bia survey raw data

Upload: saurabh-misra

Post on 14-Apr-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Bia Survey Raw Data

    1/21

    How large is your organisation: How distributed is your company?

    Medium (100 - 499 staff) Single site

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locationsLarge (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Medium (100 - 499 staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Small (1 - 99 staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Single site

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Single site

    Large (500+ staff) Single site

    Large (500+ staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Medium (100 - 499 staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Medium (100 - 499 staff) Single site

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Medium (100 - 499 staff) Single site

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Medium (100 - 499 staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Small (1 - 99 staff) Single site

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Small (1 - 99 staff) Single site

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locationsLarge (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Medium (100 - 499 staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Small (1 - 99 staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Small (1 - 99 staff) Single site

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locationsLarge (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

  • 7/30/2019 Bia Survey Raw Data

    2/21

    Small (1 - 99 staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Medium (100 - 499 staff) Single site

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locationsLarge (500+ staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Small (1 - 99 staff) Single site

    Small (1 - 99 staff) Single site

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Small (1 - 99 staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Small (1 - 99 staff) Single site

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Medium (100 - 499 staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Small (1 - 99 staff) Single site

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Single site

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Small (1 - 99 staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Single site

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Medium (100 - 499 staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locationsLarge (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Medium (100 - 499 staff) Single site

    Medium (100 - 499 staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Medium (100 - 499 staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Medium (100 - 499 staff) Single site

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locationsLarge (500+ staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

  • 7/30/2019 Bia Survey Raw Data

    3/21

    Small (1 - 99 staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 2 to 10 locationsMedium (100 - 499 staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Small (1 - 99 staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Small (1 - 99 staff) Single site

    Large (500+ staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Single site

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Select here Select here

    Large (500+ staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Medium (100 - 499 staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Single site

    Medium (100 - 499 staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Medium (100 - 499 staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 2 to 10 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Large (500+ staff) Multinational - less than 50 locations

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

    Small (1 - 99 staff) Multinational - 50 or more locations

    Large (500+ staff) Single site

    Large (500+ staff) National - 10 or more locations

  • 7/30/2019 Bia Survey Raw Data

    4/21

    What is your main industry sector? What level of manager is responsibl How is the BIA information collect

    Financial services Middle manager Questionnaire

    Banking Middle manager Face to face (Workshops)

    Transport and logistics Middle manager Questionnaires and interviews with m

    Other Senior manager Electronic surveyFinancial services Middle manager Excel-based BIA questionnaire for rol

    Health products & services Middle manager email questionnaires

    Public sector Middle manager By questionnaire and follow up meeti

    Public sector Middle manager By questionnaire and follow up meeti

    Financial services Senior manager Each Business area completes Annu

    Public sector Middle manager Via one to one interviews with senior

    Other Senior manager Interviews following a questionaire

    Financial services Middle manager By conducting workshops, meetings,

    Other Non-managerial Via interview for initial BIA.

    Financial services Senior manager Via 1-1 meetings with business area

    Health products & services Middle manager Meet with subject matter experts fro

    Health products & services Senior manager Interviews only

    Financial services Select here interview, questionnnaire

    Public sector Senior manager Questionnaire's for each department

    Computer software & services Senior manager By Questionnaires depending on the

    Financial services Senior manager Templates and guidence notes. Mee

    Telecommunications Junior manager Interviews and survey questionnaire

    Public sector Middle manager Survey and follow up questions for cl

    Financial services Middle manager electronically via email.

    Public sector Non-managerial Questionnaire

    Computer software & services Middle manager Interviews and questionaires

    Banking Middle manager By Questionnaires followed by intervi

    Banking Middle manager By Questionnaires followed by intervi

    Financial services Middle manager Questionnaire

    Financial services Middle manager Manual excel spread sheets.

