auditory and vestibular defects in the circling (ci2) rat mutant
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Auditory and vestibular defects in the circling (ci2) rat mutant](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081812/575023c71a28ab877eab9b98/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Auditory and vestibular defects in the circling (ci2) ratmutant
Alexander Kaiser,1 Maren Fedrowitz,2 Ulrich Ebert,2 Elke Zimmermann,1 Hans-JuÈrgen Hedrich,3 Dirk Wedekind3
and Wolfgang LoÈscher2
1Department of Zoology and2Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacy, School of Veterinary Medicine, 30559 Hannover, Germany3Institute for Laboratory Animal Science, Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
Keywords: cochlea, cochlear nuclei, dopamine, hearing loss, rotational behaviour
Abstract
The circling rat is an autosomal recessive mutant (homozygous ci2/ci2) that displays lateralized circling behaviour, locomotorhyperactivity, ataxia and stereotypic head-movement. These abnormal behaviours occur in phases or bursts either spontaneously
or in response to stress. Heterozygous (ci2/+) littermates display normal spontaneous behaviours. We have previously found that
ci2/ci2 rats of both genders have a lower tissue content of dopamine in the striatum ipsilateral to the preferred direction ofrotation, indicating that the rats turn away from the brain hemisphere with higher striatal dopaminergic activity. In view of the
similarities of the motor syndrome of the ci2/ci2 mutant rat to that of mouse deafness mutants, the present study evaluated the
hearing ability of the circling rat mutant by recording brainstem auditory-evoked potentials. To test for vestibular dysfunction, aswimming test was conducted. Histological methods were used to examine the cochlear and vestibular parts of the inner ear and
the cochlear and vestibular brainstem nuclei for defects. The absence of auditory-evoked potentials demonstrated a complete
hearing loss in the adult ci2/ci2 mutant rat, whereas heterozygous littermates exhibited auditory-evoked potentials with thresholds
resembling those of other laboratory strains. Furthermore, the mutant rats were unable to swim. Histological analysis of the innerear of adult mutants revealed virtually complete loss of the cochlear neuroepithelium, while no such hair cell degeneration was
seen in the vestibular parts of the inner ear. However, part of the vestibular hair cells showed protrusions into the endolymphatic
space, suggesting alterations in the cytoskeletal architecture. The histological ®ndings in mutant circling rats strongly indicate thatthe hearing loss of the mutants is of the sensory neural type, the most prevalent type of hearing loss. In the cochlear nuclei of
the brain stem of mutant rats, neurons exhibited an abnormal shape, reduced size and increased density compared to controls.
In contrast, no abnormal neuronal morphology was seen in the vestibular nuclei, but a signi®cantly reduced neuronal density wasfound in the medial vestibular nucleus. Abnormal vestibular function would be a likely explanation for the disturbed balance of
mutant rats as exempli®ed by the ataxia and the inability to swim, whereas the previous data on these rats strongly indicate an
involvement of the basal ganglia in the abnormal circling behaviour. The genetic defect in the mutant rats, thus, results in a
clinical syndrome with features also seen in human genetic disorders with deafness and hyperkinesia, making the ci2/ci2 rat anexcellent model for investigating both cochlear/vestibular dysfunction and hyperkinetic movement disorders.
IntroductionWe have recently described a new rat mutant characterized by phases
of rapid lateralized circling, locomotor hyperactivity, hyperexcit-
ability, repetitive short-lasting arching of the neck (opisthotonus,
`stargazing'), and moderate ataxia (LoÈscher et al., 1996; Richter et al.,
1999; Fedrowitz et al., 2000). This phenotype, which was discovered
in a Lewis (LEW/Han) rat breeding colony, is caused by an
autosomal recessive mutation, which we have designated circling,
gene symbol ci. Because a mutant with the same behavioural
alterations (ci1) had been detected before in the same breeding colony
of LEW/Han rats (Deerberg et al., 1989), but was not further
characterized, the mutant described by us recently and used in the
present study was designated ci2 (Fedrowitz et al., 2000).
Neurochemical studies showed that ci2 rats have a lower tissue
content of dopamine in the striatum ipsilateral to the preferred
direction of rotation (LoÈscher et al., 1996; Richter et al., 1999),
indicating that the rats turn away from the brain hemisphere with
higher striatal dopaminergic activity, a common hypothesis of turning
behaviour in rodents (Pycock, 1980; Carlson & Glick, 1996). In
addition to lateralities in striatal dopaminergic function as a cause for
rotational behaviour in rats, circling is often observed in mouse
deafness mutants and is commonly suggested to be a consequence of
inner ear defects impairing vestibular functions (Kitamura et al.,
1991; Bloom & Hultcrantz, 1994; Alagramam et al., 1999; Rogers
et al., 1999). However, often the determination of inner ear defects in
such mutants is restricted to the cochlea. Similarly, in the deaf
stargazer (stg) rat mutant, abnormal circling behaviour was proposed
to be due to vestibular dysfunction, but hair cell degeneration was
only demonstrated for the cochlea (Truett et al., 1994). In another
more recently described rat mutant with circling (waltzing)
behaviour, the vestibular parts of the inner ear were examined and
Correspondence: Dr W. LoÈscher, 2Department of Pharmacology, Toxicologyand Pharmacy, as above.E-mail: [email protected]
Received 15 May 2001, revised 14 July 2001, accepted 31 July 2001
European Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 14, pp. 1129±1142, 2001 ã Federation of European Neuroscience Societies
![Page 2: Auditory and vestibular defects in the circling (ci2) rat mutant](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081812/575023c71a28ab877eab9b98/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
no abnormalities in vestibular hair cells were found (Rabbath et al.
2001). Previous examination of the inner ear in the ci2 mutant had not
revealed any gross abnormalities (LoÈscher et al., 1996), but speci®c
histological methods to demonstrate hair cell degeneration had not
been used yet in this rat mutant.
In view of the similarities of the motor syndrome of the ci2 mutant
rat to that of mouse deafness mutants and the deaf stargazer rat
mutant, the goal of the present study was to investigate the auditory
and vestibular system in mutant circling rats by an integrative
behavioural, neurophysiological and neuroanatomical approach.
Hearing ability was tested by auditory-evoked potentials and
vestibular functions by a swimming test. Results were related to the
morphology of the inner ear and cochlear and vestibular brainstem
nuclei.
Materials and methods
Animals
The mutant (ci2) rat described by us previously (LoÈscher et al., 1996;
Richter et al., 1999; Fedrowitz et al. 2000) and used in the present
study was isolated in F96 of LEW/Han rats and is maintained as a
segregated inbred strain LEW/Ztm-ci2. About 50% of the offspring
exhibit the mutation (ci2/ci2), which can be identi®ed by phenotype
behaviour (intense circling, hyperactivity, opisthotonus) as early as
10±14 days of age, while the remaining 50% of pups are unaffected
(ci2/+), showing normal behaviour. This makes them suitable
experimental controls for comparing behavioural and anatomical
differences. The abnormal motor behaviour of the mutants appears
either spontaneously in their home cage, or can be observed (and
ampli®ed) in a new environment, such as new cage or open-®eld
(LoÈscher et al., 1996). The abnormal behaviour of the mutant rats in
the home cage or a new environment appears in phases or bursts;
between these phases the rats behave normal, particularly when not
being disturbed. Most ci2 mutant rats of both genders exhibit a side-
preference of more than 70% in their rotational behaviour (LoÈscher
et al., 1996).
For the present study, adult, homozygous ci2/ci2 animals of both
sexes as well as age- and sex-matched, heterozygous ci2/+ rats were
used. All homozygous mutants differed by intense circling behaviour
and other behavioural abnormalities (locomotor hyperactivity,
opisthotonus, ataxia) from heterozygous (ci2/+) littermates. The
latter behaved normally like the genetic background strain (LEW/
Ztm). For determination of the side-preference of turning behaviour
in mutants, the spontaneous behavioural abnormalities of the mutant
rats were recorded by observation of the animals in a new, empty
plastic cage (one rat per cage). Following onset of circling in this new
environment, the rotations were counted for a period of 5 min. Only
complete (360°) left or right rotations were counted for quanti®cation
of circling behaviour. Recording of circling in a new cage was
repeated at least twice in each rat (the average number of recordings
was ®ve per rat, using separate days per recording) to study the
consistency of the rotational behaviour. The percentage directional
(side) preference of each rat's turning behaviour in each test was
determined by the following formula: 100 3 (full turns in preferred
direction/total full turns). Only rats with a side-preference of more
than 70% were used for the present experiments. Heterozygous (ci2/
+) rats (used as controls for comparison with the mutant ci2/ci2 rats)
showed no circling or other behavioural abnormalities in the home
cage or a new environment.
