aug 73 - eric - education resources information … i ligh school in stewart, nevada. phoenix indian...

79
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 085 130 32 RC 007 473 TITLE Report of Final Evaluation ESEA Title I Projects, Fiscal Year 1973; Phoenix Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of Interior. INSTITUTION Bureau of Indian Affairs (Dept. of Intrior), Phoenix, Ariz. SPONS AGENCY Bureau of Elementary and Secondary Education (DREW /0E) 1 Washington, D.C. Div. of Compensatory Education. PUB DATE Aug 73 NOTE 78p.; Related document is EDO6S459 EDES PRICE MF-$0.o5 HC-$3.29 DESCRIPTORS *Academic Achievement; *American Indians; *Annual Reports; Expenditures; Language Development; Mathematics; Paraprofessional School Personnel; Parent Associations; Physical Education; Professional Personnel; Reading; Student Enrollment; *Summative Evaluation; *Tables (Data) IDENTIFIERS Arizona; *Bureau of Indian Affairs; Phoenix ABSTRACT A summary of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act Title I projects operated in the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), Phoenix Area, during fiscal year 1973 is given in this evaluation report on a school by school basis. Data, presented by charts and graphs, cover: the BIA's organization; student enrollment in the Phoenix Area; school expenditures; student participation by component and school; professional and paraprofessional staff; parent council involvement; and student achievement in reading, language, mathematics, special education, and physical education. The data in this report show that, except for a few isolated grades in some schools, projects were very successful during 1973. Students in every grade gained at or above the national average in reading and language and, with the exception of students in grades 3 and 11, also in mathematics. The following recommendations are made: (1) schools showing low gains in reading and mathematics should critically evaluate their programs to see what is hindering their students and (2) projects which are demonstrating consistent gains in every grade should attempt to have the regular program institute the activities throughout the school. (NQ)

Upload: lydang

Post on 12-Jul-2019

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

DOCUMENT RESUME

ED 085 130 32 RC 007 473

TITLE Report of Final Evaluation ESEA Title I Projects,Fiscal Year 1973; Phoenix Area, Bureau of IndianAffairs, Department of Interior.

INSTITUTION Bureau of Indian Affairs (Dept. of Intrior),Phoenix, Ariz.

SPONS AGENCY Bureau of Elementary and Secondary Education(DREW /0E) 1 Washington, D.C. Div. of CompensatoryEducation.

PUB DATE Aug 73NOTE 78p.; Related document is EDO6S459

EDES PRICE MF-$0.o5 HC-$3.29DESCRIPTORS *Academic Achievement; *American Indians; *Annual

Reports; Expenditures; Language Development;Mathematics; Paraprofessional School Personnel;Parent Associations; Physical Education; ProfessionalPersonnel; Reading; Student Enrollment; *SummativeEvaluation; *Tables (Data)

IDENTIFIERS Arizona; *Bureau of Indian Affairs; Phoenix

ABSTRACTA summary of the Elementary and Secondary Education

Act Title I projects operated in the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA),Phoenix Area, during fiscal year 1973 is given in this evaluationreport on a school by school basis. Data, presented by charts andgraphs, cover: the BIA's organization; student enrollment in thePhoenix Area; school expenditures; student participation by componentand school; professional and paraprofessional staff; parent councilinvolvement; and student achievement in reading, language,mathematics, special education, and physical education. The data inthis report show that, except for a few isolated grades in someschools, projects were very successful during 1973. Students in everygrade gained at or above the national average in reading and languageand, with the exception of students in grades 3 and 11, also inmathematics. The following recommendations are made: (1) schoolsshowing low gains in reading and mathematics should criticallyevaluate their programs to see what is hindering their students and(2) projects which are demonstrating consistent gains in every gradeshould attempt to have the regular program institute the activitiesthroughout the school. (NQ)

prima) PROM BEST AVAILABLE COPY

It1.14tTn<

-1

' r,$ I.:0.1%4 ,0 0$ Al 141// Awl

..A104A 04%1111111I 00C %'.0%

REPORT OF FINAL EVALUATION

ESEA TITLE I PROJECTS

FISCAL YEAR 1973

0`CCtIVElly

;-3"C 14 19732NUSU

E.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIORBUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, EDUCATION

PHOENIX AREA

John Artichoker, Jr.Area Director

Ray SorensenAssistant Area Director (Education)

David N. BurchDeputy Assistant Area Director

(Education)

Harriet B. HilburnFederal Programs Administrator

David R. Moers Steven J. AndersonTitle I Specialist Title l Specialist

Richard L. SchwartzTitle f Specialist

AUGUST 1973

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I wish to express my sincere appreciation to several individuals who contributed directlyand indirectly to the completion of this document.

First to the teachers whose diligence and perseverance made the difference between thespectacular results reported here and the mediocre results that could have occurred. Second-ly, to the Title I Coordinators, School, and Agency Administrators whose logistical work andcooperation were invaluable. Appreciation is extended to the Parent Advisory' Councils fortheir concern, input, and support in the planning and operation of all local school projects.

Special thanks are clue to Richard Schwartz, Steve Anderson, David Ntoers, and TheresaSerapigha for providing technical assistance and support from the area office level to theschools.

Finally-, I am deeply indebted to Frances Makii for the cover design and to Mr. WintonColes of Phoenix Indian School who voluntarily worked overtime to provide the art workfor the various charts.

Harriet B. HilburnFederal Programs AdministratorPhoenix Area Office

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Introduction iv

Overview and Organization of the Bureau of Indian Affairs 1

Enrollment in the Phoenix Area ..... 4

Expenditures/school ... 5

Student Participation by Component and School 6

Professional and Paraprofessional Staff .._.. 7

Parent Council Involvement 12

Student Achievement:

Reading ...... . 13

Language 37

Mathematics 53

Special Education 70

Physical Education 71

Conclusions and Recommendations . ......... ...._.... 72

Definition of Terms 74

iii

INTRODUCTION

This Evaluation report addresses itself to a summary of profiects operated in the Bureauof Indian Affairs, Phoenix Area, (hiring Fiscal 197:3. The format of the present report is a breakfrom the traditional Phoenix area report in that the long narrative has been replaced with amore manageable and readable presentation of charts and graphs.

Additionally, this year the Phoenix Area is presenting two evaluatioh reports. One, forgeneral distribution, is a composite summary of the data into au area-wide report. The secondis an individual school report that presents the data on a school by school basis. The schoolreport is primarily meant for distribution to the 22 Phoenix Area Schools; however, anyonewho wants a copy of the report may have one.

For further information relative to the evaluation reports Of the Title 1 programs pleasecontact:

Phoenix Area Office (Education )Attention: David NioersP.O. Box 7007Phoenix, Arizona 85011

For further information regarding the operation of the programs please contact:Phoenix Area Office ( Education )Attention: Harriet B. Hilburn

Federal Programs AdministratorP.O. Box 7007Phoenix, Arizona 85011

iv

OVERVIEW AND ORGANIZATION OF THE BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS

At the time of printing of this report, the Bureau of Indian Affairs was considering severalreorganization plans, each of which would change the alignment and functions of the differ-ent administrative levels, However the basic organizational flow from the Commissioner tothe field Area Offices, agency, and school levels appears not to change from previous yeas.(Sec figure 1)

The Phoenix Area Office exercises jurisdiction over Bureau of Indian Affairs schools in a threestate region. Figure 2 shows the geographical location of schools in the Phoenix Area. Thetwenty-one schools are situated in a three-state region comprised of Arizona, California andNevada. With the exception of two off-reservation high schools, all are located in Arizona.The two exceptions are Sherman Indian High School in Riverside, California and Stewart In-dian I ligh School in Stewart, Nevada. Phoenix Indian High School, the Arco's third board-ing high school, is located in the heart of Phoenix, Arizona.