    Food, drink & tobacco production Senior manager Consultant-led workshop and follow-

    Financial services Non-board director By face to face interview of Directors

    Financial services Junior manager Questionnaire

    Leisure Senior manager Via a series of face-to-face departme

    Insurance Junior manager Survey and follow up interviews

    Other Senior manager Via Questionaire with client. Across

    Manufacturing Junior manager via paper form through snail mail or

    Transport and logistics Non-board director Face to face structured interview usin

    Other Middle manager By way of questionnaires and intervi

    Other Senior manager by interview with key managers

    Financial services Middle manager Interview

    Transport and logistics Senior manager Checklist & template by the line man

    Banking Non-managerial ^Personnal interview

    Telecommunications Senior manager Via a series of interviews and predefi

    Banking Senior manager Workshops, Interviews, questionnair

    Other Middle manager ManuallyFinancial services Senior manager MS Word based template

    Other Middle manager Interviews

    Other Non-managerial It is not.

    Other Select here Via workshops and interviews with ke

    Public sector Senior manager survey

    Public sector Middle manager Interviews and discovery meetings.

    Financial services Middle manager workshops & self assessment survey

    Computer software & services Middle manager Through the users

    Select here Board director Survey templates.

    Banking Non-managerial Questionnaire, generated and filled i

    Banking Senior manager Unitwise data on BIA is collated for

    Computer software & services Senior manager users a supplied with an information I

    Financial services Senior manager integrated as part of the BRP six mo

    Financial services Board director Meetings and workshops with each liEnergy Middle manager BIA information is collected in conjun

  • 7/30/2019 Bia Survey Raw Data

    5/21

    Computer software & services Senior manager Department heads at meetings

    Financial services Non-board director Interviews with all senior staff followin

    Banking Select here We are in the planning stage of our B

    Aerospace & defence Senior manager Through combination of brainstormin

    Other Middle manager Using checklists and questionnaires

    Manufacturing Senior manager Through project plans and interviews

    Other Non-board director Up to local BC managersInsurance Senior manager Interview style primarily.

    Financial services Senior manager Via paper survey:

    Banking Non-board director Brief questionnaire to gather (1) impa

    Other Middle manager Through an interview process

    Other Senior manager Face-to-Face interview of senior man

    Other Junior manager surveys

    Financial services Middle manager By interviews with business team, te

    Manufacturing Middle manager questionnaire

    Financial services Middle manager Interview, e-mail, departmental meeti

    Financial services Non-managerial Form was designed and sent to all di

    Computer software & services Senior manager

    Construction Junior manager Interviews with operational managers

    Financial services Middle manager By questionnaires sent annually to all

    Insurance Junior manager MS Word Document - to work with ou

    Computer software & services Senior manager By using Questionaries

    Computer software & services Non-board director Interviews with business line leads a

    Financial services Non-board director Through enterprise level Business R

    Utilities Senior manager Specialist Consultancy appointed to

    Financial services Middle manager interviews and questionnaires

    Other Senior manager Strohl Systems BIA Tool

    Other Non-managerial By interview.

    Health products & services Non-board director

    Financial services Senior manager Via software and then follow up calls

    Other Senior manager Survey of staff

    Financial services Senior manager Retained an external consultant

    Health products & services Middle manager Interview templates

    Insurance Middle manager Survey

    Retailing Middle manager information is gathered during struct

    Financial services Middle manager Template

    Telecommunications Non-board director Access Data base survey questions li

    Health products & services Middle manager Strohl Systems' BIA Pro; interviews,

    Public sector Non-managerial Individual interviews with key manag

    Financial services Senior manager Via questionnaire completed in 1-1 m

    Other Non-managerial questionnaire, interviews, and querie

    Health products & services Senior manager Electronic survey distributed to all de

    Public sector Senior manager Using proforma and question forms

    Public sector Middle manager Regionally (11 regions)

    Financial services Senior manager Template completed by business ma

    Financial services Middle manager Through questionairres directed at Pr

    Computer software & services Middle manager interview and workshops

    Financial services Middle manager BIA workbookInsurance Middle manager Currently via templates in MS Word

    Financial services Middle manager Computerised model, done in one-o

    Other Senior manager Use of Sthroll software and individual

    Transport and logistics Board director Specifically assigned tasks to senior

    Other Senior manager BIA software from Strohl Systems

    Financial services Non-managerial Using BIA questionnaire software.