Rats were housed in groups under a 12-h light : 12-h dark cycle
(lights on at 07.00 h) and permitted food and water ad libitum. All
experiments were performed during the light period. All animal care
and handling was conducted in compliance with the German Animal
Welfare Act and was approved by the responsible governmental
agency in Hannover.
Testing of auditory function
Following testing for the presence of circling behaviour, rats of either
sex were classi®ed as homozygous (ci2/ci2) or heterozygous (ci2/+),
respectively (see above). We describe here recordings of brainstem
auditory-evoked potentials (BAEP) from six heterozygous and seven
homozygous adult ci2 rats (6±10 months of age). Individuals were
anaesthetized with an initial dose of chloral hydrate (360 mg/kg i.p.)
and placed on a controlled heating pad in a sound-attenuated (60 dB
measured at 1 kHz), double-walled anechoic chamber (G & H,
Hannover, Germany). Before and during the recording session, the
chamber was additionally heated by a 250-W heating bulb placed
about 80 cm above the animal. For maintaining anaesthesia,
supplemental doses of chloral hydrate were given when needed.
Rectal temperature was monitored and maintained at 37 °C. As a
measure of the physiological state and the depth of anaesthesia, a
combined electrocardiogram and muscle-potential recording was
monitored using two stainless steel insect pins (0.5 mm diameter),
which were inserted subcutaneously into the left extremities. At the
end of the experiment, the animals were allowed to recover from
anaesthesia in a moderately heated cage. For acoustic stimulation and
recording of BAEPs, we used hardware (System II) and software
(BioSig, SigGen) from Tucker-Davis Technologies (Gainesville,
Florida). Pure tones with a frequency of 5±60 kHz and sound pressure
levels (SPLs) from 20 to 120 dB (ref. 20 mPa) were presented in 5 dB
steps with a 10-ms duration (2 ms rise/fall-time) at a rate of 4 Hz.
Acoustic stimuli were generated using a digital signal processor,
which controlled a digital-to analogue-converter (Tucker-Davis
Technologies). The output of the converter was routed through an
antialiasing ®lter and digital attenuators which were either connected
to a low-frequency loudspeaker or an ampli®er connected to an
electrostatic high-frequency loudspeaker. Speakers were mounted in
front of the animal with a distance of 5 or 10 cm from the ear canal
openings and a 1/4¢ B & K microphone (BruÈel and Kjaer Denmark,
Type 4135, Spectris, Germany) was placed above the head for
recording of the sound stimuli. Calibration of the speaker was
performed using the same microphone without the animal at a
midline position at the same speaker distance as used in the recording
sessions.
For binaural recordings of BAEPs, four stainless steel insect pins
with a diameter of 0.5 mm were inserted subcutaneously with the
active recording electrodes (+) placed about 5 mm lateral from the
dorsal midline above the cerebellum. The reference electrodes (±)
were placed close to the ventral parts of the pinnae. In addition, a
ground electrode was placed subcutaneously at a mid position of the
lower jaw.
Signals from the electrodes were fed to a HS4 headstage, digitized
and routed to a digital control unit (DB4) via ®bre optic cables
(Tucker-Davies Technologies). The ampli®cation of the control unit
was set to 700 000 with band pass ®lter settings of 0.3 kHz and
3 kHz. Outgoing signals were fed to an analogue-to-digital-converter
(ADC; AD 1) with the sampling rate set to 40 ms. The ADC was
controlled via ®bre optic cables by a digital signal processor with
software (BioSig, Tucker-Davis Technologies) running on a personal
computer. Every stimulus was presented and averaged for 250 times,
stored on the computer hard disk and analysed off-line for the
presence of peaks. The minimum sound pressure level at a given
frequency that was necessary to evoke a peak within 8 ms of stimulus
1130 A. Kaiser et al.
ã 2001 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies, European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 1129±1142
![Page 3: Auditory and vestibular defects in the circling (ci2) rat mutant](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081812/575023c71a28ab877eab9b98/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
onset in the recorded trace was taken as a measure of threshold for the
audiograms presented in the result section.
Testing of vestibular function
Because vestibular-de®cient rodents are known to be unable to swim,
a swimming test was used (Porsolt et al., 1978) to test for vestibular
disruption as previously described for different rodent species with
inner ear defects (Gray et al., 1988; Sawada et al., 1994; Truett et al.,
1994; Sondag et al., 1998). The rats were individually forced to swim
in a rectangular box (50 3 50 3 50 cm), three quarters ®lled with
warm (30±35 °C) water, from which they could not escape. While in
the water the rats were observed to determine if they showed `normal'
swimming behaviour. Normal swimming behaviour was de®ned as
follows: after being placed in the water, normal rats quickly
resurfaced, managed to keep their noses above the surface of the
water and swam towards the wall of the cylinder.
A further test for vestibular dysfunction in rats with inner ear
defects is the air-righting re¯ex test (Ossenkopp et al., 1990). For this
test, rats are held supine and are dropped from a height of 30 cm onto
a foam cushion. While normal rats are able to right themselves in the
air and land on their feet, rats with vestibular dysfunction exhibit an
impairment of this normal righting re¯ex, thus, landing on their back
or side (Ossenkopp et al., 1990).
To test for postural changes associated with vestibular defects in
rats, the tail-hanging test was performed (Hunt et al., 1987). This test
consists of lifting the rats by the tail. Normal rats extend their
forelimbs toward the earth, thus, showing a `landing' response. In
contrast, rats with vestibular dysfunction tend to bend ventrally, thus,
tending towards an `occipital' landing (Hunt et al., 1987).
In all tests for vestibular function, mutant rats were compared with
age-matched, heterozygous (ci2/+) rats and rats of the background
strain (LEW/Ztm). In the air-righting re¯ex and tail-hanging tests,
each mutant or control rat was evaluated three times in each test.
Only rats showing a de®cit in each of the three tests were considered
to have a vestibular defect.
Cochlear and vestibular histology
Following the auditory-evoked potential testing, rats were reanaesthe-
tized and perfused transcardially with ringer solution followed by a
solution of 4% formaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution.
Immediately after the perfusion, the brains and the bullae including
the cochleae and vestibular organs were removed and stored for
several days in the same ®xative as above. Brains were processed for
cyto- and immunohistology of brainstem nuclei (see section below).
The cristae ampullaris, the macula utriculi and the macula sacculi
were removed from the bony labyrinth while the bone overlying the
cochleae was thinned with forceps and razor blades. To permit a
better penetration of the embedding medium, the bony and
membranous labyrinth were carefully opened on one side of the
cochleae. Following preparation, specimens were decalci®ed and
embedded in araldite (Durcupan, Fluka; Deisenhofen, Germany). For
a better visualization, some of the specimens were ®xed with osmium
tetroxide before the embedding procedure. Semi-thin sections (3±
5 mm) were cut using a Leica Microtom RM 2065 Supercut with a
diamond knife for thick sectioning (Diatome, Switzerland), mounted
on glass slides and coverslipped or counterstained with toluidine blue
to enhance visibility of cell types and stereocilia. Sections were
analysed with a Zeiss Axiophot microscope using bright light or
phase contrast illumination and documented with a cooled digital
camera with a 1315 pixels 3 1035 pixels CCD chip and a PC-based
software package (SPOT camera, Diagnostic Instruments;
MetaMorph, Universal Imaging Corporation; both Visitron
Systems, Puchheim, Germany). Digital processing of recorded
images was restricted to a shading correction, an unsharp mask ®lter
and brightness and contrast enhancement when necessary.
Histological examination of the cochlear and vestibular nucleiin the brainstem
The morphological studies of the cochlear and vestibular nuclei and
the cochlear neurons were performed in brain sections of nine
homozygous circling rats (ci2/ci2; six males, three females) and eight
heterozygous noncircling littermates (ci2/+ three males, ®ve
females). The age of the animals was 5±12 months. Only two rats
(one homozygous and one heterozygous animal) were younger
(5 weeks old). Because data from these younger rats did not differ
from the other animals, data were combined into group values. The
average side-preference of circling of the mutant rats used for these
experiments was 85% (mean of 2±7 tests per rat).