Located in the White Mountains of eastern Arizona are the John F. Kennedy, Day School,Cibecue Day School, and Theodore Roosevelt Boarding School. To the north, approximately180 miles are the Hopi mesas mid the six schools which serve the Hopi children. A mule tripis necessary to reach the Havasupai village, where the Supai Day School is located near theGrand Canyon. Farther south near the Mexico-Arizona border in the Sonoran Desert, is theSanta Rosa Boarding School and three small clay schools on the Papago Reservation. Approxi-mately 30 miles south of Phoenix on the Gila River Reservation are the two Pima Bureauday schools, one small tribal operated school and one mission school. Also, located near met-ropolitan Phoenix is the Salt River Reservation which contains one day school.

Are

as(1

)

Abe

rdee

n A

rea

Offi

ceM

erge

n. S

. Dak

ota

(2)

Alb

uque

rque

Are

a O

ffice

Alb

uque

rque

. N. M

.

(3)

Ana

dark

o A

rea

Offi

ceA

nada

rko.

Okl

ahom

a

(4)

Bill

ings

Are

a O

ffice

Bill

ings

. Mon

te.

Fig

ure

1O

rgan

izat

ion-

Bur

eau

of In

dian

Affa

irs

OF

FIC

E O

F C

OM

MIS

SIO

NE

R

CO

MM

ISS

ION

ER

(5)

(6)

Min

neap

olis

Are

a O

ffice

Mnn

eapc

hs..A

.nns

et.

(7)

Mus

koge

e A

rea

Offi

ceM

usko

gee.

Okl

ahom

a

(8)

Nav

a,*

Are

a O

tt..

Gal

lup.

N."

..'"

(9)

Prio

ems

Are

s O

r,..

Ph.

fh, 1

,440

r.

(1C

)

Per

eend

Are

. °M

eeP

oe V

and.

Ore

gon

iCM

Men

tu A

r.. 0

1OC

S.1

1.10

.011

0. C

AM

P

Age

ncie

s

Sch

ools

Age

ncie

sA

genc

ies

Sch

ools

Sch

ools

Age

ncie

s

Sch

ools

Figure 2Phoenix Area Schools

Truxton CanonAgency School

22

1

1920

12

10

4

1613 14

15

frPapago Agency

Schools

1. Phoenix Indian High School2. Sherman Indian High School3. Stewart Indian High School4. Cibecue Day School5. John F. Kennedy Day School6. Theodore Roosevelt Boarding Zchool7. Hopi Day School8. Hotevilla Day School9. Keams Canyon Boarding School

10. Moencopi Day School11. Polacca Day School

3

Hopi AgencySchools

Fort ApacheAgencySchools

Salt RiverAgencySchools

Pima AgencySchools

12. Second Mesa Day School13. Kerwo Day School14. Santa Rosa Boarding'School15. Santa Rosa Ranch Day School16. Vaya Chin Day School17. Blackwater Demonstration School18. Casa Blanca Day School19. Gila Crossing Day School20. St. John's Mission School21. Salt River Day School22. Supai Day School

Table 1

Enrollment in the Phoenix Area Schools by Agency and Schoolfor School Year 1972.73

Agency & SchoolGradesServed

Elementary Schools

Fort Apache AgencyCibecue Day SchoolTheodore Roosevelt Brdg.John F. Kennedy Day

Hopi AgencyHopi Day SchoolHotevilla Day SchoolKeams Canyon Brdg/DayMoencopi Day SchoolPolacca Day SchoolSecond Mesa Day School

Papago AgencyKerwo Day SchoolSanta Rosa Boarding/DaySanta Rosa Ranch Day.Vaya Chin Day School

Pima AgencyBlackwater Demonstration*Casa Blanca Day SchoolGila Crossing Day SchoolSt. John's Indian School**

Salt River AgencySalt River Day School

Truxton Canon AgencySupai Day School

High Schools***Phoenix 'ndian High SchoolSherman Indian High SchoolStewart Indian High School

K8K52.8

1.81.6B81.4K-6K-6

B8B.8B-7(34

K-1

K-4K-5

1.12

K-7

B-4

7-129.128-12

Number of Students

288104213

, 147103279

59193276

50390

1974

52139

.114210

285

42

726699490

= Contracted to Community** = Catholic Mission School

*** = Off-Reservation Schools

4

Tab

le 2

Exp

endi

ture

s/S

choo

l

Inst

ruct

iona

l Com

pone

nts

Sup

port

ive

Com

pone

nts

Rea

ding

Lang

uage

Mat

hS

peci

alE

duca

tion

Tot

alA

cade

mic

Phy

sica

lE

duca

tion

Adm

inis

trat

ion

Dis

sem

inat

ion

Par

ent

Cou

ncil

Cos

tT

otal

s

Pol

acca

Day

Sch

ool

20,9

4711

,851

5041

133

.259

Kea

ms

Can

yon

Brd

g. S

ch-

37,2

6521

,569

22,0

12!2

2,56

379

103,

488

Moe

ncop

i Day

Sch

ool

23,2

4179

23,3

20S

econ

d M

esa

Day

Sch

.47

,450

381

47.8

31H

otev

illa

Day

Sch

ool

21,9

3879

22,0

17H

opi D

ay S

choo

l31

,799

5931

.858

Cib

ecue

Day

Sch

ool

35,5

9431

,122

2.62

669

.342

The

odor

e R

oose

velt

Boa

rdin

g S

choo

l49

,307

10,4

702.

566

2,85

065

.193

John

F. K

enne

dy D

ay S

ch.

37,4

281,

255

600

39.2

83cn

Ker

wo

Day

Sch

ool

San

ta R

osa

Brd

g. S

choo

l"1

04,4

92**

28,2

36**

27,3

54S

anta

Ros

a R

anch

Sch

."2

2,20

3*1

82.2

85V

aya

Chi

n D

ay S

choo

lB

lack

wat

ar D

ay S

choo

lC

asa

Bla

nca

Day

Sch

ool

** =

153,

943

*4-'2

7,75

8**

*15,

674

***2

3.64

9**

*404

***2

21.4

28G

ila C

ross

ing

Day

Sch

ool

St.

John

's In

dian

Sch

ool

Sal

t Riv

er D

ay S

choo

l53

,480

22,2

7075

.750

Sup

ai D

ay S

choo

l24

,055

6C0

24,6

55P

hoen

ix In

dian

Sch

ool

193,

244

21,9

242.

000

217.

168

She

rman

Indi

an S

choo

l23

,243

50,4

4511

,756

6,10

44,

800

96,3

48S

tew

art I

ndia

n S

choo

l65

,899

7.84

54,

100

77.8

44P

hoen

ix A

rea

Offi

ce12

0,97

012

0,97

0H

opi F

ollo

w T

hrou

gh42

,570

42.5

70T

otal

$730

,081

$31,

122

$150

,329

$43,

028

$235

,814

Thi

s ad

min

istr

atio

n co

st s

erve

d al

l 6 H

opi S

choo

ls**

Age

ncy

Pro

ject

ser

ved

all 4

Pap

ago

Age

ncy

Sch

ools

***A

genc

y P

roje

ct s

erve

d al

l 4 P

ima

Age

ncy

Sch

ools

$56,

038

$231

.755

$16,

442

$1.4

94.6

09

0)

Tab

le 3

Stu

dent

Par

ticip

atio

n by

Com

pone

nt a

nd S

choo

l

Rea

ding

Lang

uage

Mat

hem

atic

sS

peci

al E

duca

tion

Phy

sica

l Edu

catio

n

Gra

des

No.

of

Stu

dent

sG

rade

sN

o. o

fS

tude

nts

Gra

des

No.

of

Stu

dent

sG

rade

sN

o. o

fS

tude

nts

Gra

des

No.

of

Stu

dent

s

Kea

ms

Can

yon

Brd

g. S

ch.