    Financial services Non-managerial Manually

    Transport and logistics Senior manager By teams reporting to divisional head

    Financial services Non-managerial Surveys, Research, Statistics

    Computer software & services Senior manager Unknown

    Leisure Middle manager Survey (template) to all department

    Financial services Middle manager Questionnaire plus interview

    Financial services Senior manager Scenario analysis - critical systems,

    Computer software & services Junior manager At meetingsUtilities Middle manager By Deaprtments and locations

  • 7/30/2019 Bia Survey Raw Data

    6/21

    Other Non-board director Formalised Questionnaire

    Financial services Senior manager Through many sources:

    Insurance Senior manager

    Financial services Senior manager Formal survey and inventory of critica

    Energy Middle manager

    Public sector Middle manager

    Financial services Select here divisional interviewsFinancial services Non-managerial Interviews with Managers + Worksho

    Public sector Senior manager Agency Risk Register

    Public sector Middle manager We conduct discovery meetings und

    Other Senior manager The BIA form is distributed to each Di

    Other Board director Desk study of background material -

    Other Middle manager Via a survey form and on-site risk as

    Other Non-managerial Each business head is responsible fo

    Other Non-board director Usually via questionnaire designed b

    Banking Senior manager Structured Risk Assessment Model

    Energy Middle manager By identifying business processes fir

    Insurance Middle manager survey document that is filled in by e

    Banking Middle manager Through briefing and filling in BIA qu

    Select here Select here

    Insurance Junior manager Business areas' leaders complete onl

    Financial services Senior manager Through discussion and sign off

    Other Junior manager Through a survey

    Banking Board director

    Financial services Non-board director Criticality, financials, staffing, proces

    Health products & services Non-managerial Survey

    Financial services Middle manager Interviews using standard format an

    Telecommunications Non-managerial

    Banking Junior manager Questionnaire

    Manufacturing Middle manager Meetings scheduled with the manag

    Telecommunications Senior manager At individual business unit level

    Banking Board director by department, using a document te

    Financial services Senior manager Word documents completed, agreed

    Other Middle manager Tool enabled, face-to-face interviews,

    Other Senior manager Business process analysis is underta

    Financial services Senior manager Interview, paper and electronic

    Computer software & services Middle manager Questionnaire

    Financial services Middle manager Written Survey with followup intervie

    Manufacturing Senior manager BIA questionnaire is distributed for co

    Financial services Middle manager the Plan owner approaches the Busi

    Financial services Junior manager Individual meeting with business unit

  • 7/30/2019 Bia Survey Raw Data

    7/21

    Does your BIA cover eve Does your BIA cover eve How often do you cond How is the BIA inf Is the BIA information

    Yes 1 time Spreadsheet for sor No

    Yes Min 3 yearly Centrally collated b Yes

    No In process of doing this BC plan has complete anPlanner develops

    Yes required annually by corp Software program NoYes Are doing our first one. Still developing that.No

