-Sayed, H., Kantouch, A., Heine, E., Hocker, H., ‘Developing a zero-AOX shrink-resist
process for wool part 1: preliminary results’, Coloration Technology, 2001, 117, 234–38.
El-Shafei, H.A. and Rezkallah, L.A., ‘Production, purication and characterization of
Bacillus lipase’, Microbiology Resource, 1997, 152(2), 199–208.
Emilla csiszar, Gyorgy szakacs and Istvan Rusznak, ‘Combining traditional cotton scouring
with cellulase enzymatic treatment’, Text. Res. J., 1998, 68(3), 163–167.
Emilla Csiszar., Gyorgy Szakacs and Istvan Rusznak., ‘Combining traditional cotton
scouring with cellulase enzymatic treatment’, Text Res J, 1998, 68(3), 163–167.
Etters, J.N., ‘Cotton Preparation with Alkaline Pectinase: An Environmental Advance’,
Text Chemists and Colorists and American Dyestuff Reporter, 1999, 1(3), 33–36.
Etters, J.N., and Anis, P.A., ‘Textile Enzyme Use: A Developing Technology’, American
Dyestuff Reporter, 1998, 77(5), 18–23.
Etters, J.N., Husain, P.A. and Lange, N.K., ‘Alkaline pectinase: an eco friendly approach
to cotton preparation’, Textile Asia, 2003, 1, 83–86.
Fabiani, C., Pizzichini, M., Spadoni, M., Zeddita, G., ‘Treatment of waste water from silk
degumming processes for protein recovery and water reuse’, Desalination, 1996, 105, 1–9.
Feitkenhauer, H. and Meyer, U., ‘Anaerobic Microbial Cultures in Cotton Desizing -
Efcient Combination of Fabric and Waste Water’, Text Res J, 2003, 73(2), 93–97.
Fetouh, M.S.A., Khalil, A.M., Islam, A.M. and Mohamed, A.G., ‘Size Removal of Cotton
Fabrics - A - Comparative Study’, Indian Text J, 1974, 84(6), 147–159.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 182/457
170 Bioprocessing of textiles
Feughelman, M., ‘Introduction to the physical and mechanical properties of wool, hair and
other keratin bres’, UNSW Press, 1997, 1–14.
Fielf, J., ‘Studies on the Starch-Iodine Reaction’, J Biological Chemistry, 1931, 92(3),
413–419.
Fini, M., Motta, A., Torricelli, P., Giavaresi, G., Aldini, N.N., Tschon, M., Giardino, R.,
Migliaresi, C., ‘The healing of conned critical size cancellous defects in the presence of
silk broin hydrogel’, Biomaterials, 2005, 26, 3527–36.
Foulk, J.A., Chao, W.Y., Akin, D.E., Dodd, R.B., and Layton, P.A., J Polymers Environ,
12, 165 (2004).
Freddi, G., Anghileri, A., Sampaio, S., Buchert, J., Monti, P., and Taddei, P., ‘Tyrosinase-
catalyzed modication of Bombyx mori silk broin: Grafting of chitosan under
heterogeneous reaction conditions’, J Biotech, 125 (2), 2006, 281–294.
Freddi, G., Mossotti, R., and Innocenti, R., ‘Degumming of silk fabric with several
proteases’, J Biotech, 2003, 106 (1), 101–112.
Freddi, G., Mossotti, R., Innocenti, R., ‘Degumming of silk fabric with several proteases’,
J Biotech, 2003, 106(1), 101–112.
Freddi, G., Mossotti, R., Innocenti, R., ‘Degumming of silk fabric with several proteases’,
J Biotechnol, 2003, 106, 101–112.
Freddi, G., Pessina, G., Tsukada, M., ‘Swelling and dissolution of silk broin (Bombyx mori)
in N-methyl morpholine N-oxide’, Int J Biological Macromolecules, 1999, 24(2), 251–263.
Friend, D.R., and Chang, G.W., ‘Simple Dye Release for Determining Endopectinase
Activity’, J Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 1982, 30(5), 982–985.
Friesen, G., ‘Effect of weed interference on yield and quality of ax seed oil’, Can J Plant
Sci, 1986, 66, 1037–40.
Fujii, T., Tarara, T. and Minagawa, M., ‘Studies on Applications of Lipolytic Enzyme
in Detergent - Effect of Lipase from Candidacylindracea on Removal of Olive Oil from
Cotton Fabrics’, J American Oil Chemists Society, 1986, 63(6), 796–799.
Gaertner, H.F., Puigserver, A.J., ‘Increased activity and stability of poly (ethylene glycol)-
modied trypsin’, Enzyme Microb Technol, 1992, 14, 150–55.
Gama, F.M., Vilanova, M. and Mota, M., ‘Exo and Endoglucanolytic Activity of Cellulase
Puried from Trichoderma reesei’, Biotechnology Techniques, 1998, 12(9), 677–681.
Gambler, G.R., ‘Effects of Elevated Temperatures on Chemical Properties on Cotton Fibre
Pectin’, Text Res J, 2003, 73(2), 157–160.
Gangadharan, D., Sivaramakrishnan, S., Nampoothiri, K.M. and Pandey, A., ‘Solid
Culturing of Bacillus amyloliquifaciens for an amylase Production’, Food Technology and
Biotechnology, 2006, 44(2), 269–274.
Ghanem, E.H., Al Sayed, H.A. and Saleh, K.M., ‘An Alkalophilic ThermostableLipase Produced by a New Isolate of Bacillus alkalophilus’, World J Microbiology and
Biotechnology, 2000, 16(4), 459–464.
Ghose, T.K., ‘Measurement of Cellulase Activities’, Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1987,
59(2), 257–268.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 183/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 171
Ghosh, B.L, and Dutta, A.K., ‘The enzymatic softening and upgrading of lignocellulosic
bres Part I: The softening and cleaning of low grade Mesta and jute’, J Text Inst, 1980,
71, 108–116.
Ghosh, B.L, and Dutta, A.K., ‘The Enzymatic softening and upgrading of lignocellulosic
bres Part II: The softening and cleaning of barky root ends of jute and Mesta’, J Text Inst,
1983, 74, 83–85.
Ghosh, B.L., and Dutta, A.K., ‘The Enzymatic Softening and Upgrading of Lignocellulosic
Fibres Part II: the Softening and Cleaning of Burky Root Ends of Jute and Mesta’, J Text
Inst, 74, 1983, 83.
Ghosh, P., and Gangopadhyay, R., ‘Photo-functionalisation of Cellulose and Lignocellulosic
Fibres using Photoactive Organic Acid’, European Polymer J, 2000, 36, 625.
Ghosh, P., Samanta, A.K, and Basu, G., ‘Effect of selective chemical treatments of jute
bre on textile properties’, Indian J Fibre Text Res, 2004, 29, 85–99.
Gowda, K.N., Ninge P.N., Sudhakar, R., Subramani, R., ‘Eco-friendly preparatory process
for silk: Degumming by protease enzyme’, Man-Made Textiles in India, 2007, 50, 1, 28.
Grebeshova, R.N., Torres, S.L.E., and Hidalgo, M.A., ‘Serine protease of Bacillus subtilis’,
Applied Biochemical Microbiology, 1999, 35, 131–34.
Gubitz, G.M. and Cavaco-Paulo, A., ‘Biotechnology in the Textile Industry – Perspectives
for the New Millennium’, J Biotechnology, 2001, 89(2), 91–94.
Gübitz, G.M., Cavaco-Paulo, A., ‘Biotechnology in the textile industry – perspectives forthe new millennium’, J Biotech, 2001, 89, 89–90.
Guha, S.B. and Shah, S.R., ‘Enzymatic Scouring of Cotton Fabrics’, J Text Association,
2001, 61(2), 215–218.
Gulrajani, M.L. and Venkatraj, R., ‘A Low Temperature Scouring / Bleaching Process for
Cotton’, Text Res J, 1986, 56(8), 476–483.
Gulrajani, M.L., ‘Degumming of silk’, Review of Progress in Coloration, 1992, 22, 79–89.
Gulrajani, M.L., Agarwal, R., Chand, S., ‘Degumming of silk with fungal protease’, Indian
J Fibre and Text Res, 2000, 25, 138–142.
Gulrajani, M.L., Agarwal, R., Grover, A., Suri, M., ‘Degumming of silk with lipase and
protease’, Indian J Fibre and Text Res, 2000, 25, 69-74.
Gulrajani, M.L., Gupta, S.V., Gupta, A., Suri, M., ‘Degumming of silk with different
protease enzymes’, Indian J Fibre and Text Res’, 1996, 21, 270–275.
Gulrajani, M.L., Sen, S., Soria, A., Suri, M., ‘Efcacy of proteases on degumming of
dupion silk’, Indian J Fibre and Text Res’, 1998, 23, 52–58.
Gupta, R., Beg, Q.K. and Lorenz, P., ‘Bacterial Alkaline Proteases: Molecular Approaches
and Industrial Applications”, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2002, 59(1), 15–
32.
Gupta, R., Gupta, N. and Rathii, P., ‘Bacterial lipases: An overview of production,
purication and biochemical properties’, Applied Microbiology Biochemistry, 2004,
664(6), 764–769.
Haefely, H.R., ‘Enzymatische Behandlung von Wolle’, Textilveredlung, 1989, 24, 271–76.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 184/457
172 Bioprocessing of textiles
Hagihara, H., Igarashi, K., Hayashi, Y., Endo, K., Kitayama, K.I., Ozaki, K., Kawai, S. and
Ito, S., ‘Novel a Amylases That is Highly Resistant to Chelating Reagents and Chemical
Oxidants from the Alkaliphilic Bacillus Isolate KSM K38’, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2001, 67(4), 1744–50.
Hahn, W., Axel, S., Riegels, M., Koch, R. and Pirkotsch, M., 1998. Enzyme Mixtures and
Processes for Desizing Textiles Sized with Starch. US Patent No. 5 769 900.
Hardin, I.R. and Kim, J., ‘The Cuticular Structure of Cotton: What Does Enzymatic
Scouring Do?’, Colourage Annual, 2000, 47(12), 43–48.
Hardin, I.R. and Yanghuna, L., ‘Enzymatic scouring of cotton: effects on structure and
properties’, Text Chemist and Colorist, 1997, 29, 71–76.
Hartman, P.A., Wellerson, J.R. and Tetrault, P.A., ‘Bacillus Stearothermophilus - Thermal
and pH Stability of the Amylase’, Applied Microbiology, 1955, 3(1), 7–10.
Hartzell, M. and Hsieh, Y.L., ‘Enzymatic scouring to improve cotton fabric wettability’,
Text Res J, 1998, 68(4), 233–241.
Hathway, D.E. and Sekins, J.W.T., ‘The Inuence of Tannins on the Degradation of Pectin
by Pectinase Enzymes’, Biochemical J, 1958, 70(1), 158–163.
Hayhurst, R. and Smith, K, ‘Instrumental Evaluation of Whiteness’, J Society of Dyers and
Colourists, 1995, 111(9), 263–266.
Heijenrath, R., and Peijs, T., ‘Natural bre mat reinforced thermoplastic composites based
on ax bres and polypropylene’, Adv Composite Lett, 1996, 5, 81–85.
Heikinheimo, L., Oinonen, A.M., Paulo, A.C. and Buchert J., ‘Effect of Puried Trichdenna
reesei Cellulases on Formation of Cotton Powder from Cotton Fabric’, J Applied Polymer
Sci, 2003, 90(7), 1917–22.
Heine, E., ‘Shrink proong and handle modication of wool’, Textile Biotechnology and
Quality, 2002, 1: 6–10.
Heine, E., and Hocker, H., ‘Enzyme treatments for wool and cotton’, Review of Progress
in Coloration, 1995, 26, 57–63.
Heine, E., Hocker, H., ‘Enzyme treatments for wool and cotton’, Rev Prog Colorat, 1995,
25, 57–63.
Heine, E., Hollfelder, B., Lorenz, W., Thomas, H., Wortmann, G., Hocker, H., (1998),
Enzymes for wool bre modication’, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC,
279–293.
Hema Anto, Ujjval Trivedi and Kamlesh Patel, ‘Alpha Amylase Production by Bacillus
cereus MTCC 1305 Using Solid-State Fermentation’, Food Technology Biotechnology,
2006, 44(2), 241–245.
Hemmpel, W.H., ‘The Surface Modication of Woven and Knitted Cellulosic Fibre Fabrics
by Enzymatic Degradation’, Int Text Bulletin - Dyeing / Printing / Finishing, 1991, 3(1),5–14.
Henriksson, G., Akin, D., Hanlin, R., Rodriguez, C., Archibald, D., Rigsby, L., and
Eriksson, K., ‘Identication and retting efciencies of fungi isolated from dew-retted ax’,
Appl Environ Microbiol, 1997, 63, 3950–56.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 185/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 173
Henriksson, G., Akin, D., Slomczynski, D., and Eriksson, K., ‘Production of highly efcient
enzymes for ax retting by Rhizomucor pusillus’, J Biotechnol, 1999, 68, 115–123.
Himelbloom, B.H. and Hassan, H.M., ‘Effects of Cysteine on Growth, Protease
Production and Catalase Activity of Pseudomonas uoresces’, Applied and Environmental
Microbiology, 1986, 51(2), 418–421.
Hino, T., Tanimoto, M., Shimabayashi, S., ‘Change in secondary structure of silk broin
during preparation of its microspheres by spray-drying and exposure to humid atmosphere’,
J Colloid Interface Sci, 2003, 266, 68–73.
Holme, I., ‘New developments in the chemical nishing of textiles’, J Text Inst, 1993, 84:
520–533.
Holme, L., ‘Biopreparation - The Eco-friendly Alternative’, Int Dyer, 2001, 2, 8–9.
Horikoshi, K., ‘Alkaliphiles: Some Applications of Their Products for Biotechnology’,
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 1999, 63(4), 735–750.
Hsieh, Y.L. and Cram, L., ‘Protease as Scouring Agents for Cotton’, Text Res J, 1999,
69(8), 590–597.
Hsieh, Y.L., Hartzell, M.M., Mathew, G., Clarkson, K.A., Collier, K.D., Graycar, T.P.
and Larenas, E.A., 2002. Enzyme Treatment to Enhance Wettability and Absorbency of
Textiles. US Patent No. 6 436696.
Hu, C., Cui, J., Ren, F., and Peng, C., ‘Enzyme Hydrolysis of Silk Fibroin and the Anti-
diabetic Activity of the Hydrolysates’, Int J Food Engg, 2008, 4, 2–7.
Hyun, H.H., and Zeikus, J.G., ‘General Biochemical characterization of Thermostable
Extracellular Amylase from Clostridium thermosulfurgenes’ , Applied and Environmental
Microbiology, 1985, 49(5), 1162–67.
Ibrahim, N.A., Allam, E.A., El-Hossamy, M.B., and El-Zairy, W.M., ‘Enzymatic
modication of cotton/wool and viscose/wool blended fabrics’, J Natural Fibres, 2008,
5: 154–169.
Ibrahim, N.A., Hossamy, M.E., Morsy, M.S. and Eid, B.M., ‘Optimization and Modication
of Enzymatic Desizing of Starch Size’, Polymer - Plastics Technology and Engineering,
2004, 43(2), 519–538.
Imamura, S., 2007. Compositions for Lipase Activity Determinations and Method of
Determining Activity. European Patent No. 1 813 680.
Inoue, K., Arai, H. and Aoki, J., 2003. Novel Lipase. European Patent No. 1 298 205.
Inoue, S., Tanaka, K., Arisaka, F., Kimura, S., Ohtomo, K., Mizuno, S., ‘Silk broin of
Bombyx mori is secreted, assembling a high molecular mass elementary unit consisting of
H-chain, L-chain, and P25, with a 6:6:1 molar ratio’, J Biological Chem, 2000, 275(51),
40517–528.
Iyer, P.V.D., ‘Effect of C: N Ratio on an Amylase Production by Bacillus licheniformisSPT27’, African Journal of Biotechnology, 2004, 3(10), 519–522.
Jadwiga Sójka-Ledakowicz, Joanna Lichawska-Olczyk, Stanisław Ledakowicz, Anna
Michniewicz, ‘Bio-Scouring Of Linen Fabrics With Laccase Complex From Cerrena
Unicolor’ , Fibres & Text in Eastern Europe, 2007, 4(63), 15–19.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 186/457
174 Bioprocessing of textiles
Janssen, P.H., Peek, K., Morgan, H.W., ‘Effect of culture conditions on the production of
a extracellular proteinase by Thermus sp. Rt41A’, Applied Microbiology Biotechnology,
1994, 41(4), 400–406.
Jayam, R.S., Saxena, S. and Gupta, R., ‘Microbial Pectinolytic Enzymes: A Review’,
Process Biochemistry, 2005, 40(9), 2931–44.
Jensen, N.P., ‘Catalase Enzymes’, Text Chemist and Colorists and American Dyestuff
Reporter, 1998, 32(5), 23–24.
Jin, H.J., Kaplan, D.L., ‘Mechanism of silk processing in insects and spiders’, Nature,
2003; 424, 1057–61.
Jin-Hong Wu, Zhang Wang, and Shi-Ying Xu, ‘Preparation and characterization of sericin
powder extracted from silk industry wastewater’, Food Chemistry, 103 (4), 2007, 1255–62.
Joko Kyohei, Tokuda Sumi, Kikumoto Noriko., ‘Enzymatic function on jute bre with
various commercial enzymes’, SENGAS, 2002, 58, 22–28, ISSN 0037-9875
Jolly, M.S., Narasimhanna, M.N., Wartkar, V.B., ‘Arrangement of tubercular setae in
Antheraea species (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae)’, Entomologist, 1970, 103, 18–23.
Jolly, M.S., Sen, S.K., ‘Patterns of follicular imprints in egg shell-a species-specic
character in Antheraea’, Bull Entomol, 1969, 10, 32–38.
Jones, F.W., and Leeder, J.D., ‘Wool-polymer system: The effect of internal deposition of
polymers on the wrinkle recovery of wool’, J Text Inst, 1975, 66: 627–631.
Jovancic, P., Jocic, D., Molina, R., Rosa, J.M., Erra, P., ‘Shrinkage properties of peroxide-
enzyme-biopolymer treated wool’, Text Res J, 2001, 71(11), 948–53.
Kalum, L., and Andersen, B.K., 2000. Enzymatic Treatment of Denim. US Patent No. 6
146 428.
Kan, C.W., Yuen, C.W.M., and Jiang, S.Q., ‘Enzymatic treatment of Linen’, J Text Inst,
2007, 4, 363–368.
Kanehisa, K., 2000. Woven or knit fabrics manufactured using yarn dyed raw silk. US
Patent 6,080,689.
Karapinar, E. and Sariisik, M.O., ‘Scouring of Cotton with Cellulases, Pectinases andProteases’, Fibres and Text in Eastern Europe, 2004, 12(3), 79–82.
Karapinar, E., and Sariisik, M.O., ‘Scouring of cotton with cellulase, Pectinases and
proteases’, Fibres and Text Eastern Europe, 2004, 12, 79–84.
Karin Schumacher, Elisabeth Heine, Hartwig Hocker, ‘Extremozymes for improving wool
properties’, J Biotech, 2001, 89, 281–88.
Karmakar, S.R., ‘Application of Biotechnology in the Pretreatment Process of Textiles’,
Colourage Annual, 1998, 45(12), 75–86.
Kashmiri, M.A., Aduan, A. and Butt, B.W., ‘Production, Purication and Partial
Characterization of Lipase from Trichoderma viride’, African J Biotech, 2006, 4(10),
878–882.
Kashyap, D.R., Chandra, S., Kaul, A. and Tewari, R., ‘Production, Purication and
Characterisation of Pectinase from a Bacillus sp DTT’, World J Microbiology and Biotech,
2000, 16(3), 277–282.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 187/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 175
Kerem, Z., Friesem, D., Hadar, Y, ‘lignocellulosic Degradation during Solid-State
Fermentation Pleurotus ostreatus versus Phanerochaete chrysosporium’, Appl Environ
Microbiol, 1992, 58, 1121–27.
Kessler, R., and Kohler, R., ‘New strategies for exploiting ax and hemp‘, Chem Technol,
1996, 12(1), 34–42.
Kettering, J., Goldthwait, C.F. and Kraemer, R.M., ‘Solvent Extraction of Cotton Wax’,
Text Res J, 1946, 16 (12), 627–634.
Khalil, A.M., Fetouh, M.S.A., Islam, A.M. and Mohamed, A.G., ‘Size Removal of Egyptian
Cotton Fabrics’, Indian Text J, 1974, 84(7), 141–148.
Kim, H.K., Hoe, H.S,, Suh, D.S,, Kang, S.C,, Hwang, C., Kwon, S.T, ‘Gene structure
and expression of the ene from Beauveria basiana encoding bassiasin , an insect cuticle-
degrading serine protease’, Biotechnol Lett, 1999, 21, 777–83.
Kim, J., Choe, E.K., Kim, S.Y. and Nam, S.W., ‘Optimization of Enzymatic Scouring’, J
Natural Fibres, 2005, 3(2), 155–168.
Kim, J., Kim, S.Y. and Choe, E.K., ‘The Benecial Inuence of Enzymatic Scouring on
Cotton Properties’, J Natural Fibres, 2005, 2(4), 39–52.
Kiran, O., Comlekcioglu, U. and Arikan, B., ‘Effects of Carbon Sources and Various
Chemicals on the Production of Novel Amylase from Thermophilic Bacillus sp K 12’,
Turkish J Biology, 2005, 29(2), 99–103.
Kirk, O., Borchert, T.V. and Fuglsang, C.C., ‘Industrial Enzyme Applications’, CurrentOpinion in Biotech, 2002, 13(4), 345–351.
Kocabiyik, S., Erdem, B., ‘Intracellular alkaline proteases produced by thermoacidophiles:
detection of protease heterogeneity by gelatin zymography and polymerase chain reaction
(PCR)’, Bioresource Tech, 2002, 84, 29–33.
Kodera, Y., Matsushima, A., Hiroto, M., Nishimura, H., Ishii, A., Ueno, T., ‘PEGylation
of proteins and bioactive substances for medical and technical applications’, Progr Polym
Sci, 1998, 23, 1233–71.
Kokusho, Y., Machida, H. and Iwasaki, S., ‘Studies on Alkali Lipase: Isolation and
Identication of Lipase Producing Microorganism’, Agricultural and Biological Chemistry,1982, 46(5), 1159–64.
Koo, H., Ueda, M., Wakida, T., Yoshimura, Y. and Igarashi T., ‘Cellulase Treatment of
Cotton Fabrics’, Text Res J, 1994, 64(2), 70 -74.
Kozlowski R., Batog, J., Konczewicz, W., Mackiewicz-Talarczyk, M., Muzyczek M.,
Sedelnik, N., and Tanska B., Biotechnol Lett., 2006, 28, 761–768.
Kristensen, H., 2001. Enzymatic Treatment Method. US Patent No. 6296671.
Kuhad, R.C., Singh, A., Eriksson, K.E., ‘Microorganisms and enzymes involved in the
degradation of plant bre cell walls’, Advances in Biochemical Engg Biotech, 1997, 46–125.Kuilderd, H. and Wu, G., ‘Simultaneous Desizing and Scouring with Enzymes’, AATCC
Review, 2008, 8(6), 33–35.
Kumar V S, Meenakshisundaram S and Selvakumar N, ‘Conservation of cellulase enzyme
in biopolishing application of cotton fabrics’, J Text Inst, 2008, 1, 339–346.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 188/457
176 Bioprocessing of textiles
Kumar, A., Yoon, M.Y., and Purtell, C., ‘Optimizing the use of Cellulase Enzymes in
Finishing Cellulosic Fabrics’, Text Chemist and Colour, 1997, 29, 37–42.
Kumar, C.G,, Malik, R.K., Tiwari, M.P, ‘Novel enzyme-based detergents: an Indian
perspective’, Curr Sci, 1998, 75, 1312–18.
Kunanmneni, A., Permaul, K. and Singh, S., ‘Amylase Production in Solid State
Fermentation by the Thermophilic Fungus Thennomyces lanuginosus’, J Bioscience and
Engg, 2005, 100(2), 168–171.
Kundu, A.B., Ghosh, B.S, and Chakraborty, S.K., ‘Enhanced bleaching and softening of
jute pretreated with polysaccaride degrading enzyme’, Text Res J, 1993, 63, 451–454.
Kundu, A.B., Ghosh, B.S., Dutta, A.K., Ghosh, U.K., Sengupta, S., and Ghosh, B.L., ‘Bio-
polishing of Jute-cotton Union Fabric’, Indian J Fibre and Text Res, 1996, 21, 127–135.
Kundu, J., Dewan, M., Ghoshal, S., Kundu, S.C, ‘Mulberry non-engineered silk gland
protein visa-vis silk cocoon protein engineered by silkworms as biomaterial matrices’, J
Mater Sci Mater Med, 2008, 19, 2679–89.
Kundu, S.C., Dash, B.C., Dash, R., Kaplan, D.L., ‘Natural protective glue protein, sericin
bioengineered by silkworms: Potential for biomedical and biotechnological applications’,
Progress in Polymer Science, 2008, 33, 998–1012.
Kyon, Y.T., Kim, J.O., Moon, S.Y., Lee, H.H., Rho, H.M, ‘Extracellular alkaline proteases
from alkalophilic Vibrio metschnikovii strain RH530’, Biotechnol Lett, 1994, 16, 413–418.
Lan, T., Wenping, W., Duan, J. and Johannesen, P.F., 2007. Themostable a Amylases. USPatent No. 7 189 552.
Lange, N.K., ‘Lipase Assisted Desizing of Woven Cotton Fabrics’, AATCC Review, 1997,
29(6), 23–26.
Lassen, S.F., Sjoeholm, C., Oestergaard, P.R., Andersen, C. and Fischer, M., 2007.
Thermostable Proteases, US Patent No.7 179 630.
Lawson, M.M.H. and Hsieh, Y.L., ‘Characterizing the NonCellulosics in Developing
Cotton Fibres’, Text Res J, 2000, 70(9), 810–819.
Lee, L., Evans, B.R. and Woodward, J., ‘The Mechanism of Cellulase Action on Cotton
Fibres - Evidence from Atomic Force Microscopy’, Ultramicroscopy, 2000, 82(4), 213–
221.
Lee, L., Evans, B.R., Lane, L.M. and Woodward, J., ‘Substrate Enzyme Interactions in
Cellulase Systems’, Bioresource Technology, 1996, 58(22), 163–169.
Lee, S., Oneda, H., Minoda, M., Tanaka, A. and Inouye, K., ‘Comparison of Starch
Hydrolysing Activity and Thermal Stability of Two Bacillus licheniformis a-amylases
and Insights into Engineering a-amylase Variants Active Under Acidic Conditions’, J
Biochemistry, 2006, 139(6), 997–1005.
Lenting, H.B.M. and Warmoeskerken, M.M.C.G., ‘A Fast, Continuous Enzyme basedPretreatment Process Concept for Cotton Containing Textiles’, Biotransfonnation, 2004,
22(5), 361–368.
Lenting, H.B.M., Zwier, E. and Nierstrasz, V.A., ‘Identifying Important Parameters for a
Continuous Bioscouring Process’, Text Res J, 2002, 72(9), 825–831.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 189/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 177
Levene, R. and Prozan, R., ‘Preparation Procedures for Woven Cotton and Polyester-Cotton
Fabrics: Enzymatic Desizing’, J Society of Dyers and Colourists, 1992, 108(7), 338–344.
Lewis, D.M., ‘Wool dyeing.Yorkshiere’, Society of Dyers and Colorists, 1992, 1–51.
Li, A., Zhao, Q., Tang, S., Zhang, Z., Pan, S., Shen, G., ‘Molecular phylogeny of
the domesticated silkworm, Bombyx mori, based on the sequences of mitochondrial
cytochrome b genes’, J Genetics, 2005, 84, 137–142.
Li, G., Liu, H., Li, T.D., Wang, J., ‘Surface modication and functionalization of silk broin
bres/fabric toward high performance applications’, Materials Science and Engineering,
2012, 32, 627–636.
Li, M., Ogiso, M., Minoura, N., ‘Enzymatic degradation behavior of porous silk broin
sheets’, Biomaterials, 2003, 24, 357–365.
Li, Y. and Hardin, I.R., ‘Enzymatic Scouring of Cotton Surfactants, Agitation, and Selection
of Enzymes’, Text Chemists and Colorists, 1998, 30(9), 23–29.
Li, Y. and Hardin, I.R., ‘Enzymatic Scouring of Cotton: Effects on Structure and Properties’,
Text Chemists and Colorists, 1999, 29(8), 71–76.
Li, Y. and Hardin, I.R., ‘Treating Cotton with Cellulase and Pectinases: Effects on Cuticle
and Fibre Properties’, Text Res J, 1998, 68(9), 671–679.
Li, Y., Hardin, I.R., ‘Treating Cotton with Cellulases and Pectinases: Effects on Cuticle
Properties’, Text Res J, 1998, 68, 671–75.
Lie, E., Persson, A. and Mohi, G., ‘Screening for Lipase Producing Microorganisms with a
Continuous Cultivation System’, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 1991, 35(11),
19–20.
Liu, J., Condon, B. and Showmaker, H.L., 2000. Single Bath Biopreparation and Dyeing
of Textiles, US Patent No.6 162260.
Long, J.J., Wang, H.W., Lu, T.Q., Tang, R.C., Zhu, Y.W., ‘Application of Low-Pressure
Plasma Pretreatment in Silk Fabric Degumming Process’, Plasma Chemistry and Plasma
Processing, 2008, 28, 701–713.
Lorentz, K. and Oltmanns, L., ‘A New Saccharogenic Micromethod for Amylase Activity
in Biological Fluid’, Clinical Chemistry, 1970, 16(4), 300–304.
Lowry, O.H., Rosenberg, W.J., Farr, A.L., Randell, R.J., ‘Quantitation of protein using
Folin Ciocalteau reagent’, J Biol Chem, 1951, 193, 265–75.
Lu, H., ‘Insight into Cotton Enzymatic Pretreatment’, Int Dyer, 2005, 4, 9–11.
Macmillan, W.G., Sengupta, A, and Roy, A, ‘Chemical constituents of jute’, J Ind Chem
Soc, 1995, 32, 80–83.
Maekawa, M., Hashimoto, A. and Tahara, M., ‘Effects of pH in Hydrogen Peroxide Bleaching
of Cotton Fabrics Pretreated with Ferrous Sulphate’, Text Res J, 2007, 77(4), 222–226.
Mahendran, B., Acharya, C., Dash, R., Ghosh, S.K., Kundu, S.C., ‘Repetitive DNA in
tropical tasar silkworm Antheraea mylitta’, Gene, 2006, 370, 51–57.
Mahendran, B., Padhi, B.K., Ghosh, S.K., Kundu, S.C., ‘Genetic variation in ecoraces
of tropical tasar silkworm, Antheraea mylitta D using RFLP technique’, Current Science,
2005, 90, 100–103.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 190/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 191/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 179
Mori, R., Haga, R. and Takashishi, T., ‘Bending and Shear Properties of Cotton Fabrics
Subjected to Cellulase Treatment’, Text Res J, 1999, 69(10), 742–746.
Morton, W.E., and Hearle, J.W.S., ‘Physical Properties of Textile Fibres’ , 3rd Ed., The
Textile Institute, Manchester, UK, 1993.
Mukherjee, A., Ganguly, P.K., and Sur, D., ‘Structural Mechanics of Jute: The Effects of
Hemicellulose or Lignin Removal’, J Text Inst, 1993, 84, 348–351.
Nabil Ibrahim, A., Mamdouh El-Hossamy., Mahmoud S Morsy. and Basma, M.E.,
‘Optimization and Modication of Enzymatic Desizing of Starch-Size’, Polymer Plastic
Tech and Engg, 2004, 43(2), 519–538.
Naik, S.R. and Paul, R., ‘Application of Enzymes in Textile Processing’, Asian Text J,
1997, 6(2), 48–55.
Naja, M.F., Deabagkar, D. and Deepti, D., ‘Potential Application of Protease isolated
from Psedomonas aeruginosa PD 100’, Electronic J Biotech, 2005, 8(2), 197–203.
Nakagawa, A., 1994. Method for cleaning a contact lens. US Patent 5,314,823.
Nakamura, T., Yamagata, Y., Ichishima, E, ‘Nucleotide sequence of the subtilisin NAT
gene, aprN, of Bacillus subtilis (natto)’, Biosci Biotech Biochem, 1992, 56, 1869–71.
Nakpathom, M., Somboon, B., Narumol, N, ‘Papain Enzymatic Degumming of Thai
Bombyx mori Silk Fibres’, J Microscopy Society of Thailand, 2009, 23(1), 142–146.
Nalankilli, G., and Sundar, A.E., ‘Biobleaching’, Asian Text J, 2002, 2(7), 33–34.
Nalankilli, G., Saravanan, D., Govindaraj, N., Harish, P., and Ramachandran, T., ‘Efcacyof solvent, alkali and pectinase on removal of non-cellulosics from cotton bres’, Indian J
Fibre & Text Res, 2008, 33(4), 438–42.
Nalankilli.G., ‘Application of Enzymes in Wet Processing of Cotton’, Indian Text J, 1992,
C3 (12), 110.
Nallankilli.G., ‘Enzymes in Textile wet processing’, Text Industry and Trade J, 1992, 30
(1), 51.
Nolte, H., Bishop, D.P., Hocker, H., ‘Effects of proteolytic and lipolytic enzymes on
untreated and shrink resist treated’, Wool J Text Inst, 1996, 87(1), 212–26.
Obendorf, S.K., Varanashi, A., Mejldal, R. and Nielsen, V.S., ‘Lipid Distribution of Cotton
Textiles in Relation to Washing with Cellulase’, J Surfactants and Detergents, 2003, 6(1),
1–5.
Ogiwara, Y. and Arai, K., ‘Swelling Degree of Cellulose Materials and Hydrolysis Rate
with Cellulase’, Text Res J, 1968, 38(9), 885–91.
Okudubo, F., Beskid, G. and Howard, J.M., ‘Studies of Amylase Producing Bacteria’,
Annals of Surgery, 1964, 159(1), 155–158.
Opwis, K., Knittel, D., Dofer, C. and Koppe, A., ‘Combined Use of Enzymes in the
Pretreatment of Cotton’, Melliand Int, 2006, 12(2), 130–136.
Opwis, K., Knittel, D., Kele, A. and Schollmeyer, E., ‘Enzymatic Recycling of Starch
Containing Desizing Liquor’, Starch, 2000, 51(10), 348–53.
Ossola, M., Galante, Y.M., ‘Scouring of ax rove with the aid of enzymes’, Enzyme and
Microb Tech, 2004, 34, 177–186.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 192/457
180 Bioprocessing of textiles
Pallesen, B., ‘The quality of combine-harvested bre ax for industrials purposes depends
on the degree of retting’, Ind Crops Prod, 1996, 5, 65–78.
Pandey, A., Selvakumar, P., Soccol, C.R. and Nigam, P., ‘Solid State Fermentation for the
Production of Industrial Enzymes’, Current Science, 1999, 77(1), 149–162.
Pandey, S.N. and Iyengar, R.L.N. “A Study on Wax Content and Its Relation to Moisture
Regain and Tensile Strength of Cotton Fibre”, Text Res J, 1970, 40(12), l053–58.
Pardeshi, P.D., ‘Recent Developments in Bleaching of Cotton’, Indian Text J, 2000, 112(1),
29–32.
Pascual, E., Julia, M.R., ‘The role of chitosan in wool nishing’, J Biotech, 2001, 89,
289–96.
Patra, A.K., Agrawal, G., and Ray, S., ‘Enzymatic Scouring and Bleaching Compatibilityof Cotton’, Indian Text J, 2004, 114(4), 25–27.
Paulo, A.C. and Almeida, L., ‘Cellulase Hydrolysis of Cotton Cellulose: The Effects of
Mechanical Action, Enzyme Concentration and Dyed Substrates’, Biocatalysis, 1994, 10,
353–360.
Paulo, A.C. and Almeida, L., ‘Kinetic Parameters Measured during Cellulase Processing of
Cotton’, J Text Inst, 1996, 1(1), 227–33.
Paulo, A.C., ‘Mechanism of Cellulase Action in Textile Processes’, Carbohydrate
Polymers, 1998, 37(3), 273–277.
Pedersen, G.L., Screws, G.A., and Cedroni, D.M., ‘Bio-polishing of cellulosic fabrics’,
Can Text J, 1992, 109, 31–35.
Pera, L.M., Romero, C.M., Baigori, M.D. and Castro, G.R., ‘Catalytic Properties of Lipase
Extracts from Aspergillus niger’, Food Tech and Biotech, 2006, 44(2), 247–252.
Pererra, S.S., Torres, E.F., Gonzalez, G.V. and Rojas, M.G., ‘Effects of Different Carbon
Sources on the Synthesis of Pectinase by Aspergillus niger in Submerged and Solid Stage
Fermentation’, Applied Microbiology and Biotech, 1993, 39(1), 36–41.
Peterson, G.L., ‘A simplication of the protein assay method”, Analytical Biochemistry,
Vol. 83, pp. 346–356, 1977.
Pettier, G.L. and Beckord, L.D. “Sources of Amylase Producing Bacteria’, J Bacteriology,
1945, 50(6), 711–14.
Pilanee Vaithanomsat, Taweesiri Malapant and Waraporn Apiwattanapiwat, ‘Silk
Degumming Solution as Substrate for Microbial Protease Production’, Kasetsart J. (Nat.
Sci.), 2008, 42, 543–551.
Plowman, J.E., ‘Proteomic database of wool components’, J Chromatogr B, 2003, 787,
63–76.
Potikha, T.S., Collins, C.C., Johnson, D.L. and Delmer, D.P., ‘The Involvement of
Hydrogen Peroxide in the Differentiation of Secondary Walls in Cotton Fibres’, Plant Physiology, 1999, 119(3), 849–58.
Presa, P. and Forte Tavcer, P., ‘Pectinases as agents for Bioscouring”, Tekstilec, 2007, 50,
16–34.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 193/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 181
Prudhomme, J.C., Couble, P., Garel, J.P., and Daillie, J., ‘Silk synthesis’, Oxford: Pergamon
Press, 1985, 10, 571–594.
Puri, S., ‘An alkaline protease from a Bacillus sp.: Production and potential applications
in detergent formulation and degumming of silk’, MSc thesis, University of Delhi, 2001,
New Delhi.
Puri, S., Beg, Q.K., Gupta, R., ‘Optimization of alkaline protease production from Bacillus
sp. using response surface methodology’, Curr Microbiol, 2002, 44, 286–90.
Pyc, R., Ledakowics, J.S. and Bratkowska, H., ‘Biosynthesis of Enzymes by Aspergillus
niger IBT-90 and an Evaluation of Their Application in Textile Technologies’, Fibres and
Text in Eastern Europe, 2003, 11(4), 71–77.
Qiang Wang., Xuerong Fan., Weidong Gao. and Jian Chen., ‘Characterization of bioscoured
cotton fabrics using FT-IR ATR Spectroscopy and microscopy techniques’, Carbohydrate
Res, 2006, 341(12), 2170–75.
Radhakrishnaiah, P., Meng, X., Huang, G., Diller, G.B. and Walsh, W.K., ‘Mechanical
Agitation of Cotton Fabrics during Enzyme Treatment and Its Effect on Tactile Properties’,
Text Res J, 1999, 69(10), 708–13.
Rajasekhar, A., Ravi, V., Reddy, M.N.., Rao, K.R.S.S, ‘Thermostable Bacterial Protease
– A New Way for Quality Silk Production’, Int J Bio-Science and Bio-Tech, 2011, 3(2),
43–58.
Ramasamy, M. and Kandasamy, V. “A Techno-Economic Study on Bioscouring”, IndianText J, Vol. 114, No.1, pp. 33–38, 2004.
Ramkumar, S.S. and Abdalah, G., ‘Surface Characterization of Enzyme Treated Fabrics’,
Colourage, 2001, 48(4), 15–16.
Rana, A.K., Mandal, A., Mitra, B.C., Jacobson, R., Rowell, R., Banerjee, A.N., J Appl
Polym Sci, 1998, 69, 329–36.
Rao, M.B., Tanksale, A.M,, Ghatge, M.S., Deshpande, V.V., ‘Molecular and biotechnological
aspects of microbial proteases’, Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 1998, 6, 597–635.
Ray, S., ‘A Statistical Tool for Process Optimisation’, Indian Text J, 2006, 116(12), 24–30.
Reid, I.D., and Paice, M.G., ‘Effects of manganese peroxidase on residual lignin of
softwood kraft pulp’, Appl Environ Microbiol, 1998, 64, 2273–74.
Reshmi, R., Sanjay, G. and Sugunan, S., ‘Enhanced Activity and Stability of a Amylase
Immobilized on Alumina’, Catalysis Communications, 2006, 7(7), 460–65.
Rho, D., Yang, J., Lorrain, M., Peter, C. K. Lau, Minh-Tan, Ton-That, Kenneth Cole, Wei
Hu., and Johanne Denault. (2008), Processing of Flax Fibres for Biocomposites Using
Thermostable Pectate Lyase’, International Conference on Flax and Other Bast Plants.
(ISBN 978-0-9809664-0-4).
Richardson, T.H., Tan, X., Frey, G., Callen, W., Cabell, M., Lam, D., Macomber, J., Short,J.M., Robertson, D.E. and Miller, C., ‘A Novel, High Performance Enzyme for Starch
Liquefaction’, J Biological Chemistry, 2002, 277(29), 26501–507.
Rippon, J.A., The structure of wool, In: Wool dyeing, Society of Dyers and Colourists,
Bradford, 1992.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 194/457
182 Bioprocessing of textiles
Rippon, J.A., Wool, in Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology, Interscience
Publishers, New York, 2003.
Rita Arau, J., Margarida Casal, and Artur Cavaco-Paulo, ‘Application of enzymes for
textile bres processing’, Biocatalysis and Biotransformation, 2008, 26(5), 332–349.
Riva, A., Alsina, J.M,, Prieto, R., ‘Enzymes as auxiliary agents in wool dyeing’, JSDC,
1999, 115, 125–9.
Riva, A., Cegarra, J., Prieto, R., ‘The role of an enzyme in reducing wool shrinkage’,
JSDC, 1993, 9, 210–13.
Sae, B.P., Sangwatanaroj, U., and Punnapayak, H., ‘Analysis of the Products from
Enzymatic Scouring of Cotton’, Biotech J, 2007, 2(3), 316–25.
Sahin, U.K., and Gursoy, N.C., ‘Low Temperature Acidic Pectinase Scouring for EnhancingTextile Quality’, AATCC Review, 2005, 5(1), 27–30.
Sakiyama, T., Toyomasu, T., Nagata, A., Imamura, K., Takahashi, T., Nagai, T., Nakanishi,
K, ‘Performance of protease as a cleaning agent for stainless steel surfaces fouled with
protein’, J Ferment Bioeng, 1998, 55, 297–30.1
Samanta, A.K., Basu, G, and Ghosh, P, ‘Enzyme and Silicon treatments on Jute bre; Part
I: Effect on textile – related properties’, J Text Inst, 2007, 4, 295–306.
Samanta, A.K., Basu, G., and Ghosh, P., ‘Enzyme and Silicone Treatment of Jute Part I:
Effect on Textile Related Properties of Jute Fibre’, J Text Inst, 2005, 26(3), 85–93.
Samanta, A.K., Mitra, S., and Mahalanabis, K.K., ‘Effect of Selective Chemical and Bio-
chemical Softening Treatment of Jute Fabric’, J Inst Engrs (India), 2006, 86, 32–39.
Samanta, A.K., Mitra, S., Mahalanabis, K.K., ‘Effect of selective chemical and bio-
chemical softening treatment of jute fabric’, IE (I) Journal-TX, 2006, 86, 21–24.
Samanta, A.K., Singhee, D., Basu, G., and Mahalanabis, K.K., ‘Effect of selective pre-
treatments and subsequent mixed enzyme treatment on properties of jute-cotton union
fabrics’, Indian J Fibre and Text Res, 2005, 30, 451–467.
Sammour, R.H., ‘Purication and Pal1ial Characterisation of an Acid Lipase in Germinating
Lipidobody Linseed lings’, Turkish J Botany, 2005, 29(3), 177–184.
Santin, M., Motta, A., Freddi, G., Cannas, M., ‘ In vitro evaluation of the inammatory
potential of the silk broin’, J Biomed Mater Res, 1999, 46, 382–389.
Santos, E.O. and Martins, M.L.L., ‘Effect of the Medium Composition Formation of
Amylase by Bacillus sp’, Brazilian Archieves of Biology and Tech, 2003, 46(1), 129–134.
Saravanan, D., Ramachandran, T., Rajendran, R. and Raajesh, E.M., ‘Inuence of
Mechanical Agitation in Enzyme Assisted Processing’, Man Made Text in India, 2008,
52(9), 313–16.
Sawada, K., Ueda, M., ‘Enzyme processing of textiles in reverse micellar solution’, J
Biotechnol, 2001, 89, 263–69.
Schafer, K., ‘Microscopical investigation of the diffusion of dyestuffs into keratin bres’,
Wool Tech Sheep Breed, 1994, 42(1), 59–82.
Schafer, T., Antranikian, G., Royter, M. and Hoff, T., 2006. Hydrolysis of Ester Bonds with
Lipase, World Patent No. 373 344.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 195/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 183
Schnitzhofer, W., Kandelbauer, A., Klug-Santner, B., Onos, M., Calafell, M. and Glibitz,
G.M., ‘Production of Cellulase-free Polygalacturonase Preparations by Sclerotium rolfsii
for Bioscouring of Cotton’, J Natural Fibres, 2006, 3(2), 19–38.
Schroeder, M., Lenting, H.B.M., Kandelbauer, A., Silva, C.J.S.M., Cavaco-Paulo, A.,
Guebitz, G.M., ‘Restricting detergent protease action to surface of protein bres by
chemical modication’, Appl Microb Biotech, 2006, 72, 738–44.
Schunke, H., Sanio, C., Pape, H., Schunke, U., and Matz, C., ‘Reduction of time required
for dew retting of ax: Inuence of agricultural, mechanical and microbiological techniques
on bre processing’, Melliand Int, 1995, 76, 101–104.
Scott, W.M., ‘Enzyme Desizing Efciency – Quantitative Evaluation’, Industrial & Engg
Chemistry, 1940, 32(6), 784–87.
Shah, J.K., and Sadhu, M.C., ‘High Temperature Enzymes Desizing - A Rapid Continuous
Process’, Colourage, 1976, 23(9), 15–20.
Shah, K.R., Patel, P.M. and Bhatt, S.A., ‘Lipase Production by Bacillus sp. Under Different
Physio-chemical Conditions’, J Cell and Tissue Res, 2007, 7(1), 913–916.
Shamey, R., and Hussein, T., ‘Critical Solutions in the Dyeing of Cotton Textile Materials’,
Text Progress, 2005, 37(1), 15–17.
Shao, Z.Z., Vollrath, F., ‘Surprising strength of silkworm silk’, Nature, 2002, 418, 741–43.
Sharma, A. and Gupta, M.N., ‘Purication of Pectinase by Three Phase Partitioning’,
Biotech Letter, 2001, 23(19), 1625–27.
Sharma, H., and Van Sumere C., ‘Enzyme treatment of ax’, Genet Engg Biotech, 1992,
12:19–23.
Sharma, H.S.S., Whiteside, L., Kernighan, K., ‘Enzymatic treatment of ax bre at the
roving stage for production of wet-spun yarn’, Enzyme and Microb Technol, 2005, 37,
386–394.
Sharmaa, R., Chisty, Y. and Banerjee, U.C., ‘Production, Purication, Characterisation and
Applications of Lipases’, Biotech Adv, 2001, 19(8), 627–62.
Shaw, J.F., Lin, F.P., Chen, S.C. and Chen, H.C., ‘Purication and Properties of an
Extracellular a Amylase from Thermus sp’, Botanical Bulletin Academia Sinica, 1995,
36(3), 195–200.
Shen, J., Bishop, D.P., Heine, E., Hollfelder, B., ‘Some factors affecting the control of
proteolytic enzyme reactions on wool’, J Text Inst, 1999, 3, 404–11.
Shewale, S.D. and Pandit, A.B., ‘Hydrolysis of Soluble Starch Using Bacillus lichenifonnis
a Amylases Immobilized on Super porous celbeads’, Carbohydrate Res, 2007, 342(8),
997–1008.
Shuen-Fuh Lin, Chien-Ming Chiou, Chuan-Mei Yeh and Ying-Chieh Tsai, ‘Purication
and Partial Characterization of an Alkaline Lipase from Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenesF-111’, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1(4), 1093–1095, 1996.
Shukla, S.R. and Jaipura, L., ‘Estimating Amylase Activity for Desizing by DNSA’, Text
Asia, 2004, 35(11), 15–20.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 196/457
184 Bioprocessing of textiles
Silva, C.J.S.M., Cavaco-Paulo, A., ‘Treatment of animal hair bres with modied
proteases’, WO0l polymer, 2003, 30(9), 79–87.
Silva, C.J.S.M., Gubitz, G. and Paulo, A.C., ‘Optimization of a Serine Protease Coupling to
Eudrajit S 100 by Experimental Design Techniques’, J Chemical Tech and Biotech, 2006,
81(1), 8–16.
Silva, C.J.S.M., Prabaharan, M., Gubitz, G., Cavaco-Paulo, A., ‘Treatment of wool bres
with subtilisin and subtilisin-PEG’, Enzyme Microbial Tech, 2005, 36, 917–22.
Silva, C.J.S.M., Sousa, F., Gubitz, G., Cavaco-Paulo, A., ‘Chemical modications on
proteins using glutaraldehyde’, Food Technol Biotech, 2004, 42(1), 51–6.
Simpson, W.S., Crawshaw, G.H., Wool: Science and Technology, Woodhead Publishing
Ltd, Cambridge, 2002.
Singh, V.N., ‘Stable Bleaching Powder’, Chemical Engg World, 2000, 35(1), 71–72.
Sinohara, H., ‘Glycopeptides isolated from sericin of the silkworm, Bombyx mori.
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B’, Comparative Biochemistry, 1979,
63(1), 87–91.
Sinohara, H., Asano, Y., Fukui, A., ‘Glycopeptides from silk broin of Bombyx mori’,
Biochimica Biophysica Acta, 1971, 237, 275–279.
Sivaramakrishnan, S., Gandadharan, D., Nampoothiri, K.M., Soccol, C.R. and Pandey, A,
‘Alpha Amylases from Microbial Sources – An Overview on Recent Developments’, Food
Tech and Biotech, 2006, 44 (2), 173–184.
Sójka-Ledakowicz, J., Antczak, T., Pyć, R., Lichawska, J., ‘Biosynthesis of multi-
enzymatic preparation from Aspergillus Niger IBT-90 useful in textile fabric treatment’, J
Biotech, 2005, 118(l), 127–132.
Solbak A.I., Richardson, T.H., McCann, R.T., Kline, K.A., Bartnek, F., Tomlinson, G.,
Tan, X., Parra-Gessert, L., Frey, G.J., Podar, M., Luginbühl, P., Gray, K.A., Mathur, E.J.,
Robertson, D.E., Burk, M.J., Hazlewood, G.P., Short, J.M., Kerovuo, J., ‘Discovery of
Pectin Degrading Enzymes and Directed Evolution of a Novel Pectate Lyase for Processing
Cotton Fabrics’, J Biological Chemistry, 2005, 280(10), 9431–38.
Souche, Y.S., and Patole, M., ‘Sequence analysis of mitochondrial 16S ribosomal RNAgene fragment from seven mosquito species’, J Biosciences, 2000, 25, 61–66.
Sprague, K.U, ‘Bombyx mori silk proteins: Characterization of large polypeptides’,
Biochemistry, 1975, 14, 925–931.
Sreenath, H.K., Shah, A.B., Yang, V.W., Gharia, M.M., and Jeferies, T.W., ‘Enzymatic
polishing of jute/cotton blended fabrics’, J Ferm Bioeng, 1996, 81(1), 18–20.
Sreenath, H.K., Shah, A.B., Yang, V.W., Gharia, M.M., and Jeferies, T.W., ‘Enzymatic
polishing of jute/cotton blended fabrics’, J Ferm Bioengg, 1996, 81(1), 18–20.
Srivastava, R.A.K. and Baruah, J.N., ‘Culture Conditions for Production of ThermostableAmylases by Bacillus Stearothennophilus’, Applied and Environmental Microbiology,
1986, 52(1), 179–184.
Sunna, A., Antranikian, G., ‘Growth and production of xylanolytic enzymes by
the extreme thermophilic anaerobic bacterium Themotoga thermarum’, Appl Microbiol
Biotechnol, 1997, 45, 671–76.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 197/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 185
Sunna, A., Puls, J., Antranikian, G., ‘Purication and characterization of two thermostable
endo-1, 4-beta-D-xylanases from Thermotoga thermarum’, Biotechnol Appl Biochem,
1996, 24, 177–185.
Suzana Jus, Marc Schroeder, Georg M. Guebitz, Elisabeth Heine, Vanja Kokol, ‘The
inuence of enzymatic treatment on wool bre properties using PEG-modied proteases’,
Enzyme and Microbial Techn, 2007, 40, 1705–11.
Svilokos Bianchi, A., Colonna, G.M., ‘Developments in the degumming of silk’, Melliand
Text, 1992, 73, 68–75.
Takasu, Y., Yamada, H., Tsubouchi, K., ‘Isolation of three main sericin components from
the cocoon of the silkworm, Bombyx mori’, Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry,
2002, 66, 2715–2718.
Tan, Y.D., Wan, C., Zhu, Y., Lu, C., Xiang, Z., Deng, H.W., ‘An amplied fragment length
polymorphism map of the silkworm’, Genetics, 2001, 157, 1227–84.
Tatsuma Mori, Michio Sakimoto, Takashi Kagi. and Takuo Saki., ‘Enzymatic Desizing
of Polyvinyl Alcohol from Cotton Fabrics”, J Chemical Tech and Biotech, 1999, 68(2),
151–156.
Tavcer, P.F., Krizman, P. and Presa, P., ‘Combined Bioscouring and Bleaching of Cotton
Fibres’, J Natural Fibres, 2005, 3(2), 83–97.
Teodoro, C.E.S. and Martins, M.L.L., ‘Culture Conditions for the Production of
Thermostable Amylases by Bacillus sp’, Brazilian J Microbiology, 2000, 31(4), 298–302.Teramoto, H., Kakazu, A., Asakura, T., ‘Native structure and degradation pattern of silk
sericin studied by 13C NMR spectroscopy’, Macromolecules, 2006, 39, 6–8.
Tester, R.F., ‘Hydrolysis of Native Starches with Amylases’, Animal Feed Sci and Tech,
2006, 130(2), 39–54.
Thiagarajan, P. and Selvakumar, N., ‘Cotton, Pectinolytic Enzymes and Enzymatic
Scouring of Cotton’, Colourage, 2008, 55(9), 51–58.
Thurston, C.F., ‘The structure and function of fungal laccase’, Microbiology, 1994, 140(4),
19–26.
Tien, M., and Kirk, T K., ‘Lignin peroxidase of Phanerochaete chrysosporium’, Methods
Enzymol, 1988, 161, 238–248.
Tomazic, S.J., and Klibanov, A.M., ‘Kinetics and Mechanism of Transfer Action of
Saccharifying alpha amylase of Bacillus Subtilis’, J Biochemistry, 1969, 66(2), 183–190.
Traore, M.K. and Buschle-Diller, G., ‘Environmentally friendly scouring process’, Text
Chemist Coloration, 2000, 32, 40–43.
Traore, M.K., and Diller, G.B., ‘Inuence of Wetting Agent and Agitation on Enzymatic
Hydrolysis of Cotton’, Text Chemists and Colorists and American Dyestuff Reporter, 1999,
1(4), 21–56.Tyagi, G.K, and Dhirendra Sharma, ‘Study on cotton ring and OE rotor yarn characteristics:
Part II – Effect of caustic and enzymatic scouring treatments on structure and recovery
characteristics’, Indian J Fibre & Text Res, 2008, 33, 17–22.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 198/457
186 Bioprocessing of textiles
Tyagi, G.K., Ashvani Goyal, Gon, D.P., and Mahajan, D.K., ‘Investigation on cotton
ring-and OE rotor yarn characteristics: Part I — Effect of caustic and enzymatic scouring
treatments on dye uptake and mechanical characteristics’, Indian J Fibre & Text Res, 2007,32, 279–283.
Tyndall, R.M., ‘Improving the Softness and Surface Appearance of Cotton Fabrics and
Garments by Treatment with Cellulase Enzymes’, Text Chemists and Colorists, 1996,
24(6), 23–26.
Tzanko Tzanov., ‘Protein interactions in enzymatic processes in textiles’, Electronic J
Biotech, 2003, 6(3), 85–93.
Tzanko, T., Calafell, T. M., Guebitz, G.M. and Cavaco-Paulo, A., ‘Bio-preparation of
cotton fabrics’, Enzyme and Microbial Tech, 2001, 29(6), 357–62.
Tzanko, T., Costa, S., Calafell, M., Guebitz, G.M. and Paulo, A.C., ‘Enzymes for Cotton
Fabrics Preparation and Recycling of Waste Water for Dyeing’, Colourage Annual, 2000,
47(12), 65–72.
Tzanko, T., Costa, S.A., Gubitz, G.M. and Paulo, A.C., ‘Hydrogen Peroxide Generation
with Immobilized Glucose Oxidase for Textile Bleaching’, J Biotech, 2002, 93(1), 87–94.
Tzanov, T., Andreaus, J., Gubitz, G., Cavaco-Paulo, A., ‘Protein interactions in enzymatic
processes in textiles’, Electr J Biotechnol, 2003, 3, 146–54.
Uebersax, L., Hagenmuller, H., Hofmann, S., Gruenblatt, E., Müller, R., Vunjaknovakovic,
G., Kaplan, D.L., Merkle, H.P., Meinel, L., ‘Effect of scaffold design on bone morphologyin vitro’, Tissue Engg, 2006, 12, 3417–29.
Ueda, M., Koo, H., Wakida, T. and Yoshimura, Y., ‘Cellulase Treatment of Cotton Fabrics -
Part II Inhibitory Effect of Surfactants on Cellulase Catalytic Reactions’, Text Res J, 1994,
64(10), 615–618.
Unger, R.E., Peters, K., Wolf, M., Motta, A., Migliaresi, C., Kirkpatrick, C.J.,
‘Endothelialization of a non-woven silk broin net for use in tissue engineering: growth
and gene regulation of human endothelial cells’, Biomaterials, 2004, 25, 5137–46.
Usharani, B. and Muthuraj, M., ‘Production and characterization of protease enzyme from
Bacillus laterosporus’, African J Microbiology Res, 2010, 4(11), 1057–63.Uttrup, H.O. and Conrad, L.S., 1999. Alkaline Protease from Bacillus sp I 612, US Patent
No.5 928 929.
Vaithanomsat, P., Kitpreechavanich, V., ‘Sericin separation from silk degumming
wastewater’, Separation and Purication Tech, 2008, 59, 129–133.
Vallee, B.L., Stein, E.A., Sumerwell, W.N. and Fischer, E.H., ‘Metal Content of Alpha
Amylase of Various Origins’, J Biological Chemistry, 1959, 234(11), 2901–05.
Van den Oever, M.J.A., Bos, H.L., Van Kemenade, M.J.J.M., ‘Inuence of the physical
structure of ax bres on the mechanical properties of ax bre reinforced polypropylene
composites’, Appl Comp Mat, 2000, 7(5), 387–402.
Varanasi, A., Obendorf, S.K., Pedersen, L.S. and Mejldal, R., ‘Lipid Distribution on
Textiles in Relation to Washing with Lipases’, J Surfactants and Detergents, 2001, 4(2),
135–146.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 199/457
Bioprocessing of natural bres 187
Varavinit, S., Chaokasem, N. and Shobsngob, S., ‘Immobilization of a Thermostable a
Amylases’, Science Asia, 2002, 28(2), 247–251.
Vepari, C., Kaplan, D.L., ‘Silk as a biomaterial’, Progress in Polymer Science, 2007, 32,
991–1007.
Vollrath, F., Knight, D.P, ‘Liquid crystalline spinning of spider silk’, Nature, 2001, 410,
541–548.
Wakelyn, P.J., ‘Amino Acid Composition of Total Protein of Cotton’, Text Res J, Vol. 45,
No.5, pp. 418–420, 1975.
Wakelyn, P.J., ‘Amino-Acid Composition of Total Protein of Cotton’, Text Res J, 1975,
45(5), 418–420.
Wan, Q., Fan, X., Hua, Z., Gao, W. and Chen, J.,, ‘Degradation Kinetics of Pectins byan Alkaline Pectinase in Bioscouring of Cotton Fabrics’, Carbohydrate Polymers, 2007,
67(4), 572–75.
Wang, H.L., Vespa, J.B. and Hesseltine, C.W., ‘Acid Protease Production by Fungi Used in
Soybean Food Fermentation’, Applied Microbiology, 1974, 27(5), 906–11.
Wang, Q., Fan, X., Gao, P. and Chen, J., ‘Characterization of Bioscoured Cotton Fabrics
using FT-IR ATR Spectroscopy and Microscopy Techniques’, Carbohydrate Res, 2006,
341(12), 2170–75.
Wang, Q., Fan, X., Hua, Z. and Chen, J., ‘Optimizing Bioscouring Condition of Cotton
Knitted Fabrics with Alkaline Pectinase from B. subtilis WSHB 04 - 02 by Using ResponseSurface Methodology’, Biochemical Engg J, 2007, 34(2), 107–113.
Wang, Q., Fan, X., Hua, Z., Gao W. and Chen, J., ‘Degradation Kinetics of Pectins by
an Alkaline Pectinase in Bioscouring of Cotton Fabrics’, Carbohydrate Polymers, 2007,
67(4), 572–75.
Wang, Q., Fan, X., Hua, Z., Gao, W. and Chen, J., ‘Inuence of Combined Enzymatic
Treatment on One-bath Scouring of Cotton Knitted Fabrics’, Biocatalysis and
Biotransformation, 2007, 25(1), 9–15.
Wang, Y., Kim, H.J., Vunjak-Novakovic, G., Kaplan, D.L., ‘Stem cell-based tissue
engineering with silk biomaterials’, Biomaterials, 2006, 27, 6064–82.
Wariishi, H., Valli, K., and Gold, M.H., ‘Manganese (II) oxidation by manganese
peroxidase from basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium Kinetic mechanism and
role of chelators’, J Biol Chem, 1992, 267: 688–695.
Warke, V.V., and Chandratre, P.R., ‘Application of Biotechnology in Textiles’, Man-made
Text India, 2003, 26(4), 142–46.
Wesenberg, D., Kyriakides, I., Agathos, S.N., ‘White-rot fungi and their enzymes for the
treatment of industrial dye efuents’, Biotechnol Adv, 2003, 22, 161–187.
Whistler, R.L., Martin, A.R. and Harris, M., ‘Pectic Substance in Cotton and Its Relation tothe Properties of the Fibre’, Text Res J, 1940, 10(7), 269–279.
Wray, L.S., Hu, X., Gallego, J., Georgakoudi, I., Omenetto, F.G., Schmidt, D., Kaplan, D.L.,
‘Effect of processing on silk-based biomaterials: Reproducibility and biocompatibility’, J
Biomedical Materials Res and Applied Biomaterials, 2011, 99(1), 89–101.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 200/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 201/457
Abstract: This chapter discusses the application of enzymes in synthetic bresfor improving the functional properties such as moisture and surface aspects.
Synthetic bres are being playing in major role in textile applications such asclothing, hygienic, sports, industrial uses like protection and ballistic etc. Thesesynthetic bres made from polymer source like polyester, nylon, polyethylene, andpolypropylene or regenerated from natural source such as viscose rayon, modal,lyocell and tencel have been widely accepted for their care properties, versatilityand long life. In spite of such acceptance, certain drawbacks concerning theirhand properties, thermal properties, and moisture absorbency can be enhancedby introducing hydrophobic block copolymers. However, this modication canlead to problems of longer drying time, excessive wrinkling, and wet cling. In thischapter the properties of the synthetic bres and their structural modicationsmade by the many researchers both chemical and biochemical treatments have
been discussed. The latest developments and research going on the enzymebiotechnology on various bres such as polyester, polyamide, regeneratedcellulosic bres, and biodegradable plastics have been discussed.
Keywords: Biodegradation polyester, nylon, viscose rayon, renewable polymers,regenerated cellulose, polyurethane
4.1 Introduction
Synthetic bres are man-made bres that derived from chemical resources
(Achwal 1984). Synthetic bres are continuous lament form during bre
extrusion process at the stage of manufacturing either dry or wet or melt
spinning methods, which means the bres come in long lengths. Synthetic
bres are manufactured using plant materials and minerals: viscose comes
from pine trees or petrochemicals, while acrylic, nylon and polyester come
from oil and coal. Viscose bre is obtained from the cellulose; versatility
allows imitating materials such as cotton or silk. Polyester is a synthetic
material, strong and easy to maintain. Its aspect is smooth and glossy. Nylon
bre has tough and resilient need not be pressed, and to be synthetic, wash
with warm water (So Hee Lee and Wha Soon Song 2010).
The potential of microbial enzymes for surface modication of syntheticbres has recently been assessed (Khoddami et al. 2001). The major advantages
of enzymes in polymer modication compared to chemical methods are milder
reactions leading to less damage to bres, easier control, and environment
friendly on polymer surfaces. Enzymatic hydrolysis of synthetic bres
4
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 202/457
190 Bioprocessing of textiles
improves some undesired properties such as hydrophilicity, improved wearing
comfort, tendency to pilling, low dyeability, and electrostatic forces.
Poly (ethylene terephthalate) (PET) is the most widely used synthetic brefor clothes, because it has many benecial properties. However, it also has severaldisadvantages, most of which are attributable to low hydrophilicity (moistureregain of 0.4%) (Zeronian and Collins 1990). Because of such low hydrophilicity,the surfaces of PET fabrics cannot wet easily and this may causes some difcultiesin nishing, washing, and dyeing. In addition, due to the buildup of electrostaticcharge and pilling on the surface of PET fabrics, the wearing comfort of clothingis diminished. In order to solve these problems, many attempts have been madeto modify the low hydrophilicity of the surface of PET fabrics. Recent studieshave suggested new alternatives for chemical treatment; one of these involvesthe use of enzymes for eco-friendly processing (Kim and Song 2012). Enzymatichydrolysis is more advantageous than conventional chemical hydrolysis by alkalitreatment as it consumes lesser amounts of energy; further, no harsh chemicalsare required. Moreover, enzymatic hydrolysis is restricted to the bre surface
because the enzymes cannot penetrate the bre; thus, there is no decrease inbre strength (Cavalco-Paulo and Gübitz 2003). Some of the enzymes that can
potentially be applied to PET fabric hydrolysis include lipases, and cutinases,esterases. These enzymes hydrolysis on ester linkage cause producing hydroxyland carboxyl groups on the surface of the fabrics, so surface hydrophilicity ofPET fabrics could be improved. Among these, lipases have the greatest numberof industrial applications and are already regarded as effective enzymes for the
hydrolysis of PET fabrics.
The bioprocessing of synthetic bres such as polyester, nylon,
polypropylene, polyethylene, polystyrene; and semi-synthetic (regenerated)
bres such as viscose rayon, lyocell and modal have been reported (Heumann et
al. 2006). Moreover the reports of previous research work made by researcher
and scientist in the area of synthetic bre have shown very little and studiesare being focussed on improving the functional characteristics of synthetic
bres. The new innovative work on the surface characteristics of polyester
bre by using the lipase and other enzymes to improve the hydrophilic nature
of polyester is creative and will pave the new path for functional textiles.
4.2 Bioprocessing of polyester and their
characteristics
4.2.1 Polyester bres
The world leader among synthetic man-made bres is polyester bre. Polyester
was one of the great man-made bre discoveries of the forties and has been
manufactured on an industrial scale since 1947. In 1996, 24.1 million metric
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 203/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 191
tons of man-made bres were produced worldwide. The main volume gain
took place in production of PET bres (PET lament 9%, PET staple 4%)
(Froehlich 1997). The primary drive for this growth is demand for bre and
container resin. Seventy ve percent of the entire PET production is directed
toward bre manufacturing. Hoechst, Dupont and Eastman are the three world
largest polyester producers. Additional current US Polyester Fibre Producers
are: Acordis Industrial Fibres, Inc.; AlliedSignal Inc; Cookson Fibres, Inc.;
KoSa; Intercontinental Polymers, Inc., Martin Color-Fi. Nan Ya Plastics Corp.,
Wellman, Inc. Dramatic growth in PET bre production is foreseen in Asia in
the near future (Harris 1996). The cost of polyester, with the combination of
its superior strength and resilience, is lower than that of 100% cellulosic andregenerated rayon. Polyester bres are hydrophobic, which is desirable for
light weight facing fabrics used in the disposable industry.
4.2.2 Polyester bres – chemical structure
Polyester bre is a “manufactured bre in which the bre forming substance is
any long chain synthetic polymer composed at least 85% by weight of an ester of
a dihydric alcohol (HOROH) and terephthalic acid (p–HOOC–C6H
4COOH)”.
Figure 4.1 shows the chemical structure of polyethylene terephthalate (PET).The most widely used polyester bre is made from the linear polymer poly
(ethylene terephtalate), and this polyester class is generally referred to simply
as PET. High strength, high modulus, low shrinkage, heat set stability, light
fastness and chemical resistance account for the great versatility of PET.
Fig. 4.1 Chemical structure of polyethylene terephthalate (PET)
4.2.3 Polyester bre characteristics
The polyester bre has unique characteristics when compared to other
synthetic bres because it has the following characteristics such as
• Strong
• Resistant to stretching and shrinking
• Resistant to most chemicals• Quick drying
• Crisp and resilient
• Wrinkle resistant
• Mildew resistant
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 204/457
192 Bioprocessing of textiles
• Abrasion resistant
• Retains heat-set pleats and crease
• Easily washed
4.2.4 Polyester polymer formation
Polyethylene teraphthalate (PET) is a condensation polymer and is industrially
produced by either terephthalic acid (TPA) or dimethyl terephthalate (DMT)
with ethylene glycol (EG) (Hearl 1969). The polymerization processes
includes: (a) Terephthalic acid (TPA), produced directly from p-xylene with
bromide-controlled oxidation, (b) Dimethyl terephthalate (DMT), made in the
early stages by esterication of terephthalic acid. However, a different processinvolving two oxidation and esterication stages now accounts for most DMT,
and (c) Ethylene glycol (EG) initially generated as an intermediate product
by oxidation of ethylene. Further ethylene glycol is obtained by reaction of
ethylene oxide with water.