1-7

130

6-8

68B

-337

Moe

ncop

i Day

Sch

ool

1.4

27

Hop

i Day

Sch

ool

4.8

951

Hot

evill

a D

ay S

choo

l1.

642

Sec

ond

Mes

a D

ay S

choo

l4-

640

Pol

acca

Day

Sch

ool

4.6

704.

641

Cib

ecue

Day

Sch

ool

4.8

64K

-360

John

F. K

enne

dy D

ay S

ch.

1-7

61.

The

odor

e R

oose

velt

Sch

.4.

918

5

Sal

t Riv

er D

ay S

choo

l2-

790

Sup

ai D

ay S

choo

l1-

443

Pho

enix

Indi

an H

igh

Sch

.7-

920

07-

920

07-

920

07.

930

She

rman

Indi

an H

igh

S:h

.9-

1220

09-

1210

09-

1290

Ste

war

t Ind

ian

Hig

h S

ch.

9.12

163

St.

John

's H

igh

Sch

ool

8.11

156

St.

John

's E

lem

enta

ry1.

754

1-7

64

Bla

ckw

ater

Sch

ool

111

Cas

a B

lanc

a D

ay S

choo

l1.

435

1-4

32K

-425

Gila

Cro

ssin

g D

ay S

choo

l1.

545

1.5

38

Vay

a C

hin

Day

Sch

ool

B-4

704.

539

Ker

wo

Day

Sch

ool

13-5

483-

412

San

ta R

osa

Ran

ch D

ay S

ch.

13-6

22

San

ta R

osa

Boa

rdin

g S

ch.

B-8

202

5-8

89

Table 4Number of Professional and Pararlofessional

Staff for the Reading Components

School Professional Para Professional

Regular Program Title 1 Regular Program Title 1

Blackwater School 1 teacher 1 teacher 1 aide

Casa Blanca Day School 2 teachers 1 aide

Cibecue Day School 2 teachers 4 aides

Gila Crossing Day School 2 teachers 1 aide

Hopi Day School 5 teachers 3 aides

Hotevilla Day School 1 teacher 1 aide

John F. Kennedy Day Sch. 2 teachers 3 aides

Keams Canyon Brdg. Sch.1 tea-.Iier1 specialist 2 aides

Kerwo Day School 2 teachers 2 aides

Moencopi Day School 1 teacher 1 aide

Phoenix Indian High Sch. 3 teachers1 teacher1 specialist 11 aides

Polacca Day School 1 teacher 2 aides

St. John's Elementary2 teachers1 counselor 1 aide

St. John's High School2 teachers1 counselor 2 aides

Salt River Day School1 teacher1 counselor 4 aides

Santa Rosa Brdg. Sch. 5 teachers 1 teacher 7 aides

Santa Rosa Ranch Sch. 1 teacher 1 aide

Second Mesa Day Sch. 3 teachers 1 aide

Sherman Indian High Sch. 2 teachers 2 aides

Stewart Indian High Sch. 3 teachers 3 aides

Supai Day School 2 teachers 1 teacher 1 aide

Theodore Roosevelt 1 teacher 2 teachers 3 aides

Vaya Chin Day School. 3 teachers 3 aides

7

Table 5Number of Professional and ParaProfessional

Staff for the Oral Language Components

School Professional ParaProfessional

Regular Program Title 1 Regular Program Title 1

Blackwater School

Casa Blanca Day School

Cibecue Day School 3 teachers 3 aides

Gila Crossing Day School

Hopi Day School

Hotevilla Day School

John F. Kennedy Day Sch.

Keams Canyon Brdg. Sch.

Kerwo Day School

Moencopi Day School

Phoenix Indian High Sch.

Polacca Day School

St. John's Elementary

St. John's High School

Salt River Day School

Santa Rosa Brdg. Sch.

Santa Rosa Ranch Sch.

Second Mesa Day Sch.

Sherman Indian High Sch.

Stewart Indian High Sch.

Supai Day School

Theodore Roosevelt

Vaya Chin Day School

8

Number

School

Table 6of Professional and Para-Professional

Staff for the Math Components

Professional ParaProfessional

Regular Program Title 1 Regular Program Title 1

Blackwater School

Casa Blanca Day School 1 teacher 1 aide

Cibecue Day School

Gila Crossing Day School 1 teacher 1 aide

Hopi Day School .

Hotevilla Day School

John F. Kennedy Day Sch.

Keams Canyon Brdg. Sch. 1 teacher 1 aide

Kerwo Day School 1 teacher 1 aide

Moencopi Day School

Phoenix Indian High Sch. 2 teachers 11 aides

Polacca Day School.

St. John's Elementary 1 teacher 1 aide

St. John's High School

Salt River Day School

Santa Rosa Brdg. Sch.

Santa Rosa Ranch Sch.

Second Mesa Day Sch.

Sherman Indian High Sch. 1 teacher 1 aide

Stewart Indian High Sch.

Supai Day School

Theodore Roosevelt .1. aide

Vaya Chin Day School 1 teacher 1 aide

9

NumberStaff

School

Table 7of Professional and Para-Professional

for the Special Education Components

Professional Para - Professional

Regular Program Title 1 Regular Program Title 1

Blackwater School

Casa Blanca Day School 1 teacher 1 aide

Cibecue Day School

Gila Crossing Day School

Hop. Day School

Hotevilla Day School

John F. Kennedy Day Sch.

Keams Canyon Brdg. Sch.

Kerwo Day School

Moencopi Day School

Phoenix Indian High Sch. 1 teacher

Polacca Day School

St. John's Elementary

St. John's High School

Salt River Day School

Santa Rosa Brdg. Sch.

Santa Rosa Ranch Sch. 1 teacher 1 aide

Second Mesa Day Sch.

Sherman Indian High Sch.

Stewart Indian High Sch.

Supai Day School

Theodore Roosevelt

Vaya Chin Day School

10

NumberStaff

School

Table 8of Professional and Para-Professional

for the Physical Education Components

Professional ParaProfessional

Regular Program Title 1 Regular Program Title 1

Blackwater School

Casa Blanca Day School

Cibecue Day School

Gila Crossing Day School

Hopi Day School

Hotevilla Day School

John F. Kennedy Day Sch.

Keams Canyon Brdg. Sch. 1 teacher 2 aides

Kerwo Day School

Moencopi Day School

Phoenix Indian High Sch.

Polacca Day School

St. John's Elementary

St. John's High School l''

Salt River Day School 1 teacher 2 aides

Santa Rosa Brdg. Sch.

Santa Rosa Ranch Sch.

Second Mesa Day Sch.

Sherman Indian High Sch. 2 teachers 1 teacher

Stewart Indian High Sch.

Supai Day School

Theodore Roosevelt

Vaya Chin Day School

11

Table 9Parent Council Involvement

School Number of Members Number of MeetingsAverage

Attendance

Cibecue Day School 10 6 4

John F. Kennedy Day School 5 12 4

Theodore Roosevelt Brdg. 7 2 6

Stewart Indian High School 11 3 9.7

Sherman Indian High School 7 4 5

Phoenix Indian High School 16 3 5

Supai Day School 15 6 6

Hotevilla Day School 2 4 2

Moencopi Day School 3 9 3

Second Mesa Day School 8 8 7

Casa Blanca Day School 65 5 8

Gila Crossing Day School 55 8 10

Blackwater Demonstration 12 8 12

St. John's Indian School 27 8 6

Vaya Chin Day School 7 4 4.5

Kerwo Day School 6 6 4

Santa Rosa Ranch Day School 6 2 4

Santa Rosa Boarding School 17 4 9

Salt River Day School 12 8 8

Polacca Day School 7 5 7

Keams Canyon Brdg/Day School 5 8 3

Hopi Day School 5 8 3

12

Table 10First Grade Reading Results

School N Post Test

Keams Canyon Boarding School 11 1.9

Supai Day School 6 2.1

John F. Kennedy Day School 15 1.0

Blackwater School 3 1.5

13

GRADE EQUIVALENT SCORES

\ C)I)

1 I 1

11 (f)

Moencopi (N = 5)

Keams Canyon (N = 11)

Kerwo ( N 7)

Santa Rosa Boarding School

(N = 29)

Salt River (N = 15)

oo IN a, Cr, r\) no 6i\ilia I I I I I I I I I I I

TQW01 John F. Kennedy simi

(N = 18)

St. John's Indian School

(N1= 10)

Gila Crossing

Casa Blanca (N 6)

Supai (N = 11)

Vaya Chin (N = 11)

O CD

CD

en 0 -.0

en O #.4*

a) a)

W 9,

o u)

(I)CD re)

o CD a

CD

eu -e 0

1 7,"

73 CD CD 0.1

Cl: CL. 5 5 CAI CAI

-0 0 O a) CAI

CD

m a.