    No Headquarters only - cost c 1-2 years spreadsheet Yes

    Yes First one recently comple By hand, used to p No

    Yes First one recently comple By hand, used to p No

    Yes Standards are Annual or Reviewed directly w No

    Yes Only one conducted to m Report presented to Yes

    Yes once now, then every 2 Manually through d Yes

    Yes is currently being done, l Entered in a databa Yes

    Yes Annually Trying to obtain a to Yes

    Yes Once with updates on a r Used as input into r No

    No Wide and diverse busines Once in the lifetime of a Form / paperwork fil No

    No IT with a business focus o once By the BC manage Yes

    Yes as regularly as possible analysed against th No

    Yes This process was carried out about 2 years a No

    No NO ,as a fair answer , let's Not enough , mostly a th Data is somtimes p No

    Yes 12-18 months, or when siCurrently analysed No

    No Critical processes / functi Annually Collated and sum No

    Yes Every 12 months or whe All information is an Yes

    No The original BIA looked at annually Master copies of all Yes

    Yes Have only just completed Responses are reta No

    Yes Bi-annual or when major Analyzed by BC offi Yes

    Yes annually manually Yes

    Yes annually manually Yes

    Yes 1 time Spreadsheet for sor No

    No IT focus based on applicai Every two years Various views of th No

    Yes This is the first Manual inspection, Yes

    No Only large revenue produ Based on risk analysis d It is used to substan No

    Yes BU has to document speciAt the project initiation a Information is sum Yes

    Yes This is the first Consolidated into m Yes

    Yes Annually Analyzed by continuYes

    Yes Identifies all services and/ About one per quarter. We develop an exe Yes

    No covers payroll and human has been done twice in t collated manually a Yes

    Yes After each organisational Paper interview doc No

    Yes Every 3 years or whenev It is analyzed base Yes

    No key processes annually manual review No

    Yes yearly Analyse, prioritizatioYes

    Yes On significant change wit Line manager uses No

    Yes BCPC decision to view all, Min. yearly, but continuo MS-Access databa No

    Yes See above. BIAs are reviewed, rathe BIA Reports are pro No

    Yes every 2 years excel sheets, matrix Yes

    No Each division decides on it once per five years Cumulated mannualYesYes At the minimum annually, Once completed it i Yes

    Yes Once every two years Final report with rec No

    No Still in the process of integ Never N\A No

    Yes once a year Analyzed, refined a Yes

    Yes 6 mths spreadsheet Yes

    Yes Every change in administ BIA Professional fro Yes

    Yes Every 2 years analysis work done Yes

    No IT division only once a year through report findi No

    Yes Every change to any part We use SunGard's Yes

    Yes Annually, and a monthly Automated reports Yes

    No Non critical functions - m BIA is done Annually, bu BIA collated forms No

    Yes Once a year or if there are significant change No

    Yes 6 monthly database No

    Yes At least annually, but mo Manually NoNo Any function that is deeme Done in conjunction with We are developing No

  • 7/30/2019 Bia Survey Raw Data

    8/21

    Yes Generally once but every built into our proce No

    Yes Annually or more often if It is not processed, iNo

    Yes We are planning to conducWe are using BIA Profes No Additionally, this inform

    Yes Annual review, with ame Information is mana No

    No Only those deemed critical Currently developing orig Yes

    Yes When new systems are l LDRPS No

    Yes New process, no history Up to local BC man YesYes Annually Entered into system No

    Yes Annually Database No

    Yes Annually Reports are prepareNo

    Yes one time Yes

    Yes As approved & required by Every 6 months, plus as Interpretation of res No

    Yes annually carefully Yes

    No This would be to cumbers Annually, or more often if It is analyzed for co No

    No only pre-identified critical a every 5 yrs spread sheet No

    No Areas that impact revenue Whenever there are signi It is used as referen Yes

    Yes Currently doing the first suOnly when t6here are ch The Disaster Recov Yes

    Yes Yes

    No Those with a high IT relian Only once so far Diagramatically Yes

    Yes Annually Through an MS Acc Yes

    Yes Annually Excel No

    Yes Every 2-3 years Manually Yes

    No BIA has been completed f yearly database No

    Yes Annually By utilizing our Rev No

    Yes In some areas of the busin Introducing company wid Documented and ci No

    Yes annually Yes

    Yes annually electronically throuNo

    Yes once a year Manuel by consulteNo

    Yes Yearly+ Manually and teh B Yes

    Yes Every 2 years Cmpiled onto sprea Yes

    Yes Done once Collated by external Yes

    No Business Applications deciOnce Information extracte Yes

    Yes Once every 5 to 7 years: Furnished to senior Yes

    Yes every five years, or whe questionnaires are No

    Yes Annually Impact ratings are u Yes

    Yes Either on an anual basis Measured against o No

    Yes We are conducting one t We try to verify and No

    Yes Every three years. Analyzed for RTO, cNo

    Yes Initially with revisions req collated to determin No

    Yes yearly reviewed by two-thr Yes

    Yes This is the first, hoping to Survey Software an No

    Yes every three years computer Yes

    Yes Once, in 2000. Even the Regionally, first. N Yes

    No Covers all divisions but is Every 2-3 years Reviewed by centra No

    Yes Initial (all encompassing) Basically feeds into No

    No Tends to be HQ focused every two years manually Yes

    Yes Once every 3 years, or s BIA workbook form NoNo BIA is conducted for thos min 12 monthly or more f This is a somewhat No