4. 2.5 Synthesis of polymer
4.2.5.1 Linear polyesters
Linear polyester, PET is polymerized by one of the following two ways: Ester interchange: Monomers are diethyl terephtalate (DET) and ethylene
glycol (EG). Direct etherication: Monomers are terephthalic acid (TPA) and
ethylene glycol (EG). Both ester interchange and direct esterication processes
are combined with polycondensation steps either batch-wise or continuously.
Batch-wise systems need two-reaction vessels – one for esterication or ester
interchange, the other for polymerization. Continuous systems need at least
three vessels – one for esterication or shear interchange, another for reducing
excess glycols, the other for polymerization.
4.2.5.2 Branched and cross linked polyesters
In the polymer formation process, if glycerol is allowed to react with a di-acid
or its anhydride each glycerol will generate one branch point. Such molecules
can grow to very high molecular weight. If internal coupling occurs (reaction
of a hydroxyl group and an acid function from branches of the same or
different molecule), the polymer will become cross linked.
4.2.6 Fibre formation
The sequences for production of PET bres and yarns depend on the different
ways of polymerization (continuous, batch-wise, and solid-phase) and
spinning (low or high wind-up speed) processes.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 205/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 193
4.2.6.1 Spinning process
The degree of polymerization of PET is controlled, depending on its end-uses.PET for industrial bres has a higher degree of polymerization, higher molecular
weight and higher viscosity. The normal molecular weight range lies between
15,000 and 20,000. With the normal extrusion temperature (280–290°C), it has
a low shear viscosity is 1000–3000 poise. Low molecular weight PET is spun
at 265°C, whereas ultrahigh molecular weight PET is spun at 300°C or above.
The degree of orientation is generally proportional to the wind-up speeds in the
spinning process. Theoretically, the maximum orientation along with increase
in productivity is obtained at a wind-up speed of 8000–10,000 m/min.
4.2.6.2 Drawing process
To produce uniform PET, the drawing process is carried out at temperature
above the glass transition temperature (80–90°C). Since the drawing process
gives additional orientation to products, the draw ratios (3:1–6:1) vary
according to the nal end-uses. For higher tenacities, the higher draw ratios
are required. In addition to orientation, crystallinity may be developed during
the drawing at the temperature range of 140–220°C.
4.2.7 Structural composition of PET
The one of the distinguishing characteristics of PET is attributed to the
benzene rings in the polymer chain. The aromatic character leads to chain
stiffness, preventing the deformation of disordered regions, which results in
weak van der Waals interaction forces between chains. Due to this, PET is
difcult to be crystallized. Polyester bres may be considered to be composed
of crystalline, oriented semi crystalline and non-crystalline (amorphous)
regions. The aromatic, carboxyl and aliphatic molecular groups are nearly
planar in conguration and exist in a side-by-side arrangement. The cohesion
of PET chains is a result of hydrogen bonds and van der Waals interactions,
caused by dipole interaction, induction and dispersion forces among the
chains (Lewin and Pearce 1985). The capacity to form useful bres and the
tendency to crystallize depend on these forces of attraction. The interactive
forces create inexible tight packing among macromolecules, showing high
modulus, strength, and resistance to moisture, dyestuffs and solvents. The
limited exibility in the macromolecule is mainly due to the ethylene group.
4.2.7.1 Relationship between structure, properties and
processing parameters of PET bres
Properties of polyester bres are strongly affected by bre structure. The
bre structure, which has a strong inuence on the applicability of the
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 206/457
194 Bioprocessing of textiles
bre, depends heavily on the process parameters of bre formation such as
spinning speed, hot drawing (stretching), stress relaxation and heat setting
(stabilization) speed. As the stress in the spinning is increased by higher
wind-up speed, the PET molecules are extended, resulting in better as-spun
uniformity, lower elongation and higher strength, greater orientation and high
crystallinity (Morton et al. 1975). Hot drawing accomplishes the same effect
and allows even higher degrees of orientation and crystallinity. Relaxation is
the releasing of strains and stresses of the extended molecules, which results
in reduced shrinkage in drawn bres. Heat stabilization is the treatment to
“set” the molecular structure, enabling the bres to resist further dimensional
changes. Final bre structure depends considerably on the temperature, rateof stretching; draw ratio (degree of stretch), relaxation ratio and heat setting
condition. The crystalline and non-crystalline orientation and the percentage
of crystallinity can be adjusted signicantly in response to these process
parameters.
4.2.8 Mechanical properties of PET bres
As the degree of bre stretch is increased (yielding higher crystallinity and
molecular orientation), so are properties such as tensile strength and initialYoung’s modulus. At the same time, ultimate extensibility, i.e., elongation
is usually reduced. An increase of molecular weight further increases the
tensile properties, modulus, and elongation. Typical physical and mechanical
properties of PET bres are given (Table 4.1).
Table 4.1 Physical properties of polyester bres
Type of material /
Property
Filament yarn Staple and tow
Regular
tenacity
High
tenacity
Regular
tenacity
High
tenacity
Breaking tenacity (N/tex) 0.35–0.5 0.62–0.85 0.35–0.47 0.48–0.61
Breaking elongation 24–50 10–20 35–60 17–40
Elastic recovery at
5% elongation (%)
88–93 90 75–85 75–85
Initial modulus (N/tex) 6.6–8.8 10.2–10.6 2.2–3.5 4.0–4.9
Specic gravity 1.38 1.39 1.38 1.38
Moisture regain (%) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
Melting temperature (oC) 258–263 258–263 258–263 258–263
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 207/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 208/457
196 Bioprocessing of textiles
chain scission at ester linkages (Fig. 4.2), although a radical mechanism has
also been proposed. The degradation products can undergo further changes,
but at ordinary processing temperatures a certain proportion of carboxyl
groups are introduced into the polymer structure. Color formation upon
degradation has been attributed to the formation of polyenaldehydes from
acetaldehyde and from a further breakdown of poly(vinyl ester)s. Polyester
bres display good resistance to sunlight but long-term degradation appears
to be initiated by ultraviolet radiation. However, if protected from daylight
by glass, PET bre gives excellent performance, when enhanced by an UV
stabilizer, in curtains and automobile interiors. Although PET is ammable,
the fabric usually melts and drops away instead of spreading the ame. PETbre will burn, however, in blends with cotton, which supports combustion.
Polyester has good oxidative and thermal resistance. Color forming species
are produced and carboxyl end groups are increased.
Fig. 4.2 Thermal degradation of polyester – chain molecular mechanism
4.2.12 Dyeing properties of PET bres
Because of its rigid structure, well-developed crystallinity and lack of reactive
dye sites, PET absorbs very little dye in conventional dye systems. This is
particularly true for the highly crystalline (highly drawn), high tenacity–high
modulus bres. Polyester bres are therefore dyed almost exclusively with
disperse dyes. A considerable amount of research work has been done to
improve the dye ability of PET bres. Polymerizing a third monomer, such
as dimethyl ester, has successfully produced a cationic dye able polyester
bre into the macro-molecular chain. This third monomer has introduced
functional groups as the sites to which the cationic dyes can be attached (Pal
et al. 1993). The third monomer also contributes to disturbing the regularity ofPET polymer chains, so as to make the structure of cationic dye able polyester
less compact than that of normal PET bres. The disturbed structure is good
for the penetration of dyes into the bre. The disadvantage of adding a third
monomer is the decrease of the tensile strength.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 209/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 197
A new dyeing process for polyester bre at low temperature (40°C
and below) has been reported (Fite et al. 1995). This method employs a
disperse dye in a micro-emulsion of a small proportion of alkyl halogen and
phosphoglyceride. The main advantage of this method is low temperature
processing, but there remains the environmental problem that is produced
by using toxic carriers. Another approach has been introduced by Saus et al.
(1993a). The textile industry uses large amounts of water in dyeing processes
emitting organic compounds into the environment. Due to this problem
dyeing process for polyester bre was developed, in which supercritical CO2
is used as a transfer medium (Saus 1992b). This gives an option avoiding
water discharge. It is low in cost, non-toxic, non-ammable and recyclable.
4.2.13 Applications of PET bres
DuPont Company produced the rst US commercial polyester bre in 1953.
Since polyester bre has a lot of special characteristics, most of them are used
in the following three major areas:
• Apparel: Every form of clothing
• Home furnishings: Carpets, curtains, draperies, sheets and
pillowcases, wall coverings, and upholstery • Other uses: Hoses, power belting, ropes and nets, thread, tire cord,
auto upholstery, sails, oppy disk liners, and brell for various
products including pillows and furniture
• Composites made of 100% polyester bres are widely used as
ltration media. Its layered structure gives excellent tear strength, a
smooth, bre-free surface and edge stability.
4.2.14 Chemical method of PET hydrolysisOne of the surface modications is the controlled alkaline hydrolysis of the
polyester fabric. The action of a strong base leads to the cleavage of ester
linkages on the bre surface. The result is the formation of terminal hydroxyl
and carboxylase groups on the bre surface. Hydrolysis is believed to
increase the number of polar functional groups on the bre surface. In a study
by Zeronian and Collins (1990), on a 22-hour treatment with 10% aqueous
NaOH at 60°C, a weight loss of 25.3% was observed for semi-dull polyester
bres and, under the same treatment conditions, a weight loss of 81.4% wasobserved for bright polyester bres. In a comparative study by Namboori and
Haith (1968), treating polyester bres with alkalies and various alkoxides
showed the weight loss in the following order: sodium hydroxide (NaOH)
< tertiary butoxide < secondary propoxide < methoxide and ethoxide. In a
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 210/457
198 Bioprocessing of textiles
study by Chidambaram, Venkatraj, and Manisankar (2004), alkali treatment
of a polyester fabric was carried out in a solution of 0.3% NaOH in ethanol
(organic solvent medium). The fabric was squeezed to a 50% pick up and then
stored after covering it with a nylon lm for 24 hours at room temperature.
There was a 21% weight loss in the treated fabric, and the fabric attained
uniform silk-like handle. In a study by Zeronian and Collins (1990), a
polyester fabric was treated with a solution containing 60 g/l of alkali and
about 5% ethanol. The fabric was squeezed to a 50% pick up and then was
stored at room temperature after subjecting it to a few rotations to minimize
the uneven deposition or drying of the alkali solution on the fabric. In this
case, the fabric suffered a weight loss of 21%. Bendak and El-Marsa (1991)studied the topochemical degradation of polyester bres by pretreatment
with methanolic NaOH solutions. The methanolic medium and the higher
temperature of the pretreatment resulted in a steeper loss in the weight of the
fabrics. The pretreated samples, which had lost about 5–8% of their original
weight, showed a signicant decrease in the wicking time and also a relatively
slight improvement in reducing the sinking time. The pretreatment of bres
did not signicantly alter the moisture regain characteristics – only a small
part of the bres seemed to be affected by the pretreatment.
In a study by Samanta, Chattopadhyay, Konar, and Sharma (2003), pretreatment and post-treatment of micro-denier polyester fabrics with
selective chemicals were studied for improving the surface depth of the color.
It was observed that to achieve a 15% weight loss, the optimum treatment
conditions were 5% NaOH plus 0.1% hexamethylene diamine, 60 min, and
90°C.In a study by Achwal (1984) on treatment of polyester fabrics with 4%
NaOH in aqueous medium, weight losses of 10.7%, 15%, and 17% were
observed at 30, 45, and 60 min, respectively, at a material-to liquor (M:L)
ratio of 1:60 and at 90°C temperature with stearyl trimethyl ammoniumchloride (10 g/l) as catalyst. Whereas weight losses of 6%, 8.5%, and 10.5%
were observed at 30, 45, and 60 min, respectively, under the same treatment
conditions without the catalyst. The contribution of the surface wetting ability
and the pore structure to the liquid retention ability of brous materials were
analyzed by Hsieh, Miller, and Thompson (1996) using regular and micro-
denier poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) fabrics by treatment with an
aqueous NaOH solution. The hydrolysis time and the alkali concentration
of PET fabrics showed improved water wettability and liquid retention
characteristics. A theoretical model based on the surface reaction concept todescribe the kinetics of polyester bre dissolution in alkaline solutions has
shown that the weight loss is not a simple linear function of time. In their
study, Kallay et al. (1990) treated PET fabrics with an aqueous NaOH solution
at 100°C and reported that the reaction was a rst-order process with respect
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 211/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 199
to the surface area of the bres and the concentration of hydroxyl ions. In the
studies by Bruce (1984) and Gorrafa (1980), the treatment of a polyester fabric
with an aqueous NaOH solution caused a decrease in the weight and breaking
strength of the fabric and the handle quality improved with the increase in
the NaOH concentration, treatment time, and temperature. In view of these
studies, it is clear that many researchers have attempted the modication of
the polyester bres/ring spun yarn/fabric either by copolymerization or by
alkali/acid/organic solvents treatments (El-Gendy 2004; Kish and Nouri
1999; Shohola and Tumuli 1993; Yang 2003) to overcome their disadvantages.
With the above background information in mind, the alkaline hydrolysis of
polyester rotor spun yarns was carried out with the objective to study theinuence of various treatment conditions and yarn twist parameters on the
physical characteristics of polyester rotor spun yarns. Hence, characterization
of the alkali treated polyester spun yarns was also carried out to understand
the optimum or balanced process parameters and yarn parameters to get the
most desirable modications.
The alkaline hydrolysis of polyester spun yarns by treating with aqueous
sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution (with and without catalyst) has been
studied at various concentrations, times, and temperatures (Vigneswaran and
Anbumani 2011). The changes in the physical characteristics of the parentand the alkali-treated polyester spun yarns, such as weight loss, strength
loss, abrasion resistance, wicking behavior, coefcient of friction, and
exural rigidity were analyzed. The rates of strength loss and weight loss
of the polyester spun yarns showed an increasing trend as the concentration
of NaOH increased from 5% to 15% and the temperature rose from 60°C to
100°C. The absorbency properties in terms of the wicking behavior of the
alkali-treated yarns increased compared with those of the parent yarn. Due to
the loss of mass from the bre surface, a decreasing trend was observed in theabrasion resistance and exural rigidity of the alkali-treated polyester rotor
spun yarns when compared with the parent yarn. The polyester rotor spun
yarns treated with 10% NaOH at 60°C gave better results for the physical
properties compared with the yarns subjected to the same treatment at 100°C
under comparable treatment conditions. This research work will enhance
further study on improving comfort characteristics and developing new
products in functional apparel using polyester spun yarns.
4.2.15 Enzymatic hydrolysis of polyester using lipase
The application of lipase enzyme on the biodegradation of polyester was
investigated by many researchers in the past 10 years. Lipolytic hydrolysis
of polyester as well as copolymers and blends containing polyester for the
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 212/457
200 Bioprocessing of textiles
purpose of biodegradation has been studied (Khoddami et al. 2001). In a study
reported in 1998 (Hiseh and Cram 1998), it was reported that the lipase enzymes
had the ability of improving the wettability and absorbency of polyester fabrics.
Estrases (carboxylic ester hydrolyses) are a group of lipases that are able to
play the role of a catalyst in the hydrolysis of many uncharged carboxylic
esters. Aryl estrases and Ali estrases constitute two major types of estrases.
Ali-estrases, which are also called Bestrases (EC 3.1.1.1) can break the ester
linkages of aliphatic compounds such as butyrate and tributyrine. Aryl estrases,
or A-estrases (EC 3.1.1.2) can hydrolyze the linkages in aromatic compounds
(Krisch 1971; Reed and Underkoer 1966) such as polyethylene terephthalate
(PET) (Hiseh and Cram 1998). Identication of the process parameters affectingthe enzymatic hydrolysis of polyester bres is important, because ideally, it is
required to improve the quality of polyester fabrics without considerable loss of
strength and other desired characteristics by means of controlling the conditions
of the selective enzyme reaction carefully.
In order to make the bio-treatment process more applicable to polyester
bres, more research is needed in this eld. As the results of previous works
showed that the enzymatic hydrolysis was limited to the surface of polyester
bres, and this could be related to the compact structure of drawn polyester
(Khoddami et al. 2001; Khalili et al. 2001), therefore, the choice of undrawnyarn could explain whether enzymes would penetrate more in the less ordered
structure of polyester bres. For this purpose, two polyester multilament
yarns were drawn with four levels of draw ratio; each draw ratio at four levels
of temperature, and then hydrolyzed with the same conditions. Khoddami et
al. (2001) have been studied the hydrolysis of polyester lament yarn using
lipase enzyme at various enzymatic process conditions. The material used in
this study consisted of two polyester multilament yarns, namely 180 denier
with 20 laments and 280 denier with 34 laments. The lipase enzyme is produced by submerged fermentation of a genetically modied Aspergillus
microorganism (Novozym 1999). The lipase enzyme hydrolysis process
conditions are given (Table 4.2).
Table 4.2 Lipase enzyme hydrolysis conditions for polyester
Hydrolysis Process condition
Polyester sample weight (kg) 5 × 10 –3
Enzyme conc. (kg/m3) 0.5
Temperature (°C) 40
Time (seconds) 15 × 60
pH 8–8.5
MLR 1:10
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 213/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 201
In order to hydrolyze the polyester, the phosphate buffer solution was
prepared rst and then the required amount of enzyme was added to the buffer
solution. After adding the samples to the hydrolysis bath, the temperature was
increased to 40°C in 5 × 60s and hydrolysis continued for 15 × 60s. At the end,
the polyester lament yarn hanks were treated in an acid buffer in order to
denature and deactivate the lipase enzyme (Khoddami et al. 2001). This was
followed by cold and warm rinsing. Finally the polyester yarn samples were
dried in air.
4.2.15.1 Testing procedure
The weight loss was measured by weighing the samples before and after
hydrolysis treatment with an accuracy of ±0.0001 g. Before weighing, the
samples were dried at 60°C for 12 × 3600s. Measurement of tenacity and
elongation-at break were carried out according to the standard test method
of ASTM D2256. For the determination of moisture regain and other
experiments, the samples were conditioned at 20 ± 2°C and 65 ± 2% relative
humidity (RH) for 72 × 3600s.
4.2.15.2 Weight loss
The weight loss of the polyester samples drawn with different conditions
as well as that of POY yarns are analyzed after lipase enzyme treatments.
The weight loss for both yams is less than 0.5%. No trend can be established
for either draw ratio or temperature (Nagata 1996). Considering an average
weight loss of 0.41% for 180 denier and 0.27% for 280 denier drawn yarns. It
can be observed that on the whole drawing at different temperatures increases
the weight loss by about 0.1% for both yams when compared with hydrolyzed
POY samples. Considering a weight loss of 0.3 and 0.14 for 180 and 250
denier POY yams, respectively, it is concluded that drawing at different
temperatures does not lead to considerable weight loss. The relative increase
in weight loss due to drawing can be related to the decrease of lament
diameter, which leads to an increase of specic surface area. The effects of
specic surface area on the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis are well known. It
is also pointed out that due to the big size of the enzymes molecules and
the compact structure of polyester bres, the enzymatic reaction is limited
to the surface of bres (Khalili et al. 2001). Therefore, it can be said that the
effect of increase in accessible surface area is more important than the internal
structure of polyester bres.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 214/457
202 Bioprocessing of textiles
4.2.15.3 Tensile strength
The percentage strength loss due to hydrolysis for both polyester yarns drawnwith draw ratios of 1.4 and 1.85 at 90°C and 140°C lies between 3.5% and
10%. No trend can be established for the results. It should be noted that in
spite of the drawing effect which lead to higher strength (Walter et al. 1995).
These strength losses show the negative effect of enzymatic hydrolysis on
the strength of polyester laments. The percentage decrease of elongation-at-
break due to hydrolysis was between 7% and 25%.
4.2.15.4 Moisture regainTable 4.3 shows the result of the moisture absorption measurements. As it can
be seen the moisture absorption increases due to hydrolysis. This agrees with
the results already obtained for the hydrolysis of polyester fabric (Khoddami et
al. 2001). It shows that higher draw ratios lead to higher moisture absorption,
which again is related to higher accessible surface area.
Table 4.3 Increased moisture regain % of polyester after enzymatic hydrolysis
Type of PET yarn Temperature (oC)
Draw ratio
90oC 140oC
180/20 1.46 4.8 4.28
1.85 9.18 26.67
280/34 1.46 21.05 10.91
1.85 49.24 33.70
4.2.15.5 SEM micrograghs
Figure 4.3 shows the SEM micrographs of some of the hydrolyzed and
unhydrolyzed POY and drawn yams. It is evident that the drawn yarns
have been affected by the enzymatic hydrolysis more than the POY yarns.
Results of this research showed that the weight loss of polyester yarn hanks
is generally less than 0.5%. The loss of strength, due to the hydrolysis
had a maximum value of 10%, the moisture absorption of the hydrolyzed
samples increased by up to 50%. The decrease of elongation-at-break due to
hydrolysis was between 7% and 25% for drawn yarns. The observation of
surface of hydrolyzed and unhydrolyzed yarns show that due to the big sizeof the enzymes molecules and compact structure of polyester, the hydrolysis
effect is limited to the surface of the substrate. Therefore, the intensity of
hydrolysis is more affected by the specic surface area of the substrate
rather than the effects of drawing.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 215/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 216/457
204 Bioprocessing of textiles
to detect collagenase activity. The technique is very sensitive to the optical
properties of the dielectric adjacent to the metal layer and can be used to
detect changes in the refractive index or the thickness of thin organic lms
(Homola et al. 1999).
4.2.16.1 Biodegradable polymers
Three types of biodegradable materials, which can be dissolved under
the catalytic action of a single enzyme, were chosen for the study (Sumner
and Krause 2001). Figure 4.4 shows the rst biodegradable polymer
under study as the poly (ester amide) based on bis (L-phenylalanine)alkylene di-esters. This system was chosen because the esters of N-acyl-L
amino acids are readily cleaved by chymotrypsin, i.e. they are hydrolyzed
105 times faster than the corresponding amides. The enzymatic hydrolysis
of powdered material and of lms of the polymer at pH 8 and 37°C has
previously been investigated (Arabuli et al. 1994). This study showed that
>50% of ester groups were cleaved within 4 h by the action of 540 units
of chymotrypsin. The starting rate of hydrolysis of the lm was similar
to that of a powdered substrate. Chymotrypsin is a suitable enzyme labelfor immunosensing since it is virtually never present in peripheral blood
samples. The second polymer is dextran hydrogels, the degradation of dextran
hydrogels in the presence of different concentrations of dextranase has been
investigated by Brøndsted et al. (1995, 1996). Hydrogels were obtained by
cross-linking dextran with diisocyanates (Fig. 4.5). Disks of the material,
2 mm thick, were reported to dissolve completely within 4 h or 20 min at
concentrations of dextranase of 31 or 1000 units/ml, respectively. The rate
of degradation can be adjusted by the degree of cross-linking. The higher the
cross-linking density the longer is the dissolution time. Since hydrogels are
strongly hydrated.
Fig. 4.4 Chemical structure of biodegradable PET bre
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 217/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 205
Fig. 4.5 Dextran hydrogel cross linked with hexamethylene diisocyanates
The third polymer under investigation was poly (trimethylene) succinate
(Fig. 4.6). This polyester is degraded by the enzyme lipase, which cleaves
naturally occurring ester groups (Walter et al. 1995). The dissolution of poly
(trimethylene) succinate powder and lms was investigated and comparing
ester bond cleavage and weight loss measurements. Oligomers with an
average length of ve to six monomers were released from the polymer bulk.The enzyme activity for the interaction of lipase with an insoluble substrate
was found to be highly reproducible (Walter et al. 1995).
Fig. 4.6 Structure of poly (trimethylene) succinate
4.2.16.2 Preparation of polymer lms
Films of poly (ester amide) ranging from 5 to 10 nm thick were spin coated
at a speed of 3000 rpm onto the gold surface from solutions of the polymer in
chloroform. Films of different thickness were produced by varying the amount
of the poly (ester amide) in the solutions. Dextran (2.5 g, 3.57 × 10−5 mol) was
dissolved in 14 ml DMSO. Some 0.03 ml hexamethylene diisocyanate wereadded under continuous stirring (Sumner et al. 2001). The resulting solution
was immediately applied to an SPR substrate and spun at a speed of 3500
rpm for 40s. The substrates were then left on a hotplate at 70°C overnight for
the cross-linking reaction to proceed. Films of poly (trimethylene) succinate
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 218/457
206 Bioprocessing of textiles
were produced by spin coating at 3000 rpm from a 0.13 wt. % solution of the
polymer in acetone. All poly (ester amide) and poly (trimethylene) succinate
lms were left to dry at room temperature for at least 24 hours before analysis.
4.2.16.3 Effect of enzyme concentration
Degradation of the polymer lms was shown to be dependent on the enzyme
concentration for all three polymer enzyme systems. The change in the SPR
angle with time is presented for the degradation of dextran hydrogel lms at
different enzyme concentrations. The lower the enzyme concentrations used,
the smaller the rate of degradation. After an initial period, the degradation was
roughly linear with time.
4.2.16.4 Effect of lm thickness
Poly (ester amide) lms ranging from 5 to 10 nm thickness were degraded
by chymotrypsin solutions with a concentration of 4 × 10−8 mol dm−3. For
the range of thickness used in this study, a linear relationship between the
lm thickness and the total change of the SPR angle was observed. Films
of different thickness were found to degrade at the same rate. These results
agree with the accepted mechanism of chymotrypsinolysis (Arabuli et al.
1994). Once the chymotrypsin had adsorbed onto the surface of the polymer
lm, degradation occurred at a constant rate. A linear relationship between
enzyme concentrations and the rates of the enzyme catalysed dissolution of
three biodegradable materials has been established. The poly (ester amide)
chymotrypsin and the dextran hydrogel–dextranase systems have been
proven to be the most sensitive and have therefore been selected for further
development. Since the dextran hydrogel degraded faster at low enzyme
concentrations, it has potential for further improving the lower limit ofdetection (Sumner et al. 2000).
4.2.17 In vitro enzyme catalysis on polyester
Enzyme technology has signicantly expanded in scope and impact over
the past 10 years to include organic transformations in non-traditional
environments. This review focuses on a relatively new but rapidly expanding
research activity where in vitro enzyme catalysis is used for the synthesis of
polyesters (Gross et al. 2001). Aspects include enzyme-catalyzed step-growthcondensation reactions, chain-growth ring-opening polymerizations, and
corresponding transesterication of macromolecular substrates are discussed.
Increasingly, research has been carried out to explore the ability of enzymes
to function in non-traditional media such as in organic solvents. Researchers
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 219/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 207
have found that many enzymes can function with specicity on a surprisingly
broad range of synthetic polymers. Prior to 1995, almost all of these activities
were directed towards developing knowledge on organic transformations of
small molecules. More recently, the use of enzymes for polymer synthesis is
gaining attention and is showing great promise. Enzyme-catalyzed polyester
synthesis based on lipase-catalyzed condensation polymerizations, a
pioneering study by Margolin et al. (1987) described the synthesis of optically
active oligoesters by exploiting lipase enantioselectivity. These researchers
prepared oligoesters by porcine pancreatic lipase (PPL) catalyzed reactions
between both a racemic di-ester and an achiral diol, or, a racemic diol and
an achiral diester. In both cases, trimers and tetramers of type AA-BB-AAand AA-BB-AA-BB-AA and very low quantities of higher oligomers were
formed. They observed formation of hydroxyl-capped oligomers since an
excess of the diol was used. Wallace and Morrow (1989) were also early
contributors to this new eld. They recognized the importance of stoichiometry
and studied polycondensation using equimolar quantities of trihaloalkyl
diesters and primary diols. Halogenated alcohols such as 2,2,2-trichloroethyl
activated the acyl donor and thereby improved the polymerization kinetics.
They also removed by products periodically during the reactions to facilitate
the growth of chains. Wallace and Morrow 1989; Morrow and Wallace 1992investigated PPL-catalyzed copolymerization of bis (2,2,2-trichloroethyl)
trans-3,4-epoxyadipate and 1,4-butanediol. They reported the synthesis
of product with Mw = 7.9–103 g/mol after 120 hours. In addition, the
polyesters formed by Wallace and Morrow (1989) had high optical purity
(>95%). Knani et al. (1993) studied the inuence of enzyme type, solvent,
concentration, reaction time, and other parameters on the self-condensation
of methyl hydroxyhexanoate. They observed no chain growth with aromatic
monomers. Reactions conducted in bulk gave oligoesters with longer chainlength than similar reactions conducted in solvents. Chaudhary et al. (1997)
summarized work carried out using lipase-catalysis for condensation-type
polymerizations. They emphasized that moderate molecular weight polyesters
required efcient methods to shift the thermodynamic equilibrium towards
product formation. For example, Novozyme-435 was used to catalyze the
solvent less copolymerization of divinyl adipate and 1,4-butanediol to form
a polyester with Mw = 23.2–103 g/mol. From this work and that by others, it
was concluded that the product molecular weight and end-group structure are
a function of: (1) Enzyme water content
(2) The enzyme/ substrate ratio
(3) Monomer-substrate stoichiometry, and
(4) Reaction temperature
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 220/457
208 Bioprocessing of textiles
Later, Rodney et al. (1999) described Novozyme-435-catalyzed AA-BB
type condensation polymerizations to form aromatic polyesters.
4.2.17.1 Enzyme-catalyzed ring-opening polymerizations
Ring-opening polymerizations of lactones and cyclic carbonates circumvents
the generation of leaving groups that can limit propagation kinetics and product
molecular weight (Gross et al. 2001). Publications have appeared on lipase-
catalyzed ring-opening polymerizations of caprolactone (CL) (Uyama and
Kobayashi 1993; Macdonald et al. 1995: Kumar and Gross 2000a), valerolactone
(VL) (Uyama and Kobayashi 1993), methyl-valerolactone (Kullmer et al.
1998), methyl--caprolactone (Kullmer et al. 1998), propiolactone (Nobes et
al. 1996), methyl--propiolactone, methyl--propiolactone (Svikrin et al. 1996),
butyrolactone (Dong et al. 1998; Nobes et al. 1996), 8-octanolide (Kobayashi
et al. 1998), and others. In all of these reports, the polymerizations proceeded
with slow propagation kinetics and gave low molecular weight products.
However, as will be seen in certain examples below, in the few years since
these reports, signicant improvements in polymerization efciencies and
product molecular weights have been made. Lipase catalyzed polymerizations
of macro lactones have in some cases proved advantageous relative to chemical preparative routes. Kobayashi and coworkers were the rst to investigate
lipase-catalyzed polymerization of undecanolide (UDL) (Uyama et al. 1996),
dodecanolide (DDL) (Uyama et al. 1995a), and pentadecanolide (PDL) (Uyama
et al. 1996) (12-, 13-, and 16-membered lactones). Screening of enzymes for
the polymerization of UDL, DDL, and PDL using lipases including those from
Aspergillus niger, Candida cylindracea (lipase B), Candida rugosa, Rhizopus
delmar, Rhizopus javanicus, Pseudomonas uorescens (lipase P, Cosmo Bio.)
Pseudomonas sp. (lipase PS, Amano) as well as phospholipase and PPL were
carried out (Uyama et al. 1995b). Quantitative conversions of UDL to poly(UDL)
were achieved within 120 h using lipase P and PS. The highest number average
molecular weight reported by these workers was for poly (DDL) synthesis
(Mn = 25.0–103 g/mol, 75°C, 120 h) using the immobilized lipase PS from
a Pseudomonas sp. (lipase PS, Toyobe Co.) (Uyama et al. 1995b). Bisht et al.
(1997a) reported that, by using lipase PS-30 immobilized on celite, the solvent
less polymerization of PDL gave poly(PDL) having Mn 62.0–103 g/mol and
PDI 1.9. Kumar et al. (2000b) reported poly (PDL) having Mn of 86.4–103 g/
mol using Novozyme-435 as catalyst in low levels of toluene. Copolymerization of two or more monomers is an important strategy
for the “tailoring” of polymeric materials. Since in vitro enzyme-catalyzed
polymerization is a relatively new area of study, copolymerizations have
thus far received little attention. Namekawa et al. (1996) reported the lipase-
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 221/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 209
catalyzed copolymerization of propiolactone and CL. Uyama et al. (1996)
studied Pseudomonas uorescens lipase-catalyzed copolymerizations of PDL
with DDL, UDL, VL, and CL. The rates of these reactions were slow and
yielded low molecular weight copolymers (Mn<6000 g/mol). Later, Kobayashi
et al. (1998) reported the formation of copolymers from VL and CL using the
lipase from P. uorescens. In addition, the lipase from Candida antarctica
was used for the copolymerization of 8-OL with CL and DDL in isooctane.
The latter copolymerization gave %-monomer conversions of about 80% in
48 hours at 60°C (lipase 0.10 g/1.0 mmol monomer) and products with Mn <
9.0, 103 g/mol (Kobayashi et al. 1998). Matsumura et al. (1999) reported the
preparation of polyester copolymers also. Thus far, the kinetics and mechanism of lipase-catalyzed ring-opening
polymerizations have been investigated with only a limited set of monomers
and enzyme-catalyst systems. However, for these systems, work has been
conducted to begin developing knowledge of how reaction parameters such
as solvent, temperature, enzyme concentration, and water and monomer
concentration inuence the rate of propagation, molecular weight and
polydispersity. Henderson and Gross (2000) and Bisht et al. (1998) believe
that lipase-catalyzed ring-opening polymerization proceeds by the nucleophilic
attack of lipase serine residues at lactone carbonyl groups. This results in theformation of an enzyme-activated monomer (EAM) complex. Polymer chain
growth or propagation takes place when the hydroxyl terminal group of a chain
acts as the nucleophile that reacts with the EAM complex to give a product that
is elongated by one repeat unit (Fig. 4.7). Lipase-catalyzed polymerization of
-CL was found to share many features with that of an immortal polymerization.
Fig. 4.7 Mechanism of lipase catalysed polymerization
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 222/457
210 Bioprocessing of textiles
Considering the requirement that two macromolecules must be in close
proximity at the lipase active site for these reactions, it is surprising that they
occur so rapidly (Bankova et al. 2000). Apparently, lipase catalysis results in
the cleavage of internal ester linkages along chains. The resulting enzyme-
activated-polymer complex (EAP) then reacts with terminal hydroxyl groups
at chain ends to form ester linkages. These reactions can be used to reshufe
the repeat unit sequence distribution between different aliphatic polyester
chains (Kumar and Gross 2000c). Integration of these powerful new tools
in enzyme engineering with the current challenges in enzyme-catalyzed
polymerizations will surely become a prominent activity in future years that
will empower current activities.
4.2.18 Biodegradation of polyester-based polyurethane
polymer
Polyurethane (PUR), which is a kind of plastic used as base material in various
industries (Yukie Akutsu et al. 1998). PUR is synthesized by condensation of
polyol and polyisocyanate (Fig. 4.8). There are two types of PUR, named
according to the polyol used in the synthesis: PUR which uses polyester as
polyol in synthesis is called polyester PUR, and the one which uses polyetheris called polyether PUR. PUR is a material which is resistant to microbial
attack, but generally, the ester-type PUR is more easily degraded than the
ether-type PUR (Morton and Surman 1994). Several kinds of fungi and
bacteria that can degrade ester-type PUR have been reported (Crabbe et al.
1994; Darby and Kaplan 1968; Kay et al. 1991; Pathirana and Seal 1984). In
all cases, the degradation was considered to be initiated by hydrolysis of the
ester bond by some hydrolytic enzyme(s), such as esterase.
Fig. 4.8 Structure of poluurethane (pur)
In solid-polyester biodegradation, degradation of poly (3-hydroxyalkanoate)
(PHA) by PHA depolymerase is well-known (Kanesawa et al. 1994; Kasuya
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 223/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 211
and Doi 1994; Kita et al. 1995). This enzyme, which is one of the esterases, has a
hydrophobic surface-binding domain and a catalytic domain and accomplishes
the degradation of PHA lm via two steps (Kasuya et al. 1996; Nakajima-
Kambe et al. 1997). The rst step is adsorption of the enzyme on the surface of
the lm via the surface-binding domain, and the second step is hydrolysis of the
ester bond. Pathirana and Seal (23) reported the activities of several enzymes,
namely, esterase, protease, and urease, in culture broth during ester-type PUR
degradation by fungi. Crabbe et al. (1994) also obtained fractions containing
esterase activity from the broth of a fungus culture which could degrade colloidal
PUR. In the case of bacteria, Kay et al. (1993) have detected extracellular
esterase activity in the medium during PUR degradation by a Corynebacterium
sp. Previously (Nakajima-Kambe et al. 1995) a bacterium, strain TB-35, which
could utilize solid polyester PUR as the sole carbon and nitrogen source, was
isolated and identied as Comamonas acidovorans. Esterase plays a major role
in PUR degradation by this strain (Nakajima-Kambe et al. 1997). This strain
constitutively secreted two kinds of extracellular esterase: one is secreted into
the culture broth, and the other is bound to the cell surface. Only the cell-bound
esterase could degrade the PUR.
4.2.18.1 MaterialsThe polyester PUR was synthesized by reacting poly(diethylene glycol adipate)
with 2,4-tolylene diisocyanate under anhydrous conditions (Nakajima-Kambe
et al. 1995).
4.2.18.2 Bacterial strains and cultivation
Comamonas acidovorans TB-35, which had been isolated as a degrader of
solid polyester PUR, was used (Akutsuet et al. 1998). One loopful of cells
was used to inoculate three 500-ml Erlenmeyer asks, each containing 100ml of basal medium and 1.0 g of PUR cubes (5 by 5 by 5 mm) as the sole
carbon source. Cultivation was performed under the following conditions:
aeration, 1.5 liters/min; temperature, 30°C; and agitation, 500 rpm. Cells were
harvested after 7 days’ cultivation and were stored at 280°C until use.
4.2.18.3 Degradation of polyurethane polymer
The ester bonds of the PUR were hydrolyzed by the PUR esterase of strain
TB-35 and that adipic acid and diethylene glycol was released as degradation products. This observation suggests that this enzyme is a novel plastic-
degrading esterase with properties different from those of lipase or PHA
depolymerase. Figure 4.9 shows the scanning electron micrograph of PUR in
which (A) Undegraded control; (B and C) PUR after degradation by 0.02 and
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 224/457
212 Bioprocessing of textiles
0.2 U of PUR esterase, respectively, for 24 h. The puried PUR esterase had
a high hydrophobicity, surface-binding domain and a catalytic domain. The
degradation of the PUR was done by two steps. The rst step is hydrophobic
adsorption of the enzyme to the surface of the PUR via the surface-binding
domain, and the second step is hydrolysis of the ester bond. From this
observation, it was thought that the surface binding site and catalytic site of
the PUR esterase exist in three-dimensionally close positions, unlike those
of PHA depolymerase. In this model, the catalytic domain can gain access to
the PUR surface even if the PUR surface has been saturated by the enzyme
molecules. However, since the number of adsorbable enzyme molecules per
surface area of the PUR is xed (Fig. 4.10), the PUR degradation activityremained constant. Furthermore, in contrast to PHA depolymerase, which is
strictly extracellular, the PUR esterase is bound to the cell surface; therefore,
the PUR esterase may have a cell surface-binding domain in addition to
catalytic and PUR surface-binding domains.
Fig. 4.9 SEM view of polyurethane (PUR); (a) undegraded control; (b and c) pur after
degradation by 0.02 and 0.2 u of PUR esterase, respectively, for 24 h.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 225/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 213
Fig. 4.10 Kinetic models of the surface binding and hydrolysis of PHA by PHA
depolymerase (a) and PUR by PUR esterase (b) [Source: Mukai et al. 1993]
Recently the potential of enzymes for surface hydrophilisation and/
or functionalisation of polyethyleneterephthalate (PET) and polyamide(PA) have been discovered (Sonja Heumann et al. 2006). However, there
was no correlation between enzyme class/activity (e.g. esterase, lipase,
cutinase) and surface hydrolysis of these polymers. Enzymes active on
the model substrates bis (benzoyloxyethyl) terephthalate and adipic acid
bishexyl-amide were also capable of increasing the hydrophilicity of PET
and PA. When dosed at the identical activity on 4-nitrophenyl butyrate,
only enzymes from Thermobida fusca, Aspergillus sp., Beauveria sp. and
commercial enzymes (TEXAZYME PES sp5 and Lipase PS) increased thehydrophilicity of PET bres. Hydrophilicity of bres was greatly improved
based on increases in rising height of up to 4.3 cm and the relative decrease
of water absorption time between control and sample of the water was up to
76%.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 226/457
214 Bioprocessing of textiles
4.3 Bioprocessing of polyamide and their
characteristics4.3.1 Nylon bres
Nylon (Polyamide), invented in 1928 by Wallace Carothers (DuPont) is
considered to be the rst engineering thermoplastic (Pezzin and Gechele
1964). Nylon is created when a condensation reaction occurs between amino
acids, dibasic acids and diamines. Commercially nylon is commonly used in
the production of tire cords, rope, belts, lter cloths, sports equipment and
bristles. Nylon was the rst truly synthetic bre and commercialized in 1939.
Nylon was developed in the 1930s by scientists at Du Pont, headed by anAmerican chemist Wallace Hume Caruthers (1896–1937). It is a polyamide
bre, derived from a diamine and a dicarboxylic acid. The two most
common versions are nylon 66 (polyhexamethylene adiamide) and nylon 6
(Polycaprolactam, a cyclic nylon intermediate). Raw materials for these are
variable and sources used commercially are benzene (from coke production
or oil rening), furfural (from oat hulls or corn cobs) or 1,4-butadiene (from
oil rening). Figure 4.11 shows the chemical reaction of Nylon 6 and Nylon
66 polymers (Galanty and Bujtas 1992).
Fig. 4.11 Chemical reaction of nylon 6 and nylon 66 polymers
Nylon is produced by melt spinning and is available in staple, tow,
monolament, and multi-lament form. The nylon bre has outstanding
durability and excellent physical properties. Nylons are semi-crystalline
polymers. The amide group -(-CO-NH-)- provides hydrogen bonding between
polyamide chains, giving nylon high strength at elevated temperatures,
toughness at low temperatures, combined with its other properties, such as
stiffness, wear and abrasion resistance, low friction coefcient and good
chemical resistance. These properties have made nylons the strongest of allman-made bres in common use. Because nylons offer good mechanical and
thermal properties, they are also a very important engineering thermoplastic.
For example, 35% of total nylon produced is used in the automobile industry
(Meplestor 1997). There are several commercial nylon products, such as
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 227/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 215
nylon 6, 11, 12, 6/6, 6/10, 6/12, and so on. Of these, the most widely used
nylon products in the textile industry are formed of nylon 6 and nylon 6/6. The
others are mainly used in tubing extrusion, injection molding, and coatings of
metal objects. Nylon’s outstanding characteristic in the textile industry is its
versatility. It can be made strong enough to stand up under the punishment
tire cords must endure, ne enough for sheer, high fashion hosiery, and light
enough for parachute cloth and backpacker’s tents. Nylon is used both alone
and in blends with other bres, where its chief contributions are strength and
abrasion resistance. Nylon washes easily, dries quickly, needs little pressing,
and holds its shape well since it neither shrinks nor stretches.
4.3.2 Properties of nylon bres
Tenacity-elongation at break ranges from 8.8g/d-18% to 4.3 g/d-45% (Han et
al. 1987). Its tensile strength is higher than that of wool, silk, rayon, or cotton.
The other properties of nylon bres are
• 100% elastic under 8% of extension
• Specic gravity of 1.14
• Melting point of 263oC
• Extremely chemically stable • No mildew or bacterial effects
• 4–4.5% of moisture regain
• Degraded by light
• Permanent set by heat and steam
• Abrasion resistant
• Easy to wash
• Resilient
• Filament yarn provides smooth, soft, long lasting fabrics
• Spun yarn lend fabrics light weight and warmth
4.3.3 Crystalline structure
Both nylon 6 and nylon 66 are semi-crystalline polymers. These linear aliphatic
polyamides are able to crystallize mostly because of strong intermolecular
hydrogen bonds through the amide groups, and because of Vander walls forces
between the methylene chains. Since these unique structural and thermo-
mechanical properties of nylons are dominated by the hydrogen bonds inthese polyamides, quantum chemistry can be used to determine the hydrogen
bond potential. For the α-form of nylon 6, adjacent chains are parallel and
the hydrogen bonding is between adjacent chains within the same sheet
(bisecting the CH2 angles). For formation of nylon 6, the chains are parallel
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 228/457
216 Bioprocessing of textiles
and the hydrogen bonding is between chains in adjacent sheets (Nagata and
Kiyotsukuri 1992). In nylon 66, the chains have no directionality. Research
results have shown that the stable crystalline structure is the form comprised
of stacks of planar sheets of hydrogen bonded extended chains. It also appears
that young’s modulus of the α-form is higher than the γ-form. Mechanical,
thermal and optical properties of bres are strongly affected by orientation and
crystallinity. Basically, higher bre orientation and crystallinity will produce
better properties. Crystallinity of nylons can be controlled by nucleation, i.e.,
seeding the molten polymer to produce uniform sized smaller spherulites. This
results in increased tensile yield strength, exural modulus, creep resistance,
and hardness, but some loss in elongation and impact resistance. Anotherimportant benet obtained from nucleation is decrease of setup time during
processing (Galanty and Bujtas 1992).
4.3.4 Environmental degradation properties
The -COOH and -NH2 end-groups in nylons are sensitive to light, heat, oxygen,
acids and alkali. When exposed to elevated temperatures, unmodied nylons
undergo molecular weight degradation, which results in loss of mechanical
properties. The degradation is highly time/temperature dependent (Shibusawa1996). By adding heat stabilizer, nylon can be used at elevated temperature
for long-term performance. Exposure to UV light results in degradation
nylon over an extended period of time; it appears that adding carbon black
can reduce the radiation degradation. Nylons are chemical resistance to
hydrocarbons, aromatic and strong acids, bases, and phenols attack aliphatic
solvents, but them. They also are gradually attacked hydrolytically by hot
water. Newly developed sulfonation of nylon 6 bre (El Garf and El kemry
1997) by 2,5 dichlorobenzene sulfonyl chloride (DSBC) has a great effect on
the heat and chemical stability of the bres. It reported that the modied bre
is non-melting up to 1000°C, and does not burn when put it in direct ame
(but chars without losing bre form). It does not dissolve in formic acid and
concentrated mineral acid. Its glass transition temperature is about 500°C.
4.3.5 Biodegradation of polyamides
4.3.5.1 Nylon 4
It has been reported that nylon 4 was degraded in the soil (Hashimoto et al.
1994) and in the activated sludge (Kawasaki et al. 2005). The results conrmed
that Nylon 4 is readily degradable in the environment. Furthermore, the
biodegradability of nylon 4 and nylon 6 blends was investigated in compost
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 229/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 217
and activated sludge. The nylon 4 in the blend was completely degraded
in 4 months while nylon 6 was not degraded (Hashimoto et al. 2002).
Recently, Yamano et al. (2008) was able to isolate polyamide 4 degrading
microorganisms (ND-10 and ND-11) from activated sludge. The strains were
identied as Pseudomonas sp. The supernatant from the culture broth of strain
ND-11 degraded completely the emulsied nylon 4 in 24 h and produced γ-
amino butyric acid (GABA) as degradation product.
4.3.5.2 Nylon 6
Polyamide (nylon) has excellent mechanical and thermal properties, good
chemical resistance and low permeability to gases, but it is known to be
resistant to degradation in the natural environment. The poor biodegradability
of nylon in comparison with aliphatic polyesters is probably due to its
strong inter-chain interactions caused by the hydrogen bonds between
molecular chains of nylon. Some microorganisms such as Flavobacterium
sp. (Kinoshita et al. 1975) and Pseudomonas sp. (NK87) (Kanagawa et
al. 1989) have been reported to degrade oligomers of nylon 6. Moreover,
some white rot fungal strains were reported to degrade nylon 66 through
oxidation processes (Deguchi et al. 1998). The biodegradation of nylon-6utilized in particular intrauterine devices (IUD) in vivo enzyme system has
been reported (Hudson and Crugnola 1987). For periods of two years or
longer, 67% of these devices examined had breaks in the coating of the tail
string. From results using synthesized specimens of 14C-labeled nylon-6,6
exposed, in vitro, to a number of enzyme solutions, nylon-6,6 was found to be
unaffected by esterase, but degraded by papain, trypsin, and chymotrypsin,
though the extent of degradation was small (Smith et al. 1987). Recently,
biochemical studies on the biodegradation of nylon-6,6 by a lignin-degrading
fungus were reported (Deguchi et al. 1998; Nomura et al. 2001). A nylon-
degrading enzyme was found in the culture medium of a white rot fungus
strain. The characteristics of the puried protein such as molecular weight,
absorption spectrum, and requirements for 2,6-dimethoxyphenol oxidation
were found to be identical to those of manganese peroxidase. The nylon-
degrading activity did not depend on exogenous H2O
2, but was inhibited
by catalase. These features are identical to those of the reaction catalyzed
by horseradish peroxidase. From the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)
analysis of the degradation products, it was proposed that the methylenegroup adjacent to the nitrogen atom in the polymer chain was attacked by
the enzyme, and subsequently the reaction proceeded auto-oxidatively (Fig.
4.12) (Nomura et al. 2001).
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 230/457
218 Bioprocessing of textiles
Fig. 4.12 Proposed mechanisms of nylon degradation by fungus peroxidase
[Source: Nomura et al. 2001].
A nylon-degrading enzyme found in the extracellular medium of a
ligninolytic culture of the white rot fungus strain IZU-154 was puried by ion-
exchange chromatography, gel ltration chromatography, and hydrophobic
chromatography (Tetsuya Deguchi et al. 1998). The characteristics of
the puried protein (i.e., molecular weight, absorption spectrum, and
requirements for 2,6-dimethoxyphenol oxidation) were identical to those of
manganese peroxidase, which was previously characterized as a key enzyme
in the ligninolytic systems of many white rot fungi. Nylon degradation is
catalyzed by manganese peroxidase (MnP). However, the reaction mechanism
for nylon degradation differed signicantly from the reaction mechanism
reported for manganese peroxidase. The nylon-degrading activity did notdepend on exogenous H
2O
2 but nevertheless was inhibited by catalase, and
superoxide dismutase inhibited the nylon-degrading activity strongly. These
features are identical to those of the peroxidase-oxidase reaction catalyzed
by horseradish peroxidase. In addition, α-hydroxy acids which are known to
accelerate the manganese peroxidase reaction inhibited the nylon-degrading
activity strongly. Degradation of nylon-6 bre was also investigated. Drastic
and regular erosion in the nylon surface was observed, suggesting that nylon
is degraded to soluble oligomers and that nylon is degraded selectively. Figure
4.13 shows the variations in surface properties after degradation of nylonbres. After 1 day of incubation, the smooth surface of the bre became rough,
but there was no change in diameter (Fig. 4.13b), indicating that the surface of
the bre was stripped. Subsequently, many horizontal grooves were observed
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 231/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 232/457
220 Bioprocessing of textiles
4.3.6 Enzymes in dye reduction on polyamide fabrics
Classical processes of indigo dyeing use sodium dithionite as reducing agent,causing enormous environmental problems. New process of indigo reduction
using NADH dependent reductases from Bacillus subtilis in the presence of
redox mediators is studied (Mojca Božič 2009). The efciency of mediated
enzymatic indigo reduction on the dyeing of decitex polyamides 6 and 6,6
was studied at 60°C, pH 7 and 11, and different indigo concentrations. The
color values and color fastness properties (to wash, light and perspiration)
were evaluated and compared to chemically indigo-dyed polyamides. The
results indicated that the dyeing properties were pH, time and polyamide
type dependent, resulting in the greater color depth of morphologically more
amorphous polyamide 6,6 dyed at pH 11 for 90 min. Both the alkaline and
acid perspiration fastness properties of the dyeing were very good, whereas
the dyeing displayed poorer fastness of 3—4 to light and wash.
4.4 Bioprocessing of regenerated cellulosic and
their characteristics
4.4.1 Viscose rayon
Viscose rayon is the regenerated cellulosic man-made bre and has a long
tradition. The primary raw material is cellulose derived from wood. The wood
of the Southern Pine grown in Florida is particularly suitable as it contains
60–70% cellulose (Lenz et al. 1993). Various processes turn the cellulose into
a thick spinning solution which is pressed through ne spinnerets. Extremely
thin continuous threads are produced, viscose lament yarns, mainly used
for making silk-like textiles. Viscose is made up for linings and mostly lightsummer wear, such as dresses, skirts, blouses, shirts, jackets and trousers.
There are also viscose staple bres, made by cutting the laments into specic
lengths. Viscose staple bres are mostly processed into cotton, wool or linen
like yarns and fabrics. Viscose has many characteristics, the properties varying
according to the method of processing. Textile fabrics made of viscose can be
dyed and printed extremely well and exhibit exceptionally brilliant colors.
Viscose breathes actively, regulates temperature well, making it especially
pleasant to the skin and have a silk-like brightness, soft, graceful ow and
high moisture absorption. The physical and chemical properties of viscose
rayon are given in Tables 4.4 and 4.5, respectively. Viscose rayon is a bre
made from regenerated wood cellulose. Viscose rayon is structurally similar
to cotton, which is almost pure cellulose (Bochek et al. 1997). Cellulose
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 233/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 221
is a linear polymer of β-D-glucose units with the empirical formula of
(C6H
10O
5)n. To prepare viscose, the cellulose is treated with sodium hydroxide
to form “alkali cellulose,” which has the chemical formula [C6H
9O
4-ONa]
n.
The alkali cellulose is then treated with carbon disulde to form a solution of
sodium cellulose xanthate, which is called viscose (Liu et al. 2001).
Table 4.4 Physical properties of viscose rayon
Tensile strength Tensile strength of the viscose rayon bre is less when
the bre is wet than dry conditions. It is 1.5–2.4 gpd in the
dry state and 0.7–1.2 gpd in the wet state.
Elasticity The elasticity of viscose rayon is less than 2–3%. This is
very important in handling viscose yarns during weaving,
wet processing when sudden tensions are applied.
Moisture absorption Viscose rayon absorbs more moisture than cotton bre.
Moisture content of cotton is 6–8% at 70°F and 65%
relative humidity, and for viscose rayon it is 11–13%
under the same conditions.
Elongation at break Viscose rayon has 15–30% elongation at break, while
high tenacity rayon has only 9–17% elongation at break.
Density The density of viscose rayon is 1.53 g/cc.
Action of heat and light At 300°F or more, viscose rayon loses its strength andbegins to decompose at 350–400°F. Prolonged exposure
to sunlight also weakens the bre due to moisture and
ultraviolet light of the sunlight.
Table 4.5 Chemical properties of viscose rayon
Action of acids Acids like H2SO
4, HCl breaks the cellulose to
hydrocellulose. Oxidizing agents like Na(OCl)2, Bleaching
powder, K2Cr
2O
7, KMnO
4 form oxycellulose. Organic acids
can be safely used in 1 to 2 percent concentration withoutinjury to the bre. Inorganic acids such as hydrochloric
and nitric can be used in strong concentrations. Oxalic
acid for removal of iron stains is not recommended except
at temperatures lower than 150°F.
Action of detergent Ordinary soaps in usual textile concentration have no
direct effect on regenerated cellulose materials. Improper
use of soap or use of poorly made soap results in rancidity
and odor in rayon fabrics or yarns.
Action of dry heat Most regenerated celluloses, under the inuence of heat
as well as light, show rapid loss in strength, this changebeing accompanied by an increase in copper number and
alkali solubility.
Action of solvents Textile solvents can be used on viscose rayon without
any deteriorating effect. Viscose rayon dissolves in
cuprammonium hydroxide solution.Contd...
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 234/457
222 Bioprocessing of textiles
Effect of iron Contact with iron in the form of ferrous hydroxide weakensviscose rayon yarns. Therefore staining, marking or
touching of rayon to iron or iron surface should be avoided.
Action of
microorganisms
Microorganisms (moulds, mildew, fungus, bacteria) affect
the colour, strength, dyeing properties and luster of rayon.
Clean and dry viscose rayon is rarely attacked by moulds
and mildew.
4.4.2 Application of viscose rayon bre
The viscose rayon is mainly used in four sectors namely apparels, home
furnishings, industrial uses and medical applications; (i) Apparel: Accessories,
blouses, dresses, jackets, lingerie, linings, millinery, slacks, sport shirts,
sportswear, suits, ties, work clothes, (ii) Home furnishings: Bedspreads,
blankets, curtains, draperies, sheets, slipcovers, tablecloths, upholstery,
(iii) Industrial uses: Industrial products, medical surgical products, nonwoven
products, tire cord and (iv) Medical applications: Feminine hygiene products.
4.4.3 Enzymatic treatment of viscose fabrics
Danuta Ciechańska et al. (2002) have made an attempt an enzyme-based
process applied in nishing viscose fabrics, which are very susceptible
to pilling. A normal viscose fabric has individual loose bres ends which
protrude from surface, and impurities and fuzzes. A commercial enzyme
of cellulase type Econase CE (Rohm Enzyme Finland) and experimental
cellulases such as endoglucanase II (EGII), cellobiohydrolase I (CBHI) and
cellulase enriched with EGII (Cell. F) from the Trichoderma reesei strains
prepared and were used for modication of viscose-woven fabrics. Viscose
woven fabric was exposed to the action of the enzyme solution in an acetic
buffer at pH 4.8 at temperature of 50°C by the dynamic method in a Linites
machine under the following process conditions.
• The modulus of Econase CE activity (of endo-1,4-glucanase) to the
sample weight (E/S) equaled 100 U/g. The dosage of Econase CE
was 8 mg of total protein per gram of fabric.
• The dosages of experimental enzymes (EGII, CBHI and Cell.F) were
5 mg of total protein per gram of fabric. The time of reaction was 60min. After the treatment, the enzyme solution was ltered, and the
fabrics were washed, rst with hot water and then several times with
cold water.
• The fabrics were dried at a temperature of 20 ± 2°C.
Contd...
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 235/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 223
4.4.3.1 Analytical test
The content of reducing sugars in cellulase enzyme solutions was assessed by a colorimetric method with dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) (Miller 1959). The
endo-1,4 glucanase activity of the cellulases was estimated by the colorimetric
method with caroboxy methyl cellulose (CMC) used as a substrate. The
fabric weight loss was assessed by the gravimetric method. The average
polymerization degree (DPv) was estimated by the viscometric method with an
alkali sodium-ferric-tartrate solution (EWNN) (Edelman and Horn 1953). The
cellulose content was determined in a sodium hydroxide solution according to
the Polish Standard. The water retention value (WRV) was estimated by the
gravimetric method. The molecular weight distribution was determined by
gel permeation chromatography. The mechanical properties of fabrics such
as breaking force, breaking force per cm and strain extension were measured
using an Instron 5544 machine in the weft direction. The appearance of the
fabric’s surface before and after enzymatic treatment was examined using a
Jeol JSM-35C (Japan) scanning electron microscope at 100 × magnication.
The results of previous studies on the biomodication of cellulosic
bres such as viscose, Lyocel, and Celsol which were conducted in the
Institute of Chemical Fibres formed the basis for the experiments concerningthe application of cellulases for nishing viscose woven fabrics (Danuta
Ciechańska et al. 2002). Investigations related to the modication of viscose
fabrics were carried out both in the presence of commercial cellualse (Econase
CE) and experimental enzymes (EGII, CBHI and CELL.F) from Trichoderma
reesei strains at 50°C for 60 min with continuous shaking. The course of the
bio-modication process was evaluated on the basis of molecular and morpho
logical characteristics as well as mechanical properties (Cavaco-Paulo et
al. 1996). Some test results of the studies concerned with the estimation of
the effect of cellulases used on the changes of fabric properties (i.e. average
polymerization degree (DPv), water retention value (WRV), weight loss,
breaking force and strain extension) are presented in Tables 4.6 and 4.7
(Ciechańska et al. 2002). Table 4.6 represents properties of viscose woven
fabric after commercial cellulase enzyme treatments and Table 4.7 represents
properties of viscose woven fabric after experimental enzymes treatments
(EGII – endoglucanase, CBHI – cellobiohydrolase, CELL.F – cellulase-
enriched endoglucanase).
On the basis of the test results obtained (Table 4.6), an insignicantdegradation process during the treatment of viscose fabric with Econase CE
was observed, which leads to a decrease in the average polymerisation degree
from DPv=324 for initial fabric to DPv=314 for the biomodied, and also to
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 236/457
224 Bioprocessing of textiles
an increase in weight loss to 1.4% (Evans et al. 1998; Pyæ et al. 1999). The
puried enzymes EGII and CBHI as well as CELL F which were used for the
treatment of viscose fabric (B) (Table 4.7) caused slight weight loss ranging
from 0.9 to1.3%, and also to an increase in the average polymerization degree,
from DPv = 502 for the initial to DPv = 547 for the modied fabric by CELL.F,
which resulted mainly from the solubilisation of low molecular fractions.
Neither the commercial nor the experimental cellulases used affected the
water retention value of the modied fabrics in comparison to the untreated
ones (Guziñska et al. 2002).
Table 4.6 Properties of viscose-woven fabric after commercial cellulase enzyme
treatments
Type of
fabric
Enzyme Weight
loss
( %)
DP WRV
(%)
Mechanical properties
Breaking
force
(daN)
Breaking
force per
cm (daN/
cm)
Strain
extension
(%)
Viscose
fabric – A
(untreated)
– – 324 80.3 19.5 7.8 36.5
Viscose
fabric – A
(treated)
Econase
CE1.35 314 79.4 16.3 6.5 41.8
Table 4.7 Properties of viscose-woven fabric after experimental enzymes treatments.
Type of
fabric
Enzyme Weight
loss
(%)
DP WRV
(%)
Mechanical properties
Breaking
force
(daN)
Breaking
force per
cm (daN/
cm)
Strain
extension
(%)
Viscose
fabric – B
(untreated)
– – 502 50.3 31.8 12.7 13.6
Viscose
fabric – B
(treated)
EG II 0.87 509 50.9 23.7 9.5 11.6
CBHI 0.90 519 50.4 30.4 12.2 13.7
CELL.F 1.32 547 49.6 27.9 11.2 13.8
The practical application of cellulase enzymes for viscose bre/fabric
modication is strongly connected with estimating the changes in mechanical properties occurring during treatment. On the basis of the results presented
(Table 4.8). It was observed that the breaking force of modied viscose fabric
(A) dropped by about 17%, whereas the breaking force of viscose fabric
(B) decreased by 25% with EGII, 4% with CBHI and 12% with CELL F in
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 237/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 225
comparison to the initial. The strain extension of viscose fabric (A) increased
by about 15% after Econase CE treatment, and that of viscose fabric (B)
decreased by about 15% with EGII, and was permanent with CBHI and
CELL. F.
Table 4.8 Molecular characteristic of modied viscose fabric after experimental
enzymes treatments
Type of
fabric
Type of
enzyme
Molecular characteristics
Mn ×
103
Mw ×
103
Pd DPw Percentage of DP fraction
200> 200–
550
>550
Viscose
fabric – B
(untreated)
– 22.3 71.3 3.2 440 41 35 24
Viscose
fabric – B
(treated)
EG II 26.5 73.7 2.8 455 36 37 27
CBHI 22.1 66.2 2.9 409 42 35 23
CELL.F 28.2 71.2 2.5 440 37 38 25
To determine the structural changes of fabrics which occurred as a result of
cellulase action, the molecular characteristic of initial and biomodied viscose
fabrics was estimated by gel permeation chromatography (GPC). Within the
studies of the biomodication process, the surface changes of viscose-woven
fabrics treated with both commercial and experimental cellulases was evaluated
using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). On the basis of the results, it can be
noted that the surface of initial viscose fabric (A) is characterized by the presence
of protruding individual bre ends and impurities, which must be removed in
order to improve the fabric quality (Cavaco-Paulo et al. 1998). Application of
cellulase type Econase CE to treat the viscose fabric cleanses its surface by
removing the individual bres as well as impurities and fuzzes. When the puried cellulases (EGII, CBHI and CELL.F) are applied, no signicant changes
in the microtopography of modied viscose fabric (B) are observed (Fig. 4.14).
To summarise, it can be concluded that for the experimental cellulases used,
it is necessary to optimize the parameters of the enzymatic process in order to
improve the effect of cleaning and smoothing of woven fabrics (Morgado and
Cavaco-Paulo 2000; Hardin et al. 1998).
4.4.4 Cellulase enzyme kinetics on viscose, lyocell andmodal
Carrillo et al. (2003) have made attempt to analyze the cellulase enzyme kinetics
on lyocell, viscose and modal bres of 1.7 dtex. The bres were washed in a
bath containing 1 g/litre of a nonionic surfactant with a 12:1 liquor ratio for
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 238/457
226 Bioprocessing of textiles
60 min. The fabrics (yarns of 56.8 tex in both warp and weft directions, plain
weave construction and weight of 283 g/m2) made with the staple bres of 1.7
dtex (average length of 38 mm), were subjected to the industrial process of
brillation by mechanical action in a jet machine. Fibrillation treatments were
carried out for 90 min at a temperature of 100°C and liquor to fabric ratio
of 10:1. The pH of the liquor was adjusted to 10 with Na2CO
3. Samples of
brillated lyocell were removed from the fabric for the enzymic treatment.
(a)
(c)
(b)
(d)
Fig. 4.14 SEM view of (a) normal viscose fabric; and enzyme modied by (b)
Endoglucanase EG II, (c) Celobiohydrolase CBH I, (d) Cellulase Cell. F. [Source: Danuta
Ciechańska et al. 2002]
Microorganism: Enzyme used was a commercial product of liquid acidic
cellulase produced by submerged fermentation of a nonpathogenic fungus. The
product was standardized to a declared activity of 400 EGU/g. determined by
a Novo Nordisk test method, AF 275. The experimental complex activity was
428.8 FPU/g of crude enzyme measured by the lter paper method (FP) as
described (Mandel et al. 1976). Enzymic hydrolysis involved 2.5 g of bre at
a temperature of 50°C and a liquor ratio of 80:1 (v/w). The enzyme hydrolysis
was carried out in a thermo stated reactor, with mechanical stirring (300 rpm) by using 0.05 M acetate buffer (pH 6). Initial enzyme concentrations of 6,
12.5 and 25 g/l were tested for different hydrolysis times (15, 30, 60 and 155
min). Finally the enzymes were deactivated by increasing the temperature to
80°C for 15 min.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 239/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 227
Testing: Sample solutions were removed at timed intervals and
the concentration of reducing sugars as glucose was determined by a
dinitrosalycilic acid method (Miller 1959) using glucose for calibration. From
this determination the rate of bre hydrolysis were calculated. The adsorption
of cellulase onto the bres during treatment was determined by means of the
loss of protein solution, using the Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 adsorption
method (Bradford et al. 1976). The approach relating the initial hydrolysis
rate (V0, g/l h) and the initial enzyme concentration ([E
0], g/l) was used to
calculate the rate of substrate turnover at saturation with enzyme (Vem) and
the half-saturation constant (Ke) by linearization of the experimental results
in equation [4.1].
Vem
[E0] =
Vem
[E0]
K e + [E
0]
[4.1]
Where V0 (g/l h) is the initial reaction rate, [E
0] (g/l) is the initial enzyme
concentration, Vem (g/l h) is the maximum rate of reaction at saturation with
enzyme and K e (g/l) is the half saturation constant relative to the substrate
sites. Adsorption of cellulase enzyme protein by regenerated cellulose bres
from a 12.5 g/l solution of a cellulase complex at pH 6.0, 50°C, liquor-to-
bre ratio 80:1 onto the modal, lyocell and viscose type bres is illustrated(Fig. 4.15). The initially rapid adsorption over the rst 30–60 min was
followed by a continuous slow decrease, which is believed to be due to a new
cellulose surface created as hydrolysis of the bres proceeded.
Fig. 4.15 Adsorption of cellulase enzyme protein by regenerated
cellulose bres [Source: Carrillo et al. 2003]
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 240/457
228 Bioprocessing of textiles
The maximum adsorption value was observed for a viscose rayon which
had the lower degree of crystallinity and amorphous orientation (Colom
and Carrillo 2002) and adsorption decreased in the following order: modal,
brillated lyocell and lyocell. Figure 4.16 shows the brillation treatment of
lyocel bres by cellulase which improved cellulase adsorption probably due
to an increase in accessibility produced by the formation of brils along the
surface of the bres.
Fig. 4.16 Typical SEM micrographs of lyocell bres: untreated (left) and brillated
(right) [Source: Carrillo et al. 2003]
The kinetics of various regenerated bres hydrolysis by a cellulase
enzyme complex ([E0] treated with/12.5 g/l, at pH 6, 50°C, liquor-to-bre
ratio 80:1 was studied and the corresponding rate of production of soluble
reducing sugars with an initial enzyme concentration of 12.5 g/l (Fig. 4.17)for the different substrates. Comparing regenerated celluloses, the viscose
bres showed maximal hydrolysis with great differences mainly at extended
hydrolysis times, where the adsorption step was less important. Modal bres
had a similar behavior to lyocell bres, probably due to their high molecular
orientation (Fink et al. 2001), although showing a higher degree of hydrolysis
than the more crystalline lyocell bres. Treated lyocell bres showed
higher enzyme hydrolysis than the original (Walker and Wilson 1991). This
difference can be explained by the damaged bres on the surface and a more
open structure of brillated lyocell bres (Fig. 4.16).