For histomorphological examination, the rats were deeply
anaesthetized with chloral hydrate and transcardially perfused with
0.1% phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4) followed by perfusion
with 4% formaldehyde/PBS or in four cases with 4% paraformalde-
hyde/PBS. Brains were removed and placed in 30% sucrose/PBS
overnight. Coronal sections were cut at 40 mm on a freezing
microtome and every second section was mounted on glass slides,
air-dried and Nissl-stained with thionine (Sigma, Deisenhofen,
Germany). All sections were dehydrated in graded ethanols, cleared
in xylene and coverslipped with Entellan (Merck, Darmstadt,
Germany).
The following cochlear and vestibular nuclei were examined
(based on the atlas of Paxinos & Watson, 1998): the anteroventral
cochlear nucleus (AVCN), the posteroventral cochlear nucleus
(PVCN), the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN), the superior vestibular
nucleus (SVN), the medial vestibular nucleus (MVN; parvicellular
and magnocellular part), the lateral vestibular nucleus (LVN; anterior
and posterior part), and the inferior (spinal) vestibular nucleus (IVN).
All examinations were made for both sides of the brain by an
investigator who was not aware of the side-preference in rotational
behaviour of the ci2/ci2 rats. After completion of the histological
examinations, data from mutant rats were grouped with respect to the
ipsilateral and contralateral side of the brain, referring to the side-
preference of rotational behaviour of the ci2/ci2 rats, and to the left
and right side of ci2/+rats.
For comparison of the size of cochlear and vestibular nuclei, the
areas of the subnuclei were measured in all coronal sections
containing the respective nuclei with an image analysis system (KS
300, Zeiss, Germany) at 25 3 magni®cation. The volume was
calculated according to the following equation: volume = (area
section 1 + area section 2¼ + area section n) 3 distance between
sections. For these measurements, the MVN was not divided into
magnocellular and parvicellular. For the IVN, the size was only
determined for its rostral part (±11.00 to ±11.48 mm from bregma)
and for the AVCN only for its caudal part (±9.88 to ±10.46 mm from
bregma). Because of partial damage during histological preparation,
it was not possible to determine the volume of the PVCN and DCN.
For these nuclei, the mean areas of two to three corresponding
sections were compared between mutants and controls.
As described in the Results section, the cell bodies of cochlear
neurons of the ci2/ci2 rats seemed to be morphologically different
from those of the ci2/+rats. They appeared to be of a rounder shape,
smaller, and with fewer primary dendrites. For quantitative evalu-
ation of this observation, the area, the perimeter, and the circularity
shape factor (4 3 p 3 area/perimeter2) of 25 neurons per side and
animal were measured in one of the cochlear nuclei, the AVCN, at
Deafness and vestibular defects in the circling rat 1131
ã 2001 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies, European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 1129±1142
![Page 4: Auditory and vestibular defects in the circling (ci2) rat mutant](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081812/575023c71a28ab877eab9b98/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
400 3 magni®cation. To have comparable sections of the AVCN for
these comparisons in all rats, sections ±10.33 6 0.24 mm from
bregma were used. For the comparison between mutants and controls,
it was not possible to compare different types of AVCN neurons,
because no clear differentiation into different types of neurons was
visible in the AVCN of mutant rats. In order to avoid inclusion of
neurons which were cut at the edge of the sections, only cell bodies
with nucleolus were measured. In the vestibular nuclei, no morpho-
logical differences between the neurons of ci2/ci2 and ci2/+rats were
obvious, so that these measurements were restricted to the AVCN.
In another series of measurements, neurons were counted in the
different nuclei, using the optical disector method (Coggeshall &
Lekan, 1996). For these measurements, the MVN was divided into a
magnocellular and a parvicellular part. For each cochlear and
vestibular nucleus, neuronal density was determined in three
consecutive sections. At a magni®cation of 400 3, neurons were
counted in 30 square ®elds of 1434 mm2 each. Three counts per side
and animal were made and averaged. All cell counts were expressed
as neurons/mm3. In order to have comparable sections for the
comparisons between mutants and controls, sections at the following
coordinates were used for determination of neuronal densities (all
values in mm from bregma): AVCN, ±10.3 6 0.16; PVCN,
±10.76 6 0.26; DCN, ±10.76 6 0.26; SVN, ±10.38 6 0.24; MVN
parvicellular, ±10.22 6 0.2; MVN magnocellular, ±11.22 6 0.2;
LVN anterior, ±10.38 6 0.24; LVN posterior, ±10.98 6 0.28; IVN,
±11.22 6 0.28.
Statistics
Signi®cance of differences within groups were calculated by paired
tests (Wilcoxon signed rank test or Student's t-test), whereas,
differences between groups were calculated by nonpaired tests
(Mann±Whitney U-test or Student's t-test), the choice of test
depending on whether data were normally distributed or not.
Signi®cance of differences in vestibular tests was calculated by
Fisher's exact test. All tests used were two-sided and a P < 0.05 was
considered signi®cant. Because there was no obvious difference
between sexes in any measure, data from both sexes were combined.
FIG. 1. Examples of auditory brainstem potentials from a heterozygous (unaffected) ci2/+ rat (left column) and a homozygous (mutant) ci2/ci2 rat (rightcolumn). To the left of each trace the recorded side (L, left; R, right), the stimulation frequency (kHz) and the dB sound pressure level (SPL) values areindicated. Because the thresholds for unaffected ci2/+ rats were not different between left and right ears, recording examples are only shown for the left ear.An attenuation of 0 dB corresponds to 105 dB SPL. Whereas in ci2/+ animals the amplitude of BAEPs clearly increased with sound pressure, in ci2/ci2 ratseven with high sound intensities no potentials could be recorded at either side. Calibration for amplitude and time is given in the right part of the ®gure.
1132 A. Kaiser et al.
ã 2001 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies, European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 1129±1142
![Page 5: Auditory and vestibular defects in the circling (ci2) rat mutant](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081812/575023c71a28ab877eab9b98/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Results
Behavioural abnormalities
As previously reported (LoÈscher et al., 1996), homozygous (ci2/ci2)
rats showed several abnormal behaviours when observed after
transfer to a new environment (new clean cage) during the light
phase. These abnormal behaviours occurred in phases or bursts
(typically lasting about 5±10 s) and were characterized by circling
behaviour, locomotor hyperactivity, brief periods of opisthotonus
(`stargazing'), and moderate ataxia. Circling consisted of tight 360°rotations. Typically, when ci2/ci2 rats were placed in the new cage
they exhibited bursts of intense circling for about 2±4 min after
which they became inactive, so that observation in each trial was
restricted to 5 min. In a total of 88 mutant rats, the majority of rats
(85 out of 88 = 97%) exhibited a side-preference of at least 70% in
their rotational behaviour during a 5-min test trial. Repeated testing
of the same rats on separate days demonstrated that the side-
preference was consistent in 80% of the animals. Two subgroups
were observed, i.e. those showing right-sided and left-sided rotational
preferences. The average number of rotations of the 88 ci2/ci2 rats in
three subsequent 5-min trials was 18.8 6 1.4. Heterozygous (ci2/+)
littermates or rats from the background strain (LEW/Ztm) did not
show any circling or other behavioural abnormalities in the new cage.
Testing of auditory function
We initially observed that the mutant rats did not respond to intense
ultrasonics, which suggested that they have impaired hearing ability.
To quantify their hearing range and sensitivity, auditory-evoked
brainstem responses were recorded.
Comparison of hearing abilities of both groups of ci2 rats showed
unequivocally that the mutant circling (ci2/ci2) rats were completely
and binaurally deaf within the tested range of frequencies and sound
pressure levels (Figs 1 and 2). In contrast to an increasing BAEP
amplitude as a response to an increasing sound pressure level in
heterozygous ci2/+rats, no BAEP's could be recorded at any tested
stimulus for ci2/ci2 animals (Fig. 1). The overall course of the
averaged audiogram of the heterozygous group of rats resembles
those of other laboratory rats (cf. Fay, 1988). Maximum sensitivity
was in the frequency range of 10±30 kHz with individual thresholds
between 40 and 60 dB SPL (Fig. 2).