    Yes Yearly, or as business p On computer. AnalNo

    Yes 1st was this year Use Sthroll software Yes

    Yes Annually Report to board of dNo

    Yes Annual BIA software from No

    No Every area completes a BIAt least once a year, or Again, software doe No

    No Corporate office only Every 2 years Reviewed and com Yes

    Yes Annually Input into database, No

    No Bank-wide any and all impAnnually Written Word docu No

    No Unknown Unknown Unknown No

    Yes Yearly Combined and brok Yes

    Yes Infrequently. Manually, spreadshYes

    Yes Scenario development o Presented to Syste No

    No Just the critical areas, IT, Once a year The manager puts iYesYes Bi-annually Assimilated by Dis No

  • 7/30/2019 Bia Survey Raw Data

    9/21

    Yes Every 6 Months Reviewed by Busin Yes

    team meetings, Disaster R Yes We conduct them o The data is reviewed fo

    Interview with key manage Yes 2 yearly with annu Compiled into standar

    Yes Annually Risk factors assess No

    No Yes

    Yes reviewed 6 monthly cross checked agai NoNo Key business funtions Annually: Report and speads Yes

    Yes As often as the manager Centrally monitored No

    Yes After every administratio We use excel and BYes

    Yes annually Since the same fo No

    Yes 6-monthly or on material analysed from a sp No

    No Critical functions only -- th Annually. Reviewed by LC OpYes

    Yes BIA are completed forma The information is c No

    Yes In every company with w Cerified against any No

    Yes Annually & whenever sig Prioritised for consi No

    Yes Once every two years in It is used to develop No

    No Only the critical areas are Every other year or a maWe use Strohls BIA Yes

    Yes Do it once Analyze across fun No

    Yes Quarterly Cross-referenced a Yes

    Yes As per the security policy which is once in ye No

    Yes every 18 mos Reviewed by BCP t No

    Yes Yes

    Yes Annually or more if nec Manually and auto No

    No Many surveys pending At deployment of new ap entered into a spreaNo

    Yes Annually, or when new p Into standard sprea Yes

    No No

    Yes Bi annual Cross analysis No

    Yes At least once evry 3 year Using predetermin Yes

    No Essential Functions only * 12 monthly Report & Presentat Yes

    No currently business critical annually processed manaullyNo

    Yes Annually but updated for Entered into spread No

    No Only Mission Critical functi Not often enough Tool enabled and m Yes

    Yes To be decided as part of Looking at tools to Yes

    Yes full annually. project imp excel / access No

    Yes so far only once, when w BCP coordinator an Yes

    Yes Annual update to original MS Accexss, MS E No

    Yes depends on criticality of f Used to ensure busiNo

    Yes 2x a year it is placed into a sp Yes

    Yes Update every three mont Spreadsheets upda Yes

  • 7/30/2019 Bia Survey Raw Data

    10/21

    Is the BIA information usWhat are the main diffic Are you planning to mak Are you planning to make any changes t

    IT uses application/syste information accuracy, esp Yes include BIA questionnaire in change mana

    User participation No

    Timely return of informatio Yes Questionnaires will be completed in prese

    used by variety of other deTime commitment require NoOur Internal Audit people Obtaining people's time a Yes Not sure yet - experience will drive this. I

    questionnaires not returneYes Automation - software

    Report issued for risk ma Getting the information fr No

    Report issued for risk ma Getting the information fr No

    Good summary source of i Each Business Area is un Yes Ever evolving process as the business are

    Unrealistic timeframe for rYes

    None so far. No

    Difficult to decide what lve Yes Streamline as possible

    In the course of the analy No

    Information also used by I Lack of business impact i Yes Possibly - always revising and implementin

    It is used to determine dis Availability of people with Yes Global acceptance and compliance.

    separating IT and busine Yes Interviews and surveys. Encompass more

    also by any other relevant t ime and resources No

    By each of the service are 2 years ago problems werYes If any areas of improvement can be identifi

    No , normaly this data is u It is very difficult to get ex Yes Yes , workgroups to (re-)evaluate the curre

    The business will use the Consistency of informatio Yes Will be looking at gathering information ele

    IS use for prioritising critic Obtaining time/ resource No

    The knowledge level of te Yes I will be conducting awareness sessions pr

    poor quality information prYes Greater participation by internal audit and

    It has been used to help o Defining the functions and Yes Questions will be revised, added, dropped.