Table 4.9 shows the effect of initial enzyme concentration on the degree
of saccharication of viscose, modal and treated and untreated lyocell bres
treated at 500°C, pH 6 and liquor to bre ratio80:1 and 155 min.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 241/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 229
Fig. 4.17 Kinetics of various regenerated bres hydrolysis by a cellulase enzyme
complex [Source: Carrillo et al. 2003]
Table 4.9 Degree of hydrolysis % of regenerated cellulosic bres by cellulase enzyme
Cellulase
concentration [Eo]
Viscose Modal Lyocell
fbrillated
Lyocell
6 g/l 6.6 3.3 1.7 1.6
12.5 g/l 10.7 4.6 3.1 2.7
25 g/l 14.3 6.0 6.2 5.0
Figure 4.18 shows the relationship between maximum hydrolysis rateand enzyme concentration on the regenerated cellulosic bres. The rate of
hydrolysis increased with increasing initial enzyme concentration. It was not
proportional to the enzyme concentration due to the saturation of the catalytic
reaction surface (Eginer et al. 1985). From linearization of these curves, by
application of Eq. (1), kinetics parameters Vem and Ke have been determined
and the catalytic specicity of the enzyme has been calculated. The values
obtained are shown in Table 4.10. The half saturation constant Ke can be
interpreted as an apparent dissociation constant of the entire enzyme bound
species. This dissociation constant is higher for the viscose bre, comparing
untreated bres, because they have a more accessible cellulose substrate
(Colom and Carrillo 2002). This indicates that the concentration of the
enzyme/substrate complex (ES) at the equilibrium state is not high so enzyme
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 242/457
230 Bioprocessing of textiles
concentration is greater in the non-associated form (low enzyme afnity for
substrate) and is ready for the next catalysis reaction. Modal samples show
kinetic parameters more closely similar to those of untreated lyocell than to
viscose bres, probably due to the high amorphous orientation structure of
modal and lyocell bres (Lenz et al. 1992).
Fig. 4.18 Relationship between maximum hydrolysis rate and enzyme concentration
for regenerated cellulose bres [Source: Carrillo et al. 2003]
Table 4.10 Cellulase enzyme kinetics on various bres
Enzyme kinetics Viscose Modal Lyocell
fbrillated
Lyocell
Vem
(g/l h) 1.20 0.56 0.55 0.41
Ke (g/l) 12.7 7.63 13.29 8.79
Vem
/Kc (per h) 0.094 0.074 0.042 0.046
Lyocell bres present a low value of half saturation constant (K e),
although after the brillation treatment a signicant increase of K e was
observed because they have a more accessible cellulose structure. This changemeans that brillation treatment of lyocell bres produces a more synergistic
cellulase action by increasing the dissociation of the enzyme bound species,
leaving free enzyme for catalysis (Valldeperas et al. 2000). Moreover, the
brillation effect produces little increase of the maximum rate of hydrolysis
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 243/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 231
for lyocell, although the rate continues being lower than for viscose and modal
bres. The untreated and brillated lyocell bres have the lowest catalytic
specicity (Table 4.10) by the Vem/Ke relationship. This relationship is
directly correlated to the maximum rate of hydrolysis respect of the enzyme
afnity for substrate (related to 1/ke). The higher values for viscose suggest
that enzyme attack at the ends of viscose cellulose chain is a more specic
catalysed reaction than random cellulose scission on lyocell bres.
From the adsorption experiments results show low cellulase adsorption
on lyocell bres due to the higher orientation and crystallinity of these
regenerated cellulosic bres and ahead of viscose or modal bres (Baley
1989). Moreover, brillated lyocell bres have more binding sites on the bresurface, increasing cellulase adsorption. The kinetics of the enzymic hydrolysis
of lyocell and viscose type bres can be accurately described by steady-state
Eq. [4.1], which includes two parameters providing important mechanistic
information about cellulase hydrolysis. The morphology and structure
(crystallinity and orientation) of the different regenerated bres studied lead
to different rates of cellulosic degradation suitable for an industrial process of
cellulose conversion.
Cotton, linen, ramie, and viscose rayon fabrics along with a cotton/linen
blend were hydrolyzed with cellulase from Trichoderma viride (Buschle-Diller et al. 1994). Surface brils were eliminated by a 6-hour treatment in all
cases. The loss of brillar matter appeared to be the primary cause of weight
loss at this stage. On prolonged treatment, cotton, linen, and viscose rayon
lost weight at a faster rate than ramie and the cotton / linen blend. From the
test analysis, the fall in yam strength was progressive with increasing weight
loss for cotton and viscose, while for linen and ramie it was slight initially and
then increased sharply. Retention of strength after 48 hours’ incubation time
increased in the order viscose rayon << cotton < ramie < linen, whereas weightloss increased in the order ramie < linen < cotton < viscose rayon. X-ray
crystallinity and moisture sorption of the samples did not change after the
treatment, indicating that the mechanism of endwise attack of the cellulase at
accessible cellulose chains on crystallite surfaces appeared to apply to all four
bres. Shen et al. (2004) also studied the explicit form of the kinetic equation
for the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose bres with SF enzyme is derived.
This equation is effective for estimating and controlling hydrolysis reactions
of cellulose with cellulase. With this equation, it is possible to calculate the
maximum digestibility and the half maximum digestion constant. Under thesame experimental conditions, the maximum digestibility of bres treated
with SF cellulase decreases in the order viscose rayon > cotton > ax, whereas
the concentration of cellulase needed to digest the same fraction of hydrolyzed
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 244/457
232 Bioprocessing of textiles
cellulose decreases in the order ax > cotton > viscose rayon. The enzymatic
hydrolysis rate of bres is greatly affected by cellulase concentration. The
results show that the rate is proportional to cellulase concentration at a lower
level, while at too high a concentration, the rate increases very little with
increased concentration. Thus, it is not rational to select too high a cellulase
concentration for the process.
4.4.5 Wash down effect by cellulase enzyme
The study was made attempt to analyze the effects of cellulase enzymes on the
physical and aesthetic properties of viscose rayon and Tencel materials both
dyed and unnished fabrics forms which were subjected to enzymatic treatment
in a Unimac garment washing machine. The trials were conducted with three
different acid-stable cellulase enzymes at medium and high activities for 60
and 120 min. The fabrics were then analyzed for improvements in aesthetics
and deterioration in physical properties. Aesthetics of viscose rayon fabrics
were assessed using subjective hand evaluations color loss data and surface
appearance. Physical properties, after enzyme treatment, were evaluated
using weight loss, tensile strength, and tearing strength data. The viscose
rayon fabric appearance was affected by enzymatic treatment, but little tensilestrength deterioration occurred after cellulase enzyme treatment at various
concentration levels. The viscose and Tencel fabric acquired a “washed down”
look typical of denim fabric. This look might be desirable for casual garments.
The softness of these fabrics, however, was not drastically improved after
bioprocessing with cellulase. The appearance and physical properties of the
Tencel fabric were greatly changed by enzymatic treatment when compared to
viscose rayon. Substantial tensile strength losses of up to 50% were obtained;
however, the treatment dramatically improved the brillation tendency of
the Tencel fabric. The most improved appearance was obtained on fabric
that lost half its strength. Enzymatic treatment on Tencel could prove very
valuable if the proper compromise can be made between strength properties
and aesthetics with various concentrations of cellulase enzyme treatments.
4.5 Biodegradability of plastics
Plastic is a broad name given to different polymers with high molecular
weight, which can be degraded by various processes. However, consideringtheir abundance in the environment and their specicity in attacking plastics,
biodegradation of plastics by microorganisms and enzymes seems to be the
most effective process (Tokiwa 2009). With the advances in technology
and the increase in the global population, plastic materials have found wide
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 245/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 233
applications in every aspect of life and industries. However, most conventional
plastics such as polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, poly(vinyl
chloride) and poly(ethylene terephthalate), are non biodegradable, and their
increasing accumulation in the environment has been a threat to the planet
(Chandra and Rustgi 1998). The rst strategy involved production of plastics
with high degree of degradability. Bio-plastics consist of either biodegradable
plastics (i.e., plastics produced from fossil materials) or bio-based plastics
(i.e., plastics synthesized from biomass or renewable resources). Figure 4.19
shows the inter-relationship between biodegradable plastics and bio-based
plastics.
Fig. 4.19 Bio-plastics comprised of biodegradable plastics and bio-based plastics
[Source: Yutaka Tokiwa et al. 2009]
Polycaprolactone (PCL) and polybutylene succinate (PBS) are petroleum
based, but they can be degraded by microorganisms. On the other hand,
poly(hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), poly(lactide) (PLA) and starch blends are
produced from biomass or renewable resources, and are thus biodegradable.Despite the fact that polyethylene (PE) and Nylon 11 (NY11) can be produced
from biomass or renewable resources, they are non-biodegradable. Acetyl
cellulose (AcC) is either biodegradable or non-biodegradable, depending
on the degree of acetylation. Biodegradable plastics are seen by many as a
promising solution to this problem because they are environment-friendly.
They can be derived from renewable feed stocks, thereby reducing greenhouse
gas emissions. For instance, polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) and lactic acid
(raw materials for PLA) can be produced by fermentative biotechnological
processes using agricultural products and microorganisms (Wang and Lee
1997; Tokiwa and Ugwu 2007; Tokiwa and Calabia 2008). Furthermore,
biodegradable plastics can be recycled to useful metabolites (monomers and
oligomers) by microorganisms and enzymes. A typical example can be seen
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 246/457
234 Bioprocessing of textiles
in the case of some aliphatic polyester such as PCL and PBS that can be
degraded with enzymes and microorganisms (Tokiwa et al. 1976; Tokiwa
1977a; Tokiwa and Suzuki 1977b).
4.5.1 Polymer degrading microorganisms
The enzymatic degradation of plastics by hydrolysis is a two-step process:
rst, the enzyme binds to the polymer substrate then subsequently catalyzes
a hydrolytic cleavage. Polymers are degraded into low molecular weight
oligomers, dimers and monomers and nally mineralized to CO2 and H
2O.The
clear zone method with agar plates is a widely used technique for screening
polymer degraders and for assessment of the degradation potential of different
microorganisms towards a polymer. Agar plates containing emulsied
polymers are inoculated with microorganisms and the presence of polymer
degrading microorganisms can be conrmed by the formation of clear halo
zones around the colonies.
4.5.2 Factors affecting the biodegradability of polymers
materials
The properties of polymers are associated with their biodegradability. Both
the chemical and physical properties of polymers inuence the mechanism
of biodegradation. The bre polymer surface conditions (surface area,
hydrophilic, and hydrophobic properties), the rst order structures (chemical
structure, molecular weight and molecular weight distribution) and the high
order structures (glass transition temperature, melting temperature, modulus
of elasticity, crystallinity and crystal structure) of polymers play important
roles in the biodegradation processes.
In general, polyesters with side chains are less assimilated than those
without side chains (Tokiwa et al. 1976). The molecular weight is also
important for the biodegradability because it determines many physical
properties of the polymer. Increasing the molecular weight of the polymer
decreased its degradability. PCL with higher molecular weight (Mn > 4,000)
was degraded slowly by Rhizopus delemar lipase (endo-cleavage type) than
that with low Mn (Tokiwa and Suzuki 1978; Iwata and Doi 1998). Moreover,
the morphology of polymers greatly affects their rates of biodegradation.
The degree of crystallinity is a crucial factor affecting biodegradability,since enzymes mainly attack the amorphous domains of a polymer. The
molecules in the amorphous region are loosely packed, and thus make
it more susceptible to degradation. The crystalline part of the polymers is
more resistant than the amorphous region. The rate of degradation of PLA
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 247/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 235
decreases with an increase in crystallinity of the polymer (Tsuji and Miyauchi
2001). The melting temperature (Tm) of polyesters has a strong effect on the
enzymatic degradation of polymers (Fig. 4.20). The higher the Tm, the lower
the biodegradation of the polymer (Tokiwa et al. 1979; Tokiwa and Suzuki
1981). In general, Tm is represented by the following Eq. [4.2]:
Tm = ΔH/ΔS [4.2]
Fig. 4.20 Relationship between Tm and biodegradability of polyesters by r. arrhizus
lipase [Source: Yutaka Tokiwa et al. 2009]
where ΔH was the change of enthalpy in melting and ΔS is the change
of entropy in melting. It is well known that the interactions among polymerchains mainly affect the ΔH value and that the internal rotation energies
corresponding to the rigidity (the exibility) of the polymer molecule
remarkably affect the ΔS value. The chemical structures of aliphatic polyester,
polycarbonate, polyurethane and polyamides, together with their (Tm)s are
listed in Table 4.11. The aliphatic polyesters [ester bond (-CO-O-)] and
polycarbonates [carbonate bond (-O-CO-O-)] are two typical plastic polymers
that show high potential for use as biodegradable plastics, owing to their
susceptibilities to lipolytic enzymes and microbial degradation. Compared
with aliphatic polyesters and polycarbonates, aliphatic polyurethane and
polyamides (nylon) have higher Tm values. The high (Tm)s of polyurethane
and polyamide (nylon) are caused by the large ΔH value due to the presence
of hydrogen bonds among polymer chains based on the urethane bond (-NH-
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 248/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 249/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 237
mesophilic temperatures and very few of them were capable of degrading
PHB at higher temperature (Tokiwa et al. 1988; Liu et al. 2000). Tokiwa et
al. (1992) have emphasized that composting at high temperature is one of
the most promising technologies for recycling biodegradable plastics and
thermophilic microorganisms that could degrade polymers play an important
role in the composting process. Thus, microorganisms that are capable of
degrading various kinds of polyesters at high temperatures are of interest. A
thermophilic Streptomyces sp. Isolated from soil can degrade not only PHB
but also PES, PBS. This actinomycete has higher PHB-degrading activity
than thermotolerant and thermophilic Streptomyces strains from culture
collections (Calabia and Tokiwa 2004). A thermotolerant Aspergillus sp. wasable to degrade 90% of PHB lm after ve days cultivation at 50°C (Sanchez
and Tsuchii 2000). Furthermore, several thermophilic polyester degrading
actinomycetes were isolated from different ecosystems. Out of 341 strains, 31
isolates were PHB, PCL and PES degraders and these isolates were identied
as members of the genus Actinomadura, Microbispora, Streptomyces,
Thermoactinomyces and Saccharomonospora (Tseng et al. 2007).
4.5.3.2 Poly (Lactic Acid) (PLA)
PLA ([-O(CH3)CHCO-]n) is a biodegradable and biocompatible thermoplastic
which can be produced by fermentation from renewable resources (Jang et al.
2007). It can also be synthesized either by condensation polymerization of
lactic acid or by ring opening polymerization of lactide in the presence of
a catalyst. This polymer exists in the form of three stereoisomers: poly(L-
lactide) (L-PLA), poly(D-lactide) (D-PLA) and poly(DL-lactide) (DL-PLA).
The manufacture of PLA from lactic acid was pioneered by Carothers in 1932
(Carothers and Hill 1932). Ecological studies on the abundance of PLA-
degrading microorganisms in different environments have conrmed that
PLA-degraders are not widely distributed, and thus it is less susceptible to
microbial attack compared to other microbial and synthetic aliphatic polymers
(Tansengco and Tokiwa 1998). The degradation of PLA in soil is slow and that
takes a long time for degradation to start (Uruyama et al. 2002; Ohkita and
Lee 2006). Since then, a number of research studies dealing with microbial
and enzymatic degradation of PLA have been published (Tokiwa and Calabia
2006). Many strains of genus Amycolatopsis and Saccharotrix were able
to degrade both PLA and silk broin. The main amino acid constituents ofsilk broin are L-alanine and glycine and there is a similarity between the
stereochemical position of the chiral carbon of L-lactic acid unit of PLA and
L-alanine unit in the silk broin. Silk broin is one of the natural analogues
of poly(L-lactide), thus, the PLA degrading microorganisms may probably
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 250/457
238 Bioprocessing of textiles
identify the L-lactate unit as an analogue of L-alanine unit in silk broin.
Several proteinous materials such as silk broin, elastin, gelatin and some
peptides and amino acids were found to stimulate the production of enzymes
from PLA-degrading microorganisms (Pranamuda et al. 2001; Jarerat and
Tokiwa 2001, 2003a, 2003b, 2004). Williams (1981) has investigated the
enzymatic degradation of PLA using proteinase K, bromelain and pronase.
Among these enzymes, proteinase K from Tritirachium album was the most
effective for PLA degradation. Proteinase K and other serine proteases are
capable of degrading L-PLA and DL-PLA but not D-PLA. Furthermore,
proteinase K preferentially hydrolyzes the amorphous part of L-PLA and the
rate of degradation decreases with an increase in the crystalline part (Reeveand McCarthy 1994; McDonald et al. 1996). Fukuzaki et al. (1989) reported
that the degradation of PLA oligomers was accelerated by several esterase-type
enzymes, especially Rhizopus delemar lipase. The puried PLA depolymerase
from Amycolatopsis sp. was also capable of degrading casein, silk broin,
Suc-(Ala)3-pNA but not PCL, PHB and Suc-(Gly)3-pNA (Pranamuda et al.
2001). Their studies showed that PLA depolymerase was a kind of protease
and not a lipase. It was reported that α-chymotrypsin can degrade PLA and
PEA with lower activity on poly (butylenes succinate-co-adipate) (PBS/A).
Moreover, several serine proteases such as trypsin, elastase, and subtilisinwere able to hydrolyze L-PLA (Lim 1995).
4.5.3.3 Polyethylene (PE)
PE is a stable polymer, and consists of long chains of ethylene monomers. PE
cannot be easily degraded with microorganisms. However, it was reported that
lower molecular weight PE oligomers ( Mw = 600–800) was partially degraded
by Acinetobacter sp. 351 upon dispersion, while high molecular weight PE
could not be degraded (Tsuchii et al. 1980). Furthermore, the biodegradability
of low density PE/starch blends was enhanced with compatibilizer (Biliaris
and Panayiotou 1998). Biodegradability of PE can also be improved by
blending it with biodegradable additives, photo-initiators or copolymerization
(Grifn 2007; Hakkarainen and Albertsson 2004). The initial concept of
blending PE with starch was established in UK to produce paper-like PE bag.
A few years later, the idea to blend PE with starch and photoinitiators was
conceived as a way of saving petroleum, though its biodegradability was also
taken into account. Environmental degradation of PE proceeds by synergisticaction of photo-and thermo-oxidative degradation and biological activity (i.e.,
microorganisms). When PE is subjected to thermo- and photo-oxidization,
various products such as alkanes, alkenes, ketones, aldehydes, alcohols,
carboxylic acid, keto-acids, dicarboxylic acids, lactones and esters are
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 251/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 239
released. Blending of PE with additives generally enhances auto-oxidation,
reduces the molecular weight of the polymer and then makes it easier for
microorganisms to degrade the low molecular weight materials. It is worthy
to note that despite all these attempts to enhance the biodegradation of PE
blends, the biodegradability with microorganisms on the PE part of the blends
is still very low.
4.5.3.4 Polypropylene (PP)
PP is a thermoplastic which is commonly used for plastic moldings, stationary
folders, packaging materials, plastic tubs, non-absorbable sutures, diapers
etc (Iwamoto and Tokiwa 1994). PP can be degraded when it is exposed to
ultraviolet radiation from sunlight. Furthermore, at high temperatures, PP
is oxidized. The possibility of degrading PP with microorganisms has been
investigated (Cacciari et al. 1993).
4.5.3.5 Polystyrene (PS)
PS is a synthetic hydrophobic polymer with high molecular weight. PS is
recyclable but not biodegradable. Although it was reported that PS lm was biodegraded with an Actinomycete strain, the degree of biodegradation was
very low (Mor and Silvan 2008). At room temperature, PS exists in solid
state. When it is heated above its glass transition temperature, it ows and
then turns back to solid upon cooling. PS being a transparent hard plastics
is commonly used as disposable cutleries, cups, plastic models, packing and
insulation materials.
4.5.4 Future prospects
Biodegradable polymer is an innovative means of solving the plastic disposal
problem from the standpoint of development of new materials. In general,
plastics are water-insoluble, thermo-elastic polymeric materials (Witt et al.
1995; Abou-Zeid et al. 2001). Biodegradability of plastics is affected by
both their chemical and physical properties. Beside the covalent forces of
polymer molecules, various kinds of weak forces (i.e., hydrogen bond forces,
van der Waals forces, coulombic forces, etc.) among macromolecular chains
affect not only the formation of polymer aggregates, but also the structure
and physical properties and function (reactivity) of the polymer aggregates.
The biodegradation mechanisms of plastics as shown in this review can be
applied to biomasses that are composed of polymeric materials (i.e., cellulose,
hemicellulose, lignin, chitin, silk broin, etc.). Lipolytic enzymes such as
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 252/457
240 Bioprocessing of textiles
lipase and esterase can hydrolyze not only fatty acid esters and triglycerides,
but also aliphatic polyesters. Lipolytic enzyme has an important role in the
degradation of natural aliphatic polyesters such as cutin, suberin and esteroid
in the natural environment and animal digestive tract. However, it is not
certain whether human body produces any aliphatic polyester or not.
4.6 References
Abou-Zeid, D.M., Muller, R.J., Deckwer, W.D., ‘Degradation of natural and synthetic
polyesters under anaerobic conditions’, J Biotechn, 2001, 86, 113–126.
Achwal, W.B., ‘A comparative study of surface action of caustic soda on polyester under
different conditions’, Man-Made Textiles India, 1984, 27, 185–189.
Akbar Khoddami, Mohammad Morshed, and Hossein Tavanai, ‘Effects of Enzymatic
Hydrolysis on Drawn Polyester Filament Yarns’, Iranian Polymer J, 2001, 10(6), 363–370.
Arabuli, N., Tsitlanadze, G., Edilashvili, L., Kharadze, D., Goguadze, T., Beridze,
V., Gomurashvili, Z., Katsarava, R., ‘Heterochain polymers based on natural amino-
acids-synthesis and enzymatic hydrolysis of regular poly(ester amide)s based on bis(L-
phenylalanine) alpha, omega-alkylene diesters and adipic acid’, Macromol Chem Phys,
1994, 195, 2279–89.
Baley, J., ‘Enzyme kinetics of cellulose hydrolysis’, Biochem J, 1989, 262, 1001–2.
Bankova, M., Kumar, A., Gross, R.A., Impallomeni, G., Ballistreri, A., ‘Control of
polyester chain scission by lipase catalysis’, Polymer, 2000, 41, 1822–23.
Bendak, A., and El-Marsa, S.M., ‘Effects of chemical modications on polyester bres’,
J Islamic Academy of Sci, 1991, 4(4), 275–284.
Bikiaris, D., Panayiotou, C., ‘LDPE/starch blends compatibilizer with PEGMA
copolymers’, J Appl Polym Sci, 1998, 70, 1503–21.
Bisht, K.S., Deng, F., Gross, R.A., Kaplan, D.L., Swift, G., ‘Ethyl glucoside as a
multifunctional initiator for enzyme-catalyzed regioselective lactone ring-opening
polymerization’, J Am Chem Soc, 1998, 120, 1363–67.
Bisht, K.S., Svirkin, Y.Y., Henderson, L.A., Gross, R.A., Kaplan, D.L., Swift, G., ‘Lipase-
catalyzed ring-opening polymerization of trimethylene carbonate’, Macromolecules, 1997,
30, 7735–42.
Bochek, A.M., Petropavlovsky, G.A., Yakimansky, A.V., Kennedy, J.F., Phillips, G.O.,
Williams, P.A., Piculell, L., Cellulose and cellulose derivates: physico-chemical aspects
and industrial applications, Woodhead Publishing Limited, 1995.
Bradford, M.M., ‘A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities
of protein utilizing the principle of protein/dye binding’, Anal Biochem, 1976, 72, 248–54.
Bruce, M.L., ‘Improved tactile and sorption: Properties of polyester fabrics through caustic
treatment’, Text Res J, 1984, 54(11), 766–75.
Buschle-Diller, G., Zeronian, S.H., Pan, N., Yoon, M.Y., ‘Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cotton,
Linen, Ramie, and Viscose Rayon Fabrics’, Text Res J, 1994, 64(5), 270–79.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 253/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 241
Calabia, B.P., Tokiwa, Y., ‘Microbial degradation of poly(D-3-hydroxybutyrate) by a new
thermophilic streptomyces isolate’, Biotech Lett, 2004, 26, 15–19.
Carlene, P.W., ‘The measurement of the bending modulus of monols’, J Text Inst, 1947,
30, 38–42.
Carothers, W.H., Hill, J.W., ‘Studies of polymerization and ring formation. XV. Articial
bres from synthetic linear condensation super polymers’, J Am Chem Soc, 1932, 54,
1579–96.
Carrillo, F., Colom, X., Lo´pez-Mesas, M., Lis, M.J., Gonza´lez, F., Valldeperas, M.,
‘Cellulase processing of lyocell and viscose type bres: kinetics parameters’, Process
Biochemistry, 2003, 39, 257–261.
Carrillo, F., Colom, X., Lopez-Mesas, M., Lis, M.J., Gonzalez, F., Valldeperas, M.,
‘Cellulase processing of lyocell and viscose type bres: kinetics parameters’, Process Biochemistry, 2003, 39, 257–61.
Cavaco-Paulo, A., Almeida, L., Bishop, D., ‘Effects of Agitation and Endoglucanase
Pretreatment on the Hydrolysis of Cotton Fabrics by a Total Cellulase’, Text Res J, 1996,
66(5), 287–294.
Cavalco-Paulo, A., and Gübitz, G.M., ‘Textile Processing with Enzymes’, CRC Press,
Washington D.C., 2003.
Chandra, R., Rustgi, R., ‘Biodegradable polymers’, Prog Polym Sci, 1998, 23, 1273–85.
Chattopadhyay, D.P., Singh, R.K., Patra, T.N., and Samanta, A.K., ‘Effect of pretreatment
with solvents and solvent mixtures on the structure/properties and dye uniformity of
textured polyester yarns’, Indian J Fibre Text Res, 1998, 23, 267–276.
Chaudhary, A.K., Lopez, J., Beckman, E.J., and Russell, A.J., ‘Biocatalyic solvent-free
polymerization to produce high molecular weight polyesters’, Biotechnol Prog, 1997, 13,
318–325.
Chidambaram, D., Venkatraj, R., and Manisankar, P., ‘Tensile behavior of polyester yarns
modied by solvent acid mixture pretreatment process’, Indian J Fibre Text Res, 2004, 29,
163–172.
Choi, K.F., and Kim, K.L., ‘Fibre segment length distribution on the yarn surface in relation
to yarn abrasion resistance’, Text Res J, 2004, 74, 603–606.
Chowdhury, A.A., ‘Poly-β-hydroxybuttersaure abbauende Bacterium under exo-enzyme’,
Arch Microbio, 1963, 47, 167–200.
Claire Sumner, Stef Krause, Andrea Sabot, Katrina Turner, Calum McNeil, ‘Biosensor
based on enzyme-catalysed degradation of thin polymer Films’, Biosensors &
Bioelectronics, 2001, 16, 709–714.
Claire Sumner, Stef Krause, Andrea Sabot, Katrina Turner, Calum McNeil, ‘Biosensor
based on enzyme-catalysed degradation of thin polymer Films’, Biosensors and
Bioelectronics, 2001, 16, 709–714.
Colom, X., Carrillo, F., ‘Crystallinity changes in lyocell and viscose type bres by caustic
treatment’, Eur Polym J, 2002, 38(11), 2225–30.
Crabbe, J.R., Campbell, R., Thompson, L., Walz, S.L., and Schultz, W.W., ‘Biodegradation
of a colloidal ester-based polyurethane by soil fungi’, Int Biodeterior Biodegrad, 1994,
33:103–113.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 254/457
242 Bioprocessing of textiles
Danuta Ciechańska, Henryk Struszczyk, Arja Miettinen-Oinonen, and Grażyna Strobin,
‘Enzymatic Treatment of Viscose Fibres Based Woven Fabric’, Fibres & Text in Eastern
Europe, 2002, 35(2), 45–62.
Darby, R.T., and Kaplan, A.M., ‘Fungal susceptibility of polyurethanes’, Appl Microbiol,
1968, 16, 900–5.
Deguchi, T., Kakezawa, M., Nishida, T., ‘Nylon degradation by lignin-degrading fungi’,
Appl Environ Microbiol, 1997, 63, 329–331.
Deguchi, T., Kitaoka, Y., Kakzawa, M., Nishida, T., ‘Purication and characterization of a
nylon-degrading enzyme’, Appl Environ Microbiol, 1998, 64, 1366–71.
Dong, H,, Wang, H., Cao, S., Shen, J.C., ‘Lipase-catalyzed polymerization of lactones and
linear hydroxyesters’, Biotechnol Lett, 1998, 20, 905–8.
Edelman K, Horn E, ‘Fabric treatments by bacterial enzymes’, Faserforschung Textiltech,
7, 153, 1953.
Eginer, W.D., Huber, A., Schurz, J., ‘The reaction system cellulose cellulase’, Cellulose
Chem Tech, 1985, 19, 579–89.
El Garf, S.A., and El kemry, S.M., ‘Modifying Nylon 6 by Treating with Dichloro benzene
sulfonyl Chloride’, Text Res J, 1997, 67, 13–17.
El-Gendy, E.H.K., ‘Modication of polyester fabric via radiation grafting with methacrylic
acid’, Indian J Fibre Text Res, 2004, 29, 129–137.
Evans, B., Lee, I., Woodward, J., Fox, S., ‘Enzyme Applications in Fibre Processing’, ACS
Symp Series, American Chemical Society, Washington DC, 1998, 228.
Ferrus, R., Fayes, P., Cell Chem Techn, 11, 663, 1977.
Fink, H.P., Weigel, P., Purz, H.J., ‘Structure formation of regenerated cellulose materials
from NMMO-solutions’, Prog Polym Sci, 2001, 26, 1473–84.
Fite, G.F.J., ‘Dyeing Polyester at Low Temperatures: Kinetics of Dyeing with Disperse
Dyes’, Text Res J, 1995, 65(6), 362–368.
Froehlich Fritz W, ‘Restructuring, Innovation See Akzo Nobel Through Difcult Business
Environment’, Int Fibre J, 1997, 12, 3–18.
Fukuhara Mototada, ‘Innovation in Polyester Fibres: from Silk-like to New Polyester’,
Text Res J, 1993, 63, 387–91.
Fukuzaki, H., Yoshida, M., Asano, M., Kumakura, M., ‘Synthesis of copoly (D, L-lactic
acid) with relative low molecular weight and in vitro degradation’, Eur Polym J, 1989, 25,
1019–26.
Galanty, P.G., and Bujtas, G.A., ‘Modern Plastics Encyclopedia’, McGraw Hill, 1992,
23–30.
Ghosh, P., and Samanta, A.K., ‘Chemical texturing or bulking of rotor spun jute/polyester
bre blended yarns’, J Text Inst, 1997, 88(3), 209–231.
Gorrafa, A.M., ‘Caustic treatment of polyester lament fabric’, Text Chemical Color, 1980,
12, 83–85.
Grifn, G.J.L., ‘Degradation of polyethylene in compost burial’, J Polym Sci Polym Symp,
2007, 57, 281–6.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 255/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 243
Gross, R.A., Kalra, B., and Kumar, A., ‘Polyester and polycarbonate synthesis by in vitro
enzyme catalysis’, Appl Microbiol Biotech, 2001, 55, 655–60.
Gross, R.A., Kalra, B., Kumar, A., ‘Polyester and polycarbonate synthesis by in vitro
enzyme catalysis’, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2001, 55, 655–60.
Guziñska, K., Ciechañska, D., Struszczyk, H., Fibres & Text in Eastern Europe, 2002, 10,
2(37), 77–81.
Haghighat Kish, M., & Nouri, M., ‘Effects of sodium hydroxide and calcium hydroxide on
polyester fabrics’, J Applied Polymer Sci, 1999, 72, 631–637.
Hakkarainen, M., Albertsson, A.C., ‘Environmental degradation of polyethylene’, Adv
Polym Sci, 2004, 169, 177–182.
Han, L., Wakida, T., and Takagishi, T., ‘Polymer Blends and Composites’, Text Res J, 1987,57(9), 519–12.
Hardin, I., Yonghua, L., Akin, D., ‘Enzyme Applications in Fibre Processing’, ACS Symp
Series, American Chemical Society, Washington DC, 1998, 190.
Harris, W.B., ‘Is There a Future for Polyester Investments Outside Asia?’, Int Fibre J,
1996, 11, 5–13.
Hashimoto, K., Hamano, T., Okada, M., ‘Degradation of several polyamides in soil’, J
Appl Polymer Sci, 1994, 54, 1579–83.
Hashimoto, K., Sudo, M., Ohta, K., Sugimura, T., Yamada, H., ‘Biodegradation of nylon 4
and its blend with nylon 6’, J Appl Polym Sci, 2002, 86, 2307–11.
Hearle, J. W. S., Handbook of textile bres, Textile Institute & Industry, 1969, 7(3), 80.
Henderson, L.A., Gross, R.A., ‘Lipase-catalyzed ring-opening polymerization of
pentadecalactone: kinetic and mechanistic investigations’, In: Scholz C, Gross RA
(eds) Renewable resources, bipolyesters and biocatalysis. American Chemical Society,
Washington, DC, 2000, 100–112.
Hiseh, Y.L., and Cram, L.A., ‘Enzymatic hydrolysis to improve wetting and absorbency of
polyester fabrics’, Text Res J, 1998, 68(5), 311–19.
Ho, W.O., Krause, S., McNeil, C.J., Pritchard, J.A., Armstrong, R.D., Athey, D., Rawson,K., ‘Electrochemical sensor for measurement of urea and creatinine in serum based on AC
impedance measurement of enzyme-catalysed polymer transformation’, Anal Chem, 1999,
71, 1940–46.
Homola, J., Yee, S.S., Gauglitz, G., ‘Surface plasmon resonance sensors: review’, Sens
Actuators B-Chem, 1999, 54, 3–15.
Hsieh, Y.L., ‘Wetting, Pore Structure, and Liquid Retention of Hydrolyzed Polyester
Fabrics’, Text Res J, 1996, 66(1), 1–10.
Hsieh, Y.L., Miller, A., and Thompson, J., ‘Wetting, pore structure and liquid retention of
hydrolyzed polyester fabrics’, Text Res J, 1996, 66(1), 1–10.
Iwamoto, A., Tokiwa, Y., ‘Effect of the phase structure on biodegradability of polypropylene/
poly(ε-caprolactone) blends’, J Appl Polym Sci, 1994, 52, 1357–60.
Iwamoto, A., Tokiwa, Y., ‘Enzymatic degradation of plastics containing polycaprolactone’,
Polym Degrad Stab, 1994, 45, 205–13.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 256/457
244 Bioprocessing of textiles
Iwata, T., Doi, Y., ‘Morphology and enzymatic degradation of poly(L-lactic acid) single
crystals’, Macromolecules, 1998, 31, 2461–67.
Jang, W.J., Shin, B.Y., Lee, T.J., Narayan, R., ‘Thermal properties and morphology of
biodegradable PLA/starch compatibilized blends’, J Ind Engg Chem, 2007, 13, 457–64.
Jarerat, A., Tokiwa, Y., ‘Degradation of poly(L-lactide) by fungus’, Macromol Biosci,
2001, 1, 136–140.
Jarerat, A., Tokiwa, Y., ‘Poly(L-lactide) degradation by Kibdelosporangium aridum’,
Biotechnol Lett, 2003, 25, 2035–38.
Jarerat, A., Tokiwa, Y., Tanaka, H., ‘Microbial poly(L-lactide) degrading enzyme induced
by amino acids, peptides and poly(L-amino acids)’, J Polym Environ, 2004, 12, 139–146.
Kallay, N., Grancari, A.M., and Tomi, M., ‘Kinetics of polyester bre dissolution’, Text Res J, 1990, 60(11), 663–668.
Kanagawa, K., Negoro, S., Takada, N., Okada, H., ‘Plasmid dependence of Pseudomonas
sp. strain NK87 enzymes that degrade 6-aminohexanoaate-cyclic dimer’, J Bacteriol,
1989, 171, 3181–86.
Kanesawa, Y., Tanahashi, N., and Doi, Y., ‘Enzymatic degradation of microbial poly(3-
hydroxyalkanoates)’, Polym Degrad J, 1994, 45,179–185.
Kasuya, K., and Doi, Y., ‘Enzymatic degradation of poly [(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate] by
Comamonas testosteroni ATSU of soil bacterium’, Polym Degrad J, 1994, 45, 379–386.
Kasuya, K., Inoue, Y., and Doi, Y., ‘Adsorption kinetics of bacterial PHB depolymerase on
the surface of polyhydroxyalkanoates lms’, Int J Biol Macromol, 1996, 19, 35–40.
Kasuya, K., Inoue, Y., Yamada, K., and Doi, Y., ‘Kinetics of surface hydrolysis of poly[(R)-
3-hydroxybutyrate] lm by PHB depolymerase from Alcaligenes faecalis’, Polym Degrad
J, 1995, 48, 167–74.
Kasuya, K., Takagi, K., Ishiwatari, S., Yoshida, Y., Doi, Y., ‘Biodegradability of various
aliphatic polyesters in natural waters’, Polym Degrad J, 1997, 59, 327–32.
Kawasaki, N., Atsuyoshi, N., Naoko, Y., Takeda, S., Kawata, Y., Yamamoto, N., Aiba, S.,
‘Synthesis, thermal and mechanical properties and biodegradation of branched polyamide’,
Polymer, 2005, 46, 9987–93.
Kay, M.J., McCabe, R.W., and Morton, L.H.G., ‘Chemical and physical changes occurring
in polyester polyurethane during biodegradation’, Int Biodeterior Biodegrad, 1993, 31,
209–225.
Kay, M.J., Morton, L.H.G., and Prince, E.L., ‘Bacterial degradation of polyester
polyurethane’, Int Biodeterior, 1991, 27, 205–222.
Khalili, H., Khoddami, A., and Morshed, M., ‘Enzymatic hydrolysis of polyester fabrics’,
Iran J Polym Sci & Tech, 2001, 14, 2(53), 101–107.
Khoddami, A., and Morshed, M., ‘Effect of the enzymatic hydrolysis on weight loss and pilling of cotton & cotton/ polyester fabrics’, Iran J Polym Sci & Tech, 1998, 11, 39, 23–30.
Khoddami, A., Khalili, H., and Morshed, M., ‘Enzymatic hydrolysis of polyester fabrics’,
J Sci & Tech, 2001, 12, 45, 17–26.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 257/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 245
Kim H R and Song, W.S, ‘Optimization of enzymatic treatment of polyamide fabrics’,
Fibre. Polym, 2012, 13(3), 282–288.
Kinoshita, S., Kageyama, S., Iba, K., Yamada, Y., Okada, H., ‘Utilization of a cyclic
dimmer and linear oligomers of ε-amino caproic acid by Achromobacter guttatus K172’,
Agric Boil Chem, 1975, 39, 1219–1223.
Kita, K., Ishimaru, K., Teraoka, M., Yanase, H., and Kato, N., ‘Properties of poly
(3-hydroxybutyrate) depolymerase from a marine bacterium, Alcaligenes faecalis AE122’,
Appl Environ Microbiol, 1995, 61, 1727–1730.
Knani, D., Gutman, A.L., Kohn, D.H., ‘Enzymatic polyesterication in organic media
Enzyme catalyzed synthesis of linear polyesters by condensation of caprolactone’, J Polym
Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 1993, 31, 1221–1232
Knani, D., Kohn, D.H., ‘Enzymatic polyesterication in organic media II. Enzyme
catalyzed synthesis of lateral substituted aliphatic polyesters and copolyesters’, J Polym
Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 1993, 31, 2887–97
Kobayashi, S., Uyama, H., Namekawa, S., Hayakawa, H., ‘Enzymatic ring-opening
polymerization and copolymerization of 8-octanolide by lipase catalyst’, Macromolecules,
1998, 31, 5655–59.
Krisch, K., Carboxylic ester hydrolases, in The Enzymes, Boyer P.D., Ed., V, 43–69,
Academic, New York, 1971.
Kumar A, Gross, R.A., ‘Candida antartica lipase B-catalyzed transesterication: newsynthetic routes to copolyesters’, J Am Chem Soc, 2000, 122, 11767–770.
Kumar, A., Gross, R.A., ‘Candida Antarctica lipase B-catalyzed transesterication: new
synthetic routes to Copolyesters’, J Am Chem Soc, 2000, 122, 11767–770.
Kumar, A., Gross, R.A., ‘Candida antartica lipase B catalyzed polycaprolactone synthesis.
Effect of organic media and temperature’, Biomacromolecules, 2000, 1, 133–138
Lee, S.Y., ‘Bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates’, Biotechnol Bioengg, 1996, 49, 1–14.
Lenz, J., Schurz, J., Wrentschur, E., ‘Comparative characterization of solvent spun
cellulose and high wet modulus viscose bres by their long periods’, Acta Polym, 1992,
43, 307–312.
Lenz, J., Schurz, J., Wrentschur, E., ‘Properties and structure of solvent-spun and viscose-
type bres in the swollen state’, Colloid Polym Sci, 1993, 8, 271–79.
Lewin, M., Pearce, E.M., Fibre Chemistry: Handbook of Fibre Science and Technology
(IV), Marcel Dekker Inc., 1985.
Lim, H.A., Raku, T., Tokiwa, Y., ‘Hydrolysis of polyesters by serine proteases’, Biotechnol
Lett, 2005, 27, 459–64.
Liu, L., Li, S., Garreau, H., Vert, M., ‘Selective enzymatic degradations of poly (L-lactide)
and poly (ε-caprolactone) blend lms’, Biomacromolecules, 2000, 3, 350–359.Liu, R.G., Shen, Y.Y., Shao, H.L., Wu, C.X., Hu, X.C., ‘An analysis of lyocell bre
formation as a melt-spinning process’, Cellulose, 2001, 8, 13–21.
Mandels, M., Andreotti, R., Roche, C., ‘Measurement of saccharifying cellulase’,
Biotechnol Bioengg Symp, 1976, 6, 21–33.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 258/457
246 Bioprocessing of textiles
Margolin, A.L., Creene, J.Y., Klibanov, A.M., (1987) ‘Stereo selective oligomerizations
catalyzed by lipases in organic solvents’, Tetrahedron Lett, 1987, 28, 1607–1610
Mazeyar Parvinzadeh, Reza Assepour and Amir Kiumarsi, ‘Biohydrolysis of nylon 6,6
bre with different proteolytic enzymes’, Polymer Degradation and Stability J, 2009, 9,
1197–1205.
McDonald, R.T., McCarthy, S., Gross, R.A., ‘Enzymatic degradability of poly (lactide):
Effects of chain stereochemistry and material crystallinity’, Macromolecules, 1996, 29,
7356–7361.
McNeil, C.J., Athey, D., Ball, M., Ho, W.O., Krause, S., Armstrong, R.D., Wright, J.D.,
Rawson, K., ‘Electrochemical sensors based on impedance measurement of enzyme-
catalyzed polymer dissolution-theory and applications’, Anal Chem, 1995, 67, 3928–3935.
Mehta Aspy., Equilibrium Melting Parameters of Poly (ethylene terephtalate), J Polym Sci,Polym Phys Ed, 1978, 16, 289–296.
Meplestor, P., Modern Plastics, 1997, 74, 66.
Mergaert, J., Swings, J., ‘Biodiversity of microorganisms that degrade bacterial and
synthetic polyesters’, J Ind Microbiol, 1996, 17, 463–469.
Miller, G.L., ‘Use of Dinitrosalicylic Acid Reagent for Determination of Reducing Sugar’,
Analytical Chem, 1959, 31, 426.
Miller, G.L., ‘Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar’,
Anal Chem, 1959, 31, 426–29.
Mojca Božič, Vanja Kokol, Georg M. Guebitz, ‘Indigo Dyeing of Polyamide Using
Enzymes for Dye Reduction’, Text Res J, 2009, 79(10), 895–907.
Morgado, J., Cavaco-Paulo, A., ‘Enzymatic Treatment of Lyocell – Clarication of
Depilling Mechanisms’, Text Res J, 2000, 70(8), 696–702.
Mori, R., Silvan, A., ‘Biolm formation and partial biodegradation of polystyrene by
theactinomycete Rhodococcus rubber: Biodegradation of polystyrene’, Biodegradation,
2008, 19, 245–58.
Morrow, C.J., Wallace, J.S., 1992. Enzyme catalyzed synthesis of polyesters. US Patent
No. 5, 147,791. Issued: Sept 15, 1992,Morton, L.H.G., and Surman, S.B., ‘Biolms in biodeterioration—a review’, Int
Biodeterior Biodegrad, 1994, 32, 203–221.
Morton, W.R., and Hearle, J.W.S., Physical Properties of Textiles Fibres, The Textile
Institute, 1975.
Mukai, K., Yamada, K., and Doi, Y., ‘Kinetics and mechanism of heterogeneous hydrolysis
of poly [(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate] lm by PHA depolymerase’, Int J Biol Macromol, 1993,
15, 361–66.
Nagata M., ‘Enzymatic degradation of aliphatic polyesters copolymerized with various
diamine’, Macromol Rapid common, 1996, 17(8), 583–87.
Nagata, M., and Kiyotsukuri, T., European Polymer J, 1992, 28 (9), 1069–72.
Nakajima-Kambe, T., Onuma, F., Kimpara, N., and Nakahara, T., ‘Isolation and
characterization of a bacterium which utilizes polyester polyurethane as a sole carbon and
nitrogen source’, FEMS Microbiol. Lett, 1995, 129, 39–42.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 259/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 247
Namboori, C.G.G., and Haith, M.S., ‘Steric effects in the basic hydrolysis of poly (ethylene
terephthalate)’, J Applied Polymer Sci, 1968, 12(9), 1999–2005.
Nobes, G.A.R., Kazalauskas, R.J., Marchessault, R.H., ‘Lipase catalyzed ring-opening
polymerization of lactone: a novel route to poly (hydroxyalkanoate)s’, Macromolecules,
1996, 29, 4829.
Ohkita, T., Lee, S.H., ‘Thermal degradation and biodegradability of poly(lactic acid)/corn
starch biocomposites’, J App Polym Sci, 2006, 100, 3009–17.
Pal, S.K., ‘Draw-texturing of Microbre Polyester yarn’, Text Res J, 1996, 66(12), 770–
776.
Pathirana, R.A., and Seal, K.J., ‘Studies on polyurethane deteriorating fungi Part I: Isolation
and characterization of the test fungi employed’, Int Biodeterior, 1984, 20, 163–68.
Peters, R. H., Textile Chemistry: The Chemistry of Fibres, Vol. I, Elsevier Publishing Co.,
1963.
Pezzin, G., and Gechele, G.B., J Appl Polym Sci, 1964, 8, 2159–63.
Polish Standard PN-62/P-50099, (1962), Paper Industry Products - Technical Tests -
Determination of Alpha-cellulose In Special Pulps, Poland.
Pranamuda, H., Tokiwa, Y., Tanaka, H., ‘Microbial degradation of an aliphatic polyester
with a high melting point, poly (tetramethylene succinate)’, Appl Environ Microbiol, 1995,
61, 1828–32.
Pranamuda, H., Tsuchii, A., Tokiwa, Y., ‘Poly(L-lactide degrading enzyme produced by
Amycolatopsis sp.’, Macromol Biosci, 2001, 1, 25–29.
Pyæ, R., Romanowska, I., Galas, E., Sójka Ledakowicz, J., Fibres & Text in Eastern
Europe, 1999, 7, 1(24), 54.
Reed, G., and Underkoer, L.A., ‘Lipase, in Food Science and Technology’, Academic,
New York, 1966, 157–175.
Reeve, M.S., McCarthy, S.P., Downey, M.J., Gross, R.A., ‘Polylactide stereochemistry:
Effect on enzymatic degradability’, Macromolecules, 1994, 27, 825–31.
Rodney, R.L., Allinson, B.T., Beckman, E.J., Russell, A.J., ‘Enzyme catalyzed polycondensation reaction for the synthesis of aromatic polycarbonate and polyester’,
Biotechnol Bioengg, 1999, 65, 485–89.
Samanta, A.K., Chattopadhyay, D.P., Konar, A., & Sharma, D.N., ‘Selective chemical
pretreatments and post treatments on micro denier polyester fabric for improving surface
depth of colour’, Indian J Fibre Text Res, 2003, 28, 76–85.
Sanchez, J.G., Tsuchii, A., Tokiwa, Y., ‘Degradation of polycaprolactone at 50°C by a
thermotolerant Aspergillus sp.’, Biotechnol Lett, 2000, 22, 849–53.
Saum, A.G.E., Cumming, R.H., Rowell, F.J., ‘Use of substrate coated electrodes and ac
impedance spectroscopy for the detection of enzyme activity’, Biosens Bioelectron, 1998,13, 511–518.
Saus, W., Krittel, D., Schollmeyer, E., ‘Dyeing of Textiles in Supercritical CO2’ , Text Res
J, 1993, 63, 135–142.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 260/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 261/457
Bioprocessing of synthetic bres 249
Tokiwa, Y., Suzuki, T., Takeda, K., ‘Two types of lipases in hydrolysis of polyester’, Agric
Biol Chem, 1988, 52, 1937–43.
Tokiwa, Y., Ugwu, C.U., ‘Biotechnological production of (R)-3-hydroxybutyric acid
monomer’, J Biotechnol, 2007, 132, 264–272.
Tseng, M., Hoang, K.C., Yang, M.K., Yang, S.F., Chu, W.S., ‘Polyester-degrading
thermophilic actinomycetes isolated from different environment in Taiwan’,
Biodegradation, 2007, 18, 579–83.
Tsuchii, A., Suzuki, T., Fukuoka, S., ‘Microbial degradation of polyethylene oligomers’,
Rep Ferment Res, 1980, 55, 35–40.
Tsuji, H., Miyauchi, S., ‘Effects of crystallinity on enzymatic hydrolysis of poly (l-lactide)
without free amorphous region’, Polym Degrad Stab, 2001, 71, 415–24.
Uruyama, H., Kanamori, T., Kimura, Y., ‘Properties and biodegradability of polymer
blends of poly(L-lactide)s with different optical purity of the lactate units’, Macromol
Mater Eng, 2002, 287, 116–21.
Uyama, H., Kikuchi, H., Takeya, K., Kobayashi, S., ‘Lipase-catalyzed ring-opening
polymerization and copolymerization of 15 pentadecanolide’, Acta Polym 1996, 47, 357–
360
Uyama, H., Kobayashi, S., ‘Enzymatic ring opening of lactones catalyzed by lipase’, Chem
Lett, 1993, 1149–50
Uyama, H., Shigeru, Y., Kobayashi, S., ‘Enzymatic synthesis of aromatic polyesters bylipase-catalyzed polymerization of dicarboxylic acid divinyl esters and glycols’, Polym J,
1993, 31, 380–83.
Uyama, H., Takeya, K., Hoshi, N., Kobayashi, S., ‘Lipase-catalyzed ring-opening
polymerization of 12-dodecanolide’, Macromolecules, 1995, 28, 7046–50.
Uyama, H., Takeya, K., Kobayashi, S., ‘Enzymatic ring-opening polymerization of
lactones to polyesters by lipase catalyst: unusually high reactivity of macrolides’, Bull
Chem Soc J, 1995, 68, 56–61.
Valldeperas, J., Carrillo, F., Lis, M.J., Navarro, J.A., ‘Kinetics enzymatic hydrolysis of
lyocell bres’, Text Res J, 2000, 70(11), 981–84.
Vigneswaran, C., and Anbumani, N., ‘Partial alkaline hydrolysis treatment on the physical
characteristics of polyester rotor spun yarns’, J Text Inst, 2011, 102(2), 140–49.
Walker, L.P., Wilson, D.B., ‘Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: an overview’, Bioresour
Technol, 1991, 36, 3–14.
Wallace, J.S., and Morrow, C.J., ‘Biocatalytic synthesis of polymers. II. Preparation of [AA-
BB]x polyesters by porcine pancreatic lipase catalyzed transesterication in anhydrous,
low polarity organic solvents’, J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 1989, 27, 3271–84.
Walter, T., Augusta, J., Muller, R.J., Widdecke, H., and Klein, J., ‘Enzymatic degradationof a model polyester by lipase from rhizopus delmar’, Enzyme Microb Technol, 1995, 17,
3, 218–24.
Wang, F., Lee, S.J., ‘Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) production with high productivity and high
polymer content by a fed-batch culture of Alcaligenes latus under nitrogen limitation’,
Appl Environ Microbiol, 1997, 63, 3703–06.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 262/457
250 Bioprocessing of textiles
Williams, D.F., ‘Enzymatic hydrolysis of polylactic acid’, Engg Med, 1981, 10, 5–7.
Witt, U., Muller, R.J., Deckwer, W.D., ‘Biodegradation of polyester copolymers containing
aromatic compounds’, J Macromol Sci Pure Appl Chem. 1995, 4, 851–56.
Yamano, N., Nakayama, A., Kawasaki, N., Yamamoto, N., Aiba, S., ‘Mechanism and
characterization of polyamide 4 degradation by Pseudomonas’, J Polym Environ, 2008,
16, 141–46.
Yang, R., ‘Alkali deweighting of acid modied multi component copolyester bre’, Indian
J Fibre Text Res, 2003, 28, 343–347.
Yukie Akutsu, Toshiaki Nakajima-Kambe, Nobuhiko Nomura, and Tadaatsu Nakahara,
‘Purication and Properties of a Polyester Polyurethane- Degrading Enzyme from
Comamonas acidovorans TB-35’, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1998, 64,(1),
62–67.
Yukie Akutsu, Toshiaki Nakajima-Kambe, Nobuhiko Nomura, and Tadaatsu Nakahara,
‘Purication and Properties of a Polyester Polyurethane Degrading Enzyme from
Comamonas acidovorans TB-35’, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1998, 64(1),
62–67.
Yutaka Tokiwa, Buenaventurada Calabia, Charles Ugwu and Seiichi Aiba, ‘Biodegradability
of Plastics’, Int J Mol Sci, 2009, 10, 3722–42.
Zeronian, S.H., and Collins, M.J, ‘Surface modication of polyester by alkaline treatment’,
Text Progress, 1990, 20(2), 1–30.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 263/457
Abstract: This chapter discusses cotton textile processing and methods of treatingwaste water efuent in the textile industries both present and future scenario.
Industrial textile wet processing comprises various operations includes desizing,scouring, bleaching, dyeing, printing, and nishing operations. Effective efuenttreatment is an important step towards conserving water resources. The use ofenzymes is an alternative method for treatment of such recalcitrant pollutants.It evaluates different methods in which enzymes can be delivered to the targetefuent, including nanoparticles as delivery systems. It also emphasizes theneed for current and future research to focus on developing economically feasibleand environmentally sustainable wastewater treatment practices. Consumersin developed countries are demanding biodegradable and ecologically friendlytextiles. The chapter then discusses the application of enzymes in decolourationof dye house efuent water treatment using white rot fungi and laccase enzymes
studied by many researchers and scientists in the efuent treatments. Theconuence of nanoscience and enzyme technology has resulted in an upcominginterdisciplinary approach to wastewater treatment. Such innovative applicationsof enzymes can enable the utilization of these biocatalysts to their maximumpotential.
Keywords: Dye waste water, efuent treatment, decolouration, whote rot fungi,laccase, enzyme technology, biotransformation
5.1 Introduction
Cotton provides an ecologically friendly textile, but more than 50% of its
production volume is dyed with reactive dyes (Chavan 2001). Today the
main challenge for the textile industry is to modify production methods,
and move towards more eco friendly at a competitive market price, by using
safer dyes and chemicals and by reducing cost of efuent treatment/disposal.
Dyes are unfavorable from an ecological point of view, because the efuents
generated are heavily colored, which contain high concentrations of salts,
and high biological oxygen demand/chemical oxygen demand (BOD/COD)
values. In dyeing textiles, ecological standards are strictly applied throughout
processing from raw material selection to the nal apparel product. This has
become more critical since the German environmental standards regarding
dye efuents became effective (Robinson et al. 1997). Clean technology,
5
Enzymes in textile efuents
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 264/457
252 Bioprocessing of textiles
eco-mark and green chemistry are some of the most highlighted practices
in preventing and or reducing the adverse effect on environment both land
and air. Due to the nature of various chemical processing of textiles, large
volumes of wastewater with numerous pollutants are discharged. Since
the stream of water affect the aquatic eco-system in number of ways such
as depleting the dissolved oxygen content or settlement of suspended
substances in anaerobic condition, a special attention needs to be demanded.
Thus, a study on different measures, which can be adopted to treat the
wastewater discharged from textile chemical processing industries to protect
environment from possible pollution problem, has been the focus point of
many recent investigations (Seshadri et al. 1994). These wet processingoperations not only consume large amounts of energy and water, but they
also produce substantial waste products. The waste production from textile
processes, such as desizing, mercerizing, bleaching, dyeing, nishing, and
printing, with a discussion of advanced methods of efuent treatment, such
as electro-oxidation, bio-treatment, photochemical, and membrane processes
have been discussed. These dyeing industries consume large quantities of
water and produces large volumes of waste water from different steps in the
dyeing and nishing processes. Wastewater from printing and dyeing unitsis often rich in color, containing residues of reactive dyes and chemicals,
and requires proper treatment before being released into the environment
(Sivaramakrishnan 2004). The toxic effects of dyestuffs and other organic
compounds, as well as acidic and alkaline contaminants, from industrial
establishments on the general public are widely accepted. Increasing public
concern about environmental issues has led to closure of several small-
scale industries. Interest in ecologically friendly, wet-processing textile
techniques has increased in recent years because of increased awareness ofenvironmental issues throughout the world.
5.2 Textile processing operations
The process of converting raw bers into nished apparel and non-apparel
textile products is complex, so most textile mills specialize their own based
on their product manufacturing (Hashem et al. 2005). Textiles generally go
through three or four stages of production that may include yarn formation,
fabric formation, wet processing, and textile fabrication. Figure 5.1 shows
some of the steps in processing of textile bers into fabrics both cotton and
synthetics.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 265/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 266/457
254 Bioprocessing of textiles
from the cotton and chemical residuals from previous processing. Natural
impurities include waxes, oils, proteins, mineral matter and residuals seeds.
The cotton contains a signicant amount of contaminants resulting from the
widespread use of fertilizers, insecticides and fungicides. Previous knitting
or weaving processes leave residuals of knitting oils and sizing chemicals
on the surface of the cotton bers. All these impurities must be removed
before dyeing, because they can interfere with the dyeing process. Insufcient
preparation can result in an uneven dyeing, can cause spotting or can even
damage the fabric permanently. The auxiliary chemicals used in textile wet
processing are given in Table 5.1.
Fig. 5.2 Processing steps for the conventional and enzymatic pre-treatment of cotton
Table 5.1 Auxiliary chemicals used in textile wet processing (Correia, 1994)
Description Composition Function Processing step
Salts Sodium chloride
Sodium sulphate
Neutralize zeta
potential of the ber,
retarder
Dyeing
Acids Acetic acid
Sulfuric acid
pH control Preparation,
dyeing, nishing
Bases Sodium hydroxide
Sodium carbonate
pH control Preparation,
dyeing, nishing
Buffers Phosphate pH control Dyeing
Sequestering
agents (Chelators)
EDTA Complex hardness Preparation
Dyeing
Surface active
agents
Anionic, cationic
and
non-ionic
Softeners
Emulsiers
Dyeing
Finishing
Contd...
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 267/457
Enzymes in textile efuents 255
Description Composition Function Processing step
Oxidising agents Hydrogen peroxide Insoluble dyes Dyeing
Reducing agents Sodium
hydrosulphite
Sodium sulphide
Soluble dyes
Remove unreacted
dyes
Dyeing
Carriers Phenyl phenols Enhance absorption Dyeing
5.2.1.1 Sizing
During sizing, chemicals are applied to the yam before the production of awoven fabric. Substances such as starch, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polyvinyl
acetate, carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and gums were used to enhance the
tensile strength and smoothness of the warp yarn.
5.2.1.2 Singeing
Singeing is a process that removes surface bers from textile fabric. These
surface bers form small ber balls on the cloth after being washed several
times. Many different systems are available but usually the goods pass through
gas-red burners at high speed.
5.2.1.3 Desizing
After the weaving process, the sizes have to be removed from the fabric because
they interfere with subsequent processing steps. Sizes have, in general, a high
biological oxygen demand (BOD) and will contribute signicantly to the
waste load of the mill’s efuent. The waste stream of the desizing operationcan contribute up to 50% of the total pollution load of a mill’s wastewater.
Three methods frequently used in textile processing are acid desizing, enzyme
desizing, and oxidative desizing. The goal of these different methods is to
hydrolyze the starch.
5.2.1.4 Scouring
Scouring is typically performed in an alkaline solution and high temperature
environment. The removal of natural impurities is based upon saponicationat high pH. Soaps and detergents added during scouring may precipitate
with calcium, magnesium and iron (3+) if present. The removal of natural
impurities can be done in a single process or can be combined with desizing
and/or bleaching.
Contd...
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 268/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 269/457
Enzymes in textile efuents 257
Dyes most commonly applied to cotton are reactive and direct dyes. Cotton/
polyester goods are dyed using reactive or direct dyes for the cotton portion
of the fabric and disperse dyes for the polyester. Several auxiliary chemicals
are added to the bath during the dyeing processes. These chemicals can be
divided into two groups: commodity chemicals and specialty chemicals.
Specialty chemicals are mixtures which have an unknown composition due to
proprietary information. The mixtures are often developed to solve problems
specic to the process.
5.2.1.8 Finishing
Finishing operations may change the properties of the textile fabric or yarn.
They can increase the softness, luster, and durability of textiles. Finishing can
also improve the water repelling and ame resistant properties of the fabric.
The characteristics of textiles can be altered by physical techniques (dry
nishing processes) or by application of chemicals (wet nishing processes).
Luster can be added by both physical and chemical methods. Characteristics
like ame or water repellency can only be obtained by wet nishing.
Table 5.2 Waste materials generated during cotton textile wet processing
Process Waste water Residual wastes
Fiber preparation Little or no wastewater
generated
Fiber waste; packaging
waste; hard waste
Yarn spinning Little or no wastewater
generated
Packaging waste; sized yarn;
ber waste; cleaning and
processing waste
Slashing/Sizing BOD; COD; metals; cleaning
waste and size
Fiber lint; yarn waste;
packaging waste
Weaving Little or no air emissionsgenerated
Packaging waste; yarn andfabric scraps; used oil
Knitting Little or no air emissions
generated
Packaging waste; yarn and
fabric scraps
Desizing BOD from water-soluble size;
synthetic size; lubricants;
biocides; anti-static
compounds
Packaging waste; ber lint;
yarn waste; cleaning materials
Scouring Disinfectants and insecticide
residue; NaOH; detergents;
fats; oils; pectin; wax; knitting
lubricants; spin nishes; spent
solvents
Little or no residual waste
generated
Bleaching Hydrogen peroxide; Sodium
silicate; organic stabilizer
Little or no residual waste
generated
Contd...
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 270/457
258 Bioprocessing of textiles
Process Waste water Residual wastesSingeing Little or no wastewater
generated
Little or no residual waste
generated
Mercerizing High pH; NaOH Little or no residual waste
generated
Heat setting Little or no wastewater
generated
Little or no residual waste
generated
Dyeing Metals; Salt; surfactants;
toxic; organic processing
assistance; cationic materials;
color; BOD; Sulde; acidity;
alkalinity; spent solvents
Little or no residual waste
generated
Printing Suspended solids; urea;
solvents; color; metals; heat;
BOD; foam
Little or printing gum and
thickener
Finishing BOD; COD; Suspended
solids; toxics; spent solvents
Fabric scraps and trimmings;
packaging waste
5.3 Textile efuent characteristicsIn the textile wet processing for natural and synthetic material operations,
lists of some wastes that may be generated at each level of textile processing
are given (Table 5.2). Wet processing of textiles involves unit operations
such as desizing, scouring, bleaching, dyeing and nishing. Different
auxiliaries are used either in solid or in liquid form to the textile product
to obtain the desired fabric effect. Cotton textiles cannot be dyed evenly
without removing its natural and added impurities, which inhibit the proper
penetration of dyes and chemicals. Thus, treatment with various chemicalagents such as enzyme, alkalis, acids, salts, surfactants, solvents, oxidizing
and reducing bleaching agents etc. are necessary prior to dyeing. In the
process of dyeing, auxiliary chemicals such as glauber salt, sodium chloride
and other bio-salts are added to exhaust the dye from the liquor to the
substrate at appropriate temperature and pH. Even after dyeing, unxed
dyestuffs and complex organic products arising out of the reaction with
textile substrate and dyes are to be adequately removed from the surface
of the yarns/fabrics to achieve the proper fastness requirements (Babu et
al. 2007). So, waste stream from the dyeing industry which is to be fed into
the efuent treatment plant essentially comprised of the above ingredients
which are used in the preparatory processes and in actual dyeing process.
Waste stream generated in this industry is essentially based on water-based
Contd...
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 271/457
Enzymes in textile efuents 259
efuent generated in the various activities of wet processing of textiles. The
main cause of generation of waste water efuent is the use of huge volume
of water either in the actual chemical processing or during re-processing in
preparatory, dyeing, printing and nishing. In fact, in a practical estimate, it
has been found that 45% material in preparatory processing, 33% in dyeing
and 22% are re-processed in nishing. The fact is that the efuent generated
in different steps is well beyond the standard and thus it is highly polluted
and dangerous. Properties of waste water from textile chemical processing
are given (Tables 5.3 and 5.4). The regulatory standrds to which efuent
needs to be treated is given (Table 5.5).
Table 5.3 Properties of waste water from textile chemical processing
Property Standard Cotton Synthetic Wool
pH 5.5–9.0 8–12 7–9 3–10
BOD, mg/l, 5 days 30–350 150–750 150–200 5000–8000
COD, mg/l, day 250 200–2400 400–650 10,000–20,000
TDS, mg/l 2100 2100–7700 1060–1080 10,000–13,000
Table 5.4 Characteristics of textile waste efuent from cotton textile mill
Characteristics Values
pH 9.8–11.8
Total alkalinity (mg/l) 17–22
BOD (mg/l) 760–900
COD (mg/l) 1,400–1,700
Total solids (mg/l) 6,000–7,000
Total chromium (mg/l) 10–13
Table 5.5 Regulatory standrds for efuent water
Quality parameters Tolerance limits
pH 5.5–9
BOD (mg/l) 30
COD (mg/l) 250
TDS (mg/l) 2100Suspended solids (mg/l) 100
Chlorides (mg/l) 1000
Sulphides Nil
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 272/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 273/457
Enzymes in textile efuents 261
5.4. Mercerization
Cotton fabric is mercerized in the gray state after bleaching to impart luster,increase strength and improve dye uptake. Essentially, mercerization is carried
out by treating cotton material with a strong solution of sodium hydroxide
(about 18–24%) and washing-off the caustic after 1 to 3 min, while holding the
material under tension. Cotton is known to undergo a longitudinal shrinkage
upon impregnation during mercerization and it can be prevented by stretching
it or holding it under tension. The material acquires the desired properties of
luster, increased strength, dye uptake, and increased absorbency. The large
concentrations of NaOH in the wash water can be recovered by membrane
techniques. Use of ZnCl2 may be as an alternative method which leads to
an increase in the weight of cotton fabric and in dye uptake. Moreover, the
process is ecologically friendly and does not require neutralization by acetic
or formic acid (Karim et al. 2006).
5.4.3 Bleaching
Natural color matter in the yarn imparts a creamy appearance to the textile
fabric. In order to obtain white yarn that facilitates producing color in pale and bright shades, it is necessary to decolorize the yarn by bleaching. Hypochlorite
is one of the oldest industrial bleaching agents. The formation of highly toxic
chlorinated organic by products during the bleaching process is reduced by
adsorbable organically bound halogen (AOX) which may result minimize the
pollution load in bleaching operation. Over the last few years, hypochlorite is
being replaced by other bleaching agents (Rott and Minke 1999).
An environmentally safe alternative to hypochlorite is peracetic acid. It
decomposes to oxygen and acetic acid, which is completely biodegradable.
One of the advantages of peracetic acid is higher brightness values with lessber damage (Rott and Minke 1999). Recently, a one-step preparatory process
for desizing, scouring, and bleaching has helped to reduce the volume of
water. The feasibility of a one-step process for desizing, scouring, bleaching,
and mercerizing of cotton fabric followed by dyeing with direct dyes has
been discussed by Slokar and Majcen (1997). Cooper (1995) has suggested
an economical and pollution free process for electrochemical mercerization
(scouring) and bleaching of textiles. The process does not require conventional
caustic soda, acids, and bleaching agents. The treatment is carried out in a low
voltage electrochemical cell. The base required for mercerization (scouring)
is produced in the cathode chamber, while an equivalent amount of acid is
produced in the anode chamber, which is used for neutralizing the fabric.
Gas diffusion electrodes simultaneously generate hydrogen peroxide for
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 274/457
262 Bioprocessing of textiles
bleaching. With a bipolar stack of electrodes, diffusion electrodes can be used as
anode or cathode or both. The process does not produce hydrogen bubbles at the
cathode, thereby avoiding hazards involving the gas (Lin and Peng 1994). An
electrochemical treatment was developed for the treatment of cotton in aqueous
solution containing sodium sulphate. In this technique, the current density was
controlled between two electrodes. At the cathode, water is reduced to hydrogen
and base, while at the anode it is oxidized to oxygen and acid. Favorable results
on mercerization (scouring) and electrochemical sanitation of unmercerized
(grey) cotton have been reported (Naumczyk et al. 1996).
5.4.4 NeutralizationAccording to Bradbury et al. (2000), has stated that the replacement of acetic
acid by formic acid for neutralization of textile cotton fabric after scouring,
mercerizing, bleaching, and reduction processes is effective, economical,
and environment-friendly. The procedure also allows a sufcient level of
neutralization in a short period of time, needs low volumes of water, and
results in low levels of BOD in the waste water efuent.