Testing of vestibular function
To test for vestibular function in the mutant rats, a swimming test was
conducted. A total of 30 adult ci2/+ rats and 30 adult ci2/ci2 mutant
rats were tested. Furthermore, some rats of the background strain
(LEW/Ztm) were examined. All the heterozygous ci2/+ and LEW/
Ztm rats displayed normal swimming behaviour resulting in proper
orientation of the rats with respect to the water surface. However, all
the ci2/ci2 mutant rats showed abnormal swimming behaviour
associated with lack of orientation: when placed in water, the
mutants spiralled underwater (in a corkscrew fashion) unable to
maintain their noses above the water surface. Mutants needed to be
rescued promptly to prevent drowning. Like all other behavioural
abnormalities (lateralized, circling, hyperactivity, ataxia, opisthoto-
nus), the swimming inability of the ci2/ci2 mutant rats did not change
with age as indicated by tests in rats of different age up to 1.5 years.
In the air-righting re¯ex and tail-hanging tests, 23 ci2/ci2,
nine ci2/+ and eight LEW/Ztm rats were examined. Whereas all 17
controls (ci2/+or LEW/Ztm) showed a normal air-righting re¯ex in
three subsequent tests, ci2/ci2 rats were less successful as the controls
to right themselves in the air and to land on their feet: data for the 23
ci2/ci2 rats in the three tests (number of rats with normal air-righting/
number of rats tested) were 3 out of 23, 8 out of 23, and 6 out of 23.
Twelve ci2/ci2 rats showed no normal air-righting in all three tests,
which was signi®cantly different from controls (P = 0.0003).
In the tail-hanging test, all controls (n = 17) extended their
forelimbs toward the ear, thus, showing a `landing' response in all
of the three subsequent tests. In contrast, most of the 23 ci2/ci2 rats
tended to bend ventrally and curl up their tail, thus, tending towards
an `occipital landing'. Some ci2/ci2 rats also showed a lateral body
bias during hanging, as described for rats with unilateral lesions of the
nigrostriatal pathway (Abrous et al., 1998), but there was no clear
correlation between this lateral bias and the preferred direction of
circling. In 13 ci2/ci2 rats, abnormalities in the tail-hanging test were
seen in all three tests, the difference from controls being highly
signi®cant (P = 0.0001).
Inner ear defects
A total of ®ve adult mutant circling (ci2/ci2) rats was examined for
inner ear defects. Five heterozygous (ci2/+) control rats served as
controls. The gross anatomic inspection of the bony and membranous
labyrinth of the circling ci2/ci2 rats did not reveal any differences
compared to heterozygous rats (Fig. 3a and b). Microscopical
examination of semi-thin sections of the inner ears from both sides,
however, showed clear defects in the cochlear hair cells of ci2/ci2 rats
(Fig. 3d and f). In the cochleae of homozygous ci2 rats, the basilar
membrane, the tectorial membrane and the Reissner's membrane
appeared normal, but the Organ of Corti, including inner and outer
hair cells, supporting cells and the Tunnel of Corti was completely
absent or occasionally reduced to a disarranged cell layer. There was
no longitudinal gradient in hair cell loss along the cochlea. As a result
of the hair cell degeneration, the cochleae of those animals are
functionally defective resulting in the observed complete deafness
FIG. 2. Audiogram of brainstem auditory-evoked potentials (BAEPs). Thelower curve shows the averaged audiogram from six ci2/+ rats as obtainedfrom BAEPs. Thresholds from individual animals (in dB sound pressurelevel, SPL) are indicated by different symbols above and below the curve.There was no difference in threshold for simultaneous recordings from theleft and right side of the brainstem (not shown). As there were no responsesdetected in ci2/ci2 rats at any combination of frequency and sound pressurelevel, the upper curve (open circles) represents the maximum soundpressure levels used for stimulation at the individual frequencies.
Deafness and vestibular defects in the circling rat 1133
ã 2001 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies, European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 1129±1142
![Page 6: Auditory and vestibular defects in the circling (ci2) rat mutant](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081812/575023c71a28ab877eab9b98/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
FIG. 3. Illustration of results from the study of inner ear morphology and cochlear histology of unaffected rats (ci2/+, left column, a, c and e) and mutantcircling rats (ci2/ci2, right column b, d and f). The anatomical (a and b) and histological (c±f) investigation of the hair cell organs of adult mutant ci2/ci2 ratsrevealed a normal gross anatomical appearance of the bony and membraneous labyrinth (b, d and f). Compared to heterozygous rats (a, c and e) the bony andmembraneous labyrinth (b, d and f) of the mutant circling rats showed a normal gross anatomical appearance of the turns of the cochlea. Highermagni®cation light-microscopical examination of the cochleae (d and f) of mutant circling rats, however, clearly showed the absence of hair cells andsupporting cells in the cochlea, while in the heterozygous animals those cell types were present. (c and d) Mid-modiolar section through a ci2/+ (c) and aci2/ci2-cochlea (d) showing different turns of the cochlea. In all turns of the ci2/ci2 rats both types of hair cells and supporting cells were absent. In rareexamples, remnants of the Organ of Corti were occasionally seen (not shown). Those cells did not form a Tunnel of Corti and had a disordered appearancecompared to a normal cochlea. Note that a rupture of the Reissner's membrane (for orientation see also e and f) as shown in the turn to the lower left side ind was due to preparation artifacts and was not speci®c for mutant rats. (e and f) Higher magni®cation of a section through the middle turn of the cochlea of aci2/+ (e) and a ci2/ci2 rat (f).Note that compared to the ci2/+ rats (e and c) there is an almost complete loss of ganglion cells in the ci2/ci2 mutant (f and d).SV, scala vestibuli; SM, scala media; ST, scala tympani; RM, Reissner's membrane; TM, tectorial membrane; BM, basilar membrane; St.V, Stria vascularis;IHC, inner hair cell; OHC, outer hair cell; GC, ganglion cochleare.
FIG. 4. Histology of vestibular organs in unaffected rats (ci2/+ left column, a, c, e and g) vs. circling (ci2/ci2) mutant rats (right column, b, d, f and h). Fromtop to bottom examples from the sacculus (a and b), utriculus (c and d), Crista ampullaris (e and f) and Scarpa's ganglion (g and h) are shown. In allepithelia, type I and type II hair cells and supporting cells were present. Supporting cells appear as a basal monolayer of cells beneath the hair cells.Compared to the unaffected ci2/+ animals (a, c and e) we found abnormal cytoplasmic protrusions (b, d and f) in some of the hair cells as indicated by openarrows. Furthermore in the ci2/+ rats, stereovilli appeared longer compared to the ci2/ci2 rats (®lled arrows). A qualitative comparison of the vestibularganglions of both phenotypes of rats revealed that there are less cell bodies and less thicker axons in the ci2/ci2 rats.
1134 A. Kaiser et al.
ã 2001 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies, European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 1129±1142
![Page 7: Auditory and vestibular defects in the circling (ci2) rat mutant](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081812/575023c71a28ab877eab9b98/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Deafness and vestibular defects in the circling rat 1135
ã 2001 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies, European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 1129±1142
![Page 8: Auditory and vestibular defects in the circling (ci2) rat mutant](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081812/575023c71a28ab877eab9b98/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
(see above). Furthermore, ganglion cell degeneration was clearly
visible in mutant rats (Fig. 3d and f).
In contrast to the lack of hair cells and ganglion cells in the cochlea
of ci2/ci2 mutants, the gross appearance of the epithelia of the
vestibular organs and Scarpa's ganglion appeared to be not different
from ci2/+ rats (Fig. 4). Both types of hair cells (type I, type II) were
present in the utriculus, sacculus and the cristae. Further inspection of
the epithelia, however, revealed that for some hair cells, the
cytoplasm is protruding into the endolymphatic space and that the
stereovilli appear shorter compared to controls (Fig. 4b and d and f).
Within Scarpa's ganglion, the cell bodies and ®bres had a normal
appearance (Fig. 4g and h), but the number of ganglion cells and the
number of thick axons tended to be reduced (Fig. 4h).