    Territorial managers No

    Getting it completed in a ti Yes Looking for more automated methods and

    Getting it completed in a ti Yes Looking for more automated methods and

    IT uses application/syste information accuracy, esp Yes include BIA questionnaire in change mana

    End of life for legacy syste time and money Yes Acquire an automated system into a datab

    Getting contributors to co No

    To substantiate current ri Lack of due diligence on Yes I will stay away as much as I can from req

    Obtain acurate informatio Yes Simplify the questions

    Consistency of response No

    Business is not will ing to take the take to complete the information for the survey

    Interviewing the right peo No

    getting support from exec No

    It is also used by the IT de First time round, general i Yes We have historically covered buildings, s

    Having the resources to No

    for process improvement availability of key manag No

    Lack of enthousiasm of in No

    See 8. Line manager engageme Yes Piloting the process over the next few mon

    A card of credit card size) Nobody's (Mngmt) willing Yes More and more formal regular reporting, th

    Responsibility for creating Time - There's never eno No

    resources availability, No

    Getting senior manageme Yes Awareness and convincingCan be time consuming. No

    Booking the actual meetin No don't know , first time it is done.

    Not used If such an activity would e No

    User involvement; ambigu Yes process of collecting information under rev

    getting answers No

    Delay in varifying accurac No We just recently changed our process.

    lack of time and resource No

    It is used for head of divis lack of cooperating and u No

    Getting business people t No

    Answer like : - its someone else responsibilities...

    Scenario-based BIA data Consistency in approach No But we are constantly engaging to find a r

    All so used by our BS779 None No Make it webbased

    process interdependencie was difficult to get team le Yes ongoing improvements to make the gather

    Used as part of the annual Change of management a Yes Restructure of the mechanism with possiblThere are numerous initiat Time -- or lack thereof. B Yes Although I cannot foretell what the change

  • 7/30/2019 Bia Survey Raw Data

    11/21

    the information is used to Time and resurces for a t No

    Audit, technology and rep Finding the time, keeping Yes Intranet collected

    Resource constraints are tNo

    It is open for all to see. ThiMind set and culture. Fire Yes As the process matures the BIA will be am

    Learning curve of BCP co Yes To address ALL functions/services

    cooperation from others o No

    Time allocation, lack of ex Yes As this is new to us it will inevitably be upDisaster Recovery Team Scheduling the meeting. No

    All deparments review an Defining Criticality Yes Automate the process

    The information is used to Getting across the import No

    Consistency of the users No

    Where critical systems ide Need to ensure response No It's taken awhile, but we think we've now g

    No

    Information Security is no Identifying anyone with a Yes Improve BIA templates, increase BIA temp

    drp team also size of questionnaire No

    Getting timely response frNo

    1. Managers not completi Yes 1. Reformating the form 2. Additional que

    No

    Fixing appointments No

    Encouraging managers to No

    It's used for move plannin Identifying all of the depar No

    People withou time to fulfilYes Not sure yet, although we are seeking new

    Business process informa Scheduling Yes Improve the ability to quantify RTO and ad

    The Office of Protective S Impacting the business Yes It is in a constant state of incremental impr

    Used for System continuit Getting the involvement a No

    delay in answer: No

    To prioritize business pr mindset, standardization No

    By the hwole oragnisation To get the information ab Yes A better interview with the senior manage

    People do not understand No

    1. Ensuring coverage of alYes Changing from procedure/process basis to

    Management committmen No

    Business Representative Yes Automate to a planning tool

    Cooperation of the parties No

    shared with other groups It can be difficult getting t No

    Perception of which functi Yes Process under review as a Six sigma proje

    By Risk manager to evalu Lack of will to perform the Yes Depends on the regulatory environment. T