5.4.5 Dyeing
Dyeing is a process of treatment of ber or fabric with chemical pigments
to impart color. The color arises from chromophore and auxochrome groups
in the dyes, which also cause pollution (Azymezyk et al. 2007). In the wet
dyeing process, water is used to transfer dyes and in the form of steam to heat
the treatment baths. Cotton, which is the world’s most widely used ber, is a
substrate that requires a large amount of water for processing. For example,
to dye one kg of cotton fabric with reactive dyes, 0.6–0.8 kg of NaCl, 30–60
g of dyestuff, and 70–150 L of water are required (Chakraborty et al. 2005).Once the dyeing operation is over, the various treatment baths are drained,
including the highly colored dye bath, which has high concentrations of salt
and organic substances. The wastewater must be treated before reuse (Ciardelli
and Ranieri 2001). Coagulation and membrane processes (nanoltration or
reverse osmosis) are among processes suggested for treatment of the dye
waste water; however, these treatments are effective only with very dilute dye
liquors. The dye baths are generally heavily polluted. For example, wastewater
produced by reactive dyeing contains hydrolyzed reactive dyes not xed on thesubstrate (representing 20–30% of the reactive dyes applied on an average of
2 g/L). This residual amount is responsible for the coloration of the efuents,
and cannot be recycled. Dyeing auxiliaries or organic substances are non-
recyclable and contribute to the high BOD/COD of the dye water efuents.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 275/457
Enzymes in textile efuents 263
Membrane technologies are increasingly being used in the treatment of
textile wastewater for the recovery of valuable components from the waste
stream, as well as for reusing the aqueous stream. A number of studies deal
with application of various pressure driven membrane ltration processes in
the treatment wastewater from the dyeing and nishing process (Chen et al.
2005). Measures adopted for the abatement of pollution by different dyes are
(i) use of low material-to-liquor ratios, (ii) use of trisodiumcitrate (Fiebig et
al. 1992), (iii) replacement of reducing agent (sodium hydrosulphite) with a
reducing sugar or electrochemical reduction (Maier et al. 2004), and (iv) use
of suitable dye-xing agents to reduce water pollution loads. Padma et al.
(2006) rst reported the concept of totally ecologically friendly mordents ornatural mordents during dyeing with natural dyes. Deo and Desai (1999) were
the rst to point out that natural dye shades could be built-up by a multiple
dip method that renders natural dyeing more economical. Dyeing of natural
and synthetic bers with natural dyes has been the subject of several studies.
Development of eco-friendly non-formaldehyde dye xative agents for
reactive dyes was recently reported (Bechtold et al. 2005; Sekar 1995).
5.4.6 Printing
Printing is a branch of dyeing. It is generally dened as ‘localized dyeing’.
In dyeing, color is applied in the form of a solution, whereas in printing color
is applied in the form of a thick paste of the dye. The xation of the color in
printing is brought about by a suitable after treatment of the printed textile
material (El-Molla and Schneider 2006). In the textile fabric printing operation
produces hydrocarbon efuents that must be removed before they reach the
atmosphere. Limits on emissions will become more restrictive in the future,
which makes cleaning exhausts an environmental necessity. A majority of
textile printing units prefer to use kerosene in printing because of the brilliant
prints and ease of application. Kerosene is released into the atmosphere during
printing, drying, and curing which resulting pollution of the atmosphere and
wastage of hydrocarbon products. Air laden kerosene is harmful to human
beings, as well as to the ora and fauna, in the neighborhood. Therefore, it is
imperative that as much kerosene as possible is recovered from the exhaust
pipes of the printing industry. Zachariah (1995) was developed a process for
the recovery of thin kerosene vapor. In this process, the percentage of recovery
of kerosene from the printing drier was 78.5%, and the total percentage ofrecovery of kerosene consumed for the preparation of print paste was 58.8%.
The most common chemical in reactive dye printing is urea, which leads
to a high pollution load. A number of attempts have been made to limit or
eliminate the use of urea in the print paste to reduce efuent load. Geeta et
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 276/457
264 Bioprocessing of textiles
al. (2004) developed a urea-free process in which caprolactam, PEG-400, and
PEG-600 partially or completely replaced urea in the dyeing and printing of
reactive dyes on cotton fabrics. Caprolactam in many reactive dyes can fully
replace urea, while PEG-400 and PEG-600 replaced approximately 50% of
the dyes required for xation. Other substitutes for urea include glycerin,
cellosolve, sorbitol, polycarboxylic acid, PEG-200, and PEG-4000. Printing
is mainly done by a at or rotary screen, and after every lot of printing some
residual paste is left in the wastewater. This can be reused for printing of
similar shades by adding new stock. Recently, screen free printing methods,
such as ink-jet printing and electrostatic printing, have been developed that
make use of an electronic control of color distribution on fabric. Screen-free printing methods are attractive for pollution mitigation (Lukanova and
Ganchev 2005).
5.4.7 Finishing
Both natural and synthetic textiles are subjected to a variety of nishing
processes to improve specic functional properties of the materials. These
nishing processes involve the use of a large number of nishing agents for
softening, cross-linking, and waterproong. The most of the nishing operations,formaldehyde based cross-linking agents are used for getting desired properties,
such as softness and stiffness that impart bulk and drape properties, smoothness,
and handle, to cellulosic textiles. These operations contribute to high level water
pollution. The use of formaldehyde and liberation of chemical products, and
which leads to toxicity and stream pollution. Generation of formaldehyde during
vacuum extraction has been used in the storage of resin-nished fabrics and
garments. The formaldehyde resin used as a cross-linking agent is a pollutant
and a known carcinogen. Much effort has been expended in the search for a
substitute for formaldehyde (Hashem et al. 2005). Since the late 1980s, there
has been an increase in the demand for easy-care, wrinkle-resistant (durable
press), 100% cotton apparel. The formaldehyde based chemical nishes, such
as dimethylol dihydroxyethylene urea (DMDHEU) and its etheried derivative
with lower formaldehyde concentrations, are used to impart ease of care
characteristics and durable-press properties to cotton apparels. They are cost-
effective and efcient. The free formaldehyde on the nished textile fabric is a
major drawback given the adverse effects of formaldehyde, which ranges from
a strong irritant to carcinogenic. A variety of cellulose cross-linking agents, suchas polycarboxylic acids, has been investigated to provide non-formaldehyde
easy-care nishing. Natural polymeric substances, such as natural oil and wax,
have been used for water-proong; however, textiles made from natural bers are
generally more susceptible to bio-deterioration compared with those made from
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 277/457
Enzymes in textile efuents 265
synthetic bers. Bio-polishing using cellulose enzymes is an environmentally
friendly method to improve soft handling of cellulose bers with reduced piling,
less fuzz and improved drape.
5.5 Treatment of textile efuents by various
methods
5.5.1 Present scenario
The efuent treatment method is broadly classied into three main categories:
physical, chemical and biological treatments. There are four stages: preliminary,
primary, secondary and tertiary treatments to treat the efuents. The preliminary
treatment processes are equalization and neutralization. The primary stages
involve screening, sedimentation, oatation, and occulation. Secondary
stages are used to reduce the organic load, facilitate physical/chemical
separation and biological oxidation. Tertiary stages are important because they
serve as polishing of efuent treatment. The wastewater from the dye house
is generally multi-colored. The dye efuent disposed into the land and river
water reduces the depth of penetration of sunlight into the water environment,
which in turn decreases photosynthetic activity and dissolved oxygen (DO).The adverse effects can spell disaster for aquatic life and the soil. Figure 5.4
shows the classication of waste water treatments for cotton processing. Many
dyes contain organic compounds with functional groups, such as carboxylic (–
COOH), amine (–NH2), and azo (–N=N–) groups, so treatment methods must
be tailored to the chemistry of the dyes. Particularly in the dye houses, the waste
water efuents resulting from dyed cotton fabrics with reactive dyes are highly
polluted and have high BOD/COD, coloration, and salt load.
Fig. 5.3 Activities involving water in textile processing [Source: Ramesh Babu et al. 2007]
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 278/457
266 Bioprocessing of textiles
Fig. 5.4 Classication of waste water treatment process
5.5.1.1 Primary treatment After the removal of gross solids, gritty materials and excessive quantities
of oil and grease, the next step is to remove the remaining suspended solids
as much as possible. This step is aimed at reducing the strength of the waste
water and also to facilitate secondary treatment.
Screening: In the rst screening operation, coarse suspended matters such
as rags, pieces of fabric, bres, yarns and lint are removed. Bar screens and
mechanically cleaned ne screens are mainly removing most of the bres
present in the waste efuents. The suspended bres have to be removed priorto secondary biological treatment; otherwise they may affect the secondary
treatment system. They are reported to clog trickling lters, seals or carbon
beads.
Sedimentation: The suspended matter in textile waste efuent can be
removed efciently and economically by sedimentation. This process is
particularly useful for treatment of wastes containing high percentage of
settable solids or when the waste is subjected to combined treatment with
sewage. The sedimentation tanks are designed to enable smaller and lighter
particles to settle under gravity. The most common equipment used includes
horizontal ow sedimentation tanks and centre feed circular clariers. The
settled sludge is removed from the sedimentation tanks by mechanical
scrapping into hoppers and pumping it out subsequently.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 279/457
Enzymes in textile efuents 267
Equalization: The waste efuent streams are collected into ‘sump pit’.
Sometimes mixed efuents are stirred by rotating agitators or by blowing
compressed air from below. The pit has a conical bottom for enhancing the
settling of solid particles.
Neutralization: Normally, pH values of cotton nishing efuents are on
the alkaline side. Hence, pH value of equalized efuent should be adjusted.
Use of dilute sulphuric acid and boiler ue gas rich in carbon dioxide are not
uncommon. Since most of the secondary biological treatments are effective in
the pH 5 to 9, neutralisation step is an important process to facilitate.
Chemical coagulation and mechanical occulation: Finely divided
suspended solids and colloidal particles cannot be efciently removed bysimple sedimentation by gravity. In such cases, mechanical occulation or
chemical coagulation is employed. In mechanical occulation, the textile
waste water is passed through a tank under gentle stirring; the nely divided
suspended solids coalesce into larger particles and settle out. Specialized
equipment such as clarriocculator is also available, wherein occulation
chamber is a part of a sedimentation tank. The degree of clarication obtained
also depends on the quantity of chemicals used. In this method, 80–90% of
the total suspended matter, 40–70% of BOD, 5days, 30–60% of the COD and
80–90% of the bacteria can be removed. However, in plain sedimentation,only 50–70% of the total suspended matter and 30–40% of the organic matter
settles out. Most commonly used chemicals for chemical coagulation are
alum, ferric chloride, ferric sulphate, ferrous sulphate and lime.
5.5.1.2 Secondary treatment
The main purpose of secondary treatment is to provide BOD removal beyond
the sedimentation level of treatments. It also removes appreciable amounts of
oil and phenol. In secondary treatment, the dissolved and colloidal organic
compounds and colour present in waste water is removed or reduced and to
stabilize the organic matter. This is achieved biologically using bacteria and
other microorganisms. Textile processing efuents are amenable for biological
treatments (Vanndevivera and binanchi 1998). These processes may be
aerobic or anaerobic. In aerobic processes, bacteria and other microorganisms
consume organic matter as food (Basibuyuk and Forster 1997). They bring
about the following sequential changes: (i) Coagulation and occulation of
colloidal matter (ii) Oxidation of dissolved organic matter to carbon dioxide(iii) Degradation of nitrogenous organic matter to ammonia, which is then
converted into nitrite and eventually to nitrate. Anaerobic treatment is mainly
employed for the digestion of sludge (Bortone et al. 1995). The efciency
of this process depends upon pH, temperature, waste loading, absence of
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 280/457
268 Bioprocessing of textiles
oxygen and toxic materials. Some of the commonly used biological treatment
processes are described below:
Aerated lagoons: These are large holding tanks or ponds having a depth
of 3–5 m and are lined with cement, polythene or rubber. The efuents from
primary treatment processes are collected in these tanks and are aerated with
mechanical devices, such as oating aerators, for about 2 to 6 days. During
this time, a healthy occulent sludge is formed which brings about oxidation
of the dissolved organic matter. BOD removal to the extent of 99% could be
achieved with efcient operation. The major disadvantages are the large space
requirements and the bacterial contamination of the lagoon efuent, which
necessitates further biological purication. Trickling flters: The trickling lters usually consists of circular or
rectangular beds, 1 m to 3 m deep, made of well graded media (such as
broken stone, PVC, coal, synthetic resins, gravel or clinkers) of size 40–150
mm, over which wastewater is sprinkled uniformly on the entire bed with the
help of a slowly rotating distributor (such as rotary sprinkler) equipped with
orices or nozzles. Thus, the waste water trickles through the media. The lter
is arranged in such a fashion that air can enter at the bottom; counter current to
the efuent ow and a natural draft is produced. A gelatinous lm, comprising
of bacteria and aerobic microorganisms known as “Zooglea”, is formed onthe surface of the lter medium. The organic impurities in the waste water are
adsorbed on the gelatinous lm during its passage and then are oxidized by
the bacteria and the other micro-organisms present therein.
Activated sludge process: This is the most versatile biological oxidation
method employed for the treatment of waste water containing dissolved solids,
colloids and coarse solid organic matter. In this process, the waste water is
aerated in a reaction tank in which some microbial oc is suspended. The
aerobic bacterial ora bring about biological degradation of the waste intocarbon dioxide and water molecule, while consuming some organic matter
for synthesizing bacteria. The bacteria ora grows and remains suspended in
the form of a oc, which is called “Activated Sludge”. The efuent from the
reaction tank is separated from the sludge by settling and discharged. A part
of the sludge is recycled to the same tank to provide an effective microbial
population for a fresh treatment cycle (McMullan et al. 2001). The surplus
sludge is digested in a sludge digester, along with the primary sludge obtained
from primary sedimentation. An efcient aeration for 5–24 hours is required
for industrial wastes. BOD removal to the extent of 90–95% can be achievedin this process.
Oxidation ditch: This can be considered as a modication of the
conventional activated sludge process. The waste water, after screening in
allowed into the oxidation ditch. The mixed liquor containing the sludge
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 281/457
Enzymes in textile efuents 269
solids is rst aerated in the channel with the help of a mechanical rotor. The
usual hydraulic retention time is 12–24 hours and for solids, it is 20–30 days.
Most of the sludge formed is recycled for the subsequent treatment cycle.
Oxidation pond: An oxidation pond is a large shallow pond wherein
stabilization of organic matter in the waste is brought about mostly by bacteria
and to some extent by protozoa. The oxygen requirement for their metabolism
is provided by algae present in the pond. The algae, in turn, utilize the CO2
released by the bacteria for their photosynthesis. Oxidation ponds are also
called waste stabilization ponds.
Anaerobic digestion: Sludge is the watery residue from the primary
sedimentation tank and humus tank (from secondary treatment). Theconstituents of the sludge undergo slow fermentation or digestion by anaerobic
bacteria in a sludge digester, wherein the sludge is maintained at a temperature
of 35°C at pH 7–8 for about 30 days. CH4, CO
2 and some NH
3 are liberated as
the end products.
5.5.1.3 Tertiary treatment processes
The textile waste contains signicant quantities of non-biodegradable
chemical polymers, since the conventional treatment methods are inadequateand need for efcient tertiary treatment process.
Oxidation techniques: A variety of oxidizing agents can be used to
decolorize wastes. Sodium hypochlorite decolorizes dye bath efciently.
Though it is a low cost technique, but it forms absorbable toxic organic halides
(AOX). Ozone on decomposition generates oxygen and free radicals and the
later combines with colouring agents of efuent resulting in the destruction
of dye colours. Arslan et al. (2000) investigated the treatment of synthetic dye
house efuent by ozonisation, and hydrogen peroxide in combination with
ultraviolet light. The main disadvantage of these techniques is it requires an
effective sludge producing pretreatment.
Electrolytic precipitation and foam fractionation:Electrolytic precipitation
of concentrated dye wastes by reduction in the cathode space of an electrolytic
bath been reported although extremely long contact times were required.
Foam fractionation is experimental method based on the phenomenon that
surface-active solutes collect at gas–liquid interfaces. However, the chemical
costs make this treatment method too expensive.
Membrane technologies: Reverse osmosis and electro dialysis are theimportant examples of membrane process. The TDS from waste water can
be removed by reverse osmosis. Reverse osmosis is suitable for removing
ions and larger species from dye bath efuents with high efciency (up to
>90%), clogging of the membrane by dyes after long usage and high capital
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 282/457
270 Bioprocessing of textiles
cost are the main drawbacks of this process. Dyeing process requires use of
electrolytes along with the dyes. Neutral electrolyte like NaCl is required
to have high exhaustion of the dye. For instance, in cotton dyeing, NaCl
concentration in the dyeing bath is in the range of 25–30 g/l for deep tone and
about 15 g/l for light tone, but can be as high as 50 g/l in exceptional cases.
The exhaustion stage in reactive dyeing on cotton also requires sufcient
quantity of salt. Reverse osmosis membrane process is suitable for removing
high salt concentrations so that the treated efuent can be re-used again in
the processing. The presence of electrolytes in the washing water causes an
increase in the hydrolyzed dye afnity (for reactive dyeing on cotton) making
it difcult to extract. In electro dialysis, the dissolved salts (ionic in nature)can also be removed by impressing an electrical potential across the water,
resulting in the migration of cations and anions to respective electrodes via
anionic and cationic permeable membranes. To avoid membrane fouling it
is essential that turbidity, suspended solids, colloids and trace organics be
removed prior to electro dialysis.
Electro chemical processes: They have lower temperature requirement
than those of other equivalent non electro chemical treatment and there is no
need for additional chemical. It also can prevent the production of unwanted
side products. But, if suspended or colloidal solids were high concentration inthe waste water, they impede the electrochemical reaction. Therefore, those
materials need to be sufciently removed before electrochemical oxidation.
Ion exchange method: This is used for the removal of undesirable anions
and cations from waste water. It involves the passage of waste water through
the beds of ion exchange resins where some undesirable cations or anions of
waste water get exchanged for sodium or hydrogen ions of the resin. Most ion
exchange resins now in use are synthetic polymeric materials containing ion
groups such as sulphonyl, quarternary ammonium group etc. Photocatalytic degradation: An advanced method to decolorize a wide
range of dyes depending upon their molecular structure. In this process,
photoactive catalyst illuminates with UV light, generates highly reactive
radical, which can decompose organic compounds.
Adsorption: It is the exchange of material at the interface between two
immiscible phases in contact with one another. Adsorption appears to have
considerable potential for the removal of colour from industrial efuents.
Owen (1978) after surveying 13 textile industries has reported that adsorption
using granular activated carbon has emerged as a practical and economical process for the removal of colour from textile efuents.
Thermal evaporation: The use of sodium per sulphate has better oxidizing
potential than NaOCl in the thermal evaporator. The process is ecofriendly
since there is no sludge formation and no emission of the toxic chlorine fumes
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 283/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 284/457
272 Bioprocessing of textiles
(Pala and Tokat 2002), is often resorted to after the biological treatment
(Ledakowic et al. 2001). These methods, which only release efuents into the
environment per legal requirements, are expensive.
5.7.2 Biological aerated lters (BAF)
The growth of an organism on media that are held stationary during normal
operation and exposed to aeration. In recent years, several BAF-based
technologies have been developed to treat wastewater. Efuents from textile
industry are among wastewaters that are hard to treat satisfactorily, because
their compositions are highly variable. The strong color is most striking
characteristic of textile wastewater. If unchecked, colored wastewater can
cause a signicantly negative impact on the aquatic environment primarily
arising from increased turbidity and pollutant concentrations.
5.7.3 Coagulation occulation methods
Coagulation occulation methods are generally used to eliminate organic
substances, but the chemicals normally used in this process have no effect
on the elimination of soluble dyestuffs. Although this process effectivelyeliminates insoluble dyes (Gaehr et al. 1994).
5.7.4 Adsorption on powdered activated carbon
The adsorption on activated carbon without pretreatment is impossible
because the suspended solids rapidly clog the lter (Matsui et al. 2005). This
method is feasible only in combination with occulation decantation treatment
or a biological treatment. The combination permits a reduction of suspended
solids and organic substances, as well as a slight reduction in the color (Rozziet al. 1999).
5.7.5 Electrochemical processes
Electrochemical techniques for the treatment of dye waste are more efcient
than other treatments (Naumczyk et al. 1996). Electrochemical technology
has been applied to effectively remove acids, as well as dispersed and metal
complex dyes. Marrot and Roche (2002) have studied and reported more than
100 references in a bibliographical review of textile waste water treatment.Figure 5.5 shows the treatment operation and decision structure of waste
water treatment. The physical methods include precipitation (coagulation,
occulation, sedimentation) (Lin and Peng 1996; Solozhenko et al. 1995; Lin
and Liu 1994; McKay et al. 1987), adsorption (on activated carbon, biological
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 285/457
Enzymes in textile efuents 273
sludges) (Pala and Tokat 2002), ltration, or reverse osmosis membrane
processes (Ghayeni et al. 1998; Treffry-Goatley et al. 1983; Tinghui et al.
1983).
Fig. 5.5 Electrochemical treatment and recovery of chemicals from the textile efuent
The removal of dyes from aqueous solutions results from adsorption and
degradation of the dye-stuff following interaction with iron electrodes. If metal
complex dyes are present, dye solubility and charge are important factors thatdetermine the successful removal of heavy metals. In order to maximize dye
insolubility, pH control is crucial (Chakarborty et al. 2003; Vedavyasam 2000;
Nowak et al. 1996; Calabro et al. 1990). Electro-coagulation is an efcient
process, even at high pH, for the removal of color and total organic carbon.
The efciency of the process is strongly inuenced by the current density
and duration of the reaction. Under optimal conditions, decolorization yields
between 90 and 95%, and COD removal between 30 and 36% can be achieved.
5.7.6 Ozone treatment
This ozone treatment is widely used in water treatment; ozone (O3-UV or
O3-H
2O
2) is now used in the treatment of industrial efuents (Langlais et al.
2001; Malik and Sanyal 2004). Ozone especially attacks the double bonds that
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 286/457
274 Bioprocessing of textiles
bestow color. For this reason, decolorization of wastewater by ozone alone
does not lead to a signicant reduction in COD (Coste et al. 1996; Adams
et al. 1995). Moreover, installation of ozonation plants can entail additional
costs (Scott and Ollis 1995).
5.7.7 Membrane processes
Increasing cost of water and its proigate consumption necessitate a
treatment process that is integrated with in-plant water circuits rather than as
a subsequent treatment (Machenbach 1998). From this standpoint, membrane
ltration offers potential applications. Processes using membranes provide
very interesting possibilities for the separation of hydrolyzed dye-stuffs anddyeing auxiliaries that simultaneously reduce coloration and BOD/COD of
the wastewater. The choice of the membrane process, whether it is reverse
osmosis, nanoltration, ultra ltration or microltration, must be guided by
the quality of the nal product (Al-Malack and Anderson 1997).
5.7.8 Reverse osmosis
Reverse osmosis membranes have a retention rate of 90% or more for most
types of ionic compounds and produce a high quality of permeate (Ghayeni etal. 1998; Treffry-Goatley et al. 1983; Tinghui et al. 1983). Decoloration and
elimination of chemical auxiliaries in dye house wastewater can be carried out
in a single step by reverse osmosis. Reverse osmosis permits the removal of
all mineral salts, hydrolyzed reactive dyes, and chemical auxiliaries (Abadulla
et al. 2000).
5.7.9 Nanoltration
Nanoltration has been applied for the treatment of colored efuents fromthe textile industry (Akbari et al. 2002). A combination of adsorption and
nanoltration can be adopted for the treatment of textile dye efuents
(Chakraborty et al. 2003). Nanoltration membranes retain low molecular
weight organic compounds, divalent ions, large monovalent ions, hydrolyzed
reactive dyes, and dyeing auxiliaries (Jiraratananon et al. 2000; Xu et al. 1999;
Erswell et al. 1988). Harmful effects of high concentrations of dye and salts
in dye house efuents have frequently been reported (Tang and Chen 2002;
Koyuncu 2002; Bruggen et al. 2001).
5.7.10 Ultraltration
Ultraltration enables elimination of macromolecules and particles, but the
elimination of polluting substances, such as dyes, is never complete (it is
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 287/457
Enzymes in textile efuents 275
only between 31% and 76%) (Watters et al. 1991). Even in the best of cases,
the quality of the treated wastewater does not permit its reuse for sensitive
processes, such as dyeing of textile. Rott and Minke (1999) emphasize that
40% of the water treated by ultra ltration can be recycled to feed processes
termed “minor” in the textile industry (rinsing, washing). Ultraltration can
only be used as a pretreatment for reverse osmosis (Ciardelli and Ranieri
2001) or in combination with a biological reactor (Mignani et al. 1999).
5.7.11 Microltration
Microltration is suitable for treating dye baths containing pigment dyes (Al-
Malack and Anderson 1997), as well as for subsequent rinsing baths. Thechemicals used in dye bath, which are not ltered by microltration, will
remain in the bath. Microltration can also be used as a pretreatment for
nanoltration or reverse osmosis (Ghayeni et al. 1998). The various textile
wet processing stages in the textile industry and the methodologies adopted
for treating textile wastewater (Table 5.6) are discussed from an environmental
point of view (Ghosh and Gangopadhyay 2000).
Table 5.6 Possible treatments for cotton textile wastes and their associated
advantages and disadvantages
Process Advantages Disadvantages References
Biodegradation Rates of elimination
by oxidizable
substances about
90%
Low
biodegradability of
dyes
Pala and Tokat
2002; Ledakowicz
et al. 2001
Coagulation/
Flocculation
Elimination of
insoluble dyes
Production of
sludge blocking
lter
Gaehr et al. 1994
Adsorption onactivated carbon
Suspended solidsand organic
substances well
reduced
Cost of activatedcarbon
Arslan et al. 2000
Ozone treatment Good decolorization No reduction of the
COD
Adams et al.
1995; Scott and
Ollis 1995
Electrochemical
processes
Capacity of
adaptation to
different volumes
and pollution loads
Iron hydroxide
sludge
Lin and Peng
1994; Lin and
Chen 1997
Reverse osmosis Removal of all
mineral salts,
hydrolyzes reactive
dyes and chemical
auxiliaries
High pressure Ghayeni et al.
1998
Contd...
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 288/457
276 Bioprocessing of textiles
Process Advantages Disadvantages References
Nanoltration Separation of
organic compounds
of low molecular
weight and
divalent ions from
monovalent salts
High installation
cost
Erswell et al.
1998;
Xu et al. 1999;
Akbari et al. 2002;
Tang and Chen
2002
Ultraltration/
microltration
Low pressure Insufcient quality
of the treated
wastewater
Watters et al.
1991; Rott and
Mike 1999;
Ghayeni et al.1998
5.8 Role of enzymes in decolouration
In textile processing as well as other industrial applications, large amounts of
dyestuffs are used. The high COD and BOD, suspended solids (SS) and intense
colour due to the extensive use of synthetic dyes characterize wastewater from
textile industry, especially dye houses. The water must be decolorized; harmful
chemicals must be converted into harmless chemicals. Biological treatmentshave been used to reduce the COD of textile efuents. Physical and chemical
treatments are effective for colour removal but use more energy and chemicals
than biological processes. Instead of using the chemical treatments, various
biological methods can be used to treat the water from the textile industry.
These methods include, (i) biosorption, (ii) use of enzymes, (iii) aerobic and (iv)
anaerobic treatments. Biotechnological solutions can offer complete destruction
of the dyestuff, with a co-reduction in BOD and COD. The synthetic dyes are being
designed in such a way that they become more resistant to microbial degradation
under the aerobic conditions. The water solubility and high molecular weightinhibit the permeation through biological cell membranes. Anaerobic processes
convert the organic contaminants with less space; treat wastes containing up
to 30,000 mg/l of COD, have lower running costs and produce less sludge.
Biological systems, such as biolters and bioscrubbers, are now available for
the removal of odor and other volatile compounds. The dyes can be removed
by biosorption on apple pomace and wheat straw. Apple pomace had a greater
capacity to absorb the reactive dyes compared to wheat straw.
5.8.1 Decolorization of the dye house efuent using
enzymes
The use of lignin degrading white rot fungi has attracted increasing scientic
attention as these organisms are able to degrade a wide range of recalcitrant
Contd...
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 289/457
Enzymes in textile efuents 277
organic compounds such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, chlorophenol,
and various azo, heterocyclic and polymeric dyes (Alemzadeh et al. 2009).
The enzymes associated with the lignin degradation are identied such as (i)
laccase, (ii) lignin peroxidase, and (iii) manganese peroxidase. The lacasses are
the multicopper enzymes which catalyzes the oxidation of phenolic and non-
phenolic compounds (Alexandre and Zhulin 2000). However, the substrate
of the laccases can be extended by using mediators such as 2,2-azoinobis-(3-
ethylthiazoline-6-sulfonate) and 1-hydroxy benzotriazole. Many researchers
also identied the fungi groups which have been used for laccase production
and for the decolorization of synthetic dyes such as Trametes modesta,
trametes versicolor, trametes Hirsuta, and Sclerotium Rolfsii (Ardon et al.1996).
Trametes modesta laccase enzyme has been noticed the highest potential
to transform the textile dyes into colorless products (Heining et al. 1997).
The rate of the laccase catalyzed decolorization of the dyes increase with the
increase in temperature up to certain degree above which the dye decolorization
decreases or does not take place at all (Camarero et al. 2005). The optimum
pH for laccase catalyzed decolorization depends on the type of the dye used.
Dyes with different structures were decolorized at different rates. The structure
of the dye as well as the enzymes play major role in the decolorization ofdyes and it is evident that the laccase of trametes modesta may be used for
decolorization of textile dyestuffs, efuent treatments, and bioremediation or
as a bleaching agent. Activated sludge systems can also be used to treat the
dye house efuents (Ambatkar and Mukundan 2012). Immobilized microbe
bioreactors (IMBRs) address the need of increased microbial/waste contact,
without concomitant production of excessive biosolids, through the use of
solid but porous matrix to which a tailored microbial consortium of organisms
has been attached (Campos et al. 2001). This method may be allowed greaternumber of organisms to be available for waste degradation without the need of
a suspended population and greater increased contact between the organisms
and the waste.
5.8.1.1 Causes of recalcitrance of pollutants
The removal of coloring matter from dye efuent is a major problem faced
by industries. In general, the chemical structure of dyes contains conjugated
double bonds and aromatic rings (Zille et al. 2004). Many synthetic dyeshaving characteristics which tend to persist in the environment due to the
inherent stability of their molecular structure. Azo dyes for example, have
a characteristic azo (–N=N–) linkage which is electron withdrawing in
nature. The presence of this linkage decreases the susceptibility of azo dyes
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 290/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 291/457
Enzymes in textile efuents 279
peroxidase (E.C. 1.11.1.13) and lignin peroxidase (E.C. 1.11.1.14) are
ferric ion containing heme proteins and require peroxides like H2O
2 for
their functioning. Lignin peroxidase (Kersten et al. 1990) and manganese
peroxidase (Moturi and Singara charya 2009) are obtained from fungi.
There are various plant sources of peroxidases – like horse radish (Da Silva
et al. 2010; Maddhinni et al. 2006; Ulson de Souza et al. 2007), soyabean
(Johnson and Pokora 1994), radish (Naghibi et al. 2003), beetroot (Rudrappa
et al. 2005) and peanut (Bagirova et al. 2001). Most of these peroxidases
have been tested to determine their potential to treat synthetic and actual
wastewaters. Laccase (E.C.1.10.3.2) is a blue copper oxidase that catalyzes
the four electron reduction of molecular oxygen (O2) to water (H2O)(McGuirl and Dooley 1999). These enzymes are mainly obtained from lignin
degrading fungi such as Trametes versicolor (Adam et al. 1999) and T. Villosa
(Zille et al. 2004) as well as fungi like Fusarium solani (Abedin 2008) and
Cladospora cladosporioides (Vijayakumar et al. 2006). Azo dyes undergo
reductive splitting relatively easily under anaerobic conditions (Kalyuzhnyi
et al. 2006). The anaerobic reduction of certain azo dyes, however, yields
aromatic amines that are potentially carcinogenic (Kandelbauer et al. 2004).
The degradation of different dyes by select oxidoreductases from different
biological sources has been summarized (Table 5.7).
Table 5.7 Enzyme mediated decoloration of some dyes
Substrate(s) Enzyme Reference
3-(4 dimethyl amino-1 phenylazo)
Benzene sulfonic acid
Laccase from Trametes
villosa
Zille et al. 2004
Acid Orange 6, Acid Orange 7
Methyl Orange and Methyl Red
Mixture of bacterial
Oxidoreductases from
sludge methanogens
Kalyuzhnyi et al.
2006
Direct Yellow Horseradish peroxidase
from
Armoracia rusticana
Maddhinni et al.
2006
Acid Blue Laccase from
Cladosporium
cladosporioides
Vijaykumar et al.
2006
Tartrazine and Ponceau Azoreductase from Green
Algae
Omar 2008
Reactive Yellow, Reactive BlackReactive Red and Direct Blue
Azoreductase fromStaphylococcus arlettae
Franciscon et al.2009
While peroxidases are specic to the electron acceptor, i.e. hydrogen
peroxide or alkyl peroxides, they are not very specic towards the electron
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 292/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 293/457
Enzymes in textile efuents 281
Fig. 5.6 Response surface plots for decolouration of RY15 as a function of (a) pH and
temperature at 96 U/L; (b) enzyme concentration and temperature at pH 5; (c) pH and
enzyme concentration at 35°C [Source: Ana et al. 2009]
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 294/457
282 Bioprocessing of textiles
Fig. 5.7 Response surface plots for decolourization of RB114 as function of: (a) pH
and temperature at 96 U/L; (b) pH and enzyme concentration at 35°C [Source: Ana et
al. 2009]
5.8.2.1 Applications of laccases – wastewater treatment
Textile dye efuents are complex, containing a wide variety of dyes, natural
impurities extracted from the bers and other products such as dispersants,
leveling agents, acids, alkalis, salts and sometimes heavy metals (Laing 1991).
In general, the efuent is highly coloured with high biological oxygen demand
(BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD), it has a high conductivity and
is alkaline in nature. The dyeing processes have, in general, a low yield and
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 295/457
Enzymes in textile efuents 283
the percentage of the lost dye in the efuents can reach up to 50% (Pierce
1994; Pearce et al. 2003). From the available literature it can be estimated that
approximately 75% of the dyes, discharged by textile processing industries,
belong to the following classes: reactive (~36%), acid (~25%) and direct
(~15%) (Øllgaard et al. 1998). In these classes, the azo dyes are the most
important chemical class of synthetic dyes. Azo dyes are characterised by the
presence of at least one azo bond (-N=N-) bearing aromatic rings and have
high photolytic stability and resistance towards major oxidising agents (Reife
et al. 1993).
Fig. 5.8 Response surface plots for decolourization of RR239 as function of: (a) pH
and temperature at 96 U/L enzyme concentration; (b) pH and enzyme concentration at
35°C [Source: Ana et al. 2009]
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 296/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 297/457
Enzymes in textile efuents 285
at 25°C (Fig. 5.9). The manganese pyrochlorophyride methylester (MnPChlide
ME) dissolved in a Triton X-100 micellar solution also exhibited the catalytic
activity, indicating the micellar environment plays an important role in the
catalytic reaction (Dellamatrice and Monteiro 2006). The reaction rate was
accelerated by addition of imidazole. The catalytic reactions were analyzed
by Michaelis–Menten kinetics, revealing that the higher reactivity of catalyst
substrate complex is responsible for the present catalytic reaction system.
Fig. 5.9 Catalyst-substrate complex of MnP and PEG in decoloration of azo dye
Fig. 5.10 Various types of PEG and MnP and their catalytic groups
The commercial azo, triarylmethane, antraquinonic, and indigoid textile dyes
are efciently decolorized with enzyme preparations from Pleurotus ostreatus,
Schizophyllum commune, Neurospora crassa, Polyporus sp., Sclerotium rolfsii,
Trametes villosa, and Mycelioph tora thermophila, (Fig. 5.10). The nature of
substituents on the dyes benzene rings inuences enzyme activity, and hydroxyl
and amino groups enhance decolorization (Abadulla et al. 2000). The presence
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 298/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 299/457
Enzymes in textile efuents 287
Fig. 5.11 Absorption spectra of the azo dyes – Reactive Black 5 (A), Reactive Yellow27 (B), and Reactive Red 158 (C) – during decoloration by Geotrichum sp. For the black
dye the overlays correspond to Day 0, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 10. For the yellow and red dyes
the overlays correspond to Day 0, 3, 7, 11, 14, 18 and 24 [Source: Cristina Máximo et
al. 2003]
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 300/457
288 Bioprocessing of textiles
One of the limiting steps for bacterial degradation of azo dyes is the
necessity for their uptake into the cell. In contrast, fungal transformations
are mediated by exo-enzymes and membrane permeation of the substrate can
be by-passed (Mustafa et al. 2005; Pereira et al. 2005). It is likely that the
phenoloxidases studied i.e. Mn peroxidase; Mn-independent peroxidase and/or
laccase were responsible for the biotransformation of the black dye. In the case
of the yellow and red dyes it is suggested that additional enzymes or factors are
involved (Tzanov et al. 2003). When the yellow and red dyes were introduced
at the start of the cultivation, the dye transformation required about 20 days.
Future work will be directed at identifying additional oxidoreductases that may
have auxiliary roles in transformation of dyes that are more recalcitrant. Thiscould lead to the development of a more effective enzymatic cocktail for dye
decoloration. The use of enzymes (Setti et al. 1999; Thurston 1994), rather than
whole fungi might be expected to be a more viable option from the point of view
of the decolorization process control at the industrial scale.
5.9 Prospects and future research
The number of studies on the biodecoloration of dyestuffs has been steadily
increasing in recent years. Several countries, including India, have introducedstrict ecological standards for textile industries. With more stringent controls
expected in the future, it is essential that control measures be implemented
to minimize efuent problems. Waste minimization is of great importance
in decreasing pollution load and production costs. This review has shown
that various methods can be applied to treat cotton textile efuents and to
minimize pollution load. Traditional technologies to treat textile wastewater
include various combinations of biological, physical, and chemical methods,
but these methods require high capital and operating costs. Technologies
based on membrane systems are among the best alternative methods that
can be adopted for large-scale ecologically friendly treatment processes.
A combination methods involving adsorption followed by nanoltration
has also been advocated. Initially, refractory organic compounds and dyes
may be electrochemically oxidized to biodegradable constituents before the
wastewater is subjected to biological treatment under aerobic conditions.
Color and odor removal may be accomplished by a second electro-oxidation
process. Microbial life, if any, may be destroyed by a photochemical treatment.
The treated water at this stage may be used for rinsing and washing purposes;however, an ion-exchange step may be introduced if the water is desired to be
used for industrial processing.
Enzymes have been employed in numerous elds primarily for their
immense catalytic potential. In wastewater treatment, enzymes can be utilized
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 301/457
Enzymes in textile efuents 289
to develop remediation processes that are environmentally less aggressive than
conventional techniques. Their versatility and efciency even in mild reaction
conditions gives them an advantage over the conventional physico-chemical
treatment methods. The biological origin of enzymes reduces their adverse
impact on the environment thereby making enzymatic wastewater treatment an
ecologically sustainable technique. Currently, efuent treatment using enzymes
on a large scale is not economically viable. However, if maximum reusability of
enzymes is achieved through the use of standardized immobilization procedures,
the running cost can be lowered considerably. The conuence of nanoscience
and enzyme technology has resulted in an upcoming interdisciplinary approach
to wastewater treatment. Such innovative applications of enzymes can enablethe utilization of these biocatalysts to their maximum potential. Future research
in this eld should emphasize on the optimization of the activity of crude enzyme
preparations and on the improvement of enzyme reusability to counteract the
high start-up and running costs.
5.10 References
Abadulla, E., Robra, K.H,, Gubitz, G.M., Silva, L.M., Cavaco-Paulo, A., ‘Enzymatic
decolorization of textile dyeing efuents’, Text Res J, 2000, 70, 409–414.Abadulla, E., Tzanov, T., Costa, S., Robra, K.H., Cavaco-Paulo, A., Gübitz, G.M.,
‘Decolorization and detoxication of textile dyes with a laccase from Trametes hirsuta’,
Appl Environ Microb, 2000, 66, 3357–62.
Abdessemed, D., and Nezzal. G., ‘Treatment of primary efuent by coagulation adsorption
ultraltration for reuse’, Desalination, 2002, 152, 367–73.
Abedin, M.A.R., ‘Decolorization and Biodegradation of Crystal Violet and Malachite
Green by Fusarium solani (Martius) Saccardo, A Comparative Study on Biosorption of
Dyes by the Dead Fungal Biomass’, J Bot, 2008, 1(2), 17–31.
Abo-Farah, S.A., ‘Comparative Study of Oxidation of Some Azo Dyes by DifferentAdvanced Oxidation Processes, Fenton, Fenton-Like, Photo-Fenton and Photo-Fenton-
Like’, Am J Sci., 2010, 6(10), 128–142.
Adam, W., Lazarus, M., Saha-Mollera, C., Weichold, O., Hoch, U., Haring, D., and
Schreier, P., ‘Biotransformation with Peroxidase’, Adv Biochem Engg Biotechnol, 1999,
63, 73–107.
Adams, C.D., Fusco, W., and Kanzelmeyer, T., ‘Ozone, hydrogen peroxide/ozone and UV/
ozone treatment of chromium and copper complex dyes: decolorization and metal release’,
Ozone Sci Engg, 1995, 17, 149–161.
Adlercreutz, P., Methods in Biotechnology - Immobilization of Enzymes and Cells, 2nd
Edition, Humana Press, Totowa, USA, 2006.
Akbari, A., Remigy, J.C., and Aptel, P., ‘Treatment of textile dye efuent using a polyamide-
based nanoltration membrane’, Chem Engg Proc, 2002, 41, 601–609.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 302/457
290 Bioprocessing of textiles
Alemzadeh, I., Nejati, S., and Vossoughi, M, ‘Removal of Phenols from Wastewater with
Encapsulated Horseradish Peroxidase in Calcium Alginate’, Engg Lett, 2009, 17(4), 56–68.
Alexandre, G., Zhulin, I.B., ‘Laccases are widespread in bacteria’, Trends Biotechnol,
2000, 18, 41–42.
Al-Malack, M.H., and Anderson, G.K., ‘Use of cross ow microltration in wastewater
treatment’, Water Res, 1997, 31, 3064–72.
Ambatkar Mugdha and Mukundan Usha, ‘Enzymatic treatment of wastewater containing
dyestuffs using different delivery systems’, Sci Revs chem commun, 2012, 2(1), 31–40.
Ana, P.M., Tavares, R.O., Cristóvão, J.M., Loureiro, R., Boaventura, A, R, Eugénia,
A.M., ‘Application of statistical experimental methodology to optimize reactive dye
decolourization by commercial laccase’, J Hazardous Materials, 2009, 162, (2), 1255–60.
Ardon, O., Kerem, Z., Hadar, Y., ‘Enhancement of laccase activity in liquid cultures of
the ligninolytic fungus Pleurotus ostreatus by cotton stalk extract’, J Biotechnol, 1996, 51,
201–207.
Arslan, I., Balcioglu, I.A., and Bahnemann, D.W., ‘Advanced chemical oxidation of
reactive dyes in simulated dye house efuents by ferrioxalate-Fenton/UV-A and TiO2/
UV-A processes’, Dyes Pigments, 2000, 47, 207–218.
Azymezyk, M., El-Shafei, A., and Freeman, H.S., ‘Design, synthesis and characterization
of new iron complexed azo dyes’, Dyes Pigments, 2007, 72, 8–15.
Bagirova, N.A., Shekhovtsova, T.N., and Van Huystee, R.B., ‘Enzymatic Determination ofPhenols using Peanut Peroxidase’, Talanta, 2001, 55, 1151–64.
Banat, I.M., Nigam, P., Singh, D., Marchant, R., ‘Microbial decolorization of textile-dye-
containing efuents: a review’, Bioresource Technol, 1996, 58, 217–27.
Basibuyuk, M., and Forster, C.F., ‘The use of sequential anaerobic/aerobic processes for
the bio-treatment of a simulated dyeing wastewater’, Environ Technol, 1997, 18, 843–848.
Batra, S.H., ‘Other long vegetable bers: abaca, banana, sisal, henequen, ax, ramie, hemp,
sunn, and coir. p. 15–22. In M. Lewin and E.M. Pearce (ed.). Handbook of ber science and
technology. Vol. IV, Fiber Chemistry. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1985.
Bechtold, T., Mussak, R., Mahmud-Ali, A., Ganglberger, E., and Geissler, S., ‘Extraction
of natural dyes for textile dyeing from coloured plant wastes released from the food and
beverage industry’, J Sci Food Agric, 2005, 86, 233–42.
Bl´anquez, P., Sarra, M., and Vicent, M.T., ‘Study of the cellular retention time and the
partial biomass renovation in a fungal decolourisation continuous process’, Water Res,
2006, 40, 1650–56.
Blánquez, P., Casas, N., Font, X., Gabarrell, M., Sarrá, M., Caminal, G., Vicent, T.,
‘Mechanism of textile metal dye biotransformation by Trametes versicolor, Water Res,
2004, 38, 2166–72.
Bortone, G., Cech, J.S., Bianchi, R., and Tilche, A., ‘Effects of an anaerobic zone in a
textile wastewater treatment plant’, Water Sci Technol, 1995, 32, 133–140.
Bradbury, M.J., Collishaw, P.S., and Moorhouse, S., ‘Controlled rinsing: A step change in
reactive dye application technology’, Colourage Annu, 2000, 5, 73–80.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 303/457
Enzymes in textile efuents 291
Bruggen, V.B., Daems, B., Wilms, D., and Vandecasteele, C., ‘Mechanisms of retention
and ux decline for the nanoltration of dye baths from the textile industry’, Purif Technol,
2001, 22, 519–28.
Calabro, V., Pantano, G., Kang, M., Molinar, R., and Drioli, E., ‘Experimental study on
integrated membrane processes in the treatment of solutions simulating textile efuents’,
Desalination, 1990, 78, 257–77.
Camarero, S,, Ibarra, D., Martínez, M.J., Martínez, A.T., ‘Lignin derived compounds as
efcient laccase mediators for decolorization of different types of recalcitrant dyes’, Appl
Environ Microb, 2005, 71, 1775–84.
Campos, R., Kandelbauer, A., Robra, K.H., Cavaco-Paulo, A., Gübitz, G.M., ‘Indigo
degradation with puried laccases from Trametes hirsuta and Sclerotium rolfsii’, J
Biotechnol. 2001, 89, 131–139.
Chakraborty, S., Purkait, M.K., DasGupta, S., De, S., and Basu, J.K., ‘Nanoltration of
textile plant efuent for color removal and reduction in COD’, Purif Technol, 2003, 31,
141–51.
Chakraborty, S.S., De, S., Basu, J.K., and Das Gupta, S., ‘Treatment of a textile
efuent: Application of a combination method involving adsorption and nanoltration’,
Desalination, 2005, 174:73–85.
Chavan, R.B., ‘Environment friendly dyeing processes for cotton’, Ind J Fibre Text Res,
2001, 4, 239–42.
Chen, X., Shen, Z., Zhu, X., Fan, Y., and Wang, W., ‘Advanced treatment of textile
wastewater for reuse using electrochemical oxidation and membrane ltration’, Water
South Africa, 2005, 31, 127–132.
Ciardelli, G., and Ranieri, N., ‘The treatment and reuse of wastewater in the textile industry
by means of ozonation and electroocculation’, Water Res, 2002, 35, 567–72.
Claus, H., ‘Laccases and their occurrence in prokaryotes’, Arch Microbiol, 2003, 179,
145–150.
Coen, J.J.F., Smith, A.T., Candeias, L.P., and Oakes, J., ‘New Insights into Dye Degradation
Mechanisms by One-electron Oxidation Processes’, J Chem Soc Perk, 2001, 2, 2125–29.Cooper, P., ‘Removing colour from dye house wastewater’, Asian Text J, 1995, 3, 52–56.
Costa, S.A., Azevedo, H.S., and Reis, R.L., ‘Biodegradable Systems in Tissue Engineering
and Regenerative Medicine’, C R C Press, Boca Raton, 2005, 310 - 323.
Coste, C., Marmagne, O., and Jacquart, J.C., ‘Efuents decoloration’, Industrial Textiles,
1996, 1278, 46–51.
Correia, V.M., Stephenson, T., and Judd, S.J., ‘Characterisation of textile wastewaters - a
review’, Environmental Technology, 1994, 15(10), 917–929.
Cripps, C., Bumpus, J.A., Aust, S.D., ‘Biodegradation of azo and heterocyclic dyes by Phanerochaete chrysosporium’, Appl Environ Microbiol, 1990, 56, 1114–1118.
Cristina Máximo, Maria Pessoa Amorim, Maria Costa-Ferreira, ‘Biotransformation of
industrial reactive azo dyes by Geotrichum sp. CCMI 1019’, Enzyme and Microbial Tech,
2003, 32(1), 145–151.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 304/457
292 Bioprocessing of textiles
D’souza, S.F., ‘Immobilized Enzymes in Bioprocess’, Curr Sci, 1999, 77, 69–79.
Da Silva, M.R., De Sá, L.R., Russo, C., Scio, E., and Ferreria-Lietão, V.S., ‘The use of
HRP in Decolorization of Reactive Dyes and Toxicological Evaluation of their Products,
Enzym. Res., (Published Online) Article ID 703824, 2010.
Das, S.S., Dey, S., Bhattacharyya, B.C., ‘Dye decolorization in a column bioreactor using
wood-degrading fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium’, Indian Chem Engg Sect, 1995,
37, 176–180.
Dellamatrice, P.M., and Monteiro, R.T.R., ‘Decolorization and Toxicity of Municipal
Waste by Horseradish (Cochlearia armoracia)’, Quím Nova, 2006, 29(3), 419–21.
Deo, H.T., and Desai, B.K., ‘Dyeing of cotton and jute with tea as a natural dye’, Coloration
Tech, 1999, 115, 224–227.
Dhale, A.D., and Mahajani, V.V., ‘Studies on treatment of disperse dye waste: membrane-
wet oxidation processes’, Waste Management, 2000, 20, 85–92.
Durán, N., Rosa, M.A., D’Annibale, A., Gianfreda, L., ‘Applications of laccases and
tyrosinases (phenoloxidases) immobilized on different supports: a review’, Enzyme Microb
Tech, 2002, 31, 907–931.
El-Molla, M.M., and Schneider, R., ‘Development of eco-friendly binders for pigment
printing of all types of textile fabrics’, Dyes Pigments, 2006, 71, 130–137.
Erswell, A., Brouchaert, C.J., and Buckley, C.A., ‘The reuse of reactive dye liquors using
charged Ultraltration membrane technology, 1988, Desalination, 70, 157–167.
Fiebig, H., Herlinger, J., Reichert, J., and Weller, T., ‘The role of non-ionic auxiliaries for
exhaust dyeing with reactive dyestuffs’, Text Praxis Int, 2002, 5, 11–23
Franciscon, E., Zille, A., Dias, G.F., Ragaanin De Menezes, Durrant, L.R., and Cavaco-
Paulo, A., ‘Biodegradation of Textile Azo Dyes by a Facultative Staphylococcus Arlettae
Strain VN-11 using a Sequential Microaerophilic/aerobic Process’, Int Biodeter Biodegr,
2009, 63, 280–288.
Fulekar, M.H., ‘Nanobiotechnology - Importance and Applications’, 1st Edition, I. K.
International Publication House, New Delhi (India), 2010.
Gaehr, F., Hermanutz, F., and Oppermann, W., ‘Ozonation—an important technique tocomply with new German laws for textile wastewater treatment’, Water Sci Technol, 1994,
30, 255–263.
Ganesh, R., Gregory, D.B., and Michelsen, D., ‘Fate of azo dyes in sludges’, Water Res,
1994, 28, 1367–76.
Geeta Sheth, N., and Musale, A.A., ‘Studies in uorescence and photo degradation of
stilbene-based uorescent brighteners during interaction with polymers: theory applied to
practice’, Colourage, 2004, 51, 23–30.
Ghayeni, S.B., Beatson, P.J., Schneider, R.P. and Fane, A.G., ‘Water reclamation
from municipal wastewater using combined microltration-reverse osmosis (MERO):Preliminary performance data and microbiological aspects of system operation’,
Desalination, 1998, 116, 65–80.
Gitsov, I., Simonyan, A., and Tanenbaum, S., ‘Hybrid Enzymatic Catalysts for Environmentally
Benign Biotransformations and Polymerizations’, ACS Polym J, 20009, 50(2), 40.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 305/457
Enzymes in textile efuents 293
Hashem, M., Refaie, R., and Hebeish, A., ‘Cross-linking of partially carboxy methylated
cotton fabric via cationization’, J Clean Prod, 2005, 13, 947–54.
Heining, A., Bergbauer, M., Szewzyk, U., ‘Biodegradation of azo and phthalocyanine
dyes by Trametes versicolor and Bjerkandera adusta’, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 1997,
48, 261–266.
Hou, H., Zhou, J., Jing Cuihong Du, W., Yan, B., ‘Enhancement of laccase production
by Pleurotus ostreatus and its use for the decolorization of anthraquinone dye’, Process
Biochem, 2004, 39, 1415–19.
Jiraratananon, R., Sungpet, A., and Luangsowan, P., ‘Performance evaluation of
nanoltration membranes for treatment of efuents containing reactive dye and salt’,
Desalination, 2000, 130, 177–183.
Jogdand, S.N., Environmental Biotechnology - Industrial Pollution Management, 3rdEdition, Himalaya Publishing House, Mumbai (India), 2006.
Johnson, M.A., and Pokora, A.R., (1994). Method for Deinking Printed Waste Using
Soybean Peroxidase, US Patent, 5370770.
Kagalkar, A.N., Jagtap, U.B., Jadhav, J.P., Govindwar, S.P., and Bapat, S.A.,
‘Biotechnological Strategies for Phytoremediation of the Sulfonated Azo dye Direct Red
5B using Blumea malcolmii’, Bioresource Technol, 2009, 100, 4104–10.
Kalyuzhnyi, S., Yemashova, N., and Federovich, V., ‘Kinetics of Anaerobic
Biodecolourisation of Azo Dyes’, Water Sci Technol, 2006, 54(2), 73–79.
Kandelbauer, A., Maute, O., Kessler, R.W., Erlacher, A., and Gübitz, G.M., ‘Study of Dye
Decolorization in an Immobilized Laccase Enzyme-Reactor Using Online Spectroscopy’,
Published Online in Wiley Interscience, (www.interscience.wiley.com) (2004).
Karam, J., and Nicell, J.A., ‘Potential Applications of Enzymes in Waste Treatment’, J
Chem Technol, Biot, 1997, 69, 141–153.
Karim, M.M., Dasa, A.K., and Lee, S.H., ‘Treatment of colored efuent of the textile
industry in Bangladesh using zinc chloride treated indigenous activated carbons’, Anal
Chim Acta, 2006, 576, 37–42.
Kersten, P.J., Kalyanaraman, B., Hammel, K.E, Reinhammar, B., and Kirk, T.K.,
‘Comparison of Lignin Peroxidase, Horseradish Peroxidase and Laccase in the Oxidation
of Methoxybenzenes’, Biochem J, 1990, 268, 475–480.
Kim, J., and Grate, J., Nanotechnology and the Environment, Applications and Implications,
Oxford University Press, London, 2004.
Kim, J., and Grate, J., ‘Single Enzyme Nanoparticles Armored by a Nanometer-Scale
Organic/Inorganic Network’, Nano Lett, 2003, 3(9), 1219–22.
Koyuncu, I., ‘Reactive dye removal in dye/salt mixtures by nanoltration membranes
containing vinyl sulphone dyes: effects of feed concentration and cross ow velocity’,
Desalination, 2002, 143, 243–253.
Kragl, U., Industrial Enzymology, Macmillan Press, London, 1996.
Kunamneni, A., Ballesteros, A., Plou, F.J., and Alcalde, M., ‘Communicating Current
Research and Educational Topics and Trends in Applied Microbiology’, World Scientic
Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., Singapore, 2007.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 306/457
294 Bioprocessing of textiles
Kunamneni, A., Plou, F.J., Ballesteros, A., and Alcalde, M., ‘Laccase and their Applications
– A Patent Review’, Recent Biotechnol, 2008, 2(1), 10–24.
Laing, I.G., ‘The Impact of Efuent Regulations on the Dyeing Industry’, Coloration
Technology, 1991, 21(1), 56–70.
Langlais, B., Reckhow, D.A., and Brink, D.R., Ozone in water treatment: application and
engineering. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, London, 1991.
Lantto, R., Schänberg, C., Buchert, J., ‘Effects of laccase-mediator combination on wool’,
Textile Res J, 2004, 74, 713–717.
Ledakowicz, S., Solecka, M., and Zylla, R., ‘Biodegradation, decolourisation and
detoxication of textile wastewater enhanced by advanced oxidation processes’, J
Biotechnol, 2001, 89, 175–184.
Lin, S.H., and Peng, F.C., ‘Continuous treatment of textile wastewater by combined
coagulation, electrochemical oxidation and activated sludge’, Water Res, 1996, 30, 587–
592.
Lin, S.H., and Peng, F.C., ‘Treatment of textile wastewater by electrochemical method’,
Water Res, 1994, 28, 277–282.
Lin, S.H., and Chen, M.L., ‘Treatment of textile wastewater by chemical methods for
reuse’, Water Res, 1997, 31, 868– 876.
Lin. S.H., and Liu, W.Y., ‘Continuous treatment of textile waster by ozonation and
coagulation’, J Environ Eng, 1994, 120, 437–446.
Lukanova, V., and Ganchev. V.A., ‘Possibility for shrinkage decrease of textile fabrics
made from cotton and viscose bers’, Fibre Text East Eur, 2005, 13, 51–53.
Machenbach, I., ‘Membrane technology for dye house efuent treatment’, Membrane
Technol, 1998, 58, 7–10.
Maddhinni, V.L., Vurimindi, H.B., and Yerramilli, A., ‘Degradation of Azo Dye with
Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP)’, J Indian Inst Sci, 2006, 86, 507–514.
Maier, R., Schrott, W., Bechtold, T., and Melliand, C.R., ‘Electrochemical bleaching in the
nishing of jeans’, Tdberichte, 2004, 85, 11–12.
Malik, P.K., and Sanyal, S.K., ‘Kinetics of discolourisation of azo dyes in wastewater by
UV/H2O
2 processes, Purif Technol, 2004, 36, 167–175.
Marquez, M.C., and Costa, C., ‘Biomass concentration in pact process’, Water Res, 1996,
30, 207–2085.
Marrot, B., and Roche, N., ‘Wastewater treatment and reuse in textile industries, a review’,
Res Adv Water Res, 2002, 3, 41–53.
Masaharu Kondo, Tatsuro Mitsui, Shingo Ito, Yuji Kondo, Syuichi Ishigure, Takehisa
Dewa, Keiji Yamashita, Junko Nakamura, Ritsuko Oura, and Mamoru Nango, ‘Efcient
peroxide decoloration of azo dye catalyzed by polyethylene glycol-linked manganesechlorine derivative’, J Colloid and Interface Sci, 2007, 310, 2, 686–689.
Matsui, Y., Murase, R., Sanogawa, T., Aoki, N., Mima, S., Inoue, T., and Matsushita, T.,
‘Rapid adsorption pretreatment with submicrometre powdered activated carbon particles
before microltration’, Water Sci Technol, 2005, 51, 249–256.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 307/457
Enzymes in textile efuents 295
McGuirl, M.A., Dooley, D.M., ‘Copper containing oxidases’, Curr Opin Chem Biol, 1999,
3, 138–134.
McKay, G., Ramprasad, G., and Mowli, P., ‘Desorption and regeneration of dye colors
from low-cost materials’, Water Res, 1987, 21, 375–77.
McMullan, G., Meehan, C., Conneely, A., Kirby, N., Robinson, T., Nigam, P., Banat, I.M.,
Marchant, R., Smyth, W.F., ‘Microbial decolourisation and degradation of textile dyes’,
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2001, 56, 81–87.
Meier, J., Melin, T., and Eilers, L.H., ‘Nanoltration and adsorption on powdered
adsorbent as process combination for the treatment of severely contaminated waste water’,
Desalination, 2002, 146, 361–366.
Mignani, M., Nosenzo, G., and Gualdi, A., ‘Innovative ultraltration for waste water
reuse’, Desalination, 1999, 124, 287–292.
Mohapatra, P.K., Textbook of Environmental Biotechnology, 1st Edition, I. K. International
Publishing House, New Delhi (India), 2006.
Moturi, B., and Singara Charya, M.A., ‘Decolorization of Crystal Violet and Malachite
Green by Fungi’, Sci World J, 2009, 4(4), 28–33.
Movahedin, H., Shokoohi, R., Parvaresh, A., Hajia, M., and Jafri J A, Evaluating the Effect
of Glucose on Phenol Removal Efciency and Changing the Dominant Microorganisms in
the Serial Combined Biological System, J. Res. Health Sci., 6(1), 8–13 (2006).
Mustafa R, Muniglia L, Rovel B, Girardin M (2005). Phenolic colorants obtained byenzymatic synthesis using a fungal laccase in a hydroorganic biphasic system. Food Res.
Int. 38: 995–1000.
Naghibi F, Pourmorad F, Honary S and Shamsi M, Decontamination of Water Polluted
with Phenol Using Raphanus Sativus Root, Iran. J. Pharmaceut. Res., 2(1), 29–32 (2003).
Naumczyk, J., I. Szpyrkowicz, and F.Z. Grandi. 1996. Electrochemical treatment of textile
wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 33:17–24.
Nelson C and Cox M, Principles of Biochemistry, 4th Edition, W. H. Freeman, New York,
(2004) pp.47–50.
Nowak, K.M., M.K. Korbutowicza, and J. Winnicki.1996. Capillary membranes for
separation of dye particles. Desalination 105:91.
O’Neill, C., F.R. Hawkes, D.L. Hawkes, M.S. Esteves, and S.J. Wilcox. 2000. Anaerobic-
aerobic bio-treatment of simulated textile efuent containing varied ratios of starch and azo
dye. Water Res. 34: 2355–2361.
Øllgaard H, Frost L, Galster J, Hansen OC (1998). Survey of azocolorants in Denmark:
Consumption, use, health and environmental aspects. Ministry of Environment and Energy,
Denmark. Ossola M, Galante YM (2004).
Omar H, Algal Decolorization and Degradation of Monoazo and Diazo Dyes, Pak. J. Biol.Sci., 11 (10), 1310–1316 (2008).
Owen, G.R., J Society of Dyers and Colourists, 1978, 94, 243–251.
Padma, S.V., Rakhi, S., Mahanta, D., and Tiwari, S.C., ‘Ecofriendly sonicator dyeing of
cotton with Rubia cordifolia Linn using biomordant’, Dyes and Pigments, 2006, 11, 1–6.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 308/457
296 Bioprocessing of textiles
Pala, A., and Tokat, E., ‘Color removal from cotton textile industry wastewater in an
activated sludge system with various additives’, Water Res, 2002, 36, 2920–25.
Pearce, C.I., Lloyd, J.R., Guthrie, J.T., ‘The removal of colour from textile wastewater
using whole bacterial cells: a review’, Dyes Pigments, 2003, 58, 179–196.
Pereira, L., Bastos, C., Tzanov, T., Cavaco-Paulo, A., Gübitz, G.M., ‘Environmentally
friendly bleaching of cotton using laccases’, Environ Chem Lett, 2005, 3, 66–69.
Pierce, J., ‘Colour in textile efuents – the origins of the problem’, J Soc Dyers Colour,
1994, 110, 131–134.
Pigmon, H.M., Brasquet C.F., and Cloiree P.L., ‘Adsorption of dyes onto activated carbon
cloths: approach of adsorption mechanisms and coupling of ACC with Ultraltration to
treat coloured wastewaters’, J Purif Technol, 2003, 31, 3–11.
Ramesh Babu B., Parande, A.K., Raghu, S., and Prem Kumar, T., ‘Cotton Textile
Processing: Waste Generation and Efuent Treatment’, J Cotton Sci, 2007, 11, 141–153.
Reife, A., Othmer, K., Chemical Technology, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, 1993,
753–784.
Robinson, T., McMullan, G., Marchant, R., and Nigam, P., ‘Remediation of dyes in textile
efuent: a critical review on current treatment technologies with a proposed alternative’.
Colourage, 1997, 44, 247–255.
Rodríguez Couto, S., Hofer, D., Sanromán, M.A., Gübitz, G.M., ‘Production of laccase by
Trametes hirsuta grown in an immersion bioreactor, Application to decolourisation of dyesfrom a leather factory’, Engg Life Sci, 2004, 4, 233–38.
Rodríguez Couto, S., Sanromán, M.A., Gübitz, G.M., ‘Inuence of redox mediators and
metal ions on synthetic acid dye decolourization by crude laccase from Trametes hirsuta’,
Chemosphere, 2005, 58, 417–22.
Rott, U., and Minke, R., ‘Overview of wastewater treatment and recycling in the textile
processing industry’, Water Sci Technol, 1999, 40, 37–44.
Rozzi, A., Malpei, F., Bonomo, L., and Bianchi, R., ‘Textile wastewater reuse in northern
Italy’, Water Sci Technol, 1999, 39,121–128.
Rudrappa, T., Neelwarne, B., Kumar, V., Lakshmanan, V., Venkataramareddy, S. R., andAswathanarayana, R.G., ‘Peroxidase Production from Hairy Root Cultures of Red Beet
(Beta vulgaris)’, Electron J Biotechnol, 2005, 8(2), 66–78.
Salony, S.M., Bisaria, V.M., ‘Production and characterization of laccase from Cyathus
bulleri and its use in decolourization of recalcitrant textile dyes’, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol,
2006, 71, 646–653.
Scott, J. P., and Ollis, D., ‘Integrated chemical and biological oxidation processes for water
treatment, review and recommendations’, Environ Prog, 1995, 14, 88–103.
Sekar, N., ‘Direct dyes: a brief review’, Colourage, 1995, 42, 45–52.
Seshadri, S., Bishop, P.L, and Agha, A.M., ‘Anaerobic/ aerobic treatment of selected azo
dyes in wastewater’, Waste Manage, 1994, 14, 127–137.
Setti, L., Giuliani, S., Spinozzi, G., Pifferi, P.G., ‘Laccase catalyzedoxidative coupling
of 3-methyl 2-benzothiazolinone hydrazone and methoxy phenols’, Enzyme Microb Tech,
1999, 25, 285-289.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 309/457
Enzymes in textile efuents 297
Sivaramakrishnan, C.N., Colourage, 2004, 9, 27–32.
Slokar, Y.M., and M.A. Majcen., ‘Methods of decolorization of textile wastewater’, Dyes
and Pigments, 1997, 37, 335–356.
Soares, G.M.B., Costa-Ferreira, M., Amorim, M.T., ‘Use of laccase together with redox
mediators to decolourize Remazol Brilliant Blue’, J Biotechnol, 2001, 89, 123–129.
Solozhenko, E.G., Soboleva, N.M., and Goncharuk, V., ‘Decolorization of azo dye
solutions by fenton oxidation’, Water Res, 1995, 29, 2–7.
Speccia, V., and Gianetto, A., ‘Powdered activated carbon in an activated sludge treatment’,
Water Res, 1984, 18, 133–137.
Stephen, J.A., ‘Electrooxidation of dyestuffs in waste waters’, J Chem Technol Biot, 1995,
62, 111–117.Susana Rodríguez Couto and José Luis Toca-Herrera, ‘Lacasses in the textile industry’ ,
Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Review, 2006, 1(4), 117–122.
Swamy, J., Ramsay, J.A., ‘The evaluation of white rot fungi in the decoloration of textile
dyes’, Enzyme Microbiol Technol, 1999, 24, 130–137.
Tang, C., and Chen, V., ‘Nanoltration of textile wastewater for water reuse’, Desalination,
2002, 143, 11–20.
Theron, J., Walker, J.A., and Cloete, E., ‘Nanotechnology and Water Treatment,
Applications and Emerging Opportunities’, Crit Rev Microbiol, 2008, 34(1), 43–69.
Thurston, C.F., ‘The structure and function of fungal laccase’, Microbiology, 1994, 140,
19–26.
Tinghui, L., Matsuura, T., and Sourirajan, S., ‘Effect of membrane materials and average
pore sizes on reverse osmosis separation of dyes’, Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev, 1983, 22,
77–85.
Treffry-Goatley, K., Buckley, C.A., and Groves, G.R., ‘Reverse osmosis treatment and
reuse of textile dye house efuents’, Desalination, 1983, 47, 313–320.
Tzanov, T., Basto, C., Gübitz, G.M., Cavaco-Paulo, A., ‘Laccases to Improve the Whiteness
in a Conventional Bleaching of Cotton’, Macromol Mater Engg, 2003, 288, 807–810.
Ulson de Souza S, Forgiarini E and Ulson de Souza A, ‘Toxicity of Textile Dyes and their
Degradation by the Enzyme Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP)’, J Hazard Mater, 2007, 147,
1073–78.
Vanndevivera, P.C., and Bianchi, R.W., ‘Treatment and reuse of wastewater from the textile
wet-processing industry: review of emerging technologies’, J Chem Technol Biotechnol,
1998, 72, 289–302.
Vedavyasan, C.V., ‘Combating water shortages with innovative uses of membranes’,
Desalination, 2000, 132, 345–347.
Vijaykumar, M.H., Veeranagouda, Y., Neelkanteshwar, K., and Karegoudar, T.B.,
‘Degradation of 1:2 Metal Complex Dysse Acid Blue 193 by a Newly Isolated Fungus
Cladosporium Cladosporioide’, World J Microbiol, Biotechnol, 2006, 22, 157–162.
Watters, J.C., Biagtan, E., and Sener, O., ‘Ultraltration of textile plant efuent’, Sci
Technol, 1991, 26, 1295–1313.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 310/457
298 Bioprocessing of textiles
Wong, Y., Yu, J., ‘Laccase-catalyzed decolorization of synthetic dyes’, Water Res, 1999,
33, 3512–3520.
Xu, Y., Lebrun, R., Gallo, P.J., and Blond, P., ‘Treatment of textile dye plant efuent by
nanoltration membrane’, Sci Technol, 1999, 34, 2501–19.
Yu, S., Gao, C., Su, H., and Liu, M., ‘Nanoltration used for desalination and concentration
in dye production’, Desalination, 2001, 140, 97–100.
Zachariah, J., ‘Kerosene recovery in textile printing’, The Bombay Textile Research
Association (BTRA), Bombay, India, 1995.
Zhang, W.X., ‘Nanoscale Irron Particles for Environmental Remediation, an Overview’, J
Nanopart Res, 2003, 5, 323–332.
Zimmerman, T., Kulla, H.G., and Leisinger, T., ‘Properties of Puried Orange IIAzoreductase, the Enzyme Initiating Azo Dye Degradation by Pseudomonas KF 46’, Eur
J Biochem, 1982, 129, 197–203.