CD

rt

Tab

le 1

12n

d G

rade

Rea

ding

Com

pone

nt

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

Moe

ncop

i Day

Sch

ool

1.1

.7+

.4

Kea

ms

Can

yon

Boa

rdin

g S

ch.

1.2

.5+

.7K

erw

o D

ay S

choo

l.7

.8-

.1

San

ta R

osa

Boa

rdin

g S

choo

l-

2.6

.7+

1.9

Sal

t Riv

er D

ay S

choo

l.9

.3+

.6Jo

hn F

. Ken

nedy

Day

Sch

ool

1.2

.4+

.8S

t. Jo

hn's

Indi

an S

choo

l.6

.3±

.3

Gila

Cro

ssin

g D

ay S

choo

l0

.5-

.5

Cas

a B

lanc

a D

ay S

choo

l.5

.3-1

--.2

Sup

ai D

ay S

choo

l-1

.2.6

± .6

Vay

a C

hin

.5.5

0

(.n

Moencopi (N -= 15)

Kearns Canyon (N = 18)

91

GI--?,4 DE EQUI VA LEN T SCORES

o c p I I I

) is\-) f_\.) 4 :4 R) b f\) izt Co 0 f\) ri (IN 00 0 1\)

Santa Rosa Boarding (N = 24)

Salt River (N = 13)

John F, Kennedy (N = 9)

Gila Crossing (N = 6)

Casa Blanca (f) (N = 4)

7R.sw.12(1,i,YIRM Santa Rosa Ranch .4; - igkiikp.g.65 ( N 3)

Tab

le 1

23r

d G

rade

Rea

ding

Com

pone

nt

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

Moe

ncop

i Day

Sch

ool

.9.6

+ .3

Kea

ms

Can

yon

Boa

rdin

g1.

2.4

'+ .8

Ker

wo

Day

Sch

ool

.4.8

.4

San

ta R

osa

Boa

rdin

g1.

1.6

+ .5

Sal

t Riv

er D

ay S

choo

l1.

2.3

+ .9

John

F. K

enne

dy D

ay S

choo

l1.

2.5

+ .7

St.

John

's In

dian

Sch

ool

1.0

.7+

.3

Gila

Cro

ssin

g D

ay S

choo

l.2

.3.1

Cas

a B

lanc

a D

ay S

choo

l.8

.3+

.5

Sup

ai D

ay S

choo

l1.

3.5

+ .8

San

ta R

osa

Ran

ch1.

4.8

,d-

.6

Moencopi (N 4)

rrl U.)

Keams Canyon (N = 15)

Hopi Day (N = 4)

Second Mesa (N = 16)

Polacca (N = 16)

Hotevilla (N = 8)

Kerwo (N = 8)

GRADE EQUIVALENT SCORES i\) IN) c,1/4-1 -P. AN -"LI

00 b r\) "(3 "co rk, ooOtisOoo I I II I I I I I II III II II

Santa Rosa Boarding rggai (N = 33)

Salt River (N = 15)

John F. Kennedy Venigta (N = 9)

St. John's ISSUOtiV' (N 6)

Gila Crossing (N = 7)

7:P vips..togortr v:m*44k*

Casa Blanca (N 8)

S u Pa i MO? (N 12)

Santa Rosa Ranch (N = 3)

-o

0 0

(1)

O 0 co cn

.,0 11) t7).

> CI) 0 = O < O CD

cn 2 CD .dirt

CU CD

4%. G S: 31 Pc,

0. Pzi co

ma: CD S a 011

S 0 "1:1

O cD

M

B 7

4.

CD

Tab

le 1

34t

h G

rade

Rea

ding

Com

pone

nt

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

Moe

ncop

i Day

Sch

ool

.5.6

.1

Kea

ms

Can

yon

Boa

rdin

g1.

8.3

+1.

5

Hop

i Day

Sch

ool

1.8

.5+

1.3

Sec

ond

Mes

a D

ay S

choo

l.9

.3+

.6

Pol

acca

Day

Sch

ool

1.1

.5+

.6

Hot

evill

a D

ay S

choo

l1.

1.5

+ .6

Ker

wo

Day

Sch

ool

.2.6

.4

San

ta R

osa

Boa

rdin

g.9

.6+

.3

Sal

t Riv

er D

ay S

choo

l.6

.4+

.9

John

F. K

enne

dy D

ay S

choo

l1.

1.5

+ 6

St.

John

's In

dian

Sch

ool

1.2

.5+

.7

Gila

Cro

ssin

g D

ay S

choo

l.6

.60

Cas

a B

lanc

a D

ay S

choo

l.9

.4+

.5

Sup

ai D

ay S

choo

l1.

0.5

+ .5

San

ta R

osa

Ran

ch0

.8-

.8

H

Keams Canyon (N = 21)

Hopi Day (N = 7)

Second Mesa (N = 13)

Polacca (N = 25)

Hotevilla (N = 11)

GRADE EQUIVALENT T

1\) (_,) L.) 4' 4 4

I I I I l I I l I I I I l I I I I I I I

fp.Q4 Santa Rosa Boarding -4,i,WW,W-

(N 32)

Salt River (N := 10)

John F. Kennedy (N = 6)

Theodore Roosevelt (N 16)

Cibecue (N :7-- 19)

St. John's (N 11)

Gila Crossing (N 3)

Santa Rosa Ranch (N - 4)

Q,T;*V. Nr1/TAT''' Ir-457.14V 404140 tgA144

Tab

le 1

45t

h G

rade

Rea

ding

Com

pone

nt

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

Kea

ms

Can

yon

Boa

rdin

g.9

.5+

.4

Hop

i Day

1.3

.6+

.7

Sec

ond

Mes

a D

ay S

choo

l1.

2.3

.4-

.9

Pol

acca

Day

Sch

ool

1.1

.5+

.6

Hot

evill

a D

ay S

choo

l1.

0.6

-I-

.4

Ker

wo

Day

Sch

ool

.7.6

+ 1

San

ta R

osa

Boa

rdin

g1.

0.5

+ .5

Sal

t Riv

er D

ay S

choo

l1.

0.3

+ .7

John

F. K

enne

dy D

ay S

choo

l.6

.5+

.1

The

odor

e R

oose

velt

.9.5

+ .4

Cib

ecue

Day

Sch

ool

.8.6

+ .2

St.

John

's In

dian

Sch

ool

1.1

.5+

.6

Gila

Cro

ssin

g D

ay S

choo

l.6

.60

San

ta R

osa

Ran

ch1.

0.6

4-.4

S.

11,17,77.7.7.17;'174.11.7,3,77,1771.7,7%17:77,77.4.77,77477.11,7, 4 5,

17777:1;", e-75.717,1.41-

FilT7777rn.

Lt ''''r."'R."r'''Y'44%::7.7).FM713'.771727C7T7rr71VZ, ktrA'd. ,'1711!t fiZ.74r .4:tt

NtellItiN.X.A.U7\.211EtaliaI6. .12r.,..iat:t.a.t...4.4.