Morphology of the cochlear and vestibular nuclei in thebrainstem
In a ®rst series of experiments, the volume of the cochlear and
vestibular nuclei was determined separately for the left and right
hemisphere in unaffected (ci2/+) rats and ipsilateral and contralateral
in mutant rats, ipsilateral being the preferred direction of circling. As
shown in Table 1, no signi®cant volume asymmetries between the
ipsi- and contralateral hemisphere were found for the cochlear or
vestibular nuclei in mutant rats. Compared to heterozygous controls,
the volume of the MVN of mutants was signi®cantly smaller (by
about 40%), while no signi®cant differences were seen for the other
subregions of the vestibular or cochlear nuclei. However, there was a
clear tendency for cochlear nuclei of mutant rats to be smaller (by
about 25% on average) than respective nuclei in controls.
In a second series of experiments, the morphology of neurons in
vestibular and cochlear nuclei was compared between homozygous
ci2/ci2 rats and heterozygous littermates. The cell bodies of neurons
in all cochlear nuclei of mutant rats had an atypical round shape
which only rarely gave rise to primary dendrites, whereas normal
neuronal shape with emerging dendrites was seen in heterozygous
controls (Fig. 5). In order to quantify these differences between
mutant and ci2/+ control rats, the shape of neurons in the AVCN was
evaluated by image analysis. As shown in Fig. 6A, neurons of mutant
rats in the ipsi- and contralateral AVCN had a rounder shape than
respective neurons in controls (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, the
perimeter of ipsi- and contralateral AVCN neurons was signi®cantly
smaller (Fig. 6B) and the soma tended to be smaller (Fig. 6C)
compared to unaffected controls. In contrast to the cochlear nuclei of
mutant rats, neurons in the vestibular nuclei appeared normal and did
not exhibit any obvious morphological difference from heterozygous
control rats (not illustrated).
In a third series of experiments, neuronal density was determined
in the cochlear and vestibular nuclei of ci2/ci2 and ci2/+ rats using
the optical disector counting technique. As already indicated in
Fig. 5, neuronal density in the different cochlear nuclei was
signi®cantly higher in mutant rats compared to controls (Fig. 7).
No differences in neuronal density was obvious between ipsi- and
contralateral hemisphere in mutant or right and left hemisphere in
heterozygous control rats. In the vestibular nuclei of mutant and
control rats (Fig. 8), no signi®cant difference in neuronal density was
seen in the SVN, IVN and LVN, whereas, mutant rats had a
signi®cantly lower neuronal density than controls in the MVN. The
only regions in which we found a signi®cant difference between
ipsilateral and contralateral hemisphere in mutant rats was the
anterior LVN, in which neuronal density ipsilateral to the preferred
direction of circling was signi®cantly lower compared to the
contralateral side (Fig. 8).
Discussion
The auditory-evoked potential testing demonstrated a complete
hearing loss in the adult ci2/ci2 mutant rat, whereas, heterozygous
littermates exhibited a hearing range, which lay within the sensitiv-
ities reported from other laboratory strains (Fay, 1988). Histological
analysis of the inner ear revealed virtually complete loss of the
TABLE 1. Volume of subregions of cochlear and vestibular nuclei in mutant circling (ci2/ci2) rats and unaffected heterozygous (ci2/+) controls determined by
image analysis
Region
Volume
Control (ci2/+) Mutant (ci2/ci2)
Left Right Ipsilateral Contralateral
Cochlear nucleusAVCN (mm3) 0.419 6 0.041 0.390 6 0.054 0.284 6 0.029 0.302 6 0.027PVCN (mm2) 0.551 6 0.052 0.479 6 0.055 0.381 6 0.046 0.398 6 0.027DCN (mm2) 0.512 6 0.068 0.583 6 0.091 0.397 6 0.069 0.411 6 0.017
Vestibular nucleusSVN (mm3) 0.205 6 0.022 0.235 6 0.037 0.164 6 0.018 0.178 6 0.024MVN (mm3) 0.981 6 0.050 1.000 6 0.045 0.649 6 0.076* 0.603 6 0.060*LVN (mm3) 0.470 6 0.029 0.469 6 0.025 0.433 6 0.098 0.413 6 0.100IVN (mm3) 0.386 6 0.024 0.350 6 0.028 0.262 6 0.053 0.328 6 0.034
For the IVN, volume data refer to the rostral part of this subregion, for the AVCN volume data refer to the caudal part of this subregion. In the case of PVCN andDCN, partial damage during histological preparation did not allow us to determine the volume of these subregions; instead, the mean areas of two to threecorresponding sections were determined (in mm2) and used for comparison between mutants and controls. Data are means 6 SE of six to seven mutants and sevencontrols. All mutants exhibited a clear rotational side-preference, so that data from mutants are shown ipsilateral and contralateral to the preferred direction ofturning. Controls showed no turning or other behavioural abnormalities, so that data from controls are shown for the left and right hemisphere. Signi®cantdifferences between controls and mutants are indicated by asterisk (*P < 0.05). The MVN of mutants was signi®cantly smaller compared to controls, irrespectiveof whether the ipsi-/contralateral data or data from left and right hemisphere were used for comparison with controls (ANOVA: P < 0.0001). In mutants, data fromipsi- and contralateral sites did not differ signi®cantly. In controls, data from left and right hemisphere did not differ signi®cantly except for PVCN (P = 0.0313).AVCN, anteroventral cochlear nucleus; PVCN, posteroventral cochlear nucleus; DCN, dorsal cochlear nucleus; SVN, superior vestibular nucleus; MVN, medialvestibular nucleus; LVN, lateral vestibular nucleus; IVN, inferior vestibular nucleus.
1136 A. Kaiser et al.
ã 2001 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies, European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 1129±1142
![Page 9: Auditory and vestibular defects in the circling (ci2) rat mutant](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081812/575023c71a28ab877eab9b98/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
cochlear neuroepithelium and ganglion cells in the adult mutants,
while no hair cell degeneration was seen in unaffected ci2/+ rats. The
histological ®ndings in mutant circling rats suggest that the hearing
loss of the mutants is of the sensory neural type, the most prevalent
type of hearing loss. Genetic deafness is a frequent sensory disorder
in the human population, affecting about 1 in 2000 births (Gasparini
et al., 1999; Skvorak Giersch & Morton, 1999). Many of these
patients show primary abnormalities of the sensory neuroepithelia of
the inner ear, as do several hearing-impaired mouse mutants (Fekete,
1999; Gasparini et al., 1999; Probst & Camper, 1999). In recent
years, mouse mutants have played an important role in the
identi®cation of human hereditary hearing loss genes (Steel, 1995;
Hughes, 1997; Fekete, 1999; Probst & Camper, 1999). To date,
numerous different genetic conditions associated with hearing
impairment have been described, and several of the genes involved
in these forms have been mapped and identi®ed, showing that myosin
and connexin mutations and mitochondrial dysfunction can lead to
deafness (Martini et al., 1997; Steel et al., 1997; Koehler et al., 1999;
Redowicz, 1999; Skvorak Giersch et al., 1999). Despite the
widespread use of rats in studies on auditory and vestibular functions,
in contrast to mice, only few mutants with hereditary deafness have
been described in the rat (Hedrich, 1990).
In the ci2/ci2 rat, in addition to the hair cell loss in the cochlea,
neurons in the cochlear nuclei of the brainstem exhibited morpho-
logical alterations, reduced size and increased density. A similar
change in morphological characteristics, i.e. smaller but densely
packed neurons, was found in deaf subjects of various species,
including mouse (Willott et al., 1994), guinea pig (Lesperance et al.,
1995), cat (Saada et al., 1996), dog (Niparko & Finger, 1997), and
man (Seldon & Clark, 1991). The shrinkage of cells in the cochlear
nuclei is thought to result from the lack of synapses formed by
incoming afferent ®bers from the cochlea to these primary auditory
neurons. The increased density of cochlear neurons was found to be
secondary to a reduced volume of these nuclei (Willott et al., 1994;
Saada et al., 1996).
In contrast to the marked abnormalities of the cochlear hair cells in
ci2/ci2 rats, no obvious hair cell degeneration was seen in the
different parts of the vestibular apparatus of the inner ear of adult
mutants by the methods employed. Thus, under light microscopy, the
epithelia of the cristae as well as those of the maculae utriculi and
sacculi had a normal gross appearance. However, examination of the
surface of the vestibular epithelia with light microscopy revealed a
possible cause for the difference of vestibular function in ci2/ci2
mutants. At least some hair cells of the epithelia of the utriculus,
sacculus and the cristae ampullaris showed a protrusion of the
FIG. 5. The micrographs show nissl-stained neurons from corresponding locations of the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of a heterozygous (nonaffected,control) ci2/+ (a and b) and a mutant ci2/ci2 rat (c and d). It can clearly be seen that in ci2/ci2 animals the cell bodies have a rounder shape with fewer cellprocesses. Furthermore, higher densities of cell bodies can be observed in ci2/ci2 rats. The same abnormalities were seen in all other parts of the cochlearnucleus, but not in the vestibular nuclei.