Zille, A., Górnacka, B., Rehorek, A., and Cavaco-Paulo, A., ‘Degradation of Azo Dyes
by Trametes villosa Laccase over Long Periods of Oxidative Conditions’, Appl Environ
Microbiol, 2005, 71(11), 6711–18.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 311/457
Abstract: This chapter provides information on safety of enzyme-handlingpractices for plant managers, industrial hygienists, occupational and safety
professionals, medical personnel and employees in the enzyme-handling industry.It includes a medical surveillance program describing measures the employercan use to help ensure employee health and safety in the workplace. Enzymeshave been used for over 35 years in the textile industry for the desizing of clothand fabric nishing. Implementing an enzyme safety program is important forlimiting exposure to enzymes and maintaining employee health and safety inthe workplace. The chapter then discusses the modern biotechnology techniquesutilized to improve microbial production strains to increase the enzyme yieldsand to make minor amino acid changes that improve the functionality of theenzyme. These changes are not known to increase the ability of enzymes tocause allergies. Work-practice controls include appropriate management systems
and operational controls, education, safe work practices and good housekeepingpractices have been discussed.
Keywords: Enzyme safety, enzyme handling, enzyme allergy, safety program,work practice, medical monitoring
6.1 Introduction
Enzymes are regulated in different legislation depending on their end uses. The
scientic literatures investigated indicate that enzymes have the potential for
sensitization of the respiratory tract. At present, no validated test method exists
to determine and to predict sensitization via the inhalative route (Basketter
1995; Cullinan and Harris 2000). The studies investigated so far revealed
that enzymes seem unlikely to be dangerous to the aquatic environment due
to their ready biodegradability and the low effects on aquatic organisms
observed. However, enzymes derived from new technologies might have
increased stability (e.g. with higher stability to temperature or pH), therefore,
the ready biodegradability of such enzymes should be proved. It is suggested,
only to perform a biodegradation test in the case that the enzyme has .unusualstability (Schweigert 2000).
The long-term safety of enzyme supplements has been explored in detail
for a hundred years. The result is that enzymes are generally found to be
highly safe with no toxic limit no matter how much you take or for how long
6
Safety and precaution in handling enzymes
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 312/457
300 Bioprocessing of textiles
you take them. There is research showing that it is the lack of enzymes that
causes problems, not taking too many (Zachariae et al. 1981). Enzymes have
very specic mechanisms and many are well known and characterized based
on their specicity. Each enzyme has a very particular function according to
their active sites. Enzymes work according to ordinary biochemical properties
and are not living organisms complete with free will and instincts (AISE
1995). Because of this, enzymes have far fewer side-effects and unknown
possible reactions than other compounds, supplements, or medications. This
feature makes them extremely safe. Also, healthy tissue and cells have natural
mechanisms protecting them from enzyme action. The body is full of checks
and balances, including lots of enzyme inhibitors, which allow enzymes tofunction properly without digesting you away. Every time you eat fresh fruits,
vegetables, or other raw food you are consuming digestive enzymes. Another
report assessed in-home use by over 4,000 consumers of detergents that
contained a protease enzyme (Bolam et al. 1971). The researchers concluded
that:
“... detergents containing proteolytic enzymes had no greater effect on
the skin than conventional detergents, even when the hand skin condition was
initially poor. The same was true in a further test on 130 housewives with
‘dishpan’ hands. No adverse reactions attributable specifcally to the enzyme products were seen. No eruptions from contact with clothes washed in enzyme
products were reported from any of the families involved in these tests.”
Enzymes and enzyme notication in the European Union and in non-EEA
countries are regulated in different legal provisions depending on their use,
e.g. as technical enzymes, food enzymes, feed enzymes, cosmetic enzymes or
medicinal products.
6.2 Enzyme safety: GeneralThe enzyme industry has developed safe host organism systems for the
production of many enzymes that could not otherwise be produced (Neidleman
1991). These safe host systems have been used since the early 1980s for the
production of different enzymes in contained manufacturing facilities. The
host organisms and their enzyme products have been tested to demonstrate
that they are safe for their intended use; this includes, but isn’t restricted to,
testing of the organism to demonstrate that it is not pathogenic and does not
produce toxins and testing of the product to demonstrate that it is safe for theintended use and to determine whether it is an irritant and how likely it is to
cause allergies when inhaled (IFBC 1990). Guidelines for safety assessments
of food and food ingredients developed through biotechnology have been
prepared by several internationally recognized scientists and expert groups
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 313/457
Safety and precaution in handling enzymes 301
(Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Health Canada,
Food and Agriculture Organization / World) (Health Canada 1994; Jonas et
al. 1996).
Using tools of modern biotechnology, the enzyme industry is continuing to
dramatically improve a wide range of production processes with both primary
and secondary benets (Jank and Haslberger 2003). The reduced consumption
of energy, water and raw material with generating less waste and fewer
environmental pollutants are among the target benets of this technology.
Additionally, many unavoidable waste materials can be effectively modied,
either for recycling as a useful raw material or as a valuable secondary product
(Kessler et al. 1992). Since the 1980s, new enzymes have been developedthrough modern biotechnology for widespread use in many products for
example in laundry detergents and paper production (Fuchs and Astwood
1996; Bajpai 1999). The use of these new enzymes in detergents enables
consumers to remove difcult stains at lower wash temperatures without
the use of harsh chemical additives, thus reducing the burden on wastewater
systems. Enzymes are simple proteins and thus are fully biodegradable and
environmentally sound (Pariza and Foster 1983). The use of new, more robust
enzymes in paper processing can signicantly reduce the need for chlorine
and chlorine dioxide bleach, which ultimately feeds into wastewater streamsas chlorinated organic compounds. Without the use of the modern tools of
biotechnology, not enough of these enzymes, as well as enzymes in other
industrial applications, can be produced to meet industry demand. Further,
these modern tools give us the opportunity to produce enzymes that can
replace other processes and/or chemicals that are less environmentally sound
and thereby continue to move towards sustainability (Pariza and Johnson
2001; Masgrau et al. 2006).
6.3 Enzyme safety program
The goal of an enzyme safety program is to maintain employee exposures
below a level that could cause an adverse health effect. The elements of a
safety program include employee training, product design, engineering
controls, work-practice controls, personal protective equipment and medical
surveillance (SDIA 1991).
6.3.1 Employee training
The following are suggestions for educating employees and contractors
about the importance of safe enzyme-handling practices. Proper training is
essential for the safe use of materials in an industrial setting (Vanhanen and
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 314/457
302 Bioprocessing of textiles
Tuomi 2000). It is important that people understand not only what is required
of them but also why. It is the responsibility of every company to ensure
that employees and contractors handling enzymes and enzyme products are
adequately trained. They must have adequate knowledge of the potential
health effects of enzymes and safe work practices associated with their use.
Information provided on enzymes should include the nature of the effect, risks
to health arising from exposure, routes of entry into the body, the anticipated
degree of exposure, and any factors that may increase risk. Employees should
know proper practices and procedures for working with enzymes and enzyme-
containing products.
Employees and contractors should understand:• Reasons for an education program
• Reasons for medical surveillance
• Health effects of enzymes
• Proper use of control measures
• Personal protection
• Emergency procedures
Instruction manuals, safe practices, and/or standard operating procedures
for the handling of enzyme preparations and enzyme products should be
written for the individual workplace at a level suitable for the work force(Grifth et al. 1969). These should take into account the types of enzymes and
equipment used and the types of products that are manufactured. All employees
and contractors involved in the use of enzyme materials must be briefed
on their potential effects and adequately trained in the relevant operations
specied in the standard operating procedures before working with these
materials. These operations should include all checks on the environmental
control systems (e.g., ventilation, static pressure, etc.) to ensure their correct
and safe operation. Only responsible, trained personnel should handle enzyme preparations, as mistakes, spills or plant malfunctions could potentially result
in the release of enzyme aerosol. All such employees should be trained in
cleaning and spill recovery procedures. In addition, all emergency response
personnel should be informed of the potential health effects of enzyme
preparations. Education and training are also required by the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) under its Hazard Communication
(HAZCOM) Standard (OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1200). This regulation requires
that the employer prepare a written hazard communication program and
provide employees with information and training on hazardous chemicals.To satisfy these OSHA requirements, employers may wish to document and
retain training program records, including employee attendance records,
program contents and instructor qualications. Where personnel are required
to use personal protective equipment, education and training are also required.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 315/457
Safety and precaution in handling enzymes 303
This training includes the proper equipment selection, as well as training in its
use and maintenance.
6.3.2 Product design
The physical form of the enzyme can greatly inuence the potential for
aerosol formation. Therefore, the product form often dictates the selection
of engineering controls, handling procedures, and the type of protective
equipment needed to provide adequate protection to the employee. Enzyme
aerosols can be in the form of liquid droplets, mists, solid particles, or dusts
(Plinke et al. 1992). Powdered enzyme formulations present the greatest
potential for exposure because they are easily aerosolized. Granular enzyme
formulations encapsulate the enzyme to prevent its release into the air. They
have low dusting capabilities, but care must be taken not to crush them. Liquid
enzyme formulations have a potential for aerosolization when any type of
mechanical agitation is taking place, such as container lling or cleaning of
spills.
6.3.3 Engineering controls
Engineering controls should be designed for the specic product form and
production process. A qualied ventilation expert should evaluate and design
the control measures. Key components of an effective program include overall
plant and equipment design, performance verication, system maintenance,
process design, and management of process changes. Engineering controls
in the form of enclosures and local exhaust ventilation are the most effective
methods to control enzyme exposures. Using enclosures and local exhaust
ventilation together will assist in isolating the enzyme preparation from the
employee. Local exhaust ventilation and enclosures should be used in thefollowing areas: locations where enzyme preparations are added into the
process, material transfer points, and where the enzyme-containing product is
packaged into containers.
6.3.4 Work practice controls
Proper work practice procedures are also important in controlling enzyme
aerosols and are often used in conjunction with engineering controls and
personal protective equipment. Operational goals in the facility should include
making sure that there are no visible dust or recurring spills; minimizing
skin contact as much as possible; avoiding prolonged temporary repairs on
equipment; and preventing, as well as containing, aerosol generation (Bannan
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 316/457
304 Bioprocessing of textiles
et al. 1983). Each site that works with enzyme preparations should have
programs which address good housekeeping and work practices. It is important
to implement work practices that do not generate enzyme aerosols or result
in direct skin contact. Safe work practices include proper enzyme transfer
procedures, cleaning procedures, spill cleanup, and good personal hygiene.
High-pressure water, steam, and vacuums without HEPA (high-efciency
particulate arresting) lters should be avoided. Spills should not be swept
or brushed, and washing facilities should be accessible and well maintained
(Newhouse et al. 1970). Good personal hygiene should be encouraged and
practiced. Initial and continuing education of employees and contractors on
the health effects of enzymes will allow better understanding and compliancewith safe work practices.
6.3.5 Personal protective equipment
Personal protective equipment should only be used as a supplement to
engineering controls and work practice controls. The exclusive use of personal
protective equipment instead of these other controls is strongly discouraged.
When needed, respiratory, eye, and skin protective equipment are used.
Respiratory protection equipment prevents exposure by ltering airborneenzyme aerosols or supplying clean air to the worker (Musk et al. 1989). The
type of respirator that should be used depends on the airborne concentration of
the enzyme, time spent in the production area, and worker activity. As in any
industrial environment where chemicals are used, eye and skin contact should
be avoided. Commonly used protective eye wear includes safety glasses with
side shields, splash goggles, or, for more protection, a face shield. The type of
eye protection should be determined by the potential for contact with enzymes
and the type of process or operation the employee is conducting. Protective
clothing is important when the potential for splashing or immersion is possible
(Rodriguez et al. 1994). Common pieces of equipment used to protect the
skin are rubber gloves, splash aprons, and full protective suits. Again, the
type of protective equipment to use depends on the potential for contact with
enzymes and type of process or operation the employee is conducting. A
qualied safety and health professional should be consulted for the selection
of personal protective equipment. Education and training is vital to ensure the
proper use of protective equipment.
6.3.6 Medical surveillance
A medical surveillance program monitors employees’ health and can provide
early detection of potential health problems. Such a program includes a medical
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 317/457
Safety and precaution in handling enzymes 305
history, a medical examination of the employee, pulmonary function tests,
and the determination of enzyme sensitization. All these elements become
a baseline for the health and well being of the worker. There are always
many questions asked about the medical evaluation of allergies or a person’s
sensitization to specic allergens. There are two commonly used tests. The
rst is called the skin prick test which is commonly used by allergists (Nelson
et al. 1993). In this test a small drop of the specic enzyme allergen is placed
on the forearm and a sterile needle is used to gently lift the skin. A sensitized
individual will have a wheal and are appear on the arm. This is an indication of
the presence of allergic antibody (Pepys 1992). The second method is a blood
test called a Radio Allegro Sorbent Test (RAST) which evaluates a specicenzyme allergen present in a person’s blood stream. While sensitization is not
an illness, it is an indication that an employee has been exposed to sufcient
enzyme concentrations to cause the development of allergic antibody. If a
worker is found to be sensitized to an enzyme, it could mean that current work
practices, engineering controls and personal protective devices are not meeting
their goals and would need to be reevaluated by plant personnel (Zetterstrom
and Wide 1974). Sensitization does not prevent an employee from working
in an adequately controlled plant environment. Sensitized employees are at
a grater risk of developing allergy symptoms. Because of this, all employeesshould be educated in safe work practices that minimize exposure. If allergy
symptoms start to develop, the employee should be instructed to notify their
supervisor immediately (Pepys et al. 1969).
6.4 Safe handling of enzymes
Enzyme Technical Association (ETA 2000) provides information on safe
enzyme-handling practices for the textile industry. The ETA is a trade
association of the US enzyme producers and distributors, and has supported
the safety production and use of enzyme products since 1970. Exposure to
enzymes may cause irritation and/or respiratory allergies (Stenius and Wide
1969). The primary routes of exposure to enzymes are by inhalation and skin
and eye contact. Preventing exposures by these routes is the goal of an enzyme
safety program. Enzymes can be safely handled by using safe product design,
engineering controls, safe work practices, and appropriate personal protective
equipment. When handling concentrated enzyme preparations – as with most
substances used in industrial processes – care should be taken to avoid skincontact and inhalation of aerosols. Enzymes can be used safely without any
adverse health effects through the use of good work practices, engineering
controls, and appropriate personal protective equipment.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 318/457
306 Bioprocessing of textiles
6.4.1 Skin and eye exposure
Skin and eye contract with proteolytic enzymes, those with the ability to break down complex proteins into simpler products, may cause irritation.
Other classes of enzymes are less irritating or pose no risk of irritation
(Goenin 1987). However, formulation ingredients may be irritants so it is
important to consult each product’s material safety data sheet (MSDS) for
safety precautions. Exposed areas should be protected by using hand and eye
protection and other protective clothing. When the exposure is discontinued,
the irritation should disappear. There is no evidence to indicate that enzyme
allergies are developed through skin contact (Hamann 1993).
6.4.2 Inhalation
As with any protein that is foreign to the respiratory system, repeated
inhalation of enzyme containing aerosol (dust or mist) can cause a respiratory
allergy in some individuals. There are two main stages to the development of
a respiratory allergy, which is also called Type 1 immediate hypersensitivity
(Buehler 1965; Flood et al. 1985). The rst stage is called sensitization and
this occurs when the individual is rst exposed by inhalation to the allergensuch as an enzyme, house dust, or pollen. As stated in the Soap Detergent
Association (SDA) document, “if enough enzyme is inhaled, the body will
begin to recognize the enzyme as a foreign material and will produce allergic
antibodies (Juniper et al. 1977). Once allergic antibodies are produced, the
individual is said to be sensitized”. However, sensitization is not a disease
as there are no allergic symptoms at this stage. In the second stage, clinical
allergic symptoms can occur when a sensitized individual is re-exposed to an
allergen such as an enzyme (Janssens et al. 1995; Flindt 1969). Symptoms of
enzyme allergies are no different than allergies to other materials such as housedust, animal dander, or pollen and can include sneezing, congestion, coughing,
watery eyes, or a runny nose. Symptoms will only occur if enzyme dust or
aerosols are inhaled and should disappear when the exposure is discontinued.
It is important to note that not all sensitized individuals will develop allergic
symptoms (Bruce et al. 1978). The development of allergies depends on the
susceptibility of the individual and the exposure concentration.
6.5 Symptoms of enzyme exposure6.5.1 Skin irritation
Enzymes are not skin sensitizers (Grifth et al. 1969). Prolonged skin contact
with proteolytic enzymes can cause skin irritation. The eyes can also be
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 319/457
Safety and precaution in handling enzymes 307
irritated by contact with proteolytic enzymes. As would be expected, the more
concentrated the enzyme preparation, the greater the potential for producing
irritation upon contact. Skin irritation is most likely to appear in body areas
where perspiration occurs, i.e., hands, armpits, groin, and feet, and around
tight tting clothing areas, such as cuffs, waist, collar, and facial areas in
contact with face masks. This irritation is caused by the chemical properties
of the proteases and is not an allergic response (Gothe et al. 1972). Other types
of enzymes, i.e., non proteolytic enzymes, have not been shown to cause skin
and eye irritation. However, skin and eye contact with all enzymes should
be minimized as part of personal hygiene practices. As with any chemical,
avoid contact with enzymes if the skin is broken or irritated. Consult themanufacturer’s MSDS for information on the hazards associated with other
ingredients of the enzyme preparation (Zachariae et al. 1981). Also, inhaling
high levels of enzyme-containing aerosols may result in coughing and/
or congestion due to irritation of the mucous membranes of the respiratory
tract. Respiratory irritation is a very rare occurrence and should never occur
when adequate manufacturing controls are in place. Exposed areas should
be protected by the use of gloves and other protective clothing whenever the
potential for gross skin contact exists. The irritant response is characterized by
a weeping, red glistening appearance of the skin surfaces, usually involvinghands and ngertips, which can be painful. This reaction is due to the primary
irritant characteristic of proteases and is not an allergic response. When
exposure is discontinued, imitation should disappear.
6.5.2 Allergy
The purpose of the immune system is to protect the organism from foreign
substances such as infectious agents and tumors. An allergy is a hypersensitivity
reaction of the immune system (Norman 1992). There are several types of
allergies. Taken together, allergies occur among 20–30% of all humans.
Proteins, and therefore enzymes as well, can in some cases cause a so-called
Type I allergy which requires the development of allergic antibodies. Type
I allergy symptoms can include watery eyes, runny noses, sneezing (hay
fever), wheezing (asthma), hives (urticaria) and several reactions to food,
including vomiting and diarrhea (Marzulli and Maibach 1977). As with any
protein that is foreign to the respiratory tract, repeated inhalation of enzyme
contained in aerosols can cause an allergic response. Predicting who willdevelop an allergic response or the level and duration of exposure needed
to elicit a response is not known at this time (Zachariae et al. 1973). As with
any protein allergen, such as pollen, mild to severe symptoms may occur
and may include any, or a combination of, the following: Asthma, sneezing,
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 320/457
308 Bioprocessing of textiles
nasal or sinus congestion, coughing, watery eyes, runny nose, tightness of
the chest, hoarseness or shortness of breath. These symptoms may develop
during work hours or can be delayed, occurring even 2 or more hours after
work exposure (Pepys et al. 1985). Symptoms will occur only in an allergic
individual if enzyme aerosols are inhaled, and usually disappear within hours
or a few days after exposure is eliminated. Currently, there is no evidence to
indicate that skin contact with enzymes will cause allergic contact dermatitis
(Cronin 1987). Aside from allergies, no long-lasting effects from working
with enzymes have been found. Ordinary cold or u symptoms may resemble
enzyme allergy (McMurrain 1970).
6.5.3 Routes of exposure to allergens
Allergens can trigger the immune system through several routes of exposure,
via food, via skin contact or via inhalation (Pepys 1973). Enzymes can cause
allergies through repeated exposure via inhalation in sufcient high doses
and possibly by contact with mucosal surfaces (eyes, nose). There is limited
evidence for enzyme allergy development from contact with eyes. In addition,
only susceptible individuals will develop allergies. Exposure via food and
skin contact has not been documented to be associated with enzyme allergy(AMFEP – Association of Manufacturers of Fermentation Enzyme Products).
6.5.4 Allergy tests
There are two types of simple medical tests that can be made to determine if
an individual is sensitized to a particular enzyme (Bernstein 1972). When a
person becomes sensitized to a substance, allergic antibodies will be produced
against that substance. Sensitization by itself is not a disease, but rather an
indication of exposure to the enzyme that may lead to allergic symptoms(Sarlo et al. 1990). However, not all sensitized individuals develop allergic
symptoms. By detecting sensitization early, enzyme exposure can be controlled
to prevent allergy symptoms onset. Allergic antibodies can be detected either
through a laboratory blood test (such as Radio Allegro Sorbent Test – RAST or
Enzyme Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay – ELISA) or by a simple skin prick test
commonly used by allergists. The laboratory blood test measures the amount of
antibody in the blood, with a certain level indicating sensitization to a specic
enzyme preparation. The skin prick test consists of pricking the skin with asolution of the enzyme (antigen preparation). In a sensitized individual, a raised,
reddened area (wheal and are) will appear on the skin. If the laboratory blood
test or skin test is positive, it is an indication that sensitization has developed and
allergic symptoms may result unless precautions are taken to reduce exposure.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 321/457
Safety and precaution in handling enzymes 309
Pulmonary function testing is also a means to screen whether an individual has
allergic symptoms. Consult a physician for advice. Additional information on
allergy test procedures and materials is available from the enzyme manufacturer
or the Enzyme Technical Association.
6.6 Practical aspects – handling and safety
Safe handling of enzyme preparations can be accomplished through proper
work practices and use of protective equipment. When working with these
preparations, it is important to use work practices that do not generate
aerosols or that result in direct skin contact. For each work operation, careful
consideration must be given to minimizing aerosol formation and skin or eye
contact. Aerosols are formed through high-energy operations such as mixing,
grinding, washing with high water pressure or steam, and using compressed
air for cleanup operations. Sweeping, blowing, splashing, steam cleaning, and
high-pressure water ushing must be avoided. Mixing and grinding operations
should be contained as much as possible, and the areas in which they take
place should be provided with adequate local exhaust ventilation (Newhouse
et al. 1970). When handling enzyme preparations or enzyme-contaminated
equipment, avoid direct skin contact. Wear appropriate gloves when there is a potential for skin contact with enzymes. Wash enzyme-contaminated surfaces
thoroughly before handling.
6.6.1 Air monitoring
There are airs monitoring techniques available to measure the level of
enzyme dust or mist in the air. The American Conference of Governmental
Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) has established a threshold limit value (TLV)
for only one class of enzymes, subtilisins, of 60 mg/m3 as a ceiling limit.Both low-ow and high-ow air sampling methods are available for some
enzymes. Contact the enzyme manufacturer for additional information. An
air monitoring program can evaluate the potential for employee exposure to
airborne enzymes and determine if current engineering control measures are
working properly or if additional control measures are needed. Air monitoring
is also valuable for the proper selection of respiratory protection. Enzyme
supplier may provide additional information on air monitoring for enzymes.
6.6.2 Respiratory protection
Under most operating conditions involving enzymes, respiratory protection
is not normally necessary. There are some operations, such as spill cleanup,
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 322/457
310 Bioprocessing of textiles
equipment cleaning, and equipment repairing, that may generate aerosols.
In these instances, respiratory protection may be the necessary guideline by
American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA 1992). The use of respiratory
protection is usually necessary when working with powdered enzymes.
Respiratory protection should also be used when indicated by your supervisor,
safety professional or medical personnel. The Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) respiratory protection standard must be followed in
the selection, training and use of respirators. Use only National Institute of
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) approved respiratory protection.
6.6.3 Protective clothing and glovesProtective clothing should be worn when there is a potential for skin or eye
contact. This clothing may include gloves, aprons, safety glasses, and outer
garments, such as coveralls or lab coats. Protective clothing is particularly
important when working with proteolytic enzymes, which are known to
cause skin irritation (Witmeur et al. 1973). Operations that may require the
use of protective clothing include spill cleanup, equipment maintenance, and
equipment cleaning. Gloves should be worn when there is a potential for skin
contact with any enzyme material. Cotton liners or cotton-lined gloves are
recommended to absorb perspiration. Protective clothing should be removed
prior to leaving the work area and should not be worn into other areas of
the facility (i.e., lunchroom, ofces) or to the home. The OSHA personal
protective equipment standard (1910.132-138) must be followed in selection,
training and use of personal protective equipment. Consult the enzyme
manufacturer and/or their MSDS for additional information on the selection
of personal protective equipment.
6.6.4 MaintenanceWhenever maintenance is to be performed on equipment that has been in
contact with enzymes, the equipment should be cleaned before the work is
begun. Use wet washing (ooding, wiping) or a vacuum system equipped
with a high-efciency particulate air lter (HEPA) to clean equipment or
spills. High-pressure cleaning (steam, air, or water) must be avoided, since
these operations are known to cause aerosol formation. Personal protective
equipment (gloves, respirators, eye protection) may be required during some
maintenance operations.
6.6.5 Spills
Care should be taken when handling enzyme preparation spills to prevent the
generation of aerosols. Workers should use appropriate personal protective
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 323/457
Safety and precaution in handling enzymes 311
equipment as recommended by a qualied safety. Measures should be taken to
contain all spills. Vacuums using high efciency lters or a dedicated central
vacuum system are preferred. At no time should spills be swept, brushed
or dispersed by air blowing or high pressure water jets. After the spill is
collected, the area should be gently washed using cold, low pressure water or
water-spray portable vacuum cleaners. Consult a qualied health and safety
professional on spill cleanup for procedures tailored to particular industrial
settings.
6.6.6 Spill cleanup
Spilled enzymes must be removed immediately by central vacuum system,vacuums equipped with a HEPA lter, mopping, or washing. To prevent dust
or aerosol formation during cleanup, do not sweep or use high water pressure,
steam, or compressed air on spills. Use plenty of water in wet washing to
ush all enzyme material away to prevent enzyme dust generation from
dried material. Dependent upon the place and extent of the spill, respiratory
protection and protective clothing may be required during cleanup. Disposal
of spilled material should be in compliance with federal, state and local
regulations.
6.6.7 Personal cleanliness
Personal cleanliness is essential to prevent irritation from proteolytic enzymes
to skin and mucous membranes. The irritation response on skin is increased
in the presence of moisture and when the natural oils of the skin are removed.
The following procedures are recommended to prevent irritation:
1. Hands should be washed with water and mild soap before leaving the
work area and immediately after coming into contact with enzyme
materials.2. Change work clothes daily and whenever they are soiled with enzyme
material. Do not wear work clothing home.
3. Avoid touching your face and eyes with enzyme contaminated
clothing or gloves.
4. Wear cotton-lined gloves to absorb perspiration.
6.7 First-aid treatment
Skin contact: Most enzyme materials are water soluble; therefore, the exposedskin should rst be thoroughly ushed with water and then washed with a
mild soap and water. If clothes are contaminated, remove them, shower and
change into clean clothes. Immerse the contaminated clothes in water and
wash them as usual.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 324/457
312 Bioprocessing of textiles
Inhalation: Remove the individual from exposure and monitor for
irritation or allergic symptoms. If symptoms occur, consult a physician.
Symptoms may occur as late as 2 or more hours after exposure.
Eye contact: Rinse the eyes thoroughly with water for at least 15 minutes
and then consult a physician.
6.8 Safety in enzyme therapy
Enzymes are used for wound healing because they selectively degrade
infection and dead tissue away while leaving healing tissue growing. Enzymes
are used to remove tumors because they attack the cancerous tissue and
remove it, while faciliating the growth of healthy tissue. This built-in natural
selective property of enzymes can be seen on surface wounds. It has also be
seen and measured in cell cultures and by monitoring internal wounds and
tumors (Enzyme therapy, Wolf). Enzyme therapy is currently approved in the
treatment of certain health conditions (Lopez 1994).
These include:
• Cardiovascular disorders
• Gastrointestinal conditions, particularly pancreatic insufciency and
related disorders • Replacement therapy for specic genetic disorders and deciencies
• Cancer treatment
• Debridement of wounds (degradation or cleaning out of dying or
dead/necrotic tissue)
• Removal of toxic substances from the blood
6.9 Routes of exposure and possible controls
6.9.1 Work practice control
Work-practice controls include appropriate management systems and
operational controls, education, safe work practices and good housekeeping
practices. Work-practice controls are used in combination with engineering
controls to limit employee exposure. Finally, personal protective equipment
is used to supplement engineering and work-practice controls, when both are
not feasible, or in the event of emergencies, such as spills, or during high
exposure tasks such as clean outs.
6.9.2 Management systems
Accountability for maintaining the necessary hygiene standards should
be clearly dened and assigned to the appropriate level of management.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 325/457
Safety and precaution in handling enzymes 313
Responsibilities for daily management of the program should be clearly
delegated to operating personnel. Companies should ensure that personnel
trained in medicine, industrial hygiene, and/or engineering verify that
these company standards are being adhered to. Access to potentially high
exposure areas such as enzyme addition areas should be restricted to qualied
employees.
6.9.3 Operational controls
Enzyme operations should seek to achieve:
• No visible dust
• No recurring spills
• No prolonged ‘temporary’ repairs
• No gross skin contact
• Prevention/containment of aerosol generation
6.10 Medical monitoring program for enzyme
workers
The medical monitoring of employees potentially exposed to enzymes attheir workplace is important. It is intended for use by companies producing
enzyme-containing cleaning product formulations. However, it may also be
applicable to other industries using enzyme technology. The intent is to assess
and monitor the health of employees working with enzymes. A program should
be designed to survey employee health to ensure that any adverse health
effects are uncovered and dealt with early. Occupational health and safety
stewardship of enzyme technology is important to prevent health allegations
that could erode public trust in the cleaning products industry. Enzymes can
cause sensitization and, in some cases, symptoms in susceptible, exposed
individuals. If enough enzymes are inhaled, the body will begin to recognize
the enzyme as a foreign material and produce allergic antibodies. Once allergic
antibodies are produced, the individual is said to be sensitized. Sensitization
by itself is not a disease. In individuals who have become sensitized, further
breathing of high levels of enzyme dust or aerosol can trigger symptoms
ranging from allergy symptoms such as watery eyes, runny nose and scratchy
throat to occupational asthma.
For a new employee or an employee transferring to enzyme work, thefollowing may be considered:
1. Medical history. Obtain a medical history of the employee. Specic
reference should be made to any history of allergies, asthma, eczema,
smoking, previous chest disease and medication use.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 326/457
314 Bioprocessing of textiles
2. Respiratory questionnaire. Have the employee complete a respiratory
questionnaire.
3. Medical examination. On the basis of the medical history or responses
to the respiratory questionnaire, the medical examiner may decide to
conduct a physical examination.
4. Baseline pulmonary function test (PFT). A PFT should be done on
all employees before they begin working with enzymes so that a
pulmonary function baseline can be established against which future
PFT results can be compared.
5. Baseline determination of enzyme sensitivity. A baseline determination
of enzyme sensitivity may be made using either a skin prick test ofenzyme(s) that the employee will be exposed to or a blood test (e.g.,
RAST) to determine the level of antibody against the specic enzyme
allergen that is present in the blood. If a skin test is performed, a
negative (saline) and positive (histamine) control should be used as a
reference for the enzyme antigen.
6. Skin prick test for common allergens. A skin prick test for common
allergens may help determine the atopy of the individual.
6.11 Safety measures
Enzymes can be handled safely through the use of appropriate control
methods. Establishing safety programs and educating employees are the rst
steps to a safe and productive plant operation. Prior to introducing an enzyme
preparation into a consumer product, the potential for consumer exposure to
the enzyme and possible health effects should be assessed. Since enzymes
are respiratory allergens and some enzymes are irritants, both the potential
for inhaling the enzyme preparation and for skin contact should be evaluated.
Important factors that need to be considered include the following: Product
use, potential misuses, enzyme concentration, and product form (liquid,
powder, granule, and foam), duration and frequency of exposure, potential
exposure level and the no-effect level of enzyme exposure. Through the use
of proper work practices and control measures, enzymes can be handled in the
work place without any adverse health effects. All work with enzymes must
be done with care and proper precautions. Avoid generation of aerosols and
direct skin or eye contact when handling enzyme materials. Even though there
may be no visible signs of dust or aerosols, safety measures must be followedat all times. By following these relatively simple work practices and control
measures, enzymes can be handled safely.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 327/457
Safety and precaution in handling enzymes 315
6.12 References
American Industrial’ Hygiene Association (AIHA), (1992), Respiratory Protection – AManual and Guideline, second edition, Fairfax, VA.
AMFEP (Association of Manufacturers of Fermentation Enzyme Products), ‘Consumer
Allergy Risk for Enzyme Residues in Food, http://www.amfep.org/content/enzymes
10.4.2013
Bajpai, P., ‘Applications of enzymes in the pulp and paper industry’, Biotechnol Prog,
1999, 15, 147–157.
Bannan, E.A., Grifth, J.F., Nusair, T.L. and Sauers, L.J., ‘Skin testing of laundered fabrics
in the dermal safety assessment of enzyme-containing detergents’, J Toxicology, 1983,
11(4), 327–339.
Basketter, D., Enzymes: Lack of Skin Sensitization Potential, AIS/AMFEP, 1995.
Bernstein, I.L., ‘Enzyme allergy in populations exposed to long-term, low-level
concentrations of household laundry products’, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 1972, 49(4), 219–
237.
Bolam, R.M., Hepworth, R., and Bowerman, L.T., ‘In-use Evaluation of safety to skin of
Enzyme containing washing Products’, British Medical J, 1971, 2, 499–501.
Bruce, C.F., Dunn, E., Brotherton, R., Davies, D.R., Hall, F., Potts, S.C., ‘Methods of
measuring biologically active enzyme dust in the environmental air of detergent factories’,
Ann Occup Hyg, 1978, 21(1), 1–20.
Buehler, E.V., ‘Delayed contact hypersensitivity in the guinea pig’, Archives of
Dermatology, 1965, 91, 171–77.
Cronin, E., ‘Dermatitis of the hands in caterers’, J Dermatitis, 1987, 17, 265–69.
Cullinan, P., Harris, J.M., ‘An outbreak of asthma in a modern detergent industry’, The
Lancet, 2000, 356(9245), 1899–1900.
Enzyme Technical Association, ‘Safe Handling of Enzymes’, Textile Chemist and Colorist
& American Dyestuff Reporter, 2000, 32(1).
Flindt, M.L., ‘Pulmonary disease due to inhalation of derivatives of Bacillus subtilis
containing proteolytic enzyme’, Lancet, 1969, 14(1), 1177–81.
Flood, D.F., Blofeld, R.E., Bruce, C.F., Hewitt, J.I., Juniper, C.P., Roberts, D.M., ‘Lung
function, atopy, specic hypersensitivity and smoking of workers in the enzyme detergent
industry’, Br J Ind Med, 1985, 42(1), 43–50.
Fuchs, R.L., Astwood, J., Allergenicity Assessment of foods derived from genetically
modied plants, Food Technol., 1996, 83–88.
Goethe, C.J., Nilzen, A., Holmgren, A., Szamosi, A., Werner, M., and Wide, L., ‘Medical
problems in the detergent industry caused by proteolytic enzymes from Bacillus subtilis’,
Acta Allergologica, 1972, 27, 63–86.
Gothe, C.J., Nilzén, A., Holmgren, A., Szamosi, A., Werner, M., Wide, L., ‘Medical
problems in the detergent industry caused by proteolytic enzymes from bacillus subtilis’,
Acta Allergol, 1972, 27(1), 63–86.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 328/457
316 Bioprocessing of textiles
Grifth, J.E., Weaver, J.E., Whitehouse, H.S., Polle, R.L., Newmann, E.A., and Nixon,
G.A., ‘Safety evaluation of enzyme detergents: Oral and cutaneous toxicity, irritancy and
skin sensitization’, Food Cosmet Toxicol, 1969, 7, 581–593.
Hamann, C.P., ‘Natural rubber latex protein sensitivity in review’, Am J Contact Derm,
1993, 4 (1), 2–4.
Health Canada, Guidelines for the Safety Assessment of Novel Foods, Food Directorate
Publication, Health Protection Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, 1994.
IFBC (International Food Biotechnology Council), ‘Safety Evaluation of Foods and
Food Ingredients Derived from Microorganisms in Biotechnologies and Food: Assuring
the Safety of Foods Produced by Genetic Modication’, Regulatory Toxicology and
Pharmacology, 1990, 12, S1–S196.
Jank, B., Haslberger, A.G., ‘Improved evaluation of potential allergens in GM food’,
Trends Biotechnol, 2003, 21, 249–250.
Janssens, V., Morren, M., Dooms-Goossens, A., and De Greef, H., ‘Protein contact
dermatitis: myth or reality’, British J Contact Dermatitis, 1995, 132, 1–6.
Jonas, D.A., Antignac, E., Antoine, J.M., Classen, H.G., Huggett, A., Knudsen, I.,
Mahler, J., Ockhuizen, T., Smith, M., Teuber, M., Walker, R. and de Vogel, P., ‘The Safety
Assessment of Novel Foods, Guidelines prepared by ILSI Europe Novel Food Task Force’,
Food Chemical Toxicology, 1996, 34, 931–940.
Jonas, D.A., Antignac, E., Antoine, J.M., Classen, H.G., Huggett, A., Knudsen, I.,Mahler, J., Ockhuizen, T., Smith, M., Teuber, M., Walker, R. and de Vogel, P., ‘The Safety
Assessment of Novel Foods, Guidelines prepared by ILSI Europe Novel Food Task Force’,
Food Chemical Toxicology, 1996, 34, 931–40.
Juniper, C.P., How, M.J., Goodwin, B.F., Kinshott, A.K., ‘Bacillus subtilis enzymes: a
7-year clinical, epidemiological and immunological study of an industrial allergen’, J Soc
Occup Med, 1977, 27(1), 3–12.
Kessler, D.A., Taylor, M.R., Maryanski, J.H., Flamm, E.L. and Kahl, L.S., ‘The Safety of
Foods Developed by Biotechnology’, Science, 1992, 256, 1747–49.
Marzulli, F., and Maibach, H., ‘Contact Allergy Predictive Testing in Humans’, Advancesin Modem Toxicology, 1977, 4, 353–372.
Masgrau, L., Roujeinikova, A., Johannissen, L. O., Hothi, P., Basran, J., Ranaghan, K. E.,
Mulholland, A. J., Sutcliffe, M. J., Scrutton, N. S., Leys, D., ‘Atomic Description of an
Enzyme Reaction Dominated by Proton Tunneling”, Science, 2006, 312, (5771), 237–41.
McMurrain, K.D., ‘Dermatologic and pulmonary responses in the manufacturing of
detergent enzyme products’, J Occup Med, 1970, 12, 416–420.
Musk, A.W., Venables, K.M., Crook, B., Nunn, A.J., Hawkins, R., Crook, G.D., Graneek,
B.J., Tee, R.D., Farrer, N., Johnson, D.A., ‘Respiratory symptoms, lung function, and
sensitization to our in a British bakery’, Br J Ind Med, 1989, 46(9), 636–642.
Neidleman, S.L., ‘Enzymes in the food industry: a backward glance’, Food Technology,
1991, 45, 88–91.
Nelson, H.S., Rosloniec, D.M., McCall, L.I., and Ikle, D., ‘Comparative Performance of Five
Commercial Prick Skin Test Devices’, J Allergy Clinical Immunology, 1993, 92, 750–752.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 329/457
Safety and precaution in handling enzymes 317
Newhouse, M.L., Tagg, B., Pocock, S.J., and McEwan, A.C., ‘An epidemiological study of
workers producing enzyme washing powders’, Lancet, 1970, 1, 689–693.
Norman, P.S., Skin Testing, Manual of Clinical Laboratory Immunology, 4th edition, 1992.
Vol. 100, 685–688.
Vanhanen, M., and Tuomi, T., ‘Risk of enzyme allergy in the detergent industry’, Occup
Environ Med, 2000, 57, 1121–1215.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), http://www.osha.gov/dsg/
hazcom/standards.html 10.4.2013
Pariza, M.W., and Foster, E.M., ‘Determining the Safety of Enzymes Used in Food
Processing’, J Food Protection, 1983, 46, 5, 453–468.
Pariza, M.W., and Johnson, E.A., ‘Evaluating the Safety of Microbial Enzyme PreparationsUsed in Food Processing: Update for a New Century’, J Regulatory Toxicology and
Pharmacology, 2001, 2, 26–37.
Pepys, J., ‘Allergic asthma to Bacillus subtilis enzyme: a model for the effects of inhalable
proteins’, Am J Ind Med, 1992, 21(4), 587–593.
Pepys, J., ‘Allergic asthma to Bacillus subtilis enzyme: A model for the effects of inhalable
proteins’, American J Industrial Medicine, 1992, 21587–593.
Pepys, J., ‘Clinical and immunological responses to enzymes of Bacillus subtilis in factory
workers and consumers’, Clinical Allergy, 1973, 3, 143–160.
Pepys, J., ‘Immunological and clinical ndings in workers and consumers exposed to
enzymes of Bacillus subtilis’, Proc R Soc Med, 1973, 66(9), 930–32.
Pepys, J., ‘Skin tests for immediate, type I, allergic reactions’, Proc R Soc Med, 1972,
65(3), 271–72.
Pepys, J., Longbottom, J.L., Hargreane, F.E., and Faux, J., ‘Allergic Reactions of the Lungs
to Enzymes of Bacillus subtilis’, Lancet, 1969, 1(607), 1181–84.
Pepys, J., Mitchell, J., Hawkins, R., Malo, J.L., ‘A longitudinal study of possible allergy to
enzyme detergents’, Clin Allergy, 1985, 15(2), 101–115.
Plinke, A.E., Maus, R., and Leith, D., ‘Experimental Examination of Factors That AffectDust Generation by Using Heubach and MRI Testers’, American Industrial Hygiene
Association J, 1992, 53, 92–97.
Rodriguez, C., Calvin, G., and Lally, C., ‘Skin effects associated with wearing fabrics
washed with commercial laundry detergents’, J Toxicol Cut Ocular Toxicol, 1994, 13,
39–45.
Sarlo, K., Clark, E.D., Ryan, C.A. and Bernstein, D.I., ‘ELISA for Human Ire Antibody to
Subtilisin (Alcalase): Correlation with RAST and Skin Tests with Occupationally Exposed
Individuals’, J Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1990, 86(3), 393–98.
Schweigert, M.K., ‘Occupational asthma and allergy associated with the use of enzymesin the detergent industry – A review of the epidemiology, toxicology, and methods of
prevention’, Clin Exp Allergy, 2000, 30, 1511–1518.
Stenius, B., Wide, L., ‘Reaginic antibody, skin, and provocation tests to Dermatophagoides
culinae and house dust in respiratory allergy’, Lancet, 1969, 2(7618), 455–58.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 330/457
318 Bioprocessing of textiles
The Soap and Detergent Industry Association (SDIA), ‘The standing committee on
enzymatic washing products. Fifth Report, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 OJD, England, 1991.
Witmeur, O., Wolf Jurgensen, P., Hoegh Thomsen, J., Rasmussen, O.G., Wide, L.,
Zachariae, H., ‘Medical experience in enzyme production’, Acta Allergol, 1973, 28(4),
250–59.
Zachariae, H., Høech Thomsen, J., Witmeur, O., Wide, L., ‘Detergent enzymes and
occupational safety: Observations on sensitization during Esperase production’, Allergy,
1981, 36(7), 513–516.
Zachariae, H., Thomsen, K., and Rasmussen, O.G., (1973), Occupational enzyme
dermatitis’, Acta Dennatovener, 1973, 53, 145–148.
Zetterstrom, O., Wide, L., ‘Antibodies and skin test reactions to a detergent--enzyme in
Swedish consumers’, Clin Allergy, 1974, 4(3), 273–80.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 331/457
Abstract: This chapter discusses the organic cotton textile standard, scope andapplication of biotechnology (enzymes) in textile wet processing for especially
organic cotton textiles. Very few research works were carried out in the pastdecade in the area of organic cotton wet processing concern, more over the globalorganic cotton textiles have been guided to process the organic cotton eithermild chemicals or enzyme technology for ecofriendly processing. The previousresearchers involved in production and characterization of various enzymes suchas alpha amylase, lipase, protease, pectinase and cellulase enzymes for cellulosicmaterials have been discussed. Application of these enzymes on organic cottonfabric for desizing, scouring and bleaching, their inuence on structure andproperties of organic cotton bres and fabrics have discussed elaborately withindividual, binary and mixed enzymatic system. The improved enzyme reactionsby the sonication and aerodynamic principle have also highlighted and reported
in single-stage enzymatic desizing, scouring and bleaching processes for organiccotton textiles. This study will provide the industrial bioscouring technologies aninsight into the properties of mixed enzymatic systems and the predictability oftheir scouring performance while deciding the recipe and process parameters.
Keywords: Organic cotton, alkaline pectinase, lipase, protease, mixed enzymes,ultrasonic, aerodynamic system
7.1 Introduction
Organic cotton usage in textile and apparel industry for development of biodiversied products in medical textiles such as wound dressing, surgical
gowns and baby care skin clothing are grown in the past years. The processing
of organic cotton in textile wet processing is recommended by the Global
Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) which framed the guidelines for textile
processing through mild chemicals and/or go with enzyme technology. In the
present industrial practices, the pectinase enzymes are used for bioscouring of
cotton materials, but drawback of the pectinase enzyme is it removes or break
downs only pectin groups in the cotton bre structure, which is not sufcient
for removal of wax, oil and fatty substances in the bre. However, recent
biotechnology and genetic engineering advances have opened opportunities for
successful applications of other enzyme systems, such as lipases, xylanases,
laccases, proteases and alkaline pectinases. The aim of this research work is to
7
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 332/457
320 Bioprocessing of textiles
study the performance of biopreparation of organic cotton fabrics in biodesizing
and bioscouring processes through specic mixed enzymatic system.
Advances in biotechnology and enzymology have brought new lines
of research on organic cotton textiles and have accelerated the development
of enzymatic applications in textile wet processing for sustainable process.
Amongst the various stages of cotton preparation, textile wet processing is a
highly energy, water and chemicals consuming processes (Naik and Paul 1997;
Warke and Chandratre 2003). Enzymes are known for their specicity, high
efciency and ability to work under mild conditions and provide a promising
solution to ecofriendly processing challenges (Carlier 2001). But the awareness
and guideline in the textile wet processing is not still well known and describedonly to go with mild chemicals and/or process with enzymes. The sustainable
processing is the need of the textile wet processing for organic cotton fabrics to
obtain ecofriendly and environmental friendly agents and sustainable methods of
processing in order to have environmentally safe processing with less chemicals
inputs and problems in efuent disposals (Aiteromem 2008). Presently, the
pectinase enzymes used in the bioscouring of cotton textiles, but it’s having
drawback such as longer reaction time and removes only pectin groups in the
cellulosic structure of cotton bres. It is clear that advanced enzyme technology
can be used to develop a usable; more environment friendly, economicalcompetitive textile wet processing for organic cotton process to develop
hygienic and value added products in the forth coming days in the textile era.
7.2 Organic cotton
Organic cotton is grown in subtropical countries such as United States, China,
India, Pakistan, Republic of Uzbekistan, Brazil, Australia, Egypt, Argentina,
Turkey, Greece and Syria, from non-genetically modied plants (Thakur et
al. 1997). Organic cotton originates from organic agriculture and is grown
without the use of any synthetic agricultural chemicals such as fertilizers
or pesticides. Its production also promotes and enhances biodiversity and
biological cycles (Grant 2000; Vughn and Turley 1998). Organic cotton is
currently being grown successfully in many countries; the largest producers
(as of 2011) are the United States, Turkey, India and China. The strategy of
organic cotton production in global status is forecasted that the need of organic
cotton may be increased to 20% higher in the 2012–13.
7.2.1 Organic Textile Standard
The GOTS was developed by the International Working Group on the Global
Textile Standard as part of the International Conference on Organic Textiles
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 333/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 321
(INTERCOT). The GOTS is emerged as a result of a technical harmonization
procedure for organic cotton processing. During last few years GOTS has
become the leading organic textile processing standard in spinning, weaving
and textile wet processing (Goyal 2009). The sizing of organic cotton fabric
recommended by the GOTS is natural sizing agents such as maize, potato
starch and thin boil starch, and in case of synthetic binders such as PVA –
polyvinyl alcohol and CMC – carboxyl methyl cellulose can be used (Behara
and Gupta 2009). In case of scouring of organic cotton fabric may be with mild
alkali or prefer to go with biochemical method or go with enzyme technology.
In case of bleaching of organic cotton fabric may use hydrogen peroxide or
biochemical method of handling with safe and ecofriendly chemicals.
7.2.2 Applications of organic cotton
Organic cotton is not only better for our bodies but also better for environment.
It makes a world of difference in the health and comfort of people, especially
those with allergies, asthma, or multiple chemical sensitivities (Nallankilli
1992). Few of the applications of organic cotton in textile and apparels are
t-shirts, shirts, trousers, underwear, vests, socks, baby wear, towels, bathrobes,
denim, bed-sheet, napkins and diapers. Applications of organic cotton inmedical textiles are wound dressing, surgical clothing’s, stockings, hygienic
and healthcare dressings etc.
7.2.3 Biotechnology – scope and importance
Enzymes are gaining an increasingly important role as a tool in various wet
textile pre-treatment and nishing processes (Tzanko et al. 2001). Biocatalysts
have proven to be a exible and reliable tool in wet textile processing and
found to be a promising technology to full the expected future requirements.Enzymatic scouring has been investigated extensively by various researchers
for nearly one decade (Buschie-Diller 1994; Traore and Buschle 2000; Nabil
Ibrahim et al. 2004; Tatsuma Mori et al. 1999; Wen-Chi et al. 1999). The organic
cotton fabric for its textile wet processing needs the use of minimum safe
chemicals to health (Gubitz and Cavaco-Paulo 2001; Warke and Chandratre
2003) and for this the alternative way is to go into enzyme technology, because
enzymes are substrate specic bio-catalysts and they operate best at an
ambient pressure, mild temperature and often at a neutral pH range (Poloncaand Petra 2009; Daniel et al. 2010). Different enzymes like pectinases such
as lyases (EC 4.2.2.2), polygalacturonase endo-acting type (EC 3.2.1.15) and
polygalacturonase exo-acting type (EC 3.2.1.67), proteases (EC 3.4.21-25),
cellulases such as endo-glucanases (EC 3.3.1.4); cellobiohydrolases (EC
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 334/457
322 Bioprocessing of textiles
3.2.1.91), xylanases (EC 3.2.1.8), lipases (EC 3.1.1.3); and recently cutinases
(EC 3.1.1.74) have been examined to degrade and subsequently remove the
natural component present in the outer layer of cotton bres (Presa and Forte
2007; Jayapriya and Vigneswaran 2010; Lenting et al. 2002).
7.2.4 Bioscouring with various enzymes on cellulosic
materials
Scouring is related to hydrophilicity and can be achieved by uncovering the
pores present in the bres, by removing waxes and other non-cellulosic materials
in the primary wall (Ramachandran and Karthik 2004). The technical feasibilityof enzymatic scouring has been recognized by many researchers over the last
decade. However, continuous enzymatic scouring process has not yet been
widely implemented by textile industries, due to inability to remove waxes from
cotton bre during enzymatic scouring. Much of the work in the area of cotton
bioscouring has been focused on investigating the utility of various enzymes.
Although several types of enzymes including pectinases (Vigneswaran and
Keerthivasan 2008; Hardin and Yanghuna 1997; Li and Hardin 1998; Etters et
al. 1999), cellulases (Vigneswaran and Jayapriya 2010; Buschie-Diller 1994),
proteases (Buchert and Pere 2000; Lin and Hsieh 2001), cutinases (Vigneswaranand Jayapriya 2010), xylanases (Traore and Buschle 2000), and lipases (Lenting
et al. 2002; Traore and Buschle 2000) have been studied. Pectinases have
proved to be the most effective and suitable enzymes for cotton bioscouring.
The mechanism of pectinase scouring reportedly assumes that the degradation
and elimination of pectins makes the loosened waxes more easily removable
with the help of mechanical agitation. This allows the cotton to achieve superior
hydrophilicity without bre deterioration (Traore and Buschle 2000).
A rationale approach is adopted to design a new efcient enzymatic scouring process (Buschle-Diller et al. 1998). Several aspects were considered such as
the specicity of enzymes, the complexity of the cotton bre substrate and
mass transfer. Different commercial as well as specially produced pectinases
were tested for bioscouring performance. Alkaline pectinases (PL and
Bioprep 3000L) work better than acidic pectinases (PGs). The pectin removal
efciency of specially produced PL was comparable to commercial Bioprep
3000L. The most important parameters, such as enzyme concentration, pH,
temperature, ionic strength and chelators, for the bioscouring process have
been evaluated (Tzanko et al. 2001; Perez et al. 2000). Hardin and Yanghuna(1997) postulated that pectin acts as a cementing material in the primary wall
of cotton bres. After enzymatic destabilization of the pectin structure, the
different components present in the primary wall layer can be removed easily
in subsequent rinsing steps.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 335/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 323
7.3 Biodesizing of organic cotton fabrics with
alphas amylaseThe biodesizing of organic cotton fabric with indigenously produced alpha-
amylase and their enzyme kinetics, using alpha-amylase enzyme was studied
with various process parameters such as enzyme concentration, temperature
and reaction time (Vigneswaran et al. 2010). In that study, grey organic cotton
yarns of 2/40s Ne for warp and 40s Ne for weft yarns were procured from
M/s. Armstrong Mills (P) Limited, Tirupur, India. These yarns were used for
weaving of plain organic cotton fabric using a power loom. The organic cotton
fabric having 64 ends per inch, 60 picks per inch, fabric cover factor of 18.96
and average fabric mass of 120.44 g/m2 was produced. The laboratory scale
production of alpha-amylase enzyme and process variable for biodesizing are
briey discussed below.
7.3.1 Laboratory scale production of alpha-amylase
Seed culture – microbial source Bacillus cereus used in the present study was
obtained from Department of Microbiology, PSG College of Arts & Science,
Coimbatore, India. The culture was maintained on Nutrient Agar (NA) slants
and subcultured periodically.
7.3.1.1 Development of the inoculum
For the development of inoculum, the bacterial culture was transferred from
the stock to 100 mL nutrient broth and the inoculated asks were incubated
overnight at (35 ± 2)°C and 150 rpm. Cells were harvested from the broth
and their absorbance (A) was checked at 660 nm. Accordingly, cells with
inoculums size of A660 = 0.5 (10% inoculum [volume per mass]) per 5 g ofsubstrate were harvested, washed and resuspended in sterile distilled water.
7.3.1.2 Enzyme production system
The substrate used in the present study was wheat bran. Production media
containing 5 g of solid substrate and 10 mL of Bushnell–Haas (BH) mineral
salt medium in 250 mL Erlenmeyer asks were inoculated with the above
inoculum. Inoculum production media were incubated under static conditions
at (35 ± 2)°C and enzyme production was checked (Anto et al. 2006) for theenhanced production of the alpha-amylase. Glucose as an additional carbon
source (0.4 mg/g) was added into the production medium and it has been
reported that maximum enzyme production was observed after 72 hours. The
same incubation time was also maintained in our experiment.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 336/457
324 Bioprocessing of textiles
7.3.1.3 Extraction of crude enzyme
After the incubation period, crude enzyme was extracted in 50 mL of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7) on a rotary shaker at 250 rpm for 30 min. The content
was ltered through muslin cloth. Filtrate was centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 10
min and clear brown supernatant was used as the enzyme source.
7.3.1.4 Alpha-amylase enzyme assay
Alpha-amylase was determined by incorporating a mixture of 0.5 mL of aliquot
of each enzyme source and 1% soluble starch dissolved in 0.1 M phosphate
buffer, pH 7, at 55°C for 15 min (Berneld 1955). The reaction was stopped by adding 1 mL of 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid, followed by boiling for 10 min.
The nal volume was made up to 12 mL with distilled water and the reducing
sugar released was measured at 540 nm (Miller 1959). One unit (U) of alpha-
amylase activity was dened as the amount of enzyme that releases 1 mmol of
reducing sugar as glucose per minute, under assay conditions and expressed
as U/ml of dry substrate. All the experiments were performed in triplicates.
7.3.2 Warp yarn sizing and fabricationThe sizing of warp yarns of organic cotton was carried out using laboratory
model yarn sizing machine and the average size add-on on the warp yarn was
12.21% and then the sized warp yarns were taken into warp beam preparation
for weaving. The average size add-on the organic cotton fabric was measured
with respect to warp and weft yarn mass and was found to be 8.27%. The
aerial density of the PVA-sized organic cotton grey fabric after weaving was
found to be 130.24 grams per square metre. The size recipe of PVA starch
used for the organic cotton yarn was as follows:
Size recipe for warp yarn
• Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) – 4 parts
• Vegetable tallow – 2 parts
• Anti-static agent – 0.3 parts
• Gum tragacanth – 2 parts
• Soap oil – 1 part
• Thin boiling starch – 40 parts
• Water – required level of pick up
7.3.3 Enzymatic desizing
The organic cotton sized fabrics were treated with alpha-amylase with various
process variables such as enzyme concentration, temperature and reaction
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 337/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 325
time. The process variables were chosen according to the Box–Behnken
method of statistical tool for process optimisation. In this present work, a
systematic statistical approach has been adopted to obtain optimum weight
loss of the sized fabric with different process conditions. The response surface
methodology was used to develop a mathematical correlation between the
enzyme concentration, temperature and time. The enzymatic desizing process
was carried out at pH 6–7 and then the fabrics were thoroughly rinsed with hot
water and cold water and dried at 80°C using hot air oven.
7.3.3.1 Design of experiment
The biodesizing experiments were conducted based on the Box–Behnken
second order design for three variables. In this experimental design, enzyme
concentration (X1), temperature (X
2) and time (X
3) were taken as independent
variables. The variables were selected at three levels: –1, 0, +1. The response
(Y) is given by a second order polynomial as shown in equation [7.1]:
k k k k 2
o i i ii i ij i j
i 1 i 1 i j i 1
Y b b X b X b X X= = ≥ =
= + + +∑ ∑ ∑∑ [7.1]
where Y – predicted response, bo – offset term, bi – linear effect, bii –squared effect and b
ij –interactive effect. The above equation was solved
using the Design-Expert (State-Ease Statistics Made-Easy, version 8.0.2,
2010) to estimate the response of the independent variables. The actual design
experiment and the corresponding actual values for each variable are listed
(Table 7.1).
Table 7.1 Design of experiments – alpha-amylase process variables
Coded values Biodesizing process variables
Enzyme concentration (%) Temperature (°C) Time (min)
–1 2 50 30
0 3 55 45
+1 4 60 60
7.3.3.2 Testing – Iodine solution
The residual presence of starch in the desized organic cotton fabric was
assessed by the iodine test as per the standard test procedure of the iodinesolution preparation. (Iodine solution was prepared as using reagent of
Potassium iodine (10 g of KI [100%] in 100 ml of water), add 0.6358 g of
iodine (100%) stir and shake, iodine is completely dissolved). Fill up to 800
ml with water then complete to 1000 ml of ethanol (Mostafa 2003).
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 338/457
326 Bioprocessing of textiles
7.3.4 Effect of biodesizing process variables – Box–
Behnken designThe Box–Behnken design of experiment was used to study the optimization
of biodesizing process conditions to get an accurate output and the predicted
% weight loss of desized organic cotton fabrics. Several factors inuence the
desizing of PVA starch such as alpha-amylase concentration, temperature
and time play a vital role. The limits for the design in terms of enzyme
concentration, temperature and time were xed after careful consideration
which plays a signicant role in the degradation of PVA starch leading to
effective desizing. The effects of enzyme concentration and temperature on
weight loss of PVA-desized organic fabric at various time intervals of (a) 30
min, (b) 45 min and (c) 60 min are shown in the 3D surface plot (Fig. 7.1).
Fig. 7.1 Effect of enzyme concentration and temperature on weight loss of desizedorganic cotton fabric at various time intervals of (a) 30 min, (b) 45 min and (c) 60 min
The empirical model was tted to the response and the lack of t test
was carried out and the polynomial equation derived from the design of
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 339/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 327
experimental is given below, taking into account the signicant interaction
effects (Table 7.2).
Table 7.2 Analysis of variance for the response surface
Source F P (Prob > F)
X1 – Enzyme concentration 93.94 0.0002
X2 – Temperature 6.63 0.0498
X3 – Time 79.84 0.0003
X1X
21.000 0.0064
X1X
30.255 0.075
X2X3 0.838 0.0037
The model F-value was 21.07 which implied that the model was
signicant and there was only 0.18% chance that a “Model F-value” of this
large a value could occur due to noise. The predicted R 2 value was 0.9743 and
is in reasonable agreement with the adjusted R 2 of 0.9281. Adequate precision
which measures the signal to noise ratio was 16.132, which is greater than
4 indicating that the model can be used to navigate the design space. From
Table 7.2, it can be observed that the enzyme concentration in the degradation
of PVA size starch in the desizing process had notably signicant differencesat F
actual > F
critical (F
2,14 values of 93.94 > 21.07), at 95% condence level. With
respect to the design of experiments, no signicant differences are found
between temperature levels of 50–60°C at Factual
< Fcritical
(F2,14
values of 6.63 <
21.07) at 95% condence level; this may be due to better stability and kinetics
of the enzyme at selected temperature ranges in the desizing process. With
respect to the reaction time in the desizing process, signicant differences were
observed at Factual
> Fcritical
(F2,14
values of 79.84 > 21.07) at 95% condence
level; this may be due to the enzyme reaction time of the degradation of PVAstarch mainly depends on the selected range of times to achieve the required
weight loss of the PVA starch in the sized fabric.
7.3.4.1 Effect of temperature and time
Figure 7.2 shows the weight loss of PVA-desized organic cotton fabric at
various enzyme concentrations. It can be seen that at any given time the
weight loss of the fabric increases with increasing temperature, and it can
also be observed that at a given reaction temperature, with increasing timethe desizing efciency increases for higher enzyme concentrations. At higher
concentration, the degradation of the PVA starch increases, and it can be
attributed to the signicant weight loss of the sized organic cotton fabric
during desizing as a result of hydrolysis. Moreover, it should be mentioned
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 340/457
328 Bioprocessing of textiles
that at a higher enzyme concentration, the increase in temperature and time
aids in faster hydrolysis resulting in quick conversion of polymer chains into
water-soluble products. Similar kind of results has also been observed by other
researchers (Mori et al. 1999; Hsieh and Cram 1999) and has been attributed
to the autocatalytic effect after certain time duration, thereby resulting in
higher weight loss.
Fig. 7.2 Effect of reaction time and temperature on weight loss of PVA-desized
organic fabric at various enzyme concentrations of (a) 2%, (b) 3% and (c) 4%
7.3.4.2 Effect of enzyme concentration and time
Figure 7.3 shows the contour plot of weight loss of the PVA starch-sized
organic cotton fabric at different temperatures. It can be seen that the weight
loss of the fabric increases with the increase in concentration of the enzymes
used in both lower and higher temperatures. Moreover, it can be seen that the
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 341/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 329
amount of hydrolysis of the size starch by the enzymatic reaction is higher at
higher temperature of 60°C indicating the hydrolysis of starch chain groups
into water-soluble groups at the elevated temperature, thereby increasing the
weight loss. However, it was noted that the effect of time is more pronounced
at elevated temperature and can be seen by the skew in the contour lines.
Fig. 7.3 Effect of enzyme concentration and reaction time on weight loss of PVA starch
desized organic fabric at various temperatures of (a) 50°C, (b) 55°C and (c) 60°C
7.3.4.3 Effect of enzyme concentration and temperature
Figure 7.4 presents the effect of enzyme concentration and temperature on the
weight loss of the PVA-sized organic cotton fabrics at various reaction times.With increase in enzyme concentration and temperature there is an increase
in desizing efciency at both lower and higher reaction time intervals, but
at higher time duration there is a higher rate of PVA starch hydrolysis with
the increase in enzyme concentration. Another interesting observation made
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 342/457
330 Bioprocessing of textiles
during the trials was the higher desizing rate of the specimen at higher enzyme
concentration, time and temperature resulting in a maximum weight loss of
8% and above.
Fig. 7.4 Contour graphs represents the effect of enzyme concentration and
temperature at various reaction times of (a) 30 min, (b) 45 min, (c) 60 min
7.3.5 Process optimization
The desizing process variables such as alpha-amylase enzyme concentration,
temperature and reaction time were optimized using Box–Behnken
experimental design and their output values are executed using Design-
Expert software 8.0. The Design-Expert software was executed to get variousoptions/predicted process parameters to achieve the required weight loss of
the fabric of 8.0% during the desizing of PVA-starched organic cotton fabric.
The software was processed and the resulting desirability and FDS-Fraction
of Design Space of design model of process (Fig. 7.5). The output result of
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 343/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 331
the Design-Expert software in achieving the desired weight loss of 8.0% in
the PVA starch desizing process is studied and out of which the software opted
the best process conditions of alpha-amylase enzyme concentration of 3.37%
at temperature of 55°C and reaction time 48 min with 1.0% desirability. From
the best opted test results, the actual weight loss of the desizing process of the
organic cotton fabric was achieved, 7.90% with an error of 1.25%.
Fig. 7.5 Fraction of Design Space (FDS) of design model of PVA desizing process
7.3.6 Characteristics of the biodesizing samples
7.3.6.1 Iodine test
The desizing efciency of the PVA starch-sized fabric was assessed by the
presence of starch on the fabric in the iodine test which indicates the depth of
color of the starch. The various enzyme concentration treated organic cotton
fabrics at 2%, 3% and 4% levels compared with grey organic sized cotton
fabric are studied and the absence or pale white color of the desized fabric is
the indication of removal of starch during the enzymatic desizing.
7.3.6.2 FTIR spectroscopic analysis
The organic cotton fabric with and without PVA starch size of fabrics were
analyzed using FTIR Spectrometer – (Schimadzu). The presence and integrity
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 344/457
332 Bioprocessing of textiles
of the PVA and other sizing compounds in the sized organic cotton fabric can
be clearly understood and the hydrolysis of the PVA starch during enzymatic
desizing at 8% level of weight loss of the organic cotton fabric sample shows
the removal of PVA groups in the specimen after desizing at 60°C reaction
temperature and 60 min time at 4% enzyme concentration at 3315 cm –1 which
is responsible for the –OH group stretching. In the test results, the transparency
(%) of the sized organic cotton fabrics are at a lower level when compared to
the grey fabric which is due to the starch and other ingredients present in the
size paste. The residual size components are analysed after desizing using
FTIR reports by differentiating the transparency (%) wave length of the grey
and desized organic cotton fabrics are studied and wave length at 1058 cm –1
,1112 cm –1 and 2362 cm –1 groups are responsible for C–C stretch from phenyl
ring, –CH2 symmetric stretching and C–H stretching in the desized organic
cotton fabrics.
7.3.7 Summary
The process optimization of desizing of PVA starch sized organic cotton
fabric has been studied and the process variables such as alpha-amylase
enzyme concentration temperature and reaction time were optimized toachieve the required desizing efciency in terms of weight loss % of fabric
and the degradation of PVA starch during the desizing process on the fabrics
was assessed by iodine test and FTIR test results. The activity of the alpha-
amylase enzymes are better and catalyze the degradation of PVA starch at
the temperature range of 50–55°C and time of 30–40 min to achieve the
required level of 8% size removal efciency. The pH of the desizing bath
has a major inuence on the improved reaction of the enzyme to catalyze the
hydrolysis of starch groups. At the higher enzyme concentration of 4% level
and higher temperature of 60°C lesser time to achieve the required desizing
efciency was observed. Process variables are optimized using the Design-
Expert software 8.0, and it will pave the way to predicting the enzyme kinetics
at various concentrations, temperatures and reaction times to achieve the
required desizing efciency with minimum error %. This study will be helpful
to the organic cotton processors for the ecofriendly and sustainable textile wet
processing using alpha-amylase enzyme in the desizing of PVA starch-based
desizing operations. This study will provide the industrial sizing technologies
an insight into the properties of PVA-based modied starch materials and the predictability of their desizing performance while deciding the size recipe and
desizing parameters.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 345/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 333
7.4 Bioscouring of organic cotton with alkaline
pectinase7.4.1 Grey organic cotton fabric and desizing
In this study the 100% organic cotton fabric was produced which having the
specications 64 ends/inch, 60 picks/inch, 19.0 fabric cover factor and 120.4
g/m2 average fabric mass. The average size add-on on the organic cotton
fabric was measured with respect to warp and weft yarn mass; it was found to
be 8.27%. The aerial density of the organic cotton grey fabric after weaving
was found to be 130.2 g/m2. The PVA sized 100% organic cotton sized fabrics
were treated with alpha-amylase using various process variables such as3% enzyme concentration, 55°C temperature and 60 min reaction time. The
enzymatic desizing process was carried out at pH 6–7 and then the fabrics
were thoroughly rinsed with hot water followed by cold water and dried at
80°C.
7.4.2 Enzymatic scouring with alkaline pectinase
Alkaline pectinase and puried pectate lyase were selected for the degradation
of cotton pectin. Scouring experiments were performed in 1 L beaker in which
three fabric samples of 10 × 10 cm were treated using enzyme solution of
different concentrations of 2–6%, non-ionic wetting agent of 1–2%, treatment
time of 30, 45 and 60 min, and pH of 8.5–9.0. The fabric samples thereafter
were rinsed in 500 mL of water at 90°C for 15 min to inactivate the enzymes
followed by drying at 80°C to constant weight.
7.4.2.1 Design of experiment
Experiments were conducted based on the Box-Behnken second order design
for three variables (Table 7.3). The response (Y) is given by a second order
polynomial, as shown in equation [7.1].
Table 7.3 Box-Behnken experimental design
Coded
values
Bioscouring process variables
Enzyme concentration (%) Temperature (°C) Time (Min)
–1 2 50 30
0 4 55 45
+1 6 60 60
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 346/457
334 Bioprocessing of textiles
7.4.3 Testing
7.4.3.1 FTIR analysisThe organic cotton fabric with and without alkaline pectinase treatment were
analyzed using FTIR Spectrometer (Model: 8400S, Make: Schimadzu).