`177.a.7.77-4 4 V. ,; oVP 4 '"P., "ViN,5-:1`1.4 74'

: S.

Ne77717.7%...""L'61.7 ,:.r1,1Z;;

117'.1721:7,7,;-,17-,;7,77

,N dr' 2,

777-747V-71

777177&57:51,i7K't r

-

.

777, 777,, 'CP:=7W.7.7,A7,7"741-.7.71.7-17;r

IS

ripq.:777,7m-,1,774771,,p,FV,571171,, 7,1,,;117,V77;1774. 1-`" v`,1

% 111 lb It OA 11 111

a r

Tab

le 1

56t

h G

raae

Rea

ding

Com

pone

nt

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

Kea

ms

Can

yon

Boa

rdin

g S

ch.

.8.6

+ .2

Hop

i Day

Sch

ool

1.1

..7

+ .4

Sec

ond

Mes

a D

ay S

choo

l1.

2.5

+ .7

Pol

acca

Day

Sch

ool

1.2

.6+

.6

Hot

evill

a D

ay S

choo

l1.

4.7

-I-

.7

San

ta R

osa

Boa

rdin

g S

choo

l1.

2.4

1- .8

Sal

t Riv

er D

ay S

choo

l1.

7.3

+1.

4

John

F. K

enne

dy D

ay S

choo

l.8

.3-I

-.5

The

odor

e R

oose

velt

.9.5

-I-

.4

Cib

ecue

Day

Sch

ool

.6.4

+ .2

St.

John

's In

dian

Sch

ool

.7.6

+ .1

San

ta R

osa

Ran

ch.

.9.6

+ .3

4 : :4 4 U71 Ul S71

. CO 0 I1\) 4 00 0 RS 0) Co 0 1\) () 1

rrl

(11 Keams Canyon (N = 19)

Hopi Day (N = 36)

Tab

le 1

67t

h G

rade

Rea

ding

Com

pone

nt

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

erei

ice

Kea

ms

Can

yon

Boa

rdin

g S

ch.

.8.5

+ .3

Hop

i Day

Sch

ool

.6.6

0

San

ta R

osa

Boa

rdin

g S

choo

l1.

4.4

+1.

0

Sal

t Riv

er D

ay S

choo

l.8

.4+

.4

The

odor

e R

oose

velt

.5.6

.1

Cib

ecue

Day

Sch

ool

1.4

.4+

1.0

St.

John

's In

dian

Sch

ool

2.3

.6+

1.7

Pho

enix

Indi

an S

choo

l1.

7.5

+1.

2

9-6

GRADE EQUIVALENT SCORES

44 4 4 44 (-n cn cr, g\ CJ\

0 (\) CN Co 0 ti 4 CO 0 Oo 0 k) 0 I II I I II I I I

DZI

111

(1) Keams Canyon

(N = 30)

Theodore Roosevelt (N = 58)

Cibecue (N = 13)

St. John's (N = 10)

Phoenix Indian

(N = 8)

Stewart (N = 8)

Tab

le 1

78t

h G

rade

Rea

ding

Com

pone

nt

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

Kea

ms

Can

yon

Boa

rdin

g S

ch.

.9.5

+ .4

Hop

i Day

Sch

ool

.7.6

+ .1

San

ta R

osa

Boa

rdin

g S

choo

l.7

.5+

.2

The

odor

e R

oose

velt

.7.6

+ .1

Cib

ecue

Day

Sch

ool

.8.4

+ .4

St.

John

's In

dian

Sch

ool

1.3

.4+

.9

Pho

enix

Indi

an S

choo

l1.

0.6

+ .4

Ste

war

t Ind

ian

Sch

ool

1.9

.5+

1.4

6,4-

6, 2

-6

.0-

5 .8

-.5

.65.

4-5.

2-5.

0-4.

8-4.

6-4.

4-4,

2-

4. 0

-3,

8-

3. 6

-3.

4-J.

2-3,

0-

Fig

ure

11P

re-

Pos

t Cal

iforn

ia A

chie

vem

ent T

est T

otal

Rea

ding

Gra

de E

quiv

alen

tS

core

s fo

r al

l Sch

ools

with

a 9

th G

rade

Rea

ding

Pro

gram

PR

E -

TE

S T

(-e

tft)

mom

- P

OS

T-T

ES

T(-

AL5

,(,,_

,74)

Tab

le 1

89t

h G

rade

Rea

ding

Com

pone

nt

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

St.

John

's In

dian

Sch

ool

.9.5

+ .4

Pho

enix

Indi

an S

choo

l.8

.6+

.2

Ste

war

t Ind

ian

Sch

ool

1.5

.5+

1.0

She

rman

Indi

an S

choo

l.8

.5+

.3

6.6-

6..4

-62

-(r

) 6.

0-L1

5.8

-o

5.6-

c) 5

.4-

(r'

5.2-

k- 5

.0-

,4,

8-4.

6-s4

. 4 -

4-j 4

.2-

P/

4,0-

W3.

8-LI

J3.

6-Q

3.4

-3,

2-3.

C)-

I soa

r.sw

iE-.

.._$-

J

Figu

re 1

2Pr

e- P

ost C

alif

orni

a A

chie

vem

ent T

est T

otal

Rea

ding

Gra

de E

quiv

alen

tSc

ores

for

all

Scho

ols

with

a 1

0th

Gra

de R

eadi

ng P

rogr

am

PR

E-T

ES

TC

A )

ca a)II Z

FY

' ST

-T

ES

T

Tab

le 1

910

th G

rade

Rea

ding

Com

pone

nt

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

St.

John

's In

dian

Sch

ool

Ste

war

t Ind

ian

Sch

ool

She

rman

Indi

an S

choo

l

1.3

1.9 .7

.5 .5 .5

+ .8

+1.

4

+ .2

ca ),

64-

62-

60-

58-

56-

54-

5- 2

-5

0-48

-46

-44

-42

-40

-38

-36

--34

-32

-30

-

AM

..q':0

--31

1PR

E-T

ES

T

Fig

ure

13P

re-

Pos

t Cal

iforn

ia A

chie

vem

ent T

est T

otal

Rea

ding

Gra

de E

quiv

alen

tS

core

s fo

r al

l Sch

ools

with

a 1

1th

Gra

de R

eadi

ng P

rogr

am

Imm

o P

OS

T-

TE

ST

Tab

le 2

011

th G

rade

Rea

ding

Com

pone

nt

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

St.

John

's In

dian

Sch

ool

.9.5

+ .4

Ste

war

t Ind

ian

Sch

ool

1.0

.5+

.5S

herm

an In

dian

Sch

ool

.8.5

+ .3

6.8-

6 .6

-6.

46.

2-6.

0-(1

) 5

.8Li

j 5.6

-Q

5..

C_d

5.2

-u)

5.0

-I-

-4.

84_

14.6

--1

4 .4

-4.

2-

Of4

.0-

.0-

4_1_

3 .8

-

isu

3.6-

c3.4

-3.

2-3Q

Fig

ure

14P

re-

Pos

t Cal

iforn

ia A

chie

vem

ent T

est T

otal

Rea

ding

Gra

de E

quiv

alen

tS

core

s fo

r al

l Sch

ools

with

a 1

2th

Gra

de R

eadi

ng P

rogr

am

PR

E-

TE

ST

9#)

wilm

i P05

T-T

ES

TA

rt7'

1)

Tab

le 2

112

th G

rade

Rea

ding

Com

pone

nt

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

Ste

war

t Ind

ian

Sch

ool

She

rman

Indi

an S

choo

l

2.0

1.1

.3 .5

+1.

7

+ .6

1

Tab

le 2

2

1st G

rade

Lan

guag

e re

sults

usi

ng th

e T

est o

f Bas

ic E

nglis

h an

d pr

esen

ted

in S

tani

nes.