    Equipment on which critic the link between applicati Yes We plan on keeping it mainly in house wit

    Used by IT to establish re Staff availability for intervi No

    USed also by IT to review Difficult to quantify costs i Yes Unsure at present but always looking to im

    much of the information i Yes moving toward greater reliance on informa

    It will be used by Senior management to justify budg No

    Apathy, obstruction, fear No

    Follow-up and follow thro Yes Press for an annual internal regional revi

    Used bu business areas t Getting business resource No

    It is proving to be of great Lack of true business und No

    costing impacts Yes reduce subjectivity increase precision

    Support functions use the Documenting financial im NoIt is also used by/ in partn The 2 key difficulties are Yes Process to be aligned with new corporate

    As explained above Expertise in business uni Yes Going over to the BCI's new Best Practice

    Sr Mgt time, lack of preceiYes Will conduct it at lower levels withing the o

    By auditors and Board for no real difficulty No

    Business planning Key people completing th No

    It can end up being used i The software we use is to Yes We are hoping we will be allowed to. Som

    Getting the proper people No

    Departmental heads given Response times, Weighti No

    Risk Management team a Corporate wide cooperati Yes Allow it to cover business units individuall

    Unknown I have not seen a BIA con Yes Unknown

    Getting back all the docu No

    Heavy on resources & ti Yes Need to run more frequently. *Possibly rev

    Can be referred to as part Quantifying impacts: No

    Employees do not think it NoAlso by Network Infrastru Time Frame in receiving i No

  • 7/30/2019 Bia Survey Raw Data

    12/21

    Ensuring Business Mana No

    No Disaster Recovery Team, Buy in from all area's. It is No

    No Available to managers to Collecting cost data No

    BCP Executive Committe There are no significant " No

    No

    see above getting people to set asid Yes INSTRUCTING DIVISIONS TO INCLUDEEverything, but mainly coll Yes BIA review in November 2003

    High impact risks are refe Assessments need to be Yes More sophisticated use of software to guid

    Getting the necessary fun No We have just modified to this methodology

    It is used by the Informati My priorities to capture t No

    Business and department Availability for interview; Yes Increasingly BIA is being viewed as part o

    Lack of management invo No

    See above. The BIA are tApathy - reluctance to tak Yes Not specifically about the BIA but there ha

    Also by change mangeme Lack of real knowledge of Yes develop more sophisticated, multi-level qu

    To manage all operationa Lack of knowledge in rela Response to Basel committee in relation to capital adequacy

    It is used every time one n Inconsistencies in the way Yes Will be amended to meet the requirements

    Determing and collecting Yes last BIA was for the complete corporate en

    Could be used for other ri Participation from the ma No

    Getting all owners of plan Yes New system/process being introduced soo

    Its used by all members o At times participants are Yes

    IT uses the information to Management commitment No

    Yes We are planning to make this a mandator

    Audit, Technology, busin Time Yes Revamp to make easier for business unit

    General reference S L O W turnaround of su No

    BCP is normally always th Yes Easier to use

    Yes

    Time of participants Yes

    Lack of any one individu Yes Nothing definative, but we want to modify

    BCM is a long way down No

    used by each department lack of buy-in from depart No

    as above Too paper intensive Yes make the templates easier to underastand

    Communicating purpose Yes Increase frequency of data refreshes

    Validating the responses. Yes Always looking for better methods.

    plan maintenance staff availability, sufficient Yes more process dependency emphasis

    Subjective perceptions of Yes Work on more disaster scenarios, rather th

    Feeds into requirements d Doing the survey, normali Yes Integrate into follow-on Application Impact

    See above. Also used for Using the same questionnNo

    explaining why the inform Yes we are expanding it

    Business Continuity PlannNo

  • 7/30/2019 Bia Survey Raw Data

    13/21

    o your BIA procedure in the future? More info

    gement/implementation process to keep it current. Review/update annually or bi-annually

    ce of planner to assure everyone REALLY understands the requirement.

    suspect future BIA iterations will include prior results for reference purposes.

    as are learning, so are we, we are continually updating the Form and Process to ensure that it is as user friendly as possible for

    g good practice as appropriate to business.

    business functions into overall plans

    ed from this current process once it has been completed than the programme/procedure will be up-dated and improved.

    tn practise will look at it. The BIA is more and more becoming a Risk Management practise ...Regulations like Basel II in the fin

    ctronically

    ior to requesting the impact information. We have had a signifcant change in our management structure and all new managers

    enior management.