7.4.3.2 Pectin determination
The pectin removal of organic cotton fabrics was carried out as per the
procedure reported earlier (Wen-Chi et al. 1999). K/S values were calculated
using the following equation:
K/S = (1 – R)2 / 2R [7.2]
The lower the K/S values the lesser is pectic and proteinic substance
present in cotton bre (Ame and Toby 2005).
7.4.3.3 Fabric water absorbency
Water absorbency of organic cotton fabric treated with alkaline pectinase was
evaluated according to AATCC test method 79-2000.
7.4.3.4 Wax content
The wax content of the grey organic cotton fabric and alkaline pectinase
treated fabrics were measured as per AATCC test method 97-2009 (revised)
by solvent extraction using Soxhlet apparatus.
7.4.3.5 Weight loss
After the enzymatic treatments, the weight loss (WL) of the treated fabrics
was calculated using the following formula: %WL = (W
1 – W
2) *100 / W
1 [7.3]
where W1 and W
2 are the weights of fabric before and after enzymatic
treatment.
7.4.4 Effect of enzymatic process variables
Enzymatic treatments were carried out based on the experimental design
(Table 7.3). The effect of enzyme concentration and temperature on weight
loss of organic cotton fabric at various time intervals of (a) 45 min and (b) 60min are shown as 3D surface plot (Fig. 7.6). The empirical model was tted
to the response and lack of t test was carried out. The polynomial equation
derived from the experimental design is given below taking into account the
signicant interaction effects (Table 7.4).
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 347/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 335
Fig. 7.6 Effect of enzyme concentration and temperature on weight loss of organic
cotton fabric at various time intervals of (a) 45 min, and (b) 60 min
Table 7.4 Analysis of variance for response surface
Source F P (Prob > F)
Enzyme conc. (X1), % 267.48 0.0001
Temp. (X2), °C 26.87 0.0035Time (X
3), min 2770.93 0.0003
X1*X
21.29 0.3069
X1*X
36.39 0.0527
X2* X
30.14 0.7201
Final equation in terms of coded factors
Fabric weight loss = + 2.42 + 0.23 × X1 + 0.072 × X
2 + 0.74 × C-0.023 × X
1 ×
B-0.050 × X1 × X
3 – 7.5E-003 × X
2 × X
3 + 0.075 × X
12 +
0.088 × X22 – 0.22 × X3
2 [7.4]
Final equation in terms of actual factors
Fabric weight loss = + 6.82 + 0.163 × X1 – 0.35700 × X
2 + 0.149 × X
3 –
2.25E-003 × X1 × X
2 – 1.66E-003 × X
1 × X
3 – 1.0E-004
× X2 × + 0.018 × X
12 + 3.50E-003 × X
22 – 9.77E-004
× X3
2 [7.5]
where X1 is the enzyme concentration (%); X
2 , the temperature (°C); and
X3, the time (min).
The ‘Model F-value’ was 66.15 which imply that the model is signicantand there is only 0.01% chance that a ‘Model F-value’ of this large value
could occur due to noise. The predicted R 2 value is found to be 0.94 and is in
reasonable agreement with the adjusted R 2 value of 1.0. Adequate precision
which measures the signal to noise ratio is found to be 16.821, which is
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 348/457
336 Bioprocessing of textiles
greater than 4, indicating that the model can be used to navigate the design
space. From Table 7.4, it is observed that the enzyme concentration affects the
degradation of pectin in the scouring process, showing signicant differences
at Factual
>Fcritical
(F2,14
values of 267.48 > 66.15) at 95% condence level. With
respect to the design of experiments, there is no signicant difference found
between the temperature levels of 50–60°C at Factual
< Fcritical
(F2,14
values of
26.87 < 66.15) at 95% condence level. This may be due to better stability
and kinetics of enzyme at selected temperature ranges in the scouring
process. With respect to reaction time in the scouring process, it is found that
signicant differences occur at Factual
> Fcritical
(F2,14
values of 2770.93 > 66.15)
at 95% condence level. This may be due to the enzyme reaction time on thedegradation of pectin to achieve required weight loss of the cotton fabric.
Table 7.5 shows the predicted and actual fabric weight losses of the scoured
100% organic cotton fabric with alkaline pectinase. From the test results, it is
observed that the error % of the predicted and actual value of the experimental
design is below 3% and not found to be statistically signicant at 5%.
Table 7.5 Design model and error of experiment
Run
Enzyme
(X1) conc.%
Temp.
(X2)°C
Time
(X3)min
Weight loss , %
Error %Predicted Actual
1 4.0 60 30 1.64 1.61 1.83
2 4.0 55 45 2.42 2.48 –2.48
3 2.0 55 60 2.80 2.74 2.14
4 2.0 50 45 2.30 2.25 2.17
5 2.0 60 45 2.45 2.38 2.86
6 6.0 55 60 3.2 3.15 1.56
7 6.0 50 45 2.76 2.85 –3.268 4.0 50 30 1.44 1.42 1.39
9 4.0 50 60 2.95 3.04 –3.05
10 4.0 55 45 2.42 2.43 –0.41
11 2.0 55 30 1.25 1.22 2.40
12 6.0 55 30 1.85 1.87 –1.08
13 6.0 60 45 2.82 2.81 0.35
14 4.0 60 60 3.12 3.18 –1.92
15 4.0 55 45 2.42 2.43 –0.41
7.4.5 Effect of enzyme concentration and temperature
Figures 7.7 and 7.8 clearly indicate, as expected, a progressive weight
loss with increasing enzyme concentration due to the hydrolysis of pectin.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 349/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 337
At higher time duration, there is higher rate of pectin and wax hydrolysis
observed with the increase in enzyme concentration. The organic cotton fabric
shows higher water absorbency rate at higher enzyme concentration of 6%,
treatment time of 60 min and temperature of 60°C with maximum weight loss
of 3.2% and above. Figure 7.8 shows the interaction of alkaline pectinase
enzyme concentration and temperature for 60 min reaction time which shows
the higher rate of pectin removal by the reaction of alkaline pectinase enzyme
at 60°C on the organic cotton bre to break the pectin components in the bre
structure. The water absorbency of fabric is in the range of 12–14 sec when
treated with 2–3% alkaline pectinase at 55°C for 30 min. The better water
absorbency is observed for 5–6% alkaline pectinase concentration at 55–60°Cfor 60 min treatment time. The lower the water absorbency time the better
scouring can be done.
Fig. 7.7 Effect of enzyme concentration and temperature at various reaction time (a)
30 min, (b) 45 min, (c) 60 min
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 350/457
338 Bioprocessing of textiles
Fig. 7.8 Interaction of enzyme concentration and temperature
7.4.6 FTIR spectroscopic analysis
The FTIR spectra of the desized organic cotton fabric and 2%, 4% and 6% pectinase enzyme treated cotton fabrics are analysed and it mainly highlights
the changes in the non-cellulosic impurities by characterizing the carboxyl
acids and esters that are present in pectin and waxes. The hydrolysis of
the pectin at 6% enzyme concentration for 45 min reaction time indicates
the maximum removal of pectin and waxes, as indicated by the peak at
3315 cm –1, responsible for the –OH group stretching, the CH stretching at
2917 cm –1, the asymmetrical COO– stretching at 1617 cm –1, and the CH
wagging at 1316 cm –1. The absorbance intensity of the characteristics peaks at
around 1736 cm –1 varies in the following order: desized fabric >2% pectinase>4% pectinase >6% pectinase fabrics.
7.4.7 Wax and pectin removal
Figure 7.9 shows the wax content of alkaline pectinase treated cotton fabric
and also it is observed that the wax present in the grey organic cotton fabric is
0.81% and the subsequent alkaline pectinase treated fabric with 2%, 4% and 6%
enzyme concentrations at 60°C temperature and 45 min reaction time shows
35.80%, 48.15% and 54.32% loss in wax content respectively. It may be dueto the fact that the alkaline pectinase enzyme degrades the pectin component
in the organic cotton bre which hydrolysis the wax component in the bre.
Figure 7.10 shows the pectin degradation level of organic cotton fabric treated
with various process conditions of time and temperature with 2–6% alkaline
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 351/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 339
enzyme concentration. It is observed that the rate of pectin removal increases
with increase in enzyme concentration and at higher time and temperature.
Fig. 7.9 Wax content of alkaline pectinase treated organic cotton fabric at 60°C for
45 min reaction time
The enzyme kinetics of alkaline pectinase at various concentrations with time
interval of 30, 45 and 60 min show that the pectin removal rate is 1.30 and 1.32times higher in case of 2–4% and 4–6% pectinase concentration respectively
at 60°C. The higher pectin removal (82.41%) is observed at 60°C and 60 min
treatment time and in addition the efcient wax removal step improves the
performance of pectinase in terms of pectin removal and hydrophilicity.
Fig. 7.10 Pectin degradation of alkaline pectinase-treated organic cotton fabric
enzyme kinetics – interaction of pectin degradation rate at 60°C
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 352/457
340 Bioprocessing of textiles
7.4.8 Process optimization
The process variables such as alkaline pectinase enzyme concentration,temperature and reaction time have been optimized using Box-Behnken
experimental design and their output values are executed using Design-Expert
software 8.0. This software was executed to get various options/predicted
process parameters to achieve required pectin degradation range of 75–82%
and weight loss of 2.80%. The output result of the Design-Expert software to
achieve the desired weight loss in the alkaline pectinase process for predicted
process variables of 9 solutions is shown (Table 7.6). The software shows the
best process conditions, such as alpha-amylase enzyme concentration 5.65%,
temperature 60°C, and reaction time 45 min with 1.0% desirability. The best
opted test results are the loss of 78.40% pectin with 2.80% weight loss at an
error of 1.21%.
It is possible to employ alkaline pectinase to scour the organic cotton fabric
to achieve better water absorbency rate of <5 sec and 52.5% wax removal by
higher pectin degradation of 75–80% using 6% enzyme concentration, 60°C
temperature, and 60 min reaction time with 3.2% fabric weight loss. The
higher concentration of alkaline pectinase enzymes shows better activity and
catalyzes the degradation of pectin groups at 55–60°C and 8.5–9.0 pH, takinglesser time to achieve required pectin hydrolysis. This study will be helpful to
the organic cotton processors for the ecofriendly and sustainable textile wet
processing using alkaline pectinase enzyme in bioscouring processes and also
will pave the way to nd better scouring with mixed enzymatic systems, to
predict required alkaline pectinase and to bring better scouring performance
of cotton fabrics.
Table 7.6 Output results of Design-Expert software
Solution
no.
Enzyme
concentration
(%)
Temperature
(°C)
Time
(min)
Fabric
weight loss
(%)
Pectin
degradation
(%)
Water
absorbency
(sec)
1 5.65 60.00 45.00 2.80079 80.21 5.999
2 5.67 59.94 45.00 2.80114 80.42 5.999
3 5.70 59.84 45.00 2.80173 79.34 6.000
4 5.72 59.78 45.00 2.80215 78.40 6.000
5 5.68 60.00 44.82 2.79741 81.07 5.999
6 5.53 60.00 45.79 2.81662 79.38 5.999
7 5.41 60.00 45.00 2.76276 80.32 6.270
8 6.00 58.20 45.00 2.79149 78.92 6.140
9 5.42 59.76 47.04 2.84409 79.43 5.999
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 353/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 341
7.5 Bioscouring of organic cotton fabric using
protease enzymeProtease enzyme from puried Pseudomonas aeruginosa was selected for the
degradation of cotton low volatile wax, oil and fatty substances. Scouring
experiments were performed in 1 L beaker in which three fabric samples of 20
× 20 cm were treated in protease enzyme solution of different concentrations
of 1–3%, non-ionic wetting agent of 1–2%, treatment time of 30 min, 45 min,
60 min and pH from 8.0 to 8.5. The fabric samples thereafter were rinsed in
500 mL of water at 90°C for 15 min, to inactivate the enzymes followed by
drying at 80°C, then to weigh the fabric using electronic balance.
7.5.2 Effect of enzymatic process variables – Box-
Behnken design
Enzymatic treatments are carried out based on the experimental design as
given in Table 7.7. The effect of enzyme concentration and temperature on
weight loss of organic cotton fabric at various time intervals of (a) 30 min, (b)
45 min, and (c) 60 min are shown as 3D surface plot (Fig. 7.11). The empirical
model was tted to the response surface and lack of t test was analysed.
The polynomial equation derived from the design of experimental is given below taking into account the signicant interaction effects of input variable
for ANOVA as given in Table 7.8.
Table 7.7 Box-Behnken experimental design – protease enzyme
Coded
values
Input variables
Enzyme
concentration, %Temperature, °C Time, min
–1 1 50 300 2 55 45
+1 3 60 60
Table 7.8 Analysis of variance for the response surface
Source Factual
P (Prob > F)
X1 – Enzyme concentration 62.78 0.0035
X2 – Temperature 4.97 0.0005
X3 – Time 66.76 0.0763
X1*X
20.3933 0.6602
X1*X
30.2554 0.0530
X2* X
30.6602 0.7109
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 354/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 355/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 343
The model F-value of 16.04 implies the model was signicant and there
was only 0.35% chance that could occur due to noise. The predicted R 2 value
was 0.9665 and is in reasonable agreement with the Adjusted R 2 of 1.0. From
Table 7.8, it is noticed that the enzyme concentration in the degradation of
wax component in the scouring process was noticed signicant differences at
Factual
>Fcritical
(F2,14
values of 62.78 > 16.04) at 95% condence level.
With respect to the design of experiments, there is no signicant difference
found between temperature levels of 50–60°C at Factual
< Fcritical
(F2,14
values of
4.97 < 16.04) at 95% condence level, it may be due to better stability and
kinetics of enzyme at selected temperature ranges in the scouring process.
With respect to reaction time in the scouring process, it was noticed thatsignicant differences at F
actual > F
critical (F
2,14 values of 66.76 >16.04) at 95%
condence level, it may be due to the enzyme reaction time on the degradation
of wax depends mainly on the selected range of times to achieve required
weight loss of the organic cotton fabric.
Figure 7.12 shows the predicted and actual fabric weight losses of the
bioscoured 100% organic cotton fabric treated with protease enzyme. From
the test results, it was observed that the error % of the predicted and actual
value of the experimental design was not found to be statistically signicant
at 95% condence level.
Fig. 7.12 Relationship between the actual and predicted weight loss of protease
enzyme-treated on organic cotton fabric
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 356/457
344 Bioprocessing of textiles
7.5.2 Effect of protease enzyme concentration and
temperatureFigure 7.13 clearly indicates, as expected, a progressive weight loss with
increasing protease enzyme concentration due to the hydrolysis of wax
components. At higher time duration, there is higher rate of wax degradation
observed with increase in enzyme concentration. An interesting observation
noticed during the trials that the organic cotton fabric was noticed higher water
absorbency rate at higher enzyme concentration of 3%, 60 min time and 60°C
temperature of maximum weight loss of 1.92% and above. The interaction
of protease enzyme concentration and temperature at 60°C which shows the
higher rate of wax removal by the reaction of enzyme on the organic cotton bre
to break the low volatile fatty components. The water absorbency of fabric is
in the range of 8–14 sec when treated with 2–3% protease enzyme at 55°C for
60 min. The lower the water absorbency time the better scouring can be done.
Fig. 7.13 Contour graphs represent the effect of enzyme concentration and
temperature at various reaction times of (a) 30 min (b) 45 min (c) 60 min
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 357/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 345
7.5.3 FTIR spectroscopic analysis
The FTIR spectra of the desized organic cotton fabric and 1–3% proteaseenzyme treated cotton fabrics are analyzed and it mainly highlights changes in
the non-cellulosic impurities by characterizing the carboxyl acids and esters
that are present in waxes.
The hydrolysis of the wax components at 3% enzyme concentration for
60 min reaction time indicates the maximum removal of waxes, as indicated
by the peak at 3315 cm –1, responsible for –OH group stretching, the CH
stretching at 2917 cm –1, the asymmetrical COO- stretching at 1617 cm –1, and
CH wagging at 1316 cm –1. The absorbance intensity of the characteristics
peaks at around 1736 cm –1 varied in the following order: desized fabric > 1%
protease > 2% protease > 3% protease fabrics.
7.5.4 Wax removal by protease enzyme treatment
Figure 7.14 shows the wax content of protease enzyme treated cotton fabric,
it was observed that the wax present in the grey organic cotton fabric was
0.81% and subsequent protease enzyme treated fabric at 1%, 2% and 3%
enzyme concentrations at 60°C temperature and 60 min reaction time noticed14.82%, 18.15% and 24.63%, respectively. It may be due to protease enzyme
degrading the low volatile wax, oil and fatty components in the organic cotton
bre.
Fig. 7.14 Wax removal (%) of protease treated organic cotton fabric at 60°C and 60
min reaction time
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 358/457
346 Bioprocessing of textiles
7.5.5 Process optimization – protease enzyme
The process variables such as protease enzyme concentration, temperature andreaction time was optimized using Box-Behnken experimental design and their
output values are executed using Design-Expert software 8.0. This software
was executed to get various options / predicted process parameters to achieve
required wax degradation range of 23–25% and weight loss of the fabric 1.80%.
The output result of the Design-Expert software to achieve the desired
weight loss in the protease enzyme process is shown the predicted process
variables of seven solutions which is shown (Table 7.9), out of which the
software opted best process conditions of protease enzyme concentration
of 2.95% at temperature of 60°C and reaction time of 58 min with 1.0%
desirability. The best opted test results are loss of 23.54% wax with 1.80%
weight loss at an error of 1.08%. It is possible to employ protease enzyme
to scour the organic cotton fabric to achieve better water absorbency rate
between 5 and 8 sec and 22–25% wax removal by higher wax removal of
75–80% pectin degradation at 6% enzyme concentration, 60°C, and 60 min
reaction time with 1.80% fabric weight loss. The higher concentration of
protease enzyme have noticed better active and catalyze the degradation of
wax groups at temperature range of 55–60°C and pH at 8.5–9.0 took lessertime to achieve required proteinolytic hydrolysis.
Table 7.9 Output results of Design-Expert software
Solution
no.
Enzyme
conc.
(%)
Temp
( °C)
Time
(min)
Fabric
Weight loss
(%)
Wax
removal
(%)
Water
absorbency
(sec)
1 2.95 60.00 58.24 1.8079 23.54 8.1258
2 2.87 59.92 60.00 1.8114 22.85 6.2944
3 2.90 59.84 59.86 1.8173 23.61 8.12464 2.92 59.72 60.14 1.8215 24.52 6.2576
5 2.91 60.00 58.00 1.7627 23.64 6.5270
6 3.00 59.28 56.42 1.7949 25.04 5.6814
7 2.92 58.76 58.04 1.8449 23.85 7.6992
7.6 Bioscouring of organic cotton fabric using
lipase enzyme
Lipase enzyme from puried Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes was selectedfor the degradation of low volatile wax, oil and fatty substances. Scouring
experiments were performed in 1 L beaker in which three fabric samples of
20 × 20 cm were treated in an enzyme solution of different concentrations of
lipase enzyme 0.4–0.8%, non-ionic wetting agent of 1–2%, treatment time of
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 359/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 347
30 min, 45 min, 60 min and pH from 8.0 to 8.5. The fabric samples thereafter
were rinsed in 500 mL of water at 90°C for 15 min, to inactivate the enzymes
followed by drying at 80°C, then to weigh the fabric using electronic balance.
7.6.1 Effect of enzymatic process variables – Box-
Behnken design
Lipase enzymatic treatments are carried out based on the experimental design
as given in Table 7.10. The effect of enzyme concentration and temperature on
weight loss of organic cotton fabric at various time intervals of (a) 30 min, (b)
45 min, and (c) 60 min are shown 3D surface plot (Fig. 7.15). The empiricalmodel was tted to the response surface and lack of t test was analysed.
The polynomial equation derived from the design of experimental and their
signicant interaction effects between variables are given in Table 7.11.
Fig. 7.15 Effect of lipase enzyme concentration and temperature on weight loss of
bioscoured organic cotton fabric at various time intervals of (a) 30 min, (b) 45 min and
(c) 60 min
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 360/457
348 Bioprocessing of textiles
Table 7.10 Box-Behnken experimental design – Lipase enzyme
Codedvalues
Input values of the variablesEnzyme concentration
(%)
Temperature
(°C)
Time (min)
–1 0.4 50 30
0 0.6 55 45
+1 0.8 60 60
Table 7.11 Analysis of variance for the response surface
Source F P (Prob > F)X
1 – Enzyme concentration 110.73 0.0001
X2 – Temperature 3.39 0.0007
X3 – Time 149.64 0.0478
X1*X
20.6004 0.7624
X1*X
30.0384 0.8630
X2* X
30.2496 0.4094
Final equation in terms of coded factors
Fabric weight loss = +0.52 + 0.20 × X1 + 0.035 × X2 + 0.23 × X3 + 0.015 × X1 × X
2 + 0.075 × X
1 × X
3 + 0.035 × X
2 × X
3 – 0.055 × X
12
+ 0.025 × X22 – 0.030 × X
32 [7.8]
Final equation in terms of actual factors
Fabric weight loss = +3.42250 + 0.70 × X1 – 0.133 × X
2 – 0.013167 ×
X3 + 0.015 × X
1 × X
2 + 0.025 × X
1 × X
3 + 4.667E-004 ×
X2 × X
3 – 1.375 × X
12 + 1.00E-003 × X
22 – 1.33E-004 ×
X32 [7.9]
X1 – Enzyme concentration (%) X
2 – Temperature in °C
X3 – Time in minutes
The model Fcritical
value of 31.06 implies the model was signicant and
there was only 0.07% chance that could occur due to noise. The predicted R 2
value was 0.9824 and is in reasonable agreement with the adjusted R 2 of 1.0.
From Table 7.11, it is noticed that the enzyme concentration in the degradation
of wax component in the scouring process has signicant differences at Factual
> Fcritical (F2,14 values of 110.73 > 31.06) at 95% condence level. With respectto the design of experiments, there is no signicant difference found between
temperature levels of 50–60°C at Factual
< Fcritical
(F2,14
values of 3.39 < 31.06)
at 95% condence level; it may be due to better stability and kinetics of
enzyme at selected temperature ranges in the scouring process. With respect
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 361/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 349
to reaction time in the scouring process, signicant differences were noticed
at Factual
>Fcritical
(F2,14
values of 149.64 > 31.06) at 95% condence level; it
may be due to the enzyme reaction time on the degradation of wax depends
mainly on the selected range of times to achieve required weight loss of the
organic cotton fabric. The predicted and actual fabric weight losses of the
scoured 100% organic cotton fabric treated with protease enzyme is shown in
Fig. 7.16. From the test results, it was observed that the error % of the predicted
and actual value of the experimental design was noticed within range and not
found to be statistically signicant at 95% condence level.
Fig. 7.16 Relationship between the actual and predicted weight loss of protease
enzyme-treated organic cotton fabric
7.6.2 Effect of lipase enzyme concentration and
temperature
Figure 7.17 clearly indicates, as expected, a progressive weight loss with
increasing lipase enzyme concentration due to the hydrolysis of wax and oil
components. At higher time duration, there is higher rate of wax degradation
observed with increase in enzyme concentration. An interesting observation
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 362/457
350 Bioprocessing of textiles
noticed during the trials that the organic cotton fabric was noticed higher water
absorbency rate at higher enzyme concentration of 0.8%, 60 min reaction
time and 60°C temperature of maximum weight loss of 0.92% and above,
which shows the higher rate of wax removal by the reaction of enzyme on
the organic cotton bre to break the low volatile fatty components. The water
absorbency of fabric is in the range of 7–26 sec when treated with 0.4–0.8%
lipase enzyme at 60°C for 50–60 min reaction time.
Fig. 7.17 Contour graphs represent the effect of lipase enzyme concentration and
temperature at various reaction times of (a) 30 min, (b) 45 min (c) 60 min
7.6.3 FTIR spectroscopic analysis
The FTIR spectra of the desized organic cotton fabric and 0.4–0.8% protease
enzyme treated cotton fabrics are analyzed and it mainly highlights changes in
the non-cellulosic impurities by characterizing the carboxyl acids and esters
that are present in waxes. The hydrolysis of the wax components at 0.8%
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 363/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 351
lipase enzyme concentration for 60 min reaction time indicates the maximum
removal of waxes, as indicated by the peak at 3315 cm –1, responsible for –OH
group stretching, the CH stretching at 2917 cm –1, the asymmetrical COO–
stretching at 1617 cm –1, and CH wagging at 1316 cm –1. The absorbance
intensity of the characteristics peaks at around 1736 cm –1 varied in the
following order: desized fabric > 0.4% lipase > 0.6% lipase > 0.8% lipase
fabrics. The residual non-cellulosic components were analyzed after enzyme
treatment using FTIR reports.
7.6.4 Wax removal by lipase enzyme
The wax content of lipase enzyme treated cotton fabric was observed that
the wax present in the grey organic cotton fabric was 0.81% and subsequent
protease enzyme treated fabric at 0.4%, 0.6% and 0.8% enzyme concentrations
at 60°C temperature and 60 min reaction time noticed 8.76%, 12.42% and
18.94%, respectively (Fig. 7.18). It may be due to lipase enzyme degrading
the low volatile wax, oil and fatty components in the organic cotton bre.
Fig. 7.18 Wax content of lipase enzyme-treated organic cotton fabric at 60°C and 60
min reaction time
7.6.5 Process optimization
The process variables such as lipase enzyme concentration, temperature
and reaction time was optimized using Box-Behnken experimental design
and their output values are executed using Design-Expert software 8.0. This
software was executed to get various options / predicted process parameters
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 364/457
352 Bioprocessing of textiles
to achieve required wax degradation range of 16–19% and weight loss of the
fabric 0.80%. The output result of the Design-Expert software to achieve the
desired weight loss in the alkaline pectinase process is shown the predicted
process variables of 9 solutions which is shown in Table 7.12, out of which
the software opted best process conditions of lipase enzyme concentration
of 0.85% at temperature of 60°C and reaction time of 60 min with 1.0%
desirability. The best opted test results are loss of 16.24% pectin with 0.82%
weight loss at an error of 1.15%. It is possible to employ lipase enzyme to scour
the organic cotton fabric to achieve better water absorbency rate in the range
of 10–15 sec and 16.2% wax removal at 0.8% lipase enzyme concentration,
60°C, and 60 min reaction time with 0.82% fabric weight loss. The higherconcentration of lipase enzymes are better active and catalyze the degradation
of low volatile wax and oil groups at temperature range of 55–60°C and pH at
8.5–9.0 took lesser time to achieve required proteinolytic hydrolysis.
Table 7.12 Output results of Design-Expert software
S. no. Enzyme
conc.
(%)
Temperature
(OC)
Time
(min)
Fabric
weight
loss (%)
Wax
removal
(%)
Water
absorbency
(sec)
1 0.85 60.00 58.24 0.82079 16.24 13.8
2 0.87 59.92 60.00 0.80412 17.52 12.2
3 0.80 59.84 59.86 0.81173 16.85 14.1
4 0.82 59.72 60.14 0.82215 16.76 13.2
5 0.88 59.64 58.62 0.79741 17.52 12.5
6 0.83 60.00 58.79 0.81662 18.94 13.8
7 0.81 60.00 58.00 0.79760 16.96 14.5
8 0.80 59.28 56.42 0.79491 16.94 13.6
9 0.82 58.76 58.04 0.83409 16.82 14.6
7.6 Binary enzyme treatment on bioscouring of
organic cotton fabric
7.6.1 Effect of binary enzyme concentration on weightloss of organic cotton fabric
The effect of binary enzyme concentration on the weight loss of the organic
cotton fabrics treated at 60°C and 60 min reaction time was studied. With
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 365/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 353
increase in enzyme concentrations, there is an increase in fabric weight loss.
Another interesting observation that occurred during the trials was that the
organic cotton fabric was noticed higher water absorbency rate at binary
enzyme concentration of 8% of pectinase and 3% of protease and the fabric
weight loss of 6.76% and above. From the test results, pectinase plays important
role in removal of pectin groups and protease and lipase plays esterication of
oil, wax and fatty substances in the organic cotton during bioscouring process.
The cellulase enzyme enhances the pectinolytic reaction of pectinase enzyme
to fasten the enzyme reaction. Another interesting observation noticed that the
pectinase and protease combination of enzyme treatment was noticed higher
pectinolytic and proteinolytic reaction at 60°C and 60 min reaction time.The protease and lipase combination of enzyme treatments was noticed the
removal of low volatile wax and fatty substances in the organic cotton.
7.6.2 Fabric wax removal – binary enzyme combinations
Figure 7.19(a) and (b) represent the wax removal analysis of various binary
mixed enzyme combinations of pectinase and protease enzymes and pectinase
and lipase enzymes treated at 60°C, 60 min reaction time at pH 8–8.5.
From the test results, it was noticed that higher wax removal was achievedat 6% pectinase and 3% protease. Protease enzyme plays important role in
degradation or breakdown of wax and oil substances present in the organic
cotton fabrics.
The regression equation of this analysis shows R 2 = 0.975; it correlated
the linear relationship between wax removal and concentration of binary
enzyme combinations at 95% condence level. The combination of protease
and lipase enzyme was carried out to optimize the better removal of wax and
oil substances at various combinations treated at 60°C, 60 min reaction time
is shown (Fig. 7.19c). From the test results, it was observed the interesting
results that wax removal rate was achieved 52.8% at 6% protease and 0.8%
lipase binary mixed enzyme treatment on the organic cotton fabric. The
pectinase and protease binary enzyme combination was observed higher
rate of pectinolytic and proteinolytic activity on organic cotton fabric when
compared with pectinase and lipase enzyme combinations. Because protease
enzyme can be removal of high and medium volatile fatty substances and
lipase enzyme responsible for low volatile fatty substance hydrolysis. The
wax and oil substances using protease and lipase responsible for proteinolyticactivity and pectinase enzyme responsible for pectinolytic activity on the
organic cotton fabric was analyzed with individual and binary mixed enzyme
combination.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 366/457
354 Bioprocessing of textiles
Fig. 7.19 Wax removal % of organic cotton fabric treated with binary enzymes:
(a) pectinase and protease, (b) pectinase and lipase, and (c) protease and lipase
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 367/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 355
7.7 Bioscouring of organic cotton fabrics through
specifc mixed enzymatic systemThe objective is to develop an improved enzymatic cotton scouring process
on the basis of a fast enzyme reaction to efciently remove the pectin and
wax compounds from the organic cotton fabrics by specic mixed enzymatic
system.
An attempt has been made to study the pectinolytic activity of degrading
rate of pectin on the organic cotton fabric using four selective enzymes such as
alkaline pectinase, protease, lipase and cellulase enzyme with various process
parameters such as enzyme concentration, temperature and reaction time.
These process variables are selected based on the articial neural network
(ANN) using MATLAB 7.0 software design of experiment and output of
experiment was resulted with fabric physical properties such as weight loss,
water absorbency, wetting area, whiteness index, yellowness index, brightness
index. The bioscoured organic cotton fabric was tested for wax content and
pectin degradation rate on the fabric and their results were optimized with
minimum error. The test results were analyzed to predict the optimum process
parameters to achieve the required bioscouring fabric properties and removal
of pectin degrading rate and compared their results with actual trials. The performance of specic mixed enzymatic system and alkaline pectinase
enzyme during bioscouring process was assessed by ruthenium red dye test
and FTIR results to conrm the degradation of pectin on the bioscouring of
organic cotton fabrics.
7.7.1 Bioscouring with mixed enzymatic system
In this study, the bioscouring of organic cotton fabric was carried out by
selecting specic mixed enzymes namely (a) alkaline pectinase, (b) protease,(c) lipase, and (d) cellulase. These enzymes was specially screened, isolated
and puried, the selective alkaline pectinase puried from Pectate Lyase was
selected for the degradation of cotton pectin. Various experimental setups
and techniques were applied in the enzymatic scouring experiments. All
experiments were performed with demineralised water.
Scouring experiments where performed in 1 L beaker in which three
fabric samples of 10 × 10 cm were treated in an enzyme solution of different
concentrations of 2–6%, non-ionic wetting agent of 1–2%, treatment time of30 min, 45 min, 60 min and adjusted to pH of 8.5–9.0. The beaker was placed
in a temperature controlled water bath at 50°C, 55°C and 60°C. After the
treatment, the fabric samples were rinsed in 500 mL of water at 90°C for
15 min, to inactivate the enzymes. Thereafter the samples were rinsed twice
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 368/457
356 Bioprocessing of textiles
for 5 min in water at room temperature. Finally, the samples were dried at
80°C using hot air oven and weigh the fabrics using electronic balance with
accuracy ±0.01grams.
7.7.1.1 Articial Neural Network (ANN)
Neural networks are used for modeling non-linear problems and to predict the
output values for a given input parameters from their training values. Most
of the textile processes and the related quality assessments are non-linear
in nature and hence neural networks nd application in textile technology.
The software used in this study was backward feed propagation network
using MATLab 7.0. In order to carry out prediction, the network was trained
with training patterns namely input and output parameters. Input and output
parameters used for training the ANN and their selection criteria are given
below.
Input parameters
(i) Enzyme concentration
(ii) Process time
(iii) Process temperature
Output parameters
(i) Fabric weight loss
(ii) Fabric water absorbency
(iii) Fabric wetting area
(iv) Fabric whiteness index
(v) Fabric yellowness index
(vi) Fabric brightness index
7.7.1.2 Training of neural network
For training, the organic cotton fabrics were treated with various enzyme
concentration, time and temperatures with specic mixed enzyme system.
Then the physical characteristics such as fabric weight loss, water absorbency,
wetting area, whiteness index, yellowness index and brightness index of the
organic cotton fabrics were evaluated with standard testing procedures and
their values are trained by using feed backward propagation algorithm. For the
error back propagation net, the sigmoid function is essentially for non linearfunction. Training process of the neural network developed was started with
5000 preliminary cycles to optimize the ANN prediction accuracy. The best
structure is one that gives lowest training error and it is found to be minimum
error percent. The training of the network was further continued in order to
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 369/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 357
reduce the training error. The average training error of 1% was obtained and
terminated at this stage since beyond this reduction in training error was not
appreciable. Figure 7.20 shows selective articial neural network training of
specic mixed enzymatic systems and their input and output levels.
Fig. 7.20 Schematic diagram of ANN used in bioscouring of organic cotton fabric
7.7.1.3 Testing of neural network
For testing the prediction accuracy of the neural network a known specications
and process parameters were evaluated and their error percentage was
compared with predicted sample values. It can be observed that mean absolute
error with respect prediction is around 1%.
7.7.2 Fabric weight loss – effect of enzymatic process
variables
The response surface methodology is an empirical modeling technique, which
is used to evaluate the relationship between a set of controllable experimental
factors and observed results. Factors inuence the bioscouring process oforganic cotton such as enzyme concentration; temperature and time play a
vital role. The effect of enzyme concentration and temperature on weight loss
of organic cotton fabric at various time intervals of (a) 30 min, (b) 45 min and
(c) 60 min are shown 3D surface plot (Fig. 7.21).
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 370/457
358 Bioprocessing of textiles
Fig. 7.21 Fabric weight loss of bioscoured organic cotton fabric treated with various
process conditions of (a) pectinase, (b) protease, (c) lipase, and (d) cellulase
7.7.3 Effect of enzyme concentration and temperature
The effect of enzyme concentration and temperature on the weight loss of the
alkaline pectinase enzyme treated organic cotton fabrics at various reaction
times was analysed. With increase in enzyme concentration and temperature
there is an increase in fabric weight loss at both lower and higher reaction
time intervals but at higher time duration there is higher rate of pectin and wax
hydrolysis with increase in enzyme concentration. An interesting observation
noticed during the trials that the organic cotton fabric was noticed higherwater absorbency rate at higher enzyme concentration of 6%, 60 min time and
60°C temperature with maximum weight loss of 3.2% and above.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 371/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 359
7.7.4 FTIR spectroscopic analysis
The FTIR spectra of the desized organic cotton fabric and 2%, 4%, 6% pectinase enzyme treated cotton fabrics are analyzed and found changes in
the non-cellulosic impurities by characterizing the carboxyl acids and esters
that are present in pectin and waxes. It can be clearly understood that the
presence of cellulose group peaks around 1000–1200 cm –1 and integrity of
the pectin and wax compounds in the organic cotton fabric at 1736 cm –1 and
1617 cm –1, respectively. The hydrolysis of the pectin during alkaline pectinase
enzymatic treatment (D) at 6% concentration and 45 min reaction time of
the organic cotton fabric showed the removal of pectin and wax groups in
the specimen at 3315 cm –1 which was responsible for –OH group stretching,
the –CH stretching at 2917 cm –1, the asymmetrical COO- stretching at
1617 cm –1, and CH wagging at 1316 cm –1. The absorbance intensity of the
characteristics peaks at around 1736 cm –1 varied in the following order:
desized fabric > 2% pectinase > 4% pectinase > 6% pectinase fabrics. In the
test results, the transmittance (%) of the pectinase enzyme treated organic
cotton fabrics are noticed lower level when compared to desized fabric which
was due to the degradation of pectin, waxes and non-cellulosic compounds
while pectinolytic degradation. The residual non-cellulosic components wereanalyzed after enzyme treatment using FTIR reports by differentiating the
transmittance (%) wave length. From the test results, the peaks at 1058 cm –1,
1112 cm –1 and 2362 cm –1 groups are responsible for C–C stretch from phenyl
ring, –CH2 symmetric stretching and C–H stretching in the alkaline pectinase
treated organic cotton fabrics.
7.7.5 Process optimization – specic mixed enzymatic
systemThe various specic enzymes such as alkaline pectinase, protease, lipase and
cellulase enzymes with process variables such as enzyme concentrations,
temperature and reaction time was optimized using MATLAB 7.0 software
with neural network experimental design and their output values are executed.
Tables 7.13 and 7.14 represent the process variables for training sample of
bioscoured organic cotton fabrics of their input values and output results of
actual and predicted respectively. The software was executed to get various
options / predicted process parameters to achieve required pectin degradationrange of 75–82% and weight loss of the fabric 4.80%. The software was
processed for analyzing the performance and desirability of FDS-Fraction of
Design Space of design model of process for optimized test results (Fig. 7.22a
and b). The output result of the software to achieve the desired bioscouring
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 372/457
360 Bioprocessing of textiles
of organic cotton fabric on their physical properties such as fabric weight
loss, water absorbency, wetting area, whiteness index, yellowness index, and
brightness index in the specic enzymatic system. The software opted best
process conditions of specic mixed enzymes was sample 19, which was
treated with 8% alkaline pectinase, 3%protease, 0.8%lipase and 0.8%cellulase
process condition at temperature of 55°C and reaction time 60 min, pH 8.5
with 1.0% desirability. From the best opted test results, the actual pectin and
weight loss of the bioscoured organic cotton fabric was achieved 78.40% and
4.80% respectively with error of 1.218%.
Fig. 7.22 Neural network training of mixed enzymatic system for analyzing (a) their
performance level, and (b) FDS –Fraction of Design Space level
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 373/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 361
7.7.6 Fabric Whiteness Index (FWI)
From Table 7.13, the highest whiteness index of bioscoured organic cottonfabric with specic mixed enzymatic system is achieved 52.57% at 8%
pectinase, 4%protease, 0.8% lipase and 0.4% cellulase enzyme at 60 min
reaction time, 60°C and pH 9.0 (Sample no. 29). It may be due to better
integration and higher concentration of pectinase for removal of pectin up
to 83.2% and wax/oil component removal up to 92.4% on the organic cotton
bioscoured fabrics which has higher water absorbency and lower yellowness
in nature when compared to sample no. 18. The mixed enzymes such as
pectinase, protease and lipase plays a important role for removal of pectin
and wax/oil components and also cellulase enzyme supports the exo and endo
partial surface reaction of the organic cotton fabrics.
7.7.7 Fabric Yellowness Index (FYI)
From Table 7.13, the lowest yellowness index of the bioscoured organic cotton
fabric with specic enzymatic system is achieved 13.14% at 8%pectinase,
3%protease, 0.8%lipase and 0.8%cellulase of sample no. 19 treated at 60 min
reaction time, 55°C and pH 9.5. It may be due to higher removal of pectin and
wax component in the organic cotton fabric in the enzymatic system whichhas whiteness index of 52.413. It is noticed that highest whiteness index of
organic cotton fabric show lower yellowness index in all the treated fabrics.
For sample no. 18 which has highest yellowness index of 24.371% due to
absence of pectinase and cellulase enzymes, 2%protease and 0.8%lipase.
From the test results, the pectinase plays important role in removal of pectin
for lowering the yellowness index of fabric and cellulase plays the better
mixed enzyme reaction on the organic cotton fabric during bioscouring.
7.7.8 Fabric Brightness Index (FBI)
From Table 7.13, the highest fabric brightness in bioscoured organic cotton
fabric was found in the sample no. 19 which was treated with 8% pectinase,
3% protease, 0.8% lipase and 0.8% cellulase at 60 min time, 55°C, and pH
8.5. It may be due to higher whiteness of 52.413 and lower yellowness index
of 13.14 and fabric treated higher pectinase and cellulase concentrations.
It was also noticed that higher concentration of cellulase enzyme treated
fabric observed higher brightness index due to surface smoothness of the
organic cotton fabric. The lowest brightness index of organic cotton fabric
was noticed in sample no. 18, it was treated with absence of pectinase and
cellulase, 2%protease and 0.8% lipase enzyme conditions. It was noticed that
pectinase and cellulase enzymes plays important role in brightness index of
the bioscoured organic cotton fabrics.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 374/457
362 Bioprocessing of textiles
T a b l e 7 . 1
3 A r t i
f c i a l n e u r a l n e t w o r k – t r a i n i n
g s a m p l e s
S a m p l e n o .
I n p u t d a t a ,
S p e c i f c m i x e d e n z y m e s
O u t p u t d a t a ,
T r a i n e d s
a m p l e s f a b r i c p r o p e r t i e s ( A c t u a l )
E n z y m e c o n c e n t r a t i o n s ( % )
P r o c e s s p a r a m e t e r s
F a b r i c
W e i g h t l o s s
( % )
F a b r i c w a t e r
a b s o r b e n c y
( s e c )
F
a b r i c
w
e t t i n g
a r e a
( m m
2 )
F a b r i c
W h i t e n e s s
I n d e x
( W I )
F a b r i c
Y e l l o w
I n d e x ( Y I )
F a b r i c
B r i g h t
I n d e x
( B I )
P e c t i n
a s e
P r o t e a s e
L i p a s e
C e l l u
l a s e
T i m e
T e m p
p H
S 1
4
2
0 . 4
0 . 4
3 0
5 5
8 . 5
2 . 8
3 . 2
7 0
2 6 . 1
5 2
2 2 . 1
4 2
5
4 . 1
4 7
S 2
4
2
0 . 6
0 . 6
3 0
5 5
9 . 5
3 . 1
2 . 4
1 1 4
2 6 . 4
5 2
2 1 . 8
3 1
5
6 . 3
8 7
S 3
4
2
0 . 8
0 . 8
3 0
6 0
8 . 5
4 . 4
1 . 8
2 4 0
2 7 . 3
2 0
2 0 . 3
9 2
5
8 . 9
4 7
S 4
6
3
0 . 4
0 . 4
3 0
6 0
9
4 . 1
1 . 4
2 3 8
3 2 . 5
2 0
2 0 . 3
1 4
5
7 . 3
2 4
S 5
6
3
0 . 6
0 . 6
4 5
5 5
8 . 5
4 . 3
1 . 2
2 4 7
3 4 . 3
7 8
2 0 . 1
3 2
5
8 . 1
4 7
S 6
6
3
0 . 8
0 . 8
4 5
6 0
9
4 . 4
1 . 2
2 5 1
3 8 . 4
1 5
1 7 . 7
4 2
6
3 . 4
3 6
S 7
6
2
0 . 6
0 . 8
4 5
6 0
8 . 5
4 . 7
0 . 8
3 3 0
3 6 . 1
3 7
1 9 . 2
4 1
6
1 . 5
2 4
S 8
2
2
0 . 4
0 . 4
4 5
6 0
9
2 . 7
6 . 2
6 5
2 7 . 8
6 0
2 0 . 6
9 0
5
1 . 5
8 0
S 9
2
1
0 . 6
0 . 6
3 0
5 5
8
2 . 4
5 . 8
6 4
2 8 . 6
0 0
2 3 . 5
4 7
5
2 . 4
0 7
S 1 0
2
3
0 . 8
0 . 8
6 0
6 0
9
3 . 8
4 . 8
6 7
2 7 . 6
9 0
2 2 . 6
4 1
5
3 . 4
5 2
S 1 1
2
1
0 . 4
0 . 4
6 0
6 0
8
2 . 4
5 . 7
7 2
2 7 . 8
3 1
2 3 . 6
4 0
4
9 . 8
6 0
S 1 2
0
3
0 . 6
0 . 6
6 0
5 5
8 . 5
2 . 7
7 . 2
4 5
2 4 . 5
8 0
2 3 . 6
5 4
4
9 . 6
3 1
S 1 3
0
1
0 . 4
0 . 4
6 0
5 5
9 . 5
2 . 9
8 . 9
5 1
2 3 . 9
8 0
2 3 . 9
7 2
5
1 . 2
5 0
S 1 4
6
0
0 . 8
0 . 4
4 5
6 0
9
3 . 8
3 . 1
1 1 4
3 7 . 8
6 0
1 7 . 8
5 0
5
2 . 3
6 8
S 1 5
4
1
0 . 6
0 . 6
4 5
6 0
9
4 . 5
3 . 4
1 2 0
3 9 . 6
4 7
1 9 . 6
4 0
5
3 . 2
4 0
S 1 6
6
1
0 . 4
0
3 0
6 0
9 . 5
3 . 1
4 . 2
7 4
3 2 . 0
7 8
2 0 . 0
6 8
5
9 . 3
7 8
S 1 7
4
2
0 . 1
0
4 5
6 0
8 . 5
2 . 7
4 . 4
7 0
2 8 . 5
2 0
2 0 . 1
2 7
5
8 . 4
1 8
S 1 8
0
2
0 . 8
0
6 0
5 5
9
2 . 2
8 . 8
6 1
2 2 . 4
1 3
2 4 . 3
7 1
4
3 . 4
3 6
S 1 9
8
3
0 . 8
0 . 8
6 0
5 5
9 . 5
4 . 8
1 . 2
2 5 0
5 2 . 4
1 3
1 3 . 1
4 0
6
8 . 7
1 5
S 2 0
8
1
0 . 2
0
3 0
6 0
8 . 5
2 . 8
2 . 5
8 5
5 1 . 4
5 2
1 4 . 8
5 7
5
1 . 4
5 0
S 2 1
8
3
0
0 . 4
4 5
6 0
9 . 5
4 . 1
1 . 8
2 6 4
5 2 . 4
7 0
1 4 . 2
5 0
5
8 . 6
7 0
S 2 2
6
2
0
0 . 8
6 0
5 5
8 . 5
4 . 2
1 . 4
2 2 8
4 7 . 6
8 0
1 5 . 8
5 7
5
3 . 4
8 0
S 2 3
2
2
0 . 6
0 . 4
6 0
6 0
9
3 . 1
4 . 8
2 6 0
2 7 . 6
5 0
1 9 . 5
6 1
5
2 . 6
8 7
S 2 4
2
3
0 . 6
0 . 4
4 5
5 5
9
3 . 4
4 . 6
2 6 8
2 6 . 7
8 0
2 0 . 4
5 0
5
2 . 6
8 1
S 2 5
2
2
0 . 4
0 . 8
4 5
6 0
8
3 . 3
4 . 2
2 5 0
2 7 . 5
4 0
2 1 . 5
8 0
5
1 . 2
4 0
S 2 6
4
3
0 . 6
0 . 4
3 0
5 5
8 . 5
3 . 8
2
3 0 0
3 0 . 6
8 1
1 8 . 6
4 0
5
4 . 8
9 0
S 2 7
4
3
0 . 4
0
4 5
5 5
8 . 5
3 . 6
1 . 8
3 1 0
2 9 . 7
4 0
1 9 . 5
6 4
5
9 . 5
7 0
S 2 8
4
3
0 . 8
0 . 4
4 5
5 5
8 . 5
3 . 5
2
2 8 0
3 0 . 4
5 0
1 7 . 6
9 8
6
4 . 5
8 0
S 2 9
8
4
0 . 8
0 . 4
3 0
6 0
9 . 5
4 . 9
1 . 6
2 9 2
5 2 . 5
7 0
1 3 . 8
0 0
6
7 . 4
8 0
S 3 0
0
3
0
0 . 4
4 5
6 0
8
2 . 8
8 . 7
4 8
2 3 . 1
4 7
2 2 . 4
1 3
5
4 . 1
3 8
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 375/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 363
T a b l e 7 . 1
4 A r t
i f c i a l n e u r a l n e t w o r k – o u t p u
t d a t a a n a l y s i s ( p r e d i c t e d )
S a m p l e n o .
A N N o u t p u t d a t a , F a
b r i c p r o p e r t i e s
A
N N e r r o r %
F a b r i c
w e
i g h t
l o
s s
( % )
F a b r i c
w a t e r
a b s o r b
( s e c )
F a b r i c
w e t t i n g
a r e a
( m m 2 )
F a b r i c
W h i t e n e s s I n d e x
( W I )
F a b r i c
Y e l l o w
I n d e x ( Y I )
F a b r i c
B r i g h t I n d e x
( B I )
F a b r i c
W e i g h t
l o s s
( % )
F a b r i c
w a t e r
a b s o r b
( s e c )
F a b r i c
w e t t i n g
a r e a
( m m 2 )
F a b r i c
W h i t e n e s s I n d e x
( W I )
F a b r i c
Y e l l o w
I n d e x ( Y I )
F
a b r i c
B
r i g h t
I n d e x ( B I )
S 1
2 . 8 7 4
3 . 0
8 7
7 2
2 8 . 8
7 6
2 1 . 9
2 7
5 7 . 9
6 7
– 2 . 6
5 7
3 . 5
0 6
– 2 . 8
5 7
– 1 0 . 4
1
0 . 9
6 7
–
7 . 0
5 5
S 2
2 . 9 8 9
2 . 4
5 3
1 1 9
2 8 . 8
7 5
2 1 . 3
2 1
5 8 . 0
3 5
3 . 5
7 4
– 2 . 2
4 6
– 4 . 3
8 5
– 9 . 1
6 0
2 . 3
3 2
–
2 . 9
2 3
S 3
4 . 3 2 5
1 . 8
3 7
2 2 0
2 8 . 8
7 6
2 1 . 9
6 9
5 7 . 9
9 5
1 . 6
9 5
– 2 . 0
8 3
8 . 3
3 3
– 5 . 6
9 6
– 7 . 7
3 3
1 . 6
1 5
S 4
4 . 0 9 0
1 . 4
7 2
2 1 8
3 3 . 0
8 8
1 9 . 3
5 8
5 7 . 9
8 6
0 . 2
3 9
– 5 . 1
5 0
8 . 4
0 3
– 1 . 7
4 7
4 . 7
0 5
–
1 . 1
5 6
S 5
4 . 2 4 2
1 . 2
7 7
2 6 1
3 4 . 5
2 5
1 7 . 1
7 3
5 7 . 9
9 2
1 . 3
4 9
– 6 . 4
2 5
– 5 . 6
6 8
– 0 . 4
2 8
1 4 . 6
9 7
0 . 2
6 5
S 6
4 . 3 9 4
1 . 2
4 9
2 4 8
3 8 . 3
0 9
1 7 . 6
1 4
5 8 . 0
1 4
0 . 1
2 7
– 4 . 1
0 8
1 . 1
9 5
0 . 2
7 4
0 . 7
1 9
8 . 5
4 5
S 7
4 . 6 3 6
0 . 9
0 7
3 2 1
3 5 . 9
4 8
1 8 . 7
5 2
5 7 . 4
4 9
1 . 3
4 7
– 1 3 . 3
7 5
2 . 7
2 7
0 . 5
2 0
2 . 5
4 0
6 . 6
2 3
S 8
2 . 8 5 6
6 . 3
3 4
5 7
2 8 . 7
6 7
2 2 . 0
1 8
5 7 . 0
3 5
– 5 . 8
0 0
– 2 . 1
6 1
1 2 . 3
0 7
– 3 . 2
5 6
– 6 . 4
2 1
–
1 0 . 5
7
S 9
2 . 4 9 7
5 . 9
3 5
6 1
2 8 . 8
7 1
2 1 . 9
6 9
5 0 . 6
2 2
– 4 . 0
4 2
– 2 . 3
3 4
4 . 6
8 7
– 0 . 9
4 7
6 . 6
9 8
3 . 4
0 4
S 1 0
3 . 8 6 3
4 . 4
7 8
6 8
2 7 . 6
1 3
2 0 . 7
6 0
5 7 . 8
5 7
– 1 . 6
7 1
6 . 6
9 0
– 1 . 4
9 2
0 . 2
7 4
8 . 3
0 7
–
8 . 2
4 2
S 1 1
2 . 3 8 0
6 . 0
1 1
7 0
2 9 . 1
1 5
2 2 . 2
4 8
4 8 . 5
0 1
0 . 8
2 9
– 5 . 4
6 0
2 . 7
7 7
– 4 . 6
1 4
5 . 8
8 6
2 . 7
2 4
S 1 2
2 . 8 1 1
7 . 8
4 4
5 1
2 4 . 5
9 5
2 3 . 7
2 6
4 7 . 5
5 6
– 4 . 1
3 3
– 8 . 9
4 9
– 1 3 . 3
3
– 0 . 0
6 1
– 0 . 3
0 7
4 . 1
7 9
S 1 3
2 . 9 9 4
8 . 2
8 4
5 2
2 3 . 9
6 7
2 4 . 0
8 1
5 1 . 3
7 5
– 3 . 2
6 6
6 . 9
1 2
– 1 . 9
6 0
0 . 0
5 4
– 0 . 4
5 5
–
0 . 2
4 4
S 1 4
3 . 9 0 4
2 . 7
9 5
1 1 7
3 8 . 2
6 9
1 7 . 4
2 3
5 2 . 7
6 1
– 2 . 7
4 7
9 . 8
3 5
– 2 . 6
3 1
– 1 . 0
8 1
2 . 3
8 8
–
0 . 7
5 1
S 1 5
4 . 4 1 9
3 . 7
7 2
1 2 1
3 4 . 7
8 6
2 0 . 0
0 5
5 5 . 3
1 9
1 . 7
8 0
– 1 0 . 9
6 2
– 0 . 8
3 3
1 2 . 2
5 9
– 1 . 8
5 8
–
3 . 9
0 5
S 1 6
3 . 1 7 6
4 . 0
0 9
7 2
3 1 . 6
5 4
1 9 . 8
8 4
5 5 . 7
3 4
– 2 . 4
6 8
4 . 5
4 3
2 . 7
0 2
1 . 3
2 1
0 . 9
1 6
6 . 1
3 6
S 1 7
2 . 6 0 5
4 . 6
7 6
7 1
2 8 . 2
5 0
2 0 . 3
5 6
5 4 . 6
7 2
3 . 5
0 4
– 6 . 2
9 3
– 1 . 4
2 8
0 . 9
4 6
– 1 . 1
3 9
6 . 4
1 1
S 1 8
2 . 3 9 2
8 . 1
9 6
6 3
2 2 . 3
9 9
2 4 . 0
7 2
4 6 . 1
6 8
– 8 . 7
3 5
6 . 8
5 8
– 3 . 2
7 8
0 . 0
5 8
1 . 2
2 3
–
5 . 1
1 2
S 1 9
4 . 8 8 8
1 . 2
9 9
2 4 8
5 2 . 8
2 1
1 5 . 2
9 8
5 8 . 0
3 4
– 1 . 8
4 8
– 8 . 3
0 0
0 . 8
– 0 . 7
8 0
– 1 6 . 4
2
1
5 . 5
4 3
S 2 0
2 . 9 5 8
2 . 2
9 7
7 8
5 1 . 2
9 7
1 6 . 2
7 7
5 3 . 4
4 6
– 5 . 6
6 1
8 . 0
9 6
8 . 2
3 5
0 . 2
9 9
– 9 . 5
6 1
–
3 . 8
8 0
S 2 1
4 . 1 6 2
1 . 9
6 7
2 4 8
5 2 . 8
6 9
1 3 . 9
8 7
5 5 . 5
4 7
– 1 . 5
3 4
– 9 . 3
0 0
6 . 0
6 0
– 0 . 7
6 1
1 . 8
3 9
5 . 3
2 1
S 2 2
4 . 3 3 4
1 . 3
9 0
2 1 8
4 7 . 6
8 7
1 7 . 5
8 8
5 3 . 9
6 7
– 3 . 1
9 5
0 . 6
5 7
4 . 3
8 5
– 0 . 0
1 6
– 1 0 . 9
2
–
0 . 9
1 2
S 2 3
3 . 0 0 9
4 . 9
5 3
2 6 1
2 8 . 9
7 0
2 0 . 8
0 1
5 6 . 6
6 1
2 . 9
2 9
– 3 . 2
0 2
– 0 . 3
8 4
– 4 . 7
7 7
– 6 . 3
4 2
–
7 . 5
4 3
S 2 4
3 . 4 0 5
4 . 6
9 7
2 7 0
2 9 . 1
0 2
2 0 . 7
6 8
5 7 . 9
0 1
– 0 . 1
6 3
– 2 . 1
1 5
– 0 . 7
4 6
– 8 . 6
7 1
– 1 . 5
5 9
–
9 . 9
0 8
S 2 5
3 . 4 9 1
4 . 6
1 2
2 5 1
2 3 . 2
5 6
2 2 . 2
9 3
5 6 . 2
6 3
– 5 . 8
1 2
– 9 . 8
1 4
– 0 . 4
1 5 . 5
5 4
– 3 . 3
0 5
–
9 . 8
0 3
S 2 6
3 . 6
1 2 3
2 . 0
3 4
2 9 8
2 8 . 8
7 8
1 9 . 8
3 8
5 8 . 0
3 0
4 . 9
3 9
– 1 . 7
1 0
0 . 6
6 6
5 . 8
7 5
– 6 . 4
2 9
–
5 . 7
2 1
S 2 7
3 . 4 3 7
1 . 8
4 6
3 0 4
2 9 . 3
0 2
1 9 . 8
5 5
5 8 . 0
3 1
4 . 5
2 2
– 2 . 5
6 5
1 . 9
3 5
1 . 4
7 2
– 1 . 4
8 9
2 . 5
8 2
S 2 8
3 . 6 5 4
2 . 0
8 9
2 8 3
2 9 . 1
6 7
1 7 . 6
2 6
5 7 . 9
4 8
– 4 . 4
2 0
– 4 . 4
7 5
– 1 . 0
7 1
4 . 2
1 3
0 . 4
0 3
1 0 . 2
6
S 2 9
4 . 8 6 0
1 . 6
6 5
2 9 0
5 1 . 8
7 9
1 3 . 7
8 8
5 8 . 0
5 4 6
0 . 8
0 2
– 4 . 0
7 5
0 . 6
8 4
1 . 3
1 4
0 . 0
8 3
1 3 . 9
6
S 3 0
2 . 5 0 4
8 . 4
9 6
5 1
2 2 . 9
8 3
2 1 . 9
7 3
5 7 . 1
4 2 4
1 0 . 5
4 3
2 . 3
3 7
– 6 . 2
5
0 . 7
0 4
1 . 9
6 1
–
5 . 5
4 9
A v e r a g e
– 0 . 6
6 5
– 2 . 1
8 8
0 . 6
3 9
– 0 . 2
4 2
– 0 . 6
0 9
0 . 1
4 3
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 376/457
364 Bioprocessing of textiles
7.7.9 Fabric Water Absorbency (FWA)
From Table 7.13, the water absorbency (sec) of bioscoured organic cotton fabricwas noticed better in sample no. 7 which was treated with 6% pectinase, 2%
protease, 0.6% lipase and 0.8% cellualse at 45 min reaction time, 60°C, and pH
8.5. It may be due to higher removal of wax/oil component in the organic cotton
up to 84.2% and presence of cellulase enzyme which improves partial surface
hydrophilic nature in the organic cotton fabric. The highest time in seconds
for water absorbency of the organic cotton fabric was noticed in sample no.
18 which has treated with absence of pectinase and protease enzymes. These
enzymes are playing important role in the fabric water absorbency by removal
of pectin and wax components and also noticed improved water absorbency by
adding the cellulase enzyme in the bioscouring process.
7.7.10 Summary
The process optimization of bioscouring of 100% organic cotton fabric
through enzyme technology has been studied with selective specic mixed
enzymatic system using four enzymes namely alkaline pectinase, protease,
lipase and cellulase. The process variables such as enzyme concentration,temperature and reaction time was optimized to achieve the required water
absorbency and pectin removal during bioscouring process on the organic
cotton fabrics. The alkaline pectinase enzymes are better active and catalyze
the degradation of pectin at temperature range of 55–60°C and time of 45
min to achieve required level of 75–80% pectin degradation. The pH of
the process bath is also a major inuence for better reaction of enzyme to
catalyze the hydrolysis of pectin groups. The higher enzyme concentration at
6% level and higher temperature of 60°C took lesser time to achieve required
pectin hydrolysis. Process variables are optimized using MATLAB 7.0 andit will pave the way to predict the enzyme kinetics at various concentrations,
temperature and reaction time to achieve required degradation of pectin with
minimum error %. This study will be helpful to the organic cotton processors
for the ecofriendly and sustainable textile wet processing using specic mixed
enzymatic system in bioscouring processes.
7.8 Sonication and aerodynamic principles –
enzymatic activity
7.8.1 Ultrasonic treatment
Ultrasonic technique holds a promise in applications in the eld of textiles.
Ultrasonics represents a special branch of general acoustics, the science of
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 377/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 365
mechanical oscillations of solids, liquids and gaseous media. Ultrasound
can enhance a wide variety of chemical and physical processes, mainly by
generating cavitation in liquid medium. The sonicator used is of 20 kHz
frequency which is found to be suitable for inducing cavitation (Abramov
1998; Kamel et al. 2005). It is well known that cavitation which causes
formation and collapse of micro bubbles are most effective for better bre
opening which enhances water absorbency and dye uptake. This activated
state causes chemical reaction between the fabric and the enzyme by forming
waves and severe shear force capable of breaking chemical bonds. Ultrasound
energy has great potential in industrial processes as it offers reduction in cost,
time, energy and efuents. Ultrasound reduces processing time and energyconsumption, maintains or improves product quality, and reduces the use of
auxiliary chemicals (Yachmenev 2005).
7.8.2 Sonication – basic principle
In a solid, both longitudinal and transverse, waves can be transmitted whereas
in gas and liquids only longitudinal waves can be transmitted. In liquids,
longitudinal vibrations of molecules generate compression and refractions,
i.e., areas of high pressure and low local pressure. The latter gives rise tocavities or bubbles, which expand and nally, during the compression
phase, collapse violently generating shock waves. The phenomena of bubble
formation and collapse (known as cavitations) are generally responsible for
most of ultrasonic effects observed in solid/ liquid or liquid/liquid systems.
7.8.3 Ultrasonic application – textile wet processing
New bio-preparation processes that utilize highly specic enzymes instead of
conventional organic/inorganic chemicals are becoming increasingly popularin the textile industry (Yachmenev et al. 2005). The major shortcoming
of this new technology is that the processing time is much longer than the
conventional method. This limitation was overcome by use of ultrasound
energy in combination with enzyme processing. The combined enzyme/
ultrasound bio-preparation of greige cotton offers signicant advantages such
as less consumption of expensive enzymes, shorter processing time, better
uniformity of treatment and a notable decrease in the amount and toxicity of
the resulting textile wastewater efuents. Sonolysis, enzyme treatment, and acombination of the two processes were tested for the degradation of phenol
in aqueous medium. Degradation of starch followed by ultrasonic desizing
could lead to considerable energy saving as compared to conventional starch
sizing and desizing (Sakakibara et al. 1996). Desizing of the pure cotton
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 378/457
366 Bioprocessing of textiles
fabric with alpha amylase was conducted by the ultrasonic wave method and
the traditional one respectively. Research on the effect of ultrasonic wave
on the enzyme desizing of the fabric indicated that it can improve desizing
percentage, wettability and whiteness of the fabric, reduce the strength loss,
treatment time and temperature, and save energy. Therefore, it has bright
prospect of application. Introduction of ultrasonic energy during enzymatic
bio-preparation/bio-nishing of cotton textiles signicantly improved
enzyme performance but did not contribute to a decrease in fabric strength.
Experimental data indicate that the maximum benet provided by sonication
of enzyme processing solution occurred at lower enzyme concentrations
(Yachmenev et al. 2005).The hydrolysis of maltoheptaose by α-amylase, andthe resulting reaction was followed by the continuous monitoring of changes
in ultrasonic velocity. As the reaction proceeds, ultrasonic velocity increases
because the hydration level of the product is higher than that of the starting
substrate. It is simple to recalculate the ultrasonic curve to give the time
dependence of the amount of substrate that has been hydrolysed, providing
the kinetic prole of the reaction, and allowing the enzyme’s activity faster
(Fig. 7.23) (Sakakibara et al. 1996).
Fig. 7.23 Hydrolysis of starch by alpha amylase using sonication technique
7.8.4 Effect of sonication on bioscouring of organic
cottonEffect of sonication on bioscouring of organic cotton was studied by
Vigneswaran et al. (2013) using laboratory model OSCAR Ultrasonicator,
Model: Micro clean 103 at 20 kHz which was supplied by M/s. OSCAR
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 379/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 367
Ultrasonicor (P) limited, Mumbai; and reported that (i) the actual pectin
removal and weight loss of the bioscoured organic cotton fabric was achieved
as 78.40% and 4.80% respectively with the error of 1.218% in case of without
ultrasonic treatment; with ultrasonic treatment, the fabric weight loss is
observed as 5.46% and pectin removal up to 81.46%. Secondly, the sonicator
efciency shows 8–12% higher bioscouring performance on organic cotton
fabric through mixed enzymatic system when compared to without sonication.
7.8.5 Aerodynamic system
Aerodynamic technique has been studied and used for a variety of applications
in liquids, dispersions and polymers (Pinheiro 2000). Limited research works
have been reported to acceleration of enzyme kinetics through aerodynamic
system (air pressure) to improve the reaction of substrate and enzyme binding
to high quality and standardization of process parameters (Xia Yuan-jing
and Li Zhi-yi 2009; Michal Gross and Rainer Jaenicke 1994). Aerodynamic
system of enzyme acceleration has great potential in industrial processes as it
offers reduction in cost, time, energy and efuents.
7.8.6 Effect of air pressure on enzyme activity
Elevated hydrostatic pressure has been used to increase catalytic activity
and thermal stability of enzymes. For increase in pressure at 20°C results
in an exponential acceleration of the hydrolysis rate catalyzed by cellulase
reaching a 6.5-fold increase in activity at 4700 atm (4.7 kbar). Due to a strong
temperature dependence of the enzyme, acceleration effect of high pressure
becomes more pronounced at high temperatures (Fig. 7.24). At 50°C, under a
pressure of 3.6 kbar, cellulase enzyme shows activity which is more than 30
times higher than the activity at normal conditions (20°C, 1 atm). At pressuresof higher than 3.6 kbar, the enzymatic activity is decreased due to a pressure-
induced denaturation (Vadim Mozhaev 1996). Air pressure amplitude serves
as a critical control parameter of periodic pressure solid state fermentation
process. Effects of different air pressure amplitudes on cellulase production
by Trichoderma viride-SL were investigated. The effects of these two factors
on the stability of Rhizomucor miehei lipase have been investigated. The
stability criterion used was residual hydrolytic activity of the lipase (Margarita
and Pere 2004). Experimental and theoretical parameters, obtained by linearregression analysis, were compared with theoretical kinetics in order to
validate the series-type inactivation model. The lipase enzyme was activated
by either thermal or pressure treatment (Feitkenhauer and Meyer 2003).
Moreover conformational studies made by uorescence spectroscopy suggest
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 380/457
368 Bioprocessing of textiles
that the conformational changes induced by pressure were different from those
induced by temperature. In addition they show that after thermal deactivation
there were less intermolecular hydrogen bonded structures formed than was
the case for deactivation by high pressure. The organic cotton fabric was
treated with mixed enzymatic system using laboratory model breaker dyeing
bath tted with air pump model U9900 which was supplied by M/s BOY U®
(Fig. 7.25).
Fig. 7.24 Enzymatic treatments in (a) laboratory model beaker bath and
(b) air nozzle in beaker
Fig. 7.25 Single stage enzymatic desizing and scouring process – Trial I
7.8.7 Effect of air pressure on bioscouring of organiccotton fabric
The process optimization of bioscouring of 100% organic cotton fabric
through enzyme technology with aerodynamic system have been studied
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 381/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 369
with selective specic mixed enzymatic system using four enzymes namely
alkaline pectinase, protease, lipase and cellulase. The process variables such
as enzyme concentration, temperature and reaction time have optimized to
achieve the required water absorbency and pectin removal during bioscouring
process by pectinolytic and proteolytic activity on the organic cotton fabrics.
These process variables are selected based on the articial neural network
(ANN) and output of experiment was resulted with fabric physic properties
such as fabric weight loss, water absorbency, wetting area, whiteness index,
yellowness index, and brightness index using MATLAB 7.0 software with
minimum error and also studied with and without aerodynamic treatments.
The test results have analyzed to predict the optimum process parametersto achieve the required bioscouring fabric properties and removal of pectin
degrading rate and compared their results with actual trials. This study will
be helpful to the organic cotton processors for the ecofriendly and sustainable
textile wet processing using specic mixed enzymatic system in bioscouring
processes. From the research study the following conclusions were derived: (i)
The alkaline pectinase enzymes are better active and catalyze the degradation
of pectin at temperature range of 55–60°C and time of 45 min to achieve
required level of 75–80% pectin degradation. The pH of the process bath is
also a major inuence for better reaction of enzyme to catalyze the hydrolysisof pectin group. (ii) The higher enzyme concentration at 6% level and higher
temperature of 60°C took lesser time to achieve required pectin hydrolysis.