Sch

ool

NP

re T

est

Pos

t Tes

tG

ain

Ker

wo

73

4+

.1V

aya

Chi

n12

24

+ .2

San

ta R

osa

Boa

rdin

g23

16

+ .5

Kearns Canyon (N = 11)

SC

({BADE EQUIVALENT SCORES !N) R, R, 1\) 1/4)

.C3 4o 0 CS Co 0 1\) (D Co 0 1\) 4 sCY 03 0 Iiiji) 11 1 I f ;Ii1111

Santa Rosa Boarding (N = 29)

Supai AfT,, (N 11)

St. John's Sr (N = 10)

Gila Crossing yi4,,*1 (N = 5)

Casa Blanca Ti

(N = 6)

wge John F. Kennedy 3 (N = 17)

Vaya Chin 0%,.,

(N= 11)

CD

0 cn

O

fDrI

3 CD rt

't7

CD

CA -1 w

4 0

Tab

le 2

32n

d G

rade

Lang

uage

Com

pone

nt

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

Kea

ms

Can

yon

Boa

rdin

g S

ch.

.5.5

0

Ker

wo

Day

Sch

ool

.9.5

+ .4

San

ta R

osa

Boa

rdin

g S

choo

l1.

8.7

+1.

1

Sup

ai D

ay S

choo

l.6

.4+

.2

St.

John

's In

dian

Sch

ool

.3.4

.1

Gila

Cro

ssin

g D

ay S

choo

l.4

.40

Cas

a B

lanc

a D

ay S

choo

l.6

..4

+ .2

John

F. K

enne

dy D

ay S

choo

l1.

2.3

+ .9

Vay

a C

hin

.7.4

+ .3

"i

(5)

Kerwo (N = 7)

Santa Rosa Boarding (N = 17)

Supai (N = 10)

St. John's (N = 6)

Gila Crossing (N = 6)

Casa Blanca (N = 4)

'-Qohn F. Kennedy (N = 9)

Santa Rosa Ranch (N = 3)

of,

GRADE EQUIVALENT SCORES O 0 r\)NLoc..ouJu.,(A)-- -N -4.

140 0 EN) (3 .00 O i\) .44 :n 6o 6 r\) mill( 1(1 lilt I

etioritw

g-VAVIv47:

Ktpsig5; <4.

'1,14kegV

ibra-azt

Tab

le 2

43r

d G

rade

Lang

uage

Com

pone

nt

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

Ker

wo

Day

Sch

ool

.5.9

.4

San

ta R

osa

Boa

rdin

g S

choo

l1.

9.7

+1.

2

Sup

ai D

ay S

choo

l1.

1.3

+ .8

St.

John

's In

dian

Sch

ool

1.1

.7+

.4

Gila

Cro

ssin

g D

ay S

choo

l1.

3.3

+1.

0

Cas

a B

lanc

a D

ay S

choo

l.9

..3

+ .6

John

F. K

enne

dy D

ay S

choo

l1.

2.5

+ .7

San

ta R

osa

Ran

ch.2

1.2

1.0

Erty6.:,a;S2A

TP2:6.tA ,

;1., 4i1

Vg717777-770:317ATPTV, krAY,717,71catiearual'akddakteidurmns.,,,,-,::tivkl.M.I:4A,14;e!4

mr-Ap,22d,t1c1.

F1.7.Ffiz77,17Sci,l,M

TIT 77777 r:747:7t47f'r--.:"'tr41''illy, .1 I'll!" tf-g); t etaSt./.

NF7773,347-0...,c7k ..3411," &Jere

nr07.1M's751`;

'qktrirrrt"315,174.tr-7:47 Ri7:04777,7;77,-;?P'#^7,--m- ,rtz...4Litotiztal-ex ,.4

-

I

*4-'4zs..V

^w

?Y, 17-9

'23112.1 V' /1

$hiltaktAtiltraeliatz'

Se

,1,1Y.OV:777,77' `71,7177, 5W277, 17.71'," '7D7P-7.

-

o

":`'-;g1F4`.11.71';',.

. . .

" S.

Tab

le 2

54t

h G

rade

Lang

uage

Com

pone

nt

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

Kea

ms

Can

yon

Boa

rdin

g S

ch.

1.8

.5+

1.3

Pol

acca

Day

Sch

ool

1.1

.7+

.4

Hot

evill

a D

ay S

choo

l.6

.60

Sec

ond

Mes

a D

ay S

choo

l1.

4.4

+1.

0

Hop

i Day

Sch

oo!

.5.5

0

San

ta R

osa

Boa

rdin

g S

choo

l1.

6.7

+1.

0

Ker

wo

Day

Sch

ool

.2.8

.6

Sup

ai D

ay S

choo

lL3

.3+

1.0

St.

John

's In

dian

Sch

ool

1.2

.5+

.7

Gila

Cro

ssin

g D

ay S

choo

l1.

8.4

+1.

4

Cas

a B

lanc

a D

ay S

choo

l1.

2.4

+ .8

John

F. K

enne

dy D

ay S

choo

l.8

.6--

I-.2

San

ta R

osa

Ran

ch0

.8.8

-1 rri (J)

Keams Canyon (N = 21)

Polacca (N = 24)

Hotevilla (N = 11)

Second Mesa (N =13)

Hopi Day (N = 5)

Santa Rosa Boarding (N = 32)

Kerwo (N = 3)

o St. JOhn's (f) (N =12)

rti Gila Crossing (f, (N = 4)

John F. Kennedy (N = 6)

Santa Rosa Ranch (N = 4)

GRADE EQUIVALENT SCORES NrJ -1 (.11 9c) N

?)-1M-c?T f.0-,NTco?(Pce.P.)9°9

01

Tab

le 2

65t

h G

rade

Lang

uage

Com

pone

nt

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

Kea

ms

Can

yon

Boa

rdin

g S

ch.

.6.7

- .1

Pol

acca

Day

Sch

ool

1.6

.6+

1.0

Hot

evill

a D

ay S

choo

l1.

3.6

+ .7

Sec

ond

Mes

a D

ay S

choo

l1.

8.4

+1.

4

Hop

i Day

Sch

ool

2.8

.8+

2.0

San

ta R

osa

Boa

rdin

g S

choo

l1.

5.6

+ .9

Ker

wo

Day

Sch

ool

.2.6

- .4

St.

John

's In

dian

Sch

ool

2.3

..5+

1.8

Gila

Cro

ssin

g D

ay S

choo

l.8

.7+

.1

John

F. K

enne

dy D

ay S

choo

l1.

5.5

+1.

0

San

ta R

osa

Ran

ch.2

.20

GRADE (A) L3 us) (k3

i\) I I I

Tab

le 2

76t

h G

rade

Lang

uage

Com

pone

nt

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

Kea

rns

Can

yon

Boa

rdin

g S

ch.

1.4

.7-I

-.7

Pol

acca

Day

Sch

ool

1.2

.7-I

-.5

Hot

evill

a D

ay S

choo

l1.

3.7

-I-

.6

Sec

ond

Mes

a D

ay S

choo

l1.

7.6

+1.

1

Hop

i Day

Sch

ool

2.0

.7+

1.3

San

ta R

osa

Boa

rdin

g S

choo

l1.

0.6

+ .4

San

ta R

osa

Ran

ch.g

.7+

.2

St.

John

's In

dian

Sch

ool

1.2

.7-I

-.5

John

F. K

enne

dy D

ay S

choo

l1.

1.6

+ .5

-1 (f)

Kearns Canyon (N = 19)

\--

0 Hopi Day lid (N = 31)

(J)

Santa Rosa Boarding

= 32)

St. John's (N = 7)

Phoenix Indian (N = 3)

8f7

GRADE EQUIVALENT SCORES 4 -A I> 4a 01 U1 Ul (JI 01 9- 0) In 0) N N N N N 00 Kj :14

( Po 6 k, -k 3

.03 O ) o- Co 44 too O 11111

c- 0 co

- t. 0

ar

0 0

rt

c-

C.)