    We will also vary the frequency in which we administer the questionnaire to low priority business groups.

    benchmarks

    benchmarks

    gement/implementation process to keep it current. Review/update annually or bi-annually

    ase verses manual colleciton

    uesting BIA info. via fil ling forms preferring multiple one on one interviews. Need to find a way to present the data in a ROI forma

    stems and people but because of our increasing dependency on external suppliers we have added, in the last 6 months, critical

    ths - this should lead to modifications in detail but is unlikely to change the concept.

    rough scorcard, and check list.

    iew. Other key resources will be influencial in providing information.

    bust methodology

    ed data more dynamic

    e survey approach using a web site and browser based tools.might be, I can almost guarantee that changes will be required. That's the nature of business today!

  • 7/30/2019 Bia Survey Raw Data

    14/21

    ended to suit the needs of the business. Depending on feedback it may be lengthend or reduced, or terminology amended to en

    ated and changed.

    t the business groups to understand the value of independent BIA.

    late options, improve use instructions, move to a more consistant methodology across the business (note - this decision is politi

    tions to be added

    paths and ways to get staff and managers involved in the whole process.

    ability to measure cost impact using different methods.

    ovement, based on industry best practices

    ent

    business outputs basis

    ct.

    he question is irrelevant if the plan documentation does not include the ability to change.

    out use of consultants, and to maintain it.

    prove. May gather from BCI Forum

    tion in product database rather than on interviews and questionnaires. However, this will take time as not all the information for

    w and rehearsals.

    tandards and the overall process to be siimplified and made more user friendtly

    s, implementing it enterprise-wide, awareness and education, re-engineering the whole BC policy, model, roles & responsibili tie

    rganization

    ething like an interview process would be much better than the way it is handled now.

    iew automation/tools. *Would like to demonstrate risk better in terms of more accurate cost/analysis. *Improvements required to

  • 7/30/2019 Bia Survey Raw Data

    15/21

    IA IN 6 MONTHLY REVIEWS ON WORK SCHEDULESWITH ACTIONS COMPLETED AND SCHEDULE OF ACTIONS TO B

    e and analyse the data

    because we were having trouble getting members to participate in providing information as well as final approval on findings. F

    the strategic business process - see answer to 9.

    e been changes in the organisational structure with more responsibility placed upon the businesses and Group Operations and

    stionnaire to make data collection quicker and easier . PS AS I am a consultant in BC and DR I have answered for the procedu

    of people that use its results.

    tity, the next will be for the local enterprise only.

    n on international level.

    requirement for annual business-plans.

    to supply, probably web based

    the analysis process.

    and put it on a web page for ease of use.

    an a total unavailability of building.

    Analysis

  • 7/30/2019 Bia Survey Raw Data

    16/21

    all concerned.

    ncial Industry will be drivers in this process

    ill have to be briefed on the who, what and why.

    t and in risk management terminology.

    l suppliers.

  • 7/30/2019 Bia Survey Raw Data

    17/21

    sure consistent use.

    cal and not beneficial to accurate BIA's)

    all products is in the database.

    , process and procedures

    identify interfaces better.

  • 7/30/2019 Bia Survey Raw Data

    18/21

    E TAKEN

    unding will always be an issue in a tough economy and a government entity.

    the BCMF taking a lesser role.

    res that I put into companies with whom I work. The main change for BIAs is going to be the drivers from regulatory, statutory,

  • 7/30/2019 Bia Survey Raw Data

    19/21

  • 7/30/2019 Bia Survey Raw Data

    20/21

  • 7/30/2019 Bia Survey Raw Data

    21/21

    nd contractual sources to ensure that the due process of BCM is carried oout.