Process variables are optimized using MATLAB 7.0 and it will pave the way
to predict the enzyme kinetics at various concentrations, temperature and
reaction time to achieve required degradation of pectin with minimum error
%. (iii) The output result of the software to achieve the desired bioscouring
of organic cotton fabric on their physical properties such as fabric weight
loss, water absorbency, wetting area, whiteness index, yellowness index, and brightness index in the specic enzymatic system, out of which the software
opted best process conditions at 8% alkaline pectinase, 3% protease, 0.8%
lipase and 0.8% cellulase process condition at temperature of 55°C and
reaction time 60 min at pH 8.5 with 1.0% desirability. (iv) From the best opted
test results, the actual pectin and weight loss of the bioscoured organic cotton
fabric was achieved 68.40% and 4.80% respectively with error of 1.218%
in case of without aerodynamic treatment. With aerodynamic treatment, the
fabric weight loss was observed 6.38% and pectin removal up to 76.42%,
and (v) the overall aerodynamic efciency was achieved 9.72%, 24.08% and37.20% treated at 8 kPa, 12 kPa and 16 kPa air pressure levels respectively
on organic cotton fabric through mixed enzymatic system when compared to
without aerodynamic.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 382/457
370 Bioprocessing of textiles
7.9 Biopreparation of organic cotton fabric
This part of research work deals with single-stage enzymatic desizing andscouring process and enzymatic scouring and bleaching process with various
approaches for improvement of the organic cotton fabrics characteristics. The
organic cotton fabric properties such fabric weight loss (%), water absorbency,
fabric wetting area, fabric whiteness index, yellowness index, and brightness
index have been studied with various enzymatic process conditions. An attempt
has been made in this research work to combine fabric preparation (desizing,
scouring and bleaching) in a single stage and six different process sequences
were designed to optimize the results. The comparison and performance level
of various enzymatic process trials have been made to analyse the quality
of organic cotton fabrics with chemical scouring method which has been
followed in the industrial practices.
7.9.1 Single-stage enzymatic desizing and scouring
process
The single-stage enzymatic desizing and scouring processes have been carried
out with alpha amylase for biodesizing and specic mixed enzymes such asalkaline pectinase, protease, lipase and cellulase enzymes for bioscouring.
The process parameters of single-stage continuous wet processing of organic
cotton fabrics through chemical method and enzymatic method are given in
Tables 7.15 and 7.16, respectively. The Trials I and II represent the single-
stage enzymatic desizing and scouring process carried out with and without
washing process in the middle of the biotreatment (Figs. 7.26 and 7.27). In
the rst sequence (Trials I and II), was conducted to assess the inuence of
desizing combined with scouring enzymes and also carried out with ultrasonic
and aerodynamic systems.
Fig. 7.26 Single stage enzymatic desizing and scouring process – Trial II
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 383/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 371
Fig. 7.27 Comparison of Trail I and Trail II on fabric weight loss (%) in biopreparation
of organic cotton fabric
Table 7.15 Process parameters of single-stage continuous wet processing of organic
cotton fabrics – chemical method
Desizing Scouring Bleaching
Hydrochloric
acid (HCl)
1% Sodium hydroxide
(NaOH)
3% Hydrogen
peroxide
(H2O
2)
3%
Wetting agent 0.5%
(owm)
Sodium carbonate
(Na2Co3)
1% Sodium silicate
(Na2Sio3)
2%
MLR 1:20 Wetting agent 0.5% Sodium
hydroxide
(NaOH)
1%
Temperature 50°C MLR 1:20 MLR 1:20
Time 60 min Temperature Boil Temperature 95°C
Time 60 min Time 60 min
Table 7.16 Process parameters of single-stage continuous wet processing of organiccotton fabrics – mixed enzymatic method
Biodesizing Bioscouring Biobleaching
Alpha amylase 3.50% Alkaline
pectinase
8% Peroxidase 2%
Wetting agent 1% Protease 3% MLR 1:20
pH 7.0–7.5 Lipase 0.8% pH 7.0
Temperature 55°C Cellulase 0.8% Temperature 55°C
Time 60 min pH 9.5 Time 15 minMLR 1:20 Temperature 55°C
Time 60 min
MLR 1:20
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 384/457
372 Bioprocessing of textiles
7.9.1.1 Assessment of single-stage continuous enzymatic
processThe sample produced using above process sequence were assessed using
iodine test for identifying the starch removal on the enzymatic treatment in
the samples and residual pectin assessment using ruthenium red test. Besides
change in weight of the samples, drop absorbency, tensile strength, whiteness,
yellowness, brightness index were assessed and compared with the samples
obtained from the individual treatments. Whiteness of samples was measured
using spectrophotometer and FTIR analysis was carried out for identication
of residual impurities and structural changes in the bre using relevant
functional groups.
7.9.1.2 Iodine test
After enzymatic desizing process, the samples treated with various trials
showed clear yellow color with iodine solution, characteristics to that of dilute
iodine solution, without even faint discoloration that showed the absence of
residual starch or degraded starch in the fabric samples, similar to that of
desizing treatments using combination analysis.
7.9.1.3 Extractable impurities and residual pectin
Higher removal of impurities from the raw cotton bre can be expected in
the combined preparation in presence of cellulase in the reaction, which by
hydrolyzing the surface cellulose layers, could facilitate the access to other
substrates for hydrolysis by the respective enzymes (pectinase, protease
and lipase). However, there was a signicant difference in Trial I values as
compared to those obtained in the protease, pectinase, lipase and cellulasetreated samples by many folds. When the pectinase, protease, lipase and
cellulase were added at regular intervals, one after another removal of pectin
in the bres was less than that of the treatments where the enzymes were
added at once in terms of residual pectin measured by ruthenium red staining.
7.9.1.4 Fabric weight loss (%)
The performance of single-stage enzymatic desizing and scouring of
organic cotton are given in Tables 7.17 and 7.18, respectively. Figure 7.28shows the fabric weight loss (%) after single-stage enzymatic desizing and
scouring process with alpha amylase and mixed enzymatic system in scouring
process. From the test results, there is a signicant differences found in fabric
weight loss (%) between chemical method and normal mixed enzymatic and
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 385/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 373
ultrasonic treatment at F(2,29)
(8.27) > Fcrit
(4.291) at 95% condence level.
But in the case of aero dynamic system, there is no signicant differences
between chemical and aerodynamic system at F(2,29)
(3.287) > Fcrit
(4.291) at
95% condence level. It may be due to better enzyme kinetics on catalysis
of starch and non cellulosic groups present in the organic cotton fabric in
presence of air pressure which energies the enzymes in reaction. It is also
noticed that Trial II samples were noticed higher fabric weight loss (%) when
compared to Trial I samples in all the cases of enzymatic treatment, it may
be due to washing process introduced between biodesizing and bioscouring
which enrich the enzymatic reaction on the cotton bre.
Fig. 7.28 Comparison of Trail I and Trail II on fabric wax removal (%) in
biopreparation of organic cotton fabric
7.9.1.5 Fabric wax removal (%)
Figure 7.29 shows wax removal percentage on the organic cotton fabric
after single-stage enzymatic desizing and scouring process. It is clear that
% wax removal on the normal mixed enzymatic method, ultrasonic and
aerodynamic system were noticed 56.8%, 60.1% and 63.1% in Trial I and
57.2%, 62.8% and 68.4% in Trial II, respectively. But when compared tochemical alkaline scouring process, it was noticed up to 80.2% wax removal
on the organic cotton fabric. There is signicant differences noticed between
all the enzymatic treatments in Trial I at F(2,29)
> Fcrit
in various combination of
ANOVA multivariant analysis which are given in Table 7.20.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 386/457
374 Bioprocessing of textiles
Fig. 7.29 Comparison of Trail I and Trail II on pectin removal (%) in biopreparation of
organic cotton fabric
Table 7.17 Test results of Trial I single-stage enzymatic desizing and scouring
process
Fabric characteristics Normal
mixed
enzymatic
method
Ultrasonic
method
Aerodynamic
method
% change
Ultrasonic Aerodynamic
Fabric
weight loss (%)
12.40 12.72 13.04 2.581 5.161
Wax removal (%) 56.8 60.1 63.1 5.810 11.092
Pectin removal (%) 62 66.5 68.6 7.258 10.645
Fabric wetting area (mm2) 202 219 230 8.416 13.861
Whiteness Index 52.45 55.63 56.82 6.063 8.332
Yellowness Index 21.82 20.68 20.12 –5.225 –7.791Brightness Index 53.65 58.42 60.51 8.891 12.787
Fabric tensile strength
(g/tex)
Warp way 296.55 285.71 283.34 –3.655 –4.454
Weft way 249.49 225.28 219.04 –9.703 –12.204
7.9.1.6 Pectin removal (%)
Figure 7.30 shows the pectin degradation level on the single-stage enzymatic
desizing and scouring process of organic cotton fabric. It was noticed that
alkaline pectinase enzyme catalysis the pectin groups on the organic cotton
fabric was noticed higher up to 79.2% in aerodynamic system in Trial II. It
is interesting that there is no signicant differences between the chemical
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 387/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 375
method of pectin removal (78.4%) and also noticed that there is signicant
differences found in Trial I and II enzymatic treatments, it may be due to
washing process in the middle of biotreatment. It was also noticed that
washing process removes all the degraded starch after biodesizing with alpha
amylase and improves the better enzymatic reactions in bioscouring process
in next sequence of enzyme treatment in Trial II.
Fig. 7.30 Effect of biopreparation Trial I and II on water absorbency characteristics of
organic cotton fabric
Table 7.18 Test results of Trial II single-stage enzymatic desizing and scouring
process
Fabric characteristics Normalmixed
enzymatic
method
Ultrasonicmethod
Aerodynamicmethod
% change
Ultrasonic Aerodynamic
Fabric weight loss (%) 13.35 13.85 14.28 3.745 6.966
Wax removal (%) 57.2 62.8 68.4 9.790 19.580
Pectin removal (%) 64.2 74.2 79.1 15.576 23.209
Fabric wetting area (mm2) 212 252 270 18.868 27.358
Whiteness Index 54.52 58.45 62.14 7.208 13.977
Yellowness Index 18.41 13.45 13.04 –26.942 –29.169
Brightness Index 60.25 66.38 69.45 10.174 15.270
Fabric tensile strength
(g/tex)
Warp way 292.14 287.52 279.58 –1.581 –4.300
Weft way 238.65 221.85 218.69 –7.039 –8.363
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 388/457
376 Bioprocessing of textiles
Table 7.19 Performance level of Trial I and II in enzymatic desizing and scouring
process
Fabric characteristics % change
Normal mixed
enzymatic method
Ultrasonic
method
Aerodynamic
method
Fabric weight loss (%) 7.66 8.88 9.51
Wax removal (%) 0.70 4.49 8.40
Pectin removal (%) 3.55 11.58 15.31
Fabric wetting area (mm2) 4.95 15.07 17.39
Whiteness Index 3.95 5.07 9.36
Yellowness Index –15.63 –34.96 –35.19
Brightness Index
Tensile strength (g/tex)
12.30 13.63 14.77
Warp way –1.487 –0.633 –1.327
Weft way –4.344 –1.522 –0.159
7.9.1.7 Fabric water absorbency and wetting
characteristicsFigures 7.31 and 7.32 represent the water absorbency and wetting characteristics
of single-stage enzymatic desizing and scouring process of organic cotton
fabric. From the test results, the aerodynamic system of enzymatic treatment
samples were noticed similar to the chemical scouring fabric characteristics
and having <1 sec water absorbency and noticed >300 mm2 water wetting area.
It was noticed that there is no signicant differences between the chemical and
aerodynamic methods and also ultrasonic treatments, it may be due to higher
pectin and wax component break down in ultrasonic and aerodynamic system.
There is a signicant differences noticed between Trial I and Trial II in case
comparison between various enzymatic treatments as given in Table 7.20.
7.9.1.8 Fabric whiteness, yellowness index, and
brightness
Comparisons of fabric characteristics such as whiteness index, yellowness index
and brightness index of single-stage enzymatic desizing and scouring process
are given in Fig. 7.33. The performance levels of Trial I and II of these sample
characteristics are given in Table 7.17. From the test results, whiteness index
and brightness index were noticed higher up to 5.07%, and 13.63% in case of
ultrasonic treatments and also noticed 9.36% and 14.77% in case of aerodynamic
system. It was noticed that there is signicant differences F(2,29)
> Fcrit
between
Trial I and II enzymatic treatments. It may be due to washing process introduced
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 389/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 377
in single-stage enzymatic desizing and scouring process. The washing process
improves the fabric scouring characteristics and enzymatic degradation rate of
pectin and wax components in the organic cotton fabric (Tables 7.18 and 7.19),
respectively, and ANOVA multivariant test results are given in Table 7.20. It
was noticed that higher pectin and wax components in the organic cotton fabric
while bioscouring with ultrasonic and aerodynamic system which improves
whiteness and brightness index of the cotton fabric by better endo pectinolytic
and proteinolytic on the cotton bre structure.
Fig. 7.31 Effect of biopreparation Trial I and II on fabric wetting characteristics of
organic cotton fabric
Fig. 7.32 Effect of biopreparation Trial I and II on water absorbency characteristics of
organic cotton fabric
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 390/457
378 Bioprocessing of textiles
Fig. 7.33 Comparison of tensile characteristics of organic cotton fabric processed
through chemical and enzymatic desizing and scouring methods
7.9.1.9 Fabric tensile characteristics
Figure 7.34 shows the comparison of organic cotton fabric tensile characteristics
(both warp and weft way) of single-stage chemical and enzymatic desizing and
Fig. 7.34 Single-stage enzymatic scouring and bleaching process – Trial III
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 391/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 379
scouring process. From Table 7.20, the ANOVA test results, there is signicant
differences found between chemical (alkali) and enzymatic treatments at F(2,29)
> Fcrit
(8.521 > 4.182) between Trial I and II at 95% condence values both
ultrasonic and aerodynamic system of treatments. It may be due to higher
fabric strength loss and weight loss in chemical scouring which weakens the
bre molecules at higher concentration of alkali treatments. The performance
levels of Trial I and II of these sample characteristics are given in Table 7.19.
From the test results, there is no signicant difference between Trial I and
Trial II by incorporating washing process between enzymatic desizing and
scouring process, but it improves the fabric properties in terms of whiteness,
and brightness index in concern.
Table 7.20 ANOVA Multivariant Analysis – single-stage enzymatic desizing and
scouring process
Source of Variation SS df MS F Pvalue Fcrit
Fabric weight loss
Between Trials I and II 1750.35 29 60.357 17.52 0.006 4.182
Between normal and ultrasonic methods 354.854 29 12.236 6.527 0.034 4.182
Between normal and aerodynamic
methods
457.127 29 15.763 8.624 0.048 4.182
Wax removal (%)
Between Trials I and II 11.760 29 0.4055 23.913 0.186 4.182
Between normal and ultrasonic methods 76.570 29 2.6403 12.74 0.073 4.182
Between normal and aerodynamic
methods
65.820 29 2.2697 11.457 0.004 4.182
Pectin removal (%)
Between Trials I and II 69.360 29 2.392 7.78 0.108 4.182
Between normal and ultrasonic methods 120.25 29 4.147 6.744 0.129 4.182
Between normal and aerodynamicmethods
124.23 29 4.284 7.852 0.012 4.182
Fabric wetting area
Between Trials I and II 1148.16 29 39.592 19.322 0.093 4.182
Between normal and ultrasonic methods 1914.33 29 66.011 7.771 0.114 4.182
Between normal and aerodynamic
methods
1425.36 29 49.150 11.862 0.025 4.182
Whiteness Index
Between Trials I and II 17.374 29 0.599 22.362 0.074 4.182
Between normal and ultrasonic methods 36.354 29 1.254 8.132 0.048 4.182Between normal and aerodynamic
methods
34.681 29 1.196 8.562 0.045 4.182
Yellowness Index
Between Trials I and II 52.333 29 1.805 14.251 0.042 4.182
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 392/457
380 Bioprocessing of textiles
Source of Variation SS df MS F Pvalue Fcrit
Between normal and ultrasonic methods 14.689 29 0.507 10.527 0.242 4.182
Between normal and aerodynamic
methods
13.681 29 0.472 8.694 0.281 4.182
Brightness Index
Between Trials I and II 92.042 29 3.174 133.30 0.007 4.182
Between normal and ultrasonic methods 67.227 29 2.318 48.682 0.020 4.182
Between normal and aerodynamic
methods
61.425 29 2.118 34.821 0.041 4.182
Fabric tensile characteristics
Between Trials I and II 58.140 29 8.142 0.0458 0.850 4.182
Between normal and ultrasonic methods 307.12 29 30.75 0.208 0.692 4.182
Between normal and aerodynamic
methods
476.52 29 18.65 0.301 0.638 4.182
7.9.2 Single-stage enzymatic scouring and bleaching
process
The single-stage enzymatic scouring and bleaching process was carried out
with mixed enzymes such as alkaline pectinase, protease, lipase and cellulase
enzymes for bioscouring and hydrogen peroxide for bleaching process which
are optimized in the Chapters 5 and 6 for ultrasonic and aerodynamic system,
respectively. The Trial III to VI represent the single-stage enzymatic scouring
and bleaching process carried out with various combinations of enzymes in
bioscouring process (Figs. 7.35 to 7.38). The fabric properties such as fabric
weight loss, wax removal, pectin removal, water absorbency, wetting area,
whiteness index, yellowness index and brightness index of normal method,
ultrasonic method and aerodynamic method of enzymatic treatments are
compared and test results are given in Tables 9.7–9.9, respectively.
Fig. 7.35 Single-stage enzymatic scouring and bleaching process – Trial IV
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 393/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 381
Fig. 7.36 Single-stage enzymatic scouring and bleaching process – Trial V
Fig. 7.37 Single-stage enzymatic scouring and bleaching process – Trial VI
Fig. 7.38 Effect of fabric weight loss (%) on combined bioscouring and bleaching
treatment of organic cotton fabric
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 394/457
382 Bioprocessing of textiles
7.9.2.1 Fabric weight loss (%)
Figure 7.39 shows the fabric weight loss (%) of the organic cotton fabric aftersingle-stage enzymatic scouring and bleaching process carried out normal
method, ultrasonic method and aerodynamic method. From the test results,
the fabric weight losses (%) of the aerodynamic and ultrasonic method of
enzymatic treatment were noticed similar to the alkaline scouring and hydrogen
peroxide bleaching nature. There is no signicant differences noticed when
compared between chemical method and Trial VI at 95% condence level F(2,29)
< Fcrit
(4.38 < 4.081), which may be due to better degradation of pectinolytic
and proteinolytic reaction between alkaline pectinase, lipase and protease
enzymes in the bioscouring process. It is also noticed that the concentration
of cellulase enzyme in the bioscouring imparts higher fabric weight loss
(%) and signicant improvement in the endo-pectinolytic activity on the
cellulosic bre structure. There are signicant differences noticed between
various enzymes combinations of trials at Trial III and IV and Trial V and
VI at various enzymatic process conditions which are shown in Tables 7.23
and 7.24, respectively, for ANOVA multivariant analyses at 95% condence
level. The performance levels of Trial III to VI at various combinations of
enzyme treatments with normal, ultrasonic and aerodynamic system are givenin Tables 7.21 and 7.22.
Fig.7.39 Effect of wax removal (%) on combined bioscouring and bleaching treatment
of organic cotton fabric
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 395/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 383
Table 7.21 Test results of Trial III single-stage enzymatic scouring and bleaching
process
Fabric
characteristics
Normal
mixed
enzymatic
method
Ultrasonic
method
Aerodynamic
method
% change
Ultrasonic Aerodynamic
Fabric weight loss
(%)
3.42 3.86 4.31 12.865 26.023
Wax removal (%) 68.5 70.5 72.2 2.920 5.401
Pectin removal
(%)
65.9 68.9 69.4 4.552 5.311
Fabric wetting
area (mm2)
184 203 210 10.326 14.130
Whiteness Index 68.63 69.9 71.58 1.851 4.298
Yellowness Index 20.63 19.62 18.04 –4.896 –12.555
Brightness Index 58.96 60.23 64.23 2.154 8.938
Fabric tensile
strength (g/tex)
Warp way 268.22 263.54 262.85 –1.74 –2.00
Weft way 234.52 228.54 229.51 –2.54 –2.31
Table 7.22 Test results of Trial IV single-stage enzymatic scouring and bleaching
process
Fabric
characteristics
Normal
mixed
enzymatic
method
Ultrasonic
method
Aerodynamic
method
% change
Ultrasonic Aerodynamic
Fabric weight loss
(%)
3.73 4.16 4.84 11.528 29.759
Wax removal (%) 70.5 72.5 74.5 2.837 5.674
Pectin removal (%) 68.5 71.8 74.8 4.818 9.197
Fabric wetting area
(mm2)
195 218 232 11.795 18.974
Whiteness Index 71.56 74.08 75.92 3.522 6.093
Yellowness Index 19.01 17.62 15.93 –7.312 –16.202
Brightness Index 62.53 64.85 70.32 3.710 12.458
Fabric Tensilestrength (g/tex)
Warp way 263.52 261.52 260.52 –0.75 –1.13
Weft way 230.52 224.52 222.67 –2.60 –3.40
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 396/457
384 Bioprocessing of textiles
7.9.2.2 Fabric wax removal (%)
Figure 7.40 shows the comparisons of degradation of low volatile wax and oilcomponents present in the organic cotton fabric after single-stage enzymatic
scouring and bleaching carried out by normal method, ultrasonic method and
aerodynamic method. From the test results, the higher degradation of wax
and oil substances were noticed in Trial VI, it may be because of protease and
lipase enzymes added in rst in bioscouring process and then added alkaline
pectinase and cellulase enzymes in the single-stage bioprocess sequences
which imparts better removal of low volatile fatty molecules on the cotton
bre structure and increases endo pectinolytic activity on the organic cottonfabric. It is also noticed Trial VI of aerodynamic and ultrasonic treatments have
no signicant differences when compared to chemical method of treatments
at F(2,29)
< Fcrit
at 95% condence level of comparison of test results. ANOVA
multivariant analyses were carried out to analyze the signicant differences
of various enzymatic trials between Trial III and VI, and their test results are
given in Tables 7.23 and 7.24.
Fig. 7.40 Effect of pectin removal (%) on combined bioscouring and bleaching
treatment of organic cotton fabric
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 397/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 385
Table 7.23 Test results of Trial V single-stage enzymatic scouring and bleaching
process
Fabric
characteristics
Normal
mixed
enzymatic
method
Ultrasonic
method
Aerodynamic
method
% change
Ultrasonic Aerodynamic
Fabric weight loss
(%)
4.20 4.31 4.45 2.619 5.952
Wax removal (%) 68.4 68.6 71.5 0.292 4.532
Pectin removal (%) 69.5 70.1 72.1 0.863 3.741
Fabric wetting area
(mm2)
222 236 248 6.306 11.712
Whiteness Index 71.56 72.6 74.56 1.453 4.192
Yellowness Index 18.45 16.92 16.84 –8.293 –8.726
Brightness Index 64.31 65.25 67.52 1.462 4.991
Fabric tensile
strength (g/tex)
Warp way 263.96 260.52 258.94 –1.30 –1.91
Weft way 234.04 230.9 226.54 –1.34 –3.20
Table 7.24 Test results of Trial VI single-stage enzymatic scouring and bleaching
process
Fabric
characteristics
Normal
mixed
enzymatic
method
Ultrasonic
method
Aerodynamic
method
% Change
Ultrasonic Aerodynamic
Fabric weight loss
(%)
4.65 4.92 5.27 5.806 13.333
Wax removal (%) 74.5 75.6 82.5 1.477 10.738
Pectin removal (%) 73.5 74.6 78.4 1.497 6.667
Fabric wetting area(mm2)
242 270 291 11.570 20.248
Whiteness Index 75.65 80.25 84.24 6.081 11.355
Yellowness Index 16.85 14.38 13.64 –14.659 –19.050
Brightness Index 67.92 70.2 75.58 3.357 11.278
Fabric tensile
strength (g/tex)
264.51 259.85 258.06 –1.76 –2.43
Warp way
Weft way 234.34 232.86 230.7 –0.63 –1.55
7.9.2.3 Fabric pectin removal (%)
Alkaline pectinase enzyme plays important role in the breakdown of pectin
groups in the organic cotton bre structure. Figure 7.41 shows the fabric
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 398/457
386 Bioprocessing of textiles
pectin removal (%) of the organic cotton fabric after single-stage enzymatic
scouring and bleaching process carried out normal method, ultrasonic method
and aerodynamic method. The alkaline pectinase enzyme was noticed higher
reaction on the pectin removal (%) treated at ultrasonic and aerodynamic
systems. There is a signicant difference noticed between Trial V and Trial
VI, which may be due to higher fabric weight loss (%) and wax removal on
the organic cotton fabric which are subjected combination of enzymes added
in the bioscouring sequence of process.
Fig. 7.41 Effect of fabric water absorbency characteristics on combined bioscouring
and bleaching treatment of organic cotton fabric
7.9.2.4 Fabric water absorbency and wetting
characteristics
Figures 7.42 and 7.43 show the fabric water absorbency and wetting
characteristics of the organic cotton fabric after single-stage enzymatic
scouring and bleaching process at various combinations of mixed enzymes in
the process sequences at normal method, ultrasonic method and aerodynamic
method. From the test results, ultrasonic and aerodynamic system of mixed
enzymatic treated in Trial VI was noticed water absorbency <1 sec and higher
wetting characteristics when compared to normal mixed enzymatic system.
It is interesting observation that test results are comparable with chemical
alkaline scouring followed in the industrial practices. These improved water
absorbency and wetting characteristics, may be due to higher pectin and wax
component break downs in the organic cotton bre structure and enhanced
enzyme catalysis in the ultrasonic and aerodynamic system.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 399/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 387
Fig. 7.42 Effect of fabric wetting characteristics on combined bioscouring and
bleaching treatment of organic cotton fabric
Fig. 7.43 Effect of fabric whiteness index on combined bioscouring and bleaching
treatment of organic cotton fabric
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 400/457
388 Bioprocessing of textiles
7.9.2.5 Fabric whiteness, yellowness and brightness index
Figures 7.44–7.46 show the comparison of single-stage enzymatic scouring and bleaching of organic cotton fabric treated at normal method, ultrasonic method
and aerodynamic method carried out at various enzymatic combinations.
From the test results, higher fabric whiteness and brightness index were
noticed better in ultrasonic and aerodynamic system and comparable results
with chemical alkaline cotton fabric. There is signicant differences noticed
at F(2,29)
> Fcrit
between Trial V and VI at 95% condence level of test analysis,
it may be due to higher pectin degradation up to 78% and 80% in case of
ultrasonic and aerodynamic system in Trial VI. It may be because of protease
and lipase enzymes added in rst in the sequence of bioscouring which breaks
the surface wax and oil substances and then added pectinase and cellulose
which enhances the higher degradation of pectin groups in the enzymatic
treatments. Yellowness index of Trial VI samples were noticed lower and
comparable with chemical alkaline scouring followed in industrial practices.
The test results of various combinations of Trials III to VI and compared with
ANOVA multivariant analysis at 95% condence level and their test results
are given in Tables 7.24 and 7.25.
Table 7.25 Performance level of Trial III and IV in enzymatic scouring and bleaching
process
Fabric characteristics % change
Normal mixed
enzymatic method
Ultrasonic
method
Aerodynamic
method
Fabric weight loss (%) 8.31 7.77 12.30
Wax removal (%) 2.92 2.84 3.19
Pectin removal (%) 3.95 4.21 7.78
Fabric wetting area (mm2) 5.98 7.39 10.48
Whiteness Index 4.27 5.98 6.06
Yellowness Index –7.85 –10.19 –11.70
Brightness Index 6.05 7.67 9.48
Fabric tensile strength (g/tex) 1.75229 0.76649 –0.88644
Warp way
Weft way 1.70561 –1.75899 –1.38026
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 401/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 389
Fig. 7.44 Effect of fabric yellowness index on combined bioscouring and bleaching
treatment of organic cotton fabric
Fig. 7.45 Effect of fabric brightness index on combined bioscouring and bleaching
treatment of organic cotton fabric
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 402/457
390 Bioprocessing of textiles
Fig. 7.46 Comparison of tensile characteristics of organic cotton fabric processed
through chemical and enzymatic scouring and bleaching methods.
7.9.2.6 Fabric tensile characteristicsFigure 7.47 shows the fabric tensile characteristics (both warp and weft way) of
organic cotton fabric treated by single-stage chemical and enzymatic desizing
and scouring process. From the test results, there is signicant differences
found between chemical and enzymatic treatments at 95% condent level Fact
> Fcri 6.842 > 4.182. The performance level of Trial III and IV, V and VI of
these sample characteristics are given in Tables 7.25 and 7.26, respectively. It
was also noticed that there is signicant differences found in case of Trial III
and IV, V and VI treatments with normal and aerodynamic system of enzymetreatments which may be due to higher non-cellulosic compounds removal
in aerodynamic system and their ANOVA test results are given in Table 7.27.
Table 7.26 Performance level of Trial V and VI in enzymatic desizing and scouring
process
Fabric characteristics % change
Normal mixed
enzymatic method
Ultrasonic
method
Aerodynamic
method
Fabric weight loss (%) 10.71 14.15 18.43
Wax removal (%) 8.92 10.20 15.38
Pectin removal (%) 5.76 6.42 8.74
Fabric wetting area (mm2) 9.01 14.41 17.34
Contd...
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 403/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 391
Fabric characteristics % change
Normal mixed
enzymatic method
Ultrasonic
method
Aerodynamic
method
Whiteness Index 5.72 10.54 12.98
Yellowness Index –8.67 –15.01 –19.00
Brightness Index 5.61 7.59 11.94
Fabric tensile strength (g/tex) –0.208 –0.257 –0.339
Warp way
Weft way –0.128 –0.348 –1.836
Fig. 7.47 Waste water efuent after scouring (a) chemical method (b) enzyme method
Table 7.27 ANOVA Multivariant Analysis – single-stage enzymatic scouring and
bleaching process between Trial III and IV
Source of variation SS df MS F Pvalue Fcrit
Fabric weight loss
Between Trials III and IV 1345.21 29 46.38 13.58 0.012 4.182
Between normal and ultrasonic
methods
451.52 29 15.57 5.630 0.031 4.182
Between normal and aerodynamic
methods
368.63 29 12.71 6.924 0.042 4.182
Wax removal (%)
Between Trials III and IV 47.52 29 1.638 14.532 0.056 4.182
Between normal and ultrasonic
methods
96.25 29 3.319 9.634 0.038 4.182
Contd...
Contd...
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 404/457
392 Bioprocessing of textiles
Source of variation SS df MS F Pvalue Fcrit
Between normal and aerodynamic
methods
56.63 29 1.953 8.637 0.081 4.182
Pectin removal (%)
Between Trials III and IV 74.52 29 2.570 9.631 0.044 4.182
Between normal and ultrasonic
methods
96.35 29 3.323 11.52 0.127 4.182
Between normal and aerodynamic
methods
124.67 29 4.298 8.637 0.024 4.182
Fabric wetting area
Between Trials III and IV 958.52 29 33.05 11.42 0.124 4.182
Between normal and ultrasonic
methods
1124.63 29 38.78 6.83 0.098 4.182
Between normal and aerodynamic
methods
1325.67 29 45.71 6.18 0.352 4.182
Whiteness Index
Between Trials III and IV 42.758 29 1.474 19.63 0.073 4.182
Between normal and ultrasonicmethods
42.860 29 1.478 10.62 0.051 4.182
Between normal and aerodynamic
methods
37.951 29 1.309 14.52 0.042 4.182
Yellowness Index
Between Trials III and IV 65.52 29 2.259 9.631 0.142 4.182
Between normal and ultrasonic
methods
17.36 29 0.599 8.652 0.351 4.182
Between normal and aerodynamic
methods
9.865 29 0.340 6.124 0.054 4.182
Brightness Index
Between Trials III and IV 121.52 29 4.190 42.36 0.042 4.182
Between normal and ultrasonic
methods
118.62 29 4.090 9.863 0.241 4.182
Between normal and aerodynamic
methods
92.53 29 3.191 11.53 0.058 4.182
Fabric tensile characteristics
Between Trials III and IV 18.92 29 3.425 0.035 0.870 4.182Between normal and ultrasonic
methods
71.50 29 38.75 2.561 0.094 4.182
Between normal and aerodynamic
methods
87.63 29 42.35 9.254 0.0345 4.182
Contd...
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 405/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 393
Table 7.28 ANOVA Multivariant Analysis – single-stage enzymatic scouring and
bleaching process between Trial V and VI
Source of variation SS df MS F Pvalue Fcrit
Fabric weight loss
Between Trials V and VI 851.24 29 29.35 21.43 0.041 4.182
Between normal and ultrasonic methods 365.42 29 12.60 8.634 0.064 4.182
Between normal and aerodynamic methods 258.63 29 8.918 10.25 0.085 4.182
Wax removal (%)
Between Trials V and VI 52.86 29 1.822 8.342 0.096 4.182
Between normal and ultrasonic methods 68.42 29 2.359 6.587 0.185 4.182
Between normal and aerodynamic methods 43.52 29 1.501 9.634 0.042 4.182
Pectin removal (%)
Between Trials V and VI 63.85 29 2.202 8.934 0.125 4.182
Between normal and ultrasonic methods 72.68 29 2.506 10.52 0.241 4.182
Between normal and aerodynamic methods 92.53 29 3.191 8.631 0.056 4.182
Fabric wetting area
Between Trials V and VI 1042.53 29 35.95 18.53 0.028 4.182
Between normal and ultrasonic methods 968.35 29 33.39 6.83 0.125 4.182
Between normal and aerodynamic methods 856.31 29 29.52 12.42 0.042 4.182
Whiteness Index
Between Trials V and VI 56.38 29 1.944 11.52 0.312 4.182
Between normal and ultrasonic methods 50.27 29 1.734 9.631 0.124 4.182
Between normal and aerodynamic methods 48.25 29 1.664 8.964 0.265 4.182
Yellowness Index
Between Trials V and VI 45.96 29 1.585 18.63 0.041 4.182
Between normal and ultrasonic methods 18.96 29 0.654 8.964 0.246 4.182
Between normal and aerodynamic methods 14.65 29 0.505 11.52 0.124 4.182
Brightness Index
Between Trials V and VI 148.63 29 5.125 36.42 0.052 4.182
Between normal and ultrasonic methods 127.96 29 4.412 8.96 0.004 4.182
Between normal and aerodynamic methods 104.52 29 3.604 10.25 0.086 4.182
Fabric tensile characteristics
Between Trials V and VI 78.952 29 23.21 2.035 0.080 4.182
Between normal and ultrasonic methods 124.14 29 39.75 3.254 0.404 4.182
Between normal and aerodynamic methods 135.67 29 26.34 61.54 0.345 4.182
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 406/457
394 Bioprocessing of textiles
7.9.2.7 Waste water efuent analysis
The waste water efuent after processed through chemical and enzymaticmethod of organic cotton fabric was analyzed and their comparison test results
are given in Table 7.29. From the analysis the enzymatic method of scouring is
better than chemical scouring in COD and BOD for ecofriendly processing in
concern. From the waste water analysis of enzymatic scouring efuent meets
the standard level of government norms for ecofriendly processing.
Table 7.29 Waste water efuent analysis
Parameters Government
standards
Chemical
method
Enzyme method
pH 6.8–8.5 9–13 7–8.5
BOD 30 mg/lit 300 40–50
COD 100 mg/lit 600 150–220
Suspended solids 100 mg/lit 90 30–40
TDS Approx. 2100 mg/lit 3000–5000 1500–2400
Oil and grease 10 mg/lit 15–30 12–15
Sulphates Nil 1–2 mg/lit Nil
Chlorides 600 mg/lit 1250–1850 150–300
Color (units) 100 units 2000–2400 600–850
Turbidity (fau) 15 180 35–60
Note: Scouring efuent analysis
7.9.2.8 Summary
The organic cotton fabric treated with ultrasonic and aerodynamic system in
the single-stage enzymatic scouring and bleaching treatments were noticed
higher degradation of pectin (above 75%) and wax components (above
80%) in the bioscouring process and also noticed better water absorbency
<1 sec and fabric whiteness (above 80%) and brightness index (above 73%).
These fabric properties are comparable with chemical alkaline scouring and
bleaching followed in the industrial practices. Sonication method improves
enzyme cavitation in the catalysis of enzymes for breakdown of pectin and
wax/oil substances faster than normal method of treatments. Aerodynamic
method improves catalysis of enzymes by boosting/energizing air pressure of
living organisms.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 407/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 395
7.10 References
Abramov O V, High-Intensity Ultrasonic, Gordon and Breach Publications, London, 1998.Anto, H., Trivedi, U., and Patel, K., ‘Alpha amylase production by Bacillus cereus MTCC
1305 using solid state fermentation’, Food Technology and Biotechnology, 2006, 44(2),
241–245.
Arne I Solbak and Toby H Richardson, ‘Discovery of pectin-degrading enzymes and
directed evolution of a novel pectate lyase for processing cotton fabric’, J Biological
Chem, 2005, 280(10), 9431.
Behara, B.K., and Gupta, R., ‘Comparative analysis of mechanical properties of size lms’,
J Text Inst, 2009, 100(4), 305–313.
Berneld, P., Amylase alpha and beta: In Methods in enzymology, Academic Press,
Newyork, 1955, 49–158.
Buschie-Diller, G., Zeronian, S.H., Pan, N., and Yoon, M.Y., ‘Enzymatic hydrolysis of
cotton, linen, ramie and viscose fabric’, Text Res J, 1994, 64, 240–48.
Buschie-Diller, G., Zeronian, S.H., Pan, N., and Yoon, M.Y., ‘Enzymatic hydrolysis of
cotton, linen, ramie and viscose fabric’, Text Res J, 1994, 64, 240–279.
Buschle-Diller, G., Mogahzy, E.Y., Inglesby, M.K., and Zeronian, S.H., ‘Effect of scouring
with enzymes, organic solvents and caustic soda on the properties of hydrogen peroxide
bleached cotton yarn’, Text Res J, 1998, 68(12), 920–28.
Daniel, R.M., Peterson, M.E., and Danson, M.J., ‘The molecular basis of the effect of
temperature on enzyme activity’, Biochem J, 2010, 425(2), 353–56.
Emillia Csiszar, Gyorgy Szakacs, and Istvan Rusznak, ‘Combining traditional cotton
scouring with cellulase enzymatic treatment’, Text Res J, 1998, 68(3), 163.
Etters, J.N., Husain, P.A., and Lange, N.K., ‘Cotton Preparation with Alkaline Pectinase:
An Environmental Advance’, Text Asia, 1999, 1, 83–86.
Feitkenhauer, H., and Meyer, L., ‘Anaerobic microbial cultures in cotton desizing: Efcient
combination of fabric and wastewater treatment’, Text Res J, 2003, 73(2), 93–97.
Grant, R.J.S., ‘Cementing the wall: cell wall polysaccharide synthesising enzymes’,
Current Opinion Plant Biol, 2000, 3, 512–19.
Gubitz, G.M., and Cavaco-Paulo, A., ‘Biotechnology in the textile industry – Perspectives
for the new millennium’, J Biotech, 2001, 89(2), 91–94.
Hardin, I.R., and Yanghuna, L., ‘Enzymatic scouring of cotton: effects on structure and
properties’, Text Chem Color, 1997, 29, 71–78.
Hsieh, Y.L., and Cram, L., ‘Protease as Scouring Agents for Cotton’, Text Res J, 1999,
69(8), 590–97.
Jayapriya, J., and Vigneswaran, C., ‘Process optimization for biosoftening of lignocellulosicbres with white rot fungi and specic mixed enzymatic system’, J Natural Fibres, 2010,
7(1), 17–26.
Kamel, M., El-Shishtawy, R.M., Yussef, B.M., and Mashaly, H., ‘Ultrasound in textile
dyeing and the decolouration/mineralization of textile dyes’, Dyes Pigm, 2005, 652, 103–
109.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 408/457
396 Bioprocessing of textiles
Lenting, H.B.M., Zwier, E., and Nierstrasz, V.A., ‘Identifying Important Parameters for a
Continuous Bioscouring Process’, Text Res J, 2002, 72(9), 825.
Li, Y., and Hardin, I.R., ‘Enzymatic Scouring of Cotton Surfactants, Agitation, and
Selection of Enzymes’, Text Chem Color, 1998, 30(9), 23.
Margarita Calafell, and Pere Garriga, ‘Enzymatic degradation of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)
by a commercial lipase’, Enzyme Micro Tech, 2004, 34, 326–34.
Michael Gross, and Rainer Jaenicke., ‘Proteins under pressure’, European J Biochemistry,
1994, 221(2), 617–630.
Miller, G.L., ‘Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugars’,
Analytical Chemistry, 1959, 31, 426–428.
Mori, T., Sakimoto, M., Kagi, T., and Saki, T., ‘Enzymatic desizing of polyvinyl alcoholfrom cotton fabrics’, J Chemical Tech and Biotech, 1999, 68(2), 151–156.
Mostafa, K.M., ‘Evaluation of starch derivatives for cotton yarns’, Carbohydrate Polymers,
2003, 51, 63–68.
Nabil Ibrahim, A., Mamdouh El-Hossamy, Mahmoud S Morsy, and Basma M Eid,
‘Optimization and Modication of Enzymatic Desizing of Starch-Size’, Polym Plast Tech
Engg, 2004, 43(2), 519–23.
Nallankilli, G., ‘Enzymes in textile wet processing’, Text Industry and Trade J, 1992, 30,
51–57.
Perez, S., Mazeau, K., and Herve, D.P., ‘The Three-Dimensional Structure of the Pectic
Polysaccharides’, Plant Physiol Biochem, 2000, 38, 37.
Pinheiro, R., Belo, I., and Mota, M., ‘Air pressure effects on biomass yield of two different
Kluyveromyces strains’, Enzyme and Microbial Tech, 2000, 26(9), 756–762.
Polonca Presa and Petra Forte Tavcer, ‘Low Water and Energy Saving Process for Cotton
Pre-treatment’, Text Res J, 2009, 79(1), 76.
Presa, P., and Forte, T.P, ‘Pectinases as agents for Bioscouring’, Tekstilec, 2007, 50, 16–34.
Rakesh Goyal and Prabhu, C.N., ‘Emerging standards for organic textiles – Part II’,
Colourage, 2009, 5, 87.
Ramachandran, T., and Karthik, T., ‘Application of genetic engineering and enzymes in
textiles’, IE (I) Journal – TX, 2004, 84, 32–36.
Sakakibara, M., Wang, D., Takahashi, R., Takahashi, K., Mori, S., ‘Inuence of ultrasound
irradiation on hydrolysis of sucrose catalyzed by invertase’, Enzyme and Microbial Tech,
1996, 18(6), 444–448.
Tatsuma Mori, Michio Sakimoto, Takashi Kagi and Takuo Saki, ‘Enzymatic Desizing of
Polyvinyl Alcohol from Cotton Fabrics’, J Chem Tech Biotechnol, 1999, 68(2), 151–56.
Thakur, B.R., Singh, R.K., and Handa, A.K., ‘Chemistry and Uses of Pectin — A Review’,
Critical Rev Food Sci Nutrition, 1997, 37(1), 47–56.
Traore M K & Buschle-Diller G, ‘Environmentally friendly scouring process’, Text Chem
Color & Am Dye Rep, 2000, 32, 40–47.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 409/457
Bioprocessing of organic cotton textiles 397
Tyndall, R.M., ‘Application of cellulase enzymes to cotton fabrics and garments’, Text
Chemist and Colorist, 1996, 24, 23–26.
Tzanko, T., Calafell, T.M., Guebitz, G.M., and Cavaco-Paulo, A., ‚Biopreparation of cotton
fabrics’, Enzyme Micro Tech, 29(6) (2001) 357–362.
Vadim V Mozhaev, Reinhard Lange, Elena V Kudryashova, and Claude Balny, ‘Application
of high hydrostatic pressure for increasing activity and stability of enzymes’, Biotech and
Bioengg, 1996, 52(2), 320–31.
Vigneswaran, C., Ananthasubramanian, M., Anbumani, N., ‘Effect of sonication on
bioscouring of organic cotton through mixed enzymatic system’, Indian J Fibre and Text
Res, 2013, 38(1), 44–56.
Vigneswaran, C., and Jayapriya, J., ‘Effect on physical characteristics of jute bres with
cellulase and specic mixed enzymatic system’, J Text Inst, 2010, 101(6), 506.
Vigneswaran, C., and Keerthivasan, D., ‘Bio-processing of cotton fabrics with commercial
enzymes’, Melliand Int, 2008, 5(6), 303–7.
Vughn, K.C., and Turley, R.B., ‘The primary walls of cotton bres contain an ensheathing
pectin layer’, Protoplasma, 1999, 209, 226–237.
Warke, V.V., and Chandratre, P.R., ‘Application of Biotechnology in Textiles’, Man-made
Text India, 2003, 16(4), 142.
Wen-Chi Hou, Wei-Hsien Chang & Chii-Ming Jiang, ‘Qualitative distinction of carboxyl
group distributions in pectins’, Bot Bull Acad Sin, 1999, 40, 115.
Xia Yuan-jing., and Li Zhi-yi., ‘Effects of high pressure treatment on peroxidase (POD)
activity in orange juice’, J Nanjing University of Tech (Natural Science Edition), 2009, 5,
124–130.
Yachmenev, V.G., ‘The Effects of Ultrasound on the Performance of Industrial Enzymes
Used in Cotton Biopreparation /Bionishing Applications’, J Natural Fibres, 2005, 3(2),
99–112.
Yonghua, Li., and Hardin, I.R., ‘Enzymatic scouring of cotton: effects on structure and
properties’, Text Chem Color, 1997, 29(8), 71–76.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 410/457
Abstract: This chapter is to outline and review the latest developments andadvance in medical textiles and biopolymers for wound management providing
the overview with generalized scope of biotechnology about novelties in medicalproducts and properties. The past decade has seen considerable efforts in the useof polymer nanobres for biomedical and biotechnological applications. Theseinclude tissue engineering, controlled drug release, wound dressings, medicalimplants, dental composites, molecular ltration, biosensors and preservation ofbioactive agents. An overview of these applications has been discussed. Most ofthese applications are still being tested in laboratories worldwide with some atthe infancy stage. Signicant advancements are necessary before clinical usageor commercialization can be realized. More attention should be given to naturalbiopolymers (e.g., chitin, alginate, etc.) so that better biological compatibilityand performance can be realized. In order to advance the biotechnological
and especially biomedical applications of polymer nanobres from perspectiveto commercialized stages, collaborative interdisciplinary researches involvingsurgeons, material scientists, biologists, physiologists, clinicians, and engineersare required. It is believed that continual investments from academia, government,and industry into this eld will not only shorten the distance between laboratoryand practical utilization stages in any of the above reviewed areas but also openup other new range of opportunities for polymer nanobres in biomedical andbiotechnological applications.
Keywords: Biomedical, wound care, drug release, biopolymer, biosensor,polymer nanobre
8.1 Introduction
New generation medical textiles are signicantly growing eld with great
expansion in wound management products. Virtually new products are
coming in the market with signicantly improved properties using advanced
technologies. These new products are in the centre of research which is highly
technical, technological, functional, and effective oriented (Petrulyte 2008).
The qualities of wound care products include that they are bacteriostatic,
anti-viral, fungi static, non-toxic, high absorbent, non-allergic, breathable,
haemostatic, and biocompatible. Many additional advantages over traditional
materials have products modied or blended with biopolymers based on
alginate, chitin/chitosan, and collagen (Verreck et al. 2003). Textile structures
8
Biotechnology and biomaterials for hygienic and
health care textiles
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 411/457
Biotechnology and biomaterials for hygienic and health care textiles 399
used for modern wound dressings are of large variety: sliver, yarn, woven, non-
woven, knitted, crochet, braided, embroidered, composite materials (Pavlova
and Draganova 1993). Wound care also applies to materials like hydrogels,
matrix (tissue engineering), lms, hydrocolloids, and foams. Additives along
with special functions can be introduced in advanced wound dressings with
the aim to absorb odours, provide strong antibacterial properties, smooth pain
and relieve irritation. Because of unique properties as high surface area to
volume ratio, lm thinness, nano scale bre diameter, porosity, light weight,
nanobres are used in wound care (Matsuda et al. 1993).
8.2 Medical textilesMedical textiles are also known as healthcare textiles and most rapidly
expanding sector in the technical textile market. The textile materials for
medical and healthcare products are ranges from simple gauze or bandage
materials to scaffolds for tissue engineering applications (Bense and
Woodhouse 1999). Advanced medical textiles are signicantly developing
area because of their major expansion in such elds like wound healing and
controlled release, bandaging and pressure garments, implantable devices as
well as medical devices, and development of new intelligent textile products(Choi et al. 1999). The basic requirements of textile material for medical
applications are biocompatible; good resistance to alkalis, acids and micro-
organisms; good dimensional stability; elasticity free from contamination or
impurities; absorption/repellency and air permeability.
These medical and healthcare textile products can be classied into
following main areas;
• barrier material (for infection control)
• bandaging and pressure garment
• wound care material
• hygiene material
• implantable material (sutures, articial joints)
• extra corporal devices (articial kidney)
Medical textiles products are mainly used for hygienic and biological
applications primarily for rst aid, clinical and rehabilitation purposes. It
consists of all those textile materials used in health and hygienic applications
in both consumer and medical markets (Matsuda et al. 1992). Today these
medical products are manufactured with new treatment options (textile- based implants instead of scarce donor organs; articial tissues, joints and
ligaments), Speed up recovery after medical treatment (innovative wound
dressings; light, breathable orthoses/protheses) to enhance quality of life of
chronically ill people (functional clothing). Surgeons wear, wound dressings,
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 412/457
400 Bioprocessing of textiles
bandages, articial ligaments, sutures, articial liver/kidney/lungs, nappies,
sanitary towels, vascular grafts/heart valves, articial joints/bones, eye contact
lenses and articial cornea and the like are some of the examples of medical
textiles (Ruizcardona et al. 1996).
8.2.1 Medical applications
The enzyme inhibition is the important application in the use of antibiotics
in medicine (Matsuda et al. 1992). There are also many necessary co-
enzymes, or co-factors for culturing the tissue and bacterial reactions with
organic non-protein molecules, which either enhance or are necessary for
the enzyme’s activity because enzymes work most effectively within narrow
ranges of temperature and pH. Deviations cause the enzyme to change
shape (denaturation) and to become less effective; it may happen if the
body overheats as a result of physical exertion or when lactic acid produced
by anaerobic respiration lower the pH of body uids (Chekmareva 2002).
Several possibilities exist for producing entirely new bre materials, so called
biopolymers, using biotechnological process routes, naturally occurring
polyester; Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) is produced by bacterial fermentation
of a sugar feed stock and commercially available as ‘Biopol’. This polymer isstable under normal conditions but biodegrades completely in any microbial
active environment. These kinds of biopolymers with textile potential include
polylactates and polycaprolactones, which are also applied in medical
applications (Zong et al. 2003).
8.2.1.1 Dressing – types and usage
A dressing is an adjunct used by a person for application to a wound to promote
healing and/or prevent further harm. A dressing is designed to be in directcontact with the wound, which makes it different from a bandage, which is
primarily used to hold a dressing in place. Dressings are frequently used in
rst aid and nursing. A dressing can have a number of purposes, depending on
the type, severity and position of the wound, although all purposes are focused
towards promoting recovery and preventing further harm from the wound.
The main purposes of a dressing are:
• Stem bleeding – helps to seal the wound to expedite the clotting
process;• Absorb exudate – soak up blood, plasma and other uids exuded from
the wound;
• Ease pain – some dressings may have a pain relieving effect, and
placebo effect;
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 413/457
Biotechnology and biomaterials for hygienic and health care textiles 401
• Debride the wound – the removal of slough and foreign objects from
the wound;
• Protection – from infection and mechanical damage; and
• Promote healing – through granulation and epithelialization.
Types of dressing: Historically, a dressing was usually a piece of material,
cloth, but the use of cobwebs, dung, leaves and honey has also been described.
However, modern dressings include gauzes (which may be impregnated with
an agent designed to help sterility or to speed healing), lms, gels, foams,
hydrocolloids, alginates, hydrogels and polysaccharide pastes, granules and
beads (Jia et al. 2002). Many gauze dressings have a layer of nonstick lm
over the absorbent gauze to prevent the wound from adhering to the dressing.Dressings can be impregnated with antiseptic chemicals, as in boracic lint
or where medicinal castor oil was used in the rst surgical dressings. The
various types of dressings can be used to accomplish different objectives
including (i) controlling the moisture content, so that the wound stays moist
or dry, (ii) protecting the wound from infection, (iii) removing slough, and (iv)
maintaining the optimum pH and temperature to encourage healing (Wang et
al. 2004).
Usage of dressings: Applying a dressing is a rst-aid skill, today almost
all come in a prepackaged sterile wrapping, date coded to ensure sterility andfulll the ‘protection from infection’ aim of a dressing. Applying and changing
dressings is one common task in nursing. An “ideal” wound dressing is one
that is sterile, breathable, and conducive for a moist healing environment.
8.2.1.2 Dressings for wound healing
An ideal dressing is one that can provide an environment at the surface of the
wound in which healing can take place at the maximum rate consistent with
the reproduction of the healing wound with an acceptable cosmetic appearance
(Thomas 1990). Modern wound dressings are developed to serve the purpose
of facilitating wound healing apart from the basic function of covering wounds
from further infection. It has been recognized that ideal dressings should have
the characteristics of (1) haemostatic, (2) efciency as bacterial barrier, (3)
absorption of excess exudates (wound uid), (4) provision and maintenance
of a moist environment, or appropriate water vapor transmission rate, and
provision of adequate gaseous exchange, (5) ability to conform to the contour
of the wound area, (6) functional adhesion, i.e. adherent to healthy tissue butnon-adherent to wound tissue, (7) painless to patient and ease of removal, and
(8) low cost. Current efforts using polymer nanobrous membranes as medical
dressings are still in its early stage. Some major factors such as an increasing
aging population with more chronic wounds and unexpected sufferings of
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 414/457
402 Bioprocessing of textiles
civilians from terrorist attacks, warfare conicts, and frequent casualties from
trafc accidents, there is an increasing demand for advanced wound care
products. Ionic silver exhibits antimicrobial activity against a broad range of
micro-organisms. As a consequence, silver is included in many commercially
available healthcare products. The use of silver is increasing rapidly in the
eld of wound care, and a wide variety of silver containing dressings are now
available in market (e.g., hydrobre dressing, polyurethane foams and gauzes).
It is proposed that hygiene should be emphasized and targeted towards those
applications that have demonstrable benets in wound care (Wang et al. 2002).
The problem of traditional wound dressings are well known that gauze adheres
tightly to wounds and leads to the occlusion and accumulation of wounddischarge under the dressing, which favors the growth of pathogenic microora
in the wound. In this regard, new technology will dramatically accelerate the
development of innovative dressing materials for wound healing.
8.3 Modern wound dressings
Modern wound dressings are signicantly differ from traditional in both
design and properties. The modern wound dressing will imply both textiles
(gauze, net, and tricot fabric) and other materials such as lms and lm-
forming compositions, sponges, hydrocolloids, gels, powders, pastes, and
combinations thereof (Nazarenko et al. 2002). Numerous publications reveal a
variety of new research direction and show that there are important advantages
and good prospects in this eld. Extensive research was stimulated by a change
in the commonly accepted notions about the optimum conditions of wound
healing. This implies that a dressing must also maintain a certain optimum
microclimate including vapor and air circulation. There is an increase in the
level of other requirements on dressings, such as efcacy of the rst aid and
post-operation repair, and the increased level of aesthetic demands. In orderto meet all these requirements, dressings must ensure good modeling of the
wound surface, be atraumatic, make possible contactless monitoring of the
wound, produce no toxic and local irritant action, admit sterilization, provide
a maximum level of comfort. The main role in performing the aforementioned
functions belongs to the polymer matrix. The large variety of wound dressings
created to the present is explained to a considerable extent by the broad
spectrum of available polymers whose physicochemical properties determine
the properties and functions of each dressing (Hansson 1997).
8.3.1 Polymeric wound dressings
The rst investigations devoted to the creation of polymeric wound dressings
are implicated the preliminary chemical modication of polymers in order to
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 415/457
Biotechnology and biomaterials for hygienic and health care textiles 403
introduce certain functional groups into macromolecules, which were used
for grafting the polymer chains. Extensive research was devoted to materials
based on the well-known natural polysaccharide – cellulose and its numerous
derivatives. An advantage of cellulose-bre-based materials is the existence
of rich sources of raw materials, the well-developed technological basis for
their processing, and a large variety of their forms, including textiles (gauze).
It is the very low cost that makes traditional cellulose-based bandages still
competitive. On the other hand, the high hygienic, sorption, and mechanical
properties of materials based on cellulose bres allow them to exist together
with the new polymeric wound dressings. Many investigations are still
devoted to the modication of traditional (e.g., gauze) dressings with theaim of eliminating the aforementioned disadvantages and imparting new
useful properties. The rich special features of the chemical structure and
supramolecular structure of biopolymers (polysaccharides, proteins) offer
broad possibilities for new solutions in the creation of wound dressings. Many
of these polymers possess high biocompatibility and intrinsic physiological
activity. This group of polymers includes alginate, which is known to stimulate
repair processes (Doyle et al. 1996).
8.3.2 Wound dressings – Antimicrobial properties
One of the main functions of wound dressings is to protect the wound from
penetration of a pathogenic microora from the environment. The traditional
cotton gauze dressing only provides a reliable initial mechanical protection,
but, absorbing the wound discharge, it becomes a medium favoring the
growth of the pathogenic microora. In order to prevent a wound from
the development of pyoinammatory complications, it is expedient to use
dressings producing a certain antimicrobial activity (Nazarenko et al. 2002;
Fedorov 2000).
8.3.3 Chitosan – Antimicrobial agent
Chitosan is a ß-1,4-linked polymer of glucosamine (2-amino-2-deoxy-ß-
D-glucose) and lesser amounts of N-acetylglucosamine. It is formed by the
deacetylation of chitin (poly-N-acetylglucosamine). Chitosan is antimicrobial
against a wide range of target organisms. Activity varies considerable with
the type of chitosan, the target organism and the environment in which itis applied (Lim and Hudson 2003). The main directions of research aimed
at the development of new wound dressings are considered using chitosan
biopolymer-based products. An important modern trend is the use of
biocompatible natural and synthetic polymers and their compositions as the
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 416/457
404 Bioprocessing of textiles
bases of wound dressings. The new products have exible design, and possess
combined properties (including antimicrobial activity), which expands their
functions and free of the disadvantages of traditional textile materials.
Important advantages of new dressings are the atraumatic character, effective
curative action, and reduced therapy time. The production of chitosan-based
wound dressings and bandages have become a rapidly developing eld of
polymer-based medical applications (Sashiwa and Aiba 2004).
8.3.3.1 Chitosan-based dressings
Chitosan biopolymer-based wound dressings can be manufactured invarious forms, including bres (Hirano et al. 1999), lms (Wang et al.
2002), asymmetric spongy membranes (Mi et al. 2001), and gels (Ishihara
et al. 2001). The mechanical properties of chitosan wound dressings can
be improved by introducing polymers of a different chemical nature. A
chitosan lm with antimicrobial properties (Kordestani 2001) may contain
up to 20% of another hydrophilic polymer (e.g., polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA),
gelatin, collagen, Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), polyethylene glycol (PEG),
and poly (methacrylic acid) (PMA)), which increases the lm strength and
improves adhesion. Wound dressings based on chitosan and sodium alginatecomplexes were obtained in the form of lms (Wang et al. 2002) and sponges
impregnated with silver sulfadiazine (Kim et al. 1999). The equilibrium
adsorption capacity of the sponge and the release of the drug component can
be controlled by varying conditions of the chitosan – alginic acid complex
formation. A combination of different chitosan-based materials was used
to obtain two-layer dressings (Loke et al. 2000; Mi et al. 2002). A special
group of wound dressings includes those based on chitin and its derivatives,
in particular, chitosan. The unique properties of chitosan as a carrier for biologically active components are related to its chemical nature, as a cationic
biodegradable polymer with intrinsic biological activity (Markin et al. 1994;
Sandford and Steinnes 1991).
8.3.3.2 Chitosan – grafting technique
Chitosan is a water-soluble biocompatible and biodegradable polymer.
Chemical modication of Chitosan is important for the production of
biofunctional materials with a wide practical application in many areas.Among various methods, graft copolymerization is most attractive because
it is a useful technique for modifying the chemical and physical properties of
natural polymers. Grafting of chitosan is a common way to improve chitosan
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 417/457
Biotechnology and biomaterials for hygienic and health care textiles 405
properties such as increasing chelating (Yang and Yuan 2001) or complexation
properties (Chen and Wang 2001), bacteriostatic effect (Jung et al. 1999)
or enhancing the adsorption properties. Several methods of grafting onto
chitosan are known, such as grafting initiated by free radicals, grafting using
radiation, enzymatic grafting (Jayakumar et al. 2005), graft copolymerization
via polycondensation, graft copolymerization via oxidative coupling, cyclic
monomer graft copolymerization (ring-opening) (Zohuriaan 2005), etc.
The enzymatic grafting is new method of preparing the chiton biomedical
wound dressings. Tatjana Romaškevič et al. (2007) have studied the grating
of chitosan based on maltogenase (MG) enzyme for preparation of biowound
products. Enzyme: Maltogenase (MG) from Bacillus Stearothermophilus (glucan
1,4-α-maltohydrolase, E.C.3.2.1.133) recombinant exo-acting maltogenic
amylase, removes maltose units (through 1,4-α-D-glucosidic linkages) from
the non-reducing chain ends in malt oligosaccharides and polysaccharides,
such as amylase and amylopectin.
Immobilization of maltogenase via covalent binding: The immobilization
of MG was carried out in 0.1 M citrate buffer (pH 6.5). The mixture of 0.25
cm3 (500 IU) of MG, 5 ml of buffer and 3.5 g of wet carrier activated with GA
Chs-g-PEGMEMA (immediately after the synthesis) was stirred at 40°C for 30min and was left overnight at 4°C. The immobilized enzyme was thoroughly
washed with buffer. The efciency of immobilization was dened as the activity
of the immobilized MG in percent values from the activity of the native enzyme
used for the immobilization (Tatjana Romaškevič et al. 2007). The yield of
immobilization was dened as the protein quantity of the immobilized enzyme
in percent values from the quantity of the protein of the native enzyme used
for the immobilization. Figure 8.1 shows the Immobilization of enzyme via
covalent binding onto chitosan graft copolymers.
Fig. 8.1 Immobilization of enzyme via covalent binding onto Chitosan graft copolymers
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 418/457
406 Bioprocessing of textiles
8.3.4 Alginate and collagen wound dressing
Alginate is capable of forming high viscosity gels whose degree ofstructurization can be controlled by introducing cations (calcium group).
This principle was used for the creation of numerous wound dressings in the
form of sponges and bres (Suzuki et al. 1999; Thomas et al. 2000). In order
to increase the elasticity of alginate-based wound dressings, it is possible to
introduce poly (ethylene oxide). Alginate drapes are recommended for use
in surgery as a hemostatic dressing material. The group of natural polymers,
which are rather frequently used as bases or components of wound dressings,
also includes collagen (Tomihata et al. 1994). The main difculty that hinders
a still wider use of natural collagen is its very low solubility in typical protein
solvents. In most cases, the collagen-based wound dressings have the form of
sponges, which are obtained by lyophilic drying of various collagen containing
compositions (Grzybowski et al. 1997).
8.3.5 Biologically active PVA-based gel dressing
The biologically active PVA-based gel dressing employs a polymer-based
matrix containing a bound antibiotic which is activated only in the case ofwound infection. Proteinases present in exudating wounds hydrolyze the
bonds between the antibiotic and PVA only in the presence of Staphylococcus
aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, after which gentamicin is released into
the wound medium. The kinetics of release of various substances (hydrophilic,
hydrophobic, proteins) from a hydrogel based on human serum albumin and
poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG) was studied (Gayet and Fortier 1996). The
use of biodegradable polymers is another direction in the creation of wound
dressings (Kobayashi et al. 1991).
8.3.6 Polymer nanobres – Biomedical and
biotechnological applications
Research in polymer nanobres has been undergone signicant progress in
the last one decade. One of the main driving forces for this progress is the
increasing use of these polymer nanobres for biomedical and biotechnological
applications (Yanzhong et al. 2005). The latest research and advancement made
in the use of polymer nanobres are focused on the applications such as tissue
engineering, controlled drug release, wound dressings, medical implants, and
nanocomposites for dental restoration, molecular separation, biosensors and
preservation of bioactive agents. Within the association of nanotechnology
and nanostructured materials, a nanobre generally refers to a bre having a
diameter less than 100 nm (Grafe and Graham 2003). Several techniques such
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 419/457
Biotechnology and biomaterials for hygienic and health care textiles 407
as electrospinning (Reneker and Chun 1996; Huang et al. 2003), melt-blown
(Ward 2001; Gu et al. 2003), phase separation (Ma and Zhang 1999; Yang et
al. 2004), self-assembly (Hartgerink et al. 2001; Cheng 2003), and template
synthesis (Martin 1996; Feng et al. 2002) have been employed to produce
suitable polymer nanobres for different purposes. Amongst, electrospinning
is the most popular and preferred technique to use. It is simple, cost-effective
and able to produce continuous nanobres of various materials from polymers
to ceramics. In addition, electrospinning seems to be the only method which
can be further developed for large scale production of continuous nanobres
for industrial applications.
Polymer nanobre structures usually provide superior hydrophobic property because an effective contact angle increases with decrease in bre
diameter. The use of polymer nanobres for biomedical and biotechnological
applications has some intrinsic advantages. From a biological point of view,
a great variety of natural biomaterials are deposited in brous forms or
structures such as silk, keratin, collagen, viral spike proteins, polysaccharide
cellulose and chitin. The recent uses of polymer nanobres for biomedical
and biotechnological applications (Fig. 8.2) which include tissue engineering,
controlled drug release, dressings for wound healing, medical implants,
nanocomposites for dental applications, molecular separation, biosensors and preservation of bioactive agents (Risbud et al. 2002).
Fig. 8.2 Polymer nanobres in biomedical and biotechnological applications
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 420/457
408 Bioprocessing of textiles
8.3.6.1 Scaffolds for tissue engineering
Recently, poly (L-lactic acid) (PLLA) polymer nanobres were used asa scaffold onto which nerve stem cells (NSCs) were cultured (Yang et al.
2004). The nanobres were produced following a liquid-liquid phase
separation method (Ma and Zhang 1999). Biodegradable scaffold is generally
recognized as an indispensable element in engineering living tissues. They
are used as temporary templates for cell seeding, invasion, proliferation and
differentiation prior to the regeneration of biologically functional tissue or
natural extracellular matrix (ECM) (Stephens et al. 2003; Fertala et al. 2001).
A pioneer work employing a composite nanobrous scaffold for therapeutic
application in gene delivery was recently reported by Luu et al. (2003).
Scaffold was electro spun by incorporating plasmid DNA into synthetic
biodegradable polymers of PLGA and PLA-PEG. The DNA released from
the scaffold was not only intact, but also capable of cellular transfection, and
had even successfully encoded a protein β-galactosidase. The architecture of
a scaffold and the material used play an important role in modulating tissue
growth and response behavior of the cells which have been cultured onto the
scaffold. Polymer nanobres have been considered for use as scaffolds for
engineering tissues such as cartilages (Fertala et al. 2001; Li et al. 2002), bones(Yoshimoto et al. 2003), arterial blood vessels (Huang et al. 2000; Nagapudi
et al. 2002; Xu et al. 2004), heart (Zong et al. 2003), nerves (Silva et al. 2004),
etc. Biodegradable polymer nanobres of PLA, PLGA, and PEG-PLA were
attempted for use in heart or cardiac tissue constructs (Zong et al. 2003).
8.4 Enzymes in medical applications
Developments of medical applications using enzymes have been reecting
the magnitude of the potential rewards for example; pancreatic enzymeshave been in use since the nineteenth century for the treatment of digestive
disorders. As enzymes are specic biological catalysts, they should make the
most desirable therapeutic agents for the treatment of metabolic diseases.
The variety of enzymes and their potential therapeutic applications are
considerable. Table 8.1 shows the selection of enzymes which have realised
this potential to become important therapeutic agents. At present, the most
successful applications are extracellular: purely topical uses, the removal
of toxic substances and treatment of life-threatening disorders within blood
circulation. In contrast to the industrial use of enzymes, therapeutically useful
enzymes are required in relatively tiny amounts but at a very high degree of
purity and specicity. A major potential therapeutic application of enzymes
is in the treatment of cancer (Buchko et al. 2001). Asparaginase enzyme has
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 421/457
Biotechnology and biomaterials for hygienic and health care textiles 409
proved to be particularly promising for the treatment of acute lymphocytic
leukaemia. This enzyme action depends upon the fact that tumour cells are
decient in aspartate ammonia lipase activity, which restricts their ability to
synthesis the normally non-essential amino acid L-asparagine. The action of
the asparaginase does not affect the functioning of normal cells which are
able to synthesis enough for their requirements, but reduce the free exogenous
concentration and so induces a state of fatal starvation in the susceptible
tumour cells.
Table 8.1 Therapeutic enzymes in medical applications
Enzyme EC number Reaction UseUricase 1.7.3.3 Urate + O
2 → Allantoin Gout
Rhodanase 2.8.1.1 S2O
32– + CN – → SO
32– + SCN –
Cyanide
poisoning
Ribonuclease 3.1.26.4 RNA hydrolysis Antiviral
Hyaluronidase 3.2.1.35 Hyaluronate hydrolysis Heart attack
Lysozyme 3.2.1.17 Bacterial cell wall hydrolysis Antibiotic
Collagenase 3.4.24.3 Collagen hydrolysis Skin ulcers
Asparaginase 3.5.1.1L-Asparagine H
2
O→ L-aspartate +
NH3 Leukaemia
Glutaminase 3.5.1.2L-Glutamine H
2O→ L-glutamate +
NH3
Leukaemia
Lactamase 3.5.2.6 Penicillin→ PenicilloatePenicillin
allergy
Streptokinase 3.4.22.10 Plasminogen→ Plasmin Blood clots
Trypsin 3.4.21.4 Protein hydrolysis Inammation
Urokinase 3.4.21.31 Plasminogen→ Plasmin Blood clots
8.4.1 Enzymes in medicine
Enzymes are produced by living cells they are substances that act as a catalyst
in living organisms. All enzymes are proteins and therefore have a tertiary
structure. Each enzyme is a specic shape with an active site which is specic
to one substrate molecule. When the substrate combines with the active site
enzyme substrate complexes are formed. The uses of important enzymes in
medicine include (i) killing disease causing micro organisms, (ii) prompting
wound healing, and (iii) diagnosing certain diseases. Enzymes are beingused heavily in medicine as direct pharmaceutical products. The medical and
pharmaceutical application of enzymes covers such a wide range of ideas.