0. rn

oa

as

=

40 c'

CDEU.

=

C)

0

3 CD

rh

M C 0 v

0

r- ar

va

ar av rn

o.

m . 0

CD

rt

Tab

le 2

8-

7th

Gra

deLa

ngua

ge C

ompo

nent

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

Kea

ms

Can

yon

Boa

rdin

g S

ch.

1.1

.6+

.5

Hop

i Day

Sch

ool

2.0

.7+

1.3

San

ta R

osa

Boa

rdin

g S

choo

l2.

6.6

+2.

0S

t. Jo

hn's

Indi

an S

choo

l2.

1.8

+1.

3

Pho

enix

Indi

an S

choo

l1.

3.7

+ .6

8.0-

7.8-

7.6-

7.4-

7.2-

(n7.

0-

06.6

-(I

) 6-

4-

Z6.

0-LI

-15.

8 - -

04

-2 -6

-

)atY

.e.:*

goat

t(

Fig

ure

21P

re-P

ost C

alifo

rnia

Ach

ieve

men

t Tes

t Tot

al L

angu

age

Gra

de E

quiv

alen

tS

core

s fo

r al

l Sch

ools

with

an

8th

or 9

th G

rade

Lan

guag

e P

rogr

am

I I(4

) E z

co

(I,CD

0 0 z

x=

---

,N3

c z

-5 5

3,II

2cp

(,:i

z_c

wee

a.

PR

E-T

ES

T(-

e,ie

r),-

---s

t, P

OS

T-T

ES

T (

A,

.8t

h G

rade

9th

Gra

de

Tab

le 2

98t

h G

rade

Lang

uage

Com

pone

nt

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

Kea

ms

Can

yon

Boa

rdin

g S

ch.

1.5

.7+

.8

San

ta R

osa

Boa

rdin

g S

choo

l.1

.4.7

+3

Pho

enix

Indi

an S

choo

l2.

6.6

+2.

0

Hop

i Day

Sch

ool

1.5

.8-1

-.7

Tab

le 3

09t

h G

rade

Lang

uage

Com

pone

nt

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce...

Pho

enix

Indi

an S

choo

l1.

2.7

+ .5

2,0-

1 ,8

-

/ .6-

/ 4-

1.2-

1 ,0

-.8

-.6

-.4

--

1.-m

o-at

axffi

vilP

PE

-TE

ST

r_

Fig

ure

22P

re-

Pos

t Cal

iforn

ia A

chie

vem

ent T

est T

otal

Mat

h G

rade

Equ

ival

ent

Sco

res

for

all S

choo

ls w

ith a

2nd

Gra

de M

ath

Pro

gram

PO

ST

-TE

ST(,

;,/

Tab

le 3

12n

d G

rade

Mat

h C

ompo

nent

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

Cas

a B

lanc

a D

ay S

choo

l.4

..4

0

Gila

Cro

ssin

g D

ay S

choo

l0

.5.5

St.

John

's In

dian

Sch

ool

.3.3

0

4.4

4.2-

4,0-

3.8-

3,6-

3.4-

3.2-

3.0-

28-

2,6

2.4

2.2

2.0

I.8

1.6 /.4 l,2 I.0 .8 .6

Fig

ure

23P

re-

Pos

t Cal

iforn

ia A

chie

vem

ent T

est T

otal

Mat

h G

rade

Equ

ival

ent

Sco

res

for

all S

choo

ls w

ith a

3rd

Gra

de M

ath

Pro

gram

V) C

I I z

PR

E T

ES

T C

:Ze-

1;14

)P

OS

T T

ES

T

0 co11

co z

>

Tab

le 3

23r

d G

rade

Mat

h C

ompo

nent

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

St.

John

's In

dian

Sch

ool

.5.6

.1

Gila

Cro

ssin

g D

ay S

choo

l.7

,.2

+ .5

Cas

a B

lanc

a D

ay S

ch,d

ol.

.7.3

+ .4

Ker

wo

Day

Sch

ool

1.1

.7+

.4

Vay

a C

hin

Day

Sch

ool

1.4

.6+

.8

Tab

le 3

34t

h G

rade

Mat

h C

ompo

nent

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

St.

John

's In

dian

Sch

ool

.9.6

+ .3

Gila

Cro

ssin

g D

ay S

choo

l.1

.7.6

Cas

a B

lanc

a D

ay S

choo

l1.

1.4

+ .7

Vay

a C

hit-

,i)a

y S

choo

l1.

0.6

+ .4

San

ta R

osa

Ran

ch.6

.7.1

Pol

acca

Day

Sch

ool

1.4

.5+

.9

89

GRADE EQUIVALENT SCORES

IN) [\-) r\-) 1\-) <,0 <A) :4 :-A (Y1 (Y1 U1 bo 0 ti -P m Co '0 r\) =A Co 0 r\) 6 Co o r\) b

111111 I I I I I 11111

Gila Crossing (N = 3)

Santa Rosa Ranch (N = 4)

Santa Rosa Boarding (N = 21)

Theodore Roosevelt (N = 4)

Polacca (N = 12)

Tab

le 3

45t

h G

rade

Mat

h C

ompo

nent

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

St.

John

's In

dian

Sch

ool

1.0

.6+

.4

Gila

Cro

ssin

g D

ay S

choo

l1.

4.5

+ .9

Ker

wo

Day

Sch

ool

1.5

.6+

.9

San

ta R

osa

Ran

i.i,

.8.6

+ .2

San

ta R

osa

Boa

rdin

g S

choo

l1.

4.5

+ .9

The

odor

e R

oose

velt

.9.5

+ .4

Pol

acca

Day

Sch

ool

.1.

6.4

+1.

2

I St. John's- (N 6)

Santa Rosa Ranch (N =.- 2)

Santa Rosa Boarding (N = 18)"

Keams Canyon Ul (N 9)

Polacca (N 13)

Theodore Roosevelt (N 5)

09

GRADE EQUIVALENT SCORES

nu pu .4. .4 N 4 14a VI _ri cn ("J ch

.(3. 03 ;CD Co 0 rk) Co 0 ki Co rk)

I. I 1 I

C) 0 I I

Tab

le 3

56t

h G

rade

Mat

h C

ompo

nent

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

St.

John

's In

dian

Sch

ool

.9.7

+ .2

San

ta R

osa

Ran

ch1.

9.8

+1.

1

San

ta R

osa

Boa

rdin

g S

choo

l.8

.5+

.3

Kea

ms

Can

yon

Boa

rdin

g S

ch.

1.3

.6+

.7

Pol

acca

Day

Sch

ool

.8.6

+ .2

The

odor

e R

oose

velt

1.2

.5±

.7

St. John's (N 7)

Santa Rosa Boarding (N= 19)

Keams Canyon (N = 32)

GRADE EQUIVALENT SCORES c..1/4) -14 -la 44 44 (11 V1 Cri Ui cry cr

c , 0 f1) A (3\ Cu 0 IN) 4a o, OD 0 i\) {a 0, o r\) bb

1.1 I I 1.1 1.11 I I 1

WTI 4A TheodOre Roosevelt *kora (N = 5)

O

0)

Phoenix Indian (N = 3)

Tab

le 3

67t

h G

rade

Mat

h C

ompo

nent

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

St.

John

's In

dian

Sch

ool

1.6

.7+

.9

San

ta R

osa

Boa

rdin

g S

choo

l1.

5.5

+1.

0

Kea

ms

Can

yon

Boa

rdin

g1.

4.6

+ .8

The

odor

e R

oose

velt

.7.6

+ .1

Pho

enix

Indi

an S

choo

l1.