Deafness and vestibular defects in the circling rat 1137
ã 2001 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies, European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 1129±1142
![Page 10: Auditory and vestibular defects in the circling (ci2) rat mutant](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081812/575023c71a28ab877eab9b98/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
cytoplasm into the endolymphatic space. A similar defect has been
described for the shaker-2 mouse, in which, besides other
ultrastructural alterations, vestibular hair cells were observed pro-
truding into the endolymphatic space (Anniko et al., 1980). Such a
deformation of hair cells can be probably related to an alteration of
structural components of the cytoskeleton including the cuticular
plate and the stereovilli. Interestingly, recent studies in the shaker-2
mouse mutation, the homologue of human DFNB3, causing deafness
and circling behaviour, have discovered that mutation of the
unconventional myosin gene, Myo15, is responsible for the vestibular
defects, deafness and inner ear morphology of these mice (Probst
et al., 1998). We currently investigate whether mutations in
unconventional myosins may also be responsible for the phenotype
of the ci2/ci2 rat mutant.
The morphology of neurons in the vestibular nuclei did not differ
from controls, but the size and neuronal density of the MVN was
signi®cantly reduced. Abnormal vestibular function in ci2/ci2 rats
FIG. 6. Morphology of neurons in the cochlear nucleus as determined bymorphometric imaging analysis. Per rat and hemisphere, 25 neurons wererandomly chosen from the anteroventral cochlear nucleus (AVCN), usingsections at the same coordinates in mutants and controls. For each neuron,the circularity shape factor (A), the perimeter (B) and the area of the soma(C) were determined and averaged. These averaged values were then usedto calculate the means 6 SE of six to seven ci2/ci2 mutants and seven ci2/+ controls. All mutants exhibited a clear rotational side-preference, so thatdata from mutants are shown ipsilateral and contralateral to the preferreddirection of turning. Controls showed no turning or other behaviouralabnormalities, so that data from controls are shown for the left and righthemisphere. *P < 0.01, signi®cant differences between controls (left andright hemisphere) and mutants (ipsi- and contralateral hemispheres).
FIG. 7. Neuronal density determined by the optical disector countingtechnique in thionine-stained sections of nonaffected (heterozygous) controlsand mutant rats for the different cochlear nuclei. Data are means 6 SE ofsix to seven mutants and eight controls. *P < 0.05, signi®cant differencesbetween controls (left and right hemisphere) and mutants (ipsi- andcontralateral hemispheres). For further explanations see Fig. 5 legend.AVCN, anteroventral cochlear nucleus; PVCN, posteroventral cochlearnucleus; DCN, dorsal cochlear nucleus.
1138 A. Kaiser et al.
ã 2001 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies, European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 1129±1142
![Page 11: Auditory and vestibular defects in the circling (ci2) rat mutant](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081812/575023c71a28ab877eab9b98/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
was indicated by the inability of these mutants to swim, because
swimming inability is a well-known consequence of vestibular
defects in rodents (Gray et al., 1988; Sawada et al., 1994; Truett et al.,
1994; Sondag et al., 1998). Interestingly, inability to swim and
deafness have also been reported for the circling stargazer rat mutant
(Truett et al., 1994), whereas, the recently described circling
(waltzing) rat mutant identi®ed in Pavia, Italy, could swim, but
exhibited other defects in vestibular function tests, including
abnormal behaviour in the tail-hanging test (Rabbath et al. 2001).
The ci2/ci2 rat also showed abnormal behaviour in this test and
righting problems in the air-righting re¯ex test, substantiating
vestibular dysfunction. Similar to the present ®ndings with ci2/ci2
rats, Rabbath et al. (2001) did not detect any gross alterations in
the vestibular sensory epithelium and concluded that the vestibular
de®cits may be due to other types of cellular impairment of the
labyrinth and/or abnormalities in the central processing of
vestibular information underlying gaze and postural control. We
have, however, found a more subtle deformation (see above) that
is a probable cause for the observed vestibular defects in the ci2/
ci2 rat mutant.
FIG. 8. Neuronal density determined by the optical disector counting technique in thionine-stained sections of nonaffected (ci2/+) controls and mutant rats forthe different vestibular nuclei. *P < 0.01, signi®cant differences between controls (left and right hemisphere) and mutants (ipsi- and contralateralhemispheres). For further explanations see Fig. 5 legend. SVN, superior vestibular nucleus; MVN, medial vestibular nucleus (separated into parvicellular andmagnocellular parts); LVN, lateral vestibular nucleus (separated into anterior and posterior parts); IVN, inferior vestibular nucleus.
Deafness and vestibular defects in the circling rat 1139
ã 2001 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies, European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 1129±1142
![Page 12: Auditory and vestibular defects in the circling (ci2) rat mutant](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081812/575023c71a28ab877eab9b98/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
In both the studies on the waltzing rat and the ci2/ci2 rat, adult
animals were used for histological examination of the inner ear. Thus,
it cannot be excluded that the morphology of cochlear and vestibular
hair cells was different during early development. For instance,
cochlear hair cells could be present or vestibular hair cells could be
reduced or absent during early stages of postnatal development.
Whereas, in mammals, cochlear hair cells do not have the ability to
regenerate, vestibular hair cells can regenerate (Forge et al., 1993;
Warchol et al., 1993; Rubel et al., 1995; Tanyeri et al., 1995; Lopez
et al., 1997). We have preliminary evidence for vestibular hair cell
loss in young (about 4 weeks of age) ci2 rat mutants (Kaiser et al.
2000) which would indicate that hair cell regeneration occurs during
further development of these animals, so that vestibular hair cells
appear morphologically normal in adult rat mutants examined in the
present study. In this respect, it is important to note that degeneration
of the cochlear and vestibular hair cells by administration of the
ototoxic drug, streptomycin to postnatal rats leads to deafness and
abnormal motor activity, including backward locomotion, circling,
repetitive head movements and hyperactivity, but that most of these
abnormalities, including the circling, are gradually diminished or
disappear during subsequent months, most likely as a result of
regeneration of vestibular hair cells (Alleva & Balazs, 1978). In
contrast, the lateralized circling behaviour and other abnormal motor
activities of the ci2/ci2 rats are present over the whole life-span of the
animals without any evidence for remission (LoÈscher et al., 1996).
One possible explanation for the circling and other motor
abnormalities in the ci2/ci2 rat is that peripheral vestibular defects
cause the circling, and that the central effects are simply a
consequence of the abnormal sensory input. Based on the present
data, it is not possible to determine whether circling, hyperactivity
and the other abnormalities exhibited by the ci2 rat mutant result from
abnormalities within the vestibular system, require a combination of
vestibular dysfunctions with other types of central defects, or occur
independently from the vestibular defects. An alternative possibility
to the vestibular system being the primary cause of the movement
abnormalities, is that the mutation affects susceptible tissues, such as
certain brain regions, in addition to the inner ear, resulting in
recognizable clinical syndromes as recently demonstrated for the
deafness dystonia syndrome as a result of a genetically induced
mitochondrial dysfunction (Jin et al., 1999; Koehler et al., 1999).
Based on our previous studies in ci2/ci2 rats and the fact that most
ci2/ci2 rats exhibit a consistent side-preference in their circling while
all alterations in the cochlear and vestibular system are bilateral, we
do not consider the abnormal circling behaviour of ci2/ci2 mutant rats
to be a direct consequence of vestibular dysfunction, but rather relate
this lateralized behaviour to the asymmetries in the striatal dopamine
system previously found in the mutants (LoÈscher et al., 1996; Richter
et al., 1999; Fedrowitz et al. 2000). As mentioned above, mutant rats
of both genders have a lower tissue content of dopamine in the
striatum ipsilateral to the preferred direction of rotation, indicating
that the rats turn away from the brain hemisphere with higher striatal
dopaminergic activity (LoÈscher et al., 1996; Richter et al., 1999).