In contrast to industrial uses where production is on a much larger scale,
uses of medical and pharmaceutical enzyme applications generally require
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 422/457
410 Bioprocessing of textiles
small quantities of highly puried enzymes. Enzymes and enzyme-generated
products are administered to patients in very small doses; to avoid possible
side effects.
Enzymes are being used to detect and measure amounts of glucose in
blood. The amount of glucose in the blood and urine is a crucial indicator
in the diagnosis of diabetes; when there is a deciency of insulin resulting
in high glucose levels in the blood. It is detected using the enzyme glucose
oxidase which is impregnated onto a strip of paper, and a biosensor. This
instrument uses glucose oxidase as its biological system (Gekas and Lopez
1985). The enzyme may catalyse the reaction between glucose and oxygen
to form gluconic acid. The biosensor then uses the amount of gluconic acid produced to indicate the quantity of glucose and oxygen there was in the blood
this is indicated by a colour change. Enzymes are very important when coming
to diagnose disease particularly in the case of a damaged liver. Enzymes that
would be normally found in the liver, leak into the blood stream. By testing
the blood for alternate enzyme activity, liver damage can be conrmed.
Enzymes are vitally important in preventing excessive blood clotting
and reducing the tendency for platelets and red blood cells to ‘clog’, because
enzymes are playing a part in removing metabolic waste and improving
circulation of proteases. For example, Trypsin and chymotrypsin can be usedin brinolysis, this a process that dissolves blood clots. One use is in the case
of thrombosis, this is when blot clots form in damaged blood vessels, if these
clots are carried to an small artery and may become blocked a heart attack
stroke can be caused. This can be treated by enzymes such as trypsin and
protease. Digestion of the insoluble brin clot takes place and because the
enzymes are proteins this results in a conversion to minor acids, consequently
freeing the trapped blood cells and eliminating the clot. This process is called
‘brinolysis’. Opposite to the prevention of clotting; the enzyme protease can be used as a debriding agent they are used to clean the wound and accelerate
the healing process. Enzymes can also be used in drug manufacture where
the synthesis of drugs is difcult therefore enzymes are used to perform the
chemical procedure. Enzymes can also be used to aid digestion where they
are used to supplement amylase, lipase and protease produced mainly by the
pancreas. (Ref. www.enzymes.co.uk/ enzyme technology, date 3.4.2013)
The main enzyme application in medicine is the production of antibiotics
in particular penicillin. The major pharmaceutical; products produced using
enzyme technology are the antibiotic, semi-synthetic penicillin’s. Antibioticsare chemical substances produced by micro organisms which are effective in
dilute solution in preventing the spread of other micro organisms (Khil et al.
2003). Most inhibit growth rather than kill the micro organism on which they
act. One of the best known antibiotics is penicillin – discovered by Alexander
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 423/457
Biotechnology and biomaterials for hygienic and health care textiles 411
Fleming in 1928. It was found that it acts on growing bacteria, killing them
and preventing their growth. It is believed to compete with paraaminobenzoic
acid for the active site of an enzyme. In this way they do not kill the acteria but
simply stop them from reproducing. New developed drugs should therefore
be used with much more restraint and discrimination and more time should be
used searching for natural antibiotics to the development of new strains using
genetic engineering.
8.4.2 Benets of enzymes for health care
The human body is constituted by trillion cells and function upon thousands of
metabolic enzymes as energy factor and to carry out numberless biochemical
processes. Metabolic enzymes act as the workhorses of the body because
they also regulate and control each and every process that keeps the body
functioning harmoniously. Mixtures of enzymes had a positive effect in
reducing swelling and inammation, enhancing immune function, improving
circulation, reducing pain, strengthening connective tissue, and speeding
recovery from traumatic injury.
8.4.2.1 Proteases
Proteases are a very extensive family of enzymes. There is potential for
several of these agents to be used in the treatment of wounds. Only two of
them, papain and collagenase, have had a substantial and continuous role for
this indication. Briey, a more accepted term for proteases is peptidases, and
the whole group of enzymes can be subdivided into exopeptidases, which
remove amino acids from the ends (either the N- or C-terminus) of proteins,
and endopeptidases (or proteinases), which cleave bonds within protein.
8.4.2.2 Proteolytic enzymes
In recent years, certain proteolytic enzymes such as serratopeptase and
nattokinase have been employed for their brinolysis properties because these
enzymes possess the ability to emulsify and digest arterial plaque. Proteolytic
enzymes act as a natural anti-inammatory and have also demonstrated the
ability to break down plasma proteins and cellular debris into smaller fragments
at the site of an injury helping their dispersal through the lymphatic system.
This is turn relieves swelling and pain. The healing properties have been
found to be excellent therapeutic agents for minor musculoskeletal injuries
and for accelerating recovery in sports injuries, surgery and burns. Proteolytic
enzymes are useful in the ght against bacterial and fungal infections. When
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 424/457
412 Bioprocessing of textiles
it comes to ghting viruses – enzymes attack and dissolve the isoprin bonds
– the exterior protein shell coating of the virus, rendering it useless. Enzymes
are to modulate immune function by enhancing the production of cytokines,
increasing the phagocytic activity of macrophages and facilitating the break-
up of circulating immune complexes which are the major causes of auto-
immune diseases such as arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis.
8.4.2.3 Serine proteinases
The serine proteinases are well known members in chymotrypsin, trypsin,
plasmin, plasminogen activators, and leukocyte elastases. In general, serine
proteinases are potential enzymes with a broad range of catalytic activity
and are readily available in tissues (Theron et al. 2001). The second group
of proteinases is the cysteine proteinases, and certainly papain is the better
known member of this group and the best studied. The aspartic proteinases
have a number of well-known enzymes, such a rennin and pepsin. The
metalloproteinases (MMPs) are well known in the eld of wound healing
because of their properties of being able to cleave collagens and other
extracellular matrix components.
Many of these peptidases require zinc or calcium cations (or both) fortheir activity and considerable overlap in substrate specicity among the
MMPs. Removal of the necrotic tissue is essential to reduce the bacterial
burden, which in turn decreases the amount of exudate produced. In response
to wounding, keratinocytes migrate from the edge of the wound and assume
a collagenolytic phenotype. Indeed, it has been shown that collagenase
expression is rapidly induced in wound-edge keratinocytes, persists during
healing, and stops at reepithelialization. Moreover, the activity of collagenase
is required for keratinocyte migration on a type I collagen matrix.
A human burn wound indicates that both collagenase and its inhibitor,
tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases, are articulated during wound repair. The
relationships between proteinase activity and keratinocyte migration appear
to be very tightly regulated, and it is clear that the type of proteinase expressed
is critical. For example, in experimental studies using injured cornea, it was
shown that failure to reepithelialize correlated with the amount of gelatinases,
but not with the increase in collagenase and stromelysin (Min et al. 2004).
The concept of proteolytic enzymes to digest necrotic tissue as an adjunct
in the treatment of complex wounds is probably stems from observing theageless healing techniques of natives in tropical countries. For example,
wound debridements seem to have utilized the papain-rich material obtained
by scratching the skin of the green fruit of the papaw tree (Carica papaya)
and been used for the treatment of several skin conditions. Trypsin directly
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 425/457
Biotechnology and biomaterials for hygienic and health care textiles 413
hydrolyzes a large number of naturally occurring proteins (Layman et al. 2003).
Chymotrypsin acts upon different bonds in proteins than does trypsin, but its
spectrum of activity is similar. Trypsin and chymotrypsin preparations were
prepared from pancreatic sources (usually beef) but are no longer available for
the treatment of wounds. Papain–urea-based combinations and collagenase
are identied in prominent in terms of their use in chronic wounds.
8.4.2.4 Papain–urea-based combinations
A well-known and widely used enzymatic system is the papain–urea
combination. In this system, papain is used to attack and break down any
protein containing cysteine residues. This property of papain renders the
combination quite nonselective because most proteins, including growth
factors, contain cysteine residues. Collagen contains no cysteine residues
and is thus unaffected by papain. However, urea’s role in this enzymatic
combination is to facilitate the proteolytic action of papain by altering the
three-dimensional structure of proteins and disrupting their hydrogen bonds,
as well as exposing by solvent action of papain. Urea also plays a role in the
reduction of disulde bridges; as the disulde bridges are reduced, cysteine
residues become exposed and are, therefore, more susceptible to the action of papain. It should be noted that the combination of papain and urea is probably
twice as effective in protein digestion as papain alone.
8.4.2.5 Collagenase preparations
Collagenase is another well known and established enzyme preparation used
for debridement. Its development as a debriding agent applications came
to a peak in the early 1970s. The commercially available preparation of
collagenase is derived from bacteria (Clostridium histolyticum). Collagenaseis a water-soluble proteinase that specically attacks and breaks down
collagen. Collagenase is reported to be most effective in a pH range of 6 to
8, It can hydrolyze native collagen and thereby facilitate rapid debridement
and healing of chronic wounds. The mechanism of action of collagenase is
to degrade collagen and convert it to gelatin. An interesting observation is
that the collagenase preparation may be selective for nonviable collagen.
This effect needs to be studied further, but it is thought that viable collagen is
surrounded and protected by mucopolysaccharide sheaths.Collagenase has been found to be remarkably gentle on viable cells.
For example, cell suspensions prepared with collagenase, then stored at low
temperature, were found equal to trypsinized cells in their viability and growth.
Similarly, collagenase can be used as a permanent ingredient of culture media
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 426/457
414 Bioprocessing of textiles
without loss of cell viability. In more recent work, the addition of collagenase
derived from Clostridium histolyticum to keratinocyte cultures enhanced their
proliferation and migration up to 10-fold. Some potentially underestimated
effects of collagenase, such as angiogenesis and epithelialization; wound
debridement is being accomplished by this enzyme. As is the case with the
papain-based debriding systems, there is considerable published information
detailing the effectiveness of collagenase for wound debridement for all types
of wounds.
8.4.2.6 Enzyme reaction on wound healing
In some cases, chemically modied cellulose acquires intrinsic physiological
activity that imparts to cellulose dressings curative properties even without
the introduction of drugs. An interesting example is viscose bres partly
hydrolyzed by the enzyme cellulase (Tereschenko and Shamolia 1998;
Gusakov et al. 1985). The ability of partly hydrolyzed viscose to absorb
staphylococci, which is 90% higher as compared to the initial bres, decreases
the degree of wound contamination by these microbes. Another cellulose
derivative — carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) containing acid functional
groups which is capable of binding peptides in the wound medium, thusinhibiting the activity of some enzymes such as elastase (Edwards et al. 1999).
Mono-CMC gauze is widely used as a hemostatic dressing. At the same
time, the aforementioned cellulose derivatives are potential matrices for the
physical or chemical immobilization of biologically active substances. In this
respect, an interesting alternative approach is offered by the introduction of
biologically active substances into soluble polymer compositions, followed by
the formation of wound dressings of the desired shape. By selecting polymers
with various ctional groups, it is possible to inuence the character of
interactions between components of the system, thus controlling the kinetics
of desorption of the biologically active substances and the physicochemical
properties of wound dressings (Bisaria and Ghose 1981).
The biological activity of a PVA-based lm containing chlorhexidine
bigluconate and lysozyme was practically completely retained upon radiation
sterilization and subsequent long-term storage. An analysis of the literature
shows evidence of the extensive search for new “ideal dressings” for the
treatment of various wounds. Characteristic trends in the modern stage of
this research are the rejection of traditional textile bases and expansion of thecircle of novel base materials, which provides for the development of dressing
with improved properties and increased functions.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 427/457
Biotechnology and biomaterials for hygienic and health care textiles 415
8.4.3 Enzymatic pre-treatment eliminates infectious
bacteriaHospital acquired infections are signicantly a growing problem in the medical
eld. Hospital-acquired infections are one of the leading causes of mortality
and increased morbidity in inpatients and place a heavy burden on the health
system (Percival et al. 2005). Between 3 and 10% of inpatients acquire
an infection during their hospital stay. The mortality rate for nosocomial
infections is 1%, and they contribute to 3% of mortality from other diseases.
As for medical costs, it has been estimated that infections of this type lengthen
hospital stays by between ve and ten days, a statistic that underscores the
economic impact of the problem. Nosocomial infections of endogenous origin
occur mainly as a result of contact with hospital gowns and sheets.
In fact, any type of linen used in a hospital setting can harbour bacteria and
spread infection to patients and medical staff. To address the above problems,
Researchers in the Molecular and Industrial Biotechnology Group of the
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya BarcelonaTech (UPC), in Barcelona,
Spain (2012), have improved the antimicrobial properties of medical textiles
using an enzymatic pre-treatment combined with simultaneous deposition of
nanoparticles and biopolymers under ultrasonic irradiation (Ilana Perelshtein etal. 2012). The technique can be used to create completely sterile antimicrobial
textiles that can help prevent hospital-acquired infections. The research goal is
to improve the antimicrobial properties of medical textiles by using ultrasonic
irradiation to deposit zinc oxide nanoparticles and biopolymers on the materials.
By applying these enzymes, the researchers have been reported that increased the
durability of the nanoparticles on the fabric remain present even after 70 laundry
cycles. The effectiveness of the antimicrobial treatment has been boosted by
incorporating hybrid materials that combine organic and inorganic components
(zinc and chitosan nanoparticles) within the fabric. In addition to eliminating any
bacteria present, these materials prevent the growth of new microbes.
8.4.4 Biotechnological applications
8.4.4.1 Molecular separation
Polymer nanobres have been used as industrial lters, recognizing their
high ltration efciency, and also potential for protective clothing against
biochemical attacks (Grafe and Graham 2003; Graham et al. 2002). Likewise,
electrospun polymer nanobres with functionalized surface can be extended for
use for high efcient biomolecular or protein separation. The high surface area
to weight ratio makes nanobres an ideal substrate for molecular separation.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 428/457
416 Bioprocessing of textiles
The principle of separation is similar to that of afnity chromatography. This
involves utilizing a specic interaction between one kind of solute molecule and
a second molecule or functional group that is immobilized on the nanobrous
membrane (stationary phase). For example, the immobilized molecule may
be an antibody to some specic protein. When the solute containing a mixture
of proteins is passed by the antibody, only the specic protein is reacted and
is bound to the stationary phase (Loscertales et al. 2002; Wnek et al. 2003).
To fulll this molecular separation, proper surface functionalisation of the
nanobrous membrane is important. Structural and material properties of the
nanobrous membranes are also important so that the membranes can withstand
the imposed forces acting on them during the ltration process. At present, polymer nanobrous membrane for molecular separation is still a concept that
needs to be realized (Flemming et al. 1999; Neimark et al. 2003).
8.4.4.2 Biosensor
Biosensors are typically consisting of biofunctional membrane and transducer
(Fig. 8.3), which is widely used for environmental and clinical purposes. The
performance of a biosensor is accessed generally include sensitivity, selectivity,
response time, reproducibility, and aging, all of which are dependent directlyon the property of the sensing membrane used. Among these, sensitivity is
particularly important because there is a strong need for detection of gases and
biological substances at low concentration. Improve the sensitivity will require
using sensor lms with larger surface area to unit mass ratio (Xu et al. 1990).
This provides an opportunity for polymer nanobres to be used as biosensors.
Fig. 8.3 Principle of biosensor
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 429/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 430/457
418 Bioprocessing of textiles
• Some plastics are now referred to as being ‘degradable’, ‘oxy-
degradable’ or ‘UV-degradable’. This means that they break down
when exposed to light or air, but these plastics are still primarily (as
much as 98 per cent) oil based.
• Biopolymers (also called renewable polymers) are produced from
biomass for use in the packaging industry.
• Biomass comes from crops such as sugar beet, potatoes or wheat:
when used to produce biopolymers, these are classied as non food
crops. These can be converted in the following pathways:
Sugar beet > Glyconic acid > Polyglonic acid
Starch > (fermentation) > Lactic acid > Polylactic acid (PLA) Biomass > (fermentation) > Bioethanol > Ethene > Polyethylene
8.5.1 Polylactic acid (PLA)
Poly (lactic acid) or polylactide (PLA) is thermoplastic aliphatic polyester
commonly made from a-hydroxy acids, derived from renewable resources,
such as
• corn starch (in the United States),
• tapioca products (roots, chips or starch mostly in Asia) or• sugarcanes (in the rest of world).
It can biodegrade under certain conditions, such as the presence of
oxygen, and is difcult to recycle.
PLA is not a polyacid (polyelectrolyte) but rather polyester. Bacterial
fermentation is used to produce lactic acid from corn starch or cane sugar.
Two lactic acid molecules undergo a single esterication and then catalytically
cyclized to make a cyclic lactide ester (Fig. 8.5). PLA of high molecular weight
is produced from the dilactate ester by ring-opening polymerization (Tucci et
al. 2001). Polymerization of a racemic mixture of L- and D-lactides usually
leads to the synthesis of poly-DL-lactide (PDLLA) which is amorphous. Table
8.2 shows the properties of polylactic acid, polycaprolactone and nylon 11.
Fig. 8.5 Catalytic and thermolytic ring-opening polymerization of
lactide (left) to polylactide (right)
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 431/457
Biotechnology and biomaterials for hygienic and health care textiles 419
Table 8.2 General properties of polylactic acid, polycaprolactone and nylon 11
Polymer properties Nylon 11 Polycaprolactone(PCL) PolylacticAcid (PLA)
Density (lb/in3) 0.0361–0.0379 0.0401–0.0434 0.0448–0.0459
Tensile modulus (psi) 8,100 30,000–50,000 5,00,000
Ultimate tensile elongation 20% 300–500% 2.50%
Hardness (Shore’D’) – 80 50
Dielectric strength (V/mil) 650–749 412–429 305–406
Heat capacity (BTU/lb*F) 0.405–0.421 0.468–0.478 0.282–0.289
Coefcient of Friction 0.15–0.25 – 0.16–0.32
Crystallinity – 67% 0–1%
Melt temperature (°F) 347–376 136–145 306
Degradation temperature
(°F)
608 247 518
Glass transition temperature
(°F)
108 –140 140
Viscosity (psi-s) 0.0187–0.0275 – 0.0177–0.0256
Biodegradability
PLA is considered both as biodegradable (e.g., adapted for short-term
packaging) and as biocompatible in contact with living tissues (e.g., for
biomedical applications such as implants, sutures, drug encapsulation, etc.)
(Kenawy et al. 2003). PLA can be degraded by biotic degradation (i.e., simple
hydrolysis of the ester bond without requiring the presence of enzymes to
catalyze it). During the biodegradation process, and only in a second step,
the enzymes degrade the residual oligomers till nal mineralization (biotic
degradation). As long as the basic monomers (lactic acid) are produced from
renewable resources (carbohydrates) by fermentation, PLA complies with the
rising worldwide concept of sustainable development and is classied as an
environmentally friendly material (Choi et al. 1999; Desai 2000).
Applications
PLA is currently used in a number of biomedical applications, such as sutures,
stents, dialysis media and drug delivery devices (Zeng et al. 2003). The total
degradation time of PLA is a few years. It is also being evaluated as a material
for tissue engineering. PLA is a sustainable alternative to petrochemical-derived products, since the lactides from which it is ultimately produced can
be derived from the fermentation of agricultural by-products such as corn
starch or other carbohydrate-rich substances like maize, sugar or wheat. PLA
can be an alternative to high-impact polystyrene by using as much as 1 wt%
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 432/457
420 Bioprocessing of textiles
non-PLA due to creating co-polymers which can strengthen PLA plastic
(Draye et al. 1998).
8.5.2 Biopolymer stimuli-responsive polymeric system
for textiles
Textile material is considered as unique in nature properties compare among
various kinds of products (Mather 2001). Textile material for clothing is
an example of a material which is personal, comfortable, and used almost
anywhere and anytime. Clothing is considered as an extension to body
physiological characteristics and is very close to the body skin (protection, breathability, sensing). “Smart” textiles are expected to act both as sensors
and actuators, so they should not be confused with other existing high-
performance or multifunctional textiles that are in fact “passive” materials
with advanced properties. In recent studies, an increasing amount of research
is being done on functional nishing of textile materials by incorporating
stimuli-responsive polymeric systems (Liu and Hu 2005; Jocic 2008). Through
this approach, the new value-added textile material can be created containing
bres that maintains advantageous conventional properties (e.g., mechanical
strength, exibility and wear comfort) but with advanced functionalities and/or environmental responsiveness implemented by the modication of a very
thin surface layer of the material.
Currently, the most encouraging option for producing efcient surface
modifying systems comprises the use of hydrogels. This polymeric form
exhibits specic volume phase transition (swelling and shrinking) properties
which can be triggered by various stimuli (temperature, pH, humidity,
etc.) (Fig. 8.6). Hydrogels responsive to temperature and pH have been the
most widely studied systems since these two factors have a physiologicalsignicance (Qu et al. 2001). Versatile dual responsive hydrogels have been
reported mainly for biomedical applications and a number of reviews coming
up in this area in recent times address the latest developments. However,
due to the need for biocompatibility and biodegradability, biopolymer -based
hydrogels are currently of great interest. Such hydrogels can be prepared
by combining a thermo responsive synthetic polymer with a natural based
pH-responsive polymeric component, resulting in dual responsive hydrogel
systems (Prabaharan and Mano 2006). Among the wide choice of natural
polymers, biopolymer chitosan is a good option for combining with syntheticstimuli-responsive polymers. Chitosan is a typical pH-sensitive polymer
which responds to the changes in the pH of the surrounding medium by
protonation/ deprotonation that imparts charges on its amino groups. The pH-
induced phase transition will result in varying dimensions of the hydrogel
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 433/457
Biotechnology and biomaterials for hygienic and health care textiles 421
(swelling and deswelling). Furthermore, the interesting intrinsic properties of
chitosan are its biodegradability, antibacterial activity and biocompatibility
(Qu et al. 1999).
Fig. 8.6 Different forms of stimuli-responsive polymers and their macroscopic
response [Source: Dragan Jocić 2008]
Microgel is a dispersion of cross linked hydrogel particles whichare swollen by a good solvent. It may also be dened as a disperse phase
of discrete polymeric gel particles with sizes ranging between 1 nm and 1
μm. Microgel particles are insoluble and do not form solutions like linear or
branched polymers, but they may be considered to form colloidal dispersions.
The preparation of microgel can be achieved by different methods such
as: emulsion polymerization; anionic copolymerization; cross linking of
neighbouring polymeric chains; inverse micro-emulsion polymerization or
surfactant-free dispersion polymerization (SFDP). Emulsion polymerization
is a versatile technique which yields narrow particle size distributions.
Conventional emulsion polymerization enables preparation of very small
microgel particles (i.e. particle diameters less than 150 nm) and suffers
from the difculty of completely removing the residual surfactant used for
emulsion stabilization. Surfactant-free dispersion polymerization (SFDP)
yields microgel particles with diameter range between 100 and 1000 nm, and
this method does not suffer from residual surfactant contamination.
Among synthetic polymers, poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) (poly-
NiPAAm) is the most intensively investigated thermo responsive polymerwhich exhibits a volume phase transition (i.e. hydration–dehydration change
due to side-chain re-conguration) in response to even slight temperature
changes. The microgel of poly-NiPAAm and chitosan (PNCS) was prepared
by the surfactant-free dispersion copolymerization method (Lee et al. 2001;
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 434/457
422 Bioprocessing of textiles
2002). Three kinds of reactions occur in the reaction system of dispersion
copolymerization. In addition, Liu et al. (2005) stated that in the chemical
structure of the grafting copolymers poly-NiPAAm was attached to the C6-
OH reactive group of chitosan and to amino group. In summary, the covalent
bonding between chitosan and poly-NiPAAm can be created from different
chitosan functional groups: the terminal carbonyl groups of its backbone,
its amino groups or its C6-OH reactive groups (Alvarez et al. 2005). The
possibility of anionic persulfate (from the initiator) immobilization inside
degraded chitosan chains through electrostatic attraction has been also
mentioned (Chen et al. 2005). Hence, chitosan plays multiple roles in the
reaction system: in one way it can increase the polymerization rate by servingas a surfactant; on the other hand, the degraded chitosan chain can inhibit free
radicals and slow down the polymerization (Kim et al. 2000).
However, current environmental and human health concerns increasingly
focus on polymers derived from biological precursors or produced by modern
biotechnology, which are also called “biopolymers” (Van Schijndel et al.
1998). Among the different types of biopolymers, polysaccharides are the
second most diverse and complex groups of biopolymers (after proteins).
Since chitosan has a highly reactive primary amino group and also
primary and secondary hydroxyl groups, a high functionality of chitosan can be achieved by simply introducing a specic functional group to the chitosan
structure. Since chitosan has excellent hydrogel forming properties, another
approach is to control the micro- and macrostructure of the chitosan gel itself
without any chemical modication. The structure and properties of chitosan
gels may be varied by the appropriate choice of the preparation method used
(Igarashi et al. 2002), and by blending two or more polymers to obtain the
desired properties.
8.5.3 Chitosan hydrogels
In designing “smart” textile materials, the application of chitosan-based, pH-
sensitive, temperature-sensitive and temperature/pH dual-sensitive hydrogels
is of special interest. In addition to chitosan, other biopolymers or synthetic
polymers are also used as components to produce effective “smart” hydrogels.
Hydrogels are dened as water-swollen three-dimensional networks based on
hydrophilic polymer chains, in which retained water constitutes at least 20%
of weight. They are capable of absorbing a large volume of water or other biological uids (Peppas 1986). Hydrogels swell and shrink in the presence
or absence of water.
Nowadays, considerable efforts have been made to synthesize hydrogels
based on chemical modication of natural polymers in order to use them as
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 435/457
Biotechnology and biomaterials for hygienic and health care textiles 423
thickeners in food, moisture releasers to plants, uid uptake and retention
in the sanitary area, hydrophilic coatings for textile applications, contact
lenses, and drug-delivery matrices for pharmaceutical applications (Yazdani
et al. 2003). Chitosan hydrogels can be obtained by various mechanisms of
chemical and physical cross linking such as covalent, ionic, hydrogen bonding
and hydrophobic association. Covalently cross-linked chitosan hydrogels are
chemical hydrogels that are formed by irreversible covalent links. Chitosan
hydrogels formed by reversible links (ionic interactions or secondary
interactions) are physical hydrogels. Stable hydrogels can be formed by the
addition of cross linkers (covalently or ionically cross linked hydrogels) or
the direct interaction between polymeric chains without the addition of crosslinkers (complexation with another polymer or aggregation after chitosan
grafting) (Berger et al. 2004). The absorbing capacity of chitosan gels is
highly improved by the presence of synthetic polymers such as polyacrylate.
The gels obtained by self-curing chitosan with acrylic acid (AA) and methyl
acrylate (MA) absorb up to 500 times their dry weight and therefore they can
be classied as super-absorbents (Borzacchiello et al. 2001).
The ability of polymer hydrogels to undergo a volume transition between
swollen and collapsed phases as a function of their environment is one of the
most remarkable and universal properties of these materials. The phenomenonof gel volume transitions, which can be induced by temperature, pH, solvent
composition, ionic strength, electric eld, light, stress or the presence of
specic chemical stimuli, is reversible and has prompted researchers to
explore the potential of gels as actuators, sensors, controllable membranes for
separations and modulators for the delivery of drugs (Goycoolea et al. 2003).
8.5.4 Bioplastics
Conventional plastic derived from petrochemical source takes a long time
to biodegrade when dispersed. Rising concern about shortage of fossil fuel
and long term environmental impact resulted biotechnology research to
develop eco-friendly alternatives (Mo et al. 2004). Bioplastics are produced
by using ‘biopolymers’ which can be produced as secondary metabolites
through fermentation or modication of polymers from renewable sources.
Actively involved in understanding the nature of biological polymers that can
ll up following strategies: (i) Screening and modication of microorganisms
for efcient production of lactic acid through fermentation path and efcientconversion to polylactic acid; (ii) hyper expression and protein engineering
of polyester synthase for production of medical grade nano-material; and
(iii) bio-polylactic acid and plastoGAL series of triglycerides derived from
vegetable source for use in bioplastics industry (Khan et al. 2003).
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 436/457
424 Bioprocessing of textiles
8.5.5 Bioplastics from microorganisms
Bioplastics are degradable polymers that are naturally degraded by the actionof microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi and algae, such as made from
• Polyhydroxy alkanoates (PHAs): PHB
• Polyactides
• Aliphatic polyesters
• Polysaccharides
• Blends of above
Benets of these bioplastics are 100 % biodegradable, produced from
natural, renewable resources, recycled, composted or burned without
producing toxic byproducts.
8.5.6 Bio-pharmaceuticals
Bio-pharmaceuticals are effectively replacing conventional medicines due to
the advantages of specicity and compatibility. Recently the research work
focuses on healthcare biopolymers that can be used in improving human
life (Matthews et al. 2002). These enzyme technologists focus on the vast
array of dietary enzymes which can supplement human metabolism in the
most compatible manner. Access to methods for evaluating the reactivity and pharmacology of natural ingredients allows pharmaceutical specialists to
choose the best neutraceutical formulations.
8.5.7 Bacterial cellulose
The speciality papers and nonwovens are produced based on bacterially
grown cellulose bres these are extremely ne and resilient and are used
as specialized lters, odour absorbers and reinforcing blends with aramids.
Attempts have been made to transfer certain advantageous textile propertiesinto microorganisms where they can be more readily reproduced by bulk
fermentation processes. The spider DNA is transferred into bacteria with the
air of manufacturing proteins with the strength and resilience of spider silk
for use in bulletproof vests (Jin et al. 2003). This note of caution needs to be
echoed across the whole spectrum of biotechnology developments. Although
biological systems have many attractive possibilities and new approaches to
all sorts of problems and needs, considerable advances are still being made
in conventional technologies, such as, catalysis, chemical synthesis and
physical bre modication which need to be kept in perspective. There is also
still great concern in society about the unbridled advance of biotechnology,
especially with regard to the modication of natural species with possible
unknown long-term consequences.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 437/457
Biotechnology and biomaterials for hygienic and health care textiles 425
8.5.8 Nanocomposite for dental application
Polymer nanobres can be used as reinforcement in dental compositeapplications. A dental restorative composite is generally made of some dental
resin such as 2,2’-bis-[4- (methacryloxypropoxy)-phenyl]-propane (bis-
GMA) and tri-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) and llers (e.g.,
silica or ceramic particles). The use of polymer nanobres as reinforcement
for engineering composites have so far provided only marginal enhancement
in terms of strength and stiffness properties. Nevertheless, limited research
work along this direction has indicated that polymer nanobres are effective
for improving fracture toughness of the composites (Kim and Reneker
1999; Dzenis and Reneker 2001). Fracture toughness is one of the important
considerations in developing polymer composite dental devices such as an
orthodontic bracket (Teo et al. 2004).
8.5.9 Recycling of biopolymers
The two sides of the sustainability platform that happen to directly oppose
one another are recycling and degrading of polymer materials. As of late, the
balance of the two seems to be heavily weighing toward the biopolymers andsteering away from recycling (Laurencin et al. 1999). Despite the primary
reason for the initiative of biodegradable resins being introduced into common,
everyday uses, such as degradable bags and bottles, the other side of the
sustainability platform is being researched. The recyclability of biodegradable
resins seems to be slightly odd, as the primary reason for the use of these
materials is to dissipate to eliminate the need to recycle. As it turns out, the
products made from degradable resins do see some degree of recycling. But
as with any recycling process it is not cost effective to recycle. Recycling is
an expensive and difcult process that turns used products into new ones. Inaddition, biopolymers offer even more levels of problematic scenarios while
recycling. It is inferred, though from limited resources, that recycling these
resins can produce yield loss from contamination and incompetent critical
mass. This means that when recycled bottles are received to again be recycled,
ones that possess a degree of biodegradable material must be separated because
of the losses associated with them. They can prove to hinder the performance
of the primary material in bottles, PET. It is a suggestion to not include these
materials in applications that do typically see a lot of recycling since they can
augment to the economic burdens even in minimal amounts of contamination
(Curtis and Wilkinson, 2001).
Despite the complexity in recycling, Nature works has announced a plan
for post-consumer PLA bottles that is designed to institute a large-volume
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 438/457
426 Bioprocessing of textiles
“buy-back” system for the problematic resin. PLA can be sorted from other
plastics using standard near-infrared equipment. The ability to separate PLA
can mechanically or chemically be depolymerized into its monomer. Recycling
of PLA can produce problems for the larger scale recycling of resins like PET
and HDPE, some arbitrary independent studies have “veried” that PLA can
subsist with negligible inuence on the current recycling medium.
8.7 Future trends in medical textiles
The rst revolution began almost two decades ago with the realization that moist
wound healing principles were applicable to the treatment of chronic wounds
(Vincent Falanga, 2002). Since then, development of variety of dressings capable
of providing optimal coverage for wounds in different situations and actually
stimulating wound repair. The second revolution, still ongoing, began about
ten years ago with the successful testing of advanced technological products,
such as topically applied growth factors and bioengineered skin. Finally, the
third revolution began a few years ago with the introduction of the concept
of wound dress preparation, which allows us to break down into individual
components the critical steps involved in optimizing the clinical aspects and
the microenvironment of chronic wounds. Innovative materials are also foundin the eld of medicine and many applications are possible, ranging from
tissue engineering to wound dressings and implants (Vigo 1999). In the eld of
biomedical technology, biologists and textile engineers cooperate closely and
develop biomaterials and implants as well as methods enabling the regeneration
of tissue, for example restorable, three-dimensional, shapeable eeces in which
the cartilage cells can be grown. New opportunities for modern textiles have
also opened up in the treatment of wounds. In view of the growing number of
elderly people and diabetics in modern society, the treatment of problematic
wounds is a major application area of such textiles. Innovative medical textiles
will important role in the treatment of wounds and skin in future. The integration
of therapeutic substances turns textiles into innovative medical products.
8.8 References
Alvarez Lorenzo, C., Concheiro, A., Dubovik, A.S., Grinberg, N.V., Burova, T.V., and
Grinberg, V.Y., ‘Temperature-sensitive chitosan-poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) inter-
penetrated networks with enhanced loading capacity and controlled release properties’, J
Controlled Release, 2005, 102, 629–41.Bense, C.A., and Woodhouse, W.A., ‘Plasmin degradation of brin coatings on synthetic
polymer substrates’, J Biomed Mater Res, 1999, 46(3), 305–314.
Berger, J., Reist, M., Mayer, J.M., Felt, O., Peppas, N.A. & Gurny, R., ‘Structure and
interactions in covalently and ionically cross linked chitosan hydrogels for biomedical
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 439/457
Biotechnology and biomaterials for hygienic and health care textiles 427
applications’, Eur J Pharmaceutics Biopharmaceutics, 2004, 57, 19–34.
Biagini, G., Bertani, A., Muzzarelli, R., ‘Wound management’, Biomaterials, 1991, 12(3),
281–286.
Bisaria, V.S., and Ghose, T.K., ‘Biodegradation of cellulosic materials: substrates,
microorganisms, enzymes and products’, Enzyme and Microbial Tech, 1981, 3, 90–104.
Borzacchiello, A., Ambrosio, L, Netti, P.A., Nicolais, L., Peniche, C., Gallardo, L., and San
Roman, J., ‘Chitosan-based hydrogels: synthesis and characterisation’, J Materials Sci:
Materials in Medicine, 2001, 12, 861–864.
Buchko, C.J., Kozloff, K.M., and Martin, D.C., ‘Surface characterization of porous,
biocompatible protein polymer thin lms’, Biomaterials, 2001, 22(11), 1289–96.
Chekmareva, A., ‘Experimental study of reparative regeneration processes in the woundtreated with bioactive dressings’, Bul Exper Biol Med, 2002, 133(2), 192–195.
Chen, K.S., Ku, Y.A., Lee, C.H., Lin, H.R., Lin, F.H., and Chen, T.M., ‘Immobilization of
chitosan gel with cross-linking reagent on PNIPAAm gel/nonwoven composites surface’,
Mat Sci Engg C, 2005, 25, 472–78.
Chen, S., and Wang, Y., ‘Study on β-cyclodextrin grafting with chitosan and slow release
of its inclusion complex with radioactive iodine’, J Appl Polym Sci. 2001, 2, 2414–22.
Cheng, Q., ‘Study on physical properties and nerve cell afnity of composite lms from
chitosan and gelatin solutions’, Polym Prep, 2003, 44(2), 87–95.
Choi, Y. S., Hong, S. R., Lee, Y. M., ‘Studies on gelatin-containing articial skin: II.
Preparation and characterization of cross-linked gelatin hyaluronate sponge’, J Biomed
Mater Res, 1999, 48(5), 631–39.
Choi, Y.S., Hong, S.R., Lee, Y.M., ‘Study on gelatin-containing articial skin: Preparation
and characteristics of novel gelatin-alginate sponge’, Biomaterials, 1999, 20(5), 409–417.
Curtis, A., and Wilkinson, C., ‘Nantotechniques and approaches in biotechnology’, Trends
Biotechn, 2001, 19(3), 97–106.
Desai, T.A., ‘Micro-and nanoscale structures for tissue engineering constructs’, Med Eng
and Physics, 2000, 22, 595–601.
Doyle, J.W., Roth, N.P., Smith, R.M., ‘Effect of calcium alginate on cellular wound healing
processes modeled in vitro’, J Biomed Mater Res, 1996, 32(4), 561–568.
Draye, J.P., Delaey, B., Vandevoorde, A., ‘In vitro and in vivo biocompatibility of dextran
dialdehyde cross-linked gelatin hydrogel lms’, Biomaterials, 1998, 19(18), 1677–87.
Dzenis, Y.A., and Reneker, D.H., 2001, Delamination Resistant Composites Prepared by
Small Diameter Fibre Reinforcement at Ply Interfaces, US Patent No. 626533.
Edwards, J.V., Batiste, S.L., Gibbins, E.M., and Goheen, S.C., ‘Synthesis and activity of
NH2-and COOH-terminal elastase recognition sequences on cotton’, J Peptide Res, 1999,
54(6), 536–543.
Feng, L., Li, S., Li, H., Zhai, J., Song, Y., Jiang, L., and Zhu, D., ‘Super-Hydrophobic
Surfaces: From Natural to Articial’, Angew Chem Int Ed, 2002, 41(7), 1221–29.
Fertala, A., Han, W.B., and Ko, F.K., ‘Mapping critical sites in collagen II for rational
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 440/457
428 Bioprocessing of textiles
design of gene-engineered proteins for cell-supporting materials’, J Biomed Mater Res,
2001, 57(1), 48–53.
Flemming, R.G., Murphy, C.J., Abrams, G.A., Goodman, S.L., and Nealey, P.F., ‘Effects of
synthetic micro-and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior’, Biomaterials, 1999, 20(6),
573–81.
Gayet, J.C., and Fortier, G., ‘High water content BSA-PEG hydrogel for controlled release
device: Evaluation of the drug release properties’, J Control Rel, 1996, 38(2), 177–184.
Gekas, V. & Lopez-Leiva M. (1985). Hydrolysis of lactose: a literature review. Process
Biochemistry, 20, 2–12.
Goycoolea, F. M., Heras, A., Aranaz, I., Galed, G., Fernandez-Valle, M. E. & Arguelles-
Monal, W., ‘Biopolymers Used in Microspheres and Microcapsules’, Macromol Biosci,
2003, 3, 612–619.
Grafe, T., and Graham, K., ‘Polymeric nanobres and nanobre webs: a new class of
nonwovens’, Int Nonwov J, 2003, 12(1), 51–57.
Graham, K., Ouyang, M., Raether, T., Grafe, T., Mcdonald, M., and Knauf, P., ‘Polymer
Nanobres in Air Filtration Applications’, Fifteenth Annual Technical Conference & Expo
of the American Filtration & Separations Society, Galveston, Texas, 9–12 April, 2002.
Grzybowski, J., Kolodziej, W., Trafny, E.A., and Struzyna, J., ‘A new anti-infective
collagen dressing containing antibiotics’, J Biomed Mater Res, 1997, 36(2), 163–166.
Gu, B., Badding, J.V., and Sen, A., ‘Process for forming polymeric micro and nanobres’, Polym Preprs, 2003, 44(2), 142–49.
Gusakov, A. V., Sinitsyn, A. P. & Klyosov, A. A. (1985). Kinetics of the enzymic hydrolysis
of cellulose. A mathematical model for a batch reactor process. Enzyme and Microbial
Technology, 70, 346–52.
Hansson, C., ‘Medication delivery and monitoring system and methods’, Drugs & Aging,
1997, 11(4), 271–284.
Hartgerink, J.D, Beniash, E., and Stupp, S.I., ‘Self-assembly and mineralization of peptide-
amphiphile nanobres’, Science, 2001, 294(5547), 1684–89.
Hirano, S., Nakahira, T., Nakagawa, M., and Kim, S.K., ‘Peptide and protein presenting
materials for tissue engineering’, J Biotechnol, 1999, 70(3), 373–377.
Hong, S.R., Lee, S.J., Shim, J.W., ‘Study on gelatin-containing articial skin IV: a
comparative study on the effect of antibiotic and EGF on cell proliferation during epidermal
healing’, Biomaterials, 2001, 22(20), 2777– 83.
Huang, L., Mcmillan, R.A., Apkarian, R.P., Pourdeyhimi, B., Conticello, V.P., and Chaikof,
E.L., ‘Generation of synthetic elastin mimetic small diameter bres and bre networks’,
Macromolecules, 2000, 33(8), 2989–93.
Huang, Z.M., Zhang, Y.Z., Kotaki, M., and Ramakrishna, S., ‘A review on polymernanobres by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites’, Comp Sci Techn,
2003, 63, 2223–29.
Igarashi, K., and Nakano, Y., ‘Fundamental Adsorption Properties of Chitosan Gel Particles
Prepared by Suspension Evaporation Method’, J Applied Polym Sci, 2002, 86, 901–906.
Ilana Perelshtein, Yelena Ruderman, Nina Perkas, Kamelia Traeger, Tzanko Tzanov, Jamie
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 441/457
Biotechnology and biomaterials for hygienic and health care textiles 429
Beddow, Eadaoin Joyce, Timothy J. Mason, María Blanes, Korina Mollá and Aharon
Gedanken, Enzymatic pre-treatment as a means of enhancing the antibacterial activity
and stability of ZnO nanoparticles sonochemically coated on cotton fabrics, Ishihara, M.,Ono, K., and Sato, M., ‘Acceleration of wound contraction and healing with a photo-cross
linkable chitosan hydrogel’, Wound Repair Regener, 2001, 9(6), 513–521.
Jayakumar, R., Prabaharan, M., Reis, R.L., and Mano, J.F., ‘Graft copolymerized
chitosan—present status and applications’, Carb Polym, 2005, 62, 142–47.
Jia, H., Zhu, G., Vugrinovich, B., Kataphinan, B., Reneker, D.H., and Wang, P., ‘Enzyme-
Carrying Polymeric Nanobres Prepared via Electrospinning for Use as Unique
Biocatalysts’, Biotechn Progr, 2002, 18(5), 1027–35.
Jin, H.J., Chen, J., Karageorgiou, V., Altman, G.H., and Kaplan, D.L., ‘Carbon nanotubes’,
Mat Res Soc Symp Proc, 2003, 735, 11–17.
Jocic, D. (2008). Smart textile materials by surface modication with biopolymeric
systems. Research Journal of Textile and Apparel, Vol. 12, No. 2, 58–65, ISSN 1560-6074.
Jocic, D., ‘Smart Textile Materials by Surface Modication with Biopolymeric Systems’,
Res J Text Apparel , 2008, 12(2), 45–86.
Jung, B.O., Kim, C.H., Choi, K.S., Lee, Y.M., and Kim, J.J.,’ Impact properties of
polypropylene composites by control of spherulitic morphology’, J Appl Polym Sci, 1999,
72, 1713–18.
Kenawy, E.R., Layman, J.M., Watkins, J.R., Bowlin, J.L., Matthews, J.A., Simpson, D.G.,and Wnek, G.E., ‘Electrospinning of poly (ethylene-co-vinyl alcohol) bres’, Biomaterials,
2003, 24, 907–11.
Khan, S.S., Fertala, A., and Ko, F., ‘Multifunctional nanobre scaffolds for tissue
engineering’, Polym. Prepr, 2003, 44(2), 88–93.
Khil, M.S., Cha, D.I., Kim, H.Y., Kim, I.S., and Bhattarai, N., ‘Electrospun nanobrous
polyurethane membrane as wound dressing’, J Biomed Mater Res, 2003, 67, 675–79.
Kim, H.J., Lee, H.C, and Oh, J.S., ‘Hydrogels for tissue engineering’, J Biomater Sci
Polym, 1999, 10(5), 543–556.
Kim, J.S., and Reneker, D.H., ‘Mechanical properties of composites using ultraneelectrospun bres’, Polym Comp, 1999, 20(1), 124–29.
Kim, S.Y., Cho, S.-M., Lee, Y.M., and Kim, S.J., ‘Thermo- and pH-Responsive Behaviors
of Graft Copolymer and Blend Based on Chitosan and N-Isopropylacrylamide’, J Applied
Polym Sci, 2000, 78, 1381–91.
Kobayashi, H., Hyon, S.H., and Ikada, Y., ‘Water-curable and biodegradable prepolymers’,
J Biomed Mater Res, 1991, 25(12), 1481–94.
Laurencin, C.T., Ambrosio, A.M., Borden, M.D., and Cooper, J.A., ‘Tissue engineering:
orthopedic applications’, Ann Rev Biomed Engg, 1999, 1, 19–23.
Layman, J.M., Kenawy, I.R., Watkins, J.R., Carrjr, M.E., Bowlin, G., and Wnek, G.E.,
‘Development of the biohemostat-a treatment modality for high pressure bleeding based on
super-absorbent polymers and electrospun membranes’, Polymer preprints, 2003, 44(2),
94–98.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 442/457
430 Bioprocessing of textiles
Lee, S.H., Ku, B.C., Wang, X., Samuelson, L.A., and Kumar, ‘Design, synthesis and
electrospinning of a novel uorescent polymer for optical sensor applications’, J Design,
Mat. Res, 2002, 708, 10–16.
Lee, W.F., and Chen, Y.J., ‘Studies on Preparation and Swelling Properties of the
N-Isopropylacrylamide/Chitosan Semi-IPN and IPN Hydrogels’, J Applied Polym Sci,
2001, 82, 2487–96.
Li,, W.J., Laurencin, C.T., Caterson, E.J., Tuan, R.S., and Ko, F.K., ‘Electrospun nanobrous
structure: a novel scaffold for tissue engineering’, J Biomed Mater Res, 2002, 60(4), 613.
Lim, S.H., and Hudson, S.M., ‘Review of chitosan and its derivatives as antimicrobial
agents and their uses as textile chemicals’, J Macromol Sci Polym Rev, 2003, 43 (2), 223–
269.
Liu, B., and Hu, J., ‘The application of temperature-sensitive hydrogels to textiles: a
review of Chinese and Japanese investigations’, Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe,
2005, 13, 45–49.
Loke, W.K., Lau, S.K., and Yong, L.L., ‘Wound dressing with sustained anti-microbial
capability’, J Biomed Mater Res, 2000, 53(1), 8–17.
Loscertales, I.G., Barrero, A., Guerrero, I., Cortijo, R., Marquez, M., and Ganancalvo,
A.M., ‘Micro/nano encapsulation via electried coaxial liquid jets’, Science, 2002, 295,
1695–99.
Luu, Y.K., Kim, K., Hsiao, B.S., Chu, B., and Hadjiargyrou, M., ‘Development of ananostructured DNA delivery scaffold via electrospinning of PLGA and PLA–PEG block
copolymers’, J Contr Rele, 2003, 89, 341–47.
Ma, P.X., and Zhang, R., ‘Porous poly (L-lactic acid)/apatite composites created by
biomimetic process’, J Biom Mater Res, 1999, 46(1), 60–65.
Markin, V.S., Iordanskii, A.A., Feldshteyn, M.M., ‘Diffusion model for the study of a
drug from the hydrophilic matrix of a transdermal therapeutic system through a model
polymeric membrane’, Pharmaceutical chemistry journal, 28(10), 38 – 45 (1994).
Martin, C.R., ‘Membrane-based synthesis of nanomaterials’, Chem Mater, 1996, 8, 1739–
46.Mather, R.R., Intelligent textiles, Rev Prog Coloration, 2001, 31, 36–41.
Matsuda, K., Suzuki, S., Isshiki, N., ‘Evaluation of a bilayer articial skin capable of
sustained release of an antibiotic’, Biomaterials, 1992, 13(2), 119–122.
Matsuda, K., Suzuki, S., Isshiki, N., and Ikada, Y., ‘Re-freeze dried bilayer articial skin’,
Biomaterials, 1993, 14(13), 1030–1035.
Matthews, J.A., Wnek, G.E., Simpson, D.G., and Bowlin, G.L., ‘Electrospinning of
collagen nanobres’, Biomacromolecules, 2002, 3(2), 232–38.
Mi, F.L., Shyu, S.S., and Wu, Y.B., ‘Fabrication and characterization of a sponge-likeasymmetric chitosan membrane as a wound dressing’, Biomaterials, 2001, 22(2), 165–173.
Mi, F.L., Wu, Y.B., and Shyu, S.S., ‘Control of wound infections using a bilayer chitosan
wound dressing with sustainable antibiotic delivery’, J Biomed Mater Res, 2002, 59(3),
438–449.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 443/457
Biotechnology and biomaterials for hygienic and health care textiles 431
Min, B.M., Lee, G., Kim, S.H., Nam, Y.S., Lee, T.S., and Park, W.H., ‘Electrospinning
of silk broin nanobres and its effect on the adhesion and spreading of normal human
keratinocytes and broblasts in vitro’, Biomaterials, 2004, 25, 1289–96.
Mo, X.M., Xu, C.Y., Kotaki, M., and Ramakrishna, S., ‘Electrospun P (LLA-CL) nanobre:
a biomimetic extracellular matrix for smooth muscle cell and endothelial cell proliferation’,
Biomaterials, 2004, 25(10), 1883.
Nagapudi, K., Brinkman, W.T., Leisen, J.E., Huang, L., Mcmillan, R.A., Apkarian, R.P.,
Conticello, V.P., and Chaikof, E.L., ‘Photomediated solid-state cross-linking of an elastin-
mimetic recombinant protein polymer’, Macromolecules, 2002, 35(5), 1730.
Nazarenko, G.I., Yu Sugurova, I., and Glyantsev, S.P., Wound, Dressing, Patient: A
Practical Nurse Guide, Meditsina, Moscow, Russia, 2002.
Neimark, V., Kornev, K.G., Ravikovitch, P.I., and Ruetsch, S., ‘Modeling of spontaneous
penetration of viscoelastic uids and biouids into capillaries’, Polym Prepr, 2003, 44(2),
160–67.
Parabaharan, M., and Mano, J.F., ‘Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels Based on Polysaccharides
Incorporated with Thermo-Responsive Polymers as Novel Biomaterials’, Macromol
Biosci, 2006, 6, 991–94.
Pavlova, M., and Draganova, M., ‘Biocompatible and biodegradable polyurethane
polymers’, Biomaterials, 1993, 14(13), 1024–29.
Peppas, N.A., Preface, in: N.A.Peppas (Ed.), Hydrogels in Medicine and Pharmacy:Fundamentals, CRC Press, 1986.
Percival, S.L., Bowler, P.G., and Russell, D., ‘Bacterial resistance to silver in wound care’,
J Hospital Infection, 2005, 60(1), 1–7.
Petrulyte, S., ‘Advanced textile materials and biopolymers in wound management’, Qu,
X., Wirsen, A., and Albertsson, A.C., ‘Synthesis and Characterization of pH-Sensitive
Hydrogels Based on Chitosan and Lactic Acid’, J Applied Polym Sci, 1999, 74, 3193–3202.
Qu, X., Wirsen, A., Olander, B., and Albertsson, A.C., ‘Surface modication of high
density polyethylene tubes by coating chitosan, chitosan hydrogel and heparin’, Polym
Bull, 2001, 46, 223–229.Reneker, D.H., and Chun, I., ‘Nanometre diameter bres of polymer, produced by
electrospinning’, Nanotechnology, 1996, 7(3), 216–19.
Risbud, M.V., Karamuk, E. & Mayer, J., ‘Designing hydrogel coated textile scaffolds
for tissue engineering: Effect of casting conditions and degradation behavior studied at
microstructure level’, J Mater Sci Lett, 2002, 21, 1191–94.
Ruizcardona, L., Sanzgiri, Y.D., Benedetti, L.M., ‘Application of benzyl hyaluronate
membranes as potential wound dressings: evaluation of water vapour and gas
permeabilities’, Biomaterials, 1996, 17(16), 1639–43.
Sandford, P.A., and Steinnes, A., Water soluble polymers: synthesis, solution properties,
and applications, ACS Symp Series, 1991, 467, 430–445.
Sashiwa, H., and Aiba, S., ‘Chemically modied chitin and chitosan as biomaterials’, Prog
Polym Sci, 2004, 29, 887–908
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 444/457
432 Bioprocessing of textiles
Silva, G.A., Czeisler, C., Niece, K.L., Beniash, E., Harrington, D., Kessler, J.A., and
Stupp, S.I., ‘Selective differentiation of neural progenitor cells by high-epitope density
nanobres’, Science, 2004, 303(5662), 1352–59.
Stephens, J.S., Casper, C.L., Chase, D.B., and Rabolt, J.F., ‘Biomimetic Processing of
Protein-Based and Bioderived Polymers’, Polym Prepr, 2003, 44(2), 91–96.
Suzuki, Y., Tanihara, M., and Nishimura, Y., ‘In vivo evaluation of a novel alginate
dressing’, J Biomed Mater Res, 1999, 48(4), 522–527.
Tatjana Romaškevič, Saulutė Budrienė, Aurelija Liubertienė, Irina Gerasimčik, Asta
Zubrienė and Gervydas Dienys, ‘Synthesis of chitosan-graft-poly(ethylene glycol) methyl
ether methacrylate copolymer and its application for immobilization of maltogenase’,
CHEMIJA, 2007, 18(2), 33–38.
Teo, C.Y.K., Fujihara, K., Ganesh, V.K., Loh, P.L., Ramakrishna, S., and Chew, C.L.,
‘Fracture Resistance of Tie-Wing of Braided Composite Orthodontic Brackets’, J Dental
Materials, 2004, 2(4), 26–37.
Tereschenko, L.Y., Shamolina, I., ‘The Use of Cellulases to Improve the Sorption Properties
of Cellulosic Wound Dressings’, J Text Inst, 1998, 89(3), 570–578.
Theron, A., Zussman, E., and Yarin, A.L., ‘Electrostatic eld-assisted alignment of
electrospun nanobres’, Nanotechnology, 2001, 12, 384–87.
Thomas, A., Harding, K.G., and Moore, K., ‘Alginates from wound dressings activate
human macrophages to secrete tumour necrosis factor’, Biomaterials, 2000, 21(17), 1797– 1802.
Thomas, S., Wound Management and Dressings, Pharmaceutical Press, London, 1990.
Tomihata, K., Burczak, K., Shiraki, K., and Irada, Y., ‘Cross-linking and biodegradation of
native and denatured collagen’, ACS Symposium Series, 1994, 540, 275–286.
Tucci, M.G., Ricotti, G., Mattiolibelmonte, M., ‘Chitosan and gelatin as engineered
dressing for wound repair’, J Bioactive Compat Polymers, 2001, 16(2), 145–157.
Ulubayram, K., Cakar, A.N., Korkusuz, P., ‘EGF containing gelatin-based wound
dressings’, Biomaterials, 2001, 22(11), 1345–56.
Van Schijndel, R., Van Soest, J., Verduin, H., and Feil, H., ‘Biopolymers Used in
Microspheres and Microcapsules’, Carbohydrate Polymers, 1998, 34, 421–422.
Verreck, G., Chun, I., Peeters, J., Rosenblatt, J., and Brewster, M.E., ‘Preparation and
characterization of nanobres containing amorphous drug dispersions generated by
electrostatic spinning’, Pharm Res, 2003, 20(5), 810–19.
Vigo, T.L., ‘Intelligent Fibrous Materials’, J Text Inst, 1999, 3, 90, 1–13.
Vincent Falanga, M.D, ‘Wound Bed Preparation and the Role of Enzymes: A Case for
Multiple Actions of Therapeutic Agents’, Wounds, 2002, 14(2).
Wang, L.H., Khor, E., Wee, A., and Lim, L.Y., ‘Chitosan-alginate PEC membrane as awound dressing: Assessment of incisional wound healing’, J Biomed Mater Res, 2002,
63(5), 610–618.
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 445/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 446/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 447/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 448/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 449/457
Index 437
C
Candida cylindracea (lipase B), 208Candida rugosa, 208
Carbohydrate polymer, 94
Carbohydrates, 33
Carbon dioxide, 268
Carbonic anhydrase, 135
Carbonization, 54
Carboxyl acid, 8
Carboxyl methyl cellulose, 321
Carboxyl, 190, 196
Carboxylase, 197
Carcinogenic, 283
Cardiovascular disorders, 312
Catalase, 36, 40
Catalytic constant, 12
Cell bundles, 88
Cell disruption, 28
Cell matrix, 94Cellobiase, 36
Celluclast 1.5 L, 80, 82
Cellulase EBT, 80, 81
Cellulase, 23, 35
Cellulomonas, 80
Cellulosic material, 37
Cellusoft L, 80
Centrifugation, 24
Cerrena unicolor, 123
Chain scission, 196
Chelating agents, 65
Chelator, 120
Chelators, 66
Chemical coagulation, 267
Chemical efuents, 23
Chemical properties, 193
Chemical resistance, 190Chitosan hydrogels, 422
Chitosan-based dressings, 404
Chlorhexidinem, 414
Chlorination, 135
Chlorine dioxide, 301
Chromatography, 24, 29, 218
Chronic wounds, 413
Chymotrypsin, 32, 204
Chymotrypsinolysis, 206
Clean technology, 251
Cleaning procedures, 304
Clinical analysis, 16
Clogging, 270
Clostridium, 80
Clothing, 189Coagulation, 272
Collagen wound dressing, 406
Collagenase, 204, 409, 413
Color spectroscopy, 99, 108
Coloration, 265
Colour removal, 271, 276
Comfort characteristics, 200
Comfort, 142
Competitive inhibition, 13Complex pollutants, 278
Compliance, 304
Composite materials, 399
Concentration, 24
Congestion, 306
Contamination, 26
Copolymer, 200, 203
Corn starch, 418Cosmetic enzymes, 300
Cotton, 53
Cotton-lined gloves, 310
Coughing, 306
Crease recovery, 95
Creep resistance, 216
Crochet, 399
Cross-linked polyester, 192
Crude enzyme, 324Crystalline cellulose, 92
Cuticle, 55
Cutinases, 322
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 450/457
438 Bioprocessing of textiles
D
Debriding agent, 410Decolorization of dye water efuent,
23, 43
Decolouration, 251, 276
Degradation, 196, 205
Degree of polymerization, 59
Degree of whiteness, 73
Degumming, 23, 42, 154
Deinking, 31
Denaturation, 72
Denimax Acid L, 80
Denimax L, 80
Dental application, 425
Depolymerisation, 69
Dermatitis, 308
Desalting, 29
Design-Expert software, 331
Desizing efciency, 74Desizing, 23, 61
Detergents, 23, 31
De-waxing, 156
Dew-retted, 120
Dextran, 204
Dextranase, 204
Dextrin, 64
Digestive, 32
Diisocyanate, 211
Dinitrosalycilic, 227
Dipole, 193
Dissolved oxygen, 265
DNA-modifying enzymes, 33
Down steam processing, 23
Drapability, 41
Drug release, 398
Dry rubbing, 85Dye detoxication, 116
Dye efuents, 251
Dye house, 276
Dye solubility, 273
Dye substantively, 256
Dye waste water, 251
Dyeability of wool, 144
Dyeing efuents, 24
Dyeing, 251
Dyestuff, 146
E
Ecologically sustainable, 289
Eco-mark, 252
Economical competitive, 320
Effect of temperature, 327
Efuent characteristics, 258
Efuent disposals, 320
Efuent treatment, 251
Ehabilitation, 399
Electro chemical process, 270
Electro dialysis, 270
Electrochemical, 261, 272Electrolytic precipitation, 269
Electro-oxidation, 252, 260
Electrophoresis, 29
Electrospinning, 407
Elongation at break, 95
Elongation, 67
Embroidered, 399
Employee training, 301
Endergonic, 6
Endogluconase, 36
Endonuclease, 33
Energy and efuents, 367
Engineering controls, 302
Environment friendly,320
Environmentally safe, 320
Enzymatic desizing, 324
Enzymatic grafting, 405Enzyme activity, 7
Enzyme allergy, 300
Enzyme assay, 324
Enzyme classication, 2
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 451/457
Index 439
Enzyme Commission, 2
Enzyme complex, 9
Enzyme concentration, 8
Enzyme diffusion, 140
Enzyme effect on color, 23
Enzyme exposure, 306
Enzyme handling, 300
Enzyme inhibition, 13
Enzyme kinetics, 12
Enzyme preparation, 307
Enzyme production system, 323Enzyme purication, 29
Enzyme retting, 53
Enzyme safety, 300
Enzyme structure, 2
Enzyme-handling, 299
Enzyme–substrate complex, 37
Epicuticle, 128
Equalization, 267
Eri silk 149Ester bonds, 71
Ethylene glycol, 192
Exergonic, 6
Exhaust ventilation, 303
Exoglucanase, 36
Extraction, 24
Extremozyme, 145
Eye contact, 400
F
Fabric handle, 78
Fabric water absorbency, 334
Factorial design, 280
Fashionable effects, 42
Fats, 65
Fatty acids, 60Fatty substances, 319
Feed backward propagation, 356
Feedback inhibition, 10
Fermentation, 16, 23
Ferric chloride, 267
Ferric sulphate, 267
Ferrous sulphate, 267
Fertilizers, 320
Fiber formation, 192
Fibre neness, 67
Fibrillation, 226
Fibrin, 54
Fibrinolysis, 410Fibroin, 152
Filtration, 24
Finishing of cotton knits, 23, 44
Finishing, 257
Flax ber, 112
Flax retting, 53, 116
Flax rippling, 116
Flax, 53
Fleece, 127Flexural modulus, 216
Flexural rigidity, 67, 96, 99, 103
Floatation,265
Flocculation, 29, 265, 272
Flocculent sludge, 268
Flooding, 310
Fluidity, 73
Fluorescein Isothiocyanate, 136Fluorescence spectroscopy, 367
Fluorescent dye, 138
Foam fractionation, 269
Foams, 401
Food enzymes, 300
Food ingredients, 300
Functional, 190
Fungal biotransformation, 286
Fungal culture, 98Fungal, 63
Fungi static, 398
Fusarium solani, 41
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 452/457
440 Bioprocessing of textiles
G
Gel dressing, 406Gel ltration chromatography, 218
Gelatin, 159
Gels, 401
Genetic disorders, 312
Genetic engineering, 15
Geotrichum sp., 286
Globular proteins, 1
Glucose Oxidase, 77
Glucose, 323
Glucosidic linkage, 35
Glutaminase, 409
Granular enzyme, 302
Granules, 401
Green chemistry, 252
Group specicity, 12
H
Haemostatic, 401
Hairiness, 67
Hand properties, 189
Handle 142
Hardness, 216
Harmful effects, 274
Hazard Communication, 302
Health care textiles, 398Healthcare dressings, 321
Heart valves, 400
Heat set stability, 190
Hemicellulase, 74
High absorbent, 398
High modulus, 190
Horse radish peroxidase, 278
Host organism, 31
Hyaluronidase, 409
Hydrocolloids, 401
Hydrogel, 204, 401
Hydrogen bonding, 59, 61
Hydrogen peroxide, 321
Hydrolase, 2, 40
Hydrolysate, 26
Hydrolysis, 190
Hydrophilicity, 190
Hydrophobic, 195, 218
Hydrophobicity, 212
Hydroxyhexanoate, 207
Hydroxyl, 192
Hygienic, 189Hygienic, 321, 398
Hypochlorite, 261
I
Imitation, 307
Immobilization, 161, 405
Immune system, 307
Immuno Sorbent Assay, 308Implantable, 399
Indigo pigments, 37
Induced t theory, 6
Industrial applications, 15
Industrial efuents, 273
Industrial enzyme, 25
Industrial hygienists, 299
Industrial pollution, 23
Inhalation, 306
Inhibitors, 9
Initial modulus, 96
Inoculation, 23, 27
Integrated bio-desizing and bio-
scouring, 23
Intermolecular, 215
Intracellular, 27
Iodine solution, 325Iodine test, 331
Ionic silver, 402
Isomerase, 2
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 453/457
Index 441
J
Jute bre, 87Jute, 53
K
Keratin, 125
Keratinisation, 133
Kinetic energy, 7
Kinetic theory, 11
L
Laccase complex, 122
Laccase production, 277
Laccase, 37, 101, 251, 319
Lactamase, 409
Leather and food industries, 23, 32
Lenses, 400
Lepidoptera, 149
Ligase, 2, 33
Light fastness, 190
Lignin degrading, 276
Lignin peroxidase, 98, 277
Lignin, 31, 93
Lignin-cellulose complex, 123
Lime, 267
Linen, 113Linkage specicity, 12
Lipase, 23, 32, 319
Lock-and-key, 5
Long-term safety, 300
Low shrinkage, 190
Lumen wall, 55
Lungs, 400
Lyase, 2, 66
Lyocell, 189
Lysine, 30
Lysozyme, 409
M
Macro-brillar, 141Macro-molecular, 196
Macromolecule, 193
Maltogenase, 405
Management systems, 300
Manganese peroxidase, 98, 277
Manganese pyrochlorophyllide, 284
Mechanical occulation, 267
Mechanical properties, 142, 193
Medical examination, 305
Medical monitoring, 300
Medical personnel , 299
Medical surveillance, 304
Medical textiles, 399
Medicinal products, 24
Membrane fouling, 260
Membrane processes, 252
Membranes, 26Mercerization, 23, 256, 261
Mesophilic proteases, 145
Metabolic, 2
Methotrexate, 13
Methyl glucuronic acid, 89
Methylamine, 195
Michaelis constant, 12
Microbes, 24
Microbial degradation, 276
Microbispora, 237
Microber, 195
Microltration, 273
Microgel, 421
Micronaire, 57
Mineral matter, 254
Mixed enzymatic system, 355
Mixed enzymes, 319Mixed inhibition, 14
Modal, 189
Modern biotechnology, 16
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 454/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 455/457
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 456/457
444 Bioprocessing of textiles
Saccharomyces cerevisae, 63
Safe host systems, 300
Safe processing, 320
Safety precaution, 299
Safety professionals, 299
Safety program, 300
Salt linkages, 134
Salt load, 265
Sand blasting, 40
Sanitary towels, 400
Saponication, 255Saturniidae, 149
Savinase, 141, 158
Scaffolds, 161, 408
Scouring, 23
Screening, 265, 266
Sedimentation, 265, 266
Seed culture, 323
Seed-coat, 82
Sensitization, 300Sericin, 54, 154
Serine proteases, 32, 412
Shrinkage, 95
Shrink-proof, 157
Shrink-proong, 139
Silk degumming, 53
Silk broin, 160, 237
Silk garment, 54Silk, 148
Silk, 53
Silk-like handle, 198
Silkworm, 148
Singeing, 255
Skin irritation, 306
Skin prick test, 314
Sludge digester, 268
Sludge management, 271Smart textiles, 420
Sneezing, 306
Sodium hydroxide, 67
Sodium silicate, 256
Softness, 142
Solid waste, 271
Solvent dyes, 256
Solvent extraction, 67
Sonication, 365
Sonicator efciency, 367
Soy protein, 159
Specic mixed enzyme, 95
Spill cleanup, 304Splashing, 309
Sports, 189
Stabilizers, 256
Staining methods, 70
Static electricity, 131
Steam cleaning, 309
Sterilization, 23
Stimuli-responsive, 420
Stockings, 321Stoichiometry, 207
Strength, 67, 73
Streptokinase, 409
Streptomyces, 80, 237
Substrate concentration, 6, 9
Subtilisin-PEG, 139
Surface brils, 82
Surface modication, 197Surface tension, 65
Surfactants, 27, 66
Surgical clothing’s, 321
Suspended solids, 276
Sustainable planet, 34
Sustainable process, 320
Sutures, 400
Sweeping, 309
Swelling, 58Symptoms, 306
Synthetic bre, 189
8/17/2019 Bioprocessing of Textiles (2014)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bioprocessing-of-textiles-2014 457/457
Index 445
T
Tassar silk, 149Tegawa scale, 64
Temperature, 201
Tenacity, 96
Tencel, 189
Tensile strength, 202
Tergazyme, 160
Tertiary treatment, 269
Textile auxiliaries, 23, 42
Textile industry, 276
Textile processing, 17
Textile wet processing, 320
Thennomyces lanoginosus, 63
Thermal degradation, 196
Thermal evaporation, 270
Thermal properties, 189, 195
Thermo stability, 31
Thermoactinomyces, 63, 237Thermo-elastic, 239
Thermolabile, 29
Thermonospora,80
Thermoplastic, 60
U
Ultimate cells, 88Ultra ltration, 29, 159, 274
Ultrasonic energy, 366
Ultrasonic irradiation, 415
Ultrasonic, 319
Univoltine, 149
Uricase, 409
Urokinase, 409
V
Vascular grafts, 400
Vibrational energy, 7
Viscose rayon, 189
Viscozyme 120 L, 80
Volatile compounds, 276
W
Wash down effect, 232
Wash fastness, 147
Washing, 23
W t t f t 34 282