0.7

+ .3

U)

Santa R osa Boarding

(N = 20)

0 Keams Canyon (r) (N = 12) II

P-11:1

vl

Theodore Roosevelt Th(N = 15)

Phoenix Indian (N 8)

V9

GRADE EQUIVALENT SCORES co w Lu 44 f4 -14 pi. ul (r) U1 cri O> O> O> (3

;=:N O3 O fti 7-N 6, Co 03.

III1.1

,T.Pn7Fii5nZga ,Y;

41L

13

Go 0 o

r) co)

o

a) a = u) 3). C1 A o o < cn lD

.e ;4'7 rt

a)

G7

03 U)

0" ...I

.-- CL CD =.

" -13 ." O CD

oa rn ' 'n 3 ni

CD

Tab

le 3

78t

h G

rade

Mat

h C

ompo

nent

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

San

ta R

osa

Boa

rdin

g S

choo

l.7

.6+

.1

Kea

ms

Can

yon

Boa

rdin

g1.

2.6

+ .6

The

odor

e R

oose

velt

.7.5

+ .2

Pho

enix

Indi

an S

choo

l.7

.6+

.1

7.4 6.8

6.6

(-06

.44j

6.2

06.0

)5.8

(f)5.

6k-

5.4

LU-5

.2m

,Of 4.

4

C )

4.0

3.6

Fig

ure

29P

re-

Pos

t Cal

iforn

ia A

chie

vem

ent T

est T

otal

Mat

h G

rade

Equ

ival

ent

Sco

res

for

all S

choo

ls w

ith a

9th

Gra

de M

ath

Pro

gram

w=

AE

=4,

, PR

ET

ES

TC

,e<

g) E

ME

MP

OS

TT

ES

T

Tab

le 3

89t

h G

rade

Mat

h C

ompo

nent

Sch

ool

Act

ual G

ain

Sco

res

Exp

ecte

d G

ain

Sco

res

Diff

eren

ce

She

rman

Indi

an S

choo

l

Pho

enix

Indi

an S

choo

l

1.7 .6

.7

+1.

3 .1

00

6.8-

6.6-

6.4-

6.2-

6.0-

(f)

5 .8

-ku

.6-

Q 5

.41,

,C5.

2-_) u )5.

64.

8LL

J 4.

6-

I 4 .4 4.2-

4 .0

-j 3

.8-

uj 3

.6 3.4

3 .2

Q D

3.0-

Fig

ure

30P

re-

Pos

t Cal

iforn

ia A

chie

vem

ent T

cst T

otal

Mat

h G

rade

Equ

ival

ent

Sco

res

for

Gra

des

10-1

2 at

She

rman

Indi

an H

igh

Sch

ool

t (1)

cif

R:1 z

PR

E-T

ES

T (

-64.

er)

PO

ST

-T

ES

T (

AL

Tab

le 3

910

th-1

2th

Gra

deM

ath

Com

pone

nt

Sch

ool

Gra

deA

ctua

l Gai

n S

core

sE

xpec

ted

Gai

n S

core

sD

iffer

ence

She

rman

Hig

h S

choo

l10

1.3

.5±

.8S

herm

an H

igh

Sch

ool

11.7

.5+

.2S

herm

an H

igh

Sch

ool

12.9

.4+

.5,

Table 40

California Achievement Test Total Battery Resultsfor Students in Schools with a Special Education Component

School Grade N Pretest PostestActualGain

ExpectedGain

(Actual -

Expected)

Casa Blanca 2 5 .6 .9 .3 .3 0

Casa Blanca 3 4 .8 1.6 .8 .3 +.5

Casa Blanca 4 5 1.1 1.9 .8 .3 +.5

Phoenix Indian High 7 2 4.6 5.5 .9 .7 +.2

Phoenix Indian High 9 10 4.0 4.8 .8 .5 +.3

Table 41

AAHPER and Glover Physical Education Results in Percentilesfor those Schools with a Physical Education Component

School Grade N Pretest Postest Gain

._cu>i=4-,03

En

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

19

11

11

9

22

23

15

31

40

38

34

28

27

29

81

75

73

65

46

46

44

50

35

35

31

18

19

15

c0>,co0

co(i)

B

1

2

3

9

11

10

7

12

20

24

12

56

61

50

60

44

41

26

48

cco

Ew-cEn

9

10

11

12

31

25

19

7

36

32

36

33

52

53

58

51

16

21

22

.18

71

Conclusions and Recommendations

The data presented in this report clearly show that except in a few isolated grades in someschools the Title I projects were tremendously successful in FY 1973. This is documentedin the Phoenix Area consolidated schools report where students in every grade gained ator above the national average in reading and language. Except for students in grades 3 and11 this was also true in mathematics.

ReadingA number of schools, Kearns Canyon, Hoteville, Polacca, Second Mesa, Supai, and Ste-

wart reported gain scores that met or exceeded the national average in every grade. Threeschools, Santa Rosa Boarding grade 2, St. Johns grade 7, and Stewart grade 12 reportedgains of 2 or more years.

In contrast, students did not gain at a satisfactory level at Gila Crossing Day School ingrades 2-5, or at Kerwo in grades 3-4. In addition, there were several other schools that re-ported low gains in reading in one isolated grade whereas they reported large gains in othergrades.

LanguageThere were several schools in which the students met or exceeded the national average in

every grade. These schools were John F. Kennedy, Hopi Day, Polacca, Second Mesa, andSanta Rosa Boarding School. In addition several schools had gain scores of double or morethe national average; these were Hopi Day school grades 4-7, Santa Rosa Boarding schoolgrades 3 and 7, and St. Johns Indian school in grades 5 and 7.

On the other hand, several schools reported unexpectedly low gains in language, KearnsCanyon in grades 2 and 5, and Kerwo and Santa Rosa Ranch in grades 3-5. These schools.had several grades in which the students either gained what was expected without Titleintervention or less.

Mathematics

There were several schools, Keams Canyon, Polacca, Kerwo, and Vaya Chin, in whichthe students in every grade averaged gains at or above the national Average.

There were small gains in Casa Blanca and Gila Crossing schools in grades 2-3. Theseresults were not entirely unexpected. The type of program offered in these schools in theearly grades is a measurement based program that teaches mathematics concepts notmeasured by the Californif, .Achievement Test. Thus, the major benefits to be derived fromthe program will not become evident until grade 5 or where the students should reach thenational average in mathematics.

Special EducationThe results in special education do .not at first glance appear to be very substantial. How-

ever, this was the first year of operation for these programs and many logistical and techni-cal problems in implementation were not solved until mid year. Even so, the actual gainsin total achievement exceeded in every case the gains that would bare occurred withoutTitle I intervention.

72

Physical EducationThe results in physical education show that students in every grade at two schools had

post test physical fitness scores at or above the 50th percentile. The two schools are KearnsCanyon and Sherman. The lowest test average for any school was at the 44th percentilewhich is a substantial change from the pre tests scores.

Recommendations

The data reported logically lead to two major recommendations: First, those schools show-ing low gains in reading and mathematics should critically evaluate what is occuring intheir programs that is preventing their students from making gains equal to students inother Phoenix Area schools, and secondly, those Title I projects that are demonstrating con-sistent gains in every grade should attempt to have the regular program institute the ac-tivities throughout the school.

73

DEFINITION OF TERMS

There are several terms used in the manuscript that might not immediately be clear with-out some clarification.

N = the number of students who took both the pre and post-test and thus com-prise the total number of students included in the test results.

Expected Gain: For purposes of this report, expected gain refers to the gain in grads equi-valent score that would be expected if the students did not receive Title Iservices. The value was computed by dividing the students pre-test scoreby the number of years in school +1. Thus a student beginning the secondgrade with a pre-test score of 1.6 would have an expected growth of .8 ingrade equivalents. While it is recognized that this does not take into ac-count the gain/loss factor over the summer it was the most accurate figurethat could be derived given the limitations of the data.

Test Dates: Dates of administration of the pre-tests were the last 2 weeks in Septem-ber and of the post-test were the first 2 weeks in May.

74