Histological examination of the striatum and substantia nigra pars
compacta failed to disclose any morphological abnormality in the
mutant circling rat (Richter et al., 1999), indicating a biochemical,
rather than morphological, abnormality in the dopamine system.
Interestingly, whereas circling in the stargazer (stg) rat was initially
thought to be due to a vestibular defect (Truett et al., 1994),
subsequent studies led to the proposal that circling in this mutant is
due to genetically mediated dysfunction of the central dopaminergic
system (Brock & Ashby, 1996). These data in different circling rat
mutants suggest that the concept of circling behaviour in deaf rodent
mutants being simply a direct consequence of peripheral vestibular
defects needs to be reevaluated.
Whereas, abnormalities in dopaminergic function are likely
candidates to explain the circling behaviour and possibly also the
hyperactivity of the mutant ci2/ci2 rats, vestibular dysfunction could
cause the ataxia and opisthotonus observed in these animals.
Furthermore, as shown by the present experiments, the ci2/ci2
mutant rat is unable to swim, another balance disorder which is
probably a result of disturbed vestibular function. In view of the
various efferent connections of the vestibular nuclei (Rubertone et al.,
1995) and the ®nding that vestibular information is transmitted not
only to the cerebellum, cortex and spinal cord but also, via the
thalamus, to the striatum (Shiroyama et al., 1999), it is conceivable
that abnormalities in vestibular nuclei during brain development lead
to secondary changes in brain regions such as the striatum thought to
be critically involved in circling behaviour (Pycock, 1980; Carlson &
Glick, 1996). This view is in line with previous observations of
Alleva & Balazs (1978) using the ototoxic drug streptomycin in rats.
Whereas, this drug induced head tremor and dif®culty with the
righting re¯ex in adult rats, administration of streptomycin to
postnatal rats induced circling, hyperactivity, repetitive head move-
ments and backward locomotion. Alleva & Balazs (1978) concluded
from their experiments with streptomycin-induced auditory and
vestibular defects in rats, that the neurological syndrome developing
in postnatal rats involves both the vestibular apparatus and higher
motor centres and that particularly the hyperactivity and circling are
suggestive of a central site of action, presumably involving a
dopaminergic mechanism. In a subsequent study, this group found
increased dopamine D2 receptor binding in the striatum of dyskinetic
rats that had been treated subacutely with streptomycin, as neonates
(Seth et al., 1982). In ci2/ci2 mutant rats, we also recently found
increased dopamine receptor binding in the striatum (Richter et al.,
1999). Thus, the data from these different models seem to suggest
that vestibular defects during postnatal development, independent of
whether induced or inherited, lead to secondary changes in the
dopaminergic system within the basal ganglia, which would be a
likely explanation for the typical phenotype seen in these models.
In conclusion, the ci2 rat mutant provides interesting features as a
new model in the ®eld of deafness research and may be useful for
studies on cochlear and vestibular dysfunctions. Furthermore, the
behavioural phenotype of the ci2/ci2 rat mutant makes this animal an
interesting model for hyperkinetic movement disorders. Our previous
data on these rats suggest an involvement of the basal ganglia in the
abnormal circling behaviour of the ci2/ci2 mutant (LoÈscher et al.,
1996; Richter et al., 1999; Fedrowitz et al. 2000), whereas, the
present data suggest that abnormal vestibular function may be
responsible for the disturbed balance of the rats as exempli®ed by the
ataxia and the inability to swim. The genetic defect in the mutant rats,
thus, leads to a clinical syndrome with features also seen in human
genetic disorders with deafness and hyperkinesia, e.g. the human
deafness dystonia syndrome (Jin et al., 1996; Koehler et al., 1999).
The underlying genetic and neurochemical substrates of this
syndrome in circling mutant ci2/ci2 rats await further study.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr Ivan Lopez (Division of Head and Neck Surgery, UCLA, LosAngeles, USA) for technical advise regarding the histological examination ofvestibular hair cells. Furthermore, we thank Dr GuÈnter Reuter and Dr SvenCords (Department of Otolaryngology, Medical School Hannover) for initialexamination of auditory-evoked potentials in mutant rats and Dr AngelikaRichter for advise and discussion. The experiments on the air-righting re¯ex
1140 A. Kaiser et al.
ã 2001 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies, European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 1129±1142
![Page 13: Auditory and vestibular defects in the circling (ci2) rat mutant](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081812/575023c71a28ab877eab9b98/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
and tail-hanging were performed by Dr Sven Lindemann and Ms. AlinaLessenich. The technical assistance of Ms. E. Engelke, Ms. C. Bartling, Mr M.Weissing, and Mr M. Meyer is gratefully acknowledged. The study wassupported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Lo 274/8±1).
Abbreviations
AVCN, anteroventral cochlear nucleus; BAEP, brainstem auditory-evokedpotential; DCN, dorsal cochlear nucleus; IVN, inferior (spinal) vestibularnucleus; LVN, lateral vestibular nucleus; MVN, medial vestibular nucleus;PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PVCN, the posteroventral cochlear nucleus;SPL, sound pressure level; SVN, superior vestibular nucleus.
References
Abrous, D.N., Rodriguez, J.J., Montaron, M.-F., Aurousseau, C., Le Moal, M.& Barneoud, P. (1998) Behavioural recovery after unilateral lesion of thedopaminergic mesotelencephalic pathway: effect of repeated testing.Neuroscience, 84, 213±221.
Alagramam, K.N., Kwon, H.Y., Cacheiro, N.L., Stubbs, L., Wright, C.G.,Erway, L.C. & Woychik, R.P. (1999) A new mouse insertional mutationthat causes sensorineural deafness and vestibular defects. Genetics, 152,1691±1699.
Alleva, F.R. & Balazs, T. (1978) Toxic effects of postnatal administration ofstreptomycin sulfate to rats. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 45, 859.
Anniko, M., Sobin, A. & WersaÈll, J. (1980) Vestibular hair cell pathology inthe shaker-2 mouse. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 226, 45±50.
Bloom, D. & Hultcrantz, M. (1994) Vestibular morphology in relation to ageand circling behavior. Acta Otolaryngol., 114, 387±392.
Brock, J.W. & Ashby, C.R.J. (1996) Evidence for genetically mediateddysfunction of the central dopaminergic system in the stargazer rat.Psychopharmacology, 123, 199±205.
Carlson, J.N. & Glick, S.D. (1996) Circling behavior in rodents. Methodology,biology, and functional implications. In Sanberg, P.R., Ossenkopp, K.P. &Kavaliers, M.Totowa (eds), Motor Activity and Movement Disorders.Research Issues and Applications. Humana Press, Totoway, NJ, 269±300.
Coggeshall, R.E. & Lekan, H.A. (1996) Methods for determining numbers ofcells and synapses: a case for more uniform standards of review. J. Comp.Neurol., 364, 6±15.
Deerberg, F., Kaspareit, J. & Reetz, I.C. (1989) Circling (ci), a newneurological mutant in the rat. Rat News Lett., 21, 19.
Fay, R.R. (1988) Hearing in vertebrates: a psychophysic databook. Hill-FayAssociates, Winnetka, Illinois.
Fedrowitz, M., Potschka, H., Richter, A. & LoÈscher, W. (2000) Amicrodialysis study of striatal dopamine release in the circling rat, agenetic animal model with spontaneous lateralized rotational behavior.Neuroscience, 97, 69±77.
Fekete, D.M. (1999) Development of the vertebrate ear: insights fromknockouts and mutants. Trends Neurosci., 22, 263±269.
Forge, A., Li, L., Corwin, J.T. & Nevill, G. (1993) Ultrastructural evidence forhair cell regeneration in the mammalian inner ear. Science, 259, 1616±1619.
Gasparini, P., Estivill, X. & Fortina, P. (1999) Vestibular and hearing loss ingenetic and metabolic disorders. Curr. Opin. Neurol., 12, 35±39.
Gray, L.E., Rogers, J.M., Ostby, J.S., Kavlock, R.J. & Ferrell, J.M. (1988)Prenatal dinocap exposure alters swimming behavior in mice due tocomplete otolith agenesis in the inner ear. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 92,266±273.
Hedrich, H.-J. (1990) Genetic monitoring of inbred strains of rats, GustavFischer, Stuttgart.
Hughes, D.C. (1997) Paradigms and paradoxes: mouse (and human) models ofgenetic deafness. Audiol. Neurootol., 2, 3±11.
Hunt, M.A., Miller, S.W., Nielson, H.C. & Horn, K.M. (1987) Intratympanicinjection of sodium arsanilate (atoxyl) solution results in postural changesconsistent with changes described for labyrinthectomized rats. Behav.Neurosci., 101, 427±428.
Jin, H., Kendall, E., Freeman. T.C., Roberts, R.G. & Vetrie, D.L.P. (1999) Thehuman family of deafness/dystonia peptide (DDP) related mitochondrialimport proteins. Genomics, 61, 259±267.
Jin, H., May, M., Tranebjaerg, L., Kendall, E., Fontan, G., Jackson, J.,Subramony, S.H., Arena, F., Lubs, H., Smith, S., Stevenson, R., Schwartz,C. & Vetrie, D. (1996) A novel X-linked gene, DDP, shows mutations in
families with deafness (DFN-1), dystonia, mental de®ciency and blindness.Nature Genet., 14, 177±180.
Kaiser, A., Fedrowitz, M., LoÈscher, W., Zimmermann, E., Richter, A. &Hedrich, H.-J. (2000) Auditory and vestibular abberations in a mutantcircling rat. Eur. J. Neurosci., 12 (Suppl. 11), 132.
Kitamura, K., Yagi, M., Yoshikawa, Y., Ochidubo, F. & Kato, M. (1991)Vestibular pathology in a new-mutant mouse. Acta Otolaryngol.Supplement, 481, 121±124.
Koehler, C.M., Leuenberger, D., Merchant, S., Renold, A., Junne, T. & Schatz,G. (1999) Human deafness dystonia syndrome is a mitochondrial disease.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 96, 2141±2146.
Lesperance, M.M., Helfert, R.H. & Altschuler, R.A. (1995) Deafness inducedcell size changes in rostral AVCN of the guinea pig. Hear. Res., 86, 77±81.
Lopez, I., Honrubia, V., Lee, S.C., Schoeman, G. & Beykirch, K. (1997)Quanti®cation of the process of hair cell loss and recovery in the chinchillacrista ampullaris after gentamicin treatment. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci., 15,447±461.
LoÈscher, W., Richter, A., Nikkhah, G., Rosenthal, C., Ebert, U. & Hedrich, H.-J. (1996) Behavioural and neurochemical dysfunction in the circling (ci) rat:a novel genetic animal model of a movement disorder. Neuroscience, 74,1135±1142.
Martini, A., Mazzoli, M. & Kimberling, W. (1997) An introduction to thegenetics of normal and defective hearing. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 830,361±374.
Niparko, J.K. & Finger, P.A. (1997) Cochlear nucleus cell size changes in thedalmatian: model of congenital deafness. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.,117, 229±235.
Ossenkopp, K.P., Prkacin, A. & Hargreaves, E.L. (1990) Sodium arsanilate-induced vestibular dysfunction in rats: effects on open-®eld behavior andspontaneous activity in the automated digiscan monitoring system.Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., 36, 875±881.
Paxinos, G. & Watson, C. (1998). The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates,4th edn, Academic Press, Sydney.
Porsolt, R.D., Anton, G., Blavet, N. & Jalfre, M. (1978) Behavioural despair inrats: a new model sensitive to antidepressant treatments. Eur. J. Pharmacol.,47, 379±391.
Probst, F.J. & Camper, S.A. (1999) The role of mouse mutants in theidenti®cation of human hereditary hearing loss genes. Hear. Res., 130, 1±6.
Probst, F.J., Fridell, R.A., Raphael, Y., Saunders, T.L., Wang, A., Liang, Y.,Morell, R.J., Touchman, J.W., Lyons, R.H., Noben-Trauth, K., Friedman,T.B. & Camper, S.A. (1998) Correction of deafness in shaker-2 mice by anunconventional myosin in a BAC transgene. Science, 280, 1444±1447.
Pycock, C.J. (1980) Turning behaviour in animals. Neuroscience, 5, 461±514.Rabbath, G., Necchi, D., de Waele, C., Gasc, J.P., Josset, P. & Vidal, P.P.
(2001) Abnormal vestibular control of gaze and posture in a strain of awaltzing rat. Exp. Brain Res., 136, 211±223.
Redowicz, M.J. (1999) Myosins and deafness. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil., 20,241±248.
Richter, A., Ebert, U., Nobrega, J.N., Vallbacka, J.J., Fedrowitz, M. &LoÈscher, W. (1999) Immunohistochemical and neurochemical studies onnigral and striatal functions in the circling (ci) rat, a genetic animal modelwith spontaneous rotational behavior. Neuroscience, 89, 461±471.
Rogers, M.J., Fleming, J., Kiernan, B.W., Mburu, P., Varela, A., Brown, S.D.& Steel, K.P. (1999) Genetic mapping of the whirler mutation. Mamm.Genome, 10, 513±519.
Rubel, E.W., Dew, L.A. & Roberson, D.W. (1995) Mammalian vestibular haircell regeneration. Science, 267, 701±707.
Rubertone, J.A., Mehler, W.R. & Voogd, J. (1995) The vestibular nuclearcomplex. In Paxinos, G. (ed.), The Rat Nervous System, 2nd Edn. AcademicPress, San Diego, 773±796.
Saada, A.A., Niparko, J.K. & Ryugo, D.K. (1996) Morphological changes inthe cochlear nucleus of congenitally deaf white cats. Brain Res., 736,315±328.
Sawada, I., Kitahara, M. & Yazawa, Y. (1994) Swimming test for evaluatingvestibular function in guinea pigs. Acta Otolaryngol. Supplement, 510,20±23.
Seldon, H.L. & Clark, G.M. (1991) Human cochlear nucleus: comparison ofNissl-stained neurons from deaf and hearing patients. Brain Res., 551,185±194.
Seth, P.K., Alleva, F.R. & Balazs, T. (1982) Alteration of high-af®nity bindingsites of neurotransmitter receptors in rats after neonatal exposure tostreptomycin. Neurotoxicology, 3, 13±19.
Shiroyama, T., Kayahara, T., Yasui, Y., Nomura, J. & Nakano, K. (1999)Projections of the vestibular nuclei to the thalamus in the rat: a Phaseolusvulgaris leucoagglutinin study. J. Comp. Neurol., 407, 318±332.
Deafness and vestibular defects in the circling rat 1141
ã 2001 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies, European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 1129±1142
![Page 14: Auditory and vestibular defects in the circling (ci2) rat mutant](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081812/575023c71a28ab877eab9b98/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Skvorak Giersch, A.B. & Morton, C.C. (1999) Genetic causes ofnonsyndromic hearing loss. Curr. Opin. Pediatr., 11, 551±557.
Sondag, H.N., de Jong, H.A., van Marle, J. & Oosterveld, W.J. (1998)Behavioural changes in hamsters with otoconial malformations. ActaOtolaryngol., 118, 86±89.
Steel, K.P. (1995) Inherited hearing defects in mice. Annu. Rev. Genet., 29,675±701.
Steel, K.P., Mburu, P., Gibson, F., Walsh, J., Varela, A., Brown, K., Self, T.,Mahony, M., Fleming, J., Pearce, A., Harvey, D., Cable, J. & Brown, S.D.(1997) Unravelling the genetics of deafness. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol.Supplement, 168, 59±62.
Tanyeri, H., Lopez, I. & Honrubia, V. (1995) Histological evidence for haircell regeneration after ototoxic cell destruction with local application ofgentamicin in the chinchilla crista ampullaris. Hear. Res., 89, 194±202.
Truett, G.E., Brock, J.W., Lidl, G.M. & Kloster, C.A. (1994) Stargazer (stg),new deafness mutant in the Zucker rat. Lab. Anim. Sci., 44, 595±599.
Warchol, M.E., Lambert, P.R., Goldstein, B.J., Forge, A. & Corwin, J.T.(1993) Regenerative proliferation in inner ear sensory epithelia from adultguinea pigs and humans. Science, 259, 1619±1622.
Willott, J.F., Bross, L.S. & McFadden, S.L. (1994) Morphology of thecochlear nucleus in CBA/J mice with chronic, severe sensorineural cochlearpathology induced during adulthood. Hear. Res., 74, 1±21.
1142 A. Kaiser et al.
ã 2001 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies, European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 1129